DOCSLIB.ORG

A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Alloparenting and Child Health Outcomes among the Comca'ac Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Hohman, Zachary J. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 17:07:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625896 ALLOPARENTING AND CHILD HEALTH OUTCOMES AMONG THE COMCA’AC by Zachary J. Hohman __________________________ Copyright © Zachary J. Hohman 2017 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2017 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Zachary Hohman, titled Alloparenting and Child Health Outcomes among the Comca’ac and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (1/27/2017) Aurelio J Figueredo _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (1/27/2017) William J Jacobs _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (1/27/2017) Horst D Steklis _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (1/27/2017) Joanna Monti-Masel Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. ________________________________________________ Date: (1/27/2017) Dissertation Director: Aurelio J Figueredo 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: Zachary J. Hohman 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The scale of this project was massive, and my hope is that it will only continue to grow. Even this pilot study alone could not have been accomplished with such success without the contributions of everyone on our team. First and foremost I thank my mentor A.J. Figuredo, who conceived of the idea for this project and had a hand in every aspect of its formation and development, offering invaluable guidance to me and all of our colleagues. The initial ethogram development and field data collection teams, consisting of veteran ethologists A.J., Dieter Steklis, and Netzin Steklis, as well as Tomás Cabeza de Baca and Marcela Sotomayor-Peterson got this project off the ground and running, and it would never have existed without them. My subsequent field teams, consisting of my right-hand man and translator Ernesto Gomez, as well as Amber Perry, Aubrey Wadman-Goetsch, Beatriz Alvarado, and Natalia Chapovalova, all of whom spent fourteen hours a day training and then meticulously recording behavioral data under the desert sun, are nothing less than warriors. And making sense of it all required the invaluable intellectual contributions, from instrument development and technical expertise to hypothesis refinement and data analysis, from all those above as well as Richard Wahl, Alfredo Figueredo, Jake Jacobs, Joanna Masel, Otila Caballero-Quevedo, Candace Black, Bruce Ellis, Emily Patch, Filippo Rossi, Taylor Edwards and Barbara Fransway. From expert and fledgling ethologists, to psychologists, geneticists, anthropologists and pediatricians, this project brought together an impressively diverse set of scientific minds. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 8 Study Population ....................................................................................................................... 16 Goals of the Project ................................................................................................................... 18 METHODS ................................................................................................................................... 20 Genealogical Distance: “Emic” Family Relatedness ................................................................ 20 Spatial Distribution: Geographical Proximity ........................................................................... 20 Molecular Genetic Distance: “Etic” Family Relatedness ......................................................... 21 Anthropometric Health Assessment .......................................................................................... 23 Behavioral Observations ........................................................................................................... 24 One-Zero Focal Animal Sampling. ....................................................................................... 24 Instantaneous Sampling. ........................................................................................................ 25 Quantitative Ethogram Development. ................................................................................... 25 Instrument Revision. .............................................................................................................. 26 Summary of Ethological Data Collection .............................................................................. 27 ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................... 28 Psychometric Evaluations of Quantitative Ethograms .............................................................. 28 Training and Inter-Rater Reliability. ..................................................................................... 28 Convergent Validity .............................................................................................................. 30 Computation of Genetic Relatedness ........................................................................................ 35 Categorization ........................................................................................................................... 38 Statistical Methods .................................................................................................................... 40 6 MODEL & HYPOTHESES .......................................................................................................... 42 Measurement Models ................................................................................................................ 42 Differential Alloparenting Hypotheses ..................................................................................... 44 WHO Child Health Outcomes ................................................................................................... 45 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 47 Descriptive statistics .................................................................................................................. 47 Dyadic-Level Hypothesis 1 ....................................................................................................... 47 Dyadic-Level Hypothesis 2 ....................................................................................................... 47 Dyadic-Level Common Alloparenting Factor ........................................................................... 48 Dyadic-Level Hypotheses 3 & 4 ............................................................................................... 48 Dyadic-Level Hypothesis 4a ..................................................................................................... 49 Individual-Level Common Child Health Factor ....................................................................... 49 Individual-Level Hypotheses 5 & 6 .......................................................................................... 50 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................... 51 Limitations and Future Directions for Research ....................................................................... 58 TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... 64 APPENDIX A – Satellite
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)

