DOCSLIB.ORG

Mimicking Vertebrates Time Since Split from Humans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mimicking Vertebrates Time Since Split from Humans Table S1. Vertebrates with disease mimicking phenotypes. Time since split from Disease- Genome Genome humans Organ mimicking Phenotype available on annotated (millions of vertebrates NCBI? on NCBI? years; timetree.org) Pangolins Teeth 96 Myr No teeth Yes Yes (Pholidota) Baleen whales 96 Myr No teeth Yes Yes (Mysticeti) Narwhal (Monodon 96 Myr No enamel No N/A monoceros) Dwarf and pygmy sperm whales 96 Myr No enamel No N/A (Kogia spp.) Anteaters 105 Myr No teeth No N/A (Vermilingua) Sloths (Folivora) 105 Myr No enamel Yes No Armadillos 105 Myr No enamel Yes Yes (Cingulata) Aardvark 105 Myr No enamel Yes Yes (Orycteropus afer) Steller's sea cow (Hydrodamalis 105 Myr No enamel No N/A gigas) Echidnas 177 Myr No teeth No N/A (Tachyglossidae) Birds (Aves) 312 Myr No teeth Yes Yes Turtles 312 Myr No teeth Yes Yes (Testudinata) Egg-eating snakes 312 Myr No teeth No N/A (Dasypeltis spp.) Toads (Bufonidae) 352 Myr No teeth No N/A Carps, minnows, loaches and 435 Myr No teeth Yes Yes relatives (Cypriniformes) No cones, Blind mole rats Eyes 90 Myr degenerate Yes Yes (Spalacinae) eyes No cones, African mole rats 90 Myr degenerate Yes Yes (Bathyergidae) eyes Baleen whales 96 Myr No cones Yes Yes (Mysticeti) Sperm whales 96 Myr No cones Yes Yes (Physeteroidea) Beaked whales 96 Myr No cones No N/A (Ziphiidae) Sloths (Folivora) 105 Myr No cones Yes No Armadillos 105 Myr No cones Yes Yes (Cingulata) No cones, Golden moles 105 Myr degenerate Yes Yes (Chrysochloridae) eyes Marsupial moles Degenerate 159 Myr No N/A (Notoryctes spp.) eyes Burrowing snakes (Typhlopidae, Leptotyphlopidae, 312 Myr No cones No N/A Anomalepididae, Anilius scytale) Montpellier snake (Malpolon 312 Myr No rods No N/A monspessulanus) Geckos (Gekkota) 312 Myr No rods Yes Yes Blind cave No cones, salamander 352 Myr degenerate No N/A (Proteus anguinus) eyes No cones, Caecilians 352 Myr degenerate No N/A (Gymnophiona) eyes Blind cave fish No rods, (Astyanax fasciatus, 435 Myr degenerate Yes Yes Amblyopsidae) eyes Deep sea bony fishes (e.g., Conocara spp., Bathysaurus spp., 435 Myr No cones No N/A Coryphaenoides spp., Hoplostethus spp.) Deep sea cartilaginous fishes (e.g., Chimaera monstrosa, 473 Myr No cones No N/A Hydrolagus mirabilis, Bathyraja richardsoni) Lack Toothed whales Olfaction 96 Myr capacity for Yes Yes (Odontoceti) olfaction Lungless Lungs salamanders 352 Myr No lungs No N/A (Plethodontidae) Platypus Stomach (Ornithorhynchus 177 Myr No stomach Yes Yes anatinus) Lungfish (Dipnoi) 413 Myr No stomach No N/A Pufferfish 435 Myr No stomach Yes Yes (Tetraodontidae) Platyfish 435 Myr No stomach Yes Yes (Xiphophorus spp.) Zebrafish (Danio 435 Myr No stomach Yes Yes rerio) Medaka (Oryzias 435 Myr No stomach Yes Yes latipes) Chimaeras 473 Myr No stomach Yes Yes (Holocephali) Red blood Ice fishes No red 435 Myr No N/A cells (Channichthyidae) blood cells No hind Limbs Whales (Cetacea) 96 Myr Yes Yes limbs Manatees and No hind 105 Myr Yes Yes dugong (Sirenia) limbs Limbless or Snakes (Serpentes) 312 Myr degenerate Yes Yes hindlimbs Limbless or Skinks (Scincidae) 312 Myr degenerate No N/A hindlimbs No Pygopodids forelimbs, 312 Myr No N/A (Pygopodidae) degenerate hindlimbs Limbless or Seps (Tetradactylus 312 Myr degenerate No N/A spp.) hindlimbs Limbless or Worm lizards 312 Myr no hind No N/A (Amphisbaenia) limbs American legless 312 Myr Limbless No N/A lizards (Anniellidae) Caecilians 352 Myr Limbless No N/A (Gymnophiona) Females limbless, Dibamidae 352 Myr males No N/A degenerate hind limbs Grass lizards Degenerate (Chamaesaura 352 Myr No N/A limbs spp.) Limbless or Bachia 352 Myr degenerate No N/A limbs Limbless or Glass lizards 352 Myr degenerate No N/A (Ophisaurus spp.) hind limbs Sharks, skates, Bones rays, chimaeras 473 Myr No bone Yes Yes (Chondrichthyes).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Predation of Oscaecilia Bassleri (Gymnophiona: Caecilidae) by Anilius Scytale (Serpentes: Aniliidae) in Southeast Peru
