DOCSLIB.ORG

Critique and Neoliberalism in Michel Foucault

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2018 Critique and neoliberalism in Michel Foucault Neal Miller DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Miller, Neal, "Critique and neoliberalism in Michel Foucault" (2018). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 259. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/259 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Critique and Neoliberalism in Michel Foucault Neal Miller A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2018 Directed by Dr. Peg Birmingham Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 1 the vortex of creation is the vortex of destruction the vortex of artistic creation is the vortex of self-destruction the vortex of political creation is the vortex of flesh destruction flesh is in the fire, it curls and terribly warps fat is in the fire, it drips and sizzling sings bones are in the fire the crack tellingly in subtle hieroglyphs of oracle charcoal singed the smell of your burning hair for every revolutionary must at last will his own desteruction rooted as he is in the past he sets out to destroy –Diane Di Prima, Revolutionary Letter #12 What good is a book that does not even carry us beyond all books? –Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science 2 Table of Contents Introduction: The Impossibility of Foucaultian Commentary, The Exhaustion of Neoliberalism, and Critique ......................................................................................................... 5 0.0 Arriving at the Point of Departure .................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1: The Problem of Archaeology: Anthropology ........................................................ 11 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 The Beginning of Philosophy ......................................................................................................... 12 1.2 The Vocabulary of Archaeology: Discourse, The Historical A Priori, and the Archive .......... 15 1.3 Anthropology as The Historical Problem of Archaeological Critique ...................................... 20 1.4. “Man” as a Historical A Priori ..................................................................................................... 23 Chapter 2: From the Being of Language to the Politics of Truth .......................................... 30 2.0. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 30 2.1. The Being of Language as a Void in Discourse ........................................................................... 31 2.2. Foucault’s Decision on the Being of Language ........................................................................... 39 Chapter 3: The Politicization of the Critique of Anthropology and the Politics of Truth ... 44 3.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 44 3.1 Politicizing the Anthropological Problematic: From Ideology to the Politics of Truth ........... 46 3.2 The Politicization of Truth ............................................................................................................. 50 3.3 The Possibility of the Politics of Truth ......................................................................................... 57 3.4 The Task of the Philosopher in the Politics of Truth .................................................................. 64 3.5 Philosophical Writing as a Relay between the Politics of Refusal and Critical Subjectivation ................................................................................................................................................................ 70 Chapter 4: Governmentality and the Limits of the Politics of Truth .................................... 77 4.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 77 4.1 From the Critique of Discipline and Biopower to Governmentality ......................................... 77 4.2 From the Critique of Governmentality to the Neoliberal Test of Critique ............................... 86 Chapter 5: Toward a Foucaultian Critique of Neoliberalism and Its First Paradox of Unnatural Naturalization ........................................................................................................... 88 5.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 88 5.1 Situating a Foucaultian Critique of Neoliberalism—“Why Not Marx?” .................................. 89 5.2 Situating the Critique of Neoliberalism in Foucault ................................................................... 96 5.3 The Birth of Biopolitics: An Overview ........................................................................................ 101 5.4 The Paradox of Unnatural Naturalization I: Of the Market Apparatus and its Norm, Competition ......................................................................................................................................... 103 5.5 The Paradox of Unnatural Naturalization II: The Rule of Law and Market Subjection in Hayek ................................................................................................................................................... 112 Chapter 6: On the Critique of the Neoliberal Paradox of Subjection by Desubjection and the Remnants of Anthropology ................................................................................................ 119 6.0. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 119 6.1. The Paradox of Subjection by Desubjection: Of Entrepreneurial Subjection ...................... 120 6.2. The Critique of Neoliberalism as a Late Anthropology ........................................................... 132 Chapter 7 (Conclusion): Insurrectionary Communism and “Cynicism” as Counter- Neoliberal Conducts.................................................................................................................. 141 7.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 141 7.1 The Neoliberal Closure of Civil Society and the Return to the War Hypothesis ................... 142 3 7.2 The Communist War Machine as a Counter-Conduct in Neoliberalism ................................ 148 7.3 The Other Life: Cynic Parrhēsia as an Ethics of Desubjection ................................................ 153 7.4 Cynic Life as Counter-Neoliberal Subjectivation ...................................................................... 157 Appendix: Is Foucault a Neoliberal?....................................................................................... 163 Abbreviations Used for the Texts of Michel Foucault ........................................................... 170 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 173 4 Introduction: The Impossibility of Foucaultian Commentary, The Exhaustion of Neoliberalism, and Critique The student has no interests. The student’s interests must be identified, declared, pursued, assessed, counseled, and credited. Debt produces interests. The student will be indebted. The student will be interested. Interest the students! The student can be calculated by her debts, can calculate her debts with her interests. She is in sight of credit, in sight of graduation, in sight of being a creditor, of being invested in education, a citizen.1 (Moten and Harney 2013, 67) 0.0 Arriving at the Point of Departure To write critically is to take up a position that one is always already in the act of leaving. The gesture of critique is not only a certain refusal of the given, but flight, abandonment, or desertion. As Foucault once said, “My problem, or the only theoretical work that I feel is possible for me, is leaving the trace, in the most intelligible outline possible, of the movements by which I am no longer at the place where I was earlier.” (GL, 76) But in truth, this dissertation is an attempt to arrive at something that has for some time now already been evident. The anonymous insurrectionary collective Tiqqun put it forward in 2004. Situated between September 11, 2001 and the global financial crisis of 2007 – 2008, they asserted an ethical-political starting point when they wrote: The “we” that speaks here is not a delimitable, isolated we, the we of a group. It is the we of a position. In these times, this position
Recommended publications
  • Foucault and Deleuze, April 2014 Nicolae Morar, Penn State University, Thomas Nail, University of Denver, and Daniel W

