DOCSLIB.ORG

Simple E1 Software Synchronization Algorithm Based on the Windows PIPE Concept

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Simple E1 Software Synchronization Algorithm Based on the Windows PIPE Concept 369 Simple E1 Software Synchronization Algorithm Based on the Windows PIPE Concept. Yuriy Dorozhovets, Mykhailo Klymash Abstract – This work demonstrate algorithm invented for FAS, and frame not containing the frame alignment signal - software realization at Windows PC, and demonstrate principles NFAS) are used for sending some signaling/management of E1 stream synchronization handling particular for fractional information, normally not used for any content data E1 to. transmission. Synchronization signal present in the bits 2…8 Keywords – E1, G.704, ITU-T, algorithm, PIPE, in the each FAS frame, format of this signal is in binary synchronization. 0011011(LSB). I. INTRODUCTION Every telecommunication system requires some low level data transmitting protocol. In Microwave radio relay, Satellite system is very common used E1 Frame to convey any transmitted data. E1 can handle with stream up to 2048kbps and it’s still a base for GSM Abis interface, HDLC and DCME links. E1 is based in few concepts: Fig.1 Binary FAS in the real E1 stream. · Frame alignment signal(FAS) All other features described in the G.704, like MFAS · 8000 fps CRC4 or 4kbprs are not the part of this work, because it’s · Timeslot optional E1 features. Data traffic can be conveyed inside E1 in any order but So base purpose of the realized software algorithm is FAS maximum throughput is up to 1984kbps. search/monitoring. There is wary important notation that proposed technic is designed to work in very hard condition, During projecting some receive equipment for E1 streams, it is where synchronization of the signal can be lost many times very important to implement simple and efficient E1 during receiving signal, and it’s very important to understand synchronization algorithm, and synchronization is only a half of all that output of such kind system will be very complex to future story. Most important to receiver site is a second part – information recovery. But without such algorithms there will resynchronization. This term mean recovering of the Frame be no any possibility to provide any data receiving. alignment signal in various points of the time. To provide this possibility in real-time mode it is required some cycle buffer. III. WINDOWS PIPE CONCEPT Almost all modern OS has very convenient way to do this – PIPE. For simple FIFO realization it is enough anonymous PIPE. There is two kinds of this objects – named and anonymous. It’s requiring less overhead than named pipes and easily to Named pipe is an extension to the traditional pipe concept on use. To create anonymous PIPE call: UNIX and Unix-like systems, and is one of the methods of inter- process communication. The concept is also found in Microsoft BOOL WINAPI CreatePipe( Windows, although the semantics differ substantially. A traditional __out PHANDLE hReadPipe, pipe is "unnamed" because it exists anonymously and persists only __out PHANDLE hWritePipe, for as long as the process is running. A named pipe is system- __in_opt LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpPipeAttributes, persistent and exists beyond the life of the process and must be __in DWORD nSize); deleted once it is no longer being used. Processes generally attach hReadPipe and hWritePipe – HANDLE for FIFO to the named pipes (usually appearing as a file) to perform inter- read/write functions. nSize – FIFO buffer size. process communication (IPC). As you see from this definition, the lpPipeAttributes – to set binary/massage mode, by default – main purpose of this concept is to organize multithread and binary. multiprocessors interaction, but also you can use PIPEs as very efficient FIFO buffers managed by OS. In this article we will demonstrate how to use it in this mode to provide software E1 synchronization and resynchronization module. II. E1 BASE SYNCHRONIZATION PRINCIPLES In accordance to ITU-T G.704(E1) bits 1 to 8 of the both frame types (frame containing the frame alignment signal - Yuriy Dororzhovets, Mykhailo Klymash - Lviv Polytechnic National University , S. Bandery Str., 12, Lviv, 79013, UKRAINE, E-mail: [email protected] Fig.2 Base PIPE read algorithm. TCSET'2012, February 21–24, 2012, Lviv-Slavske, Ukraine Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository http://ena.lp.edu.ua 370 . When working with this concept bandwidthit’s very The obtained results are shown on the Fig. 4 and Fig. 5: important to know that starting from Windows XP it is required to control PIPE read side, because Microsoft make some undocumented changes in to PIPE logic and according to this changes all read function must control read size by algorithm. Another PIPE feature – blocking (by default), require read and write counters to avoid thread blocking during read from empty PIPE. IV. ALGORITHM DESCRIPTION Signal monitoring requires two threads, one realize write to FIFO function, another