Baggott J. the Quantum Story (OUP, 2011)(ISBN 0199566844)(O

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Baggott J. the Quantum Story (OUP, 2011)(ISBN 0199566844)(O the quantum story This page intentionally left blank THE Quantum Story a history in 40 moments jim baggott 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Jim Baggott 2011 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc ISBN 978–0–19–956684–6 10987654321 For MSS, because every student deserves at least one great teacher This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Preface xiii Prologue: Stormclouds 1 London, April 1900 PART I: QUANTUM OF ACTION 1 The Most Strenuous Work of My Life 7 Berlin, December 1900 2 Annus Mirabilis 17 Bern, March 1905 3 A Little Bit of Reality 25 Manchester, April 1913 4 la Comédie Française 34 Paris, September 1923 5 A Strangely Beautiful Interior 43 Helgoland, June 1925 6 The Self-rotating Electron 51 Leiden, November 1925 7 A Late Erotic Outburst 60 Swiss Alps, Christmas 1925 PART II: QUANTUM INTERPRETATION 8 Ghost Field 71 Oxford, August 1926 9 All This Damned Quantum Jumping 79 Copenhagen, October 1926 vii the quantum story 10 The Uncertainty Principle 87 Copenhagen, February 1927 11 The ‘Kopenhagener Geist’ 95 Copenhagen, June 1927 12 There is No Quantum World 103 Lake Como, September 1927 PART III: QUANTUM DEBATE 13 The Debate Commences 115 Brussels, October 1927 14 An Absolute Wonder 126 Cambridge, Christmas 1927 15 The Photon Box 133 Brussels, October 1930 16 A Bolt from the Blue 141 Princeton, May 1935 17 The Paradox of Schrödinger’s Cat 149 Oxford, August 1935 Interlude: The First War of Physics 159 Christmas 1938–August 1945 PART IV: QUANTUM FIELDS 18 Shelter Island 171 Long Island, June 1947 19 Pictorial Semi-vision Thing 181 New York, January 1949 20 A Beautiful Idea 193 Princeton, February 1954 21 Some Strangeness in the Proportion 204 Rochester, August 1960 22 Three Quarks for Muster Mark! 214 New York, March 1963 viii contents 23 The ‘God Particle’ 225 Cambridge, Massachusetts, Autumn 1967 PART V: QUANTUM PARTICLES 24 Deep Inelastic Scattering 237 Stanford, August 1968 25 Of Charm and Weak Neutral Currents 247 Harvard, February 1970 26 The Magic of Colour 256 Princeton/Harvard, April 1973 27 The November Revolution 265 Long Island/Stanford, November 1974 28 Intermediate Vector Bosons 275 Geneva, January/June 1983 29 The Standard Model 285 Geneva, September 2003 PART VI: QUANTUM REALITY 30 Hidden Variables 297 Princeton, Spring 1951 31 Bertlmann’s Socks 306 Boston, September 1964 32 The Aspect Experiments 318 Paris, September 1982 33 The Quantum Eraser 328 Baltimore, January 1999 34 Lab Cats 339 Stony Brook/Delft, July 2000 35 The Persistent Illusion 349 Vienna, December 2006 PART VII: QUANTUM COSMOLOGY 36 The Wavefunction of the Universe 361 Princeton, July 1966 ix the quantum story 37 Hawking Radiation 372 Oxford, February 1974 38 The First Superstring Revolution 381 Aspen, August 1984 39 Quanta of Space and Time 391 Santa Barbara, February 1986 40 Crisis? What Crisis? 399 Durham, Summer 1994 Epilogue: A Quantum of Solace? 407 Geneva, March 2010 Notes and Sources 411 Bibliography 441 Plate Acknowledgements 448 Index 451 x ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jim Baggott is an award-winning science writer. A former academic sci- entist, he now works as an independent business consultant but main- tains a broad interest in science, philosophy, and history, and continues to write on these subjects in his spare time. His previous books have been widely acclaimed and include: Atomic: The First War of Physics and the Secret History of the Atom Bomb 1939–49 (Icon Books, 2009); A Beginner’s Guide to Reality (Penguin, 2005); Beyond Measure: Modern Physics, Philosophy and the Meaning of Quantum The- ory (Oxford University Press, 2004); Perfect Symmetry: The Accidental Discovery of Buckminsterfullerene (Oxford University Press, 1994); and The Meaning of Quantum Theory: A Guide for Students of Chemistry and Physics (Oxford University Press, 1992). xi This page intentionally left blank PREFACE The last century was defi ned by physics. From the minds of the world’s leading physicists there fl owed a river of ideas