A New Study Finds That Many Pronghorn Migrate Hundreds of Miles Each Year, Often Struggling to Overcome a Growing Number of Obstacles Along the Way

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A New Study Finds That Many Pronghorn Migrate Hundreds of Miles Each Year, Often Struggling to Overcome a Growing Number of Obstacles Along the Way A new study finds that many pronghorn migrate hundreds of miles each year, often struggling to overcome a growing number of obstacles along the way. BY BEN LONG LONG ROAD HOME A herd of several hundred pronghorn migrates north across Montana near Fort Peck Lake toward spring fawning grounds in southern Can ada. In some years the animals will travel hundreds of miles during their seasonal migrations. PHOTO BY MICHAEL FORSBERG 8 NOVEMBER –DECEMBER 2011 FWP.MT.GOV/MTOUTDOORS MONTANA OUTDOORS 9 nder the big sky of the high plains, species is like the pronghorn. Its closest ge - a herd of pronghorn stands out netic relative is, of all things, the giraffe. amid the sage and bunchgrass, Pronghorn have lived in North America the tallest natural features along for millions of years, surviving glacial eras, U the skyline. They snap to atten - volcanic ash winters, and predation by the tion the moment a truck slows, and when now-extinct American cheetah. But it took the vehicle stops and binoculars come out, humans only 50 years around the turn of the the animals trot off over the horizon. 20th century to nearly wipe out the animals. This vast, open country that scientists call After explorers and trappers opened the the Northern Sagebrush-Steppe Ecosystem West, the teeming herds of wildlife observed seems an unlikely place for secrets. But until just a few decades earlier by Lewis and Clark recently, pronghorn possessed an important were quickly overrun. Ambitious pioneers one—the location of core habitats and the punched railroads and telegraph lines across routes they use to migrate throughout the the prairie, plowing arable land and replac - year. Now scientists are discovering these ing hoofed wildlife with cattle. Pronghorn critical summer fawn rearing areas, winter - were shot by hungry farmers and unregu - ing sites, and ancient pathways along which lated market hunters. By the early 1900s the the prairie denizens move back and forth total pronghorn population in North Amer - across portions of the northern Great Plains ica was reduced to fewer than 15,000. each year. They’re also finding what obsta - Conservation-minded hunters and land - cles—natural and man-made—impede the owners eventually repopulated the plains animals’ migrations. The research is timely with the fleet-footed animals. Working with and essential. Natural gas wells, oil pipe - state bi ol ogists, they trapped pronghorn in lines, wind turbines, housing subdivisions, population strongholds and relocated the an - and other developments in northern Mon - imals in historic habitat. Within decades, tana and Can ada’s prairie prov inces con - pronghorn had recolonized the American tinue to expand. Unlocking the secret West, although in nowhere near pre-settle - to the pronghorn’s mysterious spring and ment numbers and only in marginalized frag - fall migrations is critical to finding ways ments of their historic range. Today, to ensure that these age-old seasonal move - pronghorn number over 1 million across ments can continue. North America. In some parts of the West they are common enough to take for granted. PULLED BACK FROM THE BRINK Yet pronghorn populations remain vulner - Though commonly called antelope, prong - able. According to northeastern Montana horn are not related to gazelles, eland, or wildlife managers, the severe winter of other true antelope species, which are native 2010-11 cut populations in much of the only to Africa and Asia. Pronghorn are an region by 70 percent. Of more long-term con - endemic North American ungulate, a cern, say biologists, is the increasing difficulty holdover from when mastodons, ground pronghorn have in making their seasonal mi - sloths, and other ice age mammals roamed grations. Housing and fencing are spreading the continent. In all the world, no other out from new subdivisions across southern SPREADING THE WEALTH A Montana Department of Fish and Game pilot hazes pronghorn into a trap on Townsend Flats near Helena in the mid-1940s. UNFAMILIAR TERRITORY Captured by a Thousands of the animals were N remote-sensor camera, migrating pronghorn in O I trapped from strongholds and T C E northern Wyoming find easier winter walking in transplanted during the mid-19th L L O a river valley willow thicket. In severe winters, C century to restore a population O T Mon tana pronghorn take similar routes through O that in Montana had dwindled H P riparian areas and cattail marshes—and even to just 3,000. S A C onto railroad tracks and county roads—in order U L S I C I to move across snow-filled landscapes. R M E M I O J J 10 NOVEMBER –DECEMBER 2011 FWP.MT.GOV/MTOUTDOORS MONTANA OUTDOORS 11 Canada. New roads, pipelines, and oil and tect winter