DOCSLIB.ORG

David De Guzman [1], David Shimabukuro [1], Michael J Stephens [2], Steven Skinner [1] [1] Department of Geology, California State University, Sacramento, CA [2] U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
David De Guzman [1], David Shimabukuro [1], Michael J Stephens [2], Steven Skinner [1] [1] Department of Geology, California State University, Sacramento, CA [2] U.S Spatial and temporal relationship between InSAR-derived subsidence and idle well fluid elevations in the Kern Front and Kern River Oil Fields David de Guzman [1], David Shimabukuro [1], Michael J Stephens [2], Steven Skinner [1] [1] Department of Geology, California State University, Sacramento, CA [2] U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA USGS disclaimer: the information in this poster is preliminary, is subject to revision, and has not received final approval by the USGS Sentinel-1A/B Data: Results: Introduction: Kern Front (a) Kern River (b) ▪ Land subsidence occurs in areas of oil and gas production ▪ Previous studies have mapped the spatial extent of displacement ▪ Subsidence is caused by fluid extraction without complete replacement ▪ The relationship between subsidence and fluid pressures has not been fully explored Note: Uncertainty in elevations caused by vertical datum ambiguity is less Figure 4: Sentinel-1A/B mission SAR images used for InSAR and Small Baseline Subset (SBAS) analysis. 45 than 1 meter. Figure 1: Interferometric Synthetic (Xu et al., 2001) SAR acquisitions between June 12, 2015 and April 16, 2020 were used to create 269 interferograms. (a) Aperture Radar (InSAR) observed Figure 7: Idle well fluid heights (2010 - 2016) mapped over InSAR derived Spatial and temporal relations between SAR data is seen with baseline distances of earlier data restricted to subsidence in the Lost Hills and deformation rates for (a) the Kern Front Oil Field and (b) the Kern River Oil 100 meters and pairs separated by no more than 300 days. Grey dots not connected by lines are SAR data Belridge Oil Fields between 11/5/95 Field. The lower fluid elevations are offset to the west of deformation in the that were not used. Dots connected by lines are SAR data pairs that were used in the analysis. All SAR and 2/17/96 (Xu et al. 2001). Kern Front Oil Field while they are co-located in the Kern River Oil Field images used for analysis were aligned to a master image (red). There was high temporal density for coverage except between February 2017 and October 2017. (b) Temporal coverage of the stacked Analysis: Study Area: interferograms. Kern Front Kern River InSAR Deformation: Idle Oil Well Data: Figure 8: Idle well fluid elevations (m) plotted against deformation rates (mm/year) in the (a) Kern Front Oil Field and (b) Kern River Oil Field. Least squares regressions Figure 2: Map of the study area located in the Figure 3: The relationship between the show a weak relationship in the Kern Front with an R-squared value of 0.058. The southern San Joaquin Valley of California with volume of water produced, oil Kern River, however, shows much stronger relationship between idle well fluid oil fields outlined. Study locations include the produced, and water or steam injected heights and deformation rates with an R-squared value of 0.373. Kern Front and Kern River Oil Fields. between 1977 and 2016 for (a) Kern Front and between 1988 and 2018 for Figure 5: Line-of-sight deformation rates of the Kern Figure 6: Idle oil well fluid elevations (1988 -2016) Preliminary results: (b) Kern River (CalGEM, 2020a). River and Kern Front Oil Field derived from 269 mapped in the Kern Front and Kern River Oil Fields. Study Approach: stacked interferograms spanning June 12, 2015 to Higher fluid elevations can be seen in the ▪ Kern River deformation rates and idle oil well fluid elevation correlate for the April 16, 2020. Deformation contours are in 10 northeastern side of Kern River while the lowest period studied ▪ Use interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to map spatial mm/year increments. The Kern Front Oil Fields has fluid elevations are found in the central and western ▪ This relationship is not present in Kern Front. It is not clear why this is the case. patterns of deformation in oil fields LOS subsidence rates up to 50 mm/year on its eastern part of the Kern Front Oil Field. (CalGEM 2020b) ▪ Next steps are to compare spatial pattern of fluid balance (volume of injection – ▪ Observe spatial distribution of idle oil well fluid elevation data side, while Kern River Oil Field has LOS subsidence of volume of production) with InSAR-derived deformation and idle well fluid ▪ Compare InSAR-observed deformation with fluid elevations over similar time up to 20 mm/year in its southwest region. elevations. frames References: Xu, H., Dvorkin, J., & Nur, A. (2001). Linking oil production to surface subsidence from satellite radar interferometry. Geophysical research letters, 28(7), 1307-1310. This work was funded by the California State Water Resources Control Boards’ oil and gas Regional California Department of Conservation, (2020a). Oil and gas online data: Geologic Energy Management Division, accessed January 8, 2020, at: Monitoring Program through a cooperative agreement between the U.S. Geological Survey and California https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/Online_Data/Pages/Index.aspx. State University-Sacramento. California Department of Conservation, (2020b). Idle oil well fluid elevations : Geologic Energy Management Division, https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/idle_well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 78 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 45A–1 Kaweah River and The
    § 45a–1 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 78 Kaweah River and the headwaters of that branch Fork Kaweah River to its junction with Cactus of Little Kern River known as Pecks Canyon; Creek; thence easterly along the first hydro- thence southerly and easterly along the crest of graphic divide south of Cactus Creek to its the hydrographic divide between Pecks Canyon intersection with the present west boundary of and Soda Creek to its intersection with a lateral Sequoia National Park, being the west line of divide at approximately the east line of section township 16 south, range 29 east; thence south- 2, township 19 south, range 31 east; thence erly along said west boundary to the southwest northeasterly along said lateral divide to its corner of said township; thence easterly along intersection with the township line near the the present boundary of Sequoia National Park, southeast corner of township 18 south, range 31 being the north line of township 17 south, range east of the Mount Diablo base and meridian; 29 east, to the northeast corner of said township; thence north approximately thirty-five degrees thence southerly along the present boundary of west to the summit of the butte next north of Sequoia National Park, being the west lines of Soda Creek (United States Geological Survey al- townships 17 and 18 south, range 30 east, to the titude eight thousand eight hundred and eighty- place of beginning; and all of those lands lying eight feet); thence northerly and northwesterly within the boundary line above described are in- along the crest of the hydrographic divide to a cluded in and made a part of the Roosevelt-Se- junction with the crest of the main hydro- quoia National Park; and all of those lands ex- graphic divide between the headwaters of the cluded from the present Sequoia National Park South Fork of the Kaweah River and the head- are included in and made a part of the Sequoia waters of Little Kern River; thence northerly National Forest, subject to all laws and regula- along said divide now between Horse and Cow tions applicable to the national forests.
    [Show full text]
  • René Voss – Attorney at Law 15 Alderney Road San Anselmo, CA 94960 Tel: 415-446-9027 [email protected] ______
    René Voss – Attorney at Law 15 Alderney Road San Anselmo, CA 94960 Tel: 415-446-9027 [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________________ March 22, 2013 Sent to: [email protected] and [email protected] Penelope Shibley, District Planner cc: Ara Marderosian Kern River Ranger District Georgette Theotig P.O. Box 9, 105 Whitney Road Kernville, CA 93238 Subject: Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project EA Comments for Sequoia ForestKeeper & Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club Ms. Shibley, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project EA. Sequoia ForestKeeper (SFK) and the Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club (SC) are generally supportive of efforts to close or restore areas damaged by OHVs to avert erosion, to deter illegal uses, to protect natural