DOCSLIB.ORG

Weekly Relative Value

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weekly Relative Value WEEK OF JANUARY 22, 2019 Weekly Relative Value Too Much Debt “Debt has exploded during a growing economy… but are we really growing or is it just because we increased the national debt?” – Jeffrey Gundlach, Chief Investment Officer of Double Line Capital (aka “The Bond King”) Tom Slefinger is Senior Vice President, Director of Institutional Fixed Income Sales at Balance Sheet Solutions. One cannot deny that we are now in the throes of a synchronized global slowdown, led by “The Big Four” – U.S. China, Japan and Germany. Slowing… THIS WEEK… • Too Much Debt • $22 Trillion and Rising Fast • China: Leveraged to the Hilt • The Return of Deflation • Drops and Pops • Recession Coming? PORTFOLIO STRATEGY Source: HedgeEye Risk Management In the U.S., real final sales growth throttled back to a 1% stall-speed in the third quarter. Vehicle sales peaked over a year ago and have declined irregularly since then. Meanwhile, the layoffs announced by auto manufacturers are tacit confirmation of faltering sales. New and existing home sales have fallen 23% and 7% from their recent peaks, respectively. Home prices slowed in December as sales slumped, marking the smallest annual increase since 2012 – the end of the last housing crash when the housing market was just beginning to climb out of the hole left by the collapse. Home builders have expressed concerns over the considerable weakness. www.balancesheetsolutions.org BALANCE SHEET SOLUTIONS WEEKLY RELATIVE VALUE | 2 Capex is nowhere to be seen. Growth slowed again in the third quarter and most of the leading indicators show little in the way of any forward momentum. To wit, the Duke CFO Global Business Outlook Survey revealed that expected capital spending growth in the coming 12 months has gone from 11.0% in the first quarter of last year, to 8.3% in the second quarter, to 5.7% in the third quarter and is now down to a mere 1.0% as of the fourth quarter — the lowest since the third quarter of 2016. The occurrence of such a significant shift makes an important statement regarding the major corporate tax cut in 2018 and the ability of firms to repatriate overseas funds at low tax rates. These fiscal actions were widely anticipated to lead to a capital spending boom, which has failed to materialize. CEO Confidence Plummets Meanwhile, the New York Fed recently updated its recession-risk model for the coming year; it is now up to a 21.4% chance, the highest since August 2008. As a matter of fact, it is precisely where it was in March 2001 — the date that a recession began! And this level accurately foreshadowed the 1990-91 recession by six months. That said, the New York Fed’s model isn’t perfect. There were two head fakes: the 1995 Mexican and Orange County fiascos and the 1998 Asian/LTCM crisis. They turned out to be “head fakes” because the Fed aggressively cut rates. Intermeeting too. And let’s face it, Fed Chair Jerome Powell may be talking less hawkishly, but he isn’t likely to ease policy just yet. (Remember, he tightened into a meltdown in December.) Back to the graph. You can see that this index does not go to 100%. Generally, the index gets the recession call right in 30%-40% of the time. So, on a “normalized” basis, these recession probabilities are really now between a flip of a coin and two out three. www.balancesheetsolutions.org BALANCE SHEET SOLUTIONS WEEKLY RELATIVE VALUE | 3 New York Fed Probability of a Recession 12 Months Ahead Source: Bloomberg Meanwhile in China, retail sales growth has weakened to a 15-year low. In December, auto sales in China plunged 13%, fourth months in a row of double-digit year-over-year declines. Auto sales for the whole year fell 4.1%, the first annual decline in 28 years! Industrial activity has contracted for the first time in 18 months. Corporate profits are in contraction mode. China’s exports for December were far worse than expected as the trade war bites, falling -4.4% from year-ago levels (consensus was +2.0% so quite the “miss”). In a sign of fledgling domestic demand, imports contracted -7.6% (again, the consensus was close but missed the “sign” as it was expecting a +4.5% result). Both readings were the softest in about two years. The Slowdown in China Source: Bloomberg Japan already printed a negative GDP for the third quarter. A clear sign that the Chinese slowdown is spreading. Ditto for Germany. If it managed to escape a technical recession in the fourth quarter, it was by a hair and no more. Manufacturing activity is in reverse in a major way. And don’t forget that the country is a juggernaut, accounting for about one-third of all output in the euro area. It caters to Chinese demand likely nobody else — and it has to be emphasized that China commands the biggest automotive sector on the planet. To be sure, recent German economic data have been disastrous and confirmed the sharp slowdown in the economy. It will be up to first quarter data to confirm or deny whether a German recession has arrived. www.balancesheetsolutions.org BALANCE SHEET SOLUTIONS WEEKLY RELATIVE VALUE | 4 In its second growth downgrade in three months, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) just slashed its forecast for 2019 global GDP to just 3.5% from 3.7% as of October (its lowest forecast in three years) while warning that trade tensions pose further downside risks to global growth. While its U.S. GDP forecast remained somewhat surprisingly unchanged, still seeing a solid 2.5% in 2019 GDP growth, the IMF took a machete to its German GDP forecast to only 1.3% this year. The IMF also said, “A range of triggers beyond escalating trade tensions could spark a further deterioration in risk sentiment with adverse growth implications, especially given the high levels of public and private debt.” These potential triggers include more trade tariffs, a renewed tightening of financial conditions, a “no deal” Brexit and a deeper-than-anticipated slowdown in China. TOO MUCH DEBT The biggest constraint on the global economy is excess debt. According to the just-released quarterly report from the Institute of International Finance, the world is “pushing at the boundaries of comfortably sustainable debt.” Indeed, global debt at $244 trillion is now equivalent to a whopping 318% of GDP. Japan and Greece are the most indebted countries in the world, with debt-to-GDP ratios of 237.6% and 181.