range and fawning grounds as many of the research animals on historic mi - Decades ago, waterfowlers and biolo - Alberta to work together more coopera - gas wells are spreading across many parts of well as ensuring that landscapes remain gration treks in search of food and milder gists learned that ducks often travel vast tively and pay attention to habitat condi - the northern Great Plains—from the Pinedale permeable for highly mobile wildlife. conditions, allowing Jakes to document distances, many nesting in Canada’s prairie tions on both sides of the border. “If we Anticline in Wyoming to the Bowdoin oil State wildlife agencies such as Montana some of the longest land migrations ever pothole region then wintering in the warm want to manage for pronghorn hunting in fields northeast of Malta to the coal-bed Fish, Wildlife & Parks knew the locations of recorded in the lower 48 states. In a single wetlands of Mississippi, Louisiana, and northern Montana, we can’t just look at Pronghorn have methane wells in southern Alberta. The re - some core prairie wildlife habitats. But they year, some animals traveled more than 300 Texas. By putting leg bands on ducks and where the animals live during the hunting “to put their foot in sulting development pushes its way into lacked data on others, as well as on the miles. One intrepid pronghorn, number 169, tracking where the birds were shot by season,” he says. “We have to also consider established wintering habitat and summer routes pronghorn follow as they move be - was tracked starting near Glasgow as it hunters, biologists began mapping water - what’s happening hundreds of miles away every little bit of grounds where pronghorn rear their fawns. tween those sites. That’s where Andrew moved north to Saskatchewan’s Grasslands fowl migratory routes, along with prime in Canada.” Even worse, it chops great swaths of prairie Jakes came in. National Park in spring. Then in fall it wetlands for nesting and overwintering. Just as important as conserving core their path. So what habitat into isolated pieces. The resulting In 2008, the Helena-based University of headed back to Montana, where severe win - Also documented were critical resting and habitats is maintaining pronghorn migra - landscape fragmentation les sens what con - Calgary doctoral candidate began a trans - ter weather pushed it south all the way to In - refueling “stopover” sites, such as shallow tion corridors. “Ducks can fly over the tops happens on the servation biologists call “connectivity”—the boundary study of pronghorn core habitats gomar—a total annual trek of more than 350 temporary wetlands. Private conservation of most barriers,” says Gates. “But prong - degree to which pronghorn and other wildlife and seasonal movement in Montana, south - miles (see a map of the trek on page 14). groups such as Ducks Unlimited, along with horn have to put their foot in every little bit landscape is freely move from one place to another. ern Alberta, and southern Saskatchewan. The “The scale of these migrations is beyond state, provincial, and federal wildlife agen - of their path. So what happens on the land - To find a balance between the needs of study is funded by the Bureau of Land Man - those of African wildebeest and right up cies, began protecting, conserving, and scape is critically important.” critically important.” HARD GOING Historically able to follow bison herds that acted as snowplows, pronghorn now must break trail themselves. The animals are ill equipped TRAIN WRECKED Deep snow forces pronghorn to travel along railroad corridors. Last winter hundreds trying to migrate along tracks were killed by to negotiate drifts like those that piled up across northern Montana this past winter. In any year, fences pose constant problems. If pressed, pronghorn can trains in northeastern Montana, such as this section of line northwest of Glasgow. Cars and trucks are no friendlier. As human development grows leap over obstacles, but they have not evolved to do so easily, as elk and deer have. In winter, they squander precious energy trying to bypass fences. across the northern Great Plains, so do highways and collisions between migrating pronghorn and moving vehicles. grassland wildlife and those of economic agement, the World Wildlife Fund, FWP, and there with the barren ground caribou’s,” restoring critical waterfowl habitats in the BLOCKING THE WAY Alberta headed to Montana when the growth, western states and prairie provinces the Alberta Conservation Association. says Cormack Gates, professor of Environ - United States, and even more so in Canada. A major impediment to pronghorn survival weather turned cold. The pronghorn gath - have begun to identify core habitats and mi - Jakes aims to learn how human activi - mental Science and Planning at the Univer - Pronghorn appear to require a similar is deep snow. The animal’s tiny hooves, per - ered in herds of up to 1,000 animals and S I gration routes so development can be sited ties affect pronghorn habitat and move - sity of Calgary.
