DOCSLIB.ORG

Immigration and Nationality Act *

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Immigration and Nationality Act * * This version of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is current as of December 2002, with the exception of Sections 213A - 241, which are current as of March 2004. Users are advised not to rely solely on this version, and should visit the US Citizenship and Immigraion Service website (www.uscis.gov) to access the most current copy of the INA. IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT Acronyms used in footnote text INA: TITLE I ACT 101 Definitions ACT 102 Applicability of Title II to certain Nonimmigrants ACT 103 Powers and duties of the Attorney General and the Commissioner. ACT 104 Powers and duties of the Secretary of State ACT 105 Liaison with internal security officers. ACT 106 Repealed INA: TITLE II -- IMMIGRATION CHAPTER 1 - SELECTION SYSTEM ACT 201 Worldwide level of immigration. ACT 202 Numerical limitation to any single foreign state. ACT 203 Allocation of immigrant visas. ACT 204 Procedure for granting immigrant status. ACT 205 Revocation of approval of petitions. ACT 206 Unused immigrant visas. ACT 207 Annual admission of refugees and admission of emergency situation refugees. ACT 208 Asylum ACT 209 Adjustment of status of refugees. ACT 210 Special agricultural workers. ACT 210A Repealed CHAPTER 2 -- QUALIFICATIONS FOR ADMISSION OF ALIENS; TRAVEL CONTROL OF CITIZENS AND ALIENS ACT 211 Documentary requirements. ACT 212 General classes of aliens ineligible to receive visas and ineligible for admission; waivers of inadmissibility. ACT 213 Admission of certain aliens on giving bond. ACT 213A Requirements for sponsor's affidavit of support. ACT 214 Admission of nonimmigrants. ACT 215 Travel documentation of aliens and citizens. ACT 216 Conditional permanent resident status for certain alien spouses and sons and daughters. ACT 216A Conditional permanent resident status for certain alien entrepreneurs, spouses, and children. ACT 217 Visa waiver program for certain visitors. ACT 218 Admission of temporary H - 2A workers. ACT 219 Designation of foreign terrorist organization CHAPTER 3 -- ISSUANCE OF ENTRY DOCUMENTS ACT 221 Issuance of visas. ACT 222 Applications for visas. ACT 223 Reentry permits. ACT 224 Immediate relative and special immigrant visas. CHAPTER 4 -- INSPECTION, APPREHENSION, EXAMINATION, EXCLUSION, AND REMOVAL ACT 231 Lists of alien and citizen passengers arriving or departing; record of resident aliens and citizens leaving permanently for foreign country. ACT 232 Detention of aliens for observation and examination. ACT 233 Entry through or form foreign territory and adjacent islands; landing stations. ACT 234 Designation of ports of entry for aliens arriving by civil aircraft. ACT 235 Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing. ACT 235A Preinspection at foreign airports. ACT 236 Apprehension and detention of aliens. ACT 236A Mandatory Detention of Suspected Terrorists; Habeas Corpus; Judicial Review ACT 237 General classes of deportable aliens. ACT 238 Expedited removal of aliens convicted of committing aggravated felonies. ACT 239 Initiation of removal proceedings. ACT 240 Removal proceedings ACT 240A Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status. ACT 240B Voluntary departure. ACT 240C Records of admission. ACT 241 Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed. ACT 242 Judicial review of orders of removal ACT 242A Redesignated ACT 242B Repealed ACT 243 Penalties related to removal ACT 244 Temporary protected status CHAPTER 5 -- ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS ACT 245 Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence. ACT 245A Adjustment of status of certain entrants before January 1, 1982, to that of person admitted for lawful residence ACT 246 Rescission of adjustment of status ACT 247 Adjustment of status of certain resident aliens to nonimmigrant status ACT 248 Change of nonimmigrant classification ACT 249 Record of admission for permanent residence in the case of certain aliens who entered the United States prior to July 1, 1924 or January 1, 1972 ACT 250 Removal of aliens who have fallen into distress CHAPTER 6 -- SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO ALIEN CREWMEN ACT 251 Lists of alien crewmen; reports of illegal landings ACT 252 Conditional permits to land temporarily ACT 253 Hospital treatment of alien crewmen afflicted with certain diseases ACT 254 Control of alien crewmen ACT 255 Employment on passenger vessels of aliens afflicted with certain disabilities ACT 256 Discharge of alien crewmen ACT 257 Bringing alien crewmen into United States with intent to evade immigration laws ACT 258 Limitations on performance of longshore work by alien crewmen CHAPTER 7 -- REGISTRATION OF ALIENS ACT 261 Aliens seeking entry into the United States ACT 262 