arXiv:2103.07456v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 27 May 2021 II h the Why VIII. ∗ I.Tesg fdlt ferromagnetic dilute of saga The VII. I.Teeegneo semimagnetic of emergence The III. I Epilog XI. X o ildsmcnutrsitoisadwhy and spintronics semiconductor killed I How IX. magnetic dilute of structures Quantum VI. V h osi ffcsacutfrpositive for account effects spin do Why IV. [email protected] .O h odt oooia uecnutvt 15 superconductivity topological to road the On X. .Hwd eoatsae nac electron enhance states resonant do How V. I ufc n ukDrccnsi narrow-gap in cones Dirac bulk and Surface II. rmnro-a n eiantcsmcnutr ospintr to semiconductors semimagnetic and narrow-gap From .Itouto 1 Introduction I. thdi oig13 12 10 9 coming it had it Vleck Van nor mechanism? exchange double neither but semiconductors semiconductors cnweget 16 References Acknowledgments mobility? eiodcos3 not and MR, negative for phenomena orbital whereas magnetoresistance, 2 semiconductors attic an to basement a from semiconductors: rpristruhdpn,lgtn,adapyn various applying and lighting, resu doping, cells through thermoelectric properties and photovoltaic sources, light natborpia oe afo etr fato’ int author’s identify allowing of theories, century quantitative a observations. and of ideas con half of this a rise in tone, significant autobiographical especially an been Comprehensi have des theoretical semiconductors Polish spintronics. and investigations, Physics, and experimental of matter opment, Institute topological the to at today, prese researchers Society, Physical by Polish obtained the of years 100 celebrating h bnac fsmcnutr norsathns comput smartphones, our in semiconductors of abundance The p - d ee oe n superexchange, and model Zener oihAaeyo cecs lj onkw3/6 PL-02668 32/46, Lotnikow Aleja Sciences, of Academy Polish CONTENTS 1 nentoa eerhCnr aTp nttt fPhysic of Institute MagTop, Centre Research International ieversa vice atr iewt spins with life A matter: 6 ? oazDietl Tomasz 16 15 8 a n iuemgei eiodcos u o years for (1923-2008) Witold run and semiconductors, (1925-1996) Lidia magnetic by dilute narrow- of II-V Department and in the gap specializing of Zabrze, history in Gaj a Physics State find Jan Solid to unable 13], been [15]. have [12, (1943–2018) I Nawrocki Micha (1939–2002) l and Blinowski [14], (1926-2001) (1943-2011) Jan Giriat Witold 11], 9], [10, [8, Jerzy (1930-1986) Masters [7], Mycielski our (1911-1986) Sosnowski of Leonard importance colleagues, the and and us monumental to Obituaries unsurpassed recall recent Wr´oblewskireminiscences [6]. a Andrzej in of found masterpiece be as can a tion [3] Ga to and l¸azka Robert Society [4] Kisiel contribution by Physical reviews Andrzej Gaj recollection Polish to Jan the as well to of also meeting previous and (UW) [2], Warsaw’s of viewpoint University presented Kami´nska Poland from Maria in by research semiconductor of overview spintronics. and topo- matter dilute to logical today, and seen as narrow-gap relevant, Academy semiconductors concerning Polish magnetic (IFPAN) Physics, of Sciences of accomplishments Institute of past the of and at couple ahistorical researchers to an a addendum in way, an describes, self-centered is and [1], paper of presentation this the meeting Hence, contri- the spintronics”. their at semiconductors and underline semimagnetic are to to Tomek we your like and as would butions I ”... physicists, Polish fellow, talk: community the the semiconductor Wasik, commented the Darek and meeting, chair, the session and of fields. extraordinary character different the ceremonial given from therefore, meetings colleagues surprisingly, Society Not publishers, Physical Polish teachers, of re- – audience aimed broad was topological-matter a program information- at a tomorrow’s Such and and technologies. today’s communication spintronic to relevant search in throughs nasne hssre scmlmnayt broad a to complementary is survey this sense, a In break- recent presented I [1], talk recorded my In t rmtepsiiiiso otoln their controlling of possibilities the from lts rpino arwgpaddilute-magnetic and narrow-gap of cription n h hsc eidogigadfuture and ongoing behind physics the ing 1 t isdslcino otwieresults worthwhile of selection biased a nts ed.Ti ae,apr ftevolume the of part a paper, This fields. et hssre loepaie in , emphasizes also survey This text. esuis obnn aeil devel- materials combining studies, ve cdm fSine eeat sseen as relevant, Sciences of Academy leta mtosacmayn the accompanying emotions ellectual r,fie pi ucin,cars, junctions, optic fiber ers, tal. et .INTRODUCTION I. asw Poland Warsaw, 5.Mn ytmtzdinforma- systematized Many [5]. nc n topological and onics s, ∗ Zdanowicz ˙ 2

(Gulag prisoner and Monte Casino hero). Also, there is cent to odd surface step edges [20], presumably, the first no adequate account of the Unipress contribution to the observation of higher-order topological states. Present physics of narrow-gap semiconductors, InSb in particu- studies of topological surface bands, making used of won- lar. derfully working Krak´ow’s SOLARIS ARPES facilities, I hope that the present overview will trigger the ap- include Weyl semimetals [21] and ferromagnetic TCIs pearance of papers showing the topic from different an- [22], also examined from a theoretical perspective [23, 24]. gles or describing developments of other physics branches The case of TCIs, topological insulators, and earlier in a similar way. This article purposely presents only ref- of graphene, shows that electron Dirac cones have been erences to papers containing the IFPAN affiliation. One with material physicists for a long. But when and where hundred reviews I am co-author of, particularly the two have they been observed for the first time? This ques- most recent [16, 17], contain extensive and, hopefully, tion brings us back to the beginning of the 1960s and to well-balanced citations of other institution contributions. the attic of UW’s physics building at Ho˙za 69. There, IFPAN’s Witold Giriat initiated the grow of HgTe under the wings of Leonard Sosnowski, Master and Mentor of II. SURFACE AND BULK DIRAC CONES IN many generations of Warsaw’s semiconductor physicists, NARROW-GAP SEMICONDUCTORS: FROM A who, while in UK elucidated the physics of p-n junctions BASEMENT TO AN ATTIC (three Nature articles 1946-1947), and became elected as the President of the International Union of Pure and I am not alone regarding the ARPES visualization Applied Physics (IUPAP) for the term 1978-1981. From today’s perspective, IFPAN studies of narrow-gap semi- of 2D topological surface Dirac states in Pb1−xSnxSe [18], as IFPAN’s most significant accomplishment in the conductors brought several worthwhile accomplishments second decade of the XXI century. These studies were relevant to present works on topological matter of semi- initiated by Tomasz Story immediately after a suggestion conductors and semimetals: of the MIT/Northeastern group that SnTe-type materi- als belong to a class of topological crystalline insulators (1) Inverted band structure of HgTe. Sylwester Porowski (TCIs), just discovered theoretically by Liang Fu at MIT. and co-workers developed at IFPAN high-pressure tech- The Warsaw/Lund/Stockholm results were not only nique (the first step on Sylwester’s heroic way to found submitted earlier than those of Sendai/Osaka and Prince- at PAS the prominent Institute of High-Pressure Physics, ton/Shanghai/Berkeley/Boston/Villigen/Huston/Tampei Unipress). Measurements of the Hall resistance and the collaborations but showed the full gapless Dirac cones, Seebeck coefficient α up 1.2GPa at room temperature not only their valence band part and, moreover, traced demonstrated that HgTe has an inverted band struc- the topological phase transition in a single sample. ture [25], just proposed by Steven Groves and William Furthermore, Ryszard’s Buczko tight-binding compu- Paul at Harvard for gray tin. Robert Gal¸azka (1937- tations supported the photoemission data, and nicely 2021), under supervision of Leonard Sosnowski, grew illustrated the presence of surface gapless cones only if bulk n-Hg0.9Cd0.1Te and, by measuring α in high mag- the band structure is inverted, i.e., anion p-states reside netic fields, determined the values of the effective mass ∗ above cation ones. Not surprisingly, therefore, this m of electrons as a function of their concentration n ∗ 1 3 publication is already among ten most cited IFPAN’s [26]. The results pointed to m ∝ n / , proving a linear papers, and Tomasz Story has been invited to speak (Dirac) dispersion, E(k)= vf k. Amazingly, the resulting 8 about at many venues, including the 32nd International Fermi velocity vf = 1.1 · 10 cm/s is within 10% of the Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors (ICPS; graphene value. Despite the lack of topological protec- Austin TX 2014) and APS March Meeting (San Antonio tion, fine-tuning of the energy gap to the Dirac point by TX 2015). For these studies, Andrzej Szczerbakow hydrostatic pressure made it possible to observe, a dozen 7 2 obtained high-quality Pb1−xSnxSe single crystals by a years later, electron mobility as high as 2 · 10 cm /Vs 20ke˙self-selecting vapor growth method [19], perfected in Hg0.94Mn0.06Te [27] (see Sec. V). The thermoelectric during his retainment times in a basement just below measurements of HgTe (and afterward of HgSe) were five pieces of ultrahigh vacuum equipment for MBE, taken over and sophisticated by Andrzej J¸edrzejczak, my sometimes refereed to as mega backs’ epitaxy. Similarly MSc supervisor (1972/1973), whose and my data I put to the case topological insulators of Bi am Sb chalco- to our first publications [28, 29]. Andrzej shared my wife genides developed at Princeton by Robert Cava’s group, Maniela and my happiness on our son Marek’s birth, as the IV-VI program at IFPAN had been carried on in the his Godfather. pre-topological epoch with thermoelectric applications About that time, Andrzej Mycielski and Lucjan in mind. Sniadower´ studied optical properties of HgTe-based sys- Experimental and theoretical studies of TCIs are con- tem, which brought Andrzej to find out with Jacek tinued in IFPAN on many fronts and also in a worldwide Baranowski (UW) infrared detecting capabilities of collaboration. Among others, Matthias Bode’s STM Hg1−xCdxTe. Andrzej did not wait long to start supply- group in W¨urzburg discovered, on surfaces of Szczer- ing these detectors around, for instance, to mines as local bakow’s Pb1−xSnxSe, 1D topological Dirac cones adja- heat sensors. J´ozef Piotrowski took over and develop this 3 technology in the Military University of Technology, and tore Majorana (1906-unknown), and Frank Wilczek to founded Vigo System, now a stock-exchange global com- describe existing or hypothetical elementary particles, pany located in Warsaw’s area, which produces top-level fermions in particular. infrared detectors. This company is one of MagTop’s in- While the first report about an analogy between the dustrial partners. four-band model (including spin) equations for narrow- gap semiconductors and the Dirac equation goes back (2) Electron transport phenomena. The quantitative de- to Leonid Keldysh (1931–2016), since 1964 Wlodek Za- scription of above experimental data was carried out wadzki has persistently developed and extended this making use of Jerzy Kolodziejczak and Leonard Sos- analogy [38], also in the reverse direction, for instance, by nowski’s theory of transport phenomena in semiconduc- deriving a formula for the spin magnetic moment of rela- tors with a non-parabolic band structure proposed for tivistic electrons [39]. In general, however, the four-band InSb by Evan Kane in his famous 1957 paper carried out version of the Kohn-Luttinger kp theory does not suffice at General Electric. One of the key concepts introduced to describe semiconductor properties quantitatively. Ac- by them that time was the energy-dependent momentum cordingly, eight or fourteen band variants were developed effective mass, m∗ = ~k/v = ~2k(dε/dk)−1. Leonard at MIT, in Paris, IFPAN, and other labs in order to tackle Sosnowski presented emerging IFPAN’s experimental the magneto-optical and magneto-transport phenomena and theoretical results in his invited talks at the 7th and in these systems. 9th ICPS (Paris 1964, Moscow 1968). Jerzy Ginter and Wanda Szyma´nska were also members of the team, soon (4)Quantized magnetic fields. Warsaw’s physicists enriched by the dynamism of Wlodek Zawadzki. The cru- have often been taking their samples with and car- cial development, inspired by Henry Ehrenreich (1928- ried out charge transport and optical measurements in 2008), then at General Electric and later at Harvard, quantized magnetic fields in various labs around the was the use of proper Kohn-Luttinger amplitudes uk that globe. However, helium started to be available (Jerzy took properly into account k-dependent spin-momentum Rauluszkiewicz (1927-2005) took care of), and cryostats locking [30]. This formalism, summarized by Wlodek in with superconducting coils were purchased in the begin- his plenary talk at the 11th ICPS (Warsaw 1972) and ning of the 1970s, when we moved to a new IFPAN cam- in comprehensive Adv. Phys. paper [31], became a world pus on aleja Lotnik´ow in 1973. Andrzej Mycielski with a standard in describing momentum, energy, and spin re- group of Ph.D. students, Margaret Dobrowolska among laxation in narrow-gap semiconductors, InSb in partic- them, developed an infrared magnetooptical lab, while ular. PhD students Piotr Boguslawski and me, in daily me with Daniel Dobrowolski and a gifted technician Pi- collaboration with Wanda Szyma´nska, generalized this otr Siemi´nski (1947-1984), a setup for measurements of theory to zero-gap semiconductors [32, 33]. That theory the Shubnikov-de Haas (SdH) oscillations employing a I converted to a comprehensive code which was success- field-modulation technique [40]. Simultaneously, Daniel fully used for quantitative descriptions of my and others’ wrote a code providing Landau level energies within the electron mobility and thermomagnetic data taken over Pigeon-Brown model, a key tool for the interpretation of a wide temperature range and – as we would say now magnetooptical and magnetotransport data. Our results, – across the topological phase transition in Hg1−xCdxSe published in conference proceedings, have had a rather [34–36] and Hg1−xCdxTe [37]. limited impact. That was also the fate of a report on the theoretical and experimental demonstration that a large (3) Relativistic effects and semirelativity. As demon- difference between Dingle and mobility temperatures did not originate from samples inhomogeneities but could be strated in the last decade, topologically non-trivial states accurately explained in terms of the quantum lifetime live at the boundaries of materials with inverted band [41], the fact rediscovered at IBM a couple of years later. structures, such as Hg-, Bi-, and Sn-based chalcogenides However, the built setups and codes, together with the and cadmium arsenide. Relativistic effects, such as the already existing growth facilities, turned out to be es- spin-orbit interaction and the velocity-mass correction, sential for a quick take off with studies on semimagnetic stand behind the pertinent properties of topological mat- semiconductors or, according to the terminology imposed ter, including spin-locking and the appearance of inverted in the US, dilute magnetic semiconductors (DMSs). band structures (p-type anion orbitals above s or even p cation states) in materials containing heavy elements. This band inversion, quantified by topological invari- ances, results in gapless boundary states when stitching III. THE EMERGENCE OF SEMIMAGNETIC wave functions at interfaces between materials belonging SEMICONDUCTORS to different topological classes. At the same time, effec- tive (multiband) Hamiltonians explaining quasi-particles There are two events integrating semiconductor physi- properties in solids, particularly of electrons in narrow- cists in Poland: Friday seminars at UW, started by gap semiconductors and semimetals, are often formally Leonard Sosnowski after his return from UK in 1948, and identical to various forms of equations put forward by Jaszowiec annual meetings initiated by Witold Giriat, Paul Dirac (1902-1984), Hermann Weyl (1885-1955), Et- whose 12th and 49th editions were postponed because 4 of the martial law and the pandemic situation in 1982 same time, Ecole´ Polytechnique elite students demanded and 2020, respectively. During one of the first Friday supplying L’Humanit´e (indirectly supported by Soviets) seminars I attended, Robert Gal¸azka, after his return to the Palaiseau campus newspaper stands. On arrival, from Jacek Furdyna’s lab at Purdue, unfolded a vision Ionel – my Master – showed me our working horse, an of studying mainstream semiconductor compounds with automatized setup for resistivity measurements of hydro- group II or group III cations substituted partly by tran- genated amorphous silicon, equipped with Commodore, sition metal ions [42]. According to the painted picture, the first personal computer I had ever seen. Neverthe- these new systems – referred to as semimagnetic semi- less, we all participated in a 45 min protest (making me a conductors – should show some remarkable properties of strike expert in the Solidarity carnival times) when a sec- magnetic semiconductors but without long-range order retary did not obtain an increase in salary after refusing (hence the name semimagnetic). At the same time, ow- to attend a computer course. ing to host’s excellent semiconductor characteristics, they By field-effect measurements, we showed that surface should be more accessible for investigating, understand- depletion layers control the film properties [51]. I think ing, and applying. my main accomplishment was to invalidate, by a series of Within this program, Jacek Kossut at IFPAN, but un- experiments, Ionel’s idea that the Staebler–Wronski ef- der the supervision of Jerzy Mycielski at UW, began in- fect, killing photovoltaic cells’ performance, is a surface vestigating theoretically electron scattering by magnetic phenomenon. Amorphous silicon expertise introduced impurities in narrow-gap semiconductors [43, 44], Anna me to the physics of disordered (Sec. IV) and 2D systems Paj¸aczkowska established that, typically, up to 50% per- (see, Sec. VI). At the same time, reading for a change cent of Mn could be introduced to II-VI compounds pre- older and newer local Ph.D. theses, I became familiar serving excellent structural characteristics [45], Andrzej with the fascinating world of spin-dependent phenomena Mycielski elaborated a method of Mn purification, and in solids. On Paris diners, with my distant cousins An- transferred the invention to his on-campus company (now drzej and Jurek Mycielski (visiting Claudette Rigaux’s PUREMAT Technologies, an industrial partner of Mag- lab) as well as with G´erald Bastard, Yves Guldner, and Top) that has became the world leader in supplying pure Jan Gaj [staying in the Claude Benoit `ala Guillaume Mn to research labs. Barbara Witkowska, an electrical (1925-1994) group], the bright prospects of DMSs be- engineer and then growth technology expert, has assisted came clear to me. Andrzej for half a century. Ursula D¸ebska (1939-2020) On arrival to Warsaw, with my MSc student Marcin (later at Purdue) and Andrzej Szczerbakow jointed the Otto, I built the first Warsaw’s setup for magnetization growth team. Though busy with writing of the Ph.D. measurements of DMSs, an a.c. susceptometer. We did thesis and associated papers [33–36], I was aware of the not find any effects of electron concentration changes by approaching wave, signalized by a striking behavior of annealing in Hg1−xMnxSe, but provided supplementary SdH oscillations in Hg1−xMnxTe [46], giant Faraday ro- information for Margaret’s magnetooptical data [52] and, tation in Cd1−xMnxTe found at UW by Jan Gaj and in parallel to Robert’s SQUID measurements at Purdue, MichalNawrocki [47] (soon commercialized in optical iso- detected spin-glass freezing in Hg1−xMnxTe, the results lators by TOKIN company in the Sendai region), and published somewhat later with Faraday rotation data Gerald Bastard’s et al. magnetooptical data obtained for [53]. The magnetization behavior in n-Cd1−xMnxSe was Hg1−xMnxTe at ENS in Paris [48, 49]. I also attended essential in building up the understanding of the physics Robert’s invited talk at the 14th ICPS in Edinburgh, of bound magnetic polarons [54]. To learn more about August 1978, in which those results made an extraor- how to change carrier density by the field-effect, I spent dinary impact on the audience [50]. At the same time July 1980 in Mecca of 2D semiconductor systems – Fred (1977 and 1978) Kiev’s group around Sergiy Ryabchenko Koch (1937-2012) lab at the Technical University of Mu- reported giant exchange exciton splittings in CdTe:Mn nich, where I heard Klaus von Klitzing announcing, per- and ZnTe:Mn, respectively. haps for the first time, his discovery of the quantum After completing Ph.D., to build expertise, on Robert’s Hall effect [55]. I also spoke there about DMSs, and we recommendation, I spent 10 months in 1978 at an Ecole´ both were recommended by Fred to Noboru Miura as in- Polytechnique lab founded by Ionel Solomon (1929-2015), vited speakers at the Oji International Seminar on High which in collaboration and competition with physicists Magnetic Fields in Semiconductor Physics in Hakone, around Boris Zakharchenya (1928-2005) at Ioffe, made September 1980, a satellite event to the 15th ICPS in pioneering contributions to spintronics associated with Kyoto, where Jan Gaj also delivered an invited talk spin-orbit and hyperfine interactions in semiconductors. on DMSs. With Fujiyama in the window, I presented Despite a decade elapsed, May 1968 was in the air. an overview of Warsaw/Paris findings, adopting the s-d Georges Lampel, a discover of spin pumping in semicon- Vonsovskii model to (II,Mn)VI compounds and pointing ductors, as a protest against the incarceration of physi- out that p-d hybridization accounts for exchange coupling cist Yuri Orlov and Natan Sharansky declined to be an of Γ8 carriers to Mn spins, the suggestion confirmed the- editor of the reference book Optical Orientation (North oretically by Anadi Bhattacharjee et al. in Orsay. Holland 1984) in the series containing chapters written I would single out five durable accomplishments of alternately by Western and Soviet physicists. At the studies devoted to bulk DMSs, partly described in early 5 reviews [56, 57]: for Cd1−xMnxS. However, even more surprising was out- come of magnetooptical studies carried out for ZnO and (1) sp-d exchange energies. To interpret his inter-band GaN doped with Co and Mn in the middle of the 2000s by Wojciech Pacuski and co-workers at UW, Grenoble, magnetooptics data on n-Hg1−xMnxTe, Gerald Bastard with a support of Jerzy Mycielski described the influ- and IFPAN. The results implied the N0β values of oppo- ence of Mn ions on the effective mass electrons in terms site sign and much reduced amplitude compared to those of the molecular-field and virtual-crystal approximations stemming from photoemission and XAS as well as ex- [48, 49], an approach taken over by Jacek Kossut to in- pected from the chemical trends. I realized that Jakub’s terpret Marek Jaczy´nski’s SdH results [46] and by Gaj, approach can be extended to the case, when the hole is Ginter, Gal¸azka (the 3G model), who assumed that to bound to the transition metal ion, and showed that the quantify giant sp-d exchange splitting of free exciton model explains the reversal of the valence band splitting states, the Landau quantization can be neglected in wide- [65], in agreement with experimental data for Ga1−xFexN band gap semiconductors [58]. These models, with minor [66] and Zn1−xMnxO [67]. I think that splitting of the modifications, have served for decades to describe mag- conduction band into two branches observed in mismatch netooptical and magnetotransport results and, thus, to alloys could be explained by Jakub’s theory generalized determine the s-d and p-d exchange integrals (denoted for k 6= 0. as α and β, respectively) in a dozen of II-VI compounds Somewhat related is the issue of atypical magnitudes containing cation-substitutional Mn ions but also Cr, Fe, of α reported for certain DMSs. For instance, David and Co ions, the activity carried on by the Warsaw/Paris Awschalom’s group found negative values of α for para- collaboration and, somewhat later, primarily by Andrzej magnetic Ga1−xMnxAs with x ≤ 0.13%, which I assigned Twardowski and co-workers at UW, Jacek Furdyna’s to the exchange interaction with the hole residing on the group at Purdue/Nore Dame, Donald Heiman’s et al. at Mn acceptor, the suggestion wonderfully quantified by MIT, Shojiro Takeyama and co-workers in Himeji and Czarek Sliwa´ [68]. Tokyo, and other teams. Ab initio computations by Henry Ehrenreich group at Harvard and Alex Zunger et (3) Bound magnetic polarons. Do effective electrons al. in Golden CO as well as a tight-binding approach affect Mn spins? Around 1980 bound magnetic po- put forward by Jan Blinowski (UW) and Perla Kacman larons (BMPs) have been uncovered optically by the (IFPAN) allowed us to understand the signs and mag- Paris/Warsaw collaboration. Particularly clear were nitudes of α and β [59]. A similar approach [60] has Michal Nawrocki et al. spin-flip Raman scattering been, at least semiquantitatively, successful in describing (SFRS) data for n-Cd1−xMnxSe [69], which revealed magnetooptical splittings in PbTe and PbSe with sub- spin splitting of donor electrons even in the absence stitutional Mn and Eu cations [61] and the EPR Knight of Mn macroscopic magnetization. In 1980/1981 J´ozek shift in the of Mn in PbTe and SnTe [62]. We continue Spalek started coming from Krak´ow and brought to us his this line of research extending the theory for arbitrary k knowledge about magnetic semiconductors, particularly [63]. on theories of BMPs developed for those materials. It became clear to me that previous approaches missed the (2) Strong coupling effects. Attempts to go beyond key ingredient – the significance of thermodynamic mag- virtual-crystal and molecular-field approximations have netization fluctuations in the case of localized electrons. a long history, often put forward in the context of the To resolve the central-spin problem, as we would say now, so-called mismatched alloys. The key insight, which I I learned the Ginzburg-Landau approach to phase tran- share, is that, similarly to the Kondo effect and super- sitions from the book of Shang-keng Ma (1940-1983), conductivity, perturbation approaches come short, as a and formulated the question in terms of functional in- substantial modification of the local potential means that tegrals without the ”box” approximation [70, 71]. With a bound state can be formed, even for the substitution by J´ozek, we nicely interpreted Michal’sSFRS and my mag- the element with the same valence, such as N in GaAs, netization results [54]. Here, we were faster than the Mn in ZnO, or Fe in GaN. A non-perturbative Wigner- MIT group around Peter Wolff (1923–2013), and soon Seitz-like approach to the p-d exchange interaction that the Dietl-Spalek model, yielding the shift, width, and grows up with decreasing the anion-cation bond length shape of the spin-flip line has been verified by a dozen was proposed by Claude Benoit `ala Guillaume and De- of groups, also in the context of widely studied excitonic nis Scalbert, to which I incorporated the non-magnetic magnetic polarons (EMPs). Later Tomasz Wojtowicz, alloy potential [64]. Our work explained a mysterious in- using Witold Plesiewicz’s homemade SQUID, confirmed crease of the exchange energy |N0β| with lowering x ob- quantitatively our predictions concerning BMP magneti- served by exciton magnetospectroscopy for Cd1−xMnxS. zation [72]. In a series of beautiful works Jakub Tworzydlo at UW Works on BMPs made that I have been internationally sum up a class of diagrams describing self-energy of holes recognized as a theoretician. In that hat, I interpreted at the top of the valence band in the presence of ran- with the G¨unther Bauer group photomagnetization data domly distributed Mn spins of arbitrary magnetization, [73] and later, while in Grenoble, results on the forma- and demonstrated the quantitative accuracy of our model tion time of EMPs obtained by my hosts and previously 6 at Brown, MIT, and IBM [74]. At the same time, I was those systems vacancy-related hole densities attain the rightly sceptical about the idea of the free magnetic po- level of 7 · 1020 cm−3, not reachable in the case of II-VI laron appearing in the DMS literature at that time. More DMSs but available in Ga1−xMnxAs, where Mn ions act recently, in 2015, I confirmed that the central spin prob- as acceptors providing holes to a relatively simple and lem can be solved semiclassically, i.e., I reproduced accu- well-known valence band (see, Sec. VII). As already men- rately within our formalism the recent results obtained tioned (see, Sec. II), those materials combine magnetism by solving the quantum Liouville equation for the whole with topological characteristics, and are in the center of system or from quantum Monte Carlo numerical simula- MagTop studies. tions, concerning the dynamics of the localized electron spin in the hyperfine field of nuclear magnetic moments [75]. IV. WHY DO SPIN EFFECTS ACCOUNT FOR POSITIVE MAGNETORESISTANCE, WHEREAS (4) Antiferromagnetic superexchange. There is a consen- ORBITAL PHENOMENA FOR NEGATIVE MR, sus that the exchange interaction between dilute Mn ions AND NOT VICE VERSA? in II-VI and IV-VI semiconductors is bilinear in spin op- erators and antiferromagnetic for all distances between ”What about spin?” I asked Philip Anderson (1923- magnetic ions [59]. The Hamiltonian contains the scalar 2020) to break the embarrassing silence after his plenary Heisenberg and the pseudo-dipole terms and, depending talk at Montpellier’s IUPAP 16th ICPS in 1982 [84]. on the spin pair symmetry in a given host, non-scalar In his lecture, he presented the Gang of Four work on contributions,such as the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya compo- quantum localization [inspired by David Thouless (1934- nent, visible clearly in EPR studies. As suggested by 2019)] and corresponding millikelvin results taken at Bell J´ozek Spalek et al. [76], and shown quantitatively by the Labs. He jumped on the topic as, according to his later Ehrenreich group at Harvard, the short-range superex- writings, he spent last evenings discussing to what extent change is the dominant interaction mechanism in Mn- spin physics could account for the apparent disagreement based II-VI DMSs. A linear dependence of the Curie- between the theory and data on the quantum metal-to- Weiss temperature on the Curie constant in the high insulator transition (MIT) in Si:P. My perspective was temperature limit [76] proved the uncorrelated distribu- different: in IFPAN, we just began millikelvin measure- tion of Mn ions and also Co ions [77]. Inelastic neutron ments of Hg1−xMnxTe [27] (see Sec. V) and magnetore- and light scattering, together with steps in M(H) depen- sistance studies of Cd1−xMnxSe [85] and p-Hg1−xMnxTe dencies in high magnetic fields, have provided quantita- [86] in the vicinity of the MIT. tive information on exchange energies for Mn, Co, and The textbook paradigm was that the Lorentz force Eu nearest-neighbor pairs in II-VI and IV-VI DMSs [78]. results in a positive magnetoresistance (MR), whereas Low-temperature specific heat and magnetization mea- spin-disorder scattering (especially in the Kondo limit) surements carried out in various labs across the globe and bound magnetic polarons make MR negative in di- p allowed establishing that freezing temperature Tf ∝ x , lute magnetic materials and magnetic semiconductors. − where p =1.33 for (Cd1 xMnx)3As2 and p =2.3 for wide In the case of n-Cd1−xMnxSe it was apparently an- band-gap Mn-based DMSs [4]. Faraday rotation [79] and other way around: the weak-field MR was negative in quantum noise [80] served to determine the character of n-CdSe and positive in paramagnetic n-Cd0.95Mn0.05Se spin-glass dynamics. [85]! Immersed in a summer scenery of southern France, so bright after a long martial-law darkness in Soviet- (5) Playing with magnetism in magnetically doped controlled Poland, I realized that DMSs (see Sec. III) Pb1−xSnxTe Two pioneering works of Tomasz Story et once more opened new research horizons – this time al. demonstrated that it is possible, by changing carrier to test fundamentally new theoretical predictions con- density, to trigger ferromagnetism in Pb1−x−ySnyMnxTe cerning the crucial role of subtle interference effects in [81] and to alter the strength of antiferromagnetic cou- one-electron and many-body Anderson-Mott localization pling in Sn1−xGdxTe [82]. In the former case, the intrin- in disordered systems, put forward by Boris Altshuler, sic antiferromagnetic interaction of Mn ions is overcom- Arkadii Aronov (1939-1994), Hidetoshi Fukuyama, David pensated by carrier-mediated RKKY-type ferromagnetic Khmelnitskii, Patrick Lee, T.V. Ramakrishnan, and oth- coupling once the holes start to occupy twelve side Σ ers, the understanding accelerated by a Soviet-US joint valleys, as revealed by magnetization studies under hy- meeting at Armenian’s Lake Sevan in September 1979. drostatic pressure [83]. In the case of Sn1−xGdxTe, Gd When I learned that Jacek Kossut would host Yoshi Ono ions introduce occupied donor and empty acceptor states from the University of Tokyo, I asked them to consider (5d1 and 5d2, respectively), which are resonant with the MR of DMSs caused by quantum localization. Their valence band. By annealing, one decreases the concen- paper considering the one-electron case [87] was a good tration of native acceptors, which shifts the Fermi en- starting point to develop a more comprehensive numeri- ergy toward the 5d2 level. According to the data and the cal code, the task taken over by Maciej Sawicki. model put forward in Ref. 82, antiferromagnetic coupling Importantly, we had in place already that time bulk between Gd spins becomes then resonantly enhanced. In DMS growth technology (developed first under the lead- 7 ership of Witold Giriat and then of Robert Gal¸azka and Dagotto, Adriana Moreo and others as well as Eduard Andrzej Mycielski, see Sec. III)), and a dilution fridge Nagaev (1934-2002) to explain the origin of CMR in fer- program (initiated in IFPAN by Lucjan Sniadower´ and romagnetic oxides and semiconductors in the vicinity of Piotr S¸ekowski, who then emigrated to France and Ger- TC. Thus, within this model, critical carrier scattering many, respectively), and taken over in 1982 by a highly and the associated negative CMR originate rather from talented self-made cryogenic expert Witold Plesiewicz spatial fluctuations of TC in the MIT neighborhood than and me. Witold, till 2010 fabricated about 70 helium and from thermodynamic magnetization fluctuations at TC nitrogen cryostats, distributed over whole Poland, but (which is below 100 mK in the studied n-type DMSs). also exported to, e.g., University of Tokyo and Z¨urich’s ETH. He was my wedding witness, we were used to do not (3 Critical behavior. It was realized by Steve von Moln`ar miss any illegal Solidarity demonstration (dressed in run- at IBM and by us that while quantitative modeling of ning shoes), and sequentially hosted in our apartments conductance and, in particular, of negative CMR is not the Editorial Office of the underground Jan Str¸ekowski’s yet possible across the MIT, the presence of the field- ”Tygodnik Wojenny” (War Weekly) appearing in the induced insulator-to-metal transition in appropriately se- years 1982-1985 and later the recording studio of the lected samples allows one to determine critical expo- Solidarity Program II radio. Actually, our most active nents of the Anderson-Mott quantum transition, a much- IFPAN colleague and future Senate member Zbyszek Ro- debated issue that time. Especially