Helix Highlights Presents the Conkerton Memorial Lecture General Committee’S Meeting with Mps
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appellate Advocacy - New Challenges
THE DENNING LAW JOURNAL APPELLATE ADVOCACY - NEW CHALLENGES THE DAME ANN EBSWORTH MEMORIAL LECTURE LONDON, TUESDAY 21 FEBRUARY 2006 The Hon Justice Michael Kirby AC CMG* DAME ANN EBSWORTH REMEMBERED This lecture honours Dame Ann Ebsworth who died in 2002 of cancer. She was but sixty-four years of age.1 As I am the inaugural lecturer, I will record some personal facts, although her memory will be green for her friends, many of whom have come to this lecture to remember her and to celebrate her life. Ann Ebsworth was born on 19 May 1937. Her father was an officer in the Royal Marines. She was raised a Roman Catholic and derived from her religion and her parents strong convictions and a sense of public service. She read history at the University of London where she was known as a formidable debater. In 1962 she was called to the Bar by Gray’s Inn. Her practice, which was in Liverpool, was predominantly criminal with some family work (which increased) and some civil work (which diminished). She rose to be head of her chambers. She was known as a considerable opponent, particularly in criminal cases. She was described as an “… effective and formidable advocate, thorough in preparation, lucid and courteous in style and entirely unflappable.”2 In 1987 she was appointed to the Northern Circuit Bench. It was at that time that she first met Brenda Hale who had begun training to be an Assistant Recorder in Liverpool. Baroness Hale has told of how thoroughly intimidated she felt, especially because of the daunting experience of lunching with the other judges at St George’s Hall. -
Lady Hale at the 2018 Pankhurst Lecture, University of Manchester
2018 – A Year of Anniversaries The 2018 Pankhurst Lecture, University of Manchester Lady Hale, President of The Supreme Court 8 February 2018 2018 marks the anniversary of some very important dates in the history of women’s participation in public life. We all know that 2018 is the 100th anniversary of women getting the vote, although not on same terms as men. Most of us probably know that it is also the 100th anniversary of women getting the right to stand as candidates and be elected to Parliament, this time on the same terms as men. Why the difference? I believe that there were two reasons why only some women got the vote. One was that the same Act of Parliament gave the vote to all men, irrespective of whether they had any property. Giving the vote effectively only to middle class women – those who either had property of their own or were married to men who did or who had University degrees – softened the effect of enfranchising the working-class men. Another was that in 1918, because of the slaughter of the First World War, there were more many more adult women than there were adult men – allowing them to vote on equal terms would have meant that they were in a majority. But there was no risk that more women than men would be elected to Parliament – the whole idea was laughable – so equality there would do no harm. Voting equality was achieved ten years later, in 1928. So we should celebrate 2018 as the 90th anniversary of women getting the 1 right to vote on equal terms with men and have an even bigger celebration in ten years’ time. -
Women Lawyers: Equals at the Bar?
5 October 2017 Women Lawyers: Equals at the Bar? PROFESSOR JO DELAHUNTY QC Question: The times they are a-changing - or are they? Do female lawyers need to be Superwomen to survive? Is motherhood welcomed, tolerated or rejected at the Bar? What makes for a successful advocate? Is gender relevant? What about career progression? Are women fairly represented on the Bench and in its most senior courts? Is there practice or appointment discrimination and if so what is being done about it? The reaction on social media to this lecture has been illuminating: within seconds of the tweet out of this lecture I received these comments: Twitter: ‘inequality is far more about class, uni, school than gender’ LinkedIn: ‘what about black and ethnic minorities’ lawyers: don’t see many at the top’ Gender, race, class and education all play a part in career opportunities and career progression. I can only speak from my perspective, it would be arrogant and insensitive to speak of the barriers to advancement on the grounds of race or disability when I am an outsider on those issues. This lecture shines the spotlight on gender issues at the Bar and draws on my experience in Family Law. I deliver this lecture coming from a background as a child of a single parent from a white working class home. I was the first person in my family to stay in education after the age of 16. I went to a comprehensive state school. My careers advisor suggested I was bright enough to apply to work in a bank but not front of house as I had an ‘attitude’. -
