Traits.Js Robust Object Composition and High-Integrity Objects for Ecmascript 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Traits.Js Robust Object Composition and High-Integrity Objects for Ecmascript 5 traits.js Robust Object Composition and High-integrity Objects for ECMAScript 5 Tom Van Cutsem Mark S. Miller Software Languages Lab Google, USA Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium [email protected] [email protected] Abstract add class-like abstractions with mixin- or trait-like capabili- This paper introduces traits.js, a small, portable trait ties abound. What sets traits.js apart? composition library for Javascript. Traits are a more robust alternative to multiple inheritance and enable object com- Standard object representation format traits.js rep- position and reuse. traits.js is motivated by two goals: resents traits in terms of a new meta-level object de- first, it is an experiment in using and extending Javascript’s scription format, introduced in the latest ECMAScript recently added meta-level object description format. By 5th edition (ES5) [3]. The use of such a standard format, reusing this standard description format, traits.js can rather than inventing an ad hoc representation, allows be made more interoperable with similar libraries, and even higher interoperability with other libraries that use this with built-in primitives. Second, traits.js makes it con- format, including the built-in functions defined by ES5 venient to create “high-integrity” objects whose integrity itself. We briefly describe ES5’s new object-description cannot be violated by clients, an important property in the API in the following Section. We show how this standard context of interaction between mutually suspicious scripts. object description format lends itself well to extensions Categories and Subject Descriptors D.3.2 [Language of Javascript object semantics, while remaining interop- Classifications]: Object-oriented languages erable with other libraries. Support for high integrity traits.js facilitates the cre- General Terms Design, Languages ation of so-called “high-integrity” objects. By default, Keywords Traits, Javascript Javascript objects are extremely dynamic: clients can add, remove and assign to any property, and are even allowed to rebind the this pseudovariable in an object’s 1. Introduction methods to arbitrary other objects. While this flexibility We introduce traits.js, a small, standards-compliant trait is often an asset, in the context of cooperation between composition library for ECMAScript 5, the latest standard untrusted scripts it is a liability. ECMAScript 5 intro- of Javascript. Traits are a more robust alternative to classes duces a number of primitives that enable high-integrity with multiple inheritance. objects, yet not at all in a convenient manner. An ex- A common pattern in Javascript is to add (“mixin”) the plicit goal of traits.js is to make it as convenient to properties of one object to another object. traits.js pro- create high-integrity objects as it is to create Javascript’s vides a few simple functions for performing this pattern standard, dynamic objects. safely as it will detect, propagate and report conflicts (name Minimal traits.js introduces just the necessary features clashes) created during a composition. While such a library to create, combine and instantiate traits. It does not add is certainly useful, it is by no means novel. Because of the concept of a class to Javascript, but rather reuses Javascript’s flexible yet low-level object model, libraries that Javascript functions for the roles traditionally attributed to classes. Inspired by the first author’s earlier work [7], a class in this library is just a function that returns new trait instances. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute Availability traits.js can be downloaded from www. to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. PLASTIC ’11 October 24th, Portland. traitsjs.org and runs in all major browsers. It also runs Copyright c 2011 ACM [to be supplied]. $10.00 in server-side Javascript environments, like node.js. 2. ECMAScript 5 descriptors. This object, which we will refer to as a property Before introducing traits.js proper, we briefly touch descriptor map, describes both the properties and the meta- upon a number of features introduced in the most recent ver- data (writability, enumerability, configurability) of the object sion of ECMAScript. Understanding these features is key to to be created. Armed with this knowledge, we could have understanding traits.js. also defined the point object explicitly as: Property Descriptors ECMAScript 5 defines a new object- var point = Object.create(Object.prototype, f manipulation API that provides more fine-grained control x: f value: 5, over the nature of object properties [3]. In Javascript, objects enumerable: true, are records of properties mapping names (strings) to