SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda September 21, 2009; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1 Call to Order
2 Approval of Agenda
3 Committee Reports and Recommendations
3.1 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee n/a Recommendations of September 14, 2009:
1. Use of Pemberton Community Centre during 2010 Olympic Games THAT the “Use of the Pemberton Community Centre during the 2010 Olympic Games” be placed on the next Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services agenda;
AND THAT an invitation be sent to Pemberton Community Centre user groups to attend the October Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting to discuss “Use of the Pemberton Community Centre during the 2010 Olympic Games”.
2. Water Park for the Community THAT the recommendation: “THAT a feasibility study for a water park at Pioneer Park and a cool down facility at the Pemberton Community Centre be prepared” be referred to the Village of Pemberton’s parks department.
3. Children’s Summer Programming a) THAT the following be accepted as principle:
THAT the timing of the Pemberton Summer Programme guide be published before, or to coincide with Whistler’s Programme Guide.
b) THAT an online questionnaire regarding recreation programmes be implemented;
AND THAT up to $70 be provided for the recreation programmes online survey. SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 2 - September 21, 2009
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
4. Engineered Baseball Bleachers THAT Staff pursue the opportunity for used bleachers from VANOC after the Olympic Games.
5. Pemberton Cemetery Financial Statement THAT the Pemberton Cemetery Board be invited to a Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services committee meeting to discuss the Cemetery Function.
6. Pemberton Bike Park – Funding Request THAT up to $10,000 from the Pemberton Recreation Commission cost centre be authorized for the Pemberton Bike Park’s construction costs.
7. Pemberton/Area C Service Area Trails Master Plan THAT the Pemberton/Area C Service Area Trails Master Plan be approved in principle, and referred to agencies for comment.
8. Pemberton Community Centre Budget Update THAT Staff develop a range of options for addressing the funding shortfall for the Pemberton Community Centre.
9. Delivery of Emergency Planning and Operations as a Joint Service THAT a feasibility study be completed on alternatives for joint collaborative delivery of emergency response and preparedness services by the Regional District and their member municipalities.
10. Pemberton Valley Transit System Annual Operating Agreement – April 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009 THAT the Board: 1. approve the current, 6 month Annual Operating Agreement (“AOA”) running Apr.1-Sept.30/09; and 2. authorize the Board Chair and the CAO to execute the AOA.
4 Bylaws
4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 2 of 238 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 3 - September 21, 2009
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 4.1.1 Bylaw 1073, 2008 – Electoral Area B Official Community Plan 8
THAT Bylaw No. 1073, 2008, cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ be read a third time.
5 Staff Reports and Other Business
5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
5.1.1 Whistler Animals Galore Financial Assistance (September EAD 83 Item)
5.1.2 Development Variance Permit # 81- 3405 Lakeview Road, Gun 84 Lake, Electoral Area A (September EAD Item)
1. THAT the Board approve a Development Variance Permit for Lot A, DL 5637, LLD, Plan 24551 to vary the provisions of SLRD Area A and B Zoning Bylaw No. 670, 1999 to permit the construction of a garage with a height of 6.5m, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.
2. THAT prior to issuance of DVP 81, a section 219 covenant be registered against the property that prohibits the use of the building for dwelling or overnight accommodation uses.
5.1.3 Development Variance Permit # 82 – Brew Creek Lodge, 90 Electoral Area D (September EAD Item)
THAT the Board approve a Development Variance Permit for DL 6902, Gp1, NWD to vary the provisions of SLRD Zoning Bylaw No. 20, 1970 to permit the construction of a meeting building with a height of 13’ 7”, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.
5.1.4 Development Variance Permit # 83 – 1993 Sea to Sky Highway, 99 Electoral Area C (September EAD Item)
THAT the Board approve a Development Variance Permit for Lot 2, DL 210, LLD, Plan KAP45555 to vary the provisions of SLRD Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 to permit the construction of a pole barn at a distance of 5.0m from the interior side lot line,
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 3 of 238 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 4 - September 21, 2009
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.
5.1.5 The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery – Request for Non- 108 farm Use in the Agricultural Land Reserve
THAT the Board forward the application for non-farm use of Lot 2 DL 2248, Group 1, NWD, Plan BCP38220 in the upper Squamish Valley to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation of conditional support for the concept of The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery in the ALR, as follows:
1. The applicant be required to work with the ALC to incorporate provisions in the development plan to ensure the long term capability of the land for future food production;
2. Only consider approving non-farm buildings and structures based on careful site planning that minimizes building footprints, non-farm activity areas and impacts to ALR lands.
3. Developing and adhering to a professionally prepared soils mitigation plan to preserve the subject property’s agricultural potential and protect the land for future agricultural uses.
4. The potential impact of flood mitigation works, if required, on ALR land should be taken into account in the ALC decision. Any required flood protection works should be designed and located in a manner to minimize impacts on existing and potential agriculture use of the property.
5.1.6 VANOC Request for a Reduced Building Permit Fee for the 2010 116 Olympic Overlay Installation Located in the Callaghan Valley
Charge the building permit fee for the 2010 Olympic Overlay installation located in the Callaghan Valley in accordance with Building Bylaw 863.
5.1.7 SLRD Tenure and Licence Renewal for Pemberton Radio & TV 118 Society Communications Site
THAT the Board:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 4 of 238 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 5 - September 21, 2009
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1) Approve the attached Crown Tenure Offer to and Licence of Occupation for the SLRD with respect to the Pemberton area communications site utilized for the Pemberton Radio and TV Society, and
2) Authorize the Chair and Secretary to execute the Offer and Licence for a term of 30 years.
5.1.8 Water Hook-up to Village Water for 1539 Portage Road 150 (Highway 99), Electoral Area C
THAT the Board give permission to the Village of Pemberton to supply water to 1539 Portage Road (Hwy 99) – Lot 3, Plan 11063, DL 204, Lillooet Land District, PID 9529331 – pursuant to section 13 (1) of the Community Charter.
5.1.9 Water Hook-up to Village Water for 7454 Urdal Road, Electoral 152 Area C
THAT the Board give permission to the Village of Pemberton to supply water to 7454 Urdal Road, Lot 12, DL 165, Plan 883 – pursuant to section 13 (1) of the Community Charter.
5.1.10 Corridor Trails Management Plan (presentation by Gord 154 McKeever)
THAT the Corridor Trails Management Plan be approved in principle and referred to external agencies for comment.
5.1.11 Select Services Funds Update 157 For information
6 Correspondence Requesting Action
6.1 Interior Health – Smoking Ban in Public Areas Policy (September 162 EAD Item)
6.2 City of Burnaby – Non Payment of Industrial Property Taxes 164
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 5 of 238 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 6 - September 21, 2009
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 6.3 Lower Mainland Treaty Advisory Committee (LMTAC) – 2010 167 SLRD Funding Contribution to LMTAC
6.4 Union of BC Municipalities – Endorsement of Temporary Positions 170 for 2010 Olympic Games (Secondment of Employees)
6.5 BC Recreation and Parks Association – Recreation Infrastructure 191 Renewal
6.6 BC Lightkeepers Local 20232 PSAC and Strathcona Regional 199 District – De-staffing of Lightstations
6.7 Ucwalmicw Centre Society – Request for Funding 203
THAT $300 from Area B Select Funds be authorized to the Ucwalmicw Centre Society for the 2nd Annual Roots Gathering Initiative.
6.8 Signal Hill Elementary School – Request for Funding for Lunch 206 Programme
7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – August 24, 2009 207 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.
7.2 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes – 218 September 14, 2009 For information
7.3 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission 225 Meeting Minutes – September 14, 2009 For information
7.4 Public Hearing for Bylaw 1073 Minutes – September 9, 2009 227 For information.
8 Business Arising from the Minutes
9 Consent Items – Correspondence for Information
9.1 In-SHUCK-ch Nation – In-SHUCK-ch Days Thank-you 229
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 6 of 238 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 7 - September 21, 2009
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 9.2 Union of BC Municipalities – Delivery of Building Canada and 230 Infrastructure Stimulus Funds
10 Delegations and Petitions
10.1 Dominican Monastery Delegation – Eugene Evanetz 233
10.2 Southern Interior Beetle Action Coalition – Sally Watson 238
11 Decision on Late Business (only if required)
THAT the late items be considered at this meeting. (requires 2/3 majority vote)
12 Late Business
13 Directors’ Reports (matters of information, not requiring action)
14 Board In-Camera Meeting
Resolution to move In-Camera
THAT the Board move In-Camera under the authority of Section 90 (1) (c) (g) of the Community Charter.
15 Termination
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 7 of 238 Request for Decision
Bylaw 1073, 2008 – Electoral Area B Official Community Plan
Date: September 14, 2009
Recommendation:
THAT Bylaw No. 1073, 2008, cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ be read a third time.
CAO Comments: I concur. PRE
Who Votes: All
Recommendation Report/Document: Attached _X_Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: A second public hearing was held for the Electoral Area B OCP on September 9, 2009 to review changes to the OCP’s mapping. (The boundary of the Community Watershed Protection Area around Pavilion Lake was expanded to take in the height of land.) These changes were the result of comments at the first public hearing on May 13, 2009. No objections were raised at the public hearing.
One email was received in advance of the hearing requesting that the land use designation of a small parcel on Pavilion Lake be changed from Residential to Tourist Commercial to reflect its current use as an ‘informal campground’. (The property is co-owned by a number of people that seasonally occupy the property in travel trailers.) Staff do not recommend changing the OCP’s land use designation, as the current ‘informal campground’ use is not viewed as compatible with adjacent residential uses or water quality protection objectives stated in the OCP.
Relevant Policy: Local Government Act SLRD Electoral Areas A & B Zoning Bylaw No. 670, 1999; Pavilion Lake OCP Bylaw No. 770, 2002; Seton Portage OCP Bylaw No. 922, 2004; Duffey Lake Corridor OCP Bylaw No. 479, 1992
Strategic Relevance: The Electoral Area B OCP is a 2009 strategic priority of the Board.
Desired Outcome(s): 1. Compliance with provincial legislation, 2. an Official Community Plan that leads to informed land use decisions that balance the values of the community.
Response Options: 1. Give the bylaw 3rd reading. 2. Refer the bylaw back to staff for further review or revisions.
Preferred Strategy: 1. Give the bylaw 3rd reading. Implications Of Recommendation
General: N/A
Organizational: The Electoral Area B OCP is a major project scheduled for completion in 2009.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 8 of 238 Financial: The project budget was $5000, of which approximately $1500 has been spent. Advertising costs for the 2nd public hearing are within the allocated budget.
Legal: The new Riparian Assessment Development Permit Area contained in the OCP bylaw will bring the SLRD into compliance with provincial regulations for the protection of streamside areas.
Follow Up Action: 1. September 2009 - Board considers 3rd reading of the bylaw. 2. September 2009 –The bylaw is submitted to the Ministry of Community and Rural Development for approval. 3. December 2009 (or sooner/later upon approval by Minister) - Board considers adoption of the bylaw.
Communication: The Area B OCP webpage will be updated and the public hearing re-advertised.
Other Comments: n/a
Submitted by: Planner, Amica Antonelli Reviewed by: Director of Planning and Development, Steve Olmstead Approved by: CAO, Paul Edgington
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 9 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area B Official Community Plan
0 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 10 of 238 AUGUST 2009
SQUAMISH LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1073, 2008
A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to adopt an Official Community Plan for Electoral Area B.
WHEREAS the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District wishes to adopt a new Electoral Area B Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Regional Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008.’
2. Schedule A to Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008 is attached to and forms part of this bylaw.
3. The Duffey Lake Corridor Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 479, 1992 is rescinded.
4. The Seton Portage and Anderson/Seton Lakes Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 922, 2004 is rescinded.
5. The Pavilion Lake Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 770, 2002 is rescinded.
READ A FIRST TIME this 26th day of January , 2009.
READ A SECOND TIME this 27th day of April , 2009.
PUBLIC HEARING held on the 13th day of May , 2009.
READ A SECOND TIME as amended this 24th day of August , 2009.
SECOND PUBLIC HEARING held on the 9th day of September , 2009.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2009.
APPROVED BY THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT on this day of , 2009.
ADOPTED this day of , 2009.
______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1073 cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ as read a third time.
1 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 11 of 238 AUGUST 2009
______Paul R. Edgington Chief Administrative Officer
2 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 12 of 238 AUGUST 2009
SCHEDULE A
ELECTORAL AREA B OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ...... 4
PLANNING PROCESS...... 4 AMENDING THE PLAN ...... 5 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREAS...... 5 COMMUNITY ...... 5
1. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ...... 5 2. CULTURAL HERITAGE ...... 8 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ...... 9 4. GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION STRATEGY ...... 12 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ...... 14
5. BIODIVERSITY ...... 14 6. NATURAL HAZARDS ...... 18 SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE ...... 22
7. SERVICES &UTILITIES ...... 22 8. TRANSPORTATION ...... 23 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ...... 25
9. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL ...... 25 10. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ...... 27 11. AGRICULTURE ...... 32 12. COMMERCIAL AND RESORT COMMERCIAL ...... 34 13. INDUSTRIAL ...... 35 14. INSTITUTIONAL ...... 36 15. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA ...... 36 16. PARK ...... 37 PAVILION LAKE SUB-AREA PLAN ...... 39
SETON PORTAGE SUB-AREA PLAN ...... 45
YALAKOM VALLEY SUB-AREA PLAN ...... 53 MAPS:
Map 1: Electoral Area B Overview Map 7: Seton Portage Sub-area Plan Map 2: Critical Wildlife Habitats Map 8: Seton Portage Land Use Map 3: Riparian Assessment Areas Map 9: Yalakom Valley Land Use Map 4: Terrain Stability Map 10: Recreation Sites & Trails Map 5: Electoral Area B Land Use Map 6: Pavilion Lake Land Use
3 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 13 of 238 AUGUST 2009
INTRODUCTION
The Electoral Area B Official Community Plan (OCP) contains objectives, policies, and land use designations adopted by the Squamish Lillooet Regional District Board of Directors. The purpose of these objectives, policies, and designations is to provide direction for land use and development that are consistent with the community values of the electoral area. The policies of the plan are meant to balance the demands placed on the land base in order to ensure an equitable, comprehensive, and logical distribution of land uses. Policies are often implemented on a long-term basis, generally over a 10 to 15 year period.
The OCP provides a basis for the following actions:
a) The adoption or amendment of land use regulations, such as the zoning bylaw; b) The direction of public and private investment; c) The guidance of elected officials, and others having statutory approval authority, in the evaluation of proposals, referrals, and amendment of bylaws; and, d) Bringing the SLRD into compliance with provincial regulations, such as the Riparian Area Regulation and the greenhouse gas management requirements of the Local Government Act.
The Electoral Area B OCP updates and consolidates three previously written OCPs, and provides new policy direction for the electoral area as a whole. The following OCPs are consolidated into the Electoral Area B OCP:
1. Pavilion Lake (originally written in 2002), 2. Seton Portage (originally written in 2004), and, 3. Duffey Lake Corridor (originally written in 1992).
Six communities are addressed in the Electoral Area B OCP. These six communities are Seton Portage- Shalalth, Yalakom Valley, Bridge River/West Pavilion, Texas Creek, Fountain, and Pavilion Lake. Policies are provided to address community planning, economic development, cultural heritage, biodiversity, natural hazards, utilities, transportation, and land use. Policy direction is also provided for the Duffey Lake Corridor.
This OCP also has three sub-area plans for the following communities:
1. Pavilion Lake, 2. Seton Portage, and, 3. Yalakom Valley.
PLANNING PROCESS
The development of the Electoral Area B OCP was initiated in 2007. Invitations for early participation in the review process were sent to adjacent local governments, First Nations, School District #74, and provincial agencies.
Consultation and discussions with the District of Lillooet, the St'át'imc Nation, the Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Forests and Range, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of
4 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 14 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Tourism, Sport and the Arts, the Integrated Land Management Bureau, the Agricultural Land Commission, BC Parks, and School District #74 occurred throughout the development of the OCP.
A series of public open houses and meetings were held in Lillooet and the Yalakom Valley during the course of the plan review. Following first reading of the bylaw, a public hearing was held to provide an opportunity for formal comment on the plan in bylaw form.
AMENDING THE PLAN
An OCP is not intended to be a static document. Rather, it is intended to be adaptable to new trends within society and responsive to changing circumstances within the community. As such, following careful consideration by the SLRD Board, policies and land use designations in this OCP may be revised by an amending bylaw pursuant to provisions outlined within the Local Government Act. A comprehensive review of the OCP should occur every five to ten years.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREAS
Two Development Permit Areas (DPA) are designated within Electoral Area B:
Development Permit Area 1: Riparian Assessment Area This DPA regulates any alteration of the land or construction adjacent to waterbodies for the purposes of maintaining water quality and protecting fish habitat. Essentially, it governs all lands within 30 meters of a waterbody. See policies 5.6 to 5.13 for more information.
Development Permit Area 2: Wildfire Protection This DPA regulates construction on all property within Electoral Area B for the purposes of ensuring wildfire mitigation measures are in place. See policies 6.12 to 6.19 for more information.
COMMUNITY
1. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Context
Within Electoral Area B there are seven communities or neighbourhoods: Seton Portage – Shalalth, the Yalakom Valley, Bridge River/West Pavilion, Texas Creek, Fountain, Pavilion Lake, and the Duffey Lake Corridor. These communities and the surrounding area encompass 3,461 square kilometres of land. Electoral Area B surrounds one incorporated municipality, the District of Lillooet, which is not covered by this OCP. Neighbouring jurisdictions include the Thompson Nicola Regional District to the north and the east, and the Cariboo Regional District to the north.
Electoral Area B is home to approximately 1750 people. 2006 Statistics Canada data reports that approximately 600 of those people are living outside of Indian Reserves (IR), and 1100 are living within IRs. The census data shows a great deal of variation between census periods, likely as a result of boundary shifts and changes in data collection methods, rather than actual population change. The census data shows a decrease in population of 16 per cent between the 1996 and 2001, and an increase of 36 per
5 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 15 of 238 AUGUST 2009 cent between 2001 and 2006. IR populations are also shown as fluctuating quite widely. The total population of the District of Lillooet, the closest service centre for residents of Electoral Area B, was 2,324 in 2006. Lillooet’s population in 2001 was 2,741, representing a decline of 15.2 per cent between 2001 and 2006.
Populations of individual communities within Electoral Area B are not always known. The following provides a brief summary of each of the seven communities within Electoral Area B:
Seton Portage – Shalalth - Seton Portage is a small community of approximately 300 residents located between Anderson and Seton Lakes. Adjacent to Seton Portage and situated on the north- western shore of Seton Lake is Shalalth, home to approximately 500 members of the Seton Lake Band. The IRs in this community are named Slosh, Seton Lake, Whitecap, Mission and Necait. Along the shore of Anderson Lake, between Seton Portage and D’Arcy, there are also some small recreational and farming communities.
Yalakom Valley - The Yalakom Valley is home to a small rural community. There are approximately thirty large parcels of land in the valley with an average size of fifty hectares. Moha is the name given to the lands located at the confluence of the Yalakom and Bridge Rivers. There are no IRs in the Yalakom Valley.
Bridge River and West Pavilion - For the purposes of the OCP, Bridge River is considered to be those lands along Highway 40 between the Yalakom and Fraser Rivers. The bulk of this area is encompassed by the Bridge River IR, which has a population of approximately 200 people. The confluence of the Bridge and Fraser Rivers is the location of the Bridge River Fishing Grounds, known as Six Mile or Setl.
West Pavilion is home to several ranching families. There are approximately 50 parcels in West Pavilion ranging in size from twenty hectares to 260 hectares. These parcels are accessed via Highway 40 and the West Pavilion Road (west of Lillooet).
Texas Creek - Texas Creek, located on the western shore of the Fraser River where it runs between Lillooet and Lytton, has approximately sixty-five parcels of land and a number of IRs (Pashilqua, Kilchult, Riley Creek, Towinock, and Nesikep).
Fountain - There are approximately forty parcels of land in the Fountain area, as well as several IRs (Fountain, Quatlenemo, Chilhil, Fish Lake, and Nesikep). The parcels range in size from 0.2 hectare lots lining Fountain Lake to sixty hectare parcels.
Pavilion Lake - There are approximately fifty small parcels of land surrounding Pavilion Lake. On neighboring lands west of Highway 99 but east of the Fraser River, including the Pear Lake area and the Pavilion-Clinton Road, there are approximately forty parcels. Many of these parcels are consolidated into a single large ranch. The Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation’s traditional territory is centered on the Pavilion IR, located near the western end of Pavilion Lake.
Duffey Lake Corridor - The Duffey Lake Corridor has only a few parcels of private land and no significant areas of residential development. It is an important recreation corridor for residents of the Sea to Sky Corridor, as well as Vancouver and beyond. Land use and resource management is largely governed by the Sea to Sky Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), which was completed in 2008, and the draft Lillooet LRMP, which was completed in 2004.
6 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 16 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Significant growth is not anticipated for Electoral Area B, although the increased provision of services is desired in some areas. The following objectives and policies provide general direction for community growth and development within Electoral Area B as a whole. More specific details on community growth and character are addressed in the sub-area plans for Pavilion Lake, Seton Portage, and the Yalakom Valley.
Objectives
To recognize existing long-standing land uses within the area. To ensure the development of the community progresses in a way that is responsive to the needs and values of the residents, and consistent with provincial legislation.
Policies
1.1. Priority shall be given to the preservation of rural character and ecological integrity when planning for community growth and development. 1.2. Seton Portage and the District of Lillooet are recognized as the ‘service centres’ for Electoral Area B, where institutional and larger-scale commercial uses are encouraged to locate. 1.3. The objectives, policies, and land use designations within this plan are adopted with the understanding that existing long-standing land and subsurface uses may continue. 1.4. The Regional District encourages coordination among the municipal, provincial, and federal agencies having jurisdiction over land use planning and resource management within and surrounding the plan area. 1.5. In planning for developments of regional significance, consideration shall be given to the interests of the St'át'imc and Lil’wat Nations. 1.6. The Regional District encourages the development of community advisory groups and other committees to allow for increased participation and influence by residents of Electoral Area B on future planning and development. 1.7. The Regional District supports additional sub-area planning for those affected by intensive recreation or development. 1.8. The Regional District endorses Smart Growth principles as a framework for sustainable community development, including the following: a) distinct, attractive, economically sustainable communities with a strong sense of place; b) urban development should be directed toward existing communities (avoiding urban and rural sprawl); c) compact, complete, and mixed-use1 neighbourhoods; d) walkable communities; e) a variety of low impact transportation options; f) a range of affordable housing options; g) responsible stewardship of green spaces and sensitive areas;
1 Mixed use neighbourhoods are those neighbourhoods where residents can live, recreate, shop, and work. The land use zoning should allow for a mix of commercial, residential, industrial, institutional, etc cetera.
7 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 17 of 238 AUGUST 2009
h) integrity of a productive agricultural and forestry land base; i) energy efficient infrastructure; j) early and ongoing public involvement that respects community values and visions; k) a culture of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration between local governments, provincial agencies, federal agencies, and First Nations.
Governance
1.9. The 2008 District of Lillooet OCP does not identify any non-IR lands within Electoral Area B as being needed to accommodate future growth. Where future growth nodes are identified on the boundaries of Lillooet, and a comprehensive servicing analysis demonstrates the feasibility of urban expansion, the land to be developed should be included at an appropriate time within the District. 1.10.The planning process for boundary expansion should be undertaken as a collaborative effort by the District of Lillooet, the SLRD, the St'át'imc Nation, landowners, residents, and provincial agencies. The planning process should reflect the objectives and policies of this plan, the policies of the District of Lillooet, and the values and economic aspirations of the St'át'imc Nation and other members of the community.
2. CULTURAL HERITAGE
Context
Electoral Area B is the traditional territory of the St'át'imc and Lil’wat Nations. Large hunter-gatherer winter villages of 500 to 1000 people historically existed alongside the region’s lakes and rivers. Rich salmon stocks supported the aboriginal economy.
Europeans first came to the area in 1808, which was the year of Simon Fraser's journey through the region as he sought a passage to the Pacific Ocean. Hudson Bay Company employees began to arrive in the 1820s and 1840s. This was followed by the gold rush of 1858. Settlers began farming along the fertile river bottoms and benches in the mid 1850s. Lillooet was the terminus of the Douglas/Harrison trail and Mile 0 of the Cariboo Road. At the peak of the gold rush, Lillooet had a population of 16,000 people. The railway arrived in 1912.
For the majority of time that people have lived within Electoral Area B, no written records were made. Archaeological sites and oral tradition are the only vestiges of the area’s rich history, which extends back many thousands of years. Archaeological sites contain unique information about the region’s past and are protected under the Heritage Conservation Act on both private and Crown land, and whether the sites are known or unrecorded.
Data from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts’ Archaeology Branch indicates that within the plan area there are a large number of St'át'imc and Lil’wat historical sites and artefacts dating from the pre-European contact era. These historical sites and artefacts include village sites, pictographs, pit houses, storage and cooking pits, stone tools, burial sites, culturally modified trees, and historic trails. For example, the Anderson Lake pack trail and Douglas Trail were used as major trade and transportation routes prior to the arrival of Europeans. There are old village sites and the remains of pit houses scattered throughout Electoral Area B, such as at Tiffin, several kilometres south of the Ts'kw'aylaxw Band
8 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 18 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Office, and on Anderson Lake in Seton Portage. Other archaeological resources within Electoral Area B include old mining cabins and remains of early non-native settlements and mining operations. The Seton Portage Historic Provincial Park commemorates the location of the first railway in British Columbia.
Through the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts’ Archaeology Branch, archaeological potential mapping is available to identify areas where unrecorded archaeological sites are likely to occur.
Objective
To support the identification, protection, and conservation of heritage resources, including historical buildings, pre-contact archaeological sites, and historic trails.
Policies
2.1. Development proponents shall consider the significance of heritage resources during all phases of project planning, design, implementation, and operation. 2.2. Where a development overlaps with a known archaeological site, a qualified archaeologist shall be engaged by the developer to determine the appropriate measures for managing impacts to the archaeological resources. 2.3. As per Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts requirements, developers shall have a heritage permit to alter or develop within an archaeological site. 2.4. The Regional District encourages the development of a heritage inventory and designation of heritage trails by interested parties. 2.5. The Regional District shall promote the use of St'át'imc and Lil’wat place names.
3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Context
Statistics Canada reports that within Electoral Area B, an equal share of jobs is provided by the following five sectors: agriculture and resource based industries, manufacturing and construction, health and education, business services, including tourism, and ‘other services’, which includes wholesale and retail trade. This employment mix reflects the current shift away from a resource-based economy, and also, that the service centre of Lillooet provides much of the employment to Electoral Area B residents.
A number of economic development plans and studies have been carried out for the District of Lillooet and the surrounding areas, including Electoral Area B. Many of these studies emphasize building on the existing tourism industry to bolster the local economy. Existing tourism operations within Electoral Area B include rafting tours, heliskiing, snowmobiling, guest ranches, and golf. New tourism operations developed in a locally responsive manner are reported to have support from the community. The 2008 Tourism Development Plan developed for the District of Lillooet lists resorts, touring products, adventure products, cultural heritage interpretation, and agritourism as providing the best opportunity for tourism development in the region. There has also been First Nation interest in developing cultural tourism products featuring dancing, storytelling, carving, and aboriginal art. Agriculture, and agritourism in particular, have potential to grow within Electoral Area B. In 2007, provincial government funding was allocated to a feasibility assessment of growing wine grapes in the Lillooet area.
9 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 19 of 238 AUGUST 2009
A significant factor limiting tourism and other economic development within Electoral Area B is the remoteness of the area from major centres, and the rough condition of regional transportation routes into the area. These factors affect the number of tourists coming to the area, the ability of local merchants to access supplies, and the number of permanent residents that support local businesses year round. The Enhanced Economic Direction for the Squamish Lillooet Regional District (October 2001) study identified improved transportation linkages to Electoral Areas A and B, and sustained and expanded passenger rail service to Lillooet, as important priorities. The SLRD’s Regional Growth Strategy also emphasizes the need for improved transportation linkages.
A second explanation for the relatively slow growth of the tourism industry within Lillooet and Electoral Area B suggested in the 2005 Lillooet-Lytton Tourism Diversification Project is the lack of an established destination resort and accommodation. This is seen as an obstacle to developing other tourism offerings. A multi-season, larger scale resort related to golf or downhill skiing was suggested in the study as the needed magnet to attract tourists into the area. Boutique lodges are another concept promoted for building on tourism in Electoral Area B.
Sites that have been suggested for boutique lodges, similar to the Tyax Resort in Electoral Area A, include various locations along the main stem of the Fraser River, the confluence of the Bridge and Fraser Rivers, on Seton Lake, on local ranches, and in the Upper Yalakom Valley and Shulaps area. In the 1990s a large-scale resort was proposed for Electoral Area B, namely the Cayoosh Ski Resort in the Duffey Lake Corridor. This proposal had broad community support, but failed to proceed due to unresolved issues associated with aboriginal interests and potential environmental impacts.
Several of the areas suggested as suitable for golf resort development fall within the ALR: the current Sheep Pasture golf Course in Texas Creek, and the Diamond S. Ranch. A potentially more suitable location for golf-related development may be the Kamenka Lands, which are within the District of Lillooet, and are not in the ALR.
Relocation to rural centres, including Lillooet and Electoral Area B, is anticipated to be a significant demographic phenomenon over the next two decades. Economic development within Electoral Area B can be expected to grow in relation to this population growth. Other areas of British Columbia featuring similar climates, beautiful scenery, and reasonable real estate prices, for example, Merritt and the Nicola valley, have been experiencing steady population growth due to an increasing number of retirees and knowledge workers. The ability of knowledge workers to relocate to rural areas is contingent on the availability of suitable communications systems, such as high-speed internet. High-speed internet is available in Lillooet, but is lacking from much of Electoral Area B. Similarly with home based business, one of the limiting factors to growth in home-based businesses is the limited amount of business services available locally.
While the majority of the community is in support of some economic growth and development in Electoral Area B, support for a ‘steady state’ economy has also been voiced. The steady state economy provides an alternative to the traditional economic goal of promoting a constantly growing economy, and has the aim of eliminating the fundamental conflict between economic growth, biodiversity conservation, and maintenance of ecological services. The Lillooet Naturalists Society advocates for a steady state economy, where the economy is established at a size that does not breach the ecological capacity of the region.
10 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 20 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Objective
To foster a diversified economy that meets local and visitor needs, that contributes to the rural character of the area, and stimulates healthy ecological and social conditions.
Policies
3.1. The District of Lillooet and Seton Portage are supported as the primary centres for commercial activity and community services. 3.2. Pursuant to section 920.2 of the Local Government Act, all lands within the plan area are designated as areas where temporary commercial or industrial uses may be permitted through an application to the Regional District. 3.3. Future rezonings, subdivisions, and building permits for commercial properties should promote the use of the land by small- and medium-format businesses that are locally responsive and preserve the character of the area. 3.4. The Regional District encourages the provincial government and private businesses to assist in providing the best and most current communication systems. 3.5. The Regional District encourages provincial agencies, particularly the BC Transmission Corporation, BC Hydro, and the Ministry of Forests and Range, to protect the scenic values along all major highway corridors.
Tourism 3.6. The development of small- and medium-scale tourism operations is supported, including agritourism operations associated with farms. 3.7. Large-scale tourism proposals shall be considered where they reflect policies contained in the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy regarding major resort development. 3.8. The development of Agricultural Land Reserve, or other lands with agricultural potential, for non- farm uses, including golf courses, is not supported. 3.9. The Regional District supports the development of a joint comprehensive tourism strategy for Electoral Area B and the District of Lillooet.
Home-based Business 3.10.Home-based business and home industry are supported in the Residential, Rural Residential, Agriculture, and Resource Management designations, subject to zoning regulations to ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. 3.11.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure the bylaw facilitates and supports home-based business as a means of growing the local economy. 3.12.Where a home industry involves food intended for human consumption approval from the Interior Health Authority shall be obtained.
11 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 21 of 238 AUGUST 2009
4. GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION STRATEGY
Context
Greenhouse gases are a natural part of the atmosphere. They trap the sun's warmth, and maintain the earth's surface temperature at a level necessary to support life. However, due to human activities, progressively concentrated levels of greenhouse gases are now found in the atmosphere. As the accumulation of greenhouse gases increases, the amount of heat trapped in the atmosphere also increases, leading to climate change. There is general consensus in the scientific community that the projected changes in climate will result in significant, often adverse, impacts on many ecological systems and socio-economic sectors, including food supply, water resources, and human health.
In response to climate change projections and the predicted impacts, as of 2008 the Local Government Act requires that official community plans include targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the area covered by the plan, and policies and actions proposed for achieving those targets.
Detailed information on the release of greenhouse gases within Electoral Area B is not currently available. Based on general emissions and climate change information, the most significant contributors to green house gas emissions in Electoral Area B are likely 1) the use of energy to provide personal transportation and heat buildings, 2) the disposal of solid waste, 3) deforestation, and 4) agricultural operations.
A wide variety of greenhouse gas reduction targets are already in place in Canada, addressing federal, provincial, municipal, and corporate mandates. For example, Canada is signatory to the Kyoto Protocol which came into force in 2005. It is an agreement whereby Canada has committed to reducing its total emissions of greenhouse gases to 6% below 1990 levels by the year 2012. The Government of British Columbia has committed to ensuring the B.C. public sector is carbon neutral by 2010. The province-wide target set by the Government of BC, is to reduce total provincial emissions to 80% of 2007 levels by 2050. Another example is the Resort Municipality of Whistler, which through the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Partners for Climate Protection Program, has also committed to a minimum 6% reduction from 1990 levels.
Since the Kyoto Protocol was adopted in 1997, additional studies have suggested that deeper reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are required to maintain appropriate atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and global temperatures.2 Science-based climate change plans suggest that global greenhouse gas emissions should fall to at least 50% below the 1990 level by 2050. Considering the proportionately larger emission produced by developed countries such as Canada, an equitable way to share the global effort in reducing green house gases for developed countries has been suggested as: 25-30% below 1990 levels by 2020, and 85-90% below 1990 levels by 2050.
The next steps in addressing the issue of climate change within Electoral Area B include a detailed inventory of the local sources of greenhouse gases, and a community-specific emissions reductions strategy that takes into account local social, economic, and environmental conditions. However, without detailed information on the local sources of greenhouse gas emissions, general climate change information can still be used to inform a generalized emissions reductions strategy, including policies on
2 Source: The Case for Deep Reductions: Canada’s Role in Preventing Dangerous Climate Change. 2005. The David Suzuki Foundation & the Pembina Institute
12 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 22 of 238 AUGUST 2009 the energy efficiency of buildings, land use planning, local government operations, energy supply, and waste reduction and management.
Some of the challenges in mitigating climate change that are specific to the rural communities of Electoral Area B are as follows:
1. Population densities are often not sufficient to achieve economies of scale and support energy efficient systems, such as public transit, district energy supplies, and capture of landfill gases. 2. Promoting tourism as a way of bolstering the local economy is often at odds with greenhouse gas reduction targets. For example, the Resort Municipality of Whistler reports that ‘inter- community’ transportation (i.e. the movement of tourists to and from Whistler) results in fossil fuel consumption that is seven times higher than the in-community consumption. 3. Rural populations are often very dependent on travel in single occupancy vehicles due to dispersed housing and remote resource-based employment. 4. Hydroelectric power projects have already resulted in significant environmental and social impacts, making further ‘green’ energy generation from local waterbodies a contentious issue. 5. A small economy generally means a lack of financial resources to implement new technologies or programs.
Objectives
To develop an appropriate greenhouse gas emissions reductions strategy for Electoral Area B that takes into account local social, economic, and environmental conditions. To achieve carbon neutral local government operations by 2020.
