Risk Assessment of Trace and Undeclared Allergens in Processed Foods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risk Assessment of Trace and Undeclared Allergens in Processed Foods University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research in Food Science and Technology Food Science and Technology Department 5-2013 Risk Assessment of Trace and Undeclared Allergens in Processed Foods Benjamin C. Remington University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/foodscidiss Part of the Other Food Science Commons Remington, Benjamin C., "Risk Assessment of Trace and Undeclared Allergens in Processed Foods" (2013). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research in Food Science and Technology. 32. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/foodscidiss/32 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Food Science and Technology Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research in Food Science and Technology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRACE AND UNDECLARED ALLERGENS IN PROCESSED FOODS By Benjamin C. Remington A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Food Science and Technology Under the Supervision of Professors Stephen L. Taylor and Joseph L. Baumert Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2013 RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRACE AND UNDECLARED ALLERGENS IN PROCESSED FOODS Benjamin C. Remington, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2013 Advisers: Stephen L. Taylor and Joseph L. Baumert Minimal eliciting doses for objective allergic reactions were found for 13 priority allergens and over 1800 individuals from published clinical literature or unpublished clinical data. Allergic populations did not vary when analyzed by age or geographic region. Results of this study show there are sufficient clinical data from food allergic individuals to use for risk assessment purposes for several allergenic foods. Of 186 food products bearing advisory statements regarding peanut or 16 products that had peanut listed as a minor ingredient, 8.6% and 37.5% contained detectable levels of peanut (>2.5 ppm whole peanut). An additional market survey of 215 nutrition bars with peanuts as a minor ingredient and/or an advisory statement for peanuts found 24.6% tested positive for peanut compared to 4% of products with no mention of peanuts on the label. Probabilistic risk assessment showed the risk of reaction among peanut allergic consumers from advisory labeled nutrition bars was significant but brand- dependent. The probabilistic approach provides the food industry with a quantitative method to assist with determining when advisory labeling is most appropriate. Agricultural commodity cross-contamination of soybean was detected in 62.8% of samples representing all forms of wheat flour. Conservative probabilistic risk assessments predict a risk of allergic reaction occurring in the most sensitive soy-allergic individuals. Experimental milling and stream separation with spiked soy in wheat samples did not produce a soy-free wheat flour stream. Additional cleaning measures will be needed to remove soy before wheat milling begins. LC-MS/MS identified fourteen known allergens in industry representative soy product samples, including all subunits of Gly m 5 (β-conglycinin) and Gly m 6 (glycinin), the Kunitz trypsin inhibitor, Gly m Bd 28K, and Gly m Bd 30K. Method refinements or different techniques might be necessary to detect low abundance proteins such as Gly m 3 and 4. The relative amount of an allergen in a sample correlated positively to the intensity of IgE binding at the expected molecular weight using sera from soy-allergic individuals. iv For my parents, Glen and Jamae. Thank you for your constant support while I explore the parts of life that make me happy. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisers Drs. Steve Taylor and Joe Baumert for their support and guidance during the completion of my graduate program. Both have been outstanding mentors and their willingness to expose me to multiple aspects of the Food Allergy Research and Resource Program has offered invaluable experience as a graduate student. I will forever be grateful for opportunities and involvements they let me explore and push to be a part of. I would also like to thank many other members of FARRP. Lynn and Deb, thank you for the endless help and teachings throughout my time in the lab. Julie, thank you for the friendship, lab expertise, and honest conversations over the years. Jamie and Pat, thank you for your patience, support, and ability to make everything run smoothly. To my fellow graduate students, especially Jelena Spiric, Kaye Ivens, Poi-Wah Lee, and Rakhi Panda, thank you for the advice, assistance, and making the office a fun place to work every day. Special thanks goes to Sean, Anna, Ferlie, and all of the analytical lab members that helped with kit techniques and other analytical issues. I would like to acknowledge Dr. Geert Houben of TNO, Dr. René Crevel of Unilever, and the FARRP Board of Directors for their contributions, comments, and critiques on different aspects of the food industry and food allergen risk assessment within my project. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, siblings, and other friends and family for their support during my dissertation. I would not be where I am today without them and I am truly grateful for the influences they have had on my life. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. xi LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................xv CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................1 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 II. FOOD SENSITIVITIES ..........................................................................................1 a. Food Intolerances .........................................................................................3 i. Anaphylactoid Reaction ...................................................................3 ii. Metabolic Food Disorders................................................................3 iii. Idiosyncratic Reactions ....................................................................4 b. Food Hypersensitivity ..................................................................................5 i. Immune System Overview ...............................................................5 ii. Cell-Mediated Hypersensitivity .......................................................9 iii. IgE-mediated Hypersensitivity and Food Allergy .........................10 c. Prevalence of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy ................................................13 d. Diagnosis of Food Allergy .........................................................................16 e. Treatment of Food Allergy ........................................................................18 f. Legume Allergy .........................................................................................20 g. Soy Proteins and Allergens ........................................................................25 III. FOOD ALLERGEN LABELING AND THRESHOLDS .....................................38 a. Importance of Thresholds ..........................................................................39 b. Interval-Censoring Survival Analysis ........................................................43 vii IV. ADVISORY LABELING OF FOOD ALLERGENS IN PROCESSED FOODS ..................................................................................................................46 a. History of Use ............................................................................................46 b. Regulatory Guidance .................................................................................47 c. Previous Examples/Studies ........................................................................49 V. COMMODITY CONTAMINATION WITHIN FOOD SUPPLY ........................50 a. History of Use ............................................................................................50 b. Regulatory Guidance .................................................................................50 c. Previous Examples/Studies ........................................................................51 VI. FOOD ALLERGEN RISK ANALYSIS ................................................................52 a. Risk Assessment ........................................................................................55 i. Hazard Identification .....................................................................55 ii. Hazard Characterization .................................................................56 iii. Exposure Assessment.....................................................................57 iv. Risk Characterization .....................................................................58 1. NOAEL-Based Safety Assessment Method ......................59 2. Benchmark Dose method ...................................................61 3. Quantitative Risk Assessment............................................63 b. Risk Management ......................................................................................68 i. Preliminary Risk Management
Recommended publications
  • Everything You Need to Know About Aspartame, Including Facts About Nutrition, Safety, Uses, and Benefits
    Everything You Need to Know Aspartame About Aspartame With obesity rates among Americans at an all-time high, many people may think they have to give up sweets in order to lose weight. But, there’s good news if you love sweets: Low-calorie sweeteners offer a way to reduce calories in sweet foods and beverages, which may help you lose or maintain your weight. They also offer a way for people with diabetes to decrease their carbohydrate intake. One commonly consumed low-calorie sweetener is aspartame. The following is everything you need to know about aspartame, including facts about nutrition, safety, uses, and benefits. Favorably Reviewed By: What is aspartame? How many calories are in aspartame? Aspartame is a low-calorie sweetener that provides sweetness to foods and beverages Aspartame has four calories per gram. However, because without adding significant calories. Nutrition it is 200 times