DOCSLIB.ORG

Sraetorian Prefect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sraetorian Prefect Durham E-Theses The primipilares of the Roman army Dobson, B. How to cite: Dobson, B. (1955) The primipilares of the Roman army, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8434/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE PRIMIPILARES OF THE ROMAN ARMY Thesis submitted in candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in August, 1955- B. DOBSON of HATFIELD COLLEGE, DURHAM. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. TABLE OF COITTENTS VOLUME I INTRODUCTION 1 I'TSTORICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY 4 THE REPUBLICAN PREvJPILATE 22 THE AUC-USTAK PRIIKIPILATE 27 THE DEVELOPING PRLMPILATE 42 THE LATE PRE ilPILATE 69 THE ORIC-IEES OF PRIi.ILFILARES 39 TIS PREOPILARIS AED TIDE LEGIOKS AS SOLDIER AMD CEOTURIOE 112 THE PRII.IPILARIS AND THE ROUE COLORTS AS SOLDIER AND CEITUPION 124 TKE FRZ-IPILARIS AND THE EQUESTRIAN ORDER 145 THE PRL'.IUSPILUS AED THE FRILilPILARIS 161 TIDS PREFECTS OF THE CAliP AND OF THE LEGIONS 173 THE ROLE TRIBUNATES 202 PRIIIUSPILUS ITERUII 224 THE PRII.IIPILARIS PROCURATOR 234 TIIE SOCIAL STANDING OF T1TE FRILIPILARIS 286 THE PRL..IPILARIS IK THE ;»UrICIPALITIES 299 COBCLUSION • 309 APPENDICES THE FRIJ.JPILARIS AND THE CASTRA FEREGRINA 317 THE PRF IPILARIS AND THE FLEET 520 THE PRIl.iPILARIS AND THE PROTECTORES 321 THECEKARIUS 323 PRD;CEPS HIAETORII . 326 OFFICIAL PRILOJSPILUS DEDICATIONS 329 DOI:IS DONATUS 335 VOLUME II PROSOPOGRAPKi OF PRLuIPILARES 1 SUPELEJENT TO PROSOPOGRAPHY 591 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 4-07 NOTES 411 INDEX OF ROLE TRIBUNES 424 INDEX OF C0GU0I1INA 430 INTRODUCTION The function of the introduction to a work of this nature would seem to be a definition of the subject and an explanation of the reasons for its selection, a review of the present state of the material and the work done on it, and an explanation of the form that the thesis has taken. The term prlmipilaris is of course derived from the word primuspilus, the chief centurion of the Roman legion, commander of the first century of the first cohort. After holding this post men were known as prlmipilares and under the Empire they wex-e employed in a wide variety of further posts, notably as prefects of the camp to the legions, tribunes of the cohorts at Rome, commanders of tne Egyptian legions and later of others, and as procurators. These facts are of course generally known, but the last full study of the primipllares was by J. Karbe in lbbO (1). This was a useful study, but by no means exhaustive. It was overshadowed by A. von Domaszewski1s great book on the Roman Array (id), which appeared in /90$. This has profoundly influenced all subsequent thought on the primipilares, with the result that certain of his conclusions, though false, have been unchallenged. It was the work of,M. Durry on the praetorian cohorts whicn provided the immediate stimulus for a re-examin- ation of the primlpftlares. He put forward there 13) a view of the prlmipilares wnich seemed to Mr. Birley mistaken, and he made an initial investigation of the Durry thesis in a paper 2. reprinted in his omnibus volume (4;. Clearly however what was necessary to prove or disprove the views or M. Durry was a full examination of the primipilares, and so he introduced me to the subjecu at the end of my rirat degree course. The results of what examination appear in this thesis. I have not sought to examine every aspect of the primipilares, but have conventrated on their geograpnical origins, the corps from which they were recruited, and the pattern of their careers. The review of the present state of our knowledge about the primipilares follows in the next chapter, so I need not touch on it here. As far as the construction of my own work is concerned, it falls into two broad divisions, the general discussion of the primipllares, and the prosopography of primipilares. The rirst begins with a survey of the historical development of the primipllate. It is seen as a military post without a future in the Republic, and then it is shown how Augustus shaped this institution into one or the valuable contributions he made to the administrative machinery of the Principate. There follows the evolution of the career, and a glance at the primlpilaris of the fouth and fifth centuries. The chapter on the geographical origins of the primipilares ftojfcjfcows, and then the equally important chapters on the corps from which the primipilares were recruited, and in which they served. This leads us naturally to the consideration of what the primipilate itself involved. The next group is of posts the primipiiaris almost exclusively supplied, the 3 prefectures