Pipeline Report May 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pipeline Report May 2021 Pipeline Report May 2021 Pipeline Report FebruaryMay 2021 2021 © 2021 AcariaHealth. All rights reserved. | Data is current as of 5/17/2021 Page 1 This quarterly at-a-glance publication is developed by our Clinical Pharmacy Drug InformationPipeline team to Report Table of Contents increase your understanding of the drug pipeline, ensuring you are equipped with insights to prepare for shifts in pharmacy benefit management. In this issue, you will learn more about key themesMay centered 2021 on COVID-19, rare and ultra-rare conditions, CAR-T and gene therapies, as well as notable drugs such as Miplyffa, RVT-802, and aducanumab. 1 COVID-19 The treatment and vaccine landscape for COVID-19 is continually evolving. Comirnaty (Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine) has been granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for adolescents 12-15 years of age, Recent Drug Approvals1 expanding on its previous authorization for people 16 years of age and older. The Ad26.COV2-S vaccine 5 (J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine) was temporarily held from the market due to blood clotting concerns, but has since been returned to use. Bamlanivimab, when used alone, had its EUA revoked. Meanwhile, Upcoming Products the FDA may require increased monitoring for SARS-CoV-2 viral variants for the bamlanivimab+etesevimab combination, as well as 10 for the combination product REGEN-COV (casirivimab+imdevimab). The past quarter saw the approval of two breakthrough therapies for rare or ultra-rare conditions which previously had very limited Biosimilars or no FDA-approved treatments – Amondys 45 for Duchenne muscular dystrophy with gene mutations amenable to exon 45 23 skipping and Nulibry for molybdenum cofactor deficiency (MoCD) type A. The CAR-T therapy arena was also busy, with approvals of Abecma as the first anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy to be FDA-approved for Generic Specialty Agents relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and Breyanzi as the third CAR-T therapy to be approved for large B-cell lymphomas, after 24 Kymriah and Yescarta. Speaking of Yescarta, it also gained its own newly approved indication for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. While representing some clinical advances over existing therapies for their respective indications, the high cost of CAR-T therapies will remain in the forefront of discussions on how to optimize use of these agents. 25 Glossary Other notable pipeline developments during the last quarter include gene therapies AMT-061 and LentiGlobin. AMT-061 previously had a clinical hold imposed on its development program by the FDA in response to one reported case of liver cancer, which has since been deemed unlikely to be related to the gene therapy. The clinical hold has been lifted. LentiGlobin has also been in the 2 spotlight for serious hematologic adverse effects observed in its clinical trials for sickle cell disease, from which it too has since been exonerated. Additionally, Miplyffa (arimoclomol) is awaiting an FDA decision to become the first approved therapy for Niemann- Pick type C disease, and RVT-802, a one-time allogeneic thymic tissue regenerative therapy, expects to hear from the FDA in October on its approval for the treatment of complete DiGeorge syndrome. In the interim, we are still waiting for the FDA to make its final decision onaducanumab for mild or prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Speculation abounds in both directions regarding this agent’s prospects for approval, to be silenced only once the FDA finally speaks. To prepare this report, our team accesses a wide range of clinical resources. This information is then analyzed, resulting in updates across multiple disease states including recent and anticipated drug approvals, key changes in the biosimilar agent landscape, and notes on recent and anticipated generic product launches. Our pipeline report is just one of many ways we are committed to providing helpful tools and resources to our clients and partners. We look forward to sharing more updates with you in the months ahead. Ross Hoffman, MD To provide comments, feedback or requests for report enhancements, please email us at [email protected]. © 2021 AcariaHealth. All rights reserved. | Data is current as of 5/17/2021 Page 2 COVID-19 Pipeline Report May 2021 FDA-APPROVED AGENTS FDA Drug Name Manufacturer(s) Approval Therapeutic Class Comments Cost (WAC) Date • 5/1/2020 - Veklury is available through an FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized pediatric patients weighing 3.5 kg to <40 kg or aged $520 for a 100 mg EUA: <12 years and weighing ≥3.5 kg single dose vial Veklury 5/1/2020 • 10/22/2021 - FDA-approved for the treatment of adults and $3,120 for a 5-day remdesivir Gilead FDA Treatment - antiviral pediatric patients ≥ 12 years old and weighing ≥ 40 kg requiring course intravenous infusion Approval: hospitalization for