Ch 2. Cellular Mechanisms of Action of Therapeutic Brain Stimulation
Sungjun Kwon [email protected]
Special thanks to Jeong Heo Introduction
• DBS(Deep Brain Stimulation) has revolutionized the treatment for movement disorders
– e.g., Parkinson Disease, Dystonia(근긴장 이상증), Tremor Neuron Structure
Terms
• DBS: Deep Brain Stimulation
• firing: emitting an action potential from a neuron
• depolarization: a change in a cell's membrane potential, making it more positive, or less negative. Enough depolarization may result in an action potential.
• hyperpolarization: the opposite of depolarization, and inhibits the rise of an action potential.
• afferent: conveying towards the brain
• EPSP(excitatory postsynaptic potential): a temporary depolarization of postsynaptic membrane potential caused by the flow of positively charged ions into the postsynaptic cell as a result of opening of ligand-sensitive channels In This Chapter…
• how DBS works • the effects of DBS on neuronal functioning within the stimulated nucleus • reviews the crinical use of DBS in thalamus – explain fundamental effects of DBS based on cellular models DBS for Essential Tremor Essential Tremor
• 3-to-8 Hz tremor
• result from dysfunction in the olivo-cerebellar(소뇌) pathway – In olivo-cerebellar pathway, Purkinje cell secretes GABA, inhibitory neurotransmitter DBS for Essential Tremor
• Electrical Stimulation to VL thalamus – projections from the deep cerebellar nuclei – projections to the primary motor cortex
Features of thalamic DBS for tremor(1/4)
• There is no evidence that chronic stimulation damages surrounding brain tissue
• The effects of stimulation are reversible
• Incorrect electrode placement will result in poor outcome Features of thalamic DBS for tremor(2/4)
• Immediate benefit on tremor – within seconds of turned on, tremor disappears completely or significantly suppressed – when the stimulator is turned off, the tremor returns immediately – no after-effect
Features of thalamic DBS for tremor(3/4)
• Frequency Dependency of Stimulation – High Freq(>100 Hz) clinical benefit – Low Freq may worsen movements • 5Hz induce tremor (Hassler et al., 1960) • 15Hz induce myoclonus(간대성 근경련, Bejjani et al., 2000) • 20Hz with higher amplitudes significant tremor worsening – Pulse duration and amplitude determine whether a neural element will be brought to threshold – Frequency has a bigger role for somatic excitation Features of thalamic DBS for tremor(4/4)
• no involuntary movements or motor disruption with prolonged DBS
• When stimulation was applied directly to sensory thalamic relay, sensory perception was not disturbed Mechanisms of Action
Local Effects of DBS Local Effects of DBS
• from Human Studies • from Animal Studies • from Slice Preparations • from Modeling Studies Human Studies(1/2)
• Axon is the neural element responsible for tremor suppression – from measurement of chronaxie times • chronaxie: property of neural elements that is related to threshold for activation
• Thalamic neurons were inhibited during high-freqeuncy stimulation – from microstimulation on nearby neurons using microelectrode
Human Studies(2/2)
• DBS increased blood flow in thalamus, suggesting increased neuronal activity – Using imaging techniques, such as PET, fMRI – Haslinger et al.(2003) found relationship between stimulation properties and thalamic blood flow • frequency – blood flow: U-shape • amplitude – blood flow: linear Animal Studies
• STN-DBS produced inhibition within STN and reducing firing at its projection sites
• High-frequency stimulation in the GP reduced the firing frequency of neighboring neurons
• However, efferent outflow from the stimulated nucleus incleased during DBS Slice Preparations(1/5)
• DBS on VL thalamic neurons using intracellular techniques(in vitro) Slice Preparations(2/5)
• high-frequency stimulation produced depolarization of thalamic neurons in slice
• the effects were stimulation frequency and amplitude dependent Slice Preparations(3/5)
• Neuronal responses to high-freq stimulation • Type 1: Depolarization occurred only at the onset of the stimulus train – Functional Deafferentation – the loss of synaptic input to postsynaptic thalamocortical neurons Slice Preparations(4/5)
• Type 2: Depolarization sustained throughout the train – Functional Inactivation – where depolarization was followed by repetitive spikes, while the cell remained depolarized, and which disrupted the rhythmic pattern of the outgoing signal Slice Preparations(5/5)
• The suppression of tremor activity was specific to the stimulated pathway and did not spill over to another pathway – DBS to different pathway – 5-Hz tremor-like input and 125-Hz DBS • to same pathway DBS blocked the 5-Hz tremor-like input • to independant pathway DBS didn’t blocked
Modeling Studies(1/2)
• focused on the immediate responses of local neural elements to extra-cellular stimulation.