read and provide search/monitoring logic. When we have some E1 input, read write thread will call function what provide write frames to our FIFO buffer, Fig. 4 Output rate in different sync loss ps level. size of this buffer must be enough to compensate time wasted by search logic. In the first cycle read thread provide read 256 bytes (8 frames (4 FAS frames)) from FIFO using base PIPE read algorithm and search for 3 times FAS signal code sequence much in period from 2 to 32 bytes by step in 2 bytes, this way is very important to avoid wrong sequence detection in fractional E1. After this program will obtain E1 period and copy all good at least 6 good frames to output FIFO buffer. If period not detected drop all data, read new portion, and start from the beginning. Fig.5 Random sync loss ps level. All research where provide in correct limits. This mean that to high level of the sync loss per second is uninteresting, because data recovery at these conditions can’t take place. VI. CONCLUSION This work described a simple E1 synchronization algorithm designed for software implementation at Windows PC using PIPE concept. After offered results of the performance research and demonstrated no linear dependence Fig. 3 E1 synchronization algorithm. of the algorithm performance and FAS loos frequency. Output Next depending to the input parameter (MismatchCounter) stream rate, and quality various directly proportional. program will monitor stream for detection of sequent Maximum algorithm performance in condition from 1 to 5 MismatchCounter loss of the FAS. To perform better algorithm FAS loos per second is more than 140Mbps, and this is flexibility proposed to use byte weight table, to avoid wrong equivalent to 70 parallel E1. So, proposed algorithm provides starting of the FAS search module. If detected loss of the FAS then opportunity to create software processing units with good call search module to detect new position of the FAS sequence and performance. loop monitoring again. All good frames during this process must be copied to output FIFO and read from it each 64 bytes (one FAS VII. REFERENCE + one NFAS frame). MismatchCounter in accordance to ITU-T recommendation is from 2 to 4, but it can be lager for some types [1] ITU-T G.704 Synchronous frame structures used at 1544, of traffic. 6312, 2048, 8448 and 44 736 kbit/s hierarchical levels 10.1998. [Electronic resource] http://www.itu.int/rec/T- REC-G.704/en V. ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE RESEARCH. It’s performed a research of output E1 speed limit [2] Microsoft developers network [Electronic resource] according to input stream synchronization loss. Research http://msdn.microsoft.com consist of the two parts, first linear sync loss and second – [3] ITU-T G.706 frame alignment and cyclicre dundancy random sync loss. All research provided at Windows PC check (CRC) procedures relating to basic frame structures based on Intel Core i3 3GHz processor. TCSET'2012, February 21–24, 2012, Lviv-Slavske, Ukraine Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository http://ena.lp.edu.ua.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inter-Process Communication, Analysis, Guidelines and Its Impact on Computer Security
    The 7th International Conference for Informatics and Information Technology (CIIT 2010) INTER-PROCESS COMMUNICATION, ANALYSIS, GUIDELINES AND ITS IMPACT ON COMPUTER SECURITY Zoran Spasov Ph.D. Ana Madevska Bogdanova T-Mobile Macedonia Institute of Informatics, FNSM Skopje, Macedonia Skopje, Macedonia ABSTRACT Finally the conclusion will offer a summary of the available programming techniques and implementations for the In this paper we look at the inter-process communication Windows platforms. We will note the security risks and the (IPC) also known as inter-thread or inter-application best practices to avoid them. communication from other knowledge sources. We will look and analyze the different types of IPC in the Microsoft II. INTER -PROCESS COMMUNICATION (IPC) Windows operating system, their implementation and the usefulness of this kind of approach in the terms of Inter-Process Communication (IPC) stands for many communication between processes. Only local techniques for the exchange of data among threads in one or implementation of the IPC will be addressed in this paper. more processes - one-directional or two-directional. Processes Special emphasis will be given to the system mechanisms that may be running locally or on many different computers are involved with the creation, management, and use of connected by a network. We can divide the IPC techniques named pipes and sockets. into groups of methods, grouped by their way of This paper will discuss some of the IPC options and communication: message passing, synchronization, shared techniques that are available to Microsoft Windows memory and remote procedure calls (RPC). We should programmers. We will make a comparison between Microsoft carefully choose the IPC method depending on data load that remoting and Microsoft message queues (pros and cons).