of the camp, the Rome tribunates, and the posts of primiplli iterum. Under the first are considered the prefects of the camp in Egypt. The contribution of the primipllares to the procurators is then assessed, and finally their importance in Imperial and municipal society. The conclusion seeks to summarise all this, and in particular to give a final estimate of the importance of the primipilares. The second part owes its inspiration to H.G. Pflaum's these complementaire, (5;. It gives a complete list of all primipilares of the first three centuries of the Empire. It also gives the few cases of men holding Rome tribunates and prerectures of the camp or ducenarian commands of legions who were not primipilares. Inscriptions and literary references are given whenever it has seemed desirable, particularly to facilit• ate discussion. Much that is dismissed briefly in volume I will be found at length in the prosopography, and the book is planned on the assumption that the reader will treat the two as dependent the one on the other. Appendices are given on a few topics that cannot be ignored, but are not sufficiently important to find a place in the main body of discussion. HISTORICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY Before giving a historical survey of the work on the primipilares a word should he said on the material. This takes the form mainly of inscriptions on stone, a type of evidence which is far greater in bulk than that from literature. The literary references have their own importance, however, for whereas the inscriptions give us the origin and career of the primipilaris, literature tells us what he did. Of the other types of evidence, that from inscriptions is the most likely to increase, and much has been learned from quite recent finds, e.g. the very important new inscription relating to Marcius Turbo which is given under him in the prosopography. As explained in the Introduction, however, it is not the discovery of new material so much as the in some respects inadequate treatment of the subject so far which has led me to make a new study of this subject. I may be forgiven perhaps if I begin my survey with the work of J. Karbe in 1880. (The books mentioned are all fully detailed in the select bibliography, so the titles are only mentioned in the notes to this chapter when a specific reference to a page is made). This inmost modern study of which I am aware that attempts to deal with the primipilate comprehensively. A. Von Domaszewsk* dealt with the subject in the Rangordnung. but only as part of a far greater scheme. Karbe recognised clearly the distinction between primuspilus and primipilaris. while noting that often the terms are used interchangeably (1). He demonstrated clearly the existence of an ordo primipilarium(2.) and that there was both a numerus of primipilares at Rome and primipilares attached to commanders in the field. Rightly he concluded that the primipilaris was an Augustan creation, and he made the fundamental distinction between those who retired after the primipilate, and those who went on to further service. He saw clearly that the tenure of the primipilate was short, and that the commoda so lauded in verse and prose alike included as their most important item the sum of 600,000 sesterces received by the primuspilus on his retirement (3). He noted also the special claims of the emperors on the primipilares. He took the view that the primipilares were not automatically equestrians on the basis of the inscriptions of primipili ex equite Romano and similar, arguments His views on this subject brough.t him into grave difficulties (5). In discussing the primipilares in the municipalities Karbe noted the high posts held and the extreme rarity of magistracies lower than the rank of duovir in primipilaris careers (6). Further he noted how the retired primipilaris was often the prefect or the curator of the emperor in the municipalities. He covered competently the extraordinary posts given to primipilares (7). In discussing Wilmanns on the prefect of the camp he disputed the former's argument that tne prefect of the camp was of equestrian rank, because it conflicted with his own interpret• ation of the primipilaris as plebeian (8).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organization of the Roman Military 150 CE
