. .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 LEA VE::S NO. .,3
BOARD OF ALDERMEN CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY JULY 28, 2008
Work Session
The work session meeting of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Town and Country was held at 6:15 PM
Present were: Aldermen Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, and Kuehling. Mayor Dalton and Alderman Meyland-Smith were absent (out of town). Alderman Wright arrived at 6:20. Alderman Avioli arrived at 6:25. Attorney Steve Garrett represented the City.
In the absence of the Mayor and Acting President, Alderman Kuehling moved to elect Alderman Fons as Acting President Pro Tem. Alderman Behnen seconded the motion and the voice vote carried unanimously.
Alderman Fons presided.
1. The Board discussed the 7:00 PM meeting agenda items. No votes were taken.
2. Pursuant to Resolution No. 07-2008, passed and approved by the Board of Aldermen on June 23, 2008, a hearing was held to determine if the City of Town and Country Liquor License #07-14 should be suspended for any violation of the Municipal Code Section 600.
Representatives were present. Following discussion, Alderman Hoffmann moved to issue a letter of reprimand, seconded by Alderman Avioli. A voice vote was taken and carried unanimously.
3. Pursuant to Resolution No. 08-2008, passed and approved by the Board of Aldermen on June 23, 2008, a hearing was held to determine if the City of Town and Country Liquor License #07-17 should be suspended for any violation of the Municipal Code Section 600.
Representatives were present. Following discussion, Alderman Hoffmann moved to issue a letter of reprimand, seconded by Alderman Avioli. A voice vote was taken and carried unanimously.
The work session adjourned at 7:00 PM.
Reaular Meetina
The regular meeting of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Town and Country was held at 7:00 P.M. on Monday, July 28, 2008, at the Municipal Center, 1011 Municipal Center Drive.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Town and Country resident Mariette Palmer led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
The 7:00 PM roll call indicated Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling, and Wright to be present. Mayor Dalton and Alderman Meyland-Smith were absent (out of town). Alderman Fons presided as Acting President Pro Tem. Attorney Steve Garrett represented the City. . . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 2 of 10 July 28 2008
MINUTES - 07/14/08
Alderman Wright moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Kuehling.
Acting President pro tem Fons called for corrections or amendments.
Hearing none, the minutes were unanimously approved by voice vote.
HEARING FROM CITIZENS
Bruni Perez, 13248 Romany Way, read a prepared letter requesting the Board to be actively involved in the deliberations of the Deer Task Force and its recommendations. A copy of Mrs. Perez's letter is attached.
Jim Ambrozetes, 935 Town and Country Estates, provided a video on DVD entitled Akron Deer Slaughter (available for check-out in the City Clerk's office) and requested the Board to view it. In addition, he submitted a paper copy and CD of an e-mail previously sent to the Board. Mr. Ambrozetes stated that several e-mails had bounced back to him as "undeliverable." A copy of the e-mail is attached.
Mariette Palmer, 604 Greenwich Green Lane, spoke about the city's deer relocation program and read a letter from former Alderman Patty Wiggins, a copy of which is attached.
Barbara Ann Hughes, 101 Hawthorne Estates Drive, read a prepared letter into the record regarding deer management. A copy of Mrs. Hughes' letter is attached.
In addition, Mrs. Hughes read a letter from The Humane Society of the United States. A copy of that letter, along with an additional article entitled, Fund Fact, Living with Deer, are also attached.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
COMMUNICATIONS AND REPORTS
Alderman Hoffmann
Alderman Hoffmann reported that the Public Works and Stormwater Commission held a meeting on Monday, July 21. Since August is vacation month for many, the next meeting won't be held until September.
Alderman Avioli
Alderman Avioli announced the next Community Relations meeting to be held Thursday, August 14, 7 PM at the Fire House, and asked for reports and information from neighborhoods to be put in the newsletter.
Alderman Kuehlinq
Alderman Kuehling announced the next meeting of the Deer Task Force to be held the following morning, Tuesday, July 29, 7:30 AM at the Municipal Center, at which time Dr. Jones would report the findings of the phone survey.
In addition, the next Conservation Commission meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 12, 7 PM at the Fire House. . .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 3 of 10 July 28 2008 Alderman Wriqht
Alderman Wright announced that the next Parks & Trails Commission meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 18, 7 PM at the Municipal Center.
City Administrator/Chief Copeland
City Administrator/Chief Copeland reported that due to the election, this year's Town and Country Night Out has been changed from August 5 (Election Day) to Thursday, September 11.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
BILL NO. 08-29. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE AND AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY USE. A GATE. AT 1761 TOPPING ROAD (sponsored by Alderman Kuehling) (continued from 05/12/08, OS/27/08, 06/09/08, 06/23/08 and 07/14/08)
Pursuant to a request from the applicant's attorney, John King, Alderman Kuehling moved to continue the meeting to August 25, 2008, seconded by Alderman Wright.
It was also noted for the record that the attorney for neighbors Adam & Laura Baer and Ann Goding had e-mailed the City stating that they are in agreement with Mr. King's request.
Following discussion, a voice vote was taken and carried 6 to 1.
BILL NO. 08-38. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3149. AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3335. APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TOWN AND COUNTRY CROSSING LOCATED AT 14250 CLAYTON ROAD (sponsored by Aldermen Meyland-Smith and Behnen) (1st reading 07/14/08)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-38 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Behnen.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-38 passed and became Ordinance No. 3348.
BILL NO. 08-39. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE VILLAS AT TOWN AND COUNTRY CROSSING LOCATED AT 14250 CLAYTON ROAD (sponsored by Aldermen Meyland-Smith and Behnen) (1streading 07/14/08)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-39 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Benigas. . .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 4 of 10 July 28 2008 Mike Jantsch, Jantsch Architects, and Dan Barnard, President, Greater Missouri Builders, were present for the request.
Following discussion, Mr. Jantsch explained the Location Plan, known as Exhibit A, that was generated at the June 23,2008 Architectural Review Board meeting.
After discussion, Alderman Behnen moved to amend the Bill, as follows:
W. Materials
1. Entire fronts of buildings shall be finished 'Nith brick :md/or stone and returned t'NOfeet on each side.
2. Units on Lots 1 10 shall have exterior finish of stone and/or brick on 25% of surface area, excluding doors and 'l.'indmNs.
The front elevation of all units on the attached Exhibit A are to be 100% masonry; the side/rear elevations of units hiQhliQhted in oranQe as shown on the attached Exhibit A are required to be 60% masonry. all consis~ with approved elevations.
Alderman Kuehling seconded the motion and a voice vote carried unanimously.
Alderman Benigas moved to further amend the Bill on Page 2, Items A. and D., by adding "or less", as follows:
A. Permitted Use - Ninety-eight (98) or less residential units, attached two to a structure.
B. Maximum Floor Area - Maximum floor area shall be 196,673 square feet in ninety eight (98) or less single family attached residential units. No unit shall contain less than 1782 square feet of heated, habitable floor area, excluding garage and basement. This condition is subject to amendment of Ordinance No. 3149, Paragraph B.2.a.i., to allow units less than 2000 square feet.
Alderman Kuehling seconded the motion and a voice vote carried unanimously.
Following brief discussion regarding the savannah walkway, the roll call vote on the Bill, as amended, was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-39 passed and became Ordinance No. 3349.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. THE VILLAS AT TOWN AND COUNTRY CROSSING. 14250 CLAYTON ROAD
Alderman Wright moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Behnen.
Mike Jantsch, Jantsch Architects gave an overview of the project and replied to questions from the Board regarding anticipated price ranges of the villas, roofing, front door styles and elevation colors. . . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 8'3 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 5 of 10 July 28 2008 Alderman Behnen moved that the recommendations as listed in the June 23, 2008 Architectural Review Board Minutes be included as part of the approval. Alderman Kuehling seconded the motion. The recommendations were as follows:
1. The front elevation of all units on the attached Exhibit A are to be 100% masonry; the sidelrear elevations of units highlighted in orange as shown on the attached Exhibit A are required to be 60% masonry, all consistent with approved elevations.
The remaining elevations which are not masonry shall be constructed of hardy- board material.
2. The elevations submitted to the City dated March 27,2008 are hereby accepted.
3. An eighteen (18) inch stone wall, twelve (12) inches deep, shall be built behind lots 9 - 16 as protection from encroachment into the savanna.
4. Architect has agreed to eliminate all double hung windows.
5. Architectural roofing, metal roofing, masonry/colors and doors approved per samples.
6. Increased outdoor living space/decks/patios to be offered as options.
7. Craig Wilde, Director of Public Works, to review water runoff with Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District.
A voice vote was taken and carried unanimously.
Discussion ensued relating to the stone wall to be built behind lots 9 - 16 and security of the gated community.
A voice vote was taken on the motion to approve and the Board unanimously approved the architectural review and authorized the issuance of a building permit when the requirements of all applicable codes and ordinances have been met.
BILL NO. 08-40, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL RATE OF TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2008 ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF SAID TAXES ON THE BOOKS OF THE COUNTY COLLECTOR BY THE COUNTY CLERK AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION AS PROVIDED BY LAW (sponsored by the Board as a Whole) (1st reading 07/14/08)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-40 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Avioli.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-40 passed and became Ordinance No. 3350. . .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 6 of 10 July 28 2008 BILL NO. 08-41. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 140.090 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BIDDING PROCEDURES (sponsored by Alderman Fons) (1streading 07/14/08)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-41 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Hoffmann.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-41 passed and became Ordinance No. 3351.
BILL NO. 08-43. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE DEDICATION OF STREETS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY AND CLAYTON PLACE SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY (sponsored by Aldermen Wright and Avioli) (1st reading 07/14/08)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-43 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Wright moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Avioli.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-43 passed and became Ordinance No. 3352.
BILL NO. 08-44. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3150 RELATING TO APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CHURCHILL CENTER AND SCHOOL ON MUNICIPAL CENTER DRIVE. NORTH OF CLAYTON ROAD (sponsored by Alderman Wright) (1st reading 07/14/08)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-44 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Wright moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Avioli.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-44 passed and became Ordinance No. 3353.
BILL NO. 08-45. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A QUIT CLAIM DEED BETWEEN THE CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY AND THE BERRA FAMILY LAND COMPANY. LLC. FOR A 195 SQUARE FOOT TRACT OF LAND (sponsored by Alderman Wright) (1st reading 07/14/08) . .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVeS
Board of Aldermen Page 7 of 10 July 28 2008 Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-45 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Avioli.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-45 passed and became Ordinance No. 3354.
BILL NO. 08-46, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A RELEASE AND VACATION OF INDENTURE OF TRUST AND DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS FOR CHURCHILL FARM (sponsored by Alderman Wright) (1streading 07/14/08) Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-46 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Wright moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Avioli.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-46 passed and became Ordinance No. 3355.
BILL NO. 08-47, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHURCHILL CENTER SCHOOL FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES, BERRA FAMILY LAND COMPANY, LLC, AND THE CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY (sponsored by Alderman Wright) (1st reading 07/14/08) Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-47 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Behnen.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Sm ith.
Bill No. 08-47 passed and became Ordinance No. 3356.
BILL NO. 08-48, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN BERRA FAMILY LAND COMPANY, LLC, JFM REALTY PARTNERSHIP #1, LP, JSM REAL TV PARTNERSHIP #1, LP, CHURCHILL CENTER AND SCHOOL FOR '" LEARNING DISABILITIES, OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPANY AND THE CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY, MISSOURI, ESTABLISHING AN ESCROW AGREEMENT REGARDING THE SALE OF A 195 SQUARE FOOT TRACT OF LAND TO THE BERRA FAMILY LAND COMPANY, LLC IN EXCHANGE FOR CONSTRUCTING A SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE TOWN AND COUNTRY MUNICIPAL CENTER AND CHURCHILL SCHOOL (sponsored by Alderman Wright) (1st reading 07/14/08) . .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 8 of 10 July 28 2008 Acting President pro tem Fons called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-48 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Benigas.
Following discussion, Alderman Wright moved that the sidewalk contemplated in the ordinances would be six ft. (6') wide concrete. Alderman Avioli seconded the motion and a voice vote carrieq unanimously.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-48 passed and became Ordinance No. 3357.
NEW BUSINESS
RESOLUTION NO.1 0-2008. DIRECTING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR/POLICE CHIEF TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION AGAINST A COMPANY OR COMPANIES OPERATING AT 12977 N. OUTER FORTY DRIVE. SUITE 100 IN TOWN AND COUNTRY FOR THREE YEARS WITHOUT TOWN AND COUNTRY BUSINESS LICENSES (Hoffmann)
Alderman Hoffmann moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Kuehling.
