DOCSLIB.ORG

The L2-Cheeger-Müller Theorem for Representations of Hyperbolic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The L2-Cheeger-Müller Theorem for Representations of Hyperbolic The L2-Cheeger-M¨ullerTheorem for Representations of Hyperbolic Lattices Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN von der KIT-Fakult¨atf¨urMathematik des Karlsruher Instituts f¨urTechnologie (KIT) genehmigte DISSERTATION von Benjamin Waßermann Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 30. Juli 2020 1. Referent: Professor Dr. Roman Sauer 2. Korreferent: Professor Dr. Tobias Lamm 3. Korreferentin: Juniorprofessorin Dr. Beatrice Pozzetti Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Brief history on classical torsion invariants . .4 1.2 L2-torsion on finite CW-complexes and compact manifolds . .7 1.3 L2-torsion on locally symmetric spaces . 10 2 Equivariant Hermitian bundles 16 2.1 The twisted De Rham complex . 16 2.2 Flat bundle isometries . 23 n 2.3 The flat, canonical ρ-bundle over H .............................. 25 3 Analysis on bundles of bounded geometry 33 3.1 Bundles of bounded geometry . 33 3.2 Sobolev spaces . 36 3.3 Uniformly elliptic boundary value problems . 41 3.3.1 The standard boundary value problem on flat bundles . 45 3.4 Applications to the De Rham complex . 47 3.5 Heat kernel estimates . 53 4 Analytic torsion 62 4.1 Hilbert N (Γ)-modules . 62 4.1.1 Hilbert N (Γ)-cochain complexes . 73 4.2 The De Rham and Sobolev complexes . 78 2 4.2.1 Estimates for the spectral density function . 81 4.2.2 Comparison with the combinatorial complex . 84 n 4.2.3 Applications to the representation bundle Eρ # H .................. 85 4.2.4 Proof of large-time convergence . 90 4.3 Small-time convergence . 92 4.3.1 Small-time asymptotics on bundles of bounded geometry . 92 4.3.2 The asymptotic expansion of the hyperbolic heat kernel . 95 5 Combinatorial torsion 101 5.1 Preliminaries . 102 5.2 Cellular torsion of a pair . 103 5.3 Topological torsion . 110 5.3.1 Whitehead torsion of a cochain complex . 111 5.3.2 Whitehead torsion of a homotopy equivalence . 112 5.3.3 L2-Whitehead torsion of a homotopy equivalence . 115 5.4 The Morse-Smale torsion . 122 5.4.1 Unimodular metrics . 133 n 5.5 Applications to the representation bundle Eρ # H ...................... 136 6 The L2-Cheeger-M¨ullertheorem on manifolds with boundary 138 6.1 Preliminaries . 138 6.2 Product formulas, determinant class and subdivisions . 146 6.3 Witten-deformation of the De Rham complex . 151 6.4 Asymptotic expansions . 157 6.5 Proof of Theorem 6.1.5 . 161 6.6 Proof of Corollary C and Theorem E . 165 3 Chapter 1 Introduction The study of torsion invariants, which this thesis is devoted to, has been a driving force in the advance of modern mathematics in the last 100 years. To provide the necessary context, we aim to give a comprehensive, yet by no means exhaustive, summary of important foundational works and key results in that field. Being a prime motivation behind the development and main results of this thesis, the summary will have a strong focus on the close connection between torsion invariants and L2-invariants, as well as the relationship between their respective cellular, topological and analytical versions. At the beginning of the last century, the primary invariants of topological spaces, such as the fundamental group, the (co-)homology groups, as well as derived quantities such as the Betti-numbers and the Euler characteristic, had already been well-known and put to great use. A commonality of all these objects (and simultaneously a reason for their naming) is that they are homotopy invariants, i.e. they agree on homotopy equivalent spaces, and thus they can be used to distinguish between non-homotopy equivalent spaces. As such, they alone are however insufficient in classifying spaces up to more rigid transformations, such as homeomorphisms, diffeomorphisms or isometries. In fact, little was known at that time on elaborate methods that could distinguish between homotopy equivalent, yet non-homeomorphic spaces. 1.1 Brief history on classical torsion invariants The first prominent result in this vein was established by Kurt Reidemeister [80] in 1935. Given a finite simplicial complex K with Ke its universal cover and a unitary representation ρ : π1(K) ! U(n), one can form the twisted cellular cochain complex ∗ ∗ n C (K; ρ) := C (Ke) ⊗ρ C (1.1.1) σ.