HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE 2010 The Forecast, The Challenge
Second Edition Contributors Authors: Roy Amara, Karen Bodenhorn, Mary Cain, Rick Carlson, Janet Chambers, Diana Cypress, Hank Dempsey, Rod Falcon, Roberto Garces, Jaycee Garrett, Danielle Gasper, Katherine Haynes Sanstad, Matthew Holt, Susannah Kirsch, Nandini Kuehn, Heather Kuiper, Elaina Kyrouz, Robert Mittman, Ellen Morrison, Ian Morrison, Geof- frey Nilsen, Marina Pascali, Andrew Robertson, Denise Runde, Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, Greg Schmid, Charlie Wilson, Kathy Yu Editors: Charles Grosel, Melinda Hamilton, Julie Koyano, Susan Eastwood Art Director: Janet Chambers Graphic Designers: Adrianna Aranda, Robin Bogott, Diana Cypress, Jeanné Haffner, Melinda Hamilton HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE 2010 The Forecast, The Challenge
Second Edition
Prepared by The Institute for the Future
Support for this publication was provided by
Princeton, NJ January 2003 Copyright © 2003 by The Institute for the Future. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission.
Published by Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 www.josseybass.com
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or other- wise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, e-mail: [email protected].
Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986 or fax 317-572-4002.
Jossey-Bass also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Health and health care 2010 : the forecast, the challenge / [contributors, Roy Amara . . . [et al.]] p. cm. “To recognize the 25th anniversary of its founding, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation asked the Institute for the Future (IFTF) to forecast the future of health and and health care in America . . .”—Introduction. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7879-5974-x 1. Medical care—United States—Forecasting. 2. Public Health—United States—Forecasting. I. Amara, Roy. II. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. III Institute for the Future.
SECOND EDITION PB Printing 10987654321 Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Health and Health Care 2010 Contents
Figures x
Tables xiv
Sidebars xv
Abbreviations and Acronyms xvii
Introduction xix
Chapter 1 Health and Health Care Forecast Executive Summary 1
Legislation 1 Demographics: Patients, Populations, and New Consumers 2 Payers and Health Care Costs 4 Health Plans and Insurers 5 Hospitals and Physicians 5 Medical and Information Technologies 6 Care Processes and Medical Management 8 Public Health 8 Three Scenarios 10
Chapter 2 Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease Increasing Diversity 17
The United States Population Is Growing Older and Living Longer 17 The Face of America Continues to Change-Diversity Is Increasing 19 Household Income Is Increasing, but the Gap Between the Extremes Is Widening 20 The Shifting Burden of Disease: Chronic Diseases, Mental Illness, and Lifestyle Behaviors 21
Contents v Chapter 3 Health Care’s Demand Side Changing Trends in Growth Rates 1960–2010 25
Historical Trends 25 The Issues: What Drives Cost Increases? 26 Market Dynamics 28 The Forecast: Real Cost Growth at 1 Percent 29 The Significance of Our Cost Forecast for the Rest of Our 10-Year Outlook 32 Wild Cards 32
Chapter 4 Health Insurance The Three-Tiered Model 35
Scope of Employment-Based Coverage 35 The Issues: How Will People Receive Health Insurance? 37 The Forecast: Source of Insurance—Where Are the People? . . . 39 . . . and What Type of Insurance Will They Have? 42 Tiering Will Increase 43 Wild Cards 43
Chapter 5 Managed Care Experiments in Reinvention 47
The Issues: Managed Care is out of Balance 47 Drivers 49 Regulation May Have Cost Consequences 51 Potential Barriers to IT Implementation 52 The Forecast: Experiments in Reinvention 54 Managed Care 2010: Patterns of Power 60 Wild Cards 64
Chapter 6 Health Care Providers Themes of the Future Delivery System 67
Intermediaries 68 Reimbursement Models: Between Finance and Delivery 74 Care Delivery Organizations for the Next Decade 78 Medical Management: The New Arena of Activity 82 What Happens to Hospitals? 84 Wild Cards 92 vi Contents Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Chapter 7 Health Care Workforce Future Supply and Demand 95
Physicians 95 Nurses 103 Physicians’ Assistants 105 Future Employment 106 Pharmacists 107 Wild Cards 108
Chapter 8 Medical Technologies Effects on Care 111
Rational Drug Design 112 Advances in Imaging 114 Minimally Invasive Surgery 117 Genetic Mapping and Testing 120 Gene Therapy 123 Vaccines 126 Artificial Blood 128 Xenotransplantation 129 Stem Cell Technologies 131 Wild Cards 132