    [Show full text]
  • CS 5600 Computer Systems
    CS 5600 Computer Systems Lecture 4: Programs, Processes, and Threads • Programs • Processes • Context Switching • Protected Mode Execution • Inter-process Communication • Threads 2 Running Dynamic Code • One basic function of an OS is to execute and manage code dynamically, e.g.: – A command issued at a command line terminal – An icon double clicked from the desktop – Jobs/tasks run as part of a batch system (MapReduce) • A process is the basic unit of a program in execution 3 Programs and Processes Process The running instantiation of a program, stored in RAM Program An executable file in long-term One-to-many storage relationship between program and processes 4 How to Run a Program? • When you double-click on an .exe, how does the OS turn the file on disk into a process? • What information must the .exe file contain in order to run as a program? 5 Program Formats • Programs obey specific file formats – CP/M and DOS: COM executables (*.com) – DOS: MZ executables (*.exe) • Named after Mark Zbikowski, a DOS developer – Windows Portable Executable (PE, PE32+) (*.exe) • Modified version of Unix COFF executable format • PE files start with an MZ header. – Mac OSX: Mach object file format (Mach-O) – Unix/Linux: Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) • designed to be flexible and extensible • all you need to know to load and start execution regardless of architecture 6 ABI - Application Binary Interface • interface between 2 programs at the binary (machine code) level – informally, similar to API but on bits and bytes • Calling conventions –
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Process: a Process Partially Sharing Its Address Space with Other Processes
    Electronic Preprint for Journal of Information Processing Vol.20 No.1 Regular Paper Half-process: A Process Partially Sharing Its Address Space with Other Processes Kentaro Hara1,a) Kenjiro Taura1 Received: March 31, 2011, Accepted: September 12, 2011 Abstract: Threads share a single address space with each other. On the other hand, a process has its own address space. Since whether to share or not to share the address space depends on each data structure in the whole program, the choice of “a thread or a process” for the whole program is too much “all-or-nothing.” With this motivation, this paper proposes a half-process, a process partially sharing its address space with other processes. This paper describes the design and the kernel-level implementation of the half-process and discusses the potential applicability of the half-process for multi-thread programming with thread-unsafe libraries, intra-node communications in parallel pro- gramming frameworks and transparent kernel-level thread migration. In particular, the thread migration based on the half-process is the first work that achieves transparent kernel-level thread migration by solving the problem of sharing global variables between threads. Keywords: partitioned global address space, Linux kernel, thread migration, finite element method, reconfiguration, productivity 1. Introduction Threads share a single address space with each other. When one thread issues memory operations such as mmap()/munmap()/mprotect(), all threads can see the ef- fects immediately. When one thread updates a memory address, Fig. 1 The design of a half-process. all threads can see the update immediately. In addition, all programmer can enjoy both advantages of process and thread, threads can access the same data with the same address.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux/Unix Inter-Process Communication
    Mohammad S. Hasan Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology Linux/Unix inter-process communication Mohammad S. Hasan Staffordshire University, UK Linux/Unix inter-process communication Slide 1 Mohammad S. Hasan Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology Lecture Outline Inter-process communication methods in Linux/Unix Files Pipes FIFOs Signals Sockets System V IPC - semaphores, messages, shared memory Linux/Unix inter-process communication Slide 2 Mohammad S. Hasan Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology Interprocess communication (IPC) There are many interprocess communication mechanisms in UNIX and Linux Each mechanism has its own system calls, advantages and disadvantages Files, pipes, FIFOs, signals, semaphores, messages, shared memory, sockets, streams We will look a number of them Linux/Unix inter-process communication Slide 3 Mohammad S. Hasan Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology Interprocess communication (IPC) (Cont.) Linux/Unix inter-process communication Slide 4 Mohammad S. Hasan Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology Files These can handle simple IPC but have 2 P1 main problems for serious IPC work: Writer if reader faster than writer, then reader reads EOF, but cannot tell whether it has simply caught up with writer or writer has File …. completed (synchronisation problem) …. …. writer only writes to end of file, thus files EOF can grow very large for long lived processes (disk/memory space problem) P2 Reader Linux/Unix inter-process communication Slide 5 Mohammad S. Hasan Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology Pipes You should already be familiar with pipe from practical exercises e.g. who | sort This sets up a one directional pipeline that takes the output from ‘who’ and gives it as input to ‘sort’ Linux/Unix inter-process communication Slide 6 Mohammad S.