γ ⊗ v = σ ⊗ ρ(γ)v: Together with a choice of homology bases µ ⊆ H∗(K; ρ), one can define a positive real number T (K; ρ, µ) 2 R>0 nowadays called Reidermeister-Torsion (shortly R-torsion) in honor of its inventor. Provided that ρ is additionally acyclic, i.e. the twisted cohomology H∗(K; ρ) vanishes (so no choice of µ is necessary), it 4 can be computed as follows: Choosing a representative lift for a given oriented basis of cocells in C∗(K), n we obtain linearly independent elements in C∗(Ke). Together with the canonical basis of C , this set of representatives tensors up to become a complex, finite basis for the twisted complex C∗(K; ρ). Choosing the unique inner product on C∗(K; ρ) with respect to which this basis is orthonormal, we can further c p p construct (combinatorial) Laplacians ∆p : C (K; ρ) ! C (K; ρ) for each degree 0 ≤ p ≤ dim(M). Since c ρ was assumed to be acyclic, each ∆p is a positive, invertible endomorphism, and we get an equality dim(M) 1 X log(T (K; ρ)) = (−1)pp log(det(∆c )): (1.1.2) 2 p p=0 Using R-torsion, Reidemeister was able to give a complete combinatorial classification of 3-dimensional lens spaces. While he defined the torsion only for complexes on lens spaces, Franz [37] generalized the definition of R-torsion to arbitrary finite simplicial complexes. In the same process, he generalized Reidemeister's classification result onto higher-dimensional lens spaces. Both authors implicitly used the important fact that the R-torsion associated to acyclic representations is a combinatorial invariant: Two simplicial structures of the same space admitting isomorphic subdivisions have the same acyclic R-torsion, a fact that was later proven rigorously in a more general fashion by Whitehead in a series of papers [100], [99], [98], [97]. Namely, he proved that R-torsion is invariant under a special class of homotopy equivalences, so-called simple homotopy equivalences. In the same body of work, he also gave the homotopy classification of lens spaces and provided examples of homotopy equivalent lens spaces with different R-torsions, thus showing that not every homotopy equivalence is simple. All of this he achieved by introducing a new torsion invariant, called the Whitehead torsion, which provided an effective new tool in analyzing two homotopy equivalent spaces. Lastly, he also raised the question whether all homeomorphims are simple homotopy equivalences. Combined with his previous result, this would imply that R-torsion for acyclic representations is a homeomorphism invariant. Arguably the decade in which Whitehead torsion was used most beneficially, the 1960's began with a satisfying completion of the earlier mentioned classification results by Reidemeister, Franz and Whitehead, obtained by Brody [17] in 1960. Namely, he proved that the simple homotopy class, the combinatorial class and the homeomorphism class of lens spaces all agree. Shortly afterwards in 1961, Milnor [67] prominently applied a relative version of R-torsion to disprove the "Hauptvermutung", one of the famous topological conjectures of its time which stated that two homeomorphic finite-dimensional simplical complexes always would always have isomorphic subdivisions. He was also the one to define another torsion invariant, called the Milnor torsion, which would generalize Whitehead torsion even further. Thirdly (and perhaps most famously), Whitehead torsion played an important part in the proof of the s-cobordism theorem, shown independently by Mazur [65], Stallings [93], and Barden [5] for the category of piecewise-linear and smooth manifolds, later extended to the category of topological manifolds by Kirby and Siebenmann [49, Essay II]. It says that for n ≥ 5, given a topological/PL/smooth inclusion M n ,! N n+1 of a closed n-manifold into a compact (n+1)-manifold that is a homotopy equivalence, one has N =∼ M ×[0; 1] (here, =∼ stands for the isomorphism in the respective category) if and only if the inclusion is a simple homotopy equivalence. Most notably, the s-cobordism theorem has as an (almost) immediate consequence the generalized Poincar´e conjecture for dimensions n ≥ 5: Any n-manifold homotopy equivalent to the n-sphere Sn must in fact be homeomorphic to Sn. To close off the decade, it was shown by Kirby and Siebenmann [50] in 1969 for simplicial structures on manifolds, later by Chapman [24] in 1975 for arbitrary simplicial complexes, that all homeomorphisms are simple homotopy equivalences, thereby confirming Whitehead's old conjecture that R-torsion for acyclic representations indeed is a homeomorphism invariant. 