52B18SE803a 2.13852 BURCHELL LAKE 010 REPORT The following report details the surface outcrop geology of mining claims #TB 990341-990342-990343 and 990344.

ACCESS The claims are located on the Burchell Lake map sheet and are accessed as follows:

(1) Proceed west from approximately 67km along highway 11-17.

(2) At -the junction proceed approximately 45.5km west and south-west along HWY 11 to the junction with 802 south.

(3) Proceed approximately 5.9km south of HWY 11 to the junction with Canadian Pacific Forest Products camp 517 access road.

(4) Continue along camp 517 access road for a distance of 6.9km. (The Moss Lake/Hermin Lake road is and additional 1.3km south and south-west). At 6.9km turn east (left) and continue in that direction for approximately 1km.

(5) Take the first right turn (south) and follow that road for approximately 800 meters into a large clear-cut area.

(6) In the south-east corner of the clear cut is a flagged and blazed trail 500 meters long which leads to the north-most claim l i ne. QUALIFICATIONS

The report author has been employed full time within the mining exploration industry since graduating BSc in May 1980. The author©s field of study was the Geology programme at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, during September 1976 to April 1980.

The author has been a fellow of the Geological Association of Canada since January 1989. The claims are held by Ronald M. Tweedle of RR#1 Kamini sti pui a area.

Work was performed on the property primarily during September of 1990 by the author singlehandedly.

Previously, in 1988, two airborne geophysical surveys (MAG&EM) were flown over the property. This work was submitted by John E. Ternowesky of Robinson Avenue in Thunder Bay North. GEOLOGY

1. Mafic volcanic rocks are the predominant rocks present. Manifestations of mafic extrusives range from a very green--very fine grained (ultramafic komatiite) flow rock to a blackish (horneblende/amphlbole) actinolite rich rock which seems to be recrystalized especially proximal to later intrusive heat sources. No significant mineralization is present in these re-crystallized rox.

2. Intermediate extrusive rocks The colour index tends to be high but the silica content is inicated by (bulk hardness) and quartz eyes. The appearance is often mottled black and white a sort of salt and pepper appearance.

3. Felsic volcanic rocks These are mostly tuffs and lapilli tuffs the north shore of the beaver created lake at L104N is a classic lapilli tuff in particular a lapi11i-stone, ie > 40% l apilli fragments.

4. Sediments Clastic clay size debris is interbedded with chert. Strata layers range from a few millimeters to a few centimeters. Colour may vary from light grey to black. Iron formation is mostly of silicate and oxide facies. Strata C^^-©?;-;lay/ers range froms-^ a few milimeters to a few centimeters. Minor prijna^ su/Tphides b* are intercalculated with the oxides notably L104N @ 101+75E Pyrite and pyrhotite are the primary constituents. Copper, Zinc, and lead are less than 200 ppm. Most often the iron formation is red to black (jasper to magnetite) bands.

5. Gabbro intrusive The rock is blackish and medium grained. Deformation is nil to minor. Timing probably post S1 but pre S2.

7. A small amount of felsic porphyry is present. It occurs erratically near the creek near L101N at the mafic contact. Rock in that area is quite brecciated often quartz veins 2-10 cm with barren sulphide (py) fill brittle fractures.

8. Lamprophyre A good number of biotite lamprophyres are present in many different settings. the rock is greater than 9056 brownish black biotite of 5-6mm. laths. DEFORMATION

By far, the most prolific rock type present here is that of the mafic volcanic flows, although an entire volcanic cycle is well represented.

A minimum of three deformational episodes have occured. A well developed regional foliation (S1) is the remnant of tight ductile folding. 81 is most often vertical and usually at an azimuth near 45 degrees. Fold axes usually trend near 225 degrees and dip steeply 65 to 75 degrees to the south-west. Most folds seem to be synclines and facing is toward the iron formation. S2 is a brittle re-mobilization of the initial folding. Numerous irregular crack-seal quartz veins fill fractures oriented approximately parallel with S1 and superimposed on S1. Fold crests and troughs are most commonly broken by S2.

