AGENDA Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board

Date: November 18, 2016 Time: 9:00 - 10:30 am Location: Deschutes Services Center, DeArmond Room 1300 Wall Street (Bend) Contact: Tyler Deke, BMPO (541) 693-2113 Jovi Anderson, BMPO (541) 693-2122

1. Call to Order & Introductions

2. Visitor Comments

Action Items

3. Review & approve Policy Board meeting minutes – September 15, 2016 (Attachment A) Recommended Language for Motion: I move approval of the September 15, 2016 draft meeting minutes as presented.

4. 2015-2018 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Amendments Background: Amendments are proposed for the 2015-2018 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). Staff will provide an overview of the proposed amendments. Attachments: Summary of proposed MTIP amendments (Attachment B) Action Requested: Review and approve proposed amendments Recommended Language for Motion: I move approval of the proposed amendments to the 2015-18 MTIP as presented

5. GoOregon Project for a Transportation Funding Package Background: The Governor’s office is asking that citizens, employers, non-profit organizations, community leaders and transportation advocates from across the state call for state policy makers to take action during the 2017 Legislative Session to increase the investment necessary to maintain and enhance ’s transportation system. In response to this call for action, a project, called “GoOregon”, is gathering support from around the state for a transportation funding package. Attachments: Summary of GoOregon proposal (Attachment C) Action Requested: Consider approval of the Governor’s request to support the GoOregon project.

1 6. Oregon MPO Consortium Transportation Funding Package Background: There is anticipation that a transportation funding package will be developed during the 2017 Oregon legislative session. The Oregon MPO Consortium (OMPOC) has drafted a set of revenue proposals that support: highway and road improvements, operations, and maintenance; transit capital and operations; bicycle and pedestrian improvements; and special needs transportation. The OMPOC Board is seeking support from each MPO for the set of proposals. Attachments: OMPOC proposal (Attachment D) Action Requested: Consider support of the OMPOC transportation funding package proposal

7. Oregon greenhouse gas reduction targets Background: The Oregon legislature enacted legislation (HB2001 & SB1059), which directed LCDC to adopt greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets for metropolitan areas. In these rules, LCDC committed to review the targets at 4-year intervals starting in 2015. In May 2015, the commission initiated a review of the GHG reduction targets. The commission also recognized that GHG targets are closely related to the requirements in the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), and directed staff to review the requirements in conjunction with the update of the GHG targets. Attachments: None. Information will be distributed at the meeting. Information about the target review process is available on the following link: https://www.oregon.gov/LCD/Pages/GHGTargetReview.aspx Action Requested: Provide direction to staff on the set of proposed updates to the GHG reduction targets

Information Items

8. Other Business As time allows, staff will provide updates on other MPO business

9. Next Policy Board Meeting The next Policy Board meeting is scheduled for December 15, 2016 at 4 pm

10. Adjourn

Additional Attachments  Monthly Financial Summary (Attachment E)  Bend Count Program Overview and Initial Report (Attachment F)

2 Accessible Meeting Information This meeting event/location is accessible. Sign language, interpreter service, assistive listening devices, materials in alternate format, such as Braille, large print, electronic formats, or any other accommodations are available upon advance request. Please contact Jovita Anderson at (541) 693-2122, or [email protected]. Providing at least 3 days’ notice prior to the event will help ensure availability.

3 Attachment A

BEND METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION POLICY BOARD MEETING DRAFT Minutes September 15, 2016 DeArmond Room, Deschutes Services Center, 1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon

1. Call to Order – Introductions Chair DeBone called the meeting to order at 4:06 p.m. Present during the meeting were: Policy Board Tony DeBone, Deschutes County Commission, Chair Doug Knight, Bend City Council, Vice-Chair Nick Arnis, City of Bend, Growth Management Department Director (City alternate) Gary Farnsworth, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) BMPO Staff Tyler Deke, Manager Jovi Anderson, Program Technician Cameron Prow, TYPE-Write II Visitors Chris Doty, Deschutes County Road Department (County alternate) David Abbas, City of Bend, Right-Of-Way Operations/Maintenance Director Diane Hodiak, 350 Deschutes Michel Bayard, Bend Technical Advisory Committee Ron (Rondo) Boozell (The 3-digit number after a motion title shows the number of member jurisdictions voting in favor/opposed/abstaining.)

2. Visitor Comments None.

ACTION ITEMS 3. Review/Approve Policy Board Minutes Motion 1 (3/0/0): Mr. Farnsworth moved to approve the August 22, 2016, draft meeting minutes as presented. Mr. Arnis seconded the motion which passed unanimously.

(See Motion 3 for correction of the August 22 minutes approved after Agenda Item 4.)

4. 2015-2018 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Amendments Document: Summary of proposed MTIP amendments

Ms. Anderson said the amendment to Key 18943 was to add $96,011 in grant funds from ODOT Public Transit Division received by Cascades East Transit. These funds will be used to construct loading platforms and heated sidewalks at the Bend transit center. Key 19944 is amended to add $1,256,341 in ODOT (All Roads Transportation Safety Program) funding for two enhanced pedestrian crossings on 3rd Street at Roosevelt Avenue and at Pinebrook Boulevard. She will keep the Board updated on the progress of these projects.

