United States District Court Western District of Michigan Southern Division

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States District Court Western District of Michigan Southern Division Case 1:20-cv-00948-PLM-PJG ECF No. 24 filed 10/13/20 PageID.3266 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RUTH JOHNSON, TERRI LYNN LAND and MARIAN SHERIDAN, Plaintiffs, No. 1:20-cv-00948 v HON. PAUL L. MALONEY JOCELYN BENSON, Secretary of State of the State of Michigan, in her official capacity, Defendant. Todd A. Dawson Heather S. Meingast (P55439) Baker & Hostetler LLP Erik A. Grill (P64713) Attorney for Plaintiffs Assistant Attorneys General Key Tower, 127 Public Square, Suite 2000 Attorneys for Defendant Cleveland, Ohio 44114 PO Box 30736 216.621.0200 Lansing, Michigan 48909 [email protected] 517.335.7659 [email protected] David B. Rivkin [email protected] Andrew M. Grossman Richard B. Raile Baker & Hostetler LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1050 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20036 / DEFENDANT MICHIGAN SECRETARY OF STATE JOCELYN BENSON’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Dana Nessel Attorney General Erik A. Grill (P64713) Heather S. Meingast (P55439) Case 1:20-cv-00948-PLM-PJG ECF No. 24 filed 10/13/20 PageID.3267 Page 2 of 34 Assistant Attorneys General Attorneys for Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson P.O. Box 30736 Lansing, Michigan 48909 517.335.7659 Email: [email protected] P64713 Dated: October 13, 2020 Case 1:20-cv-00948-PLM-PJG ECF No. 24 filed 10/13/20 PageID.3268 Page 3 of 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ i Index of Authorities ....................................................................................................... ii Concise Statement of Issue Presented .......................................................................... v Counter-Statement of Facts .......................................................................................... 1 Argument ....................................................................................................................... 5 I. Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction should be denied because Plaintiffs have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their constitutional claim or imminent irreparable harm. ................ 5 A. Preliminary injunction factors. ................................................................ 5 B. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated a strong likelihood of success on the merits of their constitutional and statutory claims. .................... 6 1. This Court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims under the Colorado River Abstention Doctrine. ...................................................................... 6 2. Alternatively, this Court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ constitutional and statutory claims under Gottfried v Medical Planning Services. ................ 11 3. Plaintiffs lack standing to bring this claim on a theory of vote-dilution. ................................................................................ 13 4. Plaintiffs are not likely to succeed on the merits of their constitutional and statutory claims. ........................................... 16 C. Plaintiffs cannot show an irreparable injury absent an injunction. ............................................................................................... 24 D. The balance of harms and the public interest weigh against granting the injunction. ......................................................................... 25 Conclusion and Relief Requested ................................................................................ 26 Certificate of Service .................................................................................................... 27 i Case 1:20-cv-00948-PLM-PJG ECF No. 24 filed 10/13/20 PageID.3269 Page 4 of 34 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Abney v. Amgen, Inc., 443 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2006) ................................................... 24 Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm’n, 576 U.S. 787 (2015) ......................................................................................................... 18 Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) ............................................................................. 