Chapter 9 Information Technologies Will Health Care Join in the Information Age? 135
Base Technologies 135 The Forecast: Four Big Effects in Health Care 138 Progression of Information Technology into Health Care 145 Wild Cards 146
Chapter 10 Health Care Consumers The Haves and the Have-Nots 149
Three Tiers of Health Care Consumers 151 Forecast and Assumptions 156 Wild Cards 162
Contents vii Chapter 11 Public Health Services A Challenging Future 165
The History of Public Health in the United States 165 Key Factors Affecting Public Health in America Today 169 Technology 175 Public Health Frameworks and Strategies: Problems of Perception 176 Reconciling Public Health and Private Medicine 178 The Future: Scenarios and Forecasts 182 Forecast of the Future: Organizational Issues 183
Chapter 12 Mental Health The Hope of Science and Services 187
Facing the Problem and the Facts 189 Determining Priorities for Public Spending 190 Change Agents in Research 194 Mental Health Services Changes in the Next Decade 201 Policy and Legislation 210
Chapter 13 Children’s Health A Good Investment 219
What Keeps Kids Healthy? Access and Environment 220 Access to Health Services: Enough Providers? 225 The Impact of Environment 227 Physical Environment and Increasing Chronic Illness 230 How Are We Doing? 233 What’s in Store? 240 Wild Cards 245
Chapter 14 Health and Health Care of America’s Seniors The Future Awaits Us 251
The Demographics of an Aging Population 251 The Economic Status of Seniors 256 Health Status of Seniors 259 Long-Term Care 267 Elder Health Care Financing Through Medicare 270 Implications 273 viii Contents Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Chapter 15 Chronic Care in America An Evolving Crisis 279
Chronically Misunderstood: The Who, When, and What of Chronic Illness 279 Chronic Care Today: How We Got Here 284 Forecast 289 Implications 289
Chapter 16 Disease Management Weaving Disease Management into the Fabric of Patient Care 299
Diseases Being Managed 299 A Disease Management Primer 300 Drivers and Barriers on the Path Ahead 301 Forecast 305 The Pace of Change 308
Chapter 17 Health Behaviors Small Steps in the Right Direction 311
Alcohol and Drug Abuse in America 312 Injury Prevention: A Focus on Guns 324 Tobacco Use and Health 329 Wild Cards 333
Chapter 18 Expanded Perspective on Health Beyond the Curative Model 337
Definition of Health 339 Stress 340 Socioeconomic Status as a Determinant of Health 341 What’s New? Why Now? 342 Consumer Expectations 343 Deteriorating Health Conditions 344 Global Health Perspective 345 The Future: Shifting Paradigms 346 The Paradigm Shift: Evolution or Revolution? 348 Wild Cards 349
The Reactions 351 Glossary 383 Index 391
Contents ix Figures
Figure 1-1 Increasing diversity of the United States population 3 Figure 1-2 The real story of diversity in 2010 is regional. 3 Figure 1-3 A growing number of adults in the United States have attended college. 4 Figure 1-4 Americans move into HMOs. 5 Figure 1-5 In excess: Physician supply and estimated requirement 6 Figure 2-1 The changing age structure of the population 18 Figure 2-2 The coming surge in the population of age 65 years and older 18 Figure 2-3 Life expectancy at age 65 19 Figure 2-4 Increasing diversity of the United States population 19 Figure 2-5 The real story of diversity in 2010 is regional. 20 Figure 2-6 California is ahead of the nation 21 Figure 2-7 The middle shrinks, the high end grows. 22 Figure 2-8 Determinants of health 23 Figure 3-1 Total health care expenditures as a percentage of GDP, 1960–1999 25 Figure 3-2 Average annual growth rate of health care costs by sector 26 Figure 3-3 Health care cost increases get noticed during recessions 28 Figure 3-4 Future spending projections 29 Figure 3-5 Projection of future health care spending 30 Figure 3-6 Percent of American adults, ages 18–64, with employment-based health benefits or Medicaid, and without health insurance, 1987–1999 30 Figure 3-7 DSH spending exploded in the early 1990s. 31 Figure 3-8 Share of costs borne by government, employers, and consumers 32 Figure 4-1 HMO membership takes off in the 1990s. 36 Figure 4-2 Health plan enrollment for covered workers, selected years 1996–2001 36 Figure 4-3 Employment-based insurance 37 Figure 4-4 Sources of health insurance for Americans over time 39 Figure 4-5. Strong economy, low unemployment made employers stomach premium growth. 39 Figure 4-6 It’s been the IPAs that have grown fastest. 40 Figure 4-7 Future sources of health insurance for Americans 40 Figure 4-8 The future is much more of the present. 43 Figure 4-9 HMO descendants move from mainstream to majority. 