DEMANDS in CHILE? a FEMINIST CRITIQUE Gina Louis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARE APPEALS TO HUMAN RIGHTS AN EFFECTIVE FRAMING FOR FEMINIST ‘PRO-CHOICE’ DEMANDS IN CHILE? A FEMINIST CRITIQUE Gina Louise Maria Floyd QUEEN MARY COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy – January 2015 1 Statement of Originality I, Gina Louise Maria Floyd, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Gina Louise Maria Floyd Date: 01/01/2015 2 Abstract My central question asks to what extent the politics of the interpretation of the human rights discourse acts as an obstacle to the legalisation of abortion. To answer this question, I set out the theoretical basis for the feminist critiques of the human rights discourse and its effect on women’s rights. I contend that those in control of informal and formal institutions have control of the interpretation of human rights. I situate this within the historical context, analysing the formal and informal institutional obstacles to feminist policymaking and activism. I analyse the gender ideology that underlies the “pro-life” discourse, and explore the mechanisms by which the “pro- life” sector ensures its cultural hegemony, arguing that what occurs in civil society (informal) shapes the formal and informal institutional responses to sexual and reproductive rights. I then assess how this discourse and gender ideology is reflected in the content of political projects related to abortion, thereby highlighting how informal institutions inform formal responses. I conclude by examining the tactics of a section of the radical branch of the feminist movement in Chile today and the innovative measures they utilise in order to challenge, deconstruct, and destabilise the conservative control of the informal institutions of gender norms that shape responses to issues of sexual and reproductive health in Chile. This research is intended to add to analyses seeking to assess the interplay between informal and formal institutions, and the potential this has in isolating entry points for advocacy and activism. I argue that the way to legalisation must proceed via shifting the discourse. 3 Table of Contents Statement of Originality ............................................................................ 2 Abstract .................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents ...................................................................................... 4 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ............................................................................................. 10 Acknowledgements .................................................................................. 11 Introduction ............................................................................................. 12 i) Original Contribution ..................................................................................... 13 ii) Purpose of Thesis .......................................................................................... 16 iii) Chapter Structure ......................................................................................... 19 Chapter 1 – The Politics of Human Rights ................................................... 25 1.1 Feminist Critiques of Human Rights ............................................................ 27 1.2 The Competing Claims of Individual Rights ................................................. 30 1.3 The Personal is Political ............................................................................... 32 1.4 Equality or Difference - Equal to Whom and Different From What? ...................................................................................................... 34 1.5 Integration or Autonomy – An Uncompromising Choice? .......................... 38 1.6 Universalism or Relativism .......................................................................... 42 1.7 How Can We Apply Feminist Institutional (FI) Theory? Gendering Gendered Institutions ..................................................................... 46 1.8 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 2 – Methodology and Theoretical Context .................................... 54 2.1 Existing Literature ....................................................................................... 54 2.2 Methodology and Epistemology ................................................................. 56 2.3 Methods ...................................................................................................... 57 4 2.4 Interview Process ........................................................................................ 58 2.5 Sample Limitations and Ethical Considerations .......................................... 60 2.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 62 Chapter 3 – Historical Limitations to Feminist Policymaking and Gender Activism ................................................................................. 64 3.1 The Changing Landscape – Abortion from 1930-1973 ................................ 65 3.2 Towards Socialism! ...................................................................................... 67 3.3 From ‘Militant Mothers’ to Rights Demanding Citizens.............................. 68 3.4 The Shadow of Dictatorship Falls ................................................................ 69 3.5 The Transition to Democracy – ‘Si la Mujer no está, la Democracia no va’ ......................................................................................... 74 3.6 The Return to Democracy and Policy Legacies in the Health Sector .......... 81 3.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 86 Chapter 4 – The Mechanisms of Ideology: How the “Pro-Life” Movement Shapes the Debate .................................................. 88 4.1 Formal Institutional Obstacles .................................................................... 90 4.1.1 Conflicting Discourses .............................................................................. 90 4.1.2 The Feminist ‘Pro-Choice’ Position ............................................. 90 4.1.3 The Political Centre ..................................................................... 93 4.1.4 The Conservative “Pro-Life” Sector ............................................. 94 4.2 SERNAM: Friend or Foe? ............................................................................. 96 4.2.2 The Chilean Electoral System: How Does This Benefit the Conservative Sector?......................................................... 98 4.3 Informal Institutional Obstacles .................................................................. 99 4.3.1 The Professional Hierarchy ......................................................... 99 4.3.2 Social and Cultural Obstacles ...................................................... 100 4.4 The State of the Women’s Movement ........................................................ 106 4.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 109 Chapter 5 – The Ideology of “The Right” and the Politics of Interpretation ....................................................................................... 110 5.1 The “Pro-Life” Vision of Society and Woman.............................................. 114 5 5.2 The Emergence of Foetal Rights – How Have Foetal Rights Silenced the Rights of Women? ............................................................. 117 5.3 The “Pro-Life” Ideology: Why Women Abort .............................................. 120 5.4 The Precarious Reality of Women’s Lives ................................................... 122 5.5 Emergency Contraception ........................................................................... 124 5.6 Sexual Education ......................................................................................... 127 5.7 Public Health ............................................................................................... 130 5.8 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 136 Chapter 6 – The Political Evolution of the Abortion Debate: Formal Institutional Responses ................................................................. 138 6.1 Bill 499 ........................................................................................................