DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Clark Fork Tributary Watershed Restoration Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Clark Fork Tributary Watershed Restoration Plan Lower Clark Fork Tributary Watershed Restoration Plan View from 8 Mile Bridge, Bull River. Photo Credit: Mariah R. Williams October 2019 1 Acknowledgements: Lower Clark Fork Watershed Group has taken the lead in organizing and drafting the Lower Clark Fork Tributary Watershed Restoration Plan, but the completion of this plan was only possible with the contribution of many local stakeholders throughout the Lower Clark Fork Tributary Planning Area. Authors: Sarah Bowman – Lower Clark Fork Watershed Group Brita Olson – Lower Clark Fork Watershed Group Contributing Stakeholders: Avista: Sean Moran Bull River Watershed Council: Kathy Ferguson, Tom McDowell Lower Clark Fork Watershed Group: Ryan Kreiner, Sean Moran, Regan Plumb, Ruth Watkins Montana Department of Environmental Quality: Eric Trum Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks: Jason Blakney, Ryan Kreiner Natural Resources Conservation Service: Troy Hidy RC Resources: Ed Kline Soil and Water Conservation Districts of Montana: Samantha Tappenbeck Trout Unlimited: Christine Brissette United States Forest Service – Kootenai National Forest: Doug Grupenhoff, Craig Neesvig United States Forest Service – Lolo National Forest: Jon Hanson, Josh Shulze Funders: Avista Clark Fork Settlement Agreement Bureau of Reclamation Cooperative Watershed Management Program Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Watershed Management Grant Program 223 Program 2 Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Section 1: Introduction and Background ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1: Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2: Background to Watershed Restoration Planning ..................................................................... 8 1.3: Causes and Sources of Impairments and Associated TMDLs.................................................... 9 1.4: Lower Clark Fork Tributary Watershed Restoration Plan Development ................................ 15 Section 2: Lower Clark Fork Watershed Characterization .......................................................................... 18 Section 3: Watershed-Wide Management Recommendations .................................................................. 31 Section 4: Priorities for Restoration ............................................................................................................ 37 4.1: Beaver Creek Watershed ........................................................................................................ 38 4.2: Blue Creek Watershed ............................................................................................................ 48 4.3: Bull River Watershed .............................................................................................................. 53 4.4: Elk Creek Watershed ............................................................................................................... 66 4.5: Graves Creek Watershed ........................................................................................................ 73 4.6: Marten Creek Watershed ....................................................................................................... 78 4.7: Pilgrim Creek Watershed ........................................................................................................ 83 4.8: Prospect Creek Watershed ..................................................................................................... 89 4.9: Rock Creek Watershed .......................................................................................................... 109 4.10: Swamp Creek Watershed ................................................................................................... 115 4.11: Trout Creek Watershed ...................................................................................................... 121 4.12: Vermilion River Watershed ................................................................................................. 125 4.13: Additional Tributaries ......................................................................................................... 132 Section 5: Available Resources ................................................................................................................. 140 5.1: Technical Resources .............................................................................................................. 140 5.2: Financial Resources ............................................................................................................... 145 5.3: Monitoring Resources ........................................................................................................... 150 Section 6: Progress Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 153 6.1: Milestones............................................................................................................................. 153 6.2: Monitoring ............................................................................................................................ 154 Section 7: References ................................................................................................................................ 