sweeter than sugar, aspartame is used in and fitness experts agree that balancing the very small amounts, thus adding almost no calories to foods calories you consume with the calories you and beverages. As a result, when aspartame is substituted burn is important for health. Aspartame can for calorie-containing sweeteners, total calories in foods play a role in weight management programs and beverages are significantly reduced (and sometimes that combine sensible nutrition and physical eliminated entirely, such as in diet soda, tea, and flavored activity. seltzer water). It is important to remember that there are other sources of calories in many foods and beverages — Aspartame has been studied extensively and has been found to be safe by experts “sugar-free” does not always mean “calorie-free.” The calorie and researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspartame Metabolism © by D
    Aspartame Metabolism © by D. Eric Walters When aspartame is digested in the body, it is converted to three components: aspartic acid, phenylalanine, and methanol. Aspartic acid (also called aspartate) is an amino acid that is present in every protein we consume, and in every protein in the human body. It is also an intermediate in metabolizing carbohydrates and other amino acids. The human body can make it from other substances if it needs to, and it can burn it for energy or convert it to fat if there is more than enough. Phenylalanine is another amino acid that is present in all proteins. In contrast to aspartic acid, humans cannot produce it from other materials- -we must get a certain amount of it every day in our diet, so it is classified as an essential amino acid. If we consume more than we need, we can burn the excess for energy, or store the extra calories as fat. Phenylalanine is only a concern for people with the rare genetic disorder phenylketonuria (PKU). People with PKU lack the enzyme to break down excess phenylalanine, so they must carefully monitor their intake. They still need a certain amount of it to make proteins, but they must be careful not to consume more than this amount. Aspartic acid and phenylalanine do provide calories. In general, amino acids provide about 4 calories per gram, just like carbohydrates. Aspartame contributes calories to the diet, but it is about 180 times as sweet as sugar, so the amount needed for sweetening doesn't provide very many calories.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Sweeteners and Their Health Effects Based Upon Valid Scientific Data
    Popular Sweeteners and Their Health Effects Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By __________________________________ Ivan Lebedev __________________________________ Jayyoung Park __________________________________ Ross Yaylaian Date: Approved: __________________________________ Professor Satya Shivkumar Abstract Perceived health risks of artificial sweeteners are a controversial topic often supported solely by anecdotal evidence and distorted media hype. The aim of this study was to examine popular sweeteners and their health effects based upon valid scientific data. Information was gathered through a sweetener taste panel, interviews with doctors, and an on-line survey. The survey revealed the public’s lack of appreciation for sweeteners. It was observed that artificial sweeteners can serve as a low-risk alternative to natural sweeteners. I Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................. I Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... II List of Figures ................................................................................................................................... IV List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Saccharin Consumption on Operant Responding for Sugar
    foods Article Effects of Saccharin Consumption on Operant Responding for Sugar Reward and Incubation of Sugar Craving in Rats Kenjiro Aoyama * and Akane Nagano Department of Psychology, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe-shi, Kyoto 610-0394, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 November 2020; Accepted: 5 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: Repeated experience with artificial sweeteners increases food consumption and body weight gain in rats. Saccharin consumption may reduce the conditioned satiety response to sweet-tasting food. Rats were trained to press a lever to obtain sucrose for five days. A compound cue (tone + light) was presented with every sucrose delivery. On the following day, each lever press produced only the compound cue (cue-reactivity test). Subjects were then provided with yogurt for three weeks in their home cages. The rats were divided into two groups. Rats in the saccharin group received yogurt sweetened with saccharin on some days and unsweetened yogurt on others. For the plain group, only unsweetened plain yogurt was provided. Subsequently, the cue-reactivity test was conducted again. On the following day, the rats underwent a consumption test in which each lever press was reinforced with sucrose. Chow consumption and body weight gain were larger in the saccharin group than in the plain group. Lever responses increased from the first to the second cue-reactivity tests (incubation of craving) in both groups. During the consumption test, lever responses were higher in the saccharin group than in the plain group, suggesting that the conditioned satiety response was impaired in the saccharin group.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhoa and ROCK Mediate Histamine-Induced Vascular Leakage and Anaphylactic Shock