Motion 2 (3/0/0): Mr. Knight moved to approve the proposed amendments to the 2015- 2018 MTIP as presented. Mr. Farnsworth seconded the motion which passed unanimously.

Bend MPO Policy Board – Minutes September 15, 2016 – Page 1 of 3 Attachment A

3. Review/Approve Policy Board Minutes – Revisited Mr. Knight requested correcting Sentence 1 under 1. Call to Order – Introductions to read: “Chair DeBone called the meeting to order at 4 p.m.”

Motion 3 (3/0/0): Mr. Farnsworth moved to approve the August 22, 2016, draft meeting minutes as amended. Mr. Arnis seconded the motion which passed unanimously.

5. STBG Program Funding Document: PowerPoint presentation

Mr. Deke said the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (formerly, Surface Transportation Program) is one of the core federal transportation funding programs. ODOT distributes a portion of its STBG funds to cities, counties, and small MPOs through a cooperative process. He outlined the program’s background, annual funding summary, funding needs (City roads, CET, MPO, other), funding distribution in 2015 and for 2016 and beyond, 2016 Distribution Straw Proposal, and next steps.

Policy Board concerns included using federal accessibility dollars to purchase CET busses and using funds previously allocated to purchase to fund curb ramps, priority of the Bend Parkway study and its impacts (corridor longevity, urban growth boundary, City transportation system plan update), cost of updating the Bend MPO Plan, funding for 2016-2017 and beyond, funding sources of other MPOs, and reserving part of each year’s STBG funding to cover the MPO plan update and other needs. Following discussion, members agreed the 2016 distribution straw proposal was a good starting point and directed Mr. Deke to prepare a proposal for Board consideration at the October meeting.

Mr. Knight suggested the parkway study consider linking State Highways 97 and 20.

Mr. Doty recommended the Policy Board review funding allocations for street preservation and bus purchases biennially and specialty items annually.

Ms. Hodiak suggested researching grants from federal and state departments of energy.

Mr. Farnsworth recommended the MPO work with Joni Bramlett, ODOT Public Transit Division.

Mr. Abbas said he planned to update the PCI (Pavement Condition Index) in winter 2017.

INFORMATION ITEMS 6. 350 Deschutes: Climate Change – Solutions & Opportunities Conference Documents: Climate Change – Solutions & Opportunities and Protecting our Precious Water: Climate Forecasts & How we can Prepare (posters)

Ms. Hodiak provided an overview of topics and speakers the conference 350 Deschutes will host in Bend on October 3-4, 2016.

7. Other Business Document: Bend MPO Monthly Financial Report for 2016-2017 as of September 9, 2016

Ms. Anderson summarized the Bend Open Streets demonstration project on September 18, 2016, 12 noon to 4 p.m. Mr. Arnis provided additional details about this event.

Bend MPO Policy Board – Minutes September 15, 2016 – Page 2 of 3 Attachment A

Chair DeBone asked if Bend City Council discussed Intergovernmental Council’s “190” effort to become authorized as a taxing authority for transit programs in Central Oregon. He stated that Deschutes County Commissioners Tammy Baney and Alan Unger were very supportive. He said he supported the community connectors but was concerned about city populations driving what happens in the rural county.

Vice-Chair Knight said he was unaware of this discussion at the City level. Mr. Arnis recommended speaking with City Manager Eric King.

Motion 32 (3/0/0): Mr. DeBone moved to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Knight seconded the motion which passed unanimously.

8. Next Policy Board Meeting Thursday, October 20, 2016, 4 p.m.

9. Adjourn With no further business, Chair DeBone adjourned the meeting at 5:10 p.m.

Bend MPO Policy Board – Minutes September 15, 2016 – Page 3 of 3 Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization 2015-2018 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Plan Amendment

Oregon Department of Transportation Key# 20391 Year 1st Fund Share 2nd Fund Share 3rd Fund Share Total

Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 MPO Project # STP Fix- STP Design 2017 STP-FLX $1,000,000 $1,359,019 $286,992 $2,646,011 It R4 Fix-It US20: EMPIRE - Land Purchas $0 $0 $0 $0 Project GREENWOOD (3RD ST, BEND) Utility Name Relocate $0 $0 $0 $0

Construc $0 $0 $0 $0 tion Other $0 $0 $0 $0

Description Project Total $2,646,011 Design shelf plans for pavement preservation, ADA upgrades, sidewalks, bike lanes, pedestrian crossing, sign and signal upgrades.

Amended New 11/17/16 Full Amendment Combines Bend Central Signal System (19571), US20 @ Empire (19572), Empire Central Signal (18672), US20: OB Riley/River Mall (18671).

Comments New Amendment. Public comment is welcome at the Bend MPO Policy Board Meeting on November 17, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. in the Deschutes Services Building at 1300 NW Wall Street, Bend or via email at [email protected] prior to 11/17/16.

