A27 Chichester Bypass Scheme Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A27 Chichester Bypass Scheme Assessment Report A27 Chichester Bypass Scheme Assessment Report 343538-90-060-RE-002 February 2017 Project Support Framework (PSF) 2011-2016 A27 Chichester Bypass Scheme Assessment Report A27 Chichester Bypass Scheme Assessment Report 343538-90-060-RE-002 February 2017 Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description No P01 First Draft P02 SGAR2 Sign-off This document has been prepared on behalf of Highways England by Mott MacDonald Sweco JV for Highways England's Project Support Framework (PSF) 2011-2016. It is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. Mott MacDonald Sweco JV accepts no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from Mott MacDonald Sweco JV and from the party which commissioned it. Prepared for: Prepared by: Highways England Mott MacDonald Sweco JV Bridge House Stoneham Place 1 Walnut Tree Close Stoneham Lane Guildford Southampton GU1 4LZ SO50 9NW Project Support Framework (PSF) 2011-2016 A27 Chichester Bypass Scheme Assessment Report Contents Page Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 2 Report Purpose ................................................................................................................................. 2 PCF Context ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Need for Intervention ........................................................................................................................ 3 Planning Factors ............................................................................................................................... 4 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 4 Stage 1 Options ................................................................................................................................ 5 Interim Review .................................................................................................................................. 5 Stage 2 Options ................................................................................................................................ 6 Traffic Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 6 Economic Assessment..................................................................................................................... 8 Operational Assessment ................................................................................................................. 9 Maintenance Assessment ............................................................................................................. 10 Environmental Assessment ........................................................................................................... 10 Public Consultation ......................................................................................................................... 11 Conclusion and the Recommended Option ................................................................................ 11 1. Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. The Existing Chichester Bypass ....................................................................................... 12 1.2. The Problem ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.3. Existing Conditions and Constraints ................................................................................ 13 1.4. Scheme Brief ....................................................................................................................... 16 2. Planning Factors ......................................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Chichester Local Plan (2014-2029) ................................................................................. 17 2.1.1. Existing Transport Links and Economy ..........................................................................17 2.1.2. Strategic Development Areas ........................................................................................18 2.2. Coastal West Sussex and Greater Brighton Local Strategic Statement (2013-2031) 19 2.3. South Downs National Park Local Plan (draft) ............................................................... 20 2.4. Arun Local Plan (2011 – 2031) ......................................................................................... 20 i Project Support Framework (PSF) 2011-2016 A27 Chichester Bypass Scheme Assessment Report 2.5. West Sussex Transport Plan (2011-2026) ...................................................................... 20 2.6. Highways England Delivery Plan (2015-2020) .............................................................. 21 2.7. National Environmental Policies ....................................................................................... 21 2.8. National Planning Policy Framework (March 2012) ...................................................... 22 2.9. National Policy Statement for National Networks .......................................................... 22 3. Do Nothing Consequences ....................................................................................................... 24 4. Alternative Options ..................................................................................................................... 