DOCSLIB.ORG

Research Intelligence Research Metrics Guidebook Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research Intelligence Research Metrics Guidebook Table of Contents Research Intelligence Research Metrics Guidebook Table of contents 1.0 Introduction: Elsevier’s approach to research metrics.............04 3.2 Factors besides performance that affect the value of a metric..................................................................11 1.1 Journal metrics....................................................................05 3.2.1 Size...........................................................................13 1.2 Article-level metrics.............................................................05 3.2.2 Discipline..................................................................13 3.2.3 Publication-type.......................................................14 1.3 Author and institutional metrics.........................................05 3.2.4 Database coverage...................................................16 2.0 Scopus: the primary data source for 3.2.5 Manipulation............................................................18 Elsevier’s research metrics.......................................................06 3.2.6 Time.........................................................................18 2.1 Scopus content...................................................................07 4.0 SciVal and research metrics......................................................20 2.1.1 Scopus content and SciVal......................................07 2.1.2 Books and SciVal.....................................................07 4.1 Groups of metrics in SciVal.................................................21 2.2 Data currency in Scopus and SciVal....................................07 4.2 The calculation and display of metrics in SciVal................24 2.3 Author Profiles....................................................................07 4.2.1 Publications included in the calculation 2.3.1 Author Profiles in Scopus........................................07 of a metric...............................................................24 2.3.2 Authors and Researchers in SciVal..........................07 4.2.2 Deduplication..........................................................24 4.2.3 Zero and null values................................................24 2.4 Affiliation Profiles...............................................................08 4.2.4 The display of “>current year”................................24 2.4.1 Affiliation Profiles in Scopus...................................08 4.2.5 Citation Counts.......................................................24 2.4.2 Affiliations and institutions in SciVal......................08 4.2.6 Calculation options..................................................24 2.5 Do publications belong to Institutions or to 4.2.6.1 Subject Area filter.....................................26 Researchers?.......................................................................08 4.2.6.2 Publication-type filter..............................26 2.6 Organization-types.............................................................09 4.2.6.3 Self-citation exclusion..............................26 2.6.1 Organization-types in Scopus................................09 4.2.6.4 Total value and percentage options........26 2.6.2 Organization-types in SciVal..................................09 4.2.6.5 (Example 1a:) Self-Citation Exclusion......27 4.2.6.6 (Example 1b:) Self-Citation Exclusion......28 2.7 Journal metrics in Scopus and SciVal.................................09 2.8 Other sources for metrics in 5.0 Research Metrics in SciVal: Methods and use..........................30 Research Intelligence solutions..........................................09 5.1 Awarded Grants..................................................................30 3.0 Selection of appropriate metrics...............................................10 5.1.1 Metric: Awards Volume...........................................30 3.1 Clarity on the question being asked...................................11 5.2 Collaboration......................................................................30 5.2.1 Metric: Collaboration...............................................30 2 5.2.2 Metric: Collaboration Impact...................................34 5.6.1 Metric: Academic-Corporate Collaboration............54 5.2.3 Metric: Academic-Corporate Collaboration.............35 5.6.2 Metric: Academic-Corporate 5.2.4 Metric: Academic-Corporate Collaboration Impact................................................54 Collaboration Impact...............................................36 5.6.3 Metric: Citing Patents Count..................................54 5.6.4 Metric: Patent-Cited Scholarly Output....................54 5.3 Published.............................................................................37 5.6.5 Metric: Patent-Citations Count...............................54 5.3.1 Metric: Scholarly Output.........................................37 5.6.6 Metric: Patent-Citations per Scholarly Output........55 5.3.2 Metric: Subject Area Count.....................................38 5.3.3 Metric: Scopus Source Title Count .........................39 5.7 Societal Impact.....................................................................55 5.3.4 Metric: h-indices.....................................................40 5.7.1 Metric: Mass Media..................................................55 5.7.2 Metric: Media Exposure...........................................56 5.4 Viewed...................................................................................41 5.7.3 Metric: Field-Weighted Mass Media........................57 5.4.1 Metric: Views Count................................................41 5.4.2 Metric: Outputs in Top Views Percentiles..............42 5.8 