Recommended publications
  • MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION of a MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS a PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) in the Americas, There Are Two Documented
    Cryptozoology, 12, 1993-1996, 42-49 © 1996 International Society of Cryptozoology MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION OF A MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS A PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) PE tit A. DRATCH Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. and National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. WENDY RosLuND National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. JANICE S. MARTENSON, MELANIE CULVER, AND STEPHEN J. O'BRIEN' Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. ABSTRACT: Tissue samples from an alleged Mexican Onza, shot in the western Sierra Madre in 1986, were subjected to several biochemical assays in an attempt to determine the specimen's relationship to felid species of North America. Protein analyses included isoenzyme electrophoresis and albumin isoelectric focusing. Mi- tochondrial DNA was assayed for restriction fragment lengths with 28 restriction enzymes, and the NÐ5 gene was sequenced. The resulting protein and rnitochondrial DNA characteristics of the Onza were indistinguishable from those of North Amer- ican pumas. INTRODUCTION In the Americas, there are two documented species of large cats: 1) Puma concolor, the puma, also called mountain lion, cougar, and panther in dif- ferent regions of North America, and known as leon in Mexico; and 2) Panthera onca, the jaguar, or tigre as it is known south of the U.S. border. To whom correspondence should be addressed. 42 DRATCH ET AL.: ONZA MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION 43 Flo.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide the jill and lewis bernard family Hall of north american mammals inside: • Suggestions to Help You come prepared • essential questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for teaching in the exhibition • map of the Exhibition • online resources for the Classroom • Correlations to science framework • glossary amnh.org/namammals Essential QUESTIONS Who are — and who were — the North as tundra, winters are cold, long, and dark, the growing season American Mammals? is extremely short, and precipitation is low. In contrast, the abundant precipitation and year-round warmth of tropical All mammals on Earth share a common ancestor and and subtropical forests provide optimal growing conditions represent many millions of years of evolution. Most of those that support the greatest diversity of species worldwide. in this hall arose as distinct species in the relatively recent Florida and Mexico contain some subtropical forest. In the past. Their ancestors reached North America at different boreal forest that covers a huge expanse of the continent’s times. Some entered from the north along the Bering land northern latitudes, winters are dry and severe, summers moist bridge, which was intermittently exposed by low sea levels and short, and temperatures between the two range widely. during the Pleistocene (2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago). Desert and scrublands are dry and generally warm through- These migrants included relatives of New World cats (e.g. out the year, with temperatures that may exceed 100°F and dip sabertooth, jaguar), certain rodents, musk ox, at least two by 30 degrees at night. kinds of elephants (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia: Carnivora) in the Americas: Past to Present
    Journal of Mammalian Evolution https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-020-09496-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Environmental Drivers and Distribution Patterns of Carnivoran Assemblages (Mammalia: Carnivora) in the Americas: Past to Present Andrés Arias-Alzate1,2 & José F. González-Maya3 & Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales4 & Rodrigo A. Medellín5 & Enrique Martínez-Meyer2 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Understanding species distributions and the variation of assemblage structure in time and space are fundamental goals of biogeography and ecology. Here, we use an ecological niche modeling and macroecological approach in order to assess whether constraints patterns in carnivoran richness and composition structures in replicated assemblages through time and space should reflect environmental filtering through ecological niche constraints from the Last Inter-glacial (LIG), Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to the present (C) time. Our results suggest a diverse distribution of carnivoran co-occurrence patterns at the continental scale as a result of spatial climatic variation as an important driver constrained by the ecological niches of the species. This influence was an important factor restructuring assemblages (more directly on richness than composition patterns) not only at the continental level, but also from regional and local scales and this influence was geographically different throughout the space in the continent. These climatic restrictions and disruption of the niche during the environmental changes at the LIG-LGM-C transition show a considerable shift in assemblage richness and composition across the Americas, which suggests an environ- mental filtering mainly during the LGM, explaining between 30 and 75% of these variations through space and time, with more accentuated changes in North than South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Pbmr-400 Benchmark Solution of Exercise 1 and 2 Using the Moose Based Applications: Mammoth, Pronghorn