    [Show full text]
  • System Calls & Signals
    CS345 OPERATING SYSTEMS System calls & Signals Panagiotis Papadopoulos [email protected] 1 SYSTEM CALL When a program invokes a system call, it is interrupted and the system switches to Kernel space. The Kernel then saves the process execution context (so that it can resume the program later) and determines what is being requested. The Kernel carefully checks that the request is valid and that the process invoking the system call has enough privilege. For instance some system calls can only be called by a user with superuser privilege (often referred to as root). If everything is good, the Kernel processes the request in Kernel Mode and can access the device drivers in charge of controlling the hardware (e.g. reading a character inputted from the keyboard). The Kernel can read and modify the data of the calling process as it has access to memory in User Space (e.g. it can copy the keyboard character into a buffer that the calling process has access to) When the Kernel is done processing the request, it restores the process execution context that was saved when the system call was invoked, and control returns to the calling program which continues executing. 2 SYSTEM CALLS FORK() 3 THE FORK() SYSTEM CALL (1/2) • A process calling fork()spawns a child process. • The child is almost an identical clone of the parent: • Program Text (segment .text) • Stack (ss) • PCB (eg. registers) • Data (segment .data) #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> pid_t fork(void); 4 THE FORK() SYSTEM CALL (2/2) • The fork()is one of the those system calls, which is called once, but returns twice! Consider a piece of program • After fork()both the parent and the child are ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Operating System Zoo 1.4 Computer Hardware Review 1.5 Operating System Concepts 1.6 System Calls 1.7 Operating System Structure 10.2 UNIX
    CS450/550 Operating Systems Lecture 1 Introductions to OS and Unix Palden Lama Department of Computer Science CS450/550 P&T.1 UC. Colorado Springs Adapted from MOS2E Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 What is an operating system 1.2 History of operating systems 1.3 The operating system zoo 1.4 Computer hardware review 1.5 Operating system concepts 1.6 System calls 1.7 Operating system structure 10.2 UNIX CS450/550 P&T.2 UC. Colorado Springs Adapted from MOS2E Introduction Operating Systems Instruction Set Architecture ° A computer system consists of • hardware • system programs • application programs CS450/550 P&T.3 UC. Colorado Springs Adapted from MOS2E What is an Operating System ° It is an extended machine • Hides the messy details which must be performed • Presents user with a virtual machine, easier to use • Protection domain ° It is a resource manager • Each program gets time with the resource, e.g., CPU • Each program gets space on the resource, e.g., MEM CS450/550 P&T.4 UC. Colorado Springs Adapted from MOS2E Layers of a Computer System CS450/550 P&T.5 UC. Colorado Springs Adapted from MOS2E Services Provided by the OS ° Program development - editors and debuggers ° Program execution ° Access to I/O devices ° Controlled access to files ° System access ° Error detection and response ° Accounting CS450/550 P&T.6 UC. Colorado Springs Adapted from MOS2E OS as a Resource Manager CS450/550 P&T.7 UC. Colorado Springs Adapted from MOS2E Kernel ° Portion of operating system that is in main memory ° Contains most-frequently used functions ° Protected from user tampering by the hardware Are compilers and editors part of an OS? Why? user Trap (system calls) kernel CS450/550 P&T.8 UC.
