Behaviour of Rattus Argentiventer and Good TBS+ Te We Recommend That a 25 X 25 M Documentation of Farming Practices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Behaviour of Rattus Argentiventer and Good TBS+ Te We Recommend That a 25 X 25 M Documentation of Farming Practices Physical Control of Rats in Developing Countries We have determined the ideal size range ... the degree of asynchronous planting of rice for a TBS for farmers (G.R. Singleton and crops; and Sudarmaji, unpublished data), but not the ... the variety of other crops grown in the area. optimum spatial distribution of these in the landscape. Although there was much This information requires detailed variation between seasons in the extent of studies of the population ecology and the halo of protection provided to crops by a behaviour of Rattus argentiventer and good TBS+ Te we recommend that a 25 x 25 m documentation of farming practices. There TBS would significantly reduce rat damage are some data available on the first two dot in the surrounding 10-20 ha of rice crop. points. For instance, banks along the Therefore, at a village level we that margins of rice fields and the banks of the one TB5+ TC would be sufficient for every 15 major irrigation canals provide important ha of rice crop. This recommendation has not habitats for rats to take refuge in during non­ been tested. breeding seasons, and for rats to nest and breed in after the crop reaches the maximum The spatial distribution of physical tillering stage (see Leung et al., Chapter 14). methods for controlling rat numbers is an Also, the breeding season of R. argentiventer important issue given the ability rats have to is linked to the reproductive stage of the rice re-colonise areas where their densities have crop (Lam 1983; Murakami et al. 1990). been reduced. In rice fields, rats move Therefore, asynchronous planting of hundreds of metres in a night, especially neighbouring crops will extend the breeding once the developing crop reaches the season of rats. Although we require more booting stage (Singleton et al. 1994; P. detailed knowledge of the population Brown, pers. comm.). To reduce this ability ecology and biology of R. argentiventer, what of rats to compensate for control activities, we already know has had an important management needs to be approached influence on the development of initially at the village level and then at the management strategies for this species. Our district level. A good extension program efforts to manage this species would be with strong grower participation is considerably strengthened if we had a better fundamental for a community-based control understanding of the processes that campaign to be successful (FAO 1997). influenced whether a rat did or did not enter a trap of a TBS. Towards this end, we need to At the village level, the spatial develop a better awareness of the distribution and number of TBS sites will not behavioural responses of rats to a TBS+ TC simply be determined by the area of land and of the factors that may influence this under rice production. Important response. considerations will be how rat populations respond to: CONCWDING REMARKS ... the heterogeneity of the habitat (the In closing, the biggest hurdle facing the seasonal dynamics in habitats where rats successful use of physical methods for can take safe refuge and/ or breed); managing rodent pests is the ability of 195 Ecologically-based Rodent Management rodent populations to compensate for Leung et al., Chapter 14, for discussion of reductions in population size through other actions). immigration, increased survival and/ or How the use of physical barriers plus better breeding performance. The early traps has evolved in our endeavours to studies of Oavis (1953) clearly demonstrated manage the rice-field rat highlights the the ability of rat populations to recover to imperative of having sound ecological original levels following poisoning studies in progress before embarking on operations. Similarly, H. Leirs (pers. comm.) broad scale management programs of a has shown that a 50% reduction in a rodent pest (Leirs et a1. 