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, the U.S. sits in the #8 spot with a 105.2% ratio. And, discussed below, the impact in terms of what this has meant for the economy is in full display $22 TRILLION AND RISING FAST In virtually every weekly missive emanating from my perch, I have warned that the growth of the federal deficit and other liabilities are approaching extremely high and counterproductive levels. The federal debt is now $22 trillion, and the deficit is exploding and just reached $800 billion. Typically, a strong economy is paired with low deficits (or even surpluses) – both because strong economic performance produces more revenue and because it creates the economic space for deficit reduction. Yet, despite the economy performing at or even above its potential, deficits are widening. In fact, the deficit has never been this high when the economy was this strong. The past two years are extremely abnormal in that we are running high and rising deficits despite low unemployment, no significant output gap, no recession, and strong economic growth. Imagine what happens to the deficits when we end up in a recession. www.balancesheetsolutions.org BALANCE SHEET SOLUTIONS WEEKLY RELATIVE VALUE | 5 Deficits Should Not be Rising The national debt grew by 6% of GDP last year, which is shocking. In the first three months of fiscal year 2019, the national debt grew by another 8% of GDP, which is equivalent to every U.S. household taking on another $15,000 of debt. The non-partisan Committee for Responsible Fiscal Budget (CRFB) released its own 75-year budget outlook, which projected an unsustainable fiscal outlook. Under current law, debt will rise from 78% of GDP in 2018 to 160% by 2050 and nearly 360% by 2093. Under the Alternative Fiscal Scenario, debt will exceed 600% of GDP by 2093. Further, state pension plans are underfunded by about 50%. And according to the usdebtclock.org, there are $122 trillion of outstanding liabilities, including the national debt, state and local government debt, pension fund liabilities and money owed by Social Security. This is six-times the U.S. GDP. Question: How can a $19 trillion-dollar economy support $122 trillion (and counting) of debt? Answer: It can’t. One consequence of a rising national debt is that it crowds out productive investment, which, in turn, slows income growth. The upshot is that lower debt can actually boost income growth. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that if debt were reduced to its historic average of about 41% of GDP by 2048, per-capita GNP (a rough parallel for www.balancesheetsolutions.org BALANCE SHEET SOLUTIONS WEEKLY RELATIVE VALUE | 6 average income) would be about $6,000 (6.5%) higher than under current law. Simply holding debt at current levels would boost income per person by $4,000 per year in 2048. Maybe the “crowding out effect” is why the deficit-financed tax cuts in the U.S. never did produce the economic results that the advocates were advertising. The effects were half what they were under the Reagan tax reform of the mid- 1980s because back then, the federal debt ratio was less than half what it is today.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Equity-Bond Yield Correlation and the FED Model: Evidence of Switching Behaviour from the G7 Markets
    This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Asset Management. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260- 018-0091-x Equity-Bond Yield Correlation and the FED Model: Evidence of Switching Behaviour from the G7 Markets February 2018 Revised April 2018 This Version June 2018 Abstract This paper considers how the strength and nature of the relation between the equity and bond yield varies with the level of the real bond yield. We demonstrate that at low levels of the real bond yield, the correlation between the equity and bond yields turns negative. This arises as the lower bond yield implies heightened macroeconomic risk (e.g., deflation and economic stagnation) and causes equity and bond prices to move in opposite directions. The FED model relies on a positive relation for its success in predicting future returns. Thus, we argue that the mixed empirical evidence regarding the FED model arises due to this switch in correlation behaviour. We present supportive evidence for the switching relation and its link to the level of the bond yield using linear and non-linear smooth transition panel regression techniques for the G7 markets. The results presented here should be of interest to market practitioners who may wish to use the FED model to aid market timing decisions and for academics interested in understanding the interrelations between markets. Keywords: Equity Returns, Bond Returns, Correlation, Bond Yield, Switching JEL: C22, C23, E44, G12, G15 1 1. Introduction. The FED model implies a positive relation between the equity and bond yields.
