FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 36 NUMBER 54 Friday, March 19,1971 Washington, D.C. Pages 5281-5320

Agencies in this issue— Agricultural Research Service Agriculture Department Atomic Energy Commission Coast Guard Consumer and Marketing Service Environmental Protection Agency Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Hazardous Materials Regulations Board Housing and Urban Development Department Indian Affairs Bureau Interstate Commerce Commission Labor-Management and Welfare- Pension Reports Office Mines Bureau National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Administration Tariff Commission Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Subscriptions Now Being Accepted

SLIP L A W S

92d Congress, 1st Session 1971

Separate prints of Public Laws, published immediately after enactment, with marginal annotations and legislative history references.

Subscription Price: $20.00 per Session . . i . ... . \ ■ Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402

■ ■ T i r ' r i l £ ,fr r ' n Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, ■ a Hr K/il Hrlir\ I r* If on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Na o * * “* * “ Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. 2 > Area Code 202 1934 c j y Phone 962-8626 pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 2o, (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federa^ Register.^aP^ proved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I ) . Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. .Government Printing Washington, D.C. 20402. in The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $2.50 per month or $25 per year, pay** . or advance. The charge for individual copies is 20 cents for each issue, or 20 cents for each group of pages as actually bound. Remit cne money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. ursuant The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code o f Federal R egulations, which is published, under 50 titles, P ^ to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended (44 U.S.C. 1510). The Code of Federal R egulations is sold by the Superin of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first Federal R egister issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code of F ederal R egulati Contents

agricultural r e s e a r c h Proposed Role Making INDIAN AFFAIRS BUREAU Control zones and/or transition SERVICE areas; proposed alteration (3 Notices Rules and Regulations documents)______5298, 5299 Area directors et al.; delegation of Hog cholera and other communi­ authority, exceptions______5304 cable swine diseases; areas FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS quarantined ------,— 5285 COMMISSION INTERIOR DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations See Indian Affairs Bureau; Mines Bureau. See also Agricultural Research Oscillator radiation; measure­ Service; Consumer and Market­ ment procedure—, ______5294 ing Service. Radiotelephone station; operating INTERSTATE COMMERCE Rules and Regulations , p o sitio n ______5294 COMMISSION Review Board; practice and pro­ Milk indemnity payment pro­ Notices gram; governing regulations— 5285 cedure ______5294 Proposed Rule Making Motor carrier transfer proceed­ ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION FM broadcast station, Brunswick, ings —______5317 Md.; table as assignments_____ 5301 Notices LABOR DEPARTMENT Receipt of applications for con­ Notices struction permits and facility CATV annual fee; extension of See Labor-Management and Wel­ licenses, time for submission deadline_____.______5305 fare-Pension Office. of views on antitrust matters: Common carrier services informa­ Commonwealth Edison Co------5305 tion; domestic public radio serv­ LABOR-MANAGEMENT AND Northern Indiana Public Service ices applications accepted for C o ______5304 filing — J------,------5306 WELFARE-PENSION REPORTS Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power New 70 channel detent UHF tun­ OFFICE Corp.; order changing date and ing device to meet comparable place for prehearing confer­ TV tuning requirement; request Rules and Regulations ence ______5305 for comment______5305 Employee benefit plans utilizing COAST GUARD Connecticut General life In­ FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION surance Co.; variation from Proposed Rule Making Notices publication requirements______5289 Sulfuric acid containers______5296 Hearings, etc.: MINES BUREAU COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Columbia LNG Corp. et al_____ 5310 Lawrenceburg Gas Transmission Proposed Rule Making See National Oceanic and At­ C o r p ------5311 mospheric Administration. Minnesota Power & Light Co___ 5312 Mandatory safety standards, Northern Natural Gas Co______5312 underground coal mines; pro­ CONSUMER AND MARKETING Sylvania Corp______i ______5312 tective clothing______5296 SERVICE Texas Eastern Transmission Rules and Regulations Corp ------5313 NATIONAL OCEANIC AND Tomatoes grown in Florida; limi­ ATMOSPHERIC tation of shipments______5285 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Notices Proposed Rule Making First Massachusetts Financial AGENCY Corp.; order approving action to Whaling; notice of public hear­ Rules and Regulations become a bank holding com­ ing ______'______5296 Certain air quality control re­ pany ------5313 Notices gions; designations: Union Bank; order approving ap­ American Stem Trawlers, Inc.; Colorado ______5290 plication for merger of banks notice of hearing regarding under Bank Merger Act______5314 Maine and New Hampshire____ 5291 transfer of fishery______5304 M ontana______5290 Southern Delaware______5291 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Virginia and Tennessee______5293 REGULATIONS BOARD COMMISSION FEDERAL AVIATION Proposed Rule Making Notices ADMINISTRATION Transportation of hazardous ma­ Hearings, etc.: Rules and Regulations terials; sulfuric acid______5299 Consolidated Financial Corp. Boeing airplanes; airworthiness HOUSING AND URBAN and Baker, Fentress & Co____ 5314 directives______5286 Pennsylvania Power Co. and Control zones and/or transition DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ohio Edison Co______5315 areas (9 documents)______5286-5288 standard instrument approach Notices Small Business Investment Procedures; recent changes and Community Development Corpo­ Company of New York, Inc_5316 additions ------coco ration; assignment of functions. 5304 (Continued on next page) 5283 5284 CONTENTS

SMALL BUSINESS TARIFF COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION Notices See Coast Guard; Federal Avia­ Proposed Rule Making Pig iron from Canada, Finland tion Administration; Hazardous Small business size standards; definition for assistance pin- and West Germany; joint in­ Materials Regulation Board. poses ______5302 vestigations and hearing..____ 5317

List of CFR Parts Affected The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears following the Notices section of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1971, and specifies how they are affected.

7 CFR 29 CFR 4 7 CFR 16______5285 462______— _____ 5289 1______—...... 5294 966______:______5285 15------1___ 5294 9 CFR 3 0 CFR 83______5294 P roposed R u l e s : 76.______5285 P roposed R ules : 13 CFR 75______— 5296 73.______——______5301 P roposed R u l e s : 4 9 CFR 121______5302 42 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 481 (5 documents) —______5290-5293 14 CFR 173______5299 39______5286 71 (9 documents)______5286-5288 4 6 CFR 97____ 5288 50 CFR P roposed R u l e s : Proposed R u l e s : P roposed R u l e s : 71 (3 documents) — 5298, 5299 146______5296 230 5296 5285 Rules and Regulations

the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. 553) in Title 7— AGRICULTURE that (1) the time intervening between Title 9— ANIMALS AND the date when information upon which Subtitle A— Office of the Secretary of this amendment is based became avail­ ANIMAL PRDDUCTS Agriculture able and the time when this amendment must become effective in order to effectu­ Chapter I-—Agricultural Research PART 16— MILK INDEMNITY ate the declared policy of the act is in­ Service, Department of Agriculture PAYMENT PROGRAM sufficient, (2) compliance with this amendment will not require any special SUBCHAPTER C— INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF ANIMALS AND POULTRY Subpart— Regulations Governing preparation on the part of handlers, (3) Milk Indemnity Payments information regarding the committee’s [Docket No. 71-530] Part 16 of Subtitle A of Title 7 of the recommendation has been made available PART 76— H O G C H O LER A AND Code of Federal Regulations governing to producers and handlers in the pro­ OTHER COMMUNICABLE SWINE the Milk Indemnity Payment Program is duction area, and (4) this amendment DISEASES hereby transferred to Chapter VII, Sub­ relieves restrictions on the handling of chapter C, Part 760, “ Indemnity Payment tomatoes grown in the production area. Areas Quarantined Programs” of Title 7, and is redesignated Regulation, as amended. In § 966.308 Pursuant to provisions of the Act of as “Subpart—Dairy Indemnity Program” May 29, 1884, as amended, the Act of of that Part. Part 16 of Subtitle A is (35 F.R. 16628) paragraph

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5286 RULES AND REGULATIONS benefit to affected persons. It does not tions prescribed by (a) at intervals not to ance with the notice and public procedure appear that public participation in this exceed 600 hours’ time in service from last provisions of the Administrative Pro­ rule making proceeding would make ad­ inspection. cedures Act is unnecessary. ditional relevant information available (c) If cracks are found which exceed 29 inches in length or which have propagated In consideration of the foregoing, Part to this Department. Accordingly, under laterally three-sixteenths inch or more 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is the administrative procedure provisions from an axial line extending from the relief amended effective 0901 G.m.t„ May 27, in 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found upon good slot as shown in figure 1 of Boeing Service 1971, as hereinafter set forth: cause that notice and other public pro­ Bulletin 54-2015, Rev. 1, dated February 23, 1971, replace with a serviceable item and In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055), the follow­ cedure with respect to the amendment ing control zone is amended to read: are impracticable and unnecessary, and repeat inspections at intervals not to exceed good cause is found for making it effec­ 600 hours’ time in service from last inspec­ P ontiac, M ic h . tion, or rework in a manner approved by the tive less than 30 days after publication Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Within a 5-mile radius of Pontiac Munici­ in the F ederal R egister. Western Region. pal Airport (latitude 42°39'55" N., longitude (d) If cracks are found and the crack 83°25'05" W .), within 2 miles each side of Done at Washington, D.C., this 16th the Pontiac VOR 116° and 271® radials, day of March 1971. length and direction are within the limits of (c) above, stop drill the crack per Boeing extending from the 5-mile radius zone to 8 miles west of the VOR. This control zone is F . J. M u lh er n , Service Bulletin 54-2015, Rev. 1, dated February 23, 1971, or later FAA approved effective during specific dates and times Acting Administrator, established in advance by a notice to airmen. Agricultural Research Service. revision, or an equivalent rework approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, The effective, date and time will thereafter [PR Doc.71-3850 Filed 3-18-71;8:49 am] FAA Western Region. Inspect within 200 be continuously published in the Airman’s hours’ time in service with repeat inspec­ Information Manual. tions at intervals not to exceed 200 hours’ (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 time in service since last inspection. U.S.C. 1348, sec. 6 (c ), Department of Trans­ -Note: Terminating action for this A.D. portation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND consists of accomplishment of the rework provisions of Part III of Service Bulletin 5 4- Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on March 1, SPACE 2015, Revision 1, dated February 23, 1971, or 1971. later FAA approved revision. Inspection in­ Chapter I— Federal Aviation Adminis­ aniel arrow tervals will then revert to normal. D E. B , tration, Department of Transportation Director, Central Region. This amendment becomes effective [FR Doc.71-3824 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] [Airworthiness Docket No. 71-W E -6-A D ; April 9,1971. Amdt. 39-1176] (Secs. 31 3(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C, 1354(a), 1421, and [Airspace Docket No. 71-CE-44] DIRECTIVES 1423, sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transporta­ tion Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(C)) p a r t 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ There have been cracks of the inboard March 10,1971. nacelle strut upper link that could re­ L y n n L. H i n k , PORTING POINTS sult in separation of engine from the Acting Director, Alteration of Transition Area wing. Since this condition is likely to FAA Western Region. The purpose of this amendment to exist or develop in other airplanes of the [FR Doc.71-3820 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] same type design, an airworthiness direc­ Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ tive is being issued to require inspection tions is to alter the Billings, Mont., [Airspace Docket No. 71-CE-43] and rework if necessary of the inboard transition area. nacelle strut upper links on Boeing 747 p a r t 71— DESIGNATIONS FEDERAL Recent transfer of air traffic control responsibility at Billings, Mont., from airplanes. AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, the Great Falls Air Route Traffic Con­ Since a situation exists that requires CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ trol Center to the Salt Lake City Air immediate adoption of this regulation, it PORTING POINTS Route Traffic Control Center has af­ forded additional radar coverage for is found that notice and public procedure Alteration of Control Zone hereon are impracticable and good cause Logan Field, Billings, Mont., w h ich re­ quires a minor adjustment to the Billings exists for making this amendment effec­ The purpose of this amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ 7,000-foot MSL transition area. Action is tive in less than 30 days. tions is to alter the Pontiac, Mich., con­ taken herein to effect this change. In consideration of the foregoing and trol zone. Since this alteration is minor in nature pursuant to the authority delegated to On March 1, 1971, the control tower and is in the interest of safety, compli­ me by the Administrator (31 F.R. 13697*), serving the Pontiac, Mich., Municipal ance with the notice and public proce­ § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Airport will increase its hours of opera­ dure provisions of the Administrative Regulations is amended by adding the tion from 0700-2300 daily to 0600-2400 Procedures Act is unnecessary. daily. Since this facility provides the following new airworthiness directive: In consideration of the foregoing, Part weather and communications service 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations B oeing. Applies to Boeing Model 747 series which is the basis for the Pontiac control is amended effective 0901 G.m.t., May 27, airplanes certificated in all categories. zone and since the Pontiac control zone Compliance required as indicated. 1971, as hereinafter set forth: is presently designated as effective from In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the follow­ To detect cracks of the nacelle struct upper 0700-2300 hours daily, it is necessary to link accomplish the following: ing transition area is amended to read: Within 300 hours’ time in service after the make the Pontiac control zone effective effective date of this AD, unless already during the times that the control tower Billings, M on t. accomplished within the last 300 hours’ time is in operation. Action is taken herein to That airspace extending upward from 700 in service effect this change. The new hours for the feet above the surface within an 8-mile (a) Visually inspect the upper end of the control zone will initially be published in radius of Logan Field (latitude 45°48'25" N., inboard nacelle upper strut link Part No. advance by a notice to airmen. There­ longitude 108o31'55” W .); within a 12-mile 65B90442-5 for cracks in accordance with after, the effective date and time of the radius of Billings VORTAC, extending from Boeing Service Bulletin 54-2015, Rev. 1, control zone and any changes thereto a line 5 miles southeast of and parallel to dated February 23, 1971, or later FAA ap­ will continuously be published in the the Billings VORTAC 212° radial clockwise proved revision, or an equivalent inspection to the Billings VORTAC 347° radial; a?“ approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Airman’s Information Manual. within 2 miles each side of the Billings lb Division, FAA Western Region. Since this alteration is minor in nature localizer east course, extending from tn (b) If no cracks are found, repeat inspec­ and is in the interest of safety, compli­ 8-mile radius area to 8 miles east o f tn

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5287

Biuings RBN; that airspace extending up­ (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, or objections regarding the proposed ward from 1,200 feet above the surface within 49 U.S.C. 1348, sec. 6 (c ), Department of amendment. a 25-mile radius of Billings VORTAC, extend­ Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) No objections have been received and ing from the south edge o f V -2 west of Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Febru­ the proposed amendment is hereby Bifiings clockwise to the southwest edge of V-19 southeast of Billings; within 10 miles ary 26, 1971. adopted without change and is set forth below. southwest and 7 miles northeast of the Bill­ D aniel E . B arrow , ings VORTAC 301° radial, extending from Acting Director, Central Region. This amendment shall be effective 0901 the 25-mile radius area to 49 miles north­ G.m.t., May 27, 1971. west of the VORTAC; within 10 miles south­ (1) In § 71.171 (35 F.R. 2054), the folT west and 7 miles northeast of the Billings lowing control zone is amended to read: (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, VORTAC 317° radial, extending from the 49 U.S.C. 1348, sec. 6 (c ), Department of 25-mile radius area to 45 miles northwest W aterloo, I owa Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655 (c )) of the VORTAC; within 10 miles west and Within a 5-mile radius of Waterloo Mu­ Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Febru­ 7 miles east of the Billings VORTAC 347° nicipal Airport (latitude 42°33'20" N., lon­ ary 26, 1971.. radial, extending from the 25-mile radius gitude 92°24'00'' W .); within 2(4 miles each area to 42 miles north of the VORTAC;. side of the Waterloo, Iowa, VORTAC 078° D aniel E. B ar ro w , within 10 miles north and 8 miles south of radial extending from the 5-mile-radius zone Acting Director, Central Region. the Billings VORTAC 096° radial, extend­ to 6 miles east of the VORTAC; and within ing from the 25-mile radius area to 38 miles 2 (4 miles each side of the Waterloo, Iowa In § 71.181 (35 F.R. 2134), the follow­ east o f the VORTAC; and the area southeast VORTAC 200° radial extending from the 5- ing transition area is amended to read: of Billings bounded on the northeast by mile-radius zone to 6(4 miles south of the M arshall, M in n . V-86, on the south by latitude 45°20'00" N„ VORTAC. and on the west by V-187; that airspace ex­ That airspace extending upward from 700 tending upward from 7,700 feet MSL within (2) In § 71.181 (35 F.R. 2134), the fol­ feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius 8 miles each side of the Billings VORTAC lowing transition area is amended to of the Marshall Municipal Airport (latitude 096° radial, extending from 38 to 99 miles read: 44°26'50" N., longitude 95°49'10" W .); and east of the VORTAC; and the area northwest W aterloo, Iowa that airspace extending upward from 1200 of Billings bounded on the northeast by That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within 4(4 miles V-187, on the southwest by V2-N, and on northeast and 9(4 miles southwest of the the northwest by the Lewistown, Mont., feet above the surface within a 9-mile radius of the Waterloo Municipal Airport (latitude 323° and 143° bearings from the Marshall VORTAC 195° radial; and that airspace ex­ 42°33'20" N„ longitude 92°24'00" W.); Municipal Airport, extending from 1(4 miles tending upward from 7,000 feet MSL within within 3 miles each side of the Waterloo southeast of the airport to 18(4 miles north­ 7 miles north and 10 miles south of the ILS localizer northwest course extending west of the airport. Billings VORTAC 266° radial, extending from from the 9-mile radius area to 8 miles north­ 6 to 43 miles west of the VORTAC; and [FR Doc.71-3827 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] west of the OM; and within 5 miles each side within a 29-mile radius of the Billings VORTAC starting at the W edge of V-465 of the Waterloo, Iowa, VORTAC 120° radial extending from the 9-mile radius area to [Airspace Docket No. 70-CE-124] extending clockwise to the south edge of V-2. 16 miles southeast of the VORTAC; that air­ (Sec. 307 (a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, space extending upward from 1,200 feet PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL 49 U.S.C. 1348, sec. 6(c), Department of above the surface within the arc of a 29- AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) mile-radius circle centered on the Waterloo VORTAC, extending clockwise from a line CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Febru­ 8 miles north of and parallel to the Waterloo PORTING POINTS ary 26, 1971. VORTAC 096° radial to a line 8 miles east D aniel E. B ar ro w , of and parallel to the Waterloo VORTAC 353° Alteration of Transition Area Acting Director, Central Region. radial; within the arc of an 18-mile-radius In F.R. Doc. 71-1464, on Pages 1884 and circle centered on the Waterloo VORTAC [FR Doc.71-3825 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] extending clockwise from a line 8 miles east 1885 in the issue of Wednesday, Febru­ of and parallel to the Waterloo VORTAC ary 3, 1971, delete that portion of Line 9 reading “to 18%-mile-radius area”. [Airspace Docket No. 70-CE-107] 353° radial to a line 8 miles north of and parallel to the Waterloo VORTAC 096° radial; Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on March 2, PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL and within 9(4 miles north and 4(4 miles south of the Waterloo VORTAC 078° radial 1971. AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, extending from the VORTAC to 18(4 miles D aniel E. B a r ro w , CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ east of the VORTAC; and that airspace ex­ Acting Director, Central Region. PORTING POINTS tending upward from 3,500 feet MSL [FR Doc.71-3828 Filed 3 -1 8 -7 l;8 :4 7 am] bounded on the southeast by V-161, on the Alteration of Control Zone and west by V-13E, on the north by V-100 and [Airspace Docket No. 70-CE-125] Transition Area on the east by the arc of a 29-mile-radius circle centered on the Waterloo VORTAC. p a r t 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL On Pages 20012 and 20013 of the F ed­ [FR Doc.71-3826 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] eral R egister dated December 31, 1970, AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, the Federal Aviation Administration pub­ CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ lished a notice of proposed rule mailing [Airspace Docket No. 70-CE-112] PORTING POINTS which would amend §§ 71.171 and 71.181 p a r t 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Alteration of Control Zone and of Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Reg­ AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, Transition Area ulations so as to alter the control zone CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ and transition area at Waterloo, Iowa. In F.R. Doc. 71-1465, on Page 1885 in PORTING POINTS the issue of Wednesday, February 3,1971, Interested persons were given 45 days Alteration of Transition Area Line 7 of the Yankton, S. Dak., transition to submit written comments, suggestions, area description recited as “extending or objections regarding the proposed On Page 20014 of the F ederal R egister from the 9-mile radius to 18(4” should amendments. dated December 31, 1970, the Federal be corrected to read “extending from the No objections have been received and Aviation Administration published a no­ VOR to 18&.” the proposed amendments are hereby tice of proposed rule making which would amend § 71.181 of Part 71 of the Federal Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on March 2, adopted without change and are set forth 1971. below. Aviation Regulations so as to alter the transition area at Marshall, Minnesota. D aniel E. B a r ro w , These amendments shall be effective Interested persons were given 45 days Acting Director, Central Region. 0901 G.m.t., May 27, 1971. to submit written comments, suggestions [FR Doc.71-3829 Filed 3 -18-71;8:47 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5288 RULES AND REGULATIONS

[Airspace Docket No. 71-SO-33] the Palmdale, Calif.; control zone. [Airspace Docket No. 7L-WE-171 PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Interested persons were given 30 days in which to submit written comments, PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, suggestions, or objections. AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ The California Department of Aero­ CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ PORTING POINTS nautics objected to the proposed amend­ PORTING POINTS ment on the basis of reserving airspace Alteration of Transition Area -beyond that required for control purposes Alteration of Transition Area The purpose of this amendment to and forwarded the following recommen­ The purpose of this amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ dations: Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ tions is to alter the Cordele, Ga., transi­ 1. The control zone extension described tions is to alter the description of the tion area. on the Palmdale VORTAC 045° radial Spokane, Wash., transition area. The Cordele transition area described be deleted. A recent review of the description of in § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140) has a desig­ 2. The control zone extension based on the Spokane, Wash., transition area re­ nated radius circle of 9 miles and an ex­ the Palmdale ILS localizer east course be vealed that a portion of the airspace was tension predicated on the Vienna, Ga., reduced from 3 to 2 miles each side of the described in part by a nonexistent air­ VORTAC 2269 radial, extending to the localizer course. way. Action is taken herein to correct VORTAC. An additional review of the proposed this discrepancy. U.S. Standards for Terminal Instru­ airspace designation indicated that the In consideration of the foregoing in ment Procedures (TERPs), issued after VOR-22 instrument approach procedure, §71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the description extensive consideration and discussion for which the extension based on the of the Spokane, Wash., transition area as with government agencies concerned 045° T radial had been described, has amended by (35 F.R. 18192) is further and affected industry groups, are now been canceled. This proposed airspace amended by deleting “ * * * V-281 * * *” being applied to update the criteria for designation may be deleted and the Final where it appears in the text and sub­ instrument approach procedures. The Rule will so indicate. The additional air­ stituting ” * * * by the E edge of V-112 criteria for the designation of controlled space is the minimum required to pro­ E * * *» therefor. airspace protection for these procedures vide controlled airspace protection for was revised to conform to TERPs and aircraft executing the prescribed instru­ Effective date. This amendment shall achieve increased and efficient utilization ment procedures while operating below be effective 0901 G.m.t., May 27,1971. of airspace. 1,000 feet above the surface and in the (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Because of this revised criteria, it is interest of flying safety cannot be re­ as amended, 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), sec. 6(c), necessary to alter the description by tak­ duced to dimensions less than those Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.0 ing the following actions: proposed. 1655(c)) 1. Reduce the radius circle from 9 to In consideration of the foregoing in Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on 8 miles. § 71.171 (36 F.R. 1910) the description of March 11, 1971. 2. Revoke the extension predicated on the Palmdale, Calif., control zone is Vienna VORTAC 226° radial. hereby adopted subject to the following L y n n L. H in k, The above actions result in a substan­ change: Acting Director, Western Region. tial decrease in controlled airspace. Delete “ * * * within 2 miles each side [FR Doc.71-3832 Filed 3-18-71; 8:48 am] In consideration of the foregoing, no­ of the Palmdale VORTAC 045° radial, ex- tice and public procedure hereon are un­ • tending from the 5-mile radius zone to 9 [Docket No. 10917; Arndt. No. 747] necessary and Part 71 of the Federal miles northeast of the VORTAC * * Aviation Regulations is amended, effec­ PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT Since this change releases additional APPROACH PROCEDURES tive immediately, as hereinafter set uncontrolled airspace to the flying public forth. and imposes no additional burden on any Recent Changes and Additions In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the COrdele, person, notice and public procedure here­ Ga., transition area is amended to read: on is unnecessary. This amendment to Part 97 of the Fed­ eral Aviation Regulations incorporates by C ordele, G a. Effective date. This amendment shall reference therein changes and additions That airspace extending upward from 700 be effective 0901 G.m.t„ May 27, 1971. to the Standard Instrument Approach feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius (Sec. 307(a),' Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Procedures (SIAPs) that were recently of Cordele Airport (lat. 3 1°59'15" N., long. as amended, (49 U.S.C. 1348(a), sec. 6(c), adopted by the Administrator to promote 83°46'24'' W .). Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. safety at the airports concerned. (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 1655(c)) The complete SIAPs for the changes 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), sec. 6 (c ), Department of Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on and additions covered by this amend­ Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) March 11, 1971. ment are described in FAA Forms 3139, -Issued in East Point, Ga., on March 10, L y n n L. H in k , 8260-3, 8260-4, or 8260-5 and made a f>art 1971. Acting Director, Western Region. of the public rule making dockets of the G ordon A . W il l ia m s, Jr., In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055) the descrip­ FAA in accordance with the procedures Acting Director, Southern Region. tion of the Palmdale, Calif., control zone set forth in Amendment No. 97-696 (358 [FR Doc.71-3830 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] is amended to read as follows: F.R. 5610). Palmdale, Calif. SIAPs are available for examination [Airspace Docket No. 71-W E -3] - Witjiin a 5-mile radius of Air Force Plant at the Rules Docket and at the National PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL No. 42, Palmdale, Calif, (latitude 34°37'45" Flight Data Center, Federal Aviation AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, N., longitude 118°04'54'' W .), within 3 miles Administration, 800,Independence Ave­ each side of the ILS localizer east course, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ extending from the 5-mile radius zone to 7.5 nue SW., Washington, DC 20590. Copies PORTING POINTS miles east of the LOM, and within 2 miles of SIAPs adopted in a particular region south of and parallel to the Palmdale are also available for examination at the Alteration of Control Zone VORTAC 099° radial, extending from the 5- headquarters of that region. Individual On February 3, 1971, a notice of pro­ mile radius zone to 8 miles east of the VORTAC. This control zone is effective dur­ copies of SIAPs may be purchased from posed rule making was published in the ing the specific dates and times established the FAA Public Document Inspection Fa­ F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 1910) stating in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effec­ Avenue that the Federal Aviation Administra­ tive date and time will thereafter be con­ cility, HQ-405, 800 Independence tion was considering an amendment to tinuously published in the Airman’s Infor­ SW., Washington, DC 20590, or from the Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ mation Manual. applicable FAA regional office in accord­ tions that would alter the description of [FR Doc.71-3831 Filed 3-18-71;8:48 am] ance with the fee schedule prescribed in

