The Solid Earth: an Introduction to Global Geophysics, Second Edition C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Solid Earth: an Introduction to Global Geophysics, Second Edition C Cambridge University Press 0521584094 - The Solid Earth: An Introduction to Global Geophysics, Second Edition C. M. R. Fowler Index More information Index absolute age 234 Airy’s hypothesis 203–4, 209, 210, 215, andesitic basalt 397 absolute plate motion 32–6 216, 397 Andrew Bain fracture zone 414 abyssal plain 393, 459, 655, see also ak135 326 angle of shear 621 ocean basin aktualism 595 angular momentum, Earth 348 Acasta gneiss 262 Alaska subduction zone 465 angular velocity 14, 19, 648 accreted terrane 482, 516, 551, 655 Alberta Basin 559, 561, 562, 563, 566 present-day 15 accretion, Earth 265, 285 Alboran Sea 542 relative 18 accretionary wedge, see subduction zone Aleutian subduction zone 6, 77, 461, 465, anisotropy 346–8 accuracy 234 470, 471, 526 oceanic mantle 408 achondritic meteorite, see meteorite Aleutian Trench 8, 86, 475, 477 Antarctica 8, 23, 71, 88 acid rocks 396 alkali basalt, radioactive elements 276 anticline 173, 655 actinium series 247 alkaline rock 397 anticrack faulting, olivine-spinel 472 active margin 394, 655, see also alkali-olivine basalt 397 apatite, closure temperatures 243, 261 continental margin allanite, closure temperatures 243, 261 apatite, fission track 318, 319 activity, see radioactive decay alpha particle 655 Apennines 542 adakite, formation 526 Alpine fault, New Zealand 319 Appalachian Basin 561, 562–5, 566 Adams–Williamson equation 331, 333, Alps 88, 312, 541–50 Appalachians 302, 516, 564 334 crustal thickness 548 Ar–Ar dating, see radioactive dating adiabat 303–7, 334, 343, 350, 524, earthquakes 464 Ar ratio, non-radiogenic atmospheric 254 655 gravity 545, 546 Ar adiabatic expansion 304 seismic structure 546, 547–8, 549 loss 252, 254 Adriatic block 541, 542 seismicity 548 natural isotopic abundance 252 advection 269, 270, 274, 291, 358, 462, shortening 545 radioactive decay 238, 365 see also heat uplift 550 Arabian plate 8, 31, 542 Aegean Altai Shan 535 subduction 526 mantle structure 338 altered rock 655 Arabian Sea, magnetic anomaly 76 relative motion 542 Altyn Tagh Fault 535 Archaean 308, 595–601, 655 subduction zone 344, 461, 541, 542 Amadeus Basin 578 continental crust 280, 596–8 aeon 655 Amazonia 88 diamonds 597 Africa 88 Amitsˆoqgneiss 246 geotherm 598, 600, see also geotherm rifting 585 Amp`ere’s law 617 heat 298, 371, 599 seismic velocity 339 amphibolite 655 initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio 245 Africa–Eurasia, motion, seismicity 440 Amundsen Basin 422 lithosphere 597, 598 African plate 8, 31, 36, 70, 541 Anatolian plate 541, 542 magma anomaly 600 aftershock, see earthquake aftershock Andes 202, 310, 552 magnetic field 381 afterslip, see earthquake afterslip crustal structure 479, 482, 485 mantle 366, 371, 600 age of Earth, see Earth gravity 475, 479 oceanic crust 599, 600 age of Sun 234 Sr ratio 486 plate tectonics 285, 370–1, 599 air gun 141, 157 topography 479 temperature 280, 285 Airy, Sir George 202 andesite 395, 396, 397, 485, 525, 655 Archimedes’ principle 202 666 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521584094 - The Solid Earth: An Introduction to Global Geophysics, Second Edition C. M. R. Fowler Index More information Index 667 Arctic 70, 422 seismic velocity 513 boundary-layer model, see plate models arc–trench gap 459 basaltic andesite 397 Boussinesq approximation 355, see also argon, see Ar basement rock 656 convection Arrhenius equation 242 basic rocks 396 Bouvet Triple Junction 8, 33, 71 aseismic region 655 basin 656 bow shock 47 aseismic slip 114, 468, 469, 483 Basin and Range 299, 300, 302, 511, 559, Bowie hotspot 363 Asia, tectonics 535, 536 566, 590 Brazilide Ocean 88 aspect ratio 359–60 Bateman relations 239 breathing mode 110 asteroids, origin 263 batholith 656 British Institutions Reflection Profiling asthenosphere 5, 108, 202, 297, 655 bathymetry 656 Syndicate, see BIRPS viscosity 225, 228 Chain transform fault 443 brittle–ductile transition 514 Atlantic MORB 414 Clipperton transform fault 442 Bruhnes epoch 60 Atlantic Ocean East Pacific Rise 442 Bruhnes, Bernard 60 opening 53, 70, 88, 545 Hawaii 219 BSR, bottom-simulating reflector 167–8, sediment thickness 400 Mid-Atlantic Ridge 392, 411 527 spreading