23 CFR § 450.316 requires explicit consideration and response to public comment received during the program development process. Public, staff, agency, and other interested party comments received prior to the adoption hearing are first reviewed by staff. Comments requiring minor revisions are addressed by staff. Such comments might include requests for additional information or clarification of information. Comments on policy issues or specific projects will be considered by the Policy Board at the public hearing. Comment received during the public hearing will be discussed at the public hearing. The Policy Board and staff will determine the most appropriate manner to respond to comments received. If significant changes to the proposed MTIP are recommended as a consequence, a revised final draft document will be resubmitted to the public for an additional review and comment period. Copies are free of charge and, upon request, will be made available in CD, print, and accessible formats. Upon request, in advance of the meeting, through any of the means listed above, every effort will be made to prepare materials in other formats and in languages other than English, and to provide interpreters in American Sign Language and other languages. Assistive listening devices and large-print materials will be available at the meeting upon request. The Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC), which is the FTA Section 5307(c) applicant, has consulted with the MPO and concurs that the public involvement process adopted by the MPO for the development of the MTIP satisfies the public hearing requirements that pertain to the development of the Program of Projects for regular Section 5307, Urbanized Area Formula Program, grant applications, including the provision for public notice and the time established for public review and comment.

More about the MTIP can be found at: bendoregon.gov/mtip We want to hear from you. Please contact Bend MPO at (541) 693-2122 or [email protected] for any inquiries. Attachment C

November 14, 2016

To: Bend MPO Policy Board

From: Tyler Deke

Subject: Agenda Item 5 – GoOregon Project for a Transportation Funding Package

Discussion: The Governor’s office is asking that citizens, employers, non-profit organizations, community leaders and transportation advocates from across the state call for state policy makers to take bold action during the 2017 Legislative Session and take immediate action to increase the investment necessary to maintain and enhance Oregon’s transportation system. In response to this call for action, a project, called “GoOregon”, is gathering support from around the state for a bold transportation package.

GoOregon’s website notes that “Oregon’s robust transportation system has served the state well, but aging infrastructure and rapid growth have put at risk our ability to remain economically competitive, meet long-range greenhouse gas emission goals, as well as simply get to and from work or school. With smart investments today, we can create the kind of transportation system Oregon deserves – one that will support healthy and livable communities, improve safety and reliability, increase freight mobility and efficiency, and ensures our economy continues to create good paying jobs throughout the state.”

While the project is not drafting a transportation package and is not setting forth any specific provisions for one, the project mentions three major areas of concern and what is needed under each: Maintenance and Seismic Preparedness; Congestion; and Transit.

MAINTENANCE & SEISMIC PREPAREDNESS

With billions of dollars invested, our transportation system is too valuable to let fall into further disrepair. Concerns about the seismic resilience of our state’s transportation infrastructure are not limited to our coastal communities. To be prepared, Oregon needs a resilient transportation network that provides critical evacuation lifelines and supports long-term economic stability and recovery. $324 million of new revenue invested each year could adequately maintain a state of good repair on bridges and pavement. An additional $257 million invested each year could complete the Seismic PLUS plan within 20 years, addressing 718 vulnerable bridges and 1,185 potential landslide zones.

CONGESTION

Metro-area congestion impacts the economic vitality of communities around the Attachment C

state, making it harder to move goods in an efficient and reliable manner, get people to and from work, and safely transport children to school. We must eliminate highway bottlenecks, develop freight network alternatives and pursue transportation demand management strategies. $250 million invested each year could address 10 of Oregon’s biggest bottlenecks within 10 years.

TRANSIT

Oregonians increasingly view transit as a critical tool to help workers, seniors, students, and people with disabilities move around their communities. Transit is critical to our growing tourist economy, and helps businesses recruit a talented and diverse workforce. Providing transit options also helps reduce carbon emissions from transportation. $108 million invested annually could meet the basic mobility needs of seniors and people with disabilities, help close gaps in service, and better leverage federal funds. An additional $25 million invested annually could complete 55 miles of new bikeways, shoulders and sidewalks each year, complete 50 street crossings, and provide traffic safety education for all graduating elementary students.

Action Recommended: Consider approval of the Governor’s request to support the GoOregon project.

Attachment C List of GoOregon Supporters to Date

Metro Port of Portland Associated Oregon Industries County Oregon Building Trades Council Oregon AFL-CIO Oregon Trucking Associations NW Natural 1000 Friends of Oregon City of Eugene Bicycle Transportation Alliance Oregon Rail Users’ League Drive Oregon Port of Cascade Locks Port of Hood River Port of St. Helens, Sean Clark Pacific NW Regional Council of Carpenters National Construction Alliance NW Council WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Greenbrier Association of Oregon Counties Fred Meyer Pacific Power City of Beaverton TriMet Oregon Public Ports Association City of Tigard Cherriots City of Springfield Multnomah County City of Portland League of Oregon Cities Oregon Concrete & Aggregate Producers Association International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701 King Estate American Council of Engineering Companies of Oregon Allison Lupico Anzur Logistics LLC ARG Transportation Services, Scott Parkinson Coos Bay Rail Link David Evans and Associates, Inc. HDR Engineering, Inc. International Laborers Union North America Local 737 John Mohlis, retired Oregon Building Trades Council Executive Secretary Pamela de Jong Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Living Room Realty Megan Neill Northwest Container Services Inc. OBEC Consulting Engineers Otak Southwestern Oregon Regional Airport Attachment D

OMPOC Support for 2017 Transportation Funding Package

The Oregon MPO Consortium (OMPOC) calls for the Oregon Legislature to be truly visionary for all of Oregon in crafting a transportation package in 2017. It is important that the efforts not only provide support for the state’s transportation system in the near term, but also create a solid and lasting foundation for ongoing support.