Registration of aliens in the United States ACT 263 Provisions governing registration of special groups ACT 264 Forms and procedure ACT 265 Notices of change of address ACT 266 Penalties CHAPTER 8 -- GENERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS ACT 271 Prevention of unauthorized landing of aliens ACT 272 Bringing in aliens subject to exclusion on a health-related ground ACT 273 Unlawful bringing of aliens into United States ACT 274 Bringing in and harboring certain aliens ACT 274A Unlawful employment of aliens ACT 274B Unfair immigration-related employment practices ACT 274C Penalties for document fraud ACT 274D Civil penalties for failure to depart ACT 275 Entry of alien at improper time or place; misrepresentation and concealment of facts ACT 276 Reentry of removed alien ACT 277 Aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States ACT 278 Importation of alien for immoral purpose ACT 279 Jurisdiction of district courts ACT 280 Collection of penalties and expenses CHAPTER 9 -- MISCELLANEOUS ACT 281 Nonimmigrant visa fees ACT 282 Printing of reentry permits and blank forms of manifests and crew lists ACT 283 Travel expenses and expense of transporting remains of immigration officers and employees who die outside of the United States ACT 284 Members of the Armed Forces ACT 285 Disposal of privileges at immigrant stations ACT 286 Disposition of moneys collected under the provisions of this title ACT 287 Powers of immigration officers and employees ACT 288 Local jurisdiction over immigrant stations ACT 289 American Indians born in Canada ACT 290 Central file; information from other departments and agencies ACT 291. Burden of proof ACT 292 Right to counsel ACT 293 Deposit of and interest on cash received to secure immigration bonds ACT 294 Undercover investigation authority ACT 295 Transportation of remains of immigration officers and border patrol agents killed in the line of duty INA: TITLE III CHAPTER 1 -- NATIONALITY AT BIRTH AND BY COLLECTIVE NATURALIZATION ACT 301 Nationals and citizens of the United States at birth ACT 302 Persons born in Puerto Rico ACT 303 Persons born in the Canal Zone or Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904 ACT 304 Persons born in Alaska on or after March 30, 1867 ACT 305 Persons born in Hawaii ACT 306 Persons living in and born in the Virgin Islands ACT 307 Persons living in and born in Guam ACT 308 Nationals but not citizens of the United States at birth ACT 309 Children born out of wedlock CHAPTER 2 -- NATIONALITY THROUGH NATURALIZATION ACT 310 Naturalization authority ACT 311 Eligibility for naturalization ACT 312 Requirements as to understanding the English language, history, principles and form of government of the United States ACT 313 Prohibition upon the naturalization of persons opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government ACT 314 Ineligibility to naturalization of deserters from the Armed Forces of the United States ACT 315 Alien relieved from training and service in the Armed Forces of the United States because of alienage barred from citizenship ACT 316 Requirements as to residence, good moral character, attachment to the principles of the Constitution, and favorable disposition to the United States ACT 317 Temporary absence of persons performing religious duties ACT 318 Prerequisites to naturalization -- burden of proof ACT 319 Married persons and employees of certain nonprofit organizations ACT 320 Children born outside the United States and residing permanently in the United States; conditions under which citizenship automatically acquired ACT 321 [Repealed] ACT 322 Children born and residing outside the United States; conditions for acquiring certificate of citizenship ACT 323 Repealed ACT 324 Former citizens of United States regaining United States citizenship ACT 325 Nationals but not citizens of the United States; residence within outlying possessions ACT 326 Resident Philippine citizens excepted from certain requirements ACT 327 Former United States citizens losing citizenship by entering the armed forces of foreign countries during World War II ACT 328 Naturalization through service in the Armed Forces of the United States ACT 329 Naturalization through active-duty service in the Armed Forces during World War I, World War II, the Korean hostilities, the Vietnam hostilities, or in other periods of military hostilities ACT 329A Posthumous citizenship through death while on active-duty service in the armed forces during World War I, World War II, the Korean hostilities, the Vietnam hostilities, or in other periods of military hostilities ACT 330 Constructive residence through service on certain United States vessels ACT 331 Alien enemies; naturalization under specified conditions and procedure ACT 332 Procedural and administrative provisions; executive functions
Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany

    Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany

    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
  • IMMIGRATION LAW BASICS How Does the United States Immigration System Work?

    IMMIGRATION LAW BASICS How Does the United States Immigration System Work?

    IMMIGRATION LAW BASICS How does the United States immigration system work? Multiple agencies are responsible for the execution of immigration laws. o The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) was abolished in 2003. o Department of Homeland Security . USCIS . CBP . ICE . Attorney General’s role o Department of Justice . EOIR . Attorney General’s role o Department of State . Consulates . Secretary of State’s role o Department of Labor . Employment‐related immigration Our laws, while historically pro‐immigration, have become increasingly restrictive and punitive with respect to noncitizens – even those with lawful status. ‐ Pro‐immigration history of our country o First 100 Years: 1776‐1875 ‐ Open door policy. o Act to Encourage Immigration of 1864 ‐ Made employment contracts binding in an effort to recruit foreign labor to work in factories during the Civil War. As some states sought to restrict immigration, the Supreme Court declared state laws regulating immigration unconstitutional. ‐ Some early immigration restrictions included: o Act of March 3, 1875: excluded convicts and prostitutes o Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882: excluded persons from China (repealed in 1943) o Immigration Act of 1891: Established the Bureau of Immigration. Provided for medical and general inspection, and excluded people based on contagious diseases, crimes involving moral turpitude and status as a pauper or polygamist ‐ More big changes to the laws in the early to mid 20th century: o 1903 Amendments: excluded epileptics, insane persons, professional beggars, and anarchists. o Immigration Act of 1907: excluded feeble minded persons, unaccompanied children, people with TB, mental or physical defect that might affect their ability to earn a living.
  • Race, Religion and Nationality in Immigration Selection: 120 Years After the Chinese Exclusion Case Liav Orgad

    Race, Religion and Nationality in Immigration Selection: 120 Years After the Chinese Exclusion Case Liav Orgad

    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 2010 Race, Religion and Nationality in Immigration Selection: 120 Years After the Chinese Exclusion Case Liav Orgad Theodore Ruthizer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Orgad, Liav and Ruthizer, Theodore, "Race, Religion and Nationality in Immigration Selection: 120 Years After the Chinese Exclusion Case" (2010). Constitutional Commentary. 635. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/635 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Article RACE, RELIGION AND NATIONALITY IN IMMIGRATION SELECTION: 120 YEARS AFTER THE CHINESE EXCLUSION CASE Liav Orgad* Theodore Ruthizer** INTRODUCTION 120 years ago, in May 1889, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that "the power of exclusion of foreigners being an incident of sovereignty ... cannot be granted away or restrained. "1 Sixty years later, in January 1950, at the height of the Cold War, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the plenary power doctrine by holding that "it is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by law, to review the determination of the political branch of the Government to exclude a given alien."2 Another sixty years have passed and more recently, in February 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that "a nation-state has the inherent right to exclude or admit foreigners * Radzyner School of Law.
  • RACIAL EQUALITY BILL: JAPANESE PROPOSAL at PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE: DIPLOMATIC MANOEUVRES; and REASONS for REJECTION by Shizuka

    RACIAL EQUALITY BILL: JAPANESE PROPOSAL at PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE: DIPLOMATIC MANOEUVRES; and REASONS for REJECTION by Shizuka