    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)

    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
  • Social Constructivism and Cognitive Development in Child Counseling

    Social Constructivism and Cognitive Development in Child Counseling

    The Arts in Psychotherapy 33 (2006) 229–237 Sandplay and storytelling: Social constructivism and cognitive development in child counseling Mary Frances Russo ∗, Jody Vernam, Amanda Wolbert Department of Counseling and Development, 006 McKay Education Building, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA 16057, USA Abstract Sandplay and storytelling are therapeutic techniques that are used to elicit significant themes in clients’ social-emotional lives, and social constructivism is an appropriate theoretical framework with which to conceptualize the process of play therapy [Dale, M. A., & Lyddon, W. J. (2000). Sandplay: A constructivist strategy for assessment and change. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 13, 135–154; Russo, in press]. The purpose of this study was to use the combined sandplay-storytelling technique to explore counselors’ understanding of the manner in which children’s interpersonal relationships and developmental status are reflected in their reconstruction of their social worlds in the sandtray. This qualitative study focused on the language of play as expressed in the context of young clients’ cognitive developmental levels via sandplay-storytelling techniques. Six counselors participated in the study and worked with child and adolescent clients. Case analyses conducted by the counselors revealed themes that were consistent with clients’ cognitive developmental status according to Piagetian developmental stages. Younger children, 5–8 years of age, showed a transition from preoperational to concrete operational thought, whereas adolescents, 12–18 years of age, operated from a concrete to abstract orientation. In addition, counselors observed the stages of sandplay as outlined by Allan and Berry [Allan, J., & Berry, P. (1993). Sandplay. In C.E. Schaefer & D.M. Cangelosi (Eds.).
  • Reproductive Suppression and Alloparenting in Laboratory Mice

    Reproductive Suppression and Alloparenting in Laboratory Mice

    Two of a Kind or a Full House? Reproductive Suppression and Alloparenting in Laboratory Mice The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Garner, Joseph P., Brianna N. Gaskill, and Kathleen R. Pritchett- Corning. 2016. “Two of a Kind or a Full House? Reproductive Suppression and Alloparenting in Laboratory Mice.” PLoS ONE 11 (5): e0154966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154966. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154966. Published Version doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154966 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27320428 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA RESEARCH ARTICLE Two of a Kind or a Full House? Reproductive Suppression and Alloparenting in Laboratory Mice Joseph P. Garner1, Brianna N. Gaskill2,3, Kathleen R. Pritchett-Corning2,4* 1 Stanford University, Department of Comparative Medicine, and by courtesy, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California, United States of America, 2 Charles River, Wilmington, Massachusetts, United States of America, 3 Purdue University Department of Comparative Pathobiology, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America, 4 Harvard University Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Office of Animal Resources, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America a11111 * [email protected] Abstract Alloparenting, a behavior in which individuals other than the actual parents act in a parental role, is seen in many mammals, including house mice.
  • Attachment in the Classroom

    Attachment in the Classroom

    Educ Psychol Rev (2009) 21:141–170 DOI 10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0 REVIEW ARTICLE Attachment in the Classroom Christi Bergin & David Bergin Published online: 21 May 2009 # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009 Abstract Attachment influences students’ school success. This is true of students’ attachment to their parents, as well as to their teachers. Secure attachment is associated with higher grades and standardized test scores compared to insecure attachment. Secure attachment is also associated with greater emotional regulation, social competence, and willingness to take on challenges, and with lower levels of ADHD and delinquency, each of which in turn is associated with higher achievement. These effects tend to be stronger for high-risk students. In this era of accountability, enhancing teacher–student relationships is not merely an add-on, but rather is fundamental to raising achievement. Understanding the role of attachment in the classroom will help educators be more effective, particularly with challenging students. Twelve suggestions to improve teacher–student relationships and school bonding are provided. Keywords Attachment . Achievement . School bonding . Teacher–student relationship Children’s socioemotional well-being is critical to school success, and attachment is the foundation of socioemotional well-being. Because of this, educators—from preschool to high school—can be more effective if they understand how attachment influences their students. Attachment influences school success through two routes: indirectly through attachment to parents, and directly through attachment to teachers and schools. In this article, we briefly review basic attachment concepts for readers who are not familiar with attachment research. We then show how attachment to parents is linked to school success, and we summarize the limited research on attachment-like relationships with teachers.
  • Child Development a Practical Introduction

