DOCSLIB.ORG

The Companions of Gods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Companions of Gods CHAPTER 10 The Companions of Gods ‘I sought for myself’ (B 101), Heraclitus says,1 and our authorities tell us that he did so in compliance with the Delphic precept ‘Know thyself’:2 Julian, Or. vi 5.30–32: Therefore the god in Delphi announces: ‘Know thy- self’, and Heraclitus (responds): ‘I sought for myself’. Plutarch, Adv. Col. 1118C6–9: But Heraclitus, as having accomplished something great and holy, said ‘I sought for myself’, and of the Delphic inscriptions he thought ‘Know thyself’ to be the most divine.3 Heraclitus’ response to the injunction was not ‘I did know myself’,4 but ‘I searched for myself’, which indicates that he understood the precept as urg- ing one to look for one’s true nature. This search led Heraclitus to the recogni- tion that his nature was an immortal being entombed in the mortal body;5 he generalized this discovery in B 119: ‘The nature of man is a δαίμων’ (above, pp. 87–88). In B 116 self-knowledge is coupled with self-restraint: ‘All men have a share in self-knowing and self-restraining (γινώσκειν ἑωυτοὺς καὶ σωφρονεῖν)’. Since Heraclitus considered self-restraint, that is, mastering desire, the means of purifying the soul from the body’s pollution, hence the agent of salvation, 1 ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν. δίζημαι means ‘seek out’, ‘look for’, ‘try to find out’, ‘enquire whether’ (LSJ, s.v.; Lex. Hdt., s.v.; Solmsen, ‘Δίζημαι δίζομαι und δίζω’, 427 and n. 1; cf. B 22: χρυσὸν γὰρ οἱ διζήμενοι, ‘those who seek for gold’) and not ‘look, enquire into’. 2 The earliest extant mention of the Delphic maxims is Eur. fr. 923, but at least some of the maxims (the oldest apparently ‘Know thyself’) were probably already engraved at the entrance of the Alcmaeonid temple (erected after the fire of 548 BCE): Parke and Wormell, The Delphic Oracle i, 386–87 and n. 24; Burkert, Greek Religion, 148. 3 ὁ δ’ Ἡράκλειτος, ὡς μέγα τι καὶ σεμνὸν διαπεπραγμένος, ἐδιζησάμην φησίν ἐμεωυτόν, καὶ τῶν ἐν Δελφοῖς γραμμάτων θειότατον ἐδόκει τό γνῶθι σαυτόν. The subject of φησίν and ἐδόκει is Ἡράκλειτος. B. Einarson’s and P.H. De Lacy’s Loeb translation reads ‘ “Know Thyself” was held to be the most godlike . .’; this shift of the grammatical subject, from ‘Heraclitus’ to ‘Know Thyself’, is un necessary and awkward (for δοκέω ‘think’ with direct object in Plutarch see Pomp. 49.6.4, De Is. et Os. 383C7, Quaest. conv. 730E2, etc.) and the meaning thus obtained is incongruous: who in the past did hold the maxim to be the most godlike? Had it subsequently fallen into obscurity? 4 Xen. Mem. iv 2.25.1: ἐμαυτὸν ἐγίγνωσκον; Arist. Rh. 1395a25: ἐγίγνωσκεν ἑαυτόν. 5 As confirmed by Plotinus: asking how his soul descended into the body, he proceeds (Enn. iv.8.1.11–17): ‘Heraclitus . advises us to seek for the answer (ζητεῖν τοῦτο) . as he himself, having sought, found (αὐτὸς ζητήσας εὕρεν)’; Plotinus’ last clause alludes to B 101, which he quotes verbatim at Enn. v 9.5.31. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi ��.��63/9789004338��0_0�3 The Companions of Gods 217 he regarded it as the greatest goodness (σωφρονεῖν ἀρετὴ μεγίστη) (B 112).6 And since, as B 116 implies, self-restraint follows upon self-knowledge, Heraclitus, as Plutarch tells us, deemed ‘Know thyself’ the most divine of the Delphic precepts. The interpretation of B 101, popular since Schleiermacher (Herakleitos der dunkle, 241), is that, looking into himself, Heraclitus discovered the logos, the true nature of things, and the like, therefore the fragment endorses introspec- tion as the way of enquiry. This interpretation is hardly consistent with the meaning of δίζημαι (above, p. 216 n. 1) and is at odds with the context in which the fragment is quoted by Plutarch and Julian. B 112 and B 116 are quoted in Stobaeus along with other Heraclitean frag- ments none of which is unauthentic or a weak paraphrase;7 for that reason the two fragments must be accepted as genuine unless the contrary is con- clusively demonstrated. Yet although no such demonstration has ever been produced, the fragments are rejected by numerous scholars, following in that Schleiermacher.8 Bernays asserted that B 112 is inconsistent with Heraclitus’ language and thought.9 As regards language, the contention is scarcely defensible.10 As regards thought, nothing can be more consistent with 6 ‘In the Apolline religion sophrosyne results in moderation and self-knowledge, in the mystery cults, etc., in katharsis’; ‘[W]hen the concept of purification was extended . to include the katharsis of the soul through some form of abstinence, usually the restraint of passion, . the notions of purification and sophrosyne coincide[d]’ (North, Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature, 4 n. 12, 30). 7 B 112 is quoted along with B 95, B 108, B 110, B 111, B 113, and B 114 in the chapter Περὶ Ἀρετῆς (iii 1.174–179); B 116 is quoted along with B 117 and B 118 in the chapter Περὶ Σωφροσύνης (iii 5.6–8). 