OMPOC feels that not only is the need obviously great, but that the time is right to raise additional sustainable revenue to support all modes of transportation in Oregon. Consideration needs to be given to a full spectrum of measures, not just traditional highway or gas tax approaches. Revenue sources that support: highway and road improvements, operations, and maintenance; transit capital and operations; bicycle and pedestrian improvements; and special needs transportation must all be part of the mix.

Points for Consideration To accomplish even a subset of the initiatives listed below, it is clear that new revenue is necessary. There are established funding sources that should be increased, such as the gas tax. Be bold – do as many other states in the nation have already done in recent years, front-load a significant increase of at least X cents (see text below) per gallon to the state gas tax to address the backlog in need just in the area of maintaining and preserving our existing transportation assets. A slow incremental increase in the gas tax may only end up finding the state falling further behind. Furthermore, index the state gas tax to inflation.

At the October 7 OMPOC meeting, a potential proposal of 30 cents per gallon was discussed, with a specific allocation of funding as follows:  10 cents per gallon for seismic resiliency tied to predetermined list of projects; either sunset or transfer to other needs when seismic needs are met  10 cents per gallon for rebuilding of lost purchasing power  5 cents per gallon for city/county funding split by population or road miles for preservation/maintenance or other local need  3 cents per gallon for ODOT for projects of state or regional significance  2 cents per gallon to provide for match for major federally funded projects to support significant economic development

1. Prioritize Safety and Universal Access. It is important to prioritize safety and universal access to the transportation system above and beyond reducing congestion or any other consideration. We would like to see cost effective investments that focus on increasing mobility of people in an equitable manner. There should be more of an emphasis on, and support for, the Mayor’s Challenge, Vision Zero, complete streets, and ADA improvements. 2. Transit funding. We would like to see increased support for stabilizing and fully funding transit operations as well as for providing funds for new system build out and paratransit services. It should also include funding for expanding accessible services, especially with the aging population in Oregon. Such funding should also recognize transit’s contributions to roadway congestion reduction. 3. Support increasing investment in programs, such as Safe Routes to School, which create safe walking and biking access to schools. Not only is continued support for programs such as Safe Routes to School important, we would also like to suggest expanding such programs to include middle school and high school students to reflect the needs of our local communities. 4. Support for Freight Rail. There should be more emphasis in supporting freight rail. Freight rail presents significant opportunities for improving the movement of freight in Oregon, which is vital to Oregon’s economy, while at the same time providing congestion relief on the state’s highways.

Page 1 of 2 5. Support for Passenger Rail. There should be more emphasis in supporting passenger rail. It is an essential component of moving Oregon’s transportation system efficiently into the future as the state, and the west coast corridor, grows. Passenger rail is also a vital part of economic development throughout our region. 6. Support investments in community bicycle and pedestrian improvements. It would greatly benefit local communities if the funding eligibility for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure could be expanded beyond existing “in the right of way” constraints to also include projects that are adjacent to and beyond the right of way. 7. Jurisdictional transfers. This topic needs to be explored by local jurisdictions along with the state to ensure that the level of funding would be adequate to make the arrangements work from the local perspective. Adequate funding is critical; funding needs to cover costs to modernize and maintain the facilities in question. We suggest considering dedicating 1 cent per gallon of the state gas tax to funding jurisdictional transfers. 8. Inter-city Transit. Intra-city transit is often the focus of transit discussions at the state level, but inter-city transit improvements are just as often overlooked. There is a need for metropolitan areas across the state to maintain and expand robust inter-city and intra-city transit services. 9. Transit Student Youth Pass. Funding for a comprehensive transit student youth pass is a proven and cost effective approach to serving the transportation needs of this demographic, supporting increases in graduation rates, reducing reliance on the automobile, and creating a safer and more secure transportation option for students. 10. Improve Efficiency and Coordination in the Provision of Special Transportation Services. The state estimates that between ODOT, DHS, and OHA, hundreds of millions of dollars are spent annually providing special transportation services, with significant opportunities for improving coordination and efficiency among providers. The opportunities for improving the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and service to the end users in this area should be emphasized in the Legislature’s deliberations. 11. Environmental Stewardship: Provide Funding to Address Air Quality Concerns and Achieve Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals. Environmental Stewardship should be a leading element to direct transportation investments and priorities across Oregon. We ask that the legislature create a matching fund to provide state dollars on a one-to-one basis to augment the federal CMAQ funding for addressing air quality concerns in the state. 12. Direct more Funding and Authority to Local Communities. There are diverse needs and priorities. Let local communities choose more often where to invest as long as there is proven efficiency, such as prioritizing projects that accomplish multiple goals. ODOT should provide more flexibility in design standards and more local authority in the process for establishing speed limits to be able to accomplish local safety and mobility goals. 13. Prioritize Seismic Preparedness. Funding for seismic upgrades for lifeline transportation routes should be a priority. In addition to these infrastructure improvements, it is vital that ODOT communicate with emergency response professionals which routes have been designated as high priority seismic lifeline transportation routes. 14. Pave the way for true and rapid innovations in transportation revenue generation such as implementing Pay-As-You-Drive concepts. The state should prioritize and accelerate a program for full implementation of pay by the mile for high efficiency vehicles. New federal legislation (the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation, or FAST, Act) provides incentives for states to do so.