    Child Development a Practical Introduction

    Child Development a practical introduction 00-Crowley-Prelims.indd 3 12/18/2013 3:49:49 PM 1 Introduction to Child Development Why you should read this chapter This book focuses on the study of child development from birth to 8 years. From our own observations of children, we are all aware of the tremendous changes that take place during this period: in the space of a few years, not only do children grow in the physical sense, they also acquire skills in language and communication, the capacity to think and reason about the world, and skills in social interaction. The study of child development is not just fascinating in its own right; knowledge gained from studying development can also impact on many practical issues regarding the care, education and wellbeing of children. This book presents an overview of research and theory in various aspects of child development, but before we look at these, this chapter and Chapters 2 and 3 will aim to provide some basic context for the study of development as a whole. In this chapter we will look at some basic issues in child development and some of the broad theoretical approaches to understanding development. (Continued) 1 01_Crowley_Ch-01.indd 1 12/18/2013 3:49:53 PM 2 Child Development: A Practical Introduction (Continued) By the end of this chapter you should • be aware of the various domains of development that are of interest to researchers in this field • understand some basic issues in the study of development including the role of nature versus nurture, and whether development proceeds in a continuous or discontinuous manner • be aware of the different theoretical approaches to development including psychoanalytic, learning theory, cognitive-developmental, ethological and evo- lutionary psychology, and bioecological approaches • have a basic understanding of some specific theories from the various approaches.
  • POLICY BRIEF Translating Early Childhood Research Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice Caring for Young Children: What Children Need

    POLICY BRIEF Translating Early Childhood Research Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice Caring for Young Children: What Children Need

    No 15 2009 POLICY BRIEF Translating early childhood research evidence to inform policy and practice Caring for Young Children: What Children Need Caring for young children, and getting the caring right, is becoming recognised as one of the most significant challenges facing parents, communities and societies. Young children who develop secure attachments through positive caregiving are more likely to experience lower levels of stress and other associated benefits. In turn, they are more able to contribute positively to society and care for future generations. This Policy Brief summarises what is known about what young children need from parents and caregivers, and explores the implications for policy and practice. Why is this issue import ant? The care children receive in their first years of life have lifelong problems with emotional regulation, has a lifelong impact and may even influence self concept, social skills and learning. This can future generations. Parenting styles impact lead to decreased academic achievement, early children’s development (Aunola & Nurmi, 2005); school drop-out, delinquency, drug and alcohol the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children has problems and mental health problems (Anda, et shown that even subtle variations in parenting al., 2006; Perry, 2000). styles can have significant effects on child outcomes (Australian Institute of Family Studies, What does the research tell us? 2006). ‘Nature versus nurture’ has been debated for “… the conflicting advice widely available decades, but it has not been until recently that in the public domain can be stressful for we have been able to explain how ‘nurture’ in the external world (families, communities and parents, particularly for sensitive topics society) combines with ‘nature’, or the internal such as sleep problems and discipline.” world (biological and neurological), to influence outcomes in children.
  • Christen King Dr. Hoskins FCS 345 7 December 2018 Homeschooling