values. writable: true, A simple two-dimensional point whose y-coordinate always configurable: true g, equals the x-coordinate can be defined as: y: f get: function () f return this .x; g, enumerable: true, var point = f configurable: true g, x: 5, toString: f value: function() f...g, get y() f return this .x; g, enumerable: true, toString: function() f return ’[Point ’+this .x +’]’; g writable: true, g; configurable: true g g); ECMAScript 5 distinguishes between two kinds of prop- erties. Here, x is a data property, mapping a name to a value Tamper-proof Objects ECMAScript 5 supports the cre- directly. y is an accessor property, mapping a name to a “get- ation of tamper-proof objects that can protect themselves ter” and/or a “setter” function. The expression point.y im- from modifications by client objects. Objects can be made plicitly calls the getter function. non-extensible, sealed or frozen. A non-extensible object ECMAScript 5 further associates with each property cannot be extended with new properties. A sealed object is a a set of attributes. Attributes are meta-data that describe non-extensible object whose own (non-inherited) properties whether the property is writable (can be assigned to), enu- are all non-configurable. Finally, a frozen object is a sealed merable (whether it appears in for-in loops) or config- object whose own properties are all non-writable. The call urable (whether the property can be deleted and whether Object.freeze(obj) freezes the object obj. As we will its attributes can be modified). The following code snippet describe in Section 6, traits.js supports the creation of shows how these attributes can be inspected and defined: such tamper-proof objects. var pd = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(o,’x’); Bind A common pitfall in Javascript relates to the peculiar // pd = f binding rules for the this pseudovariable in methods [2]. // value: 5, For example: // writable : true , // enumerable: true , var obj = f // configurable : true x:1, // g m: function () f return this .x; g Object.defineProperty(o,’z’, f g; get: function () f return this .x; g, var meth = obj.m; // grab the method as a function enumerable: false, meth(); // ”this” is now set to the global object configurable: true g); Javascript methods are simply functions stored in objects. When calling a method obj.m(), the method’s this pseu- The pd object and the third argument to defineProperty dovariable is bound to obj, as expected. However, when ac- are called property descriptors. These are objects that de- cessing a method as a property obj.m and storing it in a scribe properties of objects. Data property descriptors de- variable meth, as is done in the above example, the func- clare a value and a writable property, while accessor tion loses track of its this-binding. When it is subsequently property descriptors declare a get and/or a set property. called as meth(), this is bound to the global object by de- The Object.create function can be used to generate fault, returning the wrong value for this.x. new objects based on a set of property descriptors directly. There are other ways for the value of this to be rebound. Its first argument specifies the prototype of the object to Any object can call a method with an explicit binding for be created (every Javascript object forwards requests for this, by invoking meth.call(obj). While that solves the properties it does not know to its prototype). Its second problem in this case, unfortunately, in general, malicious argument is an object mapping property names to property clients can use the call primitive to confuse the original method by binding its this pseudovariable to a totally unre- unlike mixin-based or multiple inheritance, trait composi- lated object. To guard against such this-rebinding, whether tion is commutative and associative. This tremendously re- by accident or by intent, one can use the ECMAScript 5 duces the cognitive burden of reasoning about deeply nested bind method, as follows: levels of trait composition. In languages that support traits as a compile-time entity (similar to classes), trait composi- obj.m = obj.m.bind(obj); // fixes m’s ”this” to ”obj” tion can be entirely performed at compile-time, effectively var meth = obj.m; “flattening” the composition and eliminating any composi- meth(); // returns 1 as expected tion overhead at runtime. Since their publication in 2003, traits have received Now m can be selected from the object and passed around widespread adoption in the PL community, although the de- as a function, without fear of accidentally having its this tails of the many traits implementations differ significantly rebound to the global object, or any other random object. from the original implementation defined for Smalltalk. 3. Traits Traits have been adopted in a.o. Perl, Fortress and Scheme [4]. Traits were originally defined as “composable units of be- 4.
