Trustee Emails
July
Cmail -What was the lien put on?
*" -vm -- m".-- - m " -- * .. --****~- % --* * --%% * ".- "----* ".- *- ---*"""- -- m--- *"-m"" m * ee e- +* -% ?--"- . - What was the lien put on? -?$2. *
-" -- - -ww --- -%a M -%- * *ew- -- - -* *- - wmw -
% Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:55 AM To: Margaret Kaiman
Ms Kaiman,
L Good morning to you also.
What was the lien put on?
Anthony O'Connell
Page 1 of 1
Gmail -Would you please explain this?
" " - " - - *.--- % ----I" -._I**_ ** - w%w_Iw Xm" " v " ------__.*-I u please explain this?
------* *- " -"-- " pmm*----v ony OConnell [email protected]~ Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:48 PM . tacs
Dear tacs,
Would you please explain the attachment?
Thank you,
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee
"* -4, 2-"" --%A,. A*#-- ? %%- . c tacs-bluegrass-lien-2p.pdf '36K .PtP,-, iBB ' M4rgaret Kaiman
, . ,. ,. , . S .hls I.i.i?nwas I.ssucd clue to cie1.inq.ucn.t:real estate taxes owcd to ou:r cI.i.ent, :Faildfa.xCounty Qtq3artmen.t of :l:'a.x ,4.cimi17i.stratiolx.I:f you feel. that thcrc has been e:rror p1ea.s~:contact oci~:officc a.t 80.1-545-2500 to discuss your account. Please :rcfere:nccaccount number 59140.
'l'hank you,
> ~
Margaret A. Kaiman
Special Proccriurcs ('ollcctiort Manager
'T'axing Authority C:onsulting Services, PC:
Page 1 of 2 - ~ki(- Would you please expla~nthis? * ' ' ': :A Virginia T,aw Firm
taxing Authority Corrsu lting Scrviccs, 1j.C.
I>.C), Box 1270
Mid lothian, VA 23'1 13
(804) 61 2-9047 (Ilircct l'honc)
(, . fblcasevisit our wcbsitt? at www.taxva.com
.:. . . ! , T]ii$.c-w,ril ~ri~dilny utlut:k/mi:nfs17re royfiderrfiizl und :rriuilegc,d n?rrmz~tnic;rfians.'171c+ iii~cl(X~W, ci?p:ying, dliisfribrr/.it!rii?u use qf this e-prlai: or. ~zrry q .y., ).ii~rrcim~cnf l!y anycilc i?thc~th,m the intended r.t:cipitxnt is slricily pr;~hibift:~i.lf!yilu Iwi+l?,srccei.r?ed this e-lnaii ilr er/.orJpic-ust? ni~tifjyus in/nrc.~iirzltdii ret-zirnirl~it to tilt! originirl ser;,lt:t. Thrlrrk ;ptc ji~ryctw ~.aaptmh'on. ,&. .
From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:49 AM To: Liens Cc: Anthony OConnell '"Subject: Would you please explain this? i
Page 2 of 2 Crnail -What was the lien put on?
What was the lien put on?
Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:25 AM 1 To: tacs
What was the lien put on? (Please see attachment)
Ill< f Thank you.
#srgaret Kaiman
Mr. O'Conncll, L'
I 'kc lien was issued to the ban] di 'I'hank you. , < I' i. t' Margaret Margaret A. Kairnan Special Procedures Collection Manager i Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC Page 1of 2 Gmail -What was the lien put on? 7130112 4:46 AM ; , t: ?,":T"l~ise-mrrl/ rrnd any attai:hm~tlts!in art$denl-LIL lrnd yr?oilo,yd cc)rnnlzl~lic!~Pior~s.Thi~ ~fiscicsuue, cop?jiitg, disluihtrli~inc~u use ~;flliise-rrt~zil or rln!! alta~:hn~nlby an;yc?ilt:ot/w Lhlrn Ihr: infen~led!t,cipi~t11 is: sl.uicil,y prt?hibifrri, (/'!/;)uluiv uc~c+i?edthis 1.-,inail in en.ol:. pkasr.? nol@j us i~~nlt?dirzlii!j h?j refurjti~r~yif lo fhkr~or.iginu1 si!ir(i~'r.. 7'I-rrmkyotiji)u yotir i:ooy!'nzfion. .", , 'i , From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 10: 26 AM To: Liens Subject: What was the lien put on? rtrlF'. ' ' [Quoted text hidden] ""A % --.,- , -...rxp-lr.- ---.- Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:33 AM To: Margaret Kaiman Thank you. Anthony O'Connell [Quoted text hidden] Page 2 of 2 Crnai.1 - illegal lien by DTA 8/6/124:35 PM , ,,,, ;... Illegal lien by DTA J:, 3 J:, Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at l:10 PM To: "Linda Q. Smyth" [email protected]~ Cc: Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Please look at http://ww.catbird-seat.com Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee for Accotink, http://www.alexandriavirginial5acres.com Page 1 of 1 -5, CQ~W-Please send me a copy of llen TACS#: 59140 Anthony CCannell ~at,rhanyrniner~connell@t~jmaII~cor8~r --- - -7-w- . - please send me a copy of lien TACS#: 59140, '* i$jF";';* .~~*.~".-..-.-..-~-"-"~"-~, , , *,, -...... -- . . . . ~ ~ . . --?.-- , """-- Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Tue, Jul 31, 201 2 at 6:34 AM To: tacs [email protected]> Cc: Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ :Dear Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C. '. ; j ft,lPleasesend me ZI copy of the lien for $27,669.42, TACS #: 59140. y,la+~'G I hank you. 6nthony M OConnell, TR ,$39 South Vista Del Rio 'r:Fben Valley, Az 85614 v- P p- ----I I pegaret Kaiman :Eutd Morning Mr. OrConnell, 1 $1, P t Vicasc find attached a copy of the licn. A licn release has been issued today as well. Please provide 8 contact number so that onc of our attorneys, John Rife, may contact you to discllss this account. 4 Thank you. d ,\- bJ 8'{ Margaret A. Kaiman " b" 1 . Special Procedures Collection Manager " ' ,v :~~arg~etQtaxva.com I+, nsulting Services, PC: 7b22e01e84&vlew-pt&search~lnbox&th=138dd3eee171815c Gmail - TACS 59140 TACS 59140 7 I* * Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:55 AM To: tacs Perhaps there is a misunderstanding. I received what you say is a copy of the lien but it is a "Notice". (1) Please send me a copy of the actual lien. (2) In what county court is the lien recorded? (3) What is the lien against? $'&)I want to be absolutely clear that I have not, am not, and will not, be talking to any TACS attorneys. Thank you. A: 1 -7 \ L' Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Margaret Kaiman Mr. O'Connell, 'I'hc copv of thtl Iicn is tlnc actual lien. Mr. Rift>will rcspond to your crnail as soon as 1x1 is nbltl to today. "I'lzank you. .Margaret Kaiman b>,L.> 4 Page 1 of 4 Gnlarl - TACS 59140 Special I'rocedures Col'lection 'M:anager 'Taxing Authority Consulting Services, lJC ' A Virginia I,dw [tirnl 'I'axi~xgAuthority Consulting Services, IJ.C. P.O. 13ox 1270 Midlothian, VA 231.13 , , , : . (804) 612-9047 (Tlirect. 13holxe) (804) 612-0284 (Fax) 131ease visit our websi Le at kvw w .taxva.com ,, . , , . , -:~.:IYzir; t+,tn;ri!ilnd arzy aftarz'i!.;~:it~urc c:i;t?fiileniiulan,E p,ioibgrd 1.r~p7.tnr~i~~ii:~i~io~;s~';'he disc:/osurt, [:(:;II:I!!~~~,C;ili:;l,,ii!;{fiL!;r or ria: [;f!M;: e-,n,ri/ i~p.ilny ., . ~itt~~::l~i.t?rt:~~!b,!/ al;~/~?it: (.?//LC:?' thi??? th;? intcy?zt.ltilw~:ipimt i:? siyicily j~?o/~ii~ik?(f.(fyo/,i /1.iic:t? ~c:(?z~cJthis ,?,.rrxilin /!/ i!~n:lunti~~g. if t;~ Ihe c::.iyirziii ;:c?ndc~.T&rrnk y{!u ,fiw ?JOUY i.r!c!p~r:tilotl. From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:56 AM To: Liens Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: TACS 59140 [Quoted text hidden] ? , ~.-*,. ,.~-~.-.",...... , " .-,., '. ~6hnRife Mr. O'ConneIl: I am John Rife, a I'artner with 'Taxing Authority Consulting Services. Our firm lias beer1 retairiecf by Fairpix Coitnty to collect on certain delinquent rcal estatc taxes. If you have retained an attorney to rcprcsent the 'I'rust in this regard, please forward this comxnanicatiori to I~imor her and notify me of their contact infonnation and iriy co~rirnunicationuwill be directed only to your represen~ilive, ",-. Page 2 of 4 Thc property for which you arc listed as a Trustce ('Tax Map 0904-01-0017) is delinclucnt in taxes dating back to 2010. The arnonr~tof delir~rlllerlttaxes due is $27,718.72 through today. The lien issued was issued against ariy i'ulitls held. due and owing in the 'I'rust riarne. 111 Virginia, a local goverrlinellt and its altoriieys have adrrlir~istrativecollection rcmedies available withoi~thaving to rcsort to court action to collcct on funds duc. This effort has thus far been unsuccessful. As you are the Trustee of this Trust and its property, I would lilte to ascertain your i~ltentiorisin keeping the property and paying tlie taxes due on the propel-ty? 1 warited to speitk with you in this regard ns it is rliy I . client's direction to collect the outstanding arnount duc and it is my obligation to advise then1 on their rcspectlve rights and abilities to collect such amounts from the Trust. You have, tiotvever. made it clear to my Special Proccd~~resManager that you do not wish to sl)ealc with rne. 1 will, in such case, let you know Illy intention. In the event you and lr~yclient are not able to arrange an arnicable plan to pay the delinquent taxcs due on your account, 1 will recommend my client pcrrnit mc to take such actions necessary to collect the deliriquent real estate taxes due against the aforementioned property, ~ncludirigseeking n sale of the property for the clelinquerit taxes as per~riittedunder Virginia Code Sec 58.1 - 3965, et sey. This proccdul.~would involve a court action against the Trust and woi~ldname you as Trustec. *The issues to be discussed at the hearing, however, wor~ldbe limited lo the taxes due on the property and whether those are deli~lclt~eritsul'ficiemt to entertaiii the decree of sale. It would be xrly prel'erence that we discuss a payment plan amount that bcst suits the Trl~st'sability to pay so that ttie property may bc retained. I - Plcasc give me a call at your leisure to discuss what options we may explore. My direct lirie is 804-53.5 2379" Thank yo11 in advarice for your cousideration in this matter, John A. Rife, partner Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 23 113 (804) 53.5- 2379 Direct Phone (703) 880- 1078 General Collections .(804) 545. 2378 Fax Page 3 of 4 Cmail - TACS 59140 This e-rnuil c~ndany uitai:hntc?nt.~rrre corljkltr~iinlurrd privllege(l r:onrrr~i~r~icutions!q utlorney-clici~~t privilege. Tlie di.sclo,sttre, c;qp;ving, ~$istrihutionor rise qj'this r?-m~tilor atzy at~uchmerztby otzyone other than the inter~cde(lrecipienl' i.r striatly prohibir~d.If you hovc reraivecl jhis t?-mail irl crror, plea.sc! nor(f~ris imnrediutc.ly by rrc.tr.rrnin,qit io ihe original sendt:r. Thank you fi)r your cooperation. , From: Margaret Kaiman Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:20 PM To: Anthony OConnell; Liens Subject: RE: TACS 59140 [Quoted text hidden] Page 4 of 4 Cmail - lien disclosure TACS 59140 lien disclosure TACS 59140 Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:43 PM To: tacs Dear Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C Would you please ask the Clerk of the Court for Highland County Lois Ralston Sheives ("Lois Ralston Sheives" #5 ~Iralston@courts,state.va.us~)to send me copies of any liens or other documents that have been attached to property 54 A 31 andlor 54 A 33 after 2010, and send me the bill? If there is a copy of TACS's lien there it should have Highland County Clerk of the Court markings on it. Thank you Anthony O'Connell 439 S. Vista Del Rio :rareen Valley, Arizona 85614 &hn Rife \ .'. Mr. O'Coiinell: kedo no work in Highland County and aru ilnsnre d the relation of any 'lien' you are refcrencir~gto the ten lien on the real estate owned in Fairlax Couiity. 'Ifaxirtg Authori~yCollsultirtg Services cJicl r~otplace any lie11 on your property in Highland County. 'The tax lien for Failfax (lounty is a statutory licn on thc property. The taxes alonc constitute the licn against the property. ! iJ encollrage you to speak with an attorr~eyso that he or she [nay fully explain the nature of' the taxes artd tl~c ' happenil~gson this matter. Yohn A. Rife, Partner P Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC Page 1 of 2 ,>* Gmall - lien disclosure TACS 59140 Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 23 113 1 (804) 545 -2379 Direct Phone (703) 880- 1078 General Collections, (804) 545.2378 Fax .7'1tis e-rnuil c.nd crnp cr/tachrnc:nts(ire cclnfi~lenlinlcrnd privileged cornn~rrrricationsby attorn,ey-c'liei~l.privilege. The ~,'isclo,rure,ct)p:vLng, idislribution or r~seqf this 6'-unrril or any cr.tluchmenl. b,y unj~oneother rf~unthe intencded recipi~r~tis strictly prohibileel. lf ym have rt!cc!ived , , "fhis r:-mail in error, pleusc! rior~fk1ru immecliutely by retrirning it lo /he originul sc From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 1:44 AM To: Liens Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: lien disclosure TACS 59140 [Quoted text h~dden] Page 2 of 2 August Cmail - lien disclosure; tacs 59140 lien disclosure; tacs 59140 Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Wed, Aug I,2012 at 7:39 AM To: tacs Dear Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C, Your email to me of July 25, 2012, at 4:49 am says, in part: "This lien was issued due to delinquent real estate taxes owed to our client, Fairfax County Department of , S: Tax Administration." Would you please send me a copy of whatever the Fairfax County Department of Tax Administration sent to you? Thank you. 2I,., -> Anthony O'Connell, Trustee ~ < uf,' John Rife Mr. O'Connell: The County sends us placements via electronic file and not by paper. The records of' the taxes due arld the recorcls related to real estate are publicly available in the Fairfax C,'otrnty Clerk's Office. I will be pleased to provide you a breakdown of the taxes that arc owed against the property in Fairfax County, but note that you still have no1 indicated whether it is your intention to pay these tlelir~tlucnttaxes. I 4 *.. Wo~~ldyou be kir~denough to let rne know if you as the Trustee of this property intend to pay (he amount due? John A. Rife, Partner Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 23 113 Page 1 of 2 ...- Crnail - lien disclosure; tacs 59140 (804) 545 2379 Direct Phone (703 ) 880 1078 General Collections (804) 54-15-.21;78 Fax I ? ?%is c-mdi!cind rrny c~ftachn~e!nt.s(Ire cc)r[fitlenticxlu~rd privileged r:onzrr.rrrrrlcutic)r~.c1)y uftorney--clicrr~privilege. The di.~~.:lo.s~re,copying, ciisfrihutiorr or rise oJ this s-mtiil or any crtt(~chrnelztI!v rmyone ofher than 1h.e interrcietl recipitnt i.c strir:tly j>rohibirpd. Ifyou hnvc recpivc:'d this e-nuiil in error, please IL~L(/~Yits imnterliurely by reritrning it 10 the origirrul serzdt!r. 'Th'htmlcyon ,fir your ~:oop(;'r(~tio~~. I i :::. , From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:40 AM To: Liens Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: lien disclosure; tacs 59140 \ !Quoted text hidden] Page 2 of 2 Cmail - lien disclosure: tacs 59140 lien disclosure: tacs 59140 Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Wed, Aug I,2012 at 8:00 AM To: tacs Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C P. 0. Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 231 13-8270 , Dear Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C Reference: 'Your email of August 1, 2012, at 6:31 am. I don't understand why you are not willing to ask the Clerk of the Court for Highland County Lois Ralston 6ic Sheives ("Lois Ralston Sheives" Anthony O'Connell 439 S. Vista Del Rio Green Valley, Arizona 85614 John Rife Mr. O'Counell: . ,is I will not cc)ntinue to resj~ondto your inquiry about property in I-lighland C'onnty. We have r~othingto do with ally such property. 1 suggest you hire an attorriey lo assist you with your inquires. 1 am retairiecl by Fairlax County and want to be clear that in the event that your real estate taxes in Fail-Sax C:ounty assesscd against the property known as Tax Map 0C10401 -0017 and currently due in the arnount of $27,738.00, are not paid, I iilte~idto reconlinend seekiiig a judicial sale of this propcrty whcri eligible r~rider Virgiriia Code Sec 58.1-3965. I encourage you to pay tlie arrlount chle to protect your interests ill the property. ., -IF you would lilcc to discirss the balance tluc or a suitable payment plan, wc will bc pleased to oblige. You , rrlay call our office at 703 880 1078 to disc~~ssthe account and how we might assist you in this regard. Page 1 of 5 Grnail - lien disclosure: tacs 59140 'Thank you, John A. Rife, Partner Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC , Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 23 113 " > (803) 54.5.2371) Direct Phone - "(703) 880.1078 General Collections (804) 545 2378 Fax .This e -mail arid arty nllcrchrt~entsare cor(fi(1i'rlen~icrl and privllegt?rl conzrr~w~icationsb;y anornqv-client privilegr. Tlie rlis(:lo,vur.e,cop;ving, disbibufion or rrse oftllis e-mnil or any .lyaft(~cArnen~by rfnyorbe other than rhe inmuled recipient is .slric:.llyprohibited. If you hcrve receive(l &is e-,nail in error, pleusc notijj us inzn~ediutelyhy retrtrning if lo thr! origir~ulserider. Thrmk yorr &r your coo[)eraliot~. From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:OO AM To: Liens Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: lien disclosure: tacs 59140 [huoted text hidden] + -'~ ,,,,,,-,,, ,," .*-,,-,,, .%\>\ ~>~,,*" -"-...... ,,. ~,,,,, -..- ~,,~~~.,~~~..,,. ~**% Greenlief, Kevin C. Dear Mr. O'Conncll, gXs Mr. Rife previously stated to you., lus firm,'TACS, .has 'been retained by our office as our agent. to collect. Page 2 of 5 .-. - Cmail - lien disclosure: tacs 59140 1 tic.linclucnt r(xl ~st~~tcfc~xt~s(xi thtb parcel of vacant lalld in 1;clirlax ('ounty at tclx Inay KOL30-4-01-0017. Attat hcd is rl copy of thc hunk lien that TACS issucd undcr Virginid law in tlic at&mpt to collcct thclsc taxcs. As Mr. Kifc indiratcd, ~thihishctct nothing to do with property in HighlC~n~tCounty, nor with tlw Clerk of the Court. I rrrornnlcncl vou coritact Mr. Rite at '703-880- 1078 ncr his c-rnai1,bclow in ortic.r to c'omc! to tcrnls with ~,a\lnlcntcj~ld avoid fu rthcr Icml action and additional costs. I bepar t~nerltof 'I'ax Adlninistration Fair frlx County, Virginia From: Anthony OConnell [mailta:anthanyminero~ann~ll@gmail~~o~~ Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 11:32 AM To: Greenlief, Kevin C. Cc: Anthony [email protected]~ Subject: lien disclosure, Accotink, tacs 59140 ., Dear DTA Director Kevin Greenlief. Would you please sent me a copy of the the documents and instructions you sent the lien company concerning Accotink (0904 01 0017) ? Thank you Rnthony OIConnell, Trustee for Accotink 4 From: John Rife Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11: 12 AM To: 'Anthony OConnell'; Liens Subject: RE: lien disclosure: tacs 59140 i V Mr. O'(~onncl1: Page 3 of 5 ~maii-lien disclosure: tacs 59140 I will not continue to rcspond to your inquiry about property in I lighland Cloitnty. We have nothing to do with 8ny such property. T suggest you hire an attorney to assist you with your inquires. S I arn retained by Fairfax County and want to be clear thal it1 the event that your real estate taxes in Fairfax Coll~ityassessed against the property known as Tax Map 0004-01 -0017 and curreiltly due i11 the arnoumt of' $27,738.00, are not paid, I intend to recomme~idseelring a judicial sale of this property when eligible u~~dcr Virginia Code Sec 58.1-3965. T eucourage you to pay thc amount clue to protcct your interesls in the property. If you would like to discuss the balance due or a suitilble payirient plan, we will be pleased lo oblige. You , #, rnay call our office at 703 880--1078to discuss the account and how we might assist you in this regard. 'I . Thank you, john A. Rife, Part~ier Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC v." v." Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 23 113 i804) 545-2579 Direct Phone I (703) 880 - 1078 General Collections (804) 545 -2378 Fax $)hn(:' * taxva.com ;.This e-rtzuil and ~.nyultochwrents urc cor~fi(lenticr1cmd privileged conrwuo.ricutions by attorney-client privilege. The cli.isclo,s~ire,copying, ;lislribution or r,ise qf'titis c?-mtcril or urr-y (crtmchmerrr by atiyone other tlun the interrtled re~@i~nti,~strictly j~rohiil)it( i From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]~ 'sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:OO AM To: Liens Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: lien disclosure: tacs 59140 Page 4 of 5 Gmail - lien disclosure: tacs 59140 Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C [Quoted text hidden] \ $ [Quoted text hidden] w * -wA>t ,n / -<- %mm-mmWhw, ~ ,W" ,W# d<* & TACS lien.pdf 295K Page 5 of 5 Cmail - lien disclosure, tacs 59140 8/2/12 9:12 AM lien disclosure, tacs 59140 Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:12 AM To: tacs , , Dear Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C.. 8 , .Would you please explain why you sent your lien 59140 to a bank? Thank you. I Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Page 1 of 1 Gma~l- l~end~sclosure, tacs 59140 lien disclosure; tacs 59140 Anthony OConnell [email protected]~ Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1.42 PM To: tacs I ,Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C P. O: Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 231 13-8270 ear Taxing Authority Consulting Services, P. C Reference: lien disclosure, tacs 591 40 ' , What was your lien put on? ;.(Thank you I ,Anthony O'Connell, Trustee >,&.39S. Vista Del Rio Green Valley, Arizona 85614 a \*- 7- *-en **n lien, tacs59140, to first&citizens.pdf ,m 295K Gmail - Lien for back taxes on Accotink (090-4-001-0017) 10/7/12 9:55 AM Anthony OConnell Lien for back taxes on Accotink (090-4-001-0017) 1 message Anthony OConnell Reference: Lien for back taxes on Accotink (Fairfax County Tax Map 090-4-001-0017) Dear Fairfax County Board of Supervisors; I don't understand why it's been impossible to find out where this lien is recorded. If the lien is on something in Fairfax County, it should be in the Court records of Fairfax County. If the lien is on something in Highland County, it should be in the Court records of Highland County. Failure to get resolution would be disastrous for our family. I have exhausted my options; I don't have the power to get answers. Would you please ask Fairfax County Director Kevin Greenlief two questions? (1) What is the lien on? (2) Why was it sent to Highland County? Would you please ask Highland County Clerk Lois Ralston Sheives to send you copies of any and all documents that have been attached to property 54 A 31 and/or 54 A 32 after year 2010? If neither of these work, would you please have one of your staff search the Fairfax County records and the Highland County records? The drive to Monterey is beautiful. Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.farm139.com (Highland County) http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Fairfax County) 3 attachments 2questions7p.pdf 374K lien1p.pdf 300K lien10p.pdf 471K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139030e9c860b5b3 Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Can the property that tacs lien 59140 is on be identified? 10/7/12 10:00 AM Anthony OConnell Can the property that tacs lien 59140 is on be identified? 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors; I am trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County that we call Accotink (Fairfax County Tax Map 090-4-001-0017). I am powerless against those who put entanglements on it. Those who control the entanglements control the people and assets that are entangled, and that makes our family and this Trustee powerless. The most recent entanglement uses a lien for back taxes on Accotink on another property which the creators of the lien won't identify. (By definition a lien is on property). This lien was sent to banks in Highland County, Virginia, where I own property as an individual, which suggests that the lien was put on my individual property ( trail14p ). If so, besides being against the law, this entangles two properties; http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com and http://www.farm139.com . I have exhausted my options; I don't have the power to get answers ( 2questions7p ). Can the property that this tacs lien 59140 is on be identified? If the lien is on property in Fairfax County, it should be in the Court records of Fairfax County. If the lien is on property in Highland County, it should be in the Court records of Highland County. Would you please ask Director Kevin Greenlief and his law firm TACS to identify the property the lien is on; and ask Highland County Clerk Lois Ralston Sheives to send you copies of any documents that have been attached to property 54 A 31 and/or 54 A 32 after year 2010? If neither of these work, would you please have one of your staff search the Fairfax County Court records and the Highland County Court records? The drive to Monterey in Highland County is beautiful. Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com http://www.farm139.com http://www.canweconnctthedots.com 2 attachments trail14p.pdf 510K 2questions7p.pdf 374K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13910903fbdac09f Page 1 of 1 Gmail - What property is the lien for Accotink against? 10/7/12 10:09 AM Anthony OConnell What property is the lien for Accotink against? 15 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Highland County and Fairfax County officials and others; By definition a lien is against property. I don't understand why the Fairfax DTA and their hired law firm TACS refuse to identify the property they put their lien against (lien1p.pdf). The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County (trail14p.pdf). Would you please use your power to find out what property this lien for Accotink is against? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Accotink; trust's property for sale in Fairfax County) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's property for sale in Highland County) Suggested contacts: "Kevin Greenlief" 5 attachments lien1p.pdf 305K trail14p.pdf 510K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139147e0e4e38d93 Page 1 of 10 Gmail - What property is the lien for Accotink against? 10/7/12 10:09 AM tacs29p.pdf 1023K dta17p.pdf 450K 2questions7p.pdf 374K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KXCRhEpEfLp/gth4/rs3q4sw8E6y7dw+/6NvNIMashM=; b=ThEt41Nned6376NVDiGolwrUsqL4oNeZ/twL/HBBkVZhqXzIYihYpgcsVxQoAbOel/ 6Ei/t3p5/elkGgYxJjp8MmAEtF1dgYgiFwg/g5vzeSln6UixQjCwDBuR6uxvCQNeP+n/ G69G6QYJXoHr0c9hWt+9Zfl+BW7QP3xoioybipPQYEDcb3EqGF9PHaRtc/t9BGSSC6VY gJzKxVX3GOC8gRpvZwywz0ED0JfxTZHaIZT71oBqwuTmgO/ABoCPuvk7J4THCH5nezBt DNe5AmJpFWerPX0D7kull2zwC13Yy51hpQkOSvjVHhMvxdRNhlUmH0kGgwDMHiL72MTG V0PQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.6.200 with SMTP id d8mr2970458oea.22.1344668571317; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.246.33 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:02:49 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139147e0e4e38d93 Page 2 of 10 Gmail - What property is the lien for Accotink against? 10/7/12 10:15 AM Anthony OConnell What property is the lien for Accotink against? 4 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Highland County; By definition a lien is against property. I don't understand why the Fairfax DTA and their hired law firm TACS refuse to identify the property they put their lien against (lien1p.pdf). The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County (trail14p.pdf). Would you please use your power to find out what property this lien for Accotink is against? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Accotink; trust's property for sale in Fairfax County) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's property for sale in Highland County) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Entanglement; illegal lien) Suggested contacts: "Kevin Greenlief" 5 attachments — Download all attachments lien1p.pdf 305K View Download trail14p.pdf 510K View Download tacs29p.pdf 1023K View Download dta17p.pdf 450K View Download 2questions7p.pdf 374K View Download Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1391bca529ff164e Page 1 of 4 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 10:19 AM Anthony OConnell What property did DTA put their lien against? 8 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Highland County and Fairfax County: What property did the Fairfax County DTA put their lien against? The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County (trail14p). Suggested contacts: "Lois Ralston Sheives" Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.catbird-seat.com trail14p.pdf 510K Highland Commissioner of Revenue https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13920c3cb0465211 Page 1 of 6 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 10:19 AM To: Anthony OConnell I would not have access to this information unless the property went into foreclosure or changed owners. Darlene C Crummett Highland County Commissioner of the Revenue PO Box 148 Monterey, VA 24465 540-468-2142 [Quoted text hidden] Mail Delivery Subsystem This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed: Message will be retried for 2 more day(s) Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://support.google.com/ mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [(0) house.virginia.com. [208.88.10.100]:25: Connection timed out] ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=754CD3arvEk1xLA2v2t9hcziCZrRGQC9Kmg34nU4wKk=; b=crhDjeHAAREvpC5YQSIQNA/L4CF4zHdK3qDUFCdop3dWL4UXNN0gvUWAKYSjw/qe93 EaOCJ7X3F4DuDKUnrpyjHYd0UiCeooSvKFiFAMIxXg0AZO2KWS7i6XpxpXxyN2BUfkGe rib/B+6wXasZYAWJUNOTVjwLn0eSWcoXGZZwERt9mEg/cXi2nv0jFIr7oYNiANbE1pOW BCDwoa/Lf2geizMYlgLo8rX6Iyx3XOYOqNi9gvBmPrlAAQcdmyR3255dTHZshqwjS4+a B19apWqXAXbHHGkmjsFusrSZmoCTt1WKzgh/zPj/MiMbwThOiEsSdJRcWRIL38HflJTi zTvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.212.36 with SMTP id nh4mt24063031obc.37.1344874467244; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:14:26 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13920c3cb0465211 Page 2 of 6 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:22 AM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Consumer Action, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . If you don't think this fits your purpose, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139257bf99fa97a2 Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:27 AM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139258248474f346 Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:47 AM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 3 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Virginia State Cooperation Commission, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee SccInfo The SCC is not the proper forum for this matter. You should seek the advice of legal counsel. As for the actions of particular individuals - Accountants (CPAs) are licensed by the Board of Accountancy http://www.boa.virginia.gov/ Attorneys are licensed by the Virginia State Bar http://www.vsb.org/site/regulation/inquiry Complaints against the practices of licensed individuals can be filed with these agencies. Kenneth J. Schrad Director, Division of Information Resources State Corporation Commission (SCC) PO Box 1197 Richmond, VA 23218 https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13925846deb0122a Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:47 AM Office: (804) 371-9141 or (804)371-9858 Cell: (804) 334-6454 E-mail: [email protected] From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:23 AM To: SccInfo Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: Need a just power Dear Virginia State Cooperation Commission, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Anthony OConnell Dear SCC, Thank you for your reply with the excellent links. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13925846deb0122a Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:29 AM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Webmaster, I think a webmaster knows as much if not more about the organization the web is for than anyone. Would you please forward this message to the most appropriate place? Dear Virginia State Cooperation Commission, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139258b70da5457d Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:32 AM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 1 message Anthony OConnell Would you please forward this to the appropriate place within the FDIC? Dear FDIC, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392590682845ca5 Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:38 AM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 1 message Anthony OConnell Would you please forward this to the appropriate place within the FDIC? Dear FDIC, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13925918f62e567e Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Need a just power 10/7/12 10:39 AM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 1 message Anthony OConnell Would you please forward this to the appropriate place within the FDIC? Dear FDIC, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139259242376a61e Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Need an investigative journalist 10/7/12 10:41 AM Anthony OConnell Need an investigative journalist 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Juan Williams, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Can you use this story? If not, would you please forward it to someone you think can use it? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392597d621d23dd Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Need an investigative journalist 10/7/12 10:44 AM Anthony OConnell Need an investigative journalist 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Leonard Downiel, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Can you use this story? If not, would you please forward it to someone you think can use it? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139259a0784f756a Page 1 of 1 Gmail - What property did the DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 10:54 AM Anthony OConnell What property did the DTA put their lien against? 10 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County and Highland County, What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County (trail14p). Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Related topic: http://www.catbird-seat.com trail14p.pdf 510K Highland County Chamber of Commerce https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139263afc1b84c33 Page 1 of 6 Gmail - What property did the DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 10:54 AM To: Anthony OConnell Unfortunately, the Chamber of Commerce is not involved nor has access to information you are looking for. Looking through several of your previous emails you attached, I did see map numbers. I would suggest contacting the Commissioner of Revenue, Darlene Crummett, at 540-468-2142. Tiffany White Executive Director Highland County Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 223 Monterey VA 24465 540-468-2550 www.highlandcounty.org From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 1:43 PM To: undisclosed-recipients: Subject: What property did the DTA put their lien against? [Quoted text hidden] BOA-BOA Dear Anthony O’Connell, Your email has reached the Virginia Board of Accountancy. We are a state agency regulating Certified Public Accountants. I am very sorry, but I am unable to assist you. Have a great afternoon. https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139263afc1b84c33 Page 2 of 6 Gmail - What property did the DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 10:54 AM Sincerely, Patti Hambright Examination/Licensing Coordinator Virginia Board of Accountancy 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 402 Henrico, Virginia 23233 Direct: (804) 367-8505 Fax: (804) 527-4409 Website: http://www.boa.virginia.gov From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 1:43 PM Subject: What property did the DTA put their lien against? [Quoted text hidden] Lois White Mr. O'Connell, I have forewarded your email to Lois Sheives, Circuit Court Clerk. I do not have that information in the Treasurer's Office. Lois E. White, Treas. County of Highland P.O. Box 512 Monterey, VA 24465 [Quoted text hidden] Mail Delivery Subsystem This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed: Message will be retried for 2 more day(s) Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://support.google.com/ mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [(0) house.virginia.com. [208.88.10.100]:25: Connection timed out] ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139263afc1b84c33 Page 3 of 6 Gmail - Regulating CPA 10/7/12 10:57 AM Anthony OConnell Regulating CPA 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Patti Hambright Thank you for your reply of August 14, 2012. To keep things simple I copied your reply from my multi-recipient email: "Dear Anthony O’Connell, Your email has reached the Virginia Board of Accountancy. We are a state agency regulating Certified Public Accountants. I am very sorry, but I am unable to assist you. Have a great afternoon. Sincerely, Patti Hambright Examination/Licensing Coordinator Virginia Board of Accountancy 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 402 Henrico, Virginia 23233 Direct: (804) 367-8505 Fax: (804) 527-4409 Website: http://www.boa.virginia.gov" The CPA Joanne L. Barnes (The spelling of her first name varies) working in Alexandria, Virginia, makes our family's money disappear and there is no end in sight. Please see my website http://www. canweconnectthedots.com The accountant's are sophisticated, powerful, and protected; the public doesn't have a chance against them. If the BOA tries to find out where the money went in out mother's estate, such as behind Bk467p191, for example, BOA can experience it themselves. Some files from my website are attached. Does it look as if the CPA framed me with accounting entanglements when I hired her for tax year 1991? Accounting entanglements cover accounting trails and make it impossible to follow the actual money trails (court19p.pdf, fiduciary28p.pdf). Please notice that the Attorney Edward White speaks for the CPA (microcosm35p.pdf). Something makes the CPA never have to be accountable. Thank you. Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.canweconnectthedots.com 4 attachments https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392a2bf861004b6 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Regulating CPA 10/7/12 10:57 AM court19p.pdf 298K fiduciary28p.pdf 732K microcosm35p.pdf 524K money40p.pdf 514K BOA-BOA Dear Anthony Oconnell, Thank you for the email. I am forwarding your inquiry to our enforcement department. Ms. Grant will be happy to assist you. Have a great afternoon. Sincerely, Patti Hambright Examination/Licensing Coordinator Virginia Board of Accountancy 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 402 Henrico, Virginia 23233 Direct: (804) 367-8505 Fax: (804) 527-4409 Website: http://www.boa.virginia.gov From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:05 AM To: BOA-BOA Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: Regulating CPA [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392a2bf861004b6 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:02 AM Anthony OConnell What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? 9 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, and others, What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County (trail14p). Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392aae61589f5cf Page 1 of 7 Gmail - What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:02 AM 3 attachments trail14p.pdf 510K money40p.pdf 514K evidence8p.pdf 118K SHF-Sheriff Thank you for contacting the Fairfax County Sheriff's Office. The documents you attached are unclear as to what properties are affected. We do not provide legal interpretation of such documents and only levy property at the direction of a court. For questions about a particular lien, you should the Department of Tax Administration at [email protected]. Andrea Ceisler Public Information Officer Fairfax County Sheriff's Office www.fairfaxcounty.gov/sheriff From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 10:28 AM Subject: What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? [Quoted text hidden] Anne Adams Dear Mr. O'Connell, Sorry things are so "entangled," as you say, with your mother's estate. Sure seems like you've gone through a lot with this. As promised, I checked on your question about liens on your Highland property, and I can confirm what others have confirmed for you: there are no liens attached to it. I'm not sure why you've been led to believe there are, but there's nothing showing on those documents to indicate your Highland property has been involved. https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392aae61589f5cf Page 2 of 7 Gmail - What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:02 AM Good luck with this process; I hope things work out. Best regards, Anne Adams The Recorder [Quoted text hidden] Mail Delivery Subsystem This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed: Message will be retried for 2 more day(s) Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://support.google.com/ mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [(0) house.virginia.com. [208.88.10.100]:25: Connection timed out] ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oqjk+xqHZJ3ZjA0EGZwR1oEjB8rA2YENvSLxhJOcO4A=; b=zb5h7j0mHF/sNlmBfPDjHSCKvVP90cCHYKpt+DoIXUzdpjWY+zGDQw12dAXV03Smin W5an9OeKEWIvhFf4CfXYytD1h0fzkMKHidtPZhUqgFVdAhRXKpo4yU6zSeGj/Np8MtSl ud50o5Q4yy5MdK7wx+W17+Rq/3okFF6tsmo95QDljMHojNKb80tCvsTcfK+FT4q1V8Ql ex6x7xD9l/O1El4aUjZKBM/VaO9Rp2sxLWYhuLKOf9ZnRyWbNThbOmAGSiyR+CWISgIY zNhvTWW5KMrNjTEJTnACTgWCWBp240COmUHtlvJLCOamcvnM/Pk/KogasdH3HS9Bi528 BmHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.10.103 with SMTP id h7mr1956622oeb.2.1345040836260; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:27:15 -0700 Message-ID: Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, and others, What property did the Fairfax DTA put their lien against? The trail stops https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392aae61589f5cf Page 3 of 7 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:04 AM Anthony OConnell What property did DTA put their lien against? 7 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, and others, What property did the Fairfax County DTA put their lien against? The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County (trail14p). What is Creigh Deeds's position ("Creigh Deeds" Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 3 attachments trail14p.pdf 510K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392f81d942547f0 Page 1 of 6 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:04 AM evidence8p.pdf 118K money40p.pdf 514K Mail Delivery Subsystem This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed: Message will be retried for 2 more day(s) Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://support.google.com/ mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [(0) house.virginia.com. [208.88.10.100]:25: Connection timed out] ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IztHC1/aDtqGWOzUh4yTiQ7lTppUY74w1U7Pv6FRZPk=; b=WRhYeOuCJbqriO5ZMUkbdEOL58j2saPdIOSCocs4++vmzj9GY13OVjPS/AyLNfdIVq U7LSAYAx1ps8tI//XBDp2F6PeQiNrTihEcPoaMF2PfJxwIB59iYZrUt/fRKoud8FqI3+ oPAnzDeeMBGPYPSgAK3EBvFsXUIl3Kad/TXj4mJFQMC5A4qXNPR1u8IiHhO6ar/BYHHn sIUzK27aC3HJl1w9oMMkG1MrYDc9eRJapjjdbYNELWFRKyDhJ1g93RQ5ujkFwTP3NYvL VTcGj7Yxj8VB3kdLX6YVcsU1omKGCU1rFQ5YrkMhTSNg5XVhoMdX0wz0x2L77CcpcwJ9 0vGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.19.195 with SMTP id h3mr811945oee.102.1345121804179; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:56:42 -0700 Message-ID: Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, and others, What property did the Fairfax County DTA put their lien against? The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County (trail14p). What is Creigh Deeds's position ("Creigh Deeds" Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1392f81d942547f0 Page 2 of 6 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:08 AM Anthony OConnell What property did DTA put their lien against? 7 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, and others, What property did the Fairfax County, Virginia, DTA put their lien against? The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County, Virginia (trail14p). What is Mr. Deeds's position ("Creigh Deeds" Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13934b73d1752764 Page 1 of 6 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:08 AM 3 attachments money40p.pdf 514K evidence8p.pdf 118K trail14p.pdf 510K Mail Delivery Subsystem This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed: Message will be retried for 2 more day(s) Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://support.google.com/ mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [(0) house.virginia.com. [208.88.10.100]:25: Connection timed out] ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=odx0MRyQXZ4Q5Gx9QlxmqSvZJWQ1OgvhjE2TTxzWrPM=; b=G+Q3urnFlD4769m4jRx6iHGw8mnMcOweJC/uFEjlNDSgEYqPcaBEJVrOfZRWQLudt8 NWz66cMsqRCR6FInYIh7N1R2NBbqN1/wPT+WnpJ+FnJmmeF+V2HJ0X/oT8J5BWvGW3aA GIlgApwpFl0KlUW8Yk3p2JAzy5YxXZiOgtMOyN5L03eyNZ0kjZKqS9hLTF+0GSi81Dpz e3/LGGjZvKypKl6j5HDlXjRoRbfF6uFRCmJG2ha4NVPWggxZbqV0xlTS/M+Fd0PCpvHK OUjW1qKlyHRyxoy9CP4555xKFTzaN465GXqx46VNGkVB/oVcQ4M58ELdhh/THqljUd5/ D0ug== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.222.39 with SMTP id qj7mr3811515obc.16.1345209189723; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:13:07 -0700 Message-ID: Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, and others, https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13934b73d1752764 Page 2 of 6 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:11 AM Anthony OConnell What property did DTA put their lien against? 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, and others, What property did the Fairfax County, Virginia, DTA put their lien against? The trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County, Virginia (trail14p). What is Mr. Deeds's position ("Creigh Deeds" Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13939d5e9f80229f Page 1 of 3 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:11 AM http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 3 attachments money40p.pdf 514K trail14p.pdf 510K evidence8p.pdf 123K DPOR: investigations (DPOR) Dear Mr. O’Connell: If you wish to file a formal complaint, please use the attached complaint form so that we may begin the process. Please remember to attach all of your supporting documentation that will help support your claim. Failure to attach the necessary items may result in a delay of processing. The supporting documents could include a copy of the contract (complete copy front/back), cancelled checks (to verify payment of services rendered), correspondence, telephone/fax logs, advertisements, and general notes that summarize the matter. The attached complaint form will provide with more information about the complaint process and our authority as a Regulatory agency to become involved and the action that we can take. Please note, that a Regulatory Board cannot provide legal advice, make the person/business return to complete items of a contract, make the person/business return any monies that are allegedly owed, etc. Also, State Regulations do not cover ethical behavior, business practice decision (such as billing costs for services), and civil matters that may involve workmanship issues or cosmetic defects. A Regulatory agency can only take action against the license if violations of the regulations can be proven. The Board will decide what type of action to take against the license in the form of a (1) Monetary fine, (2) Remedial Education, (3) Suspension, (4) and/or Revocation. In some instances, the Department may offer mediation as a means of alternative dispute resolution regarding complaints against licensees. A regulatory board CANNOT require any individual or business to refund money, correct deficiencies, or provide other personal remedies. In some cases, a legal action may be your only recourse to resolve a matter. The Department cannot provide legal advice. If you would like to visit our website to obtain more information about the Regulatory process and the different occupations and professions that are regulated, please visit www.dpor.virginia.gov . https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13939d5e9f80229f Page 2 of 3 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:11 AM If you have additional questions, please contact 804-367-8504, Option #8 and a complaint specialist will be happy to assist you. Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 400 Richmond, VA 23233 Governmental email is generally subject to disclosure pursuant to the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. However, if you have received this message in error, please notify the Sender and delete the message as well as all attachments. From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 9:05 AM Subject: What property did DTA put their lien against? [Quoted text hidden] complaintform.pdf 478K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13939d5e9f80229f Page 3 of 3 Gmail - What property did DTA put their lien against? 10/7/12 11:17 AM Anthony OConnell What property did DTA put their lien against? 26 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, Federal Agencies, and others, I don't understand why the Fairfax County, Virginia, DTA will not identify the property that they put their lien against. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" A visitor to the Highland County Court House is Monterey Virginia, using page 15 of the attachment "trail15p", should be able to see, within five minutes, if the lien is, or is not, on the property of Anthony O'Connell. But the power structure has to recognize it. What is Mr. Deeds position? ("Creigh Deeds" I do not have the power to compel transparency and accountability. The fundamental issue is where does the money go? (money9p, money40p). What is it that makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Do the accountants have Fairfax County, Highland County, and the Commonwealth of Virginia doing a cover-up? The accountants use of the IRS to make money disappear qualifies this for federal help.(usingIRS15p) What is it that makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 4 attachments money9p.pdf 120K money40p.pdf 452K usingIRS15p.pdf 248K trail15p.pdf 547K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=apDpv4EPbqfYm5UFldKHfjRlu70fZOX7xUrAVrgjD8g=; b=vgC7spqGCrcrveSDzBFm7bXZi8Kdbi1bUFgGQ0fgi1FvBsTdDsMTojRk1dsF7RqtZa hrRUYdBsuyc3pSSzrKbxWl3PPRD64aD71k0VzCcuCXv0d+n3QW6w+SSa2IOmrOEx9HbS 9O7SnGSOJXi7gcFqESUGeOUamIseqisfyg6LtNJhabrayoui0qW+F7CnhZBgijTXSKkf GY9DZllsNI1YYWeXX03AiUl4Hh3qEAfLixi1V3cmIdNZiY4bOnsZEoyp6ytB8GCFspgX wBI9/qih/DkUdDt2oHQKDKqOTeM6qbkiWRVw3wfMfl5RCLc1yjc4KwQi8e0fXPkTcCej BOBg== https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13945c6eae657eca Page 2 of 19 Gmail - What property did the Director of DTA put his lien against? 10/7/12 11:19 AM Anthony OConnell What property did the Director of DTA put his lien against? 19 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Federal Agencies, and others, https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139499266ccafff9 Page 1 of 14 Gmail - What property did the Director of DTA put his lien against? 10/7/12 11:19 AM I don't understand why the Director of the Department of Tax Administration for Fairfax County, Virginia, won't identify the property he put his lien against. Identification, and the recognition of it by the power structure, is essential. I don't understand why the lien trail stops at the First and Citizens Bank in Highland County, Virginia. A visitor to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, using page 15 from the attachment "trail15p.pdf", should be able to see, within five minutes, whether the lien is, or is not, against my property. The lack of identification and recognition by the power structure entangles two properties that I am trying to sell; http://www.farm139.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com. Whoever controls the entanglement(s) controls the people and assets that are entangled. I don't have any control over the entanglement(s) and I don't have the power to compel the accountants to take a position on anything much less expose their accounting. Would you please ask the Director of DTA ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" (1) What property is the lien against? (2) What are the accounting trails leading to the $27,718.72 amount? Please see http://www.catbird-seat.com , it is the easiest introduction to the accountant's patterns. What is it that makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 4 attachments money9p.pdf 124K money40p.pdf 452K trail15p.pdf 554K usingIRS15p.pdf 234K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139499266ccafff9 Page 2 of 14 Gmail - RE: O'Connell, Anthony FW: Need a just power 10/7/12 11:26 AM Anthony OConnell RE: O'Connell, Anthony FW: Need a just power 2 messages Division, Criminal Dear Anthony O’Connell: Thank you for writing the Criminal Division. We have been asked to respond on the Division’s behalf. After careful consideration of your materials, it appears that you have not set forth specific facts sufficient to require action by the Department of Justice at this time. However, if you have specific details or information relative to a violation of federal criminal law, you may wish to contact the local United States Attorney's Office or the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which is the primary investigative agency for the Department of Justice. If your request concerns a civil action, you may wish to contact a private attorney. Again, thank you for writing the Criminal Division. We regret that we cannot be of further assistance. Sincerely, Correspondence Management Staff Office of Administration From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:21 AM To: FFETF Cc: Anthony OConnell Subject: Need a just power Dear Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, Please look at my websites http://www.catbird-seat.com and http://www.canweconnectthedots.com . Does this fit your purpose? If not, would you please tell me why? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Anthony OConnell Dear Correspondence Management Staff, Thank you for replying and for mentioning the local US Attorney's Office. Your reply also made me realize that I should make it more obvious that the accountants used the IRS to make money disappear, and that is a federal offense. Please see the attachment "usingIRS15p" https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1394465b23d189f4 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - RE: O'Connell, Anthony FW: Need a just power 10/7/12 11:26 AM Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee [Quoted text hidden] usingIRS15p.pdf 234K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1394465b23d189f4 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Lien: Why does the DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? 10/7/12 11:31 AM Anthony OConnell Lien: Why does the DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Federal Agencies, and others, I don't understand why the Director of DTA does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents. Would you please ask the Director ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" (1) Why do you not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1394efca106ba15c Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Lien: Why does the DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? 10/7/12 11:31 AM trust documents? (Please see the attachment "trust-documents30p") (2) How did you arrive at the figure of $27,718.72? What is it that makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 6 attachments trust-documents30p.pdf 494K trail19p.pdf 583K usingIRS15p.pdf 234K DTA15p.pdf 523K money9p.pdf 120K money40p.pdf 452K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1394efca106ba15c Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Why does the Fairfax County DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? 10/7/12 11:40 AM Anthony OConnell Why does the Fairfax County DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Federal Agencies, and others, I don't understand why the Director of DTA does not recognize the illegality of the lien; I don't understand why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents. I don't have power. Would you please ask the Director ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? (Please see page 17 in the attachment "trust-documents30p"), and (2) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? Would you please ask Mr. Deeds ("Creigh Deeds" What is it that makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 6 attachments usingIRS15p.pdf 234K trust-documents30p.pdf 494K money40p.pdf 452K money9p.pdf 120K DTA15p.pdf 523K lien-trail19p.pdf 589K John Rife Mr. O'Connell: As you know, my firm has been retained by Fairfax County to collect certain delinquent real estate taxes. The fees associated with our service are the responsibility of the delinquent taxpayer to pay. The amount referred for collection totals to $23,124.36 in tax, penalty and interest and $4,613.64 as a collection fee. These figures are current through 8/31 and any variance from the amount you indicated results from interest accrual. Be aware that any costs of litigation to sell this property for the delinquent taxes due will be collected from the sale as a part of the proceedings and are not included in these figures. I will attempt to answer your questions as clearly and as simple as possible. https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139535b0c267d6f2 Page 2 of 3 Gmail - Why does the Fairfax County DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? 10/7/12 11:40 AM 1. There are delinquent taxes due on the property located in Fairfax County listed in the name of Anthony M. O'Connell TR (Trustee). 2. There is no personal liability asserted on you for these delinquent taxes. While you as trustee may have duties under the Trust Agreement to pay these taxes, failure to pay does not impart personal liability upon the trustee. I will note that you have yet to indicate whether the Trust intends to pay these taxes. 3. I believe you are confused by the terms 'lien' and 'levy'. Virginia local governments have the administrative authority under Virginia Code Sec. 58.1-3952 to place a lien upon funds that are being held for the benefit of a delinquent taxpayer. The lien/levy that was issued upon the bank in Highland County was against any funds the bank may have held for the trust. There were no funds found and that levy has been released. 4. There is no lien placed by Fairfax County against any real property you may own in Highland County. In this email, I have attempted to answer each of your questions raised. Yet again, I encourage you to seek the assistance of an attorney who may be able to more fully answer your inquiries. If you do not retain counsel and if you have further questions about this matter, I or a member of my staff will be pleased to discuss this with you and attempt to establish a payment plan that is suitable to pay the taxes within a reasonable amount of time. If you do not feel comfortable speaking with me, you may reach my staff at 703-880-1078. John A. Rife, Partner Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 23113 (804) 545-2379 Direct Phone (703) 880-1078 General Collections (804) 545-2378 Fax [email protected] This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and privileged communications by attorney-client privilege. The disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the original sender. Thank you for your cooperation. [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139535b0c267d6f2 Page 3 of 3 Gmail - Your letter of August 20, 2012 10/7/12 11:41 AM Anthony OConnell Your letter of August 20, 2012 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Vernon Wooddell, CEO, Thank you for your letter of August 20, 2012. You mentioned that you received notice that the lien had been released. Would you please send me a copy the release and other other related documents? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell. Trustee Vernon Wooddell Mr. O'Connell, I will be happy to do so. Copies of both the "Notice of Lien and Demand for Payment" and "Release of Lien" received from Taxing Authority Consulting Service, P. C. will be mailed to you today. Take care, Vernon [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1395610b5c7b3012 Page 1 of 1 Gmail - DTA lien illegal 10/7/12 2:28 PM Anthony OConnell DTA lien illegal 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Federal Agencies, and others, I don't understand why the Director of DTA does not recognize that his lien is illegal. Would you please ask the Director (1) To explain why "Trustee not individually liable" on page 18 in the attachment "trust-documents35p" would not mean what it says, and (2) How he arrived at the lien https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139589591472cb85 Page 1 of 3 Gmail - DTA lien illegal 10/7/12 2:28 PM figure of $27,718.72? ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Highland County property described at page 15 in the attachment "illegal-lien24p"? ("Creigh Deeds" What is it that makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Isn't it obvious that families are powerless? Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 6 attachments money9p.pdf 120K money40p.pdf 452K usingIRS15p.pdf 234K illegal-lien24p.pdf 652K trust-documents35p.pdf 643K DTA15p.pdf 527K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13). https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139589591472cb85 Page 2 of 3 Gmail - DTA illegal lien 10/7/12 2:35 PM Anthony OConnell DTA illegal lien 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Fairfax County, Highland County, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Federal Agencies, and others, I don't understand why the Director of DTA does not recognize that the lien is illegal. Would you please ask the Director ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" liable" on page 18 of trust-documents35p? (2) To explain why he does not recognize the Trust's deed for Accotink on page 2 of trust-documents35p? If you look at https://www.canweconnectthedots.com, and under "Accotink", click "deed-dnr, you can see that I tried approximately 117 times to get the Trust's deed for Accotink recognized. It would not be prudent to try to sell Accotink when the deed is not recognized. (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? It is necessary to expose the accounting trails to expose accounting fraud. Would you please ask the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Highland County property described at page 15 in the attachment "illegal-lien24p"? ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out what imakes the accountants not have to be accountable? Thank you. Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; entangle Accotink and farm) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent; can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 6 attachments illegal-lien24p.pdf 652K invisible16p.pdf 533K money9p.pdf 120K money40p.pdf 452K trust-documents35p.pdf 644K usingIRS15p.pdf 234K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1395eb43eb680b7d Page 2 of 2 Gmail - 1992 trust documents prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B's 10/2/12 6:44 AM Anthony OConnell 1992 trust documents prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B's 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Ms Collenn Crowley and Mr. Jonthan Rak; I included you on my "DTA lien illegal" email list on August 24 because of an interesting (and tragic) situation. The Director of DTA Kevin Greenlief does not recognize the Trust Deed and Trust Agreement ("Trustee not individually liable") prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B in 1992. You and I know these are good documents and should be recognized. But the documents have to be recognized by the power structure for them to fulfill their purpose. So what does the law firm that prepared the documents and the client of the law firm do? Does the law firm guarantee that their documents will be accepted by the County; or say there is nothing they can do; or look the other way, or what? I, the client, can't hire an attorney to defend the documents because, for one, that would be falling for the two- attorneys representing different members of one family trap; and history suggests, in the situation that we have been put in, that the two attorneys would tear the family apart under the guise of helping the family and money will disappear behind the confusion and conflict. Do you have a solution? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee 439 S Vista Del Rio Green Valley, Arizona 85614 (no telephone) Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien) (This website) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent, can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 3 attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 843K invisible19p.pdf 575K trust-documents38p.pdf 674K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1396520fdda937df Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Our family needs a just power. 10/5/12 8:12 PM Anthony OConnell Our family needs a just power. 1 message Anthony OConnell Our family needs a just power. I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia, and I don't have the power to get answers. Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of DTA: (1) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 is not recognized? See page 18 of "trust-documents38p". (2) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139683900a7b2fb1 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Our family needs a just power. 10/5/12 8:12 PM Would you please ask the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County, Virginia? See page 3 of "illegal-lien26p". I live in Arizona. ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Thank you. Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property for sale in Fairfax County) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property for sale in Highland County) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; what the lien is against remains unknown) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Our family is innocent) 3 attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K illegal-lien26p.pdf 843K invisible19p.pdf 580K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139683900a7b2fb1 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Need a just power 10/5/12 8:17 PM Anthony OConnell Need a just power 2 messages Anthony OConnell We need a just power to intervene; I don't have the power to get answers. Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of DTA: (1) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 is not recognized? See page 18 of "trust-documents38p". (2) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1396f509679c8484 Page 1 of 4 Gmail - Need a just power 10/5/12 8:17 PM Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County, Virginia? See page 3 of "illegal-lien26p". I live in Arizona. ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Thank you. Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property for sale in Fairfax County) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property for sale in Highland County) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; what the lien is against remains unknown) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Our family is innocent) 3 attachments — Download all attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K View Download illegal-lien26p.pdf 843K View Download invisible19p.pdf 580K View Download Greenlief, Kevin C. -----Original Message----- From: John Rife [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:23 AM To: Anthony OConnell Cc: Greenlief, Kevin C. Subject: RE: Why does the Fairfax County DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? Mr. O'Connell: As you know, my firm has been retained by Fairfax County to collect certain delinquent real estate taxes. The fees associated with our service are the responsibility of the delinquent taxpayer to pay. The amount referred for collection totals to $23,124.36 in tax, penalty and interest and $4,613.64 as a collection fee. These figures are current https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1396f509679c8484 Page 2 of 4 Gmail - Need a just power 10/5/12 8:17 PM through 8/31 and any variance from the amount you indicated results from interest accrual. Be aware that any costs of litigation to sell this property for the delinquent taxes due will be collected from the sale as a part of the proceedings and are not included in these figures. I will attempt to answer your questions as clearly and as simple as possible. 1. There are delinquent taxes due on the property located in Fairfax County listed in the name of Anthony M. O'Connell TR (Trustee). 2. There is no personal liability asserted on you for these delinquent taxes. While you as trustee may have duties under the Trust Agreement to pay these taxes, failure to pay does not impart personal liability upon the trustee. I will note that you have yet to indicate whether the Trust intends to pay these taxes. 3. I believe you are confused by the terms 'lien' and 'levy'. Virginia local governments have the administrative authority under Virginia Code Sec. 58.1-3952 to place a lien upon funds that are being held for the benefit of a delinquent taxpayer. The lien/levy that was issued upon the bank in Highland County was against any funds the bank may have held for the trust. There were no funds found and that levy has been released. 4. There is no lien placed by Fairfax County against any real property you may own in Highland County. In this email, I have attempted to answer each of your questions raised. Yet again, I encourage you to seek the assistance of an attorney who may be able to more fully answer your inquiries. If you do not retain counsel and if you have further questions about this matter, I or a member of my staff will be pleased to discuss this with you and attempt to establish a payment plan that is suitable to pay the taxes within a reasonable amount of time. If you do not feel comfortable speaking with me, you may reach my staff at 703-880-1078. John A. Rife, Partner Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 23113 (804) 545-2379 Direct Phone (703) 880-1078 General Collections (804) 545-2378 Fax This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and privileged communications by attorney-client privilege. The https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1396f509679c8484 Page 3 of 4 Gmail - Need a just power 10/5/12 8:17 PM disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the original sender. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 6:19 PM Subject: Need a just power [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1396f509679c8484 Page 4 of 4 Gmail - Commissioner of Accounts John H. Rust and Staff; exposing Bk467p191 10/5/12 8:15 PM Anthony OConnell Commissioner of Accounts John H. Rust and Staff; exposing Bk467p191 4 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Commissioner of Accounts John H. Rust Jr. and Staff; I was pleasantly surprised (understatement) to see email addresses for the Commissioner of Accounts Office. It has been my experience that a willingness to show email addresses shows a willingness for transparency and accountability. Would you please use your power to have the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White expose their accounting at Bk467p191; to untangle their accounting entanglements, and show where the money went? I don't understand why both of my attached Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report disappeared. You can see that both had been stamped as being received by the Court. Can we follow the document trails from that point and see what happened to them? The Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report for the estate was filed on June 16, 1994. The Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report for the trust was filed on August 23, 2000. The latter contains a copy of my actual 12th trust account and a copy of the Report of it to the Judges. They are different. The Commissioner at the time closed the trust account against the trustee's efforts to expose the accounting of the CPA and the Attorney. Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee for a Virginia Land Trust that the accounting at Bk467p191 entangles References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property for sale in Fairfax County) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property for sale in Highland County) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; what the lien is against remains unknown) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate; Bk467p191? Our family is innocent) 4 attachments exceptions1994-3p.pdf 56K exceptions2000-52p.pdf 853K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1396e33e334f306b Page 1 of 3 Gmail - Commissioner of Accounts John H. Rust and Staff; exposing Bk467p191 10/5/12 8:15 PM money9p.pdf 120K money40p.pdf 452K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ehMygHjhWQQ4lOMGu9unWV3+YfYXtKaq2vrLtQfo69g=; b=ceIeSQDQNGD6zpwS/lfChqPs2P/Mgm1t1UUhr0Z2OlKhhGxr5w0wmnkcM8zA97IMkC wyn8P5zg8lO07BR0FuVT65YNFoUadoXgBxaxXSDx/t6WM2HTSLMktiX3ig52RevqPcCa OIC2Z+4eC6mVgnN7TiYQN2T49gCSywQL6qe3FJl79KTYRGCUOiW8tHpo75uUZvRw+A9M 23/liLdlWbmR8wiP6AM600Y3DWihsaURuBkrSTD3mXYJ0rUq0Epl2RZm1FaHXVOkZd2S LbnAstlV2GegAyjm2SgVyztvicq6FdjmMpLd0cZjG65tDlWeIi5C0gEHaZ8TmSnbFASC zBcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.85.69 with SMTP id p5mr14714789icl.24.1346173661033; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.134 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:07:38 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1396e33e334f306b Page 2 of 3 Gmail - DTA illegal lien; suggested solution 10/5/12 8:19 PM Anthony OConnell DTA illegal lien; suggested solution 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Highland County, Problem: The Fairfax County DTA had an illegal lien recorded in the Highland County Court records (can we look at the evidence); illegal because the lien is for back taxes on a trust property in Fairfax County, and instead of putting the lien on the trust property where it should be, the DTA put the lien on the Trustee's individual's property in Highland County, The trust documents say "Trustee not individually https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139753ccd23da02f Page 1 of 3 Gmail - DTA illegal lien; suggested solution 10/5/12 8:19 PM liable" (Bk8845p1453 in the Fairfax County Court records). Suggested solution: If Highland County didn't know about Fairfax County's Bk8845p1453 when the DTA lien was recorded, wouldn't that mean that Highland County accepted the DTA lien in good faith, and therefor was not at fault? Now that Highland County is aware of Bk8845p1453, should Highland County use Bk8845p1454 as justification to remove the DTA lien from it's records? Would that be Highland County's best choice? If so, please send me a copy of what DTA had recorded, and a copy of what was used to remove it. Thank you Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell 439 South Vista Del Rio Green Valley, Arizona 85614 References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property for sale in Fairfax County) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property for sale in Highland County) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; what the lien is against remains unknown) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Our family is innocent) 3 attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K invisible5p.pdf 53K farm1989deed7p.pdf 153K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.7.0 ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139753ccd23da02f Page 2 of 3 September Gmail - Questions about DTA's lien remain unanswered 10/5/12 8:22 PM Anthony OConnell Questions about DTA's lien remain unanswered 2 messages Anthony OConnell I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. Is there a just power who will? We need a just power, transparency, and accountability. Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County when the Trust property is in Fairfax County? https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139825bad7418df0 Page 1 of 3 Gmail - Questions about DTA's lien remain unanswered 10/5/12 8:22 PM (2) What his lien is against now? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County? Please see the attachment "individual-property8p". ("Creigh Deeds" If a transparent and accountable position that all can rely upon cannot be obtained, would you please have someone go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the public records, and send me a copy of what you find? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Please see http://www.catbird-seat.com Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; Need transparency and accountability) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 5 attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 847K individual-property8p.pdf 167K invisible19p.pdf 580K nutshell5p.pdf 236K trust-documents38p.pdf 625K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.7.0 ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NOskBi4iJ/WQyvh2Fz0Xi2ph1ptdLcCRY9BidXRU3p0=; b=lvSYIRHdpupj9lF6YWbffCVlfyNnFbj1Aek7JLhqm1/pW3iAUDwROa+IjAeDj3oo5Z fZAd378AL1lTMc82B+ReTk70TpWF/2F6XJk58LrjYj6xdn9rhEsm3G8GmuPfu+s9sBnE 2vErh2PWtRTjff7dnIyMaeyPHlTmt0VrFe2XNh7K71Jm5dnjxEfsdDdnITwVjzO5DT9h xFxunzyG8uGi2JbqOmUGUJq05uIIsDl7PDqeJ+FGPKxwCm2VsJB9qpAmqkwvlh9bYIWG 1lbVwKwwsGT+Ofjn+Q2AINoSBJiQW0zQ7AlF0/DCa4Uev0JsdW4YzV34ukJdZaKo+Gzr jK0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.19.195 with SMTP id h3mr10291911oee.102.1346511811064; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 08:03:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 08:03:30 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139825bad7418df0 Page 3 of 3 Gmail - DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 10/5/12 8:28 PM Anthony OConnell DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Attorney General Cuccinelli; I don't understand why we can't find out where the money went in our mother's estate; why the accounting trails behind Bk467p191 in the Fairfax County Court records can't be exposed. I've tried since 1992. Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? If anyone with the power to do it wants to find out if the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White make money dissappear, and cover it up by creating confusion and conflict in their client's family until the family is torn apart; have them expose the accounting trails at Bk467p191 and find out where the money went. The accountants take over assets by entangling them in their accounting. Who ever controls the entanglement controls the people and assets that are entangled. Currently, the Director of DTA for Fairfax County does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the Trust document at Bk8845p1453, and his lien ignoring this entangles our family and our family's property. It's amazing; no one sees "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453. I've sent out variations of the email pasted to the bottom of this email approximately 20 to 25 times. We've had twenty years of kill the messenger and look the other way; Would you please use your power to make "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 visible, expose Bk467p191, and actually find out where the money went? Time is running out. Would you please say yes or no? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee I've sent out variations of the following email approximately 20 to 25 times: Dear [multiple recipients] I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. Is there a just power who will? We need a just power, transparency, and accountability. Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County when the Trust property is in Fairfax County? (2) What his lien is against now? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13989c7238baf54b Page 1 of 2 Gmail - DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 10/5/12 8:28 PM Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County? Please see the attachment "individual-property8p". ("Creigh Deeds" If a transparent and accountable position that all can rely upon cannot be obtained, would you please have someone go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the public records, and send me a copy of what you find? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Please see http://www.catbird-seat. com Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; Entangles and takes control of both Fairfax County and Highland County properties; Need transparency and accountability) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 5 attachments — Download all attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 847K View Download individual-property8p.pdf 167K View Download invisible19p.pdf 580K View Download nutshell5p.pdf 236K View Download trust-documents38p.pdf 625K View Download response4p.pdf 260K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13989c7238baf54b Page 2 of 2 Gmail - DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 10/5/12 8:30 PM Anthony OConnell DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Chief Deputy Attorney General Patricia L. West; I don't understand why we can't find out where the money went in our mother's estate; why the accounting trails behind Bk467p191 in the Fairfax County Court records can't be exposed. I've tried since 1992. Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? If anyone with the power to do it wants to find out if the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White make money dissappear, and cover it up by creating confusion and conflict in their client's family until the family is torn apart; have them expose the accounting trails at Bk467p191 and find out where the money went. The accountants take over assets by entangling them in their accounting. Who ever controls the entanglement controls the people and assets that are entangled. Currently, the Director of DTA for Fairfax County does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the Trust document at Bk8845p1453, and his lien ignoring this entangles our family and our family's property. It's amazing; no one sees "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453. I've sent out variations of the email pasted to the bottom of this email approximately 20 to 25 times. We've had twenty years of kill the messenger and look the other way; Would you please use your power to make "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 visible, expose Bk467p191, and actually find out where the money went? Time is running out. Would you please say yes or no? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee I've sent out variations of the following email approximately 20 to 25 times: Dear [multiple recipients] I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. Is there a just power who will? We need a just power, transparency, and accountability. Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County when the Trust property is in Fairfax County? (2) What his lien is against now? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13989cfc6da9290a Page 1 of 2 Gmail - DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 10/5/12 8:30 PM Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County? Please see the attachment "individual-property8p". ("Creigh Deeds" If a transparent and accountable position that all can rely upon cannot be obtained, would you please have someone go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the public records, and send me a copy of what you find? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Please see http://www.catbird-seat. com Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; Entangles and takes control of both Fairfax County and Highland County properties; Need transparency and accountability) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 5 attachments — Download all attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 847K View Download individual-property8p.pdf 167K View Download invisible19p.pdf 580K View Download nutshell5p.pdf 236K View Download trust-documents38p.pdf 625K View Download response4p.pdf 260K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13989cfc6da9290a Page 2 of 2 Gmail - DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 10/5/12 8:33 PM Anthony OConnell DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Lt Governor Bolling; I don't understand why we can't find out where the money went in our mother's estate; why the accounting trails behind Bk467p191 in the Fairfax County Court records can't be exposed. I've tried since 1992. Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? If anyone with the power to do it wants to find out if the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White make money dissappear, and cover it up by creating confusion and conflict in their client's family until the family is torn apart; have them expose the accounting trails at Bk467p191 and find out where the money went. The accountants take over assets by entangling them in their accounting. Who ever controls the entanglement controls the people and assets that are entangled. Currently, the Director of DTA for Fairfax County does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the Trust document at Bk8845p1453, and his lien ignoring this entangles our family and our family's property. It's amazing; no one sees "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453. I've sent out variations of the email pasted to the bottom of this email approximately 20 to 25 times. We've had twenty years of kill the messenger and look the other way; Would you please use your power to make "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 visible, expose Bk467p191, and actually find out where the money went? Time is running out. Would you please say yes or no? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee I've sent out variations of the following email approximately 20 to 25 times: Dear [multiple recipients] I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. Is there a just power who will? We need a just power, transparency, and accountability. Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County when the Trust property is in Fairfax County? (2) What his lien is against now? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13989d9d008bc3bb Page 1 of 3 Gmail - DTA lien; Bk467p191; Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? 10/5/12 8:33 PM Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County? Please see the attachment "individual-property8p". ("Creigh Deeds" If a transparent and accountable position that all can rely upon cannot be obtained, would you please have someone go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the public records, and send me a copy of what you find? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Please see http://www.catbird-seat. com Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; Entangles and takes control of both Fairfax County and Highland County properties; Need transparency and accountability) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 5 attachments — Download all attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 847K View Download individual-property8p.pdf 167K View Download invisible19p.pdf 580K View Download nutshell5p.pdf 236K View Download trust-documents38p.pdf 625K View Download response4p.pdf 260K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13989d9d008bc3bb Page 2 of 3 Gmail - Please take a position 10/6/12 6:59 PM Anthony OConnell Please take a position 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Mr. McCauley [Virginia Bar]; I don't understand why Director Greenlief responded to my questions of August 28 with Attorney John Rife's email of August 23. This would make Mr. Greenlief's level of transparency and accountability zero. Do you approve or disapprove of Mr. Greenlief using the Attorney to speak for him? Which one is true; Is (1) "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 true, or is (2) Attorney John Rife's email of August 23 true? Please take a position. Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference. (Please see the attachment response4p.pdf) My questions of August 28 were: (1) Why he [Director Greenlief] does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 is not recognized? See page 18 of "trust- documents38p". (2) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? Mr. Greenlief's response was: [From] Greenlief, Kevin C. -----Original Message----- From: John Rife [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:23 AM To: Anthony OConnell Cc: Greenlief, Kevin C. Subject: RE: Why does the Fairfax County DTA not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" in the trust documents? Mr. O'Connell: As you know, my firm has been retained by Fairfax County to collect certain delinquent real estate taxes. The fees associated with our service are the responsibility of the delinquent taxpayer to pay. The amount referred for collection totals to $23,124.36 in tax, penalty and interest and $4,613.64 as a collection fee. These figures https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=inbox&th=13987e0db890f093 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Please take a position 10/6/12 6:59 PM are current through 8/31 and any variance from the amount you indicated results from interest accrual. Be aware that any costs of litigation to sell this property for the delinquent taxes due will be collected from the sale as a part of the proceedings and are not included in these figures. I will attempt to answer your questions as clearly and as simple as possible. 1. There are delinquent taxes due on the property located in Fairfax County listed in the name of Anthony M. O'Connell TR (Trustee). 2. There is no personal liability asserted on you for these delinquent taxes. While you as trustee may have duties under the Trust Agreement to pay these taxes, failure to pay does not impart personal liability upon the trustee. I will note that you have yet to indicate whether the Trust intends to pay these taxes. 3 I believe you are confused by the terms 'lien' and 'levy'. Virginia local governments have the administrative authority under Virginia Code Sec. 58.1-3952 to place a lien upon funds that are being held for the benefit of a delinquent taxpayer. The lien/levy that was issued upon the bank in Highland County was against any funds the bank may have held for the trust. There were no funds found and that levy has been released. 4. There is no lien placed by Fairfax County against any real property you may own in Highland County. In this email, I have attempted to answer each of your questions raised. Yet again, I encourage you to seek the assistance of an attorney who may be able to more fully answer your inquiries. If you do not retain counsel and if you have further questions about this matter, I or a member of my staff will be pleased to discuss this with you and attempt to establish a payment plan that is suitable to pay the taxes within a reasonable amount of time. If you do not feel comfortable speaking with me, you may reach my staff at 703-880-1078. John A. Rife, Partner Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC Post Office Box 1270 Midlothian, Virginia 2311 response4p.pdf 258K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=inbox&th=13987e0db890f093 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA lien 10/6/12 7:22 PM Anthony OConnell Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA lien 3 messages Anthony OConnell I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. Is there a just power who will? We need a just power, transparency, and accountability. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County when the Trust property is in Fairfax County? (2) What his lien is against now? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust- documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County? Please see the attachment "individual-property8p". ("Creigh Deeds" If a transparent and accountable position that all can rely upon cannot be obtained, would you please have someone go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the public records, and send me a copy of what you find? https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1398ba32c3a3071f Page 1 of 3 Gmail - Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA lien 10/6/12 7:22 PM Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Please see http://www.catbird-seat.com Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; Need transparency and accountability) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 5 attachments — Download all attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 847K View Download individual-property8p.pdf 167K View Download invisible19p.pdf 580K View Download nutshell5p.pdf 236K View Download trust-documents38p.pdf 625K View Download response4p.pdf 260K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.7.0 ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=riphy6mYbNscIS52BiKypp1T1VEwyIhbjwokwjzNlN8=; b=HQvfbXTOJmLKrsr+xbtBrZ2ABlr54gmNwZhhKj9pdARPAXbpD2mMy21Io8bjGwHtmW ehvRB113MvH8ofJT2fC9tu4IGYGC6meBMqltmx7LxMXks8xt7jt5zrJIwPwFOJRNkphP NJ1OtTxHrSJGaLm3cU+uT12vh9uBsvG1DLlDOg2WNL4Kfrn1sJbJi4m1uAmj+E1Sbi+O oLaAZISd4ozqaQAnTNQbb6uzjmLUsZlv6weI8lIDL/ER0O2zvazVdy6DoWBkUGBENGHp 1ONyq3quf9g9dDO4lQWgaB+PJ6p1CujR8uXiWtsuAPQRkoeY8NolL6BBJ7hHycTG7cJp yKZg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.7.104 with SMTP id i8mr13371140oea.31.1346667491446; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 03:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 03:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 03:18:10 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1398ba32c3a3071f Page 2 of 3 Gmail - Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA lien 10/6/12 7:22 PM DTA lien From: Anthony OConnell Lisa Kodger Dear Mr. O'Connell, FYI...I am marking your email address as spam as I do not believe the content of your emails apply to The Blue Grass Valley Bank. Thank you, Lisa Kodger [Quoted text hidden] -- Lisa Kodger Loan Officer The Blue Grass Valley Bank P.O. Box 516 Monterey, VA 24465 Phone (540) 468-1915 Fax (540) 468-1919 [email protected] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1398ba32c3a3071f Page 3 of 3 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:53 PM Anthony OConnell Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 4 messages Anthony OConnell Dear those who have the power to expose: I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. There is an opaque trail that starts in the public records at the Fairfax County Court (Point A), and goes, and this is my best guess because it is opaque, to the public records at the Highland County Court (Point B). Point A is clear; Point A at Bk8845p1453 says "Trustee not individually liable". Point B is not clear; Point B is a lien against a trust property in Fairfax County but the lien was sent to Highland County where the Trustee has individual property. Would you, or would you please have someone, go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the deed for the Trustee's individual property at Bk87p240, and send me a copy of what you might find? (individual-property8p) To get an idea of what you would be dealing with, please take what I'm calling a stay on the trail test (trail-test9p). If you think it is impossible for everyone to look the other way from what is on the public record, see (invisible-roadway27p) To see why I am getting all this negative attention please find out where the money went in our mother's estate; http://www. canweconnectthedots.com Would you [just power] please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County when the Trust property is in Fairfax County? (2) What his lien is against now? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1399162d28f7b1da Page 1 of 4 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:53 PM not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust- documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County? Please see the attachment "individual-property8p". ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 7 attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 847K individual-property8p.pdf 167K invisible19p.pdf 580K nutshell5p.pdf 236K trust-documents38p.pdf 625K trail-test9p.pdf 301K invisible-roadway27p.pdf 600K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Fk+zpbjqq0VTQ69YXUnnFAW1wAuKGD+Audlcr5NKn4M=; https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1399162d28f7b1da Page 2 of 4 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:56 PM Anthony OConnell Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 6 messages Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1399720f33fb4489 Page 1 of 8 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:56 PM Dear those who have the power to expose: I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. Would someone please go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the deed at Bk87p240, and send me a copy of what might be attached? This is the crux of the matter. There is an opaque trail that starts in the public records at the Fairfax County Court (Point A), and goes, and this is my best guess because it is opaque, to the public records at the Highland County Court (Point B). Point A (point-a3p) is clear; Point A says "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453. Point B (point-b9p) is not clear; Point B is a lien sent to Highland County where the Trustee has individual property. Would someone please go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the deed at Bk87p240 for the Trustee's individual property, and send me a copy of what might be attached? To get an idea of what you would be dealing with, please take what I'm calling a stay-on-the-trail test (trail-test11p). If you think it is impossible for everyone to look the other way from what is on the public record, see (invisible-roadway27p) To see why I am getting all this negative attention please find out where the money went in our mother's estate; See http://www.canweconnectthedots.com Would you please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County, Virginia, when the Trust property is in Fairfax County, Virginia, and I live in Arizona? (2) What his lien is against? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property 54 A 31 and 54 A 32 in Highland County? Please see the attachment "individual-property8p". ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1399720f33fb4489 Page 2 of 8 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:56 PM Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 6 attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K trail-test11p.pdf 322K invisible-roadway27p.pdf 600K trust-documents38p.pdf 625K point-a3p .pdf 136K point-b9p.pdf 264K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Fp6skDM57KjaXm1Q0mpPKS8zQhCNWbGAByM6ryxC7x0=; b=iKA1Js5joq5KPF5x7rdCroixP6PgesWTt24y4aEZCBVkttMGRGZnxX0iV0OvumqSz+ f742JM7cFgXuFxKnjp3WHIO55vPBfzqVZvdOFqpTLGoA621STkYYCnzCJQZAHUNa6Ept t6cQ2Biym+ALtdgmUvR2rRQ/eJTQpGU5aUNzU/dmA3UHksEpY4xnG9Q085uUoGr50FAw E95drfuUtT2+bbb0HEMzLDSyyvG40Aq3zfPK9pf9rapRSr+FVkJlAfGxtMlU7Mt+13qk HcCK+++c5Rw2L5AhRb8Wk3ddGw3vSohaHCc5s6bBEVfCcLTdE7vUn1NuSRetzKz1shcO 1Ojw== https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1399720f33fb4489 Page 3 of 8 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:58 PM Anthony OConnell Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 4 messages Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1399c18852cd859d Page 1 of 6 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:58 PM Dear those who have the power to expose: I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. There is an opaque trail that starts in the public records at the Fairfax County Court (Point A), and goes, and this is my best guess because it is opaque, to the public records at the Highland County Court (Point B). Point A (point-a3p) is clear; Point A says "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453. Point B (point-b9p) is not clear; Point B is a lien sent to Highland County where the Trustee has individual property. Would someone please go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the deed at Bk87p240 for the Trustee's individual property, and send me a copy of what might be attached? This is the crux of the matter. To get an idea of what you might be dealing with, please take what I'm calling a stay-on-the-trail test (trail-test11p). To see why I am getting all this negative attention please try to find out where the money went in our mother's estate; See http://www.canweconnectthedots.com Would you please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County, Virginia, when the Trust property is in Fairfax County, Virginia, and the Trustee lives in Arizona? (2) What his lien is against? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 in the public records at the Fairfax County Court? Please see the attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property in Highland County? Please see the attachment "point-b9p". ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=1399c18852cd859d Page 2 of 6 Gmail - Need exposure. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien 10/5/12 8:58 PM References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 4 attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K point-a3p .pdf 136K point-b9p.pdf 264K trail-test11p.pdf 322K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/DUows9M2R91LVmVco2D6MypPXH/DVfp7pZ+NoUYKVQ=; b=zMtGU+/2Rj3MdJ/BkTOVHh17uhWMSmxkjLLghZC5r8EmRlEejiK8TmmkbMJc1yOWJY A4XoI9RjA2RB51ajLa5+Akah90CmIsQqpK+DbZlnKv+YCLSIbZOQbu6iX9+PiT7JxcPL hrhvrNwGgyybks/sn+tkvNNi+kaZ8y6BJy/Q+2xjtSLKArck1E68kxwzuYk75LYQZ4tj eyg4sRlf+NjCtFLY5kMTLJ7YOT4NzCpPZrgGMIVWe/rcE7y4YCp1dELgMI+His4prUdi QHpSIEmL6M/cQMuPoAEj9UdWgJZ+oqqs1XpO/hPDlgd3F7JSU4/nND2nOpksv12DLfk3 Up4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.25.193 with SMTP id e1mr2375855oeg.87.1346943618071; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:00:16 -0700 Message-ID: Anthony OConnell Please, need answers. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien. 2 messages Anthony OConnell To those who have the power to get answers; https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139a2347ffac8ecf Page 1 of 3 Gmail - Please, need answers. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien. 10/5/12 9:00 PM I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. There is an opaque trail that starts in the public records at the Fairfax County Court (Point A), and goes, and this is my best guess because it is opaque, to the public records at the Highland County Court (Point B). Point A (point-a3p) is clear; Point A says "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453. Point B (point-b9p) is not clear; Point B is a lien sent to Highland County where the Trustee has individual property. Would someone please go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the deed at Bk87p240 for the Trustee's individual property, and send me a copy of what might be attached? This is the crux of the matter. To get an idea of what you might be dealing with, please take what I'm calling a stay-on-the-trail test (trail-test11p). To see why I am getting all this negative attention please try to find out where the money went in our mother's estate; See http://www.canweconnectthedots.com Would you please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County, Virginia, when the Trust property is in Fairfax County, Virginia, and the Trustee lives in Arizona? (2) What his lien is against? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453? See attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. (5) Why he does not recognize the trust deed. It would not be prudent to try to sell the trust property when the trust deed is not recognized. See attachment "trust-deed-invisible175p" ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask Mr. McCauley of the Virginia Bar if there is any reason for "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 to not mean what it says? (James McCauley" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property in Highland County? Please see the attachment "point-b9p". ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139a2347ffac8ecf Page 2 of 3 Gmail - Please, need answers. Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien. 10/5/12 9:00 PM References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 6 attachments trail-test11p.pdf 322K point-a3p .pdf 136K point-b9p.pdf 264K trust-documents38p.pdf 625K trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf 958K invisible-roadway27p.pdf 600K John Dougherty Anthony, I appreciate your concerns and issue. However, I cannot do this work at this time. I'm swamped. I suggest you contact an person who lives in Fairfax County-- which , by the way, is where I grew up and my parents still live. Best, John [Quoted text hidden] -- John Dougherty InvestigativeMedia.com 602-710-4089 https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139a2347ffac8ecf Page 3 of 3 Gmail - What is the DTA lien against? Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk467p191 not recognized? 10/5/12 9:02 PM Anthony OConnell What is the DTA lien against? Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk467p191 not recognized? 1 message Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139ad7dbc48685ad Page 1 of 3 Gmail - What is the DTA lien against? Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk467p191 not recognized? 10/5/12 9:02 PM To those who have the power to get answers; I am Trustee for our family's remaining property in Fairfax County, Virginia. I live in Arizona and don't have the power to get answers. There is an opaque trail that starts in the public records at the Fairfax County Court (Point A), and goes, and this is my best guess because it is opaque, to the public records at the Highland County Court (Point B). Point A (point-a3p) is clear; Point A says "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453. Point B (point-b9p) is not clear; Point B is a lien sent to Highland County where the Trustee has individual property. Would someone please go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look at the deed at Bk87p240 for the Trustee's individual property, and send me a copy of what might be attached? This is the crux of the matter. To get an idea of what you might be dealing with, please take what I'm calling a stay-on-the-trail test (trail-test11p). To see why I am getting all this negative attention please try to find out where the money went in our mother's estate; See http://www.canweconnectthedots.com Would you please ask the Fairfax County Director of the Department of Tax Administration (DTA): (1) Why he sent his lien to Highland County, Virginia, when the Trust property is in Fairfax County, Virginia, and the Trustee lives in Arizona? (2) What his lien is against? (3) How he arrived at the lien figure of $27,718.72? (4) Why he does not recognize that the Trustee is not individually liable for trust property; why he does not recognize "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453? See attachment "trust-documents38p", page 18. (5) Why he does not recognize the trust deed. It would not be prudent to try to sell the trust property when the trust deed is not recognized. See attachment "trust-deed-invisible175p" ("Kevin Greenlief, Director of DTA" Would you please ask Mr. Deeds to take a position on the following so that all can rely upon it: Is there, or is there not, a lien against the Trustee's individual property in Highland County? Please see the attachment "point-b9p". ("Creigh Deeds" Can we find out where the money went in our mother's estate; at Bk467p191? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? How would the public ever know how the accountants Attorney Edward White and the CPA Joanne Barnes work unless their accounting is exposed? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Can we find out why "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk467p191 is not being honored? Is there an invisible wall around what should be public? To protect accountants that make money disappear? https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139ad7dbc48685ad Page 2 of 3 Gmail - What is the DTA lien against? Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk467p191 not recognized? 10/5/12 9:02 PM Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien) (This site is currently messy; in progress) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 7 attachments pointA3p .pdf 136K pointB13p.pdf 337K trail-test11p.pdf 322K Nutshell23p.pdf 661K illegal-lien26p.pdf 847K trust-documents38p.pdf 625K bk467p191-8p.pdf 117K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139ad7dbc48685ad Page 3 of 3 Gmail - Summons 10/5/12 9:05 PM Anthony OConnell Summons 2 messages Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139b23091ba7423f Page 1 of 3 Gmail - Summons 10/5/12 9:05 PM To those who have the power to get answers, On September 8, 2012, I received a summons from the Fairfax County Court, with our innocent sister Jean Mary O'Connell Nader as plaintiff. ("summons45p"). The contents of the summons protects the accountants, gives them more power, and is the equivalent of a death sentence for me. It is a death sentence if what it says is approved, and something makes the accountants get what the want. Something makes the accountants not have to be accountable; something makes laws not have to be enforced; something makes legal documents not have to be recognized; something makes transparency and accountability unavailable. Try to expose Bk467p191. The summons ask that I be removed as trustee of the Land Trust (Accotink). The land trust exists for twenty years; it automatically expires on October 16, 2012, and I will automatically not be trustee. Why wait 19 years and 10 1/2 months to remove me? Please compare "trusts-documents38p" with "summons45p". Which one is legal? Our innocent sister Jean Nader does not have a clue that she is being used by the accountants, and she never will until a just power visits her and tells her that what she is being told is wrong. There is no limit to the conflicts that the accountants can plant in the family and not have to be accountable. If one of you who has the power to get answers decides to get answers, please: (1) Remove the secrecy. (2) Expose the accounting at Bk467p191. This is not just a nice thing to know; it is the core of everything. (3) Common sense applies. Should we accept as true all the judgments that have been made in the past twenty years, when Bk467p191 has been unexposable for the past twenty years? Exposing Bk467p191 would explain why my reputation has been destroyed for trying to expose Bk467p191. Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee References: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien) (This site is currently messy; in progress) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 3 attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K bk467p191-8p.pdf 117K summons45P.pdf 821K Mail Delivery System https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139b23091ba7423f Page 2 of 3 Gmail - Request to Attorney General Cuccinelli; "Trustee Not Individually Liable" 10/5/12 9:09 PM Anthony OConnell Request to Attorney General Cuccinelli; "Trustee Not Individually Liable" 2 messages Anthony OConnell To Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, and others; I don't understand why the Director of DTA does not recognize the legal documents in the public records prepared by Mr. E. A. Prichard? (trust-documents38p) (1) The Trust deed at Bk8307p1446: I could never get the Director to recognize the deed for the Trust property and this blocked me from selling the trust property. (deed-not-recognized-mail175p, deed-not recognized-records94p) (2) The Trust Agreement at Bk8845p1449: I can not get the Director to recognize "Trustee Not Individually Liable" in the Trust Agreement at Bk8845p1453. (illegal-lien27p, summons8p, summons45p) (3) Would you please ask the Director ( (4) Would you please have someone go to the Highland County Court House in Monterey, Virginia, look in the Court records, and take an accountable position that all can rely upon; is there, or is there not, a lien against the trustee's individual property at B87p240? (pointA3p. pointB13p). Can we find out where the money went in our mother's estate; can we expose the accounting trails behind Bk467p191? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Sincerely, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Why is "Trustee not individually liable" at Bk8845p1453 invisible? DTA illegal lien) (This site is currently messy; in progress) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 9 attachments bk467p191-8p.pdf 117K deed-not-recognized-mail175p.pdf 958K deed-not-recognized-records94p.pdf 2480K illegal-lien27p.pdf 847K pointA3p copy.pdf 136K pointB13p copy.pdf https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139b6b265128ed1d Page 2 of 3 Gmail - Request to Attorney General Cuccinelli; "Trustee Not Individually Liable" 10/5/12 9:09 PM 337K summons8p.pdf 72K summons45p.pdf 821K trail-test11p.pdf 322K Mail Delivery System *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: "----- The delivery status notification errors -----". The line beginning with "Diagnostic-Code:" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The following lines contains the RFC822 header of the original email message. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --AOL Postmaster ----- The delivery status notification errors ----- Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected] Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected] Action: failed Status: 5.7.1 Remote-MTA: dns; core-mhb002b.r1000.mail.aol.com Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 5.7.1 Your mail could not be delivered because the recipient is not accepting any mail. If you feel you received this in error, please contact the recipient directly and ask them to check their email settings. noname 2K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139b6b265128ed1d Page 3 of 3 Gmail - Contract law and summons 10/6/12 7:50 PM Anthony OConnell Contract law and summons 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Attorney General Cuccinelli ( Attorney General Cuccinelli, please give this your personal attention before it is too late; the summons has our innocent sister Jean Nader closing two Court accounts that have outstanding Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report" against them. I do not believe you would want the Commonwealth of Virginia defending accountants who make money disappear using innocent family members as cover. Our Mother did not want her family torn apart. Please direct that Bk467p191 be exposed and protect our innocent sister Jean Nader. Does anyone see any problem with the trust documents prepared by Mr. E. A. Prichard? (trust-documents38p). Contract law: The Trust Agreement is a contract and the law of contracts applies. The law of contracts says that a contract cannot be changed unless all the parties to the contract agree to the change, and then it is a new contract. No one that is not a party to the contract can change the contract. No matter how powerful they are, no one; not a court, not the President of the United States, not the Pope, can change a contract unless they are a party to the contract. Please make yourself certain of this law. Only one party (summons) to the Trust Agreement wants to change the contract; the other parties don't. The summons is against the law of contracts and the summons should be dismissed. This is the law. The Trust Agreement says "Trustee Not Individually Liable". This is the law. Does the power structure still not recognize this? Is there any indication that they ever will? What is the probability that the power structure would recognize the contract law that would dismiss the summons? Journalists, please use your power to bring attention to the accountants patterns; imagine the story you would have if the truth came out after all these years. Please follow the trails and look at the evidence. I will respond, as soon as I can, to the summons's accusations against me using the website http://www.burntwater.net. Only a website with menus can show the complexity and nuances of the accusations. Confusion and conflict is cover and there is a lot of it. I will also respond, of course, to the Court in accordance with the summons. Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; Need transparency and accountability) (It's messy now; in progress) http://www.burntwater.net (will address accusations in summons.) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 3 attachments summons8p.pdf 72K summons45p.pdf 821K trust-documents38p.pdf 625K Cindy https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c0e6670fd9dc3 Page 2 of 3 Gmail - Contract law and summons 10/6/12 7:50 PM Have you hired an attorney to assist you? [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c0e6670fd9dc3 Page 3 of 3 Gmail - FW: 1992 trust documents prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B's 10/5/12 9:14 PM Anthony OConnell FW: 1992 trust documents prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B's 2 messages Williams, Barbara Ann Dear Mr. O’Connell: Your emails directed to Ms. Crowley and Mr. Rak have been forwarded to me. As you know, McGuireWoods LLP does not represent you in your current dispute and therefore cannot provide you any legal advice about that matter. Unsolicited information that you provide McGuireWoods may not be protected from the disclosure by the attorney-client privilege. Therefore, we respectfully ask you to stop sending emails to the firm. Barbara Ann Williams Deputy General Counsel McGuireWoods LLP One James Center 901 East Cary Street Richmond, VA 23219 804.775.4311 (Direct Line) 804.225.5408 (Direct FAX) [email protected] This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise by return e-mail and delete immediately without reading or forwarding to others. From: Anthony OConnell Dear Ms Collenn Crowley and Mr. Jonthan Rak; I included you on my "DTA lien illegal" email list on August 24 because of an interesting (and tragic) situation. The Director of DTA Kevin Greenlief does not recognize the Trust Deed and Trust Agreement ("Trustee not individually liable") prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B in 1992. You and I know these are good documents and should be recognized. But the documents have to be recognized by the power structure for them to fulfill their purpose. https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c66e78fd4c03a Page 1 of 3 Gmail - FW: 1992 trust documents prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B's 10/5/12 9:14 PM So what does the law firm that prepared the documents and the client of the law firm do? Does the law firm guarantee that their documents will be accepted by the County; or say there is nothing they can do; or look the other way, or what? I, the client, can't hire an attorney to defend the documents because, for one, that would be falling for the two-attorneys representing different members of one family trap; and history suggests, in the situation that we have been put in, that the two attorneys would tear the family apart under the guise of helping the family and money will disappear behind the confusion and conflict. Do you have a solution? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee 439 S Vista Del Rio Green Valley, Arizona 85614 (no telephone) Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust's Accotink for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Individual's farm for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien) (This website) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Our family is innocent, can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate?) 6 attachments illegal-lien26p.pdf 805K ATT00001.htm 1K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c66e78fd4c03a Page 2 of 3 Gmail - FW: 1992 trust documents prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B's 10/5/12 9:14 PM invisible19p.pdf 533K ATT00002.htm 1K trust-documents38p.pdf 609K ATT00003.htm 1K Anthony OConnell Dear Barbara Ann Williams of McGuireWoods LLP, Thank you for email of September 14, 2002. My email of August 26 said: "Dear Ms Collenn Crowley and Mr. Jonthan Rak; I included you on my "DTA lien illegal" email list on August 24 because of an interesting (and tragic) situation. The Director of DTA Kevin Greenlief does not recognize the Trust Deed and Trust Agreement ("Trustee not individually liable") prepared by E A Prichard of MWB&B in 1992. You and I know these are good documents and should be recognized. But the documents have to be recognized by the power structure for them to fulfill their purpose. So what does the law firm that prepared the documents and the client of the law firm do? Does the law firm guarantee that their documents will be accepted by the County; or say there is nothing they can do; or look the other way, or what? I, the client, can't hire an attorney to defend the documents because, for one, that would be falling for the two- attorneys representing different members of one family trap; and history suggests, in the situation that we have been put in, that the two attorneys would tear the family apart under the guise of helping the family and money will disappear behind the confusion and conflict. Do you have a solution? Thank you," Would you please give me McQuire Woods position on the following? "You and I know these are good documents and should be recognized. But the documents have to be recognized by the power structure for them to fulfill their purpose. So what does the law firm that prepared the documents and the client of the law firm do?" Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c66e78fd4c03a Page 3 of 3 Gmail - Summons and Exceptions 10/5/12 9:18 PM Anthony OConnell Summons and Exceptions 3 messages Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c6384f0955b5a Page 1 of 4 Gmail - Summons and Exceptions 10/5/12 9:18 PM Dear Attorney General Cuccinelli, Would you please say whether you will, or whether you will not, expose the accounting trails at Bk467p191? Time is running out. I believe the easiest trail to expose at Bk467p191 is $1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97, and this trail would show why none of the accountants recognize this trail. Summons-exceptions65p shows that both of my Exceptions to the Commissioners Report about the accounting were received by the Court. But then they disappeared. I asked the current Commissioner of Accounts about this but he did not reply. Please note that the summons asks that the Court do something that would make Exceptions 2000 legally disappear without it being addressed. The summons ask that I be replaced as Trustee for the trust under the will of H. A. O'Connell., which is the account that my Exceptions 2000 is against. History suggests that the accountants are not going to let my replacement Jean Nader pursue Exceptions 2000. In Exceptions 2000, please compare my actual 12th account with the report of it to the Judges. They are two different things. Please judge for yourself; have the accountants misled the Judges? If so, in how many way? Have the accountants framed the Trustee? If so, in how many ways and how many times? Please look at the parts of the summons outlined in red in summons-exceptions65p. Then look at Exceptions2000, and decide which is true. Would you please direct that the accounting at Bk467p191 be exposed so we can find out where the money went? Can we find out what makes the accountants not have to be accountable? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.catbird-seat.com (Illegal lien; Need transparency and accountability) (It's messy now; in progress) http://www.burntwater.net (will address accusations in summons.) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) 7 attachments summons-exceptions65p.pdf 1080K actual12th22p.pdf 341K report12th17p.pdf 181K exceptions1994-3p.pdf 56K exceptions2000-52p.pdf https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c6384f0955b5a Page 2 of 4 Gmail - Summons and Exceptions 10/5/12 9:18 PM exceptions2000-52p.pdf 853K summons8p copy.pdf 79K summons45p copy.pdf 821K Burch, Denise (LTGOV) Sir, Are you blind copying Lieutenant Governor Bolling on these emails? I just wanted to make sure your emails were, in fact, going to the Attorney General and not the Lieutenant Governor. Thank you. Denise Denise Burch Director of Scheduling & Constituent Services Office of the Lieutenant Governor (804)225-2440 From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 3:19 PM To: Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli Subject: Summons and Exceptions https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c6384f0955b5a Page 3 of 4 Gmail - Summons and Exceptions 10/5/12 9:18 PM [Quoted text hidden] Anthony OConnell Dear Denise Burch, Thank you for your email. Yes, I am blind coping Lt Gov Bollings and others, while putting only the Attorney General's address after "To". Anthony O'Connell, Trustee [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139c6384f0955b5a Page 4 of 4 Gmail - Questions on summons by B&K law firm 10/5/12 9:35 PM Anthony OConnell Questions on summons by B&K law firm 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Attorneys Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh and Sarah Hall; Would you please answer some questions about your summons of September 30, 2012? Question 1: Page 1 says in part: "Plaintiff v[ersus]. ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, Individually (bold mine) and in his capacity as Trustee under a Land Trust Agreement Dated October 16, 1992 and as Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell 439 S. Vista Del Rio Green Valley, Arizona 85614" Question 1: Why is the summons against me "Individually", as well as against me as Trustee, when the trust documents state that the trustee is not individually liable? (trust-documentsp38 page 18). This is illegal. If you have a justification for this, please tell me what it is. Question 2: Your Exhibit D "Second and Final Notice of Delinquent Taxes" leads to a lien. Why has it been impossible to identify the property that this lien is against? Why would this ever be concealed? Question 3: Your Exhibit B "Land Trust Agreement" The Land Trust Agreement is a contract and the law of contracts applies. No contract can be changed unless all parties to the contract agree to the change, and then it is a new contract. No one not a party to a contract can change the contract. A Court cannot change a contract. Why is your summons asking the Court to change the trust contract, and with only one of the parties to the contract asking for the change? This is illegal. If you have a justification for this, please tell me what it is. Thank you Anthony O'Connell, Trustee https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139cbefd46a2ad24 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Questions on summons by B&K law firm 10/5/12 9:35 PM 2 attachments — Download all attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K View Download summons45P.pdf 821K View Download https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139cbefd46a2ad24 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Burn a Koran? 10/6/12 8:43 PM Anthony OConnell Burn a Koran? 1 message Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139de651ef3fcd37 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Burn a Koran? 10/6/12 8:43 PM Dear Anyone, Does anyone have any suggestions of what I might do to bring attention to the accountant's accounting trails? Have a wardrobe malfunction; make a home movie of Mohammed; burn a Koran? What happened on the trail from Point A (Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453) to Point B (Summons 2012-13064 served on the Trustee as if he were individual liable). This is not rocket science. Thank you. Anthony O'Connell. Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate; at Bk467p19? Our family is innocent 3 attachments trust-documents42p.pdf 697K summons45P.pdf 824K Trustee-Not-Individually-Liable3p.pdf 60K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139de651ef3fcd37 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - summons - "individually" 10/5/12 9:33 PM Anthony OConnell summons - "individually" 1 message Anthony OConnell Reminder- If anyone thinks the public should know if there is accounting fraud behind Bk467p191, expose Bk467p191. Dear Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli, Attorneys Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh and Sarah Hal, and others: Do any of you have answers or comments to the following questions about the summons? Question 1: Page 1 says in part: "Plaintiff v[ersus]. ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, Individually (bold mine) and in his capacity as Trustee under a Land Trust Agreement Dated October 16, 1992 and as Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell 439 S. Vista Del Rio Green Valley, Arizona 85614" Why is the summons against me "Individually", as well as against me as Trustee, when the trust documents state that the trustee is not individually liable? (trust-documentsp38 page 18). If anyone knows of a justification for this, please tell me what it is. Question 2: Exhibit D "Second and Final Notice of Delinquent Taxes" leads to a lien. Why has it been impossible to identify the property that this lien is against? Why would the identity of a property that a lien is against be concealed? Question 3: Exhibit B "Land Trust Agreement" The Land Trust Agreement is a contract and the law of contracts applies. No contract can be changed unless all parties to the contract agree to the change, and then it is a new contract. No one not a party to a contract can change the contract. A Court cannot change a contract. Why is the summons asking the Court to change the contract, and with only one of the parties to the contract asking for the change? If anyone knows of a justification for this, please tell me what it is. Thank you Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139cca56c79b1fdc Page 2 of 3 Gmail - summons - "individually" 10/5/12 9:33 PM 2 attachments trust-documents38p.pdf 625K summons45P.pdf 821K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139cca56c79b1fdc Page 3 of 3 Gmail - Can we please recognize "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 and have summons 2012-13064 dismissed? 10/5/12 9:38 PM Anthony OConnell Can we please recognize "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 and have summons 2012-13064 dismissed? 1 message Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139d3643ee899d40 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Can we please recognize "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 and have summons 2012-13064 dismissed? 10/5/12 9:38 PM Dear Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli, Attorneys Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh and Sarah Hall of the B&K law firm, and others; I don't understand why the law is not being recognized. Can we please recognize "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 and have summons 2012-13064 dismissed? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate; at Bk467p19? Our family is innocent 3 attachments Trustee-Not-Individually-Liable3p.pdf 51K trust-documents42p.pdf 697K summons45P.pdf 824K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139d3643ee899d40 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Summons item 14 10/5/12 9:40 PM Anthony OConnell Summons item 14 1 message Anthony OConnell Dear Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli, Attorneys Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh and Sarah Hall of the B&K law firm, and others; I don't understand why "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 is not recognized, why no explanation is given, and why summons 2012-13064 is served to the Trustee as if he were individual liable. The Trustee did no wrong. Trying to expose the accounting is not wrong. The public should know how the accountants work, and the more people who recognize the patterns, the better the chances of exposure. Item 14 of the summons says: "For many years, Jean sent payment to Anthony for her share of the real estate taxes on the Property. Beginning in or about 1999, Anthony refused to accept her checks because they were made payable to "County of Fairfax." Anthony insisted that any checks for the real estat'k taxes be made payable to him individually, and he has returned or refused to forward Jean's checks to Fairfax County. Under the circumstances, Jean is unwilling to comply with Anthony's demands regarding the tax payments." I can't stop the accountants from using innocent Jean Nader to create accounting entanglements. I can't overcome their advice. I can't get innocent Jean Nader to make her reimburesment check for her share of the real estate taxes payable to "Anthony O'Connell, Trustee." Despite doing everything I could think of to prevent accounting entanglements from being created using the real estate taxes for Accotink, they have been entangled beyond hope of ever being untangled. Please see the attachment "wedge-payable11p" Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate; at Bk467p19? Our family is innocent wedge-payable11p.pdf 74K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139d80f0978f6a67 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Filing a Complaint 10/5/12 9:43 PM Anthony OConnell Filing a Complaint 2 messages Grant, Jean (BOA) How can I contact you to speak with you? Thank You!! Jean Grant Enforcement Manager Virginia Board of Accountancy Perimeter Center 9960 Mayland Drive Suite 402 Richmond ,Virginia 23233 Direct: 804-367-0725 Fax: 804-527-4409 Anthony OConnell Please, first thing; can we look at the evidence; can we expose the accounting trails at Bk467p191? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139d97996d6a266e Page 1 of 1 Gmail - Summons: Why is: "ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, INDIVIDUALLY" included in Exhibit C, item 7 A? 10/3/12 2:14 AM Anthony OConnell Summons: Why is: "ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, INDIVIDUALLY" included in Exhibit C, item 7 A? 3 messages Anthony OConnell Dear Lisa Overton, Steve Blizzard, Edward Lynch, Jr, Sarah E. Hall, Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh, and others The summons 2012-13064, Item 16, says: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139e4eec098de52a Page 1 of 4 Gmail - Summons: Why is: "ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, INDIVIDUALLY" included in Exhibit C, item 7 A? 10/3/12 2:14 AM "16. In 2007, Anthony received a reasonable offer from a potential buyer to purchase the Property. Upon information and belief, Anthony became convinced of a title defect with the Property that, in his opinion, was an impediment to the sale of the Property. A title commitment issued by Stewart Title and Escrow on April 24,2007, attached hereto as Exhibit C, did not persuade Anthony that he, as the trustee of the Land Trust, had the power to convey the Property. Because of this and other difficulties created by Anthony, the Property was not sold." Th summons Exhibit C, Item 7. A. (attachment "scheduleBsection-1p") says: "A. Deed from ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, TRUSTEE, and ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, INDIVIDUALLY (and spouse (s)), if any; marital status to be recited), to LONG BRANCH PARTNERS L. L. C. , vesting fee simple title to the subject property" Question: Why is: "ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL, INDIVIDUALLY" included here? What are the implications? Thank you, Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate; at Bk467p19? Our family is innocent 4 attachments summons45P.pdf 824K scheduleBsection-1p.pdf 35K trust-documents42p.pdf 695K Trustee-Not-Individually-Liable3p.pdf 42K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=e1IAYlELW2x1xsr+o44w2+O4luDzSxZ0Qjmc7kE1cGU=; b=Byby1Dnz+HvTyGRN7wK6OllHKzGJ4Z4WDFoHRLN0TPBnw7iE6XOoN+VJAInzNMz0yC KFsUdGdRJqgdcr4N9yJTE7k6uUY4LlE9CXYg6jxAfrEp/vD74RlreIU6Gl8tH+SAbDIq cYLA8tWG++cH96X1En7AgbBIOe/3zElbg6yulMR3w36i3U9DQbPt25N8ZM+4nc2ukjSw bBkPEliUPEOCKznd4StEeRKelCWmZn+WiqhZsjXq/WAGg1RFWjJg4bEy65Wp4gXTlIM1 d+guBm8AYquVmIgygt3uAT035ppX2xFHozQzyLSPjC+RfwrSsi2LrBEmRNpRoBTv47Jv 9x/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.144.68 with SMTP id sk4mr2026252obb.0.1348165617810; Thu, https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139e4eec098de52a Page 2 of 4 Gmail - To Jean through Amy 10/6/12 8:57 PM Anthony OConnell To Jean through Amy 1 message Anthony OConnell Jean, If you want to get to the truth try to find out where the money went in Mother's estate. There is no other way Love, Tony https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139f0a0cfd1bc54c Page 1 of 1 Gmail - phone number? 10/6/12 8:50 PM Anthony OConnell phone number? 2 messages Anthony OConnell Amy, I just tried to call your Mom at 724 337-7537 and no one answered. Is that still her number? I don't have a telephone so she can't call be back; I was using a neighbors. Please ask your mom for me to dismiss the summons against me no matter how much the accountants dissuade her. If she doesn't stop the summons process I'm dead. Tony Amy Johnson Yes that is the correct phone # Sent from my Droid Charge on Verizon 4G LTE [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139ea585797e1338 Page 1 of 1 Gmail - phone number? 10/6/12 9:01 PM Anthony OConnell phone number? 4 messages Anthony OConnell Sheila and Pierre I just tried to call you at 207 846-7901 and a recording said out of service. I called 207 650 1767 and I got Sheila's voice mail saying her mail box was full. What is a good number for me to call and at what time? I don't have a telephone so you can't call me back; I was using a neighbors. Please ask Jean Nader to dismiss her summons against me no matter how much the accountants dissuade her. If she doesn't stop the summons process I'm dead. Love, Tony pierre shevenell Yes - the phone situation is weird. We had no intention to change our number but somehow in switching phone companies ended up with 207 869 5135 - although it is only listed for me - they still list Sheila as the old number. Enough of this mind numbing stuff. Sheila is here most of the time. Evenings are the most likely. She has long phone call with some clients and meets wiht a few during the week with some unpredictability so just call any time from 8 am to midnight. love from both of us. Pierre Shevenell 663 Granite Street Freeport, ME 04032 cell (207)653-1169 at Wellness Health Associates (207) 799-7100 (fax - 799-7101) --- On Fri, 9/21/12, Anthony OConnell From: Anthony OConnell Anthony OConnell [Quoted text hidden] Anthony OConnell Pierre, Thank you. Tony [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=139ea5d72eceaab0 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM Anthony OConnell The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10 messages Anthony OConnell Dear potential just powers; Can we get to the bottom of this and expose Bk467p191 and find out where the money went? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why can't it be done? Why couldn't it be done before our family was terrorized and destroyed? https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 1 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM I am concerned that my responses to the summons the accountants had my sister serve me may be lost or not recognized; and the terms of the summons would be approved by default. So I want to leave evidence of my responses. I was served the summons on September 8, 2012. The summons says I have 21 days after being served to respond. On September 22, 2012, I responded with the attachment overview-sept22-62p.pdf. The Court received it on September 24. 2012. at 10:01 am. On September 24, 2012, I responded with the attachments: (1) 545820-23p.pdf, (2) bk467p191-8p.pdf, (3) blueprint4p.pdf, (4) canweconnectthedots2p.pdf, (5) codeofconduct18p.pdf, (6) commitments-Individually9p.pdf, (7) compute-tax-test35p.pdf, (8) exceptions1994disappeared.pdf, (9) exceptions2000disappeared.pdf, (10) overview72p.pdf, (11) percentages72p.pdf, (12) precedence17p.pdf, (13) tax-records94p.pdf, (14) trust-deed- invisible175p.pdf, (15) trusts-documents42p.pdf, (16) unknown14p.pdf, and (17) usingIRS15p.pdf. The Court received them on September 25. 2012. at 10:44 am. Can we look at the evidence before judging? It is impossible to judge fairly without exposing Bk467p191. Can the accountants be made accountable for their accounting? Why keep Bk467p191 covered up? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent 18 attachments 545820-23p.pdf 304K bk467p191-8p.pdf 120K blueprint4p.pdf 31K canweconnectthedots2p.pdf 91K codeofconduct18p.pdf 165K commitments-Individually8p.pdf 194K compute-tax-test35p.pdf 645K exceptions1994disappeared.pdf 59K exceptions2000disappeared.pdf 856K overview72p.pdf 1386K percentages12p.pdf 218K precedence17p.pdf 216K tax-records94p.pdf 2483K trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 2 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM 961K trust-documents42p.pdf 703K unknown14p.pdf 240K usingIRS15p.pdf 238K overview-sept22-62p.pdf 1246K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jh67vtlXhc9D7EwMzuQG87t8KLb3NIdgbqDz+9Bhk5Q=; b=Qqxx1ubmoLLdEPxnUa6gRSAUq78O2DuRwcoNLkLP5Ol65RmldVi3S1o6m0kJ+TLvoc qnrBiRuE/dzB2bptVwVFNZHSTagsBNIpynrG9sQEjdLGSpkNGGWLVe82cWLuZ6xtgBiT /lG+FTwSsfgCpAZtqVgyY06gxh2OplxT+422CurAVxHTCzrs0BmS8nRVUBay2o3Zcxte Fm6RBjBRPcLnc8z4J3fgsgaAsv7xqQ6+flk0J1tfbj7cWJp+p47vCVIATY8FF4rPIWgR DFnoG5+YGDhNppuLChWeEp7zmu5og/qi6LP5ldXI/kWvxheibpvA8CLyJ3/tK+SRuGSC cg5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr40603oeu.129.1348656569090; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 message size limit exceeded (state 17). ----- Original message ----- https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 3 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jh67vtlXhc9D7EwMzuQG87t8KLb3NIdgbqDz+9Bhk5Q=; b=Qqxx1ubmoLLdEPxnUa6gRSAUq78O2DuRwcoNLkLP5Ol65RmldVi3S1o6m0kJ+TLvoc qnrBiRuE/dzB2bptVwVFNZHSTagsBNIpynrG9sQEjdLGSpkNGGWLVe82cWLuZ6xtgBiT /lG+FTwSsfgCpAZtqVgyY06gxh2OplxT+422CurAVxHTCzrs0BmS8nRVUBay2o3Zcxte Fm6RBjBRPcLnc8z4J3fgsgaAsv7xqQ6+flk0J1tfbj7cWJp+p47vCVIATY8FF4rPIWgR DFnoG5+YGDhNppuLChWeEp7zmu5og/qi6LP5ldXI/kWvxheibpvA8CLyJ3/tK+SRuGSC cg5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr40603oeu.129.1348656569090; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 message size limit exceeded (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jh67vtlXhc9D7EwMzuQG87t8KLb3NIdgbqDz+9Bhk5Q=; b=Qqxx1ubmoLLdEPxnUa6gRSAUq78O2DuRwcoNLkLP5Ol65RmldVi3S1o6m0kJ+TLvoc qnrBiRuE/dzB2bptVwVFNZHSTagsBNIpynrG9sQEjdLGSpkNGGWLVe82cWLuZ6xtgBiT /lG+FTwSsfgCpAZtqVgyY06gxh2OplxT+422CurAVxHTCzrs0BmS8nRVUBay2o3Zcxte Fm6RBjBRPcLnc8z4J3fgsgaAsv7xqQ6+flk0J1tfbj7cWJp+p47vCVIATY8FF4rPIWgR DFnoG5+YGDhNppuLChWeEp7zmu5og/qi6LP5ldXI/kWvxheibpvA8CLyJ3/tK+SRuGSC cg5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr40603oeu.129.1348656569090; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 Message-ID: [email protected] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 4 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: [email protected] The e-mail address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's e-mail address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: i95bpm.com [email protected] #550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found ## Original message headers: Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (209.85.214.169) by Exchange.i95bpm.local (192.168.1.