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5289

49 CPR 7-85. This fee is payable in ad­ 6. Section 97.29 is amended by estab­ to their annual reports. Interested per­ vance an d may be paid by check, draft, lishing, revising, or canceling the follow­ sons were invited to submit objections or postal money order payable to the ing ILS SIAPs, effective April 15,1971. to the proposed variance within 15 days Treasurer of the United States. A weekly Atlanta, Ga.— Atlanta Airport; ILS Runway of the date of publication. No objections transmittal of all SIAP changes and ad­ 9L, Amdt. 38; Revised. have been received. Accordingly, in ac­ ditions may be obtained by subscription Atlanta, Ga.— Atlanta Airport; ILS Runway cordance with section 5(a), WPPDA, 29 at an an nu al rate of $125 per annum 9R, Amdt. 13; Revised. U.S.C. 304(a), 29 CFR Part 462, Subpart from the Superintendent of Documents, Atlanta, Ga.— Atlanta Airport; ILS Runway A, and Secretary’s Order No. 16-68 (33 U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash­ 33, Amdt. 16; Revised. F.R. 15574) the variation to appear as Bismarck, N.D.— Bismarck Municipal Airport; ington, D.C. 20402. ILS Runway 31, Amdt. 22; Revised. §§ 462.37 and 462.38 of 29 CFR Part Since a situation exists that requires Tallahassee, Fla.— Tallahassee Municipal Air­ 462, Subpart B, with an undesignated immediate adoption of this amendment, port; ILS Runway 36, Amdt. 12; Revised. centerhead, is granted as follows: I find that further notice and public pro­ Winston-Salem, N.C.—-Smith Reynolds Air­ C ertain E m p lo ye e B enefit P lans U t il iz ­ cedure hereon is impracticable and good port; ILS Runway 33, Amdt. 14; Revised. ing th e C o nnecticut G eneral L ife cause exists for making it effective in 7. Section 97.29 is amended by estab­ I nsurance C o . less than 30 days. lishing, revising, or canceling the follow­ In consideration of the foregoing, Part ing ILS SIAPs, effective March 18, 1971. § 462.37 Rule of variation. 97 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Every employee benefit plan which is amended as follows, effective on the Baltimore, Md.— Friendship International Airport; ILS Runway 10, Amdt. 17; utilizes the Connecticut General Life In­ dates specified: Canceled. surance Co. (hereinafter referred to as 1. Section 97.23 is amended by estab­ “carrier”) to provide benefits and which lishing, revising or canceling the follow­ 8. Section 97.33 is amended by estab­ presently is required under section 7(d) ing VOR-VOR/DME SIAPs, effective lishing, revising, or canceling the follow­ (2) (A) of the Welfare and Pension Plans April 15, 1971. ing RNAV SIAPs, effective April 15, 1971. Disclosure Act to attach to its annual Bismarck, N. Dak.— Bismarck Municipal Air­ Carlsbad, Calif.— Palomar Airport.; RNAV report filed with the Secretary of Labor port; VOR-A, Arndt. 12; Revised. Runway 6, Amdt. 1; Revised. pursuant to section 8(b) of the Act, a Charlotte, Mich.— Fitch H. Beach Airport, Houston, Tex.— Intercontinental Airport; copy of the financial report of the car­ VOR Runway 20, Admt. 1; Revised. RNAV Runway . 14, Original; Established. rier will no longer be required to do so, Houston, Tex.— Intercontinental Airport.; Haverhill, Mass.— Haverhill Airport; VOR-A, subject to the following conditions. Amdt. i; Revised. RNAV Runway 32, Original; Established. Hickory, N.C.—-Hickory Municipal Airport; San Antonio, Tex.— Intercontinental Airport; § 462.38 Conditions of variation. RNAV Runway 30L, Original; .Established. VOR Runway 24, Amdt. 13; Revised. (a) The carrier shall: Lansing, Mich.— Capital Airport; VOR Run­ (Secs. 307, 313, 601, 1110, Federal Aviation way 6, Amdt. 11; Revised, Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1438, 1354, 1421, 1510, (1) Submit to the Office of Labor- ïiluncie, Ind.— Delaware County-Johnson sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act, Management and Welfare-Pension Re­ Field; VOR Runway 14, Amdt. 5; Revised. 49 U.S.C. 1655(c) and 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (1) ) ports, within 120 days after the end of Pellston, Mich.— Emmett County Airport; its fiscal year, 10 copies of its latest finan­ VOR Runway 23, Amdt. 5; Revised. Issued in Washington, D.C., on cial report, including the company’s com­ Wabash, Ind.— Wabash Municipal Airport; March 9, 1971. plete name and address in each copy. VOR-A, Amdt. 2; Revised. R . S . S l if f , Houston, Tex.— Intercontinental Airport; Acting Director, (2) Thereafter make timely written VOR/DME Runway 14, Amdt. 2; Revised. Flight Standards Service. notification to each plan administrator Houston, Tex.— Intercontinental Airport; of a participating employee benefit plan VOR/DME Runway 32, Amdt. 2; Revised. Note: Incorporation by reference pro­ heretofore required to submit a copy of Trenton, Tenn.— Gibson County Airport; visions in §§ 97.10 and 97.20 approved by such financial report under section 7(d) VOR/DME-A, Amdt. 1; Revised. the Director of the Federal Register on (2) (A) of the Act that the carrier has 2. Section 97.25 is amended by estab­ May 12, 1969 (35 F.R. 5610). submitted its latest financial report to lishing, revising or canceling the follow­ [FR Doc.71-3750 Filed 3-18-71;8:45 am] the Office of Labor-Management and ing LOC-LDA SIAPs, effective April 15, Welfare-Pension Reports. 1971. (b) In lieu of submitting to the Office Anniston, Ala.— Anniston-Calhoun Airport; of Labor-Management and Welfare-Pen­ LOC Runway 5, Original; Established. Title 29— LABOR sion Reports the financial report of the 3. Section 97.25 is amended by estab­ Chapter IV——Office of Labor-Manage­ carrier, each plan administrator of an lishing, revising, or canceling the follow­ employee benefit plan to which this vari­ ing LOC-LDA SIAPs, effective March 18, ment and Welfare-Pension Reports, ation applies shall report in part III, sec­ 1971. Department of Labor tion D of Department of Labor Annual Baltimore, Md.— Friendship International PART 462— VARIATION FROM Report Form D-2, or attachment thereto, Airport; LOC Runway 10, Original; the complete name and address of Established. PUBLICATION REQUIREMENTS the carrier and shall place in Item 6 of said part and section the symbol “VAR” 4. Section 97.27 is amended by estab­ Certain Employee Benefit Plans Utiliz­ ing Connecticut General Life Insur­ in the space provided for the code lishing, revising, or canceling the follow­ number. ing NDA/ADF SIAPs, effective April 15, ance Co. 1971. (c) The carrier is cautioned that: On January 21, 1971, there was pub­ (1) This variation does not apply to Bismarck, N.D.— Bismarck Municipal Airport; lished in the F ederal R egister (36 F.R. NDB Runway 31, Amdt. 21; Revised. any employee benefit plan for which the Fort Wayne, Ind.— Municipal (Baer Field); 985) notice of a proposed variation un­ carrier maintains separate experience NpB Runway 31, Amdt. 14; Revised. der which employee benefit plans which records, since such plans are not required Wabash, Ind.— Wabash Municipal Airport; utilize the services o f the Connecticut to file financial reports of the carrier un­ NDB Runway 27, Amdt. 2; Revised. General Life Insurance Co., Hartford, der section 7(d)(2). Winston-Salem, N.C.— Smith Reynolds Air­ Conn. 06115, hereinafter referred to as port; NDB Runway 33, Amdt. 14; Revised. (2) This variation does not affect the the carrier, and for which the carrier responsibilities of the carrier to comply 5. Section 97.27 is amended by estab­ does not maintain separate experience with the certification requirements of lishing, revising, or canceling the follow- records are excused from the requirement section 7(g) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 306 197SIAPs, effective April 8, of section 7(d) (2) (A) of the Welfare and (g )) and Part 461 of this chapter. Pension Plans Disclosure Act (WPPDA), This variation shall be effective imme­ Augusta, Ga.— Bush Field; NDB Runway 35, 29 U.S.C. 306(d) (2) (A ), that they attach diately upon publication in the F ederal Amdt. 17; Revised. a copy of the carrier’s financial report R egister (3-19-71) .

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 No. 54------2 5290 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(Sec. 5, 72 Stat. 999; 76 Stat. 36; 29 U.S.C. sists of the territorial area encompassed 481.88 Billings Intrastate Air Quality 304) by the boundaries of the following juris­ Control Region. Signed at Washington, D.C., this 10th dictions or described area (including the The Metropolitan Billings Intrastate day of March, 1971. territorial area of all municipalities (as Air Quality Control Region (Montana) defined in section 302(f) of the Clean W. J. Usery, Jr., has been renamed the Billings Intrastate Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographi­ Air Quality Control Region and consists Assistant Secretary for cally located within the outermost Labor-Management Relations. of the territorial area encompassed by boundaries of the area so delimited): the boundaries of the following jurisdic­ [FR Doc.71-3833 Filed 3-18-71:8:48 am] In the State of Montana: tions or described area (including the Blaine County. Liberty County. territorial area of all municipalities (as Cascade County. Pondera County. defined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air Chouteau County. Teton County. Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically Title 42— PUBLIC HEALTH Glacier County. Toole County. located within the outermost boundaries Hill County. of the area so delimited): Chapter IV-— Environmental § 481.169 Helena Intrastate Air Quality In the State of Montana: Protection Agency Control Region. Big Horn County. Musselshell County. PART 481— AIR QUALITY CONTROL The Helena Intrastate Air Quality Carbon County. Petroleum County. REGIONS, CRITERIA, AND CON­ Control Region (Montana) consists of Fergus County. Stillwater County. the territorial area encompassed by the Golden Valley Sweet Grass County. TROL TECHNIQUES boundaries of the following jurisdictions County, Wheatland County. or described area (including the terri­ Judith Basin Yellowstone County. Certain Air Quality Control Regions County. in Montana torial area of all municipalities (as de­ fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air (Sec. 301(a), 81 Stat. 490, 504; 42 U.S.C. On January 15, 1971, notice of pro­ Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically 1857g(a) as amended by sec. 15 (c) (2) of Pub­ posed rule making was published in the located within the outermost boundaries lic Law 91-604) F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 617) to amend of the area so delimited): Note: For purposes o f identification, the Regions are referred to by Montana authori­ Part 481 by designating the Great Falls, In the State of Montana: Helena, Miles City, and Missoula Intra­ ties as follows: Beaverhead Lewis and Clark state Air Quality Control Regions and County. County. Sec. by revising the boundaries of the Metro­ Broadwater Madison County. 481.168 Great Falls Intrastate Air Quality politan Billings Intrastate Air Quality County. * Meagher County. Control Region: Region H. Control Region. Deer Lodge Park County. 481.169 Helena Intrastate Air Quality Con­ County. Powell County. trol Region: Region IV. Interested persons were afforded an 481.170 Miles City Intrastate Air Quality opportunity to participate in the rule Gallatin County. Silver Bow Granite County. County. Control Region: Region IH. making through the submission of writ­ Jefferson County. 481.171 Missoula Intrastate Air Quality ten comments. A consultation was held Control Region: Region I. on January 26, 1971, with appropriate § 481.170 Miles City Intrastate Air Qual­ 481.88 Billings Intrastate Air Quality Con­ State and local authorities pursuant to ity Control Region. trol Region: Region V. section 107 of the Clean Air Act, as The Miles City Intrastate Air Quality Dated: March 15,1971. amended (Public Law 91-604). Due con­ Control Region (Montana) consists of sideration has been given to all relevant W il l ia m D. R uckelshaus, the territorial area encompassed by the Administrator. material presented, with the recom­ boundaries of the following jurisdictions mendation that the name of the Metro­ or described area (including the terri­ [FR Doc.71-3807 Filed 3-18-17;8:45 ami politan Billings Intrastate Air Quality torial area of all municipalities (as de­ Control Region be changed to. the Bill­ fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air ings Intrastate Air Quality Control Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically PART 481— AIR QUALITY CONTROL Region and Treasure County be desig­ located within the outermost boundaries REGIONS, CRITERIA, AND CON­ nated as part of the Miles City Intra­ of the area so delimited): TROL TECHNIQUES state Air Quality Control Region rather In the State of Montana: than as proposed in the Metropolitan Certain Air Quality Control Regions Billings Intrastate Air Quality Control Carter County. Prairie County. Custer County. Richland County. in Colorado Region. Daniels County. Roosevelt County. On January 15,1971, notice of proposed In consideration of the foregoing Dawson County. Rosebud County. rule making was published in the Fed­ and in accordance with the statement Fallon County. Sheridan County. eral R egister (36 F.R. 616) to amend in the notice of proposed rule making, Garfield County. Treasure County. McCone County. Valley County. Part 481 by designating the Comanche, § 471.168, as set forth below, designating Grand Mesa, Pawnee, San Isabel, San the Great Falls Intrastate Air Quality Phillips County. Wibaux County. Powder River Luis, and Yampa Intrastate Air Quality Control Region; § 481.169, as set forth County. Control Regions and by revising the below, designating the Helena Intrastate boundaries of the Metropolitan Denver Air Quality Control Region; § 481.170, as § 481.171 Missoula Intrastate Air Qual­ ity Control Region. Intrastate Air Quality Control Region. set forth below, designating the Miles Interested persons were afforded an City Intrastate Air Qualify Control Re­ The Missoula Intrastate Air Quality opportunity to participate in the rule gion; § 481.171, as set forth below, desig­ Control Region (Montana) consists of making through the submission oi nating the Missoula Intrastate Air the territorial area encompassed by the written comments. A consultation was Quality Control Region; and § 481.88, as boundaries of the following jurisdictions held on January 28, 1971, with appropri­ set forth below, revising the boundaries or described area (including the terri­ ate State and local authorities pursuant of the Metropolitan Billings Intrastate torial area of all municipalities (as de­ to section 107 of the Clean Air Act, as Air Quality Control Region, and renam­ fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air amended (Public Law 91-604). Due con­ ing the region the Billings Intrastate Act, 42 U.S.C, 1857h(f)) geographically sideration has been given to all relevan Air Quality Control Region, are adopted located within the outermost boundaries material presented. . effective on publication. of the area so delimited): In consideration of the foregoing an In the State of Montana: in accordance with the statement in tn § 481.168 Great Falls Intrastate Air notice of proposed rule making, § 481.1» ’ Quality Control Region. Flathead County. Missoula County. Lake County. Ravalli County. as set forth below, designating the co- The Great Falls Intrastate Air Lincoln County. Sanders County. manche Intrastate Air Quality contr Quality Control Region (Montana) con­ Mineral County. Region; § 481.173, as set forth below,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5291

dCi^gr>at.inpr the Grand Mesa Intrastate the territorial area encompassed by the Sec. Air Quality Control Region; § 481.174, as boundaries of the following jurisdictions 481.175 San Isabel Intrastate Air Quality Control Region: Region Four. set forth below, designating the Pawnee or described area (including the terri­ 481.176 San Luis Intrastate Air Quality Con­ Intrastate Air Quality Control Region; torial area of all municipalities (as de­ trol Region: Region Five. § 481.175, as set forth below, designating fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air 481.177 Yampa Intrastate Air Quality Con­ the San Isabel Intrastate Air Quality Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically trol Region: Region Eight. Control Region; § 481.176, as set forth located within the outermost boundaries 481.16 Metropolitan Denver Intrastate Air below, designating the San Luis Intra­ of the area so delimited): Quality Control Region: Region Two. state A ir Quality Control Region; In the State of Colorado: § 481.175, as set forth below, designating Chaffee County. Lake County. Dated: March 15,1971. the Y am pa Intrastate Air Quality Con­ Custer County. Las Animas County. W il l iam R uckelshatjs, trol R egion ; and § 481.16, as set forth D. El Paso County. Park County. Administrator. below, revising the boundaries of the Fremont County. Pueblo County. Metropolitan Denver Intrastate Air Huerfano County. Teller County. [FR Doc.71-3808 Filed 3-18-71;8:45 am] Quality Control Region, are adopted § 481.176 San Luis Intrastate Air Qual­ effective on publication. ity Control Region. PART 481— AIR QUALITY CONTROL §481.172 C o m a n ch e Intrastate Air The San Luis Intrastate Air Quality REGIONS, CRITERIA, AND CON­ Quality Control Region. Control Region (Colorado) consists of TROL TECHNIQUES The Comanche Intrastate Air Quality the territorial area encompassed by the Southern Delaware Intrastate Air Control Region (Colorado) consists of boundaries of the following jurisdictions the territorial area encompassed by the or described area (including the terri­ Quality Control Region boundaries of the following jurisdictions torial area of all municipalities (as de­ On January 20,1971, notice of proposed or described area (including the terri­ fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air rule making was published in the F ederal torial area of all municipalities (as de­ Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically R egisetr (36 F.R. 934) to amend Part fined in section 302(f) jof the Clean Air located within the outermost boundaries 481 by designating the Southern Dela­ Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f) geographically of the area so delimited): ware Intrastate Air Quality Control located within the outermost boundaries In the State of Colorado: Region. of the area so delimited): Interested persons were afforded an Alamosa County. Mineral County. In the State of Colorado: opportunity to participate in the rule Conejos County. Rio Grande County. making through the submission of writ­ Baca County. Kiowa County. Costilla County. Saguache County. Bent County. Kit Carson County. ten comments. A consultation was held Cheyenne County. Lincoln County. § 481.177 Yampa Intrastate Air Quality on February 2, 1971, with appropriate Crowley County. Otero County. Control Region. State and local authorities pursuant to Elbert County. Prowers County. The Yampa Intrastate Air Quality section 107 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (Public Law 91-604). Due con­ § 481.173 Grand Mesa Intrastate Air Control Region (Colorado) consists of Quality Control Region. the territorial area encompassed by the sideration has been given to all relevant boundaries of the following jurisdictions material presented. The Grand Mesa Intrastate Air Quality or described area (including the terri­ In consideration of the foregoing and Control Region (Colorado) consists of torial area of all municipalities (as de­ in accordance with the statement in the the territorial area encompassed by the fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air notice of proposed rule making, § 481.178, boundaries of the following jurisdictions Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically as set forth below, designating the or described area (including the terri­ located within the outermost boundaries Southern Delaware Intrastate Air Qual­ torial area of all municipalities (as de­ of the area so delimited): ity Control Region, is adopted effective fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air on publication. Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f) geographically In the State of Colorado: § 481.178 Southern Delaware Intrastate located within the outermost boundaries Grand County. Rio Blanco County. of the area so delimited): Jackson County. Routt County. Air Quality Control Region. Moffat County. In the State of Colorado: The Southern Delaware Intrastate Air § 481.16 Metropolitan Denver Intrastate Quality Control Region (Delaware) con­ Delta County. Montrose County. sists of the territorial area encompassed Eagle County. Ouray County. Air Quality Control Region. Garfield County. Pitkin County. by the boundaries of the following juris­ The Metropolitan Denver Intrastate dictions or described areas (including the Gunnison County. San Miguel County. Air Quality Control Region (Colorado) Hinsdale County. Summit County. territorial area of all municipalities (as Mesa County. consists of the territorial area encom­ defined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air passed by the boundaries of the following Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically § 481.174 Pawnee Intrastate Air Quality jurisdictions or described area (including Control Region. located within the outermost boundaries the territorial area of all municipalities of the area so delimited): (as defined in section 302(f) of the Clean The Pawnee Intrastate Air Quality In the State of Delaware: Control Region (Colorado) consists of Air Act, 42 UJS.C. 1857h(f)) geograph­ the territorial area encompassed by the ically located within the outermost Kent County. Sussex County. boundaries of the following jurisdictions boundaries of the area so delimited): (Sec. 301(a), 81 Stat. 504; 42 U.S.C. 1857g or described area (including the terri­ In the State of Colorado: (a) as amended by sec. 15(c)(2) of Public Law 91-604) torial area of all municipalities (as de­ Adams County. Denver County. fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air Arapahoe County. Douglas County. Dated: March 15,1971. Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically Boulder County. - Gilpin County. located within the outermost boundaries Clear Creek County. Jefferson County. W il l iam D. R uckelshatjs, Administrator. of the area so delimited).: (Sec. 301 (a ), 81 Stat. 490, 504; 42 U.S.C. 1857 [FR Doc.71-3809 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am] In the State of Colorado: g(a) as amended by sec. 15(c) (2) of Public Law 91-604) Larimer County. Sedgwick County, Note: For purposes of identification, the gan County. Washington County. Regions are referred to by Colorado authori­ PART 481— AIR QUALITY CONTROL County. Weld County. ties as follows: «fillips Gounty. Yuma County. REGIONS, CRITERIA, AND CON­ Sec. TROL TECHNIQUES 481.172 Comanche Intrastate Air Quality § 181 *175 San Isabel Intrastate Air Control Region: Region Three. Certain Air Quality Control Regions Quality Control Region. 481.173 Grand Mesa Intrastate Air Quality in Maine and New Hampshire Control Region: Region Seven. The San Isabel Intrastate Air Quality 481.174 Pawnee Intrastate Air Quality Con­ On January 20, 1971, notice of pro­ ontrol Region (Colorado) consists of trol Region: Region One. posed rule making was published in the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5292 RULES AND REGULATIONS

F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 933) to amend described as follows: Beginning at the point of a line described as follows: Beginning Part 481 by designating the Aroostook, where the Penobscot-Aroostook County at the point where the Somerset-Piscataquis Central Maine, Down East, and North­ boundary is intersected by a line common to County boundary is intersected by a line west Maine Intrastate Air Quality Con­ the boundaries of Patten and Stacyville common to the northern boundary of Blan­ Townships and running due west to the chard Plantation and running northeast trol Regions. intersection of said line with Penobscot- along the northern boundary of Blanchard Interested persons were afforded an Piscataquis County boundary. Plantation to the northeast corner of Blan­ opportunity to participate in the rule Piscataquis County— That portion of Pis­ chard Plantation; then northwest along the making through the submission of writ­ cataquis County which lies south and east western boundary of Monson Township to ten comments. A consultation was held on of a line described as follows: Beginning the northweast corner of Monson Town­ February 3, 1971, with appropriate State at the point where the Somerset-Piscataquis ship; then northeast along the northern County boundary is intersected by a line boundaries of Monson, Willimantic, and and local authorities pursuant to section common to the northern boundary of Blan­ Bowerbank Townships, the northern bound­ 107 of the Clean Air Act, as amended chard Plantation and running northeast ary of Barnard Plantation, the northern (Public Law 91-604). Due consideration along the northern boundary of Blanchard boundaries of Williamsburg and Brownville has been given to all relevant material Plantation to the northeast corner of Blan­ Townships, and the northern boundary of presented with the recommendation that chard Plantation; then northwest along the Lake View Plantation to the intersection of Kennebec, Knox, Lincoln, Waldo, and western boundary of Monson Township to said line with the Piscataquis-Penobscot portions of Somerset Counties in Maine, the northwest corner of Monson Township; County boundary, which is also common to then northeast along the northern bound­ the northeast corner of Lake View Plantation. originally proposed in the Central Maine aries of Monson, Willimantic, and Bower- Somerset County— That portion of Somer­ Intrastate Air Quality Control Region, bank Townships, the northern boundary of set County which lies north and west of a now be added to the designated Andro­ Barnard Plantation, the northern bound­ line described as follows: Beginning at the scoggin Valley Interstate Air Quality aries of Williamsburg and Brownville Town­ point where the Somerset-Franklin County Controjl Region (Maine-New Hamp­ ships, and the northern boundary of Lake boundary is intersected by a line common to shire) . View Plantation to the intersection of said the northern boundary of New Portland line with Piscataquis-Penobscot County Township and running northeast along the In consideration of the foregoing and boundary, which is also common to the northern boundaries of New Portland, in accordance with the statement in the northeast corner of Lake View Plantation. Embden, Solon, and Athens Townships to notice of the proposed rule making, the intersection of said line with the § 481.179, as set forth below, designating § 481.182 Northwest Maine Intrastate Somerset-Piscataquis C o u n ty boundary, the Aroostoock Intrastate Air Quality Air Quality Control Region. which is common to the northeast corner of Control Region; § 481.181, as set forth The Northwest Maine Intrastate Air Athens Township. below, designating the Down East Intra­ Quality Control Region (Maine) consists § 481.90 Androscoggin Valley Interstate state Air Quality Control Region; § 481.- of the territorial area encompassed by Air Quality Control Region. 182, as set forth below, designating the the boundaries of the following jurisdic­ The Androscoggin Valley Interstate Northwest Maine Intrastate Air Quality tions or described area (including the Control Region; and § 481.90, as set forth territorial area of all municipalities (as Air Quality Control Region (Maine-New Hampshire) consists of the territorial below, revising the boundaries of the defined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air area encompassed by the boundaries of designated Androscoggin Valley Inter­ Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically state Air Quality Control Region, are the following jurisdictions or described located within the outermost boundaries area (including the territorial area of all adopted effective on publication. of the area so delimited): municipalities (as defined in section § 481.179 Aroostook Intrastate Air Qual­ In the State of Maine: 302(f) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. ity Control Region. Aroostook County— That portion of Aroos­ 1857h(f)) geographically located within The Aroostook Intrastate Air Quality took County which lies west of a line de­ the outermist boundaries of the area so Control Region (Maine) consists of the scribed as follows: Beginning at the point delimited): where the Maine-Canadian international bor­ territorial area encompassed by the In the State of Maine: der is intersected by a line common to the boundaries of the following jurisdictions western boundary of Port Kent Township and Androscoggin Knox County. or described area (including the terri­ running due south to the intersection of the County. Lincoln County. torial area of all municipalities (as de­ said line with the Aroostook-Penobscot Kennebec County. Waldo County. fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air County boundary. In the County of Franklin : Franklin County— That portion of Frank­ Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically Avon Town. Phillips Town. lin County which lies north and west of a - located within the outermost boundaries Carthage Town. Salem Township. line described as follows: Beginning at the of the area so delimited): Chesterville Town. Strong Town. point where the Oxford-Franklin County Farmington Town. Temple Town. In the State of Maine: boundary is intersected by a line common Freeman Township. Township No. 6. to the northern boundary of Township No. Aroostook County— That portion of Aroos­ Industry Town. Washington 6, Phillips Town, Salem Township, and took County which lies east of a line de­ Jay Town. Township. Freeman Township to the intersection of scribed as follows: Beginning at the point New Sharron Town. Weld Town. the said line with the Franklin-Somerset where the Maine-Canadian international New Vineyard Town. Wilton Town. County boundary, which is also common to border is intersected by a line common to the Perkins Township. western boundary of Port Kent Township the northeast corner of Freeman Township. and running due south to the intersection of Oxford County— That portion of Oxford In the County of Oxford: sajd line with the Aroostook-Penobscot County which lies north and west of a line Albany Township. Mason Township. County boundary. described as follows: Beginning at the point Andover Town. Mexico Town. where the Maine-New Hampshire border is Andover North Milton Township. § 481.181 Down East Intrastate Air intersected by a line common to the northern Surplus. Newry Town. Quality Control Region. boundary of Grafton Township, and running Andover West Norway Town. northeast along the northern boundaries of The Down East Intrastate Air Quality Surplus. Oxford Town. Grafton Township and Andover North Sur­ Batchelders Grant. Paris Town. Control Region (Maine) consists of the plus to the intersection of said line with Bethel Town. Peru Town territorial area encompassed by the the Oxford-Franklin County boundary, Buckfield Town. Riley Township. boundaries of the following jurisdictions which is also the northeast corner of Byron Town. Roxbury Town. or described area (including the terri­ Andover North Surplus. Canton Town. Rumford Town. torial area of all municipalities (as de­ Penobscot County— That portion of Pe­ Dixfield Town. Stoneham Town. fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air nobscot County which lies north of a line Gilead Town. Stow Town. Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically described as follows: Beginning at the point Grafton Township. Sumner Town. where the Penobscot-Aroostook County Greenwood Town. Sweden Town. located within the outermost boundaries boundary is intersected by a line common to Hanover Town. Waterford Town. of the area so delimited): the boundaries of Patten and Stacyville Hartford Town. West Paris Town. Woodstock Town. In the State of Maine: Townships, and running due west to the Hebron Town. - intersection of said line with the Penobscot- Lovell Town. Hancock County. Washington County. Piscataquis County boundary. . Somerset County— That portion of Somer- Penobscot County— That portion of Pen­ Piscataquis County— That portion of Pis­ set County which lies south and east °* a . + obscot County which lies south of a line cataquis County which lies north and west described as follows: Beginning at the pom