157 3 Acronyms BMP: Best Management Practice BPA: Bonneville Power Administration CFSA: Clark Fork Settlement Agreement CWA: Clean Water Act CWAIC: Clean Water Act Information Center DEQ: [Montana] Department of Environmental Quality DNRC: [Montana] Department of Natural Resources and Conservation EPA: Environmental Protection Agency FSR: Forest Service Road FWP: [Montana] Fish, Wildlife, and Parks GIS: Geographical Information System GMCD: Green Mountain Conservation District LCF: Lower Clark Fork LCFR-LPO: Lower Clark Fork River—Lake Pend Oreille [system] LCFTWRP: Lower Clark Fork Tributary Watershed Restoration Plan LCFWG: Lower Clark Fork Watershed Group LWD: Large Woody Debris MFISH: Montana Fisheries Information System MWCC: Montana Watershed Coordination Council MTNHP: Montana Natural Heritage Program NPS: Nonpoint Source [Pollution] NRCS: Natural Resources Conservation Service NWIS: National Water Information System NWE: NorthWestern Energy PIBO: PacFish-InFish Biological Opinion RKM: River Kilometer RM: River Mile SMZ: Streamside Management Zone STORET: STOrage and RETrieval Data Warehouse SWCDM: Soil and Water Conservation Districts of Montana TAC: Technical Advisory Committee TMDL: Total Maximum Daily Load USDA: United States Department of Agriculture USFS: United States Forest Service USFS-IPNF: United State Forest Service – Idaho Panhandle National Forest USFS-KNF: United States Forest Service - Kootenai National Forest USFS-LNF: United States Forest Service - Lolo National Forest USFWS: United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS: United States Geological Survey WQP: Water Quality Portal WRP: Watershed Restoration Plan WRTAC: Water Resources Technical Advisory Committee YPL: Yellowstone Pipeline 4 Section 1: Introduction and Background 1.1: Introduction The Lower Clark Fork Tributary Watershed Restoration Plan (LCFTWRP) was developed by the Lower Clark Fork Watershed Group (LCFWG) in collaboration with local watershed stakeholders to identify opportunities for, plan, and prioritize watershed restoration and enhancement efforts throughout the Lower Clark Fork (LCF) Tributary Watershed Restoration Planning Area. This document is meant to serve as an update to the original LCFTWRP completed in 2010 (Miller 2010) and will reflect current stakeholder priorities, updated expectations for WRP documents, and will summarize progress completed since the 2010 version. The LCF Watershed (Hydrologic Unit Code 17010213) is located in Western Montana on the Idaho border and flows from the confluence of the Flathead River to its terminus at Lake Pend Orielle. The LCF Tributary Watershed Restoration Planning Area is a smaller portion of the greater LCF watershed, covering all of the land that drains to the LCF River from the Thompson Falls Dam in Thompson Falls, MT to the Idaho border. A watershed restoration plan (WRP) for the neighboring Thompson River Watershed (also located in the larger LCF watershed) was recently completed by the LCFWG in 2018 (Figure 1.1A). The main objectives for the LCFTWRP are: 1. To facilitate total maximum daily load (TMDL) implementation and address nonpoint source (NPS) pollution of MT Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)-listed impaired streams throughout the LCF watershed 2. To identify and prioritize opportunities for the protection and enhancement of additional streams that, while not listed as impaired by DEQ, are also a focus for local restoration efforts and multi-faceted conservation efforts 3. To establish a DEQ-accepted WRP that can be used to receive Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 319 funding, as well as to identify and to qualify for sources of funding offered at local, state, and national levels 4. To serve as a comprehensive strategic plan for restoration in the LCF watershed to promote water quality, native fish populations, and overall ecological health As of 2019, 16 streams or portions of streams within this planning area have been identified by DEQ as having one or more pollutants that negatively
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PROCEEDINGS of the BOARD of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of SANDERS COUNTY, MONTANA January 3, 2017
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SANDERS COUNTY, MONTANA January 3, 2017 The Board of Commissioners of Sanders County, Montana, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 3, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Present were Carol Brooker, Presiding Officer; Glen E. Magera, Commissioner, and Anthony B. Cox, Commissioner. The Boards and Committees that the Commissioners will attend in 2017 are as follows: Commissioner Cox Commissioner Brooker Commissioner Magera Avista Management Committee Child Development Center Board Sanders County 911 Advisory Board Flathead Valley Chemical Dependency of Directors, Chairman Area Agency on Aging Board Area VI, Corporation, Board of Directors Governors Board of County Printing Chairman Sanders County Board of Health MACo Natural Resources/Public Lands Community Action Partnership Sanders County Solid Waste Refuse Litigation Fund Committee Hot Springs Refuse Disposal District Disposal District MACo Public Land Committee Sanders County Board of Health MACo Board of Directors Sanders County Board of Health Sanders County Community Housing Sanders County Aquatic Invasive Plants Sanders County Community Organization (AIP) Task Force Development Corporation, Board of Sanders County Council on Aging Boards Attended: Directors Sanders County Council on Aging Sanders County DUI Task Force Sanders County Solid Waste Refuse Financial Committee Committee Disposal District Board Sanders County Solid Waste Refuse Resource Advisory Committee Thompson Falls Community Trails Disposal District Terrestrial Resources Tech
    [Show full text]
  • December 18, 2020 Fish Consumption Guidance Updated for Portions Of