14 Barden Detroit Casino L.L.C. v. City of Detroit, 59 F. Supp. 2d 641 (E.D. Mich. 1999) ............................................................................................................... 17 Baskin v. Bath Tp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 15 F.3d 569 (6th Cir. 1994) ..................... 7 Bates v. Van Buren Tp., 122 F. App'x 803 (6th Cir. 2004) ........................................... 7 Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899 (1997) ....................................................................... 17 Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000) ..................................................................... 17, 18, 20 Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd., 531 U.S. 70 (2000) ............................ 16 Carson v. Simon, No. 20-CV-2030, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188454 (D. Minn Oct. 11, 2020) ............................................................................................................ 15 Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network v. Tenke Corp., 511 F.3d 535 (6th Cir. 2007) .................................................................................................................. 24 Cf. Tennessee Scrap Recyclers Ass'n v. Bredesen, 556 F.3d 442 (6th Cir. 2009) ......... 5 Chabad of S. Ohio & Congregation Lubavitch v. City of Cincinnati, 363 F.3d 427 (6th Cir.2004) .................................................................................................... 25 Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976) ................................................................................................................ passim Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tenn., 274 F.3d 377 (6th Cir.2001) .......................................................................... 25 Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347 (1976) ........................................................................... 24 Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67 (1997) ......................................................................... 22, 23 G & V Lounge, Inc. v. Mich. Liquor Control Comm'n, 23 F.3d 1071 (6th Cir.1994) ................................................................................................................... 25 ii Case 1:20-cv-00948-PLM-PJG ECF No. 24 filed 10/13/20 PageID.3270 Page 5 of 34 Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018) ...................................................................... 14 Gottfried v. Med. Planning Servs., 142 F.3d 326 (6th Cir. 1998) ................... 11, 13, 25 Great Earth Cos. v. Simons, 288 F.3d 878 (6th Cir. 2002) ........................................... 7 Harrison v. NAACP, 360 U.S. 167 (1959) ................................................................... 12 Healthcare Co. v. Upward Mobility, Inc., 784 F. App'x 390 (6th Cir. 2019) ................ 7 Hoover v. Wagner, 47 F.3d 845 (7th Cir. 1995) ............................................................ 26 In re De Lorean Motor Co., 755 F.2d 1223 (6th Cir. 1985) ........................................... 6 Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLC, 630 F. Supp.2d 853 (S.D. Ohio 2008) .................................................................................................................. 6 Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co., 342 U.S. 180 (1952) ................... 11 Leary v. Daeschner, 228 F.3d 729 (6th Cir. 2000) ........................................................ 6 Maddox v. Board of State Cavanssers, 149 P.2d 112 (Mont. 1944) ........................... 23 McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892) .................................................................... 17 Millsaps v. Thompson, 259 F.3d 535 (6th Cir. 2001) ................................................. 22 Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1 (1983) ................... 9 NEOCH v. Blackwell, 467 F.3d 999 (6th Cir. 2006) ................................................... 16 Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009) ........................................................................... 25 Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner, 543 F.3d 357 (6th Cir. 2008) ............................. 16 PaineWebber, Inc. v. Cohen, 276 F.3d 197 (6th Cir. 2001) ........................................... 