DOCSLIB.ORG

Mantis Shrimps (Crustacea: Stomatopoda)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mantis Shrimps (Crustacea: Stomatopoda) ISSN 1174–0043; 125 The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Mantis Shrimps (Crustacea: Stomatopoda) Shane T. Ahyong NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 125 COVER PHOTO Pariliacantha georgeorum gen. et sp. nov., male paratype, TL 65 mm (AM P87901), Deliverance Cove, Castlepoint. (Photo: copyright S. Ahyong). NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH (NIWA) The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Mantis Shrimps (Crustacea: Stomatopoda) Shane T. Ahyong Marine Invertebrates Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 125 2012 Cataloguing in Publication AHYONG, S. T. The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Mantis Shrimps (Crustacea: Stomatopoda) / by Shane T. Ahyong—Wellington: NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd), 2012 (NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, ISSN 1174-0043; 125) Soft cover: ISBN 978–0–478–23296–7 Hard cover: ISBN 978–0–478–23297–4 Electronic: ISBN 978–0–478–23298–1 Series Editor: Dennis P. Gordon Copy edited, typeset and indexed by: Geoff Gregory, Word Therapy, Paraparaumu Printed and bound by: Graphic Press & Packaging Ltd, Levin DEDICATION For Aotearoa Received for publication—11 February 2012 NIWA Copyright 2012 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................................................................................................. 7 CHECKLIST OF NEW ZEALAND STOMATOPODA ..................................................................................................... 13 SYSTEMATICS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 14 BATHYSQUILLOIDEA Manning, 1967 ....................................................................................................................... 14 BATHYSQUILLIDAE Manning, 1967 ...................................................................................................................... 14 Bathysquilla Manning, 1963 ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Bathysquilla microps (Manning, 1961) .................................................................................................................... 14 GONODACTYLOIDEA Giesbrecht, 1910 ................................................................................................................... 18 GONODACTYLIDAE Giesbrecht, 1910 ................................................................................................................... 18 Gonodactylaceus Manning, 1995 ................................................................................................................................. 19 Gonodactylaceus falcatus (Forskål, 1775) ................................................................................................................. 19 Gonodactylellus Manning, 1995 ................................................................................................................................... 23 Gonodactylellus osheai sp. nov. ................................................................................................................................ 23 Gonodactylellus viridis (Serène, 1954) ..................................................................................................................... 25 Gonodactylus Berthold, 1827 ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Gonodactylus platysoma Wood-Mason, 1895 ......................................................................................................... 29 HEMISQUILLIDAE Manning, 1980 ......................................................................................................................... 32 Hemisquilla Hansen, 1895 ............................................................................................................................................ 32 Hemisquilla australiensis Stephenson, 1967 ............................................................................................................ 33 ODONTODACTYLIDAE Manning, 1980 ............................................................................................................... 36 Odontodactylus Bigelow, 1893 .................................................................................................................................... 36 Odontodactylus hawaiiensis Manning, 1967 ........................................................................................................... 36 Odontodactylus scyllarus (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................................................................................. 39 PROTOSQUILLIDAE Manning, 1980 ...................................................................................................................... 42 Haptosquilla Manning, 1969 ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Haptosquilla helleri sp. nov. ..................................................................................................................................... 43 LYSIOSQUILLOIDEA Giesbrecht, 1910 ...................................................................................................................... 46 TETRASQUILLIDAE Manning & Camp, 1993 ....................................................................................................... 46 Colubrisquilla gen. nov. ............................................................................................................................................... 47 Colubrisquilla dempsey gen. et sp. nov. .................................................................................................................. 48 Heterosquilla Manning, 1963 ....................................................................................................................................... 