Attachment-7-1-3-2- Receiving Environment Report

IEL REVIEW APPLICATION

DAIRYGOLD CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED

DFI Mogeely, Co. For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

APPLICATION ID: LA001622

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 2 2 EMISSIONS TO SEWER ...... 2 2.1 Treated Process Wastewater Discharges ...... 2 2.2 Receiving Environment ...... 2 2.2.1 North Channel Waterbody ...... 2 Nutrient Sensitive Area ...... 4 2.2.2 Hydrological Environment along the proposed discharge pipeline route ...... 6 3 EMISSIONS TO AIR ...... 7 3.1 Sources of Emissions to Air from the DFI Facility...... 7 3.2 Receiving Environment ...... 7 3.2.1 Local Sources of Emissions to Air ...... 7 3.2.2 Ambient Air Quality ...... 8 3.2.3 Odours ...... 8 4 NOISE EMISSIONS...... 9 4.1 Sources of Noise Emissions from the DFI Facility ...... 9 4.2 Receiving Environment ...... 9 4.2.1 Characteristics of the Existing Noise Environment ...... 9 For inspection purposes only. 4.2.2 Noise Sensitive LocationsConsent of ...... copyright owner required for ...... any other use...... 9

5 GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION ...... 9 5.1 Groundwater Body & Status ...... 9 5.2 Aquifer classification ...... 10 5.2.1 Vulnerability assessment ...... 10 5.2.2 Quality of Groundwater underlying the site ...... 10 5.3 Site Ground Conditions ...... 12 6 LANDSPREADING ...... 14 7 STORMWATER DISCHARGES ...... 14 7.1 Stormwater Discharges ...... 14 7.2 Receiving Environment ...... 14

Page 1 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

1 INTRODUCTION This report provides a description of the state of the receiving environment into which emissions or discharges will occur from the activities undertaken at the Dairygold Food Ingredients (DFI) speciality cheese manufacturing facility at Mogeely, Co. Cork. The purpose of this report is to provide a description of the current state of the environment for the relevant thematic/media.

This report should be read in conjunction with relevant thematic chapters of the Environmental Impact Statement that accompanies this application. The environmental thematic/media applicable to the DFI facility as listed in Attachment 7.1 Emissions Overview are as follows:

. Emissions to sewer; . Emissions to air; . Noise emissions; . Groundwater abstraction; . Landspreading; . Stormwater discharges.

2 EMISSIONS TO SEWER There are currently no emissions to sewer from the DFI installation. The following provides details on future proposed emissions to sewer.

2.1 Treated Process Wastewater Discharges It is being proposed that treated process wastewater emissions from the on-site installation WWTP will discharge to sewer via a new circa 14km sewer pipeline connection into the existing agglomeration Main Drainage outfall at Rathcoursey and discharge without any further treatment into the North Channel Great Island receiving waterbody. For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

2.2 Receiving Environment

2.2.1 North Channel Great Island Waterbody The North Channel Great Island (waterbody code IE_SW_060_0300) is a transitional waterbody located approximately 10.5kilometres southwest of Mogeely village. The North Channel Great Island waterbody covers an area of approximately 7.96km2 and is an integral part of Cork Harbour coastal water body (IE_SW_060_0000). The main land use within the waterbody is aquaculture and fishing. The status and objectives under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) for the North Channel Great Island waterbody set out below in Table 2.1.

Table 2-1 Status and Objectives for Waterbodies relevant to the proposed development Water Body Code WaterBody Name Status Risk Objective Type

IE_SW_060_0300 Transitional North Channel Moderate At risk of not Restore 2021 Great Island achieving good status

Page 2 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) The North Channel Great Island is a designated Special Area of Conservation up to the point where the Ballynacorra River enters the channel between the Great Island and Rathcoursey. This site’s conservation value derives largely from the presence of a number of important habitats listed in Annex I of the European Union Habitats Directive.

