Pjmfe Xjmemjgf SftqpotfPjmfe Xjmemjgf Sftqpotf jo Dbmjgpsojbjo Dbmjgpsojb
B Tvnnbsz pg Dvssfou Lopxmfehf pg Qpqvmbujpot bu Sjtl boe Sftqpotf Ufdiojrvft
Prepared by
Kirsten V. K. Gilardi, DVM and Jonna A. K. Mazet, DVM, MPVM, PhD
Oiled Wildlife Care Network Wildlife Health Center School of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis
A collaborative effort between the Office of Spill Prevention and Response, California Department of Fish and Game
and
Wildlife Health Center School of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis
July, 1999
i How To Contact Us...
Oiled Wildlife Care Network . Wildlife Health Center University of California Davis, California 95616
Telephone: (530) 752-4167 ( Fax: (530) 752-3318 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/owcn
ii Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 2. SPECIES DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE 3
Statewide Distribution and Abundance Surveys ...... 3 Birds 3 Cetaceans 4 Pinnipeds 5 Southern Sea Otter 6 Sea Turtle 8 Distribution and Abundance Surveys by Geographic Area ...... 9 North Coast 9 San Francisco Bay Area 12 Monterey Bay Area and Central Coast 17 Southern California 19 Distribution and Abundance of Species of Concern ...... 25 California Least Tern (Sterna antillarum browni) 25 Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) 26 California Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis californicus) 26 Elegant Terns (Sterna elegans) 27 Xantus’ Murrelet (Synthliboramphus hypoleucus) 27 Ashy Storm-Petrel (Oceanodroma homochroa) 28 California Gulls (Larus californicus) 28 California Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) 28 California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) 29 Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) 29 Aleutian Canada Goose (Branta canadensis leucopareia) 29 White-faced Ibis (Plegadis chihi) 30 Steller Sea Lion (Eumatopius jubatus) 30
iii CHAPTER 3. SPECIES SENSITIVITY TO PETROLEUM 31
CHAPTER 4. OIL SPILL RESPONSE—INITIAL EFFORTS AND EVENTS 37
Hazing ...... 37
Search and Collection ...... 40
Capture Techniques ...... 41
CHAPTER 5. OIL SPILL RESPONSE—REHABILITATION 43
Detection of Petroleum Products on or in Wildlife ...... 43 Direct Measures of Petroleum Product Exposure 43 Indirect Measures of Petroleum Product Exposure 45 Medical Effects of Oil on Marine Wildlife ...... 47 Review 47 Effects on the Immune System 49 Effects on Plumage 49 Effects on Hematology 50 Additional References on Effects of Oil on Wildlife ...... 50
Rehabilitation ...... 52 Removing Oil from Fur and Feathers 53 Anesthesia 53 Captivity Stress 56 Diseases and Diagnostics 58 Special Procedures 58 Husbandry and Therapeutics 59 Bibliography of Diseases of Marine Wildlife ...... 60
Bibliography of Parasites of Marine Wildlife ...... 74
Bibliography of Normal Blood Values of Marine Wildlife ...... 80
iv CHAPTER 6. OIL SPILL RESPONSE—POST-RELEASE SURVIVAL 83
Post-Release Survival Studies ...... 83 Birds 83 Marine Mammals 84 Marking and Transmitter Attachment Techniques ...... 85 Birds 85 Marine Mammals 86 Sea Turtles 86 The Effects of Band, Tag, and Transmitter Attachment ...... 87 Birds 87 Marine Mammals 88 Bibliography of Topics Relevant to Post-Release Survival Studies ...... 88 Birds 88 Marine Mammals 91 Sea Turtles 93
REFERENCES CITED 95
Cited Personal Communications ...... 117
INDEX 119
v OILED WILDLIFE RESPONSE IN CALIFORNIA 1
1
Introduction
The purpose of this document is to review the information on evaluating the avian stress re- current baseline information available for effec- sponse and on the effect of captivity stress on bird tive oiled wildlife response in California. This health. Similarly, this document does not contain includes a review of what is known to date on exact counts of wintering waterfowl on coastal marine wildlife species distribution and abun- lagoons in southern California for the last 10 dance in the state; current techniques for initial years, but does contain information on the agen- response to oil spill events including hazing, cies or institutions involved with monitoring searching affected areas, collecting carcasses, and waterfowl populations on those lagoons, how capturing wildlife; detecting petroleum products often censuses are conducted, etc. The idea is to on feathers, fur or in tissues; sensitivity of species put in one place current, cutting-edge information to the toxic effects of petroleum exposure; health pertinent to oiled wildlife response: it is our hope status of populations; medical techniques relevant that Oiled Wildlife Care Network administrators, to the care and rehabilitation of oiled wildlife, and board members, and rehabilitators will use this techniques for releasing and monitoring rehabili- document as a resource, enabling us to provide tated wildlife. best acheivable care for oiled wildlife in Califor- The body of literature on these subjects is nia. In addition, this document may be useful as a vast: in the interest of keeping this document to a general reference for oiled wildlife response readable (and therefore useful) length, emphasis outside of California, and will be made available has been placed on scientific papers and reports through the OWCN website generated by universities, government agencies, (http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/OWCN). industry, or the private sector which elaborate This “living” document will be periodically upon established methods, techniques or knowl- revised and updated. Contributions from OWCN edge. For example, this document does not serve members and participants, including data, new as an overall guide for the clinical care of birds in techniques or methods, or relevant reports or a rehabilitation setting, but does review the latest papers, are highly encouraged.