    Organization of the Roman Military 150 CE It was the strength and proficiency of the Roman army that held the empire together against internal revolts and threats from beyond the borders. The army was unique in the classical world: a professional standing army, with state-provided weapons and armor, salaried troops, and 30 or so legions (the main body of the army) permanently stationed at garrison towns along imperial frontiers. Legions were reinforced with auxiliary troops drawn from the local population. To support the army and protect merchant shipping from piracy, Rome maintained a large navy with fleets in the Mediterranean Sea, the Atlantic Ocean, and along the Rhine and Danube Rivers. LEGION UNITS Legion A body of about 5,000 foot soldiers, uniformly legionaries (160 in first cohort centuries). There were 6 trained and equipped—similar to a modern army division. centuries in the 2nd to 10th cohorts and 5 in the first A legion was the smallest formation in the Roman army cohort. capable of sustained independent operations. Cavalry A small force of about 120 mounted legionaries Cohort (10) The distinct tactical units of a legion, each attached to each legion for escort, messenger, and about 480 men strong—equivalent in size and function to reconnaissance duties. They were not usually seen on a modern infantry battalion. The first cohort was the battlefield. approximately double strength (around 800 men) and Artillery Each legion had 60 engines (catapults). One contained the best soldiers. engine was capable of shooting yard-long, heavy bolts Century (59) An administrative unit within a cohort.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample File TM ROLEMASTER ROME
    Sample file TM ROLEMASTER ROME Sample file Iron Crown Enterprises 2010 1 CREDITS Author: Graham Bottley; ICE Staff: Interior Art: Graham Bottley; President: Heike A. Kubasch; Art Direction: Graham Bottley; CEO: Bruce Neidlinger; Interior maps: Graham Bottley; Editing, Development, & Production Staff: Editors: Tim Dugger, Heike Kubasch, Heike A. Kubasch, Bruce Neidlinger, Sherry Robinson; Tim Dugger; Sherry Robinson: Pagemaking: Sherry Robinson; Web Master: Tim Dugger; Proofreading: Tim Dugger, Heike Kubasch, Corporate Mascots: Gandalf T. Cat, Rajah Sherry Robinson; T. Cat, Phoebe T. Cat, Matsi T. Cat, Ember T. Cat; Cover art: ©2008 Jon Hodgson; ICE Cheering section & Moral Support: Karl Special Thanks to The ICE Forum Assistant & Helga Kubasch, John Seal, Claudia, Alexandra, Administrators; Nicholas H.M. Caldwell, Annie & Emil Aulum, Elke Lübbert, Inge Robert J. Defendi, Thom Jones, Jay Moran; Bendfeldt, Peggy, Christoph, Helen & Rickmar Bendfeldt, Judy & Hasmukh Shah, Tim & Genii Playtesting and Advice: Jon “52 F Slash” Williams, John Ross, Brad Williams, Brent Knorr, Derrick, Carl “Many Numbers” Hammond, Jonathan Dale, Mario Butter, Robert J Defendi, James “Rolling Head” Golder, Dan “Low Nicholas M. Caldwell, and the Guild Compan- Profile” Quinlan, Jet “The Analyst” Turner, ion (www.guildcompanion.com), Ken-ichi Lord Miller, Setorn, Frnchqrtr, Taurren, Futaba the RMC crew and all ICE fans every- Cormac Doyle, Temujin, Ob1knorrb and Markc; where: Thanks for keeping the faith! Sample file Copyright © 2010 by Aurigas Aldeberon LLC. All rights reserved. No reproductions without permis- sion. Produced and distributed by Mjolnir LLC, dba Iron Crown Enterprises 112 Goodman St, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22902. Stock #SPQR01 ISBN 1-55806-383-8 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar's Legion: the Epic Saga of Julius Caesar's Elite Tenth Legion
    CAESAR’S LEGION : THE EPIC SAGA OF JULIUS CAESAR’S ELITE TENTH LEGION AND THE ARMIES OF ROME STEPHEN DANDO-COLLINS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. flast.qxd 12/5/01 4:49 PM Page xiv ffirs.qxd 12/5/01 4:47 PM Page i CAESAR’S LEGION : THE EPIC SAGA OF JULIUS CAESAR’S ELITE TENTH LEGION AND THE ARMIES OF ROME STEPHEN DANDO-COLLINS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright © 2002 by Stephen Dando-Collins. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authoriza- tion through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4744. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158-0012, (212) 850-6011, fax (212) 850-6008, email: [email protected]. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. This title is also available in print as ISBN 0-471-09570-2.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPANION to the ROMAN ARMY Edited By
    ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page iii A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY Edited by Paul Erdkamp ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page i A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page ii BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO THE ANCIENT WORLD This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of periods of ancient history, genres of classical lit- erature, and the most important themes in ancient culture. Each volume comprises between twenty-five and forty concise essays written by individual scholars within their area of specialization. The essays are written in a clear, provocative, and lively manner, designed for an international audience of scholars, students, and general readers. Ancient History Published A Companion to the Roman Army A Companion to the Classical Greek World Edited by Paul Erdkamp Edited by Konrad H. Kinzl A Companion to the Roman Republic A Companion to the Ancient Near East Edited by Nathan Rosenstein and Edited by Daniel C. Snell Robert Morstein-Marx A Companion to the Hellenistic World A Companion to the Roman Empire Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by David S. Potter In preparation A Companion to Ancient History A Companion to Late Antiquity Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by Philip Rousseau A Companion to Archaic Greece A Companion to Byzantium Edited by Kurt A. Raaflaub and Hans van Wees Edited by Elizabeth James A Companion to Julius Caesar Edited by Miriam Griffin Literature and Culture Published A Companion to Catullus A Companion to Greek Rhetoric Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Edited by Ian Worthington A Companion to Greek Religion A Companion to Ancient Epic Edited by Daniel Ogden Edited by John Miles Foley A Companion to Classical Tradition A Companion to Greek Tragedy Edited by Craig W.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay Ppowellowell
    1st Century AD Roman Soldier VERSUS Germanic Warrior Lindsay Powell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com 1st Century ad Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay PowellPowell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION 4 THE OPPOSING SIDES 10 Recruitment and motivation t Morale and logistics t Training, doctrine and tactics Leadership and communications t Use of allies and auxiliaries TEUTOBURG PASS 28 Summer AD 9 IDISTAVISO 41 Summer AD 16 THE ANGRIVARIAN WALL 57 Summer AD 16 ANALYSIS 71 Leadership t Mission objectives and strategies t Planning and preparation Tactics, combat doctrine and weapons AFTERMATH 76 BIBLIOGRAPHY 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com Introduction ‘Who would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italia for Germania, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home?’ (Tacitus, Germania 2). This negative perception of Germania – the modern Netherlands and Germany – lay behind the reluctance of Rome’s great military commanders to tame its immense wilderness. Caius Iulius Caesar famously threw a wooden pontoon bridge across the River Rhine (Rhenus) in just ten days, not once but twice, in 55 and 53 bc. The next Roman general to do so was Marcus Agrippa, in 39/38 bc or 19/18 bc. However, none of these missions was for conquest, but in response to pleas for assistance from an ally of the Romans, the Germanic nation of the Ubii. It was not until the reign of Caesar Augustus that a serious attempt was made to annex the land beyond the wide river and transform it into a province fit for Romans to live in.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration Or Disintegration? the Roman Army in the Third Century A.D
    INTEGRATION OR DISINTEGRATION? THE ROMAN ARMY IN THE THIRD CENTURY A.D. Lukas de Blois My issue in this paper is: what was the main trend within the Roman military forces in the third century ad? Integration, or disintegration into regional entities? This paper is not about cultural integration of ethnic groups in multicultural parts of the Roman Empire, such as the city of Rome, thriving commercial centres, and border regions to which the armies had brought people from various parts of the Empire, and where multicultural military personnel lived together with indigenous groups, craftsmen from different origins, and immigrants from commercially active regions, either in canabae adjacent to castra stativa, or in garrison towns, as in the Eastern parts of the Empire. In variatio upon an issue raised by Frederick Naerebout in another paper published in this volume, I might ask myself in what sense an army, which in the third century ad was progressively composed of ethnically and culturally different units, kept functioning as an integrated entity, or in actual practice disintegrated into rivalling, particularistic regional forces whose actual or potential competition for money and supplies con- stantly threatened peace and stability in the Empire, particularly in times of dangerous external wars, when the need for supplies increased. The discussion should start with Septimius Severus. After his victories over Pescennius Niger, some tribes in northern Mesopotamia, and Albinus in Gaul, Severus had to replenish the ranks of his armies, for example at the Danube frontiers, which had yielded many men to Severus’ field armies and his new praetorian guard.