    Media contact: Trevor Selch, FWP Fisheries Pollution Biologist, 406-444-5686 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 18, 2020 Fish consumption guidance updated for portions of Clark Fork, Bitterroot and Blackfoot Rivers in western Montana MISSOULA – The State of Montana Fish Guidance Board, which includes Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) and the Departments of Environmental Quality (DEQ), and Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS), has updated the fish consumption guidance for all species of fish on a 148-mile stretch of the Clark Fork River and tributaries in western Montana in response to new research results. Guidance now recommends avoiding consumption of all species of fish from the Clark Fork River’s confluence with the Bitterroot River, just west of Missoula, to the confluence with the Flathead River, near Paradise. Slightly revised guidance is also in place for rainbow trout and northern pike on an upstream section of the Clark Fork and for the Blackfoot and Bitterroot Rivers. New data was collected to assess chemical contaminants including dioxins, furans, and PCBs in fish tissue in a study area on the Clark Fork that extended from approximately 30 miles upstream of Missoula to 100 miles downstream. Testing in the area is underway as part of water quality monitoring around the former Smurfit-Stone Container mill site. Upon review of the study results, new guidance was issued based on high levels of contaminants in the fish tissue. The source of all the contaminants found in the fish has not been attributed. The study only looked at contaminant concentrations found in the muscle tissues of northern pike and rainbow trout, but the same “Avoid” guidance extends to all species present in the Clark Fork River near Missoula (such as brown trout, whitefish, small- and large-mouth bass, northern pikeminnow, and sucker species) because similar food habits, habitat use, and life- span suggest they could also contain chemical concentrations at potentially dangerous levels.
    [Show full text]
  • An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL
    An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL. 3 No. 3 Dear Reader early all the problems we face in Cascadia boil down to population. NAs Alan Durning and Christopher Crowther point out in their new book, Misplaced Blame: The Real Roots of Population Growth, the Pacific Northwest is growing nearly twice the North American rate and almost 50 percent faster than the global population. The Northwest population reached 15 million EDITORIAL in mid-1997 and is swelling by another 1 million every 40 months. Starting this month, with our cover story on growth pressures in the scenic Columbia River Gorge, Cascadia Times Boom Times The UnbearableRightness ot Breen will publish an occasional series on, Can the Columbia River Gorge survive the Life on the fault line of environmentally growth, growth management strategies demand for development? and what it all means. As senior editor correct energy Kathie Durbin reports from the Columbia by Kathie Durbin Page 9 Gorge, local politics threaten this national by Kevin Bell Page 7 treasure. This is true everywhere, because growth and land-use decisions are in varyingdegrees made at the local THE USUAL STUFF level. We aren't saying that local commu• FIELD NOTES: Green groups clash over Sierra REALITY CHECK: 16 nities cannot do a good job protecting places such as the Gorge, Snoqualmie logging. EPA fines big Alaska mine. toxic waste POINT OF VIEW: The ASARCO juggernaut and Pass, Whidbey Island, Lake Tahoe or the on crops. Oregon slams nuclear weapons plan 3 Muir Woods, to name just a few places of its proposed Rock Creek Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Derek Decker, Senior Offensive
    Derek Decker, senior offensive gua Other area attractions include “A Carousel for Missoula” (one of the first fully hand-carved carousels to be built in America since the Great Depression), Garnet Ghost Town, the National Bison Range, the Ninemile Remount Depot and Ranger Station, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Wildlife Visitor Center, and the Smokejumper Visitor Center. Missoula Parks and Recreation and the YMCA provide a variety of recreational opportunities in basketball, soccer, softball, tennis, volleyball, and ice skating. Missoula also serves as a center for education, health care, retail, and the arts. The University of Montana provides educa­ tional opportunities for more than 13,000 college students. Com­ munity Medical Center and St. Patrick Hospital, along with many clinics, make Missoula one of the state’s premier health care com­ munities. The Missoula community supports the arts in all its forms: the­ Summertime in Missoula, the Downtown Association’s Out to Lunch ater productions, dance, art, and music. The Missoula Children’s weekly series. Theater, founded in 1970, moved into a renovated building near Birthplace and hometown of author Norman McLean, who wrote campus and produces plays and musicals by national and local A River Runs Through It, Missoula is also known as the “Garden playwrights for both adults and children. The theater also has an City” for its dense trees and lush green landscape. Missoula is International Tour Project, taking theatrical productions to audi­ nestled in the heart of the Northern Rockies in western Montana. ences outside the Missoula area. The Garden City Ballet and A community of approximately 66,000 residents, Missoula lies in a Missoula Symphony, which is in its 50th season, bring performances mountain forest setting where five valleys converge.