1996; Singleton 1997). Mastomys natalensis population, through the Further population studies of rodent pests use of chemical rodenticides, has little are planned for Indonesia, Vietnam and Lao impact on the yield loss of crops. However, PORI and they will complement our sustained harvesting of rats from a progress towards optimising the use of trap population can lead to the collapse of that barrier systems and trap crops. population, presumably because of a decline in the age structure of the breeding ACKNOWLEDGMENTS population (Oavis and Christian 1958). The TBS studies in Indonesia and Vietnam Together, these studies indicate that one-off were part of a multi-country study on the uses of physical control, especially when management of rodent pests in Southeast rodent densities are high, may have little to Asia, funded by the Australian Centre for no impact on rat populations. In contrast, International Agricultural Research (Project sustained use of physical control methods numbers ASl/9420 and ASl/9679). We over an appropriate spatial scale may be acknowledge the efforts and commitment of both cost effective and environmentally the support staff from the Research Institute sustainable. for Rice, Indonesia, and the Institute of Two methods which warrant further Animal Sciences and National Institute of study are the use of TBS+ TC and the targeting Plant Protection, Vietnam. We also thank of bounty seasons at appropriate times of the Monica van Wensveen, Ms Rahmini, Ir year. The timing of the latter needs to be Rochman, Nguyen Manh Hung, Nguyen dictated by our understanding of the Viet Quoc, Nguyen Phu Tuan, Lam Yuet population biology of the rat rather than the Ming and Luke Leung for their support, phenology of the crop. For both methods, input and ideas. We greatly appreciated the success will revolve around coordinated, comments of Oavid Freudenberger and Alan synchronised actions at a village or district Buckle on an earlier draft of this chapter. level and their ability to be adopted as part of an integrated approach to rodent management Singleton 1997; 196 Physical Control of Rats in Developing Countries REFERENCES Bell, A 1998. Integrated rodent management in FAO 1997. Community based IPM case studies. post-harvest systems. Eschborn, Germany, Food and Agriculture Organization Inter­ Deutsche Gesellschaft fUr Technische Zusam­ country Programme for the Development of menarbeit (GTZ), leaflet, 8p. Integrated Pest Management in Rice in South Breckwoldt, R 1988. A very elegant animal, the and Southeast Asia. FAO, Jakarta, 36p. dingo. North Ryde, Australia, Angus and Halle, S. and Pelz, H.-J. 1990. On the efficiency of Robertson, 283p. muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) control from trapping data ascertained in Bremen. Brooks, J.E. and Rowe, F.P. 1979. Commensal Zietschrift fur angewandte Zoologie, 77, 205- rodent control. Geneva, World Health Organ­ 218. isation, WHO/VBC/79.726, 109p. Hassall and Associates Pty Ltd 1998. Economic Brown, P.R and Singleton, G.R 1997. Review of evaluation of the role of bounties in pest rodent management for pig production units. management. Unpublished report for the Canberra, CSIRO Wildlife and Ecology, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. Report to the Pig Research and Development Hone,]., O'Grady,J. and Pedersen, H. 1980. Corporation, 45p. Decisions in the control of feral pig damage. Brown, P.R, Singleton, G.R, Dunn, S.C and NSW Agriculture Bulletin, 5. Jones, D.A 1998. The management of house Jenson, AG. 1965. Proofing of buildings against mice in agricultural landscapes using farm rats and mice. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisher­ management practices: an Australian ies and Food, Technical Bulletin No. 12, perspective. In: Baker, RO. and Crabb, AC, London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 18p. ed., Proceedings of the 18th Vertebrate Pest Lam, Y.M. 1983. Reproduction in the rice field Conference, Santa Clara, California, USA, 2-5 rat, Rattus argcntiventrr. Malayan Nature March 1998. Davis, University of California, Journal, 36, 249-282. 