51 Heterosquilla koning sp. nov. ................................................................................................................................... 52 Heterosquilla laevis (Hutton, 1879) .......................................................................................................................... 55 Heterosquilla tricarinata (Claus, 1871) ..................................................................................................................... 60 Heterosquilla tridentata (Thomson, 1882) ............................................................................................................... 66 Heterosquilla trifida sp. nov. .................................................................................................................................... 70 Pariliacantha gen. nov. ................................................................................................................................................ 73 Pariliacantha georgeorum gen. et sp. nov. .............................................................................................................. 74 SQUILLOIDEA Latreille, 1802 ...................................................................................................................................... 78 SQUILLIDAE Latreille, 1802 ..................................................................................................................................... 78 Anchisquilloides Manning, 1977 .................................................................................................................................. 79 Anchisquilloides mcneilli (Stephenson, 1953) ......................................................................................................... 79 Oratosquilla Manning, 1968 ........................................................................................................................................ 85 Oratosquilla fabricii (Holthuis, 1941) ...................................................................................................................... 86 Oratosquilla oratoria (De Haan, 1844) ..................................................................................................................... 89 Pterygosquilla Hilgendorf, 1890 .................................................................................................................................. 92 Pterygosquilla schizodontia (Richardson, 1953) ...................................................................................................... 93 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 99 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................................... 101 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning in Stomatopod Crustaceans
    International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2006, 19 , 297-317. Copyright 2006 by the International Society for Comparative Psychology Learning in Stomatopod Crustaceans Thomas W. Cronin University of Maryland Baltimore County, U.S.A. Roy L. Caldwell University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A. Justin Marshall University of Queensland, Australia The stomatopod crustaceans, or mantis shrimps, are marine predators that stalk or ambush prey and that have complex intraspecific communication behavior. Their active lifestyles, means of predation, and intricate displays all require unusual flexibility in interacting with the world around them, imply- ing a well-developed ability to learn. Stomatopods have highly evolved sensory systems, including some of the most specialized visual systems known for any animal group. Some species have been demonstrated to learn how to recognize and use novel, artificial burrows, while others are known to learn how to identify novel prey species and handle them for effective predation. Stomatopods learn the identities of individual competitors and mates, using both chemical and visual cues. Furthermore, stomatopods can be trained for psychophysical examination of their sensory abilities, including dem- onstration of color and polarization vision. These flexible and intelligent invertebrates continue to be attractive subjects for basic research on learning in animals with relatively simple nervous systems. Among the most captivating of all arthropods are the stomatopod crusta- ceans, or mantis shrimps. These marine creatures, unfamiliar to most biologists, are abundant members of shallow marine ecosystems, where they are often the dominant invertebrate predators. Their common name refers to their method of capturing prey using a folded, anterior raptorial appendage that looks superficially like the foreleg of a praying mantis.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Freshwater Shrimp Species of the Genus Caridina (Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) from Dawanshan Island, Guangdong, China, with the Description of a New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 923: 15–32 (2020) Caridina tetrazona 15 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.923.48593 RESEarcH articLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Two freshwater shrimp species of the genus Caridina (Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) from Dawanshan Island, Guangdong, China, with the description of a new species Qing-Hua Chen1, Wen-Jian Chen2, Xiao-Zhuang Zheng2, Zhao-Liang Guo2 1 South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510520, Guangdong Province, China 2 Department of Animal Science, School of Life Science and Enginee- ring, Foshan University, Foshan 528231, Guangdong Province, China Corresponding author: Zhao-Liang Guo ([email protected]) Academic editor: I.S. Wehrtmann | Received 19 November 2019 | Accepted 7 February 2020 | Published 1 April 2020 http://zoobank.org/138A88CC-DF41-437A-BA1A-CB93E3E36D62 Citation: Chen Q-H, Chen W-J, Zheng X-Z, Guo Z-L (2020) Two freshwater shrimp