Page 2 of 2

Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization 2016-2017 Financial Summary

2016-17 2013-14 2014-15 2015-2016 Adjusted 2016-17 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 2012-13 ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS Budget YTD 635 0000 301.00 00 Beginning Working Capital 45,000 50,000 60,000 35,000 70,000 - 635 0000 333.20 00 Federal Passthrough DOT 273,072 297,241 425,199 211,988 289,990 23,745 635 0000 334.22 00 ODOT Grant 9,733 - - - - - 635 0000 334.22 01 State Match for MPO's 20,813 15,195 30,894 15,581 16,181 234 635 0000 338.50 00 Miscellaneous - 300 - 8,019 - 1,771 635 0000 371.00 00 Donations/Contributions 4,519 200 - - - - 635 0000 374.00 00 Other Miscellaneous 358 468 - 550 800 - 635 0000 384.10 00 Int Bill Governmental Fnd - - 19,794 - 17,125 - 635 0000 386.10 00 From Governmental Funds 16,043 - 13,933 - - - 635 0000 386.50 00 From Internal Service Fnd - 13,933 - - 70,000 - REVENUE $ 369,538 $ 377,337 $ 549,820 $ 271,138 $ 464,096 $ 25,750

635 3050 551.10 01 Regular Salaries 147,402 151,223 156,021 128,099 134,054 43,236 635 3050 551.10 10 Other Payouts - 726 1,454 3,319 - 635 3050 551.10 11 Overtime - - 84 681 - 337 635 3050 551.12 01 FICA 10,795 11,200 11,628 9,704 10,106 3,193 635 3050 551.12 02 Unemployment 2,158 730 156 132 134 44 635 3050 551.12 03 PERS & OPSRP 20,136 19,920 20,709 19,548 19,827 6,450 635 3050 551.12 04 Disability Insurance 403 424 436 359 374 120 635 3050 551.12 06 Life Insurance 230 235 238 193 207 64 635 3050 551.12 07 Workers Compensation Ins 288 299 302 220 202 64 635 3050 551.12 13 PERS Debt Service 5,159 5,318 5,504 3,635 3,687 1,199 635 3050 551.12 20 Alternate Modes - - 180 60 - 30 635 3050 551.12 21 Section 125 Benefits 240 185 180 179 150 64 635 3050 551.12 22 OPEB Funding 4,512 4,044 4,044 3,027 3,000 1,021 635 3050 551.12 24 Telemed - - - - - 21 635 3050 551.12 41 High Deduct Premium 24,856 23,625 22,973 17,971 19,245 6,286 635 3050 551.12 42 High Deduct Deductible 8,666 8,000 8,000 5,951 6,000 1,526 Benefits Insurance DentalPrem $ - 680 Personnel Services $ 224,845 $ 225,929 $ 231,909 $ 193,078 $ 202,971 $ 64,334

635 3050 551.20 12 City Pd Employee Parking - - - - 540 - 635 3050 551.21 02 Employee Costs 464 573 554 340 650 700 635 3050 551.22 01 Conferences & Seminars 230 590 536 251 1,200 2,029 635 3050 551.24 02 Advertising 2,003 927 443 282 500 - 635 3050 551.26 03 Copier 1,167 607 - - 500 - 635 3050 551.27 01 Audit/Accounting Services 9,262 9,605 9,942 10,150 11,000 - 635 3050 551.27 03 Outside Legal Services 621 392 1,950 286 1,000 - 635 3050 551.27 06 Consultants 13,856 29,816 186,925 15,178 47,310 4,177 635 3050 551.27 09 MPO Overhead Costs - - - - 33,400 - 635 3050 551.28 02 Community Education & Outreach 418 255 202 813 1,100 - 635 3050 551.29 11 Insurance Deductibles - - - - 2,500 - 635 3050 551.34 01 Telephone Long Distance - - - - 50 - 635 3050 551.34 02 Postage 47 7 9 2 100 - 635 3050 551.40 01 ConsumSupp&Mat Office Supplies 65 100 150 - 250 - 635 3050 551.42 03 Equipment < $5,000 - - - - 300 - Materials and Services $ 29,554 $ 44,505 $ 202,045 $ 29,878 $ 105,650 $ 9,722