Recommended publications
  • Javascript and the DOM
    Javascript and the DOM 1 Introduzione alla programmazione web – Marco Ronchetti 2020 – Università di Trento The web architecture with smart browser The web programmer also writes Programs which run on the browser. Which language? Javascript! HTTP Get + params File System Smart browser Server httpd Cgi-bin Internet Query SQL Client process DB Data Evolution 3: execute code also on client! (How ?) Javascript and the DOM 1- Adding dynamic behaviour to HTML 3 Introduzione alla programmazione web – Marco Ronchetti 2020 – Università di Trento Example 1: onmouseover, onmouseout <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Dynamic behaviour</title> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> </head> <body> <div onmouseover="this.style.color = 'red'" onmouseout="this.style.color = 'green'"> I can change my colour!</div> </body> </html> JAVASCRIPT The dynamic behaviour is on the client side! (The file can be loaded locally) <body> <div Example 2: onmouseover, onmouseout onmouseover="this.style.background='orange'; this.style.color = 'blue';" onmouseout=" this.innerText='and my text and position too!'; this.style.position='absolute'; this.style.left='100px’; this.style.top='150px'; this.style.borderStyle='ridge'; this.style.borderColor='blue'; this.style.fontSize='24pt';"> I can change my colour... </div> </body > JavaScript is event-based UiEvents: These event objects iherits the properties of the UiEvent: • The FocusEvent • The InputEvent • The KeyboardEvent • The MouseEvent • The TouchEvent • The WheelEvent See https://www.w3schools.com/jsref/obj_uievent.asp Test and Gym JAVASCRIPT HTML HEAD HTML BODY CSS https://www.jdoodle.com/html-css-javascript-online-editor/ Javascript and the DOM 2- Introduction to the language 8 Introduzione alla programmazione web – Marco Ronchetti 2020 – Università di Trento JavaScript History • JavaScript was born as Mocha, then “LiveScript” at the beginning of the 94’s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elinks Manual the Elinks Manual Table of Contents Preface
    The ELinks Manual The ELinks Manual Table of Contents Preface.......................................................................................................................................................ix 1. Getting ELinks up and running...........................................................................................................1 1.1. Building and Installing ELinks...................................................................................................1 1.2. Requirements..............................................................................................................................1 1.3. Recommended Libraries and Programs......................................................................................1 1.4. Further reading............................................................................................................................2 1.5. Tips to obtain a very small static elinks binary...........................................................................2 1.6. ECMAScript support?!...............................................................................................................4 1.6.1. Ok, so how to get the ECMAScript support working?...................................................4 1.6.2. The ECMAScript support is buggy! Shall I blame Mozilla people?..............................6 1.6.3. Now, I would still like NJS or a new JS engine from scratch. .....................................6 1.7. Feature configuration file (features.conf).............................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Javascript
    Introduction to JavaScript Lecture 6 CGS 3066 Fall 2016 October 6, 2016 JavaScript I Dynamic programming language. Program the behavior of web pages. I Client-side scripts to interact with the user. I Communicates asynchronously and alters document content. I Used with Node.js in server side scripting, game development, mobile applications, etc. I Has thousands of libraries that can be used to carry out various tasks. JavaScript is NOT Java I Names can be deceiving. I Java is a full-fledged object-oriented programming language. I Java is popular for developing large-scale distributed enterprise applications and web applications. I JavaScript is a browser-based scripting language developed by Netscape and implemented in all major browsers. I JavaScript is executed by the browsers on the client side. JavaScript and other languages JavaScript borrows the elements from a variety of languages. I Object orientation from Java. I Syntax from C. I Semantics from Self and Scheme. Whats a script? I A program written for a special runtime environment. I Interpreted (as opposed to compiled). I Used to automate tasks. I Operates at very high levels of abstraction. Whats JavaScript? I Developed at Netscape to perform client side validation. I Adopted by Microsoft in IE 3.0 (1996). I Standardized in 1996. Current standard is ECMAScript 6 (2016). I Specifications for ECMAScript 2016 are out. I CommonJS used for development outside the browser. JavaScript uses I JavaScript has an insanely large API and library. I It is possible to do almost anything with JavaScript. I Write small scripts/apps for your webpage.
    [Show full text]
  • NINETEENTH PLENARY MEETING of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 London, United Kingdom September 19-22, 2006 [20060918/22] Version 1, April 17, 2006 1