7 Romine v. Compuserve Corp., 160 F.3d 337 (6th Cir. 1998) .................................... 7, 9 Stenberg v. Cheker Oil Co., 573 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1978) ............................................ 6 Summit County Democratic Cent. & Exec Comm. v. Blackwell, 388 F.3d 547 (6th Cir. 2004) .......................................................................................................... 16 White v. Morris, 972 F.2d 350 (Table) (6th Cir. Aug. 6, 1992) ................................... 11 iii Case 1:20-cv-00948-PLM-PJG ECF No. 24 filed 10/13/20 PageID.3271 Page 6 of 34 Statutes Mich. Comp. Laws § 168.21 ........................................................................................... 5 Mich. Comp. Laws § 168.46 ......................................................................................... 22 Mich. Comp. Laws § 168.47 ......................................................................................... 22 Mich. Comp. Laws § 168.759b ..............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • EPIC-MRA Michigan Statewide
    EPIC▪MRA STATEWIDE POLL OF ACTIVE & LIKELY VOTERS [FREQUENCY REPORT OF SURVEY RESPONSES – 600 SAMPLE – ERROR ±4.0%] Polling Dates: September 25, 2014 through September 29, 2014 Conducted by live callers -- 20% cell phones COMMISSIONED BY Detroit Free Press, WXYZ TV 7, WLNS TV 6, WOOD TV8 & WJRT (ABC) TV 12 __03. Overall, would you say that things in Michigan are generally headed in the right direction, or, have things pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? 54% Right direction 30% Wrong track 16% Undecided/Refused Now I am going to read a list of state problems and issues voters in Michigan say they are concerned about the most. After I read the whole list of nine problems, please tell me which one problem or issue that personally concerns you the most? [READ AND ROTATE 1 TO 9 BELOW – CODE RESPONSE, THEN ASK WHICH PROBLEM IS THE NEXT GREATEST CONCERN – IF ASKED TO READ LIST, DROP RESPONSE MENTIONED] COM Q.4 – 1st Q.5 – 2nd 20% Improving the quality of education and increasing school funding 22% 19% 18% Improving the state economy and creating more jobs 18% 18% 17% Improving the condition of roads and bridges 18% 16% 10% Controlling government spending 11% 9% 9% Controlling crime and drugs 11% 6% 8% Keeping state and local taxes low 8% 9% 7% Providing affordable health care for everyone 7% 6% 4% Protecting our air and water 3% 5% 2% Addressing urban problems like the Detroit bankruptcy 1% 3% 5% Undecided/Refused 1% 9% __06. Thinking about the economy in Michigan, do you believe Michigan’s economy…[READ 1 TO 3] 68% Has already bottomed out and is starting to improve 15% Is at the bottom but is not yet getting any better 12% Has not yet bottomed out and will still get worse 5% Undecided/Refused 2 Now, I would like to read the names of several political figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Daunt V. Benson, No
    RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0117p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY DAUNT, TOM BARRETT, AARON BEAUCHINE, ┐ KATHY BERDEN, STEPHEN DAUNT, GERRY │ HILDENBRAND, GARY KOUTSOUBOS, LINDA LEE │ TARVER, PATRICK MEYERS, MARIAN SHERIDAN, MARY │ SHINKLE, NORM SHINKLE, PAUL SHERIDAN, BRIDGET │ BEARD, and CLINT TARVER (19-2377); MICHIGAN > Nos. 19-2377/2420 │ REPUBLICAN PARTY, LAURA COX, TERRI LYNN LAND, │ SAVINA ALEXANDRA ZOE MUCCI, DORIAN THOMPSON, │ and HANK VAUPEL (19-2420), │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │ │ v. │ │ │ JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan │ Secretary of State; COUNT MI VOTE, doing business as │ Voters Not Politicians, │ Defendants-Appellees. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids. Nos. 1:19-cv-00614 (19-2377); 1:19-cv-00669 (19-2420)—Janet T. Neff, District Judge. Argued: March 17, 2020 Decided and Filed: April 15, 2020 Before: MOORE, GILMAN, and READLER, Circuit Judges. _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: John J. Bursch, BURSCH LAW, Caledonia, Michigan, for Appellants in 19-2377. Gary P. Gordon, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellants in 19-2420. Heather S. Meingast, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee Benson. Paul M. Smith, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Count MI Vote. ON BRIEF: John J. Bursch, BURSCH LAW, Caledonia, Nos. 19-2377/2420 Daunt et al. v. Benson et al. Page 2 Michigan, Jason Torchinsky, HOLTZMAN VOGEL JOSEFIAK TORCHINSKY PLLC, Warrenton, Virginia, for Appellants in 19-2377. Gary P. Gordon, Jason T. Hanselman, Scott A. Hughes, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Lansing, Michigan, Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • July 27, 2018 Senate Campaign Finance Reports