Special Protection Areas (SPA) The North Channel Great Island is a designated Special Protection Area up to the point where the Ballynacorra River enters the channel between the Great Island and Rathcoursey. The North Channel Great Island is an integral part of Cork Harbour which is also a wetland of international importance for the birdlife it supports.

Natural Heritage Areas (NHA) The North Channel Great Island is a designated National Heritage Area Special Protection Area up to the point where the Ballynacorra River enters the channel between the Great Island and Rathcoursey.

Bathing Water Directive There are no designated bathing areas within or in proximity to the North Channel Great Island.

EU Shellfish Waters Directive Part of the North Channel Great Island has been designated as a shellfish water. Rostellan (North, South and West) shellfish waters are also located approximately 3km from the discharge at Rathcoursey. The European Communities (Quality of Shellfish Water) Regulations 2006 (SI No 268 of 2006) set Standard/Value for physical, chemical and microbiological requirements that designated shellfish waters must either comply with or endeavour to improve. Figure 2.1 Designated Shellfish Waters For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

Designated Shellfish Water Page 3 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Nutrient Sensitive Area The North Channel Great Island is designated a nutrient sensitive area under the UWW regulations. Urban Waste Water is one of the principal pressures on water quality in Ireland and must be treated prior to being released back into the environment in order to remove contaminations that could otherwise pose a risk to the environment or public health. The Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive requires effluent discharged from all large urban areas to comply with the following quality standards.

Parameter Limit

BOD 25 mg/l

COD 125 mg/l

Suspended Solids 35 mg/l

Total Phosphorus 2 mg/l

Total Nitrogen 15 mg/l

Figure 2.2 Nutrient Sensitive Waters

For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

Nutrient Sensitive Waters

Page 4 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Amenity uses

North Island Great Channel into which the proposed treated effluent from the facility will discharge is a significant natural amenity. This waterbody contains areas that have been designated at European and National level. These designations are primarily based on the conservation value of particular habitats and the species of flora and fauna contained within them.

The North Island Great Channel is not only a resource in terms of ecology, a fact highlighted by its ecological designations but is also a major asset that offers both recreational and economic opportunities. The waterbody is a natural feature and is important as a natural recreational resource used by anglers and boating clubs. Parts of waterbody are a valued resource to the aquaculture industry and have shellfish designations supporting oyster beds.

Water Quality

The background coastal water quality for the outfall area was derived from EPA monitoring data (2007-2014). The EPA sampling locations are shown in Figure 2.3 with summary data presented in Table 2.2.

Table 2-2 Median coastal background water quality data (no SS data available)

For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

Figure 2.3 EPA Sampling Stations

LE530 LE340

LE450 LE540 LE610 OUTFALL

LE550

LE810

Page 5 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

2.2.2 Hydrological Environment along the proposed discharge pipeline route The proposed discharge pipeline route will travel north from the WWTP along the eastern side of the River Kiltha within the Dairygold premises and will cross the River Kiltha north of the Dairygold Cheese making facility on the south side of the L3627. (Refer to WC1 on Figure 2.3)

The proposed pipeline route crosses the Harrisgrove stream at the junction of the L3627 and the N25 roads. (Refer to WC2 on Figure 2.3). Lough Aderry located 2 km west of is the source of the Harrisgrove Stream, which flows west-northwest towards Midleton, where it joins the River, which in turn joins the Owencurra River and flows into the North Channel Great Island.

The pipeline route crosses the Dower River at two locations on the L3630 local road (Refer to WC3 and WC4 on Figure 2.3). The Dower River flows in a northeasterly direction where it combines with the River Kiltha and in turn joins the Womanagh River west of Ladysbrigde.

The pipeline route crosses the Loughatalia Stream at the intersection of the L3629 and the R630. (Refer to WC5 on Figure 2.3) The Loughatalia Stream appears to originate approximately 500m south of the L3629/R630 intersection and flows north into the North Channel Great Island.

Figure 2.4 Watercourse Crossings along Proposed Discharge Pipeline

For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

Page 6 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

3 EMISSIONS TO AIR

3.1 Sources of Emissions to Air from the DFI Facility Principal point source emissions to the atmosphere from the Dairygold Food Ingredients (DFI) Facility at Mogeely originate from the on-site boilers.