5 Among the most influential mathematical achievements that were brought forth in the 60's also ranks the Atiyah-Singer index theorem. Roughly stated, this deep result relates the index of certain elliptic differential operators defined over a manifold M to various of its topological properties. In the aftermath of the proof, more and more people became interested in discovering new sophisticated analytic quantities on manifolds that could possibly shed light on equally sophisticated topological properties. One of the quantities discovered this way was the analytic torsion, first appearing in a paper by Ray and Singer [78] in 1971, where they rigorously defined it and proved some of its basic properties (therefore, it is sometimes called Ray-Singer torsion): Given a closed Riemannian manifold (M; g), and a unitary representation ρ : π1(M) ! U(n), one obtains the flat, complex vector bundle Eρ # M over M associated to ρ, with Eρ the total space of the bundle and M the base space (this notation will be used throughout the thesis).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Conjecture on the Equivariant Analytic Torsion Forms
    A conjecture on the equivariant analytic torsion forms Vincent Maillot & Damian R¨ossler ∗ September 21, 2005 Let G be a finite group and let M be a complex manifold on which G acts by holomorphic automorphisms. Let f : M → B be a proper holomorphic map of complex manifolds and suppose that G preserves the fibers of f (i.e. f ◦ g = f for all g ∈ G). Let η be a G-equivariant holomorphic vector bundle on M and • η suppose that the direct images R f∗η are locally free on B. Let h be a G- invariant hermitian metric on η and let ωM be a G-invariant K¨ahlermetric on M. For each g ∈ G, we shall write Mg for the set of fixed points of g on M. This set is endowed with a natural structure of complex K¨ahlermanifold. We suppose that there is an open dense set U of B such that the restricted map −1 −1 f (U) → U is a submersion. We shall write V for f (U) and fV for the map −1 V η U fV : f (U) → U. Denote by Tg(ω , h ) ∈ P the equivariant analytic torsion V M form of η|V relatively to fV and ω := ω |V , in the sense of [4, Par. d)]. Here the space P U (resp. P U,0) is the direct sum of the space of complex differential forms of type p, p (resp. the direct sum of the space of complex differential forms V η of type p, p of the form ∂α + ∂β) on U.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYTIC TORSION 0. Introduction Analytic Torsion Is an Invariant Of
    ANALYTIC TORSION SAIF SULTAN Abstract. This article is a survey of analytic torsion of elliptic operator com- plexes. The scope of the article is expository. We define the analytic torsion of elliptic complexes in general and with this define the analytic torsion in terms of the spectrum of the Laplace operator on a Riemannian Manifold. We define the Riedemeister Torsion of a Manifold and discuss the celebrated Cheeger-Mueller theorem relating analytic torsion and Riedemeister torsion. 0. Introduction Analytic Torsion is an invariant of Riemannian Manifolds, first introduced by Ray and Singer in 1970s. It is defined in terms of determinants of Laplacians on n-forms of a Riemannian Manifold M. Using same construction it is defined for general elliptic complexes. Analytic torsion was introduced as the analytic version of the Reidemeister torsion (R-torsion). R-torsion is an algebraic topology invariant introduced by Reidemeister in 1935 [1] in classification of three dimensional lens spaces using simplicial chain complex of universal covers. Lens spaces were first known examples of 3-manifolds whose homotopy type and homology do not determine their homeomorphism type. R- torsion was generalized by Franz [2] in same year, to higher dimensional lens spaces. There is a complete classification of 3dimensional lens spaces in terms of R-torsion and fundamental group. There exist homotopic lens space with different R-torions. Though R-torsion is not a homotpy invariant, it was shown to be a topological invariant by Kirby and Siebenmann in 1969. In 1971 D.B. Ray and I.M. Singer conjectured the equality of the two torsions, which was proved independently J.