43 Figure 4-10 Tiers ‘R’ Us . . . and will be. 44 x Figures Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Figure 5-1 Inflation rates diverge 48 Figure 5-2 Enrollment in PPOs grows. 49 Figure 5-3 Expenditure increases persist. 50 Figure 5-4 Employers are unlikely to switch to defined-contribution health benefits 57 Figure 5-5 Consumers will pay more. 58 Figure 6-1 Managed competition: How it was supposed to be . . . how it really is 70 Figure 6-2 Managed care takes over from “unmanaged care.” 72 Figure 6-3 The “fee-for-service brokers” will lose their dominance. 74 Figure 6-4 How physicians got paid in 1997. 75 Figure 6-5 How HMOs pay their doctors and hospitals 76 Figure 6-6 How premium payments get divided up: The PPO world versus the HMO world 77 Figure 6-7 Fee-for-service will fade, but capitation is not its only successor. 77 Figure 6-8 More physicians and many more group physicians 81 Figure 6-9 Hospital beds are slowly disappearing. 85 Figure 6-10 Occupancy has also fallen. 85 Figure 6-11 Sicker patients and fewer beds means more staff per bed. 86 Figure 6-12 There are also more staff in total. 86 Figure 6-13 There are more for-profits, but not that many more. 87 Figure 6-14 Hospital beds will keep slowly disappearing. 90 Figure 6-15 Hospital spending-still a big deal, but proportionately falling slowly 92 Figure 7-1 Physicians in the pipeline 96 Figure 7-2 In excess: Physician supply and estimated requirement 96 Figure 7-3 Median net income 99 Figure 7-4 Projected supply of RNs, 1995–2020 104 Figure 9-1 More and more PC usage by the workforce 136 Figure 9-2 Technologies in the home take off. 136 Figure 9-3 Eighty-five percent of physicians use at least one Internet-enabled application 140 Figure 9-4 Internet access is mostly for the wealthy and educated. 145 Figure 9-5 Internet and computer penetration of the household will continue to increase. 145 Figure 10-1 Population age 65 and older, 2000 to 2050 151 Figure 10-2 Benefits insecurity 152 Figure 10-3 Description of new consumer attributes in 2005 153
Figures xi Figure 11-1 Changes in cause of death, 1900–1999 167 Figure 11-2 The three pillars of public health 168 Figure 11-3 Changes in the share of national after-tax income held by various economic groups in the United States, 1977 and 1997 170 Figure 11-4 Trends in asthma prevalence by region and year, 1980–1994 172 Figure 11-5 Trends in asthma prevalence by year, 1980–1999 172 Figure 11-6 Trends in waterborne disease outbreaks, 1971–1994 173 Figure 11-7 Patterns in waterborne disease outbreaks, 1997–1998 174 Figure 13-1 U.S. ethnic diversity increasing at an accelerating rate 229 Figure 13-2 Children 5–17 years old who speak a language other than English at home 229 Figure 13-3 Most kids are well covered-and are well. 233 Figure 13-4 Unmarried, with children 237 Figure 13-5 Youthful victims of violence: Rate of serious violent crime victimization of youth, ages 12–17 by gender 239 Figure 13-6 Serious violent crime offending rate 239 Figure 14-1 Average annual growth rate of the elderly population, 1910–2050 252 Figure 14-2 U.S. demographic profile, 1995: Middle-age spread of the baby boomers 253 Figure 14-3 U.S. demographic profile, 2010: Baby boomers reach AARP territory 253 Figure 14-4 U.S. demographic profile, 2030: Top-heavy with baby boomers 253 Figure 14-5 Projection of the elderly population by age, 1995–2030 254 Figure 14-6 Centenarians in the United States, 1995–2030 254 Figure 14-7 Number of men per 100 women by age, 1995 and 2030 255 Figure 14-8 Percent of population, 65 and older, by race and ethnicity, 1995 and 2030 255 Figure 14-9 Most common chronic conditions among women and men, 70 years of age and over 261 Figure 14-10 Disability increasing slower than projected 262 Figure 14-11 The growing gap: Anticipated number vs. projected need for physicians trained in geriatrics 265 Figure 14-12 The shrinking pool of potential caregivers 269 Figure 15-1 Prevalence of chronic conditions 280 Figure 15-2 Prevalence of unmet need for assistance among persons with need for ADL help, by age group 283 Figure 15-3 The consequences of unmet need for help, by age group 284 Figure 15-4 Who pays for what? 1995 national health expenditures 288 xii Figures Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Figure 15-5 Source of health insurance coverage for persons with any disability, by age 289 Figure 17-1 Prevalence of illicit drug use by age cohorts 314 Figure 17-2 Marijuana is the drug of choice. 314 Figure 17-3 Association of alcohol and illicit drug use 315 Figure 17-4 Prevalence of lifetime alcohol dependency or abuse, and age of drinking onset 315 Figure 17-5 Interaction of drugs, tobacco, and alcohol 316 Figure 17-6 Trends in perceptions of availability and risk of regular use, compared with 30-day prevalence for twelfth graders 316 Figure 17-7 Trends in drug-related emergency room visits, 1978–1996 317 Figure 17-8 Incarcerations in federal and state prisons and local jails, 1985–1997 318 Figure 17-9 Drug use and AIDS 318 Figure 17-10 Economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse 319 Figure 17-11 The workplace consequences of drug and alcohol abuse: Employment history and absenteeism 320 Figure 17-12 Reported past year illicit drug or alcohol problem relative to treatment 323 Figure 17-13 Trends in homicide rates by method, 1985–1999 326 Figure 17-14 Adolescent suicide: a black and white comparison, 1980–1995 327 Figure 17-15 Few smokers report getting help to quit smoking 332