8 Herakleitos der dunkle, 207, 240. 9 ‘Heraklitische Studien’, 69; similarly Bywater ad fr. cvii. 10 B 112: σωφρονεῖν ἀρετὴ μεγίστη, καὶ σοφίη ἀληθέα λέγειν καὶ ποιεῖν κατὰ φύσιν ἐπαΐοντας. For λέγειν καὶ ποιεῖν cf. ποιεῖν καὶ λέγειν in B 73 and ἐπέων καὶ ἔργων in B 1; for ἐπαΐοντας cf. οὐκ ἐπαΐων in B 117; ἀληθέα λέγειν καὶ ποιεῖν is almost the exact reverse of ψευδῶν τέκτονας καὶ μάρτυρας in B 28. Having made these observations, Kirk declared the fragment ‘a clever fusion of Heraclitean phrases’ (Heraclitus, 390–91), a logic which made Gladigow wonder how one could prove the inauthenticity of a fragment by pinpoint- ing its similarity to the authentic ones (Sophia und Kosmos, 111 n. 3). On Heidel’s objec- tions to the allegedly anachronistic meaning of σοφίη and φύσις in B 112 (‘On Certain Fragments of the Presocratics’, 713–14) see Kirk, l.c., and Gladigow, l.c.; see also Kerferd, ‘The Image of the Wise Man in Greece in the Period before Plato’. As regards Barnes’ assertion that B 112 is a paraphrase (The Presocratic Philosophers, 133), quod gratis asseri- tur, gratis negatur. On attaching to ἀληθέα, ‘what is true’, the ‘etymological value’ of ‘not .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU School of Architecture, Art, and Historic School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications Preservation 2015 Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S. Hendrix Roger Williams University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Hendrix, John S., "Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination" (2015). School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications. Paper 31. http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp/31 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John Hendrix In the thought of Plotinus, the imagination is responsible for the apprehen- sion of the activity of Intellect. If creativity in the arts involves an exercise of the imagination, the image-making power that links sense perception to noet- ic thought and the nous poietikos , the poetic or creative intellect, then the arts exercise the apprehension of intellectual activity and unconscious thought. According to John Dillon in “Plotinus and the Transcendental Imag- ination,” 1 Plotinus’ conception of the imagination led to the formulation of the imagination as a basis of artistic creativity. In Plotinus, imagination operates on several different levels: it produces images in sense perception, it synthesizes images in dianoetic thought, and it produces images in correspondence with the articulation through logos of noetic thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ A COGNITIVE-INFORMED APPROACH TO ‘SACRIFICE’ IN ANCIENT GREECE Crabtree, Charles Rawcliffe Airey Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 A COGNITIVE-INFORMED APPROACH TO ‘SACRIFICE’ IN ANCIENT GREECE Charles Rawcliffe Airey Crabtree Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classics) 1 Abstract My thesis presents a significant new understanding of ‘sacrifice’ and demonstrates the applicability of a cognitive-informed approach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pythias Excerpted from Secret History of the Witches © 2009 Max Dashu
    The Pythias excerpted from Secret History of the Witches © 2009 Max Dashu I count the grains of sand on the beach and measure the sea I understand the speech of the mute and hear the voiceless —Delphic Oracle [Herodotus, I, 47] In the center of the world, a fissure opened from the black depths of Earth, and waters flowed from a spring. The place was called Delphoi (“Womb”). In its cave sanctuary lived a shamanic priestess called the Pythia—Serpent Woman. Her prophetic power came from a she-dragon in the Castalian spring, whose waters had inspirational qualities. She sat on a tripod, breathing vapors that emerged from a deep cleft in the Earth, until she entered trance and prophesied by chanting in verse. The shrine was sacred to the indigenous Aegean earth goddess. The Greeks called her Ge, and later Gaia. Earth was said to have been the first Delphic priestess. [Pindar, fr. 55; Euripides, Iphigenia in Taurus, 1234-83. This idea of Earth as the original oracle and source of prophecy was widespread. The Eumenides play begins with a Pythia intoning, “First in my prayer I call on Earth, primeval prophetess...” [Harrison, 385] Ancient Greek tradition held that there had once been an oracle of Earth at the Gaeion in Olympia, but it had disappeared by the 2nd century. [Pausanias, 10.5.5; Frazer on Apollodorus, note, 10] The oracular cave of Aegira, with its very old wooden image of Broad-bosomed Ge, belonged to Earth too. [Pliny, Natural History 28. 147; Pausanias 7, 25] Entranced priestess dancing with wand, circa 1500 BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoic Influences on Plotinus' Theodicy?