    Nota Cuad. herpetol. 30 (1): 29-30 (2016) Predation of Oscaecilia bassleri (Gymnophiona: Caecilidae) by Anilius scytale (Serpentes: Aniliidae) in southeast Peru Jaime Villacampa 1, Andrew Whitworth1, 2 1 The Crees Foundation, Urbanización Mariscal Gamarra B-5 Zona 1 2da Etapa, Cusco, Peru. 2 Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. Recibida: 15 Abril 2015 ABSTRACT Revisada: 13 Octubre 2015 We report an event of predation between two fossorial species; the snake Anilius scytale on Aceptada: 21 Marzo 2016 the caecilian Oscaecilia bassleri, from the Manu Biosphere Reserve, southeast Peru. This is the Editor Asociado: A. Prudente first ever report of predation on O. bassleri and complements information known about the feeding ecology of A. scytale. Tropical fossorial herpetofauna species are rarely volunteer activities. The specimen was crossing one found due to their secretive lifestyles and therefore, of the pathways within the station, and was caught there is a paucity of information about their ecology and temporarily withheld in the project work area (Maritz and Alexander, 2009; Böhm et al., 2013), to be measured and photographed. At 21:30, during including feeding habits (Maschio et al., 2010). Here the measurements, the individual started to open we report upon a predation event involving two and close its mouth and began to regurgitate an fossorial species; the caecilian, Oscaecilia bassleri individual of O. bassleri (Fig. 1). (Dunn, 1942), predated by the coral pipe snake, The individual of A. scytale was 68.5 cm in Anilius scytale (Linnaeus, 1758).
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGIN and EVOLUTION of SNAKE EYES Dissertation
    CONQUERING THE COLD SHUDDER: THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF SNAKE EYES Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Christopher L. Caprette, B.S., M.S. **** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Thomas E. Hetherington, Advisor Approved by Jerry F. Downhower David L. Stetson Advisor The graduate program in Evolution, John W. Wenzel Ecology, and Organismal Biology ABSTRACT I investigated the ecological origin and diversity of snakes by examining one complex structure, the eye. First, using light and transmission electron microscopy, I contrasted the anatomy of the eyes of diurnal northern pine snakes and nocturnal brown treesnakes. While brown treesnakes have eyes of similar size for their snout-vent length as northern pine snakes, their lenses are an average of 27% larger (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.042). Based upon the differences in the size and position of the lens relative to the retina in these two species, I estimate that the image projected will be smaller and brighter for brown treesnakes. Northern pine snakes have a simplex, all-cone retina, in keeping with a primarily diurnal animal, while brown treesnake retinas have mostly rods with a few, scattered cones. I found microdroplets in the cone ellipsoids of northern pine snakes. In pine snakes, these droplets act as light guides. I also found microdroplets in brown treesnake rods, although these were less densely distributed and their function is unknown. Based upon the density of photoreceptors and neural layers in their retinas, and the predicted image size, brown treesnakes probably have the same visual acuity under nocturnal conditions that northern pine snakes experience under diurnal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetological Natural History Vol.6 December 1998 No.2