attractive was the maszewski was sentenced for four and a half years of case of p-Hg1−xMnxTe, in which, as shown by Jerzy My- prison for organizing the first Solidarity radio. Zbyszek cielski, an increase of p-d exchange splitting makes the lo- and his wife Zosia were ones of those who brought to calization length to be more and more determined by the falling walls in 1989. His Moscow visit as an IFPAN del- Γ8 light hole mass. This effect strongly enhances CMR, egate was in fact a cover for the famous meeting between and allowed us to study the critical behavior of resistance, KOR and Andrei Sakharov in 1979. resistance anisotropy, Hall effect, dielectric constant, and There were four new accomplishments collected in hopping length [96–98]. I called the Landau Institute and Ph.D. theses of Tomasz Wojtowicz (1988), Maciej Saw- asked Alexander Finkelstein to provide us with dynamic icki (1990), Jan Jaroszy´nski (1990), and Pawel Gl´od renormalization group equations for the spin-polarized (1995), made possible by their contribution to the de- case, which we compared to experimental data [96], the velopment of millikelvin measurement setups: procedure later followed by many groups for the MIT in various disordered systems. (1)Effect of spin splitting. The giant s-d exchange split- ting produces a field-dependent mass in the diffusion (4) Rashba weak antilocalization. We were the first and Cooperon poles in quantum conductivity corrections to reveal the influence of the Rashba spin-orbit term brought about by electron-electron interactions, which on transport phenomena experimentally by observing leads to a sizable positive MR on the conducting side of a tinny positive MR (weak antilocalization – WAL) the MIT. The effect was initially found and interpreted in n-CdSe:In below 1 K, which was taken over above quantitatively in n-Cd1−xMnxSe:In [88], and later inves- 20 mT by a stronger negative MR – a manifestation of tigated in various DMSs around the world, but also in IF- the Aharonov-Bohm-type of interferences for electrons PAN on epilayers from multiple labs, n-Zn1−xMnxO:Al diffusing in disordered media (weak localization MR) [89], n-Zn1−xCoxO:Al [90], Cd1−xMnxTe HEMTs [91], [88]. Notably, the determined magnitude of the Rashba and n-Ga1−xMnxN:Si [92]. Simultaneously, somewhat parameter was in excellent agreement with the value surprisingly to many, effects of spin-disorder scattering known from the strength of electron spin-resonance upon many-body quantum localization are not relevant in n-Cd1−xMnxSe, studied experimentally by Jacek in paramagnetic DMSs, as temperature at which ther- Furdyna’s and Denis Drew’s groups, and theoretically mal broadening kBT becomes smaller than spin-disorder by Peter Wolff at MIT. The WAL MR was even smaller, scattering rate corresponds to the onset of carrier-driven but detectable, in n-ZnO:Al [89] and n-GaN:Si [99]. At ferromagnetic ordering of localized spins. the same time, our data allowed verifying, presumably for the first time quantitatively, the theory of the (2) Temperature-dependent localization. We discovered phase coherence time, confirming the dominant role of an abrupt conductivity drop below 1 K accompanying by carrier-carrier scattering at low temperatures [88]. a negative colossal MR (CMR) in the MIT’s close vicin- ity in n-Cd1−xMnxSe [88, 93, 94]. To make a long story The innovative and comprehensive nature of this re- short: the key notion here is the disorder-driven spa- search resulted in inviting me to speak at IUPAP’s 18th tial separation into regions with larger and smaller car- International Conference on Low Temperature Physics rier density near the MIT, which – owing to the carrier- (Kyoto 1987) [100] and 19th ICPS, Warsaw 1988 [101] as mediated ferromagnetic coupling between Mn spins – re- well as at the Meetings of the Condensed Matter Divi- sults in mesoscopic magnetization fluctuations leading to sion of EPS (Budapest 1988) and of APS (St. Louis MO quantum localization [91, 95]. Thus, the physics behind 1989). That time, we carried out with Don Heiman mil- the phenomenon is similar to that put forward by Elbio likelvin spin-flip Raman scattering measurements at the 8

MIT Francis Bitter Magnet Lab, unsuccessfully looking condensed matter physics, as it concerns, for instance, for BMPs on the metal side of MIT in n-Cd1−xMnxSe the survival of magnetic moments in metals and the is- [102]. On those occasions, and with the help of Steve von sue of disorder-driven metal-insulator transition. The Moln´ar (1935–2020), I made two seminar tourn´ees over key notion is resonant scattering that dramatically lowers a dozen US universities and research centers (including conductivity of metals containing impurities if they give Bell Labs and IBM) traveling between them on Grey- rise to quasi-localized states with binding energies near hound busses. Quite a progress compared to my lowest- the Fermi energy. Not surprisingly, this question was level construction jobs in London and Brussels suburbs addressed for acceptors in zero-gap semiconductors, such making possible seven hitchhiking summer tours between as HgTe, for which Boris Gelmont and Mikhail Dyakonov youth hostels and my beloved relatives homes distributed predicted in 1972 a greater binding energy than lifetime over magnificent West and South Europe cities (1967- broadening. This created an abundance of theories pro- 1974; 25000km). viding the strength of resonant scattering, a prediction For the 40th birthday, I obtained a professor title in apparently confirmed by a minimum in the HgTe conduc- 1990. I was also asked to chair the International Confer- tance at temperatures at which the Fermi energy assumes ence on Electron Localization and Quantum Transport. the expected positions of acceptors states, always present The conference was organized in Jaszowiec with the logis- in real materials. tic help of Ela Zipper at Silesian University but the ban- However, this insight was called into question by quet we arranged near Krak´ow in a spacious grotto 100m Wladek Walukiewicz who showed in a qualitative model below the ground, a part of the Middle Age Wieliczka that optical phonon scattering between the conduc- Salt Mine complex – the UNESCO World Heritage Site. tion and valence bands might account for the elec- One of the scheduled highlights was the after-dinner talk tron conductivity minimum [108]. Our comprehensive to be given by Nevill Mott (1905-1996) [103] about his eight band kp theory of electron transport in zero- and Goettingen times with Max Born. Sir Nevill passed away narrow-gap zinc-blende semiconductors, developed with that night, canceling a couple of days earlier his trip to Wanda Szyma´nska employing a variational solution of Poland because of a flu infection. the Boltzmann equation [33] and verified for HgSe [34] There have been many interesting research followups. and Hg1−xCdxSe [35], confirmed Wladek’s suggestion by For instance, I found that surprising negative MR of showing good agreement of the theory and experimental − ferromagnetic p-Ga1 xMnxAs persisting up to at least data for Hg1−xCdxTe as a function of temperature and 27T at T ≪ TC [104] can be quantitatively inter- x with no adjustable parameters [37, 109]. preted in terms of the orbital single-electron WL inter- So, are resonant states irrelevant in semiconductors? ference effect [105, 106], as the exchange band splitting Absolutely not – they can lead to a significant ... en- is field-independent at low temperatures and also pre- hancement of carrier mobility. To describe magnetic cludes WAL’s MR appearance in ferromagnets. This in- impurities in metals, Anderson considered a competi- sight was confirmed by comprehensive MR studies of p- tion between intra-site correlation energy U and hy- Ga1− Mn As carried out by Dieter Weiss’s group in Re- x x bridization between impurity and band state Vk . In gensburg, the weak-field data showing, additionally, the d the case of resonant states in semiconductors, I argued presence of demagnetization effects and field-dependent [100, 110], that a competition of Vk with inter-site magnon scattering at non-zero temperatures. Another d Coulomb energy EC is essential. If the width of the line of recent studies concerns ferromagnetic and non- Efros-Shklovskii gap produced by EC is larger than the magnetic topological semiconductors which exhibit neg- tunneling rate from the resonant state to the band, the ative WL MR and positive WAL MR, respectively (see, efficiency of resonant scattering will be much reduced. e.g. Ref. 107). Moreover, as noted already in 1983 by the Nikolaj Brandt Finally, I have to note that despite all those develop- (1923-2015) group at Moscow University, who investi- ments there have been systematic assignments of nega- gated Witold Giriat’s zero-gap donor-compensated p- tive MR and/or non-linearities in the Hall resistance to Hg1− Mn Te and by Jerzy Mycielski in the context of the chiral anomaly or to spin-disorder scattering by the x x Andrzej Mycielski’s HgSe:Fe [111], EC results in a cor- existing magnetic impurities or by hypothetical spins (or related spatial arrangement of charges on resonant im- two-level systems) on defects, prior to checking the role purities, which dramatically enhances electron mobil- of orbital WL MR, whose magnitude can be evaluated ity and reduces the Dingle broadening at low tempera- without any adjustable parameters. tures. This model explained quantitatively mobility mag- nitudes in HgSe:Fe in which Fe3+/Fe2+ donor states re- side 0.2 eV above the conduction band bottom [110, 112], V. HOW DO RESONANT STATES ENHANCE elucidates the mechanism leading to mobility as high as ELECTRON MOBILITY? 6 2 20·10 cm /Vs found in pressurized Hg0.94Mn0.06Te [27], and explains the pressure dependence of electron mo- The question on whether and under which conditions bility in n-GaAs, in which Si donors form DX resonant localized and extended states can co-exist at the same en- states [113]. Amazingly, under modulation doping con- ergy appears in many contexts, and is also central to the ditions, the barrier donors constitute resonant states for 9 the channel carriers. According to the Vladimir Uman- structure programme was facilitated by our earlier ac- sky et al. 2008 paper (Rehovot/Stuttgart collaboration), complishments in the physics of low-dimensional systems the correlated arrangement of donor charges is essential [115, 116]. For instance, my then Ph.D. student Grzegorz to achieve electron mobility as high as 35 · 106 cm2/Vs in Grabecki had started in 1980 fabricating field-effect tran- GaAs HEMT structures. sistors of p-Hg1−xMnxTe, and successfully demonstrated Jacek Kossut was invited to present IFPAN results at the influence of the sp-d exchange interaction on the SdH the 20th ICPS, Thessaloniki 1990. One evening of the oscillations of interfacial electrons as a function of the meeting, I participated in the chair dinner in an elegant electric field and temperature [117]. My assignment of beach hotel. It was exactly those dining illuminated ta- some strange data to inversion layers at grain boundary bles I observed via a fence, with jealousy in my eyes, one defects in p-Hg1−xMnxTe [118] allowed Grzegorz to show year earlier eating just cooked noodles in front of our lit- that the anomalous Hall effect, expected in the presence tle tent. (Family dinner in that restaurant would then of magnetic ions, does not affect the precision of Hall cost my IFPAN monthly salary even though our 10 years resistance quantization [119, 120]. At the same time, old daughter Zosia gave up this sightseeing tour, prefer- Marian Herman (1936-2015) [121] and Janusz Sadowski ring to take advantage of the last chance to visit East were constructing an MBE setup for IV-VI compounds. Germany with her dancing group.) In 1987, Gorbachev decided to open boarders to Poland, closed in 1981. I immediately went to Moscow and Leningrad, where over an aromatic Armenian-style VI. QUANTUM STRUCTURES OF DILUTE coffee in a tiny apartment inhabited by the Boris Alt- MAGNETIC SEMICONDUCTORS shuler family, my appetite to study mesoscopic phenom- ena in DMS spin-glasses grew even further. We did not Shortly after breaking out into independence, Poland continue that discussion when Boris revisited me dur- joined CERN in 1991. Other initiatives got a bust, too. ing Warsaw’s ICPS a year later, as without any fear he In 1992, Robert Gal¸azka and Jacek Kossut, IFPAN’s Di- used the time to ask other guests, Eva Andrei among rector and Deputy Director, respectively, initiated a new them, where would it be better to work, in Europe or MBE program with Jacek Kossut and Tomasz Wojtow- in the US? Unexpected by this, taking advantage of a icz as persons in charge. In 1993 they made operating relatively long mean free path of electrons in narrow- the new MBE Lab equipped with the first commercial gap semiconductors we started to study mesoscopic uni- MBE system in Poland, purchased from the EPI com- versal conductance fluctuations (UCFs) just employing pany in the USA, using IFPAN own funds. Simultane- photolithography. That time Andre Geim entered to ously, government subsidies financed a couple of research my office and seeing what was going on immediately groups interested in low-dimensional systems. Jan Gaj advised us to use oil from not too good pumps in our coordinated the project, and Manijeh Razeghi, a pio- scanning electron microscope as a resist. He actually neer in epitaxial techniques for semiconductors, chaired a appeared faster than we [122], and reported already in panel of external advisors. This initiative made it possi- 1990 mesoscopic spin-dependent UCFs as a function of ble to develop, with significant involvement of Grzegorz the magnetic field in a GaAs nanowire. However, I ar- Karczewski and El˙zbieta Janik, the MBE growth tech- gued somewhat later that Andre and coworkers observed nology of II-VI compounds. At the same time, Jerzy actually SdH oscillations, not UCFs [123]. Hearing com- Wr´obel and I, in collaboration with Eliana Kami´nska and plains coming from the mK lab that UCFs in our n- Anna Piotrowska at the Institute of Electron Technol- Cd0.99Mn0.01Te:In submicron wire show an atypical tem- ogy, constructed a clean room at IFPAN equipped with perature dependence, I realized that UCFs in param- electron beam lithography and auxiliary nanofabrication agnetic DMSs originate primarily from the redistribu- tools. They were funded by other grants, including the tion of carriers between spin subbands, whereas both the Austrian Ost-West program we applied to with G¨unther Aharonov-Bohm-type of interferences and spin-disorder Bauer with whom many other IFPAN colleagues and scattering are of lesser importance [123]. It took another I had a long record of friendly and efficient collabora- year or two before Ja´sJaroszy´nski took a wonderful set tion. Jerzy’s proficiency is best illustrated by his Stern- of data for Cd1−xMnxTe:I submicron wires in the spin- Gerlach solid-state spin-filter, whose fabrication required glass regime [80]. His analysis of the second spectra of five electronolithography levels and lift-off of four dif- conductance noise indicated that the Huse-Fisher droplet ferent metals [114]. It looks, he triggered the use of model applies to spin-glass freezing in random antiferro- micromagnets by the spin-qubit community. IFPAN’s magnets. epitaxy and nanofabrication capabilities have been en- There have been about 600 papers reporting results riched by Tomasz Wojciechowski and Tomasz Wojtow- obtained on II-VI and later IV-VI quantum structures, icz’s decades-long tireless activities, culminating by the often containing Mn, grown by IFPAN’s MBEs. The opening in 2017 of the new Laboratory of Technological results have constituted topics of invited talks at Inter- Processes of Semiconductor Nanostructures and Devices, national Conferences on II-VI Compounds, and of the now further expanding within the MagTop project. Tomasz Wojtowicz invited talk at the 34th ICPS, Mont- Of course, the acquiring of funds for the quantum pellier 2018 and plenary talk at the 18th International 10