156-159. Lam, Y.M. 1988. Rice as a trap crop for the rice Buckle, AP. 1988. Integrated management of rice field rat in Malaysia. In: Crabb, AC and rats in Indonesia. FAO (Food and Agriculture Marsh, RE., ed., Proceedings of the 13th Organization of theUnited Nations) Plant Vertebrate Pest Conference, 123-128. Protection Bulletin, 36, 111-118. Lam, Y.M. and Mooi, K.C 1994. TBS-an Caughley, G.C 1977. Analysis of vertebrate environmentally friendly system for the populations. London, John Wiley and Sons, control of rodent pests of agriculture. 234p. Proceedings of the 4th International Confer­ Davis, D.E. 1953. The characteristics of rat ence on Plant Protection in the Tropics, 26-31 populations. Quarterly Review of Biology, 28, March, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 159-160. 373-40l. Lam, Y.M., Supaad, M.A, Chang, P.M., Mohamed, MS., Goh, CS. and Radzi, H. Davis, D.E. and Christian, J.J. 1958. Population 1990. An innovative approach for protecting consequences of a sustained yield program rice against severe rat depredation. Proceed­ for Norway rats. Ecology, 39, 217-222. ings of the 3rd International Conference on Elias, D.J. and Fall, M.W. 1988. The rodent Plant Protection in the Tropics, Genting problem in Latin America. In: Prakash, I., ed., Highlands, Malaysia, 20-23 March 1990, 1- Rodent pest management. Boca Raton, CRC, 23. 13-28. Leirs, H., Verhagen, R, Verheyen, W., Emlem,J.T.,Stokes,AW. and Winsor, CD. 1948. Mwanjabe, P. and Mbise, P. 1996. Forecasting The rate of recovery of decimated popula­ rodent outbreaks in Africa: an ecological basis tions of brown rats in nature. Ecology, 29, for Mastomys control in Tanzania. Journal of 133-145. Applied Ecology, 33, 937-943. 197 Ecologically-based Rodent Management Mathur, RP. 1997. Effectiveness of various Quick, G.R and Manaligod, H.T. 1990. Some rodent control measures in cereal crops and aspects of physical control of rice rodents. In: plantations in India. Belgium Journal of Quick, G.R., ed., Rodents and rice-report Zoology, 127, 137-144.
Recommended publications
  • Rodent Identification and Signs of Stowaways Key Features of UK Target Rodents
    FROM RSPB BIOSECURITY MANUAL CHAPTER 2: RODENT SURVEILLANCE & IDENTIFICATION Rodent identification and signs of stowaways Key features of UK target rodents Black rat Brown rat House mouse FROM RSPB BIOSECURITY MANUAL CHAPTER 2: RODENT SURVEILLANCE & IDENTIFICATION Identifying rodent droppings Rodent droppings can be very variable (depending on diet), including in colour, but as a guide: Brown rat Black rat House mouse -13-19mm long, -7-14mm long -4-8mm long -3-4mm thick -3-4mm thick -2mm thick -Rounded ends, one end may go to -Tapered ends -Small and thin a point (as pictured) -Often slightly curved -A bit like grains of rice -Likely to contain fur -Likely to contain fur -Strong smell of ammonia. -Often located in latrines along tracks, at feeding sites and on prominent rocks Figure 2.9 Droppings of UK invasive rodents. Images: taken from Morton & Cole 2013 Rabbit or goat droppings be mistaken for rat droppings, though they are usually more spherical (particularly rabbit) and uniform. Goat droppings may be more cylindrical but with flatter or round, rather than tapered ends. Breaking up droppings should help (wear gloves): rabbit and goat droppings just contain vegetation, whereas rat droppings are likely to contain fur and a range of food stuffs. Shrew droppings – typically 2-4mm long and 1-2mm thick, these should be smaller than rat or mouse droppings. However, evidence from St Agnes and Gugh (Isles of Scilly) shows shrew droppings can be much larger than this. They are of a sandy consistency and are largely comprised of insect remains, whereas rodent droppings generally contain a wider array of food sources.