species of the genus Caridina (Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) from Dawanshan Island, Guangdong, China, with the description of a new species. ZooKeys 923: 15–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.923.48593 Abstract A faunistic and ecological survey was conducted to document the diversity of freshwater atyid shrimps of Dawanshan Island. Two species of Caridina that occur on this island were documented and discussed. One of these, Caridina tetrazona sp. nov. is described and illustrated as new to science. It can be easily distinguished from its congeners based on a combination of characters, which includes a short rostrum, the shape of the endopod of the male first pleopod, the segmental ratios of antennular peduncle and third maxilliped, the slender scaphocerite, and the absence of a median projection on the posterior margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade
    Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade AUSTIN B. WILLIAMS Introduction tons to pounds to conform with US. tinents and islands, shoal platforms, and fishery statistics). This total includes certain seamounts (Fig. 1 and 2). More­ Lobsters are valued throughout the clawed lobsters, spiny and flat lobsters, over, the world distribution of these world as prime seafood items wherever and squat lobsters or langostinos (Tables animals can also be divided rougWy into they are caught, sold, or consumed. 1 and 2). temperate, subtropical, and tropical Basically, three kinds are marketed for Fisheries for these animals are de­ temperature zones. From such partition­ food, the clawed lobsters (superfamily cidedly concentrated in certain areas of ing, the following facts regarding lob­ Nephropoidea), the squat lobsters the world because of species distribu­ ster fisheries emerge. (family Galatheidae), and the spiny or tion, and this can be recognized by Clawed lobster fisheries (superfamily nonclawed lobsters (superfamily noting regional and species catches. The Nephropoidea) are concentrated in the Palinuroidea) . Food and Agriculture Organization of temperate North Atlantic region, al­ The US. market in clawed lobsters is the United Nations (FAO) has divided though there is minor fishing for them dominated by whole living American the world into 27 major fishing areas for in cooler waters at the edge of the con­ lobsters, Homarus americanus, caught the purpose of reporting fishery statis­ tinental platform in the Gul f of Mexico, off the northeastern United States and tics. Nineteen of these are marine fish­ Caribbean Sea (Roe, 1966), western southeastern Canada, but certain ing areas, but lobster distribution is South Atlantic along the coast of Brazil, smaller species of clawed lobsters from restricted to only 14 of them, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomatopoda of Greece: an Annotated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e47183 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e47183 Taxonomic Paper Stomatopoda of Greece: an annotated checklist Panayota Koulouri‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou‡§, Nicolas Bailly , Costas Dounas‡ ‡ Hellenic Center for Marine Recearch (HCMR), Heraklion, Greece § WorldFish Center, Los Baños, Philippines Corresponding author: Panayota Koulouri ([email protected]) Academic editor: Eva Chatzinikolaou Received: 09 Oct 2019 | Accepted: 15 Mar 2020 | Published: 26 Mar 2020 Citation: Koulouri P, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N, Dounas C (2020) Stomatopoda of Greece: an annotated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e47183. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e47183 Abstract Background The checklist of Stomatopoda of Greece was developed in the framework of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) project, coordinated by the Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture (IMBBC) of the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR). The application of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS) of this project has been used in order to develop a complete checklist of species recorded from the Greek Seas. The objectives of the present study were to update and cross-check all the stomatopod species that are known to occur in the Greek Seas. Inaccuracies and omissions were also investigated, according to literature and current taxonomic status. New information The up-to-date checklist of Stomatopoda of Greece comprises nine species, classified to eight genera and three families. Keywords Stomatopoda, Greece, Aegean Sea, Sea of Crete, Ionian Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, checklist © Koulouri P et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Growth of the Spiny Lobsters Panulirus Gracilis and Panulirus Inflatus (Decapoda: Palinuridae) in Guerrero, México
    Rev. Biol. Trop. 51(1): 165-174, 2003 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Factors affecting growth of the spiny lobsters Panulirus gracilis and Panulirus inflatus (Decapoda: Palinuridae) in Guerrero, México Patricia Briones-Fourzán and Enrique Lozano-Álvarez Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad Académica Puerto Morelos. P. O. Box 1152, Cancún, Q. R. 77500 México. Fax: +52 (998) 871-0138; [email protected] Received 00-XX-2002. Corrected 00-XX-2002. Accepted 00-XX-2002. Abstract: The effects of sex, injuries, season and site on the growth of the spiny lobsters Panulirus gracilis, and P. inflatus, were studied through mark-recapture techniques in two sites with different ecological characteristics on the coast of Guerrero, México. Panulirus gracilis occurred in both sites, whereas P. inflatus occurred only in one site. All recaptured individuals were adults. Both species had similar intermolt periods, but P. gracilis had significantly higher growth rates (mm carapace length week-1) than P. inflatus as a result of a larger molt incre- ment. Growth rates of males were higher than those of females in both species owing to larger molt increments and shorter intermolt periods in males. Injuries had no effect on growth rates in either species. Individuals of P. gracilis grew faster in site 1 than in site 2. Therefore, the effect of season on growth of P. gracilis was analyzed separately in each site. In site 2, growth rates of P. gracilis were similar in summer and in winter, whereas in site 1 both species had higher growth rates in winter than in summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapod Crustacean Grooming: Functional Morphology, Adaptive Value, and Phylogenetic Significance