Conference on MBE, Flagstaff 2014. Some of the findings those occasions and later at similar ceremonial events, are reviewed in the book edited by Jacek Kossut and Jan it has been underlined that our work bridged broadly Gaj [124] and in the book chapter co-authored by Alek- and fundamentally the two leading fields of condensed sandr Kazakov and Tomasz Wojtowicz [125]. One exam- matter physics: semiconductor physics and magnetism. ple of numerous activity lines is the mesoscopic physics in We made mainstream nonmagnetic semiconductors fer- submicron wires pattered of n-type doped DMS epilay- romagnetic, in which the virtues of magnetic, electronic, ers, as described above. Another research direction was and photonic systems are combined. This intersection exploring the suitability of self-organized quantum dots of magnetism, semiconductor physics, materials science, containing a single Mn ion as a quantum information and localization physics has led to discovery of new phe- carrier [126]. Also, nanowires showing giant exchange nomena essential for new generations of spintronic de- splittings of excitonic lines were obtained [127]. vices, the initiation of a massive world-wide materials sci- An important research topic has concerned ence search for magnetic semiconductors that resulted in modulation-doped DMS quantum wells, in which the discovery of FeAs-based superconductors and variety mysterious narrow peaks superimposed on beautiful of materials with ferromagnetic signatures that remain to QHE data let me propose that the quantum Hall be understood. Ferromagnetism in semiconductors has ferromagnet (QHF) state is formed on crossings of been essential in exploring new ideas and concepts, some Landau levels, imposed by the giant s-d exchange spin of which – like spin injection from a ferromagnet, elec- splittings [128]. Long electron mean free-path and trical magnetization manipulation, tunneling anisotropic giant exchange spin-splitting allowed the observation of MR, and spin-orbit torque – have already been trans- Landau-Zener transitions between spin sublevels in a ferred to ferromagnetic structures of metals or complex helical magnetic field produced by Dy microstripes [129]. oxides, others – like interplay of spin-orbit coupling and Tomasz Wojtowicz’s insistence in improving structures’ exchange spin splitting – to antiferromagnetic spintronics quality made that the modulation-doped CdTe [130] and and research on topological matter. Accordingly, broadly later Cd1−xMnxTe [131] quantum wells belong to an understood spintronics has become one of the central exclusive club of systems in which the fractional QHE themes of contemporary condensed matter physics and has been observed. Those accomplishments constitute its ICT applications. a starting point of MagTop struggle aiming at using Two recent reviews describe findings in the field of domains of the QHF in both QHE and FQHE regimes as dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors in more technical a platform hosting Majorana and, possibly, non-Abelian terms and in the context of word-wide research [16, 17]. excitations, as proposed in papers co-authored by IFPAN’s main accomplishments, achieved in collabora- MagTop researchers [132, 133]. tion with Grenoble, Linz, and Sendai teams, but also The acquired proficiency in ultra high-vacuum tech- with Athens, Nottingham, Wuerzburg, and other centers, niques was a good starting point to initiate partner include: collaboration between IFPAN and the highly success- ful PREVAC company, located in south-west Poland, (1) Predicting TCs. To establish conditions allowing for and specializing in fabricating custom-designed ultra- carriers’-mediated ferromagnetic ordering and to evalu- high vacuum systems, such as MBE, ARPES, XPS, and ate the magnitudes of Curie temperature TC and of var- others. This collaboration is continued and reinforced ious thermodynamic quantities, I made use of all that by MagTop, as PREVAC is one of MagTop’s industrial broad knowledge gathered over decades for the main- partners. stream semiconductor compounds, i.e., III-V and II-VI tetrahedrally bonded semiconductors with carriers re- siding at the Briilouin zone center [134–136]. While VII. THE SAGA OF DILUTE in Grenoble (altogether 7 months in 1994-1997), stim- FERROMAGNETIC SEMICONDUCTORS ulated by Yves Merle d’Aubign´e(1933-2000), I demon- strated the equivalence of the RKKY and Zener mod- In November 2020, my wife Maniela got an sms from els, and predicted TCs for various dimensionality struc- her nephew congratulating us that her support and my tures of II-VI compounds in the mean-field approxima- instance made me the most cited scientist working now tion [134, 137]. Zener’s model [Phys. Rev. B 81, 440 in Poland. The ensemble of papers on dilute ferromag- (1951)] in this context means competition between spin netic semiconductors contributed mostly to such a posi- entropy and carrier energy lowering coming from ex- tion in the ranking completed according to a methodol- change splitting of the band). The theoretically expected ogy elaborated by Stanford/SciTech Strategies/Elsevier TCs values were soon confirmed experimentally, particu- bibliometric experts. (Surely, other methodologies would larly in the case of modulation doped p-Cd1−xMnxTe:N reshuffle the order). Also the EPS Condensed Mat- quantum wells [138, 139] (we understood the lack of hys- ter Division Europhysics Prize, I received with David teresis much later [140, 141]), p-Zn1−xMnxTe:N epilay- Awschalom and Hideo Ohno in 2005, and the 2006 Foun- ers brought to IFPAN in 1998 for magnetic and trans- dation for Polish Science Prize were for work on ferromag- port characterization by their developers, then Ph.D. stu- netic semiconductors and semiconductor spintronics. On dents, David Ferrand and Alberta Bonanni [142, 143], 11 and in IFPAN’s bulk p-Zn1−xMnxTe:N [144, 145]. No- ies of Ga1−xMnxAs and related ferromagnets by dozen tably, the predicted absence of ferromagnetism above groups worldwide (including our own [158, 159]) show 1 K in n-type samples was corroborated by millikelvin how far we have arrived with the understanding of these studies of n-Zn1−xMnxO:Al [146]. Actually, much more systems. impacting was my evaluation of TCs, in the mean-field approximation and within the p-d Zener model, for a (3) Functionalities. No doubt, the prospect of appli- + broad range of p -type tetrahedrally coordinated semi- cations have been driving research in semiconductor conductors: the theory was in agreement with existing spintronics. It was clear to me that the demonstration data (notably for Ga1−xMnxAs) and implied a survival of changing the magnetic phase by light in modulation- of ferromagnetism to above room temperature in gallium doped p-Cd1−xMnxTe quantum well told that other nitride, zinc oxide, and diamond containing 5% of Mn means, such as gating, would also provide a high degree 20 3 and 3.5 · 10 valence band holes per cm [135, 136]. of control over magnetic properties [138], a dream made So far, no such itinerant hole densities were achieved real in the pin diode configuration in 2002, i.e., five years in the latter systems, but the theory was quantitatively later [139]. In the mean time, a series of ingenious works verified for Ga1−xMnxAs, Ga1−xMnxP, In1−xMnxAs, on magnetization manipulation by an electric field in − − Ga1 xMnxSb, and In1 xMnxSb [147], in which Mn ac- gated In1−xMnxAs and Ga1−xMnxAs epilayers, a major ceptor radius is large enough to allow for hole delocal- step towards energy efficient magnetization switching, ization. Also, pressure studies are consistent with the carried out by Hideo Ohno and co-workers (with me as model [148, 149]. Other thermodynamic properties, such a discussion partner while at Tohoku) at the turn of magnetization M(T,H) and specific heat are also well the millennium, shook the magnetic and semiconductors described by the p-d Zener model, provided that correc- communities. A contribution of IFPAN’s researchers tions to the mean-field theory are included [150, 151]. to this line of research was twofold. First, Maciej To put the understanding of carrier-mediated ferro- Sawicki constructed in Sendai and fully exploited a magnetism in semiconductors in a broader context, it is SQUID setup allowing measuring directly gate-induced worth contrasting it to another approach, in which the magnetization changes [157, 160]. Second, I developed understanding often just means the identification of an a theory describing TC for systems with non-uniform ab initio code or an exchange-correlation potential that carrier density [157], which successfully described the provides the magnetic groundstate observed experimen- dependence of TC on the gate voltage in a range of tally. Ga1−xMnxAs MOS FETs [161]. At the same time, Cezary Sliwa´ showed [159] that the p-d Zener model (2) Micromagnetic properties. I think it is hard to over- can nicely explain changes in the easy axis direction value the beauty and power of micromagnetic theory generated by gating [160]. Another pioneering work which, together with the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equa- done at Tohoku was the demonstration of magnetic wall tion, describe magnificent magnetization patterns and displacement by an electric current without a magnetic their dynamics in ever more striking magnetic materials. field’s assistance, the domain velocity being accurately But what about material input parameters with which described theoretically with my contribution [162]. At simulations are run? Typically, we rely on experimental the same time, in the frame of European projects, Piotr determination, as only recently ab initio computations Sankowski et al. have been writing tight-binding codes can provide an estimate of the magnetic anisotropy en- for computing spin injection in Zener-Esaki diodes [163] ergy (MAE) of, say, bulk iron or a dilute ferromagnetic and magnetoresitance and anisotropic magnetoresistance semiconductor Ge1−xMnxTe [152]. In contrast, our p-d in magnetic tunnel junctions [164]. Zener model, built with the spin-orbit interaction taken into account, provided MAE magnitudes as a function When at immigration kiosks, I quoted ”conference of strain, temperature, hole and Mn concentrations in physicist” as my profession in 2001-2005. My 66 in- Ga1−xMnxAs [135, 136]. Combining that with the ex- vited talks over these five years included plenary lec- change stiffness theory developed by Allan McDonald’s tures at EPS meetings (Budapest 2002, Prague 2004, group, we were able, for instance, to describe stripe do- Bern 2005), EMRS (Warsaw 2004), 27th ICPS (Flagstaff mains in Ga1−xMnxAs films with perpendicular mag- AR 2004), half-plenary at JEMS (Dresden 2003), and netic anisotropy [153]. Furthermore, the predicted theo- invited talks at Joint MMM Inter-Mag Conference (San retically change in MAE sign as a function of carrier den- Antonio TX 2001) and IUPAP’s International Confer- sity [136] was confirmed experimentally and explained in ence of Magnetism (Rome 2003). Similar visibility of terms of the carrier redistribution between hole subbands David Awschalom and Hideo Ohno, together with in- [154]. Of course, specific materials science issues, such fluential writings presenting accomplishments, but also anisotropic spinodal decomposition (see, Sec. IX) made open questions (my contribution included Refs. [165] and the physics of MAE much richer [155, 156] than could be [166]), resulted in a widespread of spintronic research as anticipated. Also, the presence of a superparamagnetic well as in support by high-profile projects on semicon- component, brought about by the proximity to the MIT, ductor spintronics. IFPAN was part of the Ohno ER- plays a role [157, 158]. Results of micromagnetic stud- ATO funding and E. C. collaborative FENIKS, AMORE, 12

SPINOSA, NANOSPIN, and SemiSpinNet projects, as tices [170], an extension of earlier Grenoble work, with well as of my ERC FunDMS Advanced Grant. This my theoretical input, on non-magnetic photonic Bragg external funding was toped by the substantial support superlattices [171]. On returning to Warsaw I stopped of government agencies and the non-public Foundation Ewa Skrzypczak (1929-2020) on the Ho˙za street to admit for Polish Science. Tomasz Wojtowicz, while with Jacek that she was absolutely right one summer day twenty- Furdyna at Notre Dame, contributed significantly to the eight years ago. That day, she, as a deputy dean, con- DARPA project [167]. More recently, the EAgLE project sented to repeat exams in September. Despite a crowd (2013-2016), obtained in the frame of the E.C. REG- in front of her door, seeing my top grades in math and POT initiative supporting long-term visits, helped lift physics, and failed the lowest level English test, she de- the window to antiferromagntic spintronics [168, 169]. cided to deliver to me a quarter of an hour tutorial on the This project supported also my travels to present a half significance of English proficiency in physics (though she plenary talk at the ICM (Barcelona 2015) and an invited might not know that I had similar failures with French talk at the 33th ICPS (Beijing 2016), where I presented and Russian while in Pozna´n’s Marcinek high school). my view on the origin of spin-spin interactions in ferro- magnetic topological semiconductors. In this two-decades-long saga, incredibly unique was VIII. WHY THE p-d ZENER MODEL AND my one-year stay at Tohoku in 1999. There, logistics SUPEREXCHANGE, BUT NEITHER DOUBLE was entirely ensured by Maniela, I had no meetings EXCHANGE NOR VAN VLECK MECHANISM? and virtually no teaching, all administration duties were taken over by Fumihiro Matsukura, and I could enjoy I do not recall who approached me over coffee after a inspiring business lunches with Hideo Ohno in a tinny conference talk and friendly advised: ”take it easy, do not French-style restaurant, sometimes with Sukekatsu Ush- treat that personally, be actually proud of it – for many ioda, the future IUPAP President, at the table. Under people, the way to magnify their visibility is to challenge these unique conditions and having a strong background the principal paradigm of the time”. Indeed, soon after in the DMSs physics [57] and in the envelope function the appearance of our 2000 Science paper [135], it has formalism [33, 34], I was in position to identify prop- become fashionable to contest its two crucial and mutu- erly (i) a minimal Hamiltonian suitable for describing ally related presumptions: it has been argued that (i) the carrier-mediated ferromagnetism in tetrahedrally coor- holes in Ga1−xMnxAs reside in an impurity band, not in dinated p-type semiconductors; (ii) thermodynamic and the valence band; (ii) the ferromagnetism of this material micromagnetic quantities that theory can provide; (iii) should be described in terms of double exchange, not by relevant theory constrains, such as the metal-to-insulator the p-d Zener model. This situation motivated Tom´aˇs transition, strong coupling, self-compensation, and solu- Jungwirth at Prague’s IoP CzAS to assemble arguments bility limits [135]. It appears that over that year I was against the paradigm shift, and publish them with quite able to describe theoretically and examine numerically an impressive co-author list [172]. a more comprehensive set of phenomena and materials As reviewed elsewhere [16], the trouble of models in- [136] than a group of five brilliant postdocs (now profes- volving the presence of an impurity band is that all ex- sors across Europe) supervised by Allan MacDonald in periments designed to demonstrate directly its existence, Austin and Lu Sham in San Diego. Many papers’ well- especially photoemission and scanning tunneling spec- known bane is the lack of values of the parameters used, troscopy, have failed in Ga1−xMnxAs. Also, results of making it impossible to check the results. Surprisingly, state-of-the-art ab initio band structure computations, one of the referees of our PRB [136] recommended the such as hybrid functionals and the dynamic mean-field removal of information on materials parameters I em- approximation, have not shown any impurity band. The ployed, apparently to make our work less substantial. data pointed out to a few percent admixture of Mn d or- And at the end, a little too didactic illustration of bitals to the wave function of holes at the valence band the German proverb: Ubung¨ macht den Meister. I top, just what is needed to explain the experimentally got terrific Grenoble spectroscopic results on 2D ferro- observed magnitudes of the valence band offset and the magnetism in p-Cd1−xMnxTe quantum wells from Yves p-d exchange energy. At the same time, the temper- Merle d’Aubign´ein February 1997, while at a family ski- ature dependence of low temperature conductivity, the week in G¨unther Bauer’s secondary house in Bad Ischl. Seebeck coefficient, infrared conductivity integrated over Being busy with Warsaw’s College of Science I could stay frequency implied the hole mass of the value similar to in Grenoble only one week in April. During that week, I GaAs. Last but not least, as mentioned above, thermo- managed to write down two manuscripts, this time with- dynamic and micromagnetic properties of Ga1−xMnxAs, out any help of IFPAN’s English writing guru, Hanka and also magnetic circular dichroism [136], can be de- Przybyli´nska: (i) the PRL on the observation of 2D scribed within the p-d Zener model with no adjustable carrier-mediated ferromagnetism [138], confirming nicely parameters – no one has reported an attempt to do that my a year old theoretical prediction [134], and (ii) the within competing models. Rapid Comm on controlling excitonic reflectivity by gi- All that is not to say that the physics and materials sci- ant exchange spin splitting in DMS photonic superlat- ence of dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors is straight- 13 forward. It was clear to me right from the beginning [135] antiferromagnetic interactions take over if Mn2+ prevail, that the Anderson-Mott localization and the associated the case of Ga1−xMnxN samples with a high concentra- non-uniformities of magnetization, together with impor- tion of compensating donors. In particular, at least so tant issues of solubility limits and self-compensation as far, we have not found any TC maximum at half filling, well as of the transition to a strong coupling case with de- as expected within the double exchange scenario. The creasing the lattice constant need to be addressed experi- semiinsulating character of Ga1−xMnxN led me to sug- mentally. For instance, in the MIT vicinity, the resistivity gest that the influence of an electric field on magnetic tensor’s absolute values can hardy be described quantita- properties resulted from sample deformation by the in- tively, and often even qualitative understanding is chal- verse piezoelectric effect [181], not by an alternation of lenging [173]. Furthermore, it is now known [65, 174], carrier density in the impurity band. also due to a beautiful series of works performed at UW At the turn of the 1970s and 1980s, G´erald Bastard, by, among others, Agnieszka Wolo´sand Marcin Zaj¸ac in the future honorary chair of the 34th ICPS (Montpel- the Maria Kami´nska and Andrzej Twardowski groups, lier 2018), worked with coworkers to understand magne- respectively, that GaN:Mn is in a strong coupling limit tization behavior M(T,H) in Mn-doped and Fe-doped (p-d hybridization alone can bind a hole on the Mn ion), HgTe. They proposed, in particular, that antiferro- a conclusion consistent with parallel studies carried at magnetic coupling between Mn ions results from the Schottky in Garching. This meant, disappointingly, that Bloembergen-Rowland (BR) mechanism, an interband resulting mid-gap Mn acceptors would not introduce any analog of the RKKY interaction, which could be strong valence band holes that might lead to room tempera- in the zero-gap (topological) HgTe, the coupling also ture ferromagnetism we had predicted [135]. Interest- considered by me and others in Warsaw [182]. We ingly, however, Marcin, after completing his Ph.D. de- now know that antiferromagnetic superexchange actu- gree, moved to Robert Dwili´nski’s AMMONO (the com- ally dominates [59] (see, Sec. III). In contrast, in the pany that made the IEEE Spectrum’s cover story; July light of later studies of various Fe-based DMSs in several 2010 issue), and introduced Mn as a trap of residual labs, the assignment of a linear field-dependence M(H) donor electrons, always present in GaN. Now, 1.5” semi- to the Van Vleck paramagnetism was correct (Serre et insulating GaN:Mn substrates are the flagship product of al., Proceedings of the Linz Narrow-Gap Conference, the AMMONO/Unipress company. Linz 1981). In the ground-breaking theory paper of the