Examples...............................................................................58 5.4.3 Metric: Views per Publication..................................43 5.8.1 Scholarly Output, Subject Area Count 5.4.4 Metric: Field-Weighted Views Impact....................44 and Scopus Source Title Count...............................58 5.8.2 Citation Count, Cited Publications 5.5 Cited...................................................................................45 and Citations per Publication..................................59 5.5.1 Metric: Citation Count............................................45 5.8.3 Number of Citing Countries....................................60 5.5.2 Metric: Field-Weighted Citation Impact.................47 5.8.4 Field-Weighted Citation Impact..............................61 5.5.3 Metric: Outputs in Top Citation Percentiles...........48 5.8.5 Collaboration, Collaboration Impact, 5.5.4 Metric: Publications in Top Journal Percentiles.......49 Academic-Corporate Collaboration, and 5.5.5 Metric: Citations Per Publication.............................51 Academic-Corporation Collaboration Impact.........62 5.5.6 Metric: Cited Publications........................................52 5.8.6 Outputs in Top Citation Percentiles........................64 5.5.7 Metric: h-indices......................................................52 5.8.7 Publication in Top Journal Percentiles.....................66 5.5.8 Metric: Number of Citing Countries.......................52 5.8.8 h-indices...................................................................67 5.5.9 Metric: Collaboration Impact...................................53 5.5.10 Metric: Academic-Corporate Collaboration Impact...............................................53 5.5.11 Metric: Citing-Patents Count..................................53 5.5.12 Metric: Patent-Cited Scholarly Output....................54 5.5.13 Metric: Patent-Citations Count...............................54 5.5.14 Metric: Patent-Citations per Scholarly Output.......54 5.6 Economic Output................................................................54 3 1.0 Introduction: Elsevier’s approach to research metrics 1.1 Journal metrics.....................................................................05 1.2 Article-level metrics.............................................................05 1.3 Author and institutional metrics..........................................05 4 1.0 Introduction: Elsevier’s approach to research metrics The quote often attributed to Albert Einstein, but perhaps more 1.1 Journal metrics properly attributed to William Bruce Cameron1, is often referred to when writing a foreword such as this: Journal level metrics continue to be an important part of the basket of metrics, complementing new and alternative metrics to provide a “Not everything that counts can be counted, and not multi-faceted view of a journal’s impact. On Scopus, you will find an everything that can be counted counts”. evolving and expanding suite of journal metrics that go beyond just journals to include most serial titles, including supplements, special This is undoubtedly true, but does not follow that nothing should be issues and conference proceedings. Freely available on Scopus you measured. There is much that can be counted that is important and will find CiteScore metrics, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) and Source provides valuable perspectives on trends in academia, and there is an Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP). increasing emphasis on this in the world of research today. The field of metrics relies on specialized academic study for its 1.2 Article-level metrics development and to capitalize on advances in technology; these PlumX Metrics is now the primary source of article-level metrics in scholarly outputs are increasingly being used by people
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Citation Analysis for the Modern Instructor: an Integrated Review of Emerging Research
    CITATION ANALYSIS FOR THE MODERN INSTRUCTOR: AN INTEGRATED REVIEW OF EMERGING RESEARCH Chris Piotrowski University of West Florida USA Abstract While online instructors may be versed in conducting e-Research (Hung, 2012; Thelwall, 2009), today’s faculty are probably less familiarized with the rapidly advancing fields of bibliometrics and informetrics. One key feature of research in these areas is Citation Analysis, a rather intricate operational feature available in modern indexes such as Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. This paper reviews the recent extant research on bibliometrics within the context of citation analysis. Particular focus is on empirical studies, review essays, and critical commentaries on citation-based metrics across interdisciplinary academic areas. Research that relates to the interface between citation analysis and applications in higher education is discussed. Some of the attributes and limitations of citation operations of contemporary databases that offer citation searching or cited reference data are presented. This review concludes that: a) citation-based results can vary largely and contingent on academic discipline or specialty area, b) databases, that offer citation options, rely on idiosyncratic methods, coverage, and transparency of functions, c) despite initial concerns, research from open access journals is being cited in traditional periodicals, and d) the field of bibliometrics is rather perplex with regard to functionality and research is advancing at an exponential pace. Based on these findings, online instructors would be well served to stay abreast of developments in the field. Keywords: Bibliometrics, informetrics, citation analysis, information technology, Open resource and electronic journals INTRODUCTION In an ever increasing manner, the educational field is irreparably linked to advances in information technology (Plomp, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue and Cell