Policies
4.1. The target of reducing green house gas emissions by 30 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020, and 90 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050 for the entire community, is supported in principle. 4.2. The Regional District shall work toward a comprehensive regional greenhouse gas reduction strategy, including action plans for: a) increasing local renewable energy generation in a sustainable manner, b) improving public transit and rail service, c) improving the energy efficiency of buildings, d) development of clean industries to augment the local economy, e) implementing Smart Growth principles, f) improving recycling and waste management, and, g) enhancing urban and rural forests. 4.3. As per the Climate Change Action Charter, the Regional District shall work toward a corporate greenhouse gas reduction strategy to achieve carbon neutral local government operations by 2012.
As initial steps toward completing a comprehensive greenhouse gas reduction strategy and ultimately reducing emissions, the following policies are incorporated into this OCP:
Policy 1.7 – Endorsement of Smart Growth principles
13 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 23 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Policy 3.10 – Support for home based businesses Policy 7.2 and 7.3 – Support for improved waste management and community recycling Policy 8.6 – Support for improved passenger rail service Policy 8.8 – Support for a regional transit service Policy 9.8 – Promote energy efficiency of residential buildings Policy 10.15 – Advocate for a regional energy plan Policy 11.2 and 11.3 – Preserve local agriculture Policy 11.15 – Promote Environmental Farm Plans Policy 12.5 – Promote energy efficiency of residential buildings Policy 14.2 – Promote energy efficiency of institutional buildings
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
5. BIODIVERSITY
Context
Much of the land within the plan area is Crown land and is governed by the draft Lillooet Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) prepared by the former Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management in 2004. The draft LRMP, in addition to other data provided by the provincial government and the St'át'imc and Lil’wat Nations, is used to inform the SLRD’s response to development and resource use proposals.
Electoral Area B provides important wildlife habitat for a variety of species (see Map 2). Wildlife reported to live within Electoral Area B includes cougar, bobcat, lynx, wolf, coyote, grizzly bear, black bear, beaver, moose, mountain goat, mule deer, sheep, and other small mammals, birds, and amphibians. Potential habitat for endangered and threatened species, such as the northern spotted owl, tailed frogs, fisher, bighorn sheep, and grizzly bear, is also found in the region. Bighorn sheep have migration corridors in and out of the north end of the Yalakom Valley. Known northern spotted owl long-term activity centres are located near Seton Portage, the Duffey Lake Corridor, and Texas Creek. The plan area encompasses some of the most threatened grizzly bear population units (GBPU’s) in the province, including the Stein-Nahatlatch GBPU. Most of Electoral Area B west of the Fraser River is designated as a grizzly bear recovery area. These habitats are key areas to protect from future development and disturbance. Minimizing road construction is a key directive in the recovery of disturbance sensitive species such as the grizzly bear.
Electoral Area B is located within the Fraser River watershed. Smaller tributaries to the Fraser River found within Electoral Area B include the Bridge, Seton, and Yalakom Rivers, as well as Cayoosh Creek. Local fish species include four species of pacific salmon (chinook, coho, pink, and sockeye), steelhead, bull trout, white sturgeon, rainbow trout, kokanee, white fish, sucker, Dolly Varden, brown trout, and brook trout. The Duffey Lake Corridor and Seton Lake area are recognized as regionally significant bull trout habitat.
Fishing, and the locations where fishing occur, are considered to be of fundamental cultural importance to the St'át'imc Nation. The St’át’imc Land Use Plan recommends that a fifty metre buffer on either side of all fish bearing streams be provided where development or resource use is proposed.
14 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 24 of 238 AUGUST 2009
The Province requires that local governments protect fish habitat from disturbance arising from residential, commercial, and industrial development by implementing the Riparian Area Regulation (RAR). RAR, enacted under Section 12 of the Fish Protection Act in July 2004, applies to all waterbodies within Electoral Area B. The development permit designation described below is intended to address water quality protection throughout the plan area and satisfy the requirements of the Riparian Area Regulation. The following definitions apply:
‘natural boundary’ means the visible high water mark of a stream where the presence and action of the water are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark on the soil of the bed of the stream a character distinct from that of its banks, in vegetation, as well as in the nature of the soil itself, and includes the active floodplain; ‘Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP)’ means an applied scientist or technologist, acting alone or together with another qualified environmental professional, where (a) the individual is registered and in good standing in British Columbia with an appropriate professional organization constituted under an Act, acting under that association’s code of ethics and subject to disciplinary action by that association, (b) the individual’s area of expertise is recognized in the assessment methods as one that is acceptable for the purpose of providing all or part of an assessment report in respect of that development proposal, and (c) the individual is acting within that individual’s area of expertise; ‘ravine’ means a narrow, steep-sided valley that is commonly eroded by running water and has a slope grade greater than 3:1; ‘top of the ravine bank’ means the first significant break in a ravine slope where the break occurs such that the grade beyond the break is flatter than 3:1 for a minimum distance of 15 metres measured perpendicularly from the break, and the break does not include a bench within the ravine that could be developed; ‘waterbody’ means any area that in a normal year has water flowing or standing above ground to the extent that evidence of an ordinary high water mark is established.
Objectives
To support protection of environmentally significant areas, avoid loss of key habitats, and maintain biological diversity. To recognize the importance of water resources and protect and improve the quality and quantity of those resources for future generations.
Policies
5.1. In order to maintain biodiversity and support intact ecosystems, intensive recreation, subdivision, and rezoning of lands shall be discouraged in critical wildlife habitats, including those indicated on Map 2. Motorized vehicles should be limited to traversing these areas using the most direct route.
Water Resources 5.2. The Regional District considers environmental protection of all natural waterbodies to be of high importance, and is therefore a primary consideration in the evaluation of any new development.
15 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 25 of 238 AUGUST 2009
5.3. The cumulative impact of development on water quality should be considered in the evaluation of any new development. 5.4. Land use developments requiring the disposal of waste materials, including sewage, garbage, industrial effluent, waste construction materials, animal waste, or soil is prohibited where it would reduce the present quality of surface or groundwater resources. 5.5. The hardening of shorelines through retaining walls or the use of rip-rap is discouraged.
Development Permit Area 1: Riparian Assessment Areas 5.6. Pursuant to Section 919.1(a) of the Local Government Act, Development Permit Area 1 (DPA 1) is designated as a development permit area for protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems, and biological diversity. Justification: The purpose of DPA 1 is to implement the Riparian Areas Regulation enacted under Section 12 of the Fish Protection Act, as required by the provincial government. Implementation of DPA 1 will provide protection for the features, functions, and conditions that are vital in the natural maintenance of stream health and productivity.
5.7. DPA 1 includes fish bearing streams, lakes, wetlands, and the associated riparian habitat, approximately as indicated on Map 3, including the following areas within and adjacent to all waterbodies that provide fish habitat or flow into a waterbody that provides fish habitat: a) A 30 metre strip on both sides of the waterbody, measured from the natural boundary; b) For a ravine less than 60 metres wide, a strip on both sides of the stream measured from the natural boundary to a point that is 30 metres beyond the top of the ravine bank; and c) For a ravine 60 metres wide or greater, a strip on both sides of the stream measured from the natural boundary to a point that is 10 metres beyond the top of the ravine bank. 5.8. Within DPA 1, land must not be altered and building permits will not be issued unless a development permit is issued by the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, or unless otherwise exempted in this plan. 5.9. Within DPA 1, a development permit shall be issued if a qualified environmental professional carries out an assessment and certifies in the assessment report for that proposal that he or she is qualified to carry out the assessment, that the assessment methods required by provincial regulations have been followed, and provides their professional opinion that: a) If the development is implemented as proposed there will be no harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of natural features, functions, and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area; or, b) If streamside protection and enhancement areas identified in the report are protected from development and the measures identified in the report as necessary to protect the integrity of those areas from the effects of the development are implemented by the developer, there will be no harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of natural features, functions, and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area. 5.10.Development permits issued may require that: a) Areas of land, specified in the permit, must remain free of development, except in accordance with any conditions contained in the permit;
16 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 26 of 238 AUGUST 2009
b) Specified natural features or areas be preserved, protected, restored, or enhanced in accordance with the permit; c) Natural watercourses be dedicated; d) Works be constructed to preserve, protect, restore, or enhance watercourses, or other specified natural features of the environment; e) Protection measures be implemented, including that trees or other vegetation be planted or retained in order to preserve, protect, restore or enhance fish habitat or riparian areas, control drainage, or control erosion or protect banks; f) An explanatory plan or reference plan prepared by a BC Land Surveyor delineate the identified streamside protection and enhancement area; and, g) Development comply with the Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat, published by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Ministry of Environment, Land and Parks, May 1992. 5.11.Development permits are not required: a) For works approved by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and/or Ministry of Environment with respect to trail construction, stream enhancement, and fish and wildlife restoration; b) To resolve emergency situations that present an immediate danger related to flooding, erosion, or other immediate threats to life or property, including removal of hazardous trees; and, c) For the repair of a permanent structure, agricultural and institutional development, and mining activities; however, federal and provincial legislation still apply. 5.12.Established buildings and other previously approved uses in DPA 1 are permitted to continue. Expansion of non-conforming uses requires a development permit. 5.13.The Board delegates the authority to issue development permits to the Director of Planning and Development within DPA 1. 5.14.Where a conflict arises between DPA 1 (riparian assessment area) and DPA 2 (wildfire protection), the requirements of DPA 1 shall be given priority. (Generally, DPA 2 can be satisfied by applying two out of four possible measures: 1) fire resistant exterior siding, 2) fire resistant roofing, 3) fire resistant landscaping within 10 m of structures, or 4) vegetation reduction within 30 m of structures. However, unless recommended by a QEP, vegetation in the riparian assessment area may not be cleared for fire safety purposes. See Policy 6.10 to 6.18 for more information.)
Referrals 5.15.Pertaining to commercial recreation referrals, applications for subdivision or development, or proposed resource management plans, the SLRD shall not support proposals unless they demonstrate the following (as applicable): a) Disturbance of wildlife by motorized vehicles is minimized; b) Wildlife movement between key habitat areas is ensured; c) Intensive recreation is located outside of key wildlife habitats, as shown in Map 2; d) Information on areas adjacent to or within the application area that support rare, threatened, or culturally important plant and animal species is provided, and access to these areas is discouraged;
17 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 27 of 238 AUGUST 2009
e) Information on the sensitivity of specific areas and appropriate conduct is provided to the appropriate stakeholders; f) Old growth forest stands are protected to the greatest extent possible; and, g) Smart Growth principles are adhered to.
Bear Smart 5.16.Residents and visitors are encouraged to follow the recommendations developed by the BC ‘Bear Smart’ program. Specifically, residents and visitors are encouraged to: a) Dispose of household garbage in bear-proof containers, or store indoors until it can be properly disposed of; b) Keep doors and windows closed and locked to prevent food smells from luring bears inside the home; c) Do not store food of any kind outside, even if it is inside a locked refrigerator or freezer; d) Do not leave garbage, groceries, animal feed, coolers, or any odorous item in a vehicle; e) Do not use birdfeeders that act as bear-attractants during bear season; f) Where appropriate, replace fruit-bearing trees or bushes with non-fruit-bearing varieties; g) Where appropriate, use electric fencing to protect fruit-bearing trees or bushes and livestock; h) Harvest fruits and vegetables as they ripen and remove fallen fruit from the ground; i) Burn barbeques clean immediately after use; j) Wash and store barbeques covered and out of the wind – preferably indoors; k) Feed pets indoors and store their food indoors; l) Keep composts clean; and, m) Support the development and use of a community waste management system.
6. NATURAL HAZARDS
Context
Natural hazards within Electoral Area B include geotechnical hazard, flood hazard, wildfire, extreme weather events, and avalanches. The plan area is not subject to high earthquake hazard.
Electoral Area B has areas of high geotechnical activity resulting from unstable ground and rock fall. The landslide that formed Seton Portage, which split the early Seton Lake in two, occurred some time between 8,000 and 20,000 years ago. Historical records show that along the Fraser River aboriginal communities peaked and declined approximately 1,000 years ago, likely due to seasonal failure of the salmon runs caused by catastrophic landslides that dammed the Fraser River. Terrain stability mapping (see Map 4) is available through Lillooet Timber Supply Area mapping; however it was compiled for forestry purposes at a 1:20,000 scale and is not intended to inform fine-scale development planning.
There is flood hazard associated with many creeks and rivers throughout the plan area. Floods and debris flows are typically associated with the spring snowmelt, which peaks between May and mid-July.
18 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 28 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Floodplain mapping is not available for Electoral Area B, however, Zoning Bylaw 670, 2000 provides flood construction levels for Seton and Anderson Lakes, the Fraser River, and other waterbodies.
Wildfire management and emergency preparedness are key concerns for residents of Electoral Area B. Communities are involved in volunteer fire fighting efforts, wildfire awareness, and implementing Fire Smart guidelines. Fire protection capability varies from location to location within the plan area. Volunteer services supported by the SLRD include the Lillooet Fire Protection Area, Seton Portage – Shalalth Fire Protection Area , the Lillooet Area Rescue Service, and the 911 Interior Service. IRs within Electoral Area B have their own fire protection services funded thorough Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
The recommendations of the SLRD’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) are reflected in the policies below. The primary aim of the CWPP is to inform government agencies and private land owners of the wildfire risk and appropriate actions to take to reduce that risk. The CWPP identifies areas of high wildfire hazard, which include the Yalakom Valley, West Pavilion, Pavilion Lake, Bridge River, Texas Creek, the Fountain area, and the Duffey Lake Corridor.
While efforts to support wildfire suppression are recognized as critical to the safety of the community, the importance of the natural role of fire in the ecosystem is also acknowledged. Many of the native plant species are dependent on fire to maintain their natural process. Fire supports ecosystem succession, helps to prepare seed beds, recycles nutrients, maintains a diversity of seral stages across the landscape, controls insect and disease outbreaks, and reduces fuel accumulation. The current mountain pine beetle outbreak in the interior of British Columbia, which is exacerbated by fire suppression, has extended through Electoral Area B and south to the Whistler area. In areas supporting pine trees, it is likely that there will be high tree mortality. The resulting fuel accumulations will pose a significant wildfire threat to existing developments, pointing to a need to find a balance between fire suppression, community safety, and ecosystem integrity.
The SLRD’s Emergency Planning Coordinator is working toward programs to address the natural hazards that occur in Electoral Area B. The programs will primarily target public education, community workshops, engaging volunteers, and developing evacuation and emergency preparedness plans.
Objectives
To protect life and property by mitigating natural hazards where feasible, and discouraging development in areas subject to immitigable natural hazards To ensure that appropriate measures are in place for emergency prevention, response, and mitigation.
Policies
Geotechnical Policies 6.1. A professional geotechnical report shall be required prior to development: a. Where a slope of 30% or greater exists (as determined in the field); or, b. Where requested by the building inspector. This report must identify hazards present, areas that are suitable and unsuitable for development, mitigation measures for hazards that can be mitigated, and certify that land may be safely used for
19 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 29 of 238 AUGUST 2009
the use intended. The development plans shall comply with all of the recommendations found in the report. 6.2. The requirement for a professional geotechnical report may be waived by the building inspector. 6.3. On slopes exceeding 30%, grading and vegetation removal should be minimized. 6.4. Where a geotechnical report concludes that development may occur on slopes exceeding 30%, the owner shall provide the Regional District with a save harmless covenant, and development must proceed in strict compliance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report.
Wildfire Protection 6.5. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Forests and Range to reduce wildfire hazard by creating and maintaining appropriate fire defense improvements on Crown lands, particularly in areas affected by the mountain pine beetle. 6.6. Homeowners are urged to carry out annual wildfire threat assessments and to reduce wildfire hazard by measures described in the Home Owner’s FireSmart Manual, recognizing that the community desires a balance between retaining the visual character of the rural setting with fire protection objectives. (The FireSmart Manual is available from the B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range website.) 6.7. The SLRD Emergency Planning Coordinator shall work toward: a) Establishing and maintaining a plan that identifies hazards and risks, recommends mitigation measures, and ensures emergency response plans are in place for existing and future communities; b) Identifying low risk fire safety areas where community members can evacuate to and wait until emergency service providers can reach them in case of an emergency; c) Annually reviewing the adequacy of the fire protection infrastructure relative to growth and development; d) Establishing a public information program to educate the public on evacuation routes and fire safety; e) Pursuing funding for fuel management projects; f) Engaging the Ministry of Forests and Range to address wildfire risk and fuel management on Crown lands; and, g) Engaging BC Hydro and the BC Transmission Corporation to ensure slash hazard on transmission line corridors is mitigated. 6.8. Volunteer fire protection services shall be supported. 6.9. The design of new community water systems shall take into consideration the water volumes required for adequate fire protection.
Development Permit Area 2: Wildfire Protection Area 6.10.Pursuant to Section 919.1(b) of the Local Government Act, Development Permit Area 2 (DPA 2) is designated as a development permit area for protection of development from hazardous conditions. DPA 2 includes all lands within the plan area, as shown on Map 1. Justification: The SLRD Community Wildfire Protection Plan (2006) indicates that within Electoral Area B, the vast majority of private and Crown lands in the vicinity of forests are
20 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 30 of 238 AUGUST 2009
subject to moderate to high wildfire hazard. The purpose of DPA 2 is to ensure new developments in Electoral Area B are designed and constructed to minimize wildfire hazard, and are contributing to the fire safety of the neighbourhood. Implementation of DPA 2 will limit damage to property, should wildfires occur.
6.11.Within DPA 2, building permits shall not be issued unless a development permit is issued by the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, or unless otherwise exempted in this plan. 6.12.Every application for a development permit shall be accompanied by plans indicating the following: a) Location of all existing and proposed structures, parking areas, and driveways; b) Extent and nature of existing and proposed landscaping, including details of trees and ground cover; and, c) The exterior materials of existing and proposed structures. 6.13.Within DPA 2, a development permit shall be issued if two or more of the following measures are indicated in the application: a) Fire resistant construction materials3 for exterior siding; b) Fire resistant construction materials for roofing; c) Fire resistant landscaping4 ensuring minimal fuel loading within 10 m of structures and projections (to the extent possible considering the size of the parcel); and, d) Fuel removal and reduction5 within 30 m from structures and projections (to the extent possible considering the size of the parcel). 6.14.Development Permits issued may require that landscape plans be prepared in consultation with a Registered Professional Biologist, Forester, or Landscape Architect that provide recommendations for ensuring minimal fuel loading within landscaped areas, ongoing protection from interface fire hazard, and the type and density of fire resistive plantings that may be incorporated within landscaped areas to help mitigate the interface fire hazard. 6.15.Development Permits are not required: a) Where the total area of additions to an existing building is less than 50 m2; b) For renovations within an existing building; c) Where a covenant is registered on title requiring property owners to comply with the DPA 2 guidelines; or, d) Where exempted by the building inspector. 6.16.Established buildings and other previously approved uses in DPA 2 are permitted to continue.
3 ‘Fire resistant construction materials’ are materials that have high resistance to combustion, including Class-A asphalt shingles, slate, clay tile, metal, cement, plaster, stucco, and other concrete products. 4 ‘Fire resistant landscaping’ is landscaping that features trees planted a minimum of 3 metres apart (preferably deciduous and trimmed of branches below 3 metres in height), low-growing non-resinous shrubs, lawn, and hard surfaces. 5 ‘Fuel removal and reduction’ means ground fuels are removed, trees are thinned to a minimum of 3 metres apart and trimmed of branches below 3 metres in height. Clusters of trees are permitted where a hard surface, lawn, or area of low vegetation (1 meter high or less), or other suitable fire break surrounds those clusters.
21 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 31 of 238 AUGUST 2009
6.17.The Board delegates the authority to issue development permits to the Director of Planning and Development within DPA 2. 6.18.Where a conflict arises between DPA 1 (riparian assessment area) and DPA 2 (wildfire protection), the requirements of DPA 1 shall be given priority. (Generally, DPA 2 can be satisfied by applying two out of four possible measures: 1) fire resistant exterior siding, 2) fire resistant roofing, 3) fire resistant landscaping within 10 m of structures, or 4) vegetation reduction within 30 m of structures. However, unless recommended by a QEP, vegetation in the riparian assessment area may not be cleared for fire safety purposes. See Policy 5.6 to 5.14 for more information.)
SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
7. SERVICES &UTILITIES
Context
The SLRD provides funding for the following Electoral Area B services: Lillooet Fire Protection Area, Seton Portage – Shalalth Fire Protection Area, Lillooet Area Rescue Service, 911 Interior Service, recreation facilities (Lillooet Recreation Centre, Lillooet Recreation Commission, and the Lillooet Library), and utilities and services (Seton Portage street lighting, Lillooet Camelsfoot TV, and Lillooet area refuse grounds).
Solid waste generated within Electoral Area B, with the exception of the Seton and Bridge River Band, is diverted to the landfill and Re-Use-It Centre6 near Lillooet. A separate landfill services the Seton and Bridge River Bands with support from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. The Lillooet landfill has approximately 80 years of service left. There are some indications that the Seton landfill may have a limited lifespan remaining.
Residents of Electoral Area B have shown a great deal of enthusiasm for recycling, however, opportunities for recycling are currently limited. Efforts are underway to develop an economical recycling system for the electoral area. However, the relatively small volume of recyclable materials generated and the high cost of transporting those materials are challenges still to be addressed.
Throughout the plan area liquid waste is disposed of by individual septic system. Domestic water is also provided through private systems. There are no community water or sewer systems funded or administered by the SLRD within Electoral Area B. New SLRD-supported utility services have not been requested by the community.
Most communities within Electoral Area B are supplied with electricity from BC Hydro and with phone service from Telus or other service providers. There are some areas without these services, such as the Yalakom Valley, which does not have phone service.
6 The Re-Use-It Centre is a building used to store useful items that have been diverted from the landfill. Residents are welcome to take home items from the Re-Use-It Centre for free.
22 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 32 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Objective
To facilitate the safe and cost effective provision and maintenance of water, sewer, and solid waste services, as appropriate to the community.
Policies
7.1. The Regional District supports the following process for the administration of future service areas: a) Request by residents to establish a service area; b) Feasibility analysis funded by the proponents or grants; c) Referendum by affected property owners.
Solid Waste Management 7.2. The Regional District supports the three R’s of waste management: reduce, reuse, and recycle. 7.3. The Regional District supports the development and maintenance of a community recycling center in Lillooet.
Liquid Waste Management 7.4. The Regional District considers environmental protection of all natural waterbodies to be of high importance, and is therefore a primary consideration in the evaluation of any new development, including the development or expansion of sewer and water systems. 7.5. All building permit applications shall be subject to provincial regulations regarding sewage disposal. 7.6. The Regional District encourages the Interior Health Authority to monitor the effects of sewage disposal throughout the plan area, to ensure that the appropriate standards are maintained, and to ensure inadequate septic systems are upgraded. 7.7. The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District, particularly around Fountain Lake and Pavilion Lake, to ensure the minimum allowable parcel size permitted in areas without a community sewer system allow for the setbacks between septic fields and watercourses required by provincial legislation. 7.8. The Regional District encourages property owners to maintain their septic systems in accordance with best management practices and provincial regulations.
8. TRANSPORTATION
Context
Transportation to and from communities within Electoral Area B is largely by car or truck via Highways 12, 40 and 99. The poor repair of these highways is seen as being one of the key factors limiting economic growth in the area. All three highways are narrow and in need of upgrades. Highway 12 and 40 require significant structural work to limit rock fall onto the road and stabilize steep slopes. In particular, ‘the Big Slide’ on Highway 12, between Lillooet and Lytton, poses a significant safety hazard to motorists. There is a strong desire expressed by the community to prioritize upgrades to Highway 12, however, the Ministry of Transportation has indicated the funds for major upgrades to this highway, or
23 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 33 of 238 AUGUST 2009 others within Electoral Area B, will not be available in the near future. Work to limit rock fall on Highway 12 and 40 with mesh barriers is underway.
There are no routes specifically designated for commuter cycling within Electoral Area B, or specially designated cycling trails. The community has not voiced a need for specially designed commuter cycling infrastructure, likely as a result of the rural nature of the plan area, the low traffic volumes, and long distances between destinations.
The McGillivray Creek Trail between Anderson Lake and Gold Bridge is a locally significant recreation trail that connects Electoral Areas A and B. While it is currently not open to vehicle traffic, it is used by snowmobiles and mountain bikes. Support has been expressed for keeping this trail open to the public for recreation and emergency use.
A small airstrip within the District of Lillooet services Electoral Area B. It is managed by the District of Lillooet. While there are no scheduled flights, the airport is viewed as important to future economic development of the area. Airport noise is not known to negatively impact residents of Electoral Area B. Extending the runway to 1500 meters and adding lighting are possibilities for future development.
Public transit is largely absent from Electoral Area B. There is no passenger rail service to Lillooet from southern communities, and there is no Greyhound bus service. There is a passenger train that runs between Lillooet and Seton Portage - Shalalth, which is administered by the Seton Band.
Section 877(3) of the Local Government Act states that an official community plan must include targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the area covered by the plan, and policies and actions of the local government proposed with respect to achieving those targets. The strategy for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions within Electoral Area B is in part based on creating an economical public transit system.
Objectives
To support a safe and efficient road network and air transport facilities that allow year round transportation to and within the area. To establish a cost effective regional public transit service and decrease green house gas emissions by limiting car travel.
Policies
8.1. Road improvement is supported where it is compatible with the social, environmental, and economic goals of the community. 8.2. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Transportation to: a) continue improvements to Highways 12, 40, and 99 to ensure safe and efficient primary travel corridors throughout the year; b) designate and maintain emergency evacuation routes from existing neighbourhoods and future developments; c) improve maintenance to the West Pavilion Forest Service Road and Douglas Tail/Highline. d) Establish a unified road signing system to facilitate emergency access and 911 services. 8.3. During the construction and maintenance of roads, the Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range and the Ministry of Transportation to ensure:
24 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 34 of 238 AUGUST 2009
a) bridge spans are adequate to permit and encourage the movement of wildlife, particularly along the Duffey Lake Road; b) wildlife movement corridors are documented and protected; and, c) no roadside pullouts are created at sites that will promote human-wildlife conflicts and wildlife habituation. 8.4. The Regional District supports the maintenance of high visual quality along Highway 99 by requiring a 20 metre vegetated buffer to be retained on lands that abut the highway right of way. 8.5. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range, the Ministry of Environment, and the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources to develop coordinated access management plans to regulate access on forestry and mining roads in and around the plan area. 8.6. The Regional District encourages CN Rail to improve its freight and passenger rail service to Lillooet and Seton Portage - Shalalth. 8.7. The Regional District supports the development of a railway station in Seton Portage, including tourist accommodation and limited commercial, on a site specific rezoning basis. 8.8. The Regional District supports the creation of a regional transit system that connects communities throughout the SLRD.
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Within the plan area there are eight land use designations:
1. Residential 5. Resort Commercial 2. Rural Residential 6. Agriculture 3. Resource Management 7. Community Watershed 4. Commercial 8. Park
In the following sections, general policies are described for each land use designation. The sub-are plans contain additional community-specific policies addressing these same land use designations. There are no lands within Electoral Area B designated as Industrial, however, policy direction is provided for industrial proposals that come forward in the future.
9. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL
Context
The District of Lillooet is the main service centre for residents of Electoral Area B, and is the preferred location for small lot and urban-style residential development. The District of Lillooet updated its OCP in 2008. The OCP states that vacant lands found within the District are sufficient to meet the projected housing demand for both the short term and the long term (e.g. for 50 years at 10 units/year). The OCP emphasizes infill and the intensification of land use in order to make efficient use of existing infrastructure and to reduce the environmental and financial costs of growth.
There are three communities within Electoral Area B that have lands designated as Residential: Pavilion Lake, Fountain, and Seton Portage. There are approximately fifty small parcels of land (0.1 to 1.4 hectares) on two bays of Pavilion Lake. The majority of these parcels are roughly 0.3 hectares in size and
25 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 35 of 238 AUGUST 2009 developed with seasonal-use cottages. There are also approximately ten full time residents on Pavilion Lake. Fountain has fourteen smaller parcels (0.3 to two hectares) adjacent to Fountain Lake. These residential lots have been developed with small homes very close to the lake, which has caused some concern over impacts to water quality and the riparian area. In Seton Portage, there are 70 small lots (0.1 to 0.7 hectares) and a dozen larger parcels (4 hectares on average) within the village area. Community specific policies addressing the Residential land use designation are contained in the Pavilion Lake and Seton Portage sub-area plans.
There is one community within Electoral Area B that has lands designated as Rural Residential, and that is Seton Portage. Community specific policies addressing the Rural Residential land use designation are contained in the Seton Portage sub-area plan.
Within Electoral Area B the price of land has seen a slow increase over the last decade; however, the region remains one of the most affordable in southern British Columbia. There is no indication of a lack of supply for large rural parcels; however, small parcels that command a lower price (less than $100,000) are relatively scarce. This lack of small rural parcels has contributed to the perception of the region as not being exceptionally affordable. However, encouraging an additional supply of small (less than one hectare) parcels in rural areas, is not consistent with Smart Growth principles, and is generally not supported. This type of development should be directed to the District of Lillooet to encourage compact communities that limit the human footprint on the land.
The 2008 District of Lillooet OCP labels 34 hectares of land on the southwest boundary of the District (within Electoral Area B) as Special Area #1. These lands are located within the T’it’q’et IR 1, near existing band housing. (The SLRD does not do land use planning for IR lands.) The Lillooet OCP describes Special Areas as those lands that are recognized for their future growth potential. Special Area #1 is identified as a location that could potentially provide an opportunity for T’it’q’et IR 1 to grow and develop over time.
A need for additional residential lands associated with IRs has also been identified in other areas of Electoral Area B. The Xalip Band in Fountain has reported the need to develop agricultural lands for housing, due to a growing population and lack of other suitable lands.
Requests for additional Residential designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.
Objectives
To ensure future development is consistent with the existing rural and semi-rural character of the area. To facilitate provision of an adequate supply of land for residential development, where it is consistent with Smart Growth principles and the desires of the community.
Policies
9.1. Lands designated for residential development are indicated on Map 5 - 8 as Residential and Rural Residential. 9.2. Permitted uses in all Residential and Rural Residential areas are single family home, secondary suite, home-based business, and auxiliary buildings and uses related to the above. 9.3. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Environment to establish a no-shooting reserve closure surrounding lands designated as Residential and Rural Residential.
26 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 36 of 238 AUGUST 2009
9.4. A high standard of energy efficiency for all new residential construction is encouraged: a) Consideration shall be given to incorporating energy efficiency objectives into zoning amendment bylaws; b) Density bonusing may be considered where alternative energy systems or other innovative sustainability initiatives are proposed. 9.5. Subdivisions to create lots accessible by water only are discouraged. 9.6. The Regional District encourages local First Nations and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs to develop IRs in manner that reflects Smart Growth principles, including mixed use neighbourhoods, multi-family housing, and other initiatives to foster a level of density that is supportive of public transit.
Residential Development in Fountain, Pavilion Lake, and Seton Portage 9.7. The creation of additional waterfront parcels on Fountain and Pavilion lakes is not supported, including those lands designated as Residential. 9.8. The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the OCP regarding policies within the Residential land use designation, particularly regarding minimum parcel size and land use on Fountain and Pavilion Lakes.
For additional policies on the Residential and Rural Residential land use designation, including minimum parcel sizes, see the Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan and the Seton Portage Sub-area Plan.
10. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Context
The vast majority of Electoral Area B is designated as Resource Management. The Resource Management designation and policies are intended to guide development in ‘non-settlement areas,’ as defined in the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy. The Resource Management policies are also intended provide guidance for informed responses to referrals from provincial agencies and adjacent municipalities.
Much of the land and natural resource management that occurs within Electoral Area B is governed by the draft Lillooet Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The St’át’imc Preliminary Draft Land Use Plan provides another layer of information to guide resource management in Electoral Area B. The policies below are intended to reflect the St’át’imc vision and principles for the St’át’imc territory and the general policy directions provided by the draft LRMP.
The draft LRMP emphasizes economic growth for the region through mining and energy development on Crown lands. Mining opportunities within Electoral Area B include metals (gold, silver, copper, tungsten), industrial minerals (limestone, dimension stone, talc), aggregates (sand, gravel, crushed rock) and gems (jade, agate). The energy related policies contained within the LRMP emphasize the development of new or expanded energy infrastructure and improving access for exploration and development.
27 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 37 of 238 AUGUST 2009
BC Hydro and the BC Transmission Corporation are two agencies that significantly shape the Resource Management lands within Electoral Area B. BC Hydro is working to implement the Province’s Energy Plan, which aims to maintain ninety per cent of all generation from ‘clean’ or renewable sources. Clean energy is defined as energy from alternative energy technologies that results in a net environmental improvement relative to existing energy production (e.g. hydroelectric, wind, solar, photovoltaic, geothermal, tidal, wave and biomass energy, as well as cogeneration, energy from landfill gas, and municipal solid waste).
The SLRD in general, and Electoral Area B in particular, are strategically positioned to take advantage of opportunities presented by emerging technologies and opportunities for clean energy. These opportunities include small-scale hydroelectric generation facilities, solar, and wind energy production. The SLRD believes that where compatible with other community values, it is desirable to accommodate such energy projects under the Resource Management land use designation. However, it is also recognized that much of Electoral Area B is highly impacted by transmission lines and other energy and transportation related infrastructure. Given the high value placed on the scenic, rural character of Electoral Area B, and the growing tourism economy, these impacts need to be addressed in the planning stages of all energy development.
Hydroelectric power projects have had a major impact on Electoral Area B, particularly around Seton Portage. Hydroelectric facilities on the Bridge and Seton Rivers are the third largest in the province. Major transmission corridors within Electoral Area B include the west side of Anderson Lake, the north and south shores of Seton Lake, along Highway 99 from Lillooet north to Pavilion, and through the Fountain Valley. Significant corridors lacking transmission lines include the Duffey Lake Corridor, along the Fraser River south of Lillooet, the Bridge River Valley downstream of the Carpenter Reservoir, and the Yalakom Valley.
Residents of Electoral Area B have expressed a strong desire to see further impacts from energy generation projects limited, and a comprehensive sub-regional plan for independent power projects (IPP) developed. Applications for IPPs within Electoral B, and the accompanying approval process, have generated a great deal of concern that existing transmission line free corridors will be impacted, environmental impacts are not well understood, and community benefits are not realized.
Section 877(1) of the Local Government Act stipulates that an OCP must include statements and map designations respecting the approximate location and area of sand and gravel deposits that are suitable for future sand and gravel extraction. This information is not available for the Electoral Area B, however, it is acknowledged that sand and gravel extraction are permitted uses throughout the Resource Management land use designation.
In several Electoral Area B communities, the inability to accommodate more than two homes for family members on large rural properties is viewed as problematic. Where the subdivision potential of the land is limited due to the RR3 zone (40 hectare minimum parcel size), the zoning bylaw permits a maximum of two homes on parcels over eight hectares. In some areas, this restriction on subdivision and the number of dwellings has prompted the un-permitted construction of homes in order to accommodate children and grandchildren on a single property. The proposed solution is a revision of the zoning bylaw to permit up to four homes on properties 40 hectares or greater.
Permitting additional homes on properties smaller than 40 hectares across Electoral Area B is not generally supported. In the SLRD’s Electoral Area C, where four homes are permitted on Resource Management zoned properties 8 hectares or larger, this policy has resulted in a large rural strata subdivision in a location that does not meet Smart Growth criteria for development. In Electoral Area B, where families desire to construct additional homes on a property beyond what the zoning bylaw allows,
28 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 38 of 238 AUGUST 2009 the land owner is encouraged to seek a rezoning if appropriate, or construct the permitted secondary suites.
Significant potential for further subdivision of larger ‘Resource Management’ parcels does exist within Electoral Area B, particularly on those lands zoned RR2 (8 hectare minimum parcel size) in Bylaw 670.