    Foucault and Deleuze, April 2014 Nicolae Morar, Penn State University, Thomas Nail, University of Denver, and Daniel W

    Nicolae Morar, Thomas Nail, and Daniel W. Smith 2014 ISSN: 1832‐5203 Foucault Studies, No. 17, pp. 4‐10, April 2014 INTRODUCTION Foucault Studies Special Issue: Foucault and Deleuze, April 2014 Nicolae Morar, Penn State University, Thomas Nail, University of Denver, and Daniel W. Smith, Purdue University Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault are widely accepted to be central figures of post‐war French philosophy. Philosophers, cultural theorists, and others have devoted considerable effort to the critical examination of the work of each of these thinkers, but despite the strong biographical and philosophical connection between Foucault and Deleuze, very little has been done to explore the relationship between them. This special issue of Foucault Studies is the first collection of essays to address this critical deficit with a rigorous comparative discussion of the work of these two philosophers. Deleuze’s Course Lectures on Foucault In particular, this special issue is motivated by the recent (2011) online publication of Gilles Deleuze’s course lectures on Michel Foucault (1985‐86) at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France (French National Library) in Paris. The BNF collected the available recordings of Deleuze’s seminar lectures at the University of Paris 8 and converted them into digital files. Needless to say, the task was a painstaking one, but the mp3 files have now been made accessible online through the Gallica search engine at the library.1 When Foucault died in 1984, Deleuze was so affected by the death of his friend, that he began lecturing and writing a book about Foucault’s philosophical corpus immediately. When asked why he wanted to write such a book, Deleuze was quite clear, “it marks an inner need of mine, my admiration for him, how I was moved by his death, and his unfinished work.”2 Deleuze’s desire for some kind of reconciliation with Foucault seems to have been a mutual one.
  • 1 from the Loving Struggle to the Struggle to Love