COVID-19 $5,720 for a 10-day 10/22/2020 • Veklury should only be administered in a hospital or healthcare course setting capable of providing acute care comparable to inpatient hospital care AGENTS GRANTED FDA EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) EUA Drug Name Manufacturer(s) Approval Therapeutic Class Comments Cost (WAC) Date • Current EUA is for the use of high titer convalescent plasma Original: for the treatment of hospitalized patients early in the disease Convalescent plasma U.S. Dept of Health and 8/23/2020 Treatment - blood course and to those hospitalized patients who have impaired Unknown at this time intravenous infusion Human Services Revised: product humoral immunity and cannot produce an adequate antibody 2/4/2021 response • 4/16/2021 - FDA revoked the EUA for bamlanivimab when administered alone • The EUA for combination use of bamlanivimab and etesevimab Original: $1,250 single dose LY-CoV555 remains unchanged 11/9/2020 Treatment - infusion bamlanivimab Eli Lilly Revoked: monoclonal antibody • EUA was for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in $450 administration intravenous infusion 4/16/2021 adults and pediatric patients with positive results of direct cost SARS-CoV-2 viral testing who are ≥ 12 years old and weighing ≥ 40 kg, and who are at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization © 2021 AcariaHealth. All rights reserved. | Data is current as of 5/17/2021 CONTINUED Page 1 COVID-19 Pipeline Report May 2021 EUA Drug Name Manufacturer(s) Approval Therapeutic Class Comments Cost (WAC) Date • EUA for use in combination with Gilead’s Veklury (remdesivir) for treating hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection in patients Olumiant aged two years or older, with suspected or laboratory confirmed $2,553 for 14-day baricitinib Eli Lilly 11/19/2020 Treatment - ARDS COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical course oral tablet ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation $91.17 per 2 mg tablet • 4 mg once daily for 14 days or until hospital discharge • 2/25/2021 - If a patient is hospitalized for reasons other than COVID-19 and the patient reports mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19, confirmed with positive results of a direct SARS- CoV-2 viral test, then it may be appropriate for treatment with casirivimab and imdevimab, administered together, if the patient is also at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization and the terms and conditions of the Original: authorization are met $1,500 single dose REGEN-COV 11/21/2020 Treatment - • FDA may require Regeneron to assess the activity of the infusion casirivimab + imdevimab Regeneron Reissued: monoclonal antibody authorized REGEN-COV against any global SARS-CoV-2 $450 administration intravenous infusion 2/3/2021; variant(s) of interest cost 2/25/2021 • EUA is for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing who are ≥ 12 years old and weighing ≥ 40 kg, and who are at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization • No cost to patients, although healthcare facilities may charge fees related to administration Original EUA: • 5/10/2021: EUA expansion approved by the FDA for use in Comirnaty 12/11/2020 children 12-15 years of age tozinameran Pfizer Expanded Vaccine $19.50 per dose* • mRNA vaccine that expresses SARS-CoV-2 spike protein intramuscular injection EUA: 5/10/2021 • No cost to patients mRNA 1273 • mRNA vaccine that expresses SARS-CoV-2 spike protein Moderna 12/18/2020 Vaccine $15-37 per dose* intramuscular injection • No cost to patients *Initially, the federal government will supply the vaccine at no cost to providers. © 2021 AcariaHealth. All rights reserved. | Data is current as of 5/17/2021 CONTINUED Page 2 COVID-19 Pipeline Report May 2021 EUA Drug Name Manufacturer(s) Approval Therapeutic Class Comments Cost (WAC) Date • 2/25/2021 - FDA may require Lilly to assess the activity of the authorized bamlanivimab and etesevimab against any global SARS-CoV-2 variant(s) of interest. bamlanivimab: $1,250 LY-CoV555 + LY- • EUA is for the emergency use of bamlanivimab and etesevimab Original: etesevimab: pending CoV016 administered together for the treatment of mild to moderate 2/9/2021 Treatment - launch bamlanivimab + Eli Lilly coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults and pediatric Reissued: monoclonal antibody etesevimab patients ( ≥ 12 years of age and weighing ≥ 40 kg) with positive 2/25/2021 $450 administration intravenous infusion results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing, and who are at high cost risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization • Outpatient only - no cost to patients, although healthcare facilities may charge fees related to administration • 4/23/2021 - EUA Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers has been updated to include information about the remote risk of blood clots. Most people who developed these blood clots and Original: low levels of platelets were females ages 18 through 49 years.