    EPJ Web of Conferences 247, 06020 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124706020 PHYSOR2020 PBMR-400 BENCHMARK SOLUTION OF EXERCISE 1 AND 2 USING THE MOOSE BASED APPLICATIONS: MAMMOTH, PRONGHORN Paolo Balestra1, Sebastian Schunert1, Robert W Carlsen1, April J Novak2 Mark D DeHart1, Richard C Martineau1 1Idaho National Laboratory 955 MK Simpson Blvd, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA 2University of California, Berkeley 2000 Carleton Street, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT High temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGR) are a candidate for timely Gen-IV reac- tor technology deployment because of high technology readiness and walk-away safety. Among HTGRs, pebble bed reactors (PBRs) have attractive features such as low excess reactivity and online refueling. Pebble bed reactors pose unique challenges to analysts and reactor designers such as continuous burnup distribution depending on pebble mo- tion and recirculation, radiative heat transfer across a variety of gas-filled gaps, and long design basis transients such as pressurized and depressurized loss of forced circulation. Modeling and simulation is essential for both the PBR’s safety case and design process. In order to verify and validate the new generation codes the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Data bank provide a set of benchmarks data together with solutions calculated by the participants using the state of the art codes of that time. An important milestone to test the new PBR simulation codes is the OECD NEA PBMR-400 benchmark which includes thermal hydraulic and neutron kinetic standalone exercises as well as coupled exercises and transients scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronghorn G TAG
    ANTELOPE AND ... the American “antelope”! IRAFFE Pronghorn G TAG Why exhibit pronghorns? • Celebrate our local biodiversity by displaying the last surviving species of the Antilocapridae, a mammalian family endemic to North America. • Participate in a recovery program close to home: AZA maintains a priority insurance population of the critically endangered peninsular pronghorn. • Engage guests with these “antelope” from the familiar song “Home on the Range” (even though pronghorns aren’t true “antelope” at all!). • Let visitors get hands-on with the unusual horn sheaths of pronghorns - they are keratinous like horns, but are shed annually like antlers! • Seek partnerships with local running groups: pronghorn are the fastest land animals in North America, able to cover 6 miles in 9 minutes! • TAG Recommendation: Contact the SSP for guidance regarding which pronghorn program is best suited to your facility’s climate. MEASUREMENTS IUCN LEAST Length: 4.5 feet CONCERN Height: 3 feet (CITES I) Stewardship Opportunities at shoulder Peninsular Pronghorn Recovery Project Weight: 65-130 lbs <200 peninsular Contact Melodi Tayles: [email protected] Prairies North America in the wild Care and Husbandry RED SSP (peninsular): 25.26 (51) in 7 AZA institutions (2019) Species coordinator: Melodi Tayles, San Diego Zoo Safari Park [email protected] ; (760) 855-1911 CANDIDATE Program (generic): 34.61 (95) in 21 institutions (2014) Social nature: Herd living. Harem groups with a single male are typical. Bachelor groups may be successful in the absence of females. Mixed species: Pronghorn are frequently exhibited with bison. They have also been housed with camels, deer, cranes, and waterfowl. Housing: Peninsular pronghorn are heat tolerant and do well in windy conditions, but heated shelters recommended where temperatures fall below 40ºF for extended periods.
    [Show full text]
  • GNUSLETTER Volume 37 Number 1
    GNUSLETTER Volume 37 Number 1 ANTELOPE SPECIALIST GROUP July 2020 ISSN 2304-0718 IUCN Species Survival Commission Antelope Specialist Group GNUSLETTER is the biannual newsletter of the IUCN Species Survival Commission Antelope Specialist Group (ASG). First published in 1982 by first ASG Chair Richard D. Estes, the intent of GNUSLETTER, then and today, is the dissemination of reports and information regarding antelopes and their conservation. ASG Members are an important network of individuals and experts working across disciplines throughout Africa and Asia. Contributions (original articles, field notes, other material relevant to antelope biology, ecology, and conservation) are welcomed and should be sent to the editor. Today GNUSLETTER is published in English in electronic form and distributed widely to members and non-members, and to the IUCN SSC global conservation network. To be added to the distribution list please contact [email protected]. GNUSLETTER Review Board Editor, Steve Shurter, [email protected] Co-Chair, David Mallon Co-Chair, Philippe Chardonnet ASG Program Office, Tania Gilbert, Phil Riordan GNUSLETTER Editorial Assistant, Stephanie Rutan GNUSLETTER is published and supported by White Oak Conservation The Antelope Specialist Group Program Office is hosted and supported by Marwell Zoo http://www.whiteoakwildlife.org/ https://www.marwell.org.uk The designation of geographical entities in this report does not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of IUCN, the Species Survival Commission, or the Antelope Specialist Group concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or concerning the delimitation of any frontiers or boundaries. Views expressed in Gnusletter are those of the individual authors, Cover photo: Peninsular pronghorn male, El Vizcaino Biosphere Reserve (© J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cougar 1 Cougar