    NINETEENTH PLENARY MEETING OF ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 London, United Kingdom September 19-22, 2006 [20060918/22] Version 1, April 17, 2006 1. OPENING OF PLENARY MEETING (9:00 hours, Tuesday, September 19) 2. CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS 3. ROLL CALL OF DELEGATES 4. APPOINTMENT OF DRAFTING COMMITTEE 5. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY 6.1 SC 22 Project Information 6.2 Proposals for New Work Items within SC 22 6.3 Outstanding Actions From the Eighteenth Plenary of SC 22 Page 1 of 7 JTC 1 SC 22, 2005 Version 1, April 14, 2006 6.4 Transition to ISO Livelink 6.4.1 SC 22 Transition 7. ACTIVITY REPORTS 7.1 National Body Reports 7.2 External Liaison Reports 7.2.1 ECMA International (Rex Jaeschke) 7.2.2 Free Standards Group (Nick Stoughton) 7.2.2 Austin Joint Working Group (Nick Stoughton) 7.3 Internal Liaison Reports 7.3.1 Liaison Officers from JTC 1/SC 2 (Mike Ksar) 7.3.2 Liaison Officer from JTC 1/SC 7 (J. Moore) Page 2 of 7 JTC 1 SC 22, 2005 Version 1, April 14, 2006 7.3.3 Liaison Officer from ISO/TC 37 (Keld Simonsen) 7.3.5 Liaison Officer from JTC 1 SC 32 (Frank Farance) 7.4 Reports from SC 22 Subgroups 7.4.1 Other Working Group Vulnerabilities (Jim Moore) 7.4.2 SC 22 Advisory Group for POSIX (Stephen Walli) 7.5 Reports from JTC 1 Subgroups 7.5.1 JTC 1 Vocabulary (John Hill) 7.5.2 JTC 1 Ad Hoc Directives (John Hill) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Refocus TC39-TG1 on the Maintenance of the Ecmascript, 3 Edition Specification
    Proposal to Refocus TC39-TG1 On the Maintenance of the ECMAScript, 3rd Edition Specification Submitted by: Yahoo! Inc. Microsoft Corporation Douglas Crockford Pratap Lakshman & Allen Wirfs-Brock Preface We believe that the specification currently under development by TC39-TG1 as ECMAScript 4 is such a radical departure from the current standard that it is essentially a new language. It is as different from ECMAScript 3rd Edition as C++ is from C. Such a drastic change is not appropriate for a revision of a widely used standardized language and cannot be justified in light of the current broad adoption of ECMAScript 3rd Edition for AJAX style web applications. We do not believe that consensus can be reach within TC39-TG1 based upon its current language design work. However, we do believe that an alternative way forward can be found and submit this proposal as a possible path to resolution. Proposal We propose that the work of TC39-TG1 be reconstituted as two (or possibly three) new TC39 work items as follows: Work item 1 – On going maintenance of ECMAScript, 3rd Edition. In light on the broad adoption of ECMAScript, 3rd Edition for web browser based applications it is clear that this language will remain an important part of the world-wide-web infrastructure for the foreseeable future. However, since the publication of the ECMAScript, 3rd Edition specification in 1999 there has been feature drift between implementations and cross-implementation compatibility issues arising from deficiencies and ambiguities in the specification. The purpose of this work item is to create a maintenance revision of the specification (a 4th Edition) that focuses on these goals: Improve implementation conformance by rewriting the specification to improve its rigor and clarity, and by correcting known points of ambiguity or under specification.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Interoperability: Why Objects Are Inevitable
    The Power of Interoperability: Why Objects Are Inevitable Jonathan Aldrich Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, USA [email protected] Abstract 1. Introduction Three years ago in this venue, Cook argued that in Object-oriented programming has been highly suc- their essence, objects are what Reynolds called proce- cessful in practice, and has arguably become the dom- dural data structures. His observation raises a natural inant programming paradigm for writing applications question: if procedural data structures are the essence software in industry. This success can be documented of objects, has this contributed to the empirical success in many ways. For example, of the top ten program- of objects, and if so, how? ming languages at the LangPop.com index, six are pri- This essay attempts to answer that question. After marily object-oriented, and an additional two (PHP reviewing Cook’s definition, I propose the term ser- and Perl) have object-oriented features.1 The equiva- vice abstractions to capture the essential nature of ob- lent numbers for the top ten languages in the TIOBE in- jects. This terminology emphasizes, following Kay, that dex are six and three.2 SourceForge’s most popular lan- objects are not primarily about representing and ma- guages are Java and C++;3 GitHub’s are JavaScript and nipulating data, but are more about providing ser- Ruby.4 Furthermore, objects’ influence is not limited vices in support of higher-level goals. Using examples to object-oriented languages; Cook [8] argues that Mi- taken from object-oriented frameworks, I illustrate the crosoft’s Component Object Model (COM), which has unique design leverage that service abstractions pro- a C language interface, is “one of the most pure object- vide: the ability to define abstractions that can be ex- oriented programming models yet defined.” Academ- tended, and whose extensions are interoperable in a ically, object-oriented programming is a primary focus first-class way.