    TISSUE AND CELL AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Impact Factor p.1 • Abstracting and Indexing p.1 • Editorial Board p.1 • Guide for Authors p.3 ISSN: 0040-8166 DESCRIPTION . Tissue and Cell is devoted to original research on the organization of cells, subcellular and extracellular components at all levels, including the grouping and interrelations of cells in tissues and organs. The journal encourages submission of ultrastructural studies that provide novel insights into structure, function and physiology of cells and tissues, in health and disease. Bioengineering and stem cells studies focused on the description of morphological and/or histological data are also welcomed. Studies investigating the effect of compounds and/or substances on structure of cells and tissues are generally outside the scope of this journal. For consideration, studies should contain a clear rationale on the use of (a) given substance(s), have a compelling morphological and structural focus and present novel incremental findings from previous literature. IMPACT FACTOR . 2020: 2.466 © Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports 2021 ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING . Scopus PubMed/Medline Cambridge Scientific Abstracts Current Awareness in Biological Sciences Current Contents - Life Sciences Embase Embase Science Citation Index Web of Science EDITORIAL BOARD . Editor Pietro Lupetti, University of Siena, Siena, Italy AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 1 Oct 2021 www.elsevier.com/locate/tice 1 Managing Editor Giacomo Spinsanti, University of Siena,
    [Show full text]
  • The Publish Or Perish Book
    The Publish or Perish Book Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis Anne-Wil Harzing Edition: September 2010 For inquiries about this book, refer to the book's web page: http://www.harzing.com/popbook.htm ISBN 978-0-9808485-0-2 (PDF) ISBN 978-0-9808485-1-9 (paperback, colour) ISBN 978-0-9808485-2-6 (paperback, black & white) © 2010 by Anne-Wil Harzing All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means (including electronic mail, photocopying, recording, or information sto- rage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. As the SOLE exception to the above if you purchased this book in its PDF edition, then you are allowed to print 1 (one) hard copy for your own use only for each licence that you pur- chased. Published by Tarma Software Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Author Harzing, Anne-Wil. Title The publish or perish book [electronic resource]: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis / Anne-Wil Harzing. Edition 1st ed. ISBN 9780980848502 (pdf) Notes Includes bibliographical references. Subjects Publish or perish (Computer program), Authorship, Academic writing, Scholarly publishing. Dewey Number 808.02 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... VII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO CITATION ANALYSIS ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is Sci-Hub Increasing Visibility of Indian Research Papers? an Analytical Evaluation Vivek Kumar Singh1,*, Satya Swarup Srichandan1, Sujit Bhattacharya2
    Journal of Scientometric Res. 2021; 10(1):130-134 http://www.jscires.org Perspective Paper Is Sci-Hub Increasing Visibility of Indian Research Papers? An Analytical Evaluation Vivek Kumar Singh1,*, Satya Swarup Srichandan1, Sujit Bhattacharya2 1Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA. 2CSIR-National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi, INDIA. ABSTRACT Sci-Hub, founded by Alexandra Elbakyan in 2011 in Kazakhstan has, over the years, Correspondence emerged as a very popular source for researchers to download scientific papers. It is Vivek Kumar Singh believed that Sci-Hub contains more than 76 million academic articles. However, recently Department of Computer Science, three foreign academic publishers (Elsevier, Wiley and American Chemical Society) have Banaras Hindu University, filed a lawsuit against Sci-Hub and LibGen before the Delhi High Court and prayed for Varanasi-221005, INDIA. complete blocking these websites in India. It is in this context, that this paper attempts to Email id: [email protected] find out how many Indian research papers are available in Sci-Hub and who downloads them. The citation advantage of Indian research papers available on Sci-Hub is analysed, Received: 16-03-2021 with results confirming that such an advantage do exist. Revised: 29-03-2021 Accepted: 25-04-2021 Keywords: Indian Research, Indian Science, Black Open Access, Open Access, Sci-Hub. DOI: 10.5530/jscires.10.1.16 INTRODUCTION access publishing of their research output, and at the same time encouraging their researchers to publish in openly Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has become one accessible forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Publish Or Perish
    Publish or Perish Maximizing the impact of your next publication Andrew Plume, Director – Scientometrics & Market Analysis City Graduate School Welcome Event - 18th November 2013 The research life: Enable, do, share Recruit/evaluate Secure Establish Manage Develop researchers funding partnerships facilities Strategy ? Search, read, Collaborate & Experiment Analyze & review network synthesize ! Have Manage data Publish and Commercialise Promote impact disseminate 2 The research life: Publish or Perish 3 Publish or Perish: Origin 4 Publish or Perish: Evidence of published authors agree/strongly agree*: “My career depends on a history of publishing research 81% articles in peer reviewed journals” Institutional: Career advancement and funding Reasons for National: Research assessment exercises agreeing Global: Research dissemination is a goal of research Articles in peer-reviewed journals make the most At my institution, there are defined thresholds of important contribution to my career in terms of status, publications for academic promotions at least during merit pay, and marketability, vs. teaching or service. early career. Engineering & Technology, UK (36-45) Social Science, USA (36-45) If I publish well (Impact Factor, h-index) I have more Because the primary role of my job is to produce chance to get a better position and to have grants. research which is of no use if it does not get into the Medicine & Allied Health, Italy (46-55) public domain. Earth & Planetary Sciences, UK (56-65) * Survey of 3,090 published authors in November 2012