    [Show full text]
  • Birley, Eric. "Before Diplomas, and the Claudian Reform, in Heer Und Integrationspolitik: Die Romischen Militardiplome
    Birley, Eric. "Before Diplomas, and the Claudian Reform, In Heer und Integrationspolitik: Die Romischen Militardiplome als historische Quelle, edited by Werner Eck and Hartrnut Wolff, 249-57. Koln: Bohlau, 1986. Before Diplomas, and the Claudian Reform Von Eric Birley It is exactly seventy years since the publication of G . L . C he e s - man's book, The Auxilia of the Roman Imperial Army (Clarendon Press, 1914), which I first made the acquaintance of as a schoolboy in 1923; and ever since then the auxilia have been one of my greatest interests. It happens that in that book Cheesman assumed,as a matter of course, that "the grant of the civitas with the improvement in civil status which it brought to the recipient,and the increased possibilities which it offered to his children, must have done much to popularize the service. We have seen that the idea of such a reward did not origi- nate with the Empire, but it was probably not until the reorganisation of the army by Augustus that it was regularly conferred and the years of service required to earn it definitely fixed"'. In a footnote he observed: "Such regulations would be covered by the general state- ment of Suetonius, Vit. Aug. 49 Quidquid autem ubique militum esset, ad certam stipendiorum praemiorumque formulam adstrinxit, definitis pro gradu cuiusque et temporibus militiae et commodis missionum2." In other words, Cheesman assumed that regular grants, confirmed by the issue of military diplomas, were established by Augustus him- self. That view was not accepted by H . N e s s e 1 ha u f in his edition of CIL XVI (1936): he suggested that it was Claudius himself who first made Roman citizenship a regular reward for the completion of good service by auxiliaries and men from the fleets.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialisation and Promotion in the Roman Imperial Army by Michael Alexander Speidel
    SPECIALISATION AND PROMOTION IN THE ROMAN IMPERIAL ARMY BY MICHAEL ALEXANDER SPEIDEL Did professional specialisation increase the chances of promotion within the Roman army? And if so, what were the benefits of such a promotion?\ The Roman imperial army was a professional organisation with many specialists amongst the ordinary soldiers - so many specialists, in fact, that it may even seem difficult to define the ordinary soldier. For every soldier had a specific task assigned to hirn, depending on his unit and his position in the battle line. Auxiliary soldiers, in particular, were often highly specialised. Many ofthem fought in the light infantry units where some were specialised in fighting with different kinds of spears and javelins, others with axes, bows or slings etc. Auxiliary horsemen, too, were highly specialised soldiers, some fighting in light, others in heavy cavalry units, and again with many of them additionaHy specialised in certain weapons. Even legionary soldiers were very often specialised in fighting with particular weapons. By the third century the specialisation of weapon-skills in the legions was such that we find lancearii, phalangarii, sagittarii, triarii, equites and others attested on inscriptions.2 However, such specialists remained ordinary soldiers, as achieving skills in certain fighting techniques did not lead to promotion. There is only one exception to that rule: for an infantry soldier becoming a horseman was indeed a promotion. This is c1ear from a number of soldiers' careers, and from the fact, that horsemen earned higher pay.3 Transfer to a troop of higher rank was also considered a promotion, and it may weH have entailed training in new fighting techniques.4 However, there is nothing to show that the mastery of such techniques was required before promotion and transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Legionaries Living in Lutetia: a Study on the Socioeconomic Effects of The
    Legionaries Living in Lutetia: A Study on the Socioeconomic Effects of the Roman Army during the Principate Brian Wagner History Honors Thesis 1 Special thanks to: Professor Josiah Osgood, for all his inspiration, patience, and feedback, for without him this project would never have been possible. Professor Howard Spendelow, for his guidance, continued attention to detail, and consummate professionalism in his last year of service to the history honors seminar. My friends and family, who put up with me talking about Rome for the better part of a year, and who nodded and smiled whenever I tried to tell them that, yes, it really is interesting, I swear. (Front page: legionaries standing in formation while on campaign during the Second Dacian War of 105 CE. Scene 98, taken from Trajan’s Column - http://www.trajans-column.org/) 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Background 7 Chapter 2: Structure of the Roman Army 18 Chapter 3: Consumption and Production in the Roman Army 57 Chapter 4: Economic and Social Effects of the Army 89 Conclusion 109 Glossary 112 Bibliography 117 3 Introduction: During the reign of Augustus, the Roman military fielded approximately 400,000 soldiers, an impressive figure in both size and scope. Supplying and equipping such a massive force involved a logistical network on an unprecedented scale. These professional soldiers were stationed in every corner of the empire for decades at a time, serving as the defensive bastion against the “barbarians” beyond the frontiers. Establishing permanent bases and forts, they became integral parts of the local economy through trade, intermarriage, and the building of infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystical Rome V 2.0- July Release Morra Universal Cinematic Game System Contents Chapter Eight: Genre: Mystical Rome