rate 60 mid-ocean ridge 442, 443 bulk Earth, isotope ratio 361 Atlantis Bank 398, 402, 450 New Hebrides Trench 392 bulk modulus 102–4, 331, 332, 625, Atlantis II transform fault, Southwest Pacific–Antarctic Ridge 392 656 Indian Ridge 398, 441, 450, 452 Peru–Chile Trench 392 bulk modulus, versus depth 335 Atlantis transform fault 420–2, 424, 441 Romanche Transform Fault 443 Bullard, Sir Edward (Teddy) 14, 374 atmosphere 47 Southwest Indian Ridge 392 b-value, see earthquake, b-value atomic number 655 St Paul Transform Fault 443 attenuation, see quality factor Bay of Bengal, magnetic anomaly 71, 76 c 126 Aurora 47 Bay of Biscay 542, 574 14C decay 238 Australia 71, 76, 262 Bay of Islands ophiolite 405 Calaveras Fault 124 Australia, gravity 578, 579 b.c.c., see iron calcic rock 397 Australia, rifting from Antarctica 74, Becquerel, Henri 233 Caledonian orogeny 550–1 88 Benioff, Hugo 464 California Australian–Antarctic Discordance 414 beta particle 656 motion 18 auxiliary plane, focal mechanism 134, Betics 542 seismicity 124 137, 139 biotite, closure temperature 243, 261 Cambrian 88 axial magnetization 67 Birch’s law 103, 104 Canada Basin 422 axial volcanic ridge 419 BIRPS 177, 178, 550 Canadian Shield 300, 339 Azores Triple Junction 8, 33, 440 Black Sea 88, 542 Canyon Diablo meteorite 265 black smokers, see hydrothermal Capricorn plate 76 Babylonians 1 circulation carbonaceous chondrite 263 back-arc basin 394, 402, 459, 460, 486, Blake Spur fracture zone 450, 452 Caribbean plate 70 526, 655 Blanco transform fault 441 Carlsberg Ridge 8, 70, 74 backstripping 557 blocking temperature 51, 242, 318, see Carpathians 88, 542 Baffin Bay 70 also closure temperature Cascadia subduction zone 31, 81, 83, Baikal Rift 535, 536, 585 blueschist 523, 656 167, 461 Baja California 82 body wave 101–4, 656 earthquakes 468, 469 balloon mode 110 amplitude 104, 152 heat flow 482 Baltica 88, 302 magnitude, see earthquake seismic structure 168, 483 Banggong Nujiang suture 531, 532 seismic velocity 104 seismic hazard 121 basalt 395, 396, 397, 656 Boltwood, Bruce 233, 262 seismicity 482 melting 518, 526 bottom-simulating reflector, see BSR uplift 473 metamorphic reactions 518 Bouguer anomaly 206, see also gravity Caspian Sea 88, 542 P-wave velocity with P, T 413 Bouguer correction 206 cation 656 radioactive elements 242, 276 Bouguer, Pierre 202 Caucasus 542 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521584094 - The Solid Earth: An Introduction to Global Geophysics, Second Edition C. M. R. Fowler Index More information 668 Index CDP reflection method 158, 159, 160, compensation 203, 205, 210, 289, 453, continental heat flow 286, 298–303 162, see also stacking see also isostasy province 299, 300 Cenozoic ocean and continent 204, 209, 397 continental lithosphere, strength envelope Central America subduction zone 465 complementary error function 282 514–15 Central Indian Ridge 8, 70, 71, 74, 75, composition continental margin 418 core 350–3 bathymetry 394 centrifugal acceleration 197 crust 348, 513–17 non-volcanic 568, 570 centripetal acceleration 656 Earth 348–53 passive 393 Chagos–Maldive–Laccadive Ridge 71, mantle 348–50 sediment 398, 560 74, 75 compressional basins 577–81 seismic velocity 576 Chain Transform Fault 443, 458 compressional fault 131 subsidence 575 Challenger Deep 391 compressional wave 656 transform fault 442 Challenger, HMS 391 equation 102 volcanic 568, 569, 576 characteristic distance 281 concordant dates, see radioactive dating continental reconstructions 88 characteristic time 281 concordia, see radioactive dating continental rifting Charlie Gibbs transform fault 452, conduction 5–10, 269, 271, 656, see also Africa and Antarctica 71 see transform fault heat Africa and India 74 chemical remanent magnetization conductive heat flow, timescale 281 Africa and North America 70 51 conductivity, see thermal conductivity Australia and Antarctica 74 chemosynthesis 430 Congo 88 early geometry 443–4 Chile Trench Conrad discontinuity 511 Eurasia and North America 70 bathymetry 479 conservative plate boundary 6 Greenland and Eurasia 70 crustal structure 482 Consortium for Continental Reflection Greenland and North America 70 Chile, composition magma 522 Profiling, see COCORP India and Australia 71 China 88 constructive plate boundary, see divergent Madagascar and Antarctica 71 chondritic meteorite 254, see meteorite