    ARTICLE Received 24 Nov 2014 | Accepted 22 Feb 2015 | Published 10 Apr 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7725 RhoA and ROCK mediate histamine-induced vascular leakage and anaphylactic shock Constantinos M. Mikelis1, May Simaan1, Koji Ando2, Shigetomo Fukuhara2, Atsuko Sakurai1, Panomwat Amornphimoltham3, Andrius Masedunskas3, Roberto Weigert3, Triantafyllos Chavakis4, Ralf H. Adams5,6, Stefan Offermanns7, Naoki Mochizuki2, Yi Zheng8 & J. Silvio Gutkind1 Histamine-induced vascular leakage is an integral component of many highly prevalent human diseases, including allergies, asthma and anaphylaxis. Yet, how histamine induces the disruption of the endothelial barrier is not well defined. By using genetically modified animal models, pharmacologic inhibitors and a synthetic biology approach, here we show that the small GTPase RhoA mediates histamine-induced vascular leakage. Histamine causes the rapid formation of focal adherens junctions, disrupting the endothelial barrier by acting on H1R Gaq-coupled receptors, which is blunted in endothelial Gaq/11 KO mice. Interfering with RhoA and ROCK function abolishes endothelial permeability, while phospholipase Cb plays a limited role. Moreover, endothelial-specific RhoA gene deletion prevents vascular leakage and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in vivo, and ROCK inhibitors protect from lethal systemic anaphylaxis. This study supports a key role for the RhoA signalling circuitry in vascular permeability, thereby identifying novel pharmacological targets for many human diseases characterized by aberrant vascular leakage. 1 Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. 2 Department of Cell Biology, CREST-JST, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan. 3 Intracellular Membrane Trafficking Unit, Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 34 • Drugs Used to Treat Nausea and Vomiting
    • Chapter 34 • Drugs Used to Treat Nausea and Vomiting • Learning Objectives • Compare the purposes of using antiemetic products • State the therapeutic classes of antiemetics • Discuss scheduling of antiemetics for maximum benefit • Nausea and Vomiting • Nausea : the sensation of abdominal discomfort that is intermittently accompanied by a desire to vomit • Vomiting (emesis): the forceful expulsion of gastric contents up the esophagus and out of the mouth • Regurgitation : the rising of gastric or esophageal contents to the pharynx as a result of stomach pressure • Common Causes of Nausea and Vomiting • Postoperative nausea and vomiting • Motion sickness • Pregnancy Hyperemesis gravidarum: a condition in pregnancy in which starvation, dehydration, and acidosis are superimposed on the vomiting syndrome • Common Causes of Nausea and Vomiting (cont’d) • Psychogenic vomiting: self-induced or involuntary vomiting in response to threatening or distasteful situations • Chemotherapy-induced emesis (CIE) Anticipatory nausea and vomiting: triggered by sight and smell associated with treatment Acute CIE: stimulated directly by chemotherapy 1 to 6 hours after treatment Delayed emesis: occurs 24 to 120 hours after treatment; may be induced by metabolic by-products of chemotherapy • Drug Therapy for Selected Causes of Nausea and Vomiting • Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) • Antiemetics include: Dopamine antagonists Anticholinergic agents Serotonin antagonists H2 antagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine) • Nursing Process for Nausea and Vomiting
    [Show full text]
  • Child Fatalities in Tennessee 2009
    CHILD FATALITIES IN TENNESSEE 2009 Tennessee Department of Health Bureau of Health Services Maternal and Child Health Section Acknowledgements The Tennessee Department of Health, Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Section, expresses its gratitude to the agencies and individuals who have contributed to this report and the investigations that preceded it. Thank you to the Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Health Statistics, and to The University of Tennessee Extension, both of whom meticulously manage the data represented in these pages. Thank you to the Child Fatality Review Teams in the 31 judicial districts across the state who treat each case with reverence and compassion, working with a stalwart commit- ment to preventing future fatalities. Thank you to the State Child Fatality Prevention Review Team members who find ways to put the recommendations in this report to work in saving lives. Their efforts, and ours, are reinforced immeasurably by the support and cooperation of the following Tennessee agencies: the Department of Health, the Commission on Children and Youth, the Department of Children’s Services, the Center for Forensic Medicine, the Office of the Attorney General, the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Mental Health, the Tennessee Medical Association, the Department of Education, the General Assembly, the State Supreme Court, the Tennessee Suicide Prevention Network, Tennessee local and regional health departments, and the National Center for Child Death Review. It is with deepest sympathy and respect that we dedicate this report to the memory of those children and families represented within these pages. This report may be accessed online at http://health.state.tn.us/MCH/CFR.htm 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Malnutrition Topic 5