    Mystical Rome V 2.0- July Release Morra Universal Cinematic Game System Contents Chapter Eight: Genre: Mystical Rome ................................................................ 4 Mystical Rome Credits .................................................................................... 5 Target Audience ............................................................................................ 5 Rating and Descriptors: R ............................................................................... 5 Mystical Rome Inspiration ............................................................................... 6 Mystical Rome Budget .................................................................................... 7 Mystical Rome Archetypes ............................................................................... 7 Artisan .................................................................................................... 7 Barbarian ................................................................................................. 9 Bureaucrat ..............................................................................................10 Clergy ....................................................................................................11 Criminal ..................................................................................................12 Druid ......................................................................................................13 Gladiator .................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • The Emperor's Guard
    THE EMPEROR’S GUARD: A LOOK INTO THE NECESSITY OF THE PRAETORIAN AND GERMAN BODYGUARDS by ANTHONY DAMIANO a dissertation submitted to the Graduate School – Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in World History written under the direction of Professor Gary D. Farney and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Newark, New Jersey May 2018 Copyright Page: © 2018 Anthony Damiano ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION THE EMPEROR’S GUARD: A LOOK INTO THE NECESSITY OF THE PRAETORIAN AND GERMAN BODYGUARDS By Anthony Damiano Dissertation Director: Professor Gary D. Farney The purpose of this text is to compare the praetorian guard to the German bodyguard (consisting of both the Equites Singulares Augusti and the Germani Corpores Custodes). These forces existed around the same time period, the first three centuries CE, and had a very similar role. This paper looks to answer the questions: why were two guards needed inside of Rome? what were their functions? and how did they affect the empire? The conclusion is made that two guards were not needed inside of Rome; it was simply a helpful luxury to keep a German bodyguard as well. The praetorians on the other hand were a necessary force that was essential to overseeing the life and death of the emperor. ii Preface I have always been fascinated by ancient history and ancient military forces. Going into the planning stages for this piece I knew that I wanted to focus on an aspect of an ancient military force.
    [Show full text]
  • AW Nr5 Okt2010.Indd 48 03-10-2010 08:30:52 the Debate
    THE DEBATE The fate of the Ninth The curious disappearance of Legio VIIII Hispana © ajbdesign.com Andrew Brozyna, IN 1954, ROSEMARY SUTCLIFF PUBLISHED A NOVEL ABOUT ROMAN BRITAIN. The last testimony of the presence of IT CAUGHT THE IMAGINATION OF AN ENTIRE GENERATION OF READERS WITH the Ninth Legion in Britain. Dated to AD 108, it testifies to a building project ITS TALE OF THE NINTH LEGION, DESTROYED IN THE MISTS OF SCOTLAND. A undertaken by the legion. BBC DRAMATISATION CAPTIVATED A FRESH GENERATION IN 1977. AND NOW A NEW MOTION PICTURE IS SET TO REVIVE INTEREST IN THE faTE OF THE LOST LEGION. BUT WAS IT REALLY DESTROYED IN BRITAIN DURING THE REIGN OF It was clearly a military building inscrip- tion, dating from the time when Roman HADRIAN? OR HAVE WE faLLEN FOR A MYTH THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN LAID builders were gradually refurbishing TO REST FIFTY YEARS AGO? the early turf-and-timber forts and fortresses in Britain, and reconstructing their defences in stone. The find-spot By Duncan B Campbell survived, however, for scholars of the was close to the original location of day to reconstruct the original text: the south-east gate into the legionary On the morning of 7 October 1854, The fortress of Eburacum. So the inscription York Herald and General Advertiser “The Emperor Caesar Nerva Trajan probably celebrated the construction of carried a short report, tucked away in the Augustus, son of the deified Nerva, the gateway, built by the emperor per bottom corner of an inside page. Under Conqueror of Germany, Conqueror legionem VIIII Hispanam (“through the the headline “Antiquarian Discovery of Dacia, Chief Priest, in his twelfth agency of the Ninth Hispana Legion”).
    [Show full text]