4.2 EDUCATION
EARLY YEARS & CHILDCARE Surrey
Figure 4.4 1,160Early Year & Childcare Providers Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. Early years and childcare capacity against housing growthLegend
London Heathrow Surrey County *# LA Boundary CURRENT SITUATION *##* *#* J^ *# *# Airport *# ! *# *#*#*# H Town *#*#*# *#ASHFORD Childcare provision in Surrey comprises independent EGHAM *#*#*# *# ASHFORD *# *# #*#EGHAM*# *# *# *# *# *# ***#*# *# *# *#**#* *##**#*#*# #* *# # *#*# Motorway ***#STAINES-UPON-THAMES* * *# #* *# #* *#STAINES-UPON-THAMES *# *# *# *#*# *#*# *#**# *#* #*** *# *# nurseries, school nurser ies, crèches, after school clubs, *# A Road #* SUNBURY *# *#*#*# *# *# *# *#*# **##*# *# *# *#*# *# *#*# *# *#*# Urban Area playgroups, holiday and weekend schemes, and individual **#* *# *# *# *#*#*#*#*##* *# *# *# *#*# *# Nursery / School Nursery *# *#*# *# #* # *#*# *# *# * *# *# #**# *#*# *#*# *#CHERTSEY *# *# *# *#*#*# *# child minders. The Childcare Act 2006 places a duty on *#*#*# CHERTSEY *# *# *#*# *# /Creche Capacity *# *# *# *# *# WALTON-ON-THAMES*# *# #* *#*# *# #**# *#*#*# *# *#*#*# **# *# *# *# *#*#*# *# *# **#*# *# *# *# *# *# *# *#*# #* *# 0 - 25 *# *# #* # * *#*# *# all local authorities in England to ensure there is enough *# *# ADDLESTONE* #**# WEYBRIDGE *# *#*# #**#*# #* *# ADDLESTONE #*#**# WEYBRIDGE*# *#*#*# *#ESHER * *# # *# *# * *# *# *#*#** *#*##*# *#*#*# *# *# #* *#*#*# *# 26 - 50 *#*# *# *#*# *# * *# **# *# *#*# *# *# #* *# *# *# *# *#*# *# ***#*# #*# *# *# #**# *# *# *# *# #* *# *#*# *# *# # **# *# *# *# childcare services for parents that want them. *# *# *# *##**# *# *#*#*# 51 - 100 *#*# *# *# #* * *# EWELL*# *#*#*# * *# *# CAMBERLEY *# # *# *#*# *# *# 101 - 200 #*# CAMBERLEY *# *# *#*# *# *# *# *# *# *#*#*# *#*#*# *# *# *# #* *# *# *# *#*#*# *# *# ##*# *#*# *# * *#*# ***# *# #**# *# *# *# *# *#*# *#** *# *# *##**#*#* *# *#*# #* *# *#*# *# *#*# *# *# 201 - 400 *#*# *# **##*# *# *#*##*EPSOM*#*# Surrey County Council therefore holds a responsibility *#*# *# *# *#*#*# *# *#*#*# *# *#*#*# *# *#*# *# *# *#*#*##* *#*# *# *# *# *#*# *# *# *# *# **##* *# *#*# *# *# *#*#*# *# #* *# *# *# *# *# *#*# *# *#*# #* *# *# * *# *# *#*#*# School Club / Playgroups *# *# *# *# *#WOKING#**# *# *# *# *# *#*# *# *#*# *#*# *# * *# *# *# BANSTEAD *#*# # for providing certa in elements of Early Years provision, *##*# *#*# *#*#*# *#*#*# *#*# *# *# *# *# *#*# *# *#*# FRIMLEY *# *# *# *# *# FRIMLEY*#*#*# #*# *#*#*# *# *# *#*# *# *# #* *#*# Capacity *# #* #*# # *# *# *# * *# WARLINGHAM # *# *# *# *# *# *# #* WARLINGHAM *# *# *#*# *#*#*# # *# *# *# *# *# *# *#*# *# *# *# *#*#*# *# #*#*#*# #* *# *# *# *# #**##* *# particularly with regard to identifying any gaps in childcare *#*# *# *# *#*#*#*# *# #* *# *# *# **# 0 - 25 *# #**# *#*#*#*# *# #* LEATHERHEAD *# *# *# *# * *#*#*# *# *# *#*# **#LEATHERHEAD *# *# *# *# *# *# *# *# #* *#*# *#*#*# *# *#*# *#*# *# 26 - 50 *# *# *# *# *# *#*#*###* *# *# * *# *#* CATERHAM *# *# *# *# *# # # *## CATERHAM provision. Many of the Earl y Years services are provided *##* *# *# *# *# *# * *#* *# *# *# #* *# #*# 51 - 100 *# * *#*# **###*# *#* *# *#*# *# *# *#*# # **# *# #* *# *# *# *# #* *# *# 101 - 200 independently, however Surrey County Council retains a *# *# * #*#**# *# *# *# #* *# *# *# *# *# *#*#*#*# *#*#**## *# # * 201 - 400 *# *# *# *# responsibili ty to aud it the statutory standards for learning, *# #*#*# *#*# *# *# *# *# *#*# *#*#*#*##**# *# *# *# *# *# *#*#*# *##*# *# *# *#*# *# *# *# *# * * # *# *# Holiday / Weekend *# *# #**#*#*# * *# *#*#REDHILL *# *# *# *#*# *#*# *#*#*# *# DORKING *#*#REIGATE*# *#*#REDHILL * development and care for children from birth to five that all *#*#*# *# *# *# *# *# *#*#*# *# *#DORKING *#*# *#*#*# *# *# *# *#*# *# *# *#*#*# *# *# *# *#*# *#*# *# *#** /Capacity Other *# *# *#*#*# #**#GGUILDFORDUILDF ORD *# *# *# *# *# *#*# *# *#*# *#*#*# *#*# *# *# *#*# *# *# *# *# *#*#*#*# *#*# *# *#*#*# *#*# *# *#**##*# *## *# *# *#*# **# *# *#*# *#*#*# *# *#*#***##* *#*#*# *#*# *# *# *#*# 0 - 25 early years providers must meet. Distribution /capacity is *# *# *#*# #* *# #*#**# *# *# *#*# *# *# *#*# *# * *# *#***# *#*# #*** *# *# *# *#*# *# *# 26 - 50 *# *# *# *#*# *# *# shown in Figure 4.4. *#*# *# * *# *# *#*#*# *# *# *# *#*# *#*# *# 51 - 100 FARNHAM *# *# *#FARNHAM *# **#*# *# *# # *#*# *# *# # *# * 101 - 200 * *# *# *# *# *# *# *## *# *# *# *#*# *#*# *# *# *#*#*# *# *# # # * *# * 201 - 400 HEADLINES *# *# *#GODALMING *# *# *# *# *# *# *# *# *#*#*#*# *# *#*# *# *# *# *# *#*#*# *# *#*# HORLEY *#*# #*# *# *# *##**# *# *# *# *#*#HORLEY *# *#*# *#*# *# *# *# *# *#*#*#*#**## ***# Additional Housing by Ward *# *# *#*#*# #* *# *##*##* *### *# *# *#*# * *# *# *# *# (2030/31) *# **#* *# *#*# There are a variety of different Early Years service types *# *# *# *# *# 0 - 25 *# *# *# *# *# *# *# *# *# provided in Surrey. These incl ude the more permanent *# *# *# *# 26 - 50 # *#*# *# London Gatwick *# *# *# *# *#*# 51 - 100 nursery and crèche facilities as well as after school, *# *# *# 101 - 250 *# *# *# *# *#** 251 - 500 weekend and holiday clubs. *# ***# *# *# 501 - 1,000 # *# *# *# *# 1,001 - 3,000 *#*# Provision of services is higher and more wide-ranging in *# #*# HASLEMERE*# *# *# *# HASLEMERE*#*# *#*#*# *#*# the more densely popu lated urban areas of Guildford and *# *#*# Elmbridge, whilst the range of services is more limited in
the more rural areas such as Mole Valley. Source: Surrey County Council location and capacity data 2017
50 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031
The SCC Childcare Sufficiency Assessment 2016has identified six areas where current provision will not be able Table 4.1 sets out the current capacity in terms of Early Years
to meet future demand for early education. These clusters are: provision. The project age specific population forecasts Holmwoods and Beare Green in Mole Valley district; show a decline in early years age children to 2031 and at the local authority level. We cannot therefore show future Bletchingley and Nutfield, Merstham, Redhill East, and Redhill West wards in Reigate and Banstead borough and Tandridge requirements for facilities. It is acknowledged however (also a focused are for FEET); that major developments will produce increased demand Chertsey Meads, and Chertsey St Ann’s in Runnymede borough (also a focused area for FEET); locally, which will need to be catered for and the challenge Addlestone Bourneside, Addlestone North, and Chertsey South and Row Town wards in Runnymede borough; for adequate cover is greater in the rural parts of the county. Stanwell North, Ashford North and Stanwell South in Spelthorne borough (also a focused area for FEET); and In addition, Surrey County Council has the responsibility for providing 15 hours of Free Early Education Entitlement Ashford East, Ashford Common, and Ashford Town wards in Spelthorne borough (also a focused area for FEET). (FEEE) for vulnerable 2 year olds, all 3 and 4 year olds and identifying gaps in Early Years and Childcare provision. From
Table 4.1 September 2017 SCC will be required to provide 30 hours of childcare for children of working families. This requirement Early years and childcare capacity to extend FEEE for 3 and 4 year olds has brought challenges in identifying the number of providers willing to create new NURSERY / SCHOOL NURSERY / SCHOOL CLUB / PLAYGROUPS HOLIDAY / WEEKEND /. OTHER FEEE places (potential increase of over 8,000 places to be CRÈCHE required based on FEEE extension from 15 to 30 hours), as
well as increase funding requirements for SCC. TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL FACILITIES FACILITIES FACILITIES CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED
Elmbridge 53 2,986 68 2,408 18 1,185 Notable investment in Early Years provision as set out within
the IDPs include the following; Epsom & Ewell 28 1,579 41 1,594 14 596 Three Early Year classrooms at Dunsford Park Primary Guildford 41 2,353 84 2,467 23 1,457
Mole Valley 22 1,051 48 1,309 8 390 New Yearly Years facility at Horley to support growth
Reigate & Banstead 39 2,295 79 2,384 13 798 COSTS AND FUNDING Based upon information contained within each local Runnymede 21 1,115 43 1,332 13 535 authority’s IDP the following costs and funding have been
Spelthorne 26 1,425 53 1,689 11 493 recorded:
Surrey Heath 20 1,105 55 1,553 10 568 Cost = £23,020,000 Tandridge 30 1,574 50 1,441 11 573 Funding Gap = £1,610,000 Waverley 43 2,312 78 2,323 21 1,323 Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5 Woking 34 1,703 52 1,637 10 434 * (considering both secured and expected funding) SURREY 357 19,498 651 20,137 152 8,352
Source: Surrey County Council
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 51
PRIMARY EDUCATION Surrey Surrey
Schools300 of26% schools Academies Figure 4.5
Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. CURRENT SITUATION Primary school capacity against housing growth Legend London Heathrow In Surrey there are 174 primary, 42 junior and 84 infant schools, Surrey County A!A! LA Boundary as well as two all through schools, providing both primary J^ Airport ! STAINES-UPON-THAMESA A! ASHFORD H! !EGHAM ! Town and secondary education. These schools comprise state A A! ! A!A ! A! A! A!A A A! A! A!A A! Motorway funded or controlled schools; voluntary aided or controlled A!A! A!SUNBURY A! A! A! A Road A! A! A! A! ! !A! schools, academies and free schools. Distribution/capacity A! A! !A A Urban Area A! A! A! A A! A! CHERTSEY A!A! WALTON-ON-THAMESA! A! Surplus Primary Places is show in Figure 4.5. This representation of primary A! A!A! A! A! ! A! (Deficit - Red, Surplus - A! A! A ADDLESTONE A! A!WEYBRIDGE A! ! A! ESHER A!A! education provision excludes that supplied by independent A! A! A! A! A A! A! A! Green) ! A!A!! A! A! A A!A! A A! A! EWELL ! A!! A! A! A -100 - -30 schools, which accounts for around 21%. A A! ! A!A! A! A ! !! A! A! A ! A! -29 - -10 AA A! ! A A! CAMBERLEY A! A! A A! A! ! !A! EPSOM A! A! A! A A A! A! -9 - 0 HEADLINES A! A! !A! A! A! A! WOKING ! A! A A!! A!! A! A A A! 1 - 10 ! A! A! A! A! A A! A! FRIMLEY AA! ! A! BANSTEAD A! ! A!A! A! A! ! A A! A! ! In January 2017, there was a 5% overall surplus of primary A A! A A! A 11 - 30 A! A! ! WARLINGHAM !A! A! A! A! A ! AA! A! A! A! A! ! ! ! A! A! A! A ! A A! 31 - 100 places across all year groups, which is in line with DfE A ! LEATHERHEAD A A! A!A A! CATERHAM A! A! A! A! recommendations. A! A! 101 - 200 A! A! A!A! A! A! A! A! !! Additional Housing by Ward A! A! AA! A A! ! (2030/31) In the 2016/17 academic year, SCC added an additional A! A ! !A A! A A! A A! A! ! ! A! A! ! DORKING A ! A 0 - 25 ! A! A AA! ! A! !AA A! RREIGATEEIGATE REDHILL A 937 places in Reception. Without this additional A! A! A! A! A! A! A! A! GUILDFORD ! A! ! A! 26 - 50 A! A! A! !AA! ! A! A A! A A! A! A! !AA! ! infrastructure, there would have been a shortage of 2% A A A! A! 51 - 100 A! A! ! A! A! A 101 - 250 A!A! FARNHAM A! in Reception places. A! A! A! A! A! 251 - 500 A! A! A! A! A! 501 - 1,000 A! A! A! ! A! ! AA! A! However, demand for school places is not uniform, so whist A GODALMING A! A! A! ! !A!!A! 1,001 - 3,000 A A!A!A! A! A A! HORLEY there may be a surplus of places in on year group or area, A! A! A! A! A! there may be exceptional demand and a need for additional A! !A A!A! A! places in another. For example, there may be a surplus of A!A!A! London Gatwick A! places in Year 6 but a shortage of places in Year 1, or a deficit A! of places in Waverley but a surplus in Tandridge. A! A! ! A! A HASLEMERE
Source: Surrey County Council location and capacity data 2017 * Symbols relate to surplus / deficit provision based on 2017 pupil and class size data
52 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2023
Table 4.2 Table 4.2 sets out forecast growth in terms of primary school places to 2023. The information should be considered in the
Primary school capacity and forecast pupil change context of the following key issues:
LOCAL AUTHORITY WIDE PLACE DATA 2017 IDENTIFIED GROWTH IN PUPIL NUMBERS Capacity and numbers on roll indicate a positive position to accommodate future growth based on the housing
trajectories provided by the Local Planning Authorities ADDITIONAL % SURPLUS % FORECAST % SURPLUS to the School Commissioning Team. However, additional TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL SCHOOL / DEFICIT* RISE OR FALL / DEFICIT* housing growth will yield more pupils which could CHILDREN ON PLACES challenge capacity. PLACES - JAN OF SCHOOL IN PUPIL OF SCHOOL ROLL - JAN CURRENTLY 2017 PLACES IN JAN NUMBERS BY PLACES BY Demographic changes indicate that the demand 2017 PLANNED BY 2017 2023 2023 pressures experienced in primary places is now moving 2023 ** into the secondary sector.
Elmbridge 11,127 10,622 5% -1% 705 14% There are certain areas of exceptional pressure as
Epsom & Ewell 6,680 6,549 2% 14% 676 -2% demand for places is not uniform.