There are 2 hot-water boilers (Boiler No.1 and Boiler No. 2) burning natural gas at the DFI facility. The generating capacity of Boiler No 1 is 6.5MW and 7.5MW for Boiler No 2. Only one boiler is required to provide sufficient quantities of hot-water for the cheese manufacturing process, with the other in standby mode. Emissions from the boiler that is on load are exhausted to atmosphere from a 15m stack (A1-1). It is proposed to install a separate 15m stack for the stand-by boiler.

A small steam boiler with a maximum rating of 0.2 MW, with a steam generating capacity of 320 kg/h, is also used for heating cream in the cheese production process. A 1MW gas fuelled boiler is also proposed for the new Jarsberg® cheese production building.

Other than the Boilers there are no other main emission points to the atmosphere.

Minor emissions from other plant (compressors, refrigeration plant, tanks, air handling units etc) are emitted through vents and duct.

Potential emissions to the atmosphere include 3 no. emergency diesel generators.

3.2 Receiving Environment

3.2.1 Local Sources of Emissions to Air The DFI facility is located at the small village of Mogeely, which is approximately 2km north of For inspection purposes only. Castlemartyr, with farming the Consent main of landcopyright-use owner with requiredin forthe any other area. use. The density of housing in the

surrounding area is very low. The nearest house is about 55m from the cheese manufacturing building with other houses along the Mogeely to Castlemartyr road 180m to NE and 220m to SE. Further South there is a small number of houses 480m to the SE.

There is a Dairygold Agri-business grain handling facility adjacent to the northern boundary of the DFI site with pasture and arable lands to the south and west. This business operates mainly on a seasonal basis with bulk cereal delivered by truck, cleaned, dried and stored in bulk silos. The drying process uses 4 hot-air blowers for direct heating of the grain in vertical dryers. The air heaters burn natural

gas and operate from July to October. Emissions of NOx from the dryer heaters will be minor. The

main air emissions from this activity are particulates, including PM10, from fugitive emissions, where the bulk grain is unloaded in the yard and from minor emissions from the dryer exhausts that are located on top of the vertical dryer units. Dust abatement with high efficiency cyclones removes particulates in the exhaust air from the grain dryers. The grain is stored in the open with stockpiles extending to the boundary wall and so there can be substantial fugitive dust emissions from the main yard, especially during the peak production period.

NOx emissions in the locality will be from the boiler stacks at the DFI facility with a minor contribution

from local traffic exhausts and from domestic boilers. Emissions of SO2 originate from burning solid

Page 7 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

fuel or oil in boilers and so will be very low in the area due to the very low density of housing and absence of any other significant industrial activities in the area. Airborne particulates originate from a wide range of sources including the movement of vehicles within the internal roads and car-park of the DFI facility. However, these are likely to be localised and small compared to the numerous other

sources of PM10 in the surrounding area, such as operation of farm machinery, cultivation of fields and resuspension of silt on roads as well as natural sources including soil wind-blow, pollen and spores.

These miscellaneous sources contribute to background PM10 concentrations observed in rural areas throughout Ireland.

3.2.2 Ambient Air Quality There is no ambient monitoring available near Mogeely to provide information on existing air quality in this part of Co. Cork. Legislation on Air Quality require Member States to divide their country into 4 zones (A-D), for the purpose of air quality monitoring, reporting, assessment and management. Outside of the Dublin and Conurbation and towns with populations greater than 15,000 the remainder of the country is within Zone D. Mogeely village is within the Zone D (small town/rural) air quality

zone classification. The air quality in the Mogeely area is assumed good with concentrations of NOx,

SO2, PM10 and other minor pollutants well below the NAQS values (Table 3.1).