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5293 where the Somerset-Franklin County bound­ Control Region; §481.146, as set forth by the boundaries of the following juris­ ary Is intersected by a line common to the below, designating the Valley of Virginia dictions or described area (including the northern boundary of New Portland Town­ Intrastate Air Quality Control Region; territorial area of all municipalities (as ship and running northeast along the north­ § 481.93, as set forth below, changing the defined In section 302(f) of the Clean ern boundaries of New Portland, Embden, Solon, and Athens Townships to the inter­ name of the Metropolitan Norfolk Intra­ Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f) ) geographi­ section o f said line with the Somerset-Pisca­ state Air Quality Control Region; and cally located within the outermost taquis co u n ty boundary, which is also com­ § 481.57, as set forth below, changing the boundaries of the area so delimited). mon to the northeast comer of Athens Town­ name of thé Bristol-Johnson City Inter­ In the State of Virginia: ship. state Air Quality Control Region. Counties In the State of New Hampshire: § 481.143 Central Virginia Intrastate Air Charles City. Henrico. Coos County. Quality Control Region. Chesterfield. New Kent. Dinwiddle. Powhatan. (Sec. 301(a), 81 Stat. 490, 504; 42 U.S.C. The Central Virginia Intrastate Air Goochland. Prince George. 1857g(a) as amended by sec. 15(c) (2) of Quality Control Region consists of the Greensville. Surry. Public Law 91-604) territorial area encompassed by the Hanover. Sussex. Dated: March 15, 1971. boundaries of the following jurisdictions or described area (including the terri­ C ities W illiam D . R uckelsh aus, torial area of all municipalities (as de­ Colonial Heights. Petersburg. Administrator. fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air Emporia. Richmond. Hopewell. {FR Doc.71-3810 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am] Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically located within the outermost boundaries § 481.146 Valley of Virginia Intrastate of the area so delimited) : Air-Quality Control Region. PART 481— AIR QUALITY CONTROL In the State of Virginia: The Valley of Virginia Intrastate Air REGIONS CRITERIA AND CON­ Counties Quality Control Region consists of the TROL TECHNIQUES territorial area encompassed by the Amelia. Franklin. boundaries of the following jurisdictions Certain Air Quality Control Regions Amherst. Halifax. or described area (including the terri­ in Virginia and Tennessee Appomattox. Henry. Bedford. Lunenburg. torial area of all municipalities (as de­ On January 13, 1971, notice of the Brunswick. Mecklenburg. fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air proposed rule making was published in Buckingham. Nottoway. Act, '42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically Campbell. Patrick. the F ederal R egister (36 P.R. 436) to located within the outermost boundaries amend Part 481 by designating the Cen­ Charlotte. Pittsylvania. of the area so delimited): Cumberland. Prince Edward. tral Virginia* Northeastern Virginia, In the State of Virginia: State Capital, and Valley of Virginia In­ Cities C ounties trastate Air Quality Control Regions, Bedford. Martinsville. Alleghany. and by changing the name of the Metro­ Danville. South Boston. Highland. Lynchburg. Augusta. Montgomery. politan Norfolk Intrastate Air Quality Bath. Page. T ow ns Control Region (§ 481.93) to the Hamp­ Botetourt. Pulaski. ton Roads Intrastate Air Quality Con­ Blackstone. Rocky Mount. Clarke. Roanoke. trol Region. Farmville. South Hill. Craig. Rockbridge. Interested persons were afforded an Floyd. Rockingham. § 481.144 Northeastern Virginia I Frederick. Shenandoah. opportunity to participate in the rule state Air Quality Control Region. making through the submission of writ­ Giles. Warren. ten comments. A consultation was held The Northeastern Virginia Intrastate C ities Air Quality Control Region consists of on January 12, 1971, with appropriate Buena Vista. Roanoke. State and local authorities pursuant to the territorial area encompassed by the Clifton Forge. Salem. section 107 of the Clean Air Act, as boundaries of the following jurisdictions Covington. Staunton. amended (Public Law 91-604). Due con­ or described area (including the territo­ Harrisonburg. Waynesboro. sideration has been given to all relevant rial area of all municipalities (as defined Lexington. Winchester. material presented, and the following in section 302(f) of the Clean Air Act, 42 Radford. changes have been made: (1) Add the U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically located T ow n s towns of Blackstone, Farmville, Rocky within the outermost boundaries of the Blacksburg. Luray. Mount, and South Hill to the Central area so delimited): Christiansburg. Pulaski. Virginia Intrastate Air Quality Control Front Royal. Vinton. In the State of Virginia: Region; (2) Add Westmoreland County § 481.93 [Amended] and the towns of Culpepper and Warren- Counties ton to the Northeastern Virginia Intra­ The Metropolitan Norfolk Intrastate Accomack. Louisa. Air Quality Control Region (Virginia) state Air Quality Control Region; (3) Albermarle. Madison. Add the towns of Blacksburg, Christians- Caroline. Mathews. has been renamed the Hampton Roads burg, Front Royal, Luray, Pulaski, and Culpeper. Middlesex. Intrastate Air Quality Control Region. Vinton to the Valley of Virginia Inter­ Essex. Nelson. No changes were made in the boundaries state Air Quality Control Region; (4) Fauquier. Northampton. of the Region. Fluvanna. Northumberland. Change the name of the designated Bris­ Gloucester. Orange. § 481.57 [Amended] tol (Virginia)-Johnson City (Tennessee) Greene. Rappahannock. The Bristol (Virginia)-Johnson City interstate Air Quality Control Region to King and Queen. Richmond. (Tennessee) Interstate Air Quality Con­ the Eastern Tennessee-Southwestern King George. Spotsylvania. trol Region has been renamed the East­ Virginia Interstate Air Quality Control King William. Stafford. Region. Lancaster. Westmoreland. ern Tennessee-Southwestern Virginia Intrastate Air Quality Control Region. . consideration of the foregoing and C ities No changes were made in the boundaries m accordance with the statement in the Charlottesville. Fredericksburg. notice of proposed rule making, § 481.143, of the Virginia portion of the Region. T ow ns as set forth below, designating the Cen­ (Sec. 301(a), 81 Stat. 504; 42 U.S.C. tral Virginia Intrastate Air Quality Con­ Culpeper. Warrenton. 1857g(a) as amended by sec. 15(c)(2) of Public Law 91-604) trol Region; § 481.144, as set forth below, § 481.145 State Capital Intrastate designating the Northeastern Virginia Quality Control Region. Dated: March 15, 1971. intrastate Air Quality Control Region; The State Capital Intrastate Air W il l ia m D . R u c kelsh au s, as *ortk below, designating Quality Control Region (Virginia) con­ Administrator. he State Capital Instrastate Air Quality sists of the territorial area encompassed [FR Doc.71-3811 Filed 3-18-71:8:46 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5294 RULES AND REGULATIONS

measurement procedures for measuring Adopted: March 10,1971. Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION oscillator radiation from FM and TV Released: March 12,1971. broadcast receivers. These are the Insti­ Chapter I— Federal Communications tute of Electrical and Electronics Engi­ F ederal C ommunications Commission neers (IEEE) Standard 187 and the C o m m is s io n , International Electrotechnical Commis­ PART 1— PRACTICE AND [ seal] B en F . W aple, sion (IEC) Publication No. 106 and Sup­ Secretary. PROCEDURE plement 106A. A new measurement pro­ [FR Doc.71-3814 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am] Review Board cedure is published in the Electronic Industries Association (EIA) Standard Order. 1. On November 6, 1970, the RS-378. [Docket No. 18884; FCC 71-241] Commission adopted a report and order 2. The new standard for measuring the PART 83— STATIONS ON SHIPBOARD transferring from the Review Board to level of oscillator radiation from FM the presiding officer authority to act on and TV broadcast receivers has been IN THE MARITIME SERVICES joint requests for approval of agreements developed by the Electronics Industries Operating Position of Radiotelephone filed (in hearing proceedings) pursuant Association working in conjunction with Station to § 1.525 of the rules and regulations. the staff engineers of the Commission’s FCC 70-1193, 26 FCC 331. Section Laboratory. The new Standard RS-378, Order. In the matter of amendment of 1.291(a)(2) of the rules, which states entitled “Measurement of Spurious Ra­ Part 83 of the Commission’s rules to per­ that such joint requests are acted on by diation from FM and TV Broadcast Re­ mit the principal operating position of the Review Board, was inadvertently not ceivers in the Frequency Range of 100 the radiotelephone station to be located then amended to reflect the transfer of to 1000 MHz—Using the EIA—Laurel in a room adjoining to and opening into authority. It is now appropriate to cor­ Broad-band Antenna” describes the po­ the room from which the vessel is nor­ rect § 1.291 by deleting that statement. tential sources of spurious radiation from mally steered while at sea on cargo ships 2. Authority for the amendment set frequency modulation and television of 300 gross tons and upwards but less forth in the attached Appendix is set out broadcast receivers and prescribes meth­ than 500 gross tom on which the keel was in sections 4(i), 5(d), and 303(r) of ods of measuring the field strength of laid prior to January 1, 1965, RM-1598. the Communications Act of 1934, as these radiations. 1. The Commission on June 17, 1970, amended. 47 U.S.C. 154 (i), 155(d) , and 3. The EIA method incorporates the adopted a notice of proposed rule making 303 (r), and in § 0.261(a) of the rulesland use of an EIA-Laurel broad-band an­ in the above-entitled matter (FCC 70- regulations. 47 CFR 0.261(a). Because tenna and has produced measurement 642) which made provisions for the filing the amendment is editorial and proce­ results which are more repeatable than of comments. The notice was published dural in nature, the prior notice, proce­ those achieved by use of the procedure in the F ederal R egister on June 25,1970 dure and effective date provisions of 5 prescribed by the IEEE method. The new (35 F.R. 10378). The time for filing com­ U.S.C. 553 are inapplicable. EIA Standard specifies a measuring dis­ ments and reply comments has passed. Accordingly, it is ordered, Effective tance of either 100 feet (as used in the 2. The notice of proposed rule making March 19, 1971, that § 1.291 of the rules IEEE method) or 3 meters (as used in was issued in reference to a petition and regulations is amended as set forth the IEC method). The EIA Standard (RM-1598) filed jointly by 34 owner/ operators of commercial fishing vessels below. RS-378 contains a conversion table which permits conversion of measure­ which requested that section 83.482(d) of (Secs. 4, 5, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, the rules be amended. The purpose of the 1068, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 303) ments made by the EIA method to equiv­ alent measurements made by the IEEE amendment is to permit the principal Adopted: March 11, 1971. method. The conversion factors are nec­ operating position of a radiotelephone station to be located in a room adjoining Released: March 12, 1971. essary as compliance with the limits of radiation contained in § 15.63 of the to and opening into the room from which F ederal C ommunications rules is based upon measurements made the vessel is normally steered while at C o m m is s io n , by the IEEE method. sea because many small cargo vessels, [ seal] B en F. W aple, 4. The Commission is taking cogni­ constructed prior to 1965, are not de­ Secretary. zance of the new measurement procedure signed for the most effective use of a Section 1.291(a) (2) is revised to read by adding a subparagraph (5) to § 15.75 principal operating position in the wheel (b) as follows: house. as follows: ' 3. No comments were received, either § 1.291 General provisions. § 15.75 Measurement procedure. during or after the close of the dates for (a) * * * (b) * * * filing comments and replies. 4. In view of the foregoing: It is (2) The Review Board acts on peti­ (5) Electronics Industries Association ordered, That pursuant to the authority tions to amend, modify, enlarge, or de­ Standard RS-378, dated August 1970, en­ titled, “Measurement of Spurious Radi­ contained in sections 4(i) and 303 (r) of lete issues in cases of adjudication the Communications Act of 1934, as (including mixed adjudicative and rule ation from FM and TV Broadcast Re­ ceivers in the Frequency Range of 100 to amended, Part 83 of the Commission s making proceedings). It also acts on rules is amended effective April 20, 1971, interlocutory pleadings filed in matters 1000 MHz—Using the EIA-Laurel Broad- as set forth below. or proceedings which are before the Band Antenna.” Board. * * * * * 5. It is further ordered, That the pro- ***** 5. No general notice of proposed rule [FRDoc. 71-3813 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am] making under the Administrative Proce­ (Secs. 4, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066,1082; dure Act is required as the amendment 47 U.S.C. 154, 303) is interpretive in nature. Adopted: March 10,1971. [FCC 71-240] 6. It is ordered, Effective April 20,1971, Released: March 12,1971. PART 15— RADIO FREQUENCY that Part 15 of the Commission’s rules and regulations is amended as set forth F ederal C ommunications DEVICES in paragraphs 4, above. Authority for C ommunications, Measurement Procedure for Oscillator this amendment is contained in Sections [ seal] B en F . W aple, Radiation 4(i), 302, 303(f), and 303) (r) of the Secretary. Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Order. 1. Section 15.75(b) of the rules (Secs. 4, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1082; Section 83.482(d) is amended to read references two standards containing 47 U.S.C. 154, 303) as follows:

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5295

§ 83.482 Radiotelephone station. into the room from which the vessel is ***** normally steered while at sea. If the sta­ (d) The principal operating position tion can be operated from any location of the radiotelephone station shall be in other than the principal operating posi­ the room from which the vessel is nor­ tion, except as provided in paragraph (e) mally steered while at sea; Provided, of this section, a direct and positive That in installations on cargo ships of means shall be provided at the principal 300 gross tons and upwards but less than operating position to take full control of 500 gross tons, on which the keel was the station. laid prior to January 1, 1965, the loca­ tion of the principal operating controls ***** may be in a room adjoining and opening [PR Doc.71-3815 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 3 6 , NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5296 Proposed Rule Making

CFR 178.150) packaging for any strength DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE sulfuric acid and limiting use of the DOT-17F (49 CFR 178.117) drum to sul­ Bureau of Mines National Oceanic and Atmospheric furic acid not exceeding 98 percent con­ [ 30 CFR Part 75 ] Administration centration. Furthermore, authorization E 50 CFR Part 230 ] of certain additional tank cars and cer­ MANDATORY SAFETY STANDARDS, tain editorial changes are being con­ UNDERGROUND COAL MINES WHALING sidered. Finally, DOT-12R (49 CFR 178.212) packaging is being considered Protective Clothing Notice of Public Hearing for concentrations of sulfuric acid up to Notice is hereby given that" pursuant On March 2,1971, the National Marine 100.5 percent, with DOT-2E (49 CFR to the authority vested in the Secretary Fisheries Service had published in the 178.24a) bottles being added as author­ of the Interior under section 101(a) of F ederal R egister notice of proposed rule ized inner packaging. the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety making amending domestic whaling reg­ Interested persons are invited to sub­ Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-173), it is ulations (36 F.R. 3925). A request on be­ mit written data, views or comments re­ proposed that Part 75, Subchapter O of half of several persons and companies garding the proposal to the Commandant Chapter I, Title 30, Code of Federal Reg­ has been received. In response to this re­ (M HM ), U.S. Coast Guard, Washington, ulations be amended by adding § 75.1719, quest a public hearing will be held on D.C. 20591. Communications should iden­ as set forth below. This proposed amend­ March 29, 1971, at 10 a.m. P.s.t. in Room tify the notice number CGFR 71-17, any ment prescribes the protective clothing 15, Federal Office Building, 50 Fulton specific wording recommended, reasons which must be worn by each miner reg­ Street, San Francisco, Calif. for any recommended change, and the ularly employed, in the active workings Any data, views, or statements per­ name, address, and organization, if any, of an underground coal mine. taining thereto may be submitted in writ­ of the commentator. The Coast Guard Interested persons may submit written ing to the Regional Director, Southwest will hold an informal hearing on Tues­ comments, suggestions or objections to Region, National Marine Fisheries Serv­ day, May 4, 1971, at 9:30 a.m. in Con­ the Director, Bureau of Mines, Washing­ ice, 300 South Ferry Street, Terminal ference Room 2230, Department of ton, D.C. 20240, no later than 30 days Island, CA 90731. Interested persons will Transportation, Nassif Building, 400 Sev­ following publication of this notice in also be afforded an opportunity to com­ enth Street SW., Washington, DC. In­ the F ederal R egister. ment orally on the proposed amend­ terested persons are invited to attend the ments. Any person who intends to pre­ hearing and present oral or written state­ R ogers C. B. M orton, sent views orally at this hearing is re­ ments on this proposal. There will be Secretary of the Interior. ' quested to furnish in writing his name no cross-examination of persons present­ M arch 12,1971. and the name of the organization he rep­ ing statements. Comments received on or resents, if any, to the said Regional before May 11, 1971, or at the hearing, Part 75, Subchapter O of Chapter I, Director. will be fully considered and evaluated Title 30, Code of Federal Regulations before final action is taken on this pro­ would be amended by adding the follow­ Dated at Washington, D.C., March 17, posal. Copies of all written communica­ ing: 1971. tions received will be available for exam­ § 75.1719 Protective clothing; require­ Ph il ip M . R oedel, ination in Room 8306, Department of ments. Director, Transportation, Nassif Building, 400 Sev­ National Marine Fisheries Service. On and after June 30,1971, each miner enth Street SW., Washington, DC, both [FR Doc.71-3874 Filed 3-18-71;8:50 am] regularly employed in the active work­ before and after the closing date for the ings of an underground coal mine shall receipt of comments. The proposal con­ be required to wear the following protec­ tained in this document may be changed tive clothing and devices: in the light of the comments received. (a) Protective clothing or equipment DEPARTMENT OF By a separate document published at and face-shields or goggles when weld­ page 5299 of this issue of the F ederal R egister, the Hazardous Materials Reg­ ing, cutting, or working with molten TRANSPORTATION metal or when other hazards to the eyes ulations Board of thè Department of exist. Coast Guard Transportation proposes amendments to 49 CFR 173.272 deleting paragraphs (c) (b) Suitable protective clothing to [4 6 CFR Part 146 1 (2), (c)(3), (c)(5), (f)(1), (j), (k), and cover the entire body when handling cor­ (1), authorizing DOT-33A packaging for rosive or toxic substances or other mate­ [CGFR 71-17] any strength sulfuric acid, limiting the rials which might cause injury to the SULFURIC ACID CONTAINERS skin. use of DOT-17F drum tq sulfuric acid not exceeding 98 percent concentration, (c) Protective gloves when handling Notice of Proposed Rule Making authorizing certain additional tank cars materials or performing work which and permitting DOT-12R packaging for might cause injury to the hands; how­ The Coast Guard is considering concentrations of sulfuric acid up to 100.5 ever, gloves shall not be worn where they amending the dangerous cargoes regula­ tions by revising the requirements for percent, with DOT—2E bottles as author­ would create a greater hazard by becom­ ized inner packaging. In addition, ing entangled in the moving parts of sulfuric acid in 46 CFR 146.23-100. § 173.272 will be amended by certain edi­ equipment. Amendments under consideration include (d) A suitable hard hat. the deletion of the following containers: torial changes to paragraphs (c), (a)> (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i). The proposed (e) Suitable protective footwear. Jugs in tubs (DOT-31); wooden barrels or kegs (DOT-11 A, 11B); plywood drums amendments have been issued pursuant (f) Seat belts in a vehicle where there (DOT-22A, 22B); and metal barrels or to requests submitted by petitioners is a danger of overturning. drums (DOT-5H). Also, the Coast Guard with explanations fully stated in the [FR Doc.71-3804 Filed 3-18-71;8:45 am] is considering authorizing DOT-33A (49 document.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 5297

The proposed amendment of the haz­ Required conditions for transportation ^ ^ ardous materials regulations of the De­ Required conditions for transportation partment of Transportation in Title 49 Cargo vessel Cargo vessel would make these changes apply to ship­ pers by water, air, and land, and to car­ (DOT-6D, 37M (NRC)), WIC Portable tanks (DOT-60) not over riers by air and land. The adoption of D O T-2T, not over 15 gal. cap. 20,000 lb. gr. wt. this proposed amendment to Title 46 Note: Overpack of 55 gal. cap. must be Tank cars complying with DOT constructed of at least 16 gage steel regulations (trainships only). would make these changes apply to car­ throughout when used for sulfuric acid Motor vehicle tank trucks complying of 93% or greater concentration. with D O T regulations (trailerships riers by water. For sulfuric acid of concentrations In consideration of the foregoing, it is 77.5% or greater with or without and trainships only). proposed to amend 46 CFR 146.23-100 inhibitor, provided such acid has a For sulfuric acid concentrations not corrosive effect on steel measured at to exceed 51%. for the article “ Sulfuric acid” , as 100° F. no greater than 93.2 percent Metal drums, rubber-lined (DO T-5D ) follows: sulfuric acid. not over 110 gal. cap. Steel barrels or drums: Portable tank, rubber-lined (DOT-60) 1. The fourth column will be revised to (DOT-5A) not over 55 gal. cap. read as follows: (DOT-5C) stainless steel. Types not over 20,000 lb. gr. wt. 304, 316 or 347, authorized only for Tank cars complying with DO T sulfuric acid of 93% or greater regulations (trainships only). Required conditions for transportation strength. Motor vehicle tank tracks complying _____ ■. ______: _ * * * (DOT-17F) STC, not over 55 gal. with D O T regulations (trailerships Cargo vessel cap. authorized only for sulfuric and trainships only). acid concentration up to 98%. For sulfuric acid of concentrations Stowage: .. 65.25% or greater provided the “ On deck protected.” corrosive effect on steel measured at 2. The fifth, sixth, and seventh col­ “ On deck under cover.” 100° is not greater than that of “ Under deck” (Steel drums containing 65.26% sulfuric acid. umns will be revised to read as follows: sulfuric acid only). Outside containers: For sulfuric acid of any Concentration: Wooden boxes (DOT-15A, 15B, 15C, Required conditions for transportation 16A, 19A) WIC, not over 200 lb. gr. Passenger vessel Ferry vessel, R .R . car ferry, wt. passenger, or vehicle Carboys, boxed, glass, earthenware, passenger, or vehicle clay or stone (D O T -IX ) STC, for export only, not over 6 gal. cap. Fiberboard boxes (DOT-12A) WIC Stowage: Entry is to be identical with Entry is to be identical with not over 5 pint cap. “ On deck protected.” - that for cargo vessels, that for cargo vessels, Polystyrene cases (DOT-33A), Outside containers: except that the stowage except that the stowage (NRC) WIC not over 5 pint cap. For sulfuric acid of any concentration. will be “ Ferry Stowage will be “ Ferry Stowage ea. ■ • — Wooden boxes (DO T-15A,, 15B, A A” and tank cars will B B ” and motor vehicle For sulfuric acid of concentrations 15C, 16A, 19A) WIC, not over not be authorized. tank tracks will not be not to exceed 100.5%: 200 lb. gr. wt. authorized. Carboys, boxed, (DOT-1A) not over Carboys, boxed, glass, earthenware, 13 gal. cap. clay or stone (D O T -IX ) STC, for Carboys in kegs (DOT-1C) not over export only, not over 6 gal. cap. 13 gal. cap. Fiberboard boxes (DOT-12A) WIC, Carboys, boxed, glass (D O T-ID ) not over 5 pint cap. not over 6J^ gal. cap. Polystyrene cases (DOT-33A), Carboys in plywood drams, glass (N R C ) WIC not over 5 gal. cap. (DOT-1E) not over 6M gal- cap. ea. Carboys, boxed (D O T-IK ) not over For sulfuric acid of concentrations 13 gal. cap. not to exceed 100.5%: Paper-faced expanded polystyrene board boxes (DOT-12R) with not Carboys, boxed (DOT-1 A) not more than six 5-pint glass bottles. over 13 gal. cap. For sulfuric acid of concentration not Carboys in kegs (DO T-1C) not to exceed 95%: over 13 gal. cap. Wooden boxes: Carboys, boxed, glass (D O T -ID ) (DOT-16A) WIC (DOT-2U) not not over 6M gal. cap. over 15 gal. cap. Carboys in plywood drums, glass, (DOT-16D) WIC (DOT-2T, 2TL, (DO T-1E) not over 6)-^ gal. cap. 28, 2SL) not over 15 gal. cap. Carboys, boxed (DOT-IK) not Fiberboard boxes (DOT-12P) WIC over 13 gal. cap. (DOT-2U polyethylene), not over Paper-faced expanded polystyrene 5 gal. cap. board boxes (DOT-12R) with Fiberboard boxes (DOT-12)B WIC not more than six 5 pint glass polyethylene not over 1 gal. cap. bottles. ea. For sulfuric acid of concentrations Fiber drums (DOT-21P) WIC 77.5% or greater with or with­ DOT-2T or 2U, not over 15 gal. cap. out inhibitor, provided such Paper-faced expanded polystyrene acid has a corrosive effect on board boxes (DOT-12R) WIC steel measured at 100° F. no (2E) not over one gal. cap. ea. greater than 93.2% sulfuric acid. Metal crate with inside polyethylene Steel barrels or drums: carboy (DOT-1H), not over 15 . (DOT-5A)notover55gal.cap. gal. cap. (DO T-5C) stainless, steel. Plywood or wooden box or drum Types 304, 316, or 347, author­ (DOT-15P, 22C) WIC (2T, 2TL) ized only for sulfuric acid of 93% , not over 15 gal. cap. or greater strength. Polyethylene container (DOT-34) For sulfuric acid concentrations not oVer 30 gal. cap. not to exceed 51% (approxi­ Cylindrical steel overpacks: mately 1.408 specific gravity (DOT-6D, 37M (NRC)), WIC (42° Baume)): DOT-28 or 2SL, not over 55 Metal drums, rubber-lined (D O T - gal. cap. 5D) not over n o gal. cap.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 No. 54------3 5298 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

This proposal is made under authority radius of the W. W . Howes Municipal Airport Louisville, K y . (B ow m an Field) of R.S. 4405, as amended, R.S. 4417a, as (latitude 44°23'03" N., longitude 98° 13'39" W .); within 4 y2 miles northeast and 11 miles Within a 5-mile radius of Bowman Field amended, R.S. 4462, as amended, R.S. (lat. 38°13'40" N., long. 85°39'47" W.)- 4472, as amended, sec. 6 (b )(1 ), 80 Stat. southwest of the Huron VORTAC 314° and 184* radials, extending from 5 miles south­ within 3 miles each side of Bowman VOR 064” 937; 46 U.S.C. 375, 391a, 416, 170, 49 east to I8 V2 miles northwest of the VORTAC; radial, extending from the 5-mile radius zone U.S.C. 1655(b) (1 ); 49 CPR 1.46(b)’. and within 5 miles each side of the Huron to 8.5 miles northeast of the VOR; within 1.5 miles each side of Louisville VOR 331° radial Dated; March 12,1971. ILS localizer southeast course, extending from the 6 % -mile radius area to 19% miles extending from the 5-mile radius zone to the W . P . R ea in, southeast of the OM; and that airspace ex­ VOR; excluding the portion within Standi­ Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, tending upward from 1,200 feet above the ford Field control zone west of a line 1.5 surface within a 25-mile radius of the Huron miles east of and parallel to the ILS localizer Chief, Office of Merchant Ma­ north course and the portion south of a rine Safety. VORTAC extending from a line 5 miles west of and parallel to the 343° radial clockwise line 2 miles north of and parallel to Louis­ ville VOR 301° radial. [PR Doc.71-3790 Piled 3-18-71; 8:45 am] to a line 5 miles , north of and parallel to the 269° radial; and within 4 y2 miles southwest Louisville, K y . (S tandiford Field) and 9 y2 miles northeast of the Huron local­ Federal Aviation Administration izer southeast course extending from 6 miles Within a 5-mile radius of Standiford Field southeast of the OM to 29 miles southeast of (lat. 38°10'33" N., long. 85°44'12" W.); [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 the OM. within 1.5 miles each side of the ILS localizer south course, extending from the 5 -mile ra­ [Airspace Docket No. 71-CE-36] This amendment is proposed under the dius zone ot the LOM; within 1.5 miles each TRANSITION AREA authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ side of the ILS localizer west course, extend­ eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348), ing from the 5-mile radius zone to 1 mile east Proposed ^Iteration and of section 6(c) of the Department of Nabb VOR 206° radial; within 2 miles each side of Louisville VOR 301° radial, extending The Federal Aviation Administration of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. from the 5-mile radius zone to 1 mile north­ is considering amending Part 71 of the 1655(c)). west of the VOR; excluding the portion Federal Aviation Regulations so as to Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Feb­ within Bowman Field control zone. alter the transition area at Huron, S. Dak. ruary 26, 1971. F ort K nox, K y . Interested persons may participate in D aniel E. B a r ro w , Within a 5-mile radius of Godman AAF the proposed rule making by submitting Acting Director, Central Region. (lat. 37°54'27" N., long. 85°58'21" W.); such written data, views, or arguments [FR Doc.71-3821 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] within 3 miles each side of the 354° bearing as they may desire. Communications from Fort Knox RBN, extending from the 5- should be submitted in triplicate to the mile radius zone to 8.5 miles north of the Director, Central Region, Attention; 114 CFR Part 71 1 RBN; within 3 miles each side of Fort Knox Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ VOR 001°, 052°, 172° and 324° radials, ex­ tion Administration, Federal Building, [Airspace Docket No. 71-SO-27] tending from the 5-mile radius zone to 8.5 miles north, northeast, south, and northwest 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, MO CONTROL ZONES AND TRANSITION of the VOR. 64106. All communications received AREA within 45 days after publication of this The Louisville 700-foot transition area notice in the F ederal R egister will be Proposed Alteration described in § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140) would be redesignated as: considered before action is taken on the The Federal Aviation Administration proposed amendment. No public hearing is considering an amendment to Part 71 That airspace extending upward from 700 is contemplated at this time, but ar­ of the Federal Aviation Regulations that feet above the surface within an 11-mile rangements for informal conferences radius of Standiford Field (lat. 38°10'33" N., would alter the Louisville, Ky. (Bowman long. 85°44'12" W .); within 3 miles each side with Federal Aviation Administration of­ Field and Standiford Field) and the Fort ficials may be made by contacting the of the ILS localizer north course, extending Knox, Ky., control zones and the Louis­ from the 11-mile radius area to 8.5 miles Regional Air Traffic Division Chief. Any ville, Ky., transition area. north of Louisville VOR 328° radial; within data, views, or arguments presented dur­ Interested persons may submit such 3 miles each side of the ILS localizer east ing such conferences must also be sub­ written data, views, or arguments as they course, extending from the 11-mile radius mitted in writing in accordance with this may desire. Communications should be area to 8.5 miles east of the LOM; within 9.5 notice in order to become part of the miles west and 4.5 miles east of the ILS local­ submitted in triplicate to the Federal izer south course, extending from the 11-mile record for consideration. The proposal Aviation Administration, Southern Re­ contained in this notice may be changed radius area to 18.5 miles south of the OM; gion, Air Traffic Division, Post Office within 3 miles each side of the ILS localizer in the light of comments received. Box 20636, Atlanta, GA 30320. All com­ west course, extending from the 11-mile A public docket will be available for munications received within 30 days radius area to 8.5 miles west of Nabb VOR examination by interested persons in the after publication of this notice in the 206° radial; within a 10-mile radius of Bow­ man Field (lat. 38°13'40" N, long. 85°39'47" Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal F ederal R egister will be considered be­ Aviation Administration, Federal Build­ fore action is taken on the proposed W .); within an 8.5 mile radius of Godman ing, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, AAF, Fort Knox (lat. 37°54'27" N., long. 85° amendment. No hearing is contemplated 58'21" W.). MO 64106. at this time, but arrangements for in­ Since designation of controlled air­ formal conferences with Federal Admin­ The proposed alterations are required space at Huron, S. Dak., a new instru­ istration officials may be made by con­ to provide controlled airspace protection ment approach procedure has been tacting the Chief, Airspace and Proce­ for IFR operations in the Louisville and developed for the W. W. Howes Municipal dures Branch. Any data, views, or argu­ Fort Knox terminal areas in conform­ Airport. Accordingly, it is necessary to ments presented during such conferences ance with the application of Terminal alter the Huron transition area to ade­ must also be submitted in writing in ac­ Instrument Procedures (TERPs) and quately protect aircraft executing this cordance with this notice in order to be­ new approach procedure. come part of the record for considera­ current airspace criteria. In consideration of the foregoing, the tion. The proposal contained in this This amendment is proposed under the Federal Aviation Administration pro­ notice may be changed in light of com­ authority of sec. 307(a) of the Federal poses to amend Part 71 of the Federal ments received. Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348(a) ) Aviation Regulations as. hereinafter set The official docket will be available and of sec. 6(c) of the Department of forth: for examination by interested persons Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)). at the Federal Aviation Administration, In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the follow­ Issued in East Point, Ga., on March 9, ing transition area is amended to read: Southern Region, Room 724, 3400 Whip­ ple Street, East Point, GA. 1971. Huron, S. Da k . The following control zones described G ordon A. W illiam s, Jr., That airspace extending upward from 700 in § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055) would be re­ Acting Director, Southern Region. feet above the surface within a 6 % -mile designated as: [FR Doc.71-3822 Filed 2-18-71;8:47 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— -FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 5299