    23 Viktor Ilievski Stoic Influences on Plotinus’ Theodicy? 1. The aim of this paper, as the interrogative form of its title indicates, is to critically examine the widespread opinion that in constructing his theodicy, Plotinus utilized quite a few building blocks of Stoic origin. Since his philosophical encounters and engagements with the Stoics in the Enneads are both obvious and well-recorded,1 their influence on Plotinus’ theodicy has also been taken as significant and unquestionable.2 It should be noted, however, that I do not harbour the ambition to provide here an exposition and evaluation of either the Stoic or the Plotinian theodicy – such a task is clearly beyond the scope of a single paper. Instead, I shall limit my efforts to an attempt to isolate the Stoic answers to the problem of evil, try to see how they reflect on and to what degree they affect Plotinus’ theodicy, and investigate whether they have a prior source, i.e. whether they can be called Stoic in the full sense of the word. My hope is to demonstrate that their influence on Plotinus’ theodicy is mostly indirect, on account of the fact that the key Stoic theodicean strategies are borrowings or elaborations of the Platonic ones. Unlike Plotinus’, the Stoic attitude towards theodicy must have been ambivalent; on the one hand, it can be taken as almost redundant on account of Stoic determinism, identification of fate and providence, and their theory of indifferents (adiaphora),3 while on the other, the necessity to present a theodicy may seem inherent to the Stoic system
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus and the Platonic Metaphysical Hierarchy
    PLOTINUS AND THE PLATONIC METAPHYSICAL HIERARCHY G.S. BOWE Global Scholarly Publications New York, New York 2003 Published by Global Scholarly Publications Copyright © 2004 by G5. Bowe All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be dupli­ cated in any way without the expressed written consent of the publisher, except in the form of brief excerpts or quotations for review purposes. Typeface: Garamond. Greek Typeface: Athenian Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data G.S. Bowe, 1969- Plotinus and the Platonic Metaphysical Hierarchy / G.S. Bowe. p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-9724918-4-8 1. Plotinus - Metaphysics. 2. Aristotle -- Metaphysics. 3. Plato - Metaphysics. 4. Greek Philosophy. I. Title Distributed by Global Scholarly Publications 220 Madison Avenue, Suite llG New York, New York 10016 www.gsp-online.org [email protected] Phone: (212) 679-6410 Fax: (212) 679-6424 For my buddy jlknur CONTENTS ACKl'lOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION iii CHAPTER I - THE PLATONIC METAPHYSICAL HIERARCHY CHAPTER II - iVIElliEXlS !li'lD THE PRINCIPLES OF EMj\NATION 33 t Positive Production 37 2. Non Convertibility 44 3. Indexed Unity 47 4. The Priority of the Simple 49 CHAPTER HI - PLOTINUS' RESPONSE TO ARISTOTLE'S UNMOVED MOVER 57 1. The Unmoved Mover as Substance 58 2. The Unmoved Mover as NolIS 69 CHAPTER IV - THE DIDASKAlJKOS AND NUMENIUS 87 1. The Didaskalikos 88 2. Numenius of Apamea 96 CHAPTER V - THE ONE OF PLOTINUS 105 CHAPTER VI - ErvlANATION AND THE SOUL 131 BIBLIOGRAPHY 155 INDEX 163 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I should thank a number of people who helped me do this.