    District Party Candidate Jan. 1-July 22 Raised Total Raised Jan. 1-July 22 Spent Total Spent Debts Cash On Hand Top Contributor 2nd Contributor 3rd Contributor 1 R Pauline Montie WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 1 D James Cole Jr. WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 1 D Nicholas Rivera WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 1 D Stephanie Chang $72,488 $147,043 $105,398 $107,008 $0 $40,035 Carpenters ($6,500) Henry Ford Health System ($2,250) Michigan Education Assoc. ($1,750) 1 D Alberta Tinsley Talabi $9,865 $9,865 $4,766 $4,766 $5,258 $5,099 Alberta Tinsley Talabi ($5,258) NICHOLSON ($2,000) Larry Brinker ($1,000) 1 D Stephanie Roehm 1 D Bettie Cook Scott 2 R John Hauler WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Tommy Campbell WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Lawrence E. Gannan WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D LaMar Lemmons WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D William Phillips WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Joe Ricci WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Adam Hollier $120,988 $120,988 $104,214 $104,215 $12,480 $25,850 Adam J. Hollier ($16,480.47) DUGGAN LEADERSHIP FUND ($15,000) David Fink ($2,000) 2 D Brian Banks $114,050 $156,875 $98,984 $106,522 $25,000 $50,353 Brian Banks ($33,500) MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE PAC ($11,500)OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 ($10,000) 2 D Abraham Aiyash $104,596 $104,596 $13,347 $13,347 $0 $91,249 WADHA AIYASH ($2,000) HAFAID GOBAH ($2,000) NASHWAN QURAY ($2,000) 2 D George Cushingberry Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020 No. 134 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was Our two countries, as you know, have the institutions of American life can- called to order by the President pro a centuries-old relationship. That rela- not stay totally shut down until our tempore (Mr. GRASSLEY). tionship will be further strengthened race for a vaccine hits the finish line. f by a comprehensive deal that presents Our Nation needs to smartly and economic opportunities for our farm- safely reopen while keeping up the PRAYER ers, our manufacturers, and our service medical battle. We need to get kids The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- providers to the benefit of both sides of safely back to school and adults safely fered the following prayer: the Atlantic. back to work without losing ground in Eternal God, You have taken care of I will continue to insist that an the healthcare fight. us in the years that have gone. We agreement reached between our two The coronavirus does not care that honor You for Your glory and strength. countries will allow us to reach our full we are divided. The coronavirus will May we place our hope in You and potential as trading partners, particu- not care if Washington Democrats de- never forget that You can also sustain larly when it comes to agricultural cide it suits their partisan goals to let us in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Representation in Michigan
    Women’s Representation in Michigan Parity Ranking: 8th of 50 Levels of Government Score of 27: Ten points for former Governor Jennifer Granholm, 3 for the secretary of state, 8 Statewide Executives points for U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow’s two most Female governors: Jennifer Granholm (2003- recent elections, 1 points for its single woman House member, 4 points for its percentage of 2011) state legislators who are women, and 1 point for Current female statewide elected executives: 1 of senate president pro tempore. 4 (secretary of state) Quick Fact Number of women to have held statewide elected In 2002, Michigan elected its third foreign-born executive office: 7, one of whom was appointed governor and its first woman governor, Jennifer Congress Granholm (D). Originally from Canada, Granholm became a naturalized American U.S. Senate: 1 of 2 seats held by women, Debbie citizen at the age of 21. She served two terms. Stabenow (2001-present) Trending U.S. House: 1 of 14 seats held by women In recent years, the Michigan state legislature In its history, Michigan has elected 7 women to has experienced large fluctuations in the the U.S. House, one of whom was also elected to percentage of seats held by women. Between the U.S. Senate. 