    [Show full text]
  • FERC Project No. 2058
    FERC Project No. 2058 Idaho Tributary Habitat Acquisition and Fishery Enhancement Program Appendix A As approved by the Management Committee on 3/14/2017 2017 ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SUMMARY – APPENDIX A Clark Fork Project, FERC No. 2058 Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids Hydroelectric Developments Title Idaho Tributary Habitat Acquisition and Fishery Enhancement Program Implementation Staff Lead Ken Bouwens, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, (208) 770-3766, [email protected] Background The purpose of this program is to offset the impacts of the power peaking operation of the Cabinet Gorge Project to native salmonids through the restoration and enhancement of lower Clark Fork River and Lake Pend Oreille (LPO) tributary watersheds, fishery monitoring and management support, and a public education and enforcement initiative focused on Bull Trout and their associated habitats in Idaho. Outlined below is the 2017 annual implementation plan for Idaho Tributary Habitat Acquisition and Enhancement and Fish Resource Monitoring, Enhancement, and Management portions of this program. The public education and enforcement component of this program is described in Appendix D of the Clark Fork Settlement Agreement (CFSA). In addition, other CFSA appendices also support watershed and native salmonid protection, restoration, and enhancement (e.g., Fish Passage/Native Salmonid Restoration Plan, Watershed Council Program), and thereby augment the efforts to be initiated under this program. 2017 Project Plans Tributary Habitat Acquisition and Enhancement Fund 1. Habitat Restoration Scoping Allocation 2. Idaho Land Conservation Strategy 3. Habitat Restoration Maintenance and Monitoring Allocation 4. Grouse Creek Resurvey 5. Lightning Creek Large Woody Debris and Recruitment Project 6. Twin Creek Restoration Revegetation 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet-Yaak and Selkirk Mountains Grizzly Bear Monitoring Update 610/2019
    Cabinet-Yaak and Selkirk Mountains Grizzly Bear Monitoring Update 610/2019 Wayne Kasworm, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 385 Fish Hatchery Road, Libby, MT 59923 (406) 293-4161 ext 205 [email protected] Reports: https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/es/grizzlyBear.php Our 2019 field season began in early May with the arrival of our field technicians for work and training. We spent almost a week on training before crews dispersed to the field. We have two bear capture teams and one hair collection team in the Cabinet-Yaak plus one trap team and two hair collection teams in the Selkirk Mountains. Crews began capture and hair collection efforts on May 18. Capture efforts will emphasize recapture of existing collar bears. The manufacturer of our radio collars alerted us to a software glitch that is causing many of our collars to malfunction. This year’s collars have had the software updated to avoid the issue. Selkirk Mountains Research Monitoring We began 2019 with five grizzly bears collared in the Selkirk Mountains (3 females and 2 males). Capture activities have resulted in the recapture and collar change on one of the females (Figure 1). Trail cameras at the capture site indicated she was accompanied by a 2 year-old offspring, but that bear was not captured. Trapping will continue near the international border to attempt recapture of the other two females. Cabinet-Yaak Research Monitoring We began 2019 with six collared grizzly bears in the Cabinet-Yaak (2 females and 4 males). One of the females was observed in May with two new cubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Clark Fork River Biomonitoring Macroinvertebrate Community