    [Show full text]
  • BANDICOTA INDICA, the BANDICOOT RAT 3.1 The
    CHAPTER THREE BANDICOTA INDICA, THE BANDICOOT RAT 3.1 The Living Animal 3.1.1 Zoology Rats and mice (family Muridae) are the most common and well-known rodents, not only of the fi elds, cultivated areas, gardens, and storage places but especially so of the houses. Though there are many genera and species, their general appearance is pretty the same. Rats are on average twice as large as mice (see Chapter 31). The bandicoot is the largest rat on the Indian subcontinent, with a body and head length of 30–40 cm and an equally long tail; this is twice as large as the black rat or common house rat (see section 3.1.2 below). This large size immediately distinguishes the bandicoot from other rats. Bandicoots have a robust form, a rounded head, large rounded or oval ears, and a short, broad muzzle. Their long and naked scaly tail is typical of practically all rats and mice. Bandicoots erect their piles of long hairs and grunt when excited. Bandicoots are found practically on the whole of the subcontinent from the Himalayas to Cape Comorin, including Sri Lanka, but they are not found in the deserts and the semi-arid zones of north-west India. Here, they are replaced by a related species, the short-tailed bandicoot (see section 3.1.2 below). The bandicoot is essentially parasitic on man, living in or about human dwellings. They cause a lot of damage to grounds and fl oorings because of their burrowing habits; they also dig tunnels through bricks and masonry.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia
    CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation i ii CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation By Ibnu Maryanto Maharadatunkamsi Anang Setiawan Achmadi Sigit Wiantoro Eko Sulistyadi Masaaki Yoneda Agustinus Suyanto Jito Sugardjito RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) iii © 2019 RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) Cataloging in Publication Data. CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA: Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation/ Ibnu Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, Anang Setiawan Achmadi, Sigit Wiantoro, Eko Sulistyadi, Masaaki Yoneda, Agustinus Suyanto, & Jito Sugardjito. ix+ 66 pp; 21 x 29,7 cm ISBN: 978-979-579-108-9 1. Checklist of mammals 2. Indonesia Cover Desain : Eko Harsono Photo : I. Maryanto Third Edition : December 2019 Published by: RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI). Jl Raya Jakarta-Bogor, Km 46, Cibinong, Bogor, Jawa Barat 16911 Telp: 021-87907604/87907636; Fax: 021-87907612 Email: [email protected] . iv PREFACE TO THIRD EDITION This book is a third edition of checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia. The new edition provides remarkable information in several ways compare to the first and second editions, the remarks column contain the abbreviation of the specific island distributions, synonym and specific location. Thus, in this edition we are also corrected the distribution of some species including some new additional species in accordance with the discovery of new species in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Analysis of Small Non-Volant Mammals of Mt. Makiling, Luzon Island, Philippines Anna Pauline O
    Journal of Environmental Science and Management 17(2): 63-68 (December 2014) ISSN 0119-1144 Gut Analysis of Small Non-Volant Mammals of Mt. Makiling, Luzon Island, Philippines Anna Pauline O. de Guia1 and Ma. Niña Regina M. Quibod2 ABSTRACT Three non-native species (Rattus exulans, R. tanezumi and Mus musculus) of small non-volant mammals were recorded along various elevational gradients of Mount Makiling. Invertebrate remains and plant matter comprised the bulk of their diets based on the food items identifed. The identifed plant matter were leaves and seeds while invertebrates were easily identifable through body parts such as legs, head and antennae. Other contents identifed including vertebrate remains such as hair/fur, feathers and bones, plastics, rubber, stones, and intestinal worms were noted. Based on the calculated relative abundance of each food type, there is no signifcant difference in the diets of the three non-native rodent species. Preliminary results suggest that introduced rodents in Mt. Makiling have broad diets and there are no indications that their main diet includes native wildlife species. Traces of vertebrate remains, however, may indicate potential predation on wildlife species and further studies are needed to clarify this. Key words: rodents, gut analysis, endemic, non-native, elevational gradient INTRODUCTION The complexity of tropical mountain ecosystems endemic species (Rickart et al. 2007; Ong and Rickart 2008). have long provided haven for various Philippine wildlife R. exulans and R. tanezumi have been recorded at altitudes species. The elevational gradients provide various forest of 725 – 1450 masl on Mt. Isarog (Heaney et al. 1998). S. types while vertical stratifcation of trees offer habitat murinus, R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Chromosome Study of Rattus Rattus Mindanensis and Rattus Argentiventerl Doris H