Rezoning of large rural properties in the RR3 zone (40 hectare minimum parcel size) to permit further subdivision is not generally consistent with Smart Growth principles and does result in some negative outcomes. Subdividing large rural acreages to create rural residential subdivisions decreases the potential for the land to operate as a viable farm unit or otherwise act as an income generating parcel. Subdivision increases the number of roads, houses, garbage, fences, cars, and pets, which all have a negative impact on wildlife. Subdivisions effectively decrease the wildlife habitat potential of the land. Subdivisions in rural areas increase the number of people who drive long distances to work, school, recreation, and shopping. This does not contribute to the community’s goal of decreasing green house gas emissions by limiting car travel. Additionally, rural subdivisions can be expensive to maintain. The cost of road maintenance in large lot subdivisions can be very high because there are more kilometres of road per person. In some cases, if the cost of future road surface replacement is factored in to those maintenance costs, the building and maintenance of the road is simply not economically feasible.
Generally speaking, Smart Growth principles advocate for accommodating the growing population in well-designed, urban communities with a small footprint, where people can walk and cycle for daily transportation, and in doing this, limit our impact on the environment and preserve rural areas as working landscapes and wildlife refuges. In light of this, the provision of residential or rural residential lots is encouraged within the District of Lillooet and in Seton Portage, rather than in remote areas.
Objective
To promote the management of land and water resources that respects the social and environmental values of the community, and protects biodiversity.
Policies
10.1.Sustainable natural resource use compatible with the social and environmental values of the community is encouraged on lands designated as Resource Management, as indicated on Maps 5 - 9. 10.2.Permitted uses on Resource Management lands are residential, agriculture, resource extraction (including aggregates), silviculture, dispersed outdoor recreation7, and ancillary uses related to these activities. 10.3.Industrial uses that have strong linkages to resource use activities that are primarily conducted outdoors, require a land area of one hectare or more, and may be incompatible with settlement uses or industry located within the District of Lillooet, may be permitted on a site specific rezoning basis on lands designated as Resource Management. 10.4.In all Resource Management areas of the plan, the minimum parcel area shall be forty hectares. 10.5.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the Resource Management land use designation policies, particularly regarding minimum parcel area.
7 Dispersed outdoor recreation means recreation that generally occurs throughout a large area and is not confined to a specific place, such as hiking, primitive camping, hunting, fishing, horseback riding, and cross-country skiing.
29 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 39 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Commercial Backcountry Recreation 10.6.Small-scale facilities for non-motorized backcountry recreation, including campgrounds, or small backcountry cabins (less than 60 m2), shall be considered consistent with the Resource Management land use designation. These facilities should not be located where they will infringe upon the public enjoyment of key natural features and popular backcountry destinations, such as waterfront locations. 10.7.Backcountry tourism guest staging8 (for motorized commercial recreation) shall be considered consistent with the Resource Management land use designation where 1) no building over 10 m2 is constructed; 2) the staging area is not within 1000 meter of a residence, except a residence on the same parcel; and, 3) the staging area is not located on lands that have been identified as culturally or environmentally sensitive. Commercial recreation operators seeking to establish facilities for motorized commercial recreation may apply for rezoning of the property. 10.8.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the Resource Management land use designation policies, particularly regarding small-scale facilities for non-motorized backcountry recreation and backcountry tourism guest staging for motorized commercial recreation.
Duffey Lake Corridor The Duffy Lake Corridor is a very popular recreation area for local communities, residents of the lower mainland and beyond, and an important resource management area, particularly for forestry and wildlife. The corridor is located in both Electoral Areas B and C of the Regional District. It is approximately 100 kilometres long and runs from Lillooet Lake east of Pemberton, through the Coast Mountain Range, and down the Cayoosh Creek valley to the District of Lillooet. The road elevation varies from several hundred meters at Lillooet Lake to 1300 meters at the summit. The corridor passes through the biogeoclimatic transition zone between the wet coastal climate and the dry interior climate in the lee of the Coast Mountains.
In 1860, James Duffey of the Royal Engineers explored the corridor between Port Pemberton and Cayoosh (as Lillooet was then known) under the orders of Governor James Douglas. Duffey Lake was later named after him. A gold discovery in the Cayoosh Creek canyon in 1897 led to development of the then famous Golden Cache Mine. During the 1960s, logging roads were built from the north and the south to access the area’s timber resources. These logging roads were eventually connected and the route was opened to the public in 1972. In 1990-91 the road was upgraded, paved, and designated Highway 99.
Specific to the Duffy Lake Corridor, the policies of this OCP are intended to:
1. Support a variety of uses within the corridor, including public and commercial recreation, and sustainable resource management for wildlife habitat, timber harvesting and mining (as per the Lillooet and Sea to Sky Land and Resource Management Plans); 2. Ensure that sufficient opportunities exist for non-commercial recreational activities;
8 ‘Backcountry tourism guest staging’ means commercial use of land that is subject to a commercial recreation tenure issued by the Province of British Columbia to congregate paying guests for the purpose of facilitating motorized open land recreation, including but not limited to helicopter accessed recreation, all-terrain vehicle tours, jet boating, and snowmobiling.
30 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 40 of 238 AUGUST 2009
3. To encourage residential, industrial, and commercial development to locate in adjacent communities, except for development directly related to the forestry, mining, and recreation resource base of the corridor; 4. To recognize the scenic values of the corridor; and 5. To support protection of environmentally significant areas, avoidance of habitat loss, and maintenance of biological diversity.
Policies: 10.9.The Duffey Lake Corridor shall be retained in a largely undeveloped state and preserved for backcountry recreation and wildlife habitat. 10.10. If approved though the provincial Crown land tenure process and/or zoning amendment process, small-scale commercial facilities for backcountry recreation or the travelling public shall be constructed in manner that prevents negative visual impacts along Highway 99.
Provincial Agency Communications 10.11. The SLRD encourages collaborative planning and decision making with all provincial ministries and licensees to ensure that operational plans, prescriptions, permits, and tenures contain provisions that will minimize adverse effects of resource use on adjacent communities (e.g. risk of flooding, debris flow, landslide, or erosion on downstream settlement areas, deteriorated water quality in domestic water supplies, deteriorated visual quality, noise pollution, et cetera). 10.12. The Integrated Land Management Bureau is encouraged to dispose of Crown land for residential, commercial, or industrial development only in locations that are consistent with the policies and designations of this plan and the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy. 10.13. The Regional District shall work with provincial ministries to identify and make possible the siting of municipal/regional infrastructure on Crown land to serve community and economic development needs throughout the plan area, where such infrastructure can appropriately co-exist with other resource and environmental values. 10.14. The Ministry of Forests and Range is encouraged to complete an update of the visual quality inventory for the plan area to reflect its very high visual sensitivity and the strong emphasis on retaining wilderness values and promoting tourism. 10.15. The Regional District encourages the Integrated Land Management Bureau to update the draft LRMP to include all areas visible from Highway 99 within Visual Management Zone A, so that it will be managed under provisions of the Forest and Range Practices Act as a known scenic area with established visual quality objectives9.
Hydroelectric Generation and Independent Power Projects 10.16. The Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources is encouraged to carry out a study of the cumulative effects of IPPs in Electoral Area B and develop a sub-regional energy plan.
9 Visual Quality Objective: the degree of acceptable alteration from the characteristic visual landscape, as determined by the Ministry of Forests and Range, which is used as a basis for deciding what forest harvesting and silviculture activities are recommended in an area.
31 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 41 of 238 AUGUST 2009
10.17. The Regional District encourages B.C. Hydro and the British Columbia Transmission Corporation to not permit the construction of transmission lines within significant transmission line free corridors, including the Duffey Lake Corridor, along the Fraser River south of Lillooet, the Bridge River Valley down stream of the Carpenter Reservoir, and the Yalakom Valley. 10.18. The development of small hydroelectric facilities is considered to be consistent with the Resource Management land use designation where they are shown to be compatible with adjacent land uses, technically sound, environmentally responsible, socially responsible, and licensable.
11. AGRICULTURE
Context
The preservation of agricultural land and the promotion of farming are integral to the well-being of Electoral Area B residents, and the region as a whole, by creating food security. Food security can be defined as a situation in which:
1. the community has assured access to adequate and appropriate food; 2. farmers and others working in the food industry are able to earn a living wage by growing, producing, processing, handling, retailing and serving food; and, 3. the quality of land, air, and water are maintained and enhanced for future generations.
Those lands with agricultural potential within Electoral Area B are primarily located on the benches above the Fraser River and in the neighbourhoods of Texas Creek, Fountain, Pavilion Lake, West Pavilion, and the Yalakom Valley. The majority of these lands, with the exception of the Yalakom Valley, are designated as Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). ALR lands are regulated by the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). The mandate of the ALC is to preserve agricultural land and encourage the establishment and maintenance of farms. In general, lands within Electoral Area B that are designated as Agriculture in this OCP coincide with ALR lands.
Ranching, haying, and gardening are the primary agricultural activities within Electoral Area B. Ginseng and hops are grown is some areas, and trials are underway in the Lillooet area to assess the feasibility of the region for growing wine grapes. Agritourism is largely undeveloped in Electoral Area B.
Objectives
To contribute to local and regional food security. To preserve the agricultural land base in the plan area. To encourage diversification and economic sustainability of the farming community. To minimize the impacts from non-agricultural development occurring at the edge of farming areas and within agricultural lands. To balance the interests of agriculture and protection of the environment.
Policies
Agricultural Land Base (Land Use) 11.1.Lands designated for agricultural use are indicated on Maps 5 and 6 as Agriculture. These lands shall be managed to retain their agricultural potential. Permitted uses are defined by the Agricultural Land Commission, including agriculture, farm retail sales, agritourism, sand and gravel extraction, residential, small hydroelectric facilities, and auxiliary uses related to these activities.
32 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 42 of 238 AUGUST 2009
11.2.Non-farm residential, recreational, institutional, industrial, commercial uses, utility facilities, and urban developments are encouraged to occur in locations that will not impact the viability of farm land. 11.3.Subdivision and exclusion of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve is discouraged. 11.4.The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the Agriculture land use designation policies, particularly regarding minimum parcel area. 11.5.Paved and unpaved helipads and airstrips are discouraged on agricultural lands. 11.6.In order to limit the fragmentation of multi-parcel farm operations by the sale of individual parcels, the SLRD will work collaboratively with farm property owners and their agents, and the Agricultural Land Commission on a case by case basis to reconcile potentially conflicting interests. 11.7.The owners of agricultural lands are encouraged to facilitate the use of the land for agriculture by actively farming or leasing or loaning their lands to persons that would undertake active farming. 11.8.Non-farm uses on agricultural land, or non-soil dependent farm operations, are encouraged to locate in areas of poorer soils.
Economic Sustainability 11.9.The Regional District encourages economic diversification initiatives accessory to and compatible with farming that add value to locally produced farm products by: a) Supporting the development of farm outlets for the sale of local agricultural products; b) Permitting roadside stands for farm gate sales of agricultural products; c) Permitting bed and breakfasts in agricultural areas and guest houses/small scale agritourism operations that feature farm vacations and farming related activities; and, d) Support home occupations that produce value added products from locally produced agricultural products. 11.10. Agritourism accommodation to a maximum of 10 sleeping units per farm operation will be considered to be consistent with the Agriculture land use designation. Applications for agritourism accommodation will be considered on a site specific rezoning basis.
Agriculture Interface 11.11. Normal farm practices with possible undesirable side effects, such as odours, machinery and animal noises, and blowing dust, are to be expected in an agricultural area. In the case of conflict between a farm operation carrying on normal farm practices and adjacent non-farm development, the agricultural interest will be supported. 11.12. Future development activities in the plan area shall result in minimal creation of new residential- agriculture interfaces. Development and subdivisions at the residential - farm land interface shall be planned and mitigated as follows: a) no road endings shall abut the ALR boundary, b) the ALR – residential boundary shall be fenced and buffered as per the Agricultural Land Commission’s Landscaped Buffer Specifications, and, c) Building setbacks and other mitigations will be considered as per the Ministry of Agriculture and Land’s Guide to Edge Planning.
33 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 43 of 238 AUGUST 2009
11.13. Agricultural Impact Assessments should be considered to measure the impacts of a proposed major rezoning, subdivision, or non-farm use on the ALR or farmed lands. Mitigation should be required for identified impacts.
Housing 11.14. As per the Agricultural Land Commission Act and regulations, additional dwellings are permitted where necessary for farm use, provided: a) The property has farm classification under the Assessment Act; and, b) Supportive comments from the Regional Agrologist with the Ministry of Agriculture have been received.
Environmental Protection 11.15. Farm operations that sustain both farming and wildlife, protect against soil erosion and degradation, and maintain water quality and hydrological functions are supported. 11.16. Farmers are encouraged to prepare Environmental Farm Plans.10 11.17. To promote the long term sustainability of agricultural production, ecosystem integrity, and human health, land use decision making shall apply the precautionary principle: When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically, and in this context, the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof.
12. COMMERCIAL AND RESORT COMMERCIAL
Context
The District of Lillooet is the primary commercial centre servicing Electoral Area B residents. Seton Portage provides a second, smaller commercial centre to serve residents in the western part of the electoral area. In the vicinity of Pavilion Lake, the Ts’ay’laxw Nation has plans to reconstruct a commercial node at the old store site near the foot of the Clinton-Pavilion Road. The Ts’ay’laxw Nation is also redeveloping the Sky Blue Water Resort on Pavilion Lake. Small home-based businesses and resource-based industries are situated throughout the electoral area.
There is one community within Electoral Area B that has lands designated as Commercial, and that is Seton Portage. Community specific policies addressing the Commercial land use designation are contained in the Seton Portage Sub-area Plan.
10 Environmental Farm Plans are assessments voluntarily prepared by farm families to increase their environmental awareness in a variety of different areas on their farm. Farmers highlight their operation's environmental strengths, identify areas of environmental concern, and set realistic action plans with time tables to improve environmental conditions. Provincial funding may be available.
34 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 44 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Pavilion Lake is the only community within Electoral Area B that has lands designated as Resort Commercial. Policies addressing the Resort Commercial land use designation, and more specifically the Sky Blue Water Resort, are contained in the Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan.
The 2008 District of Lillooet OCP identifies lands on the southwest boundary of the District, within Electoral Area B and also within the boundaries of an IR, as Special Area # 5. While local governments do not have land use planning authority within IRs, the District of Lillooet OCP recognizes these lands for their potential as a commercial node or resort opportunity. Special Area #5 is located at the gateway to Lillooet and ‘offers prime development opportunities associated with the attractive natural setting and the highway corridor.’
Requests for additional Commercial or Resort Commercial designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.
Objectives
To support the District of Lillooet as the commercial centre for the plan area. To create a viable village center in Seton Portage that serves as a focal point for residents and tourists. To support home-based businesses.
Policies
12.1.Lands designated for commercial development are indicated on Maps 6 - 8 as Commercial or Resort Commercial. 12.2.Permitted uses on Commercial lands are restaurants, retail stores, tourist accommodation, offices, clinics, and other personal service businesses compatible with adjacent land uses, as well as auxiliary uses related to the above. 12.3.First Nations economic development initiatives that reflect the community’s values are supported, including the following proposed commercial nodes (both located within IRs): a) the old store site near the foot of the Clinton-Pavilion Road (Pavilion IR), b) lands on the southwest boundary of the District (Lillooet IR). 12.4.Where local First Nations and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs propose to develop commercial nodes, the Regional District encourages public consultation, retaining a vegetated buffer along Highway 99, and adherence to applicable Smart Growth principles (mixed-use neighbourhoods and other initiatives to support the use of public transit). 12.5.A high standard of energy efficiency for all new commercial construction or renovations is encouraged: a) Consideration shall be given to incorporating energy efficiency objectives into zoning amendment bylaws; b) Density bonusing may be considered where alternative energy systems or other innovative sustainability initiatives are proposed.
13. INDUSTRIAL
35 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 45 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Context
Within Electoral Area B there are no lands designated as Industrial. Existing industrial-type operations are conducted as home industries or are resource-based and permitted under the Resource Management designation. Requests for additional Industrial designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.
Objectives
To support the District of Lillooet as the industrial centre for the plan area. To provide a process for accommodating future industrial land use where appropriate, and to promote the wise use of industrial lands.
Policies
13.1.The Regional District encourages industrial uses to locate within the District of Lillooet. 13.2.Rezoning to Industrial may be considered where there is a clear benefit to the community, the land is separated from residential uses, and the activities will not negatively impact the community. 13.3.Applications for industrial development shall be accompanied by a proposal and concept plan addressing such matters as water usage, environmental protection, landscaping, buffering, access, servicing, reclamation, and any other matters deemed necessary by the Regional District.
14. INSTITUTIONAL
Context
Within Electoral Area B, there is one parcel of land in Seton Portage designated as Institutional. This parcel is the site of the community’s fire hall. Other institutional land uses (schools, clinics, ambulance stations, et cetera) are located within the District of Lillooet or on IRs. Requests for additional Institutional designated lands were not received as part of the OCP process.
Objectives
To support the development of lands for institutional use where appropriate. To promote the health and safety of residents and visitors by encouraging the improvement of medical services and fire and police protection. To foster cooperation among all agencies involved in planning for community services.
Policies
14.1.The Regional District recognizes the statutory responsibilities of federal and provincial government agencies and will work with these agencies to facilitate the provision of services, including health care, policing, emergency services, and road maintenance. 14.2.In support of the goals of achieving carbon neutral local government operations by 2020, a high standard of energy efficiency for all new institutional buildings or renovations is encouraged.
15. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA
36 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 46 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Context
Under the Forests and Range Practices Act, the Ministry of Environment may authorize the designation of an area of land as a community watershed. The watershed designation allows for the establishment of water quality objectives and additional regulation of forest practices to prevent long-term changes to background water quality, quantity, and timing of flow. Within Electoral Area B, there are three provincially recognized community watersheds: one west of Lillooet, one in the Fountain Valley, and a small watershed near Seton Portage. These watersheds are designated as Community Watershed Protection Areas in the OCP.
Outside of the provincially recognized community watersheds, two other areas have been identified as good candidates for protection under the Forests and Range Practices Act. These areas include the larger watershed surrounding the community of Seton Portage and the drainage area for Pavilion Lake. Although they are not provincially recognized, these watersheds are also designated as Community Watershed Protection Areas in the OCP.
Objectives
To recognize the importance of water resources and protect and improve the quality and quantity of those resources for future generations. To ensure development activities within Electoral Area B support the protection of community watersheds.
Policies
15.1.The Community Watershed Protection Areas, as indicated on Maps 5 to 9, are those areas where the primary land management priority is to maintain local water quality. 15.2.Permitted uses within Community Watershed Protection Areas are appropriately managed resource extraction, dispersed outdoor recreation, and auxiliary uses related to these activities. 15.3.Intensive recreation, subdivision, and rezoning of lands within Community Watershed Protection Areas shall be discouraged. Recreationalists are encouraged to minimize stream crossings and stay on existing trails to prevent erosion. 15.4.The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range to ensure that forest practices within community watersheds are conducted in accordance with the applicable regulations. 15.5.Community groups or individuals are encouraged to apply for formal protection of those Community Watershed Protection Areas that are not recognized under the Forests and Range Practices Act.
16. PARK
Context
The Regional District’s park function consists of taking ownership of land through the park dedication process at the time of subdivision or collecting funds in-lieu. No regional parks have yet been established. Electoral Area B residents access park facilities within the District of Lillooet or amenities provided by the province through the provincial parks system, forest recreation sites administered by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts, and private and Crown lands. Provincial parks include Duffey Lake Park, Marble Canyon Park, Edge Hills, and the Seton Portage Historic Park. The draft Lillooet LRMP proposes
37 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 47 of 238 AUGUST 2009 a 2,300 hectare extension to the Marble Canyon Park and potentially new parks at, Cerise Creek, Fred and Antoine Creeks, and the Yalakom Creek – Nile Mile Ridge.
Electoral Area B is home to an extensive network of trails and recreation sites (see Map 10). Many of these features are well used by locals and visitors, but are not officially recognized by provincial ministries or licensees.
As part of the OCP process, no requests were received for the SLRD to establish a regional park or a recreation or commuter trail network. Funding for these types of services would be generated through an additional property tax funded service area.
Objective
To satisfy the recreation needs of residents and visitors by ensuring that land is provided for community parks and recreation areas and by encouraging effective management.
Policies
16.1.Lands designated for recreation use and environmental conservation are indicated on Maps 5 - 8 as Park. 16.2.Where park dedication is required at the time of subdivision, the dedication of land shall be pursued where possible, rather than cash-in-lieu. 16.3.Future subdivision of waterfront properties shall favor the public use of the waterfront to the greatest extent possible through the provision of open space. 16.4.Where possible, parks shall be planned, designed, and maintained to provide for fire protection and mitigation. 16.5.The Regional District encourages the responsible provincial agencies to effectively maintain Park land under their jurisdiction. 16.6.The Regional District encourages the responsible provincial agencies to improve information and interpretive signage emphasizing recreational opportunities. 16.7.The Regional District supports the development of a joint comprehensive trails strategy for Electoral Area B and the District of Lillooet.
38 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 48 of 238 AUGUST 2009
PAVILION LAKE SUB-AREA PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ...... 40
GUIDING PRINCIPLES ...... 40 COMMUNITY POLICIES ...... 41
1. GENERAL ...... 41 2. PUBLIC ACCESS ...... 41 3. IMPLEMENTATION ...... 42 LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES ...... 42
4. RESIDENTIAL ...... 42 5. RESORT COMMERCIAL ...... 43 6. AGRICULTURE ...... 43 7. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA ...... 44 8. PARK ...... 44
39 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 49 of 238 AUGUST 2009
INTRODUCTION
Pavilion Lake is a physical feature, a geographic location, a human settlement, a cultural landscape, and a spiritual homeland. It attracts swimmers, divers, boaters, fishing enthusiasts, and naturalists, and supports unique ecological features, such as some of the world’s largest freshwater microbiolites (coral-like sedimentary structures formed by algal mat organisms). The lake is also licensed as a water supply for the Diamond S Ranch, a historically significant agricultural operation that covers hundreds of acres near the northern boundary of the plan area. Steep limestone walls and forested hillsides surrounding Pavilion Lake create an impressive canyon that provides outstanding rock and ice climbing opportunities, a natural canvas for remarkable displays of sunlight and shadows, and a sense of calm seclusion.
The plan area (see Map 6) falls within the traditional territory of the Ts’kw’aylaxw people, who are part of the Secwepemc (Shuswap) and St'át'imc (Interior Salish) Nations. The Ts’kw’aylaxw own and operate the Sky Blue Water Resort, a collection of rustic lakefront cabins and facilities for recreational tourists. They also own and have plans to redevelop the site of the former Pavilion General store, which falls outside the plan area, but will serve local residents and visitors.
Pavilion’s history of non-indigenous uses began when roads and railway lines linking the BC interior plateau to the Fraser Canyon and the coast were built through the area. These transportation corridors engendered roadhouses, early settlement, and some of BC’s first large ranches. Today, Pavilion Lake is home to a small community of year-round residents, and is a destination for many more seasonal residents, tourists, and recreational visitors. Two areas of settlement along the northern shore of the lake are best described as small-lot residential subdivisions with permanent and semi-permanent dwellings.
Existing and proposed parks cover most of the plan area. In April 2001 local ecological, recreational, and cultural attributes were officially recognised and protected through the addition of Pavilion Lake to Marble Canyon Provincial Park. The draft Lillooet Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) anticipates further expansion of the park boundaries. Communication and cooperation between the SLRD and the Ministry of Environment is thus a key element in any land use decisions for Pavilion Lake.
The community of Pavilion Lake is not large, nor is it experiencing notable growth. The prospect of significant development pressure within the plan area is remote. To reflect the local context, this sub-area plan covers a small geographic area, it addresses a limited range of local issues, it is restricted in its scope to a short list of basic planning principles, land use designations, and policies, and it has a simple goal:
‘To preserve the natural and scenic characteristics of Pavilion Lake, and respect the quiet, rural lifestyle enjoyed by the community of permanent and seasonal residents who live in the area.’
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Any future development in the plan area must be incremental, carefully considered, and only permitted to the extent that it reflects and supports the principles of this plan. These principles include:
a. Pavilion Lake is part of the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation traditional territory. It’s spiritual and cultural significance to local indigenous people must be respected. b. The ecological integrity of Pavilion Lake is a key community priority. c. The quality and quantity of the local water supply must be protected. d. Existing water tenures must be recognized, respected, and preserved.
40 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 50 of 238 AUGUST 2009
e. Public access to Pavilion Lake should be managed to allow for recreational use by locals and visitors while minimising conflicts with adjacent landowners. f. Community planning will respect and support Ministry of Environment management directions for the Marble Canyon Provincial Park.
The remainder of the plan is divided into two sections: community policies and land use designation policies.
COMMUNITY POLICIES
1. GENERAL
Policies
1.1. The Regional District will work with landowners to identify local land use issues and develop practical strategies to address these issues. 1.2. The Regional District will consider the adoption of a new zoning bylaw for Pavilion Lake that complements the policies of this Official Community Plan and is more specific to the local context than the existing zoning (SLRD Bylaw 670). 1.3. The Regional District will communicate with the Ministry of Environment to ensure that local government land use decisions are consistent with park management objectives. 1.4. The Regional District supports the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation’s plans to redevelop a commercial node at District Lot DL 89 (Although District Lot 89 falls outside the sub-plan area, proposed facilities are expected to meet future demands for neighbourhood commercial services.) 1.5. Industrial development is not considered appropriate within the plan area. Proponents of industrial activity will be encouraged to seek alternative locations. 1.6. In conjunction with the community and provincial agencies, the Regional District supports the development of a recreation management plan for Pavilion Lake, addressing motorized recreation, public access, dock construction, campgrounds, water quality, and wildlife habitat.
2. PUBLIC ACCESS
The areas identified on Map 6 as ‘public access’ are existing public rights-of-way that enable visitors and locals to reach the lake without crossing private land. These areas encourage equal access to all public access points in order to reduce the potential impacts of intensive use.
Policies
2.1. All existing public road rights of way should be equally accessible and available for use by residents and visitors, assuming site specific approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. 2.2. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, and local residents to provide appropriate signage and maintenance of ‘public access’ areas.
41 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 51 of 238 AUGUST 2009
3. IMPLEMENTATION
Policies
3.1. To ensure consistency with the goal and principles of the sub-area plan, the following implementation measures are adopted: a. The Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan will be distributed to local First Nations and provincial agencies for reference. b. The Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan will be available to property owners and local residents for reference. c. If requested by the Ministry of Environment, the Regional District will participate actively in Park Management discussions. d. The Regional District will consider amending Zoning Bylaw 670 to more accurately reflect the land use priorities of the Pavilion Lake community. e. Community Plan amendments will be considered in consultation with local residents and property owners, the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation, and provincial agencies. f. The SLRD will review the Pavilion Lake Sub-area Plan within five years of adoption.
LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES
This section describes the five land use designations within the plan area. The boundaries of these land use designations are outlined on Map 6.
4. RESIDENTIAL
The Residential designation applies to fee simple lands surrounding the lake, including settled small-lot subdivisions and larger undeveloped parcels. The goal of the Residential designation is to accommodate development of a form, density, and location that meets future housing needs without compromising the rural character of the existing community.
Policies
4.1. The creation of additional waterfront parcels for residential use on Pavilion Lake is not supported. 4.2. The zoning bylaw shall be reviewed by the Regional District to ensure consistency with the OCP regarding policies within the Residential land use designation, particularly regarding minimum parcel size and land use on Pavilion Lake.
42 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 52 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Number of Dwellings 4.3. The Regional District strongly discourages any further development of multiple dwellings on individual parcels; this type of development contravenes existing zoning, presents health and ecological concerns, and is not supported by the community. 4.4. The Regional District will work with local residents to achieve compliance with land use regulations regarding the number of dwellings on individual parcels. 4.5. The Regional District encourages owners of parcels with multiple dwelling units to consult with Interior Health to address local sewage disposal concerns. 4.6. Any future zoning changes should not allow more than 1 dwelling unit to be located on parcels that are smaller than 1 hectare. 4.7. Any future zoning changes should not allow more than 2 dwelling units to be located on parcels that are larger than 1 hectare.
5. RESORT COMMERCIAL
The Resort Commercial designation applies to Sky Blue Water Resort. This designation supports the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation’s continued ownership and operation of the resort, including potential future development to accommodate demand for recreational use and lake access.
Policies
5.1. New development at the Sky Blue Water Resort should be designed to reflect the principles contained within this plan, and the creation of these designs should involve the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to ensure that proper traffic management plans and studies are in place. 5.2. Development that facilitates increased use of the Resort should adopt best practices for sewage treatment to minimize potential impacts on the lake ecology.
6. AGRICULTURE
All lands designated as Agriculture coincide with the boundaries of the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). This designation includes two tracts of land on the northeast side of Pavilion Lake. Land within the ALR is regulated by the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). The purpose of the ALC is first and foremost to preserve agricultural land in the province and encourage the establishment and maintenance of farms. Provisions of the Agricultural Land Commission Act take precedence over local government land use bylaws.
Policies
6.1. Land designated Agriculture is intended for agricultural uses. Agricultural uses include the growing, rearing, producing, and harvesting of agricultural products, the sale of agricultural products, agritourism activities, as well as greenhouses and nursery uses. 6.2. All uses and subdivision of land within the Agricultural Land Reserve shall be in accordance with the Agricultural Land Commission Act.
43 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 53 of 238 AUGUST 2009
6.3. To promote the sustainability of the agricultural community, exclusions from the Agricultural Land Reserve and further subdivision of lots within the Agricultural Land Reserve are generally not supported. 6.4. To protect the water quality of Pavilion Lake, agricultural practices should be compliant with provincial and federal acts and regulations.
7. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA
The Community Watershed Protection Area designation covers the rocky and forested slopes that rise to the northeast and southwest sides of the lake, to the height of land that forms the plan area boundary. This is intended to reflect the local importance of a safe drinking water supply by discouraging activities that could lead to the contamination of streams or groundwater. This watershed is not formally recognized under the Forests and Range Practices Act.
Policies
7.1. Land in the Community Watershed Protection Area designation should remain undeveloped. 7.2. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range to limit activities within this designated in order to protect scenic values, recreational potential, and water quality.
8. PARK
This designation applies to the Pavilion Lake addition to Marble Canyon Provincial Park. It is intended to support BC Parks in managing the sensitive environment and special features as described in the park’s Management Direction Statement.
Policies
8.1. The Regional District will cooperate with the Ministry of Environment to ensure that land uses adjacent to the park are consistent with park management objectives. 8.2. Public recreational use of Pavilion Lake should be managed to ensure that the ecological features and water quality of the lake are protected.
44 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 54 of 238 AUGUST 2009
SETON PORTAGE SUB-AREA PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ...... 46
PLAN AREA BOUNDARY ...... 46 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ...... 47 GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES ...... 47
1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER ...... 47 2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ...... 48 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES ...... 48 4. INFRASTRUCTURE ...... 49 5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ...... 49 LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES ...... 50
6. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL ...... 50 7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ...... 50 8. COMMERCIAL ...... 51 9. INDUSTRIAL ...... 51 10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA ...... 51 11. PARK ...... 52
45 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 55 of 238 AUGUST 2009
INTRODUCTION
Seton Portage is a small community of approximately 150 residents situated between Anderson and Seton Lakes. Adjacent to Seton Portage, on the northwest shore of Seton Lake, is the Shalalth Indian Reserve, home to more than 500 members of the Seton Lake Band. There are also a number of small settlements, lake-accessed properties, and agricultural operations, such as Ponderosa Ranch, bordering either side of Anderson and Seton Lakes. These are remote communities, accessible via D’Arcy and the Douglas Trail (Highline Road), or via Lillooet and the Mission Mountain Road and Highway 40.
The plan area is situated in the biogeoclimatic transition zone between the moist Coast Mountain environment and the drier climate of the Interior Plateau. The area is surrounded by steep mountain valleys. The land mass that is now the community of Seton Portage was formed some time between 8,000 and 20,000 years ago when a landslide came down from the surrounding peaks to create a blockage in what was once a single lake.
Within the plan area, there is evidence of human habitation dating back nearly 7000 years. The region was originally settled by the St'át'imc Nation, attracted by the mild climate and abundant fish and game. In the mid-1800s, spurred by both the Klondike and Cariboo gold rushes, Seton Portage functioned as a major transportation hub. Miners traveled along the historic Douglas Trail route, following Harrison, Lillooet and Anderson Lakes to Seton Portage, then on to Lillooet.
In the early part of the 20th Century, the area provided a transport linkage to the gold claims in Bralorne and Gold Bridge using the Mission Mountain route. At the same time, the Pacific Great Eastern Railway was constructed from D’Arcy to Lillooet, providing a new link between Seton Portage and the Lower Mainland. The next significant development for Seton Portage occurred with the construction of the Mission Mountain hydro-electric generation project in the 1950s. The Bridge River was dammed, creating the Carpenter Reservoir. Water from the reservoir was diverted into penstocks constructed under Mission Mountain, and finally released into Seton Lake after powering a series of large turbines.
Today, Seton Portage and the Anderson/Seton Lake area is still home to the Seton Lake Band, centred around the Shalalth community. A number of these people are still involved in traditional hunting, fishing, and trapping practices, serving as important reminders of the subsistence lifestyle that once dominated the region. Both the native and non-native population of the area is comprised of retirees, seasonal residents, and those employed in the tourism, agriculture, forestry, rail, and hydro sectors.
PLAN AREA BOUNDARY
The boundary for the Seton Portage Sub-Area Plan comprises a significant portion of SLRD Electoral Area B (See Maps 7 and 8). It includes the community of Seton Portage, the surrounding watershed, and most of the rural residential properties along Anderson and Seton Lakes. The plan area is bordered to the southwest by the Electoral Area C boundary near the southern tip of Anderson Lake, to the south by the height of watersheds that drain into Anderson and Seton Lakes, to the east by the extent of rural residential properties on Seton Lake and to the north by the Electoral Area A boundary.
The OCP was originally intended to focus on the community of Seton Portage, however many of the residents with fee simple and crown lease properties on Anderson and Seton Lakes expressed a desire to be included in the plan, as they share many similar land use concerns.
46 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 56 of 238 AUGUST 2009
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The community of Seton Portage is not developing rapidly, nor is it expected to see significant development in the near future. Therefore the goal of the Seton Portage Sub-area Plan is:
‘To maintain the quiet, rural residential lifestyle of the Seton Portage, Shalalth, Anderson Lake, and Seton Lake communities, while providing for some low-impact development.’
The community of Seton Portage, property owners on Anderson and Seton Lakes, and the Regional Board are generally supportive of the following as common objectives to guide future development on both private and public land within the plan area:
a. To respect the spiritual and cultural significance of the traditional territory of the Seton Lake Band, which comprises a significant portion of the plan area. This includes following, as closely as possible, the recommendations put forward in the St’at’imc Draft Land Use Plan. b. To improve communications between the aboriginal and non-aboriginal communities in the plan area and between both of these groups and the Squamish Lillooet Regional District. c. To maintain legal, viable road access to the communities via the Highline Road/ Douglas Trail, Mission Mountain Road, and Highway 40. d. To secure public boat access to Anderson Lake at Seton Portage. e. To work with the Ministry of Forests and Range and BC Hydro to protect the area from the threat of wildfire, particularly in the urban/wildfire interface zone. f. To create and maintain a Bear Smart waste management system for the Seton Portage community. g. To work towards establishing an emergency response plan for the entire plan area, as part of the SLRD’s emergency plan. h. To promote the protection of ecological integrity throughout the plan area. i. To ensure the economic viability of the Seton Portage community. j. To maintain existing opportunities for additional rural residential development.
GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES
1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER
Policies
1.1. The Regional District will work with landowners to identify local land use issues and develop practical strategies to address these issues. 1.2. The Regional District supports preservation initiatives for cultural and historical assets within the plan area. This includes potential heritage designations or an acknowledgement that certain areas need to remain undisclosed in order to maintain their preservation.