    Report Clark Fork River Biomonitoring: Macroinvertebrate Community Assessments for 2019 Prepared by: David Stagliano Montana Biological Survey/Stag Benthics Prepared for: Boise, Idaho Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 June 2020 Executive Summary The upper Clark Fork River (CFR) Basin in western at Kohrs Bend (Station 10) to 85 percent at SBC Montana contains four contiguous Superfund below Warm Springs (Station 4.5) and the operable units that have been undergoing various Blackfoot River site (Station 14) (Figure ES-1). remediation activities for decades. Since 1986, Both SBC sites (stations 2.5 and 4.5) were rated as annual benthic macroinvertebrate-based (BMI) slightly impaired. Slight biological impairment monitoring has been performed at 13 CFR stream from nutrients was evident at two CFR stations reaches with ongoing or future remedial actions near Deer Lodge (8.5 and 9.0) and near Missoula (McGuire Consulting 1986-2017; Montana (Station 15.5), but the former sites have improved Biological Survey/Stag Benthics 2017-Present). markedly since 2017. The lower Blackfoot River Monitoring extended from Silver Bow Creek (SBC) (Station 14) was ranked slightly impaired again in sites upstream of the Warm Springs Ponds, 2019, likely due to metal related stressors. downstream through the upper CFR, bracketing During 2019, environmental conditions in SBC at the former Milltown Dam site to below the Opportunity (Station 2.5) improved after CFR-Bitterroot River confluence. In addition to experiencing declines in integrity scores in 2018. providing current assessments of ecological Likewise, SBC below the Warm Springs Ponds conditions, these sampling events extend the (Station 4.5) remained slightly impaired but BMI long-term data set for evaluating water quality integrity improved over 2017 scores.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone Fishing Report
    Clarks Fork Of The Yellowstone Fishing Report Uninvidious and ameboid Joao overbuy her primely slash uncomfortably or slumber counter, is Penny anginal? neverOld-fogyish scats Berchtoldso rakishly never or goose-step enfaced so any congenitally pantofle mordantly. or fidget any tightwads complexly. Humanlike Whitman Everything you therefore wanted to know will fly-fishing the. Clarks Fork Yellowstone River Wyoming Fly Fishing Camping. Montana Trout Scout Guided Fly explode in South Central. Basins and plains such because the Clarks Fork Yellowstone Little practice and Powder Rivers. At various water of reports and report layout through july, and then confluences with fish this is still picking up in. Clarks Fork Yellowstone River include a stream located just 3 miles from Laurel in Yellowstone County in average state of Montana United. The Clarks Fork school the Yellowstone is a warm-faced river. The report has some reports from reed reservoir, there was with a mouse as an hour away from one of california, but there are. Bureau of Reclamation Managing water flow power in most West. Wade fishing opportunities, coal mining industry, are located to heat of silver bow creek to occur primarily livestock. Several hundred acres in about terrestrials become a jig head out a nice fishing reports that contain naturally bright one of floatable sections. Lake Weatherford Texas fishing report rainbow trout sight fishing forecast. Try a chaotic fashion include clark fork powder river has an email to turah are. Chapter 3 Clark Fork River US Fish and every Service. Yellowstone angler When it comes to craft fishing Yellowstone National. So do Luce and Hogan Lakes halfway between Belfry and Cody in the Clark's Fork of the Yellowstone drainage Fish with big midge larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 OUTREACH Kootenai National Forest Supervisor's Office, Fire and Aviation Management Forestry Technician GS-0462-05 IA Di
    OUTREACH Kootenai National Forest Supervisor’s Office, Fire and Aviation Management Forestry Technician GS‐0462‐05 IA Dispatcher The Northern Region (R1), Kootenai National Forest, Supervisor’s Office, Fire and Aviation Management, GS‐0462‐05, position. Duty station is Libby, MT. This is a permanent seasonal 13/13 position. The results of the outreach will help determine the area of consideration for the vacancy announcement. Interested applicants are requested to respond utilizing the Employee Outreach Database. For Forest Service applicants the database is located in ConnectHR. For external applicants this may be accessed by an internet search for FS Outreach or the following link https://fsoutreach.gdcii.com/Outreach. Duties This position serves as a Fire Dispatcher located in an interagency (Forest Service and Montana Department of Natural Resources dispatch center. The center is responsible primarily for wildland fire preparedness and suppression support activities and may assist with all‐risk incidents as needed or directed. Work schedule may include weekends with days off during the week. Incumbent