    [Show full text]
  • The Predictive Ability of the Bond-Stock Earnings Yield Differential Model
    The Predictive Ability of the Bond-Stock Earnings Yield Differential Model KLAUS BERGE,GIORGIO CONSIGLI, AND WILLIAM T. ZIEMBA FORMAT ANY IN KLAUS BERGE he Federal Reserve (Fed) model prices and stock indices has been studied by is a financial controller provides a framework for discussing Campbell [1987, 1990, 1993]; Campbell and for Allianz SE in Munich, stock market over- and undervalu- Shiller [1988]; Campbell and Yogo [2006]; Germany. [email protected] ation. It was introduced by market Fama and French [1988a, 1989]; Goetzmann Tpractitioners after Alan Greenspan’s speech on and Ibbotson [2006]; Jacobs and Levy [1988]; GIORGIO CONSIGLI the market’s irrational exuberance in ARTICLELakonishok, Schleifer, and Vishny [1994]; Polk, is an associate professor in November 1996 as an attempt to understand Thompson, and Vuolteenaho [2006], and the Department of Mathe- and predict variations in the equity risk pre- Ziemba and Schwartz [1991, 2000]. matics, Statistics, and Com- mium (ERP). The model relates the yield on The Fed model has been successful in puter Science at the THIS University of Bergamo stocks (measured by the ratio of earnings to predicting market turns, but in spite of its in Bergamo, Italy. stock prices) to the yield on nominal Treasury empirical success and simplicity, the model has [email protected] bonds. The theory behind the Fed model is been criticized. First, it does not consider the that an optimal asset allocation between stocks role played by time-varying risk premiums in WILLIAM T. Z IEMBA and bonds is related to their relative yields and the portfolio selection process, yet it does con- is Alumni Professor of Financial Modeling and when the bond yield is too high, a market sider a risk-free government interest rate as the Stochastic Optimization, adjustment is needed resulting in a shift out of discount factor of future earnings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Speculative Bubbles, the Fed Model, and Self-Fulfilling
    Monetary Exchange in Over-the-Counter Markets: A Theory of Speculative Bubbles, the Fed Model, and Self-fulfilling Liquidity Crises Ricardo Lagos∗ Shengxing Zhangy New York University London School of Economics September 2014 Abstract We develop a model of monetary exchange in over-the-counter markets to study the ef- fects of monetary policy on asset prices and standard measures of financial liquidity, such as bid-ask spreads, trade volume, and the incentives of dealers to supply immediacy, both by participating in the market-making activity and by holding asset inventories on their own account. The theory predicts that asset prices carry a speculative premium that reflects the asset's marketability and depends on monetary policy as well as the microstructure of the market where it is traded. These liquidity considerations imply a positive correlation between the real yield on stocks and the nominal yield on Treasury bonds|an empirical observation long regarded anomalous. The theory also exhibits rational expectations equi- libria with recurring belief driven events that resemble liquidity crises, i.e., times of sharp persistent declines in asset prices, trade volume, and dealer participation in market-making activity, accompanied by large increases in spreads and abnormally long trading delays. Keywords: Money; Liquidity; OTC markets; Asset prices; Fed model; Financial crises JEL classification: D83, E31, E52, G12 ∗Lagos thanks the support from the C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics at NYU. yZhang thanks the support from the Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Nowcasting Economic Activity: Secular Trends, Large Shocks and New Data∗
    Advances in Nowcasting Economic Activity: Secular Trends, Large Shocks and New Data∗ Juan Antol´ın-D´ıaz Thomas Drechsel Ivan Petrella London Business School University of Maryland Warwick Business School, CEPR June 14, 2021 Abstract A key question for households, firms, and policy makers is: how is the economy doing now? We develop a Bayesian dynamic factor model and compute daily estimates of US GDP growth. Our framework gives prominence to features of modern business cycles absent in linear Gaussian models, including movements in long-run growth, time-varying uncertainty, and fat tails. We also incorporate newly available high-frequency data on consumer behavior. The model beats benchmark econometric models and survey expectations at predicting GDP growth over two decades, and advances our understanding of macroeconomic data during the COVID-19 pandemic. Keywords: Nowcasting; Daily economic index; Dynamic factor models; Real-time data; Bayesian Methods; Fat Tails; Covid-19 Recession. JEL Classification Numbers: E32, E23, O47, C32, E01. ∗We thank seminar participants