    [Show full text]
  • L2-Analytic Torsion
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS 107, 369-386 (1992) L2-Analytic Torsion VARGHESE MATHAI Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Adelaide. Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Communicated by R. B. Melrose Received May 8, 1991 In this paper, we introduce a new differential invariant called L*-analytic torsion, for closed manifolds with positive decay and whose universal covers have trivial L*-cohomology. L*-analytic torsion can be thought of as a suitable generalization of the Ray-Singer analytic torsion. We establish various functorial properties of L*-analytic torsion and also compute it for odd-dimensional, closed, hyperbolic manifolds, with the help of results from Fried. d-’ 1992 Academic Press, Inc. INTRODUCTION In [3], we studied a class of closed, oriented manifolds, called L2-acyclic manifolds, which have the characterising property that there are no harmonic L2-differential forms on the universal cover. It follows from a theorem of Dodzuik that the condition of L2-acyclicity depends only on the homotopy type of the closed manifold. In this paper we study a differential invariant of a class of manifolds which are L2-acyclic and which have positive decay. The condition of positive decay states that the heat kernel of the Laplacian on forms (on the universal cover) decays faster than some negative power of time to the projection to the L2-harmonic differential forms on the universal cover, uniformly over compact subsets of the universal cover. By a theorem of Novikov and Shubin, it follows that the condition of positive decay is inde- pendent of the choice of metric on the manifold, and hence it only depends on the smooth structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytic Torsion and Dynamical Flow: a Survey on the Fried Conjecture
    ANALYTIC TORSION AND DYNAMICAL FLOW: A SURVEY ON THE FRIED CONJECTURE SHU SHEN ABSTRACT. Given an acyclic and unitarily flat vector bundle on a closed manifold, Fried conjectured an equality between the analytic torsion and the value at zero of the Ruelle zeta function associated to a dynamical flow. In this survey, we review the Fried conjecture for different flows, including the suspension flow, the Morse-Smale flow, the geodesic flow, and the Anosov flow. CONTENTS Introduction2 1. The Ray-Singer analytic torsion5 1.1. The flat vector bundle5 1.2. Hodge Laplacian and analytic torsion5 1.3. A formula for fibrations7 2. The Fried conjecture8 2.1. Lefschetz index8 2.2. Fuller index9 2.3. The Ruelle dynamical zeta function 11 3. Suspension flow of a diffeomorphism 12 3.1. The definition of the suspension flow 12 3.2. The flat vector bundle on the suspension 13 3.3. The Ruelle dynamical zeta function of the suspension flow 14 4. Morse-Smale flow 15 4.1. The definition of Morse-Smale flow 16 4.2. The Ruelle dynamical zeta function of the Morse-Smale flow 17 5. Geodesic flow 18 5.1. Flat vector bundle on the unit tangent bundle 19 5.2. Geodesic flow of the non positively curved manifolds 21 5.3. The V -invariant and a formal proof of the Fried conjecture 22 5.4. Reductive group, globally and locally symmetric space 23 5.5. The Selberg trace formula 26 5.6. Moscovici-Stanton’s vanishing theorem 30 5.7. The case G = SO0(p; 1) with p odd 31 5.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytic Torsion, the Eta Invariant, and Closed Differential Forms on Spaces of Metrics
    Analytic Torsion, the Eta Invariant, and Closed Differential Forms on Spaces of Metrics by Phillip Andreae Department of Mathematics Duke University Date: Approved: Mark Stern, Supervisor Hubert Bray Lenhard Ng Leslie Saper Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Mathematics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Abstract Analytic Torsion, the Eta Invariant, and Closed Differential Forms on Spaces of Metrics by Phillip Andreae Department of Mathematics Duke University Date: Approved: Mark Stern, Supervisor Hubert Bray Lenhard Ng Leslie Saper An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Mathematics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Copyright c 2016 by Phillip Andreae All rights reserved except the rights granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Licence Abstract The central idea of this dissertation is to interpret certain invariants constructed from Laplace spectral data on a compact Riemannian manifold as regularized integrals of closed differential forms on the space of Riemannian metrics, or more generally on a space of metrics on a vector bundle. We apply this idea to both the Ray-Singer analytic torsion and the eta invariant, explaining their dependence on the metric used to define them with a Stokes' theorem argument. We also introduce analytic multi-torsion, a generalization of analytic torsion, in the context of certain manifolds with local product structure; we prove that it is metric independent in a suitable sense. iv To my mother and father v Contents Abstract iv List of Symbols ix Acknowledgementsx 1 Introduction1 2 Vector bundles, metrics, and differential forms on spaces of metrics6 2.1 Differential forms.............................6 2.2 Sobolev spaces and algebras of operators................9 2.3 Adjoints and traces...........................