    Decapod crustacean grooming: Functional morphology, adaptive value, and phylogenetic significance N RAYMOND T.BAUER Center for Crustacean Research, University of Southwestern Louisiana, USA ABSTRACT Grooming behavior is well developed in many decapod crustaceans. Antennular grooming by the third maxillipedes is found throughout the Decapoda. Gill cleaning mechanisms are qaite variable: chelipede brushes, setiferous epipods, epipod-setobranch systems. However, microstructure of gill cleaning setae, which are equipped with digitate scale setules, is quite conservative. General body grooming, performed by serrate setal brushes on chelipedes and/or posterior pereiopods, is best developed in decapods at a natant grade of body morphology. Brachyuran crabs exhibit less body grooming and virtually no specialized body grooming structures. It is hypothesized that the fouling pressures for body grooming are more severe in natant than in replant decapods. Epizoic fouling, particularly microbial fouling, and sediment fouling have been shown r I m ans of amputation experiments to produce severe effects on olfactory hairs, gills, and i.icubated embryos within short lime periods. Grooming has been strongly suggested as an important factor in the coevolution of a rhizocephalan parasite and its anomuran host. The behavioral organization of grooming is poorly studied; the nature of stimuli promoting grooming is not understood. Grooming characters may contribute to an understanding of certain aspects of decapod phylogeny. The occurrence of specialized antennal grooming brushes in the Stenopodidea, Caridea, and Dendrobranchiata is probably not due to convergence; alternative hypotheses are proposed to explain the distribution of this grooming character. Gill cleaning and general body grooming characters support a thalassinidean origin of the Anomura; the hypothesis of brachyuran monophyly is supported by the conservative and unique gill-cleaning method of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumacea (Crustacea) from Shallow Waters of Bermuda
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2001 Band/Volume: 103B Autor(en)/Author(s): Petrescu I., Sterrer W. Artikel/Article: Cumacea (Crustacea) from shallow waters of Bermuda. 89-128 ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 103 B 89- 128 Wien, Dezember 2001 Cumacea (Crustacea) from shallow waters of Bermuda I. Petrescu* & W. Sterrer** Abstract Seven species of Cumacea, two new {Cumella somersi sp.n. and Schizotrema wittmanni sp.n.) were identified in samples from shallow waters and sea caves of Bermuda. This is the first record of the genus Schizotrema in the Atlantic Ocean, and the first record of Cumella serrata CALM AN, 1911 and Schizotrema agglutinanta (BÂCESCU, 1971) for Bermuda. The paper includes revisions of all species reported from Bermuda. Keywords: Cumacea, Bermuda, new taxa, revisions. Zusammenfassung Von sieben Cumaceen-Arten aus Seichtwasser- und Meereshöhlenproben von Bermuda sind zwei neu für die Wissenschaft: Cumella somersi sp.n. und Schizotrema wittmanni sp.n. Das Genus Schizotrema wird zum erstenmal aus dem Atlantik vermeldet, und die Arten Cumella serrata CALMAN, 1911 and Schizotrema agglutinanta (BÂCESCU, 1971) zum erstenmal von Bermuda. Alle bisher in Bermuda gefundenen Arten wer- den kritisch revidiert. Introduction Situated at 32°18'N, 64°46'W in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, the archipelago of Bermuda is made up of approximately 150 islands and islets, with a total land mass of only 50 km2. Despite its high latitude, the oceanic island of Bermuda boasts the north- ernmost coral reef system in the world, largely thanks to the warm Gulf Stream which passes halfway between the island and North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Horseshoe Crab Limulus Polyphemus
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Atlantic Horseshoe Crab Limulus polyphemus Contributor (2005): Elizabeth Wenner (SCDNR) Reviewed and Edited (2013): Larry Delancey and Peter Kingsley-Smith [SCDNR] DESCRITPION Taxonomy and Basic Description Despite their name, horseshoe crabs are not true crabs. The Atlantic horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, is the only member of the Arthropoda subclass Xiphosura found in the Atlantic. Unlike true crabs, which have 2 pairs of antennae, a pair of jaws and 5pairs of legs, horseshoe crabs lack antennae and jaws and have 7 pairs of legs, including a pair of chelicerae. Chelicerae are appendages similar to those used by spiders and scorpions for grasping and crushing. In addition, horseshoe crabs have book lungs, similar to spiders and different from crabs, which have gills. Thus, horseshoe crabs are more closely related to spiders and scorpions than they are to other crabs. Their carapace is divided into three sections: the anterior portion is the prosoma; the middle section is the opithosoma; and the “tail” is called the telson. Horseshoe crabs have two pairs of eyes located on the prosoma, one anterior set of simple eyes, and one set of lateral compound eyes similar to those of insects. In addition, they possess a series of photoreceptors on the opithosoma and telson (Shuster 1982). Horseshoe crabs are long-lived animals. After attaining sexual maturity at 9 to 12 years of age, they may live for another 10 years or more. Like other arthropods, horseshoe crabs must molt in order to grow. As the horseshoe crab ages, more and more time passes between molts, with 16 to 19 molts occurring before a crab becomes mature, stops growing, and switches energy expenditure to reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Summary Gough Island (United Kingdom) 2