THE Justices of the Peace and Their Work in Early Stuart
THE COMMISSION OF THE PEACE IN LANCASHIRE, 1603-1642 D.J. Wilkinson, B.A., M.Litt. HE justices of the peace and their work in early Stuart T Lancashire have been little studied by historians, despite the ample records of their activities which survive in the Lancashire Record Office. Some recent work, notably by Keith Wrightson, 1 has begun to remedy this situation, but much remains to be done. This essay is a study of the structure of the commission of the peace in early seventeenth century Lancashire. It analyses the changing size of the commission and its social composition. Patterns of recruit ment to and omission from the magistracy are discussed. Stability and continuity emerge as the main features of the early Stuart commission of the peace in Lancashire. I In 1603, Lancashire was the only county in England and Wales whose justices of the peace were not appointed by letters patent under the great seal of England.2 Instead, the commission of the peace for Lancashire was issued by the chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster under the seal of the County Palatine, according to a statute enacted in the reign of Henry VIII.' Lancashire's commission, therefore, was drawn up separately from the commissions for the rest of the country. However, the chancellor of the Duchy was a politician who was expected to manipulate his office in the interests of the Crown,4 and there is no reason to believe that the criteria adopted for the appointment of justices of the peace in Lancashire differed from those in use elsewhere. -
Northern Circuit Guidance to Civil Practitioners Practising in the Manchester Civil Justice Centre During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Northern Circuit Guidance to Civil Practitioners practising in the Manchester Civil Justice Centre during the Covid-19 Pandemic 1. This guidance has been prepared by the Northern Circuit and the Manchester Law Society. It is aimed at providing definitive guidance for solicitors and barristers undertaking civil work in the Manchester Civil Justice Centre. 2. This document has been approved by the Designated Civil Judge and the Manchester Circuit and District Judiciary. All practitioners are expected to have read it and to comply with it wherever possible. Orders 3. It is important that orders issued by the Court are read with care. Aside from the usual need to comply with court orders, there are 3 important reasons for this: (a) First, all orders set out in clear terms what the court expects of the parties. This covers early co-operation about how a remote hearing might take place to details of how bundles should be made available to the Judge who will hear the matter. These requirements have been put in place specifically for the difficulties we find ourselves in. They are designed to facilitate a fair hearing. (b) Secondly, the orders change over time and are reactive. The court has been issuing orders to cover periods 3 to 4 weeks ahead. This means that when circumstances change (as they have recently changed) the court can react to the change. For example, orders issued in respect of multi-track trials which are yet to be listed encourage parties to let the court know if the hearing is suitable for a “part remote” hearing, with the judge and legal representatives (for example) in court, and others joining remotely. -
The Circuiteer Issue 19
CIRCUITEER – AUTUMN 2005 10/11/05 11:36 AM Page 1 Issue 21 The Circuiteer News from the South Eastern Circuit Autumn 2005 The Circuit and its Judges The Annual Dropping the Pilot Loire for Dinner everyone Page 4 Page 6 Page 12 CIRCUITEER – AUTUMN 2005 10/11/05 11:36 AM Page 2 A Note from the Editor rather differently from what was declared in July. own views on a way forward. In order better to With due respect to the matter of fees, this understand with whom we are dealing in the edition is dedicated to another, often maligned present, I have profiled the new Ministers at the institution: the judiciary, and, in particular, to four DCA and Lord Carter of Coles. friends of the Circuit. Barristers may not realise The Circuit also knows how to enjoy itself. what it feels like from the bench, coping with the The reports of the annual dinner and of the trip to flood of legislation, regulations and rules, not to Berlin in July make that clear, and the pictures mention sentencing guidelines. Then there is the speak for themselves. Our wine correspondent, occasional media attack (sometimes from Tom Sharpe, Q. C. suggests some tempting wines barristers interviewed on television) for from the Loire. Tetteh Turkson, whose palate is sentencing too lightly (or too heavily) or for also well trained, gives a fair assessment of dinner undermining the war on terrorism by supporting a at JAAN, for those whose long awaited cheques Human Rights Act which the Government no have arrived. The continuing series of Circuit longer brags about putting on the statute books. -