    A COMPARATIVE CHROMOSOME STUDY OF RATTUS RATTUS MINDANENSIS AND RATTUS ARGENTIVENTERL DORIS H. WURSTER and GERRY C. ATWELL' Rattus argentiventer and Rattus rattus mindanensis are impor. tant agricultural pest species in the Philippines. Comparative chromo. some studies have been performed on these species to further clarify their taxonomic status and gain insight Into their cytogenic relation­ ship. The two forms can be consistently ldent'f led by differences in their sex chromosomes. Rodents of the genus Rattus have long been a problem in agricultural areas of the Philippines. Damage to rice, corn, coconuts, sweet potatoes, bananas, sugar cane, peanuts, cantelope and watermelons is extensive. Bio­ logists at the Rodent Research Center at the University of the Philippines' College of Agriculture estim'jted the preharvest loss of rice due to rats at $8,000,000 (Swink et ai., 1971). This estinate was based on the nationwide appraisal of rat damage to rice condicted by the Bureau of Plant Industry in 1970. Losses of other crops have not been quantitatively documented but can be extremely high at the local level. Through the late 1960's, investigators workilg in lowland areas in the Philippines did not agree on the taxonomy of the "ricefield" rat. Usually the taxa Rattus rattus umbriventer Kellogg, R. r. mindanensis Mearns and R. r. argentiventer Robinson and Kloss were used synonymously (Sumangil, 1963; 1965). Clark (1968) indicated that at least two of these animals were indeed true subspecies. Based on specirmens identified at the British Museum he stated that in Cotabato, the most important pest species was not R.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Rat Rattus Norvegicus
    brown rat Rattus norvegicus Kingdom: Animalia Division/Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Rodentia Family: Muridae ILLINOIS STATUS common, nonnative FEATURES The brown rat is large (head-body length seven to 10 inches, tail length five to eight inches) for a rat. It has a salt-and-pepper look with brown, black and gold hairs. There are darker hairs down the middle of the back. The belly fur is gray- or cream-colored. The feet have white fur. The ringed, scaly, one-colored tail is nearly hairless. BEHAVIORS The brown rat may be found statewide in Illinois. It lives in buildings, barns, houses, dumps and other areas associated with humans. This rodent will eat almost anything. It does eat food intended for human use and can contaminate food supplies. It is usually associated with poor sanitary conditions and livestock areas. This rat will carry food to its nest instead of eating it where the food is found. The brown rat is known to spread diseases. This nocturnal mammal is a good climber. It produces some sounds. Mating may occur at any time throughout the year. The average litter size is seven. Young are born helpless but develop rapidly. They are able to live on their own in about one month. Females begin reproducing at the age of about three months. If conditions are favorable, a female may reproduce once per month. The average life span of the brown rat is about one and one-half years. This species was introduced to the United States from Europe by humans. HABITATS Aquatic Habitats none Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats edge © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the Finger Lakes ID Guide
    A Guide for FL WATCH Camera Trappers John Van Niel, Co-PI CCURI and FLCC Professor Nadia Harvieux, Muller Field Station K-12 Outreach Sasha Ewing, FLCC Conservation Department Technician Past and present students at FLCC Virginia Opossum Eastern Coyote Eastern Cottontail Domestic Dog Beaver Red Fox Muskrat Grey Fox Woodchuck Bobcat Eastern Gray Squirrel Feral Cat Red Squirrel American Black Bear Eastern Chipmunk Northern Raccoon Southern Flying Squirrel Striped Skunk Peromyscus sp. North American River Otter North American Porcupine Fisher Brown Rat American Mink Weasel sp. White-tailed Deer eMammal uses the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) for common and scientific names (with the exception of Domestic Dog) Often the “official” common name of a species is longer than we are used to such as “American Black Bear” or “Northern Raccoon” Please note that it is Grey Fox with an “e” but Eastern Gray Squirrel with an “a”. Face white, body whitish to dark gray. Typically nocturnal. Found in most habitats. About Domestic Cat size. Can climb. Ears and tail tip can show frostbite damage. Very common. Found in variety of habitats. Images are often blurred due to speed. White tail can overexpose in flash. Snowshoe Hare (not shown) is possible in higher elevations. Large, block-faced rodent. Common in aquatic habitats. Note hind feet – large and webbed. Flat tail. When swimming, can be confused with other semi-aquatic mammals. Dark, naked tail. Body brown to blackish (darker when wet). Football-sized rodent. Common in wet habitats. Usually doesn’t stray from water. Pointier face than Beaver.