26 4.1. Stage 1 Options .................................................................................................................. 26 4.2. Factors Considered in Options Development ................................................................ 26 4.3. Options Sifting ..................................................................................................................... 27 4.4. Stage 2 Value Management Workshop .......................................................................... 28 4.5. Stage 2 Options .................................................................................................................. 28 4.5.1. Option 1 .........................................................................................................................28 4.5.2. Option 1A.......................................................................................................................29 4.5.3. Option 2 .........................................................................................................................30 4.5.4. Option 2A.......................................................................................................................31 4.5.5. Option 3 .........................................................................................................................32 4.5.6. Option 3A.......................................................................................................................32 4.5.7. Option 4 .........................................................................................................................33 4.5.8. Option 5 .........................................................................................................................34 4.5.9. Option 6 .........................................................................................................................35 4.6. Interim Review of Options ................................................................................................. 36 5. Traffic, Economics and Costs ................................................................................................... 37 5.1. Traffic Forecasting .............................................................................................................. 37 5.1.1. Study Area .....................................................................................................................37 5.1.2. Model Validation ...........................................................................................................37 5.1.3. Impact on Road Network ..............................................................................................38 5.1.4. Comparison of route times on existing A27 Bypass and within Chichester ..................39 5.1.5. Comparison of Journey Times through Chichester .......................................................41 5.2. Economic Assessment ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Supplement to Agenda Agenda Supplement for Cabinet, 04/10
    Public Document Pack JOHN WARD East Pallant House Head of Finance and Governance Services 1 East Pallant Chichester Contact: Graham Thrussell on 01243 534653 West Sussex Email: [email protected] PO19 1TY Tel: 01243 785166 www.chichester.gov.uk A meeting of Cabinet will be held in Committee Room 1 at East Pallant House Chichester on Tuesday 4 October 2016 at 09:30 MEMBERS: Mr A Dignum (Chairman), Mrs E Lintill (Vice-Chairman), Mr R Barrow, Mr B Finch, Mrs P Hardwick, Mrs G Keegan and Mrs S Taylor SUPPLEMENT TO THE AGENDA 9 Review of Character Appraisal and Management Proposals for Selsey Conservations Area and Implementation of Associated Recommendations Including Designation of a New Conservation Area in East Selsey to be Named Old Selsey (pages 1 to 12) In section 14 of the report for this agenda item lists three background papers: (1) Former Executive Board Report on Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals, Article 4 Directions and programme for future work - 8 September 2009 (in the public domain). (2) Representation form Selsey Town Council asking Chichester District Council to de-designate the Selsey conservation area (3) Selsey Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2007 (in the public domain). These papers are available to view as follows: (1) is attached herewith (2) has been published as part of the agenda papers for this meeting (3) is available on Chichester District Council’s website via this link: http://www.chichester.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=5298&p=0 http://www.chichester.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=5299&p=0 Agenda Item 9 Agenda Item no: 8 Chichester District Council Executive Board Tuesday 8th September 2009 Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals, Article 4 Directions and programme for future work 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhood Peninsula Destination Management Plan 2018-2023 Produced by the Sustainable Tourism on the Manhood Peninsula (STOMP) Project