NYSBA Spring 2020 I Vol
NYSBA Spring 2020 I Vol. 13 I No. 1 New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer A publication of the Dispute Resolution Section of the New York State Bar Association In This Issue •The Mediation Window: An Arbitration Process Measure to Facilitate Settlement Edna Sussman •The Inauguration of ALI’s Restatement of the U.S. Law of International Commercial and U.S. State-Investor Arbitration: An Interview with George Bermann, Reporter Laura Kaster •Necessary Change: Planning Past Bias Through the ArbitralWomen Diversity ToolkitTM Rekha Rangachari From the NYSBA Book Store Preparing For and Trying the Civil Lawsuit, 2d Ed, 2018 Rev More than 30 of New York State’s leading trial practitioners and other experts reveal the techniques and tactics they have found most effective when trying a civil lawsuit. Expert commentary and numerous practice tips guide you through all aspects of a civil lawsuit, from discovery to appeals. A thorough discussion of pretrial preparation and investigation will aid the attorney in obtaining an advantageous settlement even if the case never goes to trial. Especially helpful are the excerpts from actual trial transcripts, which illustrate the effectiveness of certain lines of questioning. Trial attorneys will benefit by using the book to supplement and reinforce their own methods of practice. The 2018 Revision includes updates to the previous edition, as well as a new chapter on Attorney-Client Privilege. EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Neil A. Goldberg, Esq.; John P. Freedenberg, Esq. PRODUCT INFO AND PRICES Print: 41955 | 2018 | 1,606 pages | 2 vols. | NYSBA Members $185 | Non-Members $235 E-book: 41955E | 2018 | 1,606 pages | 2 vols. -
1 Podcast 2 Final Transcript
Podcast 2 Final Transcript The ‘Firsts’: Gaining a Foothold (1929-1939) Dr. Judith Bourne, Senior Lecturer at St. Mary's University, author and founder of ‘The First Women Lawyers in Great Britain and the Empire Symposia’ @1919lawpioneers Katie Broomfield, postgraduate researcher in the history department of Royal Holloway University of London @KRBroomfield Elizabeth Cruickshank, retired solicitor and writer on women's legal history. LA Welcome to the First 100 Years podcast series. Join me, Lucinda Acland, and guests, as we reveal decade by decade the history and lives of the women in the legal sector over the course of the last century, and bring you the stories of the courageous pioneers and their struggle to practice law, the incredible rise of women who are now involved in all aspects of the legal sector, and we discuss the factors affecting the equality of opportunity and advancement to the top of the profession. First 100 Years is a unique project, set up to celebrate the history of women in law, and inspire and promote opportunities for future generations. And we would like to thank Goldman Sachs and Linklaters, who have generously sponsored this podcast series. In the first episode, we heard how the professional organisations who acted as gatekeepers, had refused women's applications to join the legal profession. It took the passing of the Sex Disqualification Removal Act in 1919 to make it possible for women to become solicitors, barristers, jurors and magistrates, and join the high ranks of the Civil Service. In this program we are looking at the decade of the 1930s.This was a time of huge instability due to the global economic downturn, unemployment, and growing political storm clouds across Europe. -
The Lord Chief Justice's Review of the Administration of Justice in the Courts
The Lord Chief Justice’s Review of the Administration Justice in Courts The Lord Chief Justice’s Review of the Administration of Justice in the Courts Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone Fax & E-Mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 TSO Shops 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 March 2008 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Judiciary of England and Wales The Lord Chief Justice’s Review of the Administration of Justice in the Courts Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chief Justice for England and Wales in pursuance of section 5(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 31st March 2008 +& /RQGRQ7KH6WDWLRQHU\2I¿FH © Crown Copyright 2008 The text in this document (excluding any Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be DFNQRZOHGJHGDV&URZQFRS\ULJKWDQGWKHWLWOHRIWKHGRFXPHQWVSHFL¿HG Any queries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to Information Policy Division, OPSI, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. -