that would transport man- kind to the very pinnacle of wonder and to the very depths of despair. This was a century that began with the certainties of absolute knowledge and ended with the knowledge of absolute uncertainty. It was a century in which physicists developed theories that would deny us the possibility that we can ever properly comprehend the nature of physical reality. It was also a century in which they built weapons with the capacity utterly to destroy this reality. Almost everything we think we know about the nature of our world comes from one theory of physics. This theory was discovered and refi ned in the fi rst thirty years of the twentieth century and went on to become quite simply the most successful theory of physics ever devised. Its concepts underpin much of the twenty-fi rst century technology that we have learned to take for granted. But this success has come at a price, for it has at the same time com- pletely undermined our ability to make sense of the world at the level of its most fundamental constituents. Rejecting the elements of uncertainty and chance implied by this new theory, Albert Einstein once famously declared that ‘God does not play dice’. Niels Bohr claimed that anybody who is not shocked by the theory has not understood it. The charismatic American physicist Richard Fey- nman went further: he claimed that nobody understands it. To anyone tutored in the language and the logic of classical physics, this theory is at once mathematically challenging, maddeningly bizarre, and breathtak- ingly beautiful. This is quantum theory, and this book tells its story. xiii the quantum story If we fi x on Max Planck’s discovery of his ‘quantum of action’ in Decem- ber 1900 as the historical origin of the quantum theory, then as I write this theory is 110 years old. Time enough, you would have thought, for physi- cists to get to grips with it and understand what it means. Time enough to come to terms with what quantum theory has to say about chance and causality and the nature of physical reality. And yet, if anything, the sense of shock has increased, not diminished, with the passing of time. While nobody really understands how quantum theory actually works, the rules of its application are unquestioned and the accuracy and preci- sion of its predictions are unsurpassed in the entire history of science. Although heated debate continues about how quantum theory should be interpreted, there can be no debate about whether or not the theory is fundamentally correct. For more than four hundred years we nurtured the belief (should that, perhaps, be faith?) that evidence-based investigation meeting scientifi c standards of rigour would reveal the true mechanisms of nature. And yet when the mechanisms of nature were revealed to be quantum mech- anisms, the worlds of science and philosophy were set on a collision course. Instead of truth and comprehension, we got deeply unsettling questions about what we can ever hope to know about the world. Quan- tum theory pushed us to the edge of an epistemological precipice. Since the mid-1920s we have lived in fear of stepping over the edge. This book is a celebration of this wonderful yet wholly disconcerting theory, from its birth in the porcelain furnaces used to study black-body radiation in 1900 to the promise of stimulating new quantum phenom- ena to be revealed by CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, over a century later. It is a history told in forty ‘moments’, signifi cant moments of truth or turning points in the theory’s development. This history takes us on a long journey. Part I deals with Planck’s dis- covery in 1900 and traces the development of early quantum theory through Einstein’s light-quantum hypothesis, Bohr’s quantum theory of the atom, Louis de Broglie’s dual wave–particle hypothesis, Werner Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics, the puzzling phenomenon of electron spin, and Wolfgang Pauli’s exclusion principle. This section concludes with Erwin Schrödinger’s ‘late erotic outburst’, which led him to wave mechanics in December 1925. xiv preface In Part II, the book traces the development of the Copenhagen inter- pretation of quantum theory.