    Manhood Peninsula Destination Management Plan 2018-2023 Produced by the Sustainable Tourism on the Manhood Peninsula (STOMP) Project Project partly funded by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development: Europe investing in rural areas Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Purpose of this document........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Aims of the STOMP Project......................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Sustainable Tourism........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 What is sustainable tourism?.................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Why does the Manhood Peninsula need a sustainable tourism strategy?.................................................. 3 2.3 Developing and supporting Sense of Place and Memorable Experiences.................................................. 3 2.4 How was the strategy developed?.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 126. South Coast Plain Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 126. South Coast Plain Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 126. South Coast Plain Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • New-Lipchis-Way-Route-Guide.Pdf
    Liphook River Rother Midhurst South New Downs South Lipchis Way Downs LIPHOOK Midhurst RAMBLERS Town Council River Lavant Singleton Chichester Footprints of Sussex Pear Tree Cottage, Jarvis Lane, Steyning, West Sussex BN44 3GL East Head Logo design – West Sussex County Council West Wittering Printed by – Wests Printing Works Ltd., Steyning, West Sussex Designed by – [email protected] 0 5 10 km © 2012 Footprints of Sussex 0 5 miles Welcome to the New New Lipchis Way This delightful walking trail follows existing rights of way over its 39 mile/62.4 kilometre route from Liphook, on Lipchis Way the Hampshire/West Sussex border, to East Head at the entrance to Chichester Harbour through the heart of the South Downs National Park.. Being aligned north-south, it crosses all the main geologies of West Sussex from the greensand ridges, through Wealden river valleys and heathlands, to the high chalk downland and the coastal plain. In so doing it offers a great variety of scenery, flora and fauna. The trail logo reflects this by depicting the South Downs, the River Rother and Chichester Harbour. It can be walked energetically in three days, bearing in mind that the total ‘climb’ is around 650 metres/2,000 feet. The maps divide it into six sections, which although unequal in distance, break the route into stages that allow the possible use of public transport. There is a good choice of accommodation and restaurants in Liphook, Midhurst and Chichester, elsewhere there is a smattering of pubs and B&Bs – although the northern section is a little sparse in that respect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horse Butchery Site: a High-Resolution Record of Lower Palaeolithic Hominin Behaviour at Boxgrove, Uk by (Eds) M I Pope, S a Parfitt and M B Roberts
    The Prehistoric Society Book Reviews THE HORSE BUTCHERY SITE: A HIGH-RESOLUTION RECORD OF LOWER PALAEOLITHIC HOMININ BEHAVIOUR AT BOXGROVE, UK BY (EDS) M I POPE, S A PARFITT AND M B ROBERTS SpoilHeap Publications, University College London, 2020. 157pp, 162 figures (of which 92 photographic plates), and 18 tables, pb, ISBN 978-1-912331-15-4, £25.00 The Boxgrove project burst into vibrant life in the early 1980s, challenging and antagonising the academic archaeological establishment in equal measure, its student leader inspired by, and part of, the contemporary punk milieu and its assault on the wider establishment. I don’t recall corduroys, but there were definitely bovver boots and braces as the shaven-headed Mark Roberts held forth in packed lecture halls, providing overwhelming proof that the history of Britain’s earliest human occupation needed substantial revision, and revealing the remarkable details of the substantial landscape of early Palaeolithic occupation preserved at the Boxgrove quarry complex; it was London (Institute of Archaeology) calling. However it wasn’t just the style, it was also the substance. Boxgrove overturned everything. Here was irrefutable evidence of human presence in Britain before the Anglian glaciation, 500,000 years ago in the interglacial period MIS 13; and not just a few suitably-crude lithic implements, but a prolific industry of large, symmetric and aesthetic ovate handaxes with sophisticated features such as tranchet sharpening. And, beyond the technical details of dating and typology, the behavioural evidence from the Boxgrove landscape challenged widely-held views that these early hominins were simpletons living in a mental world with a 15-minute time-depth, responding expediently to the appearance of a carcass or an injured animal, desperately casting around for a rock to chip, or hurl.
    [Show full text]
  • WOODLAND GROVE BOXGROVE, WEST SUSSEX Goodwood Racecourse