Recommended publications
  • Horizon Scanning Status Report June 2019
    Statement of Funding and Purpose This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Health Care Horizon Scanning System, operated by ECRI Institute under contract to PCORI, Washington, DC (Contract No. MSA-HORIZSCAN-ECRI-ENG- 2018.7.12). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of PCORI. An intervention that potentially meets inclusion criteria might not appear in this report simply because the horizon scanning system has not yet detected it or it does not yet meet inclusion criteria outlined in the PCORI Health Care Horizon Scanning System: Horizon Scanning Protocol and Operations Manual. Inclusion or absence of interventions in the horizon scanning reports will change over time as new information is collected; therefore, inclusion or absence should not be construed as either an endorsement or rejection of specific interventions. A representative from PCORI served as a contracting officer’s technical representative and provided input during the implementation of the horizon scanning system. PCORI does not directly participate in horizon scanning or assessing leads or topics and did not provide opinions regarding potential impact of interventions. Financial Disclosure Statement None of the individuals compiling this information have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report. Public Domain Notice This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. All statements, findings, and conclusions in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) or its Board of Governors.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Prescribing Information [FDA]
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION -------------------------------CONTRAINDICATIONS------------------------------ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use None. MONJUVI safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for MONJUVI. ------------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS----------------------- Infusion-Related Reactions: Monitor patients frequently during infusion. MONJUVI® (tafasitamab-cxix) for injection, for intravenous use Interrupt or discontinue infusion based on severity. (2.3, 5.1) Initial U.S. Approval: 2020 Myelosuppression: Monitor complete blood counts. Manage using dose modifications and growth factor support. Interrupt or discontinue -----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE-------------------------- MONJUVI based on severity. (2.3, 5.2) MONJUVI is a CD19-directed cytolytic antibody indicated in combination Infections: Bacterial, fungal and viral infections can occur during and with lenalidomide for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or following MONJUVI. Monitor patients for infections. (2.3, 5.3) refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: May cause fetal harm. Advise females of including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus and use of effective for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). contraception. (5.4) This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall -------------------------------ADVERSE
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Immuno-Oncology Medicines in Development
    2017 Immuno-Oncology Medicines in Development Adoptive Cell Therapies Drug Name Organization Indication Development Phase ACTR087 + rituximab Unum Therapeutics B-cell lymphoma Phase I (antibody-coupled T-cell receptor Cambridge, MA www.unumrx.com immunotherapy + rituximab) AFP TCR Adaptimmune liver Phase I (T-cell receptor cell therapy) Philadelphia, PA www.adaptimmune.com anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy Juno Therapeutics multiple myeloma Phase I Seattle, WA www.junotherapeutics.com Memorial Sloan Kettering New York, NY anti-CD19 "armored" CAR-T Juno Therapeutics recurrent/relapsed chronic Phase I cell therapy Seattle, WA lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) www.junotherapeutics.com Memorial Sloan Kettering New York, NY anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy Intrexon B-cell malignancies Phase I Germantown, MD www.dna.com ZIOPHARM Oncology www.ziopharm.com Boston, MA anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy Kite Pharma hematological malignancies Phase I (second generation) Santa Monica, CA www.kitepharma.com National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD Medicines in Development: Immuno-Oncology 1 Adoptive Cell Therapies Drug Name Organization Indication Development Phase anti-CEA CAR-T therapy Sorrento Therapeutics liver metastases Phase I San Diego, CA www.sorrentotherapeutics.com TNK Therapeutics San Diego, CA anti-PSMA CAR-T cell therapy TNK Therapeutics cancer Phase I San Diego, CA www.sorrentotherapeutics.com Sorrento Therapeutics San Diego, CA ATA520 Atara Biotherapeutics multiple myeloma, Phase I (WT1-specific T lymphocyte South San Francisco, CA plasma cell leukemia www.atarabio.com
    [Show full text]
  • Tables-Of-Phase-3-Mabs.Pdf