    1 from the Loving Struggle to the Struggle to Love

    1 ᳚ From the Loving Struggle to the Struggle to Love A Conversation with Calvin O. Schrag RAMSEY ERIC RAMSEY AND DAVID JAMES MILLER INTRODUCTORY REMARKS RER/DJM: Professor Schrag, we are immensely grateful for the opportu- nity to reflect here on the richness of the work that marks your distin- guished career. We hope that, in some small way, we can offer something here that acknowledges the time, encouragement, and support you so selflessly and graciously give those who are working in philosophy and communication. It is our intention to conduct this conversation in such a way that it will prove to be useful both to those who are familiar with your work and to those as yet unfamiliar with it. We hope to offer those already familiar with the work, not only further contextualization, but a new perspective on the work as well. We have always believed that the radical implications of your work, implications that have become obvious to us in our many conversations with you, have too often been overlooked, and we hope that in this conversation we can bring some of these implications to the fore. For those unfamiliar with your work, we hope to offer a consoli- dated, if not a comprehensive, introduction to your thought. In discussing your work, it will become evident that we have a par- ticular interest in your reflections on the phenomenon of “communicative praxis.” We are scholars trained in both the disciplines of philosophy and communication and have been dedicated from the first to an elaboration of the philosophy of communication.
  • Jeffrey Rubard

    Jeffrey Rubard

    1 The Torso of Humanity: An Interpretation of Being and Time Preliminary Edition Jeffrey Rubard 2019 2 Contents 1. Preface 4 2. Introductions I and II 16 Division I: The Human Achievement 3. Chapter 1 37 4. Chapter 2 49 5. Chapter 3 57 6. Chapter 4 75 7. Chapter 5 85 8. Chapter 6 100 Division II: The Temporal Interpretation 9. Chapter 1 118 10. Chapter 2 128 11. Chapter 3 141 12. Chapter 4 158 13. Chapter 5 173 14. Chapter 6 185 15. Postscript 202 3 Preface Being and Time is a work by the German philosopher Martin Heidegger on the "Question of Being", published in 1927. As the centennial of the book approaches it perhaps ought to be said that as we press further into the 21st century the 'world-views' of intellectuals in the early 20th century like Heidegger's might well be expected to fade in importance in the face of the onslaught of new technologies and ‘ways of life’ which has characterized this century to date. Yet in many ways Heidegger’s first book, though its famous 'difficulty' is not much overstated, is one of the most enduring landmarks of philosophical modernity: a book which for a long time gave 'those with eyes to see and ears to hear' a new way of thinking that ignored neither the human predicament nor the shape of the cosmos. Furthermore, it almost does not need saying that the book's importance for philosophy in general exceeds the numbers of those who explicitly subscribe to its tenets.
  • A Critique of the Learning Brain

    A Critique of the Learning Brain

    A CRITIQUE OF THE LEARNING BRAIN JOAKIM OLSSON Department of Philosophy Master Thesis in Theoretical Philosophy (45 ECTS) Autumn 2020 Supervisor: Sharon Rider Examiner: Pauliina Remes Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 A Brief Overview ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Method, Structure and Delimitations ............................................................................... 4 2. BACKGROUND ON THE LEARNING BRAIN ............................................................. 8 2.1 The Learning Brain and Its Philosophical Foundation .................................................... 9 2.2 Cognitivism’s Three Steps: Mentalism, Mind-Brain Identity and Computer Analogy . 14 3. A CRITIQUE OF COGNITIVISM .................................................................................. 24 3.1 A Critique of Mentalism ................................................................................................ 24 3.1.1 The Exteriorization of the Mental ........................................................................... 25 3.1.2 The Intentionality of Mind Seen Through Intentional Action ................................ 32 3.2 A Critique of the Mind-Brain Identity Theory .............................................................. 54 3.3 A Critique of the Computer Analogy ............................................................................
  • General Index