Following discussion, the roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Alderman Hoffmann; NAY, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
The Resolution failed 1-6.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-2008. APPROVING HEARTH ROOM CAFE & CATERING AT 265 LAMP & LANTERN VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER
Alderman Avioli moved for approval, seconded by Aldermen Benigas.
Ann Ojile, Member, R. Cuisine LLC, d/b/a Hearth Room Cafe & Catering was present for the request.
Following brief discussion, a voice vote was taken and carried unanimously.
BILL NO. 08-49. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A BEAUTIFICATION GRANT ALLOCATION FOR MASON GROVE SUBDIVISION (sponsored by Alderman Kuehling)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a first reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-49 was read for the first time by title only.
Acting President pro tem Fons declared Bill No. 08-49 continued to the meeting of August 11, 2008 for the second reading and consideration.
BILL NO. 08-50. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF COUNTY TREE SERVICE FOR THE 2008 BRANCH CHIPPING PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT FOR SAME (sponsored by Alderman Kuehling) . .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 9 of 10 July 28 2008 Acting President pro tem Fons called for a first reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-50 was read for the first time by title only.
Acting President pro tem Fons declared Bill No. 08-50 continued to the meeting of August 11, 2008 for the second reading and consideration.
BILL NO. 08-51, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A SYSTEM EXTENSION GUARANTEE AGREEMENT WITH AMEREN UE COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW TRANSFORMER AND SERVICE TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASED ELECTRICAL NEEDS AT THE LONGVIEW FARM PARK HOUSE (sponsored by Alderman Wright)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a first reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-51 was read for the first time by title only.
Alderman Kuehling moved to suspend the agenda rules for a second reading. Alderman Behnen seconded the motion and a voice vote carried unanimously.
Acting President pro tem Fons consented and called for a second reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-51 was read for the second time and placed upon its final passage.
The roll call vote was as follows: AYE, Aldermen Avioli, Behnen, Benigas, Fons, Hoffmann, Kuehling and Wright; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none; ABSENT, Alderman Meyland-Smith.
Bill No. 08-51 passed and became Ordinance No. 3358.
BILL NO. 08-52, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2008 BUDGET BY INCREASING A ROAD FUND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT FOR THE 2008 MILL AND OVERLAY PROGRAM, APPROPRIATING FUNDS TO COVER THE INCREASE AND TRANSFERRING APPROPRIATIONS AMONG ROAD FUND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNTS, ACCEPTING THE BID OF GERSHENSON CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR SAME (sponsored by Alderman Hoffmann)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a first reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-52 was read for the first time by title only.
Acting President pro tem Fons declared Bill No. 08-52 continued to the meeting of August 11, 2008 for the second reading and consideration.
APPROVAL OF PURCHASE ORDER - SALT STORAGE FACILITY
Alderman Wright moved to approve Purchase Order No. 20429 to North American Specialty Insurance, in the amount of $64,063.27, to insure the completion of the salt storage facility.
Alderman Avioli seconded the motion and a voice vote carried unanimously.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, DIGITAL 1 SAVVIS PARKWAY, LLC
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Behnen.
Chris Woodworth, Christner Architects, was present for the request and explained the proposal for a new building entrance. The expansion would add 370 sq. ft..to the . . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NO. 813 100 LEAVES
Board of Aldermen Page 10 of 10 July 28 2008 existing glass entrance and would be installed under the existing canopy. The additional square footage would also allow for relocation of the security desk to the first floor.
After brief discussion, a voice vote was taken on the motion to approve and the Board unanimously approved the architectural review and authorized the issuance of a building permit when the requirements of all applicable codes and ordinances have been met.
APPROVAL OF LIQUOR LICENSE
On motion of Alderman Wright, seconded by Alderman Behnen, the Board unanimously approved an Original Package Liquor and Sunday Package Liquor License for SuperTarget Liquor of Missouri, Inc., d/b/a Target Store T-1952.
BILL NO. 08-53, READOPTING CHAPTER 120: CODE OF ETHICS OF TITLE I OF THE CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY MUNICIPAL CODE (sponsored by the Board as a Whole)
Acting President pro tem Fons called for a first reading, without objection. Without objection, Bill No. 08-53 was read for the first time by title only.
Acting President pro tem Fons declared Bill No. 08-53 continued to the meeting of August 11, 2008 for the second reading and consideration.
WARRANT LIST
Alderman Kuehling moved for approval, seconded by Alderman Wright.
Acting President pro tem Fons called for any discussion or amendments.
Hearing none, a voice vote was taken on the motion to approve and the warrant list of July 28, 2008, as submitted, in the amount of $382,914.51 was unanimously approved.
OTHER
ADJOURN
Alderman Kuehling moved to adjourn, seconded by Alderman Wright. A voice vote was taken and unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 PM. C:Z::;:d~ Pamela Burdt, City Clerk . .
TOWN & ....COUNTRY
NOTICE OF HEARING
CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Aldermen of the City of Town and Country will hold a Hearing on Monday, July 28,2008 at 6:30 PM, in the Municipal Center, 1011 Municipal Center Drive, to determine if the City of Town and Country Liquor License No. 07-14 should be suspended for any violation of the City code Section 600.
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Aldermen of the City of Town and Country will hold a Hearing on Monday, July 28,2008 at 6:30 PM, in the Municipal Center, 1011 Municipal Center Drive, to determine if the City of Town and Country Liquor License No. 07-17 should be suspended for any violation of ~oo ~~la Burdt, City Clerk t . .
Brunilda Perez July 28. 2008 Laurel Lakes, St. Louis, MO.
Members of the Board of Aldermen:
I have come to ask each one of you to be actively involved in the deliberations of the deer task force and its recommendations.
I personally feel the composition of this task force doesn't represent all the voices in the city, and, although getting ready for a recommendation, they still don't have a clear understanding of the impact of any recommendation they make.
Although they may have read a lot of material, they have failed to notice the difference on where the articles come from, why and who writes them, what exactly do they prove, why sometimes the finding of one article is exactly opposite of the other, and have missed valuable additional information that can be obtained from these articles.
There is plenty of information that you as an entire BOA needs to review.
There are audio tapes of several of several meetings you need to listen to:
A. Task force meeting with the Mayor of Clarkson Valley. Mayor Douglas from Clarkson Valley clearly indicates that after years of hunting ( sometime 25 or more hunters for 110 days) there has been no real reduction in the deer population, if any.. .deer are moving now to other areas that didn't have deer! They allow the hunts just because it takes the government "'off the hook" with the residents.
B Task Force meeting with Erin Schank and Joel Porath from MDC. Erin Schenk clearly states that trapping and killing with captive bolt would be the less efficient of all methods to use; Joel Porath states that maybe after 4 or 5 years of hunting one can measure results in less deer populations. Joel Porath gave the task force wrong information ofthe biological data accumulated by the MDC study in T&C...and this task force did not even notice even after having in front of them a published article of MDC with the correct information.
C. tape of the meeting with the City lawyer where he summarizes his meeting of the City lawyer and MDC's wildlife biologist Lonnie Hansen in which it appears that MDC would evaluate a solid scientific protocol in fertility control, if presented to them (statement also made by Joel Porath and Erin Schenk from MDC)
D. most importantly, tapes ofMDC Commissioner's meetings clearly stating that in the 2001, (after the third year ofthe relocation project,) that MDC was still willing to give 3 additional years of permits for the City of Town & Country, as long as it was understood it was under an extended experimental approach and not for any other city to apply for relocation " . .
E. there's also a tape in which the State Commissioners review the results of the monitored deer relocation program and make recommendations to improve the survival of the relocated deer, which the city did in the years to follow.
All this material needs to be reviewed by the Board of Aldermen; this is needed as this cOIl)IIlitteedoesn't even keep minutes of their meetings.
Have I tried to share all this all along? Yes have they listened? NO. Please listen to me now.
Thank you. Brunilda Perez . . Page 10f9 Subj: What DeNicola forgot to say about White Buffalo Solon Ohio and Princeton Twp NJ Date: 7/25/20089:10:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: AmbJQzetesjim To: jdaltQn@lewisrice. com, meYland@sbcgIQbal.[Let,l To the Mayor and Aldermen of Town and Country The following articles are being posted on www.urbcmdee~jDfQwebsitefortheresidentstoview.My feeling is that these two articles and videos presents an entirely different view of how sharpshooters kill deer rather than what we were told at the T&C Expert Forum on July 17, 2008. If this type of Killing is allowed Town and Country we will no longer be a peaceful community and resident unrest will prevail. Next, I am encouraging everyone to go to WWW._gKron<1eertQrture.cQmand CLICK on the video to view the undercover footage caught by SHARK's confiscated cameras. This sharpshooting method is what Ohio's Metro Parks did not want the public to see nor Tony DeNicola. The parks were turned into a slaughterhouses. After watching the 9 1/2 minute please read the testimony by a number of veterinarian about their views of the video. The next video to view is www.sDgrkonline.Qrg/?p::::OOQ90QQ429This video is 8 minutes 17 seconds long.and it title is Rocket Netting for Deer Management. SHARK's video demonstrates the violence and cruelty of rocket netting and the use of penetrating captive bolt guns to kill deer in the Dupage county Forest Preserve. You can also read the article that is shown on the web page. Two of the articles were copied and pasted into this e-mail since the Town and Country web site seems to reject many e-mails messages sent with attachments. The site also rejects e-mails sent to all the Aldermen and Mayor at one time. I have register this complaint at City Hall along with copies of the failure notices and have not heard from anyone. Hence I will be send this out one at a time to Mayor and Alderman at your Town-and-Country web site as a forwarded message as suggested by one of the Alderman and as a group send to homelbusiness e-mail address until the Town and Country web site is modified to accepts messages from residents. Listed below are the two articles, WHITE BUFFALO KILLS DEER IN SOLON, OHIO WHITE BUFFALO, INC. BY LANE FERRANTE Last October, an article from the local paper came to my attention. Solon, Ohio, had hired a firm named "White Bllffalo"to come to the City to slaughter 600 deer. City officials claimed that "S07~e Friday, July 25, 2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim t 13 0 If 1/ J-.. r/0 . . Page 2 of9 done" because the deer were eating people's tulips!! They asked residents to volunteer their property for the hitmen to come in everyday for a month from 2:00 to 8:00 p.m. We were told they would be' shooting downward only from tree stands to ensure public safety. Anthony DeNicola, President of White Buffalo, stated that his bullets did not ricochet. The Chief of Police confirmed this. We learned that an ordinance was passed on the sly to allow for the barbaric captive bolt. People had risen up in great protest the previous year against the use of the captive bolt and the council then agreed not to allow it. Now, a second ordinance passed that ensured Mr. DeNicola and his hitmen "complete control of the population" as he put it. Any interference would bring an arrest of a third degree misdemeanor. The police were to escort the hitmen to the kill-sites each day to ensure that no one would interfere. The taxpayers would be paying large sums of money for the police to work overtime in order to protect this mercenary. The mayor stated that the venison would go to hunger centers so "some good" would come from this massacre. Yes indeed, Solon's officials are quite the humanitarians! When I learned of this plan of genocide, I knew I had to do something. I felt morally obligated. Ifound two people who felt as I did, and the three of us began to work together to stop this. I had no idea that the deer issue was one of the hardest of them all. Deer slaughtering is a business. It provides jobs and brings in thousands of dollars every year. In addition, Iwas fighting a huge political machine. The three of us stood strong, forged ahead, and organized a meeting for the residents at the public library.Itwas a success! The room was quicklyfilled to capacity and people had to be turned away. The police were there with the K-9 unit, every TV station as well as reporters from three newspapers showed. Steve Hindi, President of SHARK, came and showed his video of how "humanely" White Buffalo performed their job. Those nightmarish images and sounds willbe burned into my brain forever. There it