1
2
Species Distribution and Abundance
This section summarizes the work that has been Management Minerals Management Service or is being done by universities, government (BLM/MMS) contracted with the University of agencies, organizations and individuals to assess California to conduct at-sea surveys for several and/or monitor populations of birds and marine (but not all) seabird species off southern Califor- mammals that inhabit the California coastline. nia from 1975-1983 (Briggs et al., 1981; Briggs et The first three sections summarize statewide al., 1983; Briggs et al., 1987) and off northern surveys for birds, cetaceans, pinnipeds, sea otters California in 1980-1983 (Briggs et al., 1983; Dohl et and sea turtles. Next, the coastline is divided into al., 1983). These surveys were conducted monthly, four geographical regions for the purpose of and are some of the most thorough data obtained summarizing distribution data on seabirds, to date on seasonal at-sea distribution and abun- shorebirds, waterfowl, wading birds, and pinni- dance for several seabird species. Surveys of all peds. The section concludes with information breeding seabirds on-colony in southern Califor- regarding several species of concern in the state. nia were conducted in 1975-1977 by the Univer- Readers are also referred to a review of California sity of California under contract to the BLM/ coastal areas and wildlife species at risk compiled MMS (Hunt, 1980). The USFWS and U.S. Geologi- by the California Department of Fish and Game’s cal Survey Biological Resources Division (USGS/ Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR, BRD) conducted surveys of all breeding seabirds 1993). in the entire state during 1989-91 (Carter et al., 1992; Carter et al., 1992a) breeding seasons. Breeding season surveys were by definition seasonal, occurring in the spring/summers. Statewide Distribution and Common Murre (Uria aalge), Brandt’s Cormo- Abundance Surveys rant (Phalacrocorax penicillatus) and Double- Birds crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus ) breed- ing colonies in central and northern California Statewide surveys of seabirds at-sea and on have been surveyed in most years since 1985 breeding colonies have been conducted by vari- (Takekawa et al., 1990). ous agencies since the late 1970s. The U.S. Fish An intensive survey of shorebirds in all major and Wildlife Service (USFWS) conducted surveys coastal California wetlands from Morro Bay north of all breeding seabirds in the state in the late was coordinated by Point Reyes Bird Observatory 1970s (Sowls et al., 1980). The Bureau of Land (PRBO) in fall 1988 (Stenzel et al., 1989): These 3 CHAPTER 2—SPECIES DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE 4
surveys set the stage for a large-scale effort to Overall, the agency presently performing census shorebirds of the entire Pacific Flyway, most cetacean survey work off the coast of Cali- again coordinated by PRBO: annual surveys took fornia is the National Marine Fisheries Service, place in the fall, winter and spring from 1988- Southwest Fisheries Science Center in La Jolla. 1992, and the entire California coastline was NMFS has conducted several cetacean surveys in censused (Page et al., 1992). This report tabulates the Pacific between 1974 and 1985, a few of which species abundance by geographic location and included California (Lee, 1993). This report season. Point Reyes Bird Observatory is continu- includes maps of the species encountered along ing annual surveys during at least one season in various transects. The National Marine Fisheries most of these census areas (Dave Shuford, PRBO, Service has conducted several surveys of small pers. comm.). and large cetaceans in California waters in the last The California Department of Parks and five years, producing several internal reports and Recreation Natural Heritages Section sponsored a scientific publications. Their most comprehensive comprehensive seasonal survey of wildlife occur- surveys were conducted in 1991-1992 as part of an ring in all coastal California state parks in 1991 effort to assess the impact of gillnet fisheries on (Jaques and Strong, 1996). This survey covered marine mammal populations. In March–April every state beach, park and preserve along the 1991 and February–April 1992, NMFS/SWFSC California coast, and the report describes in detail conducted aerial surveys for cetaceans out to the occurrence of seabirds, shorebirds, waterfowl 100␣ NM (185 km) offshore in northern California and wading birds in these areas in all four sea- and 150␣ NM (278 km) offshore in southern Cali- sons. fornia to estimate winter abundance (Carretta and Forney, 1993; Forney et al., 1995; Forney and Barlow, 1998). The latter report contains detailed Cetaceans maps of species-specific sighting locations for all One of the first systematic in-depth cetacean cetaceans and pinnipeds observed. The 1998 surveys was conducted by the Minerals Manage- paper discusses differences in species abundance ment Service in the Southern California Bight between seasons. Later that year, from July from 1975-78 (Dohl et al., 1978) and off central through November, a ship survey along the entire and northern California in 1980-83 (Dohl, 1983; California coast out to 300␣ NM (555 km) estimated Dohl et al., 1983). In the Southern California Bight summer/fall cetacean species distribution and study, aerial surveys were conducted once or abundance (Hill and Barlow, 1992; Barlow, 1995). twice a month year-round from shore out to The 1992 report (Hill and Barlow, 1992) contains 