    General Index

    SCIENCE & SOCIETY GENERAL INDEX VOLUMESI-XXV (1936�1961) Part I: Author, Subject and Title Part II: Books Reviewed SCIENCE & SOCIETY, INC. New York 1965 Copyright © 1965 by Science and Society, Inc. 30 East 20th Street, New York, N.Y. 10003 All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 40-10163 �341 PREFACE The editors of Science & Society believe that this index to its contents during the first twenty-five years of publication deserves the uncustomary tribute of an editorial note, since it serves to remind us that Science & Society is theoldest publication extant devoted to the theory of Marxism. Indeed, with the single exception of that monument to German scholar­ ship, Die Neue Zeit (1883-1923), it is the longest-lived Marxist theoretical journal in the world, and this despite the enormous difficulties under which Science & Society has always been published. The editors, therefore, take this opportunity to reaffirm their inten­ tion of making Science & Society a forum for the best Marxist scholarship, and their hope that the preface to some future edition of its index will no longer need to note the exception of Die N eue Zeit. We think that those who, using this index, rediscover the great variety of subjects treated and the quality of critical scholarship represented, will agree with us that it is a bibliographic tool of real value to all scholars, but truly invaluable to Marxists. Finally, the editors of Science & Society wish to express their deep gratitude to the Louis M. Rabinowitz Foundation whose generous grant made the publication of this index possible.
  • Knowledge and Thought in Heidegger and Foucault: Towards an Epistemology of Ruptures Arun Anantheeswaran Iyer Marquette University

    Knowledge and Thought in Heidegger and Foucault: Towards an Epistemology of Ruptures Arun Anantheeswaran Iyer Marquette University

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Knowledge and Thought in Heidegger and Foucault: Towards an Epistemology of Ruptures Arun Anantheeswaran Iyer Marquette University Recommended Citation Iyer, Arun Anantheeswaran, "Knowledge and Thought in Heidegger and Foucault: Towards an Epistemology of Ruptures" (2011). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 131. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/131 KNOWLEDGE AND THOUGHT IN HEIDEGGER AND FOUCAULT: TOWARDS AN EPISTEMOLOGY OF RUPTURES by Arun Iyer, B. E., M. A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT KNOWLEDGE AND THOUGHT IN HEIDEGGER AND FOUCAULT: TOWARDS AN EPISTEMOLOGY OF RUPTURES Arun Iyer, B.E., M.A. Marquette University, 2011 This dissertation shows how Martin Heidegger and Michel Foucault, by questioning the very understanding of the subject-object relationship on which all epistemology is grounded, challenge two of its most cherished beliefs: 1. Thought and knowledge are essentially activities on the part of the subject understood anthropologically or transcendentally. 2. The history of knowledge exhibits teleological progress towards a better and more comprehensive account of its objects. In contrast to traditional epistemology, both Heidegger and Foucault show how thought and knowledge are not just acts, which can be attributed to the subject but also events which elude any such subjective characterization. They also show us how the history of knowledge exhibits ruptures when the very character of knowledge undergoes drastic transformation in the course of history. The dissertation concludes by hinting at how these new accounts of thought and knowledge have the potential to shake the very foundations of epistemology and lead us to a new framework for discussing the most basic questions of epistemology, towards an epistemology of ruptures.
  • 1. the Heritage of Modern Socialist Ideas

    1. the Heritage of Modern Socialist Ideas

    Section XVI: Developments in Socialism, Contemporary Civilization (Ideas and Institutions 1848-1914 of Western Man) 1958 1. The eH ritage of Modern Socialist Ideas Robert L. Bloom Gettysburg College Basil L. Crapster Gettysburg College Harold L. Dunkelberger Gettysburg College See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/contemporary_sec16 Part of the Models and Methods Commons, and the Sociology Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Bloom, Robert L. et al. "1. The eH ritage of Modern Socialist Ideas. Pt. XVI: Developments in Socialism, (1848-1914)." Ideas and Institutions of Western Man (Gettysburg College, 1958), 2-6. This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ contemporary_sec16/2 This open access book chapter is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1. The eH ritage of Modern Socialist Ideas Abstract Of the total heritage which gave birth to modern socialism, brief attention may be given to certain of the predecessors of Karl Marx. Although some now are saved from obscurity only by the diligence of interested historians, others generated powerful ideas still not extinguished today. Together they created an amorphous body of thought from which Marx freelv drew. Consequently, an understanding of the varieties of later socialism, and specifically of Marx, requires a brief survey of these men.
  • H-France Review Vol. 20 (October 2020), No. 176 Julia Nicholls