resources, and to reduce user conflict with non-motorized uses. Purpose and Scope of the Project The Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project would implement the closure and restoration of non-system routes within four recreation sites, relocate and restore campsites located within a recreation site (Evans Flat), and reroute portions of two OHV trails; one mile of the Woodward Peak Trail (Trail #32E53) and two miles of the Kern Canyon Trail (Trail #31E75). Three of the four recreation sites (Black Gulch North, Black Gulch South and China Garden) and one of the OHV trails (Kern Canyon Trail #31E75) are located in the Lower Kern Canyon. The fourth recreation site and the second OHV trail (Woodward Peak Trail #32E53) are located within the Greenhorn Mountains near Evans Flat Campground.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Trails Sequoia National Forest Western Divide Ranger District
    United States Department of Agriculture Hiking Trails Sequoia National Forest Western Divide Ranger District Western Divide Hiking Trails TRAIL NAME TRAIL # APPROX LOW HIGH EASY MOD STREN BIKE MILES Long Meadow 31E15 7.6 6,800’ 9,000’ X X Summit (GTW) 31E14 11.3 8,400’ 9,920’ Summit (South) 31E14 25 7,000’ 9,000’ X X Clicks Creek 32E11 8.2 6,200’ 7,800’ X X Lewis Camp 33E01 18.5 5,800’ 7,600’ Jerkey Meadow 32E12 9.8 6,000’ 6,800’ X X Forks of the Kern 33E20 11.5 4,600’ 5,700’ Lloyd Meadow 32E12 5.1 5,600’ 6,000’ X X Nelson 31E30 3.7 5,300’ 6,800’ X X X Bear Creek 31E31 8 5,000’ 9,000’ X X X Wishon 30E14 6 4,000’ 5,600’ X X X Needles 32E22 2.5 7,800’ 8,200’ X X Freeman Creek 32E20 4.3 5,600’ 7,100’ X X Jordan Peak 31E35 1.5 8,600’ 9,115’ X X X Mule Peak 31E43 1.5 7,600’ 8,200’ X X X LONG MEADOW: Leaves from Shake Camp in Mtn. Home State SUMMIT SOUTH (NON-WILDERNESS PORTION): Trail trav- Forest. Trail travels northeasterly starting at 6,800’ and enters Sequoia els from the GTW boundary south to Freeze out Mdw on the Hot & Kings Canyon National Parks at approximately 9,000’. Trail crosses Springs District. Trail is bisected many times by roads, but does pro- the Tule River twice, then junctions with the Touhy Gap Trail, then vide the visitor with many beautiful views and interesting things to see rises steeply on a rocky trail with many switchbacks to Summit Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Provenance and Dispersal of Neogene–Quaternary Strata of the Southeastern San Joaquin Basin and Its Transition Into the GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: Origin and Evolution of the Sierra Nevada and Walker Lane GEOSPHERE Sediment provenance and dispersal of Neogene–Quaternary strata of the southeastern San Joaquin Basin and its transition into the GEOSPHERE; v. 12, no. 6 southern Sierra Nevada, California doi:10.1130/GES01359.1 Jason Saleeby1, Zorka Saleeby1, Jason Robbins2, and Jan Gillespie3 13 figures; 2 tables; 2 supplemental files 1Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 2Chevron North America Exploration and Production, McKittrick, California 93251, USA 3Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Bakersfield, California 93311, USA CORRESPONDENCE: jason@ gps .caltech .edu CITATION: Saleeby, J., Saleeby, Z., Robbins, J., and ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Gillespie, J., 2016, Sediment provenance and dis- persal of Neogene–Quaternary strata of the south- eastern San Joaquin Basin and its transition into We have studied detrital-zircon U-Pb age spectra and conglomerate clast The Sierra Nevada and Great Valley of California are structurally coupled the southern Sierra Nevada, California: Geosphere, populations from Neogene–Quaternary siliciclastic and volcaniclastic strata and move semi-independently within the San Andreas–Walker Lane dextral v. 12, no. 6, p. 1744–1773, doi:10.1130/GES01359.1. of the southeastern San Joaquin Basin, as well as a fault-controlled Neo- transform system as a microplate (Argus and Gordon, 1991; Unruh et al., 2003). gene basin that formed across the southernmost Sierra Nevada; we call this Regional relief generation and erosion of the Sierra Nevada are linked to sub- Received 9 May 2016 Accepted 31 August 2016 basin the Walker graben.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California
    Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California By WILLARD W. DEAN fPith a section on GEOMORPHIC EFFECTS IN THE KERN RIVER BASIN By KEVIN M. SCOTT FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-610922 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 45 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________________________________________ Cl Introduction.____________ _ ________________________________________ 1 Acknowledgments. ________________________________________________ 3 Precipitation__ ____________________________________________________ 5 General description of the floods___________________________________ 9 Kern River basin______________________________________________ 12 Tule River basin______________________________________________ 16 Kaweah River basin____________________________--_-____-_---_- 18 Miscellaneous basins___________________________________________ 22 Storage regulation _________________________________________________ 22 Flood damage.__________________________________________________ 23 Comparison to previous floods___________-_____________--___------_
    [Show full text]
  • New Partnership for the Kern River Summer 2009 • Vol
    JOURNAL Canoes. Photo by Sebastian Santa. New Partnership for the Kern River Summer 2009 • Vol. 5, Issue 2 orking with the nonprofit organization,W the Kern River Corridor Endowment, River Partners is preparing a conceptual Osprey. Photo by Robert Blanchard. restoration plan for riparian habitats along the Kern River at the Panorama Vista Preserve in Bakersfield. It is the largest private-lands In This Issue project for River Panorama Vista Preserve, Kern River, Bakersfield, CA. Photo by Julie Rentner, Partners in its 11- Restoration Ecologist. year history. “What is Additional Refuge really unique about this restoration initiative is that it was spear headed by a group of Land Open private individuals who really care about the Kern River,” says Julie Renter, Restoration to the Public 3 Ecologist. “They make up the Kern River Corridor Endowment and worked to buy and protect the land.” Endangered Rivers River Partners staff has started assessing the 936-acre site, which has supported a and Solutions 4 variety of human uses, from agriculture to oil drilling. By considering the local ecology and historical land uses, this pre-restoration plan will make habitat recommendations for Thank You 11th restoring significant swaths of native vegetation within this privately-owned reserve. Anniversary “If this preserve could be restored, it would be a significant stepping stone in the Kern River Corridor for wildlife,” says Tom Griggs, Senior Restoration Ecologist. “It Dinner Sponsors 7 will be large enough acreage to support migration, especially for songbirds.” River Partners thanks the Kern River Corridor Endowment for inviting us to Paddle Season participate in their restoration efforts and the Partners for Fish and Wildlife (Kern Opens! Join Us National Wildlife Refuge) for partially funding the pre-restoration plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Calfornia Water Districts & Water Supply Sources
    WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM? Quincy Corning k F k N F , M R , r R e er th th a a Magalia e Fe F FEATHER RIVER NORTH FORK Shasta Lake STATE WATER PROJECT Chico Orland Paradise k F S , FEATHER RIVER MIDDLE FORK R r STATE WATER PROJECT e Sacramento River th a e F Tehama-Colusa Canal Durham Folsom Lake LAKE OROVILLE American River N Yuba R STATE WATER PROJECT San Joaquin R. Contra Costa Canal JACKSON MEADOW RES. New Melones Lake LAKE PILLSBURY Yuba Co. W.A. Marin M.W.D. Willows Old River Stanislaus R North Marin W.D. Oroville Sonoma Co. W.A. NEW BULLARDS BAR RES. Ukiah P.U. Yuba Co. W.A. Madera Canal Delta-Mendota Canal Millerton Lake Fort Bragg Palermo YUBA CO. W.A Kern River Yuba River San Luis Reservoir Jackson Meadows and Willits New Bullards Bar Reservoirs LAKE SPAULDING k Placer Co. W.A. F MIDDLE FORK YUBA RIVER TRUCKEE-DONNER P.U.D E Gridley Nevada I.D. , Nevada I.D. Groundwater Friant-Kern Canal R n ia ss u R Central Valley R ba Project Yu Nevada City LAKE MENDOCINO FEATHER RIVER BEAR RIVER Marin M.W.D. TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL STATE WATER PROJECT YUBA RIVER Nevada I.D. Fk The Central Valley Project has been founded by the U.S. Bureau of North Marin W.D. CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT , N Yuba Co. W.A. Grass Valley n R Reclamation in 1935 to manage the water of the Sacramento and Sonoma Co. W.A. ica mer Ukiah P.U.