    [Show full text]
  • A Legendrian Turaev Torsion Via Generating Families Tome 8 (2021), P
    Daniel Álvarez-Gavela & Kiyoshi Igusa A Legendrian Turaev torsion via generating families Tome 8 (2021), p. 57-119. <http://jep.centre-mersenne.org/item/JEP_2021__8__57_0> © Les auteurs, 2021. Certains droits réservés. Cet article est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence LICENCE INTERNATIONALE D’ATTRIBUTION CREATIVE COMMONS BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ L’accès aux articles de la revue « Journal de l’École polytechnique — Mathématiques » (http://jep.centre-mersenne.org/), implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://jep.centre-mersenne.org/legal/). Publié avec le soutien du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Publication membre du Centre Mersenne pour l’édition scientifique ouverte www.centre-mersenne.org Tome 8, 2021, p. 57–119 DOI: 10.5802/jep.141 A LEGENDRIAN TURAEV TORSION VIA GENERATING FAMILIES by Daniel Álvarez-Gavela & Kiyoshi Igusa To our teachers Yasha Eliashberg and Allen Hatcher Abstract. — We introduce a Legendrian invariant built out of the Turaev torsion of generating families. This invariant is defined for a certain class of Legendrian submanifolds of 1-jet spaces, which we call of Euler type. We use our invariant to study mesh Legendrians: a family of 2- dimensional Euler type Legendrian links whose linking pattern is determined by a bicolored trivalent ribbon graph. The Turaev torsion of mesh Legendrians is related to a certain mon- odromy of handle slides, which we compute in terms of the combinatorics of the graph. As an application, we exhibit pairs of Legendrian links in the 1-jet space of any orientable closed surface which are formally equivalent, cannot be distinguished by any natural Legendrian in- variant, yet are not Legendrian isotopic.
    [Show full text]
  • Heat Kernels on Covering Spaces and Topological Invariants
    J. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 35(1992) 471-510 HEAT KERNELS ON COVERING SPACES AND TOPOLOGICAL INVARIANTS JOHN LOTT I. Introduction It is well known that there are relationships between the heat flow, acting on differential forms on a closed oriented manifold M, and the topology of M. From Hodge theory, one can recover the Betti numbers of M from the heat flow. Furthermore, Ray and Singer [42] defined an analytic tor- sion, a smooth invariant of acyclic flat bundles on M, and conjectured that it equals the classical Reidemeister torsion. This conjecture was proved to be true independently by Cheeger [7] and Muller [40]. The analytic torsion is nonzero only on odd-dimensional manifolds, and behaves in some ways as an odd-dimensional counterpart of the Euler characteristic [20]. If M is not simply-connected, then there is a covering space analog of the Betti numbers. Using the heat flow on the universal cover M, one can define the L2-Betti numbers of M [1] by taking the trace of the heat kernel not in the ordinary sense, but as an element of a certain type II von Neumann algebra. More concretely, this amounts to integrating the local trace of the heat kernel over a fundamental domain in M. In §11, we summarize this theory. We consider the covering space analog of the analytic torsion. This iΛanalytic torsion has the same relation to the iΛcohomology as the ordinary analytic torsion bears to de Rham cohomology. In §111 we define the iΛanalytic torsion <9^(M), under a technical assumption which we discuss later, and prove its basic properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytic Torsion and R-Torsion for Unimodular Representations
