DOCSLIB.ORG

Honesdale, Hawley, & White Mills Work Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COMMUNITY WORKPLAN Honesdale, Hawley and White Mills Heritage Communities Program 2012 Pennsylvania Route 6 Alliance HONESDALE, HAWLEY AND WHITE MILLS HERITAGE COMMUNITY WORKPLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER/Subsection Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii COMMUNITY WORKPLAN SUMMARY 1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 3 Heritage Communities Program 3 COMMUNITY INVENTORIES 4 Community and Area Overview 4 Location Map 5 Demographics 6 Economics 8 Historical and Architecturally Significant Buildings, Sites and Themes 16 Historical Markers 25 Cultural History 26 Community Inventories – Museums 36 Community Events and Activities 38 Regional Attractions and Resources 40 Local Recreation Related Resources 48 Inventory and Survey of Businesses 52 Business Survey 56 Physical and Non-Physical Conditions 67 Transportation System 70 Community Visual Conditions and Design Analysis 80 SYNTHESIS OF INFORMATION 94 Public Input First Workshop – The Wish List 94 Second Workshop – Planning Charrette 96 Third Workshop – Draft Presentation and Comments 103 Issues and Opportunities Statement Overview 104 IMPLEMENTATION 107 Heritage Route 6 Economic Impacts 107 Tourism and Economics 108 Implementation Matrix 112 Summary of Recommendations 124 Interpretive Planning Statement 135 Marketing and Hospitality Planning Statement 137 Wayfinding Planning Statement 139 Heritage Resource Development/Physical Enhancement Planning Statement 142 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This planning effort represents a relatively new approach to heritage planning being implemented by the Pennsylvania Route 6 Alliance. The concept was locally developed during early Route 6 heritage planning and refined with the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) who insisted that the Heritage Communities Program be premised on the engagement of the community . In short, DCNR wanted this to be “grass roots” and not “top down” planning requiring the establishment of the Heritage Community Stakeholders Groups in each Heritage Community. This was envisioned to be a group of area residents who met throughout this process and even spearheaded several early action implementation actions. Members of the Honesdale, Hawley and White Mills Stakeholders Group represented a cross-section of the communities and met on numerous occasions between March 2011 and January 2012, and also helped during this period in conducting Community Workshops and a Planning Charrette. In addition, many other residents participated in various public forums such as during the focus group meetings during the Planning Charrette and at the various Community Workshops. The coordination provided by the staff of the Northeastern Pennsylvania Alliance throughout the process as the local liaison and later the Pennsylvania Route 6 Alliance planning team was also important in the development of this WorkPlan. Major project funding for the Heritage Communities Program is provided through the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation through the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, through the Heritage Areas Program under the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and a local contribution from communities involved. Last but not least, a special thanks to the residents, business community and especially the members of the Stakeholders Group who not only embraced this program and participated, but more importantly showed a genuine appreciation of the many resources and assets of the communities and region. ii HONESDALE, HAWLEY AND WHITE MILLS HERITAGE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Corridor COMMUNITY WORKPLAN Background A Community WorkPlan is a requirement of the Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Communities Program. It is intended to establish an action-oriented framework for local heritage and community planning and implementation in Heritage Communities along Route 6. This is a WorkPlan for the Honesdale and Hawley area surrounding region. While the document is important in itself the process gone through to prepare it is probably more important. In this regard local engagement is not only important but is required. The process involved the engagement and discussion with a local Stakeholders Group that was involved throughout the planning period. The document attempts to aggregate and synthesize the input and recommendations of this Group, also taking into account public input received at Community Workshops and a planning charrette. The document and process also involves original and secondary research gathered by the Route 6 planning team. The WorkPlan is organized as follows: BACKGROUND ACTIVITIES – DESCRIPTION Honesdale, Hawley and White Mills Heritage Communities Program Community Inventories - Themes and Sites, Heritage, Community