1 14 CFR Pari 71 1 In consideration of the foregoing, the agings as obsolete; to extend DOT-33A FAA proposes the following airspace packaging to any strength sulfuric acid [Airspace Docket No. 71-W E-6] actions. for which the Board has accumulated CONTROL ZONE AND TRANSITION In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055) the descrip­ satisfactory experience under special per­ AREA tion of the Walla Walla, Wash., control mits; to limit DOT-17F drum use to sul­ zone is amended to read as follows: furic acid not exceeding 98 percent, rep­ Proposed Alteration W alla W alla, W a sh . resenting the present authorized con­ centrations as being too broad; to extend The Federal Aviation Administration DOT-12R packaging to acid concentra­ is considering amendments to Part 71 of Within a 5-mile radius of Walla Walla City-County Airport (latitude 46°05'35" N., tions of 100.5 percent, representing this the Federal Aviation Regulations that longitude 118°17'20'' W.), within 3 miles packaging as being equivalent or superior would alter the descriptions of the Walla each side of the Walla Walla VOR 215° radial, to DOT-15A packaging presently author­ Walla, Wash., control zone and transi­ extending from the 5-mile-radius zone to ized; to-delete present paragraphs (j) tion area. 8 miles southwest of the VOR and that air­ and (k), representing these requirements Interested persons may participate in space within an arc of a 14-mile-radius circle as unnecessary and obsolete; and to de­ the proposed rule making by submitting centered on the Walla Walla VOR extending clockwise from a line 4 miles west to a line lete paragraph (1), representing it as such written data, views, or arguments unnecessary. The petition also requested as they may desire. Communications 4 miles southeast of and parallel to the Walla Walla VOR 354° and 036° radials. a change to provide for the use of D O T- should be submitted in triplicate to the 37P packaging for concentrations of sul­ In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140) the descrip­ Chief, Airspace and Procedures Branch, furic acid up to 95 percent. Federal Aviation Administration, 5651 tion of the Walla Walla, Wash., transi­ Another petitioner has requested West Manchester Avenue, Post Office Box tion area is amended as follows: change to this section to provide for use 92007, Worldway Postal Center, Los An­ Delete all before “ * * * that airspace of certain lined tank cars in 51 percent geles, CA 90009. All communications re­ extending upward from 1,200 feet * * *” to 65 percent sulfuric acid service, on the ceived within 30 days after publication and substitute therefor “ that airspace basis of several years satisfactory spe­ of this notice in the F ederal R egister extending upward from 700 feet above cial permit experience. will be considered before action is taken the surface within 5 miles southeast and A petitioner has requested addition of on the proposed amendments. No public 9;5 miles northwest of the Walla Walla DOT-2E inner packaging for use with hearing is contemplated at this time, but VOR 215° radial, extending from the arrangements for informal conferences the DOT—12R paper-faced expanded VOR to 18.5 miles southwest of the polystyrene board box, on the basis of with Federal Aviation Administration VOR * * *” officials may be made by contacting the improvement on inside packaging over This amendment is proposed under the the glass bottles now authorized. Regional Air Traffic Division Chief. Any authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ data, views, or arguments presented dur­ The Board believes that while the pe­ eral Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, titions filed have merit, it does not agree ing such conferences must also be sub­ (49 U.S.C. 1348(a)), and of section 6(c) mitted in writing in accordance with this that the addition of DOT-37P packag­ of the Department of Transportation Act ing to the section would be appropriate at notice in order to become part of the (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)). record for consideration. The proposals this time. Currently, in connection with contained in this notice may be changed Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on another project, the Board is reviewing in the light of comments received. March 10, 1971. this specification and upon reaching its A public docket will be available for L y n n L. H in k , conclusion will propose any changes it examination by interested persons in the Acting Director, Western Region. considers needed or for which a petition has been received. office of the Regional Counsel, Federal [FR Doc.71-3823 Filed 3-18-71;8:47 am] Aviation Administration, 5651 West Interested persons are invited to give Manchester Avenue, Los Angeles, CA their views on this proposal. Communi­ 90045. Hazardous Materials Regulations cations should identify the docket num­ Two new instrument approach proce­ Board ber and be submitted in duplicate to the dures are proposed for Walla Walla City- Secretary, Hazardous Materials Regula­ County Airport, Walla Walla, Wash. [ 49 CFR Part 173 ] tions Board, Department of Transporta­ tion, 400 Sixth Street SW., Washington, (VOR A, NDB RWY 20). In addition, an [Docket No. HM-81; Notice No. 71-8] amendment to the VOR RW Y 16 is DC 20590. Communications received on proposed. TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS or before May 11,1971, will be considered The VOR A and VOR RW Y 16 will MATERIALS before final action is taken on the pro­ utilize the Walla Walla VOR 036 • T (016 • posal. All comments received will be M) and 354° T (334° M) radials respec­ Sulfuric Acid available for examination by interested tively as final approach radials. The NDB The Hazardous Materials Regulations persons at the Office of the Secretary, ;fX.2® approach procedure will utilize Board is considering amending § 173.272 Hazardous Materials Regulations Board, a 012 T (353° M) bearing from the both before and after the closing date to delete subparagraphs (c) (2), (3), (5), for comments. opring NDB as final approach course. and (f)(1), and paragraphs (j), (k), nTe „C01^r0^ zone extension based upon and (1). Also, the Board is considering In consideration of the foregoing, the , ^ (195° M) radial is required Board proposes to amend 49 CFR Part authorizing DOT-33A packaging for any 173 as follows: tor the current VOR RW Y 2 approach strength sulfuric acid and limiting use In § 173.272, paragraphs (c), (d), (e), Procedure. of the DOT-17F drum to sulfuric acid not airspace requirements for Wai: exceeding 98 percent concentration. Cer­ (f), (g), (h), and (i) would be amended; Walla City-County Airport were deve tain additional tank cars would be au­ paragraphs (j), (k), and (1) would be canceled as follows: oped in accordance with the criteria cor thorized and DOT-12R packaging would .the United States Standai be permitted for concentrations of sul­ § 173.272 Sulfuric acid. i'nrr>r!e^mina* instrument Procedur< furic acid up to 100.5 percent, with DOT- * * * * * w * } ^ a result, the proposed 70< 2E bottles being added as authorized mot tramsihon area is reqUired for ah (c) Sulfuric acid concentration of 51 inner packaging. Otherwise, paragraphs percent or less. Authorized packaging is v rS the Procedure turn for tt (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) would described in subparagraphs (1) through ttZ 2 approach at 1,000 feet aboi be changed only editorially. (16) and (23) through (26) of paragraph •»in Proposed control zor The Manufacturing Chemists Associa­ (i) of this section. tin« ^rov*de controlled airspace prote< tion has petitioned the Board to delete (d) Sulfuric acid concentration of SS aircraft operating below 1,0( subparagraphs (c) (2), (3), (5), (f)(1), greater than 51 percent to not over 65 thn surface while executir and the reference to earthenware in (c) percent. Authorized packaging is de­ ine prescribed instrument procedures. (1) in § 173.272, representing the pack- scribed in subparagraphs (1) through

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5300 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

(16) and (27) of paragraph (i) of this gallon capacity must be constructed of at Note 1: Tapered steel plugs, without gas­ section. least 16-gage steel throughout when used kets, for standard specification 5A flanges are (e) Sulfuric acid concentration of for sulfuric acid of 93 percent or greater authorized. Threaded length must not be greater than 65 percent to not over 77.5 concentration. less than 1.5 inches. Major diameter of plug must not be over 2*%2 inches, and minor percent. Authorized packaging is de­ (7) Specification 16D (§ 178.187 of this diameter not less than 2%2 inches. scribed in subparagraphs (1) through chapter). Wirebound wooden overwrap, (16) and (20) through (22) of para­ with inside specification 2T, 2TL, 2S, or (18) Specification 17F (§ 178.117 of graph (i) of this section. 2SL (§§ 178.21, 178.27, 178.35, 178.35a of this chapter). Metal barrels or drums (f) Sulfuric - acid concentration of this chapter), polyethylene container. (single-trip on ly). Drums equipped with greater than 77.5 percent to not over 95 (8) Specification 21P (§ 178.225 of this vented closures of an experimental type percent. Authorized packaging is de­ chapter). Fiber drum overpack with in­ approved by the Bureau of Explosives are scribed in paragraphs (i) (1) through side spec. 2T or 2U (§§ 178.21, 178.24 of also authorized for export shipments. (22) of this section. this chapter) polyethylene container not Authorized for sulfuric acid of 77.5 per­ (g) Sulfuric acid concentration of over 15-gallon capacity each. cent to 98 percent concentrations with or greater than 95 percent to not over 100.5 (9) Specification 34 (§ 178.19 of this without an inhibitor, provided such acid percent. Authorized packaging is de­ chapter). Polyethylene container with­ has a corrosive effect on steel no greater scribed in subparagraphs (1) through out overpack, not over 30-gallon capacity. than 93.2 percent sulfuric acid, measured (4), (17), and (19) through (22) of para­ (10) Specification 16A (§ 178.185 of at 100° F. graph (i) of this section. this chapter). Wirebound wooden box (19) Specification 5C (§ 178.83 of this (h) Sulfuric acid concentration of over (see § 178.185-22 of this chapter) with chapter). Metal barrels or drums of Type 100.5 percent. Authorized packaging is inside specification 2U (§ 178.24 of this 304, 316, or 347 stainless steel or other described in subparagraphs (1) through chapter) polyethylene container. The types of stainless steel of at least equiva­ (4), (17), and (19) through (22) of this polyethylene container must be separated lent corrosion resistance and physical section. from the wooden box by a complete cor­ properties. Authorized for sulfuric acid (i) Authorized packagings are de­ rugated fiberboard liner and top and of 93 percent or greater concentrations. scribed as follows: bottom pads. (20) Specification 60 (§ 178.255 of this (1) Specification 15A, 15B, 15C, 16A, (11) Specification 12P (§ 178.211 of chapter). Portable tank. Authorized for or 19A (§§ 178.168, 178.169, 178.170, this chapter). Fiberboard boxes with in­ sulfuric acid of 65.25 percent or greater 178.185,178.190 of this chapter). Wooden side specification 2U (§ 178.24 of this concentrations, provided the corrosive boxes with glass inside containers, not chapter) polyethylene containers not effect in steel is not greater than that of over 1 gallon capacity each, except that over 5-gallon capacity each. Wire staples 65.25 percent sulfuric acid, measured at glass inside containers up to 3 gallons are not authorized for assembly or 100° F. capacity may be used if only one such closure of boxes, except when poly­ (21) Specification MC 310, MC 311, or container is packed in each outside ethylene container is completely enclosed MC 312 (§ 178.343 of this chapter). Tank wooden box. in inside boxes free of wire staples or motor vehicles. Authorized for sulfuric (2) Specification 12A (§ 178.210 of other projections that could cause acid of concentrations 65.25 percent of this chapter). Fiberboard boxes with in­ failures. greater concentrations, provided the cor­ side glass bottles not over 5 pints capac­ (12) Specification 12B (§ 178.205 of rosive effect in steel is not greater than ity each. Not more, than six 5-pint glass this chapter). Fiberboard boxes with that of 65.25 percent sulfuric acid, bottles may be packed in one outside inside polyethylene containers or other measured at 100° F. container. Shipper must have established containers of plastic compatible with the (22) Specification 103A,1 103AW, that the completed package meets test chemical, not over 1-gallon capacity 111A100F2, or 111A100W2 (S§ 179.200, requirements prescribed by § 178.210-10. each. Inside containers must be cush­ 179.201 of this chapter). Tank cars. of this chapter. ioned to prevent movement in the out­ Authorized for sulfuric acid of concen­ (3) Specification 33A (§ 178.150 of this side box. Not more than four 1-gallon trations 65.25 percent or greater con­ centrations, provided the corrosive effect chapter). Polystyrene cases (nonreusable inside containers may be packed in one in steel is not greater than that of 65.25 container) with inside glass bottles not outside container. Authorized gross over 5 pints capacity each. Not more than percent sulfuric acid, measured at 100° weight not over 75 pounds. F. Tank cars used for sulfuric acid, mixed four 5-pint bottles may be packed in one (13) Specification 12R (§ 178.212 of outside container. acid (nitric and sulfuric acids) (nitrat­ this chapter). Paper-faced expanded ing acid), and other fuming acids, may (4) Specification IX (§178.5 of this polystyrene board boxes with inside chapter) . Boxed carboys; single-trip for be equipped with safety vents incorpo­ specification 2E (§ 178.24a of this chap­ rating lead discs having a %-inch export only. For shipment by common ter) polyethylene bottles not over 1- carriers by water to rfoncontiguous ter­ breather hole in their center. The Ys- gallon capacity each. Not more than four inch breather hole is not permitted in ritories or possessions of the United 1-gallon polyethylene bottles may be States and foreign countries; shipments lead discs of safety vents on oleum tank packed in one outside packaging. cars. from inland points in the United States (14) Specification 12R (§ 178.212 of which are consigned to such destinations (23) Specification 5D (§ 178.84 of this this chapter). Paper-faced expanded chapter). Rubber-lined metal drums. are authorized to be transported to ship polystyrene board boxes with inside glass side by rail freight in carload lots only (24) Specification 60 (§ 178.255 of this bottles not over 5 pints capacity each. chapter). Rubber-lined portable tanks. and by motor vehicle in truckload lots Not more than six 5-pint bottles may be only. (25) Specification MC 310, MC 311, or packed in one outside shipping container. MC 312 (§ 178.343 of this c h a p t e r ) . Rub­ (5) Specifications 1H, 15P, or 22C (15) Specification 1A, 1C, or IK (§§ 178.13, 178.182, 178.198). Metal crate ber-lined tank motor vehicles. (§§ 178.1, 178.3, 178.14 of this chapter), (26) Specification 103B,1 103BW, or with inside polyethylene carboy; or glued Carboys in boxes or kegs. 111A100W5 (§ 179.200, 179.201 of this plywood or wooden box, or plywood drum (16) Specification ID or IE (§ 178.4, chapter). Tank cars. as prescribed by § 178.198-2 (a) of this 178.7 of this chapter). Glass carboys in (27) Specification 103AW, 111A100F2, chapter with inside specification 2T or boxes or plywood drums, of not over 6.5 or 111A100W2 (§§ 179.200, 179.201 of this 2TL (§ 178.21, 178.27 of this chapter) gallons nominal capacity. chapter). Tank cars having tanks equip­ polyethylene container. (17) Specification 5A (§ 178.81 of this ped with a phenolic lining impervious to (6) Specification 6D or 37M (non­ chapter). Metal barrels or drums. Au­ the lading. reusable container) (§§ 178.102, 178.134 thorized for sulfuric acid of 77.5 percent (j) [Canceled! (k) [Canceled] of this chapter). Cylindrical steel over­ or greater concentrations, with or with­ out an inhibitor, provided such acid has a (l) [Canceled] packs with inside spec. 2S, 2SL or 2T corrosive effect on steel no greater than (§§ 178.35,178.35a, 178.21 of this chapter) 93.2 percent sulfuric acid, measured at 1Use of existing tank cars authorized, but polyethylene container. Overpack of 55- 100 ° F. new construction not authorized.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 5301

This proposal is made under the not be required to shift channels as pro­ IV stations at Hagerstown (250 watts authority of sections 831-835 of title 18, posed above. Elektra contends that the night, 1 kw. day) and a daytime AM sta­ United States Code, section 9 of the proposed changes would be consonant tion at Halfway (WHAG). As to FM, Department of Transportation Act (49 with the objectives of section 307(b) of Frederick County has a Class B station USC. 1657), and title VI and section the Communications Act of 1934, as at Frederick and the newly authorized 902(h) of the Federal Aviation Act of amended, and that it will furnish rea­ Class A at Braddock Heights, mentioned 1958 (49 UJS.C. 1421-2430 and 1472(h)). sonable reimbursement to Regional for above; Washington County has two Class any change-over costs necessary to con­ B’s at Hagerstown and WHAG-FM Issued in Washington, D.C., on March vert operations from Channel 244A to (Class A) at Halfway, plus the Williams­ 12,1971. ' Channel 240A. port assignment which would be deleted W. F. R ea III, 3. Regional vigorously opposed the pe­ under the present proposal. The two Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, tition, which would require WHAG-FM counties have 1970 Census popula­ By direction of Commandant, to change channel. The pleadings subse­ tions of 84,927 (Frederick) and 103,829 U.S. Coast Guard. quent to the petition were very volumi­ (Washington). C arl V . L y o n , nous and much greater in number than 6. The proposal would involve deletion Acting Administrator, is permitted by the Commission’s rules of the only FM assignment at the com­ Federal Railroad Administration. in a rule making proceeding. All plead­ munity of Williamsport (1970 popular ings subsequent to those permitted by the tion 2,270), which has no local station. R obert A. K a y e , Petitioner asserts that this community is Director, Bureau of Motor Car­ rules were accompanied by petitions for leave to file the extra pleadings. Because and will be well seryed from nearby Hag­ rier Safety, Federal Highway erstown and Halfway stations; and also Administration. of certain channel assignments made subsequent to the original filings, we will submits an affidavit from the party at S am Schneider, consider the late-filed pleadings on their whose instance the assignment to Wil­ Board Member, For the merits. liamsport was made in 1968, to the effect Federal Aviation Administration. 4. In support of its pleading, Elektra that, with a channel otherwise available [FRDoc.71-3789 Filed 3-18-71;8:45 am] states that Brunswick, Md., is an incor­ in this area, it is no longer interested in porated city with a Mayor-Council form applying for that assignment (Regional, of government, having a 1960 population the licensee of WHAG-FM, claims in op­ of 3,555 (advance Reports of 1970 Census position that this statement was made figures indicate 3,566). Brunswick is situ­ after dealings with the principals of the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS ated on the banks of the Potomac and petitioner). Petitioner states that it will has substantial maintenance operations apply for the channel at Brunswick if COMMISSION on the main line of the Baltimore and it is assigned. Ohio Railroad. The railroad industry is 7. The opposition, the reply and all t 47 CFR Part 73 ] the predominant one in the area, but an­ subsequent pleadings will be treated to­ [Docket No. 19172; FCC 71-261] other company, a manufacturer of ladies gether on a topical basis. The main sportswear has located in Brunswick, thrusts of the Regional opposition plead­ FM BROADCAST STATIONS, TABLE OF and an aluminum company is building ings are that (a) the change in channels ASSIGNMENTS, BRUNSWICK, MD. a plant which will employ over 1,000 peo­ for WHAG-FM, the only station provid­ ing stereophonic service to Washington Notice of Proposed Rule Making and ple. The City also submitted, through a letter from the Mayor, that over $1 mil­ and Frederick Counties, would cause a Order To Show Cause lion has been or will be spent for com- disruption in service and thereby be a In the matter of amendment of .munity facilities (water treatment and disservice to the people now receiving the § 73.202, Table of Assignments, FM sewage) to accommodate a population of signal on Channel 244A; (b) that the Broadcast Stations; (Brunswick, Md.), up to 20,000 people. In addition, 3,500 shift would restrict site location improve­ RM-1450. homes are being built within 5 air miles ment of the facilities of WHAG-FM; (c) 1. Notice of proposed rule making is from Brunswick, along with a new shop­ that Elektra has not made an adequate given in the above-captioned preceding. ping center, and a builder plans to de­ showing as to other available frequencies; The Commission will also issue an order velop 150-200 homes within its city and (d) that the proposed operation on directed to Regional Broadcasting Co., limits. The city has its own volunteer Channel 244A will be shadowed between licensee of Station WHAG-FM, Halfway, fire department and police force, one the site and Brunswick, and that (e) Md., to show cause why it should not be elementary and one modern high school, WHAG-FM operation on Channel 240A required to change its operation from and churches of nine denominations. Pe­ will result in second harmonic interfer­ Channel 244A to 240A, if it is concluded titioner also asserts that the area around ence to the received aural signal of that Channel 244A should be added in Brunswick abounds with outdoor recre­ Station WTOP-TV, Channel 9, Washing­ the Table at Brunswick, Md. ational activity, as evidenced by the ton, D.C.1 Regional also contends that 2. By petition filed April 30,1969, Elek- C. & O. Canal, nearby fishing, skating, Elektra has not shown any “overriding tra Broadcasting Co., licensee of Station and skiing facilities, etc. public interest consideration” which WTRI(AM), Brunswick, Md. (daytime 5. Petitioner claims that the proposed would warrant the disruption to WHAG- only), requested that the Commission in­ channel would provide a first nighttime FM. Finally, Regional claims that the as­ stitute rule making proceedings looking aural service to Brunswick; but we note signment of Channel 280A to Braddock toward amendment of § 73.202 of Com­ that at least part of the city will be Heights, located in Frederick County, mission’s rules that would result in a re­ within the 1 mv/m contour of a station obviates the need for additional FM serv­ vision of the FM Table of Assignments newly authorized (February 1971) at ice in that county and area; and that as follows: Braddock Heights, Md. (near Frederick), some 14 miles away. The argument is 1 Regional also made an argument concern­ Channel No. also put in terms of comparative broad­ ing possible short spacing between Chan­ City cast outlets in Frederick County, where nel 240A if used by it at Halfway, ancT Chan­ Present Proposed Brunswick is located, compared to Wash­ nel 241 at Red Lion, Pa. (Station WGCB— ington County, where Williamsport and FM), based on the assumption that the Williamsport, Md Halfway are situated (about 7 and 3 miles WGCB-FM license might not be renewed and Halfway, Md 240A therefore in the future the reference point Brunswick, Md 244A from Hagerstown). As to AM stations, Frederick County has a fulltime regional would not be its present location (which station at Frederick, daytime stations at meets separation) but the center of Red Lion. Elektra also requests that the Commis­ The license of this station has since been Braddock Heights and Brunswick, and a sion issue an order to show cause di­ renewed (running until August 1, 1972), and fulltime local (Class IV) station at Thur- therefore this argument— which is specula­ rected against the licensee of W HAG- mont, which operates with 100 watts tive in any event— need not be considered pM to require it to show why it should power. Washington County has two Class further.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL, 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5302 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

Elektra has not shown the removal of WHAG-FM, if operating on Channel 14. It is ordered, That, Regional Broad­ the only assignment at Williamsport is 240A as proposed, warrants more discus­ casting Co. is ordered to show cause, pur­ in the public interest as balanced against sion. Washington County, Md. (Hagers­ suant to section 316 of the Communica­ a second transmission facility for town) , is an area which until early 1970 tions Act of 1934, as amended, why its Brunswick. was without off-air reception of local or license for Station WHAG-FM, Halfway 8. Elektra, in reply pleadings, contendsnearby signals (it now has UHF Station Maryland, should not be modified to that the disruption will be minimal be­ WHAG-TV, Hagerstown, which presents specify Channel 240A instead of Channel cause the changeover can be made in one NBC programs), and where distant sig­ 244A, if it is concluded in this proceed­ night, that the difference in frequency is nals, including those from Washington, ing that this change would be in the so close that patrons would hardly be in­ D.C., are extensively used. Television public interest in order to make possible convenienced, and that, because of re­ Factbook, 1970-71 edition, shows Ameri­ an FM assignment at Brunswick, Md. imbursement to WHAG-FM, no disrup­ can Research Bureau (March 1969) sur­ 15. Pursuant to applicable procedures tion will occur. As to the shadowing and vey data to the effect that all four Wash­ set out in section 1.415 of the Commis­ second harmonic problems, both assert- ington, D.C. VHF stations, and Baltimore sion’s rules, interested persons may file edly theoretical and speculative Elektra Channel 2 (WMAR-TV/CBS), have net comments on or before April 30,1971, and states that they can be solved relatively weekly circulation in the county of 50 reply comments on or before May 10, easily. It is stated that either channel percent or greater (other Baltimore sta­ 1971. All submissions by parties to this (240A or 244A) can be used for stereo­ tions and Lancaster, Pa. Channel 8 show proceeding or persons acting in behalf of phonic transmission. It is claimed that lesser viewing). The second harmonic of such parties must be made in written the objection concerning improvement Channel 240A (191.8 MHz) falls near the comments, reply comments or other ap­ of the WHAG-FM facilities is not sound aural carrier of Station WTOP-TV, propriate pleadings. Elektra Broadcast­ since it is colocated with WHAG(AM) Washington Channel 9, a CBS affiliate. ing Co. and Regional Broadcasting Co., and can increase antenna height if neces­ Thus, second harmonic interference to which have already filed extensive mate­ sary. With respect to Regional’s allega­ reception of a station which is exten­ rial in this matter, may incorporate it by tion that Elektra has not analyzed all sively used by viewers could occur, al­ reference in their comments rather than assignment possibilities, Elektra states though it is not the only signal carrying submit the same matter again; but if so that its study concluded that any chan­ the particular network which is available they must mention specifically the plead­ nel assignment to Brunswick would re­ in the area. ing which contains the material being quire a shift in channels for an existing 11. However, this matter has been pre­ referred to. station, and the present proposal is the sented in a number of cases in the past, 16. In accordance with the provisions only one that can reasonably be made in and the Commission has indicated its of § 1.419 of the rules, an original and 14 the circumstances, and would have the view that this is a matter which can be copies of all comments, replies, pleadings, least impact on the existing allocation corrected, and not a consideration war­ briefs, and other documents shall be structure. Elektra contends that, even ranting a limitation on the making of furnished the Commission. with the Braddock Heights assignment, FM assignments. See Information Bul­ Adopted: March 10,1971. there is a serious and demonstrable need letin FCC 65-130 (Feb. 19,1965) and Pub­ Released: March 12, 1971. for additional nighttime service in Bruns­ lic Notices “Policy to Govern the Change wick and Frederick County. of FM Channels to Avoid Interference to F ederal C ommunications Conclusions. 9. The proposal involved Television Reception” and “FM Inter­ C o m m iss io n , here is a difficult one, involving as it does ference to TV Reception,” FCC 66-106 [ seal] B en F. W aple, an assignment to a rather small com­ and FCC 67-1012, February 3, 1966 (2 Secretary. munity which already has a local day­ FCC 2d 462) and Sept. 1, 1967, respec­ [FR Doc.71-3812 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am] time AM station and receives fulltime tively. Where we have changed FM as­ FM service from one or more stations signments on this basis, it has unusually fairly close by, and which, on the other been in areas where FM channels are hand, would require the shift of an exist­ plentiful, which is not the case here. SMALL BUSINESS ing station and the deletion of the only 12. While this, consideration by itself FM assignment from a community which would probably not warrant denial of the ADMINISTRATION does not have an AM station. We havé proposal, it is a matter of some signif­ [ 13 CFR Part 121 1 not reached any decision as to whether icance which the parties should discuss in or hot the assignment should ultimately their comments in support or in opposi­ SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS be made, and the issuance of this notice tion. We would expect the party ulti­ is not to be taken as any indication that mately becoming the permittee on the Proposed Definition of Small Business we have. Nevertheless, the matter of pro­ Brunswick assignment, if it is made, to for Assistance by Small Business viding a first fulltime local outlet for bear whatever expense is involved in re­ Investment Componies or by De­ Brunswick, a fairly substantial commu­ solving such problems, either at the velopment Companies nity, appears clearly to warrant the insti­ WHAG-FM transmitter if it .operates on tution of rule making so that parties Channel 240A, or in the installation of Notice is hereby given that the Ad­ may comment. We note, in this connec­ traps in receivers in the area. Comments ministrator of the Small Business Ad­ tion, the fact that under established upon this matter are requested. ministration proposes to am end i Commission procedure Regional will be definition of a small business con cern i reimbursed for the reasonable costs of 13. Accordingly, pursuant to the au­ the purpose of receiving assistance y the shift, the small size of Williamsport thority contained in sections 4(i), 303 small business investment companies o and 307(b) of the Communications Act and the fact that it is quite close to Half­ by development companies. way and Hagerstown and their stations, of 1934, as amended, it is proposed to Currently for the purpose of suen as­ and the absence of any demand for the amend the Television Table of Assign­ sistance a concern is small business » channel at Williamsport, the party who ments in § 73.606(b) of the Commission’s together with its affiliates, it is * ' requested its assignment earlier now dis­ rules to read as follows: dependtly owned and operated, 1S avowing any interest. As far as it ap­ dominant in its field of operation, d pears, this proposal is the only way a Channel No; not have assets exceeding $5 million» City channel can be provided for Brunswick, Present Proposed not have net worth in excess of $2 /2 at least without changes more compli­ lion, and does not have an average cated than those involved here. 240A income after Federal Income ™axe Halfway,'Md...... 244A 240A the preceding 2 years in excess of 5 • 10. The matter of possible second- 244A harmonic interference to television from 000 (average net income to be compu