635 3050 551.85 01 Loan Repayment Gen Fund - - - 35,000 70,000 - 635 3050 551.81 46 General Fund Loan 453 376 398 543 800 66 635 3050 551.90 40 Transfer Risk Management 700 800 800 800 - - 635 3050 551.90 51 Transfer Information Tech 9,800 10,500 10,500 10,300 - - 635 3050 551.90 52 Transfer Facility Managem 9,800 10,500 10,500 10,500 - - 635 3050 551.90 55 Transfer Admin & HR 4,900 5,200 5,200 5,200 - - 635 3050 551.90 56 Transfer Finance 4,200 3,700 3,700 3,700 - - 635 3050 551.90 57 Transfer Purchasing - 900 900 900 - - 635 3050 551.90 58 Transfer Insurance Fund 500 600 600 600 - 635 3050 551.91 53 Allocation Engineering - 4,500 4,500 - - -

Prepared by Bend MPO 11/14/2016 Page 1 Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization 2016-2017 Financial Summary

2016-17 2013-14 2014-15 2015-2016 Adjusted 2016-17 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 2012-13 ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS Budget YTD 635 3050 551.91 54 Allocation PW Lab & Admin 9,400 - - - 70,000 - 635 3050 551.93 01 Loan Repayment Gen Fund 45,000 50,000 60,000 - - - 635 3050 799.93 99 Reclass to Balance Sheet 45,000 50,000 60,000 - - - 635 3050 551.94 01 Billed Services Gen.Fund - - 1,144 - - - 635 3050 551.94 38 Billed Srvcs Trans Const. - - 127 - 17,125 - 635 3050 551.96 01 Transfer General Fund 5,194 - - - - - 635 3050 551.96 10 Transfer Trans Ops & Plan 16,043 - - - - - 635 3050 551.96 17 Transfer Planning 1,405 2,644 - - - - 635 3050 551.96 38 Transfer Transp Construc - - 13,933 - - - 635 3050 551.96 51 Transfer Information Tech 2,050 383 488 1,999 - 400 635 3050 551.96 53 Transfer Internal Enginee - 13,933 - - - - Citywide and Department Overhead $ 154,445 $ 154,036 $ 172,790 $ 69,542 $ 157,925 $ 466 - REVENUE 369,538 377,337 549,820 271,138 464,096 25,750 EXPENDITIURES 408,844 424,470 606,744 292,498 466,546 74,522

Prepared by Bend MPO 11/14/2016 Page 2 BEND COUNT PROGRAM

October 2016 Program overview and initial data report

An overview of the City of Bend Growth Management’s count program and a comparison of traffic volumes in Bend for Spring and Summer 2016.

Program Director: Nick Arnis [email protected] Program Technician: Jovi Anderson [email protected] Bend Count Program Bend Count Program

PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND INITIAL DATA REP ORT

The City of Bend Growth Management department is in the process of developing a multimodal transportation count program with the following goals:

 The count program should be easy to implement with minimal staff time required for maintenance or data manipulation.  The data should provide mode split (Vehicle/Bicycle/Pedestrian) information.  Locations for data collection should be selected to allow for corridor trend analysis as well as regional analysis.  Locations for data collection should be developed systematically rather than randomly in response to requests.  Store the data in an accessible system for city internal and external uses.

Benefits of this program include understanding where transportation issues exist today (congestion, etc.) and how the system is operating to:

. Appropriately plan for the future of the transportation network . Prioritize maintenance activities and operations . Understand which areas experience the heaviest use (across all modes) to appropriately prioritize capital and maintenance activities . Be able to provide development identified improvements to complete appropriate mitigation

PHASE ONE - PLANNING  Collaborate with staff and local jurisdictions to implement a program that meets regional needs  Identify count methods, locations and frequency  Create a program to store and analyze data

PHASE TWO - IMPLEMENTATION  Obtain equipment for installation of permanent counters for multimodal data collection o Installation of Eco Counters is planned for fall of 2016. o Locations include . Colorado Avenue Bridge . Galveston Avenue Bridge (See Figure 1 for installation image) . Newport Avenue Bridge

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 1 Bend Count Program . Portland Avenue Bridge . Franklin Parkway Undercrossing/

The photo below is an example of how the Eco Counter system measures traffic.

FIGURE 1 Standard data collec on site configura on  Begin data collection o Quality Counts data collection completed in May and July 2016 o Counts will be collected by contractor every May with some locations counted annually or every other year. See map Figure 2 – Count locations collected in May 2016

PHASE THREE – DATA SHARING AND ANALYSIS  Data from May 2016 is being modified to be shown in the City’s Mapping Program (available by Fall 2016)  Create program for collecting vehicle data using tube counts in a three year cycle  Create annual reports of the volume data city use . Monitor use and trends . Understand trends in the transportation system (coverage counts) . Understand mode splits and changes on key corridors . Understand the number of people walking and biking . Understand the number of transit riders . Measure project success . Understand traffic changes before and after project implementation (including roadway projects as well as pedestrian/bike projects) – “before” data may also be used for grant applications.

Page 2 Bend Count Program

FIGURE 2 July 2016 Count Locations

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 3 Bend Count Program

INITIAL DATA REPORT COMPARING MAY AND JULY 2016 VOLUME DATA

As part of the data sharing and analysis of the Bend Count Program, the following comparisons are provided from vehicle collection efforts in May and July 2016.