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus' Use of Early Greek Philosophers: the Case of Ethics
    Centre for Neoplatonic Virtue Ethics University of Copenhagen Plotinus’ use of early Greek philosophers: the case of Ethics Centre for Neoplatonic Virtue Ethics University of Copenhagen Plotinus’ use of early Greek philosophers: the case of ethics Giannis Stamatellos, Post Doc Department of Media, Cognition and Communication Giannis Stamatellos (Post Doc) – May 2010 1 Centre for Neoplatonic Virtue Ethics University of Copenhagen Plotinus’ use of early Greek philosophers: the case of Ethics Plotinus and the Presocratics [Table 1] Key areas of reference Presocratics Plotinus Heraclitus The flux of becoming The flux of the heavenly bodies Unity of the opposites Soul’s ascent and descent Unity and plurality Unity of cosmos Alterations of Soul Soul’s ascent and descent Logos The universality of logos Self-knowledge Self-knowledge: soul’s ascent Empedocles Love and Strife The unity of cosmos The cycles of Soul The descent of soul The Four Roots Theory of Matter Parmenides The ‘signs’ of being The properties of intelligible Being Thinking and Being Self-thinking Intellect Timelessness of Being Timelessness of Eternity Anaxagoras Nous Purity of Intellect The original mixture Theory of matter Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans The unity of the One The Monad Plotinus’ Virtue Ethics [Table 2] Level State Virtues Wisdom Justice Self-Control Courage Practical Civic Reason Minding its Harmony Emotions own business between where ruling passion- and being reason ruled are concerned Purification Body- Soul acts Ruled by Not being Not afraid Soul alone reason
    [Show full text]
  • Rosicrucian Digest Vol 87 No 2 2009 Eleusis
    Each issue of the Rosicrucian Digest provides members and all interested readers with a compendium of materials regarding the ongoing flow of the Rosicrucian Timeline. The articles, historical excerpts, art, and literature included in this Digest span the ages, and are not only interesting in themselves, but also seek to provide a lasting reference shelf to stimulate continuing study of all of those factors which make up Rosicrucian history and thought. Therefore, we present classical background, historical development, and modern reflections on each of our subjects, using the many forms of primary sources, reflective commentaries, the arts, creative fiction, and poetry. This magazine is dedicated• to all the women and men throughout the ages who have contributed to and perpetuated the wisdom of the Rosicrucian, Western esoteric, tradition. May we ever be •worthy of the light with which we have been entrusted. In this issue, we explore• the Eleusinian Mysteries which were celebrated outside Athens for 2,000 years. Combining the mysteries of life, death, fertility, immortality, transcendence, and divine union, they were the very soul of Hellenistic civilization. Today we can glimpse their glory, still calling to us across the millennia. No. 2 - 2009 Vol. 87 - No. 2 Peter Kingsley, Ph.D. “Paths of the Ancient Sages: A Pythagorean History” Giulia Minicuci and Mary Jones, S.R.C. “Pythagoras the Teacher: From Samos to Metapontum” What We Can Learn about 2 RutOfficialh Phelps, S.R.C.Magazine “The Schoolof the of Pythagoras”the Eleusinian Mysteries AnonymousWorldwide “The Golden Verses of Pythagoras”George Mylonas, Ph.D. AntoineRosicrucian Fabre d’Olivet, Order “Excerpt fromDe mExaminationeter and Persephone of the Golden Verses” 7 Hugh McCague, Ph.D., F.R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinian Henadology
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PhilPapers Edward P. Butler PLOTINIAN HENADOLOGY In his Life of Plotinus, Plotinus’ student Porphyry states that there were, in Plotinus’ time, “many Christians and others, and sectarians [αἱρετικοι] who had abandoned the old philosophy,” from whom came a profusion of “treatises” as well as “revelations” (ἀποκαλύψεις), that Porphyry says “deceived themselves and many others, alleging that Plato had not penetrated to the depths of intelligible substance,” and that Plotinus “often attacked their position in his lectures,” as well as in the entire treatise that Porphyry says “we have given the title ‘Against the Gnostics’” (Vita Plotini 16.1‑11). The project of refuting these sectarians was so important to Plotinus that not only was it a recurring focus of his own work, but Porphyry speaks of his fellow student Amelius and himself pursuing it in multiple works of theirs as well. In Plotinus’ day, so ‑called Gnostics and Christians were scarcely distinguishable, and it was surely difficult to imagine any one of this profusion of emerging sects achieving hegemonic status, much less that one of them, through seizing for itself the power of the imperial state, would be able to sweep away before it cults that had existed for thousands of years. Hence Plotinus writes against the new sectarians, not as a threat against the Pagan world, but as a threat to the correct interpretation of Platonism, because some of these sects had adopted elements of it and might, if not critiqued, succeed in positioning themselves as Plato’s legitimate interpreters.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoplatonism
    Book Notes Neoplatonism ANNE SHEPPARD More books are published on Plotinus than on any other Neoplatonist. It is a sign of his acceptance as a major philosopher that he now has a Cambridge Companion 1 devoted to him. This is a volume for those who may be new to Plotinus but are not new to philosophy. It o ffers a series of discrete essays of high quality, most of them by well-known scholars. The essays range over metaphysics, philosophical psychology and ethics and PlotinusÕ relation to his predecessors is covered both in Maria Luisa GattiÕs rst chapter entitled ÔPlotinus: The Platonic tradition and the foun- dation of NeoplatonismÕ and from time to time in discussions in other essays. PlotinusÕ in uence on his successors is tackled to a limited extent in the last two chapters where Cristina DÕAncona Costa in ÔPlotinus and later Platonic philosophers on the causality of the rst principleÕ discusses some speci c metaphysical topics and John Rist in ÔPlotinus and Chris- tian philosophyÕ argues that Augustine was the only Christian thinker of late antiquity to be in uenced by Plotinus in particular rather than by Platonism in general. It is impossible to cover all aspects of a philoso- pherÕs thought in a volume of this kind and the selection made is rea- sonable enough. Nevertheless, I am probably not the only reader to regret that neither aesthetics nor mysticism receives much coverage. Some of the essays offer fresh surveys of familiar topics by experts who are well- known for their publications in that area (so, for example, John Bussanich on ÔPlotinusÕ metaphysics of the OneÕ, Dominic OÕMeara on ÔThe hierar- chical ordering of reality in PlotinusÕ or Henry Blumenthal ÔOn soul and intellectÕ); others tackle particular problems or discuss more unusual issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2Nd Edition Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Frontmatter More Information The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest The Hellenistic period (323–30 bc) began with the considerable expansion of the Greek world through the Macedonian conquest of the Persian empire and ended with Rome becoming the predominant political force in that world. This new and enlarged edition of Michel Austin’s seminal work provides a panoramic view of this world through the medium of ancient sources. It now comprises over three hundred texts from literary, epigraphic and papyrological sources which are presented in original translations and supported by introductory sections, detailed notes and references, chronological tables, maps, illustrations of coins, and a full analytical index. The first edition has won widespread admiration since its publication in 1981. Updated and expanded with reference to the most recent scholarship on the subject, this new edition will prove invaluable for the study of a period which has received increasing recognition. michel austin is Honorary Senior Lecturer in Ancient History at the University of St Andrews. His previous publications include Economic and Social History of Ancient Greece. An Introduction (1977). He is the author of numerous articles and was a contributor to the Cambridge Ancient History, vol. VI (2nd edition, 1994). © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Frontmatter More Information The Hellenistic World From Alexander to the Roman Conquest A selection of ancient sources in translation Second augmented edition M.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Anagnorisis in the Oedipus Tyrannus of Sophocles
    THE TRANSFORMATION OF OEDIPUS: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANAGNORISIS IN THE OEDIPUS TYRANNUS OF SOPHOCLES by CATHERINE ANNE MCANULTY MORI B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1974 T.T., The University of British Columbia, 1976 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Classics) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1995 © Catherine Anne McAnulty Mori, 1995 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis 'for scholarly purposes may be [granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date H Hi DE-6 (2/88) 11 Abstract The Oedipus myth is a very ancient one in the Greek tradition. In the Oedipus Tyrannus, Sophocles builds on the familiar theme to explore the mystery of human existence using Oedipus as a metaphor for the indomitable spirit of the human individual in face of the incomprehensible workings of the gods. Although Sophocles uses a generally well-known story, he brings originality to his drama in the way he develops the characters and stages the action. The thesis is divided into four parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus on the Objects of Thought
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 3-1991 Plotinus on the Objects of Thought Eyolfur Emilsson University of Oslo, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Emilsson, Eyolfur, "Plotinus on the Objects of Thought" (1991). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 182. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/182 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. ··*■ - ' » i L,íaas\ is$oí ^ STFSl Plotinus on the Objects of Thought One of the features by which Neoplatonism diverges from the doctrines of Plato as they are generally understood nowadays is in the Neoplatonic account of intellect and its relation to the ideas. The received view is that according to Plato the ideas, even if knowable by the intellect and in fact the proper objects of thought, exist independently of any mind, whether human or divine, that may contemplate them. The Neoplatonists, on the other hand, all believed that the realm of ideas is to be identified with a realm of a divine intellect, which hence not merely thinks about the ideas, but in some sense is the ideas.
    [Show full text]