To understand the Ga1−xMnxN physics, especially IoPChAS/Stanford/Tsinghua collaboration on the quan- fruitful has been collaboration with Alberta Bonanni’s tization of the anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic group at Kepler University in Linz, where Ga1−xMnxN topological materials (Science 2010), the authors used epilayers have been obtained by MOVPE. More recently, the formula I derived to study the BR contribution in Detlef Hommel, now in Wroclaw, has entered with his p-Ga1−xMnxAs [136] to claim that the BR mechanism, co-workers and MBE-grown films to the loop. Exten- called by them the Van Vleck paramagnetism, accounts sive characterization employing various photon, electron, for ferromagnetic coupling between Cr spins in topolog- and ion beams demonstrated world-top crystal quality, ical Bi2Se3. I think, looking on results of ab initio com- low electron concentration (measured in GaN), and ran- putations and experimental data for various transition dom Mn distribution with no spinodal decomposition up metals that – leaving aside the interaction name – also to x = 0.1 [175–179]. Seeing low-temperature ferromag- in topological Cr- and V-doped Bi and Sb chalcogenides, netism of Mn3+ ions in these samples, I asked Jacek Ma- not the BR mechanism but superexchange prevails, but 3+ jewski to dig up his tight-binding code that had served of the ferromagnetic sign, just as in the case of Mn in a decade earlier to predict ferromagnetic superexchange GaN. coupling between Cr2 ions in II-VI compounds [180]. Combining it with Monte Carlo simulations we obtained a successful description of TC(x) [177, 179]. IX. HOW I KILLED SEMICONDUCTOR Why, however, despite that the Fermi energy is pinned SPINTRONICS AND WHY IT HAD IT COMING by the Mn2+/Mn3+ impurity band, do we speak about superexchange, not about double-exchange invented also Of course, this section title is a paraphrase of ”How by Clarence Zener? The key reason is that double ex- I Killed Pluto and Why It Had It Coming” - a mar- change requires certain delocalization of d band carriers, velous book by Mike Brown. In 2003, I started to worry the case of, for instance, CMR oxides. By contrast, in that our prediction about the room temperature ferro- Ga1−xMnxN, the dilution and the random Mn distribu- magnetism in wide-band gap DMSs had been becoming tion together with a sizable Jahn-Teller effect and short too ... successful [183]: high TC was reported for DMSs, localization radius in the strong coupling limit make that in which no ferromagnetism was expected or even, one we are far from the MIT, deeply in the strongly local- year later, for compounds nominally without any mag- ized regime. In agreement with the expectation of the netic ions! Moreover, Maciej Sawicki’s magnetic data Anderson-Goodenough-Kanamori superexchange theory, [184] and some other group results pointed to the pres- we observed Mn-Mn coupling to be ferromagnetic if a ma- ence of magnetic precipitation. Thus, the crucial chal- jority of Mn ions is in the 3+ configuration. In contrast, lenge became proper nanocharacterization, a demanding 14 task, particularly considering that I [185] and Hiroshi participating in bonding (i.e., hole formation), Mn ions Katayama-Yoshida’s group in Osaka realized that pre- displace to interstitial donor positions. In this location, cipitates may assume the host crystal structure, driven they lower TC, as they couple antiferromagnetically to by chemical spinodal nanodecomposition. substitutional Mn ions [195]. A process of interstitials’ To go to the point: the advanced nanocharacteriza- removal by low-temperature annealing, which increases tion protocols developed by Alberta Bonanni in Linz TC, was then quantitatively examined [196]. for (Ga,Fe)N [186, 187], Shinji Kuroda in Tsukuba for (Zn,Cr)Te [188], and by others, together with results of (3) Anisotropic spinodal decomposition. At some point it SQUID magnetometry (that has reached the art level became clear to me that conditions at the growth front [189, 190]) and progress in using appropriate ab initio are essential for the resulting distribution of magnetic tools, achieved in Osaka, Golden Colorado, and other ions. For instance, the fact that chemical force was places shed new light on the interplay of DMS materials found attractive for Fe ions but repulsive in the case of science and magnetic properties [17, 191, 192]: Mn pairs on the GaN surface [197] explained why it was possible to grow Ga1−xMnxN epilayers with a random (1) Origin of high TCs. Ferromagnetic-like features sur- distribution of Mn ions. Another important consequence viving up to above room temperature originate from the of this insight was the realization that the magnitude of presence of nanoregions with a large density of the mag- attractive force at the surface is larger for the nearest netic constituent and, thus, characterized by a high spin neighbor Mn cation dimer residing along h110¯ i direction ordering temperature. The interplay of attractive chem- compared to the h110i arrangement, as there is no ical forces between magnetic ions (driven by a contri- anion bonding the h110¯ i pair on the (001) surface of the bution of the d orbitals to bonding), entropy, and ki- zinc-blende crystals [198]. A beautiful group theoretical netic barriers determine the degree of non-uniformity in analysis of crystals with h110¯ i dimers was carried out the magnetic ion distribution, i.e., an effective solubil- by Cezary Sliwa.´ His evaluations showed that indeed ity limit, for given growth conditions and post-growth the anisotropic spinodal decomposition can explain processing. The resulting spinodal nanodecomposition the origin and the magnitude of the in-plane uniaxial can have a character of chemical or crystallographic magnetic anisotropy hitherto mysterious but essential phase separation, in the latter case precipitation of metal for functionalities of Ga1−xMnxN [198]. This symmetry nonoparticles sometimes occur. Unforseen contamina- breaking, i.e., nematicity, is particularly strong in tion by magnetic nanoparticles can also be involved in In1−xFexAs and was directly revealed by element sen- specific cases. Uncompensated spins on surfaces of anti- sitive nanocharacterization [199]. Since this discovery, ferromagnetic nanocrystals may contribute to magnetic I have been promoting the idea that the nematicity response [90]. Furthermore, various coupling kinds be- – observed, for instance, in the quantum Hall effect, tween magnetized regions increase apparent superparam- unconventional superconductors, and magnetic oxides agnetic blocking temperature [77]. In general, however, – originates in many cases from quenched anisotropic magnetic hystereses are tilted with a minute, if any, re- distribution of defects, impurities, or alloy components manent magnetization and coercivity. No clear correla- formed during the growth rather than from a sponta- tion exists between TC and the nominal concentration of neous symmetry breaking in the many-body electronic magnetic impurities. subsystem cooled down to sufficiently low temperatures.

(2) Controlling aggregation of magnetic ions. As demon- It has been more than two thousand papers claim- strated for (Zn,Cr)Te [188] and (Ga,Fe)N [187], the ag- ing the discovery of high temperature ferromagnetism in gregation efficacy and, thus magnetic ordering, can be semiconductors, oxides, various forms of carbon, topo- controlled by co-doping with shallow impurities that logical matter, and most recently, in atomically thin changes the charge state of magnetic ions and, thus, 2D layers containing a low concentration of magnetic chemical forces between them [193]. In some cases, im- constituent (say, x < 10%) or nominal without any purity complexes containing magnetic ions and shallow magnetic ions, x = 0. Considering the lack of follow dopants appear, the case of (Ga,Mn)N doped with Mg, up reports on spintronic functionalities at room tem- in which, as demonstrated by the Linz/Warsaw collab- perature, it appears right to agree with Alex Zunger, oration, clusters of Mn with one to three charged Mg who once remarked: ”those who carefully characterize acceptors bound to it account for magnetic and optical their samples and worry about the reproducibility de- properties of Mn ions [194]. A somewhat related is a prive themselves of publications in high impact journals”. self-compensation effect predicted for Ga1−xMnxAs by However, taking into account foreseen functionalities of Jan Maˇsek and Frantisek Mac`ain Prague, and found ex- metal/semiconductor/magnet hybrids and prospects of perimentally by Berkeley/Notre Dame researchers, who self-organized growth of novel magnetic nanostructures unsuccessfully tried to raise TC by increasing the concen- [17, 191] as well as steady progress in controlling proper- tration of Mn or Be acceptors. Their glorious Rutherford ties of embedded magnetic nanocrystals [200], it is quite backscattering data demonstrated that to halt an energy possible that studies of magnetic nanocomposites may re- increase associated with a decrease in density of electrons turn to many labs. And somewhat related question: do 15 we need high temperature uniform ferromagnetic or an- non-topological IV-VI superlattices and heterostructurs tiferromagnetic semiconductors for future spintronic de- grown by Alexander Sipatov and co-workers in Kharkov vices? As mentioned in the previous section, spintronic since 1988. Prompted by these results, Evelyne Tang and functionalities discovered in dilute ferromagnetic semi- Liang Fu at MIT proposed in 2014 a theory of super- conductors operate wonderfully at room temperature in conductivity, whose essential ingredient was a flat band ferromagnetic metals. We should also not forget that fer- formed by a periodic arrangement of misfit dislocations rite antennas of ferrimagnetic oxides have been with us in topological materials. In our lab, we found supercon- since many decades. Nevertheless, similarly to the case of ductivity in Kiev’s bulk PbTe [205] and in IFPAN’s bulk superconductors, we will not stop struggling to push op- Pb0.63Sn0.37Se [22], presenting in both cases strong argu- erating temperature higher of, say, the quantum anoma- ments that metallic Pb and Sn precipitates, respectively lous Hall effect in samples of topological ferromagnetic or were a source of Cooper pairs. Somewhat related and also antiferromagnetic semiconductors [201], considering fore- surprising were Andreev reflection results for In/PbTe seen applications in quantum metrology and possibly in [206] and In/NbP heterostructures [21], taken by Grze- topological quantum computing. gorz Grabecki et al. at IFPAN. The former pointed to Tc magnitudes higher than that of metallic In. In the sim- plest interpretation, In diffusion into PbTe resulted in X. ON THE ROAD TO TOPOLOGICAL superconducting Pb precipitates [206]. In contrast, the SUPERCONDUCTIVITY In/NbP data suggest the presence of a low-gap supercon- ductivity, presumably appearing in the Weyl semimetal NbP, proximitized by the superconducting In [21]. It was a wonderful night. It happened to me during a carnival period in 1987. Suddenly, when sweeping the Even more striking is the observation by several groups horizontal magnetic field at 30 mK, the xy recorder’s nee- of Andreev-like spectra in topological semiconductors dle started moving down, and after a dozen of seconds and semimetals, nominally without any superconductor, up, reviling a strong diamagnetic signal from our home- i.e., by making point contacts of normal (e.g., Ag, Au) or made a.c. magnetometer [202]. That diamagnetism ap- even ferromagnetic (e.g., Co) metals. For instance, Grze- peared when the Earth magnetic field was compensated gorz Mazur and Krzysztof Dybko, employing a brand by the field generated by a coil pair I had recommended new Triton 400 dry dilution refrigerator with a vector to install around the millikevin cryostat. This finding magnetic field, installed in our lab by Maciej Zgirski and confirmed the origin of the resistance drop below 0.5 K, Marek Foltyn, found such spectra in samples with sil- found by Maciej Sawicki during his night shift a cou- ver paint contacts to diamagnetic Pb1−ySnyTe as well ple of weeks earlier, once he had decided to decrease the as to paramagnetic or ferromagnetic Pb1−x−yMnxSnyTe current to an irrationally low value. I still remember vi- with Sn content y corresponding to the topological crys- brating silence that fell in the Jaszowiec 1987 lecture hall talline insulator phase [22]. Is this phenomenon caused when at the end of my talk ”Physics of semiconductors by hardly detectable residual precipitates of supercon- below 1 K” [203], after describing quantum localization ducting metals? Does interfacial topological supercon- phenomena in Mn-based DMSs and the latest literature ductivity account for it, as suggested in virtually all results on the fractional quantum Hall effect, I disclosed publications? Could it originate from topological gap our discovery of superconductivity in zinc-blende Bridg- states at domain walls of a 1D carrier liquid at surface atomic steps, as proposed by Wojciech Brzezicki et al. man grown Hg1− Fe Se. x x [23]? If yes, how to make the discovery useful for sen- A detailed analysis showed that untypically low mag- sors and/or topological quantum computation? This is nitudes of critical currents and fields as well as specific one set of questions addressed by researchers from 13 dependencies of resistivity and magnetic susceptibility on countries at the International Centre for Interfacing Mag- temperature can rather nicely be explained by the pres- netism and Superconductivity with Topological Matter ence of few superconducting precipitates and the proxim- MagTop, heading since 2017 by me and Tomasz Woj- ity effect [204]. Actually, unusually high electron mobil- towicz at IFPAN. ity in HgSe:Fe, described in Sec. V, accounted for a con- siderable Cooper pair diffusion length in HgSe:Fe. Using electron microscopy we revealed indeed the presence of some inclusions but we were unable to determine their XI. EPILOG nature. After annealing in Se vapor, the disappearance of superconductivity suggested that Hg droplets might In spring 2020, I was invited by UW young profes- be involved [204]. I consider not asking Andrzej Myciel- sors Krzysztof Pachucki and Piotr Wasylczyk to one of ski that time to grow FeSe, as the greatest shame in my the on-line weekly discussion meetings they organize for scientific career. a selected group of students. To start, I showed them In 1986 superconductivity features were found in viewgraphs with pieces of advice on how to run in the PbTe-SnTe superlattices by Akihiro Ishida and co- front, not behind the others (of the sort that publish- workers at Shizuoka University and, over the next ing is essential but more important is uncovering a novel two decades, in a broad range of topological and challenge, and solving it). However, the main advice was 16 to realize that the research landscape is dynamic: use- turned out into a clear picture — it could be the re- ful tips in one epoch, fails in another. For instance, I alization that magnetic hysteresis at mK temperatures was fast in appreciating the role of arXiv, and applying are generated by a piece of type II superconductor used in the first call for the KBN project and, later, for the for wires’ soldering; it could be the recognition that low- E.C, Maestro, AdG ERC, and IRA projects. In turn, field SdH oscillations in a p-type sample originate from I was too late in abandoning meaningless titles, such as a grain boundary in a nominally perfect single crystal; ”Millikelvin Studies of Mixed–Valence HgSe:Fe” and con- it could be the understanding that thermodynamic fluc- ference proceedings (but surely one should move around, tuations or the inverse piezoelectric effect constitute the to be inspired by great people and wonders of the world). mechanisms explaining surprising optical or magnetiza- After consulting Andrzej Mycielski, I started my pre- tion data. I think that such moments of illumination (to MSc experimental work in 1971 under the supervision of refer to Krzysztof Zanussi’s film) have actually been the Andrzej J¸edrzejczak, who using his sophisticated ther- main driving force on my way. moelectric setup, needed help in urgent collecting of the Nernst-Ettingshausen data for n-InSb, to be presented by Wlodek Zawadzki in his plenary talk at the 9th ICPS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (Warsaw 1972). In a lecture delivered at a meeting of Student Research Groups in Physics inL´od´zthat fall, I I would like to thank my wonderful family (now en- described my fascination, lasting until now, that a piece larged by nine grandchildren) for continuous support and of a semiconductor is a laboratory, in which we can ob- encouragement, and my past and present collaborators serve and quantify the flow of electrons under electric for the great time we have had together. The Interna- and magnetic fields. It was, however, a little later when tional Research Centre MagTop is funded by the Foun- I started to experience a passionate, to do not say sen- dation for Polish Science through the IRA Programme sual, pleasure at that moment when the intricate puzzle financed by EU within SG OP Programme.