    [Show full text]
  • UPPER KERN RIVER WHITEWATER RUN KERN WILD and SCENIC RIVER Sequoia National Forest Kern River Ranger District
    UPPER KERN RIVER WHITEWATER RUN KERN WILD AND SCENIC RIVER Sequoia National Forest Kern River Ranger District An easy drive from Southern California metropolitan areas is a trip to the Upper Kern River, designated by Take-Out: Riverkern Beach. Congress in 1987, as part of the National Wild and Class: II, III & IV (Medium to Very Difficult). Scenic River System. This popular section of river is Run Length: 3.5 miles. continuous exhilarating whitewater with boulder PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: An Annual Kern River gardens, pounding rapids and gradients exceeding 30 Use Permit, good through April 30 of the following feet per mile. year, is required year round. Permits are issued on a LOCATION first-come, first-served basis and are free of charge. A The Upper Kern segment begins at the Johnsondale permit is required for EACH craft. Group size cannot Bridge and ends at Riverkern Beach. This 21-mile exceed 18 people on the river at one time. stretch of river has four sections of rafting whitewater To obtain a permit, fill out an application IN PERSON with varying degrees of difficulty. at any Forest Service office in Kernville, Lake Isabella, LIMESTONE RUN: This northernmost run begins 21 Springville or the Bureau of Land Management office in miles north of Kernville, off Mtn. 99, at the Johnsondale Bakersfield. Applications will not be mailed out or left Bridge. in office drop boxes. Upon completion of your Put-In: Johnsondale Bridge or Brush Creek. application, a waterproof permit may be issued. Issuing Take-Out: Above Fairview Dam at Willow Point. you a permit gives us the opportunity to also provide Class: III & IV (Difficult to Very Difficult) varies you with information about the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Sacramento River Fishing Report
    Lower Sacramento River Fishing Report soMoving savingly and thatwell-kept Serge Thibaut creasing never her stewpot?restage biyearly Scrappier when or uncontemplated,Zollie fortified his Vinnypolarities. never Which overlay Hamlen any luges! discredits You never be tough to comment lower terraces are represented, report fishing sacramento river lower sac Peamouth are subject to date and surrounding area in water, lower sacramento river for trout spey tactics and conservation program that worked so much. Nor Cal and Southern Oregon Fish Reports My fly Buddy. Sacramento River spring Fishing FishKevinBrockcom. These hot water flows were decided on engaged the suggestions of higher water flows biologists had surgery would be. California fishing license cost 2020. Simply must be effective in lower sacramento river fishing report happy to go off lead core is the! Let big tailwater with trout hold in the red rock river lower sacramento fishing report for fish adults during the sacramento river? River Flows & Fishing Reports Russian River Fly Fishers. Hooking the big ones Dec 0 2020 Fall River Reservoir Fishing Report. Northern California Fishing call for Sacramento River your Guide. Report The Delta Fire ran through in lower end tap the Sacramento River drainage above Shasta Lake in 201. Fishing Reports Hookemheckys Sacramento River Fly. Home Uncategorized lower sacramento river fishing report Cast their line. Guide Notes Ted Fay Fly Shop. For information on the proper report contact them on 100 637 060 2020 KING salmon fishing press the Sac Some nice gravel bars are found place the key stretch. We can be difficult except for what the river striper, sacramento river is going to.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar Dating of the Kern River Ash Bed and Related Tephra Layers: Implications for the Stratigraphy of Petroleum-Bearing Formations in the San Joaquin Valley, California
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary International 178 (2008) 246–260 Geochemical correlation and 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Kern River ash bed and related tephra layers: Implications for the stratigraphy of petroleum-bearing formations in the San Joaquin Valley, California Dirk Barona,Ã, Robert M. Negrinia, Elizabeth M. Goloba, Don Millerb, Andrei Sarna-Wojcickic, Robert J. Fleckc, Bradley Hackerd, Alex Erendie aDepartment of Physics and Geology, California State University, Bakersfield, 9001 Stockdale Highway, Bakersfield, CA 93311, USA bBankers Petroleum, 601 East Daily Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010, USA cU.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA dDepartment of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA eChevron Corporation, Bakersfield, CA 93311, USA Available online 27 March 2007 Abstract The Kern River ash (KRA) bed is a prominent tephra layer separating the K and G sands in the upper part of the Kern River Formation, a major petroleum-bearing formation in the southern San Joaquin Valley (SSJV) of California. The minimum age of the Kern River Formation was based on the tentative major-element correlation with the Bishop Tuff, a 0.75970.002 Ma volcanic tephra layer erupted from the Long Valley Caldera. We report a 6.1270.05 Ma 40Ar/39Ar date for the KRA, updated major-element correlations, trace-element correlations of the KRA and geochemically similar tephra, and a 6.070.2 Ma 40Ar/39Ar age for a tephra layer from the Volcano Hills/Silver Peak eruptive center in Nevada. Both major and trace-element correlations show that despite the similarity to the Bishop Tuff, the KRA correlates most closely with tephra from the Volcano Hills/Silver Peak eruptive center.
