DOCSLIB.ORG

Recreational Boating in the New Jersey Coastal Zone AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE September 3, 1977

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recreational Boating in the New Jersey Coastal Zone AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE September 3, 1977 Recreational Boating in the New Jersey Coastal Zone AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE September 3, 1977 Conducted by: Roy Mann Associates, Inc. Office of Coastal Zone Management Division of Marine Sciences DEP Department of Environmental Protection State of New Jersey DEP GV 776 .N45 R43 1977 ..,qQPERTY OF NEW JEti;- l O.E.P. INFORMATION ---- '-\tSflURCE LENTEq (;-v 776 KL~3 1 '1.-r7 Recreational Boating in the New Jers~ Coastal Zone AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE September 3, 1977 Conducted by: Roy Mann Associates, Inc. Office of Coastal Zone Management Division of Marine Sciences Department of Environmental Protection State of New Jersey NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY ~ ') 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 3009 00587 7735 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 Objectives . ... 1 Limitations of the Study . 2 Reconnaissance Area and Procedure .. 3 SUM~1ARY OF OBSERVATIONS. 4 Raritan Bay ......... 4 Atlantic Highlands/Sandy Hook. 5 Navesink River/Shrewsbury River. 5 Shark River .......... 6 Manasquan River/Point Pleasant Canal 6 Metedeconk River/Toms River/Barnegat Bay (North) . 7 Barnegat Inlet/Barnegat Bay (South). 8 Mullica River/Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor. 8 Absecon Inlet/Atlantic City ....... 9 Mamora Coastal Inlets (Great Harbor Inlet, Corson Inlet, Townsend Inlet, Hereford Inlet) 9 Cape r~ay Inlet and Cana 1 . 10 Delaware Bay Coast/Maurice River . 11 DISCUSSION . 12 RECONNAISSANCE SLIDES (attached) . QQPERTY OF NEW JEH~t.: , •"1.E P. tNFOf.tMAliON '" l'·)::f CENTECl INTRODUCTION Objectives The aerial reconnaissance of recreational boating along the shores of New Jersey was conducted as an initial observation of boating activity and preliminary identification of areas where possible boating congestion and user conflicts exist. The reconnaissance fulfills the request of the New Jersey Coastal Zone Management Program of September 2, 1977 for an overflight meeting the requirements of Section 4.2, "Aerial Reconnaissance", in A Proposal for a Study of Recreational Boating in the New Jersey Coastal Zone (Roy ~·1ann Associates, Inc., 1977). The objectives stated therein were "to locate visually and photograph representative instances of recreational boating congestion (on a) peak-day weekend afternoon." Limitations of the Study The reconnaissance was authorized by the Office of Coastal Zone Management, State of New Jersey as the initial element of a full-scale investigation of recreational boating activity, congestion problems and management strategies. The information in this report should, therefore, be used only in the context of a comprehensive study examining all relevant spacial and temporal factors influencing boating activity and utilizing a full range of data sources and study techniques. In and of itself, a single­ day aerial reconnaissance provides only a preliminary and limited indication of boating activity levels and distribution. Reconnaissance Area and Procedure The reconnaissance was conducted on Saturday, September 3, 1977 (Labor Day Weekend) between 12:00 noon and 6:00 PM. According to the New Jersey Marine Police observer participating in the reconnaissance,the level of boating activity during this period represented approximately 60-70% of peak-day volume. 1 The flight path directed the reconnaissance in a course north to south, generally following the contours of the Atlantic Coast from Newark to Cape May Canal. Certain more heavily used rivers and bays were also reviewed farther inland in instances where boating activity of the entire estuary could not be observed from the primary flight path. A brief observational overflight of the Delaware Bay shore from Cape May to the Maurice River and of the Maurice River north to Millville was also conducted during the recon­ naissance as a supplement to the observations made along the Atlantic Coast. Refer to the attached Flight Plan for an illustration of the route and timing of the reconnaissance. The study area was divided into twelve sub­ areas for purposes of this report. Observations of boa~ing activity types and levels were recorded, along with the approximate time of observation, weather conditions, and supportfve information supplied by maps, charts, and the Marine Police observer. The twelve specific sub-areas reviewed and photographed were: 1. Raritan Bay 2. Atlantic Highlands/Sandy Hook 3. Navesink River/Shrewsbury River 4. Shark River 5. Manasquan River/Point Pleasant Canal 6. Metedeconk River/Toms River/Barnegat Bay (North) 7. Barnegat Inlet/Barnegat Bay (South) 8. Mullica River/Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor 9. Absecon Inlet/Atlantic City 10. Mamora Coastal Wetlands Inlets (Great Harbor Inlet, Corson Inlet, Townsend Inlet, Hereford Inlet) 11. Cape May Inlet and Canal 12. Delaware Bay Coast/Maurice River 2 Recreational Boating in the New Jersey Coastal Zone AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHT PLAN September 3, 1977 Time: 12:00 - 18:00 Weather: Fair and hazy Depart 12:00 12:30 13:05 ••• •• ••• • •• ••• 13:50 •••• •••• ••• ••••• 17:00 ' .