Figures xiii Tables
Table 7-1 Projected physician supply and demand, as envisaged in 2000 (Physicians per 100,000 population) 97 Table 7-2 Projected RN requirements by employment setting, 2000–2010 104 Table 10-1 The tiers of coverage 157 Table 11-1 Stages of relations between public health and medicine 166 Table 11-2 Ten public health achievements, 1900–1999 167 Table 11-3 Factors in the process of privatizing publicly funded public and personal health services 180 Table 12-1 Projected future causes of disability 190 Table 12-2 The most common mental health common disorders in the United States 191 Table 12-3 Estimated economic costs of mental illness by type of disorder, 1994 (billions of dollars) 194 Table 13-1 Healthy People 2000 goals for maternal and child health 235 Table 15-1 Most noninstitutionalized individuals with chronic conditions are under age 65 281 Table 15-2 Annual per-person office visits 282 Table 16-1 The pace of adoption of disease management 308 Table 17-1 Biomedical and underlying causes of death in the United States in 1990 312 Table 17-2 Support among national poll respondents for policies to regulate firearms 328 Table 18-1 Paradigm shifts 347
xiv Tables Health Care Ten-Year Forecast Institute for the Future
Sidebars
Chapter 1 Tiers of Coverage 3 Forecast Through 2005 10 What Level of Health Spending Growth Is Sustainable in the Long Run? 10 Scenario One Indicators 11 Scenario Two Indicators 13 Scenario Three Indicators 14
Chapter 3 The Economy Is the Crucial Denominator 28
Chapter 4 Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance and the Economy 38
Chapter 6 Physicians in Group Practice 80
Chapter 7 New Roles for Pharmacists 107
Chapter 8 The Pace of Change in Drug Design 113 Unnatural Natural Products 114 Drug-producing Animals and Plants 114 Mini-MRIs and MRNs 115 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) 116 The Ethics of Genetic Testing 121
Chapter 10 The Three Modes of Empowerment 150 The Aging Baby Boomers 151 The New Consumers: Who Are They? 153 Children: Patients and Beneficiaries, but Not Active Consumers 154
Chapter 12 Service Coordination for People with Mental Illness and Substance Abuse 205 Self-Help Within a Managed Care Plan 207 Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) 210
Sidebars xv Chapter 13 Incremental Medicaid Expansion is Nothing New 223 Who Are Children with Special Health Care Needs? 234 Chapter 17 The Scope of the Alcohol and Illicit Drug Abuse Problem in the United States 313 Chapter 18 Talking to the Doctor 342 “Alternative,” “Holistic,” “Expanded”: What’s in a Name? 343 Evidence-Based Studies: What the Research Shows 344
xvi Sidebars Health Care Ten-Year Forecast Institute for the Future
Abbreviations and Acronyms
AAMC American Association of Medical Colleges AAPCC adjusted average per capita costs AARP American Association of Retired Persons AFDC Aid to Families with Dependent Children AHA American Hospital Association AIDS acquired immunodeficiency syndrome AMA American Medical Association AMC academic medical center CBO Congressional Budget Office CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COGME Council on Graduate Medical Education CPR computer-based patient record CPS Current Population Survey CT computed tomography DRG diagnosis-related group DSH disproportionate share hospital EBRI Employee Benefits Research Institute EMR electronic medical record ETS environmental tobacco smoke FDA Food and Drug Administration FFS fee for service FTE full-time equivalent GDP gross domestic product GME graduate medical education HCFA Health Care Financing Administration HEDIS health plan employer data and information set HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV human immunodeficiency virus HMO health maintenance organization HPV human papilloma virus IMGs international medical graduates IOM Institute of Medicine