boundary continental rifts 70, 124, 570, 584–95 CHUR (chondritic uniform reservoir) contact metamorphism 310 continental rise 393, 394, 656 256–7, 264, 656 continent continental shelf 286, 393, 394, 656 Clapeyron curve, olivine 349, 464 ages 262, 263, 515, 516, 595 continental shield, roots 339, 347 classical ray theory 156 seismic structure 109, 538, 550, 593, continental slope 393, 394, 656 clinopyroxene 349 594 continent–continent collision 75, 362, Clipperton transform fault continental crust 530–55 bathymetry 442 Archaean 597, 598 convection, see also mantle and heat crust 441, 453 area 516, 649 bimodal 354, 355 closed system, see radioactive dating classification 512 Boussinesq approximation 355 closure temperature 242, 243, 244, 252, composition 513–17 cell dimensions 357, 359–60, 365, 366 261, 262 density 10 coupling core and mantle 379 CMB, see core–mantle boundary geotherm 279, 280, 303 critical Rayleigh number 356–7, 358 COCORP 176, 177, 510, 553, 567, 592, heat generation 300–2, 313, 525 dimensionless numbers 356,
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3. the Crust and Upper Mantle
    Theory of the Earth Don L. Anderson Chapter 3. The Crust and Upper Mantle Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, c1989 Copyright transferred to the author September 2, 1998. You are granted permission for individual, educational, research and noncommercial reproduction, distribution, display and performance of this work in any format. Recommended citation: Anderson, Don L. Theory of the Earth. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:1989.001 A scanned image of the entire book may be found at the following persistent URL: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBook:1989.001 Abstract: T he structure of the Earth's interior is fairly well known from seismology, and knowledge of the fine structure is improving continuously. Seismology not only provides the structure, it also provides information about the composition, crystal structure or mineralogy and physical state. In subsequent chapters I will discuss how to combine seismic with other kinds of data to constrain these properties. A recent seismological model of the Earth is shown in Figure 3-1. Earth is conventionally divided into crust, mantle and core, but each of these has subdivisions that are almost as fundamental (Table 3-1). The lower mantle is the largest subdivision, and therefore it dominates any attempt to perform major- element mass balance calculations. The crust is the smallest solid subdivision, but it has an importance far in excess of its relative size because we live on it and extract our resources from it, and, as we shall see, it contains a large fraction of the terrestrial inventory of many elements. In this and the next chapter I discuss each of the major subdivisions, starting with the crust and ending with the inner core.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deep Structure of Continents
    VOL. 84, NO. B I3 JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH DECEMBER 10, 1979 The Deep Structure of Continents DON L. ANDERSON SeismologicalLaboratory, California Institute of Technology,Pasadena, California 91125 The Lehmann discontinuityat 220-km depth is an important global feature which occursunder both oceansand continents.It is a barrier to penetrationby younglithosphere and marks the baseof seismic- ity in regionsof continent-continentcollision. The stronglateral variationin uppermantle velocitiesoc- cursmainly abovethis depth. Continentalroots extend no deeperthan about 150-200 km. The basalt- eclogitetransformation and eclogite-harzburgiteseparation may be responsiblefor the geometryof inter- mediatedepth earthquakes.Oceanic and continentalgeotherms converge above about 200 km and be- comeless steep than the meltinggradient at greaterdepth. This impliesa low viscositychannel near 250 km. This would give a decouplingzone of maximumshear beneath continental shields. The Lehmann discontinuitymay be the interfacebetween two distinctgeochemical reservoirs. The velocityjump, and the inferreddensity jump, at 220 km are consistentwith an increasein garnetcontent. The mantle may be garnetlherzolite above and eclogiteimmediately below the Lehmanndiscontinuity. The transitionre- gion may be mainly eclogiteand be the sourceregion for oceanictholeiites. INTRODUCTION nental values[Jordan and Anderson,1974; Jordan, 1975].Hart et al. [1977] determined an attenuation corrected free oscilla- Continental lithosphereis much thicker than oceanic litho- sphere,but the question of how thick a sectionof continent tion averageearth model, QM2, which is comparedwith the translatescoherently during continental drift has not yet been continentalmodel SHR14 of Helmbergerand Engen[1974] in adequatelyaddressed. The bottom of the low-velocity zone is Figure 2. A more direct comparisonis the Pacific-easternU.S. usuallyconsidered to be the bottom of the asthenosphereand curve which is from Cara's [1979] surfacewave study.