was, in black and white, for the world to see; White Buffalo shooting deer and then placing plastic bags over their heads to suffocate them when the bullets didn't do the job. The rocket nets and captive bolt came next. The steel spike kept missing their targets and connected in their eyes, ears, etc. as they thrashed about. When the volume was turned up you could hear their screaming. At one point, a councilman's wife chuckled and asked ifwe would be serving popcorn at this movie. After the video, we spoke to the residents about the compensatory rebound effect [when a deer population suddenly crashes, there are more births than usual the following spring], the safety issues, the waste of taxpayers' money ($500,000 had been allocated), and non-lethal solutions. An open mike session followed and the residents demanded to speak to a council member. He, however, was in the hallwaywhere he was verbally attacking Mr. Hindi and Solon's deer protectors.This council member refusedto speak to his constituents, and told us arrogantly that it didn't matter what we did, the deer were going to die! That night and the next day it was splashed all over the news. The controversy had begun. Still being naive at that time, I was sure we had accomplished our goal. I believed that now that everyone knew the truth about this horrific plan, it wouldn't go through. This was, after all, the 21st century. We gained more soldiers for our army and proceeded to go to every council meeting, write letters, educate the public, and hand out flyers in front of stores. We made contact with wonderful Nancy Bowman, head of the Princeton Deer Alliance. She became our mentor and advisor since she had already had four years' experience with White Buffalo and the local government there. When the killings began, I started to see a pattern emerge. It was the DeNicola blueprint. Friday, July 25, 2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim . . Page 3 of9 Everything that had occurred in Princeton was happening in Solon. Exactly!! Play-by-play. We wanted to monitor White Buffalo's actions so we video-taped at some of the kill-sites when we could find out where they were. Everything was shrouded in secrecy. Neighbors living next door to kill-sites were told they would be notified 24 hours before it began. I believe that only happened the first day. Neighbors were pitted against each other. Children saw the deer being dragged along the ground after they were killed. We witnessed White Buffalo shooting laterally from someone's deck in a densely populated development. We witnessed White Buffalo sitting in a tree with a military grade rifle as the school bus came down the street. We saw them shoot and miss. Yet David Klunzinger, head of Public Works, was quoted in the paper as saying, "Tony never misses." Another time we heard gunshots and a few seconds later saw children go into the area and then heard screaming. We filed a law-suit and lost. We came up against many roadblocks, but we persevered then and we will not quit now. By March the bloodshed had ended, 602 deer were killed, they had died at the hands of White Buffalo. The final article in the Solon paper said that the culling opponents had slowed the program down. For that, we were to be punished. Tony DeNicola strongly advised that next year a "no-feed ban" should be implemented, a 200 ft. buffer zone should be placed around the killsites, and the captive bolt should be used. DeNicola also stated that his count was off and Solon had way more deer than previously thought. This is a man that was quoted in our paper saying that he equates killing deer to brushing his teeth. In Greenwich, CT, someone overheard him say that they didn't have a deer problem but he's more than happy to take their money. After the devastation, we held a memorial service for our dead deer in the middle of town for all to see. Peter Muller from C.A.S.H. and LOHV came. He was fantastic. He came to Solon and spoke at our memorial and taught us how to fight this politically. That is our strongest defense, and I believe the only way to win this. We can't thank Peter enough. A member of our group recently did remarkable research on non-lethal solutions. She also found some discrepancies in the final report from the city. We met with the mayor and gave him this 800 page document and are still waiting to hear back from him. We are starting to meet with candidates that are running in next fall's election. We have reserved a booth at the Solon Home Days and will be representing the League of Humane Voters. Most importantly, I want people to know that any action for animals is significant. Even the smallest help is needed. We are all important in this battle to force towns to act humanely. Edmond Burke, a highly respected 18th Century statesman, said, "The only way for evil to triumph is if good people do nothing." Please everyone, remember those words and do your part. We are willing and able to share our information with you, although we hope and pray you'll never need it. For the Deer, Lane Ferrante Contact info: Lane Ferrante [email protected] or Craig Sanders [email protected] Friday, July 25,2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim . . Page 4 of9 The next article describes the lies and the role of the Princeton Township Officials. Princeton Lies About Deer Killing Operation The following is a memo written by a local hunter, Bob Kubiak, detailing lies and evasions in Princeton's representation of how deer were to be killed during this year's professional tax-supported deer slaughter by "White Buffalo." Some key points include: Deer were shot from pick up trucks, not from elevated stands as promised, greatly increasing the risk of accidents caused by high powered rifles Some deer were shot multiple times, contrary to the township's assertion that the "sharp shooters" would accomplish their kill with one efficient shot per deer Deer were body shot rather than head shot contrary to the Mayor's claims Mr. Kubiak concludes that the methods used by White Buffalo were actually not those of "professional sharp shooters" but the same techniques that would be used by any hunter. Since many Princeton residents were concerned about increasing hunting in the township because of the possibility of gun accidents and the fear that large numbers of wounded deer might be staggering about dying in the woods, Mayor Phyllis Marchand assured the public that "White Buffalo" would be using special methods and skills that would preclude these dangers. In fact, this was a total lie. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From: Bob Kubiak To: Larry Herrighty, Chief New Jersey State, Bureau of Wildlife Management John Bradway, Chairman of New Jersey Fish and Game Counsel Bob Mc Dowell, Director, New Jersey Division of Fish and Game Mayor Phyllis Marchand, Mayor of Princeton Township Chief Anthony Gaylord, Chief of Police, Princeton Township Stuart Rhodes, Investigator, Law Enforcement Division State of New Jersey S.P.C.A History For several years, Princeton Township Officials have endeavored to reduce deer populations. Because of differences in popular opinion as to the need and methods for such reduction and control, the residents of Princeton are emotionally divided. Accordingly, elected Township Officials have sought to address the deer problem in a way which would cause the least amount of tension among residents. During the many documented public debates on the subject, Township Officials steadfastly maintained their resolve to find an acceptable method, which would satisfy the emotional proclivities of each side. Many methods, both lethal as well as non-lethal were considered. In the final analysis, the Township approved a lethal method, that being, hiring White Buffalo, a firm specializing in killing deer for a price. During public discussions between residents and Township Officials regarding White Buffalo's intended mode of operation, the residents of Princeton Township were given a number of clear and concise assurances by the Mayor and Township Committee. As to cruelty issues, very precise standards for instantaneously dispatching deer were put forward. Residents were told that every deer would be shot through the brain by sharp shooters with high-powered rifles causing instant death with no suffering. Friday, July 25, 2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim . . Page 5 of9 As to safety concerns, ALL deer would be shot from elevated stands at night over bait. Several area news media reported these assurances without rebuttal or correction from the Mayor or Township Officials. Mayor Marchand and Township Officials guaranteed those opposed to killing that the methods employed would be both safe as well as humane. Accordingly, she put forward a public declaration that safety concerns regarding discharge of high-powered rifles in the densely populated township would be non-existent because the shooting would occur ONLY from elevated platforms over bait. She stated publicly that, the sharp angle of the shot towards the ground would prevent ricochet and the chance of a stray bullet hitting a home or person walking in the woods at night. Even the staunchest opposition had little room for objection, given the strict safety and cruelty guidelines said to be employed by White Buffalo. With Township approval to use lethal methods in hand and with safety and cruelty assurances to the public in place, Princeton Township received necessary approval from the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife to begin killing deer. Despite massive protests in Princeton, the killing took place during the winter of 2000/2001 with over 322 deer killed in a two-week period. During the fall of 2001, Princeton Township Officials once again began to intensify efforts to further curb deer populations. During this time Princeton Township Officials set in motion a new plan for a 2001 deer killing operation. The plan, secretly adopted was a "net and bolt" method, formerly employed in Illinois, but abandoned after Illinois Township Officials determined the method was an * "inhumane process." As was expected, Princeton Township residents overwhelmingly opposed deer killing in neighborhoods. With strict firearm discharge regulations in place, White Buffalo had to provide a satisfactory means of killing deer between homes and in neighborhoods. Disregarding empirical evidence that killing deer between homes would pit neighbor against neighbor, Princeton Township Officials were determined to have their will. Secretly, and without public debate, they approved the process of "net and bolt" which, to the casual observer might appear to be a humane method of killing deer. Despite heated controversy over the selected killing method, at a meeting held in Princeton Township on November 19, 2001, residents concerned about cruelty in the "net and bolt" process were denied the right to show Township Committee members and Mayor Phyllis Marchand a video tape featuring deer being netted and killed in this manner. Numerous speakers addressed the Mayor and Township Officials on the subject. Among these, there were several notable commentaries. Mr. Herb Greenberg of Cherry Hill Road gave a most eloquent appeal for the Township to "do the right thing" and view the "net and bolt" video in order that Princeton Township would be spared the [disgrace] which would surely come as a result of such a practice. Mr. Greenberg, a respected Township businessman has been an active participant in the process to select a suitable means for controlling the deer population. Yet, the Mayor and her colleagues ignored his compelling appeal. Elenore Szymanski, a long time business person from Princeton Township expressed her deep disappointment directly to the Mayor for not being consulted during the fact finding process which led to the decision to implement the "net and bolt" method. Elenore was obviously upset at the Township and Mayor Marchand for first appointing her to be involved in the fact finding process, then, for no apparent reason excluding her without explanation. Elenore stated to the Mayor that she brought an unbiased viewpoint to the table which was ignored. I was then permitted by Mayor Marchand to speak, in which I gave a descriptive snapshot to the audience of the actual killing procedure using the hand held bolt gun. I explained the procedure and articulated the amount of needless cruelty which results from the use of this killing implement. I told Mrs. Friday, July 25, 2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim . . Page 6 of9 Marchand and the Township Committee that as a former farm hand and later a slaughterhouse worker for many years, I had personally used the device to kill many hundreds of animals. It was my personal observation that, even in the best of circumstances, in a very controlled environment wherein the animal to be killed was first herded into a "squeeze gate", the bolt gun had to be held firmly against the head with significant pressure which made the animals extremely anxious as they furiously jerked their heads from side to side trying to avoid the inevitable. During this procedure I have personally shot the bolt through eyes, foreheads and noses of these animals as they struggled against the restraints. Lastly, Mr. Stewart Rhodes, State investigator for the NJ State SPCA told Mrs. Marchand that all parties involved in the "net and bolt" procedure would be scrutinized carefully during "net and bolt" activity and that any perceived cruelty would be handled with swift and de~isive prosecution. Mr. Rhodes indicated that he was an officer of the law and that he was sent by his superior to issue the warning to Princeton Township and those involved in the deer culling operation. He stated that the "net and bolt" procedure constituted cruelty to animals. Commentary At the township meeting, I personally brought to the table my objections based solely on my long held conviction that "bolting" in actual practice is grossly inhumane. As a long time butcher and slaughterer of farm animals, (over twenty years total experience) I can assure all who will hear that this method in practice is not only inhumane, but barbaric. I have personally (but unintentionally) wounded far more animals with a bolt gun than with my arrow. In the absolute pristine condition