Guildford 10,462 9,898 5% 6% 295 3% EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED
Mole Valley 6,282 5,866 7% 1% 180 9% Notable investment in early provision as set out by Surrey County Council includes: Reigate & Banstead 11,973 11,603 3% 13% 1050 1% Expansion of Ewell Grove Infant and West Ewell Infant Runnymede 5,703 5,452 4% 12% 180 -4% Schools to primary status Spelthorne 8,284 7,886 5% 13% 450 -2% Development of a new 2FE primary school in response to
Surrey Heath 7,338 6,790 7% 0% 120 9% the Deepcut development in Surrey Heath Tandridge 6,645 6,311 5% 6% 0 -1% Development of a new 2FE primary school in Horley in
response to large scale housing growth in the area Waverley 9,848 9,335 5% 0% 50 5%
Woking 8,685 8,345 4% 3% 255 4% A new 2FE primary free school in Reigate/Redhill
Source: Surrey County Council September January 2017 School Capacity Figures and Forecast Numbers to 2023 COSTS AND FUNDING
*Surplus depicted in green , Deficit depicted in red All figures in this study in relation to primary education ** “Additional School Places Currently Planned by 2023 relates to the number of additional places that will be in the system by 2023. This includes relates to CIL and S106 funding only new schemes, as well as already implemented schemes that have only been partially completed due to their phasing Cost = £182,000,000
The need for school places is forecast using a variety of factors including birth data, existing pupil movement trends and Funding Gap = housing trajectories from the Local Planning Authorities. However, there are no guarantees and forecasts are updated £137,860,000* every six months to ensure they reflect the latest data. As such, the estimated information contained in the above table is Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5. subject to change.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 53
SECONDARY EDUCATION
Surrey Surrey
Secondary53 of72% schools Figure 4.6 Schools Academies Secondary school capacity against housing growth Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. CURRENT SITUATION Legend London Heathrow Surrey County
In Surrey there are 53 secondary schools and two all LA Boundary J^ through school s, prov idi ng both pri mary and secondary Airport STAINES-UPON-THAMES %, ASHFORD H! Town education. Schools comprise state funded or controlled %, %, Motorway EGHAM %, SUNBURY schools; voluntary aided schools, academies and free %, %, A Road schools. Distribution/capacity is shown in Figure 4.6. It is %, Urban Area CHERTSEY WALTON-ON-THAMES Surplus Secondary Places %, %, important to recogni se that the data represented does not %, (Deficit - Red, Surplus - ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER %, %, Green) capture secondary provision offered by non maintained %, %, %, -200 - -150 EWELL CAMBERLEY %, independent schools, which account for approximately 21% %, %,%, -149 - -50 %, %, %, %, EPSOM -49 - 0 of secondary education in the county. %, %, %, %, 1 - 50 WOKING %, %, %, BANSTEAD FRIMLEY%, %, 51 - 150 %, WARLINGHAM %,%, HEADLINES %, %, %, 151 - 200 LEATHERHEAD %, %, In January 2017, there was a 7% overall surplus of CATERHAM %, 201 - 400 %, 401 - 600 secondary school places across all year groups. %, %, Additional Housing by Ward %, %, %, (2030/31) %, DORKING REIGATE %, In January 2017, there was a 7% surplus of Years 7 and 0 - 25 %, GUILDFORD %, %, REDHILL %, 26 - 50 8 places, compared to an 11% surplus of Year 11 places, %,%, %, %, 51 - 100
showing the rising trend of pupils in this sector. FARNHAM 101 - 250 %, %, 251 - 500
GODALMING 501 - 1,000 Demand for school places is not uniform, and overall figures HORLEY %, 1,001 - 3,000 can mask the pressures felt in part icu lar year groups and particular areas across the county. For example, there may %, London Gatwick be vacancies in Year 11 but a shortage of places in Year 7, or %, a deficit of secondary school places in Reigate but a surplus of places in Runnymede.
%, HASLEMERE
Source: Surrey County Council location and capacity data 2015 * Symbols relate to surplus / deficit provision based on 2017 pupil and class size data
54 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2025 Table 4.3 Table 4.3 sets out forecast growth in terms of secondary school places to 2025. The information should be Secondary school capacity and forecast pupil change considered in the context of the following key issues: LOCAL AUTHORITY WIDE PLACE DATA 2017 IDENTIFIED GROWTH IN PUPIL NUMBERS Looking at capacity on a countywide and borough/district level masks local areas of pressure, particularly in larger ADDITIONAL borough and districts with a higher amount of rural areas. % SURPLUS/ % FORECAST SCHOOL % SURPLUS TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL DEFICIT OF RISE OR FALL PLACES / DEFICIT OF Demographic changes indicate that the demand PLACES JAN CHILDREN ON PLACES JAN IN PUPIL CURRENTLY PLACES BY pressures experienced in primary places is now moving 2017 ROLL JAN 2017 2017 NUMBERS BY PLANNED BY 2025 into the secondary sector. 2025 2025 Analysis represents a snapshot in time and strategic
Elmbridge 4,506 4,261 5% 41% 1,300 -2% educational planning is underway to address challenges Epsom & to capacity. However, additional housing growth will yield 4,680 4,338 7% 36% 0 -23% Ewell more pupils, which will provide additional infrastructure
Guildford 7,068 6,363 10% 20% 250 -3% challenges.
Mole Valley 3,930 3,379 14% 30% 150 -6% EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED Reigate & Notable investment in secondary provision includes the 6,475 6,162 5% 46% 1,590 -11% Banstead following: Runnymede 4,615 4,316 6% 32% 1,110 1% 6FE free school in Elmbridge
Spelthorne 5,595 5,013 10% 35% 450 -12% 1FE expansion at St Peter’s Catholic, Guildford Surrey Heath 4,375 3,943 10% 11% 0 0% 1FE expansion at the Priory School, Dorking Tandridge 3,625 3,438 5% 19% 0 -12% 6FE free school in Reigate and Banstead Waverley 6,602 6,020 9% 25% 150 -11%
Woking 4,590 4,451 3% 45% 300 -19% 2FE expansion at St John the Baptist 6FE Free School in Chertsey Source: Surrey County Council September January 2017 School Capacity Figures and Forecast Numbers to 2023
*Surplus depicted in green , Deficit depicted in red COSTS AND FUNDING All figures in this study in relation to secondary education The need for school places is forecast using a variety of factors including birth data, existing pupil movement trends and relates to CIL and S106 funding only housing trajectories from the Local Planning Authorities. However, there are no guarantees and forecasts are updated every six months to ensure they reflect the latest data. As such, the estimated information contained in the above table
is subject to change. Cost = 255,000,000
Funding Gap = £206,860,000*
Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 55
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS AND DISABILITIES (SEND) Surrey Surrey
Special22 Schools Specialist47 Centres attached Forms, 5 Sixth Form Colleges, 4 Commercial and Charitable HEADLINES to Mainstream School Providers (delivering across a number of locations), non- specialist programmes within the 4 FE colleges and 1 A number of students requiring specialist provision Higher Education Provider offering limited further education attend out of county institutions. As part of Surrey’s SEND Development Plan work is underway to develop local CURRENT SITUATION opportunities in Surrey. FE Colleges and some sixth-form colleges within Surrey also offer a range of adult education provision for students with high needs. Years Reception - 14 courses. An increasing proportion of young people are choosing In Surrey, there are 4 primary, 7 all through, and 11 secondary to continue their learning in the workplace through special schools. In addition there are 9 infant, 11 primary, programmes such as Supported Internships, thus reducing 12 junior and 11 secondary specialist centres attached to Figure 4.7 the demand on physical sites dedicated to teaching. mainstream schools, and 3 National Autistic Society Cullum centres attached to mainstream secondary schools. SENDContains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyrightfacilities and database right © 2017. against housing growth Legend London Heathrow London Heathrow Surrey County These schools cater for a wide range of special educational LA Boundary J^ Airport needs, with educational arrangements to meet the needs of A! ASHFORD H! EGHAM A! ASHFORD Town EGHAM! !A STAINES-UPON-THAMES A! pupils with: Communication and Interaction Needs, Complex A STAINES-UPON-THAMES A! Motorway SUNBURY A! SUNBURY Social and Communication Needs, Hearing Impairment A! A Road A! Urban Area needs, Learning and Additional Needs, Social, Emotional CHERTSEY A! A! WALTON-ON-THAMES ! ! A! A!CHERTSEY AA! A Special Education Needs A! WALTON-ON-THAMES A!A! A! A! A! Facility and Mental Health needs, Severe Learning Difficulty and ! ! WEYBRIDGE ! ! A AADDLESTONE ESHER A AA! ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE A!A! ! A! ESHER A!A! Additional Housing by Ward A!A! ! A! A!A! A! Disability, Visual Impairment needs A A!A! (2030/31) A! EWELL A! EWELL CAMBERLEYA! ! CAMBERLEY !A ! 0 - 25 A A! There are also a wide range of non-maintained and EPSOM 26 - 50 A!EPSOM A! WOKING 51 - 100 A! A! WOKING BANSTEAD independent special schools in Surrey, which offer education ! A! BANSTEAD FRIMLEYA!A!A A! A! FRIMLEYA!A! A! ! WARLINGHAM 101 - 250 A! ! A! WARLINGHAM to children with special educational needs. ! A A! 251 - 500 A A! A! A!A!LEATHERHEAD A! A!A!LEATHERHEAD A!A! A! ! A! A! CATERHAM 501 - 1,000 A CATERHAM A! A!A! A! A! 1,001 - 3,000 Post-16 SEN ! A! A!A! !A ! !AA! A! !A!A AA! A! A There are 11 maintained Special Schools, 6 non-maintained AA REDHILL A! DORKING A!REIGATE A! REIGATE !REDHILL DORKING A!A! A A! A! A! GUILDFORD A! A! Special Schools and 2 Special Post-16 Institutions (SPIs) A! A! GUILDFORD A!A! A! ! A! within surrey delivering further education to high needs A! A! A! A! FARNHAM learners aged 16-25. There are 4 Surrey FE Colleges which A!FARNHAM A! ! A!! A! A! A! A!A! also provide purpose built facilities and further education GODALMING GODALMING HORLEY programmes specifically designed for learners with SEND. A! A!HORLEY A! High needs learners who do not require specialist facilities ! A! London Gatwick or programmes but benefit from additional learning support ! London Gatwick A! are supported through additional high needs funding provided by the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA). This enables them to access one of the 31 School Sixth
HASLEMERE HASLEMERE
56 | Surrey Infrastructure Study Source: Surrey County Counci In January 2017, there was a 2% overall surplus of places Table 4.4 special schools across all year groups (Reception year to Year 14).
Dedicated SENDALL facilities SPECIAL INFANT JUNIOR PRIMARY SECONDARY FE A number of students requiring special or specialist THROUGH SCHOOLS SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL COLLEGE provision attend non-maintained and independent SPECIAL WITH POST- institutions. As part of Surrey’s SEND programme work SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL WITH SEN SCHOOL 16 is underway to facilitate education closer to home for
Elmbridge 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 students with high needs. Epsom & Ewell 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 For the 2016/17 academic year, SCC provided an additional 31 places in Reception. Guildford 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 It should be noted that demand for school places is not Mole Valley 1 2 2 2 1 1 0 uniform, so whist there may be a surplus of places in a year
Reigate & Banstead 0 1 2 1 3 1 1 group, area or designation of need, there may be exceptional demand and a need for additional places in another. Runnymede 0 1 1 2 3 1 0
Spelthorne 0 0 1 2 1 0 0
Surrey Heath 1 1 0 1 3 2 0 FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 Table 4.4 sets out the current spread of SEN facilities across Tandridge 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 Surrey. The IDPs and consultation with SCC identify the
Waverley 1 2 1 1 3 1 0 following significant SEN projects: Woking 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 Change of age range from secondary to primary at West Hill School SURREY 7 10 12 15 25 11 4
Purpose built nursery on school site at the Ridgeway Source: Surrey County Counci * Point Data is not availble for every facility, as some schools offer some limited SEN provision. The point data idenitifed in Table 4.4 and Figure 4.8 lists special schools, and specilaist centres and some FE colleges with School SEN. New free school to meet the needs of children with *Many post-16 education providers without specialist, dedicated SEN facilities are also able to offer appropriate education for high needs learners. Information about these non specialist providers is available on pages 56-57 complex social and communication needs Refurbishment of facilities in specialist centres for learning and additional needs at Ashford Park, Oakfield
and Loseley Fields schools New free school to meet the needs of children with communication and interaction needs.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 57
FURTHER EDUCATION, HIGHER EDUCATION AND ADULT EDUCATION Surrey Surrey Surrey
31 5 4 School Sixth Sixth Form FE colleges Forms Colleges be developed to assess this, in which physical infrastucture the University of Surrey, located in Runnymede and Guildford
Surrey Surrey to facilitate post-16 education will continue to be important, respectively. The University of the Creative Arts also has Surrey whilst work based and remote learning will play an increasing campuses at Epsom and Farnham. Higher Education role. institutions often lead to a transient student population in CCPs4 3HE Institutions SCC7 Adult the areas they are located, bringing with them their own Education Centres The two main Higher Education institutions in Surrey are challenges in planning for infrastructure. considered to be Royal Holloway University of London and Figure 4.8 CURRENT SITUATION The Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) funds 65 Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. Surrey institution to deliver further education to 16-18 year Post 16 education facilities against housing growth London Heathrow olds. These comprise of; School Sixth Forms, Sixth Form Legend Colleges, FE Colleges, Special Schools (and Specialist Post- London Heathrow Surrey County ASHFORD 16 Institutions) and Commerical and Chariable Providers EGHAM STAINES-UPON-THAMES LA Boundary
(CCP), as well as a Higher Education Institution. Within SUNBURY J^ Airport ASHFORD H! Surrey higher education is not exclusively delivered within EGHAM Town STAINES-UPON-THAMES Motorway CHERTSEY traditional University settings. All 4 of Surrey’s further WALTON-ON-THAMESSUNBURY A Road educationcollegesalsoofferhighereducationopportunities ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER Urban Area CHERTSEY WALTON-ON-THAMES Woodland as an alternative to traditional university settings. EWELL CAMBERLEY B# Sixth Form ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER
EPSOM Surrey Adult Education - run by Surrey County Council - is B# College EWELL CAMBERLEY WOKING BANSTEAD B# Higher Education the key supplier of Adult Education provision across the FRIMLEY WARLINGHAM EPSOM B# Adult Education county. There is a fairly even spread of centres across LEATHERHEAD WOKING BANSTEAD Additional Housing by Ward CATERHAM Surrey. The 7 Centres are located across 6 of the 11 local FRIMLEY WARLINGHAM (2030/31) authorities within Surrey. Adult education courses in East LEATHERHEAD 0 - 25 Surrey are provided by East Surrey College. FE Colleges and CATERHAM 26 - 50
REDHILL 51 - 100 some sixth-form colleges within Surrey also offer a range of DORKING REIGATE GUILDFORD 101 - 250 adult education courses. 251 - 500
REIGATE REDHILL DORKING 501 - 1,000 GUILDFORD FARNHAM HEADLINES 1,001 - 3,000
An increasing proportion of young people are choosing GODALMING FARNHAM HORLEY to continue their learning in the workplace, thus reducing
GODALMING the demand on physical sites dedicated to teaching and HORLEY learning. As a result, most further education providers in London Gatwick Surrey have experienced reduced ESFA contracts, but have spare capacity and potential for growth. London Gatwick
Identifying capacity for growth within post-16 education HASLEMERE requires analysis of the impact of learner choice and current and emerging skills gaps in conjunction with future housing HASLEMERE developments. Moving forward a bespoke model needs to Source: Surrey County Council location data 2017 58 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 Surrey
Additional531 Adult Education Clients Table 4.5 Royal Holloway University of London, Post-16 education facilities Runnymede HE SIXTH FORM SCC ADULT Forecast12,000 students (currently 9,000) FE COLLEGE SCHOOL CCP DELIVERY INSTITUTION COLLEGE EDUCATION CAMPUS SIXTH FORM LOCATIONS
CAMPUS CAMPUS CENTRES EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED
Elmbridge 1 1 3 1 2 Table 4.5 sets out the current spread of Post-16 Education facilities across Surrey. The IDPs identify the following Epsom & Ewell 1 1 4 significant Further Education and Higher Education projects:
Guildford 1 2 1 6 1 1
Growth on campus at Royal Holloway University of Mole Valley 4 1 London, comprising 3 building projects: Library £40m (opening 2017), Science Building £20m, and Residences Reigate & Banstead 1 1 3 £40m - based on feedback from RHUL and assumed to Runnymede 1 1 2 1 be funded. Spelthorne 1 2 1 Growth of Surrey University with expansion plans for
learning, accommodation and business facilities. Surrey Heath 2 2 1
Tandridge 2 1 COSTS AND FUNDING Based upon information contained within each local
Waverley 1 1 1 2 1 authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and Woking 1 2 2 1 funding have been recorded for Surrey:
SURREY 4 6 6 31 11 7
Source: Surrey County Council and AECOM web-based research Cost = £112,030,000
Funding Gap = £3,340,000*
Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5.
* (considering both secured and expected funding)
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 59
4.3 HEALTH + SOCIAL CARE
PRIMARY CARE SERVICES Guildford, Mole Valley and Waverley appear to be in According to the mapping there remains a lack of Surrey Surrey Surrey the strongest position to accommodate growth from capacity to the north of surrey and in Guildford/
a health perspective; and Woking. FTE619 GPs 260Dental 212Pharmacies Practices Figure 4.9
CURRENT SITUATION Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) 2017. Primary healthcare capacity against housing growthLegend London Heathrow The Health and Social Care Act 2012 changed the way that Surrey County primary care services are planned and organised. This LA Boundary J^ Airport facilitated a move to clinical commissioning, a renewed STAINES-UPON-THAMES H! Town
ASHFORD focus on public health and allowing healthcare market EGHAM ASHFORD Motorway SUNBURY competition for patients. This is provided by the Clinical A Road Urban Area
Commissioning Groups (CCGs) - of which there are 6 CHERTSEY WALTON-ON-THAMES GP Theoretical covering the Surrey area. Deficit/Surplus (Deficit - Red, ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER ESHER Surplus - Green)
EWELL GF < -5,000 In March 2016 NHS England further reorganised into 44 CAMBERLEY
Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP) areas. These GF -4,999 - -2,500 GF -2,499 - -1,000 WOKING EPSOM were agreed by NHS Trusts, local authorities and CCGs. BANSTEAD FRIMLEY GF -999 - -500
WARLINGHAM GF -499 - 0 LEATHERHEAD
This move towards STPs have focused on improving CATERHAM GF 1 - 500 CATERHAM GF integration of healthcare services (CCGs, Trusts and Adult 501 - 1,000 GF Social Care), while reorganising GP provision through a 1,001 - 2,500 GF 2,501 - 5,000 REDHILL focus on the development of hubs to create better scale DORKING GUILDFORD GF > 5,000 of provision (1GP practice : 30,000 people). This involves REIGATE Additional Housing by Ward limiting the development of new GP practices through (2030/31) FARNHAM procurement, resulting in total footprint reductions, despite 0 - 25 26 - 50 increasing demand. HORLEY 51 - 100 GODALMING 101 - 250 Similar issues are faced by health and social care 251 - 500 501 - 1,000 professionals across Surrey. London Gatwick 1,001 - 3,000 HEADLINES - GPs In general the provision of GP services across Surrey is
poor, with a provision of 1GP per 1,994 patients; HASLEMERE
Source: HSCIC GP Dataset (Sept 2016) for location, workforce and patient list data
60 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031
Surrey
Additional9,728 sqm of primary healthcare space by 2031
Surrey
Table 4.6 Additional3,024 sqm of dental healthcare space by 2031
Primary healthcare capacity & theoretical future needs Future requirements are based on the application of
benchmark standards against population growth forecasts EXISTING PRIMARY CARE PROVISION 2017 2016-2031 ADDITIONAL (identified in footnote of Table 4.6). Important caveats to
REQUIREMENTS note include:
POPULATION NUMBER OF PATIENT LIST PATIENTS PER PER DENTAL GPS DENTISTS FTE GP SIZE GP The benchmarks are high level and do not reflect the PRACTICE significant variation in usage of health facilities and
Elmbridge 56 146,420 2,594 4,160 2 3 services of communities with differing levels of older residents or the varying health needs caused by factors Epsom & Ewell 43 85,877 1,982 3,300 7 8 such as deprivation and poverty. In addition, due to the changes in delivery models that have occured in recent Guildford 69 120,413 1,750 4,580 12 12 years, which emphasise footprint reductions of primary Mole Valley 53 91,678 1,731 4,307 1 1 care services and a focus on delivery services through a hub model, it is likely the total footprint demand to be Reigate & Banstead 67 141,300 2,109 5,576 6 6 considerably less than the identified requirement.
Runnymede 40 80,799 2,040 4,798 6 6 EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED
Spelthorne 52 103,299 2,003 5,209 2 2 Notable investment in acute health provision includes the
Surrey Heath 54 106,891 1,996 4,219 4 4 following:
Tandridge 46 86,622 1,895 6,175 7 7 Extension of Greystone House Surgery in Redhill Waverley 88 154,609 1,763 4,756 9 9 Extension of Wall House Surgery in Reigate
Woking 53 116,808 2,220 3,578 4 4 COSTS AND FUNDING Based upon information contained within each local SURREY 619 1,234,716 1,994 4,516 59 60 authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where
Source: Primary healthcare capacity and patient list size according to HSCIC 2016 data, Pharmacy and Denal data from HSCIC 2016 data. no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and
UK benchmark for GP provision is 1800 patients to 1 GP, 165 sq.m per GP provision funding have been recorded for Surrey:
UK benchmark for Dental provision is .57 dentists per 1,000 people, 50 sq.m per dentist Cost = £30,600,000
Funding Gap = £1,800,000*
Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5. * (considering both secured and expected funding) Surrey Infrastructure Study | 61
HOSPITALS AND MENTAL HEALTH Surrey Surrey 197 NHS3,683 Acute Mental health Figure 4.10 hospital beds hospital beds Hospital locations against housing growth areas
CURRENT SITUATION
Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. There are 5 NHS Trusts operating within the Surrey county Legend
Surrey County boundary comprising a number of General Acute and London Heathrow LA Boundary
Community hospital facilities. The majority of these are J^ Airport Ashford Hospital H! classed as ‘General Acute Hospitals’, whilst East Surrey Town STAINES-UPON-THAMES ASHFORD Motorway Hospital is defined as a ‘Multi-Service Hospital’. Ashford EGHAM SUNBURY A Road and St Peter’s Hospitals Foundation Trust and Epsom Molesey Hospital Urban Area
Surface Water CHERTSEY and St Helier University Hospital Trust jointly run their two Walton Community Hospital Woodland Runnymede Hospital WALTON-ON-THAMES respective hospitals. ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER "' Hospital St. Peters Hospital Weybridge Community Hospital West Park Hospital Additional Housing by Ward CAMBERLEY EWELL (2030/31) Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust New Epsom and Ewell Community Hospital Woking Nuffield Hospital Cobham Hospital 0 - 25 (SABP) is the mental health trust for Surrey providing EPSOM The Old Cottage Hospital Frimley Park Hospital WOKING BANSTEAD 26 - 50 Epsom Hospital community, inpatient and social care services for psychiatric WARLINGHAM 51 - 100 FRIMLEY Ashtead Hospital Woking Hospital 101 - 250 and psychological illnesses. LEATHERHEAD Caterham Dene Hospital 251 - 500 Leatherhead Hospital CATERHAM 501 - 1,000 North Downs Hospital HEADLINES - HOSPITALS 1,001 - 3,000
Oxted & Limpsfield Hospital REIGATE REDHILL A significant proportion of mental health beds are located Royal Surrey County Hospital DORKING Guildford Nuffield Hospital GUILDFORD in Runnymede. Mount Alvernia Hospital Farnham Hospital Farnham Road Hospital Dorking General Hospital East Surrey Hospital Community hospitals are also located within Elmbridge, FARNHAM
GODALMING Epsom & Ewell, Guildford, Mole Valley, Tandridge and HORLEY Waverley.
Milford Hospital London Gatwick Figure 4.10 does not include all private hospitals. A large number of health episodes are treated within private Cranleigh Village Hospital healthcare facilities in Surrey. Holycross Hospital Haslemere Hospital HASLEMERE ² 0 1,6003,200 6,400
Meters Source: SCC using NHS SHAPE Tool. Mapping shows all General Acute and Community Hospitals listed on NHS Shape Tool Database (2017)
62 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 Surrey
Additional33,280 sqm of acute hospital bed space by 2031 Surrey Table 4.7
Additional3,639 sqm of mental health bed space by 2031
NHS hospital capacity and theoretical future need Future requirements are based on the application of best practise standards against population growth forecasts.
EXISTING HOSPITAL BED CAPACITY (2016) Important caveats to note include: 2016-2031 ADDITIONAL MENTAL REQUIREMENTS Both health and social care services are moving away
GENERAL ILLNESS &
MATERNITY TOTAL from bed based care for both physical and mental health ACUTE HOSPITAL MENTAL HEALTH ACUTE LEARNING with a greater emphasis on avoiding hospital admissions BEDS BEDS DISABILITY and nursing/residential home placements. The focus is on managing people in their own communities. It is ROYAL SURREY Elmbridge COUNTY HOSPITAL 459 61 520 9 2 - unlikely that the current benchmarks used reflect the NHS FOUNDATION (81%) (32%) (75%) TRUST Epsom & Ewell 26 5 planned move towards fewer acute beds with more
people with increasingly complex needs being managed FRIMLEY HEALTH NHS 1, 302 73 1,375 Guildford 41 8 FOUNDATION TRUST - in the community and supported, medically, by general (92%) (82%) (92%) Mole Valley 3 1 practice. ASHFORD AND ST PETER’S HOSPITALS 504 53 557 Reigate & Banstead 20 4 EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED NHS FOUNDATION - TRUST (87%) (47%) (84%) Notable investment in Hospital and Mental Health provision Runnymede 21 4 includes the following: SURREY AND SUSSEX 623 42 665 HEALTHCARE NHS - Spelthorne 7 2 TRUST* (92%) (64%) (90%) New build health facilities for Haslemere Hospital Surrey Heath 13 3 EPSOM AND ST Cranleigh Village Hospital - £6m HELIER UNIVERSITY 795 97 892 HOSPITALS NHS - Tandridge 24 5 (83%) (42%) (78%) TRUST* COSTS AND FUNDING Waverley 31 6 SURREY AND Based upon information contained within each local BORDERS 197 197 PARTNERSHIP NHS - - Woking 13 3 authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where FOUNDATION TRUST (89%) (89%) no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and SURREY 208 43 funding have been recorded for Surrey: TOTAL* 3,683 326 197 4,206 Cost = Source: NHS England: Unify2 data collection - KH03 - Average daily number of available and occupied beds open overnight by sector (October to £144,080,000 December 2016) Source: Future Requirements based on AECOM Analysis of population change and continuation of ratio of beds to population. Funding Gap = £31,590,000* Note - Existing Hospital Bed capacity data is not available at the site specific level (and therefore local authority level) but available at NHS
Trust level as presented above. The figure in brackets illustrates the % Occupied of total Available beds on Average) Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5. * The NHS Trusts presented above in some cases cover wider areas outside Surrey County (such as Epsom and St Helier University Hospital NHS Trust). Therefore the total figure provides a figure which covers a wider area than Surrey exclusively. * (considering both secured and expected funding)
ADULT SOCIAL CARE Surrey Surrey Figure 4.11 18+ Nursing143 Homes Residential300 Care Social care accommodation against housing growth areas Homes Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. Legend London Heathrow Surrey County
LA Boundary J^ CURRENT SITUATION Airport ASHFORD EGHAM H! Town STAINES-UPON-THAMES From 1 April 2009 all health and social care services in Motorway SUNBURY England are registered and regulated by the Care Quality A Road Urban Area
CHERTSEY Commission (CQC), whether provided by the NHS, local WALTON-ON-THAMES Woodland
*# Nursing Home authorities, private companies or voluntary organisations. ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER *# Residential Home
EWELL Additional Housing by Ward Across Surrey, Residential and Nursing homes are provided CAMBERLEY (2030/31) EPSOM for by a mixture of these public and private organisations. 0 - 25
WOKING BANSTEAD 26 - 50 FRIMLEY WARLINGHAM Adult Social Care client groups include: People with learning 51 - 100 LEATHERHEAD 101 - 250 disabilities; people with mental health needs; people with CATERHAM 251 - 500 physical disabilities; and older people (over 65 years). 501 - 1,000 1,001 - 3,000
HEADLINES REDHILL DORKING REIGATE GUILDFORD As of 2016, there were 5,609 nursing beds, 4,152
residential beds, and 1,040 Extra Care beds across Surrey FARNHAM According to Figure 4.11, the greatest provision is towards GODALMING HORLEY the north, in the more heavily populated areas of Surrey
Provision of Adult Social Care beds is predominantly London Gatwick
through private companies, but commissioned through SCC
HASLEMERE
Source: CQC Website for location data 2017
64 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2025
Surrey Table 4.8 Additional2,168 Nursing Care beds Social care accommodation & theoretical future need Surrey
RESIDENTIAL EXTRA CARE NURSING Additional1,378 Residential Care beds BEDS/ BEDS/ BEDS/ SCC BEDS SCC BEDS SCC BEDS 1,000 1,000 1,000 Surrey BEDS FUNDED NEEDED BEDS FUNDED NEEDED BEDS FUNDED NEEDED OVER OVER OVER BEDS BY 2025 BEDS BY 2025 BEDS BY 2025 75 75 75 Additional750 Extra Care beds/units
Elmbridge 418 95 36 137 733 181 63 218 46 46 4 - Epsom & 184 23 28 69 194 74 30 63 ---- Ewell EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED Guildford 513 86 45 165 321 116 28 88 156 116 14 - The list below sets out key investments expected to support
Mole Valley 419 136 44 160 302 122 31 98 302 122 31 - population growth: Reigate & 927 209 74 391 761 273 61 283 160 54 13 - Banstead 750 Additional Extra Care beds/units provision across Surrey Runnymede 251 84 35 84 215 68 30 64 50 50 7 -
Spelthorne 437 106 49 133 142 83 16 32 112 112 13 - Specialist Young People Accommodation in Woking Surrey 728 95 94 317 182 87 23 66 ---- COSTS AND FUNDING Heath AECOM has estimated accommodation costs based Tandridge 566 91 70 248 384 119 47 151 - - - - the forecasts presented in the Surrey Adult Social Care Waverley 825 152 63 341 478 182 37 171 61 50 5 - Commissioning Reports. UK benchmark costs have been applied to those forecasts. This identifies the following
Woking 341 93 43 123 440 110 5 144 126 43 16 - costs for Surrey:
SURREY 5,609 1,170 54 2,168 4,152 1,415 40 1,378 1,040 620 7 750 Cost = £422,250,000 Source: Draft Accommodation WWith Care and Support Commissioning Statements 2016 Funding Gap = £42,230,000*
Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 65
4.4 COMMUNITY
LIBRARIES Surrey Surrey Surrey
SCC42 10Community 3 Community managed Partnered Figure 4.12 Link Libraries Libraries Libraries
LibraryContains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database capacity right © 2017. against housing growth areas
Legend London Heathrow London Heathrow CURRENT SITUATION Surrey County /" /" LA Boundary The nature of a library and what it provides today continues to J^ Airport ASHFORD EGHAM /" /" /" ASHFORD H! change. The service is not just about books but also delivers /" EGHAM /" STAINES-UPON-THAMES/" Town STAINES-UPON-THAMES /" /" SUNBURY Motorway services that help to provide social and digital inclusion and SUNBURY /" A Road /" " /" / Urban Area support the well being and prosperi ty of Surrey residents CHERTSEY /" /" WALTON-ON-THAMES /" CHERTSEY /" /" across all ages. They look to becoming community hubs, /" /" WALTON-ON-THAMES /" Woodland ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE /" /"ESHER Library Space Deficit/Surplus /"ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE /" ESHER /" /" /" /" sharing w ith other services and have flexible spaces which /" /" /" /" /" /" -1200 - -800 /" EWELL CAMBERLEY /" /" /"EWELL also bring in opportunities locally for learning and cultural CAMBERLEY " /" /" / /" -799 - -400 " /" / EPSOM /" /" /" /" events. /" EPSOM /" /" /" /" /" -399 - -200 WOKING /" /" BANSTEAD WOKING /" /" -199 - -100 FRIMLEY /"/" BANSTEAD /" /" /" /"WARLINGHAM FRIMLEY " /" /"/ /" /" /" -99 - 0 Whilst there has been an active capital programme of /" WARLINGHAM /" LEATHERHEAD /" /" /"LEATHERHEAD 1 - 100 refurbishing libraries for some time, thi s has now ceased /" /" CATERHAM /" /"CATERHAM /" /" 101 - 200 /" /" /" due to financial pressures still leaving some libraries in /" /" 201 - 400 /" /" Additional Housing by Ward unsuitable buildings i n poor locations and the service will be /" /" (2030/31) /" REDHILL developing an asset strategy programme for the future to " DORKING REIGATE /" / REIGATE REDHILL 0 - 25 /" GUILDFORD DORKING /" /" /" GUILDFORD /" /" /" 26 - 50 tackle these. /" /" /" 51 - 100 /" /" FARNHAM 101 - 250 HEADLINES /" FARNHAM 251 - 500 /" GODALMING /" 501 - 1,000 Location of Libraries is a fundamental issue when /"GODALMING HORLEY /" /" /" HORLEY /" 1,001 - 3,000 considering quality of provision. Libraries may not be /"
sited in locations in towns where peopl e congregate. London Gatwick London Gatwick /" Focus around including Library provision alongside the /"
delivery of a wide-range of services at a collective facility.
Pressure on libraries to downsize to release assets and to HASLEMERE /"HASLEMERE /" ² reduce library space to accommodate a greater variety of other services integrated into or co-located within the
library. Source: Surrey County Council for location and capacity data 2017
66 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 Table 4.9 Surrey
Library capacity & theoretical future need 2,653 SUM OF SURPLUS 2015-2031 Sqm of additional library space required by 2031 SIZE REQUIRED NUMBER OF / DEFICIT ADDITIONAL LIBRARY FLOORSPACE(SQM) FOR CATCHMENT LIBRARIES FLOORSPACE SPACE (SQ.M) Whilst our analysis identifies the need for 2,653 sq.m (SQM) (SQM) REQUIREMENT of additional provision. It is important to recognise the changing nature of library service provision and possibilities Elmbridge 7 2,334 3,328 -994 111 for delivering these requirements in new and innovative
Epsom & Ewell 4 2,084 1,980 104 331 ways including the shared use of multi functional spaces.
Guildford 4 1,202 3,664 -2,462 519 EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED The list below sets out key library investments expected to Mole Valley 6 1,355 2,153 -798 40 support population growth:
Reigate & Banstead 6 2,637 3,624 -987 252
Multiple library refurbishments across the County Runnymede 5 1,330 2,159 -829 267 Horley Town Centre New Library Spelthorne 5 2,110 2,474 -364 95
COSTS AND FUNDING Surrey Heath 4 862 2,215 -1,353 172 Based upon information contained within each local
Tandridge 5 1,116 2,161 -1,045 307 authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and Waverley 5 1,426 3,092 -1,666 399 funding have been recorded for Surrey:
Woking 6 2,100 2,505 -405 160
SURREY 57 18,604 29,355 -10,751 2,653 Cost = £14,260,000
Funding Gap = £5,620,000* Source: Surrey County Council (2017) & AECOM analysis of future demands using benchmark of 25 sq.m per 1,000 people. headlines on previous page will not match total libraries in table above as headline exclude specialist libary provision (i.e music and drama library) Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5. Sum or Surplus / Deficit based upon current population size and application of benchmark of 25 sq.m per 1,000 people.
* (considering both secured and expected funding)
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 67
YOUTH SERVICES
Surrey Surrey Surrey
Total43 Number of SCC36 Non7 SCC Figure 4.13 Youth Centres Facilities Facilities
YouthContains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright service and database right © 2017. provision against housing growth areas Legend London Heathrow Surrey County CURRENT SITUATION D$ LA Boundary J^ D$ Airport ASHFORD H! Youth Centres in Surrey are run by Surrey County Council, $EGHAM D$ Town D STAINES-UPON-THAMES D$ D$ Motorway through it’s Family Service and Young People and Family SUNBURY A Road Teams. Through this service SCC offer a wide range of D$ D$ Railway CHERTSEY support for young people and families in each youth centre D$ D$WALTON-ON-THAMES Urban Area Woodland ADDLESTONE$D WEYBRIDGE D$ ESHER depending on local needs. $ $D D D$ Number of Clients EWELL $D < 20 CAMBERLEY D$ D$ HEADLINES $ 21 - 60 DEPSOM $D D$ Tandridge Reigate & Banstead D$ 61 - 100 $ WOKING $ D DBANSTEAD D$ D$ 101 - 200 FRIMLEY $ $ D D$ $ D WARLINGHAM D D$ D$ 201 - 400 763 783 LEATHERHEAD Fewest hours of service Highest number of clients D$ $CATERHAM Additional Housing by Ward provided March 2014-15 recorded March 2015 $D D (2030/31) D$ 0 - 25 D$ 26 - 50 $D D$ $ REDHILL 51 - 100 Runnymede & Spelthorne - most provision D DORKING REIGATE D$ GUILDFORD D$ 101 - 250 251 - 500 D$ 0.24 $ 501 - 1,000 Youth service providers per 1,000 young people DFARNHAM 1,001 - 3,000
GODALMING D$ D$ HORLEY
Tandridge - least provision
London Gatwick Youth0.11 service providers per 1,000 young people D$
It is important however to note that some facilities are privately run and accessibility by all may not be possible. D$HASLEMERE ²
Source: Surrey County Council for location and capacity data 2015
68 | Surrey Infrastructure Study Table 4.10
Youth services capacity & theoretical future need FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 2016-2031 CLIENTS HOURS OF NUMBER OF HOURS PER ADDITIONAL Surrey RECORDED - DELIVERY - YOUTH CENTRES CLIENT YOUTH FACILITY MARCH 2015 MARCH 2014 - 15 8 CLIENTS additional youth facilities
Elmbridge 5 702 1,174 1.7 10 EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED
Epsom & Ewell 3 179 980 5.5 68 The list below sets out youth facility investments expected
to support population growth: Guildford 4 620 1,048 1.7 119 Phoenix Youth Centre (recently completed); Mole Valley 4 645 1,597 2.5 2
Reigate & Banstead 5 783 2,439 3.1 36 Neighbourhood Skills Centre in Woking; and Runnymede 5 601 1,929 3.2 72 Merstham Youth Centre - Due for completion in Autumn 2017.
Spelthorne 5 620 1,755 2.8 19
COSTS AND FUNDING Surrey Heath 3 306 1,308 4.3 20 Based upon information contained within each local
Tandridge 2 327 763 2.3 57 authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and Waverley 5 652 1,144 1.8 67 funding have been recorded for Surrey:
Woking 3 505 1,297 2.6 9 Cost = £6,370,000 SURREY 43 5,940 15,434 2.6 479 Funding Gap = £190,000* Source: Surrey County Council Youth Support Services (2015) & AECOM analysis of future demands Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5. * (considering both secured and expected funding)
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 69 COMMUNITY & INDOOR SPORTS
FACILITIES
Community Sports Facilities Facilities Figure 4.14 Community & leisure provision against housing growth Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. Sports England 2017. L e g e n d
London Heathrow Surrey County L A Boundary J^ Airport CURRENT SITUATION H! Town "C "C Motorway "C " "C "C C " ASHFORD EGHAM "C C A Road Community and Indoor Sports facilities in Surrey comprise "C E% "C"C E% "C ""C E%"C "C "C " "C "C STAINES-UPON-THAMES"C Urban Area C " C "C "C E% SUNBURY Woodland both public and pr ivate facilities. Public facilities are "C"C "C "C "C E% Community Centre "C"C "C"C"C E% I n d o o r B o w l s provided and funded by the local authorities. This allows for """CCC "C "CCC " "CC CC "CC ""CC "C "C 1 - 2 CHERTSEY % "C "C "C E"C % "C"C "CC "CE%"C "C E WALTON-ON-THAMES E% "C 3 - 4 anyone to access the facilities. Private facilities often require "C "C "C "C C"CC "C "C "C "C "C 5 - 6 ADDLESTONEC WEYBRIDGE "C "C ESHER " C"""CCC %"C "C C "C membership and payment for the use of those facilities. "C C "C E "C "C 7 - 8 "C "C " E%"C "C "C "C "C "C E% C "C "C "C EWELL"CC " 9 - 1 0 "C "C "C"C "C C CAMBERLEY % E%"C"C E% "C "C"C "C"C E"C I n d o o r Te n n i s C e n t r e C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C ""C "C 1 - 2 "C E% "C "C CEPSOM "CC "C "C "C "C "C "C "CC E% "CC "C "C "C 3 - 4 HEADLINES "CC"C E% "C E% "C "CC "C C "CCC"C "C E% "C WOKING E%"C "C 5 - 6 "C BANSTEAD "CC "C "C " "C " C "CFRIMLEY"C "C "C "CC "CC CC "C "CC E% "C C WARLINGHAM "C 7 - 8 Spelthorne has the largest gaps in indoor sports "C "CC "C ""CC % "C "CC C " E "C "CCC "C"C """"""CCCCCC"C "C "C "CC "C "C LEATHERHEADC"C "C "C 9 - 1 0 "C "C "C "C "C" "C "C provision, wi th the supply below the Surrey average in all C E% E%"C "C "C "C "C"C E%E% CATERHAM S p o r t s H a l l "C " E%"C "C C 1 - 2 of the 5 categories. "C " "C"C C 3 - 4 "C "C "C "C "C ""C "C 5 - 6 C "C E%"C C E% E%"C "C "C "C "CE% "C 7 - 8 "C "C "C Reigate & Banstead and Surrey Heath also suffer with E%"C "C "C"C C "C % REDHILL % "C "C E"C "C "CDORKING "C "C REIGATE"C "C "C E E% %"C "C" "C "C"C "C E%"C "C 9 - 1 0 E% "C "CE"C"C "C C "C "C"C "C"C "C GUILDFORD "C "C"C "C gaps i n prov ision with supply below the Surrey average in "C "C %"C "C "C "CC E"C "C "C "C S q u a s h C o u r t s "C " "C" "C % E%E% "CC E% C E " "C "C" "C E%"C C "C 1 - 2 C"C "C 4 out of the 5 categories. "C " 3 - 4 "C "C C "C "C "C"C "C "C 5 - 6 E% FARNHAM "C 7 - 8 "C "C "C "C "C "C ""C There are gaps in current facility distribution against "C C "C"C " 9 - 1 0 "C GODALMING "C "C C % "C E " HORLEY the focus areas of housi ng growth. Thi s can be seen in " "CC "C "C C E%"C "C S w i m m i n g P o o l "C "C %C"CC "C"C "C " E "CC C C "C 1 - 2 "CC Guildford, Runnymede and parts of Waverley. "C 3 - 4 "C"CC "C "C "C 5 - 6 "C "C "C"C "C London Gatwick "C 7 - 8 "C"C "C Elmbridge and Reigate and Barnstead have relatively "C"C "C "C "C 9 - 1 0 strong provision of indoor sports provision where future Ad d i t i o n a l H o u s i n g b y W a r d "C (2030/ 31) housing growth is projected. 0 - 25 26 - 50 "C "C 51 - 1 00 "C"C HASLEMERE 1 01 - 250 "C "CC "C "C"C "C 251² - 500 501 - 1 ,000 1 ,001 - 3,000
Source: Surrey County Council and Sport England Active Places for location and capacity data April 2017
70 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031
Surrey
new6,898 flexible sqm community space Surrey
Table 4.11 new20 swimming pool lanes Community and leisure provision Surrey new31 sports courts
SPORTS INDOOR INDOOR Surrey COMMUNITY SWIMMING SQUASH GYM HALL BOWLS TENNIS CENTRES POOL LANES COURTS STATIONS 6 COURTS RINKS COURTS new indoor bowls rinks
The above infrastructure requirements have been identified
Elmbridge 7 69 60 25 1,012 4 6 based on a combination of those actual planned projects according to the local authorities and further AECOM Epsom & Ewell 2 55 34 16 701 1 2 analysis using Sport England and best practice standards.
Guildford 11 111 51 13 797 6 4 EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED
Mole Valley 3 57 32 13 359 4 0 The list below sets out community and leisure facility
Reigate & Banstead 3 68 45 13 565 6 0 investments expected to support population growth: Nower Wood Educational Nature Reserve and Field Runnymede 4 57 17 8 596 6 4 Centre - £1,000,000 Spelthorne 4 40 21 7 1,036 0 0 Cranleigh Arts Centre - £150,000 Surrey Heath 5 36 12 9 644 6 0 Haslemere - Community Centre for older people - Tandridge 6 47 35 11 341 0 3 £2,000,000
Waverley 2 107 67 14 937 0 3 Egham Leisure Centre upgrades
Woking 4 28 18 12 739 0 10 COSTS AND FUNDING
SURREY 49 674 392 140 7,727 33 32 Based upon information contained within each local
authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where Source: Surrey County Council and Sport England Active Places April 2017 no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and
Table includes all provision recorded by Sport England and does not differentiate between Public and Private access funding have been recorded for Surrey: Community centres presented is limited to those defined specifically as community centres and does not include wider provision of community facilities and halls for hire. Cost = £80,070,000
Funding Gap = £33,930,000* * (considering both secured and expected funding)
OUTDOOR SPORTS AND RECREATION
Figure 4.15
Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. Contains, or is based on, information supplied by Natural England. © Historic England 2017. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2017. Sports England 2017. Children’s Outdoor sports and recreation against housing growth Outdoor Sports Legend & Recreation Play Space London Heathrow Surrey County "C"C"C"C"C LA Boundary "C J^ Airport "C "C"C " "C "ASHFORD "C "C EGHAM "C C H! Town C "C "C "C "C"C "" "C"C STAINES-UPON-THAMES"C CC "C "C "C"C"C"C "C"C "C "C "C " "C Motorway C"C "C SUNBURY CURRENT SITUATION "CCC "CCC "C """CCCC"C "C "C A Road "C"""""CCCCCC """CCCC """CCCC """CCCC """"CCCC"CCC" "CCC "C "CCC """CCCC CCC" C """"""CCCCCCC "CCC "C """CCCC Urban Area Surrey has a wide range of open spaces, sports pitches, "CCCC "C """CCCC """" "C "CCC """CCCC "CCCC"C "C CHERTSEY "C """"CCCC"CCC """CCCCCC "CCC """ CCCCC" WALTON-ON-THAMES """CCC"""CCC CCCC Surface Water "CCC"CCC C"""CCC ""C "C"C sports facilities and children’s p laygrounds. Outdoor sports "C "C "C "C "C C" "C "C "CC"C"C"C"C C" "C "C Park "C "ADDLESTONE"C WEYBRIDGE "C "C "C C"C " "C "C "C"C ESHER "C "C"C "C " "C "C "C "C C"C "C"C"C"C "C "C and playspace are owned and operated by a mixture of "CC "C "C "C"C"C "C " "C "C Outdoor Sports Facilities "C"C " C "C "C "C"C C "C "C EWELL"C "C "C "C "C "C"C""C "C "C"C Artificial Grass Pitch "CCAMBERLEY "C"C C " "C private sector, voluntary organisations and local authorities. "C"C "C"C "C "C "C "C "C "C"C "CC "C "C " "C "C "C"C "C "C "C "C "C C Athletics Tracks Lane " "C"C"C C "C " "C "C "C "C "C "C "C C "C "C C "C "C " " "C EPSOM"C " "C "C "C "C "CC "CC "C "C "C "C "C "C C Golf Course HEADLINES " "C"C "C " ""C "C "C "C"C"C "C "C "C "C C " C WOKING" C "C "C "C "C" "CC "C "C C " " "CBANSTEAD "C"C"C "C "C Grass Pitch C "C " "C "C "C "C C " "C C "C "C"C"C"C "C "C "CFRIMLEY "C C ""C "C "C C "C "C "C""C "C "C "C C "C"C C "C C "C "C WARLINGHAM "C "C "C"C "C"C "C "C "C "C "C Tennis Court There is a gap in outdoor sports provision in Reigate "C """ "C "C "C "C"C"C "C "C "C "C""C "C "C "CCCC CCCC " "C "C "C LEATHERHEADC"C "C "C " C "CCC"C "C "C "C "C C Additional Housing by Ward """CCCCC """CCCC" "C "CCC "C "C "C "C C "CCC "CCC C "C "CCC " "C "C CATERHAM """ & Banstead and Spelthorne with capacity below "C"""CCC C "CCC "C"""CCC """CCCC " "CCC "CCC CCCC (2030/31) "C "CCC "C " "C C "CCC """CCCCCC "C "C "CCCC"""CCCC C " "CCC "C " "CCC"CCC C"C 0 - 25 Surrey’s average supply to populati on ratio in 4 out of """CCCC "CCC "C"C "CCCC "CCC """CCCCCC "C "C "C " ""C "C "CC C C "C "C "C 26 - 50 "C "C "C "C "C "C"C "C"C"C 5 categories. "C "C"C "C "C"C"C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C "C"C "C "C 51 - 100 "C "C"C "C "C "C "C "C " REIGATE REDHILL "C "C "C "C ""C C "CDORKING "C"C "C "C"C "C "C 101 - 250 " "C "C "C "C"C C "C"C "C "C "C "C"C "CC "C "CGUILDFORD"C "C"C "C "C"C "C "C"C""C"C "C C" "C "C "C "C C " 251 - 500 Guildford also displays similar issues with capacity "C "C"C "C"C "C C"C "C "C"C "C "C "C "C "C "C"C "C "C "C"C "C "C ""C "C 501 - 1,000 C "C " "C "C "C C "C below the average in 3 of the 5 categories. GBC has "C"C C "C "C"C "C "C " " "C " "C C 1,001 - 3,000 " C"FARNHAM "C "C C published a ‘Guildford Open Space, Sport & Recreation C "C"C "C "C "C "C "C " "C" "C "C "C "C C "C "C" "C"C "CC"C "C "C "C "C C "CC Assessment 2017’ (June 2017) which develops local "C GODALMING "C "C "C "C "C "C "C HORLEY "C "C " " "C " "C "C" "C "C"C"C "C "C "C C C C "C "C "C "C"C "C"C standards for open space and establishes deficits and "C "C "C" "C "C "C "C C C "C "C"C "C "C "C "C"C "C"C surpluses. This will form the basis of policy in GBC’s "C "C "C "C "C "C"C "C "C "C "C "C London Gatwick "CCC """" "C "CCC """CCCC """"CCCCC"CCC "C forthcoming Local Plan: development management C CCCC "C """CCCC """"CCCCC "CCC """CCCCC "CCC "C policies. """CCCC "C"C"C "CCC "C "CCCC "CCCC"C "C "C "C Lack of sports provision around Guildford, which is due "C "C"C "C to experience significant growth. "C "C HASLEMERE"C ² "CCCC "C The larger urban centres of Elmbridge and Waverley similarly have strong provision of existing outdoor Source: Surrey County Council and Sport England Active Places for location and capacity data 2017 recreational facilities. 72 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031
Surrey
3 Artificial Turf Pitches Surrey
Table 4.12 127ha Playing fields
Outdoor sports and recreation Surrey
ARTIFICIAL ATHLETIC 18ha GRASS PITCHES TENNIS COURTS GOLF CLUBS Children’s Play- GRASS PITCH TRACKS LANES space The above infrastructure requirements have been identified
Elmbridge 298 17 111 12 8 based on a combination of those actual planned projects according to the local authorities and further AECOM Epsom & Ewell 149 9 48 6 3 analysis using Sport England and Fields in Trust best
Guildford 209 12 40 12 10 practice standards.
Mole Valley 137 5 33 0 7 EXAMPLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROPOSED The list below sets out the outdoor sports and recreation Reigate & Banstead 182 14 49 6 8 investments expected to support population growth: Runnymede 142 16 72 12 7 Godalming Leisure Centre Upgrades - £4.5m
Spelthorne 99 12 31 0 2 Synthetic Pitch at Rodborough College - £1.085m Surrey Heath 165 11 24 0 6 Skate Park at Sandy Hill - £650,000 Tandridge 205 9 52 0 13
COSTS AND FUNDING Waverley 241 25 99 12 12 Based upon information contained within each local
Woking 100 11 54 10 11 authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and SURREY 1,927 141 613 70 87 funding have been recorded for Surrey: Source: Surrey County Council and Sport England Active Places April 2017 Table includes all provision recorded by Sport England and does not differentiate between Public and Private access Cost = £76,160,000
Funding Gap = £32,900,000*
Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5. * (considering both secured and expected funding)
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 73
4.5 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
HEADLINES Over 12,310 ha of Surrey have received National and International designations (not including AONB, County GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AONB make up 43,260ha (26% of Surrey land area) or National Parks, Woodland or common land)
Kent Downs, Surrey Hills, High Weald Strategic green infrastructure provision such as Epsom Downs, Horton Country Park Provide a strategic role Woodland makes up 33% of the land area of Surrey beyond the borough boundaries in which they are located and is an example of shared infrastructure with a wider Natural Green Space & Parkland 52 Parks and Gardens in Surrey (4,120ha) Strategic Projects catchment.
Figure 4.16
CURRENT SITUATION ContainsGreen Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright andinfrastructure database right © 2017. & proposed housing sites L e g e n d
Surrey’s diverse natural and semi natural environment is London Heathrow Surrey County a valuable asset. Not only does it provide the basis for the LA Boundary J^ Airport agricultural sector and supporting biodiversity but it also H! ASHFORD Town EGHAM providing an attractive character that draws residents, STAINES-UPON-THAMES Motorway employers and visitors into the county. Furthermore, the SUNBURY A Road environment performs a wider range of functions with Urban Area CHERTSEY Surface Water WALTON-ON-THAMES tangible benefits to society and the economy, such as air National and International WEYBRIDGE quality and climate regulation, flood mitigation and space for ADDLESTONE ESHER Environmental Designation Other Environmental EWELL recreation. CAMBERLEY Designation Biodiversity Opportunity EPSOM Area
WOKING The broader natural environment is supported by a network BANSTEAD Park and Garden FRIMLEY WARLINGHAM of more formal green infrastructure assets comprising Woodland LEATHERHEAD AONB a broad range of high quality green spaces and other CATERHAM Total Housing Units by 2030 !( environmental features including natural and semi natural 5 - 10 !( green space, parks and gardens, amenity space, green and 11 - 50 (! 51 - 100 REDHILL blue corridors (verges and rivers) as well as a range of other DORKING REIGATE (! 101 - 150 GUILDFORD greenspaces including allotments. (! 151 - 500 (! 500 - 2,600 FARNHAM
GODALMING HORLEY
London Gatwick
HASLEMERE
Source: Surrey County Council, Surrey Nature Partnership, Historic England, Natural England, OS Meridian, Forestry Commission 74 | Surrey Infrastructure Study Table 4.13 objectives, promote good health and quality of life as well new development will be expected to provide new green as inform ways of working and policy for key stakeholders. space in line with provision standards within each of the Green infrastructure Investment into GI projects is likely to cover a range of Local Authorities existing or emerging open space and
issues and scales: green infrastructure strategies, there is also a need for more provision strategic open space provision to alleviate areas of deficit GI TYPE AREA (HA) LANDSCAPE SCALE and pressure on popular areas.
AONB 43,260 The high quality and character of Surrey’s landscape is ACCESS TO THE COUNTRYSIDE National and International Designations 12,310 central to the county’s identity, attracting inward investment
Parks & Gardens 4,120 and providing an important recreation resource for residents Surrey’s existing long distance walking routes will need to be and visitors alike. As the county and wider south east grows, supported by a network of new and improved local access Surface Water 3,270 an increased investment into popular areas such as those in to the countryside. Better connectivity can provide a wide
Woodland 55,094 the ANOBs will be needed to ensure that the pressure from range of health and well-being benefits as well as improving Woodland 94,665 additional visitors does not undermine their special quality. access.
Other Environmental Designations 2,241 This will be in the form of welcome site, access and land management both within the AONBs and across the wider 120,295 TOTAL landscape.
INVESTING IN NATURAL CAPITAL SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE NATURAL GREENSPACE FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 The NPPF highlights the planning systems role in Any harmful effects from growth on sites internationally Surrey contributing to the protection and enhancement of the recognised for their ecological importance through the natural environment. It seeks to establish coherent, Habitats Directive will need to be mitigated. The creation 106ha ecological networks that are more resilient to current and Suitable Alternative Natural Green Space of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANGs) is one future pressures while recognising the ‘wider benefits’ Surrey approach to mitigation that provides important new GI ecosystems services can have. SCC and Surrey Nature assets. The cost of delivering and managing the SANGs Partnership (SNP) support this ambition and are determined 42ha will be needed to support future housing development will New Parkland that development should deliver a net benefit to biodiversity. be covered by developer contributions (currently S106 Surrey planning obligations and in future, by a combination of S106 GI delivery to support growth will be a product of both 21ha increased provision of dedicated space, as well as and CIL). Allotments enhancing the quality of existing sites and initiatives to HABITAT CREATION ASSOCIATE WITH DEVELOPMENT The above infrastructure requirements have been identified support the functionality of the wider environment. SNP, based on a combination of those actual planned projects SCC and partners are keen for the environmental assets In addition, SNP and SCC have identified a series of according to the local authorities and further AECOM that underpin the value derived from GI to be considered Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs), and associated analysis using Natural England and Fields in Trust best as natural capital. As such, the benefits of growth can be guidance notes, that provide a spatial framework to support practice standards. considered alongside the impacts on the natural capital the development of local GI strategies. Within this, series assets and investment can be targeted to where it can COSTS AND FUNDING of sites have also been identified on a more detailed deliver greatest benefit. Based upon information contained within each local Habitat Creation Register that could be enhanced to provide GI that helps mitigate the impacts of development, authority’s IDP and theoretical benchmark modelling where SNP is leading the development of a Natural Capital potentially through developer contributions as part of a no IDP analysis was undertaken, the following costs and Investment Strategy (NCIS) for Surrey. It is based on future biodiversity offsetting policy or better integration of funding have been recorded for Surrey: ensuring the appropriate and sustainable use of Surrey’s biodiversity consideration into new infrastructure projects. natural capital assets, thereby securing the services Cost = which flow from it, through high quality, locally embedded SPACE FOR RECREATION £92,540,000 decision-making. The NCIS will showcase how local natural Funding Gap = £13,320,000* capital, a key element of infrastructure, can create practical A growing population will also put pressure on the county’s economic opportunities, deliver on broader sustainability parks, gardens, amenity spaces and allotments. Although Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5 * (considering both secured and expected funding)
4.6 UTILITIES ENERGY
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS Table 4.14 UKPN Long Term Development Strategy (fully funded) Impacts of growth on supply
UKPN estimate that the proposed new housing REINFORCEMENTS & ELECTRICITY developments and supporting amenities will require LOCAL AUTHORITY ASSET REPLACEMENT FUNDED INVESTMENT
UKPN and SSE provide electricity network distribution approximately 150MW electricity supply demand over the PROJECTS TO 2023 services in Surrey. period, which UKPN note is technically available from grid supply capacity. Future major works identified include UKPN’s South Eastern Power Networks PLC (SPN) Elmbridge 1 £358,649 Kingston Grid transformers’ replacement, Guildford Grid electricitynetworksuppliedfromChessington275/132kV, reinforcement, Chertsey primary 33kV reinforcement Laleham 275/132kV and West Weybridge 275/132kV Grid Epsom & Ewell 8 £10,486,213 and Brookwood primary 33kV reinforcement Supply Points (GSPs) covers the Surrey study area. These Guildford 15 £10,979,287 have an aggregate demand of 759.9MW (Winter-W) and GBC have highlighted the need to reinforce from the Mole Valley 3 £2,608,867 519MW (Summer-S) across 10x132kV grid substations Dorking Circuit to support the University of Surrey and 34x33kV primary substations. Research Park. R & Banstead 8 £8,707,971 The aggregate firm capacity attributed to the three GSPs Summary of plans to support growth Runnymede 0 0 is 1,797MW (W) and 1,588MW (S) while aggregate load demand is projected to reach 878.2MW (W) and 601.3MW Major works currently at feasibility study stage or under Spelthorne 0 0
(S) by 2023. construction include the following: Surrey Heath 0 0 Brookwood Primary & EHV route - HV Switchgear / ITC / Current Capacity issues Tandridge 2 £1,086,816 33kV UGC UKPN note in the Chessington/Laleham/West Weybridge Waverley 0 0 Regional Development Plan (RDP) (dated June 2015) that West Weybridge 33kV switchgear replacement
Woking 8 £10,451,811 future load demand and network growth in the RDP area
is likely to be influenced by future Gatwick development Chertsey ITC and HV switchgear replacement Surrey 44 £44,679,613 and new residential development proposed in Surrey and West Weybridge to Chertsey 33kV underground cables surrounding areas up to 2027. (being replaced as 33kV) Source: UKPN SPN Regional Development Plan - Chessington/Laleham / West Weybridge Provisional 2017 revision SSE Long Term Development Statement (LTDS), 2015 Weybridge HV Switchgear replacement and ITC suggests that there are no constraint areas for accepting new generation or load, however, background fault levels Weybridge Dynamic Transformer Rating at most voltages are generally high. West Weybridge to Guildford 132kV cable
76 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
GAS SUPPLY FUTURE REQUIREMENTS COST OF CONNECTING THE GROWTH SITES Gas is transmitted through a National Transmission System Impacts of growth on supply UKPN strategic investments to 2023 have been taken into (NTS), in which it is then supplied to towns and villages account but no strategic Gas Network investment data has through Local Distribution Zones (LDZ). The Gas Distribution SGN forecast a small decrease in annual and peak day been made available to this study. Network Operator for Surrey is Southern Gas Networks demands over the 2014-2024 period (albeit a small (SGN). increase is expected in 2014-2015 due to economic AECOM are considering the whole cost of utilities and recovery) due to increased efficiencies and renewable have therefore also considered the cost of connecting
CURRENT SITUATION incentives. the planned housing and employment sites to the existing SGN has a duty to extend or improve the National network. Summary of plans to support growth Transmission System (NTS), where necessary, to ensure Per dwelling and commercial floorspace benchmark energy an adequate and effective network for the transportation Installation of infrastructure on a speculative basis to connection costs have been applied to the growth forecasts of gas. No specific upgrades have been identified within serve potential development areas is not supported by and based on these assumptions, AECOM estimates the the county but future works may be required to respond regulator OFGEM. following costs associated with energy provision to support to the wider demand for gas. growth across Surrey to 2031. Reinforcement projects for the LDZs are planned for on No Current Capacity issues have been identified a reactive basis, Network reinforcement is determined
on an application by application basis when new loads Cost = £191,480,000
connect to the network, rather than planned for in Funding Gap = advance. £0 It is assumed that these costs will be borne by the developer Agreements need to be reached with developers prior to and service providers. Costing caveats apply to all AECOM investment in new infrastructure being made. estimates presented within this document. See Costing It cannot be assumed that the existing network has assumptions at end of document sufficient capacity to supply all proposed development proposals across Surrey. It can however be assumed that the necessary capacity will be developed on a reactive basis by the gas Distribution Network Operator.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 77
BROADBAND
However, analysis of data from Service Providers by SCC during an Open Market Review (OMR) and State Aid Public BROADBAND DELIVERY UK (BDUK) - SUPERFAST Consultation in 2015/2016 to understand the broadband COST OF CONNECTING THE GROWTH SITES BROADBAND PROGRAMME landscape of Surrey identified that there are still more than Per dwelling and commercial floorspace benchmark
Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK), part of the Department 15,300 premises in Surrey that are unable to access fibre communication connection costs have been applied to the for Culture, Media and Sport, have set a national target of download speeds of 15mbps or more and are not included growth forecasts and based on these assumptions, AECOM 95% provision of superfast broadband (speeds of 24Mbps in any commercial plans. estimates the following costs associated with connecting or more) to all UK premises with universal basic broadband new dwellings and commercial development to the existing (speeds of at least 2Mbps). As a result of the Superfast Surrey’s very successful demand broadband network: stimulation campaigns during the programme’s main phase The programme is being delivered in three phases: of deployment, take-up of fibre broadband services by Cost = residents has been significantly higher than projected in £25,490,000 Phase 1 aims to provide superfast broadband to 90% of the contract finance model resulting in additional funding premises in the UK Funding Gap = £0 flowing into the contract as part of a clawback mechanism. Phase 2 will seek to further extend coverage to 95% of It should be noted that the costs set out above include only Last year, BT offered SCC an ‘advance’ of £3.9m of this the UK the developer funded connection costs for new housing clawback, known as ‘Gainshare’ to be used for further and commercial development. Phase 3 will test options to roll out superfast broadband broadband infrastructure and in December 2016, the SCC Cabinet gave approval for this investment to be used for beyond 95%. An assumption, as set out in section 6.3, has been made further fibre infrastructure. that all new development costs will be met by the developer Whilst this represents the current BDUK targets for all areas, in order to meet the market demand for broadband ready Surrey County Council has implemented its own Superfast SCC subsequently requested BT to model a solution, properties. Surrey Programme with different contractual targets. based on the lowest cost per premise, for as many as of the 15,300 premises as possible located across Surrey
CURRENT SITUATION IN SURREY within the programme’s available funding. This solution,
According to Think Broadband, more than 96% of all Surrey known as the Gainshare deployment, was announced at the end of February and includes nearly 6,000 homes and premises can now access download speeds of 15mbps or more. In 2012, SCC signed a multi-million contract with BT businesses that are anticipated to benefit from further fibre to build on the existing and planned commercial rollouts of infrastructure with download speeds of 24mbps or more. the fibre broadband network in order to address the issue of Work has commenced on detailed design and planning with premises in Surrey without any fibre broadband provision. deployment due to commence at the end of 2017 and final As a result, 86,000 Surrey homes and businesses were works to be completed in early 2019. covered by fibre broadband infrastructure as part of the main phase of the programme.