S3 is the last event in the structural history of this area. S3 appears to have been a completely brittle failure of the rocks. Absolutely no evidence of S3 was imprinted on any rock fabric anywhere on this property. It exists only as a function of the topography and of the offsetting of geological units. DOCUMENT No. Ministry ol Northern Development W9004* and Mines ")iMano Report of Work 52BieSE0830——-- -.-~2.13852 ~,™.BURCHELL ~,,,LAKE 900

Ifng Act (Geophysical, Geological and Geochemical Surveys) Mining Lands section, Mineral Development and Lands Branch: .ne of Survey(s) . Mining Division Townshipor Area

*ib3 Prospector's Licence N

Telephone No.

jrvey Company

and Address ol Aulhor (of Geo-Technical Report) from A to)

••dits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List In numerical sequence) ?cial Provisions Days per Mining Claim Mining Claim | Mining Claim Geophysical Claim Prefix Prefix Prefix Number f'rst sur.oy Number Number - Electromagnetic ;.nter 40 days (This includes REG EiV ED i"e cutting) - Magnetometer Q——— 1 iach aaditioriai survey: - Other _. 73^ . ' a the id 'Tii- grid. DEC. ^~ *-~T^l*~*^-© i SeologToert—J) ^ -rf* T mer 20 days ((Of each) \ 9yo?m tjriQ *? cfTiflN ^ MINING H NUi b tun VH Geochemical 990 \3 42, i Days Geophysical Days per Claim WP?4 i * ompiele roverso sioe and - Electromagnetic to •'"i lotalisl tieiu Vy&W/- O *it... - Magnetometer cr: — : -CS—— i- - Other 1—" .-~ -:-. Cr3 Z 'GebTogjcar!—-^ ,flA 1 ri i:; ( 4fc Geochemical "~P ~ — ^ Ci thorne Credits Days per |-.', C. Claim Note: Sp"in provisions Electromagnetic err crests do not CD apply lo Airborne Magnetometer Sur.eys ^ Other x Total miles flown over claim(s). ,,--©© i-- 1 Recorded Holder or Agent^SignatUre}' Total number of {j-j mining claims cotEtfed ^-/•-. - -i/A.i-^-rT^^ by this report ol work. unification Verifying Report oft Work/* 4

•'eby certify thai l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in this Report of Work, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or •r it. convction dnd annexed report is true. ^. . . . ,'ix! aivo Address of Person Certifying

or Office Use Only

9?** W90

^/7 Ministry of tnttr Northern Development - Please type or print. and Mines - Refer to Section 77, the Mining Act for assessment v and maximum credits allowed per survey type. - if number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, Report of Work attach a list. - Technical Reports and maps in duplicate should be submitted to Act (Geophysical, Geological and Geochemical Surveys) Mining Lands Section, Mineral Development and Lands Branch: .ne of Survey(S) -^ •. — - /^"^ M ning Division -xj Township or Area CP ** 7O& - ^C/L O (y /C /'^ - 1 ."C ecorded Holder(s) iUx2 ' " *"V Pfospeclor's Licence N6. " FZ 7006 'fftcc' - ~ *~"~' r x ^* t ^ X ^ y ^^ ^*J /O ^~ Telephone No. -K"A" *V y^-^vx// ^ r- x n////} POT (to V^x-tf.xp'T' irvey Company .S' ^ /er ne and Address ol Author (of Qeo-Technical Report) ^ ——^ ————— { }L4L!-!'~t^ ^ t \ 3 y 5 # zrs^^^v/o,^ dits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed List in numerical sequence) fCltl Provisions Days per Mining Claim Mining Claim | Mining Claim Geophysical Claim '•rst sur.oy Prefix Number Prefix Number Prefix Number - Electromagnetic ^nter 40 days (This includes REG :IV ED (i^e cutting) - Magnetometer 0——— ' each additional survey: - Other )3 19S . "a the satif- grid. DEC - fteologioet— ) ^/; 7*V Tiler 20 days (lor each) \ ^ ^^s ?4p?q/,; WHQ *I EGTWN——— g MINING U NUo o Geochemical yOf)?a.2t S i Days Geophysical Days per /' Claim nr?Vi ^A ompiete rovers? sine and - Electromagnetic 7 io • I'm total(s) htiiu 2^4/^ a - Magnetometer S :- "j - Other !~ ~.~ '# en --- ' /J S n-i li: Geochemical 3 5 urborne Credits Days per Claim Note: Sp"ci.i provisions Electromagnetic C5 credits do not ea,....., apply to Airborne Surveys Magnetometer j, s Other S