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 5303 without benefit of any carryover loss); of equity capital for the small concerns not have assets exceeding $7% million, or it qualifies as a small business for the that need it. does not have net worth in excess of purpose of receiving an SBA loan. Accordingly, the Administrator pro­ $2 y2 million, and does not have an av­ The above standard became effective poses to'amend the definition of a small erage net income, after Federal Income October 22, 1960 (25 F.R. 10087). business concern for the purpose of re­ Taxes, for the preceding 2 years in excess ceiving financial assistance from a Small It has come to the attention of the of $250,000 (average net income to be ¡gmg.n Business Administration that Business Investment Company by in­ computed without benefit of any carry­ creasing the assets limitation from $5 over loss); or there are n o w concerns which, in order million to $7 % million. It is proposed to to become more competitive, need equity (b) Qualifies as a small business con­ leave the net worth and average net in­ cern under § 121.3-10. financing available under the Small Business Investment Company Program come limitations at their present levels. Interested parties may file with the Specifically, it is proposed to amend Small Business Administration within 30 and which, although they meet the cur­ Part 121 of Chapter I of Title 13 of the days after publication of this proposal in rently effective net worth and average Code of Federal Regulations by revising the F ederal R egister, written state­ net incom e limitations, have assets in § 121.3-11 to read as follows: excess o f the currently effective $5 mil­ ments of facts, opinions, or arguments concerning the proposal. lion limitation and therefore are not § 121.3—11 Definition of small business All correspondence should be ad­ eligible as small business for the purpose for assistance by small business in­ dressed to: of such assistance. vestment companies or by develop­ It has been suggested that the cur­ ment companies. Associate Administrator for Procurement and Management Assistance, Small Business rently effective $5 million asset limitation A small business concern for the pur­ Administration, 1441 L Street NW., Wash­ is substantially out of balance with the pose of receiving financial or other ington, DC 20416, Attention: Size Stand­ general increase in price levels since this assistance from small business invest­ ards Staff. ment companies or development com­ standard was originally enacted in 1960 panies is one which: Dated: March 11, 1971. and that such imbalance must .be cor­ (a) Together with its affiliates, is in­ T homas S. K leppe, rected if Small Business Investment dependently owned and operated, is not Administrator. Companies are to continue as a source dominant in its field of operation, does [PR Doc.71-3839 Piled 3-13-71:8:48 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5304 N otices

operations of the 296'10" length overall ployees of the Department of Housing DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR fishing vessel “Seafreeze Atlantic”, con­ and Urban Development) as are nec­ structed with the aid of a fishing vessel essary in carrying out the programs as­ Bureau of Indian Affairs construction-differential subsidy,. from signed herein. AREA DIRECTORS ET A L the fishery for groundfish (cod, cusk, Supersedure. This delegation super­ haddock, hake, pollock and ocean perch), Delegation of Authority; Exceptions sedes the delegation of authority to the whiting, herring, squid, and mackerel to Assistant Secretary for Metropolitan M arch 12,1971. the fishery for groundfish (cod, cusk, Planning and Development, published at This notice is published in exercise of haddock, hake, pollock, and ocean 35 F.R. 2745, February 7, 1970, with re­ authority delegated by the Secretary of perch), whiting, herring, squid, mackerel, spect to the New Communities Act of the Interior to the Commissioner of and calico scallops. 1968 (Sec. A,5).* Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Indian Affairs by 230 DM 2 (32 F.R. (Sec. 7 (d ), Department of HUD Act, 42 U.S.C. 13938). provisions of the U.S. Fishing Fleet Im ­ 3535(d); sec. 729(c) of the Housing and Ur­ This delegation is issued under the provement Act, as amended (46 U.S.C. ban Development Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 1804) authority delegated to the Commissioner 1401 et seq.) and Notice and Hearing on Subsidies (50 CFR Part 257) and Re­ Effective date. This delegation of au­ by the Secretary in section 25 of Secre­ thority is effective as of March 1,1971. tarial Order 2508 (10 BIAM 2.1). organization Plan No. 4 of 1970, that a Section 3 of Part 10 of the BIA Manual hearing in the above-entitled proceedings G eorge R omney, was published beginning at page 637 in will be held on April 22,1971, at 9:30 a.m., Secretary of Housing and the January 16,1969, issue of the F ederal in Hearing Room B, 11th floor, Ballston Urban Development. R egister (34 F.R. 637). In order to pro­ Tower No. 3, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, [FR Doc.71-3840 Filed 3-18-71;8:48 am] vide the Billings and Portland Area Arlington, VA. Any person desiring to Directors with requested additional au­ intervene must file a petition of interven- thority to approve loans to individuals, tipn with the Director, National Marine section 3.3F(2) is hereby amended to Fisheries Service, Interior Building, Washington, D.C. 20235, as prescribed in ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION read as follows: [Docket No. 50-367] 3.3 Exceptions. The authorities redele­ 50 CFR Part 257 at least 10 days prior to gated in 3.1 above do not include the the date set for the hearing. If such peti­ NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE following: tion of intervention is granted, the place CO. * * ■ * * * of the hearing may be changed to a field location. Telegraphic notice will be given Notice of Receipt of Application for F. Credit. * * * to the parties in the event of such a Construction Permit and Facility Li­ (2) The approval of loans and modi­ change along with the new location. fications of loans made to corporations, cense; Time for Submission of Views tribes, bands, credit associations, and James F. M urdock, on Antitrust Matters cooperatives pursuant to 25 CFR 91 where Chief, Division of Financial Assistance. Northern Indiana Public Service Co., the indebtedness to the lender exceeds 5265 Hohman Avenue, Hammond, IN $100,000 and any modifications of such [FR Doc.71-3904 Filed 3-18-71;9:07 am] 46320, pursuant to the Atomic Energy loans extending repayment terms re­ Act of 1954, as amended, has filed an ap­ gardless of amount and approval of plication dated August 24, 1970, for au­ loans made to individual Indians where thorization to construct and operate a the indebtedness to the lender exceeds DEPARTMENT OF HOUSINR AND single-cycle, forced circulation, boiling $50,000 ; except that water nuclear reactor at its Bailly G®* (a) The Billings Area Director may URBAN DEVELOPMENT erating Station site, located in West­ approve loans to individual members of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP. chester Township, Porter County, ino. the Crow Tribe where the indebtedness The proposed site is located on the south to the lender does not exceed $70,000; Assignment of Functions end of the shore of Lake Michigan, ad­ and jacent to the fossil-fueled Units 7 and (b) The Portland Area Director may The Community Development Cor­ poration shall perform the functions and of the Bailjly Generating Station, ana is approve loans to individual members of approximately 12 miles east-northeast o the Confederated Tribes of the Warm duties, and exercise the power and au­ thority, of the Secretary of Housing and iry, Ind. Springs Reservation where the indebted­ The proposed nuclear reactor, desis­ ness to the lender does not exceed Urban Development with respect to the following programs: ted by the applicant as BaiUy Gen- $ 100,000. iting Station—Nuclear 1, is designed ***** 1. Assistance for new communities un­ r initial operation at approximately der Part B of the Urban Growth and J ames E. H a w k , 131 megawatts (thermal) with a Acting Commissioner. New Community Development Act of ictrical output of approximately w 1970 (Title VII of the Housing and Urban [PR Doc.71-3835 Piled 3-18-71;8:48 am] Development Act of 1970, Public Law 91- igawatts. .. 609, 84 Stat. 1791). Any person who wishes to have ^ ìw s on the antitrust aspects of tneap 2. Loan guarantees and supplementary DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [cation presented to the A ttorney grant assistance for new communities ail for consideration shall submi National Oceanic and Atmospheric under the New Communities Act of 1968 ìw s to the Commission w ithin sixty (Title IV of the Housing and Urban De­ Administration 0) days after March 5, 1971. [Docket No. Sub-B-38] velopment Act of 1968, Public Law 90- 448, 82 Stat. 513, 42 U.S.C. 3901). A copy of the application is avallarne AMERICAN STERN TRAWLERS, INC. The Community Development Corpo­ r public inspection at the Go Notice of Hearing Regarding Transfer ration is authorized to use the seal of the >n’s Public Document Room, wn Department of Housing and Urban De­ of Fishery reet NW , Washington, D.C., an velopment as its corporate seal. The Cor­ e local office of Northern Indiana Ri M arch 17, 1971. poration may assign such duties and : Service Co., 141 South Calumet American Stern Trawlers, Inc., has functions to its officers, employees, and reet, Chesterton, IN. applied for permission to transfer the agents (who shall be officers and em­

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH T9, 1971 NOTICES 5305

Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 22d day Since the time of the issuance of that Copies of FCC Form 326-A will be sent of February 1971. notice, many requests have been trans­ to all known CATV system owners or For the Atomic Energy Commission. mitted to the Commission for a change operators. of the location in Brattleboro of this Aption by the Commissioner March 3, P eter A . M orris, prehearing conference so that the elderly 1971.1 Director, and others who desire to attend the pro­ F ederal C ommunications Division of Reactor Licensing. ceeding may have better access to the C o m m is s io n , place for the prehearing conference. The [FR Doc.71-2624 Piled 3-4r-71;8:45 am] [ seal ] B e n F . W aple, Commission, in order to accommodate Secretary. these requests, has received permission [Dockets Nos. 50-373,50-374] to hold this conference in the Brattleboro [FR Doc.71-3816 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am] COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. Union High School Gymnasium, Fair­ ground Road, Brattleboro, VT, but this USE OF NEW 70 CHANNEL UHF DE­ Notice of Receipt of Application for space is not available on April 13 but TENT TUNING DEVICE TO MEET Construction Permits and Facility will be on April 20,1971. Licenses; Time for Submission of Wherefore, pursuant to the Atomic COMPARABLE TV TUNING RE­ QUIREMENT Views on Antitrust Matters Energy Act, as amended, and the Rules of Practice of the Commission: It is Commonwealth Edison Co., 1 First Na­ ordered, That the date and place here­ Request for Comments tional Plaza, Chicago, IL 60690, pursuant tofore specified are changed and the M arch 15, 1971. to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Commission Notice of Hearing is mod­ Sarkes Tarzian, Inc., a television tuner amended, has filed an application dated ified to the extent that the prehearing manufacturer, has requested the Com­ November 3, 1970, for authorization to conference in this proceeding shall con­ mission to rule that television receiver construct and operate two single-cycle, vene at 10 a.m. in the Brattleboro Union manufacturers may use a UHF detent forced circulation, boiling water nuclear High School Gymnasium, Fairground tuning device of its design (described reactors at its site, located in Brookfield Road, Brattleboro, VT, on Tuesday, below), with a VHP detent memory tun­ Township, La Salle County, HI. The April 20, 1971. ing system, to meet the requirements of proposed site is located approximately the Commission’s comparable tuning 5 miles south-southwest of Seneca, HI. Issued: March 17, 1971, Germantown, MD. rules. See 47 CFR 15.68. Authority is The proposed facilities are designated A tom ic S afety and L ic e n s­ requested for a period of three years. by the applicant as La Salle County Sarkes Tarzian describes the device Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2. ing B oard, S amuel W. Jen sc h , as having the following features: Each reactor is designed for initial Chairman. (a) It has 70 detent positions, one for operation at approximately 3,293 mega­ each UHF channel. watts (thermal) with a net electri­ [FR Doc.71-3895 Filed 3-18-71;8:50 am] (b) It provides for the display of the cal output of approximately 1,078 precise UHF channel selected at each megawatts. position. Any person who wishes to have his FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS (c) Sarkes Tarzian states that, “The views on the antitrust aspects of the added cost is less than one-third of the application presented to the Attorney COMMISSION present added cost of any preset memory General for consideration shall submit [device! now available on the market.” [FCC 71-231] such views to the Commission within (d) The device is said to be usable in sixty (60) days after March 5, 1971. CATV ANNUAL FEE all receivers, regardless of size. A copy of the application is available (e) The maximum variation from cor­ for public inspection at the Commis­ Deadline for Filing Extended; Re­ rect frequency at any of the 70 detent sion’s Public Document Room, 1717 H quired Computation Form Available positions is ± 3 MHz (1/2 channel). Street NW., Washington, DC, and in the M arch 5,1971. (This is probably comparable to VHP Office of the Chairman of the Board of tuning accuracy where the VHF tuning Supervisors, La Salle County Court­ Sections 1.1102(c)(2) and 1.1116(b) system is not equipped with memory house, Ottawa, 111. of the Commission’s rules provide, in tuning. If the Sarkes Tarzian device were pertinent part, that CATV systems are used in combination with wide band AFC Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 22nd day required to pay an annual fee of 30 cents of February, 1971. or AFT (automatic fine tuning), timing per subscriber on or before April 1 for accuracy would be comparable to that of For the Atomic Energy Commission. the preceding calendar year. Many ques­ a VHF system equipped with memory tions have arisen concerning the method tuning.) Peter A . M orris, of calculation of this fee during its first (f) The fine tuning range is ± 5 MHz. Director, year of application. Accordingly, a CATV Division of Realtor Licensing. (g) The fine tuning ratio is 14:1 Annual Fee Computation Form (FCC (identical to current single speed plane­ [PR Doc.71-2623 Filed3-4-71;8:45 am] Form 326-A) has been prepared to sim­ tary ITHF drives). plify calculations of the appropriate fee for each CATV system, and is now avail­ (h) Detent resettability is ± 200 kHz. [Docket No. 50-271] able from the Commission. In addition, (This term refers to maximum frequency the Commission has decided to extend variation when tuning from one channel VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWE to another, and back, without change in CORP. the time for filing the CATV annual fee due for the 1970 calendar year to May 1, the fine tuning adjustments.) Order Changing Date and Place fc 1971. (i) Other electrical and mechanical Prehearing Conference Since Commission CATV records are characteristics are as in current use. kept on a community basis, a separate A receiver utilizing the Sarkes Tar­ In the matter of Vermont Yanke FCC Form 326-A, with payment at­ zian device (without AFC) and a VHF NnSear^ ower CorI>- (Vermont Yanke memory tuning system does not “provide Nuclear Power Station). tached, must be filed for each separate and distinct community or municipal approximately the same degree of tuning The Atomic Energy Commission b entity (including single, discrete, unin­ accuracy with approximately the same Vo,, of Hearing issued February 2( corporated areas) served by CATV facil­ expenditure of time and effort,” and w 1, pr?rided for a prehearing con ities, even if there is a single head end therefore 'would not meet all require­ verwjCeKin i.this P ^ eed in g to be con and identical ownership of facilities ex­ ments of the comparable timing rules cemiLbyT>the, Atomic Safety and Li tending into several communities. Fees (see § 15.68(b)). With a VHF memory censmg Board on Tuesday, April 11 should be paid by check or money order Ari:’ m Vermont National Guan payable to the Federal Communications Armory, 207 Main Street, Brattleborc . 1 Commissioners Burch (Chairman), Bart­ Commission. (Cash or stamps should not ley, Robert E. Lee, Johnson, H. Rex Lee, Wells be sent.) and Houser.

No. 54— 4 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5306 NOTICES

tuning system, fine tuning is rarely cation, in order to be considered with only if the Commission has not acted necessary. With the Sarkes Tarzian de- any domestic public radio services appli­ upon the application by that time pur­ vice, unaided by AFC, the user selecting cation appearing on the attached list, suant to the first alternative earlier a UHF channel would receive a picture, must be substantially complete and date. The mutual exclusivity rights of a possibly a viewable picture, but would tendered for filing by whichever date is new application are governed by the usually have to fine time the channel. earlier: (a) The close of business one earliest action with respect to any one of Fine tuning would be relatively simple business day preceding the day on which the earlier filed conflicting applications. and, for most persons, would probably the Commission takes action on the pre­ The attention of any party in interest require no more than a few seconds. Use viously filed application; or (b) within desiring to file pleadings pursuant to of the Sarkes Tarzian device would ap­ 60 days after the date of the public notice section 309 of the Communications Act pear to satisfy all other requirements of listing the first prior filed application of 1934, as amended, concerning any the comparable tuning rules. (with which subsequent applications are domestic public radio services application If the request were granted, receiver in conflict) as having been accepted for accepted for filing, is directed to § 21.27 manufacturers could use the device to filing. An application which is subse­ o f the Commission’s rules for provisions meet the requirements of the comparable quently amended by a major change will governing the time for filing and other tuning rules. I f the request were denied, be considered to be a newly filed applica­ manufacturers could still use the device tion. It is to be noted that the cut-off requirements relating to such pleadings. for meeting the requirements, but only dates are set forth in the alternative- F ederal C ommunications if they degraded VHF tuning accuracy applications will be entitled to considera­ C o m m iss io n , (by eliminating memory) or upgraded tion with those listed in the appendix if [ seal ] B en F . W aple, UHF tuning accuracy (by adding AFC). filed by the end of the 60-day period, Secretary. The degradation of VHF tuning is in­ A pplications A c c e p t e d p o e F i l i n g trinsically undesirable. The addition of AFC would, of course, involve additional DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICE cost. File No^ applicant, call sign, and nature of application The question presented is whether the 4789— C2-P-71— Southern Radio-Phone Inc. (New), CJP. for a new 2-way station to be public-interest in the full development located off Highway, U.S. 1, Sugar Loaf Key, Fla., to operate on 152.06 MHz. of UHF television would best be served 4790- C2—TC—(7) 71— National Communication Systems, Inc., Consent to transfer of control by granting the authority requested, from Daniel W. Cochran, Lloyd A. French, and Bruce R. Geemaert, Transferors, to: either wholly or in part, or by denying Airsignal International, Inc., Transferees, Stations: KMM703, Lake Tahoe, Calif.; KMA704, the request. Comment on this question Sacramento, Calif.; KMM705, Stockton, Calif.; KMM706, Modesto, Calif.; KJU808, Vallejo, is requested from interested persons Calif.; KRM981, Sacramento, Calif.; KRM982, Stockton, Calif. (particularly tuner and receiver manu­ 4803— C2—P-71— Airsignal International Inc. (KKG561), C P . to relocate the (1-way) base facturers and UHF broadcasters). Com­ facilities operating on 35.22 MHz to 1 Shell Plaza, Houston, T X . 4804— C2-P-71— Airsignal International Inc. (KKE964), C P . to relocate the (2-way) base ment may be submitted by letter to the facilities operating on 152.21 MHz to 1 Shell Plaza, Houston, T X. Commission’s Chief Engineer on or be­ 4805— C2—MP—71— Answer Iowa, Inc. (KRS644), Modification of C.P. to relocate the (1-way) fore March 26, 1971. Consideration may facilities operating on 158.70 MHz to 732 18th Street, Des Moines, IA. appropriately be given to limitations on 4827-C2-P—71—Nevada Mobile Telephone Co. (New), C.P. for a new 2-way station to be any grant of authority relating, for ex­ located on Elko Mountain, 8 miles northeast of Elko, Nev., to operate on frequency ample, to the duration of the grant or 152.03 MHz. to the size or price of receivers to which 4861- C2—P-71— Mobilfone of Leoti, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new 2-way station to be located it may apply. at approximately 1.5 miles east of Intersection Highways 96 and 25, Leoti, Kans., to Copies of this notice are being mailed operate on frequency 152.09 MHz. to persons who filed comments in the 3557—C2-R -71— New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KA9446), Renewal of Develop­ comparable tuning rule making preced­ mental license expiring April 25,1971. Term: April 25,1971 to April 25,1972. ing (Docket 18433) or who have sub­ 4868—C2—TC—(2) —71, Delta Valley Radiotelephone Co., Inc., Consent to transfer of control mitted written inquiries to the Television from Leonard W . Pores, Transferor, to : Stockton Mobilphone, Inc., Transferee. Stations: Tuning Panel. KMA743, Sacramento, Calif.; KRM983, Sacramento, Calif. (1-way). Major Amendment F ederal C ommunications C o m m is s io n , 6283-C2-P-68— Mobile Telephone Service of Wheeling, W . Va. (New), Change frequency to [ seal] B e n F . W aple, 158.70 MHz: All other particulars same as reported on public notice dated Aug. 28, 1968. Secretary. 1003-C2—P-71—Florida Telephone Corp. (KIJ360), Amend to add frequency 152.66 MHz. [FR Doc.71-3817 Filed 3-18-71;8:46 am] All other particulars same as reported on public notice dated Aug. 31, 1970. 1122-C 2-P -(5)-71— Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. (New), Change frequency to 152.84 mttk and change location No. 2 to : 220 Tacoma Avenue South. All other particulars [Report No. 535] same as reported on public notice dated Aug. 31,1970. COMMON CARRIER SERVICES 3517-C2-P-71— Southeast Nebraska Telephone Co. (New), Change frequency to 152.78 MHz. INFORMATION 1 All other particulars same as reported on public notice dated Jan. 11, 1971. 7976-C2-P-70—Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. (New), Change frequency-to 152.84 Domestic Public Radio Services MHz. All other particulars same as reported on public notice dated June 8,1970. Applications Accepted for Filing 2 Correction

M arch 15, 1971. 3962-C2-AP/AL-71— Iowa City Communications Corp., Correct entry to read: Consent to Pursuant to §§ 1.227(b) (3) and 21.30 assignment of license from: Iowa City Communications Corp., Assignor, to Answer Iowa, (b) of the Commission’s rules, an appli- Inc., Assignee (public notice dated Feb. 8,1971). RURAL RADIO SERVICE 1 All applications listed in the appendix 4862- C1-P-71— The Mountain Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPQ39), C.P. to modify are subject to further consideration and re­ mitters operating on 454.60 MHz communicating with Station KPQ40, Lucin, U view and may be returned and/or dismissed Station location: 3.5 miles north-northeast of Wendover, Utah. if not found to be in accordance with the 4863- C1-P-71— The Mountain Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPQ40), C.P. to modify Commission’s rules, regulations and other mitters operating on 459.60 MHz communicating with station KPQ39, W e n d o v e r , requirements. a The above alternative cut-off rules apply Station location: 3.5 miles east-northeast of Lucin, Utah. to those applications listed in the appendix POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER) as having been accepted in Domestic Public Land Mobile Radio, Rural Radio, Point-to- 4807—Cl—MP—71—General Telephone Co. of Wisconsin (WBP52), Modification Point Microwave Radio and Local Television replace transmitters and change emission designator. Frequencies: 11,245 and 11,485 Transmission Services (Part 21 of the rules). toward Rib Mountain, Wis. Station location: 521 Fourth Street, Wausau, WI.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER)----co n tin u e d POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER>----COEI.tlXVU.e. to add frequency 3750 northeast of Sunland, Mount Gleason, Calif. MHz toward Santiago Peak, Calif. Station location: 434 South Grand Avenue, Los 4848- C1—P—71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KNM70), C.P. to add frequencies Angeles, CA. 3930 and 4010 MHz toward Hi Vista, Calif. Station location: 8.4 miles east-southeast of 4829- Cl—P—71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KME44), C.P. to replace transmitter Mojave, Calif. to operate on frequency 3890 MHz toward Los Angeles, Calif. Station location: Santiago 4849- C1-P-71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (W B 039), C.P. to add frequencies Peak, Calif. 3930 and 4010 MHz toward Mount Gleason, Calif., and 3930 and 4010 MHz toward Hi 4830- C1-P-71— Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KIP48), CP. to add frequency Vista, Calif. Station location: Mount Emma, 6.3 miles west-southwest of Little Rock, 3910 MHz toward Graves, Ga. Station location: 304 Pine Avenue, Albany, GA, Calif. / 4831 - C1-P-71— Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KRW79), C.P. to add frequency 4850- C1-P-71— Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. (KOQ86), C.P. to add frequency 2114.6 3870 MHz toward Lumpkin, Ga., and 4110 MHz toward Albany, Ga. Station location: MHz toward Livingston Mountain, Wash., on azimuth of 268°48\ Station location: 5 Approximately 3 miles southeast of Graves, Ga. miles north of Skamania, Wash. 4832- C l-P -71— Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (K I042), C.P. to add frequency 4851- C1-P-71— Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. (KOU55), C.P. to add frequency 2164.6 3910 MHz toward Port Mitchell, Ala., and 4150 MHz toward Graves, Ga. Station location: MHz toward Skamania, Wash. Station location: Livingston Mountain, 6.3 miles northeast Approximately 3.5 miles southwest of Lumpkin, Ga. of Camas, Wash. 4833- C1-P-71— Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (K I059), C.P. to add frequency 4664-C1—P—71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KQH33), C.P. to change coordinates 4150 MHz toward Port Mitchell, Ala. Station location: 405 13th Street, Columbus, GA. to 38°21'02'' N., and 81°37'58" W. Station location: 816 Lee Street, Charleston, WV. 4834 - C1—P-71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KMJ95), C.P. to add frequencies 4852- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 2.3 miles southeast 3730, 3810, 3890, and 3970 MHz toward Berryessa Peak, Calif., a new point of communica­ of Labadie, Mo., at latitude 38°31'00" N., longitude 90°48'52'' W . Frequencies 6019.3 and tion. Station location: 1407 J Street, Sacramento, CA. 6137.9 MHz on azimuth of 89°29'; 6271.4 and 6390.0 MHz on azimuth of 242°00\ 4835- C1—P-71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KMA29), C.P. to add frequencies 4853- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 1,500 feet north-north­ 4010, 4090, and 4170 MHz toward Mount Vaca, Calif., and 4198 and 4090 MHz toward San east of Neier, Mo., at latitude 38°23'38.6" N., longitude 91°06'24" W . Frequencies 5960.0 Francisco, Calif., and 11,405 MHz toward Walpert Ridge, Calif. Station location: Mount and 6078.6 MHz on azimuth of 61°49'; 6019.3 and 6049.0 MHz oh azimuth of 257°53'. Diablo, 3.6 miles northeast of Diablo, Calif. 4854- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 1.28 miles east- 4836- C l-P —71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KMN91), C.P. to add frequency northeast of Belle, Mo., at latitude 38°17'33" N., longitude 91°41'54" W . Frequencies 11,565 MHz toward Walpert Ridge, Calif. Station location: 95 Almaden Avenue, San 6301.0 and 6360.3 MHz on azimuth of 77°31'; 6271.4 and 6330.7 MHz on azimuth of 191°44'.