Recommended publications
  • Frontiers of Quantum and Mesoscopic Thermodynamics 29 July - 3 August 2013, Prague, Czech Republic
    Frontiers of Quantum and Mesoscopic Thermodynamics 29 July - 3 August 2013, Prague, Czech Republic Under the auspicies of Ing. Milosˇ Zeman President of the Czech Republic Milan Stˇ echˇ President of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Prof. Ing. Jirˇ´ı Drahos,ˇ DrSc., dr. h. c. President of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Dominik Cardinal Duka OP Archbishop of Prague Supported by • Committee on Education, Science, Culture, Human Rights and Petitions of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic • Institute of Physics, the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic • Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands • Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, USA • Institut de Physique Theorique,´ CEA/CNRS Saclay, France Topics • Foundations of quantum physics • Non-equilibrium statistical physics • Quantum thermodynamics • Quantum measurement, entanglement and coherence • Dissipation, dephasing, noise and decoherence • Quantum optics • Macroscopic quantum behavior, e.g., cold atoms, Bose-Einstein condensates • Physics of quantum computing and quantum information • Mesoscopic, nano-electromechanical and nano-optical systems • Biological systems, molecular motors • Cosmology, gravitation and astrophysics Scientific Committee Chair: Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen (University of Amsterdam) Co-Chair: Vaclav´ Spiˇ ckaˇ (Institute of Physics, Acad. Sci. CR, Prague) Raymond Dean Astumian (University of Maine, Orono) Roger Balian (IPhT, Saclay) Gordon Baym (University of Illinois at Urbana
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Fellow Quantum Mechanics;
    Dear Fellow Quantum Mechanics Jeremy Bernstein Abstract: This is a letter of inquiry about the nature of quantum mechanics. I have been reflecting on the sociology of our little group and as is my wont here are a few notes. I see our community divided up into various subgroups. I will try to describe them beginning with a small group of elderly but distinguished physicist who either believe that there is no problem with the quantum theory and that the young are wasting their time or that there is a problem and that they have solved it. In the former category is Rudolf Peierls and in the latter Phil Anderson. I will begin with Peierls. In the January 1991 issue of Physics World Peierls published a paper entitled “In defence of ‘measurement’”. It was one of the last papers he wrote. It was in response to his former pupil John Bell’s essay “Against measurement” which he had published in the same journal in August of 1990. Bell, who had died before Peierls’ paper was published, had tried to explain some of the difficulties of quantum mechanics. Peierls would have none of it.” But I do not agree with John Bell,” he wrote,” that these problems are very difficult. I think it is easy to give an acceptable account…” In the rest of his short paper this is what he sets out to do. He begins, “In my view the most fundamental statement of quantum mechanics is that the wave function or more generally the density matrix represents our knowledge of the system we are trying to describe.” Of course the wave function collapses when this knowledge is altered.
    [Show full text]
  • Subnuclear Physics: Past, Present and Future
    Subnuclear Physics: Past, Present and Future International Symposium 30 October - 2 November 2011 – The purpose of the Symposium is to discuss the origin, the status and the future of the new frontier of Physics, the Subnuclear World, whose first two hints were discovered in the middle of the last century: the so-called “Strange Particles” and the “Resonance #++”. It took more than two decades to understand the real meaning of these two great discoveries: the existence of the Subnuclear World with regularities, spontaneously plus directly broken Symmetries, and totally unexpected phenomena including the existence of a new fundamental force of Nature, called Quantum ChromoDynamics. In order to reach this new frontier of our knowledge, new Laboratories were established all over the world, in Europe, in USA and in the former Soviet Union, with thousands of physicists, engineers and specialists in the most advanced technologies, engaged in the implementation of new experiments of ever increasing complexity. At present the most advanced Laboratory in the world is CERN where experiments are being performed with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the most powerful collider in the world, which is able to reach the highest energies possible in this satellite of the Sun, called Earth. Understanding the laws governing the Space-time intervals in the range of 10-17 cm and 10-23 sec will allow our form of living matter endowed with Reason to open new horizons in our knowledge. Antonino Zichichi Participants Prof. Werner Arber H.E. Msgr. Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo Prof. Guido Altarelli Prof. Ignatios Antoniadis Prof. Robert Aymar Prof. Rinaldo Baldini Ferroli Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Lieu