    Malnutrition Topic 5 Module 5.1 Undernutrition – Simple and Stress Starvation Lubos Sobotka Peter Soeters Remy Meier Yitshal Berner Learning Objectives • To know how the body reacts to short-term and long-term starvation during non-stress conditions; • To understand the difference between simple and stress starvation; • To know the consequences of stress on metabolic pathways related to starvation. Contents 1. Definition and classification of malnutrition 2. Undernutrition 3. Aetiology of undernutrition 4. Adaptation to undernutrition – non stress starvation 5. Stress starvation 6. Summary Key Messages • Humans adapt well to short or a longer-term starvation, using their reserve stores of carbohydrates, fat and protein; • Reduction of energy expenditure and conservation of body protein are further reaction to starvation. Energy stores are replenished during feeding period; • Long-term partial or total cessation of energy intake leads to marasmic wasting; • With the addition of the stress response, catabolism and wasting are accelerated and the normal adaptive responses to simple starvation are overridden; • Weight loss in either situation results in impaired mental and physical function, as well as poorer clinical outcome. Copyright © 2006 by ESPEN 1. Definition and classification of malnutrition Malnutrition can be defined as a state of nutrition in which a deficiency or excess (or imbalance) of energy, protein and other nutrients causes measurable adverse effects on tissue/body form (body shape, size, composition), body function and clinical outcome. In broad term, malnutrition includes not only protein-energy malnutrition (both over- and under- Classification of energy and protein malnutrition nutrition) but also malnutrition of other nutrients, such as micronutrients. Malnutrition Malnutrition of micronutrients can cause deficiency states or toxic symptoms - these are discussed in Overnutrition Undernutrition particular modules related to vitamins and trace elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypothermia Hyperthermia Normothemic
    Means normal body temperature. Normal body core temperature ranges from 99.7ºF to 99.5ºF. A fever is a Normothemic body temperature of 99.5 to 100.9ºF and above. Humans are warm-blooded mammals who maintain a constant body temperature (euthermia). Temperature regulation is controlled by the hypothalamus in the base of the brain. The hypothalamus functions as a thermostat for the body. Temperature receptors (thermoreceptors) are located in the skin, certain mucous membranes, and in the deeper tissues of the body. When an increase in body temperature is detected, the hypothalamus shuts off body mechanisms that generate heat (for example, shivering). When a decrease in body temperature is detected, the hypothalamus shuts off body mechanisms designed to cool the body (for example, sweating). The body continuously adjusts the metabolic rate in order to maintain a constant CORE Hypothermia Core body temperatures of 95ºF and lower is considered hypothermic can cause the heart and nervous system to begin to malfunction and can, in many instances, lead to severe heart, respiratory and other problems that can result in organ damage and death.Hannibal lost nearly half of his troops while crossing the Pyrenees Alps in 218 B.C. from hypothermia; and only 4,000 of Napoleon Bonaparte’s 100,000 men survived the march back from Russia in the winter of 1812 - most dying of starvation and hypothermia. During the sinking of the Titanic most people who entered the 28°F water died within 15–30 minutes. Symptoms: First Aid : Mild hypothermia: As the body temperature drops below 97°F there is Call 911 or emergency medical assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspartame—True Or False? Narrative Review of Safety Analysis of General Use in Products