Overall findings include:

 A majority of locations showed less than a 5% difference comparing July daily traffic volume to May daily traffic volume.  The peak morning hour moved in several locations on city streets from the 7:00 – 8:00 AM hour in May to the 11:00 – 12:00 AM hour in July. This may be explained by school start times in May.  The summer traffic peak is higher for Lava Butte, HWY 20 East of Bear Creek, and Pinebrook. Revere and Empire stays more flat.  Difference between peak (summer) and low (winter) traffic in 2015 were – Lava Butte: 45%, Pilot Butte: 41%, Pinebrook: 46%, Revere: 22%, and Empire: 21%

The following charts and summaries were obtained from 24 hour tube counts with both directions of travel during a Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday. The counts for July were chosen for this analysis to determine if there were any differences with summer travel compared to spring travel on Bend’s roadways. Typically, data will be collected with the tube count method in May of each year.

1. Colorado Avenue was counted on May 19, 2016 (Thursday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for northbound and southbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 13,242 and in July was 16,183. The vehicle volume in July increased by 22.2% from May or 2,941 more vehicles counted in July. One explanation of this increase may have been the city effort to upgrade a sewer line running through the area from October 2015 to May 2016 where portions of Arizona and Colorado Avenues were closed at times. See Figure 3 for an image of the areas closures.

Page 4 Bend Count Program Colorade Avenue near Deschutes River Bridge 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

FIGURE 3 Arizona Avenue work from October 2015 to May 2016 included this area. Photo from December 2015.

2. Century Drive South of Simpson Avenue was counted on May 17, 2016 (Tuesday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for northbound and southbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 10,473 and in July was 8,664. The vehicle volume in July decreased by 17.3% from May. One explanation of this decrease could be the school traffic morning peak of 668 vehicles and afternoon peak of 885 vehicles corresponding to start and end time of school from 7:00 – 8:00 AM and 3:00- 4:00 PM whereas the July data shows the morning peak of 818 vehicles from 11:00 AM – 12:00 noon and the

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 5 Bend Count Program afternoon peak of 765 vehicles from 5:00 – 6:00 PM. This decrease could also be explained by the Colorado Avenue roadwork completion where many would have used this route as an alternative to Colorado during construction. SW Century Drive south of Simpson Avenue 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 400 July 200 0 1:00:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 7:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 1:00:00 AM 2:00:00 AM 3:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 7:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 12:00:00 12:00:00 PM 10:00:00 PM 11:00:00 PM 12:00:00 12:00:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM

Page 6 Bend Count Program

3. Galveston Avenue near the Deschutes River Bridge was counted on May 17, 2016 (Tuesday) and on July 21, 2016 (Thursday) for westbound and eastbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 13,621 and in July was 14,242. The vehicle volume increase in July showed a 4.6% from May to July.

Galveston Ave near Deschutes River Bridge 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

4. Newport Avenue near the Deschutes River Bridge was counted on May 19, 2016 (Thursday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for westbound and eastbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 15,495 and in July was 16,147. The vehicle volume increase in July showed a 4.2% from May to July.

Newport Avenue west of Deschutes River Bridge 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 7 Bend Count Program

5. Wilson Avenue east of Bond Street was counted on May 17, 2016 (Tuesday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday for westbound and eastbound vehicle movement). The daily traffic volume in May was 12,464 and in July was 12,901. The vehicle volume increase in July showed a 3.5% from May to July. Wilson Avenue east of Bond Street 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 400 July 200 0 (blank) 1:00:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 7:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 1:00:00 AM 2:00:00 AM 3:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 7:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 12:00:00 12:00:00 PM 10:00:00 PM 11:00:00 PM 12:00:00 12:00:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM

6. Southwest Bond Street south of Wilson Avenue was counted on May 17, 2016 (Tuesday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) The daily traffic volume in May was 11,694 and in July was 12,078. The vehicle volume increase in July showed a 3.3% from May to July.

SW Bond Street south of Wilson Avenue 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

Page 8 Bend Count Program

7. NE 27th Street north of Neff was counted on May 18-19 2016 (Wednesday from 4:00 PM to Thursday ending at 4:00 PM) and on July 20, 2016 (Wednesday) for northbound and southbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 18,962 and in July was 18,321. The vehicle volume decreased 3.4% from May to July.

27th Avenue north of Neff Road 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

8. 27th Street south of Neff was counted on May 19, 2016 (Thursday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for northbound and southbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 22,187 and in July was 20,602. The vehicle volume decreased 7.2% from May to July.

27th Avenue south of Neff Road 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 9 Bend Count Program

9. Neff Road east of 27th Street was counted on May 19, 2016 (Thursday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for westbound and eastbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 10,770 and in July was 10,345. The vehicle volume decreased 3.9% from May to July with 425 less vehicles.

Neff Road east of 27th Street 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

10. Reed Market Road east of 3rd Street was counted on May 17, 2016 (Tuesday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for westbound and eastbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 18,888 and in July was 19,216. The vehicle volume increased 1.7% from May to July with 328 more vehicles.