47 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 57 of 238 AUGUST 2009
1.3. The Regional District does not support the sale of vacant crown land for residential development within the plan area. 1.4. Any growth and development on private land within the community of Seton Portage should adhere to the principles of Smart Growth, specifically: a. Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities; and, b. Protect and preserve green space and sensitive areas. 1.5. Commercial and residential development that involves increased use of lakefront properties on either Anderson or Seton Lakes should adopt best practices for sewage treatment to minimize potential impacts on the ecology of the lakes. 1.6. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Forests and Range to improve communication and education on forest fire hazards, particularly with respect to signage, the level of fire danger, and the appropriate periods for campfires. 1.7. Although the provincial Agricultural Land Reserve designation was removed from land around Seton Portage in 1986, the Regional District continues to support agricultural activities in this area. Agricultural uses include the growing, rearing, producing, and harvesting of agricultural products, the sale of agricultural products, agritourism activities, nurseries, and the use of greenhouses.
2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Policies
2.1. The Regional District supports the return of passenger rail service to the communities of D’Arcy, Seton Portage, and Lillooet. 2.2. The Regional District will assist the community in attempting to secure the development of legal water access in the form of a beach, mooring, dock, and boat ramp on Anderson Lake close to Seton Portage. Water access onto Seton Lake is also a project supported by the Regional District. 2.3. In order to promote economic diversification and the development of the tourism industry, the Regional District will support the development of a strategy and infrastructure that will encourage low impact tourism activities that reflect the values of this plan. 2.4. The Regional District supports the development of home-based businesses and home-based industries that are self-contained, as a means to further promote economic diversity in the Seton Portage community. 2.5. The Regional District supports measures taken to ensure the sustainability and vitality of the economy in Seton Portage, as long as they do not create a negative aesthetic impact on the community.
3. COMMUNITY SERVICES
Policies
3.1. The Regional District will try to work with Chief and council of the Seton Lake Band and the community of Seton Portage to create a more effective communication link between the residents of the Seton Portage/ Shalalth area and the SLRD. The creation of a Local Community
48 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 58 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Commission, as provided for in Section 838 of the Local Government Act, is a possible means to secure this link. 3.2. The Regional District will work with the community to establish more effective waste diversion mechanisms, including the potential provision of a recycling depot and by making household composters available to the community for purchase at a subsidized rate. 3.3. The Regional District will work with the Seton Fire Department to create some form of emergency planning for the plan area. This will follow the implementation of a 9-1-1 service across Electoral Areas A & B, and will likely be put forward in conjunction with the creation of an SLRD-wide Emergency Response Plan. 3.4. The Regional District will collaborate with School District #74 and local families to ensure the long-term viability of the existing Sk’il Mountain School. 3.5. If the opportunity presents itself, the Regional District will look to form new parks or create facilities within existing parks to provide for recreational amenities within the community of Seton Portage.
4. INFRASTRUCTURE
These policies apply to all existing access roads (Highline Road/ Douglas Trail, Mission Mountain Road), transmission lines, and trail corridors.
Policies
4.1. The Regional District will support community efforts to provide secure, year-round access to the community of Seton Portage via the Highline Road/Douglas Trail and the Mission Mountain Rd. 4.2. The Regional District will support lobbying of the Ministry of Forests and Range and the Ministry of Transportation to make certain that they follow their legislated obligations for maintenance of access roads. 4.3. The Regional District will support requests to the BC Transmission Corporation to follow through with its obligations to reduce the fire hazard under power lines by eliminating slash and debris piles. 4.4. The Regional District will support requests to the BC Transmission Corporation to ensure that power lines are not being used beyond their capacity and causing a potential hazard with excessive sagging. 4.5. The communities within the plan area support an extension of the proposed Sea to Sky Trail from Horseshoe Bay to D’Arcy through to Seton Portage and on to Lillooet. The route will provide recreational access through the area, following existing roadways and potential crown land trail easements. 4.6. The Regional District supports the provision of high-speed internet access to the community of Seton Portage.
5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
To ensure consistency with the goal and principles of the OCP, the following implementation measures are adopted:
49 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 59 of 238 AUGUST 2009
5.1. The Seton Portage Sub-area Plan will be distributed to local First Nations and provincial agencies for reference, and will be made available to property owners and local residents. 5.2. Plan amendments will be considered in consultation with local residents and property owners, the Seton Lake Band, and provincial agencies.
LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES
This section describes the five land use designations within the plan area. The boundaries of these land use designations are outlined on Maps 7 and 8.
6. RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL
Policies
6.1. Future development must be of a form, density, and location that meets future housing needs without compromising the rural character of the existing community. 6.2. Residential development will be discouraged in the urban/wildfire interface zone, or within areas that could be threatened in the event of significant forest fire activity. 6.3. The Regional District encourages owners of water-access lots on Anderson Lake to make legal arrangements for storage of cars and boat trailers in D’Arcy. 6.4. Subdivisions to create lots accessible by water only are discouraged. 6.5. Minimum residential lot sizes are applicable only to the extent that site specific environmental factors allow for, including slope and natural features, access to the site, and the ability to service a parcel with water and sewer.
Residential 6.6. The minimum lot size permitted for a newly created parcel on lands designated as Residential shall be 0.8 hectares. 6.7. Subdivision to create a distinct village core through parcels smaller than 0.8 hectares may be considered as part of a comprehensive planning/rezoning process.
Rural Residential 6.8. The minimum lot size permitted for a newly created parcel on lands designated as Rural Residential shall be 8 hectares.
7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Policies
7.1. All crown land within the OCP area that is not an Indian Reserve or within the Community Watershed Protection Area designation, is designated Resource Management.
50 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 60 of 238 AUGUST 2009
7.2. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Forests and Range to address the issue of increasing fuel load and fire hazard on Crown Land. 7.3. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Forests and Range and the community of Seton Portage to address flood control and debris flow issues arising from the Whitecap Creek Fire of 2004 and any future significant forest fire activities.
8. COMMERCIAL
Policies
8.1. To contribute to the community’s economic vitality, additional development on Commercial designated parcels is supported.
9. INDUSTRIAL
Policies
9.1. There are no industrial designations within the Seton Portage and Anderson/Seton Lakes OCP. However, should an industrial development proposal come forward, it will be dealt with through a site specific rezoning process, including a public hearing.
10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA
This designation pertains to crown land within the drainage of watersheds that are known sources of drinking water within the plan area. This watershed is not officially recognized under the under the Forests and Range Practices Act.
Policies
10.1. Land in this designation should remain undeveloped. 10.2. The Regional District will work with the Ministry of Environment to establish provincial watershed protection designations for the areas designated Community Watershed Protection Area in this plan. 10.3. Activities that could lead to the contamination of streams or ground water and ultimately lead to an unsafe drinking water supply are discouraged. 10.4. Commercial motorized recreation tenures should not be issued in areas under this designation. 10.5. Independent Power Projects are not supported within this designation. 10.6. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Forests and Range and the Ministry of Energy, and Mines, and Petroleum Resources to limit activities in the area designated as Community Watershed Protection Area so that scenic values, recreational potential, and water quality are protected.
51 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 61 of 238 AUGUST 2009
11. PARK
Seton Portage Historic Provincial Park is located on the south side of the Seton River, on the main road through the community. The park was established on March 29, 1972 by the British Columbia Railway. The park commemorates the first stretch of railway constructed in the province. In 1861, three miles of railway track were constructed to transport miners and their provisions between Anderson and Seton Lakes. A continuation of the railway line to Lillooet was completed in 1915.
Policies
11.1. The Regional District will cooperate with BC Rail to ensure that land uses adjacent to the park are consistent with park management objectives.
52 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 62 of 238 AUGUST 2009
YALAKOM VALLEY SUB-AREA PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ...... 54
GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES ...... 54
1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER ...... 54 2. BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY ...... 55 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES,INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TRANSPORTATION ...... 56 4. EMERGENCY SERVICES ...... 57 5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ...... 57 6. RECREATION,TOURISM, AND ACCESS ...... 58 LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES ...... 59
7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ...... 59 8. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ...... 60 9. AGRICULTURE ...... 60 10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREAS ...... 61 11. PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS ...... 61
53 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 63 of 238 AUGUST 2009
INTRODUCTION
The Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, located approximately thirty kilometres northwest of Lillooet on Highway 40, are the geographical area to which the Yalakom Valley Sub-area Plan applies (see Map 9). The plan area consists of approximately 75,000 hectares of land. The elevational range is 400 metres to nearly 3000 metres. The topography consists of highly incised, steep valleys in the southern portion of the area, with benchlands along the lower Yalakom River and Bridge River. The northern Yalakom Watershed has gentler terrain and long ridges in transition to the Fraser Plateau. The geology is highly variable and complex. Nearly 25 per cent of the area is alpine.
Similar to other communities in the northern half of Electoral Area B, the climate in the Yalakom Valley is very dry throughout the year due to the rainshadow effect of the Coast Range. The valley exhibits some of the hottest, driest ecosystem types in British Columbia along the low elevation benches. Over the last thirty-five years, residents have noticed changes in local climate with more variable conditions, including timing of seasons, temperature, and precipitation. Residents report that the danger from wildfire has increased dramatically.
GENERAL PLAN AREA POLICIES
1. COMMUNITY GROWTH AND CHARACTER
The Yalakom community is a diverse group of families making up the latest wave of settlement, which has been ongoing since 1897. The community has maintained a steady population of approximately seventy permanent residents. Settlement has affected only a small part of the Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, mostly on the benchlands along the rivers in the southern part of the watersheds. Through the OCP planning process residents expressed their feelings of connectedness to the land and commitment to protecting the wilderness values that make their community uniquely spectacular. Homesteads have developed using principles of sustainability and self-reliance. Families grow large gardens and produce a significant percentage of organic food locally.
Policies
1.1. The present character of the community, a small, rural community living at the edge of wilderness, should be maintained. 1.2. The pattern of slow community growth should be maintained. 1.3. The healthy, caring social relations among all community members and the good relations with surrounding communities should continue to be emphasized. 1.4. The plan area shall be considered a ‘Dark Night Sky Zone’, and those activities that contribute light pollution are discouraged in order to maintain ideal conditions for local and visiting astronomers. 1.5. Honouring and accommodating aboriginal title, rights and traditional uses, while ensuring community values and privacy is respected, is encouraged.
54 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 64 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Cultural Heritage 1.6. Studies to assess and locate cultural and historical sites and features in the plan area are supported. 1.7. Preservation initiatives for cultural or historical sites and features in the plan area are supported.
2. BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY
The biodiversity of Yalakom Valley is considered high in relation to the wider bioregion. Biodiversity is defined by the Yalakom community as the diversity of ecosystem types, plants, animals, and other organisms that live in an area, and the evolutionary and functional processes that link all of them, allowing them to adapt to biophysical and ecological conditions over time.
The Yalakom community is supportive of Ecosystem-Based Conservation Planning (EBCP). EBCP is a method of ecosystem protection, maintenance, restoration and human use that as the first priority maintains and restores natural ecological integrity, including biological diversity, across the full range of spatial and temporal scales. At the same time, EBCP guides ecologically and culturally sustainable communities and their economies by providing a comprehensive picture of the ecosystem and the ecological limits for human uses. (In this definition, the word natural describes a condition which reflects pre-industrial ecological characteristics and includes indigenous management systems.)
Yalakom Valley residents have begun an EBCP for the Yalakom Valley and adjacent areas along the Bridge River. The analysis was carried out with the assistance of the Lillooet Tribal Council and the technical expertise of the Silva Forest Foundation. The results of the research were incorporated into the St’át’imc Draft Land Use Plan (Nxekmenlhkálha Iti Tmícwa).
Policies
2.1. All permanent and temporary residents, as well as other parties conducting land use activities within the Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, are encouraged to apply the following Ecosystem-Based Conservation Planning principles: a. focus on what to protect, before deciding what to use; b. recognize the interdependent relationships between ecosystems, cultures and economies; c. apply the precautionary principle to all plans and activities; d. protect, maintain and, where necessary, restore ecological connectivity, and the full range of composition, structure, and function of enduring features, natural plant communities, and animal habitats and ranges. e. facilitate the protection and restoration of indigenous land use; f. ensure that any planning process is inclusive of the known range of values and interests; g. provide for diverse, ecologically sustainable, community-based economies; and, h. practice adaptive management. 2.2. In all activities, protect the water quality, quantity, and timing of flow for all rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, and springs, including temporary flows. The community’s first priority is protecting
55 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 65 of 238 AUGUST 2009
waterbodies and the riparian areas within domestic use watersheds and along the Yalakom River itself. 2.3. All permanent and temporary residents, as well as other parties conducting land use activities within the Yalakom River and Antoine Creek Watersheds, are encouraged to continue to study and educate themselves about the biodiversity and changing ecological conditions of the area. Collecting a database of ecosystem types and the associated plant and animal communities is encouraged. 2.4. Awareness and protection of rare or endangered plants, animals, and ecotypes is encouraged. 2.5. Continued development of the Yalakom Valley Ecosystem-Based Conservation Plan is encouraged.
Pesticides 2.6. As the Yalakom Community is opposed to pesticide use within the plan area, all land users are encouraged to apply natural pest control measures, such as those approved for organic farming. 2.7. All corporations, contractors, and provincial agencies and are strongly encouraged to notify the Yalakom Community Council of pesticide use within the plan area, including information on the location and timing of the pesticide application.
3. COMMUNITY SERVICES,INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TRANSPORTATION
Water supply and liquid waste management systems within the Yalakom Valley are all private systems. Some water supplies are shared among neighbours through private agreements. The water supplies are typically untreated surface water, used for both domestic and agricultural purposes. The community values the unchlorinated, unfloridated water and wishes to continue to hold responsibility for protecting and conserving the resource. Solid waste is brought to SLRD landfill in Lillooet by individual residents.
Highway 40, the Yalakom Road, and Barton and Osterlund Roads are the primary routes through the Yalakom community. Within the sub-plan area, Highway 40 is largely paved. The other primary routes are Ministry of Transportation maintained gravel roads. All other roads within the sub-plan area that are used to access residences are private roads maintained by the owner or Forest Service Roads.
Other than road maintenance, there are no provincial services provided within the plan area. Local children meet the school bus (provided by the School District #74) at Highway 40 and attend schools in Lillooet. The community lacks reliable telephone service. Some residents have satellite phones and satellite internet.
Policies
3.1. The Regional District supports the development and maintenance of a local or regional recycling program. 3.2. The Regional District supports the development of multi-purpose community hall within the plan area.
56 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 66 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Yalakom Road and Highway 40 3.3. The Regional District encourages the Ministry of Transportation to: a. improve Yalakom Road through additional grading and use of a water truck in conjunction with the grader; b. coordinate road maintenance with the school bus schedule in order to ensure safe travelling conditions for school children; c. refrain from applying pesticides or road salt in the Yalakom Valley; d. improve road signage with consultation with the community; e. refrain from depositing fill at two locations adjacent to Highway 40 switchbacks where the slopes are unstable.
4. EMERGENCY SERVICES
Within the Yalakom Valley, wildfire, avalanches, and hazards related to La Joie or Terzaghi Dams, such as spills and flooding, have the most potential to create emergency situations.
The Yalakom Community has organized a Wildfire Protection Group to coordinate the residents’ response to wildfire outbreaks. Many residents have taken a fire suppression course through the Ministry of Forests and Range, and several have first-aid training. A system is in place to ensure proper reporting of fires and notification of residents. The community has access to a full set of fire-fighting tools, which was provided through a grant from the Regional District. The tools are housed in a central location in the valley and fire suppression drills conducted seasonally. The community intends to continue to develop its capacity to suppress fire locally, including the future acquisition of a water truck. Residents are interested in working with the Ministry of Forests and Range to explore methods of controlled burning near homes in order to protect the community from wildfire.
Policies
4.1. The Regional District supports the establishment of reliable communication system, particularly for use during emergency events. 4.2. As funds become available, the Regional District supports continued funding of the Wildfire Protection Group for emergency management education, first-aid training, purchasing emergency equipment, and establishing an emergency vehicle in the community. 4.3. The Regional District encourages BC Hydro to establish a protocol and warning system for downstream communities in the event of an emergency affecting Terzaghi or La Joie Dams.
5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Mining and timber extraction continue to be important economic activities in the Yalakom Valley. Hunting and recreational pursuits are also significant economic generators. The community wish to ensure that these economic activities are not detrimental to ecological and community sustainability, and believes that diverse, smaller-scale economic activities are more suitable for the plan area than large-scale operations.
57 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 67 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Policies
5.1. The use of the Yalakom EBCP principles to create an ecologically sustainable, community-based economy is supported. 5.2. The continued diversification of the local economy is supported, particularly with organic farming, eco-certified wood products, trades, crafts, and home-based businesses that focus on ecological and community sustainability. 5.3. Ecological restoration projects to address the effects of human land use and climate change are supported. 5.4. Further development of local food production capacity and self-sufficiency is encouraged. 5.5. Yalakom community residents are encouraged to reduce community-level greenhouse gas emissions by: a) using alternative transportation methods (for example, carpooling and developing local public transit), b) reducing the need to commute (for example, by creating home-based businesses), c) using renewable energy sources for homes and vehicles, d) increasing energy efficiency to the greatest extent possible, and, e) sharing resource and implementing Smart Growth principles.
6. RECREATION,TOURISM, AND ACCESS
Policies
Recreation 6.1. Maintaining the current spectrum of outdoor recreation activities is encouraged, with the proviso that closing roads and preventing motorized access to alpine areas is supported where necessary to maintain and improve these activities. 6.2. The low impact, non-motorized11 outdoor recreation opportunity areas proposed by the draft Lillooet LRMP, particularly for the entire Shulaps Range, are supported. 6.3. Directing intensive recreational use to existing sites, such as Lac La Mare, Beaverdam, Ore Creek Recreation Site, is supported. 6.4. Provincial agencies are encouraged to protect highly valued trails from irresponsible, motorized use. 6.5. Provincial agencies are encouraged to provide education to recreational visitors to encourage responsible enjoyment of both mid-country and backcountry areas, and signage for grazing, logging, or other industrial activities.
11 For example, hiking, primitive camping, hunting, fishing, horseback riding, and backcountry skiing.
58 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 68 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Tourism 6.6. The development of services for tourists and backcountry recreationists is supported, particularly locally owned establishments that provide food and services, and create an outlet for locally made products, and showcase the community’s local culture. 6.7. Backcountry commercial recreation operators are encouraged to uphold the EBCP principles and consult with experienced local tourism operators and the Yalakom Community Council regarding appropriate land use, locations of critical wildlife habitat, ecologically sensitive areas, and hazardous areas.
Access 6.8. The Regional District encourages the Integrated Land Management Bureau to: a. initiate a comprehensive access management planning process for the plan area, b. implement the recommendations of previous access management agreements developed through the Yalakom Local Resource Use Plan (YLRUP) and the draft Lillooet LRMP; c. maintain existing Wildlife Act motor vehicle closures, including those closures in restricting motorized access above 1920 meters at China Head Mountain, Nine Mile Ridge, Red Mountain to French Mountain, and Hog Mountain; d. improve enforcement efforts and access controls to prevent motorized vehicles from destructive, irresponsible use of backcountry areas; e. implement seasonal access closures in the Upper Yalakom Valley to protect the migration routes of two distinct herds of California Bighorn Sheep (radio collar studies have shown that the size of these herds has declined in recent years); and, f. improve information availability and local signage to advise all users of the locations of private properties and encourage respect for local residents’ peace and quiet enjoyment.
LAND USE DESIGNATION POLICIES
7. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Policies
7.1. Maintaining the current zone of Rural Resource 3 (RR3) is supported. 7.2. Zoning amendment applications to decrease the minimum lots size for newly created lots or increase the permitted number of dwelling will be considered on a case by case basis, in consultation with the Yalakom Community.
59 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 69 of 238 AUGUST 2009
Management of Natural Resources 7.3. As the community lives on the edge of a wilderness area with many species of wildlife, residents are encouraged to develop their homes in manner that conserves native species and their habitats, especially species at risk, while applying Bear Smart practices. 7.4. The Regional District encourages individuals and corporations conducting resource management activities within the plan area to: a. consult with the Yalakom Community Council and the Lillooet Tribal Council; b. follow the principles and management directions found within the Official Community Plan, the Yalakom EBCP, and the St’át’imc Draft Land Use Plan (Nxekmenlhkálha Iti Tmícwa); c. emphasize conservation, sharing of our resources, and community-based resource extraction and processing. 7.5. While the development of alternative energy sources is encouraged, independent power project proposals that that do not reflect the principles of the OCP are opposed. 7.6. Other than power lines that directly serve residences (25 kV), the construction of major power line corridors (69 kV or greater) within the plan area is opposed. 7.7. The designations in the St’át’imc Draft Land Use Plan of Antoine, Fred, Ore, Applespring and Terry Creek watersheds as non-industrial use areas where water conservation and protection is the primary consideration is supported.
8. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
There are no lands designated as Commercial or Industrial within the plan area.
Policies
8.1. Should a commercial development proposal come forward, proponents are encouraged to consult with the community and consider ecosystem-based conservation planning principles as part of the rezoning application process.
9. AGRICULTURE
There are no lands designated as Agriculture within the sub-plan area.
In the Yalakom Community most gardens and farms are certified organic or adhere to sustainable, organic principles. The community is opposed to the use of deleterious substances that would threaten or impair the ability to grow organic food crops. Local farmers emphasize the importance of soil building and reducing reliance on fossil-fuel-based fertilizers.
Policies
9.1. Property owners are encouraged to consult with the community and consider ecosystem-based conservation planning principles in the development of any large-scale farming operations or water diversions for irrigation.
60 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 70 of 238 AUGUST 2009
9.2. The plan area is considered by the residents to be a ‘genetically modified organism free zone’, and so those activities that may bring genetically modified organisms into the valley are discouraged. 9.3. Conservation of soil, arable land, and irrigation water sources is encouraged. 9.4. Any water reservoirs constructed for agricultural purposes should also be designed to assist in fire protection. 9.5. Efforts to control the establishment and spread of noxious weeds, particularly those employing alternative methods to pesticide, are encouraged, and funding applications for weed control shall be supported where able.
10. COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROTECTION AREAS
Please see Electoral Area B OCP general policies on Community Watershed Protections Areas.
Policies
10.1. Members of the Yalakom community are encouraged to apply for formal protection of Community Watershed Protection Areas that are not recognized under the Forests and Range Practices Act.
11. PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS
There are currently no parks or protected areas within the sub-plan area. The draft Lillooet LRMP designates two areas, Fred-Antoine Creeks and Yalakom Nine Mile Ridge, as Proposed Protected Areas. Proposed Protected Areas are equivalent to ‘Designated Areas’ under Part 13 of the Forest Act. This means that various forestry licences in the area may be rescinded or modified by written order of the Minister.
Maps 9 and 10 show both official and unofficial recreation sites that have been identified on Crown land.
Policies
11.1. The Fred and Antoine Creeks and Yalakom Creek-Nine Mile Ridge Proposed Protected Areas are supported. 11.2. The following management directions for the Proposed Protected Areas are supported: a. respecting the aboriginal title and rights of the St’át’imc Nation; b. maintaining the areas as wilderness to be left in a natural, undisturbed condition; c. allowing non-motorized cultural and recreational opportunities while protecting the access to and quality of domestic water supplies and the privacy of local residents; d. maintaining a single road through the Fred & Antoine Creeks Proposed Protected Areas to allow access to private land located in Antoine Creek; and, e. enabling community participation in resource management and planning.
61 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 71 of 238 AUGUST 2009
11.3. In consultation with the community, further designation of protected areas to protect the ecology of the plan area, especially species at risk and their habitats, is supported.
62 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 72 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 73 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 74 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 75 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 76 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 77 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 78 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 79 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 80 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 81 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 82 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 83 of 238 REQUEST FOR DECISION EAD MEETING – September 14, 2009 Development Variance Permit # 81 3405 Lakeview Road, Gun Lake
Recommendation: 1. THAT the Board approve a Development Variance Permit for Lot A, DL 5637, LLD, Plan 24551 to vary the provisions of SLRD Area A and B Zoning Bylaw No. 670, 1999 to permit the construction of a garage with a height of 6.5m, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized. 2. THAT prior to issuance of DVP 81, a section 219 covenant be registered against the property that prohibits the use of the building for dwelling or overnight accommodation uses.
CAO Comments:
Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: The applicant wishes to construct a garage with a storage space above, and with a total height that is greater than the 4m that is permitted under the current zoning. Relevant Policy: SLRD Area A and B Zoning Bylaw No. 670, 1999 Strategic Relevance: n/a Desired Outcome(s): Consideration of variance request and decision from Board Response Options: 1. Approve the application, and issue permit; 2. Approve the application subject to the applicant registering a Section 219 covenant that prohibits the use of the building for dwelling or overnight accommodations. 3. Deny the application. Preferred Strategy: Option 2
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
General: Approval of variance to permit over height garage. Organizational: n/a Financial: n/a Legal: n/a Follow Up Action: Issuance of permit, if approved. Registration of permit on Title. Communication: Advise applicant of resolution and issue permit, if approved. Other Comments: None
Submitted by: T Napier Endorsed by: Reviewed by:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 84 of 238 Request for Decision Background Report
: !""# Subject: Application for Development Variance Permit (DVP# 81) Applicant: Pan Choo Legal Description: Lot A, DL 5637, LLD, Plan 24551 General Location: Gun Lake, Electoral Area A Problem Defined: $%&'()* + , - . . + , -. ./ )01%2 , 3 4(!5(6117, 0($ 6$ + /89"/ : , - ,,(!4 5 ;R /=P7/ ()) 0 , ++ + ./ -8/= 5! R P7+ : , / , -+- / 1 01% 1) , , . -3 ?@, - ?- ?- + , / , , - - .- ,- .+,- ., -,,, , ,-. ,/ ,, #!!-0 '. 0(-3 + - . / . , - - + $- ! /
Action Plan 1-.. A + ,/1- . + ./ Attachments: 0 A"B , +
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 85 of 238 Site Location Map
04200 00800 ± This map is for convenience only. It is not a legal document. Accuracy is not confirmed. Meters All information should be verified with the SLRD Planning Department. 4707 10870 10800 10670 4589 10608 1048810500 4431 10430 Gun 4025 4251 10380 4085 Lake 3993 (10270) 3909 10188 277 1010010100 255 277 85 255 Subject Property 75 55 255 9818 34353405 9708 9602 3225 55 9602 3345 9508 31993301 9508 30953255 25853075 2505 3100 3000 220 2393 9112 133188 101 1902199 1123 9022 75 861909 845 8740 805 705 645
509 Lakeview Rd Gun Lake Rd W 397 8300 343396 8200 291 8020 187 8000 7990 7880 985 7770 899 985 825 899 777 825 7500 723 7444 7232 7441 71207000 732171667068
72017120 Hess Rd 6945 6581
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 86 of 238 computer ® º 13 July July 13 2009 Date and design design and A-1 Macintosh Sheet N Revision reproduced without This plan This N using an Apple written consent. 778.998.0738 pvd pvd Site Plan 29020 Jul 13/09 Jul Description was created Issued for D.V.P. for Issued º [email protected] 29020_Garage.090713 º Revisions N Project Name Garage -Lot A Sheet Title N Job Scale Drawn Checked File Date Gun Lake,B.C. property ofproperty i Design Graphix and Services, and cannot be used or the designer's Copyright Reserved. Copyright exclusive the remain times all at and are, This drawing
DRIVE 110'0" LAKEVIEW 110'0" 24551 SURVEYOR R2 LIST
PLAN GRAVEL H15545 OF LAND
PLAN ROAD EDGE Address
Site Plan Sections & Floor Plans Elevations TRAVELED C/L Pan & Joan Choo Lakeview Drive, Gun lake, BC
UP#44 DRAWING A-0 A-1 A-2 Zoning Civic OIP PROFESSIONAL L. MARSHIK, B.C.L.S., C.L.S. MARSHIK, B.C.L.S., L. PREPARED FOR: PREPARED LILLOOET, B.C. 250-256-7838 LILLOOET, B.C. Email: [email protected] 415 East 18th St. Mailing Address: Phone/Fax: 604-988-6912 North B.C. Vancouver, V7L 2Y1
SPK 7.51 726-E.SP DWG: 09 MAY 25 100'0" 27°11'35" TOE
31.66
OIP
100'0"
CUT
(ACCESS)
OF
90'0"
SPK TOP
3.4 DRIVEWAY UP 3.8
TANKS WATER
132° 17' 49" 90'0" 24551
PLAN
ACCESS
40" 94'-0"
C/L 5'-0" 19'
ROPOSED 80'0"
Prop. 77.8'
P STRUCTURE Ex. 78.4'
Prop. 78.4'
Ex. 81.5'
Prop. 75.0' Prop.
132° Ex. 78.4' Ex.
80'0"
SLAB EL. 75.0' EL. SLAB GARAGE GARAGE
SPK ROAD
24'-0" (SIDE A) Prop. 74.8' 0.8 LAKE Ex. 74.0'
80'0"
Prop. 74.3'
Ex. 74.3' PIPE
32'-0" (SIDE B) GUN
60.7'
70'0"
6'-8"x4'-2" = 28 SF 28 = 6'-8"x4'-2"
70'0"
OUTHOUSE ACCESS LOCATIONPLAN
70'0" SHED
8'-0"x7'-11" = 63 SF 63 = 8'-0"x7'-11"
54.8' 70'0" SHED
A SUBJECT SITE
B 1.5 WOOD
24945
SPK 12'-0"x12'-0" = 144 SF 144 = 12'-0"x12'-0"
19.3'
PLAN
TRAILER
499 SF 499 60'0" 15.1' GAZEBO
2.9' 24.0' Site Plan
WV CABIN DECK
UNCONSTRUCTED
8.9'
60'0"
22.9' 12.0
WALKWAY REBAR
1.9 50'0" Appendix A - DVP 81 50'0"
107.51 OIP TO OIP 50'0" WIDE)
ACCESS
SPK 112.05
247'-1 1/8" 40'0"
ROD 40'0"
STAIRS ±ON BDY REDDI (20.117m 40'0"
TOE 30'0"
CABIN
30'0" 30'0" PATH
4.3
FOOT
20'0"
30'0"
20'0"
20'0"
20'0" 10'0" 2-OBT's STAIRS
OPP
10'0"
10'0" 10'0" LAKE TRAIL OIP
P N B
MARK
ARE
FOUND
METRES)
BASED
POINT POSTS
FOUND
POSTS.
0.7
POST
BOUNDARY
AND
BOUNDARY
=
FOUND
LEGAL
DERIVED
POST
PNB
LAKE
SURVEY
SET
FOUND
2009.
TREE
AND
24551 ARE
PLAN
TO
CAPPED
FOUND
MEASURED
IRON
OWNERS REFERENCE
GUN
NATURAL
INTERVAL
MAY
SPIKE
SPIKE
POLE
VALVE
LEGAL
ACCORDING 9
BDY
OF
SPIKES
KAP80699
BEARING
0.0m
WOOD
ON
&
ELEVATION
ASSUMED
=
METRE
BETWEEN
LATH
FOUND
1
SURVEY
PRESENT
STANDARD
STANDARD UNMARKED PROPERTY OLD WATER UTILITY
SURVEY
ASTRONOMIC
PLAN
A
WAS
ARE
POSTS
TO
ARE
ELEVATION
ARE
ALL
(APPROX.
WITH
9/2009
MEASURED.
TRIANGULAR
BC
TIES
DRIVE
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES
DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES
LAKE SURVEY
DIMENSIONS
-
SURVEY AS
BESIDE
WATER
MAY
ADDRESS BEARINGS
WV
FROM
LEGEND ELEVATIONS
OBT
WHITE
ON
PNB
LOT
CONTOURS
ON
SET
FIELD
ALL
MARKED ARE
LAKE, GUN
SLRDD.L. 5637, LILLOOET DISTRICT, Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 87 of 238 PLAN 24551
PID 005-905-346
CIVIC LAKEVIEW GUN SITE PLAN OF LOT A, A Appendix B: DVP81 A-3 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September21, 2009 SLRD Regular Floor Plans and Building 32'-0" roof above [email protected] 778.998.0738 ROOF ASSEMBLY TYPICAL FLOOR STRUCTURE Elevations 01 04 METAL ROOF FINISH FLOOR 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" ON NO. 30 ASPHALT ROOFING FELT 3/4" T&G PLYW. SUB-FLOOR LAPPED PER RCABC STANDARDS 11 7/8 TJI @ 16" O.C. EAVE/VALLEY PROTECTION - BLUESKIN 2-2x10 2-2x10 2-2x10 103'-11" PE 200HT S.A. MEMBRANE OR EQUAL CONC SLAB ON GRADE Top of ridge 1/2" PLYW. SHEATHING 05 2X4 ROOF STRAPPING 24" O.C. FINISH FLOOR ON 3246 3246 3246 01 ENGINEERED SCISSOR TRUSSES 24" O.C. 4" CONCRETE SLAB R-40 FG BATT INSULATION 1 1/2" RIGID INSULATION N 12 6 MIL POLY VAPOUR BARRIER 10 MIL. POLY V.B. 3'-9 1/2" 3'-9 1/2"
12 Engineered scissor truss 1/2" GYPSUM WALLBOARD 6" GRAVEL/SAND 7'-0" EQ @ 2'-0" o.c. (typ.)
12'-11" TYPICAL FOUNDATION (INSULATED) 06 TYPICAL INSIDE PARTITION 8" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL
02 W/ 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. ON INSIDE 1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD 6
12 DRAIN MAT (WATER PROOFING 4 roof above 2X4 STUDS @ 16" 0.C. 0
MEAN ELEVATION 4 96'-1" 5 1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD WHERE REQ'D) BELOW GRADE PROJECTING MIN. 8" ABOVE GRADE 2-2x10 FREE DRAINING BACKFILL 3/4" T&G PLY ON 11 7/8" TJI @16" TYP. UNO 3 - 2X10 beam CONT. SPREAD FOOTING ON SOLID BEARING MINIMUM roof Storage 03 TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL DN Simpson H2.5 18" BELOW GRADE HARDIE PANELS
3'-6" H. guard rail 6 hurricane ties at B slope B 1/2" CCA TREATED STRAPPING ON 4 0 EQ each truss (typ.) 4'-6" 1'-6" O/H 12/12 2 LAYERS 30 MIN. BUILDING PAPER ON A-3 4 A-3 24'-0" 10'-0" Upper Flr. 91'-0" 2-2x10 1/2" PLYW. SHEATHING TYPICAL PERIMETER DRAIN El. 85.0' Top of plate 2X6 STUDS @ 16" 0.C. 07 2X blocking DOUBLE CONT. PERIM. DRAINS R-20 FG BATT INSULATION provide 1 1/2" dia. SEPARATE DRAIN FOR ROOF
9'-0" 6 MIL. POLY VAPOUR BARRIER Eave vent holes w/ insect 6" DRAINROCK COVER AND FILTER 6'-0" screen (typ.) 1/2" GYPSUM WALLBOARD
03 CLOTH W/ BACKFILL OVER [email protected]" [email protected]" 88'-3" ANCHOR BOLTS @ 4'-0" O.C. 6 trusses above ON SOLID BEARING 4 3'-0" O/H 04 P.T. BOTTOM PLATE OR FOAM GASKET 0 4 2'-0" O.C. (typ.) TO FDN. WALL 2-2x10 [email protected]" = 8'-6 1/2" = 8'-6 [email protected]" 85'-0" Upper floor 2x12 @ 16" o.c. 8'-10 1/2" 8'-10 7'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 21'-1" (MAX. 13'-1 1/2" or 4m) or 1/2" 13'-1 (MAX. 21'-1"
1-15M cont. bars w/
10'-0" stud wall corner bars. lap 24"
1/2" dia. anchor bolts @ 48" o.c. 1/2" fibre board (optional) roof above Revisions 02 05 Nº Description Date 06 8" Issued for D.V.P. 13 July 2009 75'-0" 4" conc. slab on 6 mil. poly v.b. on Attic and Roof Plan Top of Slab 06 approved compacted 2 backfill A 8" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A-3 07 2x6 ledge (optional) SS solid bearing solid 18" min. and to and min. 18" 07 protection frost 8" 2-15M cont. bars 70'0" firm undisturbed 2'-0" bearing Section - A A Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" Typical Foundation Wall Footing 3
A
A-3
Engineered scissor truss 32'-0" 2X4 @ 2'-0" o.c. lookouts @ 2'-0" o.c. (typ.) 2X4 @ 2'-0" o.c. lookouts
01 roof above 103'-11" 10'-0" Ex. 74.0' 10'-8" 10'-8" 10'-8" Top of ridge Prop. 74.8' Ex. 74.3' 2-2x10 2-2x10 Prop. 74.3'
4016 4016 EQ transom above Foundat 12'-11" below 3068 4" exterior concrete Slab on Grade 6'-0" Tool control joints at 5' max o.c. ea. way MEAN ELEVATION 96'-1" 1 Brg. + 2 King studs 2-2x10 cont. to top of beam 10'-11" Page 88of238 CONC. APRON EQ 4'-0" 91'-0" roof above 24'-0" Top of plate 03 B B
roof slope 12/12 9'-0" 3068 Eave 8'-0" A-3 A-3 24'-0"
6'-0" Strge.