·· """' •• .. ·· 14:50 15:55 16:30 --- Roy Mann Associates, Inc. SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS The following descriptions of observations made during the reconnaissance of each sub-area are intended to provide an initial review of the types and relative levels of boating activity in each water body. Boating levels are assessed in a relative manner, comparing the approximate amount of traffic using each sub-area on the afternoon of the flight, in order to provide pre­ liminary indications as to the location of potential boating congestion and user conflict. Raritan Bay Time of Day: 12:15 Weather Conditions: Fair and hazy Aerial Observations Recreational boating activity was very light near Arthur Kill and increased in areas closer to Sandy Hook. Use conflicts among the boaters were not apparent. Several small marinas were located along the New Jersey bay shore, and one large marina was observed on Staten Island, New York. Many boats were moored or anchored at these marinas at the time of the overflight. Supportive Information Raritan Bay is a large body of water which supports both recreational boating and commercial shipping. It is the primary entryway into the major port areas in Perth Amboy and Arthur Kill. Water quality is relatively poor, which affects its suitability for water contact and other recreational activities. Industrial and permanent residential development dominate the shore of the bay. 4 Atlantic Highlands/Sandy Hook Time of Day: 12:30 Weather Conditions: Fair and hazy Aerial Observations: Recreational boating levels were observed to be generally high in the proximity of Atlantic Highlands in Sandy Hook Bay. Several marinas providing slip space were identified, including the Atlantic Highlands Municipal Yacht Basin. Once again, many boats were moored in the marinas at the time of the reconnaissance. Supportive Information The Sandy Hook shoreline and adjacent waters support a large number of weekend visitors and boaters. An ammunition loading pier occupies the western portion of Sandy Hook Bay. Navesink River/Shrewsbury River Time of Day: 12:45 Weather Conditions: Fair and hazy Aerial Observations: Power boating and sailing comprised most of the boating activity on these two rivers. Boating volume was moderate with considerable traffic cruising through the Highlands Beach Bridge. Twelve boats were sighted within a 500-foot radius of the drawbridge. Supportive Information Several marinas and private docks provide access to the rivers in the vicinity of Highlands Beach Bridge. Although no conflicts were observed, the Marine Police observer characterized the bridge as being one of the major congestion locations along the coast during peak days, since it crosses the sole access channel to Sandy Hook Bay and open water for boaters in the Navesink and Shrewsbury Rivers. Additionally, the channel under the drawbridge at Locust Point on the Navesink River was reported to be a point of possible boating congestion. 5 Shark River Time of Day: 13:05 weather Conditions: Fair and hazy Aerial Observations Activity observed on the Shark River was primarily power boating with volume being relatively heavy. Waterskiing was observed on the several small landlocked lakes surrounding the Shark River. Conflicts among boats anchored and boats underway were observed immediately outside the Shark River inlet. Supportive Information According to navigational charts much of Shark River is very shallow, restricting certain traffic to maintained channels and limited deeper areas. Marinas and private docks provide access and mooring space along the shore of this water body. Three bridges with drawspans cross the Shark River channel near the coast. The Marine Police observer reported that each of the three bridges crossing the river were potential points of congestion. Manasquan River/Point Pleasant Canal Time of Day: 13:15 Weather Conditions: Fair and hazy Aerial Observations Boating activity was observed to be very heavy at the Manasquan Inlet and on the river itself, with power boats predominating. For instance, ten boats (seven power and three sail) were observed using the river's inlet simul­ taneously at the time of the overflight. Two bridges with drawspans cross the river about one mile from the inlet mouth. Many marinas and private docks line the shores of the river. 6 Property of . NJOEP OCZM Li0rary Supportive Information The Marine Police observer characterized the Manasquan River as the most severely congested waterway on the coast during peak use. Both bridges over the river have been reported to be congestion points. Furthermore,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 5: Risk Assessment – Flood