Abbreviations and Acronyms xvii IPA independent practice association IVR interactive voice response LPN licensed practical nurses MRI magnetic resonance imaging MRN magnetic resonance neurography MSA medical savings account MSO management services organization MTBE methlytertiary butyl ether NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement NCQA National Committee on Quality Assurance NHE National Health Expenditure NHIS National Health Insurance Survey NP nurse practitioner OTC over the counter PA physician’s assistant PC personal computer PET positron emission tomography POS point of service PPM physician practice management PPO preferred provider organization PPS prospective payment system PSN provider service network RN registered nurse SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Association SES socioeconomic status SIDS sudden infant death syndrome SNF skilled nursing facility SV40 simian virus 40 WHO World Health Organization
xviii Abbreviations and Acronyms Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Health and Health Care 2010 Introduction
To recognize the 25th anniversary of its described in the first chapter of this founding, in 1997 The Robert Wood report and depicted in the map that is Johnson Foundation asked the Institute bound to the inside of the back cover. for the Future (IFTF) to forecast the We hope that the findings of this study future of health and health care in Amer- will be of value to community service ica for the period between 2000 and the organizations, hospitals, providers, pay- year 2010. This is the Second Edition of ers, and researchers in the long-term that Forecast, revised and updated to planning processes that support their reflect the changes that have occurred own visions of the future. since our initial work in 1997–1998. As we originally stated, the purpose of this This forecast is organized in the forecast is to provide the reader with a following way: description of critical factors that will influence health and health care in the Health and Health Care Forecast first decade of the 21st century. This first chapter provides an overview of the important issues covered in In this book, we have singled out the greater detail throughout the forecast. trends most likely to influence the course It functions as an executive summary of Americans’ health and the state of the of the topics that are covered in greater American health care delivery system in detail in the subsequent chapters. the next decade. The drivers of this sys- tem are relatively stable and predictable Demographic Trends and the Burden of from now to 2005. Beyond 2005, and Disease through to 2010 and beyond, the future In 2010, the American population of health and health care is much more will be older and more ethnically and volatile. racially diverse. The burden of disease is shifting toward chronic illnesses To cope with the uncertainties that exist that stem from our behaviors. This in these later years, IFTF has created chapter draws attention to the impor- three different scenarios that describe tance of these shifts. emerging visions of health care in this country. They are titled Stormy Weather, Health Care’s Demand Side The Long and Winding Road, and The The growth rate of American health Sunny Side of the Street, and they are care costs steadily increased from
Introduction xix 1960 through the early 1990s, then This chapter examines in depth the slowed dramatically. This chapter battle that will evolve in the medical reviews the historical factors that management arena. drove these changes and forecasts the health care cost increases in both the Health Care Workforce public and private sectors over the There has been little real change in next 10 years. the way physicians practice medicine since the invention of the telephone. Health Insurance Although physicians are still the cen- Changes in the health insurance sys- tral figures in American health care, tem and in the numbers of the unin- the current oversupply of doctors and sured are discussed in this chapter. the emergence of new health care The growth of Medicare and Medic- provider roles may create changes in aid, as well as new versions of man- the health care delivery system over aged care products, are projected the next decade. The supply and through the year 2010. demand of these providers are pro- jected through 2010. Managed Care During the 1990’s, managed care Medical Technologies became the dominant health care New medical technologies have been insurance and delivery system, cover- one of the key driving forces in both ing more than 60 percent of publicly the cost and the organization of 20th- and privately insured lives. It was century health care. This chapter instrumental in controlling national reviews eight new medical technolo- health care expenditures during that gies that will