[1] T. Dietl, Meeting of the Polish Physical Society (2020), [16] T. Dietl and H. Ohno, “Dilute ferromagnetic semi- recorded talk. conductors: Physics and spintronic structures,” [2] M. Kami´nska, Meeting of the Polish Physical Society (2020), Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 187–251 (2014). recorded talk. [17] T. Dietl, K. Sato, T. Fukushima, A. Bonanni, M. Jamet, [3] J. Gaj, “Semimagnetic semiconductors - the adventure A. Barski, S. Kuroda, M. Tanaka, Pham Nam Hai, of my (scientific) life,” Post. Fiz. 45, 125 (1994). and H. Katayama-Yoshida, “Spinodal nanodecomposi- [4] R.R. Ga l¸azka, “II-VI compounds - Polish perspective,” tion in semiconductors doped with transition metals,” phys. stat. sol. (b) 243, 759 (2006). Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1311–1377 (2015). [5] A. Kisiel, B. Pukowska, and M. Zimnal-Starnawska, [18] P. Dziawa, B. J. Kowalski, K. Dybko, R. Buczko, “Dzia lalno´s´cnaukowa Zakladu Fizyki Og´olnej Instytutu A. Szczerbakow, M. Szot, E.Lusakowska, T. Balasub- Fizyki Uniwersytetu Jagiello´nskiego,” (2002). ramanian, B. M. Wojek, M. H. Berntsen, O. Tjernberg, [6] A. K. Wr´oblewski, Historia Fizyki w Polsce (PWN, and T. Story, “Topological crystalline insulator states 2020). in Pb1−xSnxSe,” Nat. Mater. 11, 1023–1027 (2012). [7] M. Grynberg and M. Nawrocki, “Leonard Sosnowski: [19] A. Szczerbakow and K. Durose, “Self-selecting vapour tw´orca warszawskiej szko ly fizyki p´o lprzewodnik´ow,” growth of bulk crystals: Principles and applicability,” Post. Fiz. 53, 287 (2002). Progr. Crys. Growth Charact. Mater. 51, 81–108 (2005). [8] J. Blinowski and M. Grynberg, “Jerzy Mycielski (1930- [20] P. Sessi, D. Di Sante, A. Szczerbakow, F. Glott, S. Wil- 1986),” Post. Fiz. 37, 404 (1986). fert, H. Schmidt, T. Bathon, P. Dziawa, M. Greiter, [9] J. K. Furdyna, “Jerzy Mycielski,” T. Neupert, G. Sangiovanni, T. Story, R. Thomale, Phys. Today 39, 82 (1986). and M. Bode, “Robust spin-polarized midgap states [10] A. Mycielski, “Witold Giriat (1926 - 2001),” at step edges of topological crystalline insulators,” Post. Fiz. 52, 192 (2001). Science 354, 1269–1273 (2016). [11] R. Brazis, “Witold Giriat: wygnaniec [21] G. Grabecki, A. D¸abrowski, P. Iwanowski, A. Hruban, znad rzeki Dzisny, prekursor spintroniki,” B. J. Kowalski, N. Olszowska, J. Ko lodziej, Studium Vilnense A 12, 45 (2015). M. Chojnacki, K. Dybko, A.Lusakowski, T. Wo- [12] P. Kacman, “Jan Blinowski (1939-2002),” jtowicz, T. Wojciechowski, R. Jakie la, and Post. Fiz. 54, 213 (2003). A. Wi´sniewski, “Conductance spectra of (Nb, Pb, [13] L. Turski, “Smak nauki: o profesorze Janie Bli- In)/NbP superconductor/Weyl semimetal junctions,” nowskim,” Post. Fiz. 54, 214 (2003). Phys. Rev. B 101, 085113 (2020). [14] M. Grynberg and M. Nawrocki, “Jan Gaj (1943-2011),” [22] G. P. Mazur, K. Dybko, A. Szczerbakow, J. Z. Do- Post. Fiz. 62, 89 (2011). magala, A. Kazakov, M. Zgirski, E.Lusakowska, [15] J. Suffczy´nski, “Wspomnienienie o profesorze Michale S. Kret, J. Korczak, T. Story, M. Sawicki, and Nawrockim,” Post. Fiz. 70, 34 (2019). T. Dietl, “Experimental search for the origin of low-energy modes in topological materials,” 17

Phys. Rev. B 100, 041408(R) (2019). [42] R. R. Ga l¸azka, “P´o lprzewodniki p´o lmagnetyczne,” [23] W. Brzezicki, M. M. Wysoki´nski, and T. Hyart, “Topo- Post. Fiz. 28, 601 (1977). logical properties of multilayers and surface steps in the [43] J. Kossut, “On the scattering of conduction elec- SnTe material class,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 121107 (2019). trons by magnetic impurities in semiconductors [24] A.Lusakowski, P. Bogus lawski, and T. Story, of InSb-type and HgTe-type band structure,” “Band structure and topological phases of phys. stat. sol. (b) 72, 359–367 (1975). Pb1 − x − ySnxMnyTe by ab initio calculations,” [44] J. Kossut, “Electron transport phenomena in narrow- Phys. Rev. B 103, 045202 (2021). and zero-gap semiconductors containing magnetic im- [25] R. Piotrzkowski, S. Porowski, Z. Dziuba, J. Ginter, purities,” phys. stat. sol. (b) 78, 537–542 (1976). W. Giriat, and L. Sosnowski, “Band structure of hgte,” [45] A. Paj¸aczkowska, “Physicochemical properties and phys. stat. sol. (b) 8, K135–K139 (1965). crystal growth of AII BV I - MnBV I systems,” [26] R. R. Ga l¸azka and L. Sosnowski, “Con- Prog. Crystal Growth Charact. 1, 289 (1978). duction band structure of Cd0.1Hg0.9Te,” [46] M. Jaczy´nski, J. Kossut, and R. R. Ga l¸azka, phys. stat. sol. (b) 20, 113–120 (1967). “Influence of exchange interaction on quan- [27] M. Sawicki, T. Dietl, W. Plesiewicz, tum transport phenomena in Hg1−xMnxTe,” P. S¸ekowski, L. Sniadower,´ M. Baj, and Phys. Status Solidi B 88, 73 (1978). L. Dmowski, “Influence of an acceptor state [47] J. A. Gaj, R. R. Ga l¸azka, and M. Nawrocki, “Giant ex- on transport in zero-gap Hg1−xMnxTe,” in citon faraday rotation in Cd1−xMnxTe mixed crystals,” Application of High Magnetic Fields inSemiconductor Physics, Solid State Commun. 10.1016/0038-1098(93)90270-W. edited by G. Landwehr (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, [48] G. Bastard, C. Rigaux, and A. Mycielski, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983) pp. 382–385. “Giant spin splitting induced by exchange in- [28] T. Dietl and A. J¸edrzejczak, “Temperature de- teractions in MnkHg1−kTe mixed crystals,” pendence of the band structure parameters phys. stat. solidi (b) 79, 585–593 (1977). in HgSe from thermomagnetic measurements,” [49] Bastard, G., Rigaux, C., Guldner, Y., Mycielski, J., phys. stat. sol. (b) 71, K39–K44 (1975). and Mycielski, A., “Effect of exchange on interband [29] A. J¸edrzejczak and T. Dietl, “Thermomag- magneto-absorption in zero gap MnkHg1−kTe mixed netie properties of n-type and p-type HgTe,” crystals,” J. Phys. France 39, 87–98 (1978). phys. stat. sol. (b) 76, 737–751 (1976). [50] R. R. Ga l¸azka, “Semimagnetic semiconductors,” in Pro- [30] W. Zawadzki and W. Szyma´nska, “Elastic elec- ceedings 14th International Conference on the Physics tron scattering in InSb-type semiconductors,” of Semiconductors, Edinburgh 1978, edited by B.L.H. phys. stat. sol. (b) 45, 415–432 (1971). Wilson (IoP, Bristol, 1978) p. 133. [31] W. Zawadzki, “Electron transport phenomena in small- [51] Solomon, I., Dietl, T., and Kaplan, D., gap semiconductors,” Adv. Phys. 23, 435–522 (1974). “Influence of interface charges on transport [32] W. Szyma´nska, P. Bogus lawski, and W. Za- measurements in amorphous silicon films,” wadzki, “Elastic electron scattering in J. Phys. France 39, 1241–1246 (1978). symmetry-induced zero-gap semiconductors,” [52] M. Dobrowolska, W. Dobrowolski, M. Otto, T. Di- phys. stat. sol. (b) 65, 641–654 (1974). etl, and R. R. Ga l¸azka, “The relation between magne- [33] W. Szyma´nska and T. Dietl, “Elec- tooptical and magnetic properties of Hg1−xMnxTe and tron scattering and transport phenomena Hg1−xMnxSe,” J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 49 Suppl. A, 815 in small-gap zinc-blende semiconductors,” (1980). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 39, 1025 – 1040 (1978). [53] A. Mycielski, C. Rigaux, M. Menant, T. Di- [34] T. Dietl and W. Szyma´nska, “Electron scattering in etl, and M. Otto, “Spin glass phase transi- HgSe,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 39, 1041 – 1057 (1978). tion in Hg1−kMnkTe semimagnetic semiconductors,” [35] R.J. Iwanowski, T. Dietl, and W. Szyma´nska, Solid State Commun. 50, 257 – 260 (1984). “Electron mobility and electron scat- [54] T. Dietl and J. Spa lek, “Effect of fluctua- tering in CdxHg1−xSe mixed crystals,” tions of magnetization on the bound mag- J. Phys. Chem. Solids 39, 1059 – 1070 (1978). netic polaron: Comparison with experiment,” [36] R. J. Iwanowski and T. Dietl, “The influence Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 355–358 (1982). of disorder scattering on the longitudinal nernst- [55] T. Dietl, “Kwantowy efekt Halla: ”atomowy” wzorzec ettingshausen effect in Cd0.2Hg0.8Se mixed crystals,” oma i nowa metoda dokladnego wyznaczania struktury J. Phys. C: Solid State Physics 11, 3239–3244 (1978). subtelnej,” Post. Fiz. 33, 195 (1982). [37] J.J. Dubowski, T. Dietl, W. Szyma´nska, and [56] J. K. Furdyna and J. Kossut, Diluted Magnetic Semicon- R.R. Ga l¸azka, “Electron scattering in CdxHg1−xTe,” ductors, Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 25 (Aca- J. Phys. Chem. Solids 42, 351 – 362 (1981). demic Press, New York, 1988). [38] W. Zawadzki, “Semirelativity in semiconductors: a re- [57] T. Dietl, Handbook on Semiconductors, edited by view,” J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 29, 373004 (2017). S. Mahajan, Vol. 3B (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994) [39] W. Zawadzki, “Spin magnetic moment of a free rela- pp. 1251–1342. tivistic electron,” Phys. Rev. D 3, 1728–1728 (1971). [58] J. A. Gaj, J. Ginter, and R. R. Ga l¸azka, “Exchange in- [40] T. Dietl, P. Siemi´nski, and W. Dobrowolski, teraction of manganese 3d5 states with band electrons in “Uklad do pomiar´ow efektu Szubnikowa-de Haasa,” Cd1−xMnxTe,” phys. stat. sol. (b) 89, 655–662 (1978). Pomiary, Automatyka, Kontrola XXII, 421 (1976). [59] P. Kacman, “Spin interactions in diluted magnetic semi- [41] Dietl, T., “Dingle temperature in HgSe,” conductors and magnetic semiconductor structures,” J. Phys. Colloques 39, C6–1081–C6–1083 (1978). Semicond. Sci. Technol. 16, R25 (2001). 18

[60] T. Dietl, C. Sliwa,´ G. Bauer, and H. Pascher, approach,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 125204 (2015). “Mechanisms of exchange interactions between car- [76] J. Spa lek, A. Lewicki, Z. Tarnawski, J. K. Furdyna, riers and Mn or Eu spins in lead chalcogenides,” R. R. Ga l¸azka, and Z. Obuszko, “Magnetic suscep- Phys. Rev. B 49, 2230–2233 (1994). tibility of semimagnetic semiconductors: The high- [61] G. Bauer, H. Pascher, and W. Zawadzki, “Magneto- temperature regime and the role of superexchange,” optical properties of semimagnetic lead chalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. B 33, 3407 (1986). Semicond. Sci. Technol. 7, 703 (1992). [77] M. Sawicki, E. Guziewicz, M. I.Lukasiewicz, O. Pros- [62] T. Story, C. H. W. Sw¨uste, P. J. T. Eggenkamp, elkov, I. A. Kowalik, W. Lisowski, P. Dluzewski, H. J. M. Swagten, and W. J. M. de Jonge, A. Wittlin, M. Jaworski, A. Wolska, W. Paszkow- “Electron paramagnetic resonance Knight shift in icz, R. Jakiela, B. S. Witkowski, L. Wachnicki, semimagnetic (diluted magnetic) semiconductors,” M. T. Klepka, F. J. Luque, D. Arvanitis, J. W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2802–2805 (1996). Sobczak, M. Krawczyk, A. Jablonski, W. Stefanow- [63] C. Autieri, C. Sliwa,´ R. Islam, G. Cuono, and T. Di- icz, D. Sztenkiel, M. Godlewski, and T. Dietl, “Ho- etl, “Momentum-resolved spin splitting in Mn-doped mogeneous and heterogeneous magnetism in (Zn,Co)O: trivial CdTe and topological HgTe semiconductors,” From a random antiferromagnet to a dipolar super- arXiv:2006.06309. ferromagnet by changing the growth temperature,” [64] C. Benoit `a la Guillaume, D. Scalbert, and Phys. Rev. B 88, 085204 (2013). T. Dietl, “Wigner-Seitz approach to spin splitting,” [78] A. Bonanni, T. Dietl, and H. Ohno, “Dilute magnetic Phys. Rev. B 46, 9853–9856(R) (1992). materials,” in Handbook on Magnetism and Magnetic [65] T. Dietl, “Hole states in wide band-gap di- Materials, edited by J. M. D. Coey and S. S. P. Parkin luted magnetic semiconductors and oxides,” (Springer, Berlin, 2021). Phys. Rev. B 77, 085208 (2008). [79] B. Leclercq, C. Rigaux, A. Mycielski, and M. Menant, [66] W. Pacuski, P. Kossacki, D. Ferrand, A. Golnik, “Critical dynamics in Cd1−xMnxTe spin glasses,” J. Cibert, M. Wegscheider, A. Navarro-Quezada, Phys. Rev. B 47, 6169–6172(R) (1993). A. Bonanni, M. Kiecana, M. Sawicki, and [80] J. Jaroszy´nski, J. Wr´obel, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtow- T. Dietl, “Observation of strong-coupling effects icz, and T. Dietl, “Magnetoconductance noise and ir- + − in a diluted magnetic semiconductor Ga1−xFexN,” reversibilities in submicron wires of spin-glass n Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 037204 (2008). Cd1−x Mnx Te,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5635–5638 (1998). [67] W. Pacuski, J. Suffczy´nski, P. Osewski, P. Kos- [81] T. Story, R. R. Ga l¸azka, R. B. Frankel, and P. A. Wolff, sacki, A. Golnik, J. A. Gaj, C. Deparis, C. Morhain, “Carrier-concentration–induced ferromagnetism in Pb- E. Chikoidze, Y. Dumont, D. Ferrand, J. Cibert, SnMnTe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 777 (1986). and T. Dietl, “Influence of s,p-d and s − p ex- [82] T. Story, M. G´orska, A.Lusakowski, M. Ar- change couplings on exciton splitting in Zn1−xMnxO,” ciszewska, W. Dobrowolski, E. Grodzicka, Z. Go lacki, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035214 (2011). and R. R. Ga l¸azka, “New mechanism of f–f ex- [68] C. Sliwa´ and T. Dietl, “Electron-hole contri- change interactions controlled by Fermi level position,” bution to the apparent s − d exchange inter- Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3447–3450 (1996). action in iii-v dilute magnetic semiconductors,” [83] T. Suski, J. Igalson, and T. Story, “Ferro- Phys. Rev. B 78, 165205 (2008). magnetism of (Pb,Sn,Mn)Te under high pressure,” [69] M. Nawrocki, R. Planel, G. Fishman, and J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 66, 325–330 (1987). R. R. Galazka, “Exchange-induced spin-flip Ra- [84] T. Dietl and J. Kossut, “Xvi mi¸edzynarodowa man scattering in a semimagnetic semiconductor,” konferencja fizyki p´o lprzewodnik´ow w montpellier,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 735 (1981). Post. Fiz. 34, 322 (1983). [70] T. Dietl and J. Spa lek, “Effect of thermodynamic [85] T. Dietl, J. Antoszewski, and L. Swierkowski,´ “Hop- fluctuations of magnetization on the bound mag- ping conduction of the bound magnetic polarons in n- netic polaron in dilute magnetic semiconductors,” CdMnSe,” Physica B+C 117-118, 491 – 493 (1983). Phys. Rev. B 28, 1548–1563 (1983). [86] T. Wojtowicz and A. Mycielski, “Mag- [71] T. Dietl, “Optical properties of donor elec- netic field induced nonmetal - metal tran- trons in semimagnetic semiconductors,” sition in the open - gap Hg1−xMnxTe,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 38, 34 – 44 (1983). Physica B+C 117-118, 476–478 (1983). [72] T. Wojtowicz, S. Kole´snik, I. Miotkowski, and [87] Y. Ono and J. Kossut, “Anomalous mag- J. K. Furdyna, “Magnetization of bound magnetic po- netoconductivity in semimagnetic semi- larons: Direct determination via photomemory effect,” conductors showing metallic conduction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2317–2320 (1993). J. Phys. Soc. Japan 53, 1128–1135 (1984). [73] H. Krenn, K. Kaltenegger, T. Dietl, J. Spa lek, [88] M. Sawicki, T. Dietl, J. Kossut, J. Igalson, and G. Bauer, “Photoinduced magnetization in T. Wojtowicz, and W. Plesiewicz, “Influence of dilute magnetic (semimagnetic) semiconductors,” s-d exchange interaction on the conductivity of Phys. Rev. B 39, 10918–10934 (1989). Cd1−xMnxSe:In in the weakly localized regime,” [74] T. Dietl, P. Peyla, W. Grieshaber, and Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 508–511 (1986). Y. Merle d’Aubign´e, “Dynamics of spin orga- [89] T. Andrearczyk, J. Jaroszy´nski, G. Grabecki, T. Dietl, nization in diluted magnetic semiconductors,” T. Fukumura, and M. Kawasaki, “Spin-related mag- Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 474–477 (1995). netoresistance of n-type ZnO:Al and Zn1−xMnxO : Al [75] T. Dietl, “Spin dynamics of a confined electron inter- thin films,” Phys. Rev. B 72, 121309(R) (2005). acting with magnetic or nuclear spins: A semiclassical 19