    Table 3. Monoclonal antibodies in Phase 2/3 or 3 clinical studies for cancer indications Most advanced Primary sponsoring company INN or code name Molecular format Target(s) phase Phase 3 indications Therapeutic area Janssen Research & Development, LLC JNJ-56022473 Humanized mAb CD123 Phase 2/3 Acute myeloid leukemia Cancer Murine IgG1, Actinium Pharmaceuticals Iomab-B radiolabeled CD45 Phase 3 Acute myeloid leukemia Cancer Humanized IgG1, Seattle Genetics Vadastuximab talirine ADC CD33 Phase 3 Acute myeloid leukemia Cancer TG Therapeutics Ublituximab Chimeric IgG1 CD20 Phase 3 Chronic lymphocytic leukemia Cancer Xencor XMAB-5574, MOR208 Humanized IgG1 CD19 Phase 2/3 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Cancer Moxetumomab Murine IgG1 dsFv, AstraZeneca/MedImmune LLC pasudotox immunotoxin CD22 Phase 3 Hairy cell leukemia Cancer Humanized scFv, Viventia Bio Oportuzumab monatox immunotoxin EpCAM Phase 3 Bladder cancer Cancer scFv-targeted liposome containing Merrimack Pharmaceuticals MM-302 doxorubicin HER2 Phase 2/3 Breast cancer Cancer MacroGenics Margetuximab Chimeric IgG1 HER2 Phase 3 Breast cancer Cancer Gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction Gilead Sciences GS-5745 Humanized IgG4 MMP9 Phase 3 adenocarcinoma; ulcerative colitis (Phase 2/3) Cancer; Immune-mediated disorders Depatuxizumab Humanized IgG1, AbbVie mafodotin ADC EGFR Phase 2/3 Glioblastoma Cancer AstraZeneca/MedImmune LLC Tremelimumab Human IgG2 CTLA4 Phase 3 NSCLC, head & neck cancer, bladder cancer Cancer NSCLC, head & neck cancer, bladder cancer, breast AstraZeneca/MedImmune
    [Show full text]
  • Antibodies to Watch in 2021 Hélène Kaplona and Janice M
    MABS 2021, VOL. 13, NO. 1, e1860476 (34 pages) https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1860476 PERSPECTIVE Antibodies to watch in 2021 Hélène Kaplona and Janice M. Reichert b aInstitut De Recherches Internationales Servier, Translational Medicine Department, Suresnes, France; bThe Antibody Society, Inc., Framingham, MA, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY In this 12th annual installment of the Antibodies to Watch article series, we discuss key events in antibody Received 1 December 2020 therapeutics development that occurred in 2020 and forecast events that might occur in 2021. The Accepted 1 December 2020 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed an array of challenges and opportunities to the KEYWORDS healthcare system in 2020, and it will continue to do so in 2021. Remarkably, by late November 2020, two Antibody therapeutics; anti-SARS-CoV antibody products, bamlanivimab and the casirivimab and imdevimab cocktail, were cancer; COVID-19; Food and authorized for emergency use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the repurposed Drug Administration; antibodies levilimab and itolizumab had been registered for emergency use as treatments for COVID-19 European Medicines Agency; in Russia and India, respectively. Despite the pandemic, 10 antibody therapeutics had been granted the immune-mediated disorders; first approval in the US or EU in 2020, as of November, and 2 more (tanezumab and margetuximab) may Sars-CoV-2 be granted approvals in December 2020.* In addition, prolgolimab and olokizumab had been granted first approvals in Russia and cetuximab saratolacan sodium was first approved in Japan. The number of approvals in 2021 may set a record, as marketing applications for 16 investigational antibody therapeutics are already undergoing regulatory review by either the FDA or the European Medicines Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Medical Policy Tafasitamab-Cxix (Monjuvi®)
    Corporate Medical Policy Tafasitamab-cxix (Monjuvi®) File Name: tafasitamab_monjuvi Origination: 10/2020 Last CAP Review: 1/2021 Next CAP Review: 1/2022 Last Review: 1/2021 Description of Procedure or Service Tafasitamab-cxix (Monjuvi®) is a CD19-directed cytolytic antibody indicated in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). DLBCL is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), representing approximately one-third of NHL patients. It is an aggressive and quickly progressing NHL in which survival without treatment is measured in months. While there have been many advancements in the treatment of DLBCL, a cure is not achieved in most patients using conventional therapy, and roughly 30 to 40% of patients suffer relapse. For patients who are refractory to initial treatment and for patients who relapse after an initial response, only a small percentage will experience prolonged disease-free survival with salvage chemoimmunotherapy treatment alone. The preferred treatment for a first relapse of DLBCL or primary refractory DLBCL is salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the outcome for relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients who are ineligible for transplant remains poor. Tafasitamab-cxix (Monjuvi) is a humanized CD19-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody, which was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2020 for the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL. It works by binding to CD19 expressed on the surface of pre-B and mature B lymphocytes and on several B-cell malignancies, including DLBCL, which induces B-cell lysis via apoptosis and immune effector mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibodies for the Treatment of Brain Metastases, a Dream Or a Reality?