    [Show full text]
  • International Standard Iso/Iec 9075-2
    This is a previewINTERNATIONAL - click here to buy the full publication ISO/IEC STANDARD 9075-2 Fifth edition 2016-12-15 Information technology — Database languages — SQL — Part 2: Foundation (SQL/Foundation) Technologies de l’information — Langages de base de données — SQL — Partie 2: Fondations (SQL/Fondations) Reference number ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016(E) © ISO/IEC 2016 ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016(E) This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO/IEC 2016, Published in Switzerland All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form orthe by requester. any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401 ISOCH-1214 copyright Vernier, office Geneva, Switzerland Tel. +41 22 749 01 11 Fax +41 22 749 09 47 www.iso.org [email protected] ii © ISO/IEC 2016 – All rights reserved This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016(E) Contents Page Foreword..................................................................................... xxi Introduction.................................................................................. xxii 1 Scope.................................................................................... 1 2 Normative references.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proof/Épreuve
    0- W e8 IE -2 V 07 E a3 ) 4 R i 68 P .a /5 -1 D h st 7 e si 75 R it s/ 1 A s. : d -2 rd r rf D rd a da p N a d n o- A d an ta is t /s c/ T n l s g 5 S ta l lo 8 s u a cc eh ( F at 0 /c fa iT ai c INTERNATIONAL . b0 eh a it - s. 43 STANDARD rd a9 a 1- nd f a 4b st // s: tp ht Document management for PDF — 21757-1 Part 1: Use of ISO 32000-2 (PDF 2.0) ISO First edition — ECMAScript PROOF/ÉPREUVE ISO 21757-1:2020(E)Reference number © ISO 2020 ISO 21757-1:2020(E) 0- W e8 IE -2 V 07 E a3 ) 4 R i 68 P .a /5 -1 D h st 7 e si 75 R it s/ 1 A s. : d -2 rd r rf D rd a da p N a d n o- A d an ta is t /s c/ T n l s g 5 S ta l lo 8 s u a cc eh ( F at 0 /c fa iT ai c . b0 eh a it - s. 43 rd a9 a 1- nd f a 4b st // s: tp ht © ISO 2020 All rights reserved. UnlessCOPYRIGHT otherwise specified, PROTECTED or required inDOCUMENT the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principles of Object-Oriented Javascript Zakas
    TAKETAKE CONTROLCONTROL OFOF Foreword by Cody Lindley, Best-selling Author and Principal Frontend Architect JAVASCRIPT THE PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED JAVASCRIPT JAVASCRIPT THE PRINCIPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED JAVASCRIPT THETHE PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES OFOF OBJECTSOBJECTS at TandemSeven OBJECT-ORIENTEDOBJECT-ORIENTED If you’ve used a more traditional object-oriented • How to define your own constructors JAVASCRIPTJAVASCRIPT language, such as C++ or Java, JavaScript probably • How to work with and understand prototypes doesn’t seem object-oriented at all. It has no concept of classes, and you don’t even need to define any • Inheritance patterns for types and objects objects in order to write code. But don’t be fooled — The Principles of Object-Oriented JavaScript will leave NICHOLAS C. ZAKAS JavaScript is an incredibly powerful and expressive even experienced developers with a deeper understand- object-oriented language that puts many design ing of JavaScript. Unlock the secrets behind how objects decisions right into your hands. work in JavaScript so you can write clearer, more In The Principles of Object-Oriented JavaScript, flexible, and more efficient code. Nicholas C. Zakas thoroughly explores JavaScript’s object-oriented nature, revealing the language’s A B O U T T H E A U T H O R unique implementation of inheritance and other key characteristics. You’ll learn: Nicholas C. Zakas is a software engineer at Box and is known for writing on and speaking about the latest • The difference between primitive and reference in JavaScript best practices. He honed his experience values during his five years at Yahoo!, where he was principal • What makes JavaScript functions so unique frontend engineer for the Yahoo! home page.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Major Programming Languages