    HERPETOLOGICAL NATURAL HISTORY VOL.6 DECEMBER 1998 NO.2 Herpetological Natural History, 6(2), 1998, pages 78-150. ©1998 by the International Herpetological Symposium, Inc. NATURAL HISTORY OF SNAKES IN FORESTS OF THE MANAUS REGION, CENTRAL AMAZONIA, BRAZIL* Marcio Martins Departamento de Ecologia Geral, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Caixa Postal 11.461, 05422-970 Sao Paulo SP, Brazil M. Ermelinda Oliveira Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biol6gicas, Universidade do Amazonas, Av. Rodrigo Otavio 3.000, 69077-000 Manaus AM, Brazil Abstract. We present natural history information on 66 species of snakes found in the forests of the Mana us region, Central Amazonia, Brazil. For each species, we provide information on size, color pattern, habitat and microhabitat, feeding habits, reproduction, and defense. We also include a partial summary of the infor­ mation available in the literature for Amazonian localities. Our results are based on nearly 800 captures or sightings of snakes made from 1990-95 at localities around Manaus, mostly at a primary forest reserve 25 km north of Manaus. Field data at this reserve were obtained during over 2600 person-h of visually search­ ing for snakes, ca. 1600 of which occurred during time-constrained search. Temperature and relative humid­ ity in Manaus are high and the amount of annual rainfall (2075 mm/yr) is relatively small, with a long dry season (4-7 mo). Of the 65 species for which information is available, 28 (42%) are primarily terrestrial, 20 (30%) fossorial and/or cryptozoic, 13 (20%) arboreal, and four (6%) aquatic, although many species use more than one microhabitat when active.
    [Show full text]
  • 58Th Legislature SB0442 an ACT
    58th Legislature SB0442 AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF EXOTIC WILDLIFE; PROVIDING THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE, AND PARKS MAY ISSUE PERMITS FOR AUTHORIZING THE POSSESSION OR SALE OF CONTROLLED EXOTIC WILDLIFE AND CHARGE A REASONABLE FEE FOR THE PERMIT; PROVIDING FOR LISTS OF NONCONTROLLED, CONTROLLED, AND PROHIBITED EXOTIC WILDLIFE; ESTABLISHING A CLASSIFICATION REVIEW COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE FISH, WILDLIFE, AND PARKS COMMISSION REGARDING THE IMPORTATION, POSSESSION, AND SALE OF EXOTIC WILDLIFE; PROVIDING EXCEPTIONS AND EXEMPTIONS FROM THE REGULATION OF EXOTIC WILDLIFE; PROVIDING AN AMNESTY PROGRAM FOR EXOTIC WILDLIFE POSSESSED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2004; AMENDING SECTIONS 87-5-701, 87-5-702, 87-5-704, 87-5-712, AND 87-5-716, MCA; AND PROVIDING A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA: Section 1. Regulation of exotic wildlife. (1) A person may not import into the state, possess, or sell any exotic wildlife unless: (a) the importation, possession, or sale of the exotic wildlife is allowed by law or commission rule; and (b) the person has obtained authorization for importation from the department of livestock pursuant to Title 81, chapter 2, part 7. (2) The department may issue a permit for authorizing the possession or sale of controlled exotic wildlife and make the permit available to persons who wish to import, possess, or sell controlled exotic wildlife, subject to rules of the commission and the department. The department may charge a reasonable fee, as determined by department rule, for the issuance of the authorization permit. Section 2. Noncontrolled exotic wildlife authorized for possession or sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpentes: Aniliidae): Rare Colour Aberration Or a New Species?