    SECTION 5: RISK ASSESSMENT – FLOOD Table of Contents SECTION 5 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Hazard Profile ............................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Hazard Description ...................................................................................................................................... 5-1 Previous Occurrences and Losses ...................................................................................................... 5-39 Probability of Future Occurrences ..................................................................................................... 5-56 Climate Change Impacts .................................................................................................................... 5-61 Future Trends ..................................................................................................................................... 5-63 Scenario .............................................................................................................................................. 5-64 Issues .............................................................................................................................................. 5-64 5.3 Vulnerability Assessment .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Barnegat Bay Watershed Educational Resource Guide
    Barnegat Bay Watershed Educational Resource Guide Prepared by Christine R. Raabe For the Ocean County Soil Conservation District and the Barnegat Bay Watershed Environmental Educators Roundtable Updated: March 2012 by the Barnegat Bay Partnership Table of Contents Introduction How to Use this Guide 1. Organizations and Agencies Involved with Barnegat Bay Watershed Education 2. National Organizations for Additional Resources 3. A Synopsis of Teacher Resources 4. Other Resource Guides and Directories 5. Map Resources 6. Barnegat Bay Watershed Environmental Educators Roundtable Steering Committee Members i Introduction The Ocean County Soil Conservation District and the Barnegat Bay Watershed Environmental Educators Roundtable discovered that educators within the watershed need assistance in finding pertinent information and resources if they are to effectively teach about the Barnegat Bay watershed and the issues that impact it. This guide has been compiled to answer that need. What began as a simple directory has grown into an annotated compendium of resources and organizations offering numerous programs, publications, field trips, and watershed information which educators can incorporate into their lessons and activities. It is a guide that will prove useful to anyone searching for information about the features and functions of the Barnegat Bay watershed. This Educator’s Resource Guide will be updated periodically. Please help us keep the document current by e-mailing Mary Judge at [email protected] with any additions, deletions, or corrections to the entries in this directory. Thank you for your help with this ongoing project. Original funding for this guide was provided by the USEPA and the NJDEP through the Barnegat Bay Partnership (BBP, formerly Barnegat Bay National Estuary Program) and the Partnership for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in the Barnegat Bay Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Financial Hardships Have Far-Reaching Economic, Community, and Safety Implications for Residents and Especially for Young Families and the Younger Workforce
    SECTION 4: TOWNSHIP PROFILE Income Financial hardships have far-reaching economic, community, and safety implications for residents and especially for young families and the younger workforce. A household which experiences financial difficulties will find it hard or impossible to invest in other areas that can increase safety and resilience. Necessary structural and mechanical improvements, modern technology to access information, vehicles to improve mobility and evacuation procedures, among other investments, may not be possible for individuals experiencing financial difficulties. The median household income for the Township in 2013 was $62,544. In the Township, 5% of residents are considered below the poverty line, 3.3% receive Supplemental Security Income, 1.0% receive cash public assistance, and 6.8% receive food stamps and SNAP benefits. Segments of the population experiencing financial hardship can be at additional risk during disaster events due to a variety of circumstances including a lack of access to resources and information to support safety and emergency procedures. Additional information is presented in the ‘Disabled and Vulnerable Populations’ section below. In addition, there are currently a number of both homeowners and renters substantially burdened by housing costs in the Township. Among current homeowners with a mortgage, 43.6% spend more than 30% of their income on monthly housing costs. Among renters, a troubling 61.2% spend more than 30% of their income on monthly housing costs. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) considers families that pay more than 30% of their income for housing to be cost-burdened and as a result are likely to experience significant economic hardship.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Manasquan [Squan] Beach, New Jersey
    U.S. Coast Guard History Program Station Manasquan [Squan] Beach, New Jersey USLSS Station #9, Fourth District Coast Guard Station #105 1 mile southeast of Squan Beach; 40-06' 52"N x 74-01' 43"W in 1880; Location: 40-07' 00"N x 74-02' 00"W in 1915; 40-06' 12"N x 74-02' 30"W in 1977. Date of Conveyance: 1849 Station Built: 1856; 1936 Fate: Still in operation Squan Beach (#105) : More recently known as Manasquan and located at Point Pleasant, New Jersey, this station is believed to have been built in 1856, on property conveyed in 1849, located "one mile southeast of Squan village." In the 1902 Annual Report is that statement that "under a contract entered into during the year, the old station which has become unsuitable for occupancy at Squan Beach is 1 being replaced by a new structure." In 1938, the Work Relief and Public Works Appropriation Act provided funds for a combination boathouse and garage, workshop, and launch way. History: In 1846 an investigation into the wreck of the packet ship John Minturn at Mantoloking indicated the need for organized lifesaving efforts in the area. By 1849, The Federal Government had established eight lifesaving stations in the area, including one at Chadwick Beach. The volunteer crew of that station justified the service's existence in 1850 when they rescued 201 of 202 people from the Scottish brig Ayrshire. Six months earlier a wreck such as the Ayrshire would have meant certain death for all aboard. Since that time there has always been a lifesaving station in the northern end of Barnegat Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan: Part 6
    Township of Brick, Master Plan – Stormwater Management Plan Table of Contents Introduction 1 Goals 1 The Water Cycle 2 Fig.1 - The Water Cycle 2 Natural Drainage – Watersheds 2 Land Use and its impact on Water Quality 2 Habitat Loss 2 Non-point Source Pollution 3 Stomwater System 3 A Developed Community 4 Fig.2 - 50 Year Poulation Trend 4 Density 4 Fig.3 - 50 Year Poulation Growth 4 Population Projection 5 Households 5 Average Household Size 5 Residential Building Permits 5 Fig.4 - Residential Building Permits 5 The Declining Rate of Growth 5 Fig.5 - Percent Change In Population 6 What the Future Holds 6 Natural Resources . 6 Waterways and their Condition 7 Fig.6 - Navigable Waterways 8 NJDEP AMNET New Jersey Impairment Score 8 Fig.7 - NJDEP AMNET NJ Impairment Score 8 Ground Water 9 Non-Point Sources 10 Point Sources 10 Illicit Discharges 10 Design and Performance Standards 10 Fig.8 - Basin Safety Ledges 10 Runoff Controls for Construction Sites 11 Runoff Controls for Post Development and Redevelopment 11 Pollution Prevention 11 Good Housekeeping Practices at Public Facilities 11 BMP-Based Control Measures 11 Ordinance Requirements 12 Public Education and Outreach 12 Fig.9 - Best Management Practices 12 Public Involvement and Participation 13 Fig.10 - Estuarine Land Use 13 Fig.11 - TMDL Requirement Issues and Strategies 14 Plan Consistency 15 Non-Structural Stormwater Management Strategies 15 Municipal “Build-Out Analysis” 15 Fig.8 - Residential and Commercial Build-Out of Privately-Owned Vacant Land 16 Municipal Mitigation Plan 16 Environmental Enhancement Projects 19 Township of Brick, Master Plan – Stormwater Management Plan Table of Contents – Maps Stormwater Infrastructure A Hydrologic Units (HUC14's) B Land Use Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4: Township Profile