Total miles flown over claim(s). ^' :.iK: ^ Recorded Holder 'orJkgent^SlgnatUte]' /- Total number of (n mining claims coQDfed by this report of work, 4/ ?rtification Verifying Report offWork/* c.* f ' -'eby certify thai l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the (acts set forth in this Report of Work, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/of '•f !s completion and annexed report is true. :'ix! ano Address of Person Certifying r — r.o -••'' ; ''; ' ; ^^^ f^LU^L^7^ f'///frT2T'2) /^ Telephone ftoT Date ~~, ~^ Certified Bf^Signaluta) "— ~" " xX X/. /^^.VC7-XAV^/^ . I4A/M i c?ty l/f&y-/.,,^-/*' Received Stamp1 l u y ] ' ^:: '/'" ' o-1 '"'- 1 *- 1" 1 f fiV' ^*/*y 1 *~- or Office Use Only l -fll "*i or ii/.' f s T fjAi, . """'1IU^ r— IJ " li t /II/M Df* ^r Recorded j \jittj* J^t9fi ba3 I,:-- 2.13852

The following report details the surface out crop geology of claims TB 990341 TB 990342 TB 990343 and TB 990344. The claims are located on the Burchell Lake Area map sheet and are accessed as follows: ; 1. proceed west from Thunder Bay approximately 67 km along Highway 11-17, - 2. At the Shabaqua Junction proceed approximately . 45.5 km west and southwest along Hwy 11 to the junction with Highway 802 3. proceed approximately 5.9 km south of Hwy 11 along Hwy 802 to the junction of Canadian Pad f ac Forest Products camp 517 road with Hwy 802. 4. Continue along camp 517 access road for a distance of 6.9 km (The Moss Lake/Hermio Lake road is an additional 1.3 km south) 5. At 6.9 km South turn east (left) and continue in that direction for approximately 1.0 km. 6. Take the first right turn and follow road for approx. 0.8 km to a large clear cut. 7. in the south-east of the clear cut is a blazed/flagged trail approx 500 meters long which leads to the northmost claim line.

The report author has been employed full-time with the exploration industry since graduating from Lakehead University©s BSc program in May 1980. Attendance there was Sept. 76 to May 1980; fellowship in the GAC has been from Jan. 1989 to the present. The claims are held by Ronald M. Tweedie of RR#1 in the township of Ware in the area, -, Work was performed on the property in Sept. of 1990 by myself singlehandedly. Previously two airborne geophysical surveys were flown over the property. That work was submitted by John E. Ternowesky of Robinson Avenue of Thunder Bay north. The rock types on the property are primarily acidic to basic tuffs and flows. f.ftOiW formation is mostly oxide facies minor sulfide is present in some outcrops of the fe fmn. Zinc and copper values in Fe Fmn are only double the resual background value of typical basic flow rocks in similar greenstones. Some clastic sediments present are probably of volcanolithic derivation.

1. Mafic volcanic rocks are the predominant rocks present. Manifestations of mafic extrusuves range from a very green very fine grained (ultramafic ie komatiite) flow rock to a blackish (horneblende/amphib^le) actinol ite rich rock which seems to be recrystal l ized especially proximal to later intrusive heat sources. No significant mineral i zati on is present in these re-crystallized rox. 2. Intermediate extrusive rox The colour index tends to be high but silica content is indicated by (bulk hardness) and quartz eyes. The appearance is often mottled black and white a sort of salt and pepper appearance . 3. Felsic volcanic rox These are mostly tuffs and lapilli tuffs the north shore of the Beaver created lake at ©L 104 N is a classic lapillic tuff in particular a lapi 1 1 ic-stone, ie > 40% l apilli fragments. 4. Sediments Clastic clay size debris is interbedded with chert-4sh. Iron Formation is mostly oxide and silicate facices. L 104 N has 5* sulphide mostly pyrotite and pyrite. Copper here is less than 0.1*. Zinc is less than 1*. 5. GabbrQiQ, i ntrusive The rock is blackish and medium grained. Deformation is nil to minor. Timing probably post Sa but pre Sb. © 6. A small amount of felsic porphyry is present. It occurs erratically near the creek near L101 N near the mafic contact. Rock in that area is quite brecciated often quartz veins 2-10 cm with barren sulphide (py) fill brittle fractures. 6© Lamprophyre A good number of biotite lamprophyres are present in many different settings. The rock is usually ^90fc brownish-black biotite. A minimum of three episodes qre manifest. The major evidence is the well developed regional fol iatlon, trending near 45 degrees. The indicated position of Sa (primary defn) is marked by mylonite in the field, , although the orientation of Sa as measured is , different. The reason has not yet been determined. Se fs 1© /W synclfMa.1 fM©na. Fold axes of Sa are generally steeply ( >75 degrees dip) south west. These folds are very tight. Later brittle remolization parallel to Sa is noted on the map as Sb. Sb is present as fracture seal erratic quartz veins. Sb is notably brittle compared to ductile Sa. has left no penetrative evidence any rocks present is present only as indicated b Hts offsets and topography. Ontario