where an animal's head is held firmly in place by mechanical means, where no movement is possible, bolting would be my first choice of killing. However, in the "real" world, this type of restraint is not possible. In a netting situation, I can't even imagine the horrific result. Secondly, netting in itself is also very inhumane. Wildly thrashing deer with sharp hooves often cause injury to themselves and each other as they try to get free of the net. Furthermore, individuals hired to subdue the thrashing animals can break the animals legs and cause other injury as they jump on the struggling animal in an attempt to subdue it. I have personally observed deer being netted for biological research and game management programs and can attest to the violent and traumatic experience each deer is subjected to during the procedure. It seems very suspicious to me that Mrs. Marchand and the Township Committee would not let Elenore Szymanski, the very person they chose to help with the fact finding process related to deer culling methodology, beinvolved in the "net and bolt" decision. The actions of the Committee seemed to me sneaky at best. Perhaps they did not want objections from someone who might see cruelty as a reason for not using this method. It is also very interesting, as was pointed out by Elenore, that the Committee seemed to quietly adopt the resolution, not providing ANY time for discussion PRIOR to Township approval. All those opting for full disclosure of Township activities related to the deer culling operation have been dealt a low blow by this, less than forthright action. Last year's White Buffalo deer kill in Princeton Township The concerned residents of Princeton township have been publicly informed of the following: As to safety, White Buffalo will be shooting from elevated stands in order to create a sharp angle towards Friday, July 25, 2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim . . Page 7of9 the ground. This will eliminate the possibility of bullet ricochet and incidences of high powered bullets traveling through long expanses of open space where unsuspecting residents might live or be walking at night. As to animal cruelty, township residents were publicly told that all deer were to be head shot which would alleviate the possibility of suffering. Residents were told of the efficiency and marksmanship capabilities of White Buffalo as a means to allay fears of wounded deer hobbling around in Princeton Township. We were all assured that White Buffalo would head shoot every deer. Shortly after last years announcement that White Buffalo killed over 322 deer in a two week period I personally visited Princeton Township Police Chief Tony Gaylord whom I have known for over twenty years to discuss the deer culling operation. Chief Gaylord assured me that all deer were head-shot and all deer were shot from an elevated platform in conformity with established Township rhetoric. As an avid hunter in Princeton Township for over twenty-five years, and elsewhere for another fifteen years, I felt very sure that Iwas not being told the truth. Not that Idisbelieved my friend Chief Gaylord, but that the information he may have been led to believe was false. I was absolutely sure, given my vast hunting experience in the Township that the stated operational methods articulated by Township Officials at the deer culling meetings was very different from those actually employed by White Buffalo. Ifelt it was simply impossible to kill that many deer without body shot and without spotlighting and killing deer long distances from a vehicle. I maintainedthese suspicionsdespite the Township Police assurancesthat all deer were head-shot and all deer were shot from an elevated stand in order to guarantee safety. Chief Gaylord personallytold me that State Officialswere monitoringthe killing and all was done legally. This morning, November 28, 2001, I spoke (for the second time) with NJ Bureau of Wildlife Management Chief, Larry Herrighty who informed me that the deer killing program in Princeton Township was NOT conducted in any manner consistent with the picture painted by Mayor Marchand and her supporters, but on the contrary, shooters in pick up trucks drove around the Township at night and shot the deer from the truck bed. Further, he told me that the deer were NOT head-shot as was guaranteed by Mayor Marchand. Deer were shot through the chest, head and other vital parts, very similarly to that which any credible hunter would. He also shared that some deer were shot multiple times. This information provided by Mr. Herrighty surely should cause Princeton Township residents to challenge the actions of Mrs. Marchand, the Township Committee and her supporters. Mr. Herrighty defended his position by insisting that there is medical precedence affirming mortal efficacy derived from body hits within prescribed organs. As a hunter, I personally agree with his assessment. However, the point is not whether shooting into the body is efficacious. The point is whether Mrs. Marchand lied to us in order to garner support for her plan and secondly, are we now dealing with a wounding situation no different than hunting scenario by the general public would produce. As a hunter for over forty-five years, I can assure all readers that body shooting at night from pick up trucks will produce no less crippling scenarios than ordinary hunters invited to Princeton to cull deer. Further, now that the truth is out about the way the hunt was conducted, one can imagine that without supervision by some watchdog agency, long-range shots were taken in order to quickly fill the $90,000.00 contract. To the best of my knowledge, no limits were put on White Buffalo as to how far an acceptable shot would be. And, you must consider Mr. Herrighty's statement that some of the deer were shot multiple times. At $300.00 per deer, one might very well take long and very risky shots. Supposedly the permit issued by the State of New Jersey provides for the body shot option. Why were Friday, July 25,2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim . . Page 8 of9 we not told about this? A thorough investigation should be initiated by the residents of Princeton Township and the minutes of previous Township meetings be scrutinized for possible wrong-doing. Both elevated tree stand and head shot deer issues found on tape must be brought to public attention. If lying occurred, action should be initiated. If it can be proven that lying put Princeton residents lives in danger, the attorney general should be consulted for possible prosecution. In my estimation, having been a hunter in Princeton Township most of my adult life, long range shots with body hits permitted is the only way White Buffalo could have ever accomplished the goal of killing 322 plus deer in just two weeks. To think that they actually hunted according to the stated operational plan articulated by Mrs. Marchand is sheer nonsense. Dangers associated with high-powered rifles shot at night from ground level or slightly above Regarding safety issues guaranteed by Mayor Marchand, in particular, elevated stands, sharp, downward angled shots to eliminate ricochet and short shots to eliminate wounding, all Township residents should be alarmed at the information now having surfaced from the NJ State Department of Fish and Wildlife. Flat shooting high powered rifles have the ability to travel for more than one mile and can penetrate a car at very long distances. When one fires from near ground level, such as from a pick up truck, even if elevated four or five feet, the potential for homes or persons walking in the woods to be hit is significant. Because of the near proximity of homes within the Township, flat shots at night through open spaces presents a serious danger to all living in Princeton. Mrs. Marchand lied to all of us. She knew quite well her hand picked deer killers had no intention of shooting all deer from elevated stands, nor that they would limit their shots to the brain. Her permit issued from the Department of Fish and Game made no such provision and she was well aware of that fact. She simply told all of us what we wanted to hear. She said she was interested in our safety, therefore the elevated tree stand story. She said she was interested in not wounding deer, therefore the head-shot story. Her real self serving interest is killing Princeton's deer at all cost, therefore, the shroud of secrecy as to the whereabouts of the shooters. Given her apparent tendency to avoid the truth, we should all demand an outside agency to monitor each shooter. You can be sure if Mrs. Marchand is forced to keep her word, the kill will be only a fraction of what she was otherwise able to accomplish behind our backs. Conclusion Since the playing field has now been reduced to deer killing with guns, with no limits on shot placement or weapon type, nearly all hunters would qualify for a shot at Princeton's deer herd. White Buffalo shouldn't be allowed to "Buffalo" Princeton Township residents any longer. These guys have nothing more to offer than any other hunter. Most hunters would gladly provide their talents without any charge to the Township. Further, most hunters would actually PAY for the privilege White Buffalo now charges exorbitant fees for. What's wrong with exchanging $ 150,000.00 in taxpayer assessment with $50,000.00 or more in incoming revenue to Princeton Township? Finally It is a little known fact that the State of New Jersey, Department of Fish and Wildlife has indicated in writing to Mrs. Marchand and the Township Committee that Princeton Township must provide for Friday, July 25, 2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim . . Page 9 of9 expanded hunting opportunities for the general public as a requirement of being granted its special deer culling Permit. A second (reminder) letter was issued to Princeton Township just recently. Within the past 60 days, Mrs. Marchand was asked to investigate hunting ground possibilities, which she promised she would do. In fact, she promised to inquire of White Buffalo ifthere was any property available to hunters. As of this date, Mayor Marchand has failed to respond, even though two letters issued by the State of New Jersey have been directed to the Township requiring compliance. IfWhite Buffalo has permission to body shoot animals, then there is no difference between this so called business operation and the general hunting population. Mrs. Marchand should be made to explain what measures she has taken to expand hunting possibilities in Princeton Township. Those opposing deer killingin general should be asking why she agreed to this "deal" with State Fish and WildlifeOfficials. * Quote taken from The DailyHerald, January 18, 1995. Journalist, Robert McCoppinquoting DuPage County Commissioner, Carolyn Kulie wherein she publicly declared, "Ithink that it's inescapable that it [the net and bolt deer killingprocess] is an inhumane process". Please do not forget to view the video on AkronDeerTorture.com and the comments. Thank you Jim Ambrozetes Get fantasy football with free live scoring.$igoypJorFal1t1ousenFC1ntC3gyFootbC311 tociC1Y. Friday, July 25, 2008 America Online: Ambrozetesjim chuok Le.Y\;8 Page 1 of 1 ~re ~.m "ti\~ ~ 0 +'" 'f e\ rs t"3<'\deef ~O~~+<4 2.17~Y c\.Q.Q( \ 1\~\\:)c:\~~~ ~~~ +~t \JJl)\)~ h6.J~ ~e.'t\ ~t)<" nere. ~t \Q,~\.:.~ o,c-e - \')~Qc:\~b\d.e ,,+ f'(\e1"()~~ 0'0\.., ~i'\\ «.. o"?~c,t- ~ _ "'0 'v\'\~'\- b ('1 R',~4..~\!q,\\eJ Bo~~~~ \ ~~, ~V) -r 0'('<\ \J \\\.Q:<\\o (' oc.k "'t'1"d.-Je\ Monday, July 28, 2008 AOL: lli-IPalmer . . Barbara Ann Hughes 101 Hawthorne Estates Town and Country, Missouri 63131 (314) 872-8228 June 29, 2008 Mayor Jon Dalton and Members of The Board of Aldermen City of Town and Country 1011 Municipal Center Drive Town and Country, Missouri 63131 Dear Mayor and the Board of Aldermen: As you know, I am still against lethal methods of managing the deer in Town and Country. Period. I attended the recent forum. Although they both deal with deer/wildlife management Dr. Kirkpatrick stated at the beginning of his presentation that his data was based on proven science. Dr. DeNicola presented his information from the standpoint of experience. Dr. Kirkpatrick works for a non-profit organization and Dr. DeNicola has a for-profit company. Both gentlemen suggested that we begin an annual program of deer management with sterilization followed by immunocontraception. In an ensuing conversation with a wildlife biologist with the Humane Society of the United States she indicated that she knew of both gentlemen. She suggested that we Google "Princeton deer." This inquiry provided a wealth of information on how their use of lethal methods of deer management was not successful. So my question to the Board and the Mayor is, "When you vote, if you vote to go lethal remember that when it fails miserably what will you say to your constituents that come to you wondering why they still have deer eating their plants?" But, if you pursue the scientific methodology discussed by Dr. Kirkpatrick and begin with sterilization and/or immunocontraception you still have the option to consider lethal at some point in the future. So if you start with lethal methods, where do go from there? Why not give immunocontraception a try. Thank you for your time and consideration. I may be reached at (314) 872-8228 should you require any additional information or clarification regarding the contents of this letter. I respectfully request that this letter be entered into the public record. ~~~~I . . ~~ r-{ THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES OffiCERS David 0. Wiebe1s, M.D. July 28, 2008 Chair of the Board A11i!a W. Coupe, Esq. Vf(e Chair of the Board Walter J. Stewart, Esq. To Mayor Dalton and Members of the Town & Country Board of Aldermen: Board Treasurer Wayne Pa(efle PrPsident & CEO G. lhomas Waite IU On behalf of The Humane Society of the United States (The HSUS) and its 10.8 million Treasurer & CFO Roger A Kind~r, Esq members and constituents, including 189,000 in Missouri, I am writing to object strongly Genera' Counsel & etO JanetD.Frake to any plans that city administrators may have to use trapping and the captive bolt as a Secretary Andrew N. Rowan, Ph.D. management tool for white-tailed deer. The HSUS is committed to preventing suffering