88'-3" 16'-0"
Slope DN 1/48 2-CAR GARAGE SLAB EL. 75.0'
04 lintel 2-2x10
1'-11" roof above Project Name 85'-0" Garage Flr.
75.0' x 16'-0" 8'-0" O/H DOOR 11" El. 75.0' Upper floor 74.8' Garage - Lot A Gun Lake, B.C. 1 Brg. + 2 King studs 13'-1" cont. to top of beam [email protected]" [email protected]" 21'-1" (MAX. 13'-1 1/2" or 4m) or 1/2" 13'-1 (MAX. 21'-1" UP 02 Ex. 78.4' 1/2" 8'-10 T.O. Wall 78.0' Prop. 75.0' 79.0' Copyright Reserved. This plan and design 8 are, and at all times remain the exclusive 6 10'-0" Entry property of i Design and Graphix Services, 0 and cannot be used or reproduced without 3 the designer's written consent. 2-2x10 7'-0" 2'-0" Sheet Title
05 2" 06 UP 5T@12" T.O. guardrail 81.33' SLOPE UP 1/48 Floor Plams
78.8' 3'-0" 75'-0" 2'-6" Ex. 81.5' [email protected]" 77.8' roof above Prop. 78.4' & Sections Top of Slab 74.8' 80'0" Ex. 78.4' Foundation Job Nº Sheet Nº 07 Prop. 77.8' below 29020 5'-0" 31'-0" 6'-0" Scale Drawn pvd A Checked pvd A-2 Foundation and Ground Floor Plan A-3 File29020_Garage.090713 Section - A 1 Date Jul 13/09 Revision A Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" This drawing was created using an Apple Macintosh® computer Appendix B: DVP 81 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September21, 2009 SLRD Regular Floor Plans and Building [email protected] Elevations 778.998.0738
ridge vent typ.
103'-11" 103'-11" Top of ridge Top of ridge 12 N 12 12 EQ EQ 1 1
12'-11" 12 12'-11"
2x12
2x12 MEAN ELEVATION 96'-1" 12 96'-1" MEAN ELEVATION 5 2 2x12
12 12
12 12 EQ EQ
91'-0" 2x12 91'-0"
Top of plate 2x12 4046 Top of plate 2X8 facia 4
roof slope 12/12 2x12
Eave 8'-0" Eave 6'-0" 6'-0" 88'-3" cont. alum cont. alum 88'-3" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2 flashing typ. flashing typ.
1'-11" 1'-0" 2'-0" 2x12 85'-0" 2x12 3 85'-0" 11" 1'-2"
Upper floor 2'-6" Upper floor 2 2 T.O. guardrail 81.33' 3
21'-1" (MAX. 13'-1 1/2" or 4m) or 1/2" 13'-1 (MAX. 21'-1" cont. alum 3 cont. alum 4m) or 1/2" 13'-1 (MAX. 21'-1" existing grade flashing typ. line of Ex. 81.5' flashing typ. Prop. 78.4' T.O. conc. 79.0'
T.O. conc. 79.0' Ex. 81.5' 3 2x12 10'-0" 10'-0" 2x12
3'-6" SLOPE DN 1/48 78.8' Ex. 78.4' Prop. 78.4' T.O. Wall 78.0' Prop. 77.8'5 line 77.8' of existing Revisions grade 5 Nº Description Date
Issued for D.V.P. 13 July 2009 75'-0" Prop. 74.3' 75'-0" Ex. 74.3' Top of Slab 5T@12"=5'-0" 5T@12"=31'-0" 6'-0" Top of Slab [email protected]"
FINISH MATERIALS 1 METAL ROOFING
2 HARDIE PANELS SIDING 3 PAINTED WOOD TRIM
- 2x12 horiz. typ.
- 1X4 vert. typ.
4 VINYL WINDOWS 5 EXPOSED CONCRETE
ridge vent typ.
103'-11" 103'-11" Top of ridge Top of ridge 12
12 12 EQ EQ 1 1 12'-11" 12'-11" 12
2x12
12 2x12 MEAN ELEVATION 96'-1" 96'-1" MEAN ELEVATION 5 2X8 facia 2
Page 89of238 1'-6" EQ EQ 1'-6" O/H TYP. 91'-0" 91'-0"
Top of plate 3246 3246 3246 4046 4046 Top of plate 2X8 facia 4 4 cont. alum roof slope 12/12 roof slope 12/12
Eave 8'-0" flashing typ. Eave 6'-0" 6'-0" 88'-3" cont. alum 88'-3" 2'-0" 2'-0" flashing typ. 1'-11" 1'-11" Project Name 2x12 85'-0" 3 85'-0" 11" 11" 1'-2"
Upper floor 1'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 1'-0" Upper floor Garage - Lot A 2 2 Gun Lake, B.C. T.O. guardrail 81.33' head flashing T.O. guardrail 81.33' 21'-1" (MAX. 13'-1 1/2" or 4m) or 1/2" 13'-1 (MAX. 21'-1" 21'-1" (MAX. 13'-1 1/2" or 4m) or 1/2" 13'-1 (MAX. 21'-1" 3 typ. 4016 4016 3 T.O. conc. 79.0' head flashing T.O. Wall 78.0' typ. Copyright Reserved. This plan and design 3'-6" are, and at all times remain the exclusive 10'-0" 10'-0" property of i Design and Graphix Services, 3'-6" Ex. 78.4' and cannot be used or reproduced without the designer's written consent. T.O. Wall 78.0' Prop. 77.8' line of 7'-0" existing grade 3068 16080 O/H cont. alum Ex. 78.4' Ex. 74.0' Prop. 74.8' Sheet Title Ex. 74.3' flashing typ. 5 Prop. 74.8' Prop. 74.3' T.O. conc. 75.0' grade 3'-0" 3'-0" existing Ex. 74.0' line of Elevations 75'-0" 2x12 3 2x12 75'-0" Prop. 74.8' Top of Slab Top of Slab
8" min. 8" 5T@12"=5'-0" line of existing grade [email protected]" Job Nº 29020 Sheet Nº Scale Drawn pvd Checked pvd A-3 File29020_Garage.090713 Date Jul 13/09 Revision
This drawing was created using an Apple Macintosh® computer REQUEST FOR DECISION EAD MEETING – September 14, 2009 Development Variance Permit # 82 Brew Creek Lodge, Electoral Area D
Recommendation: THAT the Board approve a Development Variance Permit for DL 6902, Gp1, NWD to vary the provisions of SLRD Zoning Bylaw No. 20, 1970 to permit the construction of a meeting building with a height of 13’ 7”, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.
CAO Comments:
Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: The applicant wishes to construct a meeting building as part of the overall facilities, with a capacity of approximately 100 people, and with a height that is greater than what is permitted under the current zoning. Relevant Policy: SLRD Zoning Bylaw No. 20, 1970 Strategic Relevance: n/a Desired Outcome(s): Consideration of variance request and decision from Board Response Options: 1. Approve the application, and issue permit; 2. Deny the application. Preferred Strategy: Option 1
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
General: Approval of variance to permit overheight meeting building.. Organizational: n/a Financial: n/a Legal: n/a Follow Up Action: Issuance of permit, if approved. Registration of permit on Title. Communication: Advise applicant of resolution and issue permit, if approved. Other Comments: None
Submitted by: T Napier Endorsed by: Reviewed by:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 90 of 238 Request for Decision Background Report
: !""# Subject: Application for Development Variance Permit Applicant: 630706 BC Ltd. (Owner), Drew Rose, Still Point Architecture (Agent) Legal Description: DL 6902, NWD General Location: Brew Creek Lodge, Electoral Area D Problem Defined: $%&'()* +, -. . + , -. , ./ )01%2 , 3 4 ,( , 0(6 $ + / !"/ : , - ,, ,( 4+.-/ ()) 0 , + ,- C , + -, ""/ O ,-4 , @,- ,5 B- 7, , - / E F. , - - , + +-,- P/ 1 01% 1) , , . -3 . C - +,4/ ,, #!!-0 '. 0(-3 +-. / .,-- + $- ! /
Action Plan 1-.. A + ,/1- . + ./ Attachments: 0 A"B! , +
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 91 of 238 Site Location Map 630706BC Ltd - Brew Creek Lodge 02125 50500 ± This map is for convenience only. It is not a legal document. Accuracy is not confirmed. Meters All information should be verified with the SLRD Planning Department.
Subject Property
99
575859 SLRD Regular Board Agenda;55 September61 21, 2009 Page 92 of 238 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT Development Variance Permit # 82
File No. 3090 20 082
Issued to: 630706 BC Ltd.
(Registered owners according to Land Title Office, hereinafter referred to as the Permittee)
Address: 2300 – 550 Burrard St. Vancouver, BC V6C 2B5
1) This Development Variance Permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the By-laws of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District applicable thereto, except as specifically varied or supplemented by this permit.
2) This Development Variance Permit applies to and only to those lands within the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District described below:
Parcel Identifier: 006-050-301
Legal Description: DL 6902, Group 1, NWD
Civic Address: Brew Creek Road
3) The maximum permitted height of an accessory building under Section 2.7.28 of Bylaw 20, 1970 is varied as follows:
The maximum permitted height for an accessory building is increased from twelve feet to thirteen feet seven inches, to allow for the construction of a meeting building, in the location shown on Appendix A: DVP 82 Site Plan, and in substantial compliance with the drawings shown in Appendix B: DVP 82 Building Elevations.
4) The following conditions and requirements are imposed:
N/A
n 5) This Permit shall not have the effect of varying the use or density of the Land specified in Zoning By-law No. 20, 1970 or a flood plain specification under s. 910 of the Local Government Act.
6) This Permit prevails over the provisions of the By-law in the event of conflict.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 93 of 238 7) Security Requirements: No
8) The land described herein shall be developed strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this permit and any plans and specifications attached to this permit shall form a part hereof.
9) This permit is not a building permit.
10) Notice of this Permit shall be filed in the Land Title Office at Kamloops under Section 927 of the Local Government Act, and upon such filing, the terms of this Permit or any amendment hereto shall be binding upon all persons who acquire an interest in the land affected by the Permit.
AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE REGIONAL BOARD THE
21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2009.
______Paul R. Edgington Chief Administrative Officer
END OF DOCUMENT
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 94 of 238 / /
A-02 Tel: 604 228-1241 Fax: 604 647-1182
REVISIONS Still Point Architecture Inc. Architecture Point Still Mews Issue for Consultant Review Issued for Construction d cannot be used without used be cannot d Maritime Maritime
Partial Site Plan 1/16" = 1'-0"
DATE Granville Island Granville CONSULTANTS 1807 - 204 PROJECT BREW CREEK LODGE 1 Brew Creek Road Whistler, B.C. SHEET TITLE SCALE NUMBERPROJECT 07-03 NUMBER SHEET the Architect an Architect the Vancouver, BCVancouver, Copyright Reserved. This plan and design is is and design and plan This Reserved. Copyright of property exclusive the remains times at all V6H 3W7V6H his consent. written June 4/09 June 25/09June 30/09July 15/09 Coordination Issue for Issued for Building Permit
0 9 105 0 6 105
.0 Cedar 0.40m
MECH
0 05
6
107.0
107.9 54. U Units
COVERED WALKWAY 108.4
110.2
107.6
106.7 105.7
105.7
100.4
107.42 0. 109.6 107.9 107.1 0.50m Fir 0.50m
102.1 60.0'
Guest 15.28 Floor
56.0
102.2
Elev. 0.40m Fir 0.40m 105.3
12 101.1
108.2
47
57.0 107.1
Units 105.0
54.0'
107.2
POWER 53.0 POND Fir well head well
POLE 0.70m Fir 0.70m
58.0'
BLUE HOUSE BLUE
53.0 107.2
106.0
107.9
102.0 Courtyard
GROUP 102.4 Guest
COVERED WALKWAY
106.8
102.3
54.0 52.0
Site Plan 9.87
106.7 54.0 107.4
Kitchenette Future
56.0' 3'x3' Kitchenette SHED
101.3 6
CREEK 102.3 3'x3' Hub #2792 ALKWAY Hub
106.7 51.0 45
COVERED W 44
105.9 OF 50.0
ENVIRONMENTAL
Appendix A: DVP 82
HOUSEKEEPING
51.0' 100.4 HOUSEKEEPING
107.17
105.70
48.0 GARDEN
48.0 50.0
HWL 102.3
103.6 402.405
52.0
49.0
102.27
CASCADE 105.1
102.56
105.5
105.0 105.3
TREES
BY: OF
46 106.2 105.3 EDGE
105.2
101.1 102.2 #12065
40 41 42 43 45 102.85 106.
105.1
fire hydrant fire
101.2 104.6 105.1 #1
105.1
104.8 102.45 104.9
POWER
103.9
103.1 POLE 105.0
104.6
100.9 104.8
ROAD
101.1
102.3 103.1
44
0.55m Firs 0.55m
103.8 104.3
104.1 FOU
Water Line
WATER VALVE WATER
2002 102.9
104.9
102.5 101.8 101.1
104.3
16 101.2 43 15
P.V.C. (4) P.V.C.
100.9 43A
CREEK: 101.1 102.8
104.5
TOP 103.5
39 19 100.6
P.V.C. (4) P.V.C.
#12501 102.5
101.5 101.8 38
101.7
42
17
101.9 103.0
18 BRIDGE
38 41
FLOW 33 103.6
102.3 102.0 BRIDGE NEW
CREEK OF HWL HWL
102.8 FOOTINGS
20 102.3 Well Head Well
WATER 35
GROUP CASCADE ENVIRONMENTAL
102.2 BY:
102.0
102.1 102.2
21
106
102.4
102.1
102.3
14 102.5
22
102.3 23 WATER FLOW WATER 34 103.3
#12072
103.8
103.8
101.7 31
100.0 102.2
103.6 30
25 P.V.C.
LAWN AREA LAWN
100.9 102.8 (4) 29
28
103.7
102.0
36 103.6
103.2 33 26
102.1 102.0
104.41 103.3 4
13
102.0 PATH BANK
27
1/2"
IN 104.2
37 101.7
LINE TOP
m ENVIRONMENTAL .5 ) 1
0 1 3.0' 106.45
103.2
33 26'-9" 25'-9( 100'-0" 102.2
100.7 BANK
1 101.8
2002
106.56 101.8
2 101.8
BANK
TOP
105.66
PUMP 105.32
POWER 103.83
CASCADE
HOUSE
TOE 3 VALVES
BANK
CREEK: 101.8
BY: m m
6 BUILDING
2 ) 6 . ' .2 ') 2 2
0 0 1 1 101.8 335.5 ( (335.5 32 MEETINGROOM
TOP
4
TOP 99.8 IN
101.7 103.95
HWL 101.7 MEETING 101.8
101.5m (333.0') 105.16
curb 103.4 BERM/ PLANTING
5
UNDERGROUND hydrant fire
30
108.90
12 PAVEDPATIO Chair Storage Storage
6 #2 101.4
100.5 105.46
101.5m 101.8
#12509 101.6 BERM/ PLANTING (333.0')
31 CRYSTAL 103.4
102.26m Field 103.4
(335.5')
101.7
101.8
curb 108.14 3 2 4 (see Civil) 102.5
ENTRY FOYER 1 PLANTING
New Septic
7 AREA 108.11 3 2 4 MENS' 1 D.L.6902 101.5m
(333.0') (Shoe Below) Storage Coats
102.26m
(335.5')
T.O.W. 101.4 WET PAVEDPATIO 103.04
PATH 1/2" 40'-4 8 100.9 103.3 3
2 4
BANK 1
ACCESSIBLE
2002
area)
3
2 4 in this (paving level 1 COVERED 101.2 WALKWAY (Shoe Below) Storage
Coats WOMENS'
ROAD
curb
9 LPB-0
TOE LIGHTING
101.5m 101.6
29 (333.0') FD Tank ELEC. 101.6 JAN.
MECH./ 10 WIRE GUY
102.26m 102.3 GRAVEL
101.8m BUILDINGS 102.26m (334.1') 101.87m 101.1 (335.5') (334.35') (335.5')
T.O.W.
New Septic curb 11
BERM/ PLANTING
GRAVEL
TOP/CREEK: 105.9 101.5m
101.5m (333.0') (333.0')
POWER POLE POWER STAFF
101.1 103.5
101.7 39 100.9
101.5m 103.3
(333.0')
28
A B C D E F
102.0
100.7
101.5 101.5
99.0
100.9 38
11 99.8
101.5
Hub #95 Hub 101.4
37
101.2
108.1 101.5
12090
101.6 DECK 101.0 26
27 99.0 SEPTIC
100.6 BANK
fire hydrant fire
24
TANK
101.0
101.4 14 101.6 #3
101.4 40
TOE
25 13
101.4
101.3
41
101.6
102.9 39 101.9
11 15
100.9 HOUSE
12
101.4
99.5
GRAVEL 101.6 BANK
23 101.5
22 101.4
10 101.8
21
TOP
100.7 36 OWNER'S
(NEW) 35
HC 34 109.8
fire hydrant fire 101.6
33 101.6
9
16
32 19
#4 101.2
BRIDGE 20 101.0
101.2 108.9 8
101.4 101.4 100.6 101.5
100.8 LINE
101.4 18
99.7 7
17
6 POWER
101.7
101.0
100.5
LINE
100.1
NEW
5
109.0
DECK .1 ROAD ATER UNDERGROUND
102.5
NE
1 I W
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 L Page 95 of 238 CONSULTANTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September21, 2009 SLRD Regular 5'-3" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 7'-0" 14'-6" 10'-3" 10'-0" 5'-3" 5'-8" Appendix B: DVP 82
T.O. Highest Ridge T.O. Ridge 352.5' 352'6 1/2" Building Elevations eq.
CL 6'-0 1/2" 1 eq. T.O. Beam
346'6" DATE REVISIONS June 4/09 Issue for Consultant Review
4 June 25/09 Issue for Coordination
7 5 10 10 5 3 4 June 30/09 Issued for Building Permit 2 19'-6" 13'-7" 11'-0" 6 4 5 BREW CREEK LODGE
concrete concrete MEETING BUILDING upstand upstand FINISH MATERIALS cont. alum. flashing typ. 1 'SNAP SEAM' STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING Main Level 335'6" 2 EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS 3 CEDAR SHINGLES Average Grade 7 3'-0" above ramp 333.0' 4 CEDAR TRIM - 2x10 horiz. typ. - 1 1/4x6 vert. typ.
WEST ELEVATION 5 BEVELLED CEDAR SIDING 1 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 6 FIBERGLASS WINDOWS 7 EXPOSED CONCRETE 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
5'-8" 5'-3" 10'-0" 10'-3" 14'-6" 7'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 5'-3"
T.O. Highest Ridge T.O. Ridge 352.5' 352'6 1/2" eq. 1
CL 6'-0 1/2" eq. T.O. Beam 346'6"
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 5 7 2 19'-6" 6 4 5 13'-7" 11'-0"
cont. alum. flashing typ.
Main Level 2x10 cedar 335'6" 7
Average Grade 3'-0" above ramp 333.0' Still Point Architecture Inc. Still Point Architecture EAST ELEVATION 2 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" F E D C B A A B C D E F
10'-6" 10'-9" 4'-6" 4'-6" 10'-9" 10'-9" 4'-6" 4'-6" 10'-9" 10'-6"
204 - 1807 Maritime Mews Granville Island T.O. Ridge T.O. Highest Ridge Vancouver, BC Tel: 604/ 228-1241 V6H 3W7 Fax: 604/ 647-1182 Page 96of238 352'6 1/2" 352.5'
Copyright Reserved. This plan and design is and
eq. at all times remains the exclusive property of 2x12 2x12 the Architect and cannot be used without cedar cedar his written consent. CL 6'-0 1/2" 3 cont. alum. flashing cont. alum. flashing 3 eq. typ. T.O. Beam typ. 2x12 cedar 346'6" 2x12 cedar PROJECT BREW CREEK LODGE 8 9 7 1 Brew Creek Road
19'-6" Whistler, B.C. 6 4 5 4
13'-7" 6 4 5 4 11'-0"
cont. alum. flashing cont. alum. flashing SHEET TITLE typ. typ.
2x10 cedar Main Level 2x10 cedar 7 335'6" 7 Meeting Building Elevations Average Grade 333.0'
SCALE 1/4"=1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION PROJECT NUMBER SHEET NUMBER 3 4 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 07-03 A-07 / /
A-02 Tel: 604 228-1241 Fax: 604 647-1182
REVISIONS Still Point Architecture Inc. Architecture Point Still Mews Issue for Consultant Review Issued for Construction d cannot be used without used be cannot d Maritime Maritime
Partial Site Plan 1/16" = 1'-0"
DATE Granville Island Granville CONSULTANTS 1807 - 204 PROJECT BREW CREEK LODGE 1 Brew Creek Road Whistler, B.C. SHEET TITLE SCALE NUMBERPROJECT 07-03 NUMBER SHEET the Architect an Architect the Vancouver, BCVancouver, Copyright Reserved. This plan and design is is and design and plan This Reserved. Copyright of property exclusive the remains times at all V6H 3W7V6H his consent. written June 4/09 June 25/09June 30/09July 15/09 Coordination Issue for Issued for Building Permit
0 9 105 0 6 105
.0 Cedar 0.40m
MECH
0 05
6
107.0
107.9 54. U Units
COVERED WALKWAY 108.4
110.2
107.6
106.7 105.7
105.7
100.4
107.42 0. 109.6 107.9 107.1 0.50m Fir 0.50m
102.1 60.0'
Guest 15.28 Floor
56.0
102.2
Elev. 0.40m Fir 0.40m 105.3
12 101.1
108.2
47
57.0 107.1
Units 105.0
54.0'
107.2
POWER 53.0 POND Fir well head well
POLE 0.70m Fir 0.70m
58.0'
BLUE HOUSE BLUE
53.0 107.2
106.0
107.9
102.0 Courtyard
GROUP 102.4 Guest
COVERED WALKWAY
106.8
102.3
54.0 52.0
Site Plan 9.87
106.7 54.0 107.4
Kitchenette Future
56.0' 3'x3' Kitchenette SHED
101.3 6
CREEK 102.3 3'x3' Hub #2792 ALKWAY Hub
106.7 51.0 45
COVERED W 44
105.9 OF 50.0
ENVIRONMENTAL
Appendix A: DVP 82
HOUSEKEEPING
51.0' 100.4 HOUSEKEEPING
107.17
105.70
48.0 GARDEN
48.0 50.0
HWL 102.3
103.6 402.405
52.0
49.0
102.27
CASCADE 105.1
102.56
105.5
105.0 105.3
TREES
BY: OF
46 106.2 105.3 EDGE
105.2
101.1 102.2 #12065
40 41 42 43 45 102.85 106.
105.1
fire hydrant fire
101.2 104.6 105.1 #1
105.1
104.8 102.45 104.9
POWER
103.9
103.1 POLE 105.0
104.6
100.9 104.8
ROAD
101.1
102.3 103.1
44
0.55m Firs 0.55m
103.8 104.3
104.1 FOU
Water Line
WATER VALVE WATER
2002 102.9
104.9
102.5 101.8 101.1
104.3
16 101.2 43 15
P.V.C. (4) P.V.C.
100.9 43A
CREEK: 101.1 102.8
104.5
TOP 103.5
39 19 100.6
P.V.C. (4) P.V.C.
#12501 102.5
101.5 101.8 38
101.7
42
17
101.9 103.0
18 BRIDGE
38 41
FLOW 33 103.6
102.3 102.0 BRIDGE NEW
CREEK OF HWL HWL
102.8 FOOTINGS
20 102.3 Well Head Well
WATER 35
GROUP CASCADE ENVIRONMENTAL
102.2 BY:
102.0
102.1 102.2
21
106
102.4
102.1
102.3
14 102.5
22
102.3 23 WATER FLOW WATER 34 103.3
#12072
103.8
103.8
101.7 31
100.0 102.2
103.6 30
25 P.V.C.
LAWN AREA LAWN
100.9 102.8 (4) 29
28
103.7
102.0
36 103.6
103.2 33 26
102.1 102.0
104.41 103.3 4
13
102.0 PATH BANK
27
1/2"
IN 104.2
37 101.7
LINE TOP
m ENVIRONMENTAL .5 ) 1
0 1 3.0' 106.45
103.2
33 26'-9" 25'-9( 100'-0" 102.2
100.7 BANK
1 101.8
2002
106.56 101.8
2 101.8
BANK
TOP
105.66
PUMP 105.32
POWER 103.83
CASCADE
HOUSE
TOE 3 VALVES
BANK
CREEK: 101.8
BY: m m
6 BUILDING
2 ) 6 . ' .2 ') 2 2
0 0 1 1 101.8 335.5 ( (335.5 32 MEETINGROOM
TOP
4
TOP 99.8 IN
101.7 103.95
HWL 101.7 MEETING 101.8
101.5m (333.0') 105.16
curb 103.4 BERM/ PLANTING
5
UNDERGROUND hydrant fire
30
108.90
12 PAVEDPATIO Chair Storage Storage
6 #2 101.4
100.5 105.46
101.5m 101.8
#12509 101.6 BERM/ PLANTING (333.0')
31 CRYSTAL 103.4
102.26m Field 103.4
(335.5')
101.7
101.8
curb 108.14 3 2 4 (see Civil) 102.5
ENTRY FOYER 1 PLANTING
New Septic
7 AREA 108.11 3 2 4 MENS' 1 D.L.6902 101.5m
(333.0') (Shoe Below) Storage Coats
102.26m
(335.5')
T.O.W. 101.4 WET PAVEDPATIO 103.04
PATH 1/2" 40'-4 8 100.9 103.3 3
2 4
BANK 1
ACCESSIBLE
2002
area)
3
2 4 in this (paving level 1 COVERED 101.2 WALKWAY (Shoe Below) Storage
Coats WOMENS'
ROAD
curb
9 LPB-0
TOE LIGHTING
101.5m 101.6
29 (333.0') FD Tank ELEC. 101.6 JAN.
MECH./ 10 WIRE GUY
102.26m 102.3 GRAVEL
101.8m BUILDINGS 102.26m (334.1') 101.87m 101.1 (335.5') (334.35') (335.5')
T.O.W.
New Septic curb 11
BERM/ PLANTING
GRAVEL
TOP/CREEK: 105.9 101.5m
101.5m (333.0') (333.0')
POWER POLE POWER STAFF
101.1 103.5
101.7 39 100.9
101.5m 103.3
(333.0')
28
A B C D E F
102.0
100.7
101.5 101.5
99.0
100.9 38
11 99.8
101.5
Hub #95 Hub 101.4
37
101.2
108.1 101.5
12090
101.6 DECK 101.0 26
27 99.0 SEPTIC
100.6 BANK
fire hydrant fire
24
TANK
101.0
101.4 14 101.6 #3
101.4 40
TOE
25 13
101.4
101.3
41
101.6
102.9 39 101.9
11 15
100.9 HOUSE
12
101.4
99.5
GRAVEL 101.6 BANK
23 101.5
22 101.4
10 101.8
21
TOP
100.7 36 OWNER'S
(NEW) 35
HC 34 109.8
fire hydrant fire 101.6
33 101.6
9
16
32 19
#4 101.2
BRIDGE 20 101.0
101.2 108.9 8
101.4 101.4 100.6 101.5
100.8 LINE
101.4 18
99.7 7
17
6 POWER
101.7
101.0
100.5
LINE
100.1
NEW
5
109.0
DECK .1 ROAD ATER UNDERGROUND
102.5
NE
1 I W
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 L Page 97 of 238 CONSULTANTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September21, 2009 SLRD Regular 5'-3" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 7'-0" 14'-6" 10'-3" 10'-0" 5'-3" 5'-8" Appendix B: DVP 82
T.O. Highest Ridge T.O. Ridge 352.5' 352'6 1/2" Building Elevations eq.
CL 6'-0 1/2" 1 eq. T.O. Beam
346'6" DATE REVISIONS June 4/09 Issue for Consultant Review
4 June 25/09 Issue for Coordination
7 5 10 10 5 3 4 June 30/09 Issued for Building Permit 2 19'-6" 13'-7" 11'-0" 6 4 5 BREW CREEK LODGE
concrete concrete MEETING BUILDING upstand upstand FINISH MATERIALS cont. alum. flashing typ. 1 'SNAP SEAM' STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING Main Level 335'6" 2 EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS 3 CEDAR SHINGLES Average Grade 7 3'-0" above ramp 333.0' 4 CEDAR TRIM - 2x10 horiz. typ. - 1 1/4x6 vert. typ.
WEST ELEVATION 5 BEVELLED CEDAR SIDING 1 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 6 FIBERGLASS WINDOWS 7 EXPOSED CONCRETE 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
5'-8" 5'-3" 10'-0" 10'-3" 14'-6" 7'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 5'-3"
T.O. Highest Ridge T.O. Ridge 352.5' 352'6 1/2" eq. 1
CL 6'-0 1/2" eq. T.O. Beam 346'6"
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 5 7 2 19'-6" 6 4 5 13'-7" 11'-0"
cont. alum. flashing typ.
Main Level 2x10 cedar 335'6" 7
Average Grade 3'-0" above ramp 333.0' Still Point Architecture Inc. Still Point Architecture EAST ELEVATION 2 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" F E D C B A A B C D E F
10'-6" 10'-9" 4'-6" 4'-6" 10'-9" 10'-9" 4'-6" 4'-6" 10'-9" 10'-6"
204 - 1807 Maritime Mews Granville Island T.O. Ridge T.O. Highest Ridge Vancouver, BC Tel: 604/ 228-1241 V6H 3W7 Fax: 604/ 647-1182 Page 98of238 352'6 1/2" 352.5'
Copyright Reserved. This plan and design is and
eq. at all times remains the exclusive property of 2x12 2x12 the Architect and cannot be used without cedar cedar his written consent. CL 6'-0 1/2" 3 cont. alum. flashing cont. alum. flashing 3 eq. typ. T.O. Beam typ. 2x12 cedar 346'6" 2x12 cedar PROJECT BREW CREEK LODGE 8 9 7 1 Brew Creek Road
19'-6" Whistler, B.C. 6 4 5 4
13'-7" 6 4 5 4 11'-0"
cont. alum. flashing cont. alum. flashing SHEET TITLE typ. typ.
2x10 cedar Main Level 2x10 cedar 7 335'6" 7 Meeting Building Elevations Average Grade 333.0'
SCALE 1/4"=1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION PROJECT NUMBER SHEET NUMBER 3 4 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 07-03 A-07 REQUEST FOR DECISION EAD MEETING – September 14, 2009 Development Variance Permit # 83 1993 Sea to Sky Highway, Electoral Area C
Recommendation: THAT the Board approve a Development Variance Permit for Lot 2, DL 210, LLD, Plan KAP45555 to vary the provisions of SLRD Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 to permit the construction of a pole barn at a distance of 5.0m from the interior side lot line, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.
CAO Comments:
Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: The applicant wishes to construct a pole barn as part of an organic blueberry farm that they are developing. The applicant wishes to locate the building at a distance of 5.0m from the interior side lot line, which requires a variance of 2.5m from the minimum setback requirement of 7.5m. Relevant Policy: SLRD Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 Strategic Relevance: n/a Desired Outcome(s): Consideration of variance request and decision from Board Response Options: 1. Approve the application, and issue permit; 2. Deny the application. Preferred Strategy: Option 1
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
General: Approval of variance to permit farm building at a desirable location on a developing blueberry farm. Organizational: n/a Financial: n/a Legal: n/a Follow Up Action: Issuance of permit, if approved. Registration of permit on Title. Communication: Advise applicant of resolution and issue permit, if approved. Other Comments: None
Submitted by: T Napier Endorsed by: Reviewed by:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 99 of 238
Request for Decision Background Report !""# Subject: Application for Development Variance Permit Applicant: John David Hare Legal Description: Lot 2, DL 210, LLD, Plan KAP45555 General Location: 1993 Sea to Sky Highway, Electoral Area C Problem Defined: $%&'()* +, -. . + , - +@, ?- ./ )01%2 , 3 4'(5 ,,7, 0(%6$ + /98=/ , ?- '(69/= / ()) 0 , + - , - , ./1 : 4. -- , QR-+ - ,- - / -+ +, ,,+ , , - ,/ 1 01% 1) 1 , , -= - + , + . -3 / ,, #!!-0 '. 0(-3 +-. / .,-- + $- ! /
Action Plan 1-.. A + ,/1- . + ./ Attachments: 0 A"B; , $,.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 100 of 238 Site Location Map
02125 50500 ± This map is for convenience only. It is not a legal document. Accuracy is not confirmed. Meters All information should be verified with the SLRD Planning Department.
Pemberton Portage Rd
utility access rd
service road
Subject Property Water St 1993 Sea to Sky Hwy IR 10 Rd
Main St
A Ave
Lillooet Lake Rd
Venture Pl 1985 1993 1979 2037 2054 Stone Cutter Pl 1987 2032 2021 1999 Timber Lane 7338 2009 20242028 1995 2005 2020 1940 2012 2026 2003 2008
Rancherie St Old Mill Rd 1975
Industrial Way
1901 Artisan Rd Sea to Sky1911 Hwy Legend unsigned Highway Mt Currie Ir 1 Rd Pemberton Way Local Lane 1888 Resource AreaCTrails 2008Boundary ICF
Airport Rd Streams Waterbodies Reserve Land
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 101 of 238
SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT Development Variance Permit # 83
FileU No. 3090 20 083
! "# $ % &''( )* * + ,-!.-/01230 &$ 4# / "# 56 #4 .* 7# 44 5 !8 4 4 * 44# 5* 4# , 2$ 4# / "# 44 * 7# 55
U" 0&9:(2(;(
U 4 2! 2&0! !" 3%":<<<<
U- %&''( )* * ($ # ## 5 ) 5 =,9 .*9=
U # ##7 5 ) 5 # 9,<# <,0#! 4 5 ! %44 8%/";( " ! 5 #4 %44 8./";(. " > , :$ 7# #4 1?% <$ "# * * 4 @ .*1 ,9=
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 102 of 238
9$ *7# 1 ;$ 5 5 4 * # 4 4# *4 4 4# #4 , '$ 4# 5 4# , &0$ 1 "# 5 U3# 4
U '29 U A # % U! 4 ! # "# *# # 55 4 4 7 5* "# , %B @>.C> B 1"%>.C >>A 1% . % > 2& %C >" >+.>!200', DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ",> - %# >1 -B+>1
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 103 of 238 Appendix A: DVP 83 Site Plan
Subject Property
Proposed Structure at 5.0m from property line
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 104 of 238 Appendix B: DVP 83 Building Plans and Elevations SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September21, 2009 SLRD Regular Page 105of238 Appendix B: DVP 83 Building Plans and Elevations SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September21, 2009 SLRD Regular Page 106of238 Appendix B: DVP 83 Building Plans and Elevations SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September21, 2009 SLRD Regular Page 107of238 Request for Decision
The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery – Request for Non-farm Use in the ALR
Date: September 21, 2009
Recommendation: That the Board forward the application for non-farm use of Lot 2 DL 2248, Group 1, NWD, Plan BCP38220 in the upper Squamish Valley to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation of conditional support for the concept of The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery in the ALR, as follows. 1. The applicant be required to work with the ALC to incorporate provisions in the development plan to ensure the long term capability of the land for future food production; 2. Only consider approving non-farm buildings and structures based on careful site planning that minimizes building footprints, non-farm activity areas and impacts to ALR lands. 3. Developing and adhering to a professionally prepared soils mitigation plan to preserve the subject property’s agricultural potential and protect the land for future agricultural uses. 4. The potential impact of flood mitigation works, if required, on ALR land should be taken into account in the ALC decision. Any required flood protection works should be designed and located in a manner to minimize impacts on existing and potential agriculture use of the property
CAO Comments: I concur. PRE
Who Votes:
Attachments Report/Document: Attached __ Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery has applied for a non- farm use for a property located in the Squamish Valley. The SLRD must decide what recommendation to forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with respect to this application
Relevant Policy: The property is designated Agriculture in the SLRD Electoral Area D Official Community Plan Bylaw 495. The objective of this designation is to ensure that valuable agricultural lands are preserved for agricultural purposes. The OCP has the following policy which relates to the non-farm use application “the Regional District supports the agricultural industry and the mandate of the Agricultural Land Commission to protect agricultural lands which have value for agricultural purposes.” In the draft Regional Growth Strategy, the land is designated non-settlement area.