[90] T. Dietl, T. Andrearczyk, A. Lipi´nska, M. Kiecana, tance in p-type ferromagnetic semiconductors,” in Maureen Tay, and Yihong Wu, “Origin of ferro- Recent Trends in Theory of Physical Phenomena inHigh Magnetic Fields, magnetism in zn1−xcoxO from magnetization and edited by I. D. Vagner, P. Wyder, and T. Maniv spin-dependent magnetoresistance measurements,” (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2003) pp. 197–210. Phys. Rev. B 76, 155312 (2007). [106] F Matsukura, M Sawicki, T Dietl, D Chiba, and [91] J. Jaroszy´nski, T. Andrearczyk, G. Karczewski, H Ohno, “Magnetotransport properties of metallic J. Wr´obel, T. Wojtowicz, Dragana Popovi´c, and T. Di- (Ga,Mn)As films with compressive and tensile strain,” etl, “Intermediate phase at the metal-insulator bound- Physica E 21, 1032 – 1036 (2004), proceedings of the ary in a magnetically doped two-dimensional electron Eleventh International Conference on Modulated Semi- system,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 045322 (2007). conductor Structures. [92] R. Adhikari, W. Stefanowicz, B. Faina, G. Ca- [107] A. Kazakov, W. Brzezicki, T. Hyart, B. Turowski, puzzo, M. Sawicki, T. Dietl, and A. Bo- J. Polaczy´nski, Z. Adamus, M. Aleszkiewicz, T. Woj- nanni, “Upper bound for the s-d exchange integral ciechowski, J. Z. Domagala, O. Caha, A. Varykhalov, in n-(Ga,Mn)N:Si from magnetotransport studies,” G.Springholz, T. Wojtowicz, V. V. Volobuev, and Phys. Rev. B 91, 205204 (2015). T. Dietl, “Dephasing by mirror-symmetry breaking and [93] T Dietl, L Swierkowski,´ J Jaroszy´nski, M Sawicki, and resulting magnetoresistance across the topological tran- T Wojtowicz, “Remarks on localization in semimagnetic sition in Pb1−xSnxSe,” arXiv:2002.07622. semiconductors,” Physica Scripta T14, 29–36 (1986). [108] W. Walukiewicz, “Electron mobility and ther- [94] P. G l´od, T. Dietl, M. Sawicki, and moelectric power in pure mercury telluride,” I. Miotkowsk, “Temperature dependent local- J. Phys. C: Solid State Physics 9, 1945–1954 (1976). ization in diluted magnetic semiconductors,” [109] T. Dietl, J. Dubowski, and W. Szyma´nska, “Interband Physica B 194-196, 995 – 996 (1994). optical phonon scattering in Cd−xHg1−xTe,” in Pro- [95] T. Dietl, “Interplay between carrier localization and ceedings 14th International Conference on the Physics magnetism in diluted magnetic and ferromagnetic semi- of Semiconductors, Edinburgh 1978, edited by B.L.H. conductors,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 031005 (2008). Wilson (IoP, Bristol, 1978) p. 245. [96] T. Wojtowicz, T. Dietl, M. Sawicki, W. Ple- [110] Z. Wilamowski, K. Swi¸atek,´ T. Dietl, and siewicz, and J. Jaroszy´nski, “Metal-insulator J. Kossut, “Resonant states in semiconduc- transition in semimagnetic semiconductors,” tors: A quantitative study of HgSe:Fe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2419–2422 (1986). Solid State Commun. 74, 833–837 (1990). [97] T. Wojtowicz, M. Sawicki, J. Jaroszy´nski, T. Di- [111] A. Mycielski, “Fe-based semimagnetic semiconductors,” etl, and W. Plesiewicz, “Conductivity in a spin- J. Appl. Phys. , 3279 (1988). polarized band near the metal-insulator critical point,” [112] J. Kossut, W. Dobrowolski, Z. Wilamowski, T. Di- Physica B 155, 357 – 361 (1989). etl, and K. Swiatek, “Correlation of donor elec- [98] J. Jaroszy´nski and T. Dietl, “Magnetic field-induced trons in diluted magnetic semiconductors with iron,” metal-insulator transition in diluted magnetic semicon- Semicond. Sci. Techn. 5, S260–S265 (1990). ductors,” Physica B 177, 469 – 475 (1992). [113] T. Suski, P. Wi´sniewski, E .Litwin-Staszewska, J. Kos- [99] W. Stefanowicz, R. Adhikari, T. Andrearczyk, sut, Z. Wilamowski, T. Dietl, K. Swiatek, K. Ploog, B. Faina, M. Sawicki, J. A. Majewski, T. Di- and J. Knecht, “Pressure dependence of electron con- etl, and A. Bonanni, “Experimental determination centration and mobility in GaAs:Si-effects of on-site and of Rashba spin-orbit coupling in wurtzite n-GaN:Si,” inter-site interactions within a system of DX centres,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 205201 (2014). Semicond. Sci. Techn. 5, 261–264 (1990). [100] T. Dietl, “Localization and magnetic interactions in [114] J. Wr´obel, T. Dietl, A.Lusakowski, G. Grabecki, semimagnetic semiconductors at low temperatures,” K. Fronc, R. Hey, K. H. Ploog, and H. Shtrikman, Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 26, 1907 (1987). “Spin filtering in a hybrid ferromagnetic-semiconductor [101] T. Dietl, M. Sawicki, J. Jaroszy´nski, T. Wojtowicz, microstructure,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 246601 (2004). W. Plesiewicz, and A. Lenard, “Semimagnetic semi- [115] T. Dietl, “Introduction to the physics of two- conductors near the metal–insulator transition,” in 19th dimensional electron gas,” Acta Phys. Polon. A 69, 817 International Conference on the Physics of Semiconduc- (1986). tors, Warsaw 1988, Proceedings, edited by W. Zawadzki [116] T. Dietl, G. Grabecki, and J. Jaroszynski, “Meso- (IF PAN, Warszawa 1988, 1988) p. 1189. scopic phenomena in diluted magnetic semiconductors,” [102] T. Dietl, M. Sawicki, M. Dahl, D. Heiman, Semicond. Sci. Techn. 8, S141–S146 (1993). E. D. Isaacs, M. J. Graf, S. I. Gubarev, and [117] G. Grabecki, T. Dietl, J. Kossut, and W. Za- D. L. Alov, “Spin-flip scattering near the metal- wadzki, “Quantum transport in semimagnetic hgm- to-insulator transition in Cd0.95Mn0.05Se:In,” nte inversion layers: Experiment and theory,” Phys. Rev. B 43, 3154–3163 (1991). Surf. Sci. 142, 588 – 592 (1984). [103] T. Dietl, “Nevill Francis Mott (1905 - 1996),” [118] G. Grabecki, T. Dietl, P. Sobkowicz, J. Kos- Post. Fiz. 48, 159 (1997). sut, and W. Zawadzki, “Quantum transport [104] T Omiya, F Matsukura, T Dietl, Y Ohno, T Sakon, studies of grain boundaries in p-Hg1−xMnxTe,” M Motokawa, and H Ohno, “Magnetotransport proper- Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 1214–1216 (1984). ties of (Ga,Mn)As investigated at low temperature and [119] G. Grabecki, T. Suski, T. Dietl, T. Sko´skiewicz, high magnetic field,” Physica E 7, 976 – 980 (2000). and M. Gli´nski, “Quantum Hall effect in [105] T. Dietl, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, J. Cibert, bicrystals of p-Hg0.75Cd0.23Mn0.02Te,” in and D. Ferrand, “Hall effect and magnetoresis- High Magnetic Fields in Semiconductor Physics, 20

edited by G. Landwehr (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, ferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 046803 (2017). Berlin, Heidelberg, 1987) pp. 127–130. [133] G. Simion, A. Kazakov, L. P. Rokhinson, T. Wojtow- [120] G. Grabecki, A. Wittlin, T. Dietl, P. A. A. Teunissen, icz, and Y. B. Lyanda-Geller, “Impurity-generated non- S. A. J Wiegers, and J. A. A. J. Perenboom, “Pre- Abelions,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 245107 (2018). cision of the Hall quantization in a naturally occur- [134] T. Dietl, A. Haury, and Y. Merle d’Aubign´e, ring two-dimensional system-HgCdMnTe bicrystals,” “Free carrier-induced ferromagnetism in struc- Semicond. Sci. Techn. 8, S95–S98 (1993). tures of diluted magnetic semiconductors,” [121] M. A. Herman and H. Sitter, Phys. Rev. B 55, R3347–R3350 (1997). Molecular Beam Epitaxy: Fundamentals and Current Status[135] T. Dietl, H. Ohno, F. Matsukura, J. Cibert, (Springer, Berlin, 1989). and D. Ferrand, “Zener model description of ferro- [122] G. Grabecki, A. Lenard, W. Plesiewicz, J. Jaroszy´nski, magnetism in zinc-blende magnetic semiconductors,” M. Cieplak, T. Sko´skiewicz, T. Dietl, E. Kami´nska, Science 287, 1019–1022 (2000). A. Piotrowska, and B. Bulka, “Conductance fluctu- [136] T. Dietl, H. Ohno, and F. Matsukura, “Hole-mediated ations in microstructures of HgCdMnTe bicrystals,” ferromagnetism in tetrahedrally coordinated semicon- Acta Phys. Polon. A 80, 307–310 (1991). ductors,” Phys. Rev. B 63, 195205 (2001). [123] J. Jaroszy´nski, J. Wr´obel, M. Sawicki, E. Kami´nska, [137] T. Dietl, J. Cibert, D. Ferrand, and Y. Merle T. Sko´skiewicz, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, d’Aubign´e, “Carrier-mediated ferromagnetic interac- A. Piotrowska, J. Kossut, and T. Dietl, “In- tions in structures of magnetic semiconductors,” fluence of s-d exchange interaction on universal Mater. Sci. Engin. B 63, 103 – 110 (1999). conductance fluctuations in Cd1−x Mnx Te : In,” [138] A. Haury, A. Wasiela, A. Arnoult, J. Cibert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3170–3173 (1995). S. Tatarenko, T. Dietl, and Y. Merle d’Aubign´e, “Ob- [124] in Introduction to the Physics of Diluted MagneticSemiconductorsservation, of a ferromagnetic transition induced by two- edited by J. Kossut and J. A. Gaj (Springer, Berlin, dimensional hole gas in modulation-doped CdMnTe 2010). quantum wells,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 511–514 (1997). [125] A. Kazakov and T. Wojtowicz, “2D electron gas in [139] H. Boukari, P. Kossacki, M. Bertolini, D. Fer- chalcogenide multilayers,” in Chalcogenide, Woodhead rand, J. Cibert, S. Tatarenko, A. Wasiela, J. A. Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials, Gaj, and T. Dietl, “Light and electric field control edited by Xinyu Liu, Sanghoon Lee, J. K. Furdyna, of ferromagnetism in magnetic quantum structures,” Tengfei Luo, and Yong-Hang Zhang (Woodhead Pub- Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 207204 (2002). lishing, 2020) pp. 189–234. [140] D. Kechrakos, N. Papanikolaou, K. N. Trohidou, [126] M. Goryca, T. Kazimierczuk, M. Nawrocki, A. Gol- and T. Dietl, “Monte Carlo simulations of fer- nik, J. A. Gaj, P. Kossacki, P. Wojnar, and romagnetism in p−Cd1−xMnxTe quantum wells,” G. Karczewski, “Optical manipulation of a sin- Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 127201 (2005). gle Mn spin in a CdTe-based quantum dot,” [141] A. Lipi´nska, C. Simserides, K. N. Trohidou, M. Goryca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087401 (2009). P. Kossacki, A. Majhofer, and T. Dietl, “Ferromagnetic [127] P. Wojnar, E. Janik, L. T. Baczewski, S. Kret, properties of p-(Cd,Mn)Te quantum wells: Interpreta- E. Dynowska, T. Wojciechowski, J. Suffczy´nski, J. Pa- tion of magneto-optical measurements by Monte Carlo pierska, P. Kossacki, G. Karczewski, J. Kossut, simulations,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 235322 (2009). and T. Wojtowicz, “Giant spin splitting in opti- [142] D. Ferrand, J. Cibert, C. Bourgognon, S. Tatarenko, cally active ZnMnTe/ZnMgTe core/shell nanowires,” A. Wasiela, G. Fishman, A. Bonanni, H. Sit- Nano Lett. 12, 3404 (2012). ter, S. Kole´snik, J. Jaroszy´nski, A. Barcz, and [128] J. Jaroszy´nski, T. Andrearczyk, G. Karczewski, T. Dietl, “Carrier-induced ferromagnetic in- J. Wr´obel, T. Wojtowicz, E. Papis, E. Kami´nska, A. Pi- teractions in p-doped Zn1−xMnxTe epilayers,” otrowska, Dragana Popovi´c, and T. Dietl, “Ising quan- J. Crys. Growth 214-215, 387 – 390 (2000). tum hall ferromagnet in magnetically doped quantum [143] D. Ferrand, J. Cibert, A. Wasiela, C. Bour- wells,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 266802 (2002). gognon, S. Tatarenko, G. Fishman, T. Andrearczyk, [129] C. Betthausen, T. Dollinger, H. Saarikoski, J. Jaroszy´nski, S. Kole´snik, T. Dietl, B. Barbara, V. Kolkovsky, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, and D. Dufeu, “Carrier-induced ferromagnetism in p − K. Richter, and D. Weiss, “Spin-transistor Zn1−xMnxTe,” Phys. Rev. B 63, 085201 (2001). action via tunable Landau-Zener transitions,” [144] Le Van Khoi, M. Sawicki, K. Dybko, V. Domukhovski, Science 337, 324–327 (2012). T. Story, T. Dietl, A. J¸edrzejczak, J. Kossut, and R.R. [130] B. A. Piot, J. Kunc, M. Potemski, D. K. Maude, Ga l¸azka, “Annealing-induced changes in electrical, opti- C. Betthausen, A. Vogl, D. Weiss, G. Karczewski, and cal, and magnetic properties of phosphorus doped bulk T. Wojtowicz, “Fractional quantum hall effect in CdTe,” Zn1−xMnxTe,” phys. stat. sol. (b) 229, 53–56 (2002). Phys. Rev. B 82, 081307 (2010). [145] H. K¸epa, Van Khoi Le, C. M. Brown, M. Sawicki, [131] C. Betthausen, P. Giudici, A. Iankilevitch, C. Preis, J. K. Furdyna, T. M. Giebultowicz, and T. Dietl, V. Kolkovsky, M. Wiater, G. Karczewski, B. A. Piot, “Probing hole-induced ferromagnetic exchange in mag- J. Kunc, M. Potemski, T. Wojtowicz, and D. Weiss, netic semiconductors by inelastic neutron scattering,” “Fractional quantum hall effect in a dilute magnetic Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 087205 (2003). semiconductor,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 115302 (2014). [146] T. Andrearczyk, J. Jaroszy´nski, M. Sawicki, Le Van [132] A. Kazakov, G. Simion, Y. Lyanda-Geller, Khoi, T. Dietl, D. Ferrand, C. Bourgognon, J. Cibert, V. Kolkovsky, Z. Adamus, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtow- S. Tatarenko, T. Fukumura, Zhengwu Jin, H. Koinuma, icz, and L. P. Rokhinson, “Mesoscopic transport in elec- and M. Kawasaki, “Ferromagnetic interactions in p- trostatically defined spin-full channels in quantum Hall and n-type II-VI diluted magnetic semiconductors,” in 21