fx€Cuti'le ViCePresident Ooerations in all animals and firmly believe that it is impossible to ensure that this technology can be Michael MarKarian Executive Vice President used correctly and consistently in the field to provide a humane death to deer. Exrernal Affairs STAFF VICE PRESIDENTS John Bal", Captive bolt guns are designed for use on restrained domestic animals in highly Senior VICe President Communications structured and controlled environments. Even under controlled conditions, the Patri(laA. Forkan Seniof VICe Pres'-dent [xtema!Affa;,s International "humaneness" of these devices has been called into question. These guns were not John W. Grandy, Ph.D. designed for use on wild animals under any circumstances, and certainly not as a Senior V1CePresident Wildlife & Habitat Protection management tool for white-tailed deer. Hol~ Hazard Chief Innovations Officer Heidi Prescott Senior VK€ President Campaigns The HSUS is committed to animal protection, and as such, opposes to the use of lethal Katherine B.liscomb methods to resolve conflicts with deer. We believe that deer culling programs simply Administration & Animal Care Centers generate an endless succession of removal and replacement in which animals die Richard M. Clug5!On, Ph,D. Higher Education unnecessarily while the root causes of problems go unaddressed. As long as attractive ~~~~ ~~~ Communications habitat remains, other deer from surrounding areas will move in to occupy the newly Jonathan R. Loworn, Esq. vacant niche resulting in a perpetual kill cycle. Animal Protectron litigation Kaml..,n C. Miiani Investigations and Video M~un Park Instead of focusing on the symptom of the problem (deer congregating in low-tolerance Farm Animar Welfare Nancy !'eIry, Esq. areas), we prefer to work with communities to create lasting, humane and Government Affairs Steve Putnam environmentally responsible solutions directed at eliminating the source of the conflict lMiness Development & Corporate RelatioJJ5 (the availability palatable forage). OUfbooklet Living with Deer outlines a variety of Robert G. Roop, Ph. D., SPHR Human Rf!5f)Urces & effective solutions to deer problems, based on scientific information, expert testimony, Education Programs Melissa ~ide Rubin, Esq. and referral sources. Field If Disaster Services John M. Snyder CompaniDn Animals Martin l. Stephens, Ph.D I urge you, on behalf of The Humane Society of the United States, and its members in Animal Research Issues Missouri, to reconsider and remove the captive bolt gun from your toolbox of deer DIRECTORS lesli€ lee NeKander, Esq management options. I would be happy to discuss with you more long-term, humane and Pauj(ia Mares Asip Pet~A.Bender effective deer conflict resolution techniques. Please feel free to contact me at 240-252- Batbara S. Brack Ani,a W. (Dupe. Esq, 9790 or [email protected] if you have questions or require additional information. Neil B. Fang, Esq.. CPA. Jodi Friedman David John Jhllad, Ph.D, Jennifer leaning, M.D., S.M.H Kathleen M.Linehan,Esq. Respectfully, William f. Mancuso Mal)lf.Max Pa~kk l. McDonnell 6i! Michaels Ju&fNey Judy J.l'eil Marian G. Probst Joshua S. Reichert. Ph.D. Stephanie Boyles, M.S., Wildlife Scientist Jeffel'! O. Rose I~ James D. Ross, Esq. Wildlife and Habitat Protection Mari~n G, Sey~r Waher 1. Stewart, Esq. I John E,Taft Andrew Weinstein 7jJ-rjo8'60ft Persia White Celebrating Animals, Confronting Cruelty David O. Wiebers, M.D. Primed on re<:.yded paper. 2100 LStreet, NW Washington, DC 20037 t 202.452,1100 f 202.778.6132 humanesociety.org ~I . . IL ~Coexisting with Wildlife Fact Sheet #7 ore and more of the environment is cycle and is the reason why animal removal provides less food and shelter; which in turn being engulfed by urban sprawl. M rarely works to solve a nuisance problem. A encourages the animals to go elsewhere. Some species, such as deer, adapt amaz- better approach is to modify the habitat so it ingly well to our human-created envi- PLANTS: ronments. The short-cropped lawns PLANTS THAT DEER and tasty flowers in our suburban land- WILL TEND TO AVOID scapes provide exactly the kind of suc- OR PREFER culent food that deer seek out in the Deer taste buds vary "edge" habitat they prefer. geographically and seasonally, and Once rarely seen, deer now abound, are largely dependent on what al- often achieving high densities. Some ternative plants are available. people relish the sight of a doe with Check your local garden store for fawns on their lawn, while others re- information on what types of act with frustration at the thought of plants seem resistant in your area. more browsed plants. All are con- You can also contact your local cerned about increased levels of deer/ Coopetative Extension Service vehicle collisions. i '[ for this information. To find a Co- Controversy erupts when a cry for ~ operative Extension specialist, see deer hunting goes up in communities around the country. Those who Javor i the directory for your state on the ~ web site 9/13/02, 12:32 AM II Ii . . ~I IL Perennials/Bulbs Adam's needle Colchicum Goldenrod Moss pinks Silvermound Alyssum Columbine Hay-scented fern Mullein Amaryllis Snakeroot Common dill Heath New York fern Snowdrop American bittersweet Coneflower' Heather Oregano Americana mountainmint Soapwort Cranesbill (Geranium) Hellebore Oriental poppy Society garlic Angelica Crinurn lily Hen & chicks Ornamental chives Spiderwort Anise Daffodil garlic Herb of grace Ornamental grass Spike gayfeather Anise hyssop Daffodil Hungarian speedwell Ornamental onion Spurge Astilbe Dame's rocket Hyacinth Ornamental rhubarb Squill Avens Daphne Interrupted fem Ostrich fern Sf. John's wort Baby's breath Delphinium Iris Painted daisy Star of Bethlehem Balloon flower Dropwort Jack-in-the-pulpit Partridgeberry Star of Persia Barrenwort Euphorbia Jacob's ladder Pennyroyal Statice Basket-of-gold Evening primrose Joe-pye weed Perennial blue flax Stella de Oro daylily Bearberry False indigo Lady's mantle Perennial sunflower' Bee balm Summer snowflake Ferns Lamb's ear Pinks Sundrops Bergenia Feverfew Lantana Plumbago Sweet Cicely Bishop's weed' Foam flower Larkspur Poppy Bleeding heart Sweet William Four o'clock Lavender Primrose Tansy Blue star Foxglove Lavender cotton Queen of the prairie Thyme Bluebeard Fritillary Lenten rose Rhubarb Tiger lily Bolton's aster' Gaillardia Lily leek Ribbon grass Toadflax Bugbane Garden sage Lily-of-the-valley Rock-cress Turtlehead Buttercup' Garlic chives Lungwort Rose champion Butterfly weed Tussock bellflower Gas plant Lupine Rosemary Wild indigo Calamint Gerbera daisy Mayapple Sage Windflower (Anemone) Cardinal flower' Germander Meadow sage Scarlet sage Winter savory Catmint Globe thistle Mint Scilla Wintergreen Christmas fern Gloriosa lily Monkshood Sensitive fern Wormwood Cinnamon fern Glory lily Montauk daisy Shasta daisy' Yarrow Cinquefoil Goatsbeard Montbretia Siberian Iris Yucca' (Adam's needle) Clematis Golden ragwort SHRUBSfTREES Allegheny serviceberry Cotoneaster Gardenia Leatherleaf mahonia Rose of Sharon American bittersweet Cranberry -+ Ginkgo Leucothoe Rotunda American Holly' Crape myrtle -+ Goldenbells Leyland cypress' Russian olive Andromeda Creeping wintergreen Gordonia Lydia Morris hollies San Jose holly Austrian pine Dawn redwood Heather Mountain laurel' Scotch pine Bald cypress Deodar cedar Heavenly bamboo Mugo pine Scots pine Banana shrub Deutzia Heritage birch Northern bayberry Shadbush Barberry Douglas fir Honey locust Norway spruce Shallon Beautybush Downy serviceberry Honeysuckle Oleander Spirea Blueberry elder Dragon lady holly Inkberry Paper birch Spruce Bottlebrush buckeye Dwarf sweet christmas box Japanese andromeda Panicled dogwood Stag horn sumac Boxwood Dwarf Yaupon Japanese cedar Paw paw Sweet mock orange Butterfly bush Eastern white pine Japanese flowering cherry Pitch pine Sweetgum Caryopteris Eleagnus Japanese holly Plum yew Sweetshrub Cherry laurel English hawthorn Japanese Pieris Red maple Vibernum Chinese holly' European beech Japanese rose Red osier dogwood Weigela Chinese junipers European privet Japanese wisteria Red pine White spruce Chinese paper birch European white birch John T. Morris holly Redvein enkianthus Winter daphne Colorado blue spruce False cypress Kousa dogwood River birch Common buckthorn Fir Common lilac Firethorn Common sassafras Flowering quince "Deer damage on these plants show regional differences Corkscrew willow Forsythia (border) 'Some plants listed may be both annual and perennial DEER-PREFERRED PLANTS (Avoid planting these in deer country) Annuals and Perennials/Bulbs Biennials Bishop's weed Garden phlox Dahlia Lilies Solomon's seal Black-eyed Susan Golden sunflower Perennial sunflower Spring-flowering crocus English daisy Buttercup Grape hyacinth Fibrous begonia Periwinkle Stock Candytuft Hibiscus Rose Geranium Trillium Cardinal flower Hosta (Plantain lily) Rose mallow Tulip Hollyhocks Crocus Hollyhock Impatiens Sedum "Autumn Joy" Wallflower Daisy Japanese painted fern Shasta daisy Yucca (Adam's needle) Pansy Daylily Jerusalem artichoke Sunflower (Mexican) English ivy Violas 2B6OCo7_cl.p65 2 I 9/13102, 12;32 AM I -+ Ii ~I . . IL ShrubslTrees American arborvitae Common winterberry Evergreen azalea Indian Hawthorn Pinxterbloom azalea American holly Cornelian cherry Evergreen holly Japanese maple Apple/crabapple Plum dogwood Evergreen rhododendron Japanese yew Quince Arborvitae Cornelian dogwood Florida azalea Juniper Atlantic white cedar Redbud Crabapple Frazer Fir Leyland cypress Atlas Cedar Rhododendron Deciduous azalea Fringe tree Manchurian lilac Rose Aucuba Eastern red cedar Goldenrain tree Merserve holly Balsam fir Saucer magnolia Eastern redbud Hemlock Mountain laurel Western yew Blackberry & Raspberry English yew Highbush blueberry Nellie Stevens holly White pine Catawba Rhododendron English/Japanese hybrid Hybrid rose Norway maple Winged euonymus Cherries yew Hybrid tea rose Pear Wintercreeper Chinese holly Euonymus Hydrangea Pink shell azalea Yew Clematis (vine) European mountain ash These tables of "deer-preferred" and "deer-resistant" plants are a compilation of information from the following sources: Reducing Deer Damage to Home Gardens and Landscape Plantings by Paul D. Curtis and Milo E. Richmond REPELLENTS Repellents are products that are meant carnage) of a predator. (Some deer re- Some chemical compounds which are ex- to disrupt and reduce deer browsing. How- pellents and homemade recipes con- tremely bitter to humans tend not to bother ever, deer are very adaptable and may vary tain animal-based ingredients, and deer at all (Lutz and Swanson). their taste preferences. Therefore, the ef- their discussion here for educational fectiveness of repellents will vary and will purposes does not imply endorsement depend on a number of factors: by The Fund for AnimaIs.) Not all sul- * Seasonal changes in plant palatability phurous odors are equally effective, how- * Local deer taste preferences and nutri- ever. For example, compounds containing tional needs garlic seem to be less effective than sul- * Availability of alternative foods phur compounds in urine. * Time of year Aside from fear-inducing odors, repel- * Deer density lents use other modes of action (some re- * 1YPe of repellent and concentration of pellents combine several modes of action) active ingredients which include: * Durability of the repellent and how of- 1) Taste: these include bitter ingredients ten it is applied that presumably create a bad flavor. These must be continually applied to the Plants are most vulnerable in winter, growing parts of plants. when snow cover or extreme cold reduces 2) Pain: these include ingredients like hot food availability, and in early spring when pepper (capsaicin) or ammonia, which young, succulent spring growth on orna- cause irritation on contact with the mu- mentals may occur before native plants. In cous membranes, eyes, mouth, nose or addition, most repellents require reappli- gut. ~ cation at regular 3-4 week intervals and 3) Conditioned aversion: these products tf. after heavy rains. This is why people may cause animals to form an association be- A wide range of repellents are available at garden consider repellents to be labor-intensive tween the treated item and a feeling of and hardware stores. and not always cost-effective, particularly sickness, usually gastrointestinal. over larger acreage. On the more positive Tips for Successful side, repellents are easy to apply and in- There are two kinds ofdelivery systems Repellent Application: visible, thus having much aesthetic appeal. for repellents: topical (repellent placed di- 1) All repellents work best if applied be- rectlyon the targeted plant) and area (such fore the deer's feeding pattern becomes What Makes Some Repellents More as scent packets, where the protection zone established. This means applying repel- Effective than Others? is meant to extend beyond the immediate lents before bud-break and as new The most effective repellents tend to be area where the repellent is present). In growth appears. Youdon't want to break those that produce sulfurous odors and are general, topical repellents appear more ef- a browsing habit, but rather prevent one considered "fear-inducing." These repel- fective than area-based ones and odor- from forming! lents depend completely on detection based repellents tend to outperform 2) Because rainfall washes off repellents, through odor. It is believed that deer asso- taste-based repellents. Taste receptors in you'll need to reapply repellents after ciate a sulphur smell with the presence (or animals are different than those in humans. heavy rains. We recommend routine re- 9/13/02, 12:32 AM II Ii . . ~I IL application at least every 3-4 weeks so A note of caution: Studies vary widely in A SAMPLING OF COMMERCIAL that new, growing plant parts are pro- the types of repellents they tested, which REPELLENTS: tected as well. plant or food was used as a carrier, repel- 3) Deer may become accustomed to the Note: See Table2for more options and afull lent concentrations, test duration, experi- ingredient list. Some commercial deer re- same repellent and ignore it over time. mental design, and criteria for success. pellent products contain animal-based Alternating repellents may help to keep Overall, many factors influence repellent the deer confused and more