Strategic Relevance:
Desired Outcome(s): A decision consistent with the objectives of the Agricultural Land Commission
Response Options:
1. The Board support the proposal as submitted, and forward the application to the ALC for consideration with a positive recommendation from the Board. SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 108 of 238 Request for Decision
The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery – Request for Non-farm Use in the ALR
2. The Board decline the non-farm use proposal as submitted, and not forward the application to the ALC for consideration at this time. 3. The Board conditionally support the concept of The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery facility in the ALR, as follows: a. The applicant be required to work with the ALC to incorporate provisions in the development plan to ensure the long term capability of the land for future food production; b. Only consider approving non-farm buildings and structures based on careful site planning that minimizes building footprints, non-farm activity areas and impacts to ALR lands. c. Developing and adhering to a professionally prepared soils mitigation plan to preserve the subject property’s agricultural potential and protect the land for future agricultural uses. d. Any requirement for flood mitigation should be take into account in the ALC decision. Flood protection works, if required, should be designed and located in a manner to minimize impacts on existing and potential agriculture use of the property.
Preferred Strategy: Option 3
Implications of Recommendation
General: Preserving agricultural lands and ensuring long term food security is of critical importance, on both a local and global scale, and therefore, the proposed non-farm use, as presented, is not supported by staff unless changes to the operation are made that will ensure the long term capability of the land for future food production.
Organizational: n/a
Financial: n/a
Legal: n/a
Follow Up Action: recommendation of the Board will be forwarded to the ALC for their consideration. The property owner will be notified of the Board recommendation.
Communication: Refer the application to the Agricultural Land Commission with the SLRD’s recommendation.
Other Comments: It is noted that the property is in the floodplain and that significant flood mitigation works could be required.
Submitted by: Writer Reviewed by: Director Approved by: CAO
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 109 of 238 Request for Decision Background Report
The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery – Request for Non-farm Use in the ALR – applicant’s response to Board questions.
Issue Defined: The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery has applied for a non-farm use for a property located in the Squamish Valley. The SLRD must decide what recommendation, if any, to forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with respect to this application. At the August 24, 2009 meeting, the application was presented to the SLRD Board. At that time, the SLRD Board had questions about the application with respect to the future use of the building and potential agricultural improvements to the land. The applicant has responded with the letter attached as Appendix “A” to this report.
Options: Below are three possible options that the Board could pursue regarding the non- farm use application for the subject property, given the new information provided by the applicant:
1. Support the proposal as submitted, and forward the application to the ALC for consideration with a positive recommendation from the Board.
1. Decline the non-farm use proposal as submitted, and not forward the application to the ALC for consideration at this time.
3. Support the concept of The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery facility in the ALR on the condition that the applicants be required to work with the ALC staff to refine the project proposal and to limit its impact to agriculture. The following ideas are suggested:
1. careful site planning to minimize impacts to ALR lands; 2. developing and adhering to a professionally prepared soils mitigation plan to preserve the subject property’s agricultural potential and protect the land for future agricultural uses.
4 A fourth option is to forward the application to the ALC without comment.
Analysis of Options:
1. Option 1 is in direct conflict with the OCP policies regarding support of the agricultural industry, the ALC’s mandate and the preservation of valuable agricultural land. Although presently underutilized for agriculture the land capability rating is good, in the Class 2 – 4 range, meaning the land is capable of producing a wide variety of crops.
2. A recommendation that the application not be allowed (option 2) is consistent with OCP and the draft RGS policies to protect agricultural land for agricultural use.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 110 of 238 3. Preserving agricultural lands and ensuring long term food security is of critical importance, on both a local and global scale. The Board could conditionally support the concept of The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery facility in the ALR given the applicant’s intention to improve on the lands agricultural productivity.
4 A fourth option is to forward the application to the ALC without comment
Conclusion: The applicant has provided further information that provides some confirmation that that the land will be used as a monastery for the foreseeable future and that the land being proposed for building footprints does not go beyond that of a residential use on the property. In addition, the applicant has indicated several ways in which the monastery will contribute to agricultural productivity on the site. Careful site planning and a soils mitigation plan could be implemented to minimize impacts to agriculture.
Action Plan: Refer the application to the Agricultural Land Commission with the SLRD’s recommendation.
Communication Plan: The recommendation of the Board will be forwarded to the ALC for their consideration. The property owner will be notified of the Board recommendation.
Respectfully submitted,
K. Needham Strategy Planner
Attachments: Letter from the applicant
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 111 of 238 Group Pacific ventures ltd.
September 6th, 2009
SLRD Planning Department 1350 Aster Street Pemberton BC Attention: Steve Olmstead and Kim ----
RE : QUEEN OF PEACE DOMINICAN MONASTERY APPLICATION TO SLRD AND ALC
Planning Department and Council members,
The Dominican Monastery application came before the SLRD council on August 24th and a number of clarifications were requested by council members to be provided for the application. The following information is submitted to be included in the information package report dated July 15th .
The following is set out in response to the questions that were requested to be clarified:
1) A question was raised as to what use could be made of the proposed 24,000 sf Monastery building if there was a change of ownership and change of use. This is a speculative question as to what might occur sometime in the future if the Dominican nuns decided to sell the property.
1.1 For the use of the building that aspect is totally controlled by zoning that SLRD may place on the property. We understand that in the near future the planning department intends to place zoning on all lands in the SLRD that are not presently zoned. Therefore any uses that are a concern to council members can be non permitted uses in the zoning.
1.2 In addition, as the use on the property must also be approved by ALC, any uses not compatible with agricultural uses would not be approved in any event.
1.3 The Dominican nuns have been looking for a property for well over a year and have identified this property as one that fits their various criteria. Accordingly the nuns have made a decision that this property will be satisfactory for the foreseeable future.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 112 of 238 1.4 The Dominican nuns will be required to make an investment in this property and building of between $3,000,000 and $4,000,000 and they will not be inclined to abandon this investment for the foreseeable future.
1.5 The Dominican nuns are a worldwide organization with a history of monasteries around the world that have been operating in the same locations for centuries. History would indicate that there is little concern that the Dominican Monastery would be abandoned.
2) A question was raised as to what would be the agricultural enhancement opportunities of the land if the Dominican Monastery was approved.
2.1 The Dominican Monastery has stated that they will continue cultivating all the land presently under cultivation and will not reduce the area presently under cultivation.
2.2 The area proposed for the building has never been under cultivation, has always been used for the residential use for the land owner and includes less than 2 acres of an 81 acre property.
2.3 An area on the property is required, in any event, for the residential use of the owner working the land and this residential area has not been increased.
2.4 The Dominican Monastery’s economic objective is to provide for it’s subsistence needs by utilizing and upgrading the agricultural uses of the land. The commitment is a long term one to continue the use and enhancement of the agricultural land as opposed to other types of potential ownership that would be heavily residential with little or no commitment for continuing cultivating the land. Their effort to be self- sufficient would include the production of crops for the use of the Monastery nuns and the production for sale of crops for the cash flow sustainability of the Monastery.
2.5 Self sufficiency for the Dominican Monastery will involve growing the following enhanced agricultural products:
Mixed Farming products such as: - potatoes - tomatoes - lettuces - turnips - squashes - beans - peas - cucumbers - zucchinis - other crops as desired
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 113 of 238 Horticulture: Initially the growing of flowers, shrubs and trees would be for landscaping the subject property and could expand into a cash crop business to financially assist the running of the Monastery. The Monastery already has experience in collaboration with Art’s Nursery in Langley.
Greenhouse Farming: The proposed greenhouses would be utilized for vegetable seedlings and to extend the growing season for vegetable crops. In addition the greenhouse may be used for horticulture seedlings. The required sizes have not been determined.
Fruit Trees: The area of land immediately south of the proposed building site is considered for planting an orchard. This area of approximately two acres has never been cultivated and would be an additional acreage brought into cultivation other than the current cultivated acreage. A variety of fruit or nut trees would be considered. A study would be done to determine how to cultivate these trees without attracting bears.
Livestock: The Monastery would consider the rearing of chickens, sheep and llamas. It is currently raising sheep in the Fort Langley area. The meat is sold and the wool is spun and woven.
Silva culture: There may be an opportunity to plant trees in some areas of the mountainous slopes that are otherwise unsuitable for agricultural crops.
2.6 The lifestyle of the Monastery and nuns includes a commitment to engage in productive work on behalf of the Monastery. This lifestyle commitment provides a substantial and committed workforce to cultivate, enhance and maintain the various agricultural opportunities that the land provides. The land presently is only in hay production netting approximately $2,400 annually and is not presently economically viable for purchase for agricultural purposes. With the use of the work force of a monastic community the property can become more productive and the agricultural potential enhanced so that it feeds the Monastery and potentially could provide cash crops for sale.
2.7 Irrigation: The property presently has a water license for 1,000 gallons a day and an additional application could be made for increase gallonage for additional agricultural uses. The present license takes water from Pillchuck Creek and is stored in a reservoir that can be increased in size to accommodate agricultural requirements. The irrigation of fruit trees and agricultural crops could be by way of a system of gravitational feeds from the higher elevation reservoir.
There are varied incentives for the Monastery to be excellent stewards of the land and to increase the agricultural opportunities of the agricultural land.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 114 of 238 3) A question was raised as to any flood mitigation works that may impact agricultural uses.
3.1 Attached is a geotechnical report by BGC Engineering dated September 2, 2009 that addresses the rock fall hazard and the flood mitigation hazard for the area proposed for the Monastery building and provides the flood construction level required for the Monastery building. The building area is not subject to a rockfall hazard and a minimal berm is to be designed and constructed to the west of Pillchuck creek for approximately 100 feet for debris flow hazard mitigation. This berm is within the area proposed for the construction of the Monastery building and no additional flood mitigation works are required. The flood mitigation does not reduce the cultivated area or impact the agricultural uses of the land.
3.2 The flood construction level set out by BGC Engineering is the 31.7 meter elevation level. The proposed Monastery building will be build above the 31.7 meter elevation level except for some non residential basement storage and meeting areas. A minimum of fill will be required under a small portion of the proposed south east wing of the building.
We believe that the enclosed additional information has addressed the questions raised by some council members at the August 24th Council meeting. If any additional information is required or any item clarified please contact the writer.
Yours truly,
______Eugene Evanetz
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 115 of 238 (@,- A )%@,-, , - -!" ") . %A / Date: #!""# Recommendation:% , --!" ") ). %A +$,$ +B8;/ CAO Comments: Who Votes: ( (C , Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: A )%@, , --!" ") ). , ?+3, +. @,/ , --. .,: ,/ , 5% -A ,.( , - H% -( -HA ,.7. $ + - - !" ") ). --I ""/""/ Relevant Policy:$,$ +B8; Strategic Relevance: 1 -!" " -$.,-/$, - 5: I """"" 7 . C;-,$, ,/ - ,@,- : - $ %/ @,.,- / 1 , - - + , / Desired Outcome(S): . , . - 0( / Response Options: / , --!" ") ). % A ,$,$ +B8;/ !/ !" "H' $,$ + -( )H+ , - , -I ""/""/ ;/ !" "H' $,$ +, - , -/ - +, , - , .,5// , - ="J- , .,/7 Preferred Strategy: , --!" ") ). % A ,$,$ +B8;/ SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 116 of 238 (@,- A )%@,-, , - -!" ") . %A / 1 )-( General: A )%, , -O$,%. (P 0 '$,%%, 3, +$/( %,0, +?- 0(.+.,/$,$ +B8; ?+,+-=J, , -/ =J , : - 0( - -, +?/ 0($, : , , .- , +?/ Organizational:/ Financial: 0(. .,- , - , .,-+? +/ . ,-+? , , 0(-. , - / $, - 5: I """"" 7 . C;- ,$, ,/ - ,@,- : - $%/ @, .,- / 1- --A )%, - 0(+, , 4 , -/ @,- - 0(+, , - A )%/ Legal: / Follow Up Action:@,/ Communication:.A )%+ , -, / Other Comments: , $K4$,1 (.+ .) L. . ,%)
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 117 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 118 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 119 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 120 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 121 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 122 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 123 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 124 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 125 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 126 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 127 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 128 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 129 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 130 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 131 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 132 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 133 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 134 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 135 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 136 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 137 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 138 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 139 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 140 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 141 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 142 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 143 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 144 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 145 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 146 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 147 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 148 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 149 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 150 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 151 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 152 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 153 of 238 REQUEST FOR DECISION AUGUST 31, 2009
SUBJECT: Corridor Trails Management Plan
RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Corridor Trails Management Plan be approved in principle and referred to external agencies for comment.
CAO COMMENTS: Agree with recommendation. PRE.
Attached : - Background on Trail Establishment - Corridor Trails Management Plan
KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED:. management plan for the Sea to Sky Trails service.
RELEVANT POLICY: the proposed plan will establish a management policy and framework for the Sea to Sky Trails service.
STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: Currently no management plan is in place.
The proposed plan gives policy guidance for trails management in the following areas:
M Trail approval process M Trail standards M Guide to determine significance of trail for funding priority M Net Gain/No net loss trail policies M Conflict management M Trail identification and rating system M Funding
Adoption of this Management Plan will complement the Risk management policy (adopted April 2009) and complete the overall policy work required for this service.
DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Clear policy direction for management/operation of trails, within current funding limits.
RESPONSE OPTIONS: /. -- / !/.
PREFERRED STRATEGY: Approve in principle.
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 154 of 238 GENERAL: Preliminary endorsement allows next step in consultation plan and facilitation of final adoption of the plan by the Board. In 2009.
ORGANIZATIONAL: Workload will increase in order to provide maintenance and risk management duties to trails. Likely to be a combination of staff, volunteers, and contracted services.
FINANCIAL: Financial implications have been incorporated into the Financial Plan.
FOLLOW UP ACTION: M Refer for comment M Consider referral responses M Report to Board M Final consideration and adoption M Implementation .
COMMUNICATION: a public education and communication program is contained in the Plan.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Submitted by Reviewed by: ,
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 155 of 238
Management Agreements with Ministry of Tourism, Sport and the Arts (MoTCA)
In February 2007, the SLRD resolved to enter into a management agreement with the Ministry of Tourism, Sport and the Arts to manage “established’ trails on Crown Land in the Sea to Sky Corridor.
The phrase “established trails” is defined under s. 56 of the Forest Range Practices Act, and refers to the level of protection a trail is permitted under the Act. An Established trail is provided the highest level of protection, and consultation is required from forestry or other land resource companies when harvesting around the trail.
The Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts is in the referral process with ILMB to establish the following trails throughout the region:
Squamish Area Trails Whistler Area Trails Pemberton Area Trails Wonderland Comfortably Numb & Young Lust Happy Trail Bob Macintosh Dark Forest River runs Through it Riverside/Bathtub Fartherside Kill me Thrill me Mosquito Lake Flat Alley Industrial Disease Cream Puff Mashiter Cut Yer bars Econoline Powerhouse Plunge Overnight sensation Ray Peters Trail Lumpy's epic Ring Creek Rip Tour De Soo Corners trails Waterfall Upper Powersmart One Mile Lake Trails Diamond Head Trail Sea to Sky Trail section 1a Sea to Sky trail, section 1b Cat Lake trails Made in the Shade/Dead End Loop
Assuming these trails are approved for establishment, the SLRD, under its agreement with MoTCA, will be asked to add them to the Management Agreement with MoTCA and become the trail managers. The (draft) Management Plan is intended to be the guide for staff to work with trail users, provincial agencies and others to provide the service to the Corridor Trails Service Area.
As the service evolves, more trails will likely be added, either through establishment of existing trails, or the construction of new trails, via the process outlined in the (draft) Management Plan.
1 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 156 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 157 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 158 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 159 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 160 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 161 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 162 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 163 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 164 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 165 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 166 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 167 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 168 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 169 of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
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 170 of 238 Vancouver, August 25, 2009
It is less than six months to go to the Opening Ceremonies for the 2010 Winter Games. The project is enormously exciting and ever challenging! We face the same compelling challenges brought on by the current economic climate as any enterprise. And, creative and daring as we try to be, we will need the help of the entire community if we are to across the finish line and achieve the kind of success we all crave for. I get asked the same question again and again by community leaders - “tell us how we can help”. The answer is “people”. Gifted, giving, inspired people. We have 1500 key temporary positions that must be filled over the next six months so we are offering seconded employees the working experience of a lifetime. A chance to join a high performance team to help deliver one of the world’s premiere sporting events and serve Canada at the same time!
One thing is certain - working for the Games will be transformational. Your employees will return to you grateful, with new skills, fully uplifted by their experience and with the knowledge that their contribution to the success of the 2010 Games was pivotal. And you will know that your contribution made a huge difference to them, to the Games, to your own company, to BC and to Canada.
You can take my word for it, or those of Frank King, a friend and colleague who led the team that staged the highly successful 1988 Olympic Winter Games in Calgary with the help of hundreds of seconded staff:
“Numerous companies and Government Partners loaned us staff in the lead up to the ’88 Games to help ensure success. From some of the most senior executives in our organization to those who had front-line jobs in Games venues, the community and our partners stepped up to give their employees the extraordinary opportunity to share the experience of working with the Organizing Committee. That was over 20 years ago and the enduring pride in the community remains strong. I still hear from people who were seconded to the Games, what it did for their careers and the memories and friendships that came with it. I strongly encourage the public and private sector to seriously consider putting people on the 2010 team, not only to help VANOC but to enrich their companies with the skills and experience gained by being part of it.” (Frank King, Chairman and CEO, Calgary Organizing Committee for the 1988 Olympic Winter Games)
Please take the time to read through the attached fact sheet on this unique program, which also includes a contact address to get you started on the process of seconding valued staff to our team.
Thank you in advance for considering this opportunity – and for embracing the spirit of the Games. I assure you that this will be one of the most treasured opportunities you can offer to the stars on your own team. We are enormously grateful for your support and thank you for making these Games your priority. The months ahead will be exciting and full of drama as we prepare to welcome the world. Thank You.
Regards,
John A. Furlong Chief Executive Officer
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 171 of 238
Employee Loan Program Details
VANOC is looking to fill out its 2010 roster – and you can help.
The Employee Loan Program presents local and national businesses with an opportunity to experience the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games up close. Positions are available in 32 of VANOC’s 53 departments, and will last between eight weeks and six months. Give your employees the opportunity of a lifetime – join the ultimate Game.
At VANOC, your employees will be part of an engaging team whose experience spans past Games, an international workforce that encourages cultural diversity and a supportive environment that inspires new ideas. By gaining exclusive insight into the planning and production of one of the world’s most elite events, your employees will return to you with a renewed sense of leadership and confidence.
Do not miss your opportunity to build the legacy of your own organization by enabling your employees to contribute firsthand to the lasting legacies of the 2010 Games.
These are Canada’s Games. Play your part.
BENEFITS: WHY YOUR ORGANIZATION SECONDMENT ROLES: SHOULD PARTICIPATE VANOC is seeking secondments in various Be part of a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity departments including Accreditation, Broadcast, Build internal capacity through skills Editorial Services, Energy Services, Event development and experiential learning Services, Food Services, International Client Services, Logistics, Sport Production, Be a recognized Employer of Choice in the Transportation, and Press Operations. community as a result of increased employee motivation, engagement and retention VANOC requires a wide range of skills and levels of experience from administrative Contribute your employees’ specialized skills assistants, coordinators and customer service and provide them with a invaluable professional roles to managers, assistant managers and experience through working temporarily for the supervisors. Games.
GUIDELINES:
Secondments can last from 8 weeks to 6 months depending on the role, skill set of the employee and ability of the company to transfer its employee. Salary and benefits are to be paid by the home organization.
Seconded employees will remain on their home organization’s programs (benefits, vacation pay, pension, etc.) for the duration of the secondment period. Relocation, accommodation or travel expenses are the responsibility of the home organization.
All VANOC operational policies and procedures will apply to the seconded employees. Seconded employees will need to have availability during Games Time.
CONTACT US: If your organization is interested in participating or would like further information on this program, please contact [email protected].
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 172 of 238
1) Today’s Date: 2) Last Name:
3) First Name: 4) Preferred Name:
5) Organization/Ministry: 6) Preferred contact phone #:
7) Indicate period of availability:
8) Preferred contact email address:
9) Where do you have accommodations? (check all that apply) Vancouver Whistler Other in Sea to Sky
10) Select the employee group you belong to: Manager Employee
11) Due to our agreement with the RCMP, all employees and volunteers are required to go through a criminal history check. Would you be willing to submit to a criminal history check? yes no
12) Indicate any confirmed vacation plans you have during your period of availability noted above:
13) Please choose the areas in which you’re interested in working. Your preferences will be 1st choice (indicate functional taken into consideration, but not guaranteed: area or position #):
2nd choice (indicate functional area or position #):
3rd choice (indicate functional area or position #):
14) Do you speak French? no yes If yes, select level from drop down list:
15) Do you speak any other languages? no yes If yes, which languages and at what level?:
16) Indicate any certificates you hold such as first aid, fork lift operator, etc:
17) Do you have a valid If yes, select class driver’s license? no yes from drop down list:
18) Have you already been accepted as a volunteer? no yes If yes, for what period of time?
19) Please indicate any skills/experiences or outside interests not listed on your resume that you would like to share and feel would help VANOC in placing you in a role.
20) Provide any other information you feel VANOC should have to help determine what role to place you in through the VANOC Secondment Program:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 173 of 238 Last Updated: Aug26, 2009 Page 1 of 1 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Notes: Title/Job Summary – Positions are ever evolving & responsibilities may shift over time. Titles may be adjusted from time to time to accurately reflect responsibilities.
ACC Accommodation The Accommodation function is responsible for securing, managing & providing &/or coordinating lodging for specific categories of accredited people attending or participating in the Games, & ensuring that quality & operational standards are met.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Duty Supervisor Responsible for the day to day management & • Experience in a hotel or resort Vancouver 2010-01-01 (20) delivery of a Workforce Accommodation Facility, setting &Whistler to including operating a Reception Desk during • Demonstrated guest relations skills 2010-03-23 given hours to address the needs & in an event or hospitality industry requirements of the residents. Guest Coordinator Coordinate the recruitment of guest families for • Experience in delivering training Vancouver 2009-08-17 (7) the Homestay Program. Coordinate arrival & programs & curricula covering a to departure information. Deliver training on wide range of topics 2010-02-28 customer service, cultural awareness, • Strong facilitation/presentation skills transportation routes, communication • Experience in coordinating several procedures & protocol. projects simultaneously Accommodations This role will involve complex project and • A minimum of five years hotel, Vancouver 2009-08-17 Venue Manager operational planning (including but not limited to resort or event management to (1) the management of rooming lists and the experience. 2010-02-28 implementation of essential services), contract • Demonstrated guest relation’s skills management and guest relations on site to in an event or hospitality industry. deliver one or more Workforce Accommodation facilities during pre-Games, Games time and wrap up.
ACR Accreditation Accreditation is responsible for registering & identifying all potential participants in the Games, & accrediting only eligible persons by issuing Games Accreditation Cards with appropriate access privileges in order that the person can perform his/her Games official roles.
Sample roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Accreditation Duties include registration & identification of • Experience in managing multiple Vancouver All positions Coordinator, Help Games participants, for smooth & efficient projects simultaneously & Whistler beginning on Office accreditation process & ensuring issues are • Diplomacy & ability to deal with 2009-10-01, (7) managed in accordance with policies & matters of a highly confidential with some procedures. nature completing on 2009-02- 28 & others on 2010-03- 25 Accreditation Ensures that accreditation policies are • Related experience in sports or Vancouver All positions Operations developed & implemented consistently across large scale events, or a client- & Whistler beginning on Coordinator (3) the Games venues & facilities, & that oriented, account management field 2009-10-01, accreditation is processed in an efficient & • Previous experience working with & with some timely manner at accreditation facilities. supervising staff or volunteers an completing asset on 2009-02- 28 & others on 2010-03- 25
CLT Cultural Olympiad The Cultural Olympiad function is responsible for planning & presenting an exciting, innovative & accessible Olympic & Paralympic arts & cultural program & festivals.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Volunteer Coordinator Work with VANOC Workforce & Culture & • 5 years progressive experience in Vancouver 2009-08-01 (1) Celebrations production teams to develop managing human resources to position descriptions, recruitment & training • Excellent interpersonal and 2010-03-21 plans & operational schedules for up to 500 relationship-building skills volunteers & participants who will support the • Ability to work in a collaborative and delivery of Cultural Olympiad 2010 customer service focused manner
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 174 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 1 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Webmaster Work as a key member of the Cultural • Diploma from media production Vancouver 2009-08-01 (1) Olympiad’s digital edition executing the online training school specializing in web to communications, publicity and news publishing programming/publishing 2010-03-31 needs for a highly visible bilingual website. or equivalent combination of Work with the in-house publishing team to education and experience required. establish timelines, protocols for publishing, and • 3 - 5 years experience overseeing coordinate production and editing for the site. websites for a large organization. Cultural Olympiad’s Work with the CODE publishing team to develop • Diploma from media production Vancouver 2009-08-01 digital edition (CODE) and timelines and protocols for publishing, training school specializing in film to Electronic Journalist planning storyboards, shooting, writing, and video production or equivalent 2010-03-31 (1) producing and editing video and audio stories. combination of education and Take the lead and develop story ideas experience required. appropriate for video and audio production from • Minimum of 3 years experience start to finish. writing, editing and producing video and audio stories required • Minimum of 3 years of on-air reporting experience required • Extensive experience using video production software, including Avid, Avid Interplay and Final Cut Pro, required Artist Services Travel Work with the Manager, Artist Services in the • 2-5 years of related work Vancouver 2009-08-01 Coordinator acquisition & assigning of accommodation experience as a Travel &/or to (1) requirements for programs & events of the Accommodations Coordinator in a 2010-03-21 Cultural Olympiad, Celebration Sites, Sports theatrical or event related area Production, Villages & other program areas as • Schedule management experience well as ensuring the services are delivered. required
NRG Energy Working in close collaboration with the venue construction & overlay teams, & in consultation with corporate partners, the Energy Services function is responsible for the provision & implementation of all permanent & temporary, reliable, redundant power infrastructure required for the Games. Key activities include planning & implementing of electrical safety initiatives, emergency preparation & the testing of operating plans & Games-time power infrastructure operations.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Energy Deputy As a member of the Energy Services team, this • Completion of a Canadian Vancouver 2009-08-01 Manager position will support the Energy Services apprenticeship program in electrical to (3) Manager with the development, project technology with a focus on building 2010-03-21 management & implementation of Games Time wiring & power distribution or a operation of Venue electrical systems required technical diploma from a recognized for venues. institution in a field related to electrical design or equivalent proven international sports event management experience related to temporary power distribution • 5 years experience in installing or designing power distribution systems & electrical infrastructure in Canada (600V distribution experience) • 3+ years working as part of a project team delivering high quality & reliable power infrastructure systems • Experience in the delivery of temporary power infrastructure for events such as major sporting, concerts, exhibitions & theatre is a definite asset
EVS Event Services Event Services is responsible for planning & managing the spectator experience at all Olympic & Paralympic Games Competition & Ceremonies Venues as well as Celebration Sites. Our primary focus is to assist spectators, however we also serve accredited participants such as athletes & media & other Vancouver 2010 workforce members.
Sample Roles:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 175 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 2 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Staff Perform customer service duties at a venue • Customer service experience Vancouver All positions such as logistical support, access control, preferred & Whistler beginning on Vancouver- 288 spectator marshal, & communications 2009-10-01, Whistler- 40 with some completing on 2009-02- 28 & others on 2010-03- 25 Supervisor Supervision of Event Services staff to ensure • Customer service experience Vancouver All positions the adequate level of service is being provided • Previous experience working with & & Whistler beginning on Vancouver- 153 to all guests (Spectators & accredited). supervising staff or volunteers an 2009-10-01, Whistler- 18 asset with some • Event experience preferred completing on 2009-02- 28 & others on 2010-03- 25
FNC Finance The Finance function is responsible for financial reporting & accounting services, budget development & management, tax services, oversight of the Rate Card program, treasury & foreign exchange management & dissolution planning & execution.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Finance Analyst Responsibilities will include: managing the • 3 years of related work experience Vancouver 2009-07-01 (1) month end process, maintaining general is required, preferably with a to ledgers, analysis, assist with preparation of medium to large organization 2010-03-21 financial reports & memorandums, coordinating • Thorough knowledge of both preparation of working papers, maintaining Canadian GAAP & current best accounting process documentation & ensuring practices relating to the control adequacy of & adherence to internal controls. environment & experience with Assist the Manager, Finance in managing the applying this to an organization’s internal & external financial reporting, financial reporting researching accounting guidance & be involved • Exposure to or experience in in tax related special projects. taxation issues • CA, CGA or CMA designation is required
Payroll Administrator Ensure timely & accurate processing of payroll. • 2-3 years of previous payroll Vancouver 2009-08-03 (2) This position will answer employee inquiries experience to regarding payroll deductions, ensure • Knowledge of labour standards 2010-03-31 appropriate documentation is obtained to • Strong working knowledge of the support all payroll entries, assist in the month Microsoft products including Excel end processing of payroll & reconciliations & & Word support Human Resources in benefits • Must be able to pay attention to administration. detail & accuracy with numbers • Strong customer service & interpersonal skills
FAB Food & Beverage Food & Beverage is responsible for delivering safe & high-quality food & beverage products to all constituent groups during the Games.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Food & Beverage Managing within the Vancouver cluster of • Previous multi-sport food & Vancouver 2009-08-01 Venue Manager competition & non-competition venues, this beverage experience to (2) position has the main responsibility of working • 5+ years of ‘hands-on’ experience 2010-02-28 with venue owners & contracted caterers to within food & beverage ensure that all VANOC standards of service & management with emphasis on product quality are maintained for all of our project planning & relationship customer groups. management • Catering procurement, negotiating & contracting experience required • Food safety handling certificate
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 176 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 3 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Food & Beverage Assist with the management of the Vancouver • Previous multi-sport food & Vancouver 2010-01-01 Assistant Venue cluster of competition & non-competition beverage experience to Manager venues, this position has the main responsibility • 5+ years of ‘hands-on’ experience 2010-02-28 (5) of working with venue owners & contracted within food & beverage caterers to ensure that all VANOC standards of management with emphasis on service & product quality are maintained for all project planning & relationship of our customer groups. management • Catering procurement, negotiating & contracting experience required • Food safety handling certificate Food & Beverage Assist in the coordination of the Whistler cluster • Previous multi-sport food & Whistler 2010-01-04 Coordinator of competition & non-competition venues, this beverage experience to (3) position has the main responsibility of working • Food safety handling certificate 2010-02-28 with venue owners & contracted caterers to ensure that all VANOC standards of service & product quality are maintained.
LOG Logistics The Logistics function is responsible for management of the assets & materials of the Games (excluding Athletes’ Villages) including material planning, receipt, storage, distribution/deployment at venues & the recovery & disposition of these items, inclusive of competition venues, non- competition venues, ceremonies, & Look of the Games.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Assistant Venue Assist in the planning, implementation & • Experience in a leadership role in a Vancouver 2009-08-01 Logistics Manager delivery of Venue Logistics operations at a logistics or event environment, to (8) specific venue. preferably in a venue based role in 2010-03-30 major sporting events • Knowledge of WorkSafe BC safety regulations as they pertain to event management & handling of hazardous materials • Proven leadership skills Inventory Coordinator Responsible for all aspects of tracking & • Experience in the utilization of a Vancouver 2009-08-01 (3) maintaining accurate records of all inventories complex integrated warehouse/ to that are held in the warehouse distribution logistics management system is 2010-03-21 centres, at the venues & other locations where desired assets may be stored or used. • Experience in implementing procedures • Strong attention to detail & a strong customer service focus are essential • Excellent administrative & computer skills Delivery Driver Operate VANOC supplied fleet vehicles & • Minimum 2 years of driving Vancouver 2009-08-01 (16) conduct pickups & deliveries between all experience to Vancouver 2010 venues & the Main Distribution • Valid Class 5 British Columbia 2010-03-21 Centre. driver’s license • Current clean driver’s abstract • Knowledge of warehousing/ distribution/inventory systems an asset • Minimum of 1 year driving experience within Metro Vancouver are with good knowledge of roads & applicable routes Lead Hand Responsible for overseeing the safe & secure • Minimum of 2 years of experience Vancouver 2009-08-01 (1) receipt, storage, distribution & recovery of in a Lead Hand role in a fast paced to goods at the VANOC Main Distribution Centre warehouse distribution operation 2010-03-21 (MDC) Warehouse. Core responsibilities include • Minimum 2 years experience supervising staff, scheduling work shifts, supervising a team assisting the Manager, MDC Warehouse • Willing to work weekends, days, Operations in policy & procedure evenings, &/or night shifts on a 24/7 implementation, coordinating work assignments, rotation where needed evaluating & managing employee performance, • Valid Lift Truck operator certification & determining training requirements. is required • Must be able to regularly lift items up to 50 lbs Material Handler Receiving, picking, staging, & shipping inventory • 2+ years experience in a Vancouver Positions (15) per work orders. Core responsibilities include warehouse distribution environment beginning operating material handling equipment & • Must be able to regularly lift items from now physical handling of inventory within warehouse up to 50 lbs until 2009-12- environment. 31 and completing on 2009-02- 28, 2010-03- 25 or 2010- 04-15
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 177 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 4 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
LOK Look of the Games To create a memorable visual experience for athletes, spectators, & the international broadcast audiences through the integrated application of “Vancouver 2010” Look of the Games treatments & signage.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Contract Manager Responsible for managing all contracts for Look • 5+ years experience contract Vancouver 2009-08-01 (1) of the Games for installation & production management experience to services required Look treatments & wayfinding • Industry knowledge (Signage 2010-02-28 signage at all venues manufacturing/Brand & Creative Services) • Strong communication & negotiation skills Installation Manager Responsible for managing the installation • 5+ years of experience in a Vancouver 2009-08-01 (1) process for all venues for the Look of the management position in similar to Games ‘treatments” & wayfinding signage industry (Signage or Brand & 2010-02-28 Creative) • Previous experience managing contracted services • Construction & Safety knowledge required Look Storage Coordinates inventory & storage of goods for • 2 years experience in inventory Vancouver 2009-08-01 Coordinator Look Treatments & Wayfinding Signage control, warehousing or storage to (1) industry an asset 2010-03-21 • Strong customer service skills & attention to detail • Strong MS Office Skills & experience with inventory management system an asset
NCS NOC/NPC Services NOC/NPC Services serves as the primary liaison & only point of contact between VANOC & our National Olympic Committee (NOC) & National Paralympic Committee (NPC) partners, in the period leading up to & during the Olympic & Paralympic Games. NOCs develop, promote & protect the Olympic Movement in their respective countries, in accordance with the Olympic Charter. NPCs are national organizations recognized by the IPC as the sole representative of the athletes with a disability in their country or territory.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment NOC and NPC Support the development and implementation of • Experience in HR and issue & Vancouver 2009-12-01 Assistants Program the volunteer host / assistants program for the conflict resolution to Coordinator National Olympic Committees (NOC) and • Experience with recruitment, 2010-03-21 (1) National Paralympic Committees (NPC) in the training and management of areas of selection, training, organization and volunteers preferred management of 1,000+ volunteer hosts. • Experience in meeting planning and project management • Strong facilitation/presentation skills with varying group sizes and audiences with broad experiences and backgrounds Delegation Coordinate in autonomy the National Olympic • Excellent interpersonal skills and Vancouver 2009-09-01 Registration Meetings Committee (NOC) Relations during the ability to work across cultural to Coordinator Delegation Registration meetings. Support NOC barriers 2010-03-24 (1) Services and NOC/NPC Assistants program as • Experience in conflict resolution and needed. problem solving; ability to negotiate and communicate across organizational levels NOC Relations Support the Manager of the NOC Relations in • Minimum Bachelor’s degree Vancouver 2009-10-01 Deputy Manager resolving issues and supporting the National • Ability to negotiate and to (1) Olympic Committees and NOC Services from communicate across organizational 2010-03-04 the Olympic Village Vancouver. levels • Excellent interpersonal skills and ability to work across cultural barriers • Experience in conflict resolution and problem solving • Ability to stay calm under pressure and in stressful situations • Fluency in other languages an asset
OFL Official Languages In keeping with Canada’s proud linguistic duality & great cultural diversity, the Official Languages function will work in close collaboration with Francophone communities across Canada as well as other VANOC functions to promote our two official languages in order to ensure the delivery of truly bilingual Games.