Events, Businesses, Physical and Non-Physical Needs and Visual Conditions and Design Analysis SYNTHESIS OF INFORMATION Public Input review and Issues and Opportunities Statement Overview Issues and Opportunities Statement IMPLEMENTATION - Planning Statements and Implementation Strategy Overview The Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Communities Program recognizes that the action-oriented framework requires attention to both physical and non-physical needs that address the Visitor’s Experience and the Community Context. Each has an impact on the other, and the latter frames and directly affects the former. Thus the Community WorkPlan must enhance the Study Area as a destination and a stopover, without negatively affecting the quality of life and community characteristics that make it a great place to reside. In essence then, this entire process is an attempt to address tourism in a context-sensitive manner. In this 1 regard, we recommend a number of enhancements including the following more significant ones: Visitor Experience Enhancement – “things to see and do” Interactive interpretive enhancements – interconnected “smart kiosks” and other displays focused on major themes and corresponding local sites Coordinated regional promotional and marketing efforts – brochures, itineraries, apps and web-based efforts relaying a clear and focused message on regional and local resources, attractions and themes Re-evaluation and search for a new business plan for the rail excursion – as part of a two-way transportation system transporting people to attractions and locations along a scenic and historic line Regional Wayfinding Signage – at critical attractions and intersections Additional events/activities – may include Rail/Canal-Fest, Baseball Heritage event, river-based activities, etc. Partnering with allied heritage organizations and tourism development and promotion agencies Completion of trail segments linking sections of area and specific resources The Community Context – addressing local needs Gateway Enhancements Continued pedestrian-oriented downtown efforts focused on specialty retail, hospitality, arts and related Select façade and streetscape enhancements Relatively minor revisions to local regulatory framework Continued implementation of plans for Lock 31 Museum and White Mills Master Plan 2 BACKGROUND ACTIVITIES – DESCRIPTION The Heritage Communities Program is an initiative of the Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Corporation, focused on strengthening the many vibrant communities along the Route 6 Corridor in Pennsylvania. The Program was developed by local stakeholders involved in the development of the Pennsylvania Route 6: Our Heritage and a Destination for the Future – Framework for Action during 2001- 03. These stakeholders have developed the Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Communities Program that requires communities – their leaders, business community and residents – to buy into the heritage tourism concept and process. The program provides assistance to Route 6 communities in first identifying and localizing heritage tourism sites, resources and themes; then developing ways to enhance and refine these resources; and finally a way to sustain local heritage tourism. This assumes a very inclusive grass-roots process involving local residents, which will have an important side-benefit of making the community a better place in which to live as well as visit. The key to the Program is to identify and capitalize on the unique qualities of select communities on the Corridor that reflect the themes of Route 6. These themes are as follows: Warrior’s Road honoring the epic stories of the warriors of many races, genders and times fought or lived along the Corridor; The many Natural Opportunities utilized and enjoyed by hunters, fishermen, oilmen, tanners and miners of the region, and the changes in the view of natural resources; The rough terrain required Engineer’s Challenge to be met by spectacular feats of civil engineering that made Northern Pennsylvania and its resources more accessible; The region has provided New Beginnings and Safe Havens for a diverse group including Connecticut Yankees, French Aristocrats and escaping slaves; Visionaries, Achievers and Social Entrepreneurs of the region whose ideas and achievements inspired and transformed the region and the country; and The region’s recognized position as an Outdoor Enthusiast’s Paradise offering active and passive recreational opportunities year-round. The Program is premised on providing technical assistance to the communities in interpreting and localizing these themes. Honesdale, Hawley Heritage and White Mills Communities Program The unique qualities of the Pennsylvania US Route 6 Corridor are created and affected by the communities along its
Recommended publications
  • Watersheds Connecting People, Land and Water by John Jose, Watershed Specialist, Pike County Conservation District