    nutrients Review Aspartame—True or False? Narrative Review of Safety Analysis of General Use in Products Kamila Czarnecka 1,2,*, Aleksandra Pilarz 1, Aleksandra Rogut 1, Patryk Maj 1, Joanna Szyma ´nska 1, Łukasz Olejnik 1 and Paweł Szyma ´nski 1,2,* 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Drug Analyses and Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, Muszy´nskiego1, 90-151 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (P.M.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (Ł.O.) 2 Department of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, 4 Kozielska St., 01-163 Warsaw, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.C.); [email protected] (P.S.); Tel.: +48-42-677-92-53 (K.C. & P.S.) Abstract: Aspartame is a sweetener introduced to replace the commonly used sucrose. It was discovered by James M. Schlatter in 1965. Being 180–200 times sweeter than sucrose, its intake was expected to reduce obesity rates in developing countries and help those struggling with diabetes. It is mainly used as a sweetener for soft drinks, confectionery, and medicines. Despite its widespread use, its safety remains controversial. This narrative review investigates the existing literature on the use of aspartame and its possible effects on the human body to refine current knowledge. Taking to account that aspartame is a widely used artificial sweetener, it seems appropriate to continue Citation: Czarnecka, K.; Pilarz, A.; research on safety. Studies mentioned in this article have produced very interesting results overall, Rogut, A.; Maj, P.; Szyma´nska,J.; the current review highlights the social problem of providing visible and detailed information about Olejnik, Ł.; Szyma´nski,P.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Radiation Syndrome Clinical Picture, Diagnosis and Treatment
    ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME CLINICAL PICTURE, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT Module XI Lecture organization Introduction ARS manifestations Haematological syndrome Gastrointestinal syndrome Neurovascular syndrome Triage of injured persons Medical management Summary Module Medical XI. 2 Introduction Acute radiation syndrome (ARS): Combination of clinical syndromes occuring in stages hours to weeks after exposure as injury to various tissues and organs is expressed ARS threat Discharged medical irradiators Industrial radiography units Commercial irradiators Terrorist detonation Nuclear fuel processing Nuclear reactors Module Medical XI. 3 Early deterministic effects <0.1 Gy, whole body - No detectable difference in exposed vs non-exposed patients 0.1-0.2 Gy, whole body - Detectable increase in chromosome aberrations. No clinical signs or symptoms >0.12 Gy, whole body - Sperm count decreases to minimum about day 45 0.5 Gy, whole body - Detectable bone marrow depression with lymphopenia Module Medical XI. 4 Exposure levels at which healthy adults are affected _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Health effects Acute dose (Gy) Blood count changes 0.50 Vomiting (threshold) 1.00 Mortality (threshold) 1.50 LD50/60 (minimal supportive care) 3.2-3.6 LD50/60 (supportive medical treatment) 4.8-5.4 LD50/60 (autologous bone marrow or ____________________________________stem cell transplant)___________________________ ______ >5.4 Source: NCRP Report 98 "Guidance on Radiation Received in Space Activities", NCRP, Bethesda (MD) (1989). Module Medical XI. 5 Factors decreasing LD50/60 Coexisting trauma combined injury Chronic nutritional deficit Coexisting infection Contribution of high LET radiation Module Medical XI. 6 Phases of ARS Initial or prodromal phase Latent phase Manifest illness phase Recovery phase Module Medical XI. 7 Manifestations of ARS Haematopoietic syndrome (HPS) Gastrointestinal syndrome (GIS) Neurovascular syndrome (NVS) Module Medical XI.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Insights Into Toxin
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Insights into Toxin Binding to Tubulin as a Potential Trigger in Parkinson’s Disease Using Molecular Modeling A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Bioengineering by Debbie J. Hlava December 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Dimitrios Morikis, Chairperson Dr. Valentine Vullev Dr. Hyle Park The Thesis of Debbie J. Hlava is approved: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Dimitrios Morikis for his guidance, and to also thank Tyler Backman, Professor Valentine Vullev, Professor Hyle Park, and Chris Kieslich for their support. iii Dedication To my beautiful mother who passed away in 1999 from complications of Parkinson’s disease. This thesis is partial fulfillment of my promise that I would one day strive to find the cause and potential cure for this devastating disease. iv ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Insights into Toxin Binding to Tubulin as a Potential Trigger in Parkinson’s Disease Using Molecular Modeling by Debbie J. Hlava Master of Science, Graduate Program in Bioengineering University of California, Riverside, December 2012 Dr. Dimitrios Morikis, Chairperson Despite years of research, little is known about the specific cause of Parkinson’s disease (PD), though genetic and environmental factors have been implicated. Evidence suggests that microtubule disruption may be involved; however this mechanism is not yet fully elucidated, and factors implicated in PD have not been conclusively related to microtubule function. This is the framework of this thesis. We have expanded on a suggested PD cascade involving microtubule disruption triggering oxidization of dopamine, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), aggregation of alpha-synuclein, and death of neuronal cells.
    [Show full text]