    pharmaceutics Review Antibodies for the Treatment of Brain Metastases, a Dream or a Reality? Marco Cavaco, Diana Gaspar, Miguel ARB Castanho * and Vera Neves * Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.A.R.B.C.); [email protected] (V.N.) Received: 19 November 2019; Accepted: 28 December 2019; Published: 13 January 2020 Abstract: The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in cancer patients is increasing. After diagnosis, overall survival (OS) is poor, elicited by the lack of an effective treatment. Monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapy has achieved remarkable success in treating both hematologic and non-central-nervous system (CNS) tumors due to their inherent targeting specificity. However, the use of mAbs in the treatment of CNS tumors is restricted by the blood–brain barrier (BBB) that hinders the delivery of either small-molecules drugs (sMDs) or therapeutic proteins (TPs). To overcome this limitation, active research is focused on the development of strategies to deliver TPs and increase their concentration in the brain. Yet, their molecular weight and hydrophilic nature turn this task into a challenge. The use of BBB peptide shuttles is an elegant strategy. They explore either receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) or adsorptive-mediated transcytosis (AMT) to cross the BBB. The latter is preferable since it avoids enzymatic degradation, receptor saturation, and competition with natural receptor substrates, which reduces adverse events. Therefore, the combination of mAbs properties (e.g., selectivity and long half-life) with BBB peptide shuttles (e.g., BBB translocation and delivery into the brain) turns the therapeutic conjugate in a valid approach to safely overcome the BBB and efficiently eliminate metastatic brain cells.
    [Show full text]
  • (INN) for Biological and Biotechnological Substances
    INN Working Document 05.179 Update 2013 International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for biological and biotechnological substances (a review) INN Working Document 05.179 Distr.: GENERAL ENGLISH ONLY 2013 International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for biological and biotechnological substances (a review) International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Programme Technologies Standards and Norms (TSN) Regulation of Medicines and other Health Technologies (RHT) Essential Medicines and Health Products (EMP) International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for biological and biotechnological substances (a review) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int ) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected] ). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html ). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunotoxins: Targeted Toxin Delivery for Cancer Therapy
    Published online: 2019-12-30 THIEME Review Article e33 Immunotoxins: Targeted Toxin Delivery for Cancer Therapy Xin Mei1,2 Junsheng Chen3,4 Jing Wang3,4 Jianwei Zhu1,2,3,4 1 Jecho Laboratories, Inc. Maryland, United States Address for correspondence Jianwei Zhu, PhD, MBA, Shanghai Jiao 2 Jecho Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China Tong University, 800 Dong Chuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, China 3 Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, (e-mail: [email protected]). MOE, China 4 School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Pharmaceut Fronts 2019;1:e33–e45. Abstract Immunotoxins are proteins that consist of a protein toxin conjugated to a specific targeting moiety. The targeting moiety is usually an antibody or ligand, such as monoclonal antibody, antibody fragment, a cytokine, or a growth factor. The toxins usually come from plant toxins, bacterial toxins, or human-origin cytotoxic elements. Nearly all toxins work by enzymatically inhibiting protein synthesis. After binding to antigens or receptors on target cell surfaces, immunotoxins are internalized and translocated to the cytosol where they can kill the cells. Immunotoxins have demonstrated high cytotoxicity to cancer cells and to date two immunotoxins have been approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration on the markets for the treatment of hematological tumors: Lumoxiti and Ontak. Many other molecules are under development or clinical trials for different forms of cancer. Although immunotoxins exhibit great potency in xenograft model systems and early clinical trials, Keywords there are obstacles that limit successful treatments, including immunogenicity, nonspecific ► cancer toxicity, and poor penetration. However, efforts are underway to address these problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Treating Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma If You’Ve Been Diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Your Treatment Team Will Discuss Your Options with You