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 6, Number 3, July 1993 ANALYTIC TORSION AND R-TORSION FOR UNIMODULAR REPRESENTATIONS WERNER MULLER CONTENTS O. Introduction 1. Reidemeister torsion 2. Analytic torsion for unimodular representations 3. The equality of analytic torsion and R-torsion 4. Some examples 4.1. Locally symmetric manifolds 4.2. Chern-Simons gauge theory References O. INTRODUCTION Let M be a closed COO -manifold of dimension n. Both R-torsion and ana- lytic torsion are smooth invariants of acyclic orthogonal (or unitary) representa- tions P of the fundamental group 1f l (M). The Reidemeister-Franz torsion (or R-torsion) r M(P) of P is defined in terms of the combinatorial structure of M given by its smooth triangulations. The analytic torsion TM(P) was introduced by Ray and Singer [RS] as an analytic counterpart of R-torsion. In order to de- fine the analytic torsion one has to choose a Riemannian metric on M. Then TM(P) is a certain weighted alternating product of regularized determinants of the Laplacians on differential q- forms of M with values in the flat bundle Ep defined by p. It was conjectured by Ray and Singer [RS] that TM(P) = r M(P) for all acyclic orthogonal (or unitary) representations p. This conjecture was proved independently by Cheeger [C] and the author [Mil]. The restriction to orthogonal (or unitary) representations is certainly a limi- tation of the applicability of this result if 1f1 (M) is infinite because an infinite discrete group will have, in general, many nonorthogonal finite-dimensional rep- resentations.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYTIC SURGERY ANALYTIC TORSION Andrew Hassell
    ANALYTIC SURGERY AND ANALYTIC TORSION Andrew Hassell B. Sc. (Hons), Australian National University, 1989 Submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 1994 @1994 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signatureof Author .. - , Department of Mathematics April 20, 1994 Certified by . , -- Richard Melrose Professor of Mathematics Thesis Advisor Accepted by J>,rAY1LlCaviu Vv caIo Science Professor of Mathematics Director of Graduate Studies .i . 14'; AUG 1 1 1994 3 Analytic surgery and analytic torsion Andrew Hassell Submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract Let (M, h) be a compact manifold in which H is an embedded hypersurface which separates M into two pieces M+ and M_. If h is a metric on M and x is a defining function for H consider the family of metrics dx2 gE = X2 2-+ 2 +h+-h where e > 0 is a parameter. The limiting metric, go, is an exact b-metric on the disjoint union M = M+ U M_, i.e. it gives M+ asymptotically cylindrical ends with cross-section H. We investigate the behaviour of the analytic torsion of the Laplacian on forms with values in a flat bundle, with respect to the family of metrics g,. We find a surgery formula for the analytic torsion in terms of the 'b'-analytic torsion on M±. By comparing this to the surgery formula for Reidemeister torsion, we obtain a new proof of the Cheeger-Miiller theorem asserting the equality of analytic and Reidemeister torsion for closed manifolds, and compute the difference between b-analytic and Reidemeister torsion on manifolds with cylindrical ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Two Analytic Torsions on Orbifolds
    Comparison between two analytic torsions on orbifolds Xianzhe DAI∗ and Jianqing YU† July 11, 2021 Abstract In this paper, we establish an equality between the analytic torsion introduced by Dar[10] and the orbifold analytic torsion defined by Ma [15] on a compact manifold with isolated conical singularities which in addition has an orbifold structure. We assume the orbifold flat vector bundle is an honest vector bundle, although the metric on the flat bundle may not be flat. 1 Introduction Let X be a closed Riemannian manifold and F be a flat real vector bundle over X carrying the flat connection ∇F . As a geometric invariant, the analytic torsion of X, was first introduced by Ray and Singer [18, 19] in searching for an analytic interpretation of the combinatorially