    COS 301 Programming Languages Evolution of the Major Programming Languages UMaine School of Computing and Information Science COS 301 - 2018 Topics Zuse’s Plankalkül Minimal Hardware Programming: Pseudocodes The IBM 704 and Fortran Functional Programming: LISP ALGOL 60 COBOL BASIC PL/I APL and SNOBOL SIMULA 67 Orthogonal Design: ALGOL 68 UMaine School of Computing and Information Science COS 301 - 2018 Topics (continued) Some Early Descendants of the ALGOLs Prolog Ada Object-Oriented Programming: Smalltalk Combining Imperative and Object-Oriented Features: C++ Imperative-Based Object-Oriented Language: Java Scripting Languages A C-Based Language for the New Millennium: C# Markup/Programming Hybrid Languages UMaine School of Computing and Information Science COS 301 - 2018 Genealogy of Common Languages UMaine School of Computing and Information Science COS 301 - 2018 Alternate View UMaine School of Computing and Information Science COS 301 - 2018 Zuse’s Plankalkül • Designed in 1945 • For computers based on electromechanical relays • Not published until 1972, implemented in 2000 [Rojas et al.] • Advanced data structures: – Two’s complement integers, floating point with hidden bit, arrays, records – Basic data type: arrays, tuples of arrays • Included algorithms for playing chess • Odd: 2D language • Functions, but no recursion • Loops (“while”) and guarded conditionals [Dijkstra, 1975] UMaine School of Computing and Information Science COS 301 - 2018 Plankalkül Syntax • 3 lines for a statement: – Operation – Subscripts – Types • An assignment
    [Show full text]
  • 1. with Examples of Different Programming Languages Show How Programming Languages Are Organized Along the Given Rubrics: I
    AGBOOLA ABIOLA CSC302 17/SCI01/007 COMPUTER SCIENCE ASSIGNMENT ​ 1. With examples of different programming languages show how programming languages are organized along the given rubrics: i. Unstructured, structured, modular, object oriented, aspect oriented, activity oriented and event oriented programming requirement. ii. Based on domain requirements. iii. Based on requirements i and ii above. 2. Give brief preview of the evolution of programming languages in a chronological order. 3. Vividly distinguish between modular programming paradigm and object oriented programming paradigm. Answer 1i). UNSTRUCTURED LANGUAGE DEVELOPER DATE Assembly Language 1949 FORTRAN John Backus 1957 COBOL CODASYL, ANSI, ISO 1959 JOSS Cliff Shaw, RAND 1963 BASIC John G. Kemeny, Thomas E. Kurtz 1964 TELCOMP BBN 1965 MUMPS Neil Pappalardo 1966 FOCAL Richard Merrill, DEC 1968 STRUCTURED LANGUAGE DEVELOPER DATE ALGOL 58 Friedrich L. Bauer, and co. 1958 ALGOL 60 Backus, Bauer and co. 1960 ABC CWI 1980 Ada United States Department of Defence 1980 Accent R NIS 1980 Action! Optimized Systems Software 1983 Alef Phil Winterbottom 1992 DASL Sun Micro-systems Laboratories 1999-2003 MODULAR LANGUAGE DEVELOPER DATE ALGOL W Niklaus Wirth, Tony Hoare 1966 APL Larry Breed, Dick Lathwell and co. 1966 ALGOL 68 A. Van Wijngaarden and co. 1968 AMOS BASIC FranÇois Lionet anConstantin Stiropoulos 1990 Alice ML Saarland University 2000 Agda Ulf Norell;Catarina coquand(1.0) 2007 Arc Paul Graham, Robert Morris and co. 2008 Bosque Mark Marron 2019 OBJECT-ORIENTED LANGUAGE DEVELOPER DATE C* Thinking Machine 1987 Actor Charles Duff 1988 Aldor Thomas J. Watson Research Center 1990 Amiga E Wouter van Oortmerssen 1993 Action Script Macromedia 1998 BeanShell JCP 1999 AngelScript Andreas Jönsson 2003 Boo Rodrigo B.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Composition of Object-Oriented Frameworks
    Evolution and Composition of Object-Oriented Frameworks Michael Mattsson University of Karlskrona/Ronneby Department of Software Engineering and Computer Science ISBN 91-628-3856-3 © Michael Mattsson, 2000 Cover background: Digital imagery® copyright 1999 PhotoDisc, Inc. Printed in Sweden Kaserntryckeriet AB Karlskrona, 2000 To Nisse, my father-in-law - who never had the opportunity to study as much as he would have liked to This thesis is submitted to the Faculty of Technology, University of Karlskrona/Ronneby, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering. Contact Information: Michael Mattsson Department of Software Engineering and Computer Science University of Karlskrona/Ronneby Soft Center SE-372 25 RONNEBY SWEDEN Tel.: +46 457 38 50 00 Fax.: +46 457 27 125 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.ipd.hk-r.se/rise Abstract This thesis comprises studies of evolution and composition of object-oriented frameworks, a certain kind of reusable asset. An object-oriented framework is a set of classes that embodies an abstract design for solutions to a family of related prob- lems. The work presented is based on and has its origin in industrial contexts where object-oriented frameworks have been developed, used, evolved and managed. Thus, the results are based on empirical observations. Both qualitative and quanti- tative approaches have been used in the studies performed which cover both tech- nical and managerial aspects of object-oriented framework technology. Historically, object-oriented frameworks are large monolithic assets which require several design iterations and are therefore costly to develop. With the requirement of building larger applications, software engineers have started to compose multiple frameworks, thereby encountering a number of problems.
    [Show full text]