    WOODLAND GROVE BOXGROVE, WEST SUSSEX Goodwood Racecourse The South Downs Eartham East Lavant Funtington Goodwood WOODLAND GROVE Goodwood Circuit Boxgrove Hambrook Fontwell Southbourne Oving Fishbourne Chichester Bosham Barnham Donnington Chichester harbour Chichester Marina Itchenor Birdham Aldwick Bognor Regis West Wittering Sidlesham Pagham Bracklesham Bay WOODLAND GROVE BOXGROVE, WEST SUSSEX A DEVELOPMENT BY AGENTS www.domusea.com Chichester Office The Old Coach House, 14 West Pallant, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1TB Tel +44 (0)1243 523723 www.todanstee.com The local area CITY COAST COUNTRYSIDE Chichester is one of the most sought after locations in the Less than 10 miles away is West Wittering, one of the UK’s Chichester is moments away from the rolling hills of South south it’s easy to see why. Chichester’s cathedral city is most striking unspoilt beaches and winner of a European Blue Downs National Park a recognised area of outstanding famous for its historical Roman and Anglo-Saxon heritage. Flag Award with views of Chichester harbour and the South beauty. The South Downs are popular for walking, horse riding Now, it’s the centre of culture and beauty with impressive Downs. West Wittering is a popular location for all the family and cycling, as well as simply enjoying the beautiful views. old buildings, a canal, two art galleries and renowned and also a favourite spot for kite surfers. The whole area is For the more adventurous, activities include paragliding, festival theatre. internationally recognised for its wildlife, birds and unique hang-gliding, golf, zorbing, mountain-boarding and a range of Chichester’s cosmopolitan feel brought to life by the city’s beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • 652 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    652 bus time schedule & line map 652 Chichester - East and West Wittering View In Website Mode The 652 bus line (Chichester - East and West Wittering) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Birdham: 2:40 PM (2) Chichester: 3:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 652 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 652 bus arriving. Direction: Birdham 652 bus Time Schedule 38 stops Birdham Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 2:40 PM Bishop Luffa School, Chichester Westgate, Chichester Tuesday 2:40 PM Grosvenor Road, Stockbridge Wednesday 2:40 PM Stockbridge Gardens, Stockbridge Thursday 2:40 PM Friday 2:40 PM Mile Pond Farm, Stockbridge Saturday Not Operational Dell Quay Road, Stockbridge The Black Horse, Apuldram Oak Lane, Appledram Civil Parish 652 bus Info Chichester Marina, Birdham Direction: Birdham Stops: 38 Business Park, Birdham Trip Duration: 34 min Line Summary: Bishop Luffa School, Chichester, Sidlesham Lane, Birdham Grosvenor Road, Stockbridge, Stockbridge Gardens, Stockbridge, Mile Pond Farm, Stockbridge, Dell Quay Road, Stockbridge, The Black Horse, Apuldram, Church Lane, Birdham Chichester Marina, Birdham, Business Park, Birdham, Sidlesham Lane, Birdham, Church Lane, Stores, Birdham Birdham, Stores, Birdham, The Bell Inn, Birdham, Mill, Somerley, Glen Nurseries, Somerley, Clayton Lane, The Bell Inn, Birdham Bracklesham Bay, Holdens Farm Caravan Park, Bell Lane, Birdham Civil Parish Bracklesham Bay, Clappers Lane, Bracklesham Bay, Middleton Close, Bracklesham
    [Show full text]
  • THE PARISHES of St Peter and St Mary, New Fishbourne, and St Mary the Virgin, Apuldram Rector: the Reverend Canon Moira Wickens
    THE PARISHES OF St Peter and St Mary, New Fishbourne, and St Mary the Virgin, Apuldram Rector: The Reverend Canon Moira Wickens We Will Remember Them On the eleventh day of this eleventh month there will be special services in both our churches, to mark the 100th anniversary of the ending of the first world war. We will be joining our prayers and thoughts with countless others across the world, and you are invited to join us. At 8.00am there will be a short service at St. Mary's Church Apuldram, and then at 10.30am at Fishbourne, with the act of Remembrance taking place at the eleventh hour. If you pop into either of the churches you will see the 'silent soldiers', almost invisible figures representing those from our parishes who gave their lives for our freedom. These figures may unnerve you, for they are there, but not there, and yet they remind us all not only of those who served our country during the great wars, but also those who have been in conflicts since. We will remember those who serve in the armed forces to this day, and all those who have survived. We will also remember the great acts of service that were carried out by so many women who not only supported the men, but who also kept our country going during those terrible years. During both our services we will listen to special readings, 'The Soldier', and 'Flanders Fields', wreathes will be laid, and the names of the men from our communities who are on the memorial plaques inside the churches, will be read out.
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester - East Broyle - Chichester Mon-Sat Department for Transport’S Local West Sussex
    Catch the Bus Bus Frequencies Travel Plan Initiatives To find out when your next bus is due visit nextbuses.mobi or Information correct as of November 2014 In 2012, West Sussex County Council www.traveline.info Real time information, which enables you to track the secured £2.46 million from the expected arrival time of your bus, is available on an increasing number of services in 46/47 Chichester - East Broyle - Chichester Mon-Sat Department for Transport’s Local West Sussex. A Text-for-Times service is also available in parts of the county where 47 - Chichester, Bus Station R and Cathedral - East Broyle clockwise via St Paul’s Road, Sustainable Transport Fund (LSTF). you can obtain the arrival times of the next three buses by texting the bus stop Sherborne Road, Neville Road, Carleton Road, Worcester Road, Little Breach, St Paul’s Road The County Council, in partnership code to 84268 (charges apply). For further information about real time bus returns Chichester. 46 runs same route to East Broyle anti-clockwise. with Chichester District Council, is information visit www.westsussex.gov.uk/publictransport Monday to Saturday daytime every 30 minutes. now delivering a range of sustainable travel improvements in Chichester 50 Chichester - Graylingwell Park Daily and Horsham up to March 2015. Catch the Train R returns Chichester, Bus Station and Cathedral - Chichester University - Bloomfield Drive The package for Chichester includes: Travel by train can often work out to be cheaper than driving, particularly for Chichester regular journeys such as commuting. There are various on-line tools that can tell Monday to Sunday daytime and evenings every 30 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhood Peninsula