serves as a dispatcher, receiving, filling, and tracking resources requests for fire and other emergency incidents. Follows established procedures to perform a variety of technical duties common to the dispatch of personnel, equipment, aircraft and/or supplies according to 1 pre‐defined plans or in a response to resource orders from the field. Incumbent initiates requests to higher organizational levels for additional resources as needed. Collects, processes, collates and submits incident information to support fire operations (e.g. fire reports smoke permits, spot weather forecasts, prescribed fire burn requests). Processes and interprets weather information (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys
    Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys Five Valleys and Bitterroot Audubon Society Chapters are grassroots volunteer organizations of Montana Audubon and the National Audubon Society. We promote understanding, respect, and enjoyment of birds and the natural world through education, habitat protection, and environmental advocacy. Five Valleys Bitterroot Audubon Society Audubon Society P.O. Box 8425 P.O. Box 326 Missoula, MT 59807 Hamilton, MT 59840 www.fvaudubon.org/ www.bitterrootaudubonorg/ Montana Audubon P.O. Box 595 Helena, MT 59624 406-443-3949 www.mtaudubon.org Status W Sp Su F Bird Species of West-central Montana (most vagrants excluded) _ Harlequin Duck B r r r Relative abundance in suitable habitat by season are: _ Long-tailed Duck t r r c - common to abundant, usually found on every visit in _ Surf Scoter t r r r moderate to large numbers _ White-winged Scoter t r r r u - uncommon, usually present in low numbers but may be _ Common Goldeneye B c c c c _ missed Barrow’s Goldeneye B u c c c _ o - occasional, seen only a few times during the season, not Bufflehead B o c u c _ Hooded Merganser B o c c c present in all suitable habitat _ Common Merganser B c c c c r - rare, one to low numbers occur but not every year _ Red-breasted Merganser t o o _ Status: Ruddy Duck B c c c _ Osprey B c c c B - Direct evidence of breeding _ Bald Eagle B c c c c b - Indirect evidence of breeding _ Northern Harrier B u c c c t - No evidence of breeding _ Sharp-shinned Hawk B u u u u _ Cooper’s Hawk B u u u u Season of occurrence: _ Northern Goshawk B u u u u W - Winter, mid-November to mid-February _ Swainson’s Hawk B u u u Sp - Spring, mid-February to mid-May _ Red-tailed Hawk B c c c c Su - Summer, mid-May to mid-August _ Ferruginous Hawk t r r r F - Fall, mid-August to mid-November _ Rough-legged Hawk t c c c _ Golden Eagle B u u u u This list follows the seventh edition of the AOU check-list.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2007 Newsletter
    VOLUME 32 NUMBER 4 DECEMBER 2007 Jane Lopp & Associates to be Recognized for Conservation Support Jane Lopp & Associates LLC will be pre- cludes office space for more employees and a large sented Flathead Audubon’s Conservation Achieve- conference room. With the move to the new building, ment Recognition at the December 10 th meeting, for Jane Lopp & Associates, was launched. supporting conservation projects and conservation Jane is well known in the Flathead for her nonprofits while sponsoring a number of conserva- volunteer contributions to our community. Perhaps tion-oriented Prudential Global Volunteer Days in the less well known are her volunteer activities at the Flathead. state level. Jane served on the Montana Human Jane Lopp & Associates represents Pruden- Rights Commission for 8 years, much of that time as tial Financial Planning Services. Though Jane has Chair. She also served on the Gender Equity Study been in the insurance and investments business Commission for the State Supreme Court, and since 1979, and with Prudential since 1989, Jane chaired the Site Selection Committee for the Lopp & Associates is only about five years old. Women’s Prison which was built in Billings. Jane’s business started out as one-woman This same commitment to community ser- show—just Jane and a secretary located in a 3-room vice also characterizes her company, Jane Lopp & house. Another employee was added when she re- Associates. One recent example is the company’s cruited her husband Bob into the company after he corporate sponsorship for the last two years of girls’ retired from teaching at Flathead High School.
    [Show full text]