    [Show full text]
  • Posix Table of Contents
    POSIX #posix Table of Contents About 1 Chapter 1: Getting started with POSIX 2 Versions 2 Examples 2 What is POSIX? 2 Hello World 3 Compiling and running 3 Chapter 2: File locks 5 Syntax 5 Examples 5 POSIX record locks (fcntl) 5 lockf function 6 Chapter 3: Filesystem 8 Examples 8 Count number of text files in the directory 8 Remove files recursively (nftw, not thread-safe) 8 Remove files recursively (openat and unlinkat, thread-safe) 9 Chapter 4: Input/Output multiplexing 12 Introduction 12 Examples 12 Poll 12 Select 13 Chapter 5: Pipes 15 Introduction 15 Examples 15 Basic creation and usage 15 Establishing a pipe to a child process 16 Connecting two child processes via a pipe 17 Creating a shell-style pipeline 18 Chapter 6: Processes 20 Syntax 20 Parameters 20 Examples 20 Create child process and wait until it exits 20 Chapter 7: Signals 23 Syntax 23 Parameters 23 Examples 23 Raising SIGALARM with the default action 23 Setting signal handler using sigaction and raising signals using raise 24 A process committing suicide using kill() 26 Handle SIGPIPE generated by write() in a thread-safe manner 27 Chapter 8: Sockets 30 Examples 30 TCP Concurrent Echo Server 30 Enabling TCP keepalive at server side 32 TCP Daytime Iterative Server 34 TCP Daytime Client 35 Socket basics 35 Entire program 36 Creating IPv4 endpoint 37 TCP server snippet 37 TCP client snippet 38 UDP server snippet 38 Accepting connections on a blocking socket 39 Connecting to a remote host 40 Reading and writing on a blocking socket 40 Chapter 9: Threads 42 Examples 42 Simple Thread without Arguments 42 Simple Mutex Usage 43 Chapter 10: Timers 48 Examples 48 POSIX Timer with SIGEV_THREAD notification 48 Credits 50 About You can share this PDF with anyone you feel could benefit from it, downloaded the latest version from: posix It is an unofficial and free POSIX ebook created for educational purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Interprocess Communication with Java in a Microsoft Windows Environment
    SACJ 29(3) December 2017 Research Article Interprocess communication with Java in a Microsoft Windows Environment Dylan Smith, George Wells Department of Computer Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa ABSTRACT The Java programming language provides a comprehensive set of multithreading programming techniques but currently lacks interprocess communication (IPC) facilities, other than slow socket-based communication mechanisms (which are intended primarily for distributed systems, not interprocess communication on a multicore or multiprocessor system). This is problematic due to the ubiquity of modern multicore processors, and the widespread use of Java as a programming language throughout the software development industry. This work aimed to address this problem by utilising Microsoft Windows’ native IPC mechanisms through a framework known as the Java Native Interface. This enabled the use of native C code that invoked the IPC mechanisms provided by Windows, which allowed successful synchronous communication between separate Java processes. The results obtained illustrate the performance dichotomy between socket-based communication and native IPC facilities, with Windows’ facilities providing significantly faster communication. Ultimately, these results show that there are far more effective communication structures available. In addition, this work presents generic considerations that may aid in the eventual design of a generic, platform-independent IPC system for the Java programming language. The fundamental considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Filesystem on Unix / POSIX
    Filesystem on Unix / POSIX [email protected] CRIStAL, Université Lille Year 2020-2021 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Process [email protected] Filesystem 1 / 55 Normalisation of the interface Unix: Operating system, Ken Thompson and Denis Ritchie, Bell Labs, 1969, Source code distributed, Several versions. POSIX: Portable Open System Interface eXchange, Portable Open System Interface X for Unix, Standard IEEE, 1985, Standardized interface of what the system has to offer. One POSIX function = one Unix system call. [email protected] Filesystem 2 / 55 System programmation: the C language is natural A good programming language: good semantic, efficient, access to all the computer structures (registers, bits. ), explicit allocation memory. Natural interface with the system: Libraries are written in C, One can use them from C Other approaches are possible ! [email protected] Filesystem 3 / 55 Libraries and system call System call similar at using a library’s function. Standard C library: section 3 of man POSIX functions: section 2 of man Other differences: No link edition, System code execution, Standard libraries are a higher level abstraction. Important: one system call ≈ 1000 op. ! minimize them ! [email protected] Filesystem 4 / 55 Files: persistent memory used to store data (“for good”), managed by the system: structure, naming, access, protection. filesystem is part of the OS. dissociation OS / Filesystem (e.g., Linux can mount NTFS) Unix approach: “everything” is a file [email protected] Filesystem 5 / 55 Filesystem: a graph organisation with nodes root home bin directory tmp .