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Treating Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma If you’ve been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, your treatment team will discuss your options with you. It’s important to weigh the benefits of each treatment option against the possible risks and side effects. How is non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated? Depending on the type and stage (extent) of the lymphoma and other factors, treatment options for people with NHL might include: ● Chemotherapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ● Immunotherapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ● Targeted Drug Therapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ● Radiation Therapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ● High-Dose Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Transplant for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ● Surgery for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Common treatment approaches Treatment approaches for NHL depend on the type of cancer, how advanced it is, as well as your health and other factors. Another important part of treatment for many people is palliative or supportive care. This can help prevent or treat problems such as infections, low blood cell counts, or some symptoms caused by the lymphoma. ● Treating B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ● Treating T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma ● Treating HIV-Associated Lymphoma 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 ● Palliative and Supportive Care for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Who treats non-Hodgkin lymphoma? Based on your treatment options, you may have different types of doctors on your treatment team. These doctors could include: ● A medical oncologist or hematologist: a doctor who treats lymphoma with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. ● A radiation oncologist: a doctor who treats cancer with radiation therapy. ● A bone marrow transplant doctor: a doctor who specializes in treating cancer or other diseases with bone marrow or stem cell transplants.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Immunotherapy Approaches in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
    Review Current Immunotherapy Approaches in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas Robert Pytlik 1,2, Kamila Polgarova 2, Jana Karolova 2,3 and Pavel Klener 2,3,* 1 Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] 2 First Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology, University General Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08 Prague 2, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (K.P.); [email protected] (J.K.) 3 Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-224965933 Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 24 November 2020; Published: 27 November 2020 Abstract: Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are lymphoid malignancies of B- or T-cell origin. Despite great advances in treatment options and significant improvement of survival parameters, a large part of NHL patients either present with a chemotherapy-refractory disease or experience lymphoma relapse. Chemotherapy-based salvage therapy of relapsed/refractory NHL is, however, capable of re-inducing long-term remissions only in a minority of patients. Immunotherapy-based approaches, including bispecific antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors and genetically engineered T-cells carrying chimeric antigen receptors, single-agent or in combination with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, chemotherapy or targeted agents demonstrated unprecedented clinical activity in heavily-pretreated patients with NHL, including chemotherapy-refractory cases with complex karyotype changes and other adverse prognostic factors. In this review, we recapitulate currently used immunotherapy modalities in NHL and discuss future perspectives of combinatorial immunotherapy strategies, including patient-tailored approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Prescrire's Response
    World Health Organization Raffaella Balocco INN Programme Manager Quality Assurance & Safety : Medecines CH 1211 GENEVA 27 Switzerland Prescrire’s contribution to the WHO consultation on List 100 of Proposed INNs Prescrire is an independent continuing education journal for healthcare professionals. It is wholly funded by its subscribers, it carries no advertising and receives no other financial support whatsoever. As an active member of the Medicines in Europe Forum and the International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB), Prescrire has long been advocating the routine use, by both healthcare professionals and patients, of international nonproprietary names (INNs), which are clearer and therefore safer than brand names (1-4). Making INNs safer. The principles underlying the creation of INNs are the same that apply to the prevention of medication errors, namely standardization, differentiation, redundancy, and built-in logical controls. INNs make pharmaceutical substances easier to identify and are less frequently confused than brand names (5). However, even with the INN system there is a residual risk of confusion, partly owing to the sheer number of INNs now in circulation. A report from the Council of Europe, which recommends the use of INN, calls for active participation in public consultations on proposed INNs, within a 4-month period of the date of final adoption, in order to review proposed INNs from the perspective of in-use safety (6). Prescrire is participating in this phase of the survey and has now examined the List 100 of proposed INNs, published on 16 February 2009 (7). Our analysis of List 100 of Proposed INNs was based on the 2006 list of common stems and its updates, the INN database, and on a database of drugs marketed in France, which provides both brand names and corresponding INNs (8-10).
    [Show full text]