Table 3-1 Air Quality in Zone D (non-urban) Regions of Ireland in 2014 (μg/m3) Pollutant Annual average concentration

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) 4

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 3

PM10 9-22

Source: Air Quality in Ireland 2014, EPA 2015 For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

3.2.3 Odours The main potential sources of nuisance odour emissions in the area are identified as likely to be associated with agricultural activities, the Dairygold WWTP, and the local authority WWTP.

Statutory Authorities have received a number of complaints from local residents of existing odour nuisance in the area. The complaints received inferred that the source of the odour pollution was from the nearby WWTPs.

Page 8 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

4 NOISE EMISSIONS

4.1 Sources of Noise Emissions from the DFI Facility The main sources of noise generated in the DFI processing facility are air compressors, pumps, refrigeration units, and on-site traffic.

4.2 Receiving Environment

4.2.1 Characteristics of the Existing Noise Environment The existing land use in the proximity of the proposed DFI site is a combination of agricultural, residential and industry. The main sources of noise include the existing Dairygold agribusiness grain handling facility, the DFI cheese manufacturing facility and traffic on the local road networks.

The two industrial facilities including DFI and Dairygold Agribusiness grain handling facility when in operation dominate the noise environment, especially in summer when both are in full production. The noise environment at any one time can vary significantly depending on the amount production going on at either facility, which is related to the time of year and indeed time of day. It must be noted that both facilities have been in operation at Mogeely for several decades and have preceded many of the newer residential developments.

4.2.2 Noise Sensitive Locations There are several residential properties in the area including one off houses along the local roads and a recently developed housing estate directly east of the facility. Mogeely village is approximately 1 km north of the facility.

For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

5 GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION The sites process water requirement is supplied from the underlying groundwater body by 1 No. deep bore well (GW1).

5.1 Groundwater Body & Status The DFI site is underlain by the Middleton 1 Groundwater Body (GWB) (IE_SW_G_058) which encompasses the limestone valley from Middleton east to the coast at Bay.

The proposed sewer pipeline route runs from the DFI Mogeely Site to the south-western corner of the GWB. The Bawnard-Rathcoursey reach of the pipeline along the L3629 road crosses into and runs along the northern boundary of the Knockadoon_E GWB, which runs parallel and to the south of the Midleton GWB.

These GWBs have been classified as being of Good Status for the period 2007 to 20121.

1 The groundwater body descriptions are available from the GSI website: www.gsi.ie and the ‘status’ is obtained from the Water Framework Directive website: www.wfdireland.ie/maps.html. Page 9 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

5.2 Aquifer classification The bedrock aquifer underlying the DFI facility and most of the proposed sewer pipeline is classified as

a regionally important aquifer with a karstified, diffuse flow regime (RKd). The bedrock aquifer underlying a section of the pipeline (approx 4km) is classified as a Locally Important Aquifer (Ll), which is moderately productive only in local zones. These Ll aquifers are outside the Midleton GWB and do not contribute groundwater flow to the GWB.

5.2.1 Vulnerability assessment  The existing DFI Mogeely site and the proposed expansion site are situated over an area classified as having moderate groundwater vulnerability. The western site boundary is mapped as having extreme groundwater vulnerability, as it intersects the losing stream buffer zone delineated along the River Kiltha;  The proposed pipeline is underlain by an area of moderate groundwater vulnerability for the majority of its reach along the L3627 local road. At the Junction between the L3627 and the N25, and in the townlands of Kilmountain and Killamucky the L3627 reach varies between high and extreme vulnerability.

 Over the remainder of the proposed pipeline route along the L3628, L3630, R629 and L3629 the groundwater vulnerability is predominantly high, but passes through or adjacent to a number of extremely vulnerable areas.

5.2.2 Quality of Groundwater underlying the site A groundwater monitoring regime was implemented in 2012 in line with the requirements set out in

Schedule C.6 “Groundwater Monitoring” For inspection of the purposes existing only. license. The monitoring regime involves Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. monitoring upgradient groundwater quality at the upgradient site borehole GW1, and monitoring groundwater quality at the downgradient boreholes GW3 and GW4. Boreholes GW3 and GW4 are downgradient of the main processing area and the wastewater treatment plant respectively.