    Richard Lieu E-mail address: [email protected] Academic Qualifications: Oct., 1975 - June, 1978: BSc (1st class honors), Imperial College London, Major in Physics. Oct., 1978 - June, 1981: DIC, PhD, Imperial College London. Thesis title: Radiation Transport within the source of Hard Cosmic X-ray Photons. Career Record 21 June, 2008 - present: 10th Distinguished Professor and Chair of the Department of Physics, University of Alabama in Huntsville. 14 Sept., 2013 - 21 Jan., 2015, Chair of the Department of Physics, Univer- sity of Alabama in Huntsville. 20 Aug., 2004 - 20 June, 2008: Professor at the Department of Physics, University of Alabama, Huntsville. 16 Aug., 1999 - present: Associate Professor at the Department of Physics, University of Alabama, Huntsville. 16 Aug., 1995 - 15 Aug., 1999: Assistant Professor at the Department of Physics, University of Alabama, Huntsville. 1 1 Nov., 1991 - 15 Aug., 1995: Assistant Research Astronomer at the Center for EUV Astrophysics, University of California, Berkeley. 1 Aug., 1985 - 31 Oct., 1991: Research Assistant at the Astrophysics Group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London, England. 1 Aug., 1981 - 30 June, 1985: Postdoctoral Research Fellow and Sessional Instructor at the Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, and at the Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Awards and Prizes UAH Foundation Researcher of the year award, April 2007. Sigma Xi Huntsville chapter `researcher of the year' award, with Lloyd W. Hillman, April 2005. Three times `Discovery of the year award', 1995, 1994, and 1993, Center for EUV Astrophysics, UC Berkeley. `Outstanding software development of the year award 1993', with James W. Lewis, Center for EUV Astrophysics, UC Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Dimensional Entanglement Transport Through Single-Mode Fibre
    Multi-dimensional entanglement transport through single-mode fibre Jun Liu,1, ∗ Isaac Nape,2, ∗ Qianke Wang,1 Adam Vall´es,2 Jian Wang,1 and Andrew Forbes2 1Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China. 2School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa (Dated: April 8, 2019) The global quantum network requires the distribution of entangled states over long distances, with significant advances already demonstrated using entangled polarisation states, reaching approxi- mately 1200 km in free space and 100 km in optical fibre. Packing more information into each photon requires Hilbert spaces with higher dimensionality, for example, that of spatial modes of light. However spatial mode entanglement transport requires custom multimode fibre and is lim- ited by decoherence induced mode coupling. Here we transport multi-dimensional entangled states down conventional single-mode fibre (SMF). We achieve this by entangling the spin-orbit degrees of freedom of a bi-photon pair, passing the polarisation (spin) photon down the SMF while ac- cessing multi-dimensional orbital angular momentum (orbital) subspaces with the other. We show high fidelity hybrid entanglement preservation down 250 m of SMF across multiple 2 × 2 dimen- sions, demonstrating quantum key distribution protocols, quantum state tomographies and quantum erasers. This work offers an alternative approach to spatial mode entanglement transport that fa- cilitates deployment in legacy networks across conventional fibre. Entanglement is an intriguing aspect of quantum me- chanics with well-known quantum paradoxes such as those of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) [1], Hardy [2], and Leggett [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Cusp Effects in Meson Decays
    EPJ Web of Conferences 3, 01008 (2010) DOI:10.1051/epjconf/20100301008 © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2010 Cusp effects in meson decays Bastian Kubis,a Helmholtz-Institut f¨ur Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics, Universit¨at Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany Abstract. The pion mass difference generates a pronounced cusp in the π0π0 invariant mass distribution of K+ π0π0π+ decays. As originally pointed out by Cabibbo, an accurate measurement of the cusp may allow one to pin→ down the S-wave pion–pion scattering lengths to high precision. We present the non-relativistic effective field theory framework that permits to determine the structure of this cusp in a straightforward manner, including the effects of radiative corrections. Applications of the same formalism to other decay channels, in particular η and η′ decays, are also discussed. 1 The pion mass and pion–pion scattering alternative scenario of chiral symmetry breaking under the name of generalized chiral perturbation theory [4]. The approximate chiral symmetry of the strong interac- Fortunately, chiral low-energy constants tend to appear tions severely constrains the properties and interactions in more than one observable,and indeed, ℓ¯3 also features in of the lightest hadronic degrees of freedom, the would-be the next-to-leading-order corrections to the isospin I = 0 0 Goldstone bosons (in the chiral limit of vanishing quark S-wave pion–pion scattering length a0 [2], masses) of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking that can be identified with the pions. The effective field theory that 7M2 0 = π + ǫ + 4 , a0 2 1 (Mπ) systematically exploits all the consequencesthat can be de- 32πFπ O rived from symmetries is chiral perturbation theory [1,2], 5M2 n 3 o 21 21 which provides an expansion of low-energy observables in = π ¯ + ¯ ¯ + ¯ + ǫ 2 2 ℓ1 2ℓ2 ℓ3 ℓ4 .