    Watersheds Connecting People, Land and Water by John Jose, Watershed Specialist, Pike County Conservation District

    1. Watersheds Connecting People, Land and Water by John Jose, Watershed Specialist, Pike County Conservation District “When the land does well for its owner, and the owner does well by his land – when both end up better by reason of their partnership – then we have conservation.” ~ Aldo Leopold All lands covering the Earth’s surface are divided into watersheds. At any given time a person will find his or herself in the watershed where they live or as a visitor in a water- shed that other people call home. All lands covering the Earth’s surface A watershed can be com- are divided into watersheds. pared to a large basin that captures all the precipitation (rain, snow, etc.) that falls within its boundary. A wa- tershed boundary is formed by highpoints in the landscape, where an un- broken, continuous ridgeline creates a divide between adjacent basins. Each watershed has its own uniqueness based on climate, differences in topogra- phy (flat vs. rolling hills or mountainous), the types of plants and soils found there and, very importantly, both past and present land use activi- ties that have taken place. Examples of land use activities include commer- cial, industrial and residential development, farming, mining, logging, and recreational activities. Watersheds vary greatly in shape and size from the greater Atlantic Basin that extends from the Continental Divide to the east coast of the U.S., down to a smaller sub-watershed – or watershed within a watershed – of less than an acre draining into a local backyard pond. Pike County watersheds are part of the larger Delaware River Basin that drains portions of New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
  • JANUARY, 1938 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER'* Vol

    JANUARY, 1938 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER'* Vol

    9 ANGLER.^ OFFICIAL STATE JANUARY, 1938 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER'* Vol. 7—No. 1 ?*= =«c PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS 111 CHARLES A. FRENCH Ten cents a copy — 50 cents a year Commissioner of Fisheries MEMBERS OF BOARD 111 CHARLES A. FRENCH, Chairman Ellwood City ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor MILTON L. PEEK Radnor South Office BIdg., Harrisburg, Pa. HARRY E. WEBER Philipsburg SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Dalton FRANK J. PENTRACK NOTE Johnstown Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER EDGAR W. NICHOLSON should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either Philadelphia by check or money order payable to the Common­ KENNETH A. REID wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. Connellsville Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. FRED McKEAN New Kensington H. R. STACKHOUSE Secretary to Board PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ tions and photos of catches from its readers. Proper credit will be given to contributors. All contributions returned if accompanied by first C. R. BULLER class postage. Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte «"»»= ItfC IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given 7 Vol. 7 No. I ^ANGLER JANUARY, 1938 EDITORIAL :0& FISH CONSERVATION ADVANCED IN 1937 HE year 1937 will go down in the records of fish conserva­ in keeping with changing conditions. Some idea of the extent to tion in Pennsylvania as one of the most outstanding from the which pollution has interfered with widespread stream stocking Tangle of progress in the history of the Fish Commission may be had when it is realized that of Pennsylvania's 100,000 since its organization in 1873.
  • Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area Evaluation Findings

    Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area Evaluation Findings

    Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area Evaluation Findings Authors Prepared for Prepared by Chandria Jones, Ph.D. United States National Park Service Westat Laurel Lunn, Ph.D. Washington, D.C. 1600 Research Boulevard Teodora Vassileva Rockville, Maryland 20850-3129 Nataly Johanson (301) 251-1500 July 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Purpose of the Report . .. 4 Key Evaluation Questions. 4 Key Findings . 5 Section 1– Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................................................10 1 1. National Heritage Areas . 10 1 .2 Report Purpose . 10 1 .3 Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area . 11 1 .4 Evaluation Methodology . 14 1 1.4 Methodology. 14 1 .4 .2 Site Introduction and Background Research . 14 1 .4 .3 Data Collection . 14 1 .4 .4 Data Analysis . 15 1 .4 .5 Evaluation Limitations . 15 1 .5 Roles . 16 Section 2 – Overview of the Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area ....................................................................17 2 1. Introduction to the Lackawanna Valley . 17 2 .2 Introduction to the Lackawanna Heritage Valley Authority . 19 2 .2 1. Authorizing Legislation and LVNHA Vision and Mission . 19 2 .2 .2 The LHVA’s Organizational Structure . 20 2 .3 LVNHA’s Relationships
  • Dept Or Interior