120␣ NM offshore. Additionally, five boat-based detailed maps of species-specific sighting loca- surveys in fall, winter and spring months were tions of all cetaceans and three pinniped species conducted during the 3-year study. This report encountered. includes maps of species-specific sightings as well Since then, NMFS/SWFSC censused marine as tables presenting abundance by season for each mammals within a portion of the Navy Outer Sea species. In the central and northern California Test Range west of San Nicolas Island via aerial study, aerial surveys were performed once or surveys in winter/spring 1993-1994 (Caretta, twice a month from Point Conception north to the 1995). This report tabulates species-specific Oregon border, from shore out to 100 NM (185 sightings by season, and includes species-specific km) offshore. This report include species abun- maps locating all sightings, including pinnipeds. dance by season, a map and list of areas of special The status of large whales in California waters importance to cetaceans, and maps illustrating was updated by NMFS/SWFSC in 1994 (Barlow, “average cetacean biomass” by season. As of the 1994). This report notes that all large whale mid-1980s, these surveys represented the most species, all of which are federally listed as endan- comprehensive quantitative database assembled gered with the exception of minke whales on seasonal distribution and abundance of ceta- (Balaenoptera acuturostrata), are seen at least ceans in California. seasonally off California, with the exception of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus). For each OILED WILDLIFE RESPONSE IN CALIFORNIA 5
species, this report reviews population structure, ducted in May and June from 1985-1992 (Allen, size, growth rates and trends, and gives general- 1994): the four most abundant species were Dall’s ized information on distribution. Species seen in porpoises (Phocoenoides dalli), Pacific white-sided California primarily in winter include right dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens), harbor whales (off northern California); species seen in porpoises, and Risso’s dolphins (Grampus griseus). summer/fall include humpback (Megaptera This document contains density and distribution novaeangliae), blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and maps for all cetacean species in this area. Califor- rarely sei (Balaenoptera borealis) whales; species nia gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) population seen year-round include fin (Balaenoptera size and distribution during fall and spring physalus), minke and sperm (Physeter macroceph- migrations to and from calving grounds in Baja in alus) whales; and species seen too rarely to esti- 1979-1980 and 1984-1988 has been estimated mate seasonal abundance include Bryde’s (Buckland et al., 1993). Point Reyes National (Balaenoptera edeni) and right whales (Eubalaena Seashore (PRNS) has logged cetacean sightings glacialis). for over 20 years from the Point Reyes lighthouse The status of odontocetes (toothed whales, (Sarah Allen, PRNS, pers. comm); while sighting e.g. dolphins, porpoises and small whales) in efforts have not been entirely consistent and California was reviewed by NMFS/SWFSC in systematic with regards to sighting methods, 1994 (Forney, 1994). This report also reviews these records do represent thousands of hours of population structure, size, growth rates and observation of a section of the coastline past trends, and distribution of 20 species of which whales migrate quite close to shore and are odontocetes (excluding harbor porpoises). Harbor therefore easily observed and identified. PRNS is porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) distribution and planning on collating this data into report-form in abundance in the nearshore waters of the Califor- the near future. Similarly, several years of line nia coast (harbor porpoises range in shallow transect data on the distribution and abundance waters up to the 50 m isobath) from Point Concep- of harbor porpoises off the northern California tion north were assessed in aerial surveys per- coast have been collected but not yet collated formed in the summer/fall of 1986-1991 and in (Jeffrey Jacobsen, Humboldt State University, 1993 (Forney, 1995). This paper contains figures pers. comm.) detailing harbor porpoise abundance by transect Finally, The Gulf of the Farallones National area, and concludes that there has been a decline Marine Sanctuary initiated a Beach Watch pro- in the harbor porpoise population in California gram in 1993. This program surveys 86 pre- between 1986 and 1993. These surveys followed defined sections of the coastline (approx 241 km up on surveys conducted from 1974-1985 assess- total) from Bodega Head to the San Mateo/Santa ing harbor porpoise abundance along the North Cruz County border once or twice monthly year- American west coast, including California round (Roletto et al., 1998). Trained volunteers (Barlow, 1988; Barlow et al., 1988; Lee, 1993). The survey beaches for live and dead birds and abundance of coastal bottlenose dolphins marine mammals, including cetaceans, and pay (Tursiops truncatus), a distinct population from the particular attention to the presence of oiled bottlenose dolphins that range farther offshore, organisms and tar balls. A report is produced along the southern California coast was assessed annually which tallies the counts of live vs. dead via aerial surveys from 1991-1994, and estimated marine wildlife and the incidence of oiled wild- to be between 240-306 animals