The laboratory results for the samples have been compared to the assessment criteria in SI No. 122 of 2014, i.e. the EU (Drinking Water) Regulations and the European Communities Environmental Objectives (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 (S.I. No. 9/2010). Information from the most recent groundwater monitoring assessment provides the following:

5.2.2.1 Background Contamination Nitrate exceeded its GTV at the upgradient borehole GW1 in November 2017. This also occurred in August 2013, February 2014, September 2015 and November 2016. A phosphate exceedance occurred at GW1 in November 2013. These isolated occurrences suggest short-term point source pollution of the karst aquifer. Nitrate and phosphate are typical agricultural pollutants, which can be released to groundwater after landspreading of organic matter and/or inorganic fertilisers. Numerous karst features are known to occur in the Mogeely area which could allow such point source pollution to occur.

An ammonia concentration of 0.146 mg/l as N was measured at GW4 in November 2017. Ammonia concentrations also exceeded the GTV in November 2013, February 2014, September 2015 and

Page 10 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

November 2016 at GW4, with the peak concentration occurring in September 2015. The 2017 measurement shows a slight increase compared to 2016, but is approximately 50% less than the 2015 peak, suggesting an overall downward trend in ammonia at GW4 following the peak of 0.284 mg/l as N in September 2015.

Faecal coliforms were not measured in November 2017; however, they were detected in GW4 in February 2014. This tentatively suggests a human sewage or animal waste source for the ammonia detections at GW4. Such a source may also contribute to the high chloride concentrations at GW4. Given the faecal coliform detection, the local authority sewage treatment plant adjacent to GW4 and the eastern boundary of the DFI WWTP seems a likely possible source for the ammonia contamination, rather than the DFI WWTP itself which deals with wastewater from food grade ingredients.

5.2.2.2 Site Based Contamination Chloride was elevated above the GTV value of 24 mg/l at all locations in November 2017. Electrical conductivity was elevated at GW4 in November 2017. The highest chloride concentration observed in 2017 was 196 mg/l at GW4 at the most downgradient point of the site. Concentrations were lowest at GW3 at 29 mg/l downgradient of the main production area, and were intermediate at the upgradient well GW1 at 60 mg/l. Electrical conductivity values showed the same spatial trend. Chloride was elevated in all the samples collected in GW1, GW2 and GW3 between 2013 and 2017. Elevated electrical conductivity occurred in GW3 in May 2013 and February 2014, and in GW4 in May and November 2013, and in the samples from 2014 to 2017. The 2014 report showed that the observed elevated chloride and electrical conductivity are likely to be due to table salt (NaCl) contamination of the shallow bedrock aquifer, by a temporary, unbunded salt store in the southeast of the production facility that was located 90 m upgradient of GW3. The salt store was decommissioned between May and August 2013. This removed the primary source of the salt contamination. The data from May 2013 indicated that the salt store was generating a plume of dissolved sodium and chloride which was migrating predominantly southeast in the groundwater, but also had a component migrating towards For inspection purposes only. GW1 under the influence of the Consent groundwater of copyright owner abstraction required for any from other use. GW1. The data from August 2013

indicated that following source removal water quality improved significantly at GW3 and the zone of peak contamination had moved southeast to GW4. Data from November 2013 and February 2014 suggested that rising groundwater levels were mobilising residual salt present in the unsaturated zone, such that chloride and electrical conductivity concentrations were rising again. The corresponding sodium, calcium and magnesium data showed cation exchange trends that correlated with the trends in the chloride and electrical conductivity data. Overall the data from 2014 were consistent with removal of the source of salt contamination and the dissipation and natural attenuation of the residual subsurface salt contamination.

The chloride and electrical conductivity data from November 2017 are consistent with the interpretation of the 2013/2014/2015 data; however the large data gaps between February 2014 – September 2015 – November 2016 – November 2017, and the more restricted parameter suite in 2015, 2016 and 2017 mean that there is a larger degree of uncertainty in the interpretation of the 2017 data.