2008 and 2009, it increased 5.4 points, but has State Legislature since decreased by 6.1 to 18.9%. Percentage women: 18.9% Rankings: 36th of 50 % Michigan Legislature Women Senate: 4 of 38 (10.5%) are women 30% 25% House: 24 of 110 (21.8%) are women 20% 15% Method of election: single-member districts 10% MI Local 5% USA 0% None of Michigan’s five largest cities and counties with elected executives has a woman mayor or county executive.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Government Directory
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE PO Box 30014, Lansing MI 48909 PO Box 30036, Lansing, MI 48909 Website: www.house.mi.gov District/Party/Name/Hometown Office # Ph. 373- Website: www.senate.mi.gov 59 Republicans, 49 Democrats, 1 Independent , 1 Vacancy 91 D *Lamonte, Collene, Montague 1195 HOB 3436 26 Republicans, 12 Democrats Michigan Gary Randall, Clerk 31 D **Lane, Marilyn, Fraser 795 HOB 0159 Lt. Gov. Brian Calley (R), President GONGWER The Capitol Record Since 1906 373-0135 81 R *Lauwers, Daniel, Brockway 1185 HOB 1790 Carol Viventi, Secretary 17 D *LaVoy, Bill, Monroe 696 HOB 1530 373-2400 District/Party/Name/Hometown Office # Ph. 373- 93 R *Leonard, Tom III, DeWitt 1197 HOB 1778 71 D *Abed, Theresa, Grand Ledge 1090 HOB 0853 27 D ***Lipton, Ellen Cogen, Huntington Woods 791 HOB 0478 District/Party/Name/Hometown Office # Ph. 373- Legislative/State Government Information Since 1906 1 D *Banks, Brian, Harper Woods 585 HOB 0154 59 R ***Lori, Matt, Constantine 993 HOB 0832 124 W. Allegan, Suite 1200 (517) 482-3500 27 D Ananich, Jim, Flint 315 FB 0142 37 D ***Barnett, Vicki, Farmington Hills 886 HOB 1793 36 R ***Lund, Pete, Shelby Twp. 141 CB 0843 Lansing MI 48933 FAX: (517) 482-4367 63 R ***Bolger, Jase, Marshall 164 CB 1787 6 D **Anderson, Glenn, Westland 610 FB 1707 86 R **Lyons, Lisa Posthumus, Alto 1190 HOB 0846 E-mail: [email protected] 76 D *Brinks, Winnie, Grand Rapids 1095 HOB 0822 9 D *Bieda, Steve, Warren 310 FB 8360 73 R **MacGregor, Peter, Cannon Twp. 1092 HOB 0218 Website: www.gongwer.com 84 D ***Brown, Terry, Pigeon 1188 HOB 0476 105 R **MacMaster, Greg, Kewadin 1389 HOB 0829 35 R *Booher, Darwin, Evart 520 FB 1725 96 D **Brunner, Charles, Bay City 1285 HOB 0158 108 R **McBroom, Ed, Vulcan 1487 HOB 0156 11 R *Brandenburg, Jack, Harrison Twp.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. a Resolution Prescribing the Standing Rules of the House of Representatives. Jan. 8, Introduced by Representative Randy Richardville
    3053 PART VIII HISTORY OF HOUSE RESOLUTIONS IN THE HOUSE (References are to page numbers of the Journal.) 1. A resolution prescribing the Standing Rules of the House of Representatives. Jan. 8, introduced by Representative Randy Richardville................................................................................ 5 Jan. 8, rule 77 suspended.................................................................................................................................. 5 Jan. 8, adopted .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Representative(s) Mary Waters named co-sponsor(s) 2. A resolution to provide for officers of the House of Representatives for the Ninety-second Legislature. Jan. 8, introduced by Representative Randy Richardville................................................................................ 24 Jan. 8, rule 77 suspended.................................................................................................................................. 24 Jan. 8, roll call: Roll Call # 0002 Yeas 108 Nays 000............................................................................................... 24 Jan. 8, adopted .................................................................................................................................................. 24 Representative(s) Mary Waters named co-sponsor(s) 3. A resolution to provide for the Clerk of the House of Representatives for the Ninety-second
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy Report