Proceedings 25th International Conference on Physics Ga1−xMnxAs,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 045208 (2010). of Semiconductors, Osaka, Japan, 2000, edited by [162] M. Yamanouchi, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, and N. Miura and T. Ando (Springer, Berlin, 2001) p. 235. H. Ohno, “Velocity of domain-wall motion induced by [147] T. Dietl, “A ten-year perspective on dilute magnetic electrical current in the ferromagnetic semiconductor semiconductors and oxides,” Nat. Mater. 9, 965 (2010). (Ga,Mn)As,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 096601 (2006). [148] M. Csontos, G. Mih´aly, B. Jank´o, T. Wojtowicz, X. Liu, [163] P. Van Dorpe, W. Van Roy, J. De Boeck, and J. K. Furdyna, “Pressure-induced ferromagnetism G. Borghs, P. Sankowski, P. Kacman, J. A. Ma- in (In,Mn)Sb dilute magnetic semiconductor,” Nat. jewski, and T. Dietl, “Voltage-controlled spin in- Mater. 4, 447 (2005). jection in a (Ga,Mn)As/(Al,Ga)As Zener diode,” [149] M. Gryglas-Borysiewicz, A. Kwiatkowski, P. Juszy´nski, Phys. Rev. B 72, 205322 (2005). Z. Ogorza lek, K. Pu´zniak, M. Tokarczyk, G. Kowal- [164] P. Sankowski, P. Kacman, J. A. Majewski, and T. Dietl, ski, M. Baj, D. Wasik, N. Gonzalez Szwacki, J. Przy- “Spin-dependent tunneling in modulated structures of bytek, J. Sadowski, M. Sawicki, P. Dziawa, and J. Z. (Ga,Mn)As,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 045306 (2007). Domagala, “Hydrostatic pressure influence on TC in [165] T. Dietl, “Why ferromagnetic semiconductors?” (Ga,Mn)As,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 054413 (2020). Acta Phys. Polon. A , 139–151 (2001). [150] A. Werpachowska and T. Dietl, “Theory of [166] T. Dietl, “Ferromagnetic semiconductors,” spin waves in ferromagnetic (Ga,Mn)As,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17, 377 (2002). Phys. Rev. B 82, 085204 (2010). [167] C. R¨uster, T. Borzenko, C. Gould, G. Schmidt, [151] C. Sliwa´ and T. Dietl, “Thermodynamic and ther- L. W. Molenkamp, X. Liu, T. J. Wojtowicz, moelectric properties of (Ga,Mn)As and related com- J. K. Furdyna, Z. G. Yu, and M. E. Flatt´e, pounds,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 245210 (2011). “Very large magnetoresistance in lateral ferromag- [152] A.Lusakowski, P. Bogus lawski, and T. Story, netic (Ga,Mn)As wires with nanoconstrictions,” “DFT calculations of magnetic anisotropy energy Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 216602 (2003). of Ge1−xMnxTe ferromagnetic semiconductor,” [168] M. J. Grzybowski, P. Wadley, K. W. Edmonds, J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 27, 226002 (2015). R. Beardsley, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, B. L. Gal- [153] T. Dietl, J. K¨onig, and A. H. MacDonald, “Mag- lagher, J. S. Chauhan, V. Novak, T. Jungwirth, F. Mac- netic domains in III-V magnetic semiconductors,” cherozzi, and S. S. Dhesi, “Imaging current-induced Phys. Rev. B 64, 241201 (2001). switching of antiferromagnetic domains in CuMnAs,” [154] M. Sawicki, F. Matsukura, A. Idziaszek, T. Dietl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 057701 (2017). G. M. Schott, C. R¨uester, C. Gould, G. Karczewski, [169] M. J. Grzybowski, P. Wadley, K. W. Edmonds, R. P. G. Schmidt, and L. W. Molenkamp, “Temperature Campion, K. Dybko, M. Majewicz, B. L. Gallagher, dependent magnetic anisotropy in (Ga,Mn)As layers,” M. Sawicki, and T. Dietl, “Gating effects in antiferro- Phys. Rev. B 70, 245325 (2004). magnetic CuMnAs,” AIP Advances 9, 115101 (2019). [155] M. Sawicki, K.-Y. Wang, K. W. Edmonds, R. P. Cam- [170] J. Sadowski, H. Mariette, A. Wasiela, pion, C. R. Staddon, N. R. S. Farley, C. T. Foxon, E. Pa- R. Andr´e, Y. Merle d’Aubign´e, and T. Di- pis, E. Kami´nska, A. Piotrowska, T. Dietl, and B. L. etl, “Magnetic tuning in excitonic bragg Gallagher, “In-plane uniaxial anisotropy rotations in structures of (Cd,Mn)Te/(Cd,Zn,Mg)Te,” (ga,mn)as thin films,” Phys. Rev. B 71, 121302 (2005). Phys. Rev. B 56, R1664–R1667 (1997). [156] K.-Y. Wang, M. Sawicki, K. W. Edmonds, R. P. Cam- [171] Y. Merle d’Aubign´e, A. Wasiela, H. Mariette, pion, S. Maat, C. T. Foxon, B. L. Gallagher, and and T. Dietl, “Polariton effects in multiple- T. Dietl, “Spin reorientation transition in single-domain quantum-well structures of CdTe/Cd1−xZnxTe,” (Ga, Mn)As,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 217204 (2005). Phys. Rev. B 54, 14003–14011 (1996). [157] M. Sawicki, D. Chiba, A. Korbecka, Yu Nishitani, [172] T. Jungwirth, Jairo Sinova, A. H. MacDonald, B. L. J. A. Majewski, F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, and Gallagher, V. Nov´ak, K. W. Edmonds, A. W. Rush- H. Ohno, “Experimental probing of the interplay be- forth, R. P. Campion, C. T. Foxon, L. Eaves, tween ferromagnetism and localization in (Ga, Mn)As,” E. Olejn´ık, J. Maˇsek, S.-R. Eric Yang, J. Wunder- Nat. Phys. 6, 22 (2010). lich, C. Gould, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Dietl, and [158] M. Sawicki, O. Proselkov, C. Sliwa, P. Aleshkevych, H. Ohno, “Character of states near the fermi level J. Z. Domagala, J. Sadowski, and T. Dietl, “Cubic in (Ga,Mn)As: Impurity to valence band crossover,” anisotropy in (Ga,Mn)As layers: Experiment and the- Phys. Rev. B 76, 125206 (2007). ory,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 184403 (2018). [173] D. Chiba, A. Werpachowska, M. Endo, Y. Nishitani, [159] W. Stefanowicz, C. Sliwa,´ P. Aleshkevych, T. Di- F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, and H. Ohno, “Anomalous etl, M. D¨oppe, U. Wurstbauer, W. Wegschei- Hall effect in field-effect structures of (Ga,Mn)As,” der, D. Weiss, and M. Sawicki, “Magnetic Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 106601 (2010). anisotropy of epitaxial (Ga,Mn)As on (113)A GaAs,” [174] T. Dietl, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, “Ferromag- Phys. Rev. B 81, 155203 (2010). netism of magnetic semiconductors: Zhang-rice limit,” [160] D. Chiba, M. Sawicki, Y. Nishitani, Y. Nakatani, Phys. Rev. B 66, 033203 (2002). F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, “Magnetiza- [175] W. Stefanowicz, D. Sztenkiel, B. Faina, A. Grois, tion vector manipulation by electric fields,” M. Rovezzi, T. Devillers, A. Navarro-Quezada, Tian Nature 455, 515 (2008). Li, R. Jakie la, M. Sawicki, T. Dietl, and A. Bo- [161] Y. Nishitani, D. Chiba, M. Endo, M. Sawicki, F. Mat- nanni, “Structural and paramagnetic properties of di- sukura, T. Dietl, and H. Ohno, “Curie temperature lute Ga1−xMnxN,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 235210 (2010). versus hole concentration in field-effect structures of [176] A. Bonanni, M. Sawicki, T. Devillers, W. Stefanowicz, B. Faina, Tian Li, T. E. Winkler, D. Sztenkiel, 22

A. Navarro-Quezada, M. Rovezzi, R. Jakie la, [189] M. Sawicki, W. Stefanowicz, and A. Ney, “Sensitive A. Grois, M. Wegscheider, W. Jantsch, J. Suf- SQUID magnetometry for studying nanomagnetism,” fczy´nski, F. D’Acapito, A. Meingast, G. Kothleitner, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 26, 064006 (2011). and T. Dietl, “Experimental probing of exchange inter- [190] K. Gas, G. Kunert, P. Dluzewski, R. Jakiela, actions between localized spins in the dilute magnetic D. Hommel, and M. Sawicki, “Improved-sensitivity insulator (Ga,Mn)N,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 035206 (2011). integral SQUID magnetometry of (Ga,Mn)N [177] M. Sawicki, T. Devillers, S. Ga l¸eski, C. Simserides, thin films in proximity to Mg-doped GaN,” S. Dobkowska, B. Faina, A. Grois, A. Navarro-Quezada, J. Alloy. Comp. 868, 159119 (2021). K. N. Trohidou, J. A. Majewski, T. Dietl, and A. Bo- [191] T. Dietl, “Origin and control of ferromagnetism in di- nanni, “Origin of low-temperature magnetic ordering in lute magnetic semiconductors and oxides (invited),” Ga1−xMnxN,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 205204 (2012). J. Appl. Phys. 103, 07D111 (2008). [178] G. Kunert, S. Dobkowska, Tian Li, H. Reuther, [192] A. Bonanni and T. Dietl, “A story of high-temperature C. Kruse, S. Figge, R. Jakiela, A. Bonanni, J. Grenzer, ferromagnetism in semiconductors,” Chem. Soc. Rev. W. Stefanowicz, J. von Borany, M. Sawicki, T. Dietl, 39, 528 (2010). and D. Hommel, “Ga1−xMnxN epitaxial films with high [193] T. Dietl, “Self-organised growth controlled magnetization,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 022413 (2012). by charge states of magnetic impurities,” [179] S. Stefanowicz, G. Kunert, C. Simserides, J. A. Ma- Nat. Mater. 5, 673 (2006). jewski, W. Stefanowicz, C. Kruse, S. Figge, Tian Li, [194] T. Devillers, M. Rovezzi, N. Gonzalez Szwacki, R. Jakie la, K. N. Trohidou, A. Bonanni, D. Hommel, S. Dobkowska, W. Stefanowicz, D. Sztenkiel, A. Grois, M. Sawicki, and T. Dietl, “Phase diagram and criti- J. Suffczy´nski, A. Navarro-Quezada, B. Faina, T. Li, cal behavior of the random ferromagnet Ga1−xMnxN,” P. Glatzel, F. d’Acapito, R. Jakie la, M. Sawicki, J. A. Phys. Rev. B 88, 081201 (2013). Majewski, T. Dietl, and A. Bonanni, “Manipulating [180] J. Blinowski, P. Kacman, and J. A. Majewski, “Ferro- Mn–Mgk cation complexes to control the charge- and magnetic superexchange in Cr-based diluted magnetic spin-state of Mn in GaN,” Sci. Rep. 2, 722 (2012). semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 53, 9524 (1996). [195] J. Blinowski and P. Kacman, “Spin interactions [181] D. Sztenkiel, M. Foltyn, G. P. Mazur, R. Ad- of interstitial Mn ions in ferromagnetic GaMnAs,” hikari, K. Kosiel, K. Gas, M. Zgirski, R. Kruszka, Phys. Rev. B 67, 121204 (2003). R. Jakiela, Tian Li, A. Piotrowska, A. Bonanni, [196] K. W. Edmonds, P. Bogus lawski, K. Y. Wang, M. Sawicki, and T. Dietl, “Stretching magnetism R. P. Campion, S. N. Novikov, N. R. S. Far- with an electric field in a nitride semiconductor,” ley, B. L. Gallagher, C. T. Foxon, M. Saw- Nat. Commun. 7, 13232 (2016). icki, T. Dietl, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, and [182] J. Ginter, J. Kossut, and L. Swierkowski,´ “In- J. Bernholc, “Mn interstitial diffusion in (Ga,Mn)As,” direct exchange interaction via electrons in Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037201 (2004). spin-orbit coupled bands in semiconductors,” [197] N. Gonzalez Szwacki, J. A. Majewski, and T. Dietl, phys. stat. sol. (b) 96, 735–744 (1979). “Aggregation and magnetism of Cr, Mn, and Fe cations [183] T. Dietl, “Dilute magnetic semiconductors: Functional in GaN,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 184417 (2011). ferromagnets,” Nat. Mater. 2, 646 (2003). [198] M. Birowska, C. Sliwa,´ J. A. Majewski, and [184] G. Karczewski, M. Sawicki, V. Ivanov, C. R¨uester, T. Dietl, “Origin of bulk uniaxial anisotropy G. Grabecki, F. Matsukura, L.W. Molenkamp, and in zinc-blende dilute magnetic semiconductors,” T. Dietl, “Ferromagnetism in (Zn,Cr)Se layers grown Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 237203 (2012). by molecular beam epitaxy,” J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. [199] Y. Yuan, R. H¨ubner, M. Birowska, Ch. Xu, M. Wang, 16, 55 (2003). S. Prucnal, R. Jakiela, K. Potzger, R. B¨ottger, [185] T. Dietl, “Spintronics and ferromag- S. Facsko, J. A. Majewski, M. Helm, M. Sawicki, netism in wide band gap semiconductors,” S. Zhou, and T. Dietl, “Nematicity of correlated sys- AIP Conf. Proc. 772, 56–64 (2005). tems driven by anisotropic chemical phase separation,” [186] A. Bonanni, M. Kiecana, C. Simbrunner, T. Li, Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 114601 (2018). M. Sawicki, M. Wegscheider, M. Quast, H. Przy- [200] A. Navarro-Quezada, K. Gas, T. Truglas, byli´nska, A. Navarro-Quezada, R. Jakie la, A. Wolos, V. Bauernfeind, M. Matzer, D. Kreil, A. Ney, W. Jantsch, and T. Dietl, “Paramagnetic GaN:Fe H. Groiss, M. Sawicki, and A. Bonanni, “Out- and ferromagnetic (Ga,Fe)N: The relationship be- of-plane magnetic anisotropy in ordered ensem- tween structural, electronic, and magnetic properties,” bles of FeyN nanocrystals embedded in GaN,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 125210 (2007). Materials 13 (2020), 10.3390/ma13153294. [187] A. Bonanni, A. Navarro-Quezada, Tian Li, [201] N. Pournaghavi, M. F. Islam, R. Islam, C. Autieri, M. Wegscheider, Z. Matˇej, V. Hol´y, R. T. Lech- T. Dietl, and C. M. Canali, “Realization of the ner, G. Bauer, M. Rovezzi, F. D’Acapito, M. Kiecana, Chern insulator and Axion insulator phases in antifer- M. Sawicki, and T. Dietl, “Controlled aggregation of romagnetic MnTe-Bi2(Se,Te)3-MnTe heterostructures,” magnetic ions in a semiconductor: An experimental arXiv:2101.06259. demonstration,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 135502 (2008). [202] A. Lenard, W. Plesiewicz, M. Sawicki, and T. Dietl, [188] S. Kuroda, N. Nishizawa, K. Takita, M. Mitome, “AC susceptometer for spin-glass dynamics measure- Y. Bando, K. Osuch, and T. Dietl, “Origin and con- ments,” Cryogenics 34, 429 – 432 (1994), fifteenth In- trol of high-temperature ferromagnetism in semiconduc- ternational Cryogenic Engineering Conference. tors,” Nature Mat. 6, 440 (2007). [203] T. Dietl, “Physics of semiconductors below 1 K,” Acta Phys. Polon. A 73, 793 (1988). 23

[204] A. Lenard, T. Dietl, M. Sawicki, W. Dobrowol- clusions in a narrow-gap PbTe semiconducting host,” ski, K. Dybko, T. Sko´skiewicz, W. Plesiewicz, Semiconductors 32, 700 – 703 (1998). S. Miotkowska, A. Witek, and A. Mycielski, [206] G. Grabecki, K. A. Kolwas, J. Wr´obel, K. Kap- “Millikelvin studies of mixed-valence HgSe:Fe,” cia, R. Pu´zniak, R. Jakie la, M. Aleszkiewicz, J. Low Temp. Phys. 80, 15–29 (1990). T. Dietl, G. Springholz, and G. Bauer, “Con- [205] S. D. Darchuk, L. A. Korovina, F. F. Sizov, T. Di- tact superconductivity in In-PbTe junctions,” etl, S. Kolesnik, and M. Sawicki, “Phase states J. Appl. Phys. 108, 053714 (2010). and magnetic structure of superconducting lead in-