defined Reidemeister torsion. The latter is the first topological invariant which is not a homotopy invariant, introduced by Reidemeister [20] and Franz [11]. The Ray-Singer analytic torsion is a weighted linear combination of the arXiv:1410.5876v1 [math.DG] 21 Oct 2014 determinants of the Laplacian acting on the space of differential forms with values in F , and depends on the the metrics on F and on the Riemannian manifold. We explain this in greater detail. Let gTX be a Riemannian metric on X and gF be an Euclidean metric on F . We denote by Ωi(X, F ) the space i of smooth i-forms on X with values in F , and set Ω(X, F ) = ⊕iΩ (X, F ). The flat connection ∇F induces naturally a differential dF on Ω(X, F ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Determinant of the Lax-Phillips Scattering Operator
    The determinant of the Lax-Phillips scattering operator Joshua S. Friedman,∗ Jay Jorgenson†and Lejla Smajlovi´c Abstract Let M denote a finite volume, non-compact Riemann surface without elliptic points, and let B denote the Lax-Phillips scattering operator. Using the superzeta function approach due to ± Voros, we define a Hurwitz-type zeta function ζB (s,z) constructed from the resonances asso- ± ciated to zI − [(1/2)I ± B]. We prove the meromorphic continuation in s of ζB (s,z) and, using the special value at s = 0, define a determinant of the operators zI − [(1/2)I ± B]. We obtain expressions for Selberg’s zeta function and the determinant of the scattering matrix in terms of the operator determinants. 1 Introduction 1.1 Determinant of the Laplacian and analytic torsion To begin, let M denote a compact, connected Riemannian manifold of real dimension n with Laplace operator ∆M . Following the seminal article [33], one defines the determinant of the ∗ Laplacian, which we denote by det ∆M , as follows. Let KM (t; x, y) be the heat kernel associated to ∆M . Since M is compact, the heat kernel is of trace class, so we can consider the trace of the heat kernel which is given by TrKM (t) := KM (t; x, x)dµM (x), MZ where dµM (x) is the volume form on M. As shown in [33], the parametrix construction of the heat kernel implies that its trace TrKM (t) admits a certain asymptotic behavior as t approaches zero and infinity, thus allowing one to define and study various integral transforms of the heat kernel.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytic and Topological Torsion for Manifolds with Boundary and Symmetry” by Wolfgang Lück
    "Analytic and Topological Torsion for Manifolds with Boundary and Symmetry" by Wolfgang L¨uck 0. Introduction Let G be a finite group acting on a Riemannian manifold M by isometries. We introduce analytic torsion G ρ (M; M1; V ) R Z RepR(G) an 2 ⊗ PL-torsion G Z=2 ρ (M; M1; V ) K1(RG) pl 2 Poincar´etorsion G Z=2 ρ (M; M1; V ) K1(RG) pd 2 and Euler characteristic G χ (M; M1; V ) RepR(G) 2 for @M the disjoint union of M1 and M2 and V an equivariant coefficient system. The analytic torsionis defined in terms of the spectrum of the Laplace operator, the PL-torsionis based on the cellular chain complex and Poincar´etorsionmeasures the failure of equivariant Poincar´eduality in the PL-setting, which does hold in the analytic context. Denote by RepR(G) the subgroup of RepR(G) generated by the irreducible representations of real or complexd type. We define an isomorphism Z=2 Γ1 Γ2 : K1(RG) (R Z RepR(G)) (Z=2 Z RepR(G)) ⊕ −! ⊗ ⊕ ⊕ d and show under mild conditions G G 1 G ln(2) ρ (M; M1; V ) = Γ1(ρ (M; M1; V )) Γ1(ρ (M; M1; V )) + χ(@M; V ) an pl − 2 · pd 2 · and G G Γ2(ρpl(M; M1; V )) = Γ2(ρpd(M; M1; V )) = 0 For trivial G this reduces to the equation in R ln(2) ρan(M; M1; V ) = ln(ρpl(M; M1; V )) + χ(@M) dimR(V ) 2 · · 1 Torsion invariants are important invariants which relate topology to algebraic K-theory and hence to number theory (see Milnor [25]).
    [Show full text]