    [Show full text]
  • On Monte Carlo Time-Dependent Variational Principles
    On Monte Carlo Time-Dependent Variational Principles Von der QUEST-Leibniz-Forschungsschule der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universit¨atHannover zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften { Doctor rerum naturalium { genehmigte Dissertation von FABIANWOLFGANGG UNTERTRANSCHEL¨ Geboren am 10.01.1987 in Gehrden 2016 0 Erstpr¨ufer : Prof. Dr. Reinhard F. Werner Zweitpr¨ufer : Prof. Dr. Klemens Hammerer Beratendes Mitglied des Pr¨ufungsausschusses : Prof. Dr. Tobias J. Osborne Vorsitzender des Pr¨ufungsausschusses : Prof. Dr. Rolf Haug Tag der Promotion: 17. Dezember 2015 On Monte Carlo Time-Dependent Variational Principles Fabian W. G. Transchel Abstract The present dissertation is concerned with the development and implementation of a novel scheme for quantitative, numeric approximation of the dynamics of quantum lattice systems based on the Time-Dependent Variational Principle together with Monte Carlo techniques in order to include dissipative interactions. The specific implementation is demonstrated on both common and not yet in-detail explored Heisenberg- and Fermi-Hubbard models in one and two dimensions. Additionally, the technical requirements regarding computational complexity and capacity are discussed, especially with regards toward parallelizable components of the imple- mentation. Concluding remarks include prospects with respect to application and extension of the presented methods. Keywords: Monte Carlo method, Dissipative Dynamics, Lindblad Equation iii Zusammenfassung Die vorliegende Dissertation befasst sich mit der Entwicklung und Umsetzung eines neuartigen Schemas zur quantitativen numerischen N¨aherung der Dynamik von Quantengittersystemen auf Grundlage des zeitabh¨angigenVariationsprinzips unter Zuhilfenahme von Monte-Carlo-Techniken zur Einbeziehung von dissipativen Wech- selwirkungen. Die Implementierung wird anhand von Beispielen f¨urHeisenberg- und Fermi-Hubbard-Modellen in einer und zwei Dimensionen gezeigt und erl¨autert.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Physics – It Matters a Forward Look at UK Research Into the Building Blocks of the Universe and Its Impact on Society
    Particle physics – it matters A forward look at UK research into the building blocks of the Universe and its impact on society In partnership with CONTENTS 3 Foreword 4 Advancing human progress through basic knowledge 5 Why does it matter? 6 New frontiers in basic science 6 The experiments 8 How particle physics benefi ts society 8 Particle physics and healthcare 10 Communications 10 Manufacturing and business 11 Global challenges 12 Helping industry 13 Underpinning the knowledge-based economy 14 Particle physics in the UK 15 Further information 2 Foreword Particle physics – it matters Foreword This report summarises the science questions confronting particle-physics research in the next 20 years, what advances in technology are being pursued and the cross-disciplinary benefi ts to be accrued. It is predominantly an interest in curiosity-driven science, of which particle physics is a major part, that often attracts students to study physics and which drives the technological innovation; neither can proceed in isolation. WHAT IS PARTICLE PHYSICS? Particle physics seeks to understand the evolution of the Universe in the fi rst fraction of a second after its birth in the Big Bang in terms of a small number of fundamental particles and forces. The processes involved ultimately resulted in the creation of atoms and the complex molecules that led to our existence. The intellectual curiosity embodied in particle physics is also at the foundation of philosophy, art and other scientifi c disciplines which, together, have shaped the modern world. Without such innate curiosity, the modern world would not exist. The study of particle physics challenges our preconceptions, inspires and seeks to move human knowledge forward at a basic level – wherever that may lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004
    ANNUAL REPORT 2004 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Low Temperature Laboratory Brain Research Unit and Low Temperature Physics Research http://boojum.hut.fi - 2 - PREFACE...............................................................................................................5 SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD .......................................................................7 PERSONNEL .........................................................................................................7 SENIOR RESEARCHERS..................................................................................7 ADMINISTRATION AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL...................................8 GRADUATE STUDENTS (SUPERVISOR).......................................................8 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS.....................................................................9 VISITORS FOR EU PROJECTS ......................................................................10 OTHER VISITORS ..........................................................................................11 GROUP VISITS................................................................................................13 OLLI V. LOUNASMAA MEMORIAL PRIZE 2004 ............................................15 INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONS ..........................................................16 CERN COLLABORATION (COMPASS) ........................................................16 COSLAB (COSMOLOGY IN THE LABORATORY)......................................16 ULTI III - ULTRA LOW TEMPERATURE INSTALLATION