affect the provision of decade, and promised to deliver com- patient care in the next 10 years and prehensive, coordinated health care. examines both their potential positive Despite a recent backlash from physi- effects and the barriers that may stand cians, consumers, and the media, in the way of their adoption. managed care will persist as a mecha- nism to control costs and coordinate Information Technologies the delivery of care. This section out- The health care industry has lagged lines three scenarios that depict the behind other industries in implement- evolution of managed care over the ing information technologies that next decade. streamline business and clinical processes. We forecast that changes in Health Care Providers information technology as applied to There will be continued change in the health care will be a prime catalyst of way health care is organized and deliv- change in the future. ered over the next 10 to 15 years. The surplus of hospital beds will con- Health Care Consumers tribute to a buyer’s market, and a new As a new, educated generation of role for intermediaries will emerge. informed consumers begins to use xx Introduction Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
more health services, it is demanding health today, and forecasts the progress more information, choice, and control we will make during the next ten years than ever before. These empowered in creating an environment in which to consumers have the capacity to change raise healthy children. dramatically the culture of health care. In addition, the press of health Health and Health Care of America’s care cost containment may lead to a Seniors three-tiered system of access to care As the Baby Boom cohort of the pop- that seriously disenfranchises people ulation ages, there will be an increased who do not have insurance. demand for medical services and a greater interest in adopting healthy Public Health Services lifestyles as a way to age gracefully. Modern public health is practiced in Increased demands on the Medicare an environment of increasing global- Program to finance the health care of ism and resource scarcity. New devel- people over 65 years will put signifi- opments in technology, public health cant pressure on the health care deliv- strategy, and public-private partner- ery system. These new demands may ships will shape future successes and well outstrip our ability to provide failures in public health. This chapter services. This chapter analyzes the examines and forecasts the future of effect that the change in demograph- public health services, including orga- ics and consumer behaviors will have nizational and environmental health on care for our aging population. issues. Chronic Care in America Mental Health The numbers of chronically ill people The incidence and prevalence of men- in America will grow significantly in tal illness in our society and the effects the next decade, as our aging popula- that reverberate through our economy tion lives longer and confronts the ill- and culture are daunting. This chapter nesses inherent in growing older. We explores the issues that surround the estimate the growth in patients with provision of mental health services, chronic diseases, and forecast the new and forecasts the future of new services and technologies that will be approaches, emphasizing community- available to them. based programs. Disease Managemen Children’s Health The U.S. health care system originally Children are the backbone of our was created to treat patients with future. The integrity of their health, acute conditions. Today, the leading especially in terms of prevention of dis- diseases that cause death and disabil- ease and the establishment of healthy ity are no longer acute, but rather behaviors, is paramount to a flourish- chronic illnesses. By 2010, 40 percent ing and productive society. This chap- of Americans will have a chronic ill- ter describes the challenges facing child ness, and caring for them will cost up
Introduction xxi to $600 billion each year. Disease Wild Cards management is quickly becoming the Wild cards are events that have less than key strategy for easing the health and a 10 percent chance of occurring, but economic burdens of chronic disease. will have a tremendous impact on society This chapter provides a description of and business if they do occur. The point the evolution of disease management of wild cards is not to predict an out- into the 21st century, with implica- come but to expand our peripheral vision tions for key players in the health care regarding the total range of possibilities system. that exist; to offer a larger context within which to consider mainstream forecasts; Health Behaