DOCSLIB.ORG

Shepard's® Citation Formats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Shepard’s® Citation Formats Reporter Name Citation Display Format A.K. Marshall's Supreme Court Reports [KY] A.K. Marsh. Abbott's Admiralty Reports Abb. Adm. Abbott's Court of Appeals Decisions [NY] Abb. Dec. Abbott's New Cases [NY] Abb. N. Cas. Abbott's Practice Reports (n.s.) [NY] Abb. Pr. (n.s.) Abbott's Practice Reports [NY] Abb. Pr. Abbott's United States Circuit & District Court Reports [US] Abb. Abstracts, New Series (Customs Court) Abs. (n.s.) Action on Decision AOD Action on Decision LEXIS cite AOD LEXIS Adams County Legal Journal [PA] Adams. Co. Legal Journal Addison's Reports [PA] Add. Administrative Law Journal of American University Admin. L.J. Am. U. Administrative Law Review Ad. L. Rev. Administrative Law Review Accord Admin. L. Rev. Accord African-American Law & Policy Report (nka Berkeley Journal Afr.-Am. L. & Pol'y Rep. of African-American Law & Policy) Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals LEXIS cite AGBCA LEXIS Aiken's Reports [VT] Aik. Air Force Law Review A.F. L. Rev. Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct Air Force R. Prof'l Conduct Air Force Rules of Professional Responsibility Air Force R. Prof'l Responsibility Akron Law Review Akron L. Rev. Akron Tax Journal Akron Tax J. Alabama Appellate Court Reports [AL] Ala. App. Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review Ala. C.R. & C.L. L. Rev. Alabama Constitution [AL] Ala. Const. Alabama Court of Appeals LEXIS cite [AL] Ala. App. LEXIS Alabama Court of Civil Appeals LEXIS cite [AL] Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals LEXIS cite [AL] Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Civil Court Mediation Rules Ala. Civ. Ct. Mediation R. [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Ct. of Criminal Appeals Ala. Ct. of Crim. App. R. Rules, 1973 - Miscellaneous [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Equity Rules,1941 as Ala. Equity R. amended 1958 - Miscellaneous [AL] Reporter Name Citation Display Format Alabama Court Rules - Alabama General Rules,1941 as Ala. General Rules 1941 amended 1951 - Miscellaneous [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules Governing Appeals Ala. R. Gov'g App. of the from Alabama Court of the Judiciary [AL] Judiciary Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Appellate Ala. R. App. P. Procedure [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure & Ala. R. Civ. P. District Court Rules [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure Ala. R. Crim. P. [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Disciplinary Ala. R. of Disciplinary P. Procedure (Interim) [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Evidence [AL] Ala. R. Evid. Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Judicial Ala. R. Jud. Admin. Administration [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Juvenile Procedure Ala. R. Juv. P. [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Juvenile Ala. R. Juv. P. 1977 Procedure, 1977 - Miscellaneous [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Procedure of Ala. R. P. Judiciary Inquiry Judicial Inquiry Commission [AL] Comm'n Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Rules of Professional Ala. Rules of Prof'l Conduct Conduct [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Small Claims Court Rules Ala. Small Claims Ct. R. [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Standards for Imposing Ala. Std. Lawyer Discipline Lawyer Discipline [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Alabama State Bar Client Security Ala. St. B. Client Security Fund Funds Rules [AL] R. Alabama Court Rules - Alabama Supreme Court Revised Ala. Sup. Ct. R. Rev. 1955 Rules, Miscellaneous, 1995 as amended 1966 [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Canons of Judicial Ethics [AL] Ala. Canons of Judicial Ethics Alabama Court Rules - Circuit & Inf. Cts. of Common Law Ala. Cir. & Inf. Cts. Com. L. Juris. Juris. R, 1941 As Am 1958 - Misc.[AL] Alabama Court Rules - Rules for Mandatory Continuing Legal Ala. R. Mand. Cont. Legal Ed. Education [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Rules for Using Videotape Equipment Ala. R. Using Videotape Equip. [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Rules Governing Admission to the Bar Ala. R. Gov'g Admis. Bar - Miscellaneous [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Rules Governing Conduct of Ala. R. Gov'g Conduct of Att'ys Attorneys.,1955 As Amended 1971 - Miscellaneous [AL Alabama Court Rules - Rules of Disciplinary Ala. R. Disciplinary Enforcement Enforcement,1978 As Amended 1984 - Miscellaneous [AL] Alabama Court Rules - Rules of Procedure-Alabama Court of Ala. R. P. Ct. of Judiciary the Judiciary [AL] Alabama Law Review [AL] Ala. L. Rev. Alabama Law Review Online Ala. L. Rev. Online Alabama Lawyer [AL] Ala. Law. Reporter Name Citation Display Format Alabama Reports [AL] Ala. Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration, 1977 - Ala. R. Jud. Admin. 1977 Miscellaneous [AL] Alabama State Bar Rules of Specialization [AL] Ala. St. B. R. of Specialization Alabama Statutes: Code of Alabama [AL] Ala. Code Alabama Supreme Court LEXIS cite [AL] Ala. LEXIS Alaska Attorney General Opinions by Number [AK] Alas. Op. Att'y Gen. No. Alaska Bar Rag [AK] AK Bar Rag Alaska Constitution [AK] Alaska Const. Alaska Court of Appeals LEXIS cite [AK] Alas. App. LEXIS Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Adoption Rules, 1990 [AK] Alaska Adoption Rules Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Child in Need of Aid Rules of Alaska Child in Need of Aid R. Procedure, 1987 as amended 4/19/1990 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Delinquency Rules, 1987 as Alaska Delinquency Rules amended 4/19/90 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska District Court Rules of Civil Alaska Dist. Ct. R. Civ. P. Procedure, 1963 as amended 1973 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska District Court Rules of Criminal Alaska Dist. Ct. R. Crim. P. Procedure, 1970 as amended 1973 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules Judicial Conduct AK Jud. Cond. Comm. R Commission Rules [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure, Alaska R. App. P. 1980 as amended April 19, 1990 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Bar Association Alaska Bar Rules Revised, 1973 as amended 1974 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Bar Association Alaska R. of B. Ass'n Rev. 1973 Revised, 1973/1974 (Miscellaneous) [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Bar Association, 1965 Alaska R. of B. Ass'n 1965 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure, 1963 Alaska R. Civ. P. as amended April 19, 1990 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure, Alaska R. Crim. P. 1963 as amended April 19, 1990 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Evidence, 1979 as Alaska R. Evid. amended April 19, 1990 [AK] Alaska Court Rules - Alaska Rules of Professional Conduct Alaska Rules of Prof'l Conduct [AK] Alaska Federal [AK] Alaska Fed. Alaska Law Review [AK] D. Alaska L. R. Alaska Reports [AK] Alaska Alaska Rules of Administration, 1980 [AK] Alaska R. of Admin. Alaska Rules of Probate Procedure, as amended 1974 [AK] Alaska R. Prob. P. Alaska Statutes [AK] Alaska Stat. Alaska Supreme Court (Advance Sheets) [AK] Alaska Adv. Alaska Supreme Court LEXIS cite [AK] Alas. LEXIS Albany Government Law Review Alb. Gov't L. Rev. Reporter Name Citation Display Format Albany Law Environmental Outlook Alb. L. Envtl. Outlook Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. Albany Law Review Alb. L. Rev. Allen's Reports [MA] Allen American Annotated Cases Am. Ann. Cas. American Annotated Cases, old style Am. Ann. Cas. (o.s.) American Bankruptcy Institute Journal ABIJ American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. American Bankruptcy Law Journal Am. Bank. L.J. American Bankruptcy Reports Am. B.R. American Bankruptcy Reports (n.s.) Am. B.R. (n.s.) American Bar Association Journal (ABA) A.B.A.J. American Business Law Journal Am. Bus. L.J. American Criminal Law Review Am. Crim. L. Rev. American Decisions Am. Dec. American Federal Tax Reports (P-H) A.F.T.R. (P-H) American Federal Tax Reports, Second Series (P-H) A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) American Indian Law Journal American Indian L.J. American Indian Law Review Am. Indian L. Rev. American Journal of Comparative Law Am. J. Comp. L. American Journal of Criminal Law Am. J. Crim. L. American Journal of International Law Am. J. Int'l L. American Journal of Jurisprudence Am. J. Juris. American Journal of Law & Medicine Am. J. L. and Med. American Journal of Legal History Am. J. Legal Hist. American Journal of Tax Policy Am. J. Tax Pol'y American Labor Cases (P-H) Am. Lab. Cas. American Law Records Am. L. Rec. American Law Register Am. Law Reg. American Law Register (n.s.) Am. L. Reg., n.s. American Law Reports A.L.R. American Law Reports, Federal A.L.R. Fed. American Law Reports, Federal Second Series A.L.R. Fed. 2d American Law Reports, Fifth Series A.L.R.5th American Law Reports, Fourth Series A.L.R.4th American Law Reports, Second Series A.L.R.2d American Law Reports, Sixth Series A.L.R.6th American Law Reports, Third Series A.L.R.3d American Law Times Reports, United States Courts [US] Am. Law T. Rep. U.S. Cts. American Maritime Cases A.M.C. Reporter Name Citation Display Format American Reports Am. Rep. American Review of International Arbitration Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. American State Reporter Am. St. Rep. American University Business Law Review Am. U. Bus. L. Rev. American University Intellectual Property Brief Am. U. Intell. Prop. Brief American University International Law Review Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. American University Journal of Gender and the Law (nka Am. Am. U. J. Gender & Law U. J. of Gender, Social Policy & the Law) American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. Law (fka Am. U. J. Gender & the Law) American University Journal of International Law & Policy Am. U.J. Int'l L.
Recommended publications
  • Water Rights in Montana Handbook

    Water Rights in Montana Handbook

    April 2014 This document has been updated to reflect Montana statute and rules as of April 2014. Montana Department of Natural Legislative Environmental Resources and Conservation Quality Council P.O. Box 201601 P.O. Box 201704 Helena, MT 59620-1601 Helena, MT 59620-1704 Phone (406) 444-2074 Phone (406) 444-3742 dnrc.mt.gov leg.mt.gov/eqc Montana University System Water Center 23 Faculty Court Montana State University-Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59717-2690 Phone (406) 994-6690 watercenter.montana.edu Acknowledgment Water Rights in Montana is a compilation of two previous citizen guides discussing Montana water rights—the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation’s Water Rights in Montana and the Environmental Quality Council’s and Montana University System Water Center’s Wading into Montana Water Rights. We would like to thank the authors of the latter guide, Michelle Bryan and Professor Gerald L. Westesen, for their significant contribution to this publication. i ii Disclaimer Water Rights in Montana should not be used as a legal reference. When in doubt, always refer to the MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED or the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF MONTANA.1 When making any legal judgments on the adequacy or completeness of procedure, always consult your own legal counsel. 1 Terms that are capitalized and underlined are further defined or explained in the glossary at the end of the publication. iii iv Table of Contents Acknowledgment ....................................................................................... i Disclaimer ................................................................................................. iii Background of Water Rights in Montana .................................................. 1 Montana Water Use Act ............................................................................ 2 Water Rights Administration ..................................................................... 3 Adjudication of Existing Water Rights ......................................................
  • The-Legal-Status-Of-East-Jerusalem.Pdf

    The-Legal-Status-Of-East-Jerusalem.Pdf

    December 2013 Written by: Adv. Yotam Ben-Hillel Cover photo: Bab al-Asbat (The Lion’s Gate) and the Old City of Jerusalem. (Photo by: JC Tordai, 2010) This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position or the official opinion of the European Union. The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) is an independent, international humanitarian non- governmental organisation that provides assistance, protection and durable solutions to refugees and internally displaced persons worldwide. The author wishes to thank Adv. Emily Schaeffer for her insightful comments during the preparation of this study. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. Background ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. Israeli Legislation Following the 1967 Occupation ............................................................ 8 3.1 Applying the Israeli law, jurisdiction and administration to East Jerusalem .................... 8 3.2 The Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel ................................................................... 10 4. The Status
  • 1 EAST 494/HIST 478 Pre-Modern Chinese Society and Law WINTER

    1 EAST 494/HIST 478 Pre-Modern Chinese Society and Law WINTER

    EAST 494/HIST 478 Pre-modern Chinese Society and Law WINTER 2021 DRAFT Instructor: Robin D.S. Yates Place: Online via Zoom Time: Friday 2:35-5:25 Office: Online Office Hours: TBD Email: [email protected] Course Description: This course examines the history of Chinese law and society from early pre-imperial to late imperial times. Course themes include the philosophical basis of Chinese legal institutions; the development of different forms of legislation; the practice of pre-modern Chinese law; social and political change and the law; and legal cases translated from primary sources. Some consideration may be given to military law and the transmission of Chinese law to Japan, Vietnam and Korea depending on student interest. Law was a primary means by which the pre-modern Chinese state and the elite maintained social control of the most populous country in the world and one of the principal means by which Confucian morality was disseminated to lower levels of the social hierarchy. At the same time, it was influenced by Buddhist beliefs and practices and by the customs of the many non-Chinese peoples who conquered China. In addition, many new legal documents and statutes have recently been excavated by archaeologists while others have been rediscovered by historians working in China’s voluminous and newly-opened archives. These newly discovered documents throw much light on the origins of Chinese law and its practice in later times. This course will therefore give students important insights into a long legal tradition and will reveal many dimensions of daily life and administrative practice not covered in other courses offered at McGill University.
  • A Buyer's Guide to Montana Water Rights

    A Buyer's Guide to Montana Water Rights

    A Buyer’s Guide To Montana Water Rights By Stan Bradshaw Trout Unlimited, Montana Water Project A Cautionary Tale his tale is based on real events. I’ve just changed the names, details of the water right, the specific facts of the dispute, T and the location to avoid undue embarrassment to anyone. In 2002, Michael Hartman looked at a ranch for sale on a major tributary in the upper Missouri river basin. It was 1100 acres with frontage on a trout stream, and it had an active sprinkler-irrigated hay operation on 160 acres. When Hartmann was negotiating the deal, the realtor produced a water rights document entitled “Statement of Existing Water Right Claim” (“Statement of Claim” for our purposes). It included a water right number, identified a flow rate of 10 cubic feet per second (cfs), and 320 irrigated acres, complete with a legal description of the acres irrigated. It seemed like a great deal—nice property right on a famous trout stream, and a whole lot of water rights to work with. What’s not to like? So he bought it. After moving on to the land, Hartman looked at the acres claimed for irrigation in the Statement of Claim, located the 160 acres that weren’t currently being irrigated, and embarked on plans to start irrigating them. When he walked the land, he didn’t notice any sign of ditches or headgates on the quarter section he wanted to irrigate, but he figured, “Hey, it’s listed on the water right, so I have the water for it.” He approached the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) about cost sharing a new center pivot on the land and putting a pump into the ditch serving the other 160 acres, and they seemed interested.
  • State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report 1988 Xi FIGURE D: Criminal Case Unit of Count Used by the State Trial Courts

    State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report 1988 Xi FIGURE D: Criminal Case Unit of Count Used by the State Trial Courts

    AJIIL State court T caseload statistics: Annual Report 1988 Wyoming Conference of State Court Administrators Alabama Alaska Arizl :alifornia Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida laho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Mary1 Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevad; ew Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohia C 'ennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota ' tah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming ourt Administrators Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Coll elaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois In Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Mint lissouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New orth Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Pui ;land South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Conference of State Court Administratc Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District1 1 NCSC 1 KF i A joint effort of the Conference of State Court Administrators i 180 , .c74 I and the National Center for State Courts : 1988 I c. 2 I bu .CT q IC1 bS glib state court c ,a-- T caseload statistics: Annual Report, 1988 Funding Provided by the STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE Grant Number SJI 88-07X-067 ~pdcJ-3-clO A joint effort of the Conference of State Court Administrators, State Justice Institute, and the National Center for State Courts’ Court Statistics Project February 1990 Library National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Av~. WilIiarnsburg, VA 231 87-8798 Copyright@by The National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656-097-X National Center Publication No. R-115 This report was developed under Grant SJI-88-07X-067 from the State Justice Institute.
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60

    Israel: Growing Pains at 60

    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
  • WEST VIRGINIA HOUSE of DELEGATES, Petitioner, V

    WEST VIRGINIA HOUSE of DELEGATES, Petitioner, V

    No. 18-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— WEST VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ex rel. MARGARET L. WORKMAN, MITCH CARMICHAEL, President of the West Virginia Senate; DONNA J. BOLEY, President Pro Tempore of the West Virginia Senate; RYAN FERNS, Majority Leader of the West Virginia Senate; LEE CASSIS, Clerk of the West Virginia Senate; and the WEST VIRGINIA SENATE, Respondents. ———— On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia ———— PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— MARK A. CARTER Counsel of Record DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP 707 Virginia Street, East Chase Tower, Suite 1300 Charleston, WV 25301 (304) 357-0900 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner January 8, 2019 WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D. C. 20002 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia’s decision in this case violates the Guarantee Clause of the United States Constitution. 2. Whether the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia properly denied the Motion to Intervene of the Petitioner, the West Virginia House of Delegates. (i) ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING AND RULE 29.6 STATEMENT Respondents are Margaret L. Workman; Mitch Carmichael, President of the West Virginia Senate; Donna J. Boley, President Pro Tempore of the West Virginia Senate; Ryan Ferns, Majority Leader of the West Virginia Senate; Lee Cassis, Clerk of the West Virginia Senate; and the West Virginia Senate. Petitioner is the West Virginia House of Delegates as an indispensable and materially affected party who was wrongfully denied intervenor status.
  • 2016 Judicial Performance Review

    2016 Judicial Performance Review

    2016 Judicial Performance Review Prepared by The Iowa State Bar Association Table of Contents Judicial Performance Review Information....................................................................................................3 Judicial Performance Review Q&A...............................................................................................................4 Judicial Biographies.....................................................................................................................................6 Judicial Performance Review Results Iowa Supreme Court..................................................................................................................................22 Iowa Court of Appeals...............................................................................................................................23 District 1A.................................................................................................................................................24 Allamakee, Clayton, Delaware, Dubuque, Winneshiek Counties District 1B.................................................................................................................................................25 Black Hawk, Buchanan, Chickasaw, Fayette, Grundy, Howard Counties District 2A.................................................................................................................................................26 Bremer, Butler, Cerro Gordo, Floyd, Franklin, Hancock, Mitchell, Winnebago, Worth Counties
  • Reasonable Efforts: a Judicial Perspective

    Reasonable Efforts: a Judicial Perspective

    REASONABLE EFFORTS: A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE By Judge Leonard Edwards (ret.)1 .INTRODUCTION The term “reasonable efforts” challenges and confounds many in our juvenile dependency and family courts across the country.2 Judges hear about it in their judicial trainings, read about it now and then in publications, sign their names to court orders finding that the children’s services agency (“agency”) made “reasonable efforts” on a daily basis, and on occasion make “no reasonable efforts” findings. Yet attorneys rarely refer to reasonable efforts in court, and most judges approve of what the agency has done with little or no thought about it.3 The law requires judges to make these findings, and good reasons exist to do so. By making the reasonable efforts/no reasonable efforts findings the court informs the parties, the children’s services agency, and the federal government that the agency is or is not meeting its legal responsibilities. By monitoring the agency’s actions the court ensures that the agency has complied with its legal obligation to provide services to prevent the child’s removal from parental care, assist the family safely to reunify with its child, and make certain to finalize a permanent plan for the child. The reasonable efforts/no reasonable efforts findings are the most powerful tools juvenile court judges have at their disposal in dependency cases, and attorneys and judges should pay special attention to them to ensure that the 1 Judge Edwards is a retired judge now working as a consultant to juvenile courts in California and other states. The author is indebted to many people for the research and information contained in this booklet.
  • Pinal County Superior Court Building

    Pinal County Superior Court Building

    f • F I LED NOV 2 5 1997 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA In The Matter Of: ) ) A NEW JURY HANDBOOK ) Administrative Order FOR THE SUPERIOR ) No. 97- 64 COURT IN PINAL COUNTY ) ) --------------------------------) Pursuant to Rule 18.6(a), Rules of Criminal Procedure, Alma J. Haught, Clerk of the Superior Court in Pinal County, requests the Court's approval of a new jury handbook. The Court, having reviewed a draft of the handbook, finds that it is sufficient in form and content to fully and properly advise jurors of their conduct and duties, and the operations of the judicial system in which they will be serving. Now, therefore, pursuant to Article VI, Section 3, of the Arizona Constitution, IT IS ORDERED that the handbook is approved for immediate use by the Superior Court in Pinal County in the form submitted hereto as Attachment A. DATED this 25th day of November ,1997. THOMAS A. ZLA~ Chief Justice COpy ,4TTACHMENT A .f lJ I( \' i 1;\ N I,.I()OK PINAL ('OllNT" COlll{TS STAT II: OF AIUZONA Illi,- I, '''Hlh'''''' h:" I" \'11 :ll'llnl\' cI It, Ih,' '-I'p"'IIII' t ollfl III Ih.' ',1;1'1' ul ;\liltilla 1"" '>lI:!!I' ,,, "H' 1(110,,1 ( I illlillal l'rlltT,lul'/ Hllh lit I,'al. JURY HANDBOOK Prepared by: Alma Jennlnp Hauabt Oerk of tbe Superior Court 1997 Edition INDEX General Information 6S Absence from Employment 6S Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Period of Service 6S Justice of the Peace Judges and Precincts 4 Work Verification 66 Superior Court Judges and Divisions 6 Parking 66 Clerk of the Superior Court! Attire 66 Jury Commissioner 18 Vacation/Change of Address 66 Welcome 21 Payment 67 Introduction 23 Badges 67 Guarantees of the Right to Trial by Jury 25 Jury Trial Scheduling 67 Arizona's Judicial System 27 Smoking Policy 67 Supreme Court 28 Telephones 68 Court of Appeals 29 Security 68 Superior Court 30 Pinal County Complex Diagram 69 Justice of the Peace Courts 32 Judicial Building (Courthouse) Diagram 70 Municipal Courts 34 Important Telephone Numbers 7.
  • International Law Enforcement Cooperation in the Fisheries Sector: a Guide for Law Enforcement Practitioners

    International Law Enforcement Cooperation in the Fisheries Sector: a Guide for Law Enforcement Practitioners

    International Law Enforcement Cooperation in the Fisheries Sector: A Guide for Law Enforcement Practitioners FOREWORD Fisheries around the world have been suffering increasingly from illegal exploitation, which undermines the sustainability of marine living resources and threatens food security, as well as the economic, social and political stability of coastal states. The illegal exploitation of marine living resources includes not only fisheries crime, but also connected crimes to the fisheries sector, such as corruption, money laundering, fraud, human or drug trafficking. These crimes have been identified by INTERPOL and its partners as transnational in nature and involving organized criminal networks. Given the complexity of these crimes and the fact that they occur across the supply chains of several countries, international police cooperation and coordination between countries and agencies is absolutely essential to effectively tackle such illegal activities. As the world’s largest police organization, INTERPOL’s role is to foster international police cooperation and coordination, as well as to ensure that police around the world have access to the tools and services to effectively tackle these transnational crimes. More specifically, INTERPOL’s Environmental Security Programme (ENS) is dedicated to addressing environmental crime, such as fisheries crimes and associated crimes. Its mission is to assist our member countries in the effective enforcement of national, regional and international environmental law and treaties, creating coherent international law enforcement collaboration and enhancing investigative support of environmental crime cases. It is in this context, that ENS – Global Fisheries Enforcement team identified the need to develop a Guide to assist in the understanding of international law enforcement cooperation in the fisheries sector, especially following several transnational fisheries enforcement cases in which INTERPOL was involved.
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures

    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures

    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.