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Notes on Linux Programming (R17a0525)
    DIGITAL NOTES ON LINUX PROGRAMMING (R17A0525) B.TECH III YEAR - I SEM (2019-20) DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MALLA REDDY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (Autonomous Institution – UGC, Govt. of India) (Affiliated to JNTUH, Hyderabad, Approved by AICTE - Accredited by NBA & NAAC – ‘A’ Grade - ISO 9001:2015 Certified) Maisammaguda, Dhulapally (Post Via. Hakimpet), Secunderabad – 500100, Telangana State, INDIA. Linux Programming Page 1 MALLA REDDY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY III Year B.Tech IT – I Sem L T /P/D C 4 - / - / - 4 (R17A0525)LINUX PROGRAMMING Objectives: To develop the skills necessary for Unix systems programming including file system programming, process and signal management, and interprocess communication. To make effective use of Unix utilities and Shell scripting language such as bash. To develop the basic skills required to write network programs using Sockets. UNIT I Linux Utilities-File handling utilities, Security by file permissions, Process utilities, Disk utilities, Networking commands, Filters, Text processing utilities and Backup utilities. Sed-Scripts, Operation, Addresses. Awk- Execution, Fields and Records, Scripts, Operation, Patterns, Actions. Shell programming with Bourne again shell(bash)- Introduction, shell responsibilities, pipes and Redirection, here documents, running a shell script, the shell as a programming language, shell meta characters, file name substitution, shell variables, shell commands, the environment, quoting, test command, control structures, arithmetic in shell, shell script examples. UNIT II Files and Directories- File Concept, File types, File System Structure, file metadata- Inodes, kernel support for files, system calls for file I/O operations- open, create, read, write, close, lseek, dup2,file status information-stat family, file and record locking-lockf and fcntl functions, file permissions - chmod, fchmod, file ownership- chown, lchown, fchown, links-soft links and hard links – symlink, link, unlink.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Message Passing
    System Architecture 10 Message Passing IPC Design & Implementation, IPC Application, IPC Examples December 01 2008 Winter Term 2008/09 Gerd Liefländer 2008 Universität Karlsruhe (TH), System Architecture Group 1 Introduction Agenda Motivation/Introduction Message Passing Model Elementary IPC Design Parameters for IPC Synchronization Addressing Modes Lifetime Data Transfer Types of Activations (your work) High Level IPC IPC Applications IPC Examples 2008 Universität Karlsruhe (TH), System Architecture Group 2 Motivation 2008 Universität Karlsruhe (TH), System Architecture Group 3 Motivation Yet another Concept? 1. Previous mechanisms relied on shared memory all these solutions do not work in distributed systems 2. Threads of different applications need protection even in systems with a common RAM, because you do not want to open your protected AS for another cooperating non trusted piece of software 3. To minimize kernels some architects only offer IPC to solve communication problems as well as all synchronization problems 4. However, the opposite way also works, i.e. you can use semaphores to implement a message passing system 2008 Universität Karlsruhe (TH), System Architecture Group 4 Motivation Message Passing Used for Inter-“Process” Communication (IPC) Interacting threads within a distributed system Interacting threads within the same computer Interacting threads within the same address space WtdilitdiWe expect a decreasing complexity and vice versa an increasing speedup when implementing IPC Application: Exchange
    [Show full text]
  • Hardware for Embedded Linux
    Mastering Embedded Linux Programming Harness the power of Linux to create versatile and robust embedded solutions Chris Simmonds BIRMINGHAM - MUMBAI Mastering Embedded Linux Programming Copyright © 2015 Packt Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embedded in critical articles or reviews. Every effort has been made in the preparation of this book to ensure the accuracy of the information presented. However, the information contained in this book is sold without warranty, either express or implied. Neither the author, nor Packt Publishing, and its dealers and distributors will be held liable for any damages caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by this book. Packt Publishing has endeavored to provide trademark information about all of the companies and products mentioned in this book by the appropriate use of capitals. However, Packt Publishing cannot guarantee the accuracy of this information. First published: December 2015 Production reference: 1181215 Published by Packt Publishing Ltd. Livery Place 35 Livery Street Birmingham B3 2PB, UK. ISBN 978-1-78439-253-6 www.packtpub.com Credits Author Copy Editor Chris Simmonds Kevin McGowan Reviewers Project Coordinator Robert Berger Sanchita Mandal Tim Bird Mathieu Deschamps Proofreader Safis Editing Mark Furman Klaas van Gend Indexer Behan Webster Priya Sane Commissioning Editor Production Coordinator Kartikey Pandey Manu Joseph Acquisition Editor Cover Work Sonali Vernekar Manu Joseph Content Development Editor Samantha Gonsalves Technical Editor Dhiraj Chandanshive Foreword Linux is an extremely flexible and powerful operating system and I suspect we've yet to truly see it used to full advantage in the embedded world.
    [Show full text]