    Herpetology Notes, volume 11: 161-165 (2018) (published online on 10 February 2018) A remarkable specimen of the genus Anilius (Serpentes: Aniliidae): rare colour aberration or a new species? Raiany Cristine Cruz-da-Silva1, Marco Antonio de Freitas2 and Arthur Diesel Abegg3,* Traditionally, the clade Anilioidea Fitzinger, 1826 subspecies: Anilius scytale scytale (Linnaeus, 1758) and covers fossorial snakes that share singular cranial Anilius scytale phelpsorum Roze, 1958, distinguishing characteristics, with the palatine meeting palatal plate them based on the width and number of black body bands of the vomer to form a complete bony floor to the (wider and larger in average in the nominal subspecies). choanal passage, encompassing the monotypic genus In this study, we recorded a morphologically distinct Anilius Oken, 1816 (Aniliidae) besides Cylindrophis specimen from the two taxa currently recognizable Wagler, 1828 and Anomochilus Berg, 1901, in addition under the name A. scytale, without black dorsal bands, to Uropeltidae (McDowell, 1975; Hsiang et al., 2015). and discuss some possibilities about whether it is a new However, recent phylogenetic analyses have found species or specimen presenting an anomalous colour similarities between Anilius and Tropidophiidae and morphology. Brongersma, 1951, who share a morphological The specimen (Figure. 1A-B), was collected on apomorphism in the reproductive system, thus rejecting 07/26/2017, at 10:00 pm, in the municipality of Palmas the monophyletic Anilioidea (Siegel and Aldridge, (-10.2166, -48.3500, DATUM WGS84, 230 m ASL), in 2011; Pyron et al., 2013; Hsiang et al., 2015). the state of Tocantins, Brazil, by Raiany Cristine Cruz da Anilius scytale (Linnaeus, 1758) is widely distributed Silva and Marco Antonio de Freitas (Collecting permit along the Amazonian forest, also occurring in the SISBIO 52416-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Surveys Reveal High Species Richness in Areas Recovering from Mining Activity in the Brazilian Cerrado
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321245364 Reptile surveys reveal high species richness in areas recovering from mining activity in the Brazilian Cerrado Article in Biologia · November 2017 DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2017-0138 CITATIONS READS 0 565 10 authors, including: Fabrício Hiroiuki Oda Robson Waldemar Ávila Universidade Estadual de Maringá Universidade Regional do Cariri 67 PUBLICATIONS 186 CITATIONS 144 PUBLICATIONS 756 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Leandro Oliveira Drummond Danusy Lopes Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Universidade Federal de Goiás 29 PUBLICATIONS 108 CITATIONS 22 PUBLICATIONS 39 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Avaliação da influência das atividades antrópicas na estruturação de comunidades e populações de vertebrados da Serra do Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais View project Ecology of lizards parasites View project All content following this page was uploaded by Leandro Oliveira Drummond on 23 November 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Biologia 72/10: 1194—1210, 2017 Section Zoology DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2017-0138 Reptile surveys reveal high species richness in areas recovering from mining activity in the Brazilian Cerrado Fabrício H. Oda1,2,RobsonW.Ávila3, Leandro de O. Drummond4,DanusyL.Santos5, Priscilla G. Gambale5,6, Vinicius Guerra5,6,RaísaRomˆenia S. Vieira7, Tiago S. Vasconcelos 8, Rogério P. Bastos5 &FaustoNomura5 1Centro
    [Show full text]
  • GICAL Description of a Second Known Liotyphlops Caissara Specimen
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2019) 91(3): e20181104 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920181104 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal Description of a second known Liotyphlops caissara specimen (Serpentes: Anomalepididae) Running title: A SECOND KNOWN ARTHUR D. ABEGG1,2, WEVERTON S. AZEVEDO1, FRANCISCO L. FRANCO1 and MARCELO R. DUARTE1 SPECIMEN OF Liotyphlops caissara 1Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, Avenida Vital Brasil, 1500, 05503-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Academy Section: BIOLOGICAL 2Universidade de São Paulo/USP, Instituto de Biociências/IB, Rua do Matão, 14, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil SCIENCES Manuscript received on October 19, 2018; accepted for publication on June 17, 2019 e20181104 How to cite: ABEGG AD, AZEVEDO WS, FRANCO FL AND DUARTE MR. 2019. Description of a second known Liotyphlops caissara specimen (Serpentes: Anomalepididae). An Acad Bras Cienc 91: e20181104. DOI 10.1590/0001- 3765201920181104. 91 Abstract: We recorded a second specimen of the poorly known insular blind snake Liotyphlops caissara. (3) This new specimen expands the morphological variation of the number of dorsal scales in the genus 91(3) Liotyphlops to 296 (vs. 304 in L. wilderi) and, considering the fact that the holotype of this species was destroyed, the present specimen represents the only available L. caissara individual in zoological collections. Also, this new record constitutes the first out of type locality and expands the distribution of the species in about 40 km to the northeastern. According to IUCN criteria (B1a, b [iii]), we suggest that L.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of the Dwarf Boas and a Comparison of Bayesian and Bootstrap Measures of Phylogenetic Support