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded in MS Word Format (.Docx)
    Wang and Tseng J Cheminform (2019) 11:78 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0401-4 Journal of Cheminformatics SOFTWARE Open Access IntelliPatent: a web-based intelligent system for fast chemical patent claim drafting Pei‑Hua Wang1 and Yufeng Jane Tseng1,2* Abstract The frst step of automating composition patent drafting is to draft the claims around a Markush structure with sub‑ stituents. Currently, this process depends heavily on experienced attorneys or patent agents, and few tools are avail‑ able. IntelliPatent was created to accelerate this process. Users can simply upload a series of analogs of interest, and IntelliPatent will automatically extract the general structural scafold and generate the patent claim text. The program can also extend the patent claim by adding commonly seen R groups from historical lists of the top 30 selling drugs in the US for all R substituents. The program takes MDL SD fle formats as inputs, and the invariable core structure and variable substructures will be identifed as the initial scafold and R groups in the output Markush structure. The results can be downloaded in MS Word format (.docx). The suggested claims can be quickly generated with IntelliPatent. This web‑based tool is freely accessible at https ://intel lipat ent.cmdm.tw/. Keywords: Web server, Markush structure, Pharmaceutical patent Introduction of visualizing and analyzing Markush structures from a Claims are the most important sections in composition composition patent [7]. Its web based application, iMa- patents [1]. In the pharmaceutical industry, claims should rVis, revised the underlying R group numbering system include key compounds and all structural derivatives that to deal with nested R group presentation [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Using Open Access Literature to Guide Full-Text Query Formulation Heather A
    Using open access literature to guide full-text query formulation Heather A. Piwowar and Wendy W. Chapman Background Much scientific knowledge is contained in the details of the full-text biomedical literature. Most research in automated retrieval presupposes that the target literature can be downloaded and preprocessed prior to query. Unfortunately, this is not a practical or maintainable option for most users due to licensing restrictions, website terms of use, and sheer volume. Scientific article full-text is increasingly queriable through portals such as PubMed Central, Highwire Press, Scirus, and Google Scholar. However, because these portals only support very basic Boolean queries and full text is so expressive, formulating an effective query is a difficult task for users. We propose improving the formulation of full-text queries by using the open access literature as a proxy for the literature to be searched. We evaluated the feasibility of this approach by building a high-precision query for identifying studies that perform gene expression microarray experiments. Methodology and Results We built decision rules from unigram and bigram features of the open access literature. Minor syntax modifications were needed to translate the decision rules into the query languages of PubMed Central, Highwire Press, and Google Scholar. We mapped all retrieval results to PubMed identifiers and considered our query results as the union of retrieved articles across all portals. Compared to our reference standard, the derived full- text query found 56% (95% confidence interval, 52% to 61%) of intended studies, and 90% (86% to 93%) of studies identified by the full-text search met the reference standard criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality, and Direction of (Public) Research Output
    Methodology Data & Measurement Results Summary The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality, and Direction of (Public) Research Output Pierre Azoulay1 Waverly Ding2 Toby Stuart3 1Sloan School of Management MIT & NBER [email protected] 2Haas School of Business University of California — Berkeley 3Graduate School of Business Harvard University January 23, 2007 — Northwestern University Azoulay, Ding, Stuart The Impact of Academic Patenting Methodology Data & Measurement Results Summary Outline 1 Motivation(s) 2 Methodology Problems with existing approaches Selection on observables with staggered treatment decisions Implementing IPTCW estimation 3 Data & Measurement Data sources Measuring “patentability” Descriptive statistics 4 Results The determinants of selection into patenting The impact of academic patenting on the rate of publications The impact of academic patenting on the quality of publications The impact of academic patenting on the content of publications 5 Caveats, Summary & Future Directions Azoulay, Ding, Stuart The Impact of Academic Patenting Methodology Data & Measurement Results Summary Outline 1 Motivation(s) 2 Methodology Problems with existing approaches Selection on observables with staggered treatment decisions Implementing IPTCW estimation 3 Data & Measurement Data sources Measuring “patentability” Descriptive statistics 4 Results The determinants of selection into patenting The impact of academic patenting on the rate of publications The impact of academic patenting on the quality of publications The impact
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Comments on Proposed Amendments to Patent