wary. ingredients, and their listing herefor edu- effectiveness, including: a) relative palat- cational purposes does not imply endorse- 4) At the height of growing season, you ability of the plant to be protected, b) avail- might consider choosing an odor repel- ment by The Fund for Animals. ability of alternative forage, c) weather, d) Deey Away Big Game Repellent (BGR): lent over a taste-based one. Taste-based amount and concentration of repellent This product comes in both a powder and repellents need to be constantly applied used, e) size of the deer herd, and f) test liquid form (the product's powder form to any new growth to keep the whole duration (EI Hani and Conover). There seems more effective than the IUjuidform) plant tasting bad. have also been less formal, consumer- and is considered by researchers to be the 5) The longevity of some repellents can be based assessments, such as one published most consistently effective deer repellent. enhanced by adding a "sticker," which in Consumer Reports magazine which re- BGR is an odor-based repellent comprised is an adhesive product that literally ported that 5 of the most effective repel- makes the repellent "stick" to the plant mostly of putrescent egg solids. It is usu- lents (out of 11 tested) were Hinder, ally available in garden stores. longer! Some commercial "stickers" are Bobbex, Irish Spring soap, Repel Bye Deer WiltPmj, VaporGard and Weathershield sachets, and a homemade egg and hot pep- Milley's Hot Sauce and Deer Away Deer and can be purchased at garden stores. per spray (see homemade solution #2). and Rabbit Repellent (now marketed as Some repellents already contain a Get-Away Animal Repellent): Both of sticker as part of their formulation. NON-COMMERCIAL these products rely on trigeminal nerve ir- REPELLENTS: ritation in the mouth caused by the hot How Do I Choose a Repellent? Soap Bars: Hanging a bar of soap, particu- pepper sensation. For severe deer brows- Many repellents are stocked by YOUr larly Irish Spring, from a bush or tree will ing, the Miller's Hot Sauce manufacturer localgarden, farm supply or hardware store, help protect it. Be sure to leave the soap may recommend that the product be ap- and it's a good idea to ask what seems to wrapper ON and drill a hole through the plied at 10-100 times the labeled concen- be working best in your area since the ef- center of the soap and suspend it with a tration and that a sticker, such as Vapor fectiveness of repellents varies locally and string. The brand of soap you choose must Gard, be added to ensure higher durability. regionally.Ask your neighbors what works be high in tallow fatty acid. Glycerin and The effectiveness of any capsaicin-based for them. Overall, the one repellent that coconut-based fatty acid soaps do NOT (hot pepper) product appears to depend seems to score highest most consistently seem to repel deer well. Disadvantage: the largely on the concentration of capsaicin -+- is Deer Away Big Game Repellent. Table 2 used and that the product be reapplied ev- sphere of protection is limited to the im- -+- gives sources for certain repellents that you mediate area around the tree/bush. Be sure ery 2-3 weeks (or less) so that any new may not be able to find locally. to hang the soap bars no more than 3 feet plant growth is covered. Taste-based repel- apart, up to a height of 6 feet, all around lents seem to have a shorter duration of Have There Been Comparative the tree/bush. effectiveness than odor-based. This may be Studies of Repellents? due to the lack of an associated odor cue, There have been some published stud- Hronan Hair: Although hanging sachets so deer continually sample growing plants ies that compare various repellent products of human hair costs very little, it does not and quickly notice if the hot pepper flavor on the market. A recent study (Wagner and consistently repel deer. Hair can be ob- is absent from any plant parts. See Table 2 Nolte) reported that the most effective re- tained from beauty salons and barbershops for recommended applications and more in- pellents(out of 20 tested) were DeerAway quite easily, however. Hair should be formation about these two products. Big Game Repellent, Plantskydd, Bye Deer, bagged in 1I8-inch mesh bags or nylon Hinder: This is an odor deterrent, based Deer Away Deer and Rabbit Repellent (now stockings, and contain at least 2 handfuls on ammonium soaps high in fatty acid. Ad- marketed as Get-Away Animal Repellent) of hair apiece. Bags should be hung at least vantage: This is one of the few products and Deerbuster sachets. All of these prod- 3 feet apart from each other and up to a that can be used on garden vegetables. It ucts reduced deer browse damage for all height of 6 feet if the tree/bush to be pro- is usually available in garden stores. 18 weeks of a winter study, with 2 (Big tected has a wide diameter. Refresh the Milorganite: This human sewage-based Game Repellent and Plantskydd) outper- bags monthly with fresh hair. Some users forming the others by repeatedly, and quite fertilizer is primarily an odor deterrent, have found that periodically spraying the available at most garden stores. Recom- effectively, protecting plants for 6-8 weeks bags with cologne or aftershave enhances when directly applied. Interestingly, the mendation: Spread in a wide band around their effectiveness! the perimeter of a garden, reapply as di- sachets were effective only when they were placed so that any product dissolving rected and after heavy rains. It is usually HOMEMADESOLUTION~ available in garden stores. At this time, we in rain could drop onto the plant surfaces. 1) Mix 3 eggs well in a blender. Mix with 1 Another earlier study (Lutz and Swanson) can't say how effective this product is for gallon of water. Spray on plants. Reap- deterring deer. reported that Deer Away Big Game Repel- ply after heavy rains. Disadvantage: this Plantskydd: This new product that origi- lent, Hinder (mixed 111ratio with water), solution may clog sprayer. andMilier Hot Sauce (mixed at a ratio much 2) Mix 4 eggs, 2 oz. red pepper sauce, 2 oz. nated in Scandinavia is made from dried higher than the labeled concentration, to chopped garlic. Blend with enough wa- blood and vegetable oils. Many animals re- act to the smell of blood, instinctively achieve a 6.2% product/l00 gallons water ter to make 1 quart. Strain and apply knowing that if blood is found outside the ratio) were the most effective repellents with spray can. This is the Consumer body, something is wrong. This product in several field trials. Reports recipe. scored highly in deer repellency studies. 2B6OCo7_c1.p65 4 9/13102,12:32 AM II -+- II ~, . . IL TABLE 2: COMMERCIAL REPELLENTS NOTES: - Many of these repellents are available at your local garden store. - This list is not all-inclusive, but rather a representative sampling. - RTU means "ready-to-use" form (i.e. pre-mixed). Products marked with an asterisk include animal ingredients and their discussion herefor educationalpurposes doesnot imply endorsement by The Fundfor Animals. * TRADE ACTIVE COST OF ONE NAME INGREDIENT(S) QUART OF SOURCE COMMENTS READY- TO-USE 'Deer Away Big Putrescent eggs 4.63% in Ready-to-use Intagra This putrescent egg. Game Repellent RTU, 37% in concentrate $17.99 (comes as a 8906 Wentworth Ave. S. based repeHent scores Bloomington, MN concentrate, powder, Concentrate 55420 most highly in repellent (800) 468.2472 or a RTU form called $9.95 studies. Powder form of www.intagra.com "Deer and Rabbit Powder: 1 Ib product seems most Repellent") $24.95 effective. Odor based. Reapply every 4 weeks. *Deer Off .7813% egg solids; 0.0006% $18.99 Deer Off This product combines capsaicin and 0.0006% 1492 High Ridge Rd. Suite 5 garlic in RTU taste (capsaicin) and Stamford, CT 06903 odor (egg) for repel- (203) 968-8485 lency effect. Reapply www.deeroff.com every 3-4 weeks. *Uquid Fence Contains egg solids $11.95 Uquid Fence Inc. Odor and taste.based (co. won't reveal %); PO Box 300 3% garlic powder repellent. Reapply after Broadheadsville, PA 18322 one week and then (888) 923-3623 monthly. www.liquidfence.com *Plantskydd 87% edible animal protein $27.00 Tree World A new product from (bloodmeal); 3% vegetable fat; 4466 Stalashen Scandinavia, odor-blood- 5% salt; 5% water Dr. Sechelt based ingredients. Scored BC, Canada VON 3A1 highly in studies. (800) 252-6051 www.plantskydd.com Miller's Hot Sauce 2.5% capsaicin $98.00 per half gallon Miller Chemical Be sure to add a sticker (not sold by RTU PO Box 333, 120 Radio Rd. (ex: VaporGanj). This quart) Hanover, PA 17331 product must be handled (800) 233-2040 very carefully due to www.millerchemical.com capsaicin (l1ot pepper)1 .company will consult with you Manufacturer suggestion to make sure product fits your for heavy deer browsing: APPlo, at ratio of 1-2 quarts problem specifics repe lent, 1-2 quarts sticker (ex: Vapor Gardj, to 100 gallons water. *Deer Stopper Mint oil, rosemary oil, $16.99 Landscape Plus sodium chloride A new formulation PO Box 122 containing herbal oils. Chester, NJ 07930 Egg solids: (908) 832-0711 1.52% in RTU, www.deerstoppe~com 15.2% in concentrate DeerBusters Deer 3.33% garlic $19.95 with hose. DeerBusters and Insect This garlic-based end sprayer 9735A Bethel Rd. Repellent repellent doesn't persist attachment Frederick, MD 21702 long so it must be reo (888) 422-3337 applied every 7 days and www.deerbusters.com after rain. Get-Away Animal .625% capsaicin, $17.99 Intagra Repellent This product scored fairly .21% allyl isothiocyanate 8500 Pillsbury Ave. (mustard) well in a recent study. Minneapolis, MN 55420 Taste/pain based (800) 468-2472 repellent. Reapply every 2 www.intagra.com weeks. *Hlnder RTU: consists of .66% RTU E. M. Matson Jr. Co. Inc. One of the few products ammonium salts of higher fatty 24 ounce $12.99 PO Box 1820 acids registered for use on North Bend, WA 98045 Concentrate: 13.8% ammonium edible plants. Reapply $25.00 for one gallon (425) 888-6212 every 2 weeks. salts of hioher fattv acids of concentrate *Deerbusters Deer Concentrate: 13.8% ammo. $33.95 for DeerBusters This product can be used and Rabbit Repellent nium salts of higher fatty acids concentrate 9735A Bethel Rd. on edible plants. Reapply Frederick, MD 21702 every 2 weeks. (888) 422-3337 www.deerbusters.com II 9/13102, 12:32 AM Ii ~I . . IL SCARE DEVICES: sive initial outlay of funds, yet a well-insulated hair, and the small, pointy Another way to deter deer is to scare well-maintained fence should last 5-25 design of their hooves which lessens the them. However, deer tend to habituate to years. There is a wide variety of fencing electrical impact. This is why they can most scare devices over time. Their initial options now available. often get through the horizontal wires fear ofa device that looks, moves, or sounds Certain fences, such as the 8-10 foot tall of electric fences without feeling much strangely may even result in curiosity fol- woven wire fence, provide an absolute bar- of a shock. lowed by rapid habituation as the deer rier since they are high enough to prevent learns that the device is not harmful. deer from going over them and solid enough TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL Scarecrow Motion Activated Sprin- to prevent deer from going through them. ELECTRIC FENCES: kler: This is a motion sensor combined However, most other fences, such as elec- 1) INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: with a sprinkler that attaches to a spray tric fences, are considered more ofa "men- Fences must be regularly inspected and hose. When a deer comes into its adjust- tal barrier" since they are low enough to maintained to remain effective. Every able, motion detecting range, a sharp burst jump yet the use of electric shock (nega- week, check for broken wire and do a of water is sprayed at the animal. By com- tive stimuli) or slanted-construction (i.e. voltage check. Deer constantly test bining a physical sensation with a startling illusion of a formidable fence) teaches the fences and ifthey get through once, it is stimulus, this device appears to be more deer to stay away. much more difficultto recondition them. effective than other devices that rely on Full instructions for how to build or in- 2) MOWING: Vegetation must be cleared sights or sounds alone. This device report- stall many deer fencing options are avail- away ---and kept away --- from the lower edly is effective for other mammals that able through the book Prevention and Con- wires or the wire may short out. Be sure may come into gardens and sells for ap- trol of Wildlife Damage (Craven and to clear a minimum 10-15 foot buffer on proximately $99. Purchasing information Hygnstrom, 1994 - see "Deer" Chapter) the outside of the fence so deer see it can be obtained from Weitech Company at which is also available online via and don't run through it. (800) 343-2659 or II 9/13102, 12:32 AM Ii ~I . . IL future. Clean off any old peanut butter TABLE 3: SUPPLIERS OF DEER FENCING so it doesn't get moldy. [Arecent publi- cation (Craven et al, 2001) suggests that Please note that this is a partial list of some mail order fencing suppliers. baiting may not be necessary.] 4) LEAVE FENCE ON: Leave the electric FENCING SUPPLIER COMMENTS fence ON at all times to prevent deer Premier Fence Co. The catalog contains excellent electric fence tips and a from testing the fence when it's off. 2031 300'" St. broad variety of fencing options. 