78 | Surrey Infrastructure Study Image Source: https ://www .f li ckr .com/photos/e li teayrsh irebus inesscircle/15628644226
WATER & WASTE WATER Thames Water report that 80% of London’s potable water demands typically around 60 Ml/d. The WRZ’s own
is supplied from surface waters of the River Thames and internal sources are supplemented by a bulk import from the River Lee, via reservoirs, with the remaining 20% Portsmouth Water of 15 Ml/d. However, the WRZ also
coming from groundwater. provides a supply of 5.4 Ml/d from Weir Wood to South East Water. 30% of Thames Valley potable water comes from surface waters and 70% from groundwater. There are over 30 Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) CURRENT SITUATION within the county Several Water Only (WO) companies operate in Surrey; Southern Water’s Sussex North Water Resource Zone Sutton & East Surrey Water, South East Water and Veolia (WRZ) which includes parts of Surrey has dry year Water. Thames Water and Southern Water operate as Water Figure 4.17 and Sewerage Companies (WaSC). WaterContains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright companies and database right © 2017. & waste water treatment works All water companies have prepared Water Resource Legend London Heathrow Management Plans (WRMPs) for 2015 to 2040. These Surrey County are updated every five years with the current review LA Boundary J^ Airport completed in 2014. These seek to accommodate the ASHFORD ASHFORD EGHAM H! Town STAINES-UPON-THAMES potential increase in demand from new development, Motorway SUNBURY manage the existing supply of water and take account of A Road Urban Area likely future changes due to climate change. CHERTSEY WALTON-ON-THAMES Woodland
WEYBRIDGE ' ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE | Waste Water Facility ADDLESTONE ESHER Table 4.15 Water Provider EWELL CAMBERLEY South East Water
Water Supply and Waste Providers Sutton and East Surrey Water EPSOM Thames Water WOKING VW SEW TW SESW BANSTEAD FRIMLEY Affinity Water WARLINGHAM Elmbridge W W W LEATHERHEAD
CATERHAM Epsom & Ewell W W
Guildford W W W W
REIGATE REDHILL Mole Valley W W DORKING REIGATE GUILDFORD Reigate & Banstead W
Runnymede W FARNHAM Spelthorne W W GODALMING HORLEY Surrey Heath W W
Tandridge W W London Gatwick Waverley W W
Woking W
VW - VEOLIA WATER HASLEMERE SEW - SOUTH EAST WATER / TW - THAMES WATER SESW - SUTTON & EAST SURREY WATER
W - PROVIDER Source: DEFRA 2017
80 | Surrey Infrastructure Study
Table 4.16
Current Capacity issues Water Supply Provider Plans
PROVIDER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT PLANNED TIME FRAME Summary of Water Company Plans to Support Growth Various WO and WaSCs have identified shortfalls within various WRZs. Replacement of lead pipes in parts of Thames Ditton and Reductions in network leakage 2015-2020 Elmbridge. TWU Guildford WRZ: Average day peak week (ADPW) deficit Universal metering programme; 2015-2020 of 0.1 Ml/d in 2021/22, increasing to 3.8 Ml/d in 2039/40. Extension of bulk transfer schemes proposed between Implementation of water efficiency 2015-2020 various water companies. TWU London WRZ: A dry year annual average (DYAA) deficit nity Water Increased water abstraction; 2015-2020 of 59 Ml/d in 2014/15, increasing to 416 Ml/d in 2039/40. Affi Network enhancements (if required) to accommodate
Increase in bulk transfer of water. 2015-2020 Blackwell Farm development. FUTURE REQUIREMENTS Developing groundwater source at 2015-2020 Maytham Farm Network enhancements (if required) to accommodate Impacts of growth on supply Developing a water re-use scheme at 2020-2030 Princess Royal Barracks development in Surrey Heath. Aylesford (37.5 Ml/d) Network capacity is likely to be an issue at locations such Network enhancements (if required) to accommodate as the Guildford-Woking-Staines corridor where large scale Building a new reservoir at Broad Oak 2030-2035 former Wisley Airfield development. development is being proposed. (13.5 Ml/d) Developing six water transfer schemes 2020-2040 Upgrades to Merstham WwTW, Mogden WwTW, Old Woking
South East Water Merstham and Mogden WwTW already identified as requiring to share water with adjoining areas WwTW, Hogsmill WwTW, Guildford WwTW, Loxwood WwTW.
upgrading to meet future demand. Creation of 3 new WRZ transfers. - Network enhancements (if required) to accommodate large Additional leakage reduction required - Water Supply - Water Resource Management Plans scale developments such as Blackwell Farm, Wisley Airfield over the planning period. and Gosden Hill Farm. All five water companies have prepared Water Resource Water reuse scheme to commence 2027-2028 Water Management Plans (WRMPs) for 2015 to 2040. These are Southern updated every five years with the current review completed in Two desalination schemes 2027-2028
2014. These seek to accommodate the potential increase in Selective Metering across East Sutton 2015-2020 COST OF CONNECTING THE GROWTH SITES & Surrey demand from new development,manage the existing supply of Per dwelling and commercial floorspace benchmark water water and take account of likely future changes due to climate Water Increase Water Treatment Works Sutton & 2021-2030 supply and waste connection costs have been applied to the change. East Surrey capacity growth forecasts and based on these assumptions, AECOM Leakage reduction measures 2015-2020 Key actions to 2031 as highlighted in each plan are shown in estimates the following costs associated with provision to
Table 4.16. Commencement of ‘full’ metering 2015-2020 support growth across Surrey to 2031: programmes to households (70% of
households by 2025) Catchment Plans New groundwater schemes providing 2015-2020 Cost = £190,110,000 additional water supply Catchment Plans (CP) are in place or in preparation for the Promotion of water efficiency 2015-2020 Funding Gap = £0 improvement of the Wey, Mole, Eden, Loddon, Arun & Rother, Rollout innovative tariffs to promote 2020 + Colne and London (Hogsmill & Wandle) catchments. Projects
Thames Water water efficiency These costs are assumed funded by the developer and service Further development of small 2020 + under these action plans include Water Framework Directive providers. targets to improve the ecological status of waterbodies groundwater schemes that are not currently good by 2027 through a programme Larger scale projects to secure long- 2020 + term resilience including 150 Ml/d addressing in-channel habitat restoration, diffuse and point wastewater re-use scheme source pollution and barriers to fish passage.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 81 WASTE Patteson Court Landfill is the only landfill in Surrey which This Study captures the main waste sites managing waste Surrey Surrey Surrey receives household waste. Patteson Court is required to from households including WTSs, MRFs, MBFs and CRCs. be restored by 2030. The landfill received 277,359 tonnes These are the facilities that will bear the initial impact of 141,000 430,000 55% tonnes of tonnes recycled, of waste in 2015 . In 2015/16, 60,600 tonnes was sent to housing growth household waste of waste reused or landfill with 47,502 tonnes of household waste arising in brought to CRCs collected by composted Surrey was sent for disposal at Patteson Court. Reducing (2015/16) LAs (2015/16) (2015/16) waste to landfill remains a priority although much of the waste deposited at Patteson Court is imported from
CURRENT SITUATION outside the county. Surrey County Council, in its role as the Waste Disposal Authority, provides 15 community recycling centres (CRCs) around the county where residents can recycle and dispose Figure 4.18 of their household waste. These complement the household waste collection services arranged by the local authorities Waste capacity against housing growth Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. from the kerbside and local recycling banks. The 15 CRCs London Heathrow Legend in Surrey are operated by SUEZ Surrey Ltd on behalf of London Heathrow Surrey County
Surrey County Council. The County Council introduced LA Boundary ASHFORD EGHAM J^ changes to the CRC service in 2016 in order to achieve Airport STAINES-UPON-THAMES ASHFORD EGHAM H! Town SUNBURY savings and maintain this important service to residents. STAINES-UPON-THAMES Motorway |' SUNBURY Four of the busier CRCs at Epsom, Guildford, Leatherhead |' A Road CHERTSEY |' and Shepperton also contain waste transfer stations (WTS). |' WALTON-ON-THAMES Urban Area CHERTSEY ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE WALTON-ON-THAMESESHER Waste Site
These accept commercial & industrial (C&I) waste which Materials recovery facility ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER |' |' EWELL (MRF) is chargeable and also function as a drop off point for CAMBERLEY |' |' EWELL |' Inert Landfill CAMBERLEY ' some district collections of residual household waste and | EPSOM |' CRC/materials bulking facility WOKING|' EPSOM |' ' BANSTEAD (MBF) recyclable materials prior to bulking and onward transfer for | FRIMLEY WOKING ' WARLINGHAM|' ' | BANSTEAD Community Recycling Centre | FRIMLEY |' |' management elsewhere. LEATHERHEAD WARLINGHAM |' |' (CRC) |' CATERHAM LEATHERHEAD ' | |' CRC / Waste Transfer Station Some of the other facilities managing household waste in |' CATERHAM (WTS) |' CRC / MRF/ WTS (gasification Surrey include Ash Vale WTS, Earlswood Materials Bulking |' |' |' facility, anaerobic digestion REDHILL facility and recyclable MBF |' DORKING REIGATE |' Facility (MBF), Reigate Road Materials Recovery Facility GUILDFORD ' |' under construction) | REDHILL DORKING REIGATE ' | Additional Housing by Ward (MRF) and Patteson Court Landfill near Redhill. GUILDFORD |' |' |' (2030/31) |' FARNHAM ' 0 - 25 ' | Ash Vale WTS is partly operating as an overflow facility to FARNHAM| 26 - 50 GODALMING 51 - 100 relieve pressure on Guildford WTS for the receipt, storage HORLEY GODALMING 101 - 250 HORLEY and transfer of residual household waste sourced from 251 - 500
|' 501 - 1,000 district waste collections in Guildford and Surrey Heath. London Gatwick ' 1,001 - 3,000 | |' London Gatwick Earlswood MBF is used for the bulking, storage and |' onward transfer of district collections of residual
household waste, recyclable materials and waste from HASLEMERE
Reigate & Banstead and Tandrdidge. HASLEMERE
Source: Surrey County Council 82 | Surrey Infrastructure Study HEADLINES Shepperton WTS which can manage 120,000 tpa for sites for C,D & E Recycling, Energy Recovery, Composting
including around 32,000 tpa of C&I waste and Non-inert landfill by 2033. Surrey remains reliant on facilities outside the county for the treatment of residual waste from households and the Shepperton MRF which can manage 30,000 tpa including The following projects are designed to enhance existing
reprocessing of recyclable materials. The development around 12,000 tpa of internal transfer from Shepperton waste management infrastructure in the county: of an Eco Park at Charlton Lane, Shepperton will partly CRC Work on the construction of an Eco Park at Charlton address this issue by providing a more environmentally Grundons MRF, Leatherhead which can manage 40,000 Lane, Shepperton commenced in Summer 2015 and sustainable and cost effective means of treating the residual waste from households produced in the north of tpa including some municipal waste is expected to be completed in Summer 2018. This will
the county, as well as some waste from local businesses. comprise a gasification facility for the treatment of Earlswood MBF which can manage 110,000 tpa of around 44,710 tpa of primarily residual municipal waste In 2015, 277,359 tonnes of waste was landfilled at municipal waste from north Surrey; an anaerobic digestion facility for Patteson Court. the treatment of up to 40,000 tpa of food waste mainly Ash Vale WTS which manages 75,000 tpa of municipal, from homes around Surrey, and also some businesses; a C&I and construction & demolition (C&D) waste The proportion of Surrey’s household waste sent to 42,750 tpa capacity MBF for the receipt, storage, bulking landfill decreased slightly from 11% in 2013/14 to 6% in Reigate Road MRF which can manage 45,000 tpa of and onward transfer of recyclable materials collected 2015/16. municipal, C&I and C&D waste from homes and CRCs, and the retention of the existing 25,000 tpa capacity CRC. The Eco Park will replace the The Charlton Lane Eco Park, which is currently under Patteson Court Landfill which had a remaining voidspace existing MRF and WTS at Charlton Lane. construction, also includes a 40,000 tpa anaerobic at the end of 2014 of 5,526,000 cubic metres. digestion plant for food waste. As part of the Slyfield Area Regeneration Project (SARP), Agrivert, Trumps Farm which managed 12,863 tonnes of SUEZ Surrey, working on behalf of the County Council, During 2016, the County Council introduced changes food waste in 2015/16. has plans to relocate the Slyfield WTS and to implement to the CRCs within the County in order to meet savings improvements to the Guildford CRC on Moorfield Road. targets. These changes included reduced hours at all Colliers site at Trumps Farm which managed 3,767 tonnes The Guildford CRC may be relocated in the future to sites and smaller sites closed one day per week, the of green waste in 2015/16. provide a larger more modern facility with more recycling introduction of an enhanced van permit scheme and containers and parking bays than can be accommodated stronger trade waste controls and the introduction of on the current site. charges for non household waste comprising rubble, soil and plasterboard and tyres. In addition reuse shops were FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 A review of the Surrey Waste Plan 2008 is currently being introduced and are now established at four sites. In addition to its role as the WDA, Surrey County Council undertaken and a consultation on the draft plan is due to
is also the Waste Planning Authority (WPA). The WPA is be carried out late 2017.
The revised Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy required to produce a Waste Local Plan to ensure that (2015) includes a target to recycle and recover 70% of sufficient land is available for the waste facilities needed to household waste by 2019/20. manage all types of waste produced in Surrey i.e. not just COSTS AND FUNDING household waste. Key Sites Receiving Municipal Waste: Based upon information within each local authority’s IDP,
In 2015 Surrey generated just under 571,000 tonnes of the following costs and funding have been identified: The 15 CRCs which received 141,000 tonnes of waste from households, an estimated 892,000 tonnes of household waste in 2015/16 Commercial and Industrial (C&I) waste and 1,972,000 of Cost = £1,820,000 Epsom WTS which can manage around 120,000 tonnes Construction, Demolition and Excavation (C,D&E) waste. Funding Gap = per annum (tpa) including some C&I waste £310,000* The Waste Needs Assessment which has been prepared as Costs are set out for each local authority in Section 5 Leatherhead WTS which can manage at least 30,000 tpa part of the draft Surrey Waste Local Plan identifies ashortfall
including some C&I waste * (considering both secured and expected funding) Guildford WTS which can manage 180,000 tpa including
some C&I waste Surrey Infrastructure Study | 83
4.7 FLOOD PROTECTION
FLOODING
Figure 4.19
CURRENT SITUATION Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. © Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2017. All rights reserved. © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100024198 There is a high risk of flooding in Surrey from fluvial sources Historical flooding and proposed housing sitesLegend LondonLondon Heathrow Heathrow as it has several large rivers running through its boundaries. Surrey County LA Boundary
The highest fluvial flood risk is to the north along the River J^ Airport ASHFORDASHFORD EGHAMEGHAM H! Town Thames and the River Wey. It is anticipated that the highest STAINES-UPON-THAMESSTAINES-UPON-THAMES Motorway SUNBURYSUNBURY population growth in the county will be in Guildford and A Road the second highest is projected to be in Runnymede, Urban Area CHERTSEYCHERTSEY WALTON-ON-THAMESWALTON-ON-THAMES Surface Water where both local authorities are affected by these rivers. In Woodland ADDLESTONEADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGEWEYBRIDGE ESHERESHER recognition of this risk, SCC have updated their Local Flood Areas of Historical Flooding EWELLEWELL Historic Flooding Incident CAMBERLEYCAMBERLEY Risk Management Strategy in 2017 to better reflect the Total Housing Units by 2030/31
EPSOMEPSOM !( changing landscape of flood risk management and to allow 5 - 10 WOKINGWOKING !( BANSTEADBANSTEAD 11 - 50 FRIMLEYFRIMLEY the Council and its partners to tackle flooding as effectively WARLINGHAMWARLINGHAM (! 51 - 100 as possible. LEATHERHEADLEATHERHEAD !( 101 - 150 CATERHAMCATERHAM (! 151 - 500
Approximately £5.88million is to be invested in Flood and (! 500 - 2,600 Surface Water Alleviation Schemes in Guildford and its REDHILLREDHILL DORKINGDORKING REIGATEREIGATE surrounding area to help mitigate the risk of fluvial and GUILDFORDGUILDFORD surface water flooding. A further investment in the River
Thames Scheme is also planned to mitigate flood risk along FARNHAMFARNHAM the Thames corridor within Surrey. GODALMINGGODALMING HORLEYHORLEY The River Mole was subject to extreme flooding in 2013/14 and consequently a long-term investment strategy has LondonLondon Gatwick Gatwick been developed. This links with the existing Lower Mole scheme which will protect 8000 properties in and around Molesey, and the Upper Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme which is currently in the final phase of construction, and will HASLEMEREHASLEMERE provide benefits to Crawley and Gatwick Airport. Source: Environment Agency
84 | Surrey Infrastructure Study Future investment is also planned for the middle Mole – The River Thames Scheme particularly around the towns of Leatherhead, Fetcham, Dorking and Reigate. Additionally, further studies are The River Thames between Datchet and Teddington has the underway to better integrate river and surface water flooding largest area of developed floodplain in England without flood around Horley and Smallfield. defences. Over 15,000 homes and businesses within the area are at risk from flooding. At the time of undertaking the It should be noted that in addition to the fluvial risk, Reigate study, the cost of the River Thames Scheme was estimated and Redhill are highlighted in the Surrey Preliminary Flood at £476million. The scheme consists of: Risk Assessment to be among the five highest risk areas for surface water flooding in the county. The planned Large scale engineering work to construct a new flood channel between 30 to 60 metres wide and 17 kilometres Redhill Alleviation Scheme should help reduce this risk but as high population growth is projected in this area, further long, built in 3 sections: investment may be required. Section 1: Datchet to Hythe End flood channel Other areas which are highlighted to be at a high risk of Section 2: Egham Hythe to Chertsey flood channel surface water flooding include Woking and Byfleet and Epsom and Ewell. Section 3: Laleham to Shepperton flood channel A programme of projects and investment to reduce flood Improvements to 3 of the existing weirs on the River risk in communities near Heathrow, including: Datchet, Thames Wraysbury, Egham, Staines, Chertsey, Shepperton, Weybridge, Sunbury, Molesey, Thames Ditton, Kingston and Installation of property level protection for up to 1,200
Teddington. homes to make them more resistant to flooding Improved flood incident response plans
Creation of over 40 hectares of biodiversity action plan
habitat
The scheme will affect Surrey county as a whole but
with particular benefits for Elmbridge, Runnymede and Spelthorne.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 85
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 COSTS AND FUNDING The following projects represent examples of key investment The Environment Agency Medium Term Plan (MTP) and identified within each authority’s IDP and from Surrey Flood Risk and Coastal Erosion Management programme County Council and the Environment Agency. A full list of (FCERM) have been used to compile a list of projects that fall projects falling within the scope of this study is provided in within the scope of this study, and have associated project the Project List which accompanies this report. costs and funding breakdown. Flood risk infrastructure projects from the SCC Drainage Programme has also been River Thames Scheme taken forward for the funding gap analysis. It should be noted that the funding figures provided below, and the list Byfleet and Weybridge Flood Alleviation Scheme of projects within the accompanying Project List have been Caterham Bourne Flood Alleviation Scheme taken at the time of undertaking this study. However, new projects may be added to both the EA and the SCC drainage Dorking Flood Alleviation Scheme programmes, and funding figures may be updated based on budget allowances and prioritisation. Godalming Flood Alleviation Scheme Additionally, updates to District Local Plan documents and Guildford Flood Alleviation Scheme Infrastructure Development Plans have also been taken into account, particularly for those that have been updated Leatherhead and Fetcham Flood Alleviation Scheme since the previous issue of the Surrey Infrastructure Study Redhill Flood Alleviation Scheme (January 2016). Based on the sources listed above, the following costs and Smallfield Flood Alleviation Scheme funding gaps have been identified: Upper Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme
Cost = £549,250,000 Burstow Stream Catchment Study Funding gap = Reigate Town Initial Assessment £265,400,000*
Woking Initial Assessment Costs are set out for each Local Authority in Section 5
It should be noted that the above list of projects have been A number of projects within the SCC drainage programme selected given their significance at the time of writing this do not have allocated costs at the time of undertaking this report, and the status of these projects is likely to change. study. These have not been included as part of the funding
gap analysis.