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue Specific Regulatory Network Annotation for Non-Coding Elements
    Quantitative Biology 2020, 8(1): 43–50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-020-0195-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE ZokorDB: tissue specificregulatorynetwork annotation for non-coding elements of plateau zokor Jingxue Xin1,6,7,†, Junjun Hao2,†, Lang Chen1, Tao Zhang3, Lei Li1,5,7, Luonan Chen3,5, Wenmin Zhao4, Xuemei Lu2,5, Peng Shi2,5,*, Yong Wang1,5,7,* 1 CEMS, NCMIS, MDIS, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Laboratory of Evolutionary and Functional Genomics, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China 3 Key Laboratory of Systems Biology, Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China 4 Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 5 Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China 6 Department of Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 7 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Correspondence: [email protected], [email protected] Received September 4, 2019; Revised December 16, 2019; Accepted December 23, 2019 Background: Plateau zokor inhabits in sealed burrows from 2,000 to 4,200 meters at Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. This extreme living environment makes it a great model to study animal adaptation to hypoxia, low temperature, and high carbon dioxide concentration. Methods: We provide an integrated resource, ZokorDB, for tissue specific regulatory network annotation for zokor.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Mice and Men Tracing the Global Invasion History of the Common House Mouse (Mus Musculus)
    Of mice and men Tracing the global invasion history of the common house mouse (Mus musculus) Level: Master Start: Any time Project duration: 4-6 months Location: This desktop study can be done from home Project form: Literature research, database construction and analysis, GIS Supervision: Rob Lenders [email protected] The common house mouse (Mus musculus) is generally considered to be an indigenous species in most of its distribution area. Yet this cosmopolitan rodent is in fact – together with its cousins black rat (Rattus rattus) and brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) – one of the most successful invasive species globally. The species most likely spread from its probable area of origin North India to the Mediterranean and from there to the rest of Europe, Asia and parts of Africa and subsequently to the Americas, Australia and a large number of Islands in Oceania. Compared to black and brown rat, the house mouse seems to have less adverse effects on human societies and biodiversity. Like the brown rat house mice are often kept as pets or as model species in scientific research. Yet the species also has proven negative effects on bird, reptile and invertebrate species around the world, especially on islands, and can cause damage to agricultural crops and stored food. In an earlier study we examined the global spread of three invasive rat species, viz., black rat (Rattus rattus), brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) and Pacific rat (Rattus exulans), during the Holocene as a result of human agency. The distribution history of the house mouse seems to compare very well with those of the black and brown rat.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway Or Brown Rat (Rattus Norvegicus), Roof Or Black Rat (Rattus Rattus)
    Norway or Brown Rat (Rattus norvegicus), Roof or Black Rat (Rattus rattus) Figure 1 Brown rat Figure 2 Black Rat The two species of rats commonly found in Wisconsin are the Norway (brown) rat and the Roof (black) Rat. The Norway rat is stocky and tends to burrow along building foundations, beneath rubbish or wood piles and in moist areas around gardens and fields. The roof rat is generally smaller with a very long tail. Roof rats are good climbers and usually live in above ground nests in shrubs or trees. Damage Rats eat a wide variety of foods as well as cause damage to structures, packaging materials (such as seed packages) and containers by gnawing. They are particularly problematic because they can spread disease through their feces, urine and through biting. They may be infested with fleas and mites which also can spread disease. When Are They Active Rats do not hibernate and are active throughout the year. Because they are mostly active at night they often are not seen, however, they leave evidence such as gnaw marks, droppings, tracks, burrows and nests made of shredded materials. Susceptible Plants Rats are omnivores, eating a variety of food, but generally prefer cereal grains, nuts and fruit. The more common problem associated with rats is contamination of food stuff and animal feed from droppings and urination as well as damage caused by gnawing. Prevention/Control Methods Successful management of rats is dependent on maintaining good housekeeping in and around gardens and garden structures to reduce shelter and food sources. Off the ground storage of gardening equipment, supplies, boxes and containers as well as keeping the garden free of debris and trash will create an environment less suitable for rats.