    ADVOCACY REPORT 2011-2012 January 2013 Dear LWVMI Member: This report highlights the advocacy activities of the League of Women Voters of Michigan during the 2011-2012 legislative session. Thanks to the hard work of the LWVMI Advocacy Committee and Board of Directors who made this possible. The League of Women Voters is a non-partisan political organization. We do not support or oppose political parties or candidates. The League does: Encourage informed and active participation in government Work to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and Influence public policy through education and advocacy. The League of Women Voters has two arms. One is an educational, tax-exempt organization that provides information on candidates and issues to voters as well as information about election and government to citizens. The other is the advocacy arm. While the League does not support or oppose candidates or parties, we do take positions on issues we have studied. The members of the League of Women Voters of Michigan have adopted positions on seventeen state governmental issues. The League uses these positions, as well as those adopted at the national League to take action at the state level. LWVMI and LWVUS positions are listed on each website. A list of legislation that LWVMI has taken positions on during the two-year legislative session is in this document, as well as the voting records for the MI Senators and Representatives on legislation LWVMI opposed or supported. We are passionate advocates – women and men-who work to influence public policy on these issues by testifying at legislative committee meetings, meeting with individual legislators and other state officials, and urging League members to contact their legislators.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Western District of Michigan Southern Division
    Case 1:19-cv-00614-JTN-SJB ECF No. 43 filed 09/19/19 PageID.597 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTHONY DAUNT, et al, No. 1:19-cv-00614 Plaintiffs, (Lead) v HON. JANET T. NEFF JOCELYN BENSON, MAG. ELLEN S. CARMODY Defendant, COUNT MI VOTE (d/b/a Voters Not DEFENDANT BENSON’S BRIEF Politicians), IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS IN CASE NO. 19-00614 Intervening-Defendant. MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY, et al, Plaintiffs, v No. 1:19-cv-00669 JOCELYN BENSON, (Member) Defendant, HON. JANET T. NEFF COUNT MI VOTE (d/b/a Voters Not MAG. ELLEN S. CARMODY Politicians), Intervenor-Defendant. ________________________________________ _________________________________/ John J. Bursch (P57679) Heather S. Meingast (P55439) Attorney for Plaintiffs Daunt et al Erik A. Grill (P64713) 9339 Cherry Valley SE, #78 Assistant Attorneys General Caledonia, Michigan 49316 Attorneys for Defendant 616.450.4235 P.O. Box 30736 Lansing, Michigan 48909 517.335.7659 Eric E. Doster (P41782) Graham Crabtree (P31590) Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Voters Not Politicians 2145 Commons Pkwy 123 W. Allegan, Ste 1000 Okemos, Michigan 48864 Lansing, Michigan 48933 517.977.0147 517.377.0895 / _____________________________________/ Case 1:19-cv-00614-JTN-SJB ECF No. 43 filed 09/19/19 PageID.598 Page 2 of 13 DEFENDANT BENSON’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS IN CASE NO. 19-00614 DANA NESSEL Attorney General s/Heather S. Meingast Heather S. Meingast (P55439) Erik A. Grill (P64713) Assistant Attorneys General Attorneys for Defendant P.O. Box 30736 Lansing, Michigan 48909 517.335.7659 Email: [email protected] (P55439) Dated: September 19, 2019 2 Case 1:19-cv-00614-JTN-SJB ECF No.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Combined Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss And
    Case 2:17-cv-14148-ELC-DPH-GJQ ECF No. 129 filed 10/13/18 PageID.3319 Page 1 of 90 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS ) OF MICHIGAN, et al., ) Case No. 2:17-cv-14148 ) Plaintiffs, ) Hon. Eric L. Clay ) Hon. Denise Page Hood ) Hon. Gordon J. Quist v. ) ) VOTERS’ COMBINED ) RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT RUTH JOHNSON, in her official ) SECRETARY JOHNSON’S Capacity as Michigan ) MOTION TO DISMISS AND Secretary of State, et al., ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT AND Defendants. ) CONGRESSIONAL ) INTERVENORS’ MOTION FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT Joseph H. Yeager, Jr. (IN 2083-49) Mark Brewer (P35661) Kevin M. Toner (IN 11343-49) GOODMAN ACKER P.C. Harmony A. Mappes (IN 27237-49) 17000 West Ten Mile, Second Floor Jeffrey P. Justman (MN 390413) Southfield, MI 48075 Daniel R. Kelley (IN 30706-49) Telephone: 248-483-5000 Matthew K. Giffin (IN 31603-49) [email protected] Matthew R. Kinsman (IN 32032-71) FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP 300 North Meridian Street, Suite 2700 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Telephone: 317-237-0300 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Voters jsdavis.120126899.4.DOCX Case 2:17-cv-14148-ELC-DPH-GJQ ECF No. 129 filed 10/13/18 PageID.3320 Page 2 of 90 VOTERS’ COMBINED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SECRETARY JOHNSON’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENORS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT In 2011 the Michigan legislature ruthlessly targeted Democratic voters by carefully drawing State Senate, State House, and Congressional district lines so as to dilute Democratic votes and maximize Republican votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Senate Photo Directory for 2021-2022
    Michigan Senate Photo Directory For 2021-2022 Senate Leadership Majority Leader President Majority Floor President Pro Leader Tempore Mike Shirkey Garlin Gilchrist II Dan Lauwers Aric Nesbitt R-Clarklake D-Detroit R-Brockway R-Lawton Associate Assistant Majority Majority Caucus Majority Caucus President Pro Leader Chair Whip Tempore Marshall Bulloc k Wayne Schmid t Curt VanderWal l John Bizon D-Detroit R-Traverse City R-Ludington R-Battle Creek Minority Leader Minority Floor Leader Jim Ananich Stephanie Chan g D-Flint D-Detroit Full Senate Membership: District 5 District 27 District 24 District 12 Betty Alexande r Jim Ananich Tom Barrett Rosemary Baye r D-Detroit D-Flint R-Charlotte D-Beverly Hills 1st Term 2nd Term 1st Term 1st Term District 19 District 29 District 4 District 34 John Bizon Winnie Brinks Marshall Bulloc k Jon Bumstead R-Battle Creek D-Grand Rapids D-Detroit R-Newaygo 1st Term 1st Term 1st Term 1st Term District 1 District 31 District 6 District 23 Stephanie Chan g Kevin Daley Erika Geiss Curtis Hertel Jr . D-Detroit R-Lum D-Taylor D-East Lansing 1st Term 1st Term 1st Term 2nd Term District 2 District 32 District 18 District 14 Adam Hollier Ken Horn Jeff Irwin Ruth Johnson D-Detroit R-Frankenmut h D-Ann Arbor R-Holly 1st Term 2nd Term 1st Term 1st Term District 21 District 25 District 10 District 38 Kim LaSata Dan Lauwers Michael Ed McBroom R-Bainbridge Township R-Brockway MacDonald R-Vulcan 1st Term 1st Term R-Macomb Township 1st Term 1st Term District 20 District 13 District 11 District 26 Sean McCann Mallory McMorrow
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Michigan State Senate Race September 2017
    2018 Michigan State Senate Race September 2017 This is a preliminary report on the 2018 Michigan State Senate races. It includes filed and prospective candidates from each of the 38 Senate districts along with district maps and current Senators. The information in this document is taken from multiple sources. Updates will be made as Senate races progress. If you have any questions or comments please contact us at Public Affairs Associates. 1 1st District Current Senator: Coleman A. Young, Jr. (D-Detroit), (term-limited) Filed: Rep. Stephanie Chang (D-Detroit) Nicholas Rivera (D), Admissions Counselor at Wayne State University Prospective: Rep. Bettie Cook Scott (D-Detroit) Former Rep. Alberta Tinsley-Talabi (D-Detroit) Former Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Detroit). Rep. Tlaib’s run is a possibility, but with Chang in the race it’s questionable. Rico Razo, Mayor Mike Duggan’s re-election campaign manager Denis Boismier, Gibraltar City Council President. Although Boismier is running for Gibraltar mayor this year, he may possibly join the race if the field becomes heavily saturated with Detroit candidates. 2 2nd District Current Senator: Bert Johnson (D-Highland Park), (term-limited) Filed: Tommy Campbell (D-Grosse Pointe) Rep. Brian Banks (D-Harper Woods) Adam Hollier, former aide to Sen. Johnson Prospective: Former Rep. Lamar Lemmons (D-Detroit) Former Rep. John Olumba (D-Detroit) 3 3rd District Current Senator: Morris Hood III (D-Detroit), (term-limited) Filed: N/A Prospective: Rep. Sylvia Santana (D-Detroit) Former Rep. Harvey Santana (D-Detroit) Former Rep. David Nathan (D-Detroit) Former Rep. Gary Woronchak (R-Dearborn), current Wayne County Commission Chair 4 4th District Current Senator: Ian Conyers (D-Detroit), (Incumbent) Filed: N/A Prospective: N/A 5 5th District Current Senator: David Knezek (D-Dearborn Heights), (Incumbent) Filed: DeShawn Wilkins (R-Detroit) Prospective: N/A 6 6th District Current Senator: Hoon-Yung Hopgood (D-Taylor), (term-limited) Filed: Rep.
    [Show full text]