Sample Roles:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 178 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 5 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Revision Specialist Implementation of the Games Official • 5 - 10 years experience in corporate Vancouver 2009-10-01 Languages requirements (French/English) by communications, journalism, to revising promotional and informative material publications, or related area 2010-02-28 provided by VANOC and intended for a variety • Translation degree or diploma from of audiences such as the public, media, and a recognized institution international organizations prior to, during and • Excellent revision skills with the after the Games. ability to go beyond literal translation by capturing the essence of a text and adapt it in the other language • Fluency in English and French required, both written and oral Translation Support Responsible for providing support to the • Min. of 2+ years experience in Vancouver 2009-10-01 (4) Translation team in the areas of translating translating documents from English to different types of documents (including news to French. 2010-02-28 releases, advertising literature and booklets, • Excellent translation skills and guides, technical manuals, songs, slogans and ability to go beyond literal audiovisual productions) from English to French. translation, to capture the essence Assist with proofreading of pre-production of the text and to adapt it in another materials and with the preparation of lexicon. language • Exceptional knowledge of grammar and syntax in French and English and ability to research terminology from English to French • Fluency in English and French required, both written and oral
VIL Olympic/Paralympic Villages The Athletes’ Villages function is responsible for VANOC’s Olympic & Paralympic Village planning, oversight of the development & implementation of all operations, services, temporary facilities & equipment required to operate the Olympic & Paralympic Villages. The Villages will include approximately 4,800 beds housed in Vancouver & Whistler.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Associate, Village Oversee the administration of the Support • Experience with Microsoft Office Vancouver 2010-01-11 Support Services Services Operations Centre. In addition, they Suite to (9) will perform the dispatching process for the • Previous conflict management 2010-03-01 Village work orders. experience Representative, Assist the Welcome Centre staff with the Village • Customer service focus essential Vancouver 2010-01-22 Welcome Centre, resident & other client groups’ arrival • Experience in hospitality, travel & to Olympic Village processes. tourism an asset 2010-03-03, (5) • Fluency in as second language 2010-03-12 such as French, Russian, German, Japanese, Korean, American Sign Language or other languages, an asset Housekeeping Oversee and manage a pre-determined section • 2+ years of commercial or Vancouver 2010-01-04 Supervisor, Olympic of the Olympic and/or Paralympic Village as it residential housekeeping & Whistler to Village relates to housekeeping in residential spaces, experience at a supervisory level 2010-03-25 while working with key management and required Vancouver – 8 Villages Support Services. • Previous experience in housing Whistler - 8 related services (e.g. housekeeping, laundry, custodial and or janitorial operations.) • Experience in dealing with complex third party contracts and related issues Resident Host Support the Resident Services team in assisting • Customer service focus essential Vancouver Various start Associate, Olympic the Village residents. • Fluency in as second language dates Village such as French, Russian, German, starting, (11) Japanese, Korean, American Sign including Language or other languages, an 2009-11-01 asset or 2010-01-04 or 2010-01-22 to 2010-03-03 or 2010-03-12 or 2010-03-24
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 179 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 6 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Food & Beverage Managing all of the components of the food and • 2+ years of experience at Vancouver Various start Duty Manager, beverage program for the Athlete Villages, this progressive F&B levels with & Whistler dates Olympic Village position has the main responsibility of working emphasis on operations including, with the contracted caterer and contracted • Experience in a hotel or catering 2010-01-04 Vancouver – 3 kitchen provider to ensure that all VANOC environment an asset or Whistler - 3 standards of service and product quality are • Previous multi faceted event 2010-01-11 maintained. The manager will be a part of the experience required to Village operations team and will ensure • Food safety handling certificate 2010-03-06 contractor achievement of planning milestones or and assist in integrating the contracted caterer 2010-03-24 into the Village operation. Support Centre Responsible for assisting with the day-to-day • Experience with Microsoft Office Vancouver Various tart Supervisor, Olympic planning and operational coordination of the Suite dates Village Support Services Operations Centre (SSOC). • Conflict management experience including, (4) The Support Services Operation Centre is the • Ability to work flexible hours 2009-10-05 operations and contact centre for the Olympic & • Previous call centre experience an or Paralympic Villages. asset 2009-10-13 to 2010-03-31 or 2010-04-16
GOL Overlay The Overlay function is responsible for developing an integrated venue design & installing the temporary infrastructure required to provide a good working & spectator environment for all Olympic & Paralympic client groups.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Commodity Part of a multi department team developing the • 3-5 years experience in project Vancouver 2009-08-01 Coordinator technical specifications for commodities management, procurement &/or to (1) required for the temporary infrastructure for the contracts management of goods 2010-03-21 Games venues. Assists with sourcing suppliers &/or services preferably in the , assists the procurement team with developing construction or similar industry & writing technical specifications for the • Technical knowledge of commodities. construction industry materials • Excellent organizational, time- management, administrative & computer skills (MS Office/Excel) required • Experience working with & maintaining databases Deputy Manager, Support & assist the Director Broadcast Overlay • 10 years experience in Vancouver 2009-08-01 Cable Management Technical for the development, project design/project management to (1) management & implementation of designs & • 5+ years experience in the delivery 2010-03-21 integration plans to support cable management of temporary technical infrastructure systems required for all venues. The integration required for events such as major plan will include but is not limited to Energy sporting, concerts, exhibitions & Services, Technology, & all Cable Management theatre. Systems required to support the Games. • Experience in management of Technical, Broadcast or Energy infrastructures within a multiple purpose event environment • Experienced snow mobile operator Rigging/Lighting Support & assist the project management, • A degree or diploma from a Vancouver 2009-08-01 Manager development, & implementation of designs & recognized institution in a related to (1) operational integration plans to support all field or equivalent proven 2010-03-21 rigging systems required for all Games venues. international sports event management experience • 10 years experience in design, broadcast, entertainment project management engineering • 5+ years experience in the delivery of temporary technical infrastructure required for events Manager, Overlay Responsible for managing the Overlay program • A degree, diploma or certificate Vancouver 2009-08-01 (1) of design, development & delivery of the from a recognized institution in a to temporary infrastructure required for staging the related field such as architecture, 2010-03-21 Games. The manager would initially be interior architecture, urban design responsible for multiple venues focusing on one or planning venue or cluster prior to Games time. • Construction experience an asset • 5+ years experience in a design firm in a similar role
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 180 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 7 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Site Coordinator Assist the Overlay Manager on the delivery & • Knowledge & experience of event Vancouver 2010-01-01 (1) decommissioning of temporary commodities build out an asset to required at a venue. This position also assists • An understanding of building codes, 2010-03-21 the Overlay Manager in the site management of design, & construction criteria, all temporary facilities during the operational drawings ortho photos & contour period. mapping, as well as temporary installations an asset
PRS Press Ops The Press Operations function is responsible for planning, preparation & provision of services required for the efficient & professional operation of accredited written & photographic media & their technical & support staff.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Flash Quote Reporter Responsible for flash quotes from athletes & • Strong reporting track record & Vancouver 2010-01-29 (28) coaches in the mixed zone immediately after experience interviewing high profile & Whistler to competition. Assist in the coordination of individuals 2010-02-28 Olympic News Service volunteer staff in the • Previous experience using the mixed zone & press conference operations. INFO system is an asset
Main Press Centre Managing & supervising the effective • Previous experience in major Vancouver 2009-12-01 (MPC) Olympic News functioning of the Main Press Centre pigeon events with press operations to Service (ONS) holes, including receiving results reports, • Excellent computer skills in 2010-03-06 Supervisor photocopying selected news reports & Microsoft Office (2) distributing these to the pigeon holes. Liaising • Previous experience using the with the Print Distribution team, training & INFO system an asset assigning tasks to the Olympic News Service Co-ordinators, & managing work schedules. Main Press Centre Manage the operations of the Main Help Desk • Previous experience with major Vancouver 2009-12-01 Help Desk Supervisor located in the main lobby of the Main Media events in press operations to (2) Centre, & provides services for both press & • Excellent Microsoft Office skills & 2010-03-31 broadcasters. database management • Multiple language skills an asset Mixed Zone Responsible for manage & coordinating the • Excellent Microsoft Office skills & Vancouver 2010-01-15 Supervisor operation of the Press Mixed Zone. Work in database management & Whistler to (14) collaboration with Sport, the Olympic • Previous experience with major 2010-02-28 Broadcasting Services, Broadcast Mixed Zone events in press operations Manager & the National Olympic Committee • Sport-specific knowledge is Press Attachés to ensure Press have desirable. unrestricted access to athlete interviews post- competition. The Press Mixed Zone Supervisor will also implement and enforce the International Olympic Committee (IOC) priority order of OBSV Broadcasters, Radio, International Press Agencies and Press in the Mixed Zone Venue Photo Supervise the operation of all Photo areas & • Previous event experience required Vancouver 2010-01-15 Supervisor services at a venue, including coordination with • Excellent computer skills, & Whistler to (17) other functional areas at the venue & ensuring specifically with Microsoft programs 2010-02-28 an optimum level of support to the Press. & database management
SCW Snow, Cleaning & Waste The Snow Removal, Cleaning & Waste function is responsible for planning, designing & implementing a cleaning & waste management system to meet VANOC’s Zero Waste Commitment, & a snow clearing & removal system.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Snow Removal, Assist Manager in the planning & integration of • Experience within facilities, event Vancouver 2009-09-01 Cleaning & Waste contractors for services related to Snow management or related area to Coordinator – Management, Cleaning & Waste programs for 2010-02-28 Transportation venues. (6) Snow Removal, The initial phase of this role will involve the • Experience in a Whistler 2009-09-01 Cleaning & Waste planning & integration of contractors for service leadership/management role in to Coordinator provisions & the final phase will be operational. facilities, event management or 2010-02-28 (6) related area
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 181 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 8 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Manager, Snow Manage the planning & integration of • A minimum of 3 – 5 years of Vancouver 2009-11-01 Removal, Cleaning & contractors for services related to Snow experience in a & Whistler to Waste – Management, Cleaning & Waste programs for leadership/management role in 2010-02-28 Transportation sites venues. facilities or building cleaning (1) management or related area such as venue operations • Experience within facilities, event management or related area
SPT Sport The Sport function is comprised of three departments:
• Competition Management Competition Management is responsible for the development & management of the Field of Play (FOP) within the rules of each International Sport Federation (IF) or International Paralympic Sport Federation (IPSF).
• Sport Services Responsible for managing any planning, projects or services that cross all sports. This includes; sport planning, sport equipment, weather, sport entries, sport publications, the competition schedule, Paralympic classification & International Sport Federation & International Paralympic Sport Federation services.
• Sport Production Responsible for entertaining, educating & engaging the spectators at the competition venues. This includes selecting announcers, programming the video boards & providing music that enhances the spectators & athletes' experience.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Ceremonies Responsible for assisting in the delivery of the • Experience in sport and / or theatre Vancouver 2010-01-01 Coordinator Victory Ceremonies/Team Welcome background desirable & Whistler to (5) Ceremonies, including ensuring the athlete’s • Experience working with volunteers 2010-03-22 moment is spectacular. Responsibilities include and / or leading teams of people acting as the main point of contact for Sport • Proven ability to use radio Production team members in the lead-up to and communications systems as well as during the Games and to coordinate the daily follow run-sheets, music cues and management of Ceremonies team members, scripts including arrivals, departures, role allocation, assigning of tasks and break times. Field Producer Responsible for planning and coordinating the • Major event experience preferred Vancouver 2010-02-05 (8) interviews, contests and activities happening on • Minimum of 3-5 years of Sport & Whistler to the field of play during scheduled breaks to Entertainment, television or live 2010-02-28 keep the spectators informed, engaged and event experience entertained. • Knowledge of the Canadian and International sport system Production Responsible for assisting the Associate Venue • Major event experience preferred Vancouver All positions Coordinators Producer in entertainment production elements. • Minimum of 1-3 years of Sport & Whistler beginning on (8) Entertainment, television or live 2010-02-05, event experience with some • Knowledge of the Canadian and completing International sport system on 2009-02- 28 & others on 2010-03- 25 Coordinator, Sport This position will be responsible for the • 1 – 3 years of related work Vancouver All positions Information Services distribution and communication of sport related experience in sport administration, & Whistler beginning on (4) information between the Olympic/Paralympic project management or a related 2009-10-01, Villages to the relevant competition and training field (with awareness of the world of with some venues. sport and sport event management) completing • Excellent interpersonal, customer on 2009-02- service and organizational skills 28 & others • University Degree in Sport on 2010-03- Administration or Management an 25 asset
TEC Technology The responsibilities of the Technical Infrastructure function cover the entire range of technology equipment & infrastructure required for the Games including:
• Venue Planning: responsible for technology infrastructure requirements definition, design co-ordination, implementation, venue space required for Games time operations, as well as Games time operation practices & procedures. At Games time the team is responsible for technology venue operations.
• Telecommunications: The Games require an extensive telecommunications network to support the venues & interconnect them to the Broadcast Centre & VANOC headquarters & Data Centre. A wireless telecommunications infrastructure is also required for cellular traffic, WiFi access & support for two way radios.
• VANOC Office Support: provides for the overall technology needs of VANOC staff, such as computers, networks, printers & telephones.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 182 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 9 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
In addition, this function is responsible for technical rooms such as data centres, the operations centre & equipment rooms, providing computer hardware, operating systems & software.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Desktop Support – Support VANOC staff and partners by ensuring • 2–4 years of related work Vancouver 2009-09-01 Shift Work their desktop computer, phone and peripheral experience is required to (4) equipment and software work effectively. • Proven track record in PC hardware 2010-02-28 and software support • Sound understanding of basic IP and Microsoft networking principles • Strong customer service aptitude • Certificates: A+ and Microsoft certification (i.e. MCSE) • Fluency in French an asset Assistant Technology Provide support during the Technology • 3 - 5 years of experience in event, Vancouver 2009-10-01 Implementation Implementation and decommissioning phases, technology or logistics to Manager including the delivery, installation, and Quality management, preferably in a 2010-03-21 (3) Assurance of the hardware architecture on logistics role in major sporting venues, providing coordination between the events Venue Technology Manager and all the other • Experience in the implementation of parties involved in the venue technology technical rooms, offices and/or Call implementation. Centres, or in an Information Technology roll out for a large company • Knowledge of networking and IT systems • Ability to manage relationships in a complex environment • Proven leadership skills Technology Logistics Support the asset management of VANOC’s • Previous experiences in large Vancouver 2009-09-01 Support technology equipment through to Games – time. events or high volume warehouse & Delta to (1) Execute asset management policies and operations a plus. 2010-04-30 procedures, and work closely with VANOC • Excellent organization, spreadsheet Logistics and Venue Technology staff to ensure and writing skills required. asset tracking and logistics support procedures • Knowledge of Excel a must are in place and functioning. This position will • Knowledge of Access an asset have duties both in VANOC’s headquarters and the warehouse facility in Delta; candidates should expect to spend significant time in both locations. Assistant Venue Assist in all areas with regards to venue • A degree or diploma from a Vancouver 2009-09-01 Technology Manager planning and operations. This will include venue recognized institution in a related & Whistler to (8) equipment allocations, establishing fit-out field 2010-02-28 schedule requirements and installation of all • Minimum of 2 years experience in services and equipment within the venue(s). IT within the Technology sector • Outstanding interpersonal and relationship building skills, with the ability to work across all functions and vertically at all levels of the organization. • Proven ability to lead cross- functional teams and strong negotiation and presentation skills
TRN Transportation With one of the largest teams at VANOC, the Transportation function is responsible for planning & implementing systems, policies & procedures that provide for the transport of people to & from Games venues, facilities & related sites. VANOC is directly responsible for developing & providing appropriate transportation systems to meet the needs of different groups as well as collaborating with external stakeholders & authorities.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Fleet Supervisor Responsible for implementing the operations • Experience in public transportation, Vancouver 2009/10/01 (22) plan at the fleet depots. motor coach industry, rental vehicle & Whistler to industry &/ Proven experience in a 2010/03/31 related professional specialty • Proven experience in operations planning & project management to achieve targets within established framework • Strong Microsoft Office skills (Word, Excel, Outlook Calendar) • Ability to work closely & cooperatively with internal & external stakeholders
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 183 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 10 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Workforce Scheduling Responsible for scheduling workforce & project • Related work experience, preferably Vancouver 2009/10/01 Coordinator rollout for Pre-Games, Olympic, & Paralympic in a project management field to (1) events. 2010/03/31 Assistant Venue The Assistant Venue Transportation Manager • Minimum 1 year experience in the Vancouver 2009-11-01 Transportation (AVTM) will provide service & planning support transportation or event & Whistler to Manager to the Transportation Function & the Venue management field 2010-03-31 (26) Transportation Manager. • Previous experience with priority- level Client Groups preferred Yard Assistant Support the daily fleet operations & conducts • Previous experience in the Vancouver 2009/10/01 (35) minor maintenance of fleet of vehicles, including automotive industry is an asset to cleaning (inside & out), checking for damage, 2010/03/31 overseeing repairs, shuttling vehicles, parking vehicles & aids in registration & deactivation of insurance.
VEM Venue Management Venue Management is responsible for operating the Games competition & training venues, for ensuring that all client group needs & services are met & that operational plans & procedures are developed & then implemented for all venue activities.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Venue Event Communications is responsible for • Excellent interpersonal, Vancouver 2009-10-01 Communications facilitating on-venue communication via face-to- organizational & relationship & Whistler to Centre Managers face, cell phone, building skills 2010-03-25 (10) & radio conversations. The method of • Clear oral, written, & monitoring radio chatter is via a radio dispatch communication skills centre called the • Ability to manage a team & follow “Venue Communication Centre” (VCC). The directions from multiple supervisors VCC is the main communication & information • Ability to multi-task & assign priority hub of the to multiple projects at any given venue & will assist the venue team by facilitating time two-way radio-communications, providing up-to- • Operational event experience with date the ability to react to the ‘big picture’ event related information & assisting with issue • Experience leading, training, tracking & issue resolution. nurturing, & supporting volunteers Operations Manager Assist with the development & management of • Assist with the development of the Vancouver 2009-10-01 (1) the Venue Team. Venue Operations Plan To • Manage information flow to all 2010-03-25 Functions with regards to venue operations • Assist with the coordination of operational & service requirements in conjunction with VANOC Functional Areas •
WRK Workforce/Human Resources The Workforce/Human Resources function is responsible for all aspects of the workforce journey, including planning, recruiting, training, retaining & caring for the workforce staging the Games. The workforce includes paid staff, volunteers & contractors.
Sample Roles:
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Coordinator, Training Assist with a variety of tasks to ensure smooth • 3 years of related work experience Vancouver 2009-09-01 Administration training operations, includes training-related • Proven planning and project to (1) facilities bookings, invitation management and coordination skills and experience 2010-02-28 logistical support for training programs. Provide • Previous experience in Training project support to the Training Specialists on a environments an asset wide range of projects, as well as coordinate general administration within the function. Administrative Provide administrative support to the Workforce • Excellent customer service and Vancouver 2009-09-01 Assistant, Workforce Planning Team. Responsibilities include data interpersonal skills, including good to Planning entry, meeting scheduling, research, and oral and written communication 2010-02-28 (1) support with planning and coordination of skills various projects. • Proficient use of MS suite of products, with an emphasis of MS Excel, Outlook, Word and PowerPoint. Other database familiarity an asset.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 184 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 11 of 12 Vancouver 2010 Functional Area & Sample Position Descriptions
Title / Duration of # of Positions to Fill Job Summary Job Qualifications Location Employment Data Entry Assistant, This position will provide data entry assistance • 1 – 3 years of related work Vancouver 2009-09-01 Human Resources to the Human Resources team. This position will experience in data entry or as an to (7) support data administration of the staff on- administrative assistant 2010-02-28 boarding, accreditation and exiting processes. • Education or experience within the human resources field is an asset • Excellent organization, time- management, administrative and computer skills essential
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 185 of 238 August 25, 2009 Page 12 of 12 SECONDMENT AGREEMENT (Contributor Form)
This Secondment Agreement is entered into this ___ day of ______, 2009
AMONG:
VANCOUVER ORGANIZING COMMITTEE FOR THE 2010 OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC WINTER GAMES, a not-for-profit corporation having its head office at 400-3585 Graveley St., Vancouver, BC, V5K 5J5
("VANOC")
AND: [NAME OF ORGANIZATION], a corporation with offices located at ______
("Home Organization")
AND: [EMPLOYEE NAME], an individual residing at ______
("Secondee")
BACKGROUND:
A. VANOC has been incorporated to plan, organize, finance and stage the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (the “Games”).
B. The Home Organization would like to make a contribution to the Games by providing VANOC with the services of the Secondee, an employee of the Home Organization, during the period of time referred to in this Agreement.
C. VANOC has identified the Secondee as an individual from the Home Organization that would be well suited to fill a VANOC staffing need and the Secondee has agreed to work for VANOC under the terms of this arrangement.
For and in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits described in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:
1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on or around [start date for secondment] and, subject to prior termination in accordance with the terms hereof, shall continue to and expire on, [end of secondment date] (the “Term”). VANOC shall have the right, at its sole discretion, to extend the term of this Agreement for an additional period ending not later than March 31, 2010 in order to meet its staffing requirements for the Paralympic Games, provided that VANOC gives the Secondee and the Home Organization notice of such extension on or before August 31, 2009.
2. Seconded Services. During the Term, the Secondee will perform such work for VANOC as may be required in the role of [title], including but not limited to those duties set out in the position description attached as Schedule A (the “Services”). The Secondee shall take direction from and report to [name / title] or such other VANOC officer as may be communicated to the Secondee from time to time. The Secondee agrees that during the Term, the Secondee will only work for VANOC, despite remaining an employee of the Home Organization. The Secondee agrees to comply at all times during the Term with VANOC’s policies and procedures, all of which will be available on
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 186 of 238 VANOC’s intranet site. All work product of the Secondee in relation to the Services shall vest absolutely in VANOC and neither the Secondee nor the Home Organization shall have any right, title or interest in any of such work product.
3. VANOC Resources. VANOC will provide the Secondee with workspace, office furniture and desk telephones, together with such other office equipment, communications equipment and other resources as VANOC determines are necessary for the Secondee to carry out the Services. VANOC will also during the Term provide the Secondee with the use of its office shuttle service, access to VANOC’s cafeteria, fitness centre and employee wellness programs and such other facilities, access and use privileges as VANOC generally provides for its own employees, subject to the same policies, procedures and terms of use as are applicable to VANOC employees.
4. Compensation & Expenses. During the Term, the Secondee will remain an employee of the Home Organization and continue to receive the same total compensation including wages and benefits (as adjusted by the Home Organization from time to time) as the Secondee would be receiving if providing services for the Home Organization. The Home Organization will be responsible for payment of the Secondee’s salary, any incentive or performance bonus and continuation of benefits, including without limitation, vacation and sick leave. The Home Organization will also be responsible for deduction and remittance to the proper authorities of all income taxes, employment insurance premiums, Canada Pension Plan contributions and other assessments in respect of the remuneration paid to the Secondee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Home Organization will not be responsible for payment of WCB premiums. VANOC will remit such premiums in respect of the Secondee, as VANOC has received the opinion of WorkSafe BC that VANOC has responsibility for WCB coverage of seconded personnel. VANOC will have no obligation to make any payment to the Secondee (nor to reimburse the Home Organization) in respect of the compensation payable to the Secondee. The Secondee will not be entitled to participate in any benefit, retention, performance or other compensation and benefit plans available to employees of VANOC. If applicable, VANOC will reimburse the Secondee for expenses incurred with VANOC’s prior approval in connection with the performance of the Services, in accordance with VANOC's expense policy.
5. Acknowledgement Regarding Compensation. The Home Organization acknowledges that it is not receiving any financial consideration, marketing rights, Games tickets, Games access privileges or any other financial benefit in exchange for the provision of the Secondee’s services to VANOC under this Agreement. The Home Organization agrees that this Agreement provides the Home Organization with an opportunity to make a positive contribution to the Games, provides skills development opportunities for its employees and furthers the Home Organization’s employee engagement and retention programs.
6. Vacation and Leave. The parties acknowledge that the Secondee has certain entitlement to vacation, time off or other leave in relation to the Secondee’s employment with the Home Organization. However, the Secondee agrees to take only the maximum number of weeks vacation per year during the Term (pro-rated for any partial calendar year during the Term) consistent with that available to comparable VANOC employees, as advised by the Secondee’s manager from time to time. For greater certainty, the Secondee waives any entitlement to vacation, time off or other leave (other than sick leave or leave permitted by law) which is in excess of vacation time, time off or other leave available to comparable VANOC employees. The Home Organization may agree to bank such waived time for use by the Secondee or payment to the Secondee in lieu of use upon the Secondee’s return to work with the Home Organization after the Term. The Secondee will coordinate the scheduling of all vacation, time off or leave with VANOC.
7. Security Requirements. The Secondee agrees that given the sensitivity of Games security requirements, VANOC, in conjunction with the RCMP and in cooperation with any applicable local, national and/or international police forces or security agencies, may at any time and from time to time, conduct a criminal records search, police history information search and/or such other security checks and searches as VANOC may require (collectively, “Searches”) in connection with the
2 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 187 of 238 secondment of the Secondee. Without limiting VANOC’s rights to conduct Searches at any time, the Secondee acknowledges the particular importance of Searches being conducted prior to or at the commencement of this Agreement and again prior to any level of accreditation being granted to the Secondee for the Games. The Secondee agrees that upon VANOC's request at any time and from time to time, she will execute VANOC’s Employee Security Clearance Form and/or such other documents or consents as VANOC may require in order to permit VANOC to have the Searches conducted. The Secondee further agrees that the secondment is conditional upon VANOC being satisfied with the outcome of the Searches, and VANOC reserves the right to deny Games accreditation to the Secondee or to terminate the secondment in the event that it determines, in its sole discretion, that the outcome of the Searches is not satisfactory.
8. Termination. Any party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving the other parties sixty (60) days written notice. In addition, VANOC may terminate this Agreement at any time without notice in the following circumstances:
(i) VANOC determines that the Secondee is not performing the Services in a manner satisfactory to VANOC or that the Secondee has committed a serious breach of any VANOC policy or engaged in conduct that would be considered cause for dismissal in an employment context;
(ii) the results of any searches conducted by VANOC in accordance with Section 7 above are unsatisfactory to VANOC in its sole discretion;
(iii) the Secondee becomes unavailable to perform the Services for any reason other than vacation or approved leave for any period exceeding fifteen consecutive working days or twenty working days in any calendar month; or
(iv) the employment of the Secondee with the Home Organization is terminated for any reason. In the event that any party exercises its right to terminate this Agreement early, the Secondee’s employment with the Home Organization will not be affected, subject to any right of termination the Home Organization may otherwise have under the terms of its employment agreement with the Secondee. Immediately after completion or termination of the Agreement, the Secondee shall return to work with the Home Organization. VANOC shall in no event be liable to either the Secondee or the Home Organization for the payment of any amount for notice, pay in lieu of notice, severance or damages upon termination of this Agreement or any termination of the Secondee’s employment with the Home Organization.
9. No Promotion of Relationship. In recognition of the exclusive rights VANOC has granted to its sponsors and other commercial partners, the Home Organization agrees that it will not advertise or promote the fact that it has seconded the Secondee to VANOC or otherwise refer to its association with VANOC for promotional purposes, including by means of media releases, public declarations, website content or other publicity through any medium whatsoever, without the express written consent of VANOC. The Home Organization will not use “VANOC”, “Vancouver 2010”, the official emblem, logo or mascot of the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games or any other VANOC identification, as a reference or means of promotion, publicity or as a basis to create an association, express or implied, with VANOC, the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, the International Olympic Committee or the Olympic Movement.
10. Execution of VANOC Agreements; Confidentiality. Upon commencement of the Term, the Secondee agrees to sign VANOC’s standard forms of Consent to Use of Likeness document, Ethics Policy Acknowledgement and Confidentiality and Information Management Agreement, copies of which will be presented to the Secondee upon commencement of the Term (and will be made available to the Home Organization on request). The Secondee agrees and acknowledges that in addition to complying with the obligations contained in the Confidentiality and Information Management Agreement, the Secondee acknowledges that the terms and conditions of this 3 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 188 of 238 Agreement as well as the terms and conditions of the Secondee’s employment with the Home Organization are confidential and will not be disclosed to any other person without VANOC’s express consent.
11. Indemnification. VANOC will be responsible for and will indemnify and save harmless the Home Organization, its officers, directors, agents and employees, from all claims, losses or damages, and any reasonable associated costs, which relate to or arise directly or indirectly out of any breach of this Agreement by VANOC or any negligent acts or omissions of the Secondee in connection with the Secondee's performance of the Services at the direction of VANOC under this Agreement. Home Organization will be responsible for and will indemnify and save harmless VANOC, its officers, directors, agents and employees, from all claims, losses or damages, and any reasonable associated costs, which relate to or arise directly or indirectly out of any breach of a representation, warranty, promise or agreement made by Home Organization in this Agreement.
12. Access to Fleet Vehicles. VANOC has access to a large quantity of fleet vehicles through its sponsorship arrangements with General Motors. The Secondee may from time to time during the course of the secondment be required or permitted to use a VANOC fleet vehicle in order to carry out the Services. The Secondee’s authorization to drive a VANOC fleet vehicle will be subject to confirmation that the Secondee holds a valid driver’s license and has a driving record that meets the conditions which General Motors has established for VANOC drivers of fleet vehicles. Accordingly, the Secondee hereby authorizes VANOC from time to time to obtain from ICBC (or such other relevant agencies as may be required) the Secondee’s driver’s abstract or such other driving information as is necessary to administer the fleet vehicle program.
13. General. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of the secondment of the Secondee to VANOC. The rights, benefits and privileges outlined in this Agreement are personal and accordingly, it may not be assigned by the Secondee or VANOC. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the Province of British Columbia and will be binding on the heirs, executors and administrators of the Secondee and on the successors and assigns of VANOC and the Home Organization. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions of this Agreement will not be affected by such determination and will remain in full force and effect to the fullest extent permitted by law. No consent or waiver, express or implied, by any party to or of any breach or default by another party hereto in the performance by the other of its obligations hereunder will be deemed to be a consent or waiver to or of any other breach or default of the same or any other obligation of such party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date written above.
VANCOUVER ORGANIZING COMMITTEE FOR THE 2010 OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC [NAME OF HOME ORGANIZATION] WINTER GAMES
By: ______By: ______
By: ______By: ______
______[NAME OF SECONDEE] 4 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 189 of 238
Schedule A Position Description
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 190 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 191 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 192 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 193 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 194 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 195 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 196 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 197 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 198 of 238 From: Glen Farrough [[email protected]] Sent: September 9, 2009 1:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Resolution for the Board
September 9, 2009
Steve Bergh – President BC Lightkeepers Local 20232 PSAC Alice Woods – Vice President Chatham Pt Lt Stn Box 187 Campbell River, BC V9W 5A7 250 203 2421 [email protected]
Dear Regional District Board Members,
Please find below a resolution from the BC Lightkeepers which we would ask you to consider at your next council meeting. Unfortunately, government bureaucrats are once again attempting to remove the services of Lightkeepers from the Canadian people. They are working quickly to implement a plan to de-staff the remaining 27staffed lightstations on the west coast and the remaining 9 on the shores of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The Assistant Commissioner of Coast Guard, by continuing to refer to these stations as ‘automated’, is attempting to lead the public to believe that the stations being de-staffed are automated already and that it is only a matter of removing the Lightkeepers. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Lightkeepers have been key players in public safety for over a century and their efforts continue to be held in high regard by the Marine and Aviation communities on both coasts. This is not romanticism.. It reflects reality. The services that the Keepers perform are professional and extensive and there simply is no reliable way, even in this day, to replace them with automated equipment. Their weather observations have a positive impact in both the prevention of incidents and the success of rescue efforts when incidents occur. They help in the accuracy of forecasting and assist the timely flow of goods and passengers along the waterways of both coasts. There have been numerous attempts to duplicate these observations by a variety of equipment and all have fallen miserably short.
Lightkeepers continue to assist in Search and Rescue, provide sanctuary, act as first aid outposts, relay warnings and distress calls, liaise with RCMP, Fisheries, Pollution Control and other government agencies, and we help to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security by establishing a strong federal presence on our coastlines. Our work is not limited to this list.. We protect and maintain these, your public assets, the gems of your coasts, the Lighthouses.
Our concern is not for our jobs. It is for the continuation of the service that Canadians want, expect, and deserve to have.
Respectfully, Glen Farrough, for Steve Bergh – President BC Lightkeepers Local 20232 PSAC Alice Woods – Vice President
RESOLUTION:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 199 of 238 file:///L|/Administration/Board/Agendas/2009/09/RRM/lighthouse.htm[15/09/2009 1:48:04 PM] Be it resolved that the ______(Village, Town, City, Regional District, etc) of ______supports staffed lightstations. We believe that retaining the 27 remaining staffed lightstations is the best way to ensure the safety of the members of our community who travel on or over the waters of BC’s West coast and the safety of all those who come to visit our beautiful coastal waters. We would hold the Canadian Coast Guard to their larger mandate, their motto, of Safety First, Service Always. We want a human presence at these 27 lighthouses. We want these trained weather observers to inform us of the weather at these strategic locations 24 hours a day, every day of the year. We want a lightkeeper to be able to relay a distress call from a weak VHF radio. We want lightkeepers on hand to offer assistance to those who need it, to protect the stations, the aids to navigation and other equipment on hand. We disagree with the Canadian Coast Guard when it states that its responsibility on lightstations only extends as far as the navigational aids. Staffed lightstations help protect the marine environment, play a major role in the safety of the public on our waters, and help to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security by establishing a strong federal presence on our coastline. We ask the Canadian Coast Guard to rescind their plans to de-staff lightstations.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 200 of 238 file:///L|/Administration/Board/Agendas/2009/09/RRM/lighthouse.htm[15/09/2009 1:48:04 PM] OFFICE OF THE CHAIR
File: 0430 – 01 September 9, 2009
Office of the Prime Minister 80 Wellington Street Ottawa K1A 0A2
Dear Prime Minister Harper;
It has come to our attention that the Canadian Coast Guard has announced that it will proceed with the destaffing of lightstations on both coasts.