    [Show full text]
  • Rats and Mice Have Always Posed a Threat to Human Health
    Rats and mice have always posed a threat to human health. Not only do they spread disease but they also cause serious damage to human food and animal feed as well as to buildings, insulation material and electricity cabling. Rats and mice - unwanted house guests! RATS AND MICE ARE AGILE MAMMALS. A mouse can get through a small, 6-7 mm hole (about the diameter of a normal-sized pen) and a rat can get through a 20 mm hole. They can also jump several decimetres at a time. They have no problem climbing up the inside of a vertical sewage pipe and can fall several metres without injuring themselves. Rats are also good swimmers and can be underwater for 5 minutes. IN SWEDEN THERE ARE BASICALLY four different types of rodent that affect us as humans and our housing: the brown rat, the house mouse and the small and large field mouse. THE BROWN RAT (RATTUS NORVEGICUS) THRIVES in all human environments, and especially in damp environments like cellars and sewers. The brown rat is between 20-30 cm in length not counting its tail, which is about 15-23 cm long. These rats normally have brown backs and grey underbellies, but there are also darker ones. They are primarily nocturnal, often keep together in large family groups and dig and gnaw out extensive tunnel systems. Inside these systems, they build large chambers where they store food and build their nests. A pair of rats can produce between 800 and 1000 offspring a year. Since their young are sexually mature and can have offspring of their own at just 2-4 months old, rats reproduce extraordinarily quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Native and Non-Native Rats (Rattus Spp.) Along an Elevational Gradient in a Tropical Rainforest of Southern Luzon, Philippines
    ECOTROPICA 14: 129–136, 2008 © Society for Tropical Ecology DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE RATS (RATTUS SPP.) ALONG AN ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT IN A TROPICAL RAINFOREST OF SOUTHERN LUZON, PHILIPPINES Cristina C. Salibay & Hazel Anne V. Luyon De La Salle University-Dasmariñas, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines Abstract. Rats (Muridae) of the genus Rattus occur in the Philippines, both as native and as invasive species. While the invasive species are well known to use a large range of anthropogenic habitats, little is known about their potential to occur in forest areas. We studied the occurrence and relative abundance of different species of Rattus in forests along elevational gradients on three mountains within the Palay-palay / Mataas na Gulod National Park in Southern Luzon, Philippines. Four Rattus species were collected and their occurrence and relative abundance were found to differ significantly between species and along elevational gradients. Rattus norvegicus (40.3% of captures), R. tanezumi (21.5%), and R. argentiventer (5.6%) are invasive species and R. everetti (32.7%) a native forest-inhabiting species. While the three invasive species were most abundant at low elevations, R. everetti was most abundant at higher elevations. The number of invasive rats has been attributed to their survival and adaptation at lower elevations, where habitat conversion and degradation are most intense, while native species are more common at higher elevations where habitat is relatively un- disturbed. Key words: elevation, forest species, invasive species, Philippines, rainforest, Rattus species. INTRODUCTION and occur at high abundances in local mammal as- semblages (Heaney et al. 1998, Steppan et al. 2003).
    [Show full text]