Development of an Assessment System to Evaluate the Ecological Status of Selected Rivers in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region” (ASSESS-HKH) Water Quality Mapping around City

Lower Gangetic Plains: Moist Deciduous Forest (IMO 120) Professor M. Fazlul Bari and Professor A.B.M. Badruzzaman

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1 Introduction:

Rivers around Dhaka city are affected by industrial activities, municipal sewage disposal, faecal contamination, agro-chemicals and sediment loading and population pressure

Maintaining a sufficient supply of clean water for the growing population is one of the major challenges, especially in the densely populated Dhaka city.

2 Sampling design

• Sampling period: April 1- April 8, 2007 (Dry season)

Rivers selected: - Turag, - Balu, - Buriganga, - Shitalakkhya and - part of Dhaleshwari.

3 Sampling design

Sampling Locations: Based on reconnaissance visits and discussion with local people 20 sites on 5 rivers around Dhaka city were selected for sampling and analysis. On the western side of Dhaka city: Part of Bongshi river and Turag river from bridge upto its confluence with Buriganga. Southern side of Dhaka city: part of and Buriganga Northern side of Dhaka city: Tongi khal and part of

Eastern side of Dhaka city: Balu river and part of Shitalakkhya river 4 Sampling for water quality mapping

Steps followed:

• Sampling at selected sites(10 samples/site)

• Analysis of physical and chemical parameters

• Field sorting and Identification of macroinvertebrates

• Further identification of macroinvertebrates in the Laboratory

5 Level of pollution based on common macroinvertebrates

No pollution to slight pollution

Moderate pollution

Severe pollution 6 Site Selection Criteria

Based on Sources:

1. Point sources; e.g. industrial effluent, municipal waste etc. and

2. Non-point sources; e.g. agricultural runoff

7 Site Selection Criteria

1) Selection of Reference Sites Water quality (WQ) Class I

2) Selection of impaired sites WQ Class II, III, IV, V Stressor types – Organic pollution (eg.Balu, Turag, Buriganga etc.)

Based on species abundance and richness numerical scores were assigned to potential water quality classes, viz.

• Class I (none to very slight organic pollution), • Class II (moderate pollution), • Class III (critical pollution), • Class IV (heavy pollution), and • Class V (very heavy to extreme pollution). 8 Pollution Sources

Pollution source

Point source Non-point source

Industrial effluent Municipal waste Agricultural runoff Others

Textile

Tannery

Dyeing

Others 9 Source of Pollution

Industrial wastewater discharge Sewage discharge in Balu river in Turag river 10 Source of Pollution

Waste materials dumping in Turag river Sewage discharge in Bongshi river

11 Sampling for water quality mapping

Sampling in Dhaleshwari river Sampling in Balu river 12 Sampling for water quality mapping

Sampling in Turag river Sample sorting at Shitalakkhya river

13 Sampling for water quality mapping

Sample sorting at Balu river Identification of macroinvertebrates at Turag river 14 Chemical parameters measured for water quality mapping

Electrical conductivity measured at Field measurement of dissolved field oxygen 15 Water Quality Class Per Site

River Site Water Quality Class Balu1 Demra IV Shitalakkhya 2 Demra III Balu 3 Lanchata V Balu 4 Ichhapura IV Turag 5 Bindan V Turag 6 Thermog IV Balu7 Dhopapara III Balu 8 Pipulia III Turag 9 Istema field IV Turag10 Tiebpur III

16 Water Quality Class Per Site

River Site Water Quality Class Turag11 Chapai II Turag12 Ashulia IV Buriganga13 Postogola V Dhaleshwari14 Ferighat III Dhaleshwari15 Charkundolia III Dhaleshwari16 Dharmaganj IV Shitalakkhya17 Katchpur IV Turag18 Baimile V Turag19 Boroibari III Bongshi Sutrapur III

17 Water Quality Mapping around Dhaka city Five colors have been used to denote the WQ Classes blue for water quality Class I green for water quality Class II yellow for water quality Class III orange for water quality Class IV and red indicates water quality Class V

18 River Water Quality Map around Dhaka City

19 Conclusion

Water quality may be a useful tool for water resources managers and decision makers involved in sustainable management and utilization of river resources.

Remarks: ƒScreening protocol works better as visual examination corroborates the findings. ƒNEPBIOS based scoring may not be similar to the screening protocol as species diversity is different in each country. ƒUS approach based on order of macroinvertebrates may be compared with the ASSESS-HKH approach

ƒPhysico-chemical parameters pH, BOD5 , etc. are not reflected in the water quality map. ƒSeasonal variation of the WQ should be addressed.

20 21