    Cougar 1 Cougar Cougar[1] Temporal range: Middle Pleistocene to recent Conservation status [2] Least Concern (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Puma Species: Puma concolor Binomial name Puma concolor (Linnaeus, 1771) Cougar 2 Cougar range The cougar (Puma concolor), also known as puma, mountain lion, mountain cat, catamount or panther, depending on the region, is a mammal of the family Felidae, native to the Americas. This large, solitary cat has the greatest range of any large wild terrestrial mammal in the Western Hemisphere,[3] extending from Yukon in Canada to the southern Andes of South America. An adaptable, generalist species, the cougar is found in every major American habitat type. It is the second heaviest cat in the Western Hemisphere, after the jaguar. Although large, the cougar is most closely related to smaller felines and is closer genetically to the domestic cat than to true lions. A capable stalk-and-ambush predator, the cougar pursues a wide variety of prey. Primary food sources include ungulates such as deer, elk, moose, and bighorn sheep, as well as domestic cattle, horses and sheep, particularly in the northern part of its range. It will also hunt species as small as insects and rodents. This cat prefers habitats with dense underbrush and rocky areas for stalking, but it can also live in open areas. The cougar is territorial and persists at low population densities. Individual territory sizes depend on terrain, vegetation, and abundance of prey. While it is a large predator, it is not always the dominant species in its range, as when it competes for prey with other predators such as the jaguar, grey wolf, American Black Bear, and the grizzly bear.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCOMOTOR ADAPTATIONS and ECOMORPHOLOGY of SHORT-FACED BEARS (Arctodus Simus) in EASTERN BERINGIA
    Palaeontology Program Government of the Yukon Occasional Papers in Earth Sciences No. 7 LOCOMOTOR ADAPTATIONS AND ECOMORPHOLOGY OF SHORT-FACED BEARS (Arctodus simus) IN EASTERN BERINGIA Paul E. Matheus The Alaska Quaternary Center, Department of Geology and Geophysics and The Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks YUKON Palaeontology Program Department of Tourism and Culture Elaine Taylor, Minister 2003 Publication Note: This monograph was originally written as as Matheus 1995 and 2001. The dissertation also Chapters 2, 3, and 4 of the Ph.D. dissertation contained an appendix with stable isotope data on entitled, “Paleoecology and Ecomorphology of the modern and Pleistocene carnivores along with a Giant Short-Faced Bear in Eastern Beringia,” manual for extracting and purifying collagen from completed by the author in 1997 at The University bone. The present monograph may be cited of Alaska Fairbanks. The content is essentially directly, but if the citation is used to establish unchanged, except for minor editing, typographic when the ideas herein were established or data corrections, and re-formatting. The complete herein made public, then the dissertation or dissertation contained two additional papers Matheus (1995) take precedence. (Chapters 1 and 5) that are cited in this monograph YUKON Palaeontology Program Department of Tourism and Culture Elaine Taylor, Minister 2003 LOCOMOTOR ADAPTATIONS AND ECOMORPHOLOGY OF SHORT-FACED BEARS (Arctodus simus) IN EASTERN BERINGIA Paul E. Matheus TABLE OF CONTENTS Frontispiece
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating a Deeper Temporal Perspective Into Modern Ecology Felisa A
    opinion and perspectives ISSN 1948-6596 perspective Losing time? Incorporating a deeper temporal perspective into modern ecology Felisa A. Smith1 and Alison G. Boyer2 1Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. [email protected]; http://biology.unm.edu/fasmith/ 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. [email protected]; http://eeb.bio.utk.edu/boyer/index.html Abstract. Ecologists readily acknowledge that a temporal perspective is essential for untangling ecological complexity, yet most studies remain of relatively short duration. Despite a number of excellent essays on the topic, only recently have ecologists begun to explicitly incorporate a historical component. Here we provide several concrete examples drawn largely from our own work that clearly illustrate how the adoption of a longer temporal perspective produces results significantly at odds with those obtained when relying solely on modern data. We focus on projects in the areas of conservation, global change and macroecology because such work often relies on broad-scale or synthetic data that may be heavily influenced by historic or prehistoric anthropogenic factors. Our analysis suggests that considerable care should be taken when extrapolating from studies of extant systems. Few, if any, modern systems have been unaffected by anthropogenic influences. We encourage the further integration between paleoecologists and ecologists, who have been historically segregated into different departments, scientific societies and scientific cultures. Keywords: climate change, conservation, macroecology, paleoecology, palaeoecology, woodrat The pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) is a nature of animals like the pronghorn, but more as quintessential symbol of the Great Plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Kob Coloring Book2