    Dept Or Interior

    RECEivED LRRC Interior 1nited States Department of the 2015 MY 19 Ptl ‘4 38 NATIONAL PARK SRV ICE ort1ieast Region United Slates Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 l R PlY RErEl II) A.1.2, (NER-RS&S) MAY 192015 Department of Environmental Protection Policy Office 400 Market Street P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 Subject: 25 PA. Code CHS. Th and 78a Proposed Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites Dear l)epartment of Environmental Protection Policy Office: The National Park Service (‘NPS) is pleased 10 provide comments on 25 PA. Code CHS. 78 and 78a. Draft Final Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites. The NPS appreciates the proactive steps the Department of Environmental Protection (I)EP) is taking in revising, these regulations to protect the significant and vital natural resources in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth). Tb is effort will result in necessary and important environmental protections for state and federally managed or administered lands. held in trust for [he public, and the resources and ecosystem services they provide that arc counted upon by present and future generations for essential benefits such as clean water. The NPS offers the following comments which are intended to promote understanding cf the diverse and nationally significant resources within NPS units and affiliated areas in the Commonwealth: to claril’ and strengthen the proposed regulations: to aid in a more efficient and effective penmtflng process: to promote open and early communication between ibe NPS and Commonwealth regulatory agencies: and to promote the protection of N’ PS resources.
  • 2014 PCCD Annual Report

    2014 PCCD Annual Report

    2014 Annual Report “Those who can, do. Those who can do more, volunteer.” … Unknown As a member of the of the Pike County Conservation District Board of Directors over the past eleven years, I have been very privileged to work with some amazing people on the Conservation District Board. They are a dynamic group of dedicated volunteers who all see the many benefits of their volunteer work. These people give of their time and expertise working as volunteers to affect important conservation work in Pike County. They come from diverse backgrounds and interests bringing expertise and input to the policy decisions which guide the District’s programs and staff. With the declining rates of volunteerism across the county, and country, which are effecting many organizations, particularly volunteer fire and emergency personnel, it is becoming increasingly difficult to find individuals who have the time and inclination to “..do more.” Our Conservation District Board continually seeks out dedicated individuals – volunteers who will work towards the conservation of our County’s natural resources. This annual report highlights the broad range of conservation activities and projects which our Board volunteers and our professional staff have worked on over the past year. I am hoping that as you read through the articles you will find something that really interests you. Perhaps it will interest you enough to attend one of our monthly meetings or educational events or to follow our website or Facebook page to see what your Conservation District is all about. Or perhaps you will find yourself with time and the inclination to become part of the heart of our Conservation organization.
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
  • The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway

    The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway

    The 1825 S&DR: Preparing for 2025; Significance & Management. The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway: Historic Environment Audit Volume 1: Significance & Management October 2016 Archaeo-Environment for Durham County Council, Darlington Borough Council and Stockton on Tees Borough Council. Archaeo-Environment Ltd for Durham County Council, Darlington Borough Council and Stockton Borough Council 1 The 1825 S&DR: Preparing for 2025; Significance & Management. Executive Summary The ‘greatest idea of modern times’ (Jeans 1974, 74). This report arises from a project jointly commissioned by the three local authorities of Darlington Borough Council, Durham County Council and Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council which have within their boundaries the remains of the Stockton & Darlington Railway (S&DR) which was formally opened on the 27th September 1825. The report identifies why the S&DR was important in the history of railways and sets out its significance and unique selling point. This builds upon the work already undertaken as part of the Friends of Stockton and Darlington Railway Conference in June 2015 and in particular the paper given by Andy Guy on the significance of the 1825 S&DR line (Guy 2015). This report provides an action plan and makes recommendations for the conservation, interpretation and management of this world class heritage so that it can take centre stage in a programme of heritage led economic and social regeneration by 2025 and the bicentenary of the opening of the line. More specifically, the brief for this Heritage Trackbed Audit comprised a number of distinct outputs and the results are summarised as follows: A. Identify why the S&DR was important in the history of railways and clearly articulate its significance and unique selling point.
  • National Park Service Heister