    H-France Review Vol. 20 (October 2020), No. 176 Julia Nicholls

    H-France Review Volume 20 (2020) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 20 (October 2020), No. 176 Julia Nicholls, Revolutionary Thought after the Paris Commune, 1871-1885. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. vii + 309 pp. Bibliography and index. $99.99 U.S. (cl). ISBN 9781108499262; $32.99 U.S. (pb). ISBN 9781108713344; $80.00 U.S. (eb). ISBN 9781108600002. Review by Julian Bourg, Boston College. Revision is the historian’s stock-in-trade. Explanations of the past do not endure. Interpretations change as constantly altering circumstances shift vantage points, and even new evidence comes into view more often as a consequence than as a cause of such temporal parallax. In another way, however, in recent decades revisionism has become a default mode of historical writing. To take classic examples from contemporary French historical studies, one thinks of post-colonialism successfully decentering the metropole, François Furet overcoming Marxist interpretations of the French Revolution, and Robert Faurisson’s miserable négationnisme trying to abandon the facts of the Shoah. The extremely different normative consequences of such debates are clear, make no mistake, but so too is a certain historiographical pattern: the move to challenge and substitute prevailing views. The gesture of the hand that turns the kaleidoscope’s viewfinder, offering up endlessly combining and dispersing shards of colored glass, is itself repetitive. Historical revisionism can thus seem both a regular gambit--knotting historical writing to its present--and also a seemingly expected, even obligatory move within the “ironist’s cage” of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.[1] Julia Nicholls has revised one of the most tired stereotypes of the early Third Republic: that in the wake of the Commune’s defeat in 1871, little transpired by way of revolutionary thought in France until Marxist orthodoxy ascended in the mid-to-late 1880s.
  • Theory, Totality, Critique: the Limits of the Frankfurt School Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity

    Theory, Totality, Critique: the Limits of the Frankfurt School Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity

    Studies in 20th Century Literature Volume 16 Issue 1 Special Issue on Contemporary Spanish Article 11 Poetry: 1939-1990 1-1-1992 Theory, Totality, Critique: The Limits of the Frankfurt School Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity Philip Goldstein University of Delaware Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/sttcl Part of the German Literature Commons, and the Modern Literature Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Goldstein, Philip (1992) "Theory, Totality, Critique: The Limits of the Frankfurt School Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity," Studies in 20th Century Literature: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 11. https://doi.org/ 10.4148/2334-4415.1297 This Review Essay is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in 20th Century Literature by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Theory, Totality, Critique: The Limits of the Frankfurt School Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity Abstract Theory, Totality, Critique: The Limits of the Frankfurt School Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity by Douglas Kellner. Keywords Frankfurt School, WWII, Critical Theory Marxism and Modernity, Post-modernism, society, theory, socio- historical perspective, Marxism, Marxist rhetoric, communism, communistic parties, totalization, totalizing approach This review essay is available in Studies in 20th Century Literature: https://newprairiepress.org/sttcl/vol16/iss1/11 Goldstein: Theory, Totality, Critique: The Limits of the Frankfurt School Cr Review Essay Theory, Totality, Critique: The Limits of the Frankfurt School Philip Goldstein University of Delaware Douglas Kellner, Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity.
  • The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again