    RACIAL EQUALITY BILL: JAPANESE PROPOSAL AT PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE: DIPLOMATIC MANOEUVRES; AND REASONS FOR REJECTION By Shizuka Imamoto B.A. (Hiroshima Jogakuin University, Japan), Graduate Diploma in Language Teaching (University of Technology Sydney, Australia) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (Honours) at Macquarie University. Japanese Studies, Department of Asian Languages, Division of Humanities, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney Australia. 2006 DECLARATION I declare that the present research work embodied in the thesis entitled, Racial Equality Bill: Japanese Proposal At Paris Peace Conference: Diplomatic Manoeuvres; And Reasons For Rejection was carried out by the author at Macquarie Japanese Studies Centre of Macquarie University of Sydney, Australia during the period February 2003 to February 2006. This work has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other university or institution. Any published and unpublished materials of other writers and researchers have been given full acknowledgement in the text. Shizuka Imamoto ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iii SUMMARY ix DEDICATION x ACKNOWLEDGEMENT xi INTRODUCTION 1 1. Area Of Study 1 2. Theme, Principal Question, And Objective Of Research 5 3. Methodology For Research 5 4. Preview Of The Results Presented In The Thesis 6 End Notes 9 CHAPTER ONE ANGLO-JAPANESE RELATIONS AND WORLD WAR ONE 11 Section One: Anglo-Japanese Alliance 12 1. Role Of Favourable Public Opinion In Britain And Japan 13 2. Background Of Anglo-Japanese Alliance 15 3. Negotiations And Signing Of Anglo-Japanese Alliance 16 4. Second Anglo-Japanese Alliance 17 5. Third Anglo-Japanese Alliance 18 Section Two: Japan’s Involvement In World War One 19 1.
  • REINSTATEMENT of REMOVAL by Trina Realmuto 2

    REINSTATEMENT of REMOVAL by Trina Realmuto 2

    PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 REINSTATEMENT OF REMOVAL by Trina Realmuto 2 April 29, 2013 “Reinstatement of removal” is a summary removal procedure pursuant to § 241(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5), 8 C.F.R. § 241.8. With some statutory and judicial exceptions, discussed below, the reinstatement statute applies to noncitizens who return to the United States illegally after having been removed under a prior order of deportation, exclusion, or removal. Reinstatements generally account for more deportations than any other source.3 This practice advisory provides an overview of the reinstatement statute and implementing regulations, including how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issues and executes reinstatement orders. The advisory addresses who is covered by § 241(a)(5), where and how to obtain federal court and administrative review of reinstatement orders, and potential arguments to challenge reinstatement orders in federal court. Finally, the advisory includes a sample reinstatement order, a sample letter to DHS requesting a copy of the reinstatement order, a checklist for potential challenges to reinstatement orders, and an appendix of published reinstatement decisions. 1 Copyright (c) 2013, American Immigration Council and National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild. Click here for information on reprinting this practice advisory. This advisory is intended for lawyers and is not a substitute for independent legal advice provided by a lawyer familiar with a client’s case. Counsel should independently confirm whether the law in their circuit has changed since the date of this advisory. 2 Trina Realmuto is a Staff Attorney with the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild.
  • Government of the Republic of Lithuania

    Government of the Republic of Lithuania

    Official translation 5 September 2014 GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA RESOLUTION No 79 22 January 2014 ON THE APPROVAL OF THE LITHUANIAN MIGRATION POLICY GUIDELINES Vilnius Acting pursuant to Paragraph 346 of the Priority Measures for Implementation of the Government Programme for 2012-2016, approved by Resolution No 228 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania of 13 March 2013 on Approval of Priority Measures for Implementation of the Government Programme for 2012-2016, and with a view to establishing the objectives, principles and areas of the Lithuanian migration policy, as well as to ensuring proper management of migration processes, the Government of the Republic of Lithuanian has resolved: 1. To approve the Lithuanian Migration Policy Guidelines (as appended). 2. To establish that the provisions of the Lithuanian Immigration Policy Guidelines (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines) approved by the present Resolution shall be followed by ministries, Government institutions, institutions under the ministries, other national authorities and institutions accountable to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, as they make decisions falling within their respective competencies, draft legislation, consider proposals regarding the adoption of European Union legal acts, as well as draw up negotiation lines of the Republic of Lithuania on these proposals. 3. To recommend to municipalities and other national institutions and agencies, which are outside of the subordination of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, that they follow the provisions of the Guidelines. 4. To repeal: 4.1. Resolution No 957 of 24 September 2008 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on Approval of the Description of Monitoring, Analysis and Forecasting Procedures for Economic Migration Processes and the State of Lithuanians Living Abroad, with all its amendments; 4.2.
  • New York State DREAM Act Application