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN SUMMARY GOUGH ISLAND (UNITED KINGDOM) Summary prepared by IUCN/WCMC (March 1995) based on the original nomination supplied by the Government of the United Kingdom. This original and all documents in support of this nomination will be available for consultation at the meetings of the Bureau and the Committee. 1. LOCATION Located southeast of Tristan da Cunha Island in the south Atlantic Ocean, midway between Africa and South America. 2. JURIDICAL DATA The island and surrounding territorial waters were designated a wildlife area in 1976 under the Tristan da Cunha Conservation Ordinance. 3. IDENTIFICATION The island of Gough (6500ha) represents the eroded core of a Late Tertiary volcano. The east side of the island is dissected by a series of deep steep-sided valleys, which are separated by narrow serrated ridges. Along the west side of the island, rounded slopes extend from the central plateau to the western sea cliffs. Many offshore stacks and rocks are present, mostly within 100m of the main island. Vegetation comprises tussock grass around the coast and wet heath with moss and feldmark, and bog and swamp communities at higher elevations. Knowledge of the flora is incomplete but consists of some 35 native flowering plant and 28 native fern species. Over 30 of Gough's vascular plant taxa are endemic to the Tristan de Cunha islands. A total of 146 bryophytes have been recorded, eight of which are endemic, together with 20 fungi and 24 lichens. Invertebrate fauna also remains poorly known, but comprises 100 species, eight of which are endemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Henderson Island Expedition June 2019 Henderson Island Expedition June 2019
    Henderson Island Expedition June 2019 Henderson Island Expedition June 2019 Overview Overarching objectives of the expedition: A) Study the plastic pollution on Henderson Island and raise awareness of the waste in the context of the global problem of ocean plastics; B) Study and raise awareness of the Henderson marine environment – promoting the Pitcairn Island Marine Reserve and the benefits of large, fully protected marine protected areas. A 2015 analysis (published in 2017) found that one of the Pitcairn archipelago’s four islands, Henderson, has >18 tonnes of plastic on its beaches: “the highest density of plastic debris recorded anywhere in the world”. The 38km2 island has >38 million pieces of plastic upon its shores. Conservative estimates suggest that 3,500-13,500 new plastic items wash up on Henderson each day. One of its beaches, the 2 km long East Beach, is polluted by 30 million plastic items. The 2015 work served as a reminder that the long-term protection of large areas of ocean needs to be partnered by science and messaging capable of changing attitudes towards the way we live, consume, and discard on land. The Pitcairn Island Council has sanctioned an expedition to Henderson in June 2019 which provides an opportunity for key Pitcairn and ocean stakeholders to effectively communicate the source, scale, range and impacts of ocean debris on Henderson and the Pacific Ocean through on-site science, art and media. The initiative also provides the team an opportunity to study and showcase the beauty and ambition of the Pitcairn Island Marine Reserve Henderson Island Expedition June 2019 MEXICO Timings PACIFIC OCEAN 1 02/06 Arrive at Tahiti Team briefing Tahiti 2 04/06 PERU Depart Tahiti 07:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomatopod Interrelationships: Preliminary Results Based on Analysis of Three Molecular Loci
    Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 91 67 (1) 91 – 98 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, eISSN 1864-8312, 17.6.2009 Stomatopod Interrelationships: Preliminary Results Based on Analysis of three Molecular Loci SHANE T. AHYONG 1 & SIMON N. JARMAN 2 1 Marine Biodiversity and Biodescurity, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand [[email protected]] 2 Australian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia [[email protected]] Received 16.iii.2009, accepted 15.iv.2009. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 17.vi.2009. > Abstract The mantis shrimps (Stomatopoda) are quintessential marine predators. The combination of powerful raptorial appendages and remarkably developed sensory systems place the stomatopods among the most effi cient invertebrate predators. High level phylogenetic analyses have been so far based on morphology. Crown-group Unipeltata appear to have diverged in two broad directions from the outset – one towards highly effi cient ‘spearing’ with multispinous dactyli on the raptorial claws (dominated by Lysiosquilloidea and Squilloidea), and the other towards ‘smashing’ (Gonodactyloidea). In a preliminary molecular study of stomatopod interrelationships, we assemble molecular data for mitochondrial 12S and 16S regions, combined with new sequences from the 16S and two regions of the nuclear 28S rDNA to compare with morphological hypotheses. Nineteen species representing 9 of 17 extant families and 3 of 7 superfamilies were analysed. The molecular data refl ect the overall patterns derived from morphology, especially in a monophyletic Squilloidea, a monophyletic Lysiosquilloidea and a monophyletic clade of gonodactyloid smashers. Molecular analyses, however, suggest the novel possibility that Hemisquillidae and possibly Pseudosquillidae, rather than being basal or near basal in Gonodactyloidea, may be basal overall to the extant stomatopods.
    [Show full text]