    Overall Character THE WEST SUSSEX LANDSCAPE Land Management Guidelines This Character Area lies in the south west of the county, to the south of Chichester, between the harbours of Chichester and Pagham. A large part of this area has been reclaimed from the sea, and remains below the current high spring tide level. It is mainly flat open landscape, dominated by highly productive large arable fields and modern farm buildings and characterised by a decline in tree and hedgerow cover and loss of grassland habitats. Habitation is predominantly in scattered small traditional settlements and larger suburban villages. Areas of unimproved grassland still exist along the edges of streams and rifes which are often immediately bordered by reed beds. Sheet SC2 In contrast, some parts have a patchwork of smaller enclosed pastures and horse paddocks which have a more intimate character. Parkland tree belts remaining from former estates are an occasional feature and there are significant clusters of glasshouses in the Sidlesham area. Manhood Key Characteristics G Large scale arable farming with large, often hedgeless fields. G Mainly low-lying flat landform. G Extensive farms with both traditional and modern farm buildings and silos. Peninsula G Pockets of small enclosed pasture fields and horse paddocks. G Industry in the countryside mainly associated with horticulture, resulting in large expanses of South Coast Plain G Linear villages. glasshouses. G G Narrow, right-angled or winding lanes. Scattered vernacular villages with mixed building materials, often flint, brick, half timber and stone, often with sprawling modern fringes. G Occasional views from the land of the water, or of yacht masts.
    [Show full text]
  • Matakana Link Road Public Consultation Feedback
    Matakana link road Public Consultation Feedback Report – July 2017 AT.govt.nz Contents 1. Background ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Project Development ..................................................................................... 5 1.2 Public Consultation ....................................................................................... 6 2. Feedback Received ..................................................................................................... 8 Question 1 – Which option do you prefer? ................................................................... 9 Question 4 – How would you use the road? .................................................................. 9 Questions 2, 3, 5 & 6 – Issues and Constraints (Key themes identified) ................... 10 3. Next Steps ................................................................................................................. 22 4. Conclusion................................................................................................................. 22 5. Appendix A. Consultation feedback ........................................................................ 23 2 Executive Summary In April 2017, Auckland Transport (AT) sought public feedback on the four short-listed options for the proposed Matakana Link Road. Feedback on the short-listed options was invited from 26 April to 20 May 2017. Submitters were asked to identify their preferred route option (see map
    [Show full text]
  • No. Organisation Car Name Drag Slalom Chicane Pit Stop Sprint
    No. Organisation Car Name Drag Slalom Chicane Pit Stop Sprint Portfolio Additional Total Additional Award Rank 1 8th North Staffs Boys Brigade BB2 13 15 24 78 0 130 26 2 8th North Staffs Boys Brigade BB1 38 52 7 54 0 151 35 3 Arundel C of E Primary School ACE MIKE 47 17 53 63 0 180 49 4 Arundel C of E Primary School ACE TIM 64 42 60 32 -5 193 56 5 Beachborough School Merry Mary 56 22 25 15 -5 -3 110 Spirit 16 6 Beachborough School Arty Abby 4 3 2 35 -3 0 41 3 7 Bishop's Waltham Junior School BWJS 2 75 13 67 12 0 167 43 8 Bishop's Waltham Junior School BWJS 1 52 55 43 13 0 163 39 9 Blackwell Primary School Blackwell Bulldog 16 31 18 52 -5 112 17 10 Boxgrove CofE Primary School Boxgrove CofE 30 68 75 68 -5 236 73 11 Bursley Academy Goblin 3 2 4 4 78 -2 -5 81 8 12 Bursley Academy Goblin 2 8 7 41 78 -5 129 25 14 Bursley Academy Goblin 1 4 5 6 78 -5 88 10 15 Camelsdale Primary Camelsdale B 52 21 70 24 0 167 43 16 Camelsdale Primary Camelsdale A 35 5 72 51 0 163 39 17 Chesswood Junior School Chesswood Challenger 68 10 64 29 -5 166 42 18 Chesswood Junior School Will Power 84 28 63 26 -5 196 60 19 Ditcham Park School The Ditcham Dragon 26 13 50 37 0 126 24 20 droxford junior school The Drox 64 16 45 23 0 148 32 21 EASEBOURNE C.E.
    [Show full text]