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper-Mantle Low-Velocity Zone Structure Beneath the Kaapvaal Craton from S-Wave Receiver Functions
    Geophys. J. Int. (2009) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04178.x Upper-mantle low-velocity zone structure beneath the Kaapvaal craton from S-wave receiver functions Samantha E. Hansen,1 Andrew A. Nyblade,2 Jordi Julia,` 1 Paul H.G.M. Dirks3 and Raymond J. Durrheim3 1Department of Geosciences, 407 Deike Bldg., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Geosciences, 447 Deike Bldg., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 3School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Wits 2050, South Africa Accepted 2009 March 10. Received 2009 February 9; in original form 2008 October 3 SUMMARY The southern African Plateau is marked by anomalously high elevations, reaching 1–2 km above sea level, and there is much debate as to whether this topography is compensated by a lower mantle source or by elevated temperatures in the upper mantle. In this study, we use S-wave receiver functions (SRFs) to estimate the lithospheric thickness and sublithospheric mantle velocity structure beneath the Kaapvaal craton, which forms the core of the Plateau. To fit the SRF data, a low-velocity zone (LVZ) is required below a ∼160-km-thick lithospheric lid, but the LVZ is no thicker than ∼90 km. Although the lid thickness obtained is thinner than that reported in previous SRF studies, neither the lid thickness nor the shear velocity decrease (∼4.5%) associated with the LVZ is anomalous compared to other cratonic environ- ments. Therefore, we conclude that elevated temperatures in the sublithospheric upper mantle contribute little support to the high elevations in this region of southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPS CCP STACKS of P- & S-Wave RECEIVER
    LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE BENEATH FENNOSCANDIA BASED ON P- AND S-WAVE CONTACT ME: RECEIVER FUNCTIONS [email protected] Anna Makushkina 1, Benoit Tauzin 1,2, Meghan Miller 1, Hans Thybo 3,4,5, and Hrvoje Tkalčić 1 1 Australian National University; 2 University of Lyon, Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon; 3 CEED, University of Oslo; 4 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University; 5 China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China, INTRODUCTION Fennoscandia consists of geologically distinct domains of Archaean, RESULTS: MAPS Moho MLD HVZ early and late Proterozoic and Phanerozoic age at the surface. A little is known about the interrelation of these domains at depth. Moho depth obtained by picking (left) SRF CCP images (background color) and (right) PRF Map of the Mid-lithospheric discontinuity Depths of the high-velocity zone CCP images with Moho depth (background) measurements from EUNAseis [1] (diamonds) Controlled-source experiments show potential expression of suture zones extending down to 100 km depth. SRF PRF Regional studies show evidence for the mid-lithospheric (MLD), 8-degree discontinuity or the lithosphere– asthenosphere boundary (LAB), that are markers of continent formation and evolution. But each study samples a small portion of Sketch of the expected discontinuities. Fennoscandia and does not provide a Red color indicates discontinuity with increase of velocity with depth, blue – Topography map (m); white circles are stations used comprehensive model for the whole decrease. MLD – mid-lithospheric in this study system [e.g. 2,3,4]. discontinuity; HVZ – high velocity zone; Our goal is to image structural differences of the upper mantle in 3 geological domains LVZ – low velocity zone; LAB – create a unified model of Fennoscandia.