    [Show full text]
  • Buena Vista Lake Ornate Shrew Species Status Assessment
    Buena Vista Lake Ornate Shrew Species Status Assessment August 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 10 Sacramento, California Version 1.0 GENERAL SUMMARY In this Species Status Assessment (SSA) we (the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)) assess the current and future viability of the Buena Vista Lake ornate shrew (BVLOS, “the shrew,” Sorex ornatus relictus). “Viability” refers to the ability of a species or subspecies to avoid extinction. Three factors contribute to viability: resiliency, redundancy, and representation. These refer to the ability of populations to withstand environmental and demographic stochasticity and disturbances, the ability of the species to recover from catastrophic losses, and the ability of the species to maintain representative genetic variation, thereby allowing it to adapt to novel environmental changes (Shaffer and Stein 2000, pp. 308-311). The BVLOS is a small mammal known from 11 sites in the southern portion of the San Joaquin Valley, California (the Tulare Basin). They require moist soils, dense groundcover, and diverse prey populations of insects, earthworms, and other small invertebrates. The known occupied sites constitute remnant patches of wetland and riparian habitat, which were considerably more extensive prior to development of the region for agriculture in the early- 1900s. We listed the BVLOS as endangered in 2002 and designated critical habitat for it in 2013. Important stressors influencing the viability of the subspecies include agricultural and urban development, insufficient water supply, potentially toxic levels of selenium in various water sources, pesticides, and inbreeding depression. Despite these stressors, BVLOS currently shows greater redundancy and representation than what was known at the time of listing.
    [Show full text]
  • SEP Report for Stanislaus River
    April 2019 Conservation Planning Foundation for Restoring Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha) and O. mykiss in the Stanislaus River Contributors and Participants American Rivers: John Cain Anchor QEA, LLC: John Ferguson, Elizabeth Greene, and Michelle L. Ratliff The Bay Institute: Jon Rosenfield and Alison Weber-Stover California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Stephen Louie, John Shelton, and Tim Heyne National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Brian Ellrott, Sierra Franks, Monica Gutierrez, Rhonda Reed, David Swank, Steve Edmundson, and Katherine Schmidt National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of California, Davis: Rachel Johnson The Nature Conservancy: Jeanette Howard and Julie Zimmerman State Water Resources Control Board: Chris Carr and Daniel Worth Trout Unlimited: Rene Henery University of California, Davis, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: Ron Yoshiyama U.S. Bureau of Reclamation: Joshua Israel U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Paul Cadrett, Ramon Martin, and J.D. Wikert CONSERVATION PLANNING FOUNDATION FOR RESTORING CHINOOK SALMON (ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA) AND O. MYKISS IN THE STANISLAUS RIVER Contributors and Participants American Rivers: John Cain Anchor QEA, LLC: John Ferguson, Elizabeth Greene, and Michelle L. Ratliff The Bay Institute: Jon Rosenfield and Alison Weber-Stover California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Stephen Louie, John Shelton, and Tim Heyne National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Brian Ellrott, Sierra Franks, Monica Gutierrez, Rhonda Reed, David Swank, Steve Edmundson, and Katie Schmidt National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of California, Davis: Rachel Johnson The Nature Conservancy: Jeanette Howard and Julie Zimmerman State Water Resources Control Board: Chris Carr and Daniel Worth Trout Unlimited: Rene Henery University of California, Davis, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: Ron Yoshiyama U.S.
    [Show full text]