    SECTION 4: TOWNSHIP PROFILE SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP PROFILE ....................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Physical Setting ...................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................ 4-12 4.2.1 Population Characteristics and Trends ................................................................................. 4-12 4.2.2 Vulnerable Populations......................................................................................................... 4-15 4.3 GENERAL BUILDING STOCK .............................................................................................................. 4-19 4.4 ECONOMY ............................................................................................................................................... 4-22 4.5 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND NEW DEVELOPMENT ................................................................... 4-23 4.6 CRITICAL FACILITIES .......................................................................................................................... 4-24 4.6.1 Essential Facilities ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouth County Profile 2020
    i 2020 Monmouth County Profile Report A Monmouth County Division of Planning Publication September 2020 Monmouth County Board of Chosen Freeholders Thomas A. Arnone, Director Susan M. Kiley, Deputy Director Lillian G. Burry Pat Impreveduto Nick DiRocco Cover Photos, In Order From Left to Right: Background Photo: Tatum Park, Middletown │ (Source: Monmouth County Open Space Plan 2019, Monmouth County Park System) Top Row: Upper Freehold Township │ Monmouth County Division of Planning Sea Girt Beach, Sea Girt │ Monmouth County Division of Planning Holmdel Park, Holmdel │ Monmouth County Open Space Plan 2019, Monmouth County Park System) Bottom Row: The Link at Aberdeen Station, Aberdeen │ 2019 Monmouth County Planning Merit Award Recipient Pedestrian Safety Demonstration Project, Red Bank │ 2019 Monmouth County Planning Merit Award Recipient CentraState Medical Center’s Solar Energy Initiative, Freehold Township │ 2019 Monmouth County Planning Merit Award Recipient i Monmouth County Planning Board Members James Giannell, Chairman Paul Kiernan Jr., Vice Chairman Lillian G. Burry, Freeholder Pat Impreveduto, Freeholder Joseph Ettore, County Engineer Charles Casagrande Jennifer DiLorenzo Nancy Greblja Marcy McMullen Alternate Members Susan M. Kiley, Freeholder Deputy Director James C. Schatzle, Alt. #1 John A. Mele, Alt. #2 Contributing Staff Project Manager Kyle DeGroot, Planner Trainee, Division of Planning Contributing Authors Joe Barris, PP, AICP, CFM, Director, Division of Planning Bridget Neary, CFM, Senior Planner, Division of Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan Element Adopted: October 19, 2017
    Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan Element Adopted: October 19, 2017 Prepared for: Prepared By: Malvika Apte, PP, AICP License Number: 06056 ` Acknowledgements Township Council Theresa Berger, Mayor Robert Nicastro, Deputy Mayor Evelyn O’Donnell, Councilwoman Pauline M. Smith, Councilwoman Robert F. Walsh, Councilman Planning Board Theresa Berger, Class I, Mayor Andrew Kudrick, Class II, Official of the Township Robert Nicastro, Class III, Councilmember Paul Schneider, Class IV, Chairman Robert Nash, Class IV, Vice Chairman Thomas Russo, Class IV William Gotto, Class IV Nicholas Huszar, Class IV, Environmental Commission Member Brian Tannenhaus, Class IV Kenneth French, Alternate 1 Thomas Boyle, Alternate 2 James R. Herrman, Director of Community Development Eileen Rubano, Board Secretary Ronald Cucchiaro, Attorney Laura Neumann, Engineer Malvika Apte, Planner Shari Spero, Certified Tree Expert Project Team Jennifer Beahm, PP, AICP‐ CME Associates Megan Stanley, PP, AICP‐ CME Associates Malvika Apte, PP, AICP‐ CME Associates Max Frega – CME Associates Julia Bordelon – CME Associates Steve Johnson, Former Planning Board Chairman 2017 Howell Township Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan ii Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2 3. Mission, Vision, and Goals and Objectives .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Survey of Shellfish Growing Area NE5 Manasquan River December 2016
    NJ Department of Environmental Protection Water Monitoring and Standards Marine Water Monitoring Sanitary Survey of Shellfish Growing Area NE5 Manasquan River December 2016 i Sanitary Survey of Shellfish Growing Area NE5 Manasquan River New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring (BMWM) Robert Schuster, Chief December 2016 Data from August 1, 2013 – August 31, 2016 Report prepared by: Tracy Fay, Principal Biologist Acknowledgements: This report was written under the direction of NJDEP WM&S administration. Special acknowledgment is given to the Boat Captains, the laboratory staff, and the technical and support staff. Cover Photo by Tracy Fay ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................1 DESCRIPTION OF GROWING AREA .................................................................................................1 Location & Description........................................................................................................................... 1 Growing Area Classification Summary .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Biological Resources ........................................................................................................ 3 SHORELINE SURVEY: EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL POLLUTION SOURCES ...................3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Value of the Barnegat Bay Watershed