    Coloring Book Illustrations by Rachel Catalano King of Beasts is generously presented by Susan Naylor. Coloring Book Illustrations by Rachel Catalano King of Beasts is generously presented by Susan Naylor. OCELOT BOBCAT DOMESTIC CAT MOUNTAIN LION AFRICAN LION JAGUAR AMERICAN CHEETAH HOMOTHERIUM SMILODON AMERICAN LION illion Years go illion Years go illion Years go illion Years go illion illion Years go Years go illion illion Years go Years go illion Years go Eleven thousand years ago there were as many as nine different species of wild cats living in what is now Texas. WILD CATS: A FAMILY TREE These cats and African lions evolved millions of years ago Follo the branches of this evolutionary tree to see ho the frican lion from a common ancestor. is related to ild cats of easpast and present. The scimitar-toothed cat, Homotherium, lived in Texas around 20,000 years The well-known saber-toothed cat, Smilodon, would have been a rare sight in Texas ago. These cats weighed around 300 pounds but could easily run and pounce about 13,000 years ago. These large cats could open their jaws nearly twice as on their prey. This includes large juvenile woolly mammoths. In fact, scientists wide as any modern cat. They used their long, jagged canine teeth to take large, have discovered rare fossils of scimitar-toothed cats as well deadly bites out of their prey, which included as more than 300 teeth from juvenile camels and bison. Both Smilodon mammoths in Freisenhahn Cave, and Homotherium branched Bexar County. off from other cats on the evolutionary tree about 18 million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Elephants Roam? American High Plains Preserve Would Protect Species
    WHERE ELEPHANTS ROAM? AMERICAN HIGH PLAINS PRESERVE WOULD PROTECT SPECIES: Have you ever wanted to go on safari, but never found the time or money for an African trip? Well, if a determined bunch of field ecologists have their way, large tracts of the semi-arid southern High Plains and Intermountain West in the United States would be fenced in and populated with elephants, lions, cheetahs and wild horses. I think this is a capital idea. These creatures, including camels and sabertoothed tigers (Smilodon), were widespread in America during the Pleistocene epoch, commonly known as the last great ice age. They disappeared during a mass extinction that took place after the arrival of ice age hunters about 13,000 years ago. Though the jury is still out on whether humans actually caused the mass extinction, one thing is clear. The same mega-fauna survived, roughly intact, through all of the climatic and environmental disruptions of the previous million years before humans arrived. The ecological goal of introducing these animals is not to turn North America into Africa. The goal is to replace creatures missing from the impoverished mammalian ecosystem of the modern-day New World with their closest surrogates from the modern-day Old World. Bringing big game back to America is not a new idea. Menageries of exotic animals already thrive on ranches throughout Texas and nearby states. Drive-through game parks have become popular tourist attractions, especially San Diego's Wild Animal Park, which gets 1.5 million visitors a year. Humans flock there because practically everyone from toddlers to centenarians experiences a positive emotional response when sighting large animals in the wild (or, failing that, the semi-wild).
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Pronghorn Statewide Management Plan
    UTAH PRONGHORN STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN UTAH DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES UTAH DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PRONGHORN I. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN A. General This document is the statewide management plan for pronghorn in Utah. This plan will provide overall direction and guidance to Utah’s pronghorn management activities. Included in the plan is an assessment of current life history and management information, identification of issues and concerns relating to pronghorn management in the state, and the establishment of goals, objectives and strategies for future management. The statewide plan will provide direction for establishment of individual pronghorn unit management plans throughout the state. B. Dates Covered This pronghorn plan will be in effect upon approval of the Wildlife Board (expected date of approval November 30, 2017) and subject to review within 10 years. II. SPECIES ASSESSMENT A. Natural History The pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) is the sole member of the family Antilocapridae and is native only to North America. Fossil records indicate that the present-day form may go back at least a million years (Kimball and Johnson 1978). The name pronghorn is descriptive of the adult male’s large, black-colored horns with anterior prongs that are shed each year in late fall or early winter. Females also have horns, but they are shorter and seldom pronged. Mature pronghorn bucks weigh 45–60 kilograms (100–130 pounds) and adult does weigh 35–45 kilograms (75–100 pounds). Pronghorn are North America’s fastest land mammal and can attain speeds of approximately 72 kilometers (45 miles) per hour (O’Gara 2004a).
    [Show full text]