5) CHARGERS AND WARNINGS: It is Washington, IA 52353 Call to request a catalog and for free consulting and (800) 282-6631 guidance. The 3-D Scented Anti-Deer Fence (a kit that important to use a high quality energizer www.premier1supplies.com includes scent lures built into the electric wire system), (or charger) that puts out 5000 volts. Intellirope, and electrified netting are some of the Chargers (also called energizers) are fencing products available from this source. AC, battery or solar-powered. How well Kiwi Fence Systems, Inc. The catalog contains a variety of fencing options a charger performs is dependent on its 121 Kiwi Rd. including the relatively new five-wire electrified "spider" Waynesburg, PA 15370 fence for farm use. power output measured in "joules un- (724) 627-8158 der load." To effectively repel deer, a www.kiwifence.com good rule of thumb is that one joule of Forestry Suppliers, Inc. output from a charger will adequately This company sells solid tube seedling protectors (i.e. PO Box 8397 individual Hoot high cylindrical tubes) that protect power 3000 feet of fence wire. Check Jackson, MS 39284 seedlings and saplings during the early growth stages. with your fence supplier to make sure (800) 647-5368 that the charger is matched to the fence www.forestry-suppliers.com design and is appropriate for your needs Gallagher Power Fence, Inc. This company sells permanent and portable (tempo- (Kays 2001). And don't forget to put up PO Box 708900 rary) electric wire fence systems. They also carry the warning signs. San Antonio, TX 78270 high-quality electric Turbo-tape. 6) REPELLENTS: For added deterrence, (800) 531-5908 www.gallagherusa.com after deer have made initial contact with the fence, you can take strips of cotton Benner's Garden, Inc. This black, polypropylene fencing is very lightweight and soak them in an odor repellent 6974 Upper York Rd. and blends into the environment but may entangle New Hope, PA 18938 wildlife due to its low visibility. If used, be sure to attach (Table 2). Hang the strips at regular in- (800) 753-4660 light, bright streamers to the fence every 3 feet so tervals and reapply the repellent every www.bennersgardens.com animals see it. This fencing is for short-term use only. month. The odor will help reinforce the Kencove Farm Fence, Inc. The website offers an electric fence manual on-line negative impact of the electric shock. 344 Kendall Rd. including installation strategies for 7-wire deer fence. Blairsville, PA 15717 SOME ELECTRIC (800) 245-6902 or (800) 536-2683 WIRE FENCE TYPES: www.kencove.com Single-Strand "Peanut Butter Fence": DeerBusters This company offers a single strand, electric fence kit This single-strandfencedesignrelies ona 9735 A Bethel Rd. that includes warning signs, posts, comer supports, Frederick, MD 21702 polywire, a tester, and a "deer pop" bait system peanut butter (see ';4" at left) or other "bait" (888) 422-3337 being attached to the wire (usually through (aluminum caps filled with a refillable scent lure), that www.deerbusters.com attaches to the wire for easy use. Also carried is strips of aluminum foil hung from the wire invisible, lightweight black polypropylene fencing. with cloth adhesive tape) to reinforce a West Virginia Fence Co. negative message. This fence is only 2 Vz This company offers electric fence and high tensile US Route 219 woven-wire fences to exclude deer. feet high and most effective for small gar_ Undside, WV 24951 dens and nurseries under 3 acres. Use 17- (800) 356-5458 gauge smooth wire and attach to wooden www.maxflex.com posts (as illustrated, except be sure to Margo Supplies This company offers electric fencing: portable, high scrunch aluminum foil around the peanut PO Box 5400 tensile and a galvanized cable electric fencing. High River butter so it doesn't flutter in the wind). The Alberta, Canada T1V 1M5 cost is under 15 cents per linear foot. (403) 652-1932 DeerBusters sells a single strand, baited www.margosupplies.com fence kit for properties under 4 acres. This Live Wire Product, Inc. This company offers woven-wire high tensile fencing kit has aluminum caps built into the fence 1127 E St. systems as well as electric fences. design to hold lure, which makes bait ap- Marysville, CA 95901 (800) 272-9045 plication easier and "less messy." Polytape and Polywire Fences: These Deer-Resistant Landscape This company offers a nearly invisible 8 foot Nursery temporaryfences(see "B" at left) are highly polypropylene fence. Be sure to attach light, bright 3200 Sunstone Court streamers to avoid entangling wildlife. portable and best suited to home gardens, Clare, MI 48617 small nurseries, and orchards under 40 (800) 595-3650 acres that don't have severe browsing pres- www.deerxlandscape.com sure. Polywire is composed of 3, 6, or 9 strands of metal filament braided with as polywire. It is best to purchase materials fences are usually suspended 30 inches off stands of colored polyethylene. Polytape with the least electrical resistance (ohms! the ground by fiberglass rods at 2-4 foot in- is wider and more expensive, yet flutters 1000 feet) to prevent loss of voltage due to tervals. It is recommended that a second in the wind more so it may not last as long long distances. Poly tape or polywire wire be added to increase effectiveness, so II 9/13102, 12:32 AM II ~I . . IL c ery 10-14 days. 5000 volts at a maximum pulse. This fence Electric-Bait Kit: Deerbusters sells a can last as long as 25 years. Installation and single-strand electric fence kit that comes materials range from 50 cents to $1.50 a with "deer pops" (aluminum caps that hold linear foot. Some people run an additional, scented lure), posts, corner supports, baited strand of hot wire (such as Premier polywire, a tester, and warning signs. The Fence's lntellitape orlntellirope) outside the kits come in either solar or plug-in designs. fence to ensure that deer encounter elec- The plug-in is recommended because it's trified wire and get a shock before attempt- more powerful. This kit is for small (under ing to go through the vertical fence. The 4 acre) gardens. Cost of kit ranges from main problem with vertical fences is that $225-315 depending on size of area to be deer tend to get through them, which is why covered. this new design (9 high tensile wires, strung Electric Spider Fence: This relatively no more than 9 inches apart) replaces the new fence is mainly used to protect domes- older recommendation of a 7-wire vertical tic animals or crops. It contains a 5-wire fence, with wires 10-12 inches apart (Cra- system that is only 4 feet tall and uses a ven et al, 2001). light 16-gaugewire (see ''D'').It relies on Slanted 7.Wire Fence: This 12 gauge .~ fiberglass posts that maintain wire tension fence is a variation of the vertical fence and ~ and spacing. It does not require bracing but generally more effective because it con- I requires wood posts on the corners. It fuses deer. It must be slanted at a 30-de- 3-D Scented Anti-Deer Fence comes with an electrified gate. Note: this gree angle to the ground. Because of the is a semi-permanent fence (lasts 10-12 slanting effect, the deer see a much more that one is at 18 inches and the other at 36 years), and not as durable or long lasting formidable barrier than really exists. It inches. These fences can last 15+ years as woven wire. Baiting with peanut butter measures only 5 feet high but 8 feet wide, and be installed for less than 25 cents (as outlined above) is important to make per linear foot. Many kits, and contains an electrical "incentive" which which include all materials, are increases its deterrent value. This '0'_- kind of fence costs about available so check fencing sup- '0'__.. .. $1.50-2.00 per linear foot. The pliers (see Table3) andyour 10- + cal garden store. : disadvantages are that it's more " difficult to maneuver around this 3-D Scented Anti-Deer Fence: . .-"-",,, ' U'1 slanting fence to do maintenance This new electrified rope system (mowing, etc.) due to its wide (see "C") (sold by Premier 1 Sup- .. ~ ~ ._ _.,fr... berth. More importantly; far fewer plies) takes advantage of the fact. J. 33' HighTensileVerticalFence people use this fence because it that deer have limited depth per- - ...... r ~ ... ~ Cravenet aI.2001. ControllingDeer "requires strict adherence to ception. 1\vo electric fences are I I Damage in Wisconsin. Cooperative construction guidelines concern- spaced 3 feet apart from each : i 4. .-- ExtensionPublication63083. I I ing rigid fence comer assemblies I I Reprinted with permission other to create somewhat of a 3- I I and fence configurations (Craven D effect. The outer fence has one U 1 E et aI, 2001)." rope with scent caps attached (which contain cotton to hold an apple scent this fence fully effective. The cost is under NON ELECTRIC FENCE TYPES: lure) to attract the deer. The inner fence 50 cents per linear foot. has 2 strands of electrified rope. Both Woven Wire Fencing: The woven wire High-Tensile Vertical Fence: These fences are electrified by the same ener- fence (see ''F'' top of next page) is consid- fences deter deer effectively as long as a gizer. The whole system costs under 35 ered the most effective deer barrier. It height of 8 feet is achieved and the wires cents per linear foot to install and will last is very durable and excludes deer quite ef- are correctly spaced so deer don't go 7-10 years. The apple scent is sold sepa- fectively as long as it is at least 8 feet high. through them (see "E''). We recommend the rately for $5 an ounce, and a few drops Woven wire fencing will last 20+ years. It design using 9 high-tensile wires (Craven are used per application. It is recom- can be a bit expensive initially (about $5 et al, 2001 mended that the scent be refreshed ev- - see diagram). Deer will try per linear foot) and labor intensive to in- to go under or through these kinds of stall, but is well worth the effort! fences, so the bottom wire should be no Plastic Mesh: Netting provides protection D for individual ornamental shrubs and fruit TOLERANCE BAND more than 2 inches plants. The netting can be draped over each off the ground (strung very tightly) individual plant or an enclosure made of with additional wires netting to "box off" an entire blueberry spaced at 8-9 inch in- bush area. Netting can be inexpensively tervals. The materi- bought at most garden or hardware stores. als include high-ten- "Invisible Fence": (see "G" top of next --... sile, smooth wire, (12 page) Rolls of8-foot high plastic netting can -- 112gauge) and an en- be purchased to create an "invisible fence." Electric Spider Fence Photo: KIwiFence Systems. Inc. ergizer that puts out HoweveI; the advantages of this product 8 II 9/13102, 12:32 AM Ii ~I . . IL F of the reach of the deer. The DEER AND LYME tubes are supported bywooden DISEASE stakes. The tubes function as a The reason that hunting doesn't control r "mini-greenhouse" due to the Lyme disease is because hunting does not warmer and moister significantly reduce the tick population. In micro-climatecontainedwithin. one study where as many as 70 percent of I Tree shelters are fairly costly, the deer were removed from an island, averagingabout $2.50per tube. there was "no marked reduction in the t Tree shelters are most widely " abundance ofthe tick" (Wilson et ai, 1988). ..+ used in commercial forestry 40' ). In later years, the sub-adult tick numbers Woven Wire Fence. From S, Craven and S. Hygnstrom, "Prevention practices. declined but the adult tick abundance ac- and Control of Wildlife Damage, 1994.. University of Nebraska, tually increased. Cooperative Extension. DISEASE: Another study found that a gradual re- LYME DISEASE duction of deer density (from 350 to 60 MISCONCEPTIONS deer) did not produce a rapid, precipitous Lyme Disease is spread byIx- decline in immature tick abundance but odes scapularis, the black- rather, immature ticks declined 5-7 years legged tick. The actual after the depopulation effort while adult disease-carrying agent is a tick numbers actually increased. The bacterium (Borrelia burg- threshold of deer abundance below which dorferi). It is carried in the tick reproduction declines remains un- bloodstream of hosts who get known (Deblinger et aI). However, it ap- ...3 "bacterium-carryinginfected when bitten by a pears that well over 70 percent of a deer population would need to be removed to Invisiblefencemadeofplasticmeshfencing.(From'DeerDamage tick. AI- a Problem?. Benner'sGardensInc.Reprintedwithpermission.) though the disease IStransmlt- have an impact on the tick population (pers Donot naiidirectlyto trees. Naila 2x4 pressure-treatedboard '" comm, Kirby Stafford). Yet a recreational tothetreeandthenattachthefencetotheboard. G ted entirely through tick bites, the disease can be transported deer hunt only removes 25-30 percent of a (blends into environment) is what make it to new areas by birds who carry the ticks deer population at best, therefore hunting potentially dangerous for wild animals who (Anderson et aI, 1984). does not come anywhere near reaching this may get entangled in it. This type of fenc- The Ixodes tick has a 3-stage life cycle in critical threshold. ing costs less then $1 per linear foot. A which the tick transforms from a larvae into There is another reason why hunting recent study (Rosenberry et aI) reported a nymph and finally,into an adult. This life won't reduce Lyme disease. When looking that this material can be used to create por- cycle takes 2 years to complete. At each at the life cycle of the black-legged tick, table, inexpensive deer-proof fencing us- stage, the tick attaches to a host and slowly one sees that the ticks tend to utilize deer ing PVC pipes for corner posts. The net- takes a blood meal over the course of sev- in the adult stage, when they mate and take ting used was 2.4 m, 8 foot taIlplastic fenc- eral days. A blood-engorged tick then drops a finalblood meal prior to the adult females ing material with 2 x 2.75-inch mesh. Agas- off the host and molts into the next stage. dropping offand laying eggs. This occurs in powered auger was used to place PVC For some unknown reason, the tick seems September through November. However; pipes underground into which corner posts to prefer a progressively larger host hunting season in the northeastern United were inserted. moving through the larval, nymph and States takes place in late November through A note of caution: if an invisible then adult life stages. Although deer are January, after most of the ticks have mated fence is used, please be sure to hang a preferred host for the adult stage of the anddropped offthe deer already.Thus, hunt- long (12-18 inches) white streamers, tick, they are not the only host (the term ingseason occurs too late todisrupt the tick's at least 4 feet off the "deer tick" is a misno- reproductive cycle. Ironically,hunting may ground, at every 3 mer!). The black-legged actually increasethe public safety risk by in- foot interval so that tick is carried by 49 bird creasing the number of"questing" ticks who deer, birds and other species and all mammals are looking for a host after deer numbers wild animals see it except bats (Anderson, have been reduced. and don't plunge 1984). Therefore, the re- The bottom line is that Lyme disease through and become moval of one host, the is a serious, complex disease. An inte- entangled. white-tailed deer, does not grated approach is needed to curtail its stop the spread of the dis- spread. Current research focuses on us- Tree Shelters (also ing deer feeders that have vertical roll- ease. In some cases, when called seedling protec- ers coated with an acaricide (tick-killing tors): Tree shelters ~ deer numbers have been i:i)experimentally eradicated product) called Amitraz. The concept is are individual corru- that the chemical will rub off on the gated polypropylene ~ from an area, the ticks have ~ been noted to switch to deer's neck when the deer comes to tubes, 4 feet high, feed, and thereby kill the ticks before placed around individual ~other hosts (Duffy et ai, they reproduce. Researchers are also seedlings so they can 0..11 Mannelli et aI) or occur at . . looking at various ways to apply acari- grow qUlckly In a pro- The townof Waterton,Canadasets a higher densities on the re- model Inlivingcompatibilitywithdeer.elk, maining deer (Deblinger et cide treatments to the first host of the tected environment un- and pronghornsheep. Wrappingprotective aI). tick, the white-footed mouse til they are fairly well out devices aroundtrees is so common thatit (Peromyscus leucopus), so that the dis- has become part of the town aesthetic. 