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25 (2002) 361–371 www.academicpress.com Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support Thomas P. Wilcox, Derrick J. Zwickl, Tracy A. Heath, and David M. Hillis* Section of Integrative Biology and Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA Received 4 February 2002; received in revised form 18 May 2002 Abstract Four New World genera of dwarf boas (Exiliboa, Trachyboa, Tropidophis, and Ungaliophis) have been placed by many syste- matists in a single group (traditionally called Tropidophiidae). However, the monophyly of this group has been questioned in several studies. Moreover, the overall relationships among basal snake lineages, including the placement of the dwarf boas, are poorly understood. We obtained mtDNAsequence data for 12S, 16S, and intervening tRNA–valgenes from 23 species of snakes repre- senting most major snake lineages, including all four genera of New World dwarf boas. We then examined the phylogenetic position of these species by estimating the phylogeny of the basal snakes. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that New World dwarf boas are not monophyletic. Instead, we find Exiliboa and Ungaliophis to be most closely related to sand boas (Erycinae), boas (Boinae), and advanced snakes (Caenophidea), whereas Tropidophis and Trachyboa form an independent clade that separated relatively early in snake radiation. Our estimate of snake phylogeny differs significantly in other ways from some previous estimates of snake phy- logeny. For instance, pythons do not cluster with boas and sand boas, but instead show a strong relationship with Loxocemus and Xenopeltis.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetology at the Isthmus Species Checklist
    Herpetology at the Isthmus Species Checklist AMPHIBIANS BUFONIDAE true toads Atelopus zeteki Panamanian Golden Frog Incilius coniferus Green Climbing Toad Incilius signifer Panama Dry Forest Toad Rhaebo haematiticus Truando Toad (Litter Toad) Rhinella alata South American Common Toad Rhinella granulosa Granular Toad Rhinella margaritifera South American Common Toad Rhinella marina Cane Toad CENTROLENIDAE glass frogs Cochranella euknemos Fringe-limbed Glass Frog Cochranella granulosa Grainy Cochran Frog Espadarana prosoblepon Emerald Glass Frog Sachatamia albomaculata Yellow-flecked Glass Frog Sachatamia ilex Ghost Glass Frog Teratohyla pulverata Chiriqui Glass Frog Teratohyla spinosa Spiny Cochran Frog Hyalinobatrachium chirripoi Suretka Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium colymbiphyllum Plantation Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni Fleischmann’s Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium valeroi Reticulated Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium vireovittatum Starrett’s Glass Frog CRAUGASTORIDAE robber frogs Craugastor bransfordii Bransford’s Robber Frog Craugastor crassidigitus Isla Bonita Robber Frog Craugastor fitzingeri Fitzinger’s Robber Frog Craugastor gollmeri Evergreen Robber Frog Craugastor megacephalus Veragua Robber Frog Craugastor noblei Noble’s Robber Frog Craugastor stejnegerianus Stejneger’s Robber Frog Craugastor tabasarae Tabasara Robber Frog Craugastor talamancae Almirante Robber Frog DENDROBATIDAE poison dart frogs Allobates talamancae Striped (Talamanca) Rocket Frog Colostethus panamensis Panama Rocket Frog Colostethus pratti Pratt’s Rocket
    [Show full text]
  • Snake Communities Worldwide
    Web Ecology 6: 44–58. Testing hypotheses on the ecological patterns of rarity using a novel model of study: snake communities worldwide L. Luiselli Luiselli, L. 2006. Testing hypotheses on the ecological patterns of rarity using a novel model of study: snake communities worldwide. – Web Ecol. 6: 44–58. The theoretical and empirical causes and consequences of rarity are of central impor- tance for both ecological theory and conservation. It is not surprising that studies of the biology of rarity have grown tremendously during the past two decades, with particular emphasis on patterns observed in insects, birds, mammals, and plants. I analyse the patterns of the biology of rarity by using a novel model system: snake communities worldwide. I also test some of the main hypotheses that have been proposed to explain and predict rarity in species. I use two operational definitions for rarity in snakes: Rare species (RAR) are those that accounted for 1% to 2% of the total number of individuals captured within a given community; Very rare species (VER) account for ≤ 1% of individuals captured. I analyse each community by sample size, species richness, conti- nent, climatic region, habitat and ecological characteristics of the RAR and VER spe- cies. Positive correlations between total species number and the fraction of RAR and VER species and between sample size and rare species in general were found. As shown in previous insect studies, there is a clear trend for the percentage of RAR and VER snake species to increase in species-rich, tropical African and South American commu- nities. This study also shows that rare species are particularly common in the tropics, although habitat type did not influence the frequency of RAR and VER species.