    [Show full text]
  • Inge Lehmann: Discoverer of the Earth's Inner Core 2/4/17, 524 PM
    Inge Lehmann: Discoverer of the Earth's Inner Core 2/4/17, 524 PM Log In | Register Select Language​▼ Search Keywords or Topics GO SHARE: (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://www.amnh.org/explore/resource-collections/earth-inside-and-out/inge-lehmann-discoverer-of- the-earth-s-inner-core) Explore(http://twitter.com/intent/tweet? Inge Lehmann: Discoverer of the Earth's Inner text=Inge%20Lehmann%3A%20Discoverer%20of%20the%20Earth%27s%20Inner%20Core&url=http://www.amnh.org/explore/resource- collections/earth-inside-and-out/inge-lehmann-discoverer-of-the-earth-s-inner-core)Science Topics Core Kids Guide to the How can we find out what’s happening deep inside the Earth? Collect Museum The temperatures are too hot, pressures too extreme, and distances too vast to be explored by conventional probes. So Resource Collections scientists rely on seismic waves—shock waves generated by earthquakes and explosions that travel through Earth and Biodiversity Crisis across its surface—to reveal the structure of the interior of the Cosmic Horizons planet. Thousands of earthquakes occur every year, and each Earth Inside and one provides a fleeting glimpse of the Earth’s interior. Seismic Out signals consist of several kinds of waves. Those important for understanding the Earth’s interior are P-waves, (primary, or A Conversation compressional waves), and S-waves (secondary, or shear with Jacques waves), which travel through solid and liquid material in Malavieille different ways. Forecasting Earthquakes Using Paleoseismology The seismograph, which detects and records the movement of Dr. Inge Lehmann (1888-1993), seismic waves, was invented in 1880.
    [Show full text]
  • Anisotropic Shear-Wave Velocity Structure of the Earth's Mantle
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, B06306, doi:10.1029/2007JB005169, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Anisotropic shear-wave velocity structure of the Earth’s mantle: A global model B. Kustowski,1,2 G. Ekstro¨m,3 and A. M. Dziewon´ski1 Received 12 May 2007; revised 8 February 2008; accepted 14 March 2008; published 25 June 2008. [1] We combine a new, large data set of surface wave phase anomalies, long-period waveforms, and body wave travel times to construct a three-dimensional model of the anisotropic shear wave velocity in the Earth’s mantle. Our modeling approach is improved and more comprehensive compared to our earlier studies and involves the development and implementation of a new spherically symmetric reference model, simultaneous inversion for velocity and anisotropy, as well as discontinuity topographies, and implementation of nonlinear crustal corrections for waveforms. A comparison of our new three-dimensional model, S362ANI, with two other models derived from comparable data sets but using different techniques reveals persistent features: (1) strong, 200-km-thick, high-velocity anomalies beneath cratons, likely representing the continental lithosphere, underlain by weaker, fast anomalies extending below 250 km, which may represent continental roots, (2) weak velocity heterogeneity between 250 and 400 km depths, (3) fast anomalies extending horizontally up to 2000–3000 km in the mantle transition zone beneath subduction zones, (4) lack of strong long-wavelength heterogeneity below 650 km suggesting inhibiting character of the upper mantle–lower mantle boundary, and (5) slow- velocity superplumes beneath the Pacific and Africa. The shear wave radial anisotropy is strongest at 120 km depth, in particular beneath the central Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic and Electrical Signatures of the Lithosphere–Asthenosphere System of the Normal Oceanic Mantle
    EA45CH06-Kawakatsu ARI 14 August 2017 12:51 Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences Seismic and Electrical Signatures of the Lithosphere–Asthenosphere System of the Normal Oceanic Mantle Hitoshi Kawakatsu and Hisashi Utada Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2017. 45:139–67 Keywords The Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences is lithosphere, asthenosphere, Lid, low-velocity zone, G-discontinuity, plate online at earth.annualreviews.org tectonics, anisotropy, electrical conductivity https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-063016- 020319 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Although plate tectonics started as a theory of the ocean basins nearly 50 years All rights reserved ago, the mechanical details of how it works are still poorly known. Our Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2017.45:139-167. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org understanding of these details has been hampered partly by our inability to characterize the physical nature of the lithosphere–asthenosphere system ANNUAL (LAS) beneath the ocean. We review the existing observational constraints REVIEWS Further Click here to view this article's on the seismic and electrical properties of the LAS, particularly for normal Access provided by University of Tokyo - Library Earthquake Research Institute on 09/08/17. For personal use only. online features: oceanic regions away from mid-oceanic ridges, hot spots, and subduction • Download figures as PPT slides • Navigate linked references zones, where plate tectonics is expected to present its simplest form. Whereas • Download citations • Explore related articles a growing volume of seismic data on land has provided remarkable advances • Search keywords in large-scale pictures, seafloor observations have been shedding new light on essential details.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth's Internal Structure: a Seismologist's View
    Earth’s internal structure: a seismologist’s view Types of waves used by seismologists Organizing the information • Seismic travel times • Dispersion curves • Free oscillation frequencies Putting it all together Mantle 1-D seismic structure summary • Between 10-50 km have Mohorovicic discon;nuity – this marks the CRUST/ MANTLE boundary •At 50-200 km have a LOW VELOCITY ZONE – par;cularly under oceans and younger con;nents The crust Mohorovicic 1909 The lithosphere The asthenosphere Compositional interpretation of 1-D seismic profiles Seismic discontinuities and velocity gradients can arise from • A chemical change (e.g. the Moho) • A phase change (reorganisation of atoms into a different crystalline structure) The relative roles of phase changes and chemical changes provide a major challenge in interpreting seismology. Mantle 1-D seismic structure summary • Several seismological methods indicate a discon;nuity near 220 km depth. •Although present on PREM, it is now generally accepted not to be a global feature •Some;mes called the “Lehmann discon;nuity” aer Inge Lehmann NB: The 220-km Lehmann Discontinuity Not global in character! May reflect local anisotropy due to shearing of the asthenosphere i.e. a textural rather than chemical or phase change Mantle 1-D seismic structure summary • Between 410 and up to ~1000 km we are in the MANTLE TRANSITION ZONE • A number of sharp discon;nui;es separate regions of high velocity gradients •Main discon;nui;es are at 410 and 660 km. •660-discon;nuity widely taken as the UPPER MANTLE/LOWER MANTLE boundary The transition zone • Characterized by discontinuities in velocity and density models.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantle Flow and Melting Beneath Young Oceanic Lithosphere: Seismic
    MANTLE FLOW AND MELTING BENEATH YOUNG OCEANIC LITHOSPHERE: SEISMIC STUDIES OF THE GALÁPAGOS ARCHIPELAGO AND THE JUAN DE FUCA PLATE by JOSEPH STEPHEN BYRNES A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Earth Sciences and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Joseph Stephen Byrnes Title: Mantle Flow and Melting beneath Young Oceanic Lithosphere: Seismic Studies of the Galápagos Archipelago and the Juan de Fuca Plate This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Earth Sciences by: Douglas Toomey Chairperson Emilie Hooft Core Member Eugene Humphreys Core Member Alan Rempel Core Member Allen Malony Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Joseph Stephen Byrnes iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Joseph Stephen Byrnes Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth Sciences June 2017 Title: Mantle Flow and Melting beneath Young Oceanic Lithosphere: Seismic Studies of the Galápagos Archipelago and the Juan de Fuca Plate In this dissertation, I use seismic imaging techniques to constrain the physical state of the upper mantle beneath regions of young oceanic lithosphere. Mantle convection is investigated beneath the Galápagos Archipelago and then beneath the Juan de Fuca (JdF) plate, with a focus on the JdF and Gorda Ridges before turning to the off-axis asthenosphere. In the Galápagos Archipelago, S-to-p receiver functions reveal a discontinuity in seismic velocity that is attributed to the dehydration of the upper mantle.