Reed Market Road east of 3rd Street 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

Page 10 Bend Count Program

11. Reed Market Road west of 3rd Street was counted on May 17, 2016 (Tuesday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for westbound and eastbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 19,084 and in July was 19,980. The vehicle volume increased 4.7% from May to July with 896 more vehicles.

Reed Market Road west of 3rd Street 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

12. 3rd Street north of Reed Market Road was counted on May 17, 2016 (Tuesday) and on July 19, 2016 (Tuesday) for northbound and southbound vehicle movement. The daily traffic volume in May was 19,507 and in July was 20,065. The vehicle volume increased 2.9% from May to July with 558 more vehicles.

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 11 Bend Count Program 3rd Street north of Reed Market Road 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 May 600 July 400 200 0 1:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 1:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

NATIONAL AND STATE DATA The US Department of Transportation (DOT) uses data from each state to create a national record of travel. Nationally, travel has increased on all roads as seen in Figure 4, which shows a chart illustrating national Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) from 1971 to June 2016.

Page 12 Bend Count Program Oregon showed that VMT increased by 4.3% From June 2014 to June 2015. This data can be found on the US DOT website www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/travel_monitoring/tvt.cfm. This data is based on approximately 4000 continuous traffic counting locations nationwide.

FIGURE 4 National VMT trends on all roads (Source: http://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/DOT-Miles-Traveled.php)

The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has several permanent counters in Bend on ODOT roadways that show historical data. The comparison data for May and July does not represent the increase in traffic on all roadways. ODOT collects continuous data statewide through Automated Traffic Recorder (ATR) or Counters. – ATRs are placed at specific locations to record the distribution and variation of traffic flow by hour of the day, day of the week, and/or month of the year. The data is provided online at http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TDATA/Pages/tsm/tvt.aspx. In the Bend area, there are 6 count stations that collect traffic data continuously (see Figure 5 for a map of locations). This data is presented below in Figures 6-10. The data presented is the average daily traffic (ADT) for each month.

FIGURE 5 ODOT AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC RECORDER LOCATIONS IN BEND

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 13 Bend Count Program

US20 (3rd St) north of Olney Ave 09-009

60000 1998

1999

2000 55000 2001 2002

2003

2004

50000 2005

2006

2007

2008

45000 2009

2010

2011

2012 40000 2013

2014

2015 35000 2016

30000

25000

20000

15000 JUL JAN JUN FEB SEP APR OCT DEC MAY AUG NOV MAR

FIGURE 6 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR US20 (3RD STREET) NORTH OF OLNEY ATR DATA (SOURCE ODOT: HTTP://WWW.OREGON.GOV/ODOT/TD/TDATA/PAGES/TSM/TVT.ASPX)

Page 14 Bend Count Program

US 97 South of Empire Ave 09-007 60000 1998

1999

2000

55000 2001

2002

2003

50000 2004 2005

2006

2007

45000 2008

2009

2010

40000 2011 2012

2013

2014

35000 2015

2016

30000

25000

20000

15000 JUL JAN JUN FEB SEP APR OCT DEC MAY AUG NOV MAR

FIGURE 7 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR US97 SOUTH OF EMPIRE AVENUE ATR DATA (SOURCE ODOT: HTTP://WWW.OREGON.GOV/ODOT/TD/TDATA/PAGES/TSM/TVT.ASPX)

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 15 Bend Count Program US 97 North of Baker/Knott Rd 09 - 003 34000 2001 33000 2002 2003

32000 2004

2005 31000 2006 30000 2007 2008

29000 2009

2010 28000 2011 27000 2012 2013

26000 2014

2015 25000 2016 24000

23000

22000

21000

20000

19000

18000

17000

16000

15000 JUL JAN JUN FEB SEP APR OCT DEC MAY AUG NOV MAR

FIGURE 8 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR US 97 NORTH OF BAKER/KNOTT RD ATR DATA (SOURCE ODOT: HTTP://WWW.OREGON.GOV/ODOT/TD/TDATA/PAGES/TSM/TVT.ASPX)

Page 16 Bend Count Program

US 97 North of Pinebrook 09-025

26000 2009

2010 25000 2011 2012

2013 24000 2014

2015

23000 2016

22000

21000

20000

19000

18000

17000

16000

15000

14000

13000 JUL JAN JUN FEB SEP APR OCT DEC MAY AUG NOV MAR

FIGURE 9 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR US97 NORTH OF PINEBROOK ATR DATA (SOURCE ODOT: HTTP://WWW.OREGON.GOV/ODOT/TD/TDATA/PAGES/TSM/TVT.ASPX)

City of Bend Growth Management August 2016 Page 17 Bend Count Program

US20 East of Bear Creek Rd 09 - 005 4000 1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

3500 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005 3000 2006 2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 2500 2013

2014

2015

2016

2000

1500 JUL JAN JUN FEB SEP APR OCT DEC MAY AUG NOV MAR

FIGURE 10 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR US 20 EAST OF BEAR CREEK ROAD ATR DATA (SOURCE ODOT: HTTP://WWW.OREGON.GOV/ODOT/TD/TDATA/PAGES/TSM/TVT.ASPX)

Page 18