    [Show full text]
  • Waite's Blind Snakes (Squamata: Scolecophidia
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 1999 Records of the Australian Museum (1999) Vol. 51: 43–56. ISSN 0067–1975 Waite’s Blind Snakes (Squamata: Scolecophidia: Typhlopidae): Identification of Sources and Correction of Errors GLENN M. SHEA Department of Veterinary Anatomy & Pathology, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The majority of the 542 typhlopid specimens examined by Edgar Waite for his 1918 monograph of the family are identified, and their current status discussed. Most Waite records that do not correspond with the distribution based on modern records are shown to be in error, involving either misidentifications, misreadings of localities, or transposition of data. A few remaining problematic records are considered dubious due to a lack of supporting data. Ramphotyphlops batillus (Waite, 1894), known only from the holotype from Wagga Wagga, NSW, is restored to the Australian fauna, and new data on the type are provided. Probable paratypes for Typhlops grypus (SAM R849; QM J2947), T. proximus (AM R615, R145401– 07, SAM R915) and T. subocularis (AM R2169) are identified. New data on dorsal scale counts are provided for Ramphotyphlops leucoproctus (377–394), R. polygrammicus (370–422), R. proximus (326– 392), R. wiedii (381–439) and R. yirrikalae (447–450). SHEA, GLENN M., 1999. Waite’s blind snakes (Squamata: Scolecophidia: Typhlopidae): identification of sources and correction of errors. Records of the Australian Museum 51(1): 43–56. Although a number of species of Australian typhlopid work, particularly his key, distribution maps and figures, snakes had been described by European herpetologists in has been the main source of much of the subsequent the nineteenth century, notably Wilhelm Peters and George literature on Australian typhlopids.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Predation Interactions Between Birds and Amphisbaenians, and a Report of Bites by Amphisbaena Vermicularis Wagler, 1824 (Squamata: Amphisbaenidae)
    Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 1117-1122 (2021) (published online on 20 Aug 2021) New records of predation interactions between birds and amphisbaenians, and a report of bites by Amphisbaena vermicularis Wagler, 1824 (Squamata: Amphisbaenidae) Lucas de Souza Almeida1,* and Lucas Lima Bezerra2 Amphisbaenids are limbless reptiles with worm-like to display defensive tactics such as erratic movements, appearance, reduced eyes, and fossorial habits (Barros- fleeing, caudal luring, gaping the mouth, caudal autotomy, Filho et al., 2008). Their range covers the African and and biting (Greene, 1973; Navega-Gonçalves and Benites, American continents and, up to now, 182 species have 2019; Guedes et al., 2020). Here we present two records been described, of which 82 are reported to occur in of interactions between amphisbaenians and birds, one Brazil (Costa and Bérnils, 2018; Uetz et al., 2020). with a Roadside Hawk, Rupornis magnirostris (Gmelin, These animals are adapted for living most of their lives 1788), and another with a Rufous Hornero, Furnarius in underground galleries (Gans, 1978; Kearney and rufus (Gmelin, 1788). We also report a defensive Stuart, 2004; Bernarde, 2012; Vitt and Caldwell, 2013), behaviour for Amphisbaena vermicularis Wagler, 1824. using their heads with highly specialized and resistant The first interaction occurred on 30 September 2017 bones to excavate (Gans, 1978). Since they inhabit at 11:42 h, after a rainy morning, in a fragment of dense underground galleries, amphisbaenians are difficult to ombrophilous rainforest located in an urban area in the find and, therefore, their natural history,in situ behaviour, coastal city of Peruíbe, São Paulo State, southeastern predators, and prey are rarely documented (Gans, 1971; Brazil (24.3636°S, 47.0213°W; Datum WGS-84; Marques and Sazima, 1997; Filogonio et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]