* (considering both secured and expected funding)
86 | Surrey Infrastructure Study Figure 4.20 Risk of flooding and proposed housing sites y py g g g y py g / g g py g g y Legend
London Heathrow Surrey County
LA Boundary
J^ Airport
ASHFORD EGHAM H! Town STAINES-UPON-THAMES Motorway SUNBURY A Road
Urban Area
CHERTSEY WALTON-ON-THAMES Surface Water
Woodland ADDLESTONE WEYBRIDGE ESHER Flood Risk Probability
EWELL High (>1 in 30 pa.) CAMBERLEY Medium (1 in 30 to 1 in 100 pa.)
EPSOM Low (1 in 100 to 1 in 1000 pa.)
WOKING BANSTEAD Very Low (< 1 in 1000 pa.) FRIMLEY WARLINGHAM Total Housing Units by 2030/31
!( LEATHERHEAD 5 - 10
CATERHAM !( 11 - 50
(! 51 - 100
!( 101 - 150 (! 151 - 500 REDHILL DORKING REIGATE GUILDFORD (! 500 - 2,600
FARNHAM
GODALMING HORLEY
London Gatwick
HASLEMERE ² 0 1,600 3,200 6,400
Meters Source: Environment Agency
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 87
4.8 EMERGENCY SERVICES
EMERGENCY SERVICES
Figure 4.21
Ambulance Police Fire Service
Service EmergencyContains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2017. services facilities against housing growth Legend
Surrey County LondonLondon Heathrow Heathrow LA Boundary J^ Airport H! Town ASHFORDASHFORD Motorway SURREY POLICE SERVICES EGHAMEGHAM STAINES-UPON-THAMESSTAINES-UPON-THAMES A Road Surrey is policed by Surrey Police, with their headquarters SUNBURYSUNBURY Urban Area Surface Water
Woodland located at Mount Browne just outside Guildford - CHERTSEYCHERTSEY WALTON-ON-THAMESWALTON-ON-THAMES Police Station Type accommodating the Chief Officer team, support services WEYBRIDGEWEYBRIDGE ADDLESTONEADDLESTONE ESHERESHER g "$ HQ (ICT, HR, Training, Finance, Communications, Professional EWELLEWELL "$g Neighbourhood Base CAMBERLEYCAMBERLEY Standards etc), dog training function, the force contact, "$g Police Station EPSOMEPSOM control and dispatch centre, forensics and other operational WOKINGWOKING "$g BANSTEADBANSTEAD Police Station - due FRIMLEYFRIMLEY functions that provide a force-wide service e.g. the WARLINGHAMWARLINGHAM for closure in 2017 LEATHERHEADLEATHERHEAD Ambulance Station Type
Economic Crime Unit, central intelligence hub and Serious CATERHAMCATERHAM "&C Ambulance Community and Organised Crime Unit. Additional centralised resources C Response Post "& Ambulance Station such as the Major Crime Team and Collision Investigation C "& Hospital REDHILLREDHILL Unit are accommodated at Woking police station. Local DORKINGDORKING REIGATEREIGATE GUILDFORDGUILDFORD Fire Station - Number of Vehicles Policing is delivered through 3 geographic Basic Command %"Y "%Y 1 Units (BCUs) located at; Guilford PS, Staines PS and Reigate FARNHAMFARNHAM Y 2 - 3 PS. The vast majority of response, investigative and "% 4 - 5 GODALMINGGODALMING HORLEYHORLEY Additional Housing by Ward intelligence resources for each BCU work out of these main (2030/31) divisional hubs. 0 - 25 26 - 50 LondonLondon Gatwick Gatwick 51 - 100
Currently neither the Mount Browne nor Woking sites are 101 - 250 considered fit for modern needs with old, inefficient buildings 251 - 500 501 - 1,000 and severe parking issues. Moving forward, a replacement 1,001 - 3,000 with a single modern HQ and potential co-location with HASLEMEREHASLEMERE other Blue-Light services could be a viable option. ² 0 1,6003,200 6,400
Meters Source: Surrey County Council, Surrey Police website, South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust website.
88 | Surrey Infrastructure Study Table 4.17
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET GROWTH TO 2031 Emergency service capacity The Emergency Service projects identified cover new
POLICE SERVICES FIRE SERVICES AMBULANCE SERVICES and expanded facilities for each service type in relation to
growth requirements across Surrey. Projects include: OTHER FIRE COMMUNITY NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICE FIRE AMBULANCE POLICE STATION RESPONSE HOSPITAL BASE STATION STATIONS STATION Neighbourhood Policing Centre, Guildford - £100,000 SERVICES VEHICLES POST Policing on new settlement at Dunsford Aerodrome - Elmbridge 1 0 4 3 8 1 2 0 £250,000
Epsom & Ewell 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 Ambulance Community Response Post, Guildford
Guildford 2 2** 2 2 5 0 2 1
Replacement of Epsom Fire Station Mole Valley 2 0 0 2 6 0 2 0 Redevelopment of Ambulance station in Epsom and Ewell Reigate & Banstead 1 3 3 3 6 0 2 1
Runnymede 1 0 2 2 6 1 0 1
Spelthorne 1 1 2 2 2 0 1 0
Surrey Heath 1 1 1 2 5 0 0 1
Tandridge 2 1 1 3 6 1 2 0
Waverley 4 0 0 5 11 0 3 0
Woking 1 1 3 1 3 0 2 0
SURREY 17 9 18 26 60 2 17 5
Source: AECOM desk-based research with Surrey Police Input, **Surrey Police HQ in Guildford COSTS AND FUNDING Based upon information contained within each local authority’s IDP the following costs and funding have been SURREY FIRE SERVICES AMBULANCE SERVICES recorded: Surrey Fire and Rescue Service is a statutory service Ambulance services are run by South East Coast Ambulance provided by Surrey County Council. There are currently 25 Service NHS Foundation Trust. This is one of twelve
(permanent and temporary) stations across the county. ambulance trusts working across England. Within Surrey Cost = £36,730,000
Similar to the police services, many fire facilities are there are 24 Ambulance stations, community response Funding Gap = becoming old and modernisation would be beneficial. posts and hospitals where ambulances are located. £1,530,000 Modernisation of some facilities such as Waverley Fire Costs are set out for each local authority area in Section 5 Station are included in Surrey’s Replacement of Fire Stations Programme. Guildford has recently opened a new * (considering both secured and expected funding) fire station adjacent to the original site and work is shortly commencing on a new fire station in Spelthorne.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 89 DEVELOPMENT SUITABILITY 05 ANALYSIS
Each local authority within Surrey has been analysed in Each area plan should be reviewed in conjunction with the detail to generate the summary pages which precede this universal legend below. page. The development suitability section which follows allows us to present by area the following: Universal Legend Major development sites and forecast demographics L e g e n d Surrey County Su r p l u s E m p l o y m e n t Ar e a Key infrastructure capacity issues across each Se c o n d a r y rF y l o o r s p a c e (s q m ) L A Boundary Pl a c e s )" 500 - 1 ,000 infrastructure topic explored H! Town %, - 200 - - 10 5 50 )" 1 ,001 - 5,000 J^ Airport %, - 1 4 9 - - 50 - 50 )" 5,001 - 1 0,000 ! Railway Station Topic specific summary of all identified infrastructure %, - 4 9 - 0 ") 1 0,001 - 1 5,000 Railway projects, associated cost and estimated funding %, 1 - 50 1 5,001 - 20,000 Motorway ") %, 51 - 1 50 50 A Road ") > 20. 000 Spatial mapping of the developments against identified %, 1 51 - 200 200 B Road To t a l H o u s i n g 201 - 4 00 00 %, U n i t s b y 2030 transport and social infrastructure capacity issues. Minor Road %, 4 01 - 6 00 00 !( 5 - 1 0 Urban Area !( 1 1 - 50 Mapping of key infrastructure projects Surface Water Su r p l u s Pr i m a r y P l a c e s P l(! a c51 e s - 1 00 Woodland A! - 1 00 - - 30 30 !( 1 01 - 1 50 It is important to note that the projects and subsequent G P Th e o r e t i c a l c a l S u r p l u s / D e f i c i t f iA! c i t- 29 - - 1 0 0 (! 1 51 - 500 costings presented on the following pages are populated - 5000 - - 2500 A! - 9 - 0 GF !( 500 - 2,6 00 from a number of sources and some variation exists across A! GF - 24 99 - - 1 000 000 1 - 1 0 ! the different authorities based on the status of their own GF - 999 - - 500 A 1 1 - 30 infrastructure planning work. GF - 4 99 - 0 A! 31 - 1 00 00 GF 1 - 500 A! 1 01 - 200 200 Tables 5.1 and 5.2 on the facing page summarise the main GF 501 - 1 000 GF 1 001 - 2500 sources used to populate the project list and the current GF 2501 - 5000 status of infrastructure delivery plans for each authority. GF 5001 - 901 5
Table 5.1 Table 5.2 Project List Source Local Authority Project Schedule Source Documents
Key Source: Key Source: Key Source: AECOM LA IDP Project Surrey County Additional Sources Authority LA IDP Schedule sourced from Benchmark Schedule Council Modelling
Motorways Yes Yes Highways England Route Strategies Elmbridge Infrastructure Delivery Plan (April 2012) Highways Yes Yes Local Transport Strategy Forward Programmes Transport Public Transport Yes Yes Surrey Future Congestion programme Epsom & Ewell Infrastructure Delivery Plan (April 2013) Rail Yes Yes Surrey Rail Strategy Wessex Route Study Other Strategic Yes Yes Guildford borough Proposed Submission Local Guildford Plan: strategy and sites (June 2017) - see Primary Education Yes Yes Appendix C Secondary Education Yes Yes Education Mole Valley Infrastructure Delivery Plan (February 2016) AE / FE / HE Yes Yes FE and HE Providers Infrastructure Delivery Plan Addendum (March Early Years Yes Yes Yes Reigate & Banstead 2015) Primary Healthcare Yes Yes Infrastructure Delivery Plan (February 2013) + Acute Healthcare Yes Yes Runnymede Health and Social Infrastructure Needs Assessment (April 2017) Care Mental Healthcare Yes Yes
Adult Social Services Yes Yes Yes Spelthorne Infrastructure Delivery Plan (February 2014) Libraries Yes Yes Yes Infrastructure Delivery Plan (February 2013) + Surrey Heath Infrastructure Delivery Supplementary Planning Youth Services Yes Yes Community and Document (July 2014) Community Facilities Yes Yes Recreation Infrastructure Delivery Schedule Update Tandridge (November 2013) + Infrastructure Baseline Study Sports Facilities Yes Yes (November 2015) Open Space & Recreation Yes Yes
Green Infrastructure Yes Yes Yes Surrey Nature Partnership Waverley Infrastructure Delivery Plan (December 2016)
Energy (Electricity & Gas) Yes Yes Service Provider Investment Plans Approach to Monitoring and Delivery - Woking Water and Sewage Yes Yes Service Provider Investment Plans Infrastructure Delivery (February 2012) Utilities & Waste Waste Yes Yes
Broadband Yes Yes Yes Broadband Provider Plans
Flood Defences Yes Yes Environment Agency
Emergency Services Yes Yes
Technical Note on Local Authority figures on following pages: As stated in Section 3 of the report all the population figures presented on the following pages represent the outputs of the SCC PopGroup Model Population forecasts, based upon housing trajectories presented within this report, which have been produced to inform this study. Refer to Study Parameters in Section 1 of this report for a full explanation of the inputs, assumptions and exclusions related to the infrastructure costs and funding presented on the following pages.