    Christen King Dr. Hoskins FCS 345 7 December 2018 Homeschooling

    Christen King Dr. Hoskins FCS 345 7 December 2018 Homeschooling: How Children, Who Are Homeschooled, Develop Cognitively and Socially Christen King Bridgewater College Christen King Dr. Hoskins FCS 345 7 December 2018 Homeschooling: How Children, Who Are Homeschooled, Develop Cognitively and Socially Many people have discussed for a number of years about putting their children into public home schooling them. By 2001, one million (roughly 2% of school aged population) were being homeschooled (Lines, p.1). In Patricia Lines article, it stated that homeschooled children, most of the time, come from two parent homes that are religious, conservative, white, and better educated (Lines, p.1). Homeschooling has increased over the years. At first, only a few states allowed families to homeschool their children. Before this time, families that normally choose to homeschool come from all major ethnic, cultural, religious, background and all income levels (Lines p.1). Typically, when a family decides to homeschool their children, the mother takes the lead and does most of the schooling. The father sometimes will help but, it is mostly the mother (Lines p.1). Unfortunately, homeschooled children are normally perceived in a negative light. One parent stated, “The parents have real emotional problems themselves,” another statement later in the article states, “They need to realize the serious harm they are doing to their children in the long run, educationally, and socially,” another says that “the majority of homeschooled children are socially handicapped” (Medlin, pg. 1). When the article is saying they are doing harm to their children, they mean that since they are not in public schools around peers and teachers, they are not being taught how to act around others, so they are harming their social development.
  • Should the U.S. Approve Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy?

    Should the U.S. Approve Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy?

    SHOULD THE U.S. APPROVE MITOCHONDRIAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY? An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By: ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Daniela Barbery Emily Caron Daniel Eckler IQP-43-DSA-6594 IQP-43-DSA-7057 IQP-43-DSA-5020 ____________________ ____________________ Benjamin Grondin Maureen Hester IQP-43-DSA-5487 IQP-43-DSA-2887 August 27, 2015 APPROVED: _________________________ Prof. David S. Adams, PhD WPI Project Advisor 1 ABSTRACT The overall goal of this project was to document and evaluate the new technology of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), and to assess its technical, ethical, and legal problems to help determine whether MRT should be approved in the U.S. We performed a review of the current research literature and conducted interviews with academic researchers, in vitro fertility experts, and bioethicists. Based on the research performed for this project, our team’s overall recommendation is that the FDA approve MRT initially for a small number of patients, and follow their offspring’s progress closely for a few years before allowing the procedure to be done on a large scale. We recommend the FDA approve MRT only for treating mitochondrial disease, and recommend assigning parental rights only to the two nuclear donors. In medical research, animal models are useful but imperfect, and in vitro cell studies cannot provide information on long-term side-effects, so sometimes we just need to move forward with closely monitored human experiments. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ……………………………….……………………………………..……. 01 Abstract …………………………………………………………………..…………. 02 Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………..… 03 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………..…….
  • Attachment Histories and Futures: Reply to Vicedo’S ‘Putting Attachment in Its Place’

    Attachment Histories and Futures: Reply to Vicedo’S ‘Putting Attachment in Its Place’

    European Journal of Developmental Psychology ISSN: 1740-5629 (Print) 1740-5610 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pedp20 Attachment histories and futures: reply to Vicedo’s ‘Putting attachment in its place’ Robbie Duschinsky, Marinus Van Ijzendoorn, Sarah Foster, Sophie Reijman & Francesca Lionetti To cite this article: Robbie Duschinsky, Marinus Van Ijzendoorn, Sarah Foster, Sophie Reijman & Francesca Lionetti (2018): Attachment histories and futures: reply to Vicedo’s ‘Putting attachment in its place’, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2018.1502916 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1502916 Published online: 02 Aug 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 62 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=pedp20 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1502916 Attachment histories and futures: reply to Vicedo’s ‘Putting attachment in its place’ Robbie Duschinskya, Marinus Van Ijzendoornb,c, Sarah Fosterd, Sophie Reijmana and Francesca Lionettie aThe Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical, Cambridge, UK; bGraduate School Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, The Netherlands; cDepartment of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; dSocial Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK; eSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK ARTICLE HISTORY Received 25 November 2017; Accepted 1 December 2017; Published online 31 July 2018 For Vicedo, ‘putting attachment in its place’ seems to entail two aspects.
  • COGNITIVE LEARNING THEORY Dissatisfaction with Behaviorism's