    The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again

    The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again Chris O’Kane John Jay, CUNY [email protected] There has been a renewed engagement with the idea of real abstraction in recent years. Scholars associated with the New Reading of Marx, such as Moishe Postone, Chris Arthur, Michael Heinrich, Patrick Murray, Riccardo Bellofiore and others,1 have employed the idea in their important reconstructions of Marx’s critique of political economy. Alberto Toscano, Endnotes, Jason W. Moore and others have utilized and extended these theorizations to concieve of race, gender, and nature as real abstractions. Both the New Reading and these new theories of real abstraction have provided invaluable work; the former in systematizing Marx’s inconsistent and unfinished theory of value as a theory of the abstract social domination of capital accumulation and reproduction; the latter in supplementing such a theory. Yet their exclusive focus on real abstraction in relation to the critique of political economy means that the critical marxian theories of real abstraction -- developed by Alfred Sohn- Rethel, Theodor W. Adorno and Henri Lefebvre -- have been mostly bypassed by the latter and have largely served as the object of trenchant criticism for their insufficient grasp of Marx’s theory of value by the former. Consequently these new readings and new theories of real abstraction elide important aspects of Sohn-Rethel, Adorno and Lefebvre’s critiques of real abstraction; which sought to develop Marx’s critique of political economy into objective-subjective critical theories of the reproduction of capitalist society.2 However, two recent works by 1 Moishe Postone’s interpretation of real abstraction will be discussed below.
  • Deflection, Denial and Disbelief: Social and Political Discourses About Child Sexual Abuse and Their Influence on Institutional Responses a Rapid Evidence Assessment

    Deflection, Denial and Disbelief: Social and Political Discourses About Child Sexual Abuse and Their Influence on Institutional Responses a Rapid Evidence Assessment

    Deflection, denial and disbelief: social and political discourses about child sexual abuse and their influence on institutional responses A rapid evidence assessment Jo Lovett, Maddy Coy and Liz Kelly Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit London Metropolitan University February 2018 Deflection, denial and disbelief: social and political discourses about child sexual abuse and their influence on institutional responses A rapid evidence assessment This report is authored by Jo Lovett, Maddy Coy and Liz Kelly Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit London Metropolitan University February 2018 Disclaimer This is a Rapid Evidence Assessment prepared at IICSA’s request. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors alone. Due to the nature of the research report, the authors have worked with the predominant ideas on child sexual abuse and use the language in which those ideas were commonly expressed over the period from the 1940s to 2017. The use of language that encapsulates these ideas and meanings should not be read as an endorsement of any of the identified discourses. © Crown copyright 2018. This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/opengovernment-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.iicsa.org.uk Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Deflection, denial and disbelief: social and political discourses about child sexual abuse and their influence on 3 institutional responses.
  • AHA Colloquium

    AHA Colloquium

    Cover.indd 1 13/10/20 12:51 AM Thank you to our generous sponsors: Platinum Gold Bronze Cover2.indd 1 19/10/20 9:42 PM 2021 Annual Meeting Program Program Editorial Staff Debbie Ann Doyle, Editor and Meetings Manager With assistance from Victor Medina Del Toro, Liz Townsend, and Laura Ansley Program Book 2021_FM.indd 1 26/10/20 8:59 PM 400 A Street SE Washington, DC 20003-3889 202-544-2422 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.historians.org Perspectives: historians.org/perspectives Facebook: facebook.com/AHAhistorians Twitter: @AHAHistorians 2020 Elected Officers President: Mary Lindemann, University of Miami Past President: John R. McNeill, Georgetown University President-elect: Jacqueline Jones, University of Texas at Austin Vice President, Professional Division: Rita Chin, University of Michigan (2023) Vice President, Research Division: Sophia Rosenfeld, University of Pennsylvania (2021) Vice President, Teaching Division: Laura McEnaney, Whittier College (2022) 2020 Elected Councilors Research Division: Melissa Bokovoy, University of New Mexico (2021) Christopher R. Boyer, Northern Arizona University (2022) Sara Georgini, Massachusetts Historical Society (2023) Teaching Division: Craig Perrier, Fairfax County Public Schools Mary Lindemann (2021) Professor of History Alexandra Hui, Mississippi State University (2022) University of Miami Shannon Bontrager, Georgia Highlands College (2023) President of the American Historical Association Professional Division: Mary Elliott, Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture (2021) Nerina Rustomji, St. John’s University (2022) Reginald K. Ellis, Florida A&M University (2023) At Large: Sarah Mellors, Missouri State University (2021) 2020 Appointed Officers Executive Director: James Grossman AHR Editor: Alex Lichtenstein, Indiana University, Bloomington Treasurer: William F.