at the NBER-NSF Seminar in Bayesian Inference in Econometrics and Statistics, the ASSA Big Data and Forecasting Session, the World Congress of the Econometric Society, the Barcelona Summer Forum, the Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Spain, Bank for International Settlements, Norges Bank, the Banque de France PSE Work- shop on Macroeconometrics and Time Series, the CFE-ERCIM in London, the DC Forecasting Seminar at George Washington University, the EC2 Conference on High-Dimensional Modeling in Time Series, Fulcrum Asset Management, IHS Vienna, the IWH Macroeconometric Workshop on Forecasting and Uncertainty, and the NIESR Workshop on the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Macroeconomic Forecasting.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Bulletin November 2008 87 the Article Is Structured As Follows
    VALUING STOCK MARKETS AND THE EQUITY RISK PREMIUM ARTICLES The purpose of this article is to present a framework for valuing stock markets. Since any yardstick Valuing stock markets aimed at valuing stock markets is surrounded by a large degree of uncertainty, it is advisable to use and the equity a broad range of measures. The article starts out by discussing how stock prices are determined and risk premium why they may deviate from a rational valuation. Subsequently, several standard valuation metrics are derived, presented and discussed on the basis of euro area data. 1 INTRODUCTION for monetary analysis, because of the interplay between the return on money and the return on Stock prices may contain relevant, timely other fi nancial assets, including equity. and original information for the assessment of market expectations, market sentiment, However, the information content of stock prices fi nancing conditions and, ultimately, the with regard to future economic activity is likely outlook for economic activity and infl ation. to vary over time. Stock prices can occasionally More specifi cally, stock prices play an active drift to levels that are not considered to be and passive role in the monetary transmission consistent with what a fundamental valuation process. The active role is most evident via would suggest. For example, this can occur in wealth and cost of capital effects. For example, times of great unrest in fi nancial markets, during as equity prices rise, share-owning households which participants may overreact to bad news become wealthier and may choose to increase and thus push stock prices below fundamental their consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • BUBBLE LOGIC at FIVE YEARS OLD Our Bouncing Baby Bubble Is Growing Up
    BUBBLE LOGIC AT FIVE YEARS OLD Our Bouncing Baby Bubble Is Growing Up Clifford S. Asness AQR Capital Management, LLC The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the presenter and do not necessarily reflect the views of AQR Capital Management, its affiliates, or its employees. The information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by AQR Capital Management, LLC (“AQR”) to be reliable. However, AQR does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor does AQR recommend that the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. This document has been provided to you solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer, or any advice or recommendation, to purchase any securities or other financial instruments, and may not be construed as such. This document is intended exclusively for the use of the person to whom it has been delivered by AQR Capital Management, LLC, and it is not to be reproduced or redistributed to any other person. Introduction ¾ This presentation is based on three papers, some very bad poetry, and liberal borrowing from smart people: • Bubble Logic (working paper June 2000) • Surprise! Higher Dividends = Higher Earnings Growth (FAJ 2003) • Fight the Fed Model (JPM 2003) • Bubble Reloaded (AQR Quarterly Letter 4Q 2003) ¾ The goal is to examine the prospects for long-term stock returns from here. ¾ The conclusion is that because of still very high valuations the prospects are for far lower than normal long-term returns in nominal terms, vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation and the Stock Market: Understanding the “Fed Model”∗