Ministry of Mining Lands Northern Development 159 Cedar Street and Mines 4th Floor SUDBURY, Ontario Ministere du P3E 6A5 D6veloppement du Nord Telephone: (705) 670-7264 et des Mines Pax : (705) 670-7262 File: 2. 13852 January 21, 1991 Ronald M. Tweedie RR ft! /Kaministiquia, Ontario V POT 1KO Dear Sir/Madam: RE: Geology Survey submitted on Mining Claims TB 990341 et al in the Burchell Lake Area..

In order to complete your submission please forward a second copy of the reports and maps to this office. We require one copy for Assessment Library and one copy for the Resident Geologist. In addition we require the qualifications of the author, Ronald M. Tweedie, as per the enclosed schedule. When submitting this information, please quote file 2.13852. For further information, please contact Larry J. Stoliker at (705) 670-7264. Please submit this information to this office no later than thirty(30) days from the date of this letter. Yours truly,

. C. Gashinski Provincial Manager, Mining Lands Mines and Minerals Division LJS/dvl Enclosure cc: Mining Recorder Thunder Bay, Ontario #W9004. 922 Re: Qualifications of author of Geotechnical Survey report submitted for assessment work credits

To be acceptable, a report should be written and signed by the person who supervised the survey in question. As a general rule the person should be a graduate in geology, geophysics, mining or geochemistry from a recognized university or, alternatively, a graduate of a recognized technical college in one of the above specialized fields, and who presents evidence of having had a minimum of 3 years relevant practical experience. If a person does not meet these specific qualifications, acceptance of the reports must be based on a consideration of the following required documents, demonstrating professional competence equivalent to the above: 1) A signed and dated statement giving a detailed resume of the highest grade passed in school, any additional courses taken, a list of employers giving the name and address, dates of employment, type of work performed, renumeration received; and the name and address of a person who would be a reference concerning the employment and duties. 2) Two personal references from professional people qualified in the same type of work who are not his present employer or fellow employees. These letters should give the time that they have known the person and express an opinion on his personal conduct and the level of work he is able to perform. 3) A copy of a report of work which he has carried out himself, or for which he has been responsible and which he has personally written. S k* * " - \

Tilly Lake Area (G-770)

Greenwater Lake Area (G-724)

^/•n-.'M'^™*- Ct-l ft* * y 0V JUT g^g||- 5.^.-*^^. i •/:

'.')fij ^^J^|-7: Tilly Lake Area

-c. CO en CD O OJ Greenwater Lake Area (G-724)

Z Cfl O H W Z .C 33 C O X H O o 33 C z s - H O tp m m w - m > o o m < C/7 ^|>ocoo<^ s| m Z W S Z 3J -t 3) H -- m JO S -* S lrt ^* a- P O m x "* — o ? > CO o 5 ^ 3J 5 2? 8 Z w z m c CO 00 e- to rr O "* —i 3J m 21 i X O 2 j ^^^B ^^ ^^^——— ^^ .—— ———— ^^ ^ n in e l c c O * l 13 O 8,1 6 ^r — _ 3 Q. Z o o n z CO 5 o^-oz z O (D O S D S O - ^ "n 3J z i8S ^ "n -n O z o o m n H j - m c/) Z? Z 3) 33 Z 2 i -^ O m m 2 33 Ci OD m x m ^ rn w m 5 i D r- — C o > " O (DM — go Sss o i F i S o 5 f- CO J] (O S5 c 2- 30 - 30 5 o - x v. m c o O ^ CO -i? o 5 ^ o m "N o O Z i ~n Z 5 g i 2 o 5 o - z s -f OD 5 CD DO z 2 w i z ^ ^ x 55a o O w ^ O m m o ^ n g ? •o co en c 8 2. - ^ m 200 > O z m -c ^j m o T3 3] CO ;?E; o TJ T 0 o -^ > n J x o -H m P im '5n H x C/l CO W z fe 40 m f tp ai z z o g * -0 H H Q 91 o rn W Q. l l t O O l w' A CO f) 5 •D O O O O M r" r o A jr 01 A CO m * l — /a - /nftffC vole

52B10SE0030 2.13352 BURCHELL LAKE B20