    Economic Value of the Barnegat Bay Watershed October 2012 prepared for the prepared by Gerald J. Kauffman and Catherine Cruz-Ortíz of IPA’s Water Resources Agency Institute for Public Administration School of Public Policy & Administration College of Arts & Sciences University of Delaware www.ipa.udel.edu serving the public good, shaping tomorrow’s leaders Economic Value of the Barnegat Bay Watershed October 2012 prepared for the Barnegat Bay Partnership Toms River, N.J. prepared by Gerald J. Kauffman and Catherine Cruz-Ortíz of IPA’s Water Resources Agency Institute for Public Administration School of Public Policy & Administration College of Arts & Sciences University of Delaware www.ipa.udel.edu serving the public good, shaping tomorrow’s leaders cover credits cover images of Barnegat Bay watershed courtesy of the Barnegat Bay Partnership aerial cover image of Barnegat Bay by Doc Searles, courtesy of the New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium cover image of Barnegat Light courtesy of Friends of Barnegat Lighthouse State Park ECONOMIC VALUE OF THE BARNEGAT BAY WATERSHED October 2012 Table of Contents Section Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 645 OCEAN ROAD from South Jersey
    * 645 OCEAN R OAD * POINT P LEASANT, N EW J ERSEY * 08742 * PHONE 732.714.1907 * FAX 732.714.1913 * K INEMATIC CONSULTANTS, INC. 645 OCEAN ROAD POINT PLEASANT, NJ 08742 FROM NORTH JERSEY: 1. TAKE GARDEN STATE PARKWAY SOUTH TO EXIT 98 (POINT PLEASANT). 2. FOLLOW EXIT SIGNS TO ROUTE 34 SOUTH TOWARDS POINT PLEASANT. *** 3. GO TO LINE 4 IN THE BELOW DIRECTIONS FOR “FROM WEST JERSEY”. FROM WEST JERSEY: 1. TAKE NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE TO EXIT 7A. 2. PROCEED EAST ON INTERSTATE 195. 3. TAKE INTERSTATE 195 EAST TO EXIT FOR BRIELLE/POINT PLEASANT/ROUTE 34. *** 4. FOLLOW ROUTE 34 SOUTH, TOWARDS POINT PLEASANT. 4. YOU WILL PASS THROUGH ONE TRAFFIC CIRCLE WHILE ON ROUTE 34 SOUTH, IT WILL END, AND CONTINUE AS ROUTE 35 SOUTH. PROCEED ON ROUTE 35 SOUTH. 5. YOU WILL CROSS OVER THE MANASQUAN RIVER BRIDGE AND INTO THE TOWN OF POINT PLEASANT. 6. AT THE JUNCTION OF ROUTE 35 SOUTH AND ROUTE 88 WEST, YOU WILL BEAR RIGHT ON TO ROUTE 88 WEST. OB DINER IS ON THE RIGHT. 7. ONE HALF BLOCK ON YOUR RIGHT YOU WILL SEE A TWO STORY BRICK AND WHITE SIDED BLDG, THIS IS 645 OCEAN ROAD (RTE 88). (ROUTE 88IS ALSO CALLED OCEAN ROAD.) 8. TURN RIGHT INTO PARKING LOT. 9. ENTRANCE TO BUILDING FOYER IS ON THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING FACING THE PARKING LOT. 10. KINEMATIC CONSULTANTS, INC. IS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. SEEDLING EARLY LEARNING CENTER IS ON THE BOTTOM FLOOR. From South Jersey: 11. TAKE GARDEN STATE PARKWAY NORTH TO EXIT 90.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pfcs) in the Metedeconk River Watershed
    Identification of Perfluoroalkyl Compounds (PFCs) in the Metedeconk River Watershed Final Report NJDEP Grant Contract No. SR11‐016 Brick Township Municipal Utilities Authority 1551 Highway 88 West Brick, New Jersey 08724 In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Office of Science PO Box 420 Trenton, NJ 08625‐0420 April 2015 Contents I. Executive Summary II. Introduction III. Project Design and Methods IV. Quality Assurance V. Results and Discussion VI. Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research VII. Recommendations for Application and Use by NJDEP VIII. References IX. Appendices Tables Table 1 PFC Compounds Analyzed for the Metedeconk Watershed Study Table 2 Summary of Sampling Events and Types of Water Samples Collected Table 3 Summary of Test Results from Samples Collected within the PFC Study Area Figures Figure 1 Metedeconk River Watershed in Central New Jersey Figure 2 Metedeconk Watershed Land Use/Land Cover Figure 3 PFOA Source Area as Delineated from BTMUA’s December 2010 Sampling Campaign Figure 4 Business Inventory and NJDEP Regulatory Data for the Study Area Figure 5 Stormwater Conveyance Infrastructure in the Study Area Figure 6 Sampling Locations for Sampling Event 1 Figure 7 Sampling Locations for Sampling Event 2 Figure 8 Sampling Locations for Sampling Event 3 Figure 9 Sampling Locations for Sampling Event 4A Figure 10 Sampling Locations for Sampling Event 4B Figure 11 Sampling Locations for Sampling Event 5 Figure 12 Sampling Locations for Sampling Event 7 Figure 13 Groundwater Sampling
    [Show full text]