University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons

Departmental Papers (Classical Studies) Classical Studies at Penn

1986

The Distinction Between Comitia and Concilium

Joseph Farrell University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers

Part of the Classics Commons

Recommended Citation Farrell, J. (1986). The Distinction Between Comitia and Concilium. Athenaeum, 64 407-438. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/137

This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/137 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Distinction Between Comitia and Concilium

Disciplines Arts and Humanities | Classics

This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/137 :e dal medesimo tema au- ;o:t (15) al contrario di 3C'".,,,,'Yl THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN AND . . µt , 11 on e,· s- co,- COMITIA CONCILIUM.'' testlmonxanza d'1 - - N'1ce ta Eu-- g··-"enx-"·• : a noi ignoto:

;•!!he Romans used three words to designate legitimate public assemblies.1 Of these )Aeµov ' contlomay have been the most general term for an assembly of any kind; but it 8' oox 6:µµe XeA1fo w ouµev n tnbra sensato JrtiilJy- d�notes open meetings called by a state official to discuss public busi ess.2 assimilarlo a quell comitia concilium, v. 81 della Olimpica e:'.ty;rtl other words, and denote the various kinds of voting assem­ • • I·. ... u.t µi:;ri o:-, >tocc10 inter . ·{14 which such business was not discussed, but rather was actually carried out in the pretat1'vo'eg rusto_- ,c_, 3 contio comitia nche a que 6{elections, legislation, and trials. While is seldom confused with � lle figurazion 4 i espress fdnt:ilium, the basis of distinction between the two words applied to voting assem- rscono un ele mento inconfondib

'.f;,(�re!lminary version of this paper was read on 28 December 1980 at the 112th Annual Meeting of the '.4-t!i�fkan Philological Association in New Orleans.Although the scope of the study has since been expanded, it,{tdhcfosions presented here are essentially the same.I am pleased to thank Pwfessor Jerzy Linderski of :thf·Phiversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for his encouragement to undertake this study and for his ':stis1faihed interest in its development.Thanks as well to my colleagues, Professors R. E. A. Palmer, Ralph M. I\;osert, andR. V. Munson, whose scrutiny of an earlier 'draftgreatly improved this paper, and Professors Wesley ' b.- ,Smith .and Robert A. Kraft for technical assistence in gathering and organizing the evidence.Blame for c";rt.yresidual shortcomings is 'to be laid at my door. In addition to standard abbreviations (CIL, [LS, OLD,