    [Show full text]
  • Kshamayaa Dharithri 1 (Oh Tolerant Mother Earth! Forgive Me)
    CHAPTER Kshamayaa Dharithri 1 (Oh Tolerant Mother Earth! Forgive Me) O’MY SILENT INNER VIBES (O’M S I V – 1) The mother Earth has greatest tolerance that she bears all our mistakes and misdeeds. She gives us everything such as minerals, food, shelter etc. But she can smash everything if we cross our limits. So,..... I bow to Mother Earth to save the mankind! I pray to mankind to save the mother Earth! Oh! Mother Earth... Forgive us and give us your blessings! Though ploughed through your belly, you fill our stomachs fully Though cared never gratefully, you fulfil our needs gracefully, I stand before Thee! Maa... with folded hands Forgive us and give us your blessings! Even when your body is split parts and parts, you never move apart Though made you victim of our party, But you never leave our party I kneel down! Maa... eyes filled with tears Forgive us and give us your blessings! Even if your heart’s ‘mine’ is broken, you give us gold and diamonds Even if garbage is thrown on you! You grab in your lap and garb us I lay down on thee! Maa... to prostrate with stretched hands Forgive us and give us your blessings! Despite being kicked always with our feet! Yet, you make us walk thousands and thousands of feet! Touching thy feet! Maa...I salute you with these words Forgive us and give us your blessings! Kshamayaa Dharithri! Rakshathu! Samrakshathu!! Parirakshathu!!! 1 2 Disaster Management: Hazard and Risk Awareness Namo Prithvee Matha! – Namo Prithvee Natha!! The God (Prithvee Nath) created PrithveePrithvee Matha, ‘The Earth’ as the most beautiful planet! No other planet has all the requisites for living-hood except the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Parts of the Earth in Reference to Seismology
    INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF THE EARTH IN REFERENCE TO SEISMOLOGY SEISMILOGY • Disturbance within Earth's interior, which is in a constant state of movement, result in the release of energy in packets known as seismic waves. An area of geophysics known as seismology is the study of these waves and their effects, which often can be devastating when experienced in the form of earthquakes. The latter do not only take lives and destroy buildings, but they also produce secondary effects, most often in the form of a tsunami, or tidal wave. Using seismographs and seismometers, seismologists study earthquakes and other seismic phenomena, including volcanoes and even explosions resulting from nuclear testing. They measure earthquakes according to their magnitude or energy as well as their intensity or human impact. Seismology also is used to study Earth's interior, about which it has revealed a great deal. SEISMIC WAVES • When an earthquake occurs the seismic waves (P and S waves) spread out in all directions through the Earth's interior. Seismic stations located at increasing distances from the earthquake epicenter will record seismic waves that have traveled through increasing depths in the Earth. • Seismic velocities depend on the material properties such as composition, mineral phase and packing structure, temperature, and pressure of the media through which seismic waves pass. Seismic waves travel more quickly through denser materials and therefore generally travel more quickly with depth. Anomalously hot areas slow down seismic waves. Seismic waves move more slowly through a liquid than a solid. Molten areas within the Earth slow down P waves and stop S waves because their shearing motion cannot be transmitted through a liquid.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanic Mantle Dynamics Implementation Plan: Report of a Community Workshop
    Oceanic Mantle Dynamics Implementation Plan: Report of a Community Workshop Snowbird, Utah September 18-20, 2002 Executive Summary and Workshop Recommendations The plate tectonics revolution in the earth sciences three decades ago provided a descriptive, or kinematic model for processes at the earth’s surface. The underlying mantle flow and dynamics behind this governing paradigm for the earth sciences have been far harder to elucidate. One of the greatest difficulties has been that seismic data, the primary imaging tool for the earth’s interior, have been collected primarily on the continents, while most of the earth’s interior lies beneath the sea floor. Recent advances in sea floor seismic instrumentation and geodynamic modeling, combined with constraints from other fields of geophysics and geochemistry, now provide unprecedented opportunities to understand the structure and circulation of the earth’s mantle. The advances require an integrated, interdisciplinary approach on a large scale, far beyond the planning and resources of individual investigators. Therefore a decade-long program in Oceanic Mantle Dynamics (OMD) is needed. This program will permit major advances in our understanding of every type of tectonic setting found in the ocean basins, will yield much higher resolution global imaging of the earth’s mantle, and in combination with continental USArray seismic data, will elucidate the great unanswered questions regarding the nature of the continent–ocean transition. A multidisciplinary approach centered around experiments made possible by a new generation of ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) instrumentation could move beyond the kinematic revolution of plate tectonics towards testing and refining geodynamic models of mantle flow.
    [Show full text]