9 II 9113/02, 12:32 AM Ii ~I . . IL ease spread is curtailed in the early to have twins rather than a single fawn. One roadside vegetation, among other factors. stages. study revealed that the incidence of twin- ning was 38% on a hunted site as compared STEPS TO REDUCE THE PRE1VENTION TECHNIQUES: to 14% on a non-hunted site (Richter and The Wildlife Society conference* in RISK OF LYME DISEASE: Labisky). 1996 devoted a full day workshop to seek- Dress Preventatively: When outdoors, In other words, after hunting season, wear light colored clothing and tuck pant ing solutions to the dilemma of deer have more young and breed at an ear- wildlife-highway collisions (West and legs into socks. Most ticks are picked up lier age. The result is a quick rebound in on the lower legs and then crawl up the Messmer). Several studies revealed that population size. So as illogicalas it sounds, road design, road condition, and speed trav- body seeking a place to feed. Also apply a hunting, in essence, increases deer popu- good tick repellent (containing deet or eled were the factors that most strongly lation size. This is why hunting is more of influenced the number of deer/vehicle col- pyrethrim) to clothing, particularly around a "temporary fix" rather than a real solu- legs and pant cuffs. Check for ticks fre- lisions. Bumpier, narrower roads with tion to deer problems. twists and turns, and slower travel speeds quently. Studies indicate that it takes a tick But state fish and game agencies have several hours to attach to a host, and, on (under 45 mph), resulted in fewer collisions several powerful motivations for not allow- with wildlife. Interestingly, the bumps and average, it takes 24-48 hours for Lyme dis- ing deer populations to fall too low. First, twists and turns in the road seemed to slow ease transmission to occur through a bit- agencies are largely funded by the sale of ing tick. Therefore continual tick checks down drivers more than posted speed lim- hunting licenses. The federal Pittman- its, which people tend to ignore. and a nightly thorough check after remov- Robertson Act apportions monies to states ing clothing should reduce the risk. Ifa tick based on their land area and number of *For more information on this conference's is found, pull straight out carefully with a hunting licenses sold. Thus, the more li- findings, please write to: tweezers, being sure to get the mouthparts censes sold, the more revenue generated Wildlife and Highways out intact. Contact your localhealth depart- for the state. Second, most fish and game c/o Terry Messmer ment if you want the tick tested for the agencies have a dual mandate, written into Jack Berryman Institute presence of the Lyme disease bacterium. law, which presents contradictory de- UMC 5210, Utah State University Save the tick (alive) in a small vial or jar. mands: 1) to manage deer for recreation, Logan, UT 84322-5210 i.e. to keep the deer population high enough Watch for Rash: Mer being bitten by a so there are enough deer for hunters to Crossing Signs: Attempts to alert motor- black-legged tick, watch for reddish, some- shoot and 2) to keep deer numbers com- ists to the presence of deer through the times bulls-eye shaped rash, which is a clas- patible with other land uses, i.e. to keep standard "deer crossing" signs have proven sic sign of Lyme disease onset. However, deer numbers low enough so they don't ineffectual because people grow accus- this characteristic rash does not occur in have a negative impact on landowners. tomed to the pretty yet static silhouette of all cases, so consult your doctor if recur- This mandate presents an impossible a running deer and no longer react to it. ring flu,fatigue, or other symptoms develop challenge for agencies since they are However, when signs are combined with after anIxodes scapularis tick may have bit- being pressured to both increase and flashing red lights, drivers tend to slow ten you. decrease the deer herd at the same time. down. However, because the agency's funding Alter the Habitat: Closely cropped lawns base is so dependent on hunting license Fencing: One of the most successful but with substantial solar exposure appear to revenue, there is irresistible incentive expensive techniques for alleviating deer/ contain fewer ticks. Simply mowing the to prioritize managing for a large deer vehicle collisions is to use fencing to lawn and removing debris piles and any herd. prevent deer from crossing roads. At times, other vegetative cover will discourage deer get over one fence and then are mice, which will reduce the tick population. DEERfVEHICLE COLLISIONS trapped on the road, creating a serious There are reports around the country safety hazard. Tocounter this, some states DEER POPULATIONS AND of increasing numbers of deer/vehicle col- use crossing structures, such as one-way "MANAGEMENT" METHODS lisions. It is estimated that there are 1.5 steel return gates and earthen ramps, to Hunting deer will not significantly re- million deer/vehicle collisions in the U.S. allow deer to leave the roadway and not duce the incidence of Lyme disease nor is every year resulting in 200 human fatali- re-enter. Most effective are earthen ramps it an effective population reduction method. ties and approximately 1.4 million deer which are constructed to be easy to climb In fact, deer hunting actually increasesdeer deaths (Conover et al). Public officials fre- on one side (i.e. the road side) but have a population size. When a deer population is quentlyattribute these collisions to an in- steep 5 foot drop-off on the other, thereby hunted, about 20-30 percent of the popula- creasingly large deer population, but fail to discouraging the deer from coming back tion may be removed. This results in more see the greater impact of more roadways onto the road. food being available for the remaining deer. being built, more people driving, and more Deer exhibit a physiological response to roadways bisecting wildlife habitat and mi- Over/Underpasses: Deer overpasses and their nutritional condition. Scientific stud- gration routes. In addition, human activi- underpasses, which provide safe tunnels ies show that better-nourished deer have ties such as frequent mowing of roadsides, and passages over or under roadways, also more fawns, lower neonatal mortality, in- along with road salt use in winter, regularly help avert deer/vehicle collisions. This creased conception rates, and a higher attract deer to roads. Collisions are influ- technique is being used by an increasing prevalence of pregnancy in yearlings enced by the weather, the time of year number of western states and parts of (Verme, 1969;1Verme,1982;Severinghaus (spring and fall are peak collision times), Canada and is particularly popular in Eu- and Cheatum; Mansell). For example, in amount of roadside shrubbery which can rope for species ranging from amphibians hunted populations, does are more likely reduce visibility, and the palatability of to deer. However, this method is quite ex- 10 II 9/13102, 12:32 AM /i ~I . . IL pensive and requires proper placement stimulus only when the deer are in a poten- where deer are likely to cross (i.e. along tially dangerous area. Because the device migration routes/common crossing areas) is not continually operating, it is less likely RESOURCES: and also requires fencing to funnel deer to that deer - and drivers - will habituate to the crossings. it. Haddidian, John, Guy Hodge, and John Grandy; eds. Wild Neighbors: The Hu- Strieter-Lite Wildlife Warning Reflec- SOME CURRENT RESEARCH mane Approach to Living with Wildlife. tors: According to Strieter-Lite, more than Researchers at the Berryman Institute The Humane Society of the United 50 communities in North America have re- in Utah are testing the use of temporary ported a reduction in deer/vehicle collisions States. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publish- signs in mule deer migration corridors. The ing, 1997. by 60-100 percent by using this innovative signs are only used during migration so mo- reflector system. The concept is simple: torists will not habituate to them. Pilot Deer Resistant Nursery is a mail the device reflects the headlights ofoncom- studies revealed that there was a 70 per- ing vehicles in a way that creates a per- cent reduction in deer/vehicle collisions order company that sells a diversity of petual "fence" which deer along roadways using this technique. Studies are also be- flowering plants that are generally will see at night. The dim light is not seen ing done to assess whether planting less resistant to deer browsing: by drivers, but it appears to be moving and palatable plants along roadways - or plant- 11 9/13102, 12:32 AM II Ii ~I . . IL Resources continued Anderson, J. "Mammalian and Avian Reservoirs for Borrelia burgdorferi." Lyme Disease and Related Full instructions for how to build or in- Disorders. Eds. J.L. Benach and E.M. Bosler. vol. 539. NY: Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 1988. stall many deer fencing options are avail- Anderson, J.E and L.A. Magnarelli. "Avian and Mammalian Hosts for Spirochete-infected Ticks and Insects on a Lyme Disease Focus in Connecticut." Yale J. of Biology and Medicine 57 (1984): 627-641. able through the book Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage (Craven, S. Conover, M.R. and W.C. Pitt, K.K. Kessler, T.J. Dubow, W.A. Sanborn. "Review of Human Injuries, Illnesses, and Economic Losses Caused by Wildlife in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23 and S.E. Hygnstrom, 1994 - see "Deer" (1995): 407-414. chapter) which is also available online Craven, S. Rand S.E. Hygnstrom, P. Peterson. "Controlling Deer Damage in Wisconsin." An Informa- via MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY MONDAY, JUNE 23, 2008 REGULAR MEETING The regular meeting of the Architectural Review Board of the City of Town and Country was held at 4:30 P.M. on June 23, 2008, at the Municipal Center, 1011 Municipal Center Drive. ROLL CALL The 4:30 PM roll call indicated Chairman Phil Behnen, Members John Diehl, John Eilermann, Mary Beth Benes, and Alternate Members William Langenbacher and James Woodworth to be present. Member William McMahon and Alternate member Don Pisoni were absent. Sharon Rothmel, Planning Director, Robert Bodley, Code Official and Pamela Burdt, City Clerk were also present. Chairman Behnen stated for the record that Alternate member Langenbacher would vote in Mr. McMahon's absence. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW . AR NO. 08-10. THE VILLAS AT TOWN & COUNTRY CROSSING (continued from 05/12/08 regular meeting and OS/21/08 work session) Mike Jantsch, Jantsch Architects and Dan Barnard, Greater Missouri Builders, were present for the request. Mr. Jantsch reviewed displayed color renderings, building material and color boards and site/landscape plans. Extensive discussion ensued relating to required percentages of masonry and hardy board on front elevations and which outside walls of the building were considered "front." Member Diehl suggested that rather than trying to explain verbally which side/rear elevations are to be 60%, instead each location should be highlighted on a site plan. The Board agreed and recessed the meeting to complete the project. Mary Beth Benes left the meeting due to a prior commitment, and Chairman Behnen stated for the record that Mr. Woodworth would vote in her absence. . . Architectural Review Board Page 2 of2 June 23, 2008 After much discussion, Mr. Diehl moved to recommend approval of The Villas at Town & Country Crossing to the Board of Aldermen, subject to the following: 1. Exhibit A - The front elevation of all units on the attached Exhibit A are to be 100% masonry; the side/rear elevations of units highlighted in orange as shown on the attached Exhibit A are required to be 60% masonry, all consistent with approved elevations. The remaining elevations which are not masonry shall be constructed of hardy- board material. 2. Exhibit B - The elevations submitted to the City dated March 27,2008 are hereby accepted. 3. An eighteen (18) inch stone wall, twelve (12) inches deep, shall be built behind lots 9 - 16 as protection from encroachment into the savanna. 4. Architect has agreed to eliminate all double hung windows. 5. Architectural roofing, metal roofing, masonry/colors and doors approved per samples. 6. Increased outdoor living space/decks/patios to be offered as options. 7. Craig Wilde, Director of Public Works, to review water runoff with Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. (Architectural Review Board suggestions not enforced.) Mr. Eilermann seconded the motion and the roll call vote was: AYE, Chairman Behnen, Members Diehl, Eilermann, Langenbacher and Woodworth; NAY, none; ABSTAIN, none. ADJOURN On motion of Member Woodworth, seconded by Member Eilermann and unanimously approved, the meeting adjourned at 6:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Pamela Burdt, City Clerk . iI\