• Responses to DBS were determined by – electrode position – stimulus intensity – wave-form duration – polarity – the proportion of inhibitory and excitatory terminals within the structure Modeling Studies(2/2)
• Axons of passage were the targets of DBS • Where the cell body could be inhibited from firing action potentials, yet the axon that has a lower threshold for activation would fire independently – The axon that has a lower threshold than cell
• Regular high-frequency stimulation applied to the output of STN would normalize pathologic rhythmic activity in pallidum, thalamus, and cortex • consider the effects of DBS at its downstream projection sites
Mechanisms of Action
Distant Effects of DBS Distant Effects of DBS
• The downstream projection sites from the nucleus may be more relevant to the mechanism of action than the local effects.
• from Human Studies • from Animal Studies • from Slice Preparation
from Human Studies
• Effects of thalamic DBS on EMG – single stimuli sudden short lapses of posture in contracting muscles – The effects on EMG was transient even during prolonged DBS and only occurred with simulation of the cerebellar- receiving thalamus, not other basal ganglia structures
from Human Studies
• Effects of thalamic DBS on cortical function – using transcranial magnetic stimulation – patients with thalamic DBS had significantly larger motor- evoked potential amplitudes – cerebello-thalamocortical pathway was facilitated in the ON stimulation state from Human Studies
• Effects of thalamic DBS on cortical function – measuring regional cerebral blood flow using functional imaging – During Parkinsonian tremor, activity in the sensorimotor cortex was increased – reduction in cerebellar activity with 135-180 Hz DBS – the effects of varying amplitude and frequency on the cortical blood flow • Stimulation amplitude ↑ nonlinear increase • Stimulation frequency ↑ linear increase • thalamic DBS results in activation rather than inhibition of thalamic projections from Human Studies
• Effects of thalamic DBS on cortical function – no behavioral correlate for motor cortex activation clinically – High-frequency stimulation produces no adverse motor effects • Aside from 2-3s, 1-2Hz stimulation produced EMG excitation or inhibition depending on the intensity • perhaps, cortical blood flow changes may be an epiphenomenon of thalamic DBS from Animal Studies
• The effects of VL thalamic DBS on primary motor cortex
• DBS to other basal ganglia nuclei and recorded activity at the projection site – DBS to the globus pallidus pars interna and recorded spontaneous activity in pallidal-receiving thalamus – High-frequency stimulation to the STN and recorded spontaneous activity in the globus pallidus
• DBS interrupted abnormal patterns of thalamic and basal ganglia activity
from Slice Preparations
• examined the ability of thalamocortical and corticaothalamic neurons to follow stimuli
• thalamocortical and corticothalamic fibers did not follow high-frequency stimulation faithfully • but complete conduction block did not occur from Slice Preparations
• Motor cortical neurons depolarized in response to subcortical external capsule stimulation – current clamp traces at resting membrane potential from Slice Preparations
• At 10Hz and 20Hz, synaptic transmission could be maintained throughtout the 30-sec train • freq. > 50Hz, temporal summation of EPSPs at the onset of stimulation • After this initial response, stimulation could no longer evoke a postsynaptic response • Amp. of initial depolarization incleases up to 100 Hz from Slice Preparations
• Synaptic depression was responsible for the lack of sustained depolarization in response to high-frequency stimulation • There was a marked depression of EPSP/Cs after the DBS train, and its time course depended on the stimulus train length. Summary and Functional Implications
• Neurons are functionally deafferentated, unable to fire action potentials due to synaptic depression – Tremor cells are unable to propagate EPSPs or action potentials and thereby the tremor signal does not make it to the motor output level
• The effects are specific to the pathway stimulated – functional deafferentation can limit propagation of tremor signals without disrupting information from other pathways.
• Thalamic stimulation, despite seemingly activating thalamocortical axons projecting to the motor cortex, does not disrupt motor control.
• Synaptic depression and axonal filtering prevent remote cortical excitation during high-frequency subcortical DBS. Summary and Functional Implications
• Spontaneous cortical firing is not altered, as the synaptic depression is specific to the stimulated pathway, alone.
• Functional deafferentation occurs immediately upon application of DBS and is rapidly reversible.
• The cellular effects of stimulation are frequency dependent – high frequencies (>60 Hz) required for tremor suppression.
• no involuntary movements or motor disruption with prolonged DBS – Axonal filtering at the level of thalamocortical axons and synaptic depression in the motor cortex prevent such disruption.
Potential of DBS Therapy
• In thalamic and subcortical white-matter DBS, there are some important principles that can be broadly applied to many forms of nervous system electrical stimulation
• Electrical stimulation is able to overcome the limitation of medication – Medication • works indiscriminately at all similar nervous system synapses • timed to work only when symptoms require • produce multiple and unacceptable side effects – DBS • capability to selectively alter neurotransmitter release in a specific pathway • in a controlled manner, as required by symptoms • The costs of electrical stimulation are inexpensive, in comparison Q&A