    New York State DREAM Act Application

    Step-by-Step User Guide to completing the New York State DREAM Act Application This user guide breaks down the New York State DREAM Act eligibility application and clarifies why certain questions are asked, how to answer each question accurately, and what documentation must be provided to verify your eligibility. Table of Contents Overview of Applications ........................................................................................................................... 3 The New York State DREAM Act Eligibility Requirements .............................................................. 3 NYS DREAM Act Application ................................................................................................................... 5 Student High School Education Details .............................................................................................. 5 High School Status ............................................................................................................................. 5 High School Completion .................................................................................................................... 7 Student Citizenship and Immigration Status ...................................................................................... 8 Social Security Number (SSN) or Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN): .............................. 10 Student Information .............................................................................................................................. 10 Student
  • Background Essay—The History of Immigration Law in the United States

    Background Essay—The History of Immigration Law in the United States

    HANDOUT A Background Essay—The History of Immigration Law in the United States Read the background essay and answer the critical thinking questions at the Directions: end. In addition, formulate your own questions about the content discussed. In the modern era, nation-states are defined as Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution much by their borders as by their unique laws, empowers the Congress to “Establish a forms of government, and distinct national Uniform Rule of Naturalization.” The first cultures. Since the early years of the United national law concerning immigration was the States’ history, the federal government has Naturalization Act of 1790, which stated that sought, with varying degrees of success, to limit any free white person who had resided in the and define the nature and scale of immigration U.S. for at least two years could apply for full into the country. In the first seventy years of the citizenship. Congress also required applicants nation’s history, immigration was left largely to demonstrate “good character” and swear an unchecked; Congress focused its attention oath to uphold the Constitution. Blacks were on defining the terms by which immigrants ineligible for citizenship. could gain the full legal rights of citizenship. In 1795, naturalization standards were Beginning in the 1880s, however, Congress began changed to require five years’ prior residence in to legislate on the national and ethnic makeup of the U.S., and again in 1798 to require 14 years’ immigrants. Lawmakers passed laws forbidding residence. The 1798 revision was passed amidst certain groups from entering the country, and the anti-French fervor of the Quasi-War and restricted the number of people who could enter sought to limit the influence of foreign-born from particular nations.
  • Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends

    Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends

    Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends Updated February 3, 2015 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43892 Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends Summary The ability to remove foreign nationals (aliens) who violate U.S. immigration law is central to the immigration enforcement system. Some lawful migrants violate the terms of their admittance, and some aliens enter the United States illegally, despite U.S. immigration laws and enforcement. In 2012, there were an estimated 11.4 million resident unauthorized aliens; estimates of other removable aliens, such as lawful permanent residents who commit crimes, are elusive. With total repatriations of over 600,000 people in FY2013—including about 440,000 formal removals—the removal and return of such aliens have become important policy issues for Congress, and key issues in recent debates about immigration reform. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides broad authority to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to remove certain foreign nationals from the United States, including unauthorized aliens (i.e., foreign nationals who enter without inspection, aliens who enter with fraudulent documents, and aliens who enter legally but overstay the terms of their temporary visas) and lawfully present foreign nationals who commit certain acts that make them removable. Any foreign national found to be inadmissible or deportable under the grounds specified in the INA may be ordered removed. The INA describes procedures for making and reviewing such a determination, and specifies conditions under which certain grounds of removal may be waived. DHS officials may exercise certain forms of discretion in pursuing removal orders, and certain removable aliens may be eligible for permanent or temporary relief from removal.
  • Immigration Act of 1924 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Immigration Act of 1924 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Immigration Act of 1924 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Immigration Act of 1924, or Johnson–Reed Act, including the National Origins Act, and Asian Exclusion Act (Pub.L. 68-139, 43 Stat. 153, enacted May 26, 1924), was a United States federal law that limited the annual number of immigrants who could be admitted from any country to 2% of the number of people from that country who were already living in the United States in 1890, down from the 3% cap set by the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, according to the Census of 1890. It superseded the 1921 Emergency Quota Act. The law was aimed at further restricting the Southern and Eastern Europeans, mainly Jews fleeing persecution in Poland and Russia, who were immigrating in large numbers starting in the 1890s, as well as prohibiting the immigration President Coolidge signs the of Middle Easterners, East Asians and Indians. According to the U.S. immigration act on the White House Department of State Office of the Historian, "In all its parts, the most basic South Lawn along with appropriation purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was to preserve the ideal of American bills for the Veterans Bureau. John J. homogeneity."[1] Congressional opposition was minimal. Pershing is on the President's right. Contents 1 Provisions 2 History 3 Results 4 See also 5 References 6 Sources 7 External links Provisions The Immigration Act made permanent the basic limitations on immigration into the United States established in 1921 and modified the National Origins Formula established then. In conjunction with the Immigration Act of 1917, it governed American immigration policy until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which revised it completely.
  • US Immigration

    US Immigration

    BUSHELL (DO NOT DELETE) 5/29/2013 2:45 PM “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses”—Just as Long as They Fit the Heteronormative Ideal: U.S. Immigration Law’s Exclusionary & Inequitable Treatment of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Queer Migrants Logan Bushell* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 674 II. IMMIGRATION & SEXUALITY: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF REGULATING SEXUALITY AT THE BORDER .......................................... 677 A. 1875-1917: Establishing a Foundational Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants .................................................... 678 B. 1917-1990: Adherence to the Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants ......................................................................... 680 III. REFUGE IN THE COURTHOUSE? THE JUDICIARY’S APPROACH TO EXCLUSIONARY IMMIGRATION LAWS & POLICIES .............................. 683 A. Boutilier v. INS: Not Welcome—The Judiciary’s Sanctioning of Exclusionary Immigration Laws & Policies ............................ 683 B. Hill v. INS: An Inclusionary Olive Branch from the Judiciary ... 685 IV. TWO STEPS FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK: PROGRESSIVE MEASURES PROVE MERELY PRETEXTUAL ........................................... 687 A. No Longer Categorically Excluded, but Certainly Not Included: Dismissing LGBTQ Persons from Family Unification ................................................................................... 687 B. Defense of Marriage Act: Deciding Exactly Who
  • Immigration Law and the Myth of Comprehensive Registration

    Immigration Law and the Myth of Comprehensive Registration

    Immigration Law and the Myth of Comprehensive Registration Nancy Morawetz†* and Natasha Fernández-Silber** This Article identifies an insidious misconception in immigration law and policy: the myth of comprehensive registration. According to this myth — proponents of which include members of the Supreme Court, federal and state officials, and commentators on both sides of the immigration federalism debate — there exists a comprehensive federal alien registration system; this scheme obligates all non-citizens in the United States to register and carry registration cards at all times, or else face criminal sanction. In truth, no such system exists today, nor has one ever existed in American history. Yet, federal agencies like U.S. Border Patrol refer to such a system to justify arrests and increase enforcement statistics; the Department of Justice points to the same mythic system to argue statutory preemption of state immigration laws (rather than confront the discriminatory purpose and effect of those laws); and, states trot it out in an attempt to turn civil immigration offenses into criminal infractions. Although this legal fiction is convenient for a variety of disparate political institutions, it is far from convenient for those who face wrongful arrest and detention based on nothing more than failure to carry proof of status. Individuals in states with aggressive “show me your papers” immigration laws or under the presence of U.S. Border Patrol are particularly at risk. In an effort to dispel this dangerous misconception, this Article reviews the history of America’s experimentation with registration laws and the † Copyright © 2014 Nancy Morawetz and Natasha Fernández-Silber.