    COGNITIVE LEARNING THEORY Dissatisfaction with Behaviorism's

    COGNITIVE LEARNING THEORY Dissatisfaction with behaviorism’s strict focus on observable behavior led educational psychologists such as Jean Piaget and William Perry to demand an approach to learning theory that paid more attention to what went on “inside the learner’s head.” They developed a cognitive approach that focused on mental processes rather than observable behavior. Common to most cognitivist approaches is the idea that knowledge comprises symbolic mental representations, such as propositions and images, together with a mechanism that operates on those representations. Knowledge is seen as something that is actively constructed by learners based on their existing cognitive structures. Therefore, learning is relative to their stage of cognitive development; understanding the learner's existing intellectual framework is central to understanding the learning process. Cognitive psychology derives its name from the Latin cognoscere, referring to knowing and information. While behaviorists maintain that knowledge is a passively absorbed behavioral repertoire, cognitive constructivists argue instead that knowledge is actively constructed by learners and that any account of knowledge makes essential references to cognitive structures. Knowledge comprises active systems of intentional mental representations derived from past learning experiences. Each learner interprets experiences and information in the light of their extant knowledge, their stage of cognitive development, their cultural background, their personal history, and so forth. Learners use these factors to organize their experience and to select and transform new information. Knowledge is therefore actively constructed by the learner rather than passively absorbed; it is essentially dependent on the standpoint from which the learner approaches it. Cognitive Learning Theory implies that for those with effective cognitive processes, learning is easier and new information can be stored in the memory for a longer time.
  • Daly Perry 2020 Substitute Parenting Chapter Final.Pdf

    Daly Perry 2020 Substitute Parenting Chapter Final.Pdf

    1 Substitute Parenting in L. Workman, W. Reader & J. Barkow, eds., (2020) The Cambridge handbook of evolutionary perspectives on human behavior. Cambridge University Press. Substitute Parenting Martin Daly & Gretchen Perry Substitute parenting presents a puzzle for evolutionists Evolutionary theory has straightforward relevance to parental behavior. The behavioral inclinations that natural selection favors are those that contribute to Darwinian fitness, that is, to one's expected genetic posterity (in the statistical, not the psychological, sense of "expected"). The primary avenue by which people and other creatures promote their fitness is by producing viable young who will eventually reproduce. Parental motives, emotions, and actions are therefore prime targets of selection. "Parental investment" (Trivers, 1972) is a limited resource that parents have evolved to allocate in ways that can be expected to maximize the eventual reproductive success of one's total progeny (Clutton-Brock, 1991; Royle, Smiseth & Kolliker, 2012). This means investing preferentially in young whose individual attributes predict that the investment will be most helpful, but above all, it means investing preferentially in one's own young (Daly & Wilson, 1980). Why a Darwinian would predict that parents will avoid squandering their limited resources on unrelated young should be obvious: Selection favors those genes and traits that enhance their carriers' fitness relative to the fitness of conspecific rivals. As theory would lead us to expect, parents of many animal species indeed care discriminatively for their own young, while spurning others, using a variety of complex psychophysiological adaptations to make the distinction (Daly & Wilson, 1988, 1995). And yet, despite abundant evidence that animal parents indeed care selectively for their own offspring, our own species is one in which non-parents often serve as children's primary caregivers, sometimes temporarily ("fosterage"), and sometimes indefinitely or permanently ("adoption").
  • Family Development and the Marital Relationship As a Developmental Process

    Family Development and the Marital Relationship As a Developmental Process

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2020 Family Development and the Marital Relationship as a Developmental Process J. Scott Crapo Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Development Studies Commons Recommended Citation Crapo, J. Scott, "Family Development and the Marital Relationship as a Developmental Process" (2020). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7792. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7792 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND THE MARITAL RELATIONSHIP AS A DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESS by J. Scott Crapo A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Family and Human Development Approved: Kay Bradford, Ph.D. Ryan B. Seedall, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Co-Chair W. David Robinson, Ph.D. Sarah Schwartz, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Elizabeth B. Fauth, Ph.D. Richard Inouye, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice Provost for Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2020 ii Copyright © J. Scott Crapo 2020 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Family Development and the Marital Relationship as a Developmental Process by J. Scott Crapo, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2020 Major Professors: Kay Bradford, Ph.D., and Ryan B. Seedall, Ph.D. Department: Human Development and Family Studies There is a lack of usable theory designed for studying families developmentally, and not much is understood about how relationships such as marriage change and develop over time beyond predictors of mean levels of satisfaction and likelihood of divorce.