Jose, CA. 4855- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 1 mile northwest of NOTICES 4837- C l-P -71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KNB53), C.P. to add frequency 4050 Rola City Center, Mo., at latitude 37°57'55.5" N., longitude 91°47'02.9'' W. Frequencies MHz toward Mount Diablo, Calif. Station location: 99 Moultries Street, San Francisco, CA. 6049.0 and 6108.3 MHz on azimuth of 11°41'; 5960.0 and 6019.3 MHz on azimuth 247°19\ 4838- C l-P —71-—The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KTG 20), C.P.’ to add frequency 4856- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station 0.23 mile east of 10,795 MHz toward Mount Diablo, Calif., and 10,835 MHz toward San Jose, Calif. Station Waynesville City Center, Mo., at latitude 37°49'42" N., longitude 92°11'44" W . Frequencies location: Walpert Ridge, 3.7 miles east-southeast of Hayward, Calif. 6241.7 and 6360.3 MHz on azimuth of 67°4'; 6271.4 and 6330.7 MHz on azimuth of 254*10'. 4839- C l—P—71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KYS41), C.P. to add frequencies 4857- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 3.27 miles northwest 3970, 4050, and 4130 MHz toward Berryessa Peak, Calif., and 3970, 4050, and 4130 mttz of Lebanon Courthouse, MO, at latitude 37°42'39'' N., longitude 92°42'43" W. Frequencies toward Mount Diablo, Calif. Station location: Mount Vaca, 6 miles northwest of Vacaville. 6049.0 and 6108.3 MHz on azimuth of 73°51'; 5989.7 and 6078.6 MHz on azimuth of 200°44'. Calif. 4858- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 1.14 miles southeast 4840- C l-P -71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KYS42), C.P. to add frequencies of Marshfield, MO, at latitude 37° 19'32" N., longitude 92°53'40" W . Frequencies 6241.7 4010, 4090, and 4170 MHz toward Mount. Vaca, Calif., and change 4198 MHz to vertical and 6301.0 MHz on azimuth of 20°37'; 6271.4 and 6301.0 MHz on azimuth of 243°36'. polarization, and add 3770, 3850, 3930, -and 4010 MHz toward Sacramento, Calif. 4859- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 6.4 miles southwest 4841- C1-P-71— Florida Telephone Corp. (K I044), C.P. to change frequencies toward Mount of Springfield City Center, MO, at latitude 37°08.57.8" N. longitude 93°20'08.5" W. Verde, Fla. to 11,365 and 11,605 MHz. Station location: 33 North Main Street, Winter Frequencies 6049.0 and 5960.0 MHz on azimuth of 243°36'; 6019.3 and 6078.6 MHz on Garden, FL. azimuth of 275°43'. 4842- C l-P -71— Florida Telephone Corp. (KIV81), C.P. to change frequencies toward Winter 4860- C1-P-71— United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station, 1.28 miles west- Garden, Fla. to 10,835 and 11,075 MHz. Station location: Railroad Avenue, Mount northwest of Phelps, MO, at latitude 37°11'43" N. longitude 93°55'39" W. Frequencies Verde, CA. 6241.7 and 6360.3 MHz on azimuth of 95°21'; 6301.0 and 6390.0 MHz on azimuth of 4843- C1—P/M p-71— Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. (KOJ91), C.P. and modification of 257°20\ license to add frequency 6189.8 MHz toward (KAPP—TV near Yakima, W ash.), a new point of communication. Station location: 208 West Yakima Avenue, Yakima, WA. (Supplementing the carrier’s previous filings for a data transmission network.) The following Renewal Applications received for licenses expiring Feb. 1, 1971. Term: 4844- C l-P -71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KMQ30), C.P. to add frequencies Feb. 1,1971 to Feb. 1,1976. 3910, 3930, and 4010 MHz toward Mount Gleason, Calif. Station location: 14800 Ventura Boulevard, Sherman Oaks, CA. Puerto Rico Communications Authority 4845- C l-P -71— 'Die Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KMA38), C.P. to add frequency 3930 WWM22— Cerro Las Pinas, Caguas, P.R. WWS28— Maricao, P.R. MHz toward Mount Gleason, Calif. Station location: 434 South Grand Avenue, Los WWM23— Cayey, P.R. WWT51— Munoz Rivera No. 28, Caguas, P.R. Angeles, CA. WWR68— San Juan, PR . WWT52— El Yunque, Luquillo, P.R. 4846- Cl—P-71— The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KM W 58), C.P. to add frequencies 3890 WWR69— Ponce, P.R. WWT53— 11 Benitez Castano St. Vieques, P.R. and 3970 MHz toward Mount Emma, Calif., and 3890 and 3970 MHz toward Mojave, Calif. WWR70— Cerro de Punta, Jayuya, P.R. WWY89— Pedro Marques, Culebra, P.R. Station location: 2 miles northwest of Hi Vista, Calif. WWS27— Mayaguez, P.R. 5307

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5308 5308 Major Amendments POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER) — continued 6421- C l-P -70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Camden, Ark.: Application is 6401- CI-P-7 0 _Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), East St. Louis: Application is amended to chttage frequencies toward Waldo to 5945.2 MHz, and toward Fordyce to amended to change frequencies toward Waterloo to 6286.2 MHz. 5974.8 MHz. 6402- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Waterloo: Application is 6422- Cl—P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Waldo, Ark.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Modoc to 6004.5 MHz, and toward East St. Louis amended to change frequencies toward Brlghtstar to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Camden to 6034.2 MHz. . „ „ . to 6197.2 MHz. 6403- C l—P—70_Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Modoc: Application is amended 6423- C l—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Brlghtstar, Ark.: Application to change frequencies toward Cora to 6315.9 MHz, and toward Waterloo to 6375.2 MHz. is amended to change frequencies toward Cussetta Mountain to 6034.2 MHz, toward 6404- C1—P—70_Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Cora: Application is amended Benton to 5974.8 MHz, toward Texarkana to 5945.2 and 6123.1 MHz, and toward Waldo to change frequencies toward Oak Ridge to 6004.5 MHz, and toward Modoc to 6063.8 MHz. to 6004.5 MHz. 6405- Cl—P—70_Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Oak Ridge: Application is 6424- C1—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Texarkana, Tex.: Application amended to change frequencies toward Chaffee to 6286.2 MHz, and toward Cora to 6256.5 is amended to change frequencies toward Brlghtstar to 6197.2 and 6375.2 MHz. 6425- C l-P -70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Benton, La.: Application is 6406- C1-P-70 _Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Chaffee, Mo.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Brlghtstar to 6226.9 MHz, and toward Shreveport amended to change frequencies toward Dexter to 5974.8 MHz, and toward Oak Ridge to to 6315.9 MHz. Change azimuth toward Shreveport to 179*09'. 6034.2 MHz. 6426- C1—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Shreveport, La.: Application 6407- Cl—P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Dexter, Mo.: Application is is amended to change frequencies toward Benton to 6063.8 MHz. Change azimuth toward amended to change frequencies toward Piggott to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Chaffee to Benton to 359*09'. 6286.2 MHz. ^ . , . „ .. „ . 6427- Cl—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Cussetta Mountain, Tex.: 6408- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Piggott, Ark.: Application is Application is amended to change frequencies toward Mount Pleasant to 6226.9 MHz, amended to change frequencies toward Paragould to 5945.2 MHz, and toward Dexter to and toward Brlghtstar to 6286.2 MHz. 6004.5 MHz. 6428- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Mount Pleasant, Tex.: Ap­ 6409- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Paragould, Ark.: Application plication is amended to change frequencies toward Sulphur Springs to 6004.5 MHz, toward is amended to change frequencies toward Jonesboro to 6286.2 MHz, and toward Piggott Cussetta Mountain to 5974.8 MHz, and toward Latch to 6063.8 MHz. to 6197.2 MHz. Change azimuth toward Jonesboro to 203° 15'. . 6429- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co.' (New), Latch, Tex.: Application is 6410- Cl—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Jonesboro, Ark.: Application amended to change frequencies toward Mount Pleasant to 6315.9 MHz, and toward Tyler is amended to change frequencies toward Fisher to 6004.5 MHz, toward Jonesboro Station to 6256.5 MHz. to 5945.2 and 6123:1 MHz, toward Tyronza to 5974.8 MHz, and toward Paragould to 6034.2 6430- C l-P —70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Tyler, Tex.: Application is MHz. Change azimuth toward Fisher to 212*47', toward Jonesboro Station to 30*33', amended to change frequencies toward Latch to 6004.5 MHz. NOTICES toward Tyronza to 137*16', and toward Paragould to 23*09'. Also, change station coordi­ 6431- C1-P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Sulphur Springs, Tex.: Ap­ nates to 35“47'34" N., 90°44'41'' W. plication is amended to change frequencies toward Commerce to 6375.2 MHz, and toward 6411- C1—P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Jonesboro Station, Ark.: Mount Pleasant to 6256.5 MHz. Application is amended to change frequencies toward Jonesboro to 6197.2 and 6375.2 MHz. 6432- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Commerce, Tex.:-Application Change azimuth toward Jonesboro to 210*34'. is amended to change frequencies toward Nevada to 6093.5 MHz, and toward Sulphur, 6412- C1-P - 70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Tyronza, Ark.: Application is Springs to 6123.1 MHz. amended to change frequencies toward Jonesboro to 6226.9 MHz, and toward Memphis 6433- Cl—P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Nevada, Tex.: Application is to 6375.2 MHz, Change,azimuth toward Jonesboro to 317*30'. amended to change frequencies toward Dallas to 6226.9 MHz, and toward Commerce to 6413- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Memphis, Tenn.: Application 6345.5 MHz. is amended to change frequencies toward Tyronza to 6063.8 MHz. 6434- C1—P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Dallas, Tex.: Application is 6414- C1-P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Fisher, Ark.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Midlothian to 6123.1 MHz, and toward Nevada amended to change frequencies toward Hilleman to 6197.2 MHz, and toward Jonesboro to 5974.8 MHz. „ to 6256.5 MHz. Change azimuth toward Jonesboro to 32*39'. 6435- C1—P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Midlothian, Tex.: Application 6415- Cl—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Hilleman, Ark.: Application is is amended to change frequencies toward Ennis to 6286.2 MHz, toward Dallas to 6375.2 amended to change frequencies toward Keevil to 5974.8 MHz, and toward Fisher to MHz, and toward Fort Worth to 6345.5 and 6404.8 MHz. 5945.2 MHz. 6416- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Keevil, Ark.: Application is 6436- C1—P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Fort Worth, Tex.: Applica­ amended to change frequencies toward Stuttgart to 6286.2 MHz, and toward Hilleman to tion is amended to change frequencies toward Midlothian to 5974.8 and 6093.5 MHz. 6404.8 MHz. 6437- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Ennis, Tex.: Application is 6417- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Stuttgart, Ark.: Application amended to change frequencies toward Corsicana to 6063.8 MHz, and toward Midlothian is amended to change frequencies toward Pine Bluff to 6004.5 MHz, and toward Keevil to 6034.2 MHz. to 6034.2 MHz. 6438- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Corsicana, Tex.: Application 6418- C1-P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Pine Bluff, Ark.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Mexia to 6315.9 MHz, and toward Ennis to is amended to change frequencies toward Rison to 6197.2 MHz, and toward Stuttgart to 6256.5 MHz. . 6256.5 MHz. 6439- C l—P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Mexia, Tex.: Application is 6419- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Rison, Ark.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Bremond to 5974.8 MHz, and toward Corsicana amended to change frequencies toward Fordyce to 6034.2 MHz, and toward Pine Bluff to to 6063.8 MHz. 5945.2 MHz. 6420- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Fordyce, Ark.: Application is 6440- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Bremond, Tex.: Application amended to change frequencies toward Camden to 6226.9 MHz, and toward Rison to is amended to change frequencies toward Hearne to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Mexia to 6286.2 MHz. 6226.9 MHz.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, 5 4 -----FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER)-----C ontin ued POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER)-----C ontin ued 6441- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Hearne, Tex.: Application Is 6461- Cl—P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Langtry, Tex.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Bryan to 6063.8 MHz, and toward Bremond to amended to change frequencies toward Malvado to 6345.5 MHz, and toward Comstock to 6004.5 MHz. 6286.2 MHz. Change azimuth toward Comstock to 110°24'. 6442- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Bryan, Tex.: Application Is 6462- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Malvado, Tex.: Application amended to change frequencies toward Navasota to 6404.8 MHz, and toward Hearne to is amended to change frequencies toward Sanderson to 6004.5 MHz, and toward Langtry 6315.9 MHz. to 6093.5 MHz. 6443- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Navasota, Tex.: Application is 6463- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Sanderson, Tex.: Application amended to change frequencies toward Hempstead to 6034.2 MHz, and toward Bryan to is amended to change frequencies toward Longfellow to 6226.9 MHz, and toward Malvado 6093.5 MHz. to 6256.5 MHz. 6444- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Hempstead, Tex.: Application 6464- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Longfellow, Tex.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Satsuma to 6345.5 MHz, and toward Navasota to is amended to change frequencies toward Mount Ord to 6034.2 MHz and toward 6286.2 MHz. Sanderson to 5974.8 MHz. 6445- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Satsuma, Tex.: Application is 6465- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Mount Ord, Tex.: Applica­ amended to change frequencies toward Bosenburg to 6063.8 MHz, toward Hempstead to tion is amended to change frequencies toward Aragon to 6345.5 MHz, and toward Long­ 6093.5 MHz, and toward Houston to 6034.2, and add 6093.5 MHz toward Houston. fellow to 6286.2 MHz. 6446- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Houston, Tex.: Application is 6467- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Aragon, Tex.: Application is amended to change frequency toward Satsuma to 6286.2, and add frequency 6345.5 MHz amended to change frequencies toward Valentine to 6004.5 MHz, and toward Mount Ord toward Satsuma. to 6093.5 MHz. 6447- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Bosenburg, Tex.: Application 6468- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Valentine, Tex.: Application Is amended to change frequencies toward Eagle Lake to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Satsuma is amended to change frequencies toward Van Horn Mountain to 6197.2 MHz and toward to 6315.9 MHz. Aragon to 6256.5 MHz. 6448- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Eagle Lake, Tex.: Application 6469- C1—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Van Horn Mountain, Tex.: is amended to change frequencies toward Glidden to 6063.8 MHz, and toward Bosenburg Application is amended to change frequencies toward Twin Peak to 6004.5 MHz, and to 6004.5 MHz. toward Valentine to 5945.2 MHz. 6449- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Glidden, Tex.: Application 6470- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Twin,Peak, Tex.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Platonia to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Eagle Lake is amended to change frequencies toward Comauche Peak to 6226.9 MHz, and toward to 6315.9 MHz. Van Horn Mountain to 6256.5 MHz. 6450- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Platonia, Tex.: Application 6471- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Comanche Peak, Tex.: Ap­

is amended to change frequencies toward Luling to 6093.5 MHz, and toward Glidden plication is amended to change frequencies toward Adens Hill to 6093.5 MHz, toward NOTICES to 6004.5 MHz. Twin Peak to 5974.8 MHz, and toward El Paso to 11,055, and 11,135 MHz. Change azimuth 6451- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Luling, Tex.: Application toward Twin Peak to 122°51'. Also, transmitters toward El Paso changed to Model 76D3. is amended to change frequencies toward Marion to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Platonia 6472- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), El Paso, Tex.: Application is to 6345.6 MHz. amended to change frequencies toward Comanche Peak to 11,265 and 11,345 MHz. Also 6452- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Marion, Tex.: Application transmitters changed to Model 76D3. is amended to change frequencies toward San Antonio to 6152.8 MHz, and toward Luling 6473- C l—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Adens Hill, N. Mex.: Ap­ to 6004.5 MHz. plication is amended to change frequencies toward Deming to 6212.1 MHz, and toward 6453- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), San Antonio, Tex.: Application Comanche Peak to 6345.5 MHz. is amended to change frequencies toward Loma Alta to 6345.5 MHz, and toward Marion 6474- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Deming, N. Mex.: Application to 6404.5 MHz. Also, change station coordinates to 29°26'02" N., 98°27'36" W. is amended to change frequencies toward Gage to 6123.1 MHz, and toward Adens Hill to 6454- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Loma Alta, Tex.: Application 6049.0 MHz. is amended to change frequencies toward Seco Siding to 6034.2 MHz, and toward San 6475- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Gage, N. Mex.: Application Antonio to 6093.5 MHz. is amended to change frequencies toward Lookout Hill to 6301.0 MHz, and toward Deming 6455- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Seco Siding, Tex.: Application to 6375.2 MHz. is amended to change frequencies toward Uvalde to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Loma Alta 6476- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Lookout Hill, N. Mex.: Ap­ to 6286.2 MHz. plication is amended to change frequencies toward Heliograph Peak to 5960.0 MHz, and 6456- C l—P—70—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Uvalde, Tex.: Application is toward Gage to 6049.0 MHz. change azimuth toward Heliograph to 290°09 amended to change frequencies toward Cline to 5974.8 MHz, and toward Seco Siding to 6477- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Heliograph Peak, Ariz.: Ap­ 6004.5 MHz. / plication is amended to change frequencies toward Mount Lemmon to 6256.5 MHz, and 6457- Cl—P—170— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Cline, Tex.: Application is toward Lookout Hill to 6419.6 MHz. amended to change frequencies toward Spofford to 6197.2 MHz, and toward Uvalde to 6226.9 MHz. 6478- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Mount Lemmon, Ariz.: Ap­ 6458- C1—P—70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Spofford, Tex.: Application plication is amended to change frequencies toward Pinal Peak to 6093.5 MHz, toward is amended to change frequencies toward Del Bio to 6004.5 MHz, and toward Cline to Heliograph Peak to 6152.8 MHz, and toward Tucson to 11,385 and 11,625 MHz. Also, 5945.2 MHz. transmitters toward Tucson changed to Model 76D3. 6459- C1—P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Del Bio, Tex.:: Application is 6479- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Tucson, Ariz.: Application amended to change frequencies toward Comstock to 6226.9 MHz, and toward Spofford to is amended to change frequencies toward Mount Lemmon to 10,775 and 11,015 MHz. Also 6256.5 MHz. transmitters changed to Model 76D3. 6460- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Comstock, Tex.:. Application 6480- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Pinal Peak, Ariz.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Langtry to 6034.2 MHz, and toward Del Bio to is amended to change frequencies toward Phoenix to 6197.2 MHz, and toward Mount 5974.8 MHz. Lemmon to 6256.5 MHz. 5309

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER) — C on tin u ed POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (NONTELEPHONE)— C o n tin u e d 5310

6481- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Phoenix, Ariz.: Application (I n f o r m a t i v e : Applicant proposes to provide the television signals of Stations WDCA-TV is amended to change frequencies toward White Tanks Mountain to 6123.1 MHz, and of Washington, D.C., and WMPB of Baltimore, Md., to Keyser Television Co., Inc., in Keyser, toward Pinal Peak to 6093.5 MHz. W. Va.) 6482- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), White Tanks Mountain, 4901—Cl—MP—71— Frank K. Spain, doing business as Microwave Service Co. (KUV91), Modi­ Ariz.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Oatman Mountain to 6197.2 fication of C.P. to change frequency 6375.2 MHz to 6409.0 MHz on azimuth 114<’30'. MHz, and toward Phoenix to 6315.9 MHz. Location: West Point, 0.5 miles northwest of West Point, Miss., at latitude 33°36'44.5" N., 6483- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Oatman Mountain, Ariz.: longitude 88°39'42.6" W. Application is amended to change frequencies toward Telegraph Pass to 6034.2 MHz, and 700- C1-P-71— American Microwave & Communications, Inc. (New), Application amended toward White Tanks Mountain to 6034.2 MHz. to change frequency from 6204.7 MHz to 6182.4 MHz toward Clarkston, Mich, on azimuth 6484- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Telegraph Pass, Ariz.: Appli­ of 322°30'. Station location: Pontiac, Mich. cation is amended to change frequencies toward Midway Wells to 6315.9 MHz, toward 701- C1-P-71— American Microwave & Communications, Inc. (New), Application amended Oatman Mountain to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Yuma to 11,265 and 11,505 MHz. Change to change frequency from 6130.5 MHz to 6115.7 MHz toward Flint, Mich., on azimuth azimuth toward Yuma to 280°34\ Also, transmitters toward Yuma changed to Model 76D3. of 321°30\ Station location: 3.5 miles north-northwest of Clarkston, Mich. 6485- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Yuma, Ariz.: Application is amended to change frequencies toward Telegraph Pass to 10,815 and 11,055 MHz. Change Other particulars are same as reported on public notices dated August 10 and October 26, azimuth toward Telegraph Pass to 100°25'. Also, transmitters changed to Model 76D3. 1970. 6486- C1-P-70— Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), Midway Wells, Calif.: Applica­ 3476-C1-MP-71— American Microwave & Communications, Inc. (KQM45), Application tion is amended to change frequencies toward El Centro to 6004.5 MHz, and toward Tele­ amended to change frequency from 6390.0 MHz to 6241.7 MHz toward Boyne City and graph Pass to 5974.8 MHz. Change azimuth toward El Centro to 283° 14'. Charlevoix, Mich., on azimuths of 307°06' and 315°51', respectively. Station location: 1.5 6487- C 1-P-79—Southern Pacific Communications Co. (New), El Centro, Calif.: Application miles southeast of Elmira, Mich. is amended to change frequencies toward Superstition to 6256.5 MHz, and toward Midway Wells to 6315.9 MHz. Change azimuth toward Superstition to 306°05', and toward Midway Other particulars are same as reported on public notice dated January 11,1971. Wells to 103°01'. 7664-C1-MP-70— American Microwave & Communications, Inc. (KYO50), Major amend­ Major Amendments ment: Change frequencies to 6212.0 and 6330.7 MHz on azimuth 4°05\ Location: West of Harrison, Mich. All other particulars same as reported in public notices dated June 1, 5768-C1-P-70— United Video, Inc. Amendment to pending application for a new fixed 1970 and Aug. 17,1970. station at St. Louis, Mo., at latitude 38°31'08" N., longitude ■90°24'08'' W . to add frequen­ cies 6241.7 and 6330.7 MHz on azimuth of 269°44\ [FR Doc.71-3805 Filed 3-18-71;8:45 am]

5790-C1-P-70— United Video, Inc. Amendment to pending application for a new fixed NOTICES station at Joplin, Mo., at latitude 37°04'49" N., longitude 94°33'25'' W . to add frequencies will be purchased from El Paso Algeria 5960.0 and 6049.0 MHz on azimuth of 76°57'. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Corp. (El Paso Algeria) and would be POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (NONTELEPHONE) [Docket No. GP71-68 etc.] transported by cryogenic tanker to Columbia LNG’s proposed terminal at 4896- C1-P-71— American Microwave & Communications, Inc. (KQL44), C.P. to add frequency COLUMBIA LNG CORP. ET AL. 6387.5 MHz on azimuth 310°00\ Location: Millie Hill, l 'mile east of Iron Mountain, Cove Point, Md. Mich., at latitude 45°59'15" N., longitude 88l>02'30 " W. Order Consolidating and Phasing On November 25, 1970, Southern En­ (I nformative: Applicant proposes to provide the television signal of station W BAY-TV to Proceedings, Granting Interven­ ergy Co. (Southern Energy) filed a sim­ Bates Fire Tower, Ishpeming, Marquette, and Munising, Mich. This signal will replace ilar application in Docket No. CP71-151 the present signal of W FRV-TV carried to these communities. Applicant requests a waiver tions, and Fixing Dates for Sub­ to import LNG from Algeria of up to of section 21.701 (i) of the PCC rules.) mission of Direct Case and Prehear­ 205,312,500 MM B.t.u.2 of LNG annually 4897- C1—P-71— Maine Microwave, Inc. (KCK59), C.P. to add frequency 6274.7 MHz on ing Conference for 25 years.8 Southern Energy proposes azimuth 3°00'. Location: Quoggy Joe Mountain, 5.5 miles south of Presque Isle, Maine, latitude 46°36'15" N., longitude 68°00'30" W. M arch 11,1971. to purchase the LNG from El Paso 4898- C1-P-71— Maine Microwave, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station near Van Buren, Maine, On September 22,1970, Columbia LNG Algeria and to construct an LNG termi­ at latitude 47°08'40'' N., longitude 67°57'25'' W . Frequencies: 11,605 and 11,685 mhv. Corp. (Columbia LNG) filed in Docket nal at Savannah, Ga. on azimuth 304°48\ No. CP71-68 an application pursuant to Also on November 25; 1970, Consoli­ (I nformative: Applicant proposes to provide the television signals of Stations WLBZ-TV section 3 of the Natural Gas Act for an and WEMT(TV) to H & B Communications Corp. in Madawaska, Maine, and the signal of order of the Commission authorizing the dated Gas Supply Corp. (Consolidated) WEMT(TV) to Van Buren TV Cable Co. in Van Buren, Maine. Applicant requests waiver of importation of liquefied natural gas filed an application in Docket No. CP71- section 21.701 (i) of the FCC rules.) (LNG) from Algeria into the United 153 to import Algerian LNG in volumes 4899- C1-P-71-—Wyoming Microwave Corp. (KPB65), C.P. to reinstate expired construction permit file No. 1241—Cl-M P-71. Location: Copper Mountain, 12.3 miles north-northwest States. Columbia seeks to import up to of Bonneville, Wyo., at latitude 43°26'15" N., longitude 107°59'47” W . Frequency: 3810.0 an annual quantity of 123,187,500 MM 2 Equivalent to approximately 182,500,000 MHz on azimuth 20°44\ B.t.u.1 for a term of 25 years. The LNG Mcf per year or 500,000 Mcf per day of 1,125 B.t.u./cubic foot of natural gas in the vapor (I nformative: Facility will he used to carry the signal of KWGN-TV to CATV systems in Buffalo and Gillette, Wyo.) phase. / . 1 Equivalent to approximately 109,500,000 8 El Paso Atlantic Co. concurrently filed 4900- C1-P—71—Western Maryland Communications, Inc. (KG030), C.P. to power split Mcf per year or 300,000 Mcf per day of notice of withdrawal of its application in frequencies 11,287.5 and 11,237.5 MHz on azimuth 232°00\ Location: 3.2 miles east of natural gas in the vapor phase at 1,125 Docket No. CP71-67 for the importation of Cumberland, Md., at latitude 39°37'35" N., longitude 78°42'33" W. B.t.u./cubic foot. these volumes of LNG.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, 5 4 -----FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 NOTICES 5311

of UP to 82,125,000 MM B.t.u * annually By this order we grant such motion and (B) The above-designated matters are for 25 years.5 Consolidated would pur- set forth certain procedures for the ex­ consolidated for the purposes of hearing i chase the LNG from El Paso Algeria, and peditious handling of these proceedings. and disposition. Additionally, the hear­ the volumes would be delivered to Colum­ We note that related applications pursu­ ing shall -be phased in order to permit bia LNG’s proposed terminal at Cove ant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act the expeditious handling of these pro­ Point, Md., or to some other port in the will be forthcoming from applicants, and ceedings. northeastern seacoast of the United that Columbia LNG has filed an applica­ (C) Applicants’ direct case on the for­ [States. '■"* ^ tion to import LNG from Venezuela in eign aspects of the proposed importation shall be filed and served on all parties on : petitions seeking leave to intervene in Docket No. CP71-69. These related ap­ or before March 18, 1971. these proceedings were timely filed (ex­ plications will be consolidated with the cept where noted by an asterisk) , as above-docketed applications, but to per­ (D) A prehearing conference be con­ mit the expeditious disposition of these vened in the proceedings entitled Colum­ follows: matters, Phase I may proceed to hear­ bia LNG Corporation et al., Docket No. ing prior to such further consolidation. CP71-68, et al., in a hearing room of the Dockets Nos. Federal Power Commission, 44TG Street P e t i t i o n e r ------A prehearing conference shall be held CP71- CP71- CP7L- before an Examiner on March 23, 1971. NW., Washington, DC, on March 23,1971, 68 151 163 While we envision that Phase I of the at 10 a.m., e.s.t. The Chief Examiner will hearing will focus on the questions raised designate an appropriate officer of the Alabama Gas Corp...... by the Algerian LNG supply and ocean Commission to preside at the prehearing Amoco International Oll Co— X X X Atlanta Gas Light Co...... --- . X transportation incident thereto, the conference and at the formal hearing of Atlantic Richfield Co------X(*) scope of Phase I, as well as the further these matters, pursuant to the Commis­ Brooklyn Union Gas Co— X XX sion’s rules of practice and procedure. Carolina Pipeline Co...... X phasing of this proceeding, will be sub­ Chattanooga Gas Co------X (*) ject to discussion at the prehearing con­ By the Commission. Commonwealth Natural Gas X ference. We note that Eli Paso Algeria has Corp. Consolidated Edison Co. of ------...... X(*) filed testimony and exhibits relating to [seal] K enneth F. P lumb, New York, Inc. its part in the foreign operations involved Acting Secretary. Consolidated Gas Supply X Corp. herein. Any additional testimony and ex­ [PR Doc.71-3768 Piled 3-18-71;8:45 am] Columbia LNG Corp...... - X(*) X(*) hibits constituting applicants’ direct case El Paso Algeria Corp------:-----X X X on Phase I shall be filed on or before Esso LNG, Inc.— -...... X X X [Docket Nos. RP70-6, etc.] Florida Gas Transmission ------. X March 16, 1971. At the prehearing con­ Co. Glover Hefner Kennedy Oil _____ . X X ference, the Examiner shall set a date LAWRENCEBURG GAS Co. for the filing of answering testimony and TRANSMISSION CORP. Mississippi VaUey Gas Co____ — . X exhibits on Phase I matters, and shall fix Mobil Oil Corp.— ...... X(*) X X New England LNG Co., X the date for formal hearing of Phase I Order Accepting Tracking Increase for Inc. I . ‘Î?* at the earliest reasonable time. Filing, Allowing Proposed Revised Newmont Mining Corp., X(*) X X Newmont Overseas Petro­ At the prehearing conference, all Tariff Sheets To Become Effective leum Co., & Newmont OU parties should attempt to define the is­ Co. Subject to Further Orders and Con­ Pacific Lighting Service Co. ___ . X X sues in this proceeding, to stipulate as to solidating Proceedings & Southern California Gas evidentiary matters, to resolve those is­ Co. Pennsylvania Gas & Water X sues which are capable of resolution on M arch 15, 1971. Co. agreed evidence, and to use any other Lawrenceburg Gas Transmission Corp. Philadelphia Gas Works, a X X(*)X(*) division of UGI Corp. possible means to expenditiously dispose (Lawrenceburg), on February 18, 1970, Public Service Electric & X X(?) X(*) of this matter consistent with due process tendered for filing in Docket No. RP71- Gas Ço. and the Natural Gas Act. Additionally, Rochester Gas & Electric ___ _ . X 95 proposed changes in its FPC Gas Corp. pursuant to the revisions to the practice Tariff, Original Volume No. I,1 designed San Diego Gas & Electric _____ - X X of service contained in Order No. 424, is­ Co. solely to track the rate increase filed by Shell OÜ Co...... X XX sued February 23,1971, all parties should its supplier, Texas Gas Transmission Sinclair Mediterranean X(*) submit at the conference the name or Petroleum Co. Corp. (Texas Gas), on February 16,1971, Sonatrach...... X(*) X(*) X« names (not to exceed two) of the persons to become effective March 17, 1971. South Carolina Electric & _____ . X to be served. The Secretary thereafter Lawrenceburg proposes that its increase Gas Co. shall compile the official service list in Southern Energy Co...... X(*) - X(*) become effective on March 17, 1971, but Superior Oil Co...... X X X this proceeding. requests that if its filing is suspended, Tennessee Gas Pipeline C o ... X X X Texas Eastern Transmis- X The Commission finds: such suspension not extend beyond the sion Corp. (1) It is desirable to allow the above- date on which Texas Gas’ rate filing be­ UGI Corp...... X United Gas Pipe Line Co____X named petitioners to intervene in these comes effective. Lawrenceburg’s proposed Washington Gas Light Co___ X proceedings. rate changes would increase charges (2) It is necessary and appropriate under its two jurisdictional rate sched­ ules, CDS-1 and EX-1, by approximately Notices of intervention were filed in that the proceedings in the above-named $8,289 annually, based on volumes for the tiiese proceedings by the following par­ applications be consolidated for hearing ues: Public Service Commission of the and decision, and that the hearing be 12-month period ended June 30, 1969. State o f New York (in all Dockets), and phased. In support of its filing, Lawrenceburg m Docket No. CP71-151, the Public The Commission orders: submitted cost of service and other data Service Commissions of Georgia and (A) Each of the above-named peti­substantially identical to that which it Tennessee. submitted in support of its rate increase tioners and State Commissions is per­ filings in Dockets Nos. RP70-6, RP70-26 On March 3,1971, El Paso Algeria (the mitted to intervene in these proceedings and RP70-44.2 supplier of LNG to all three applicants) subject to the rules and regulations of the In view of the fact that the purpose \ fited a motion to expedite these proceed- Commission: Provided, however, That of Lawrenceburg’s filing is to track its V mgs and requested, inter alia, that the the participation of such intervenors supplier’s rate increase we will accept Implications be consolidated and an shall be limited to matters affecting as­ Lawrenceburg’s revised tariff sheets for /initial phase of the hearings be held on serted rights and interests specifically set filing and allow them to become effective the foreign aspects of the applications. forth in the petitions to intervene: And March 17,1971, subject to further orders provided, further, That the admission Equivalent to approximately 73,000,000 of such intervenors shall not be construed 1 The proposed revised tariff sheets are per year or 200,000 Mcf per day of nat- as recognition by the Commission that Sixth Revised Sheet Noe. 4 and 12. UFfLgas at 1,125 B.t.u./cubic foot. 2 Docket No. RP70-44 was consolidated with _ Paso Astern Oo. concurrently filed they or any of them might be aggrieved the previously consolidated Dockets Nos. C€ °f withdrawal of its application to im - by any order or orders entered in these RP70-6 and RP70-26, by order issued July P rt such volumes in Docket No. CP71-66. proceedings. 28, 1970.