This news comes as quite a shock to our Regional District. We have adamantly opposed any reduction of services to lightstations on our coast. In March of 1998, an announcement was made by the then Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, that there would be no further destaffing of any lightstations. This was later affirmed by your government. This recent move by the bureaucrats at the Coast Guard flies in the face of those commitments and also in respect to your Economic Stimulus measures.
Tourism has now become the number one industry in this province. Boaters and eco-tourists are a very large part of that sector. They have come to depend on the reliable safety services provided by lightkeepers who have been doing this valuable work for the past 150 years. Any savings that might be realized by the Coast Guard in the way of salaries will be quickly eaten up by expensive helicopter trips to these sites for maintenance and operational issues that are now dealt with efficiently and cost effectively by lightkeepers on site.
All lightstaions are located in the most strategic locations along the coast. They are a display of our sovereignty in this climate of uncertainty over various issues. Lightkeepers provide essential weather reporting 24/7, along with valuable assistance to Search and Rescue. They also provide assistance to many other agencies such as the RCMP, and various other federal and provincial agencies. Their service cannot be replaced or reduced.
We respectfully request that you step in and stop this ill conceived plan by the Coast Guard before it proceeds any further. The public has spoken loudly and clearly for many years during other attempts by the Coast Guard to destaff lightstations. They have opposed any reductions that have been proposed. That sentiment still exists today.
#301 – 990 Cedar Street, Campbell River, BC V9W 7Z8 Tel: 250-830-6700 Fax: 250-830-6710 Toll free: 1-877-830-2990 www.strathconard.ca
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 201 of 238 Page 2
Please respect the strong feelings of the population of Canada regarding what has been considered a Canadian icon for so many decades and stop this move by the Coast Guard. We have seen the Coast Guard rationale for this initiative and we do not agree with it nor do we want this letter to be referred to the Minister responsible who will then get a reply written by the Coast Guard explaining why this is a good idea. It is not a good idea, nor will it ever be.
We look forward to your positive personal response.
Sincerely,
C. Anderson
Craig Anderson Chair cc: John Duncan, MP, North Island Union of BC Municipalities Federation of Canadian Municipalities All coastal local governments
Strathcona Regional District
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 202 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 203 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 204 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 205 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 206 of 238 SLRD Regular Meeting Minutes August 24, 2009; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Board: R. Oakley (Chair); K. Melamed (Whistler); J. Turner (Area D); J. Sturdy (Pemberton); D. DeYagher (Alternate, Area B); S. Gimse (Area C)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; S. Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development; L. Griffiths, Planner; B. Hernandez, Building Inspector; S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)
Others: 5 members of the public and 1 member of the press
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 10:34 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
The following were added to the agenda:
3.2 Board Chair’s Report – Summary of Fire Activity 5.1.6 Cleaning and Sterilizing the Furry Creek Reservoir 12.1 Invitation from Canadian National Railway – Community Reception and Dinner 12.2 Elected Officials Forum Date for Regional Growth Strategy Dispute Resolution
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
3 Committee Reports and Recommendations
3.1 Committee of the Whole August 20, 2009 Recommendations:
1. Regional Economic Development Strategy Report
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 207 of 238 This is page 2 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT the Regional Economic Development Strategy be postponed until May 2010, for further review and consideration at that time.
CARRIED 2. Transportation Strategy
It was moved and seconded:
THAT an Elected Officials Forum be scheduled to come to consensus on what their transportation planning and implementation priorities are, and what they would like the SLRD’s role to be in regional service delivery.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the motion be amended to:
THAT an Elected Officials Forum be scheduled prior to the Union of BC Municipalities Convention to come to consensus on what their Northern and Southern transportation and implementation priorities are, and what they would like the SLRD’s role to be in regional service delivery.
Vote on Amendment CARRIED Motion as Amended CARRIED
3. Union of BC Municipalities Requests to Meet with Ministers:
Local Government Cost Recovery for Wildfire Responses
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a meeting with the Solicitor General be requested at the 2009 UBCM Conference to discuss cost recovery for wildfire responses by Local Governments. CARRIED
4. Susan Gimse - Federation of Canadian Municipalities Committees Appointment
It was moved and seconded:
THAT up to $10,000 for flights, accommodations, and meals be authorized to Director Susan Gimse to attend all 3 Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ (FCM) Committee meetings. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 208 of 238 This is page 3 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
3.2 Board Chair Report – Summary of Fire Activity
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Declaration of State of Local Emergency/Evacuation Alerts/Evacuation Orders report be received. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a Committee of the Whole meeting be scheduled, preferably in advance of the 2009 Union of BC Municipalities convention, to discuss the SLRD’s Emergency Response Plan.
CARRIED
4 Bylaws
4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
4.1.1 Bylaw 1128 - SLRD Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No 1128, 2009 – Blackwater Creek , Area C
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing to Electoral Area ‘C’ Director Susan Gimse, with Director Jordan Sturdy as alternate delegate pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government Act, for the consideration of Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1128, 2009.
2. THAT the public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1128, 2009 be held at 7 PM on Tuesday, September 8, 2009 at the Birken Community Hall (adjacent to the Firehall), Birken, BC. CARRIED
4.1.2 Bylaw 1129 - Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1129, 2009 - 8946 Portage Rd., Poole Creek, Area C
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing to Electoral Area ‘C’ Director Susan Gimse, with
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 209 of 238 This is page 4 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
Director Jordan Sturdy as alternate delegate pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government Act, for the consideration of Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1129, 2009.
2. THAT the public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1129, 2009 be held at 7 PM on September 8, 2009 at the Birken Community Centre, 9223 Pemberton Portage Road, Birken, B.C.
3. That previous resolutions with respect to the scheduling of a public hearing for Bylaw 1129, adopted July 27th 2009, be rescinded.
CARRIED
4.1.3 Bylaw 1073 - Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1073, 2008, cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ be amended by: a. modifying Maps 1 and 6 to show an enlarged area of land designated as Community Watershed Protection Area around Pavilion Lake (the height of land is incorporated within the Community Watershed Protection Area), and, b. an error in policy 4.7 was corrected (the word ‘smaller’ was substituted for the word ‘larger’, so that the policy now states that one dwelling is permitted on parcels smaller than one hectare, and two dwellings are permitted on parcels larger than one hectare). CARRIED It was moved and seconded:
2. THAT Bylaw No. 1073, 2008, cited as ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’ be read a second time as amended.
CARRIED It was moved and seconded:
3. THAT the Board of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing to Electoral Area ‘B’ Director Macri, with Director Oakley as alternate delegate pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 210 of 238 This is page 5 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
Act, for the consideration of ‘Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008.’ 4. THAT the public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1073, 2008 be held at 7 PM on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 at the Lillooet Recreation Centre, Lillooet, BC. CARRIED
4.1.4 Bylaw 1131 - SLRD Electoral Area D Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994, Amendment Bylaw No. 1131-2009 (Porteau Cove housekeeping)
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw No. 1131, 2009 cited as "Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Zoning By-law No. 540, 1994, Amendment By-law No 1131-2009" be adopted.
CARRIED
5 Staff Reports and Other Business
5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
5.1.1 Award of Operations and Maintenance Contract for Water and Wastewater Facilities at Britannia Beach and Furry Creek
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Award of Operations and Maintenance Contract for Water and Wastewater Facilities at Britannia Beach and Furry Creek item be deferred until the September Board Meeting CARRIED
5.1.2 The Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery – Request for Non-farm Use in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR)
Director Gimse left the meeting at 11:05 AM and returned to the meeting at 11:10 AM.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Queen of Peace Dominican Monastery’s Request for Non-farm Use in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) be referred back to staff to address:
1. Agricultural enhancement opportunities, and 2. Aspect of prospective change in use with change of ownership in the future.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 211 of 238 This is page 6 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
5.1.3 Official Community Plan (OCP) Amendment Early & Ongoing Consultation: GEMS School
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1008, 2009, Amendment Bylaw No. 1141, 2009” to facilitate the development of an independent school on a portion of Lot 2, District Lot 211, Plan EPP1353, LLD, Electoral Area C be introduced at the October Board Meeting.
2. THAT as per section 879 of the Local Government Act, the SLRD Regional Board consider that opportunities for early and ongoing consultation regarding the development of an OCP Amendment to permit an independent boarding school should be provided to the following: Aboriginal Groups: o Lower Stl'atl'imx Land and Resource Authority, o Lil’wat Nation Provincial Agencies: o Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, o Ministry of Environment, o Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and the Arts, o Ministry of Community and Rural Development, o Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, o Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, o Agricultural Land Commission o School District 48 Local Government: o Village of Pemberton Organizations: o Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce Persons: o The public.
3. THAT as per section 879(2)(b) of the Local Government Act, the SLRD Regional Board does not consider that consultation is required with adjacent regional districts.
4. THAT consultation opportunities be provided as indicated in the Schedule A to the Planning Department report of August 17, 2009.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 212 of 238 This is page 7 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff examine and report on Housing and Transit needs with respect to the current and additional potential development.
CARRIED
5.1.4 Minto Communications Tower, Gold Bridge BC
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT Minto Communications be permitted to install a 40 foot tower on top of the library/post office building to facilitate high speed internet communications in the Gold Bridge Area.
2. THAT an agreement addressing “issues for consideration” set out in the report of August 12, 2009 be prepared and executed prior to issuance of a building permit and commencement of any work. CARRIED
5.1.5 Stop Work Notice - Mr. Kyle Bubbs: Stop Work Notice #164 - Lot 4, Plan 12831, DL204, LLD - 7326 Clover Road, Pemberton BC
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT a notice on title be registered against Lot 4, Plan 12831, DL 204, LLD as “the permit was not obtained or the inspection has not been satisfactorily completed” per Community Charter Section 57 (1)(b)(ii).
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 5.1.5 be laid on the table to allow Mr. Bubbs to comment.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 5.1.5 be taken from the table.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT a notice on title be registered against Lot 4, Plan 12831, DL 204, LLD as “the permit was not obtained or the inspection has not been satisfactorily
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 213 of 238 This is page 8 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
completed” per Community Charter Section 57 (1)(b)(ii).
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
2. THAT further action be pursued if a building permit has not been issued within six months.
OPPOSED: Directors Gimse and Sturdy CARRIED
5.1.6 Cleaning and Sterilizing the Furry Creek Water Reservoir
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT up to $10,000 be allocated from the Furry Creek Water LSA – 2701 Reserve Fund to provide for the cleaning and sterilization of the water reservoir at Furry Creek.
2. THAT up to $20,000 be allocated from the same fund to provide for the swabbing of the water distribution lines at Furry Creek.
3. THAT an amendment to the Financial Plan and a Reserve Fund Expenditure Bylaw be prepared for the September Board meeting.
CARRIED
6 Correspondence Requesting Action
6.1 Union of BC Municipalities – 2009 Library Grant Freeze – Call to Action
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Chair direct a letter to appropriate ministers requesting continued support for Library Funding;
AND THAT the letter be copied to Member Municipalities with a request to consider sending a similar letter of support.
CARRIED
6.2 Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society – Office Closure
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 214 of 238 This is page 9 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT item 6.2 be moved In-Camera.
CARRIED
7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – July 27, 2009
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the July 27, 2009 Regular Board Meeting minutes be confirmed as circulated.
CARRIED
7.2 Committee of the Whole Minutes – August 20, 2009
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the August 20, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting minutes be received.
CARRIED
8 Business Arising from the Minutes
8.1 BC Ambulance Service Contract Dispute
Director J. Sturdy declared a conflict of interest in that he is an employee of the BC Ambulance Service and left the meeting at 12:08 PM; Director Sturdy returned to the meeting at 12:10 PM.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a letter be sent to the Minister responsible asking for an early resolution to the Ambulance Service contract dispute.
CARRIED
8.2 Governance Issue for Committee of the Whole Meeting
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a meeting with Minister Bennett be requested at the Union of BC Municipalities Convention regarding the Governance Project.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 215 of 238 This is page 10 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
The meeting was recessed at 12:15 PM and reconvened at 12:48 PM.
9 Consent Items – Correspondence for Information
9.1 Village of Pemberton – Support for Pemberton Festival
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Village of Pemberton correspondence regarding Support for Pemberton Festival be received. CARRIED
10 Delegations and Petitions
10.1 VANOC Delegation, Erica Rigik – Building Permit Fees
Mr. Edgington joined the meeting at 12:52 PM.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the VANOC Building Permit Fees be referred to Staff for preparation of building permit fee options for consideration by the Board.
CARRIED
11 Decision on Late Business
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the late items be considered at this meeting.
CARRIED
12 Late Business
12.1 Canadian National Railway Invitation to Chair
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Chair be authorized to attend the September 14, 2009 Canadian National Railway dinner and reception. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 216 of 238 This is page 11 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on August 24, 2009 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Street, Pemberton BC.
12.2 Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Elected Official Forum Date
September 24, 2009 was set as the date for the Regional Growth Strategy Elected Officials Forum.
13 Directors’ Reports
14 Board In-Camera Meeting
Resolution to move In-Camera
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Board move In-Camera under the authority of Section 90 (1) (c) (g) of the Community Charter. CARRIED
The meeting moved In-Camera at 1:25 PM. The meeting re-opened to the Public at 2:29 PM.
15 Termination
The Chair adjourned the meeting at 2:30 PM.
Russ Oakley Leslie E. Lloyd Chair Secretary
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 217 of 238 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes September 14, 2009; 2:00 PM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In attendance:
Committee: J. Sturdy; S. Gimse; T. Craddock; M. Blundell
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; A. Macdonald, Open Spaces Coordinator; S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)
Others: C. Lamont (VoP), and 1 member of the Public
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 2:04 PM.
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as circulated. CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 Review and Priority Setting for Outstanding Work Projects
Use of Pemberton Community Centre during 2010 Olympic Games
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the “Use of the Pemberton Community Centre during the 2010 Olympic Games” be placed on the next Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services agenda;
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the motion be amended to add:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 218 of 238 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on September 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
AND THAT an invitation be sent to Pemberton Community Centre user groups to attend the October Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting to discuss “Use of the Pemberton Community Centre during the 2010 Olympic Games”.
Vote on Amendment CARRIED Motion as Amended CARRIED
3.2 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Recommendations of May 12, 2009:
a) Water Park for the Community
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional board:
THAT the recommendation: “THAT a feasibility study for a water park at Pioneer Park and a cool down facility at the Pemberton Community Centre be prepared” be referred to the Village of Pemberton’s parks department.
CARRIED
b) Children’s Summer Programming
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the following be accepted as principle:
THAT the timing of the Pemberton Summer Programme guide be published before, or to coincide with Whistler’s Programme Guide.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT an online questionnaire regarding recreation programmes be implemented;
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 219 of 238 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on September 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
AND THAT up to $70 be provided for the recreation programmes online survey. CARRIED
3.3 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Recommendations of June 9, 2009:
1. Engineered Baseball Bleachers
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Staff pursue the opportunity for used bleachers from VANOC after the Olympic Games. CARRIED
2. Pemberton Water Park Update 3. Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Minutes
3.4 Pemberton & District Public Library Financial Statement
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton & District Public Library Financial Statement be received.
CARRIED
3.5 Pemberton Cemetery Financial Statement
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Pemberton Cemetery Board be invited to a Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services committee meeting to discuss the Cemetery Function.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 220 of 238 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on September 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
3.6 Pemberton Recreation Commission Funds
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton Recreation Commission Funds be received.
CARRIED
3.7 Pemberton Bike Park – Funding Request
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT up to $10,000 from the Pemberton Recreation Commission cost centre be authorized for the Pemberton Bike Park’s construction costs.
CARRIED
3.8 Pemberton/Area C Service Area Trails Master Plan
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Pemberton/Area C Service Area Trails Master Plan be approved in principle, and referred to agencies for comment. CARRIED
3.9 Village of Pemberton - Temporary Commercial Use Permit Referral
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Village of Pemberton Temporary Commercial Use Permit Referral be received. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 221 of 238 This is page 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on September 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
Meeting recessed at 3:42 PM and reconvened at 3:49 PM. 3.10 Pemberton Community Centre Budget Update It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Staff develop a range of options for addressing the funding shortfall for the Pemberton Community Centre.
Opposed: Director Gimse CARRIED
3.11 Update on the Structural Assessment of the Meadows Community Centre
3.12 Discussion of Delivery of Emergency Planning and Operations as a Joint Service
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT a feasibility study be completed on alternatives for joint collaborative delivery of emergency response and preparedness services by the Regional District and their member municipalities. CARRIED
3.13 Pemberton Recreation Advisory Committee Recommendations
3.14 Agricultural Land Commission/ Village of Pemberton /Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Memorandum of Understanding Re: Pemberton Festival
Item on October Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services committee meeting
3.15 October Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Date Next meeting October 8, 2009 at 9 AM
3.16 Pemberton Valley Transit System Annual Operating Agreement – April 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 222 of 238 This is page 6 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on September 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee recommend that the Board: 1. approve the current, 6 month Annual Operating Agreement (“AOA”) running Apr.1-Sept.30/09; and 2. authorize the Board Chair and the CAO to execute the AOA.
CARRIED
4 Correspondence for Action
4.1 School District #48 – Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Representative
It was moved and seconded:
THAT David Walden be appointed to the Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee. CARRIED
4.2 Agricultural Land Commission Decision Regarding Valley Loop Trail
Pemberton /Area C Trails budget on next Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services committee agenda.
5 Minutes
5.1 May 11, 2009 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Meeting Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the May 11, 2009 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services committee meeting minutes be approved as circulated. CARRIED
5.2 May 12, 2009 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the May 12, 2009 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee meeting minutes be received.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 223 of 238 This is page 7 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on September 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
5.3 June 9, 2009 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the June 9, 2009 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee meeting minutes be received. CARRIED
6 Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 5:02 PM.
Jordan Sturdy Presiding Chair
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 224 of 238 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes Monday September 14, 2009; 9:00 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Commission: A. Helmer; J. Sturdy; T. Craddock; S. Gimse; L. Lundy; S. Ryan
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)
Others: A. Ross (Consultant); 1 member of the public
1 Call To Order
The meeting was called to order at 9:02 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as circulated.
CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 August Economic Development Report
S. Ryan joined the meeting at 9:08 AM.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Consultant move forward with Phase 1 of the Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development website development as presented;
AND THAT the website development contract be awarded to Living Blueprint Creative and Custom Fit Communications.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 225 of 238 This is page 2 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Area C/Pemberton 2010 Economic Development Commission held on September 14, 2009, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
4 July 13, 2009 Pemberton /Area C 2010 Economic Development Meeting Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the July 13, 2009 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development meeting minutes be approved as circulated.
CARRIED
5 Termination
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the meeting be adjourned.
CARRIED The meeting was adjourned at 10:25 AM.
Anna Helmer Chair
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 226 of 238 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
Minutes of a Second Public Hearing for Bylaw 1073 convened by the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held in the Lillooet Recreation Centre, 930 Main Street, Lillooet BC, on September 9, 2009 at 7:00 PM.
Present were: Area B Director M. Macri (Chair); A. Antonelli, Planner; Recording Secretary S. Cheng, and 1 member of the public.
CALL TO ORDER Director Macri called the Public Hearing to order at 7:12 PM.
CHAIR’S My name is Mickey Macri, and as Electoral Area ‘B’ Director for the COMMENTS Squamish Lillooet Regional District Board, I have been asked to chair this public hearing. I would like to introduce Amica Antonelli, SLRD Planner, and Susan Cheng, who will be recording your comments.
This public hearing is convened pursuant to Section 890 of the Local Government Act to allow the public to make representations to the Board respecting matters contained in the proposed:
‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008’.
This Bylaw was advertised in the August 26th and September 2nd, 2009 issues of the Bridge River Lillooet News.
Every one of you present who believes that your interest in the property is affected by the proposed bylaw shall be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard or to present written submissions respecting matters contained in the bylaw. None of you will be discouraged or prevented from making your views known. However, it is important that you restrict your remarks to matters contained in the proposed bylaw.
When speaking please address the Chair and commence your remarks by clearly stating your name and address. Members of the Board, and I’m the only one here, may ask or respond to questions following a presentation. However, the function of Board representatives at this public hearing is to listen rather than to debate the merits of the proposed bylaw.
After this public hearing has concluded, the Board may, without further notice or hearing, adopt or defeat the bylaw, or alter and then adopt the bylaw, provided that the alteration does not alter the use or density.
May I remind you that tonight is your opportunity for input on the Bylaw and that after the conclusion of this hearing, no further public comments can be received by the Board.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 227 of 238 This is Page 2 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1073 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on September 9, 2009 at 7:00 PM in the Lillooet Recreation Centre, 930 Main Street, Lillooet BC.
I will now ask Amica Antonelli, to introduce:
‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area B Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 1073, 2008.’
Amica Antonelli Ms. Antonelli gave an overview of Bylaw 1073 which establishes a Planner comprehensive Official Community Plan (OCP) for SLRD’s Electoral Area B.
PUBLIC Chair Macri opened the floor to public comments. COMMENTS
WRITTEN There was one written submission: SUBMISSIONS Email from Ken Farraby, September 3, 2009:
Amica...thanks for sending this. Map 6 of the OCP appears to identify our property at Pavilion Lake (90 Smith Road) as single family residential. Our property was established as a privately owned commercial camp ground before the formation of the SLRD and before subdivision of the adjacent smaller lots on Smith Road. The property continues to operate as a privately owned camp ground I am requesting that the proposed Official Community Plan be amended to identify our property as a privately owned camp ground or other appropriate definition used by the SLRD.
What is the process for having this implemented into the plan. Do the SLRD directors vote on this request?
Thank you Ken Ferraby
TERMINATION Director Macri called three times for further comments. There being none, he declared the meeting closed at 7:15 PM.
Mickey Macri Director, Electoral Area B
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 228 of 238 SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 229 of 238 MEMBER NOTICE
TO: Mayor and Council Chair and Regional District Board
FROM: UBCM President Robert Hobson
DATE: September 14, 2009 RE: Delivery of Building Canada and Infrastructure Stimulus Funds
Background: Federal Budget 2009
Budget 2009 presented the federal government’s plan to mitigate the impact of the global recession on Canadians. The centerpiece of the Budget was a strategy to stimulate the economy through increased and accelerated investments in infrastructure. One of the objectives stated by the federal government was that the funding would flow to “shovel ready” projects as quickly as possible in order to maximize the impact on the economy.
The largest source of new funding in Budget 2009 was the $4 Billion Infrastructure Stimulus Fund. All projects under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund must be completed prior to March 31, 2011. When combined with provincial matching funds, British Columbia’s Infrastructure Stimulus Fund (based on a per capita amount) is worth an estimated $1.04 Billion. In the lead-up to Budget 2009, Minister Baird indicated that he expected “the overwhelming majority of new infrastructure funding will be spent on municipal projects.”
Budget 2009 also accelerated existing funding under the Building Canada Fund (to deliver 7 years of funding in 2) and provided an estimated $65 million top-up in federal funding to the Communities Component in British Columbia (for communities with populations less than 100,000). The availability of the top-up funding is conditional on provincial matching funds and the full commitment of the original amount of Communities Component funding. All projects that receive top-up funding are also required to be complete prior to March 31, 2011. In addition, $39 million was allocated for communities with populations greater than 100,000 under the Major Infrastructure Component of Building Canada.
The delivery of the new and accelerated funding announced in federal Budget 2009 was contingent upon each province entering into an agreement with the federal government. As a result, the funding has rolled out in different ways and at different times in each province and territory. Delivery of Infrastructure Stimulus Funds and the Building Canada Fund is also dependent upon provinces matching federal investments. As a reflection of the importance of flowing the funding quickly, the federal government has indicated that Infrastructure Stimulus Funds will be subject to reallocation if the delivery of funding is slow or if the province is unable to match federal investments.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 230 of 238 Status of Funding Delivery
o To date, about 25% of the estimated $520 million in federal funding available to B.C. has been committed. Most of the commitments to date reflect provincial priorities. o Project approvals representing half of the original funding for Building Canada were announced in March. Applications for the remaining funding have been received, but to date only one project has been approved for funding. o Funding decisions under the Building Canada Major Infrastructure Component have been made, with most of the funding committed to provincial priorities, primarily highway improvements and TransLink system improvements. o Infrastructure Canada has indicated that 8 out of 10 provinces have fully delivered both the accelerated and top-up portions of the Building Canada Communities Component. British Columbia is one of two provinces that have not yet delivered this funding.
Action
o UBCM has issued a province-wide news release (enclosed) expressing concern with these issues today. In addition, UBCM President Robert Hobson will be conducting several interviews with various media to put forward our view on these matters. o UBCM anticipates that Mayors and Chairs will receive calls, and are providing this information as background for local discussions.
910/40/Stimulus Delivery
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 231 of 238 News Release
UBCM Concerned About the Slow Pace of Infrastructure Funding
BC one of only two provinces that has not fully delivered Building Canada funds.
For Immediate Release: September 14, 2009 Media Contact: Paul Taylor (250) 356-2938 [email protected]
(Victoria, BC) The window is closing on the new funding for community infrastructure outlined in the 2009 Federal Budget. Robert Hobson, President of the Union of British Columbia Municipalities, came to this conclusion following a presentation by a senior official from Infrastructure Canada during a meeting of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities last week.
“BC communities have been waiting with their shovel ready projects for nearly eight months,” said Mr. Hobson. “If you look at what is happening in the other provinces, British Columbia is clearly falling behind in the delivery of Stimulus and Building Canada funding.”
The federal Budget 2009 included provisions to accelerate the Building Canada Communities Component (BC-CCF) program to deliver seven years of funding in two. Budget 2009 also provided a $65 million top up to BC-CCF that was contingent upon matching funds from the Province of British Columbia. Eight of ten provinces have already disbursed 100% of the accelerated Building Canada funding and 100% of the top-up in their jurisdictions. British Columbia so far has committed only half of the accelerated funding and none of the $65 million top-up.
Budget 2009 also introduced the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, which will provide British Columbia an estimated $1.04 billion in matched federal – provincial funding. UBCM estimates to date that less than 25% of the available funding has been committed for BC projects. In addition, most of the stimulus projects funded in BC thus far have flowed to provincial priorities. Nationally, about 60% of the funding approved has been for local projects.
“The funding which the federal government has made available to us will not be around indefinitely,” said President Hobson. “UBCM expects the province to keep pace with other jurisdictions so that local governments can access this funding for their communities. We have been told that the federal funds are ready to flow, but without matching provincial support, the money will go elsewhere.”
- 30 -
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 232 of 238 Group Pacific ventures ltd.
September 14th, 2009
SLRD Planning Department 1350 Aster Street Pemberton BC Attention: Steve Olmstead and Kim ----
RE : QUEEN OF PEACE DOMINICAN MONASTERY APPLICATION TO SLRD AND ALC
Planning Department and Council members,
The Dominican Monastery application came before the SLRD council on August 24th . The staff report provided a number of comments and a number of clarifications were requested by council members to be provided for the application. The following information is submitted to be included in the information package report dated July 15th . A) STAFF REPORT COMMENTS 1) Staff commented on the long term capability of the land for future food production. The land presently nets an annual return of $2,400 and is appraised at $1,500,000 and is presently for sale. As the land is uneconomic for commercial production there are two main types of potential buyers: i) a retirement or recreation home or an investment for a wealthy owner with little or no interest or labour capability in farming or increasing the potential of the land. This type of buyer would have a tentative long term outlook due to the nature of the owner/investor. ii) a group like the Dominican Nuns that have a life style providing a labour force to increase production and the variety of crops grown. This group has an incentive to work and improve the crop production for its own use and sustainability with the possibility of selling excess production to the community. The Dominican Monastery ownership has a history and intention of very long term ownership and has an incentive for improving future food production. The Monastery operations will change the current minimum hay production use of the lands to improved and varied crop cultivation for a long term capability of the land for future food production.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 233 of 238 2) Staff recommends careful site planning. The siting of the Monastery only utilizes the same area that is presently being used for the residence of the land owner. No additional agricultural land area is utilized and the monastery confirms that no agricultural land currently being cultivated will be reduced. The Monastery is contemplating increasing the land under production by planting an orchard on the land immediately south of the Monastery building and planting trees on the mountainous slopes where possible. The footprint of the monastery is 15,000 square feet which may not be much different than many luxury homes being built on very expensive lots such as the subject property. The area required for the building site is located at the foot of the mountain on increasingly rocky ground and is in fact a very tight area of less than two acres between the foot of the mountain and the setbacks from the surrounding creeks. The proposed building is located above the required 31.7 meter floodplain level. No construction on the existing cultivated lands is contemplated as substantial fill would be required that would reduce the agricultural land area.
3) The staff report commented on the need for a soils mitigation plan to preserve and protect the land for agricultural use. The Monastery has been very clear about preserving the land for agriculture and has both the history and incentives to not only preserve the land but increase its agricultural potential.
4) The staff commented on the potential flood mitigation works that could reduce the area used for agriculture. In the BGC Engineering report provided to planning there is only a minimum requirement for an increase to the existing berm in the current residential area to protect the building site from a debris flow hazard. This berm is not in the cultivated land area and will not impact the agricultural use of the land. In fact the berm will also protect the area contemplated for an orchard.
B) BOARD MEMBERS’ COMMENTS The following is set out in response to the questions that were requested to be clarified:
1) A question was raised as to what use could be made of the proposed 24,000 sf Monastery building if there was a change of ownership and change of use. This is a speculative question as to what might occur sometime in the future if the Dominican nuns decided to sell the property.
1.1 For the use of the building that aspect is totally controlled by zoning that SLRD may place on the property. We understand that in the near future the planning department intends to place zoning on all lands in the SLRD that are not presently zoned. Therefore any uses that are a concern to council members can be non permitted uses in the zoning.
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 234 of 238 1.2 In addition, as the use on the property must also be approved by ALC, any uses not compatible with agricultural uses would not be approved in any event.
1.3 The Dominican nuns have been looking for a property for well over a year and have identified this property as one that fits their various criteria. Accordingly the nuns have made a decision that this property will be satisfactory for the foreseeable future.
1.4 The Dominican nuns will be required to make an investment in this property and building of between $3,000,000 and $4,000,000 and they will not be inclined to abandon this investment for the foreseeable future.
1.5 The Dominican nuns are a worldwide organization with a history of monasteries around the world that have been operating in the same locations for centuries. History would indicate that there is little concern that the Dominican Monastery would be abandoned.
2) A question was raised as to what would be the agricultural enhancement opportunities of the land if the Dominican Monastery was approved.
2.1 The Dominican Monastery has stated that they will continue cultivating all the land presently under cultivation and will not reduce the area presently under cultivation.
2.2 The area proposed for the building has never been under cultivation, has always been used for the residential use for the land owner and includes less than 2 acres of an 81 acre property.
2.3 An area on the property is required, in any event, for the residential use of the owner working the land and this residential area has not been increased.
2.4 The Dominican Monastery’s economic objective is to provide for it’s subsistence needs by utilizing and upgrading the agricultural uses of the land. The commitment is a long term one to continue the use and enhancement of the agricultural land as opposed to other types of potential ownership that would be heavily residential with little or no commitment for continuing cultivating the land. Their effort to be self- sufficient would include the production of crops for the use of the Monastery nuns and the production for sale of crops for the cash flow sustainability of the Monastery.
2.5 Self sufficiency for the Dominican Monastery will involve growing the following enhanced agricultural products:
Mixed Farming products such as: - potatoes - tomatoes
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 235 of 238 - lettuces - turnips - squashes - beans - peas - cucumbers - zucchinis - other crops as desired
Horticulture: Initially the growing of flowers, shrubs and trees would be for landscaping the subject property and could expand into a cash crop business to financially assist the running of the Monastery. The Monastery already has experience in collaboration with Art’s Nursery in Langley.
Greenhouse Farming: The proposed greenhouses would be utilized for vegetable seedlings and to extend the growing season for vegetable crops. In addition the greenhouse may be used for horticulture seedlings. The required sizes have not been determined.
Fruit Trees: The area of land immediately south of the proposed building site is considered for planting an orchard. This area of approximately two acres has never been cultivated and would be an additional acreage brought into cultivation other than the current cultivated acreage. A variety of fruit or nut trees would be considered. A study would be done to determine how to cultivate these trees without attracting bears.
Livestock: The Monastery would consider the rearing of chickens, sheep and llamas. It is currently raising sheep in the Fort Langley area. The meat is sold and the wool is spun and woven.
Silva culture: There may be an opportunity to plant trees in some areas of the mountainous slopes that are otherwise unsuitable for agricultural crops.
2.6 The lifestyle of the Monastery and nuns includes a commitment to engage in productive work on behalf of the Monastery. This lifestyle commitment provides a substantial and committed workforce to cultivate, enhance and maintain the various agricultural opportunities that the land provides. The land presently is only in hay production netting approximately $2,400 annually and is not presently economically viable for purchase for agricultural purposes. With the use of the work force of a monastic community the property can become more productive and the agricultural potential enhanced so that it feeds the Monastery and potentially could provide cash crops for sale.
2.7 Irrigation: The property presently has a water license for 1,000 gallons a day and an additional application could be made for increase gallonage for additional agricultural uses. The present license takes water from Pillchuck Creek and is stored in a reservoir that can be increased in size
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 236 of 238 to accommodate agricultural requirements. The irrigation of fruit trees and agricultural crops could be by way of a system of gravitational feeds from the higher elevation reservoir.
There are varied incentives for the Monastery to be excellent stewards of the land and to increase the agricultural opportunities of the agricultural land.
3) A question was raised as to any flood mitigation works that may impact agricultural uses.
3.1 Attached is a geotechnical report by BGC Engineering dated September 2, 2009 that addresses the rock fall hazard and the flood mitigation hazard for the area proposed for the Monastery building and provides the flood construction level required for the Monastery building. The building area is not subject to a rockfall hazard and a minimal berm is to be designed and constructed to the west of Pillchuck creek for approximately 100 feet for debris flow hazard mitigation. This berm is within the area proposed for the construction of the Monastery building and no additional flood mitigation works are required. The flood mitigation does not reduce the cultivated area or impact the agricultural uses of the land.
3.2 The flood construction level set out by BGC Engineering is the 31.7 meter elevation level. The proposed Monastery building will be build above the 31.7 meter elevation level except for some non residential basement storage and meeting areas. A minimum of fill will be required under a small portion of the proposed south east wing of the building.
We believe that the enclosed additional information has addressed the questions raised by staff and some council members at the August 24th Council meeting. We believe that the Monastery provides a unique opportunity for long term agricultural use/stability and improved agricultural potential of the lands.
Yours truly,
______Eugene Evanetz
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 237 of 238 c/o PO Box 189, 2185 Voght St., Merritt, BC V1K 1B8
August 19, 2009
Russ Oakley, Chair Squamish Lillooet Regional District Box 219 Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0
Dear Mr. Oakley,
The Southern Interior Beetle Action Coalition (SIBAC) would like to confirm our presentation to the Squamish Lillooet Regional District on September 21, 2009. As a SIBAC Member Organization, we are hoping that we can secure a minimum of 20 minutes to present the 12 minute video and short power point presentation. This presentation is critical to the future role of SIBAC and requires more time if at all possible. A more detailed power point presentation will be sent in advance for Directors to review in preparation for the meeting
For the past two years, SIBAC has been engaged in studying the current and expected impacts of the Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) epidemic in the southern interior to the forest sector, the socio- economic health of communities, the environment and First Nations. SIBAC has completed the draft Mountain Pine Beetle Mitigation Report to the Provincial Government. Prior to presenting the final report to the Provincial Government, the SIBAC Board Members will be presenting to their respective organizations (9 Regional Districts, 6 Tribal Councils and Community Futures Development Corporation-Central Interior First Nations) the preliminary recommendations and seeking endorsement. SIBAC Directors will also be presenting the proposed future role of SIBAC and asking for continued support from their organization, this presentation therefore will define SIBAC’s future.
Dennis Bontron is the SLRD’s appointed Director on the SIBAC Board. Upon consultation with Mr. Bontron, I will be notifying you in the near future who will be making the presentation.
I look forward to your reply. I can be reached at 250-378-1929 or [email protected]. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Dalyce Brandt Administrator
Phone: 250-378-1929 [>-mail:[email protected] [,5 s.com
SLRD Regular Board Agenda; September 21, 2009 Page 238 of 238