The decrease in Chloride concentrations at GW4 in 2016 and 2017 compared to the peak in 2015 potentially suggests continued dissipation and natural attenuation of the residual contamination and plume in the site area.

Page 11 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Conductivity values at GW1, GW3 and GW4 in November 2017 were similar to those observed in September 2015 and November 2016. Chloride data at GW1 and GW3 in November 2017 were also similar to those observed in September 2015 and November 2016. This suggests ongoing residual contamination of the groundwater from residual subsurface salt contamination.

On the other hand, the faecal coliform contamination at GW4 in February 2014, and the ongoing elevated ammonia concentrations at GW4 have been attributed to background contamination potentially deriving from the Local Authority sewage wastewater treatment works adjacent to GW4. Groundwater contamination from this source could also cause elevated chloride and electrical conductivity concentrations.

It is possible that a component of the chloride observed in the sample from GW4 may derive from the same upgradient point source pollution considered to be the source of the elevated nitrate and phosphate occurrences at GW1.

5.3 Site Ground Conditions In February 2017, geophysical investigations were undertaken at a site on the existing (live/operational) cheese factory and the site of the proposed new cheese production building. These fieldwork investigations included borehole drilling, trial pit excavations and soil sampling. Cable tool borehole drilling (BH) (10 No.) was undertaken to a maximum depth of 14 mbgl. Rotary borehole (RC) drilling (4 No.) was undertaken to a maximum depth of 15 mbgl. Trial pits (TP) (5 No.) were excavated to a maximum depth of 3.2 mbgl. The locations of these explorations are shown IN Figures 6-1 and 6- 2 below.

The geotechnical investigations provide that the site is characterised by slightly sandy gravelly SILT between 1.0 m and 1.2 m thick and Made ground 1.2 m to 2.8 m thick, underlain by dense silty sandy For inspection purposes only. GRAVEL with varied Cobble contentConsent and of copyright Boulder owner content required for to any depthsother use. up to 15.0 mbgl (meters below

existing ground level). No bedrock was encountered within the scheduled depth of the investigation, 15.0 mbgl. The geophysical survey suggested a depth to bedrock of 22.5 m. Groundwater was encountered between depths of 9.2 mbgl and 10.7 mbgl in rotary boreholes

A total of 5 soil samples were collected for chemical testing. Analysis of soil samples indicated that levels of arsenic, cadmium, chromium VI and lead are all below Category 4 Screening Levels (C4SL)2 and the Dutch Intervention values for ‘standard’ soil. Soil conditions are considered representative of a greenfield site.

2 SP1010: Development of Category 4 Screening Levels for Assessment of Land Affected by Contamination – Policy Companion Document (UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, December 2014) Page 12 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Figure 6-1 Exploration Location Plans – Existing Production site and adjacent Greenfield lands

Figure 6-2 Exploration Location Plans – DFI Wastewater Treatment Plant

For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

Page 13 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

6 LANDSPREADING There will be no direct discharges of emissions to ground or groundwater.

Sludge generated by the on-site wastewater treatment plant is recovered by landspreading by a permitted contractor on an approved landbank under an EPA approved Nutrient Management Plan (NMP) and in accordance with the facility’s licence. The material is certified annually by the Organic Trust as a Dairy Sludge Fertiliser.

7 STORMWATER DISCHARGES

7.1 Stormwater Discharges The Dairygold Food Ingredients (DFI) Speciality Cheese making facility and associated WWTP are located on the east bank of the River Kiltha (Waterbody Code IE_SW_19_1909). Stormwater run-off from the facility is collected by the on-site surface water drainage system and discharged to the River Kiltha.

7.2 Receiving Environment The River Kiltha flows in a southerly direction for approximately 3km before joining the Womanagh River (Waterbody Code IE_SW_19_1793) west of the village of . The Womanagh River continues to flow eastwards into transitional waters (Waterbody Code IE_SW_030_0100) before finally reaching Youghal Bay (Waterbody Code IE_SW_020_0000) approximately 15km downstream of Mogeely village.