Surrey Infrastructure Study | 91 TRANSPORT Motorways 5.1 ELMBRIDGE Highways Public transport
Rail
Other transport new4,535 homes new4,437 people
(+8%) (+3%) Primary education TRANSPORTEDUCATION to 2031 Secondary education
AE / FE / HE
INFRASTRUCTURE HIGHLIGHTS Early Year facilities A3 between Esher and M25 Junction 10 traffic HEALTH Primary healthcare congestion Acute healthcare Current trends indicate that the A3 from Hook to Guildford is likely to be more highly congested. Mental healthcare New Secondary Free School required in north of the 18+ COMMUNITY Adult social services Borough. Libraries Rebuilding of Three Rivers Academy (Formerly Rydens Enterprise School). Youth services
Weylands Treatment Works in Hersham allocated as Community centres potential site for expansion of waste processing. GREEN Sports facilities Development site mitigation expected to be sufficient INFRASTRUCTURE to limit changes to flood risk Outdoor sport & Rec
Green infrastructure
UTILITIES Electricity & Gas
Total Infrastructure Costs: £205,930,000 Water & Sewage Total Secured Funding: £3,360,000 Waste Total Expected Funding: £80,400,000 Broadband Secured Funding FLOOD Expected Funding DEFENCES Flood defences Total Funding Gap: £122,160,000 Funding Gap
Emergency Services Funding as % of Costs: 41%
£0 £10 £20 £30 £40 £50 £60 £70 Millions 92 | Surrey Infrastructure Study SUMMARY OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING GAPS (2016-2031) GF %, A! GF %, A! pperton Studios MAJOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT M3 A!( !( COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Three Rivers Academy & 6th Form)"A! College A! A! !( New Athletics and football stadium in Walton on R iv e rn o o k F a rm , Wa l to n Thames Stompond Lane Sports Ground !( !( !( A! !( ! A! A! (! )" A !( Imber Court Trading Estate, East Molesey )" M o le s ey I n d u st ri a l E s t at e GF !( !!( %, !( A A! (! !( I m b e r C o u rt Tr a d in g E st a te , E a s t M o le se y A309 !( A! !( Rivernook Farm, Walton !( !( !( A! !( A! !( We y la n d s Tr e a t m e n t W o r ks , Wa lt on - O n -T h a m e s !( !( ! !( !( W A L TO N - O N -T H A M E S A A! A!!( ! !( Chertsey GF A S to m p o n d L a n e S p o rt s G ro u n d GFGF ! !( A
(! )" %,A! GF !( %, !( A3050 A! GF GF !( ! ! A A %, Th r e e R iv e r s A ca d e m y an d S ix th F o r m C o l le g e GFGFA31 7 (! !( )"!( !( !( ! !( W E Y B R I D G E A! A )" ") )" A! A2 4 4 E S H E R ! !(GF!( B374 A !( )" )"!( )" ang )" !(!( %, A! !( GF! A !( FLOOD DEFENCES GF River Thames Scheme )" !( A! A2 4A2 4
Th e H e ig h ts , We y b ri d g e
") TRANSPORT PROJECTS )" A3 Brooklands Access Improvements )" )" A! B280 Esher Access Improvements )" A24 5 )" !( Camphill(! yfleet A! A! %,A! GF EDUCATION PROJECTS !( A3 !( ! 1FE primary expansion in Walton area!( A !(!( New Secondary Free School required in north of !( Q EF, L eat borough M25
KEY EMPLOYMENT SITES WITH CAPACITY Rebuilding of Three Rivers Academy (Formerly )" Molesey Industrial Estate Rydens Enterprise School) (! A! M25 The Heights, Weybridge A! !( )" Weylands!( Treatment Works, Walton-On- )" !( (!)" KBR site, Springfield %,(!Thames !(!( A! D rive, L eatherhead !( %, r Wisley Airfield ! !( )" !(A
!(
!( !( !( GF !(
Projects Note - Any Strategic Projects Listed in Table 5.3 and affecting this SUMMARY OF GROWTH + INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES IN ELMBRIDGE local authority are not included in local costs and funding on facing page. Refer to Universal Legend at start of Chapter 5 to interpret Map icons Surrey Infrastructure Study | 93 TRANSPORT Motorways 5.2 EPSOM AND Highways Public transport
EWELL Rail
Other transport new6,270 homes 13,242new people
(+20%) (+17%) Primary education TRANSPORTEDUCATION to 2031 Secondary education
AE / FE / HE
INFRASTRUCTURE HIGHLIGHTS Early Year facilities Infrastructure investment required in urban centres HEALTH Primary healthcare (Epsom Town centre and Ewell Village)
Acute healthcare Borough wide primary education investment to support growth Mental healthcare 18+ Existing rail network will require enhancements to COMMUNITY Adult social services support development growth Libraries Upgrades to existing water and wastewater networks may be required to support new development Youth services
Support growth requirements and facilitate Crossrail Community centres 2 GREEN Sports facilities INFRASTRUCTURE Outdoor sport & Rec
Green infrastructure
UTILITIES Electricity & Gas
Total Infrastructure Costs: £240,010,000 Water & Sewage Waste Total Secured Funding: £20,240,000 Secured Funding
Total Expected Funding: £92,170,000 Broadband Expected Funding FLOOD Funding Gap Total Funding Gap: £91,610,000 DEFENCES Flood defences
Emergency Services Funding as % of Costs: 55% £0 £10 £20 £30 £40 £50 Millions 94 | Surrey Infrastructure Study SUMMARY OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING GAPS (2016-2031) GF !( A! A! GF A!
A! MAJOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT !( ! KEY EMPLOYMENT SITES WITH CAPACITY !( A The Utilities Site Longmead and Nonsuch Employment Sites
(! A! !( !( %, Remaining West Park Sites GF Woodcote Grove, Ashley road, Epsom Depot Road & Upper High Street Site !( Epsom General Hospital A! (! !( Utilities Site, East Street, Epsom Town Centre
GF A! GF EWEL L A!!( A! !( !( !(!( !( %, (! A! !( )" %, Remaining West P ark Sites L ongmead and Nonsuch Employment Sites A! !( COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS !(!( !( ! !( !( The Utilities Site !( A Refurbishment of Alexander Recreation Ground and A! !( Utilities Site, East Street, Epsom Town Centre (!)" !( )" !( !( Court Recreation Ground !( !( )" !( A! GF!(!( !()" (! !( !( !( Playground upgates and improvements to Manor GF !( !( D epot Road & Upper High Street Site Woodcote Grove, Ashley road, Epsom !(!( !( (!EP SOM Estate, Shadbolt Park, Chessington Road, Clarenden )" !( Epsom General Hospital A! !( %, Park, Gatley Avene and Iris Road playgrounds EDUCATION PROJECTS ! A School re-organisation in Ewell )" A! A! )" A! Expansion of Stamford Green Primary School herhead !( FE Education Provision Remodelling to provide
improved facilities for SEN - Nescot College GF
A! !( A!TRANSPORT PROJECTS GF A24 GF Kiln Lane Link !()" !( A! Various Epsom Town Centre transport schemes !( A! (!!( !( A! A240 Corridor improvements A! !( !( New pedestrian/cycle bridge Station Avenue !(
GFPlatform extensions - Ewell East, Ewell West and Stoneleigh A!
Projects Note - Any Strategic Projects Listed in Table 5.3 and affecting this local authority are not included in local costs and funding on facing page. SUMMARY OF GROWTH + INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES IN EPSOM & EWELL Refer to Universal Legend at start of Chapter 5 to interpret Map icons Surrey Infrastructure Study | 95 TRANSPORT Motorways 5.3 GUILDFORD Highways Public transport
Rail
Other transport new9,810 homes 20,766new people
(+17%) (+14%) Primary education TRANSPORTEDUCATION to 2031 Secondary education
AE / FE / HE
INFRASTRUCTURE HIGHLIGHTS Early Year facilities A3 road deficient in quality and capacity HEALTH Primary healthcare
Guildford town centre improvements Acute healthcare
Vehicular demand on Local Road Network approaches Mental healthcare or exceeds capacity of some junctions during peak periods 18+ COMMUNITY Adult social services Traffic congestion affects bus route efficiency Libraries
Scope to improve pedestrian & cyclist provision Youth services Capacity issues on current rail infrastructure Community centres Need for new primary and secondary school places GREEN Sports facilities to secure urban extensions INFRASTRUCTURE Outdoor sport & Rec
Green infrastructure
UTILITIES Electricity & Gas
Water & Sewage Total Infrastructure Costs: £1,008,340,000 Waste Total Secured Funding: £98,340,000 Broadband Secured Funding Total Expected Funding: £701,120,000 FLOOD Expected Funding DEFENCES Flood defences Funding Gap Total Funding Gap: £208,880,000 Emergency Services
Funding as % of Costs: 79% £0 £100 £200 £300 £400 £500 Millions 96 | Surrey Infrastructure Study SUMMARY OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING GAPS (2016-2031)
EDUCATION PROJECTS KEY EMPLOYMENT SITES WITH CAPACITY Expansion(!!( at Worplesdon Primary School (! L and surrounding West Hall, West Byfleet !( M3 A! B31 !(!( (! )" !( Blackwell Farm (Surrey Research Park extension, Guildford) GF MAJOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT2,000 homes in Woking Town Centre !( A! %, )" A322 Primary and secondary provision for Blackwell GFA! A!)" M25M2 Blackwell Farm, GuildfordA! A304 6 5 A! A!(!(! (! Land around Burnt Common warehouse (! A! !()"!()"!( Farm, Gosden HillA! and Former Wisley Airfield !( A! A! )")")"!()"!( GF L yon Way, Frimley MV A and Select House, Woking )")" Former Bisley Office Furniture Site !( !(!((!(!)" A! )" )" A! A!%, )"!( (!!( )" )"!()" development sites Land at theWoking Former Railway Wisley and Athletic!( !(Airfield(!)" )" Club!((! V ictoria Sq uare D evelopment, Woking g A! A! (!!()")")")"!((!!( M25 A! !( (!(!(!!( Gosden Hill Farm, Guildford A! A! P oole Road I ndustrial Estate, Woking )")" GF )" B301 5 GF A! (! %, !( A320GF PotentialGF!( school expansions in the Ash area GosdenA! HillGF Farm, Guildford P rincess Royal Barracks, D eepcut A! !( ! !( %,)" )" " KB B382 ) dependent on localA! housing growth A %, (! ! !( A A324 Land in Ash and Tongham (! ! D !( !(A! !( A! !((! A!()" L a n d a t t he F o rm e r W i s le y A ir fi el d A! (! GF !( )" )" GF )" A! A!)" B301 2 A! !( K (!!( (! )" A320 (! )" (! S !( )"!( ! GF A322 A !( (! !( L 3 1 1 B34 L and atMoorL ane (! !( GF !( A! !( !( (! A! )" )"!( !( (! )" GF (! A! )"A!%, A24 7 L a n d a r o u nd B u rn t C o m m o n w ar e h o us e , L o n do n R o ad !( !( )" !( G o sd e n H i ll F a rm , G u i ld fo r d !( ") A322 !( )" !( !(A3 2 3 G o sd e n H i ll F a rm , G u i ld fo r d ! (! (! A !(!( GF !( !( TRANSPORT PROJECTS A! )" GF!( A! %, (! ! Bridge Street pedestrian safety !( A A! A! A3 %, !( A! A! GFA! !( !( !( improvements !( !(A !( !( A! !( GF A! " !( %, ! L a n d i n A s h a n d To n g h a m !( )" ) A! A !(
!( )")" Sustainable Movement Corridor through !( !( A! ! !( !(%, !( !A ! (! !( A (!!( GFA (!GF!( !( !( !( " ! ) !( Guildford urban area !( !( !( ( (! (! !( )" (!)" A! G U I L D F O R D !( (! (! !( !( !( ! !(!( (! !(!( !( !( %, A !( )" GF !()"(! !( !( !( (!)"(! !( (!!( )" !( GF !( Guildford West (Park Barn) and Guildford (! B la c kw e l l F a r m ( S u rr e y R e s ea r c h A! %, (! A! A! ! A3 A P ar k e x te n s io n , G u il d f or d ) A31 L and West of Curtis R !( A! !( A2 8 1 East (Merrow) rail stations B la c kw e l l F a r m , G u il d f o rd A331 Kuoni House !( Guildford rail station capacity and A! !( A24 8 A! 1 0 A3 0 !( GF !( interchange improvements B3000 A25 !(!( A! A!!( !( A2 4 8 !( A3 Guildford ‘Road Investment Strategy’ !( A! scheme
A3 !( )" A281 A! A! !( M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange GF !( %, !( ‘Road Investment Strategy’ scheme !( A! GF A! !(!( !( A!(! !( !( Significant programme of schemes on the COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE A!PROJECTSGF !( !( A! A! A! Local Road Network delivered to support !( !(!( !( New community facilities at at!( Blackwell(!!(!( Farm, !(!(!(A! !((!!( !( (! (!(!(!( !(!( proposed planned growth )" Gosden Hill Farm and Former!(!( Wisley Airfield GF!( !(!( !( B21 28 A! !( !( development sites” A! !( New road bridge and footbridge scheme (! !( A! ! A28 Weyburn Works, Godalming !( A!A to enable level crossing closure on A323 New SANG provision at major development sites Guildford Road adjacent to Ash railway station’
Projects Note - Any Strategic Projects Listed in Table 5.3 and affecting this local authority are not included in local costs and funding on facing page. SUMMARY OF GROWTH + INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES IN GUILDFORD Refer to Universal Legend at start of Chapter 5 to interpret Map icons Surrey Infrastructure Study | 97 TRANSPORT Motorways 5.4 MOLE VALLEY Highways Public transport
Rail
Other transport new2,820 homes 1,612new people
(+7%) (+2%) Primary education TRANSPORTEDUCATION to 2031 Secondary education
AE / FE / HE
INFRASTRUCTURE HIGHLIGHTS Early Year facilities Very high car ownership among Mole Valley Residents HEALTH Primary healthcare
Significant increases predicted in AM Peak traffic Acute healthcare levels on Mole Valley Local Road Network - from Mole
Valley development but also neighbouring areas Mental healthcare A need for an improvement for bus priority schemes 18+ COMMUNITY Adult social services and measures to improve journey reliability Libraries Deepdene Station improvements identified
Youth services Cycling levels in Mole Valley are high with associated
investment requirements Community centres Need for flood improvements along the river Mole GREEN Sports facilities INFRASTRUCTURE Outdoor sport & Rec
Green infrastructure
UTILITIES Electricity & Gas
Total Infrastructure Costs: £140,080,000 Water & Sewage Total Secured Funding: £21,850,000 Waste Total Expected Funding: £55,680,000 Broadband Secured Funding FLOOD Expected Funding DEFENCES Flood defences Total Funding Gap: £62,550,000 Funding Gap
Emergency Services Funding as % of Costs: 55% £0 £5 £10 £15 £20 £25 £30 £35 Millions 98 | Surrey Infrastructure Study SUMMARY OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING GAPS (2016-2031) ) !(!( !( A! !( GF!(!(!() GFA! (!!( !( D epot Road & UpperHigh Street Site !( %,A! Woodcote Grove, Ashley road, Epsom !( GF!((! !( !( A! Epsom General Hospital%,A! )" !( A! !( A! !( !( !( "! ! GF GF!( )A)" A! !(! )"!( !( Q E F, L e a th e r he a d !( A A! !( )" GF %,!( M25 (! A! !( A! GF A! A! )"!(A24 GF!( !( !( A! )" !( !( K B R s it e, S p r in g fi el d )"%, (! !( !( A! A!(! Former D e Burgh School, P !(!( A! !(!( D ri v e , L e a th e rh e a d !( A!%, TRANSPORT PROJECTS !( )"!!( !( A L E AT H E R H E A D !( M25!( Junction 9 bottleneck relief K el v in H o u s e , !( !( !( !( GF !( M25 ! S pr in g fi e ld D r iv A! e GF A L e a t he r h e ad ! !( !( A MAJOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT !( Leatherhead congestion fixing package L a n d a t T h e r fi e l d ! A! !( A Preston Cross Hotel and Country Club GF S ch o o l, L e a th e rh e a d !( !( !( A24 Capel highways improvements GF !( ! GF (! A Kuoni House and Deepdene Lodge ondon Road )"A!%, ! A21 7 !( A ! !( !( A DorkingA! Congestion Study QEF, Leatherhead !( !(!( A!%, Holmethorpe Land at Therfield School and Cleeve Road, Redhill Railway Statio%, Leatherhead P re s to n C r o s s H o te l a nd C o u nt ry C lu b !(!( !(A! !( !( A25)" )" A! D O R K I N G !( !( A!GF GF)")" GF!( !(!( !( !( (! !()"!( )" %, A!!(!( A! A! A lbert Road North !(!( !( "!()" !!(( )")" ) !(!( GF !(!( !( Gloucester Road Car P ark, Redhill !)"GF !( A! A L a n d W e s t o f C u r ti s R o a d, D o r k in g !(!( (! !( !!( A24 Sainsbury' s, 32 L ondon Road,!( Redh GF %,GF A A! %, A! A! GF!( K uo n i H o u s e a n d D e e p de n e L o d g e KEY EMPLOYMENTA! SITES WITH CAPACITY GF Redhill Town Centre !(
)" KBR site, Springfield Drive, Leatherhead A2 5 A! Land West of Curtis Road, Dorking ! A L and West o Kelvin House,Road Springfield Drive, Leatherhead (! COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (! !(!( !( Meadowbank Recreation Ground, Dorking !( A! Horley North West Sector (! Leatherhead & Epsom Hockey Club pitch provision ! A A21 7 Dorking and Mole Valley Athletics Club enhancements !(!( A! Dorking Town Centre and Leatherhead Town CentreB2B21 12 72 7 A! public realm projects )" A! A! A24 GF Middle Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme EDUCATION PROJECTS London Gatwick New early years provision in Beare Green Ward orks Expansion at the Priory School, Dorking )"
B21 28 3
Projects Note - Any Strategic Projects Listed in Table 5.3 and affecting this SUMMARY OF GROWTH + INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES IN MOLE VALLEY local authority are not included in local costs and funding on facing page.
Refer to Universal Legend at start of Chapter 5 to interpret Map icons Surrey Infrastructure Study | 99