    Inflation and the Stock Market: Understanding the “Fed Model”∗ Geert Bekaert† Columbia University and NBER Eric Engstrom‡ Federal Reserve Board of Governors This Draft: September 2008 JEL Classifications G12, G15, E44 Keyphrases Money illusion, Equity premium, Countercyclical risk aversion, Fed model, Inflation, Economic Uncertainty Dividend yield, Stock-Bond Correlation, Bond Yield Abstract: The so-called Fed model postulates that the dividend or earnings yield on stocks should equal the yield on nominal Treasury bonds, or at least that the two should be highly correlated. In US data there is indeed a strikingly high time series correlation between the yield on nominal bonds and the dividend yield on equities. This positive correlation is often attributed to the fact that both bond and equity yields comove strongly and positively with expected inflation. While inflation comoves with nominal bond yields for well-known reasons, the positive correlation between expected inflation and equity yields has long puzzled economists. We show that the effect is consistent with modern asset pricing theory incorporating uncertainty about real growth prospects and also habit-based risk aversion. In the US, high expected inflation has tended to coincide with periods of heightened uncertainty about real economic growth and unusually high risk aversion, both of which rationally raise equity yields. Our findings suggest that countries with a high incidence of stagflationshouldhaverelatively high correlations between bond yields and equity yields and we confirm that this is true in a panel of international data. ∗This work does not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve System or its staff. In particular, our use of the term "Fed Model" reflects only conventional parlance among finance practicioners for this common valuation model.
    [Show full text]
  • An Alternative to the Pure Dividend Discount Model
    An Alternative to the Pure Dividend Discount Model William Carlson, Palumbo/Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University Conway Lackman, Palumbo/Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University ABSTRACT The pure dividend model cannot be used to analyze stocks with a zero or nominal dividend payout. Given the recent global financial crisis, this deficiency could exacerbate future global crises. The multiplier model redeveloped here is a general model capable of analyzing such stocks. Two stage models can give the same results as multistage models with fewer assumptions. Graham and Dodd (1962) estimated a multiplier of about 15 for the average S and P stock. Our update of their results gives a multiplier estimate of 16.4. They used data from 1871 to 1960 for their estimate. We added 1961-94 and 2005-1H06 in our update excluding 1995-2004 which was distorted by the dot.com bubble. Two useful by-product results emerged. It is estimated that the historic value of (kM–gM) is .0354. The terminal market growth rate gM was estimated to be .0711. Combining these two estimates gives an estimate of .1065 for kM which is a key number in the security market line equation. Keywords: Dividend policy, dividend models INTRODUCTION The simple (DDM) dividend discount model P = Do (1+g) / (k–g) cannot be used for high growth companies when the growth rate g exceeds the discount rate k. Accordingly, two and three stage models have been created to solve the problem. In turn there are two versions of the multistage model. One, presented in Reilly and Norton can be called the pure dividend discount model.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Federal Funds Rates: a Comparison of Four Methodologies
    Neural Comput & Applic (2009) 18:37–44 DOI 10.1007/s00521-008-0198-y IJCNN 2007 Modeling Federal Funds rates: a comparison of four methodologies A. G. Malliaris Æ Mary Malliaris Received: 17 March 2008 / Accepted: 14 August 2008 / Published online: 16 September 2008 Ó Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008 Abstract Monthly Federal Fund interest rate values, set divided into three groups of low, medium and high Federal by the Federal Open Market Committee, have been the Funds, the neural network approach does best. subject of much speculation prior to the announcement of their new values each period. In this study we use four Keywords Federal Funds Á Modeling interest rates Á competing methodologies to model and forecast the Taylor rule Á Neural networks behavior of these short term Federal Fund interest rates. These methodologies are: time series, Taylor, econometric and neural network. The time series forecasts use only past 1 Introduction values of Federal Funds rates. The celebrated Taylor rule methodology theorizes that the Federal Fund rate values The key instrument used by the Federal Reserve (Fed) to are influenced solely by deviations from a desired level of implement its monetary policy is the short-term interest rate inflation and from potential output. The econometric and called the Federal Funds rate (Fed Funds). These rates are neural network models have inputs used by both the time announced by the Federal Open Market Committee (the series and Taylor rule. Using monthly data from 1958 to FOMC) after a closed door meeting and influence rates the end of 2005 we distinguish between sample and out-of- around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Currency Manipulation, the US Economy, and the Global Economic