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - ISRAEL AUTHOR Request for comments on proposed David Gilat amendments to Patent Law 26 April 2021 | Contributed by Reinhold Cohn Group Easing of regulatory burden Examination of biological molecules Patentable subject matter Biological material samples Destruction of infringing products Reliance on foreign patent office decisions Other issues Outstanding issues The Ministry of Justice and the Patent Office recently published a request for comments on purported expansive amendments to the Patent Law. Some of the proposed amendments are minor, while others represent radical changes to the existing legislation. Many of the proposed amendments, if carried through, may benefit foreign applicants, which are the source of most patent applications in Israel. The deadline for filing comments was 7 April 2021. It remains to be seen how the process will develop. This article discusses the proposed amendments and the effect that they may have on the Israeli patent system. Easing of regulatory burden The proposed amendments follow a 2014 government resolution which provides that all government offices should reduce their regulatory burden. Accordingly, many of the proposed amendments clearly relate to reducing the regulatory burden which results from filing patent applications. For example, the request for comments asked applicants about the removal of the Patent Office requirement that parties must disclose any publications cited by any patent offices in other countries. The request for comments also asked applicants about the introduction of a grace period, which would give parties one year following the first publication of their invention to file a patent application. Without a grace period, an inventor's patent rights can be undermined where, for example, they discuss their new research at a conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library
    ACRL Publications in Librarianship No. 72 Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library Editors Peter D. Fernandez and Kelly Tilton Association of College and Research Libraries A division of the American Library Association Chicago, Illinois 2018 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of Ameri- can National Standard for Information Sciences–Permanence of Paper for Print- ed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. ∞ Cataloging-in-Publication data is on file with the Library of Congress. Copyright ©2018 by the Association of College and Research Libraries. All rights reserved except those which may be granted by Sections 107 and 108 of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976. Printed in the United States of America. 22 21 20 19 18 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................ix Peter Fernandez, Head, LRE Liaison Programs, University of Tennessee Libraries Kelly Tilton, Information Literacy Instruction Librarian, University of Tennessee Libraries Part I Contemplating Library Values Chapter 1. ..........................................................................................................1 The New Technocracy: Positioning Librarianship’s Core Values in Relationship to Technology Is a Much Taller Order Than We Think John Buschman, Dean of University Libraries, Seton Hall University Chapter 2. ........................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Powerhouse in Health Health Science Alliance Ltd Research – a Science and Innovation Audit
    The Northern Submitted by the Northern Powerhouse in Health Health Science Alliance Ltd Research – A Science and Innovation Audit Appendices June 2018 Key Local authorities in overlapping LEPs Northern Powerhouse LEPs The Northern Submitted by the Northern Powerhouse in Health Health Science Alliance Ltd Research – A Science and Innovation Audit Appendices June 2018 Prepared by: Prepared for: SDG Economic Development Submitted by the Northern Health 61 Mosley Street Science Alliance Ltd Manchester M2 3HZ C/O Weightmans LLP, Hardman Square No 1 Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB +44 161 261 9154 www.sdgED.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for Submitted by the Northern Health Science Alliance Ltd. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. The Northern Powerhouse in Health Research – A Science and Innovation Audit | Appendices Contents 1 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 Policy Context .................................................................................................................... 3 3 Chapter Two Appendix - Strengths in Science and Innovation ............................................ 17 4 Chapter Three Appendix - Theme 1: Data for Better Health and Wealth ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Since January 2020 Elsevier Has Created a COVID-19 Resource Centre with Free Information in English and Mandarin on the Novel Coronavirus COVID- 19
    Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Editorial overview: Membrane traffic in the time of COVID-19 Frances M. Brodsky and Jennifer L. Stow Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2020, 65:iii–v This overview comes from a themed issue on Membrane Trafficking Edited by Frances M. Brodsky and Jennifer L. Stow https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2020.09.003 0955-0674/© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Frances M. Brodsky We write this editorial emerging from lockdown in countries across the Division of Biosciences, University College world in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. These have been chal- London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, lenging, frightening, and too often catastrophic times for many. Such times UK lead to evaluation of one’s own enterprise in the context of a global *Corresponding author: Brodsky, Frances M.
    [Show full text]