Graphene-based valleytronics:
Applications in
Quantum Computing / Communications / FETs
G.-Y. Wu
National Tsing-Hua University
(Aug. 14, 2012)
Coworkers: N.-Y. Lue, M.-K. Lee, L. Chang
References Phys. Rev. B 84, 195463 (2011)
Phys. Rev. B 86, 045456 (2012)
arXiv 1208.0064 (2012) 1 Outline
• introduction - motivation - quantum information - FETs
• graphene-based valleytronics - graphene basics - quantum networks - FETs
• summary
2 Motivation • Si / III-V ------> graphene ? • spintronics in graphene ? high spin coherence vs. weak SOI ?
valleytronics
quantum FETs information 3 Quantum Information
• Benioff, Bennett, Feynman (1980s) . quantum simulations, Feymann (1982) . factorization of large numbers, Shor (1994) . quantum search, Grover (1995)
• qubit - information unit |ψ> = α |↑> + β |↓> (spin)
|ψ> = α (|↑↓> - |↓↑>) + β (|↑↓> + |↓↑>) (decoherence free)
|ψ> = α |σ+> + β |σ-> (photon)
others …… QD spin approach
• Loss, DiVincenzo, Burkard (1998, 1999) spin qubit + qugate ----> universal quantum computing
• all electrical manipulation Rashba SOI ~ p x (∂V)·σ
• challenges - g-factor engineering: Δg ≠ 0 (computing)
ge = 0 (communication) - spin flip scattering ----> decoherence
5 FETs
• standard FETs gate
x
source source drain
• post-Si FETs - graphene-based FETs (Novoselov et al., 2004) easier to scale (F. Schwierz, Nature Nanotech. 5, 487 (2010)) - spin FETs (Datta & Das, 1990) low power consumption
6 Spin FETs
• structure
Rashba SOI ~ px x (∂V)z·σy
gate
x
↑ … → … ↓ ↑ ↑ source ↓ z↑
→x
FM InAs FM
. challenges
- FM / semiconductor mismatch → tunnel FETs
- spin-flip scattering (σx) → stray electric fields
7 Graphene-Based Valleytronics
• graphene basics • quantum networks - qubit structure - qubit state - all-electric manipulation - qubit coherence …... • FETs - structure - lead state / injection / detection - all-electric manipulation
8 Graphene Basics-1
• Novoslov, Geim (2004) a) crystal → b) bands →
π-bond K, K' valleys (τv = ±)
9 Graphene Basics-2
. graphene on BN or SiC
2 2 2 E = ±(∆ + vF p ) → massive Dirac particle [cp. E = ±(m2c4 + c2p2)]
c → vF mc2 →Δ
2∆ (energy gap) → QD confinement
10 Graphene Basics-3
. Schrodinger type description (for E ~ ∆) in ε / B fields (Wu et al., 2011)
nonrelativistic part 2 ( 0 ) HV τ μ B 2m* v v0 normal
e → valley magnetic moment v 0 2m*
11 Graphene Basics-4
relativistic part (1st order)
2 2 (1) 1 H τ μ B τ ( V) * v v0 normal v * 22 m 4m Δ
1 (pV2 ). 8m*
→ valley-orbit interaction ~ τv(p x ∂V)·z cp. spin-orbit interaction ~ (p x ∂V)·σ
12 Valley-based Quantum Networks
• qubit structure / state
• all-electric single-qubit manipulation
• coherence / initialization / readout / qugate
13 Qubit Structure / State
two-electron states: ZS (isospin = 0) → logic 0
ZT0 (isospin = 1) → logic 1
ZT+, ZT- (isospin = 1) 14
Qubit State
• isomorphism valley pair ↔ spin 1/2
ZS ↔ |↓>
ZT0 ↔ |↑>
X- ↔ |←>
X+ ↔ |→> 11 |ZKKKKZKKKK (| '|' ), | (| '|' ) SLRLRTLRLR220 |XKKXKK | ' , | | ' LRLR 15
Effective Interaction
1 0 1 0i 1 0 HJ x ,,. y z JLR4 1 0 i 0 0 1
HZ = –g* σ μB|Btotal| + τv μv |Bnormal| spin valley ------> J HB() eff vL vR normal x2 z
in {0,1} space
16 Single Qubit Manipulation
• DC mode (Bnormal ≠ 0)
µv = µv0 [ 1 – O(E–∆)/∆) ]
→ electric tuning of µv in QDs
x 2( vL vR )BJ normal / z /
→ manipulation time ~ O(ns) 17
Single Qubit Manipulation
• AC mode
(Bnormal = 0)
18 AC Mode
• Bnormal = 0 ----> faithful quantum state transfer
α|σ+> + β|σ-> → α|K> + β|K'>
19
photon → valley pair 20 Graphene + Photon Quantum Network . graphene quantum memory / repeater
hν hν
graphene quantum computer graphene quantum computer
21 Qubit Coherence and Etc.
• coherence phonon-mediated relaxation: L = dot size ~ 350A,
V0 = QD potential depth ~ 70meV, Bnormal = 100mT, T = 10K
valley relaxation time ~ O(ms)
• initialization / readout / qugate operation J. M. Taylor et al, Fault-tolerant architecture for quantum computation using electrically controlled semiconductor spins, Nature Phys. 1, 177 (2005)
22 Valley FETs
• structure
• lead state / injection / detection
• all-electric manipulation
23 Structure (a) y gate x
source Q1D channel drain source L …… (b) graphene QW
x
W… W ……
AGNR AGNR
L L 24
Lead State / Injection / Detection
AGNR solution: A eiKr eiK 'r D, D, B ik y y 1 ikx iK r ikx iK'r e v (k ik) e e SK '/ K e e F y ik y y e 2 E
n+1 K' component : K component = SK'/K = (-1)
E = En, ky = kn, 2 2 2 2 2 * (En+Δ) = Δ +ћ (k + kn ) / 2m ,
kn = nπ / W – 4π / 3a0, n = 1.
25 All-electric Manipulation
channel state
2 ik x ik x exp(y ) e eiK r S e eiK'r 0 K '/ K 2 exp(y )
K' component : K component
i(k k ) x SK '/ K e
26
“Rashba” Effect
E0,τ
------>
K' K
E * 3 2m vo 3e 12 k k k k k 2 - + vo *3 3 D y 6.410 eV m
2m w0
source ↑ ↑ … → … ↓ ↑
27 Valley FET vs. Spin FET
FET d.o.f. lead channel physical mechanism valley FET valley K,K' AGNR graphene VOI
(all graphene) spin FET spin ↑,↓ FM semiconductor Rashba SOI
(hybrid)
28 Summary • gated device ---> scalable, all-electric manipulation
• VOI mechanism ~ τv(p x ∂V)·z ---> state coherence / fault tolerant ↓↓ graphene + photon quantum networks all-graphene valley FETs ↓↓ EXPERIMENTAL REALIZATION ? Thank You 29