    Policy Brief NUMBER PB12-25 DECEMBER 2012 sionary potential. Hence the United States must eliminate Currency Manipulation, or at least sharply reduce its large trade defi cit to accelerate growth and restore full employment. Th e way to do so, at no the US Economy, and cost to the US budget, is to insist that other countries stop manipulating their currencies and permit the dollar to regain a competitive level. Th is can be done through steps fully consis- the Global Economic Order tent with the international obligations of the United States that are indeed based on existing International Monetary C. Fred Bergsten and Joseph E. Gagnon Fund (IMF) guidelines. Such a strategy should in fact attract considerable support C. Fred Bergsten was director of the Peterson Institute for International from other countries that are adversely aff ected by the manip- Economics from its creation in 1981 through 2012 and became a senior ulation, including Australia, Canada, the euro area, Brazil, fellow and president emeritus at the start of 2013. He was previously assis- India, Mexico, and a number of other developing economies. tant secretary of the US Treasury for international aff airs and assistant for Th e strategy would aim to fi ll a major gap in the existing inter- international economic aff airs at the National Security Council. Joseph E. Gagnon, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute since September 2009, national fi nancial architecture: its inability to engage surplus previously was associate director, Division of International Finance at the countries, even when they blatantly violate the legal strictures US Federal Reserve Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfin Late August
    Library of Congress image det 4a32167, photo by William Henry Jackson (circa 1892). In �ate �ugust The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium In �ate �ugust The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium Published by the Public Affairs Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 1 Memorial Drive • Kansas City, MO 64198 Diane M. Raley, publisher Craig S. Hakkio, content advisor Kristina J. Young, associate publisher Lowell C. Jones, executive editor Tim Todd, co-author Bill Medley, co-author Casey McKinley, designer Cindy Edwards, archivist All rights reserved, Copyright © 2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior consent of the publisher. First Edition, 2011 First Edition, Second Printing 2013 In Late August • III �ontents vii Introduction 1 ‘Monetary Policy Issues in the 1980s’ August 1982 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 9 ‘World Agricultural Trade: The Potential for Growth’ May 1978 • Kansas City, Mo. 15 ‘Modeling Agriculture for Policy Analysis in the 1980s’ September 1981 • Vail, Colo. 23 ‘Price Stability and Public Policy’ August 1984 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 29 ‘Central Banking Issues in Emerging Market-Oriented Economies’ August 1990 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 37 ‘Maintaining Financial Stability in a Global Economy’ August 1997 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 43 ‘The Greenspan Era: Lessons for the Future’ August 2005 • Grand Teton National Park, Wyo. 51 Afterword 57 Appendix 60 Images from the Jackson Hole Symposium 62 Jackson Hole Economic Symposium Team 63 Bibliography 66 Photo Credits 68 Index Contents • V 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Exchange in Over-The-Counter Markets: a Theory of Speculative Bubbles, the Fed Model, and Self-Fulfilling Liquidity Crises
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MONETARY EXCHANGE IN OVER-THE-COUNTER MARKETS: A THEORY OF SPECULATIVE BUBBLES, THE FED MODEL, AND SELF-FULFILLING LIQUIDITY CRISES Ricardo Lagos Shengxing Zhang Working Paper 21528 http://www.nber.org/papers/w21528 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2015 Lagos thanks the support from the C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics at NYU. Zhang thanks the support from the Centre for Macroeconomics at LSE. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2015 by Ricardo Lagos and Shengxing Zhang. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Monetary Exchange in Over-the-Counter Markets: A Theory of Speculative Bubbles, the Fed Model, and Self-fulfilling Liquidity Crises Ricardo Lagos and Shengxing Zhang NBER Working Paper No. 21528 September 2015 JEL No. D83,E31,E52,E58,G12 ABSTRACT We develop a model of monetary exchange in over-the-counter markets to study the effects of monetary policy on asset prices and standard measures of financial liquidity, such as bid-ask spreads, trade volume, and the incentives of dealers to supply immediacy, both by participating in the market-making activity and by holding asset inventories on their own account.
    [Show full text]