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5312 NOTICES of the Commission in Docket No. RP70-6, $33 million in 1971. This program in­ the Commission will be considered by it et al., as consolidated herein. cludes $2.4 million for transmission lines, in determining the appropriate action The fact that the cost and related data $2.2 million for substations and $25 mil­ to be taken but will not serve to make relied upon by Lawrenceburg in support lion for production facilities. the protestants parties to the proceeding of its filings in Dockets Nos. RP71-95, Any person desiring to be heard or Any person wishing to become a party RP70-6, RP70-26, and RP70-44 are sub­ to make any protest with reference to to a proceeding or to participate as a stantially the same raises issues of law said application should, on or before party in any hearing therein m ust file a and fact common to each proceeding. April 1, 1971, file with the Federal Power petition to intervene in accordance with Under these circumstances, it is appro­ Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, the Commission’s rules. priate that Docket No. RP71-95 be con­ petitions to intervene or protests in ac­ Take further notice that, pursuant to solidated with the latter proceedings for cordance with the requirements of the the authority contained in an d subject purposes of hearing and decision. Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ to' the jurisdiction conferred upon the The Commission finds: cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10). All protests Federal Power Commission by sections It is reasonable and appropriate that filed with the Commission will be con­ 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the the proposed revised tariff sheets con­ sidered by it in determining the appro­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ tained in Footnote 1, above, be accepted priate action to be taken but will not cedure, a hearing will be h eld without for filing and allowed to become effective serve to make the protestants parties to further notice before the Commission on March 17, 1971, as hereinafter ordered the proceeding. Persons wishing to be­ this application if no petition to inter­ and conditioned. come parties to a proceeding or to par­ vene is filed within the time required The Commission orders: ticipate as a party in any hearing therein herein, if the Commission on its own re­ (A) Sixth Revised Sheets Nos. 4 and must file petitions to intervene in ac­ view of the matter finds th a t a grant 12 of Lawrenceburg’s FPC Gas Tariff, cordance with the Commission’s rules. of the certificate is required by the public Original Volume No. 1, are accepted for The application is on file with the Com­ convenience and necessity. If a petition filing, to become effective March 17,1971, mission and available for public for leave to intervene is timely filed, or subject to further orders of the Com­ inspection. if the Commission on its own m otion be­ mission as may be issued in the proceed­ K enneth F. P lumb, lieves that a formal hearing is required, ings in Docket No. RP70-6, et al., as con­ Acting Secretary. further notice of such hearing will be solidated herein, [FR Doc.71-3847 Filed 3-18-71;8:49 am] duly given. (B) The proceedings in Dockets Nos. Under the procedure herein provided RP71-95 and RP70-6, et al., are hereby for, unless otherwise advised, it will be consolidated. [Docket No. CP71-218] unnecessary for Applicant to appear or be represented at the hearing. By the Commission. NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. K enneth F, Plumb, [seal] K enneth F. P lumb, Notice of Application Acting Secretary. Acting Secretary. March 15, 1971. [FR Doc.71-3848 Filed 3-18-71:8:49 am] [FR Doc.71-3844 Filed 3 -1 8-71 ;8 :49 am] Take notice that on March 8, 1971, Northern Natural Gas Co. (Applicant), [Docket No. RP71-90] [Docket No. E-7612] 2223 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE 68102, filed in Docket No. CP71-218 an appli­ SYLVANIA CORP. MINNESOTA POWER & LIGHT CO. cation pursuant to section 7(c) of the Na­ Order Permitting Rate Increase Filing Notice of Application tural Gas Act for a certificate of public convenience and necessity, authorizing To Become Effective Without Sus- M arch 15, 1971. the operation on a stand-by emergency pension Take notice that on March 3, 1971, basis of an existing side valve for de­ M arch 15,1971. Minnesota Power & Light Co. (appli­ liveries of natural gas to Liberal Gas Co. The Sylvania Corp. (Sylvania) on Jan­ cant) filed an application with the Fed­ (Liberal), all as more fully set forth in uary 19, 1971, as supplemented on Feb­ eral Power Commission seeking an order the application which is on file with the ruary 16, 1971,1 filed First Revised Sheet pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Commission and open to public inspec­ No. 6 to its FPC Gas Tariff, Original Power Act authorizing the issuance of tion. Volume No. 2, proposing to increase the $23 million principal amount of first Applicant states that on January 5, rate and charge for storage service to mortgage bonds. 1971, it commenced emergency deliveries United Natural Gas Co. (United), an Applicant is incorporated under the of natural gas to Liberal through an ex­ affiliate, by approximately $26,000 per laws of the State of Minnesota, with its isting side valve on its 4-inch gathering annum based on operations for the 12- principal place of business office at line located in Seward County, Kans. In month period ended November 30, 1970. Duluth, Minn., and is engaged in the accordance with a contract between the Sylvania requested an effective date of electric utility business within the State parties dated February 19, 1971, Appli­ March 1, 1971. The service is provided of Minnesota. cant will provide up to 2,500 Mcf per under Rate Schedule X -l, which con­ The bonds will be sold at competitive day during periods of emergency experi­ tains a cost of service formula rate. bidding in accordance with the Commis­ enced by Liberal subject to a determina­ The only change in the formula rate sion’s regulations, are to be dated April 1, tion that such deliveries can be made from that reflected in the currently ef­ 1971, and are to mature either April 1, without impairing Applicant’s other serv­ fective tariff sheets is to increase the rate 1977, or April l r 2001. If the bonds have a ice obligations. In order to provide the of return component to 8 Vs percent. That maturity of 30 years they will not be call­ proposed stand-by service, Applicant re­ overall rate of return results in a 10-52- able for purposes of refunding with quests authorization to operate, as a percent return on equity based on tne money borrowed at a lower cost for a permanent delivery point, the aforemen­ capitalization of Sylvania’s parent, Na­ period not to exceed 5 years from the tioned side valve. tional Fuel Gas Co., as of November JO, date of issuance. If the Bonds have a Any person desiring to be heard or to 1970. maturity of 6 years they will not be call­ make any protest with reference to said Based on our review of the data sub­ able until 12 month prior to maturity but application should on or before April 5, mitted, we find that the proposed increase will be callable in whole or in part dur­ 1971, file with the Federal Power Com­ ing the 12 months prior to maturity. mission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a pe­ i By letter dated Feb. 1, 1971, the ®^cret^ The proceeds from the sale of the tition to intervene or a protest in ac­ dvised Sylvania that the proposed filing w*« bonds will be applied to the payment of cordance with the requirements of the onsidered deficient and no filing date an estimated $18 million in short-term Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ e assigned the submittal pending borrowings and will finance, in part, the cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the f proper supporting material. Such m applicant’s construction program which regulations under the Natural Gas Act ras received by the Commission on r . > is expected to require the expenditure of (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with 971.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 NOTICES 5313

in rates has been supported and should Texas Eastern served copies of its filing on February 19, 1971 (36 FJEt. 3221), be permitted to be effective 30 days fol­ on its jurisdictional customers and inter­ providing an opportunity for interested lowing the date of completion of the ested State commissions. Notice was pub­ persons to submit comments and views [filing. lished on March 2, 1971 (36 FU . 3949), with respect to the proposal. A copy of The Commission orders : and no petitions to intervene, protests or the application was forwarded to the [ (A) First Revised Sheet No. 6 to Syl- objections to the changes have been filed U.S. Department of Justice for its con­ i vania’s FPC Gas Tariff, Original Volume with the Commission. sideration. Time for filing comments and No. 2, is hereby accepted for filing to be Texas Eastern’s filing in Docket No. views has expired and all those received effective as of March 18,1971. RP71-61 reflects the tracking of supplier have been considered by the Board. rate increases, filed by producers in (B) This order is without prejudice to The Board has considered the appli­ Southern Louisiana as a result of Order cation in the light of the factors set any findings or orders which have been No. 413 issued October 27,1970, in Docket or may hereafter be made by this Com­ forth in section 3(c) of the Act, includ­ No. Rr-394. Since Texas Eastern’s rates ing the effect of the proposed acquisition mission in any proceeding now pending or are presently the subject of proceedings hereafter instituted by or against Syl- on competition, the financial and man­ in Dockets Nos. RP70-29, RP71-12, and agerial resources and future prospects of vania or any other person affected by RP71-49, it appears appropriate that the the rate hereby permitted to be effective. the Applicant and the banks concerned, proceedings in Dockets Nos. RP71-61 and and the convenience and needs of the By the Commission. RP71-93 be consolidated therewith. communities to be served, and finds that: The Commission orders: [seal] K enneth F. P lumb, Applicant is a nonoperating corpora­ Acting Secretary. (A) Section 154 of the Commission’s tion formed for the purpose of acquiring regulations under the Natural Gas Act [PRDoc.71-3845 Piled 3-18-71;8:49 am] Bank (deposits $8.6 million). As it has is hereby waived to permit filing of the no present operations or subsidiaries, above listed tariff sheets, to be effective consummation of the proposal would [Docket Nos. RP70-29, etc.] March 17, 1971, subject to any orders eliminate neither existing nor potential heretofore issued in Docket No. RP70-29 competition. On the contrary, the acqui­ TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION and such orders which hereafter may. be sition would, as noted below, have a pro- CORP. issued in these consolidated proceedings. competitive effect by strengthening one (B) Dockets Nos. RP71-61 and RP71- Order Permitting Tracking of Pur­ of the three commercial banking alter­ 93 are hereby consolidated with Dockets natives in the city of Brockton. chased Gas Increase and Consoli­ Nos. RP70-29, RP71-12, and RP71-49, for purposes of hearing and decision. Considerations relating to the finan­ dating Proceedings cial and managerial resources of Bank M arch 15,1971. By the Commission. lend strong support toward approval of On February 16, 1971, Texas Eastern [ seal] K enneth F. P lumb, the application. Bank suffers from a sub­ Transmission Corp. (Texas Eastern) Acting Secretary. stantial capital weakness and, as part of the proposal, and in an attempt to rem­ filed in Docket No. RP71-93 proposed [FR Doc.71-3846 Filed3-18-71;8:49 am] changes in its FPC Gas Tariff, Second edy this situation, Applicant will imme­ Revised Volume No. 1,* to become effec­ diately place new capital into Bank tive March 17, 1971. The proposed rate through the purchase of common stock. changes would increase Texas Eastern’s FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Applicant further proposes to provide jurisdictional revenues by $182,672 an­ additional capital to Bank, if needed, at nually, based on volumes, for the 12- FIRST MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL the conclusion of the first year after month period ended December 31, 1969, CORP. acquisition. Applicant proposes man­ as adjusted. This is in addition to the agerial changes which should also serve increases in jurisdictional revenues, sub­ Order Approving Action To Become a to strengthen Bank and both changes ject to refund, in Dockets Nos. RP70-29 Bank Holding Company should permit it to become a viable com­ of $60,150,000a effective as of November 1, In the matter of the application of petitor in Brockton. Both the Massachu­ 1970, RP71-49 of $196,000 effective as of First Massachusetts Financial Corp., setts Commissioner of Banks and the January 1,1971, and RP71-61 of $6,931,- Westwood, Mass., for approval of action Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 249 effective as of January 10,1971. to become a bank holding company have strongly recommended approval of Texas Eastern in its filing states that through the acquisition of 51 percent or the application, in both cases on the the proposed changes in its rates are more of the voting shares of Massachu­ basis of considerations concerning the designed to recoup only the effect of an setts Bank and Trust Co.,x Brockton, banking factors. While there is no evi­ dence that substantial banking needs of increase in the cost of gas purchased Mass. There has come before the Board of the Brockton community are going un­ from Texas Gas Transmission Corp. served, the proposal would benefit the (Texas Gas) resulting from the latter’s Governors, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of convenience and needs of the commu­ rate filing in Docket No. RP70-33 on 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(1)), and nity by strengthening a convenient local February 16,1971. § 222.3(a) of Federal Reserve Regulation source of banking services. Considera­ Texas Eastern requests waiver of sec­ Y (12 CFR 222.3(a)), an application by tions relating to the convenience and tion 154 of the Commission’s regulations First Massachusetts Financial Corp., needs of the communities to be served thus lend additional weight toward ap­ to permit the proposed tariff sheets to Westwood, Mass., for the Board’s prior approval of action whereby Applicant proval of the application. It is the Board’s become effective, without suspension, on judgment that the proposed transaction March 17, 1971, the same day as Texas would become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 51 percent or would be in the public interest and that Gas has requested that its rate increase the application should be approved. go into effect. more of the voting shares of Massachu­ setts Bank and Trust Co., Brockton, It is hereby ordered, For the reasons Mass. set forth above, that said application be Fourth Revised Sheet No. 10B; Seventl As required by section 3(b) of the Act, and hereby is approved, provided that Sheet No. 25. 57; 11th Revised Shee the Board gave written notice of receipt the acquisition so approved shall not be 4?' 65L! 14th Revised Sheet No. 28A of the application to the Massachusetts consummated (a) before the 30th calen­ n 17th Revised Sheet No. 65G, 65H; 18ti dar day following the date of this order, Revised Sheet No. 14, 16, 17, 19, 23, 30 , 3 2 , 33 Commissioner of Banks and requested her views and recommendation. The or (b) later than 3 months after the w T ' i 1’ 44, 46< 48> 49> 51> 55> 65B, 65P; 19ti Sh ^t No. 27, 56, 59; 20th Revisei Commissioner recommended approval of date of this order, unless such period is »fleet No. 24 and 21st Revised Sheet No. 61. the application. extended for good cause by the Board, $4,303,586 in Docket Nc Notice of receipt of the application or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston was published in the Federal R egister pursuant to delegated authority.

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 No. 5‘ -5 5314 NOTICES

By order of the Board of Governors,1 offices located in the area and control By order of the Board of Governors1 March 12,1971. about 69 percent of the deposits in the March 12,1971. area. [ se a l] K e n n e t h A . K e n y o n , [ s e a l ] K e n n e t h A . K enyon, Deputy Secretary. - The office of Union Bank located clos­ est to the nearest office of Bank of Long Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc.71-3834 Filed 3-18-71;8:48 am] Beach, N.A. is in Torrance, which is about [FR Doc.71-3806 Filed 3-18-71:8:45 am] 12 miles west of Long Beach. A large number of offices of other banks are UNION BANK located in the densely population areas Order Approving Application for intervening between the present offices SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Merger of Banks Under Bank of Union Bank and Bank of Long Beach, N.A. There is, therefore, no substantial COMMISSION Merger Act existing competition between these two [812-2862] In the matter of the application of banks. Union Bank, Los Angeles, Calif., for ap­ Under California law each bank could CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CORP. proval of merger with Bank of Long be permitted to establish de novo branch AND BAKER, FENTRESS & CO. Beach, N.A., Long Beach, Calif. offices in the areas served by the other. There has come before the Board of Because of the small size of Bank of Long Notice of Filing of Application for Governors, pursuant to the Bank Beach, N.A., it appears unlikely that Order Exempting Transactions Merger Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(c) ) , an ap­ bank would in the near future establish plication by Union Bank, Los Angeles, a de novo branch outside its market. It M arch 12, 1971. Calif., a member State bank of the Fed­ also does not appear probable that Union Notice is hereby given that Consoli­ eral Reserve System, for the Board’s Bank would establish a de novo branch dated Financial Corp., a Florida corpo­ prior approval of the merger of that bank office in the Long Beach area. In 1966, ration (Consolidated), and Baker, and Bank of Long Beach, N.A., Long Union Bank withdrew an application to Fentress & Co., Suite 2200, 208 South Beach, Calif., under the charter and establish such a branch because a large La Salle Street, Chicago, IL 60604, a I name of Union Bank. As an incident to scale real estate development did not Delaware corporation (Baker Fentress), I the merger, the two existing offices and progress beyond the planning stages; have filed an application pursuant to I an approval office (not yet in operation) since that time, Union Bank indicates section 17(b) of the Investment Com- I of Bank of Long Beach, N.A. would be­ that the area is not sufficiently attractive pany Act of 1940 (Act) for an order j come branches of the resulting bank. for establishment of a de novo office of exempting from section 17(a) of the Act ] Notice of the proposed merger, in form Union Bank. Furthermore, since Bank of certain transactions incident to a pro­ approved by the Board, has been pub­ Long Beach, N.A. has only a very small posed merger of Consolidated into Baker lished as required by said Act. share of the deposits in its area, the Fentress. Consolidated has been regis- 1 In.accordance with the Act, the Board amount of potential competition between tered under the Act since 1960 as a non- requested reports on the competitive fac­ the merging banks which would be elim­ diversified, closed-end investment com­ tors involved from the Attorney General, inated in this market area by the pro­ pany. Baker Fentress, which formerly the Comptroller of the Currency, and the posed transaction is not significant; at claimed exemption from the Act under Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. the same time, Union Bank’s entry into section 3(c) (1) thereof as a private in­ The Board has considered all relevant the market by acquisition of Bank of vestment company, registered under the-j material contained in the record in the Long Beach, N.A. would likely increase Act on November 23, 1970, as a non-1 light of the factors set forth in the Act, competition among the large banks in diversified, closed-end investment com­ including the effect of the proposal on the market. pany in anticipation of the proposed competition, the financial and man­ On the basis of the foregoing, the merger. All interested persons are re- j agerial resources and prospects of the Board concludes that consummation of ferred to the application on file with the j banks concerned, and the convenience the proposal would not eliminate signifi­ Commission for a statement of the rep- I and needs of the communities to be cant existing or potential competition. resentations made therein, which are served, and finds that: Considerations relating to the financial summarized below. Union Bank (deposits of $1.5 billion) and managerial resources and future Consolidated and Baker Fentress are is the seventh largest bank in California, prospects of the banks are consistent each affiliated persons of the other, under having about 3.3 percent of the commer­ with approval of the application. Cus­ section 2(a) (3) of the Act. Baker Fen­ cial bank deposits in the State. (All tomers of Long Beach, N.A. would bene­ tress owns 176,016 shares (19.5 percent) banking data are as of June 30, 1970,) It fit by the merger because Union Bank of the outstanding shares of Consoli­ operates its main office and 16 branches plans to offer them an additional source dated, and an additional 3,200 shares of in southern California; in northern Cali­ of a wider range of banking services, such Consolidated are owned by a retirement fornia it maintains 10 offices and has as computer and trust services, and trust for employees of B ak er Fentress. recently (February 11, 1971) received through its larger lending limit would be The five directors of Baker Fentress are approval to operate another office as an better able to meet the needs of medium among the nine directors of Consoli­ incident to a merger. Bank of Long and large-sized business customers. dated, and two of them are the highest Beach, N.A. (deposits of $16 million) Therefore, convenience and needs con­ ranking officers of both companies, a operates two offices in Long Beach, Calif., siderations lend support to approval of December 31, 1970, the directors ana and has received approval to operate an the application. It is the Board’s judg­ officers of Consolidated an d o f Baker office in the downtown district of that ment that consummation of the pro­ Fentress and members of their families • city. posed merger would be in the public in­ owned 35,420 shares (3.6 percent)) oi Bank of Long Beach, N.A., with about terest, and that the application should Consolidated and 258,079 shares (_ percent) of Baker Fentress. In adaitii > 2.5 percent of market deposits, ranks be approved. eighth among the 12 banks (total of 50 It is hereby ordered, On the basis of directors of Baker Fentress held at t date an aggregate of 41,494 shares offices) operating in its market area, the findings summarized above, that said Consolidated as trustee or nom inee or which includes the cities of Long Beach, application be and hereby is approved; Lakewood, and Signal Hill. Among the Provided, That the merger so approved other fiduciary capacities. competitors of Bank of Long Beach, N.A. shall not be consummated (a) before the Pursuant to the proposed^ agreemen are five of the largest banks in the State; 30th calendar day following the date of of merger, Consolidated wouldbemerg these five banks operate 64 percent of the this order, or (b) later than 3 months into Baker Fentress, and Baker Fentre after the date of this order, unless such L Voting for this action: Vice Cha ® 1 Voting for this action: Vice Chairman period is extended for good cause by the .bertson and Governors Mitchell, Robertson and Governors Mitchell, Daane, Board, or by the Federal Reserve Bank of dsel, Brimmer, and Sherrill. Absent an Maisel, Brimmer, and Sherrill. Absent and not San Francisco pursuant to delegated voting : Chairman Burns. authority. ting: Chairman Burns.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 NOTICES 5315

[70-4995] [would succeed to the business and assets per share of $36.55 after imputed pro­ Ef and would assume the liabilities of, vision for federal income taxes of $6.28 PENNSYLVANIA POWER CO. AND per share on unrealized appreciation of Consolidated by statutory merger as the OHIO EDISON CO. surviving corporation under the law of investments. Based upon the above data, [Delaware. It is expected that the sur- the computation of adjusted net asset Notice of Proposed Issue and Sale of [viving corporation would qualify as a values as provided in the agreement of Common Stock to Holding Com­ merger would have resulted in a con­ [regulated investment company for fed­ pany, Proposed Increase in Author­ eral income tax purposes during 1971 and version of each share of Consolidated ¡succeeding years. A ruling has been re­ into 1.7215 shares of the surviving cor­ ized Number of Common Shares ceived from the Internal Revenue Serv­ poration if the merger had become effec­ and Proposed Issue and Sale of ice to the effect that the merger would tive on December 31, 1970. Fractional First Mortgage Bonds at Competi­ be a tax-free reorganization for federal interests of both Baker Fentress and tive Bidding [income tax purposes. Completion of the Consolidated shareholders in shares of M arch 12, 1971. [merger would be conditioned upon, the surviving corporation would be set­ among other things, the approval by the tled by cash payments at adjusted net Notice is hereby given that Ohio Edi­ holders of a majority of the outstand­ asset value. son Co., (Ohio Edison), a registered hold­ ing shares of each company and the Section 17(a) of the Act prohibits, ing company, and its electric utility issuance by the Commission of the order with certain exceptions, an affiliated per­ subsidiary company, Pennsylvania Power !of exemption requested in the application. son of a registered investment company Co. (Pennsylvania), 47 North Main Under the terms of the proposed merg­ or an affiliated person of such affiliated Street, Akron, OH 44308, have filed an er agreement, the outstanding shares person, from selling to, or purchasing application with this Commission pur­ of Consolidated (other than those owned from, such registered company any se­ suant to the Public Utility Holding Com­ by Baker Fentress) would be converted curity, or other property. Section 17(b) pany Act of 1935 (Act), designating sec­ into shares of Baker Fentress on the provides that the commission, upon ap­ tions 6(a)(2), 6(b), 9(a), 10, and 12(f) [basis of the respective net asset value plication, may grant an exemption from of the Act and Rules 43 and 50 promul­ ■of each company as of the day on which the provisions of section 17(a) after gated thereunder as applicable to the the merger becomes effective, except that finding that the terms of the proposed proposed transactions. All interested per­ securities for which market quotations transaction are reasonable and fair and sons are referred to the application, are not readily available would be valued do not involve overreaching on the part which is summarized below, for a com­ by the respective boards of directors as of any person concerned and that the plete statement of the proposed trans­ of the day preceding the day on which proposed transaction is consistent with actions. the merger is approved by the latter of the policy of each registered investment Pennsylvania proposes to issue and the shareholders of the companies voting company concerned and with the general sell to Ohio Edison, its sole common on the merger. It is expected that such purposes of the act. stockholder, 340,000 additional shares of valuations by the boards of directors will Notice is further given that any inter­ its authorized and unissued common be set forth in an amendment to the ested person may, not later than March stock, par value $30 per share, and Ohio application to be filed shortly after the 29, 1971 at 5:30 p.m., submit to the Com­ Edison proposes to acquire these shares meetings of the shareholders of Consol­ mission in writing a request for a hearing for cash at par, or for a total considera­ idated and Baker Fentress scheduled to on the matter accompanied by a state­ tion of $10,200,000. It is proposed that be held on March 16 and 17, 1971, re­ ment as to the nature of his interest, the 170.000 of these shares be issued and spectively. The net asset value of each reason for such request and the issues of sold on or before April 14,1971, and that company will be adjusted bv deducting fact or law proposed to be controverted, the remainder be issued and sold on or an amount equal to 10 percent of the or he may request that he be notified if about July 1, 1971.' realized and unrealized net taxable cap­ the Commission shall order a hearing Pennsylvania further proposes to in­ ital gain on investments, provided that thereon. Any such communication should crease its authorized number of shares no adjustm ent shall be made if the pro­ be addressed: Secretary, Securities and of common stock of the par value of $30 portion of such gain to aggregate net Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. per share from 1 million (of which all asset value is larger in the case of Con­ 20549. A copy of such request shall be but 50,000 shares have been issued) to solidated than it is in the case of Baker served personally or by mail (airmail if 1.290.000 shares. Pennsylvania must seek Fentress-. For these computations, a pro­ the person being served is located more the consent and approval of its sole rata part of the net assets of Consoli­ than 500 miles from the point of mail­ voting stockholder Ohio Edison, and dated applicable to the shares of Con­ ing) upon Consolidated and Baker Fen­ Ohio Edison proposes to give such con­ solidated owned by Baker Fentress would tress at the address stated above. Proof sent and approval. be treated as if it were owned directly of such service (by affidavit or in case of Pennsylvania also proposes to issue v. ®a^er Fentress. The outstanding an attorney at law by certificate) shall and sell, subject to the competitive bid­ whole shares of Baker Fentress would be filed contemporaneously with the re­ ding requirements of Rule 50, $12 million continue unchanged as outstanding quest. At any time after said date, as principal amount of first mortgage snares of the surviving corporation, while provided by Rule 0-5 of the Rules and Bonds,____percent Series due 2001. The j "'easurF shares of both companies Regulations promulgated under the Act, interest rate (which will be a multiple of ana the shares of Consolidated owned by an order disposing of the application one-eighth of 1 percent) and the price, Baker Fentress would be canceled. herein may be issued by the Commission exclusive of accrued interest, to be paid , Th® joint proxy statement of Consol- upon the basis of the information stated to Pennsylvania (which will be not less laated and Baker Fentress with respect in said application, unless an order for than 100 percent nor more than 102.75 w the proposed merger sets forth, among hearing upon said application shall be percent of the principal amount thereof) other things, financial information con- issued upon request or upon the Commis­ will be determined by the competitive t^rnin® each of the two companies and sion’s own motion. Persons who request bidding. The bonds will be issued under tne fundamental policies and the poli- the Indenture dated November 1, 1945, a hearing, or advice as to whether a es with respect to security investments between Pennsylvania and First National poiT™ Fentress- Consolidated and hearing is ordered, will receive notice of City Bank, as successor Trustee, as here­ further developments in this matter, in­ 0bjective^ntrCSS ^ave s^rnilar investment tofore amended and supplemented and cluding the date of the hearing (if or­ to be further amended and supplemented 31, 1970, Consolidated dered) and any postponements thereof. by the Ninth Supplemental Indenture to hflH ta& L?6* 058613 of $70,688,368 and For the Commission, by the Division of be dated as of April 1, 1971, which in­ shares of common stock out- Corporate Regulation pursuant to dele­ cludes a prohibition until April 1, 1976, of *7« of asset value per share gated authority. against refunding the issue with the pro­ ?;*78-24: ^t the same date, Baker Fen- ceeds of funds borrowed at a lower in­ v 0? . 81 net assets of $59,821,149 [ seal] R osalie F. S chneider, v terest cost. storifkftA 3’63,6.’494 shares of common Recording Secretary. The net proceeds from the sale of the outstanding for a net asset value [FR Doc.71-3836 Filed 3-18-71;8:48 am] common stock and the bonds will be