The status and objectives under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) for these waterbodies are set out below in Table 7.1. For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

Page 14 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Table 7-1 Status and Objectives for Waterbodies relevant to the proposed development Water Body Code WaterBody Name Status Risk Objective Type

IE_SW_19_1909 River Kiltha, Trib of Moderate At risk of not Restore 2021 Womanagh achieving good status

IE_SW_19_1793 River Womanagh Poor At risk of not Restore 2021 achieving good status

IE_SW_030_0100 Transitional Womanagh Moderate Not at Risk of not Restore 2021 Estuary achieving good status

IE_SW_020_0000 Coastal Youghal Bay Good Not at Risk of not Protect achieving good status

Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) There are no Special Areas of Conservation designated for the River Kiltha. The lower stretches of the Womanagh River, is a designated Special Area of Conservation from its point south of the R633 at Crompaun Bridge to where the river enters Youghal Bay. This site’s conservation value derives largely from the presence of a number of important coastal habitats listed in Annex I of the European Union Habitats Directive.

For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Special Protection Areas (SPA) There are no Special Protection Areas designated for the River Kiltha. The lower stretches of the Womanagh River, from its point approximately 665m north of the R633 at Crompaun Bridge to where the river enters Youghal Bay is a Special Protection Area.

Natural Heritage Areas (NHA) There are no Natural Heritage Areas designated for the River Kiltha. The lower stretches of the Womanagh River, is a proposed National Heritage Area from its point south of the R633 at Crompaun Bridge to where the river enters Youghal Bay.

Surface Water Directive Surface water is abstracted from the Rvier Kiltha upstream of Mogeely village. There are no surface water abstractions downstream of the discharge point.

Freshwater Fish Directive & Salmonid Regulations The River Kiltha, the Womanagh River and its tributaries are not designated under these Regulations.

Page 15 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Bathing Water Directive There are no designated inland bathing areas in the Womanagh catchment nor are there any designated beaches on the Womanagh estuary.

EU Shellfish Waters Directive There is a Shellfish Designation in Youghal/Ballymacoda Bay where the Womanagh River discharges to the sea.

Water Quality The most current publicly available information for the River Kiltha waterbody indicates that while the general physio-chemical status is classed high, the overall status of the waterbody is classed moderate due to its overall ecological status. The identified pressures and risks include Point Source Risk principally associated with WWTPs.

A biological water quality assessment along a section of the River Kiltha was carried out by Malachy Walsh and Partners (MWP) on 9th September 2016. Q sampling was undertaken at three sampling locations in the vicinity of the DFI facility. Q-values were assigned on the basis of macroinvertebrate density and diversity found. The sampling locations are shown on Figure 7.1 and results of the Q sampling event are outlined in Table 7.2 below. The results of the Q-sampling show a deterioration in the stream ecological quality between the upstream and downstream sampling locations.

Water samples were also taken from the River Kiltha on 9th September 2016 at the same locations as those used for the Q sampling and were sent for laboratory analysis. The analytical results of these samples indicate a deterioration in the quality of the water between the upstream and downstream For inspection purposes only. locations with higher concentrationsConsent of COD,of copyright Orthophosphate, owner required for any otherSuspend use. ed Solids and Total Phosphorus recorded at the downstream sampling locations. There was however no difference in the recorded BOD concentrations at the upstream and downstream locations.

Table 7-2 Q values and Pollution Status of River Kiltha Sampling Location Q Value Water Framework Station Directive Status 1 Upstream of existing stormwater outfall (SW4) Q3-4 Moderate 2 Between existing stormwater outfall (SW4) and Q3 Poor existing Dairygold WWTP outfall (SW3) 3 Downstream of existing Dairygold WWTP Q3 Poor outfall (SW3)

Page 16 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45 IEL Review Application – DFI Mogeely Attachment-7-1-3-2-Receiving Environment Report Application ID: LA001622

Figure 7.1Sampling Locations

For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use.

Page 17 of 17

EPA Export 07-11-2018:04:03:45