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed-Choice Gedanken Experiments and Their Realizations
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 88, JANUARY–MARCH 2016 Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations Xiao-song Ma* Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Department of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, 15 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA, and National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China † Johannes Kofler Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (MPQ), Hans-Kopfermann-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany ‡ Anton Zeilinger Vienna Center of Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ), University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria and Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, 1090 Vienna, Austria (published 3 March 2016) The wave-particle duality dates back to Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect through quanta of light and de Broglie’s hypothesis of matter waves. Quantum mechanics uses an abstract description for the behavior of physical systems such as photons, electrons, or atoms. Whether quantum predictions for single systems in an interferometric experiment allow an intuitive under- standing in terms of the particle or wave picture depends on the specific configuration which is being used. In principle, this leaves open the possibility that quantum systems always behave either definitely as a particle or definitely as a wave in every experimental run by a priori adapting to the specific experimental situation. This is precisely what is tried to be excluded by delayed-choice experiments, in which the observer chooses to reveal the particle or wave character of a quantum system—or even a continuous transformation between the two—at a late stage of the experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kavli Prize in Astrophysics 2014
    THE KAVLI PRIZE IN ASTROPHYSICS 2014 The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters has decided to award the Kavli Prize in Astrophysics for 2014 to Alan H. Guth Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Andrei D. Linde Stanford University, CA, USA Alexei A. Starobinsky Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia “for pioneering the theory of cosmic inflation” The theory of cosmic inflation, proposed astounding success, the Big Bang theory These two fundamental problems were and developed by Alan Guth, Andrei suffers from two major shortcomings: the elegantly solved in one fell swoop by Alan Linde and Alexei Starobinsky, has revo- “horizon” and the “flatness” problems. Guth in a paper entitled “Inflationary lutionized our thinking about the uni- Cosmic inflation solves them both. universe: A possible solution to the hori- verse. This theory extends our physical zon and flatness problems” published in description of the cosmos to the earliest As the universe expanded it cooled. Today 1981. Guth hypothesized that the uni- times, when the universe was only a tiny it is bathed in a sea of microwave radia- verse was initially trapped in a peculiar fraction of a second old. According to this tion, the heat left over from the Big Bang. state (the “false vacuum”) from which it theory, very soon after our universe came At first sight, the near uniformity of this decayed, in the process expanding expo- into existence it underwent a short-lived microwave background across the sky nentially and liberating the energy pres- phase of exponential expansion. During implies a disturbing contradiction: oppo- ent in our universe today.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding the W and Z Products, Etc
    CERN Courier May 2013 CERN Courier May 2013 Reminiscence Anniversary on precisely the questions that the physicists at CERN would be interested in: the cross-sections for W and Z production; the expected event rates; the angular distribution of the W and Z decay Finding the W and Z products, etc. People would also want to know how uncertain the predictions for the W and Z masses were and why certain theorists (J J Sakurai and James Bjorken among them) were cautioning that the masses could turn out to be different. The writing of the trans- parencies turned out to be time consuming. I had to make frequent revisions, trying to anticipate what questions might be asked. To Thirty years ago, CERN made scientifi c make corrections on the fi lm transparencies, I was using my after- shave lotion, so that the whole room was reeking of perfume. I history with the discoveries of the W and was preparing the lectures on a day-by-day basis, not getting much sleep. To stay awake, I would go to the cafeteria for a coffee shortly Z bosons. Here, we reprint an extract from before it closed. Thereafter I would keep going to the vending the special issue of CERN Courier that machines in the basement for chocolate – until the machines ran out of chocolate or I ran out of coins. commemorated this breakthrough. After the fourth lecture, the room in the dormitory had become such a mess (papers everywhere and the strong smell of after- shave) that I decided to ask the secretariat for an offi ce where I Less than 11 months after Lalit Sehgal’s visit to CERN, Carlo could work.
    [Show full text]