    National Park Service Heister

    3,04^ United States Department ofthe Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region United States Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 IN REPLY REFER TO: U U L±3 \^ L^=3 u \J L=nir> MAR 1 4 2014 March 13, 2013 INDEPENDENT REGUUTORY REVIEW COMMISSION Environmental Quality Board P.O. Box 8477 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8477 RegComments@pa. gov http://www.ahs.dep.pa.gov/RegComments Subject: 25 PA. Code CH. 78 Proposed Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites Dear Environmental Quality Board members, The National Park Service (NPS) is pleased to provide comment on 25 PA. Code CH. 78 Proposed Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites. The NPS appreciates the proactive steps the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is taking in revising these regulations to protect the significant and vital natural resources in the Commonwealth. This effort will result in necessary and important environmental protections for state and federally managed or administered lands, held in trust for the public, and the resources and ecosystem services they provide that are counted upon by present and future generations for essential benefits such as clean water. The NPS offers the following comments which are intended to promote understanding ofthe diverse and nationally significant resources within NPS units and affiliated areas in Pennsylvania, to clarify and strengthen the proposed regulations to aid in a more efficient and effective permitting process, to promote open and early communication between the NPS and PA state regulatory agencies, and to promote the protection of NPS resources.
  • The History of the First Locomotives in America

    The History of the First Locomotives in America

    This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world’s books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that’s often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book’s long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google’s system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us.
  • An Examination of the Technology That Evolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine Company, Paterson, NJ

    An Examination of the Technology That Evolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine Company, Paterson, NJ

    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 4 1974 Symposium on Industrial Archaeology, Article 4 Paterson, N.J. 1975 An Examination of the Technology that Evolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine Company, Paterson, NJ Ralph J. Leo Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Leo, Ralph J. (1975) "An Examination of the Technology that Evolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine Company, Paterson, NJ," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 4 4, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol4/iss1/4 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol4/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Examination of the Technology that lvolved from the Rogers Locomotive & Machine OompanJ, Paterson, I.J. Ralph J.Leo IN TROD UCTION when early canals wer'e still under con­ struction, several pioneers became inter­ ested in the railroad as the possible Until 1815, the southern agricultural primary transportation source for America plantations, northern iron plantations, (Taylor 1951 : 76). Already, some 100 and small community-oriented sawmills years earlier in Britain, Thomas Savery and gristmills supplied services and pro­ and Thomas Neucomens bad perfected the ducts on a very small scale (Taylor 1951: modern type of stationary steam engine; 5-6 ). When population increase and in­ within 50 years it had been improved flux required increased production of steadily and used regularly for power in the basic necessities, horne industry no mining operations.
  • Steam-Engine

    Steam-Engine

    CHAPTER IV. .J.1JE MODERN STEAM-ENGINE. "THOSE projects which abridge distance bnve done most for the civiliza­ ..tion and happiness of our species."-MACAULAY. THE SECOND PERIOD OF APPLIC.ATION-18OO-'4O. STE.AM-LOCOMOTION ON RAILROADS. lNTRODUCTORY.-The commencement of the nineteenth century found the modern steam-engine fully developed in .. :.... �::�£:��r:- ::::. Fro. 40.-The First Railroad-Car, 1S25. a.11 its principal features, and fairly at work in many depart­ ments of industry. The genius of Worcester, and Morland, and Savery, and Dcsaguliers, had, in the first period of the · STEA�l-LOCOMOTION ON RAILROADS. 145 application of the po,ver of steam to useful ,vork, effected a beginning ,vhich, looked upon from a point of vie,v vvhich · exhibits its importance as the first step to,vard the wonder­ ful results to-day familiar to every one, appears in its true light, and entitles those great men to even greater honor than has been accorded them. The results actually accom­ plishecl, ho,vever, were absolutely. insignificant in compari­ son with those ,vhich marked the period of development just described. Yet even the work of Watt and of his con­ temporaries ,vas but a 1nere prelude to the marvellous ad­ vances made in the succeeding period, to which ,ve are now come, and, in · extent and importance, was insignificant in co1nparison ,vith that accomplishecl by tl1eir successors in · the development of all mechanical industries by the appli­ cation of the steam-engine to the movement of every kind of machine. 'fhe firstof the two periods of application saw the steam­ engine adapted simply to tl1e elevation of water and t,he drainage of mines ; during the second period it ,vas adapted to every variety of use£ul ,vork, and introduced ,vherever the muscular strength of men and animals, or the power of ,vind and of falling ,vater, ,vl1ich had previously been the only motors, had found application.