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5316 NOTICES used by Pennsylvania to construct and York, Inc. (Applicant), 64 Wall Street open any branch office, carry any margin acquire new facilities, for the betterment New York, NY 10005, a closed-end, non- accounts, or otherwise extend credit to I of existing facilities, to pay back loans diversified, management investment customers, execute and clear for its own I (estimated to aggregate $5 million at the Company registered under the Invest­ account, execute or clear through any time of the sale of the bonds), and to ment Company Act of 1940 (Act) and stock exchange firm not approved by reimburse its treasury in part for monies licensed as a Small Business Investment Applicant. Applicant further states that i expended for such purposes. Pennsyl­ Company (SBIC) under the Small Busi­ it will not give consent under item (l) vania estimates that its plant additions ness Investment Act of 1958, has filed an above, without the approval o f the Small for 1971 will aggregate $34,296,000. application pursuant to Section 6(c) of Business Administration (S B A ), or under It is stated that the Pennsylvania Pub­ the Act requesting an order exempting item (2) unless Daniels proves it has lic Utility Commission has jurisdiction Applicant from the provisions of section operated a well-run and profitable busi­ over the proposed issue and sale of the 12(d) (3) of the Act so that Applicant ness brokerage concern. M oreover, Appli­ common stock and the bonds, and that may invest in the common stock of Willie cant states that in no event will it m^e such Commission’s orders will be supplied Daniels & Co. (Daniels) a proposed any purchases or sales of securities from, by amendment. It is represented that no broker-dealer firm that intends to pur­ to, or through Daniels; nor will Daniels other State commission and no Federal chase a seat on the New York Stock Ex­ effect transactions in shares o f Applicant commission, other than this Commis­ change. All interested persons are re­ or of any company in w h ich Applicant sion, has jurisdiction over the proposed ferred to the application on file with the has an investment; nor will Daniels ren­ transactions. The fees and expenses to be Commission for a statement of the der investment advice nor engage in the incurred in connection with the issue and representations therein which are sum­ investment advisory business without a sale of the bonds will be supplied by marized below. further Commission order. amendment. The fees and expenses to be Daniels, which will be organized under Applicant states it is contemplated that I incurred in connection with the issue and the laws of Delaware and have its office Applicant will commit to loan to Daniels I sale of the common stock are estimated in New York City, will have a capitaliza­ up to $500,000 at the request of Daniels I at $21,000, including State Excise Tax of tion of $500,600, consisting of $345,000 of at any time during the next 5 years I $20,400 and counsel fee of $500. voting common stock and $155,000 of contingent upon Daniels obtaining an I Notice is further given that any inter­ subordinated debentures. The subordi­ amount of additional common stock ested person may, not later than April 5, nated debentures will be due in install­ equal to the total amount to be loaned. 1 1971, request in writing that a hearing ments maturing 1972 through 1982. Such loan would be represented by 10 be held on such matter, stating the nature SBICNY will subscribe to $39,500, Pioneer percent notes due December 31, 1980, ] of his interest, the reasons for such re­ Capital Corp. (Pioneer), $15,000; and payable in equal quarterly installments j quest, and the issues of fact or law raised Noel Fund, a private venture capital beginning in 1976. A 1 percent per annum I by said application which he desires to partnership, $100,000. Each share of com­ commitment fee would be paid for such I controvert; or he may request that he mon stock will have equal rights to loan commitment. Applicant states that be notified if the Commission should dividends, equal liquidation preference, the SBA has loaned to it $1,085,000 for order a hearing thereon. Any such re­ and the common stock will carry preemp­ investment in small businesses which quest should be addressed; Secretary, Se­ tive rights. Applicant states that it qualify as socially or economically dis- I curities and Exchange Commission, will purchase 2,333 shares for $80,488.50. advantaged enterprises and its loan to Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such Pioneer Capital Corp., a licensed SBIC Daniels will come from this amount. request should be served personally or by which is not a registered investment . Applicant states that after making its mail (airmail if the person being served company, will acquire 1,000 shares for proposed stock investment, A pplicant will is located more than 500 miles from the $34,500. The remaining 6,667 shares are have less than 2 percent of its assets in point of mailing) upon the applicant at to be purchased by the three principals Daniels, and if Daniels exercised its right the above-stated address, and proof o f of Daniels, Mr. Willie Daniels, Mr. Milton to borrow $500,000 from A pplicant and j service (by affidavit or, in case of an at­ P. Aeder, and Mr. Travers Jerome Applicant subscribed to 24 p ercen t of the | torney at law, by certificate) should be Beil,Jr., for a total of $230,011.50. shares being sold in connection with the filed with the request. At any time after Applicant states that up to $205,000 of borrowing, Applicant would have less said date, the application, as filed or as it this $230,011.50 will be borrowed per­ than 7 percent of its present assets m may be amended, may be granted as pro­ sonally by the three principals from per­ Daniels. . .. vided In Rule 23 of the general rules and sons unrelated to Applicant on straight Section 12(d) (3) of the Act makes it regulations promulgated under the Act, unsecured personal notes. Applicant unlawful for any registered investment or the Commission may grant exemption states that Mr. Daniels has advised Ap­ company or companies controlled by such registered company to purchase or other­ from such rules as provided in Rules plicant that he and his two associates 20(a) and 100 thereof or take such other expect to obtain these loans from an in­ wise acquire any security issued by, or any other interest in, the business of any action as it may deem appropriate. Per­ dividual who is a stockholder in another brokerage firm and from a group of six person who is a broker, a dealer, en­ sons who request a hearing or advice as gaged in the business of underwriting, or to whether a hearing is ordered will re­ banks; that the lenders will receive no participation in the equity of Daniels is either an investment adviser of an in­ ceive notice of further developments in vestment company or registered unci this matter, including the date of the or call thereon or other consideration apart from the notes; and that the the Investment Adviser Act of 1940> “r! hearing (if ordered) and any postpone­ less the person is (a) a corporation ail me ments thereof. lenders will look solely to the borrow­ ers for payment and have no claim outstanding securities of which are, For the Commission, by the Division o f will after the acquisition, be owned by one Corporate Regulation, pursuant to dele­ against Daniels. Applicant-states that Darnels proposes or more registered investment compa­ gated authority. to engage in a general securities broker­ nies and primarily engaged m me [ s e a l ] R o sa l ie F . S c h n e id e r , age business, seeking to attract primarily business of underwriting and distnoui Recording Secretary. institutional and substantial individual ing securities issued by other selling securities to customers, or any [PR Doc.71-3837 Piled S-1B-71;8:48 am] accounts. Upon its inception, Daniels will clear its brokerage transactions on a dis­ or more of such or related activitie , closed basis through a large New York the gross income of such persons [812-2769] Stock Exchange member with substantial mally is derived principally from sireu business or related activities. SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT capital resources. Applicant states that accordingly in most cases Daniels will Section 6(c) of the Act provides^ COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. not physically handle money or securities the Commission, by order upon am * tion, may conditionally or u^cond Notice of Filing of Application for for its customers. ally exempt any person or Order of Exemption Applicant states that Daniels will agree that so long as Applicant holds its from any provision o f the Act, M arch 10,1971. stock, Daniels will not, without Appli­ the extent that such exemption is Notice is hereby given that Small cant’s consent (1) purchase or sell se­ essary or appropriate in toe pdWi ® Business Investment Company of New curities as underwriter or dealer, nor (2) terest and consistent with the pro

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 NOTICES 5317

I of investors and the purposes fairly in­ at 10 a.m., e.d.s.t„ on May 11, 1971. All and from Boston, Mass., to Providence tended by the policy and provisions of parties will be given opportunity to be and Pawtucket, R.I.; wool and wool I the Act. § . , . present, to produce evidence, and to be waste, rayon, mohair, and burlap, be­ I Notice is further given that any m - heard at such hearing. Interested parties tween Boston, Mass., on the one hand, [terested person may, not later than desiring to appear at the public hearing and, on the other, points in Massachu­ I April 5,1971, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the should notify the Secretary of the Tariff setts and between Holyoke, Pittsfield^ [commission in writing a request for a Commission, in writing, at its offices in and Barre, Mass, and points in that part [hearing on the matter accompanied by a Washington, D.C., at least 5 days in ad­ of Massachusetts on and east of Mas­ [statement as to the nature of his inter­ vance of the date set for the hearing. sachusetts Highway 12, on the one hand, est, the reason for such request and the Issue&r March 16,1971. and, on the other, points in Bristol and [issues of fact or law proposed to be con­ Providence Counties, R.I. Frank J. troverted, or he may request that he be By order of the Commission. Weiner, 6 Beacon Street, Boston, Mass. notified if the Commission should order [ seal] K en n eth R . M ason, 02108, attorney for applicants. a hearing thereon. Any such communica- Secretary. [tion should be addressed: Secretary, Se­ No. MC-FC-72590. By order of curities and Exchange Commission, [FR Doc.71-3842 Filed 3-18-71;8:49 am] March 4, 1971, the Motor Carrier Board Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such approved the transfer to Pendleton request shall be served personally or by Transfer Co., Inc., Pendleton, Oreg., of mail (airmail if the person being served the operating rights in certificate No. I is located more than 500 miles from the INTERSTATE COMMERCE MC 113064 issued April 8, 1952, to Owen 1 point of mailing) upon Applicant at the Helms, doing business as Pendleton address stated above. Proof of such serv- Transfer Co., Pendleton, Oreg., authoriz­ ! ice (by affidavit or in case of an attorney COMMISSION ing the transportation of household at law by certificate) shall be filed con­ [Notice 6651 goods, as defined by the Commission, temporaneously with the request. At any between points in Umatilla, Grant, and time after said date, as provided by Rule MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER Wallowa Counties, Oreg. Joe French, 116 0-5 of the rules and regulations promul­ PROCEEDINGS Southeast Second Stretet, Pendleton, OR 97801, attorney for applicants. gated under the Act, an order disposing M arch 16,1971. of the application herein may be issued No. MC-FC-72678. By order of by the Commission upon the basis of the Synopses of orders entered pursuant to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ March 4, 1971, the Motor Carrier Board information stated in said application, approved the transfer to Hufford & Sons, unless an order for hearing upon said merce Act, and rules and regulations pre­ lnc. , Goshen, Ind., of the operating rights application shall be issued upon request scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 1132), appear below: in permit No. MC 126162 issued April 27, or upon the Commission’s own motion. 1965, to Max Summers and Jerry Sum­ Persons who request a hearing or advice As provided in the Commission’s spe­ mers, a partnership, doing business as as to whether a hearing is ordered will cial rules of practice any interested per­ receive notice of further developments son may file a petition seeking reconsid­ M & J Summers Trucking, Covington, in this matter, including the date of the eration of the following numbered pro­ lnd. , authorizing the transportation of hearing (if ordered) and any postpone­ ceedings within 20 days from the date of fertilizer and fertilizer materials from ments thereof. publication of this notice. Pursuant to Indianapolis, Ind., to points in a speci­ section 17(8) of the Interstate Com­ fied portion of Illinois, those in Ken­ By the Commission. merce Act, the filing of such a petition tucky, the Lower Peninsula of Michigan [seal] R osalie F. S chneider, will postpone the effective date of the and Ohio, and from Streator, HI., to Recording Secretary. oyder in that proceeding pending its dis­ points in Indiana; and shipments on position. The matters relied upon by return for reprocessing. Robert C. Smith, [PR Doc.71-3838 Piled 3-18-71; 8 :48 am] petitioners must be specified in their 711 Chamber of Commerce Building, petitions with particularity. Indianapolis, Ind. 46204, attorney for applicants. No. MC-FC-72515. By order of TARIFF COMMISSION March 4, 1971, the Motor Carrier Board No. MC-FC-72712. By order of March 5, [AA1921—72/74] approved the transfer to Pearson Truck­ 1971, the Motor Carrier Board approved ing & Rigging, Inc., Los Angeles, Calif., the transfer to Everett Trucking, Inc., PIG IRON FROM CANADA, FINLANI of the operating rights in Certificate No. Everett, Pa., of the operating rights in AND WEST GERMANY MC-61166 and Certificate of Registra­ certificate No. MC-133866 issued Au­ gust 13, 1970, to Samuel E. Leonard, Notice of Joint Investigations and tion No. MC-61166 (Sub-No. 3) issued April 8, 1955, and April 2, 1964, respec­ Norman E. Wilt, Floyd R. Mearkle, Rich­ Hearing tively, to A. R. Pearson Truck Co., Inc., ard E. Koontz, and Richard Riley, a part­ Having received advice from tl Los Angeles, Calif., authorizing the nership, doing business as Everett As­ weasuiy Department on March 15,197 transportation of machinery between sociates, Everett, Pa., authorizing the Wat pig iron from Canada, Finland, an points in the Los Angeles, Calif., com­ transportation of coal from points in t west Germany is being, and is likely \ mercial zone and between Los Angeles Somerset County, Pa., to Winchester and £L ,m the United States at less tha Harbor, Calif., on the one hand, and, on Clearbrook, Va., and from points in 2 ? X i ? \ the u -s - Tariff Commissic the other, Los Angeles, Calif., and Ver­ Cambria County, Pa., to Clearbrook, Va., AASio1?iStlr,t^lted j° int investigations No non, Calif., and general commodities, from points in Bedford County, Pa., to AAl921-72 (Cana(ia )> AA1921-73 (Fir with exceptions, between points in a Williamsport, Md., and from points in unripr „anfTAA1921-74 (West Germany described area in California. R. Y. Westmoreland County, Pa., to Lime Kiln Act section 201(a) of the Antidumpir Schureman, 1545 Wilshire Boulevard, and Baltimore, Md. Arthur J. Diskin, 806 (S\ “ amended (19 U.S.C. If Los Angeles, Calif. 90017, attorney for Frick Building, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219, in th. teJ™ ine whether an industi applicants. attorney for applicants. to S ta tes is being or is like] No. MC-FC-72533. By order of No. MC-FC-72718. By order of March 5, establS&K °r 18 Prevented from bein March 8, 1971, the Motor Carrier Board 1971, the Motor Carrier Board approved of snJ? d’ byreason of the importatio approved the transfer to A. A. Martin the transfer to Ryals Truck Line, Inc., Statesh merchandise into the Unite Transportation Co., Inc., Dedham, Mass., Albany, Oreg., of the operating rights in of Certificate No. MC-59828, issued certificates Nos. MC-28956, MC-28956 tion .public hearing in connec July 8, 1957, to Augusta & Barry, Inc., (Sub-No. 1), MC-28956 (Sub-No. 5), toe S f f r V nV^ ation wiU t* held i Boston, Mass., authorizing the transpor­ MC-28956 (Sub-No. 6), MC-28956 (Sub- Tariffaiw .C° ^ ? usslon,s Hearing R ood tation o f: General commodities, with the No. 9), MC-28956 (Sub-No. 12), MC- anff Commission Building, 8th and usual exceptions, between Boston, Mass., 28956 (Sub-No. 13), issued February 24, eets NW., Washington, DC, beginnin and points within 12 miles of Boston; 1941, September 30, 1958, January 10,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH 19, 1971 5 3 1 8 NOTICES

1964, August 31,1964, May 10,1967, Sep­ eral commodities, with usual exceptions, Smith and Jack Collie, a partnership tember 30,1968, and May 6,1968, respec­ between Kelly, Kans., and St. Joseph, doing business as C & S Trucking, Los tively, to G. P. Ryals, doing business as Mo.; livestock between Kelly, Kans., and Angeles, Calif., authorizing the trans­ Ryals Truck Service, Albany, Oreg,, col­ points within 10 miles thereof, on the portation of bakery products, between lectively authorizing the transportation one hand, and, cm the other, Kansas City, points in California and Arizona. Ernest of general and various specified com­ Kans., and Kansas City, Mo.; and live­ D. Salm, 3846 Evans Street, Los Angeles modities from, to or between specified stock and seeds from points in Nemaha CA 90027, representative for applicants! points in Washington and Oregon. Law­ County, Kans., and the sites o f Com­ No. MC-FC-72724. By order of March rence V. Smart, Jr., 419 Northwest 23d munity Sales or within 5 miles of Marys­ 5, 1971, the Motor Carrier Board ap­ Avenue, Portland, OR 97210, attorney ville and Frankfort, Kans., to Omaha, proved the transfer to Gale Shellito, do­ for applicants. Nebr., and St. Joseph, North Kansas ing business as Shellito Ranch Trucking, City, and Kansas City, Mo., and live­ No. MC-FC-72720. By order of Philip, S. Dak., of certificate No. mcI March 4, 1971, the Motor Carrier Board stock, millfeed, and farm machinery on 124755 (Sub-No. 3 ), issued June 12, 1967, return. approved the transfer to Glen Floyd, Box to Hoag Trucking, Inc., Philip, S. Dak., 88, Beattie, KS 66046, of the operating No. MC-FC-72721. By order of authorizing the transportation of feed, rights in certificates Nos. MC-8182 and March 5, 1971, the Motor Carrier Board between specified points and areas in MC-8182 (Sub-No. 1) issued May 14, approved the transfer to C & S Truck­ South Dakota and Iowa. 1951, to Donald Winkler, 304 North First ing, Inc., Los Angeles, Calif., of certifi­ Street, Seneca, KS 66538, authorizing cates Nos. MC-126327 (Sub-No. 1) and [seal] R obert L. Oswald, the transportation of household goods MC-126327 (Sub-No. 2) issued Au­ Secretary. as defined by the Commission and gen­ gust 31,1965 and July 18,1968, to Gerald [FR Doc.71-3841 Filed 3-18-71;8:49 am]

CUMULATIVE LISTS OF PARTS AFFECTED— MARCH The following numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during March.

1 CFR ^ 7 CFR Page 7 CFR—Continued Page 16______5203 16______— 5285 Proposed R ules—Continued 301______3882, 4471, 4776 1049. _____3909,4548 3 CFR 722______— ______4853 1050. _____ 3909,4548 724______4977 1060. _____ 3909,4548 P roclamations: 730______.______3883 1061. _____3909,4548 4032 _ 4111 760______5205 1062. _____3909,4548 4033______——______4463 780______- ______4367 1063. ____3909,4548 4034 ______4465 811______3883 1064. 3909,4415,4548 4035 ______4589 842______4475 1065. _____3909,4548 4036 ______4749 862______4261 1068. _____3909,4548 4037 ______4971 905______3884 1069. _____3909,4548 _____3909,4548 E xecu tive O rders: 907 _ 3959, 4262, 4537, 4705, 5033, 5208 1070. 908 ______— 4262, 4706, 5209 1071. ___ 3909,4548 5327 (see PLO 5029)______5042 ___3909,4548 10001 (see EO 11586)______4751 910______3960, 4476, 4537, 4859, 5034 1073. 912 _ 4476 1075. ____3909,4548 10008 (see EO 11586)______4751 ___39 09,4548 10202 (see EO 11586)______— 4751 913 ______4477 1076. 914______- 4477 1078. ____3909,4548 10292 (see EO 11586) —______4751 ____ 3909,4548 10420 (see EO 11586)______4751 966______5285 1079. 980______- ___ 4263 1090. _____3909,4548 10659 (see EO 11586)______— 4751 3909.4548 10714 (see EO 11586)______4751 1061______4776 1094. 1065______i p 4367 1096. II ___3909,4548 10837 (see EO 11586)______4751 II ___3909,4548 10984 (see EO 11586)_ 4751 1472______3884 1097. 1098. ___ 3909,4548 11248 (amended by EO P roposed R ules: 1099. ~____3909,4548 11587) ______— 4973 59______5178 :S '3909,4548 11350 (see EO 11586)____ 4751 1101. 916 ______- 4055 1102. ” ___3909,4548 11360 (see EO 11586)______4751 917 ______- _ 4056 III__ 3909, 4548 11491 (see Memorandum of 1103. 981___ 4295 1104. " I I __ 3909,4548 March 11, 1971)______S 4975 991______— ______— 4060 “ I I __ 3909,4548 11584 ______4365 1106. 1000______.______3909 1108. ~III_ 3909,4548 11585 ------4467 1001 ______3909,4408, 4548, 5141 ___3909,4548 1120 . 11586 ______4751 1002 ______3909, 4548, 5141 " I I — 3909,4548 11587______— ______4973 1121 . 1004______3909, 4548,5141 1124. I I I — 3909,4548 P residential D o cum ents O ther 1006 ______3909, 4548 1125: " " I — 3909, 4548 3909.4548 T h a n P roclamations and E xec­ 1007 _ 3909, 4548 1126. 1011 ______3909, 4548 ______3909,4548 u t iv e O rders: 1127. 1012 ______3909, 4548 3909.4548 Memorandum of March 11, 1128. 1013 ______3909, 4548 1129. ~ "I I I 3909,4548 1971______4975 "II__3909,4548 1015______3909, 4548, 5141 1130. 1030______- ______3909, 4548 1131. *1___3909,4548 5 CFR 1032 ______3909,4548 1132. ” H _ 3909,4548 213______3881, 1033 ______- ___ 3909, 4548 1133. I I —1 3909,4548 1036______3909,4297, 4548 _____ 3909,4548 3882, 4292, 4471, 4537, 4977, 5033, 1134. 1040______3909,4548 _ ____3909,4548 5205 1136. 1043 ______- 3909, 4548 _____ 3909,4548 316______— 3882 1044 ______3909, 4548 1137. ____ 3909,4548 2411— ______5205 1046...... 3909, 4548 1138.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 54— FRIDAY, MARCH T9, 1971 FEDERAI REGISTER 5319 Page 9 CFR 15 CFR—Continued Paga 21 CFR—Continued Page ______3890, 368______4375 P roposed R ules—Continued 3891, 4367, 4368, 4478, 4685, 4977, 371______4375 302 ______!______4928 5285 373______4376 303 _ 4928 ______4860 376______4376 304 ______4928 on ...... — 4591 386______4376 305 ______4928 667______5035 306 ______4928 10 CFR 307 ______4928 ______4686 16 CFR 308 ______4928 ______4368 13______4592-4596, 4692-4695, 5212 311 ____ 4928 ______4861 312 ____ 4928 170...... — ______4978 17 CFR 316______4928 12 CFR 231______4483 239______4779 22 CFR 4 - ...... 5050 41______5040 4478 241______4483 18______271______4978 47—_____ 4697 224...... 4538 P roposed R u l e s : 51______4870 226____- ...... 4113 730______- ______4698 335______>- 3959 150______„. 4408 527______:— 4686 230______4070 24 CFR 545...... 4688 249______4070 556.— — ------5051 274______4070 5------— ...... 4780 10______4291 Proposed R ules: 18 CFR 200______4542, 4980 563______5250 1600______— 4542 748______4996 101______4386 105______3960 1914 ------;______—— 4492,4780 1915 ______- ...... — 4493, 4781 13 CFR 141-______3964 201______3960, 5044 P roposed R u l e s : 121______4832 204______5048 81...... 4427 Proposed R ules: 260______— ______5049 121...... — 5302 P roposed R u l e s : 25 CFR 14 CFR 201______4551 111...... 4870 260______4551 P roposed R u l e s : 39------3891, 221______4054 4369, 4478, 4479, 4689, 4753, 4861, 19 CFR 5034, 5209, 5210, 5286 1------4979 26 CFR 4— —!------4979 10— ------4484 1______— 4597, 4871, 4984, 5214, 5215 4043, 4370-4375, 4479, 4480, 4538, 18------4485 13------4872 4690-4692, 4753, 4754, 4862, 5034, 21------4490 31------5216 5210, 5211, 5286-5288 25— __ ------4490 48------3893 114— ______4490 53------5240 ”5...... 4043, 4044, 4373, 4692, 4862, 5211 1 2 3 ______4490 154______3894 153______4597, 4877 245------4115 P roposed R u l e s : P roposed R u l e s : 1______3899 1—...... ——______4547,4611 22—...... — 4046 4387, 4388, 4547, 4885, 4986, 5221,’ 5227, 5236 20 CFR 13------— 5227 239______- ______4980 31—______5227 262------4980 53------5240 395______4980 150 ------4896 151 ------1 _ 4896 P roposed R u l e s : 152 ______4896 1 A.HA.n 194— ------4048, 4393 Proposed R u les: 410 ------4340 196 ------4048, 4393 197 ------4048, 4393 ------4878 21 CFR i t ...... 4878 201------4048, 4393, 4611 31------4R7R 240— ------4393 QQ ----- *xOfO 2 7 ______4542 «>»------4767 470R 46______39«5 245------4048, 4393, 4398 7161 ...... —...... '—--- 04*5247 1 121______R2 1 3 252------4611 130 _ R037 301______5236, 5243 3927, 4424-4426, 4508-4510, 4708, 141------4379 4788, 4789, 4881, 5249, 5298, 5299 145— ------4379 29 CFR 146a 42R0 1------:______— 4045 V5— 4298, 4299, 4510,4709, 4790, 4791 148c------4260 5------4045 148t 44Q1 462------5289 148u 4fiQfi 511------4782 123------4878 148w 4375 778------4699, 4981 148v 4RRQ 1520______5040 ch. n ...... ¡S? 149b 42R1 P roposed R u l e s : 420 3QR5 602------_ 4551 302------::::::::::::: 3 5 P roposed R u l e s : 603—______4551 15 CFR 3 ------5052 608______4551 4____ 15 ------4788 609— 1______4551 16 ------4060 610— ------4551 301------4928 611______4551 5320 FEDERAL REGISTER

29 CFR— Continued F&s& 41 CFR— Continued Page 47 CFR—Continued ^ 612—______4551 6-1______—_____— 4377, 4599 21------4600 614 ______- ____ 4551 9-1——______;______5219 73------3966,4284,4503 615 _ 4551 9-51______5219 73------3966,4284,4503 687______- 4551 12B-1______4754 83------‘T------5294 12B-50...... 4754 97------4264 30 CFR 18-5______3972 P roposed R u l e s : 70____——______4981 18-6______3980 1 ------3 9 0 2 j P roposed R u l e s : 18-7______3988 101-1______4983 2 ...... 4885 11— 25— ------4062 ______4652 101-47—______3894 12____il______4652 73 ---- 3902, 13______:______4652 P roposed R u l e s : 4062, 4064, 4068, 4511, 5142, 5301 14 ______4652 Ch. 12— !______||______5053 74 ------4068, 4885 14a____ 4652 97___------4069,4511 70______4547 42 CFR 75______4406, 4548,4994, 5244, 5296 4______1______3894 49 CFR 90_____ 3900 481______4543, 5290-5293 9------4290 P roposed R u l e s : 393------4545 32 CFR 37______4420 397------4874 52______4782 55_____ 4421 571______4290, 4291,4600,4607 262______4872 574------4783 701______,______5042 43 CFR 1003______4984 806_____ 4700 P ublic L and O rders: 1033______3896, 1632______4782 3897, 3968, 3969, 4385, 4505, 4786 1642______4782 725 (revoked in part by PLO 5026)______4378 1048______4505 32A CFR 4522 (see PLO 5029)______5042 1122______— _ 5219 4983 (corrected by PLO 5027) _ 4379 P roposed R u l e s : OIA (Ch.X): 5024 ______:______4378 OI Reg. 1______4982 5025 ______4378 172______. ______4626 33 CFR 5026 ______4378 173______4626,5299 5027 ______4379 232______4994 110______5042 5028 ______4498 571 . 4290, 4291, 4600, 4607 117______—___'______4381 ______5029 ______5042 204______5218 574 ______■ _ . 4061 207______4599, 5218 1043______H ______4995 45 CFR I ___ ;_____ 5143 P roposed R u l e s : 1048______...... 4072 117______4298, 5245 70______4498 1056— _____ 175______— ______4984 1300______4628 36 CFR 1307______. ______4072 311—______4494 46 CFR 201______—— 4377 50 CFR 38 CFR 528______4292 28______3898,4704 3______4599 542______- 4293 33______— .. 4545, 4608, 4705, 5043 6______— 4382 4609 P roposed R u l e s : 260 8______4382 ___ 4505 17______4782 146______4625, 5246, 5296 280 _ 3970 21______4783 Ch. II______„ ______— 4420 351 381...... 4707, 5052 Proposed R u l e s : 39 CFR ___ 3925, 5296 Ch. I ...... 4117, 4755 230______47 CFR 2K3 _ 4506 41 CFR 1 ____ 5294 2R4 4506 2 ______...______4264, 4500 2g0 _ 4550 1-5______3971 4506 5A-14______4259 15______- 5294 401______

LIST OF FEDERAL REGISTER PAGES AND DATES— MARCH

Pages Date 3875-3953 ___March 2 3955-4106 ______3 4107-4357 _____ 4 4359-4456 _____ 5 4457-4532 _____ 6 4533-4583 _____ 9 4585-4680 10 4681-4744 ____ 11 4745-4845 ____ 12 4847-4966 _____ 13 4967-5027 _____ 16 5029-5197 _____ 17 5199-5280 _____ 18 5281-5320 ____l 19