The Circuiteer Issue 36
The Circuiteer News from the South Eastern Circuit Issue 36 | Spring 2013 INSIDE THE CIRCUITEER… Leader’s EbSworth Column by Sarah Forshaw QC 2 LECturE: SEC Lectures available to buy 5 GEttiNG it Lawyers for Palestinian Human Rights riGht FirSt by Tareq Shrourou 10 timE Interview with Mr. Justice Singh by Fiona Jackson 12 Roberts Banks on Sentencing Developments by Barnaby Hone 16 Restaurant Review: Brixton by Tetteh Turkson 18 Bar Mess Reports 21 Editorial Committee: by the rt. hon. Lord Justice hughes 6 Ali Naseem Bajwa QC (Editor), Fiona Jackson, Tanya Robinson, Tetteh Turkson and Emily Verity The Circuiteer LEADER’S COLUMN BY SARAH FORSHAW QC I don’t tweet. I have long since There are fundamental flaws with QASA in learnt that my knee-jerk reactions its current form. They include the following: are best left un-published. That means I have a lot to say now. I would one 1. The scheme does not provide a day like the opportunity to write a light- sufficiently exacting measure of ‘quality’. hearted, up-beat Leader’s Column – at What it does is assess a minimum least before my term is over. But that day standard of competence. has not yet arrived. It is unlikely that it will. 2. ‘Plea only advocates’ are permitted under It has been a fraught seven months as QASA to represent a client charged with Leader. Timetables have been announced serious offences at a level beyond that that impact upon the publicly funded advocate’s experience, provided the lay criminal bar first and foremost. Circuiteers client pleads guilty. -
Join NYIAC for a Book Launch: ROSE QC: the Remarkable Story of Rose
March 2, 2020 Join NYIAC for a Book Launch: ROSE QC: The 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. NYIAC Remarkable Story of Rose Heilbron: Trailblazer and 150 E. 42nd St., 17th Fl. New York, NY 10017 Legal Icon, By Her Daughter Hilary Heilbron, QC Re-issued in paperback to mark the centenary of legislation enabling women to enter the professions for the first time in the United Kingdom. Rose Heilbron QC (later Dame Rose Heilbron), was an English barrister, who became a world famous icon of the 1950s and 1960s. She was one of the two first women King’s Counsel (later Queen’s Counsel) in 1949 and the first senior woman Judge in England in 1956 when she became Recorder of Burnley. This biography, written by her daughter Hilary, also a barrister and Queen’s Counsel, charts her rise to prominence and success against the odds, excelling as an advocate and lawyer and later as only the second female High Court Judge in a career spanning nearly 50 “She was without question before her time, years. She broke down many barriers with a string of firsts in the legal profession. She became blazing a trail now followed by countless a pioneer for women at the English Bar and for women generally, championing many women’s other women…Her story has everything a causes in an era when it was not fashionable to do so. good book should have: murder, mystery, suspense, courage, determination, and The biography highlights her role as an inspiring and successful defence advocate in many finally, ultimate recognition…”—Louis famous and fascinating cases as well as in cases of great legal importance. -
The Lives of Twelve Eminent Judges of the Last and of the Present Century
This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com r 1 ■ THE LIVES OK TWELVE EMINENT JUDGES OF THE LAST AND OF THE PRESENT CENTURY. WILLIAM C. TOWNSEND, ESQ. M.A. RECORDER OF MACCLESFIELD. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. I. LONDON: PRINTED KOR LONGMAN, BROWN, GREEN, AND LONGMANS, PATERNOSTER-ROW. 1846. i BOUND APR 5 1910 London : Printed by A. Spottiswoode, New- St reet- Square. PREFACE. The praise bestowed by the Quarterly and Edinburgh Reviews * upon two of the lives in these volumes, as originally published in the Law Magazine, has in duced the Author to believe that a collection of Me moirs of Eminent Modern Judges would not be un acceptable to the profession and to the public generally. The characters and fortunes of those great men who have added reverence to the judgment-seat during the last half century can scarcely fail to furnish topics of varied interest, and amusement. Commencing with the mighty master of common law, Sir Francis Buller, their history includes those eloquent holders of the Great Seal, Lords Loughborough and Erskine ; the three admirable chiefs of the Queen's Bench, Lords Kenyon, Ellenborough, and Tenterden ; those memor able Masters of the Rolls, Lord Alvanley and Sir William Grant ; those scientific lawyers, the one in real property, the other in common law, Lord Redes - dale and Sir Vicary Gibbs ; and ends with the for tunate brothers — not more fortunate than deserving — Lords Stowell and Eldon.