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:52:50 -0400 Received: by obcva7 with SMTP id va7so489995obc.0 for Final-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found noname 3K Mail Delivery Subsystem https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 5 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed maximum message size (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jh67vtlXhc9D7EwMzuQG87t8KLb3NIdgbqDz+9Bhk5Q=; b=Qqxx1ubmoLLdEPxnUa6gRSAUq78O2DuRwcoNLkLP5Ol65RmldVi3S1o6m0kJ+TLvoc qnrBiRuE/dzB2bptVwVFNZHSTagsBNIpynrG9sQEjdLGSpkNGGWLVe82cWLuZ6xtgBiT /lG+FTwSsfgCpAZtqVgyY06gxh2OplxT+422CurAVxHTCzrs0BmS8nRVUBay2o3Zcxte Fm6RBjBRPcLnc8z4J3fgsgaAsv7xqQ6+flk0J1tfbj7cWJp+p47vCVIATY8FF4rPIWgR DFnoG5+YGDhNppuLChWeEp7zmu5og/qi6LP5ldXI/kWvxheibpvA8CLyJ3/tK+SRuGSC cg5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr40603oeu.129.1348656569090; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 message size limit exceeded (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jh67vtlXhc9D7EwMzuQG87t8KLb3NIdgbqDz+9Bhk5Q=; b=Qqxx1ubmoLLdEPxnUa6gRSAUq78O2DuRwcoNLkLP5Ol65RmldVi3S1o6m0kJ+TLvoc qnrBiRuE/dzB2bptVwVFNZHSTagsBNIpynrG9sQEjdLGSpkNGGWLVe82cWLuZ6xtgBiT /lG+FTwSsfgCpAZtqVgyY06gxh2OplxT+422CurAVxHTCzrs0BmS8nRVUBay2o3Zcxte Fm6RBjBRPcLnc8z4J3fgsgaAsv7xqQ6+flk0J1tfbj7cWJp+p47vCVIATY8FF4rPIWgR DFnoG5+YGDhNppuLChWeEp7zmu5og/qi6LP5ldXI/kWvxheibpvA8CLyJ3/tK+SRuGSC cg5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr40603oeu.129.1348656569090; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 6 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM From: Anthony OConnell Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 Message size exceeds fixed maximum message size (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jh67vtlXhc9D7EwMzuQG87t8KLb3NIdgbqDz+9Bhk5Q=; b=Qqxx1ubmoLLdEPxnUa6gRSAUq78O2DuRwcoNLkLP5Ol65RmldVi3S1o6m0kJ+TLvoc qnrBiRuE/dzB2bptVwVFNZHSTagsBNIpynrG9sQEjdLGSpkNGGWLVe82cWLuZ6xtgBiT /lG+FTwSsfgCpAZtqVgyY06gxh2OplxT+422CurAVxHTCzrs0BmS8nRVUBay2o3Zcxte Fm6RBjBRPcLnc8z4J3fgsgaAsv7xqQ6+flk0J1tfbj7cWJp+p47vCVIATY8FF4rPIWgR DFnoG5+YGDhNppuLChWeEp7zmu5og/qi6LP5ldXI/kWvxheibpvA8CLyJ3/tK+SRuGSC cg5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr40603oeu.129.1348656569090; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:49:23 -0700 Message-ID: [email protected] Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists: [email protected] This message exceeds the maximum message size allowed. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please make the message smaller -- by removing attachments, for example -- and try sending it again, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator. Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: scc.state.va.us https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 7 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM [email protected] #550 5.3.4 ROUTING.SizeLimit; message size exceeds fixed maximum size for route ## Original message headers: Received: from fwd1k.spamh.com (174.36.242.66) by exedge.scc.state.va.us (192.168.5.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:50:11 -0400 Received: from l32.spamh.com (l32.spamh.com [67.225.140.157]) by fwd1k.spamh.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q8QAnv7a010760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for Final-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected] Action: failed Status: 5.3.4 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.3.4 ROUTING.SizeLimit; message size exceeds fixed maximum size for route noname 3K Mail Administrator This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: The user(s) account is temporarily over quota. The following websites may contain more information to assist you: http://help.rr.com/HMSLogic/rrmail.aspx https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 8 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM http://postmaster.rr.com/help Please do not reply to this message, as it will go to an unread mailbox Final-Recipient: RFC822; ------Forwarded message ------From: Anthony OConnell Can we get to the bottom of this and expose Bk467p191 and find out where the money went? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why can't it be done? Why couldn't it be done before our family was terrorized and destroyed? I am concerned that my responses to the summons the accountants had my sister serve me may be lost or not recognized; and the terms of the summons would be approved by default. So I want to leave evidence of my responses. I was served the summons on September 8, 2012. The summons says I have 21 days after being served to respond. On September 22, 2012, I responded with the attachment overview-sept22-62p.pdf. The Court received it on September 24. 2012. at 10:01 am. On September 24, 2012, I responded with the attachments: (1) 545820-23p.pdf, (2) bk467p191-8p.pdf, (3) blueprint4p.pdf, (4) canweconnectthedots2p.pdf, (5) codeofconduct18p.pdf, (6) commitments-Individually9p.pdf, (7) compute-tax-test35p.pdf, (8) exceptions1994disappeared.pdf, (9) exceptions2000disappeared.pdf, (10) overview72p.pdf, (11) percentages72p.pdf, (12) precedence17p.pdf, (13) tax-records94p.pdf, (14) trust-deed- invisible175p.pdf, (15) trusts-documents42p.pdf, (16) unknown14p.pdf, and (17) usingIRS15p.pdf. The Court received them on September 25. 2012. at 10:44 am. Can we look at the evidence before judging? It is impossible to judge fairly without exposing Bk467p191. Can the accountants be made accountable for their accounting? Why keep Bk467p191 covered up? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent 18 attachments 545820-23p.pdf 304K bk467p191-8p.pdf 120K blueprint4p.pdf 31K canweconnectthedots2p.pdf 91K codeofconduct18p.pdf https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 9 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; lost or not recognized documents. 10/3/12 1:43 AM 165K commitments-Individually8p.pdf 194K compute-tax-test35p.pdf 645K exceptions1994disappeared.pdf 59K exceptions2000disappeared.pdf 856K overview72p.pdf 1386K percentages12p.pdf 218K precedence17p.pdf 216K tax-records94p.pdf 2483K trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf 961K trust-documents42p.pdf 703K unknown14p.pdf 240K usingIRS15p.pdf 238K overview-sept22-62p.pdf 1246K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a0232030288bbe Page 10 of 10 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; the public has no…accountants without transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. 10/2/12 8:00 PM Anthony OConnell The public should know; response to summons; the public has no chance against the accountants without transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. 2 messages Anthony OConnell Dear potential just powers; I don't understand why my following email (less attachments) of September 26, 2012, at 3:49 am: "Subject The public should know; response to summons;lost or not recognized documents Dear potential just powers; Can we get to the bottom of this and expose Bk467p191 and find out where the money went? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why can't it be done? Why couldn't it be done before our family was terrorized and destroyed? I am concerned that my responses to the summons the accountants had my sister serve me may be lost or not recognized; and the terms of the summons would be approved by default. So I want to leave evidence of my responses. I was served the summons on September 8, 2012. The summons says I have 21 days after being served to respond. On September 22, 2012, I responded with the attachment overview-sept22-62p.pdf. The Court received it on September 24. 2012. at 10:01 am. On September 24, 2012, I responded with the attachments: (1) 545820-23p.pdf, (2) bk467p191-8p.pdf, (3) blueprint4p.pdf, (4) canweconnectthedots2p.pdf, (5) codeofconduct18p.pdf, (6) commitments-Individually9p.pdf, (7) compute-tax-test35p.pdf, (8) exceptions1994disappeared.pdf, (9) exceptions2000disappeared.pdf, (10) overview72p.pdf, (11) percentages72p.pdf, (12) precedence17p.pdf, (13) tax- records94p.pdf, (14) trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf, (15) trusts-documents42p.pdf, (16) unknown14p.pdf, and (17) usingIRS15p.pdf. The Court received them on September 25. 2012. at 10:44 am. Can we look at the evidence before judging? It is impossible to judge fairly without exposing Bk467p191. Can the accountants be made accountable for their accounting? Why keep Bk467p191 covered up? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent" https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a05b83f84753c4 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - The public should know; response to summons; the public has no…accountants without transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. 10/2/12 8:01 PM bounced ("Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently") from the following recipients after previous emails were deliverable; (1) Steve Blizzad I would think that these recipients would most want to know. Are there just powers who would ask for transparency, accountability, and the rule of law? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=W28PMqsXhTPNrUB1VSw1GmpOxIV2hzwpEhUI2S7ooQQ=; b=Rpmg4Lwl7cGDMYHBXcaqPPTJYbe6TfW2JEk/ZNBRDOTCnDijblL6Stea12jMu9O7Re Jaui9H2DVD1BHihi/VpGJu21kMQyxoSiWhjS3mhPpBjt8myeAerhnH8hqsxwD0n7d/R6 Z1GJh5o7OIQW0V48HgL5nUfyximJ6BOXLsPMWaO3lwO47RYwUre4WwTd0toh+Jj5UvpR B6kmbwkVPzok9CeVof6yM8elq/v4lor4qBEYT4Rpqriws99vngJhXcnHhGExa5rIapkO sHyvz9HCdO8Io+DAUtSZbAig8Hj1daiuAwHRmBeQH+6f89GGTtU1bXPGF/+3CJ8aotjG sdow== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.10.225 with SMTP id l1mr2160624oeb.28.1348715691776; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:14:51 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a05b83f84753c4 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Verifying undeliverable status; resend of my September 26, 2012, 3:49 am, message to six recipients that it bounced from 10/2/12 7:54 PM Anthony OConnell Verifying undeliverable status; resend of my September 26, 2012, 3:49 am, message to six recipients that it bounced from 7 messages Anthony OConnell Verifying undeliverable status; resend of my September 26, 2012, 3:49 am, message to six recipients that it bounced from: (1) Steve Blizzad My September 26, 2012, 3:49 am message was: "Dear potential just powers; Can we get to the bottom of this and expose Bk467p191 and find out where the money went? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why can't it be done? Why couldn't it be done before our family was terrorized and destroyed? I am concerned that my responses to the summons the accountants had my sister serve me may be lost or not recognized; and the terms of the summons would be approved by default. So I want to leave evidence of my responses. I was served the summons on September 8, 2012. The summons says I have 21 days after being served to respond. On September 22, 2012, I responded with the attachment overview-sept22-62p.pdf. The Court received it on September 24. 2012. at 10:01 am. On September 24, 2012, I responded with the attachments: (1) 545820-23p.pdf, (2) bk467p191-8p.pdf, (3) blueprint4p.pdf, (4) canweconnectthedots2p.pdf, (5) codeofconduct18p.pdf, (6) commitments-Individually9p.pdf, (7) compute-tax-test35p.pdf, (8) exceptions1994disappeared.pdf, (9) exceptions2000disappeared.pdf, (10) overview72p.pdf, (11) percentages72p.pdf, (12) precedence17p.pdf, (13) tax-records94p.pdf, (14) trust-deed- invisible175p.pdf, (15) trusts-documents42p.pdf, (16) unknown14p.pdf, and (17) usingIRS15p.pdf. The Court received them on September 25. 2012. at 10:44 am. Can we look at the evidence before judging? It is impossible to judge fairly without exposing Bk467p191. Can the accountants be made accountable for their accounting? Why keep Bk467p191 covered up? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a081e5d67840a7 Page 1 of 7 Gmail - Verifying undeliverable status; resend of my September 26, 2012, 3:49 am, message to six recipients that it bounced from 10/2/12 7:54 PM http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent?" 18 attachments 545820-23p.pdf 304K bk467p191-8p.pdf 120K blueprint4p.pdf 31K canweconnectthedots2p.pdf 91K codeofconduct18p.pdf 165K commitments-Individually8p.pdf 194K compute-tax-test35p.pdf 645K exceptions1994disappeared.pdf 59K exceptions2000disappeared.pdf 856K overview-sept22-62p.pdf 1246K percentages12p.pdf 218K precedence17p.pdf 216K tax-records94p.pdf 2483K trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf 961K trust-documents42p.pdf 703K unknown14p.pdf 240K usingIRS15p.pdf 238K overview72p.pdf 1386K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dGkvPqAYoL5wmXxaHn0Go4eHRfmrUhn/FWmpqytPH1U=; b=Io07pA8wQmM1OZhvMQkcqJ1cSBK5Qmbp/wBjyNdIAR0kVl1qHCZXcqQTVh/5fAIzQY Q80B3y9L3gz0/4SOrwQHT1hVq9yvsYAtg0le0+LtW6d2uCxYDAH9/K7ci6Fg5kOHpmHQ 1/YyOsBnPumZVkpi/pBtc7HD4TN71CBE1EnJIwqgJ8Z0K4quqhuMvRcmSjf1edrhn2PJ u/zFtuNeAQuNkQu03r67Xh6R8fAXGteVoibBSdfK5+H6tL1y8EQaEffaExVnkLFcc8a/ lxCIAXOVCt7ioNEqL06oKq+sHv3Vj85bpQQSCK92Bb5fA9kO3KCEThvJqBPzlz/X1ZiO y9mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.134.70 with SMTP id ib6mr3069713icc.37.1348755947560; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.134 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 Message size exceeds fixed maximum message size (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dGkvPqAYoL5wmXxaHn0Go4eHRfmrUhn/FWmpqytPH1U=; b=Io07pA8wQmM1OZhvMQkcqJ1cSBK5Qmbp/wBjyNdIAR0kVl1qHCZXcqQTVh/5fAIzQY https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a081e5d67840a7 Page 3 of 7 Gmail - Verifying undeliverable status; resend of my September 26, 2012, 3:49 am, message to six recipients that it bounced from 10/2/12 7:54 PM Q80B3y9L3gz0/4SOrwQHT1hVq9yvsYAtg0le0+LtW6d2uCxYDAH9/K7ci6Fg5kOHpmHQ 1/YyOsBnPumZVkpi/pBtc7HD4TN71CBE1EnJIwqgJ8Z0K4quqhuMvRcmSjf1edrhn2PJ u/zFtuNeAQuNkQu03r67Xh6R8fAXGteVoibBSdfK5+H6tL1y8EQaEffaExVnkLFcc8a/ lxCIAXOVCt7ioNEqL06oKq+sHv3Vj85bpQQSCK92Bb5fA9kO3KCEThvJqBPzlz/X1ZiO y9mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.134.70 with SMTP id ib6mr3069713icc.37.1348755947560; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.134 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: [Quoted text hidden] Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed maximum message size (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dGkvPqAYoL5wmXxaHn0Go4eHRfmrUhn/FWmpqytPH1U=; b=Io07pA8wQmM1OZhvMQkcqJ1cSBK5Qmbp/wBjyNdIAR0kVl1qHCZXcqQTVh/5fAIzQY Q80B3y9L3gz0/4SOrwQHT1hVq9yvsYAtg0le0+LtW6d2uCxYDAH9/K7ci6Fg5kOHpmHQ 1/YyOsBnPumZVkpi/pBtc7HD4TN71CBE1EnJIwqgJ8Z0K4quqhuMvRcmSjf1edrhn2PJ u/zFtuNeAQuNkQu03r67Xh6R8fAXGteVoibBSdfK5+H6tL1y8EQaEffaExVnkLFcc8a/ lxCIAXOVCt7ioNEqL06oKq+sHv3Vj85bpQQSCK92Bb5fA9kO3KCEThvJqBPzlz/X1ZiO y9mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.134.70 with SMTP id ib6mr3069713icc.37.1348755947560; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.134 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: Sharon Bulova Chairman [Quoted text hidden] Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 message size limit exceeded (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dGkvPqAYoL5wmXxaHn0Go4eHRfmrUhn/FWmpqytPH1U=; b=Io07pA8wQmM1OZhvMQkcqJ1cSBK5Qmbp/wBjyNdIAR0kVl1qHCZXcqQTVh/5fAIzQY Q80B3y9L3gz0/4SOrwQHT1hVq9yvsYAtg0le0+LtW6d2uCxYDAH9/K7ci6Fg5kOHpmHQ 1/YyOsBnPumZVkpi/pBtc7HD4TN71CBE1EnJIwqgJ8Z0K4quqhuMvRcmSjf1edrhn2PJ u/zFtuNeAQuNkQu03r67Xh6R8fAXGteVoibBSdfK5+H6tL1y8EQaEffaExVnkLFcc8a/ lxCIAXOVCt7ioNEqL06oKq+sHv3Vj85bpQQSCK92Bb5fA9kO3KCEThvJqBPzlz/X1ZiO y9mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.134.70 with SMTP id ib6mr3069713icc.37.1348755947560; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.134 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: [Quoted text hidden] Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a081e5d67840a7 Page 5 of 7 Gmail - Verifying undeliverable status; resend of my September 26, 2012, 3:49 am, message to six recipients that it bounced from 10/2/12 7:54 PM other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 message size limit exceeded (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dGkvPqAYoL5wmXxaHn0Go4eHRfmrUhn/FWmpqytPH1U=; b=Io07pA8wQmM1OZhvMQkcqJ1cSBK5Qmbp/wBjyNdIAR0kVl1qHCZXcqQTVh/5fAIzQY Q80B3y9L3gz0/4SOrwQHT1hVq9yvsYAtg0le0+LtW6d2uCxYDAH9/K7ci6Fg5kOHpmHQ 1/YyOsBnPumZVkpi/pBtc7HD4TN71CBE1EnJIwqgJ8Z0K4quqhuMvRcmSjf1edrhn2PJ u/zFtuNeAQuNkQu03r67Xh6R8fAXGteVoibBSdfK5+H6tL1y8EQaEffaExVnkLFcc8a/ lxCIAXOVCt7ioNEqL06oKq+sHv3Vj85bpQQSCK92Bb5fA9kO3KCEThvJqBPzlz/X1ZiO y9mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.134.70 with SMTP id ib6mr3069713icc.37.1348755947560; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.134 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: [Quoted text hidden] Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 message size limit exceeded (state 17). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dGkvPqAYoL5wmXxaHn0Go4eHRfmrUhn/FWmpqytPH1U=; b=Io07pA8wQmM1OZhvMQkcqJ1cSBK5Qmbp/wBjyNdIAR0kVl1qHCZXcqQTVh/5fAIzQY Q80B3y9L3gz0/4SOrwQHT1hVq9yvsYAtg0le0+LtW6d2uCxYDAH9/K7ci6Fg5kOHpmHQ 1/YyOsBnPumZVkpi/pBtc7HD4TN71CBE1EnJIwqgJ8Z0K4quqhuMvRcmSjf1edrhn2PJ u/zFtuNeAQuNkQu03r67Xh6R8fAXGteVoibBSdfK5+H6tL1y8EQaEffaExVnkLFcc8a/ lxCIAXOVCt7ioNEqL06oKq+sHv3Vj85bpQQSCK92Bb5fA9kO3KCEThvJqBPzlz/X1ZiO y9mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a081e5d67840a7 Page 6 of 7 Gmail - Verifying undeliverable status; resend of my September 26, 2012, 3:49 am, message to six recipients that it bounced from 10/2/12 7:54 PM Received: by 10.43.134.70 with SMTP id ib6mr3069713icc.37.1348755947560; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.134 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a081e5d67840a7 Page 7 of 7 Gmail - The public should know; summons and response; invisible continued: "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 10/6/12 9:19 PM Anthony OConnell The public should know; summons and response; invisible continued: "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 4 messages Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a12f4262fefb4e Page 1 of 5 Gmail - The public should know; summons and response; invisible continued: "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 10/6/12 9:19 PM Dear potential just powers: Rather than send out my response to the summons with it's 18 attachments again and again in hopes of it being recognized and the summons dismissed because it is against the rule of law, I made a simple website showing my response at http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com . The contents of the summons the accountants had our innocent sister Jean Nader serve on me would not survive due process. The accusations are false, the accountants know it, and history suggests that it will be approved without due process. The terms of the summons is for the benefit of the accountants; it gives them unlimited control and cover and makes our family appear at fault. Please see http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com and compare the summons with the responses. Our innocent sister Jean Nader will never understand that she is being used by the accountants until a just power visits her and reverses the effects of the accountants giving her twenty years of I'm the bad guy. Our family will never be free of the accountants until a just power does this. (Jean Nader, 350 Fourth Avenue, New Kensington, PA 15068; tel (724) 337-7537, email "Jean Nader through Amy Johnson" Can we get to the bottom of this and expose Bk467p191 and find out where the money went? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why can't it be done? Why couldn't it be done before our family was terrorized and destroyed? It is impossible to judge fairly without exposing Bk467p191. Can the accountants be made accountable for their accounting? Why keep Bk467p191 covered up? Does the power structure of Fairfax County support this? If so, why? I don't understand why my email of September 26, 2012, at 3:49 am was not deliverable to the following six recipients when my previous emails were (Please see the attachment). I would think that these recipients would want to know more than anyone: (1) Steve Blizzard Journalists; the public doesn't have a chance against the accountants unless the invisible walls of secrecy are removed. If you don't think the public should know how the accountants work, would you please contact other journalist and ask them to look at the evidence, follow the trails, and judge for themselves? I can't find email addresses for the FBI, IRS, and US Marshals, would someone please contact them? Suggested questions: (1) Why is the deed in the trust documents not recognized? (2) Why is "Trustee Not Individually Liable" in the trust documents not recognized? Why does it continue to be invisible? (3) How did the Director of DTA arrive at his delinquent tax figure? What is his lien against? Why would what his lien be against ever be cause for secrecy? (4) Why is the rule of law not recognized? Why is the law of contracts not recognized in the summons? (6) The public has no chance against the accountants unless the accountants are required to accept some level of transparency and accountability. What level of transparency and accountability do the accountants accept? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com (Quick overview of summary and response) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a12f4262fefb4e Page 2 of 5 Gmail - The public should know; summons and response; invisible continued: "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 10/6/12 9:19 PM http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent email sept26 3.49am-10p.pdf 189K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bPqR60XbfoFFZ1/D6/iLTmwJrF/Icjf5IJfOlO0d3xU=; b=dDHL3lwxWsNFigJeHJGKrWNXEymH2eCmzq4z4NeREiD8TI30g+xZOXdigQeumI1Al3 UFaO4HOFtZCRMuBVnM6LuW66kfeNpcf9t9jsJT2randIzoADNPm+SrT1X7p6sWZu1mft juVUhyY2ayYnZEfRx62VYc4KeiWMhcabsXC4CmEocSP8XuBMp2LM21LxNadyRrW6pdDw YYBDPdSKTU0BFM0MLEeGyPEPS/qz96xIKCqT+rwJH9iZy/ns3CAJAPsl8VgOoEcsZmCz v5i9Hsc0a5NMx3NjVDyIgZzFXqhd75Hm1TKguY7J4M878/Sx72w3ozhtqKgtUaum51ou M/Ew== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr8519692oeu.129.1348937722191; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:55:21 -0700 Message-ID: ksimmons simmons Thanks Tony. I am reading through it. On my way to Atlanta tonight for a work convention. Love, Kate https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a12f4262fefb4e Page 3 of 5 Gmail - The public should know; summons and response; invisible continued: "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 10/6/12 9:19 PM From: Anthony OConnell Dear potential just powers: Rather than send out my response to the summons with it's 18 attachments again and again in hopes of it being recognized and the summons dismissed because it is against the rule of law, I made a simple website showing my response at http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com . The contents of the summons the accountants had our innocent sister Jean Nader serve on me would not survive due process. The accusations are false, the accountants know it, and history suggests that it will be approved without due process. The terms of the summons is for the benefit of the accountants; it gives them unlimited control and cover and makes our family appear at fault. Please see http://www. thepublicshouldknow20.com/ and compare the summons with the responses. Our innocent sister Jean Nader will never understand that she is being used by the accountants until a just power visits her and reverses the effects of the accountants giving her twenty years of I'm the bad guy. Our family will never be free of the accountants until a just power does this. (Jean Nader, 350 Fourth Avenue, New Kensington, PA 15068; tel (724) 337-7537, email "Jean Nader through Amy Johnson" Can we get to the bottom of this and expose Bk467p191 and find out where the money went? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why can't it be done? Why couldn't it be done before our family was terrorized and destroyed? It is impossible to judge fairly without exposing Bk467p191. Can the accountants be made accountable for their accounting? Why keep Bk467p191 covered up? Does the power structure of Fairfax County support this? If so, why? I don't understand why my email of September 26, 2012, at 3:49 am was not deliverable to the following six recipients when my previous emails were (Please see the attachment). I would think that these recipients would want to know more than anyone: (1) Steve Blizzard Journalists; the public doesn't have a chance against the accountants unless the invisible walls of secrecy are removed. If you don't think the public should know how the accountants work, would you please contact other journalist and ask them to look at the evidence, follow the trails, and judge for themselves? https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a12f4262fefb4e Page 4 of 5 Gmail - The public should know; summons and response; invisible continued: "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 10/6/12 9:19 PM I can't find email addresses for the FBI, IRS, and US Marshals, would someone please contact them? Suggested questions: (1) Why is the deed in the trust documents not recognized? (2) Why is "Trustee Not Individually Liable" in the trust documents not recognized? Why does it continue to be invisible? (3) How did the Director of DTA arrive at his delinquent tax figure? What is his lien against? Why would what his lien be against ever be cause for secrecy? (4) Why is the rule of law not recognized? Why is the law of contracts not recognized in the summons? (6) The public has no chance against the accountants unless the accountants are required to accept some level of transparency and accountability. What level of transparency and accountability do the accountants accept? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com/ (Quick overview of summary and response) http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com/ (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com/ (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com/ (Can we find out where the money went in our Mother's estate? Bk467p191. Our family is innocent Anthony OConnell Kate, Thanks. I'd hate to leave you (my executor) with this mess. It's fun thinking about Oct 13. Love, Tony [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a12f4262fefb4e Page 5 of 5 October Gmail - The public should know; money disappears; look the other way; injunction 10/1/12 4:50 AM Anthony OConnell The public should know; money disappears; look the other way; injunction 2 messages Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a1c289c99783c7 Page 1 of 3 Gmail - The public should know; money disappears; look the other way; injunction 10/1/12 4:50 AM Dear potential just powers; Can we get to the bottom of this and expose Bk467p191 and find out where the money went? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why can't it be done? Why couldn't it be done before our family was terrorized and destroyed for cover, and innocent lives ruined? The public should know; money disappears and it's not recognized. (1) The First Court Account lists the Lynch Note ($518,903.26) and an interest payment from the Note ($26,917.17). Nothing about the Note appears on the Second Court. It's not supposed to disappear ("545820-23p"). (2) There are two versions of the June 11,1992, payment to the IRS; one for $175,000.00 and one for $119,000.00. There should not be two versions ("usingIRS15p"). I believe this is why the accountants want innocent Jean Nader to replace me. Verify; try to expose the accounting at Bk467p191 and see what happens. I cannot stop the accountants from tying up Accotink in a legal knot under the guise of protecting our family with the accountants in control of the knot. If anyone believes any of the accusations against me in the attached injunction, please ask the preparer ("Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh" Our innocent sister Jean Nader will never understand that she is being used by the accountants until a just power visits her and reverses the effects of the accountants giving her twenty years of I'm the bad guy. Our family will never be free of the accountants until a just power does this (Jean Nader, 350 Fourth Avenue, New Kensington, PA 15068; tel (724) 337-7537, email "Jean Nader through Amy Johnson" Should accountants who make money disappear and destroy the family as cover be exposed? What would it take to expose Bk467p191? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com (Quick overview of summary and response) http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale; controlling lien sent to Highland County) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Comprehensive; twenty years in the making; if you want to know how the accountants work) 3 attachments Injunction6pSept30b.pdf 566K usingIRS15p.pdf 238K 545820-23p.pdf 304K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a1c289c99783c7 Page 2 of 3 Gmail - The public should know; money disappears; look the other way; injunction 10/1/12 4:50 AM Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=45slyPPPtKy3ysGmX6I2gdHCqCsxpHbwlSNpKICJmzQ=; b=bwVeElQbpkmtypuH2hWQWI0M6tx37gH+epRvsjyi8rcrwIA9HU71RFjr4Rn2vPcfQ2 dsni60QLj8DpL9pj7PwUJjESVAIx+bgtDrFqhngiYqqPuGhSfJ08Sx60FBxusQ1K4Isr 4nDydt/WI0EZwoevMwtJJUMrq70sjHKpF+ZjEy0jP7IkcMQnY3NObEnUJMgHDAjQ9gKc ZWaNJMrqNYIksnMpTIi0+1QtRp7cYFnqrNpZHGjNJSgfsYQR+2xg81dELa04CfYNziGm W3U/ig/90TLdGTo8h/YK1vU/pkwpbojiZ8dqrOCdeOae19MrmVkpXmg6dL2BOqxsSJKW 6z4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.14.165 with SMTP id q5mr762409oec.28.1349092156152; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 04:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.75.227 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 04:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 04:49:14 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a1c289c99783c7 Page 3 of 3 Gmail - The public should know; "Trustee Not Individually Liable" still not recognized; Injunction and response 10/4/12 8:33 AM Anthony OConnell The public should know; "Trustee Not Individually Liable" still not recognized; Injunction and response 2 messages Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=inbox&th=13a2c661515f0e38 Page 1 of 3 Gmail - The public should know; "Trustee Not Individually Liable" still not recognized; Injunction and response 10/4/12 8:33 AM Dear potential just powers; I don't understand why "Trustee Not Individually Liable" at Bk8845p1453 is still not recognized. I don't understand how a decision on an injunction like the attached could be made fairly without the decision maker being made aware of information such as "Trustee Not Individually Liable". When does concealment apply? The definition of concealment from Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, is: "Concealment. To conceal. A withholding of something which one knows and which one, in duty, is bound to reveal. A "concealment" in law of insurance implies an intention to withhold or secrete information so the one entitled to be informed will remain in ignorance. Indiana Ins. Co v. Knoll, 142 Ind.App.506, 236 N.E.2d 63, 70. See also Conceal, Fraudulent concealment" If anyone believes any of the accusations against me in this Injunction are true, please ask the preparer ("Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh" This continued conflict is not between family members Anthony O'Connell and Jean Nader. If the secrecy were removed it would show that It is between Anthony O'Connell and the accountants using Jean Nader. Can we get to the bottom of this and find out where the money went in our mother's estate;? Can we expose Bk467p191? The law says that this is automatically done and the public trusts that it is done. Why keep Bk467p191 covered up? It is impossible to judge fairly without exposing Bk467p191. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com ("Trustee Not Individually Liable" still not recognized; Lien, Summons, Injunction.) http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale; controlling lien sent to Highland County) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Comprehensive; twenty years in the making; if you want to know how the accountants work) injunction-and-response12p.pdf 483K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IXteZvnCDCQ/18JJTw25+kdz++qbU5TpF9X0one3dMk=; https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=inbox&th=13a2c661515f0e38 Page 2 of 3 Gmail - McGuire Woods Battle & Boothe - McGuire Woods LLP; Should the public trust that documents are recognized? 10/4/12 11:18 PM Anthony OConnell McGuire Woods Battle & Boothe - McGuire Woods LLP; Should the public trust that documents are recognized? 1 message Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a2f9002d46a6e3 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - McGuire Woods Battle & Boothe - McGuire Woods LLP; Should the public trust that documents are recognized? 10/4/12 11:18 PM To McGuire Woods LLP and others: When a law firm and the client of the law firm both know the documents the law firm prepared are good and should be recognized, who is responsible for making them recognized when they are not recognized? The law firm or the law firm's client? The client does not have the power. Would McGuire Woods LLP, with the clear understanding that McGuire Woods is not representing me, please have the Director of DTA, the law firm of B&K and others, recognize the Trust documents prepared by MWB&B; such as the deed, the assignment and receipts, and "Trustee Not Individually Liable" in the Trust Agreement? I don't understand, when the Trust Agreement says "Trustee Not Individually Liable"; I have (1) a lien against me as Trustee, but the lien is sent to Highland County where there is no trust property, but where I have individual property, and what the lien is against remains unknown, a (2) Summons against me as an individual, and (3) an Injunction against me as an individual. Should the public trust that documents are recognized? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com (Summary and response, Injunction and response) http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale; controlling lien sent to Highland County) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Comprehensive; twenty years in the making; if you want to know how the accountants work) 2 attachments MWBB-trust-documents21p.pdf 353K McguireWoods3p.pdf 110K https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a2f9002d46a6e3 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Pattern two attorney wedge 10/5/12 9:55 AM Anthony OConnell Pattern two attorney wedge 1 message Anthony OConnell Potential just powers; https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a31d8c58ce9455 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Pattern two attorney wedge 10/5/12 9:55 AM If no one's going to stop it, someone should warn the public about the accountant's patterns. Pattern two attorney wedge: One attorney, appearing to represent the entire family, such as Edward White in 1985 and in 1992, plants a problem between family members and pretends he doesn't know what the problem is. When one family member tries to resolve the problem, but can't through the attorney who is supposed to be representing the entire family, goes to another attorney to try to resolve the problem, the appearance of two attorneys for one family is made to appear as if the family is the source of the conflict; and that, behind the guise of client confidentiality, is used as a wedge to divide the family. See "dads" (1985) and "car" (1992) at http://www. canweconnectthedots.com From my experience I believe it is best to use your own common sense than be caught in the two attorney wedge. Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.thepublicshouldknow20.com (Summary and response, Injunction and response) http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale; controlling lien sent to Highland County) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Comprehensive; twenty years in the making; if you want to know how the accountants work) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a31d8c58ce9455 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - McGuire Woods Battle & Boothe - McGuire Woods LLP; Should the public trust that documents are recognized? 10/9/12 1:51 PM Anthony OConnell McGuire Woods Battle & Boothe - McGuire Woods LLP; Should the public trust that documents are recognized? 1 message Anthony OConnell https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a474a0c1604677 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - McGuire Woods Battle & Boothe - McGuire Woods LLP; Should the public trust that documents are recognized? 10/9/12 1:51 PM To McGuire Woods LLP and others: McGuire Woods; would you please take a position on this? When a law firm and the client of the law firm both know the documents the law firm prepared are good and should be recognized, who is responsible for making them recognized when they are not recognized? The law firm or the law firm's client? This client does not have the power. Would McGuire Woods LLP, with the clear understanding that McGuire Woods is not representing me, please have the Director of DTA, the law firm of B&K and others, recognize the Trust documents prepared by MWB&B; such as the deed, the assignment and receipts, and "Trustee Not Individually Liable" in the Trust Agreement? I don't understand, when the Trust Agreement says "Trustee Not Individually Liable"; I have (1) a lien against me as Trustee, but the lien is sent to Highland County where there is no trust property, but where I have individual property, what the lien is against remains unknown, but history suggests will be used to control of the sale of my asset; myfarm, a (2) summons against me as an individual, and (3) an Injunction against me as an individual. Should the public trust that documents are recognized? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale; controlling lien sent to Highland County) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Comprehensive; twenty years in the making; if you want to know how the accountants work) 2 attachments — Download all attachments MWBB-trust-documents21p.pdf 353K View Download McguireWoods3p.pdf 110K View Download https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a474a0c1604677 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Please take an accountable position so the public can rely upon it. 10/10/12 2:33 PM Anthony OConnell Please take an accountable position so the public can rely upon it. 1 message Anthony OConnell To McGuire Woods LLP and others: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a4c96907c01ee5 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - Please take an accountable position so the public can rely upon it. 10/10/12 2:33 PM Would you please take an accountable position on this so the public can rely upon it? When a law firm and the client of the law firm both know the documents the law firm prepared are good and should be recognized, who is responsible for making them recognized when they are not recognized; the (1) law firm, or the (2) law firm's client? Please choose one. Would McGuire Woods LLP, with the clear understanding that McGuire Woods is not representing me, please have the Director of DTA, the law firm of B&K and others, recognize the Trust documents prepared by MWB&B; such as the deed, the assignment and receipts, and "Trustee Not Individually Liable" in the Trust Agreement? I don't understand, when the Trust Agreement says "Trustee Not Individually Liable"; I have (1) a lien against me as Trustee, but the lien is sent to Highland County where there is no trust property, but where I have individual property (Why should what the lien is against ever be a secret?), a (2) summons against me as an individual, and (3) an injunction against me as an individual. Why aren't the documents and the law recognized here? Should the public (1) trust that documents and the law are recognized, or (2) not trust that documents and the law are recognized? What is the public's trust worth? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http:www.thepublicshouldknow20.com http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale; controlling lien sent to Highland County) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Comprehensive; twenty years in the making; if you want to know how the accountants work) 2 attachments — Download all attachments MWBB-trust-documents21p.pdf 353K View Download McguireWoods3p.pdf 110K View Download https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a4c96907c01ee5 Page 2 of 2 Gmail - Should the Commonwealth cover for or expose the accountants? 10/10/12 3:52 PM Anthony OConnell Should the Commonwealth cover for or expose the accountants? 7 messages Anthony OConnell To the Virginia House of Delegates Our family is in the control of accountants who make money disappear. They ruin innocent people's lives to cover themselves. The public doesn't have a chance against the accountants unless the accountant's are held to some degree of transparency and accountability. Please do not buy that our family is the problem. Should the Commonwealth of Virginia (1) cover for the accountants, or (2) expose the accountants? Would you use your power to remove the shroud of secrecy and look at the evidence? Anthony O'Connell, Trustee Reference: http:www.thepublicshouldknow20.com http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com (Trust property in Fairfax County for sale) http://www.farm139.com (Trustee's individual property in Highland County for sale; controlling lien sent to Highland County) http://www.canweconnectthedots.com (Comprehensive; twenty years in the making; if you want to know how the accountants work) 2 attachments 545820-23p.pdf 304K usingIRS15p.pdf 238K Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rtGK/HE/5PvNNl3O+L3EnSzowNg4E6WFmK5v+6lAxhM=; b=xIA0EdHnwqFIg10Lj7Q/KSSywNVtBdHpkc/NFCD2+3t2rP7gvjItlwqVUAHarNw65X DwbpX3BAu4Q0XljsIlyT/xxQaF+2ni5bmTRFgUcXSayPrXDh5xoZI5Le9nvMC7ZWaXP8 esH61thbBeDesq4JpcBwZAMN77RcDiqbquDv9IEyXtO/ZaJ/qBcHTRq9B4eWRc+IGjoF i+H8nUkyZpBAdP6b8T5sBQ1sNLc97a+/91hq2wrvrbNVz9I7Qdq/De66uwoLwbtdYmbV P48nu8mdeI5xro7rVM61fbJb9DG+4//RTY6ywKiqZ54rqsOGRWz1yJSnTqVSuOtAB91n Kn7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.61.196 with SMTP id v4mr20149969ich.24.1349909422228; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a4cdf1c2cb0000 Page 2 of 6 Gmail - Should the Commonwealth cover for or expose the accountants? 10/10/12 3:52 PM Received: by 10.64.127.100 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rtGK/HE/5PvNNl3O+L3EnSzowNg4E6WFmK5v+6lAxhM=; b=xIA0EdHnwqFIg10Lj7Q/KSSywNVtBdHpkc/NFCD2+3t2rP7gvjItlwqVUAHarNw65X DwbpX3BAu4Q0XljsIlyT/xxQaF+2ni5bmTRFgUcXSayPrXDh5xoZI5Le9nvMC7ZWaXP8 esH61thbBeDesq4JpcBwZAMN77RcDiqbquDv9IEyXtO/ZaJ/qBcHTRq9B4eWRc+IGjoF i+H8nUkyZpBAdP6b8T5sBQ1sNLc97a+/91hq2wrvrbNVz9I7Qdq/De66uwoLwbtdYmbV P48nu8mdeI5xro7rVM61fbJb9DG+4//RTY6ywKiqZ54rqsOGRWz1yJSnTqVSuOtAB91n Kn7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.61.196 with SMTP id v4mr20149969ich.24.1349909422228; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.127.100 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13). https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a4cdf1c2cb0000 Page 3 of 6 Gmail - Should the Commonwealth cover for or expose the accountants? 10/10/12 3:52 PM ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rtGK/HE/5PvNNl3O+L3EnSzowNg4E6WFmK5v+6lAxhM=; b=xIA0EdHnwqFIg10Lj7Q/KSSywNVtBdHpkc/NFCD2+3t2rP7gvjItlwqVUAHarNw65X DwbpX3BAu4Q0XljsIlyT/xxQaF+2ni5bmTRFgUcXSayPrXDh5xoZI5Le9nvMC7ZWaXP8 esH61thbBeDesq4JpcBwZAMN77RcDiqbquDv9IEyXtO/ZaJ/qBcHTRq9B4eWRc+IGjoF i+H8nUkyZpBAdP6b8T5sBQ1sNLc97a+/91hq2wrvrbNVz9I7Qdq/De66uwoLwbtdYmbV P48nu8mdeI5xro7rVM61fbJb9DG+4//RTY6ywKiqZ54rqsOGRWz1yJSnTqVSuOtAB91n Kn7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.61.196 with SMTP id v4mr20149969ich.24.1349909422228; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.127.100 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rtGK/HE/5PvNNl3O+L3EnSzowNg4E6WFmK5v+6lAxhM=; b=xIA0EdHnwqFIg10Lj7Q/KSSywNVtBdHpkc/NFCD2+3t2rP7gvjItlwqVUAHarNw65X DwbpX3BAu4Q0XljsIlyT/xxQaF+2ni5bmTRFgUcXSayPrXDh5xoZI5Le9nvMC7ZWaXP8 esH61thbBeDesq4JpcBwZAMN77RcDiqbquDv9IEyXtO/ZaJ/qBcHTRq9B4eWRc+IGjoF i+H8nUkyZpBAdP6b8T5sBQ1sNLc97a+/91hq2wrvrbNVz9I7Qdq/De66uwoLwbtdYmbV P48nu8mdeI5xro7rVM61fbJb9DG+4//RTY6ywKiqZ54rqsOGRWz1yJSnTqVSuOtAB91n Kn7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.61.196 with SMTP id v4mr20149969ich.24.1349909422228; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.127.100 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a4cdf1c2cb0000 Page 4 of 6 Gmail - Should the Commonwealth cover for or expose the accountants? 10/10/12 3:52 PM Subject: Should the Commonwealth cover for or expose the accountants? From: Anthony OConnell Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13). ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rtGK/HE/5PvNNl3O+L3EnSzowNg4E6WFmK5v+6lAxhM=; b=xIA0EdHnwqFIg10Lj7Q/KSSywNVtBdHpkc/NFCD2+3t2rP7gvjItlwqVUAHarNw65X DwbpX3BAu4Q0XljsIlyT/xxQaF+2ni5bmTRFgUcXSayPrXDh5xoZI5Le9nvMC7ZWaXP8 esH61thbBeDesq4JpcBwZAMN77RcDiqbquDv9IEyXtO/ZaJ/qBcHTRq9B4eWRc+IGjoF i+H8nUkyZpBAdP6b8T5sBQ1sNLc97a+/91hq2wrvrbNVz9I7Qdq/De66uwoLwbtdYmbV P48nu8mdeI5xro7rVM61fbJb9DG+4//RTY6ywKiqZ54rqsOGRWz1yJSnTqVSuOtAB91n Kn7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.61.196 with SMTP id v4mr20149969ich.24.1349909422228; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.127.100 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: Mail Delivery Subsystem Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13). https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a4cdf1c2cb0000 Page 5 of 6 Gmail - Should the Commonwealth cover for or expose the accountants? 10/10/12 3:52 PM ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rtGK/HE/5PvNNl3O+L3EnSzowNg4E6WFmK5v+6lAxhM=; b=xIA0EdHnwqFIg10Lj7Q/KSSywNVtBdHpkc/NFCD2+3t2rP7gvjItlwqVUAHarNw65X DwbpX3BAu4Q0XljsIlyT/xxQaF+2ni5bmTRFgUcXSayPrXDh5xoZI5Le9nvMC7ZWaXP8 esH61thbBeDesq4JpcBwZAMN77RcDiqbquDv9IEyXtO/ZaJ/qBcHTRq9B4eWRc+IGjoF i+H8nUkyZpBAdP6b8T5sBQ1sNLc97a+/91hq2wrvrbNVz9I7Qdq/De66uwoLwbtdYmbV P48nu8mdeI5xro7rVM61fbJb9DG+4//RTY6ywKiqZ54rqsOGRWz1yJSnTqVSuOtAB91n Kn7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.61.196 with SMTP id v4mr20149969ich.24.1349909422228; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.127.100 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=sent&th=13a4cdf1c2cb0000 Page 6 of 6 Gmail - interest, simple or compound 11/6/12 11:22 AM Anthony OConnell interest, simple or compound 2 messages Anthony OConnell Milagros Woolson, Would you please tell me how interest on unpaid real estate taxes are computed in Fairfax County? Simple or compound; if compound how often, year, month, day? Thank you. Anthony O'Connell Edmonds, Vivian Dear Mr. O’Connell, Thank you for contacting the Department of Tax Administration (DTA) in reference to real estate interest rate in Fairfax County. Interest accrues on both tax and penalty at the rate of 1% annually for unpaid Real Estate taxes. Interest rate for real estate is calculated as simple interest. if you have further questions or concerns, please respond to this e-mail or you may call me at 703- 324-2703. Sincerely, Vivian Edmonds, Collection Supervisor Delinquent Collection Division Department Of Tax Administration ______ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=inbox&th=13aaebcf4524d400 Page 1 of 2 Gmail - interest, simple or compound 11/6/12 11:22 AM received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer From: Anthony OConnell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 6:56 PM To: Woolson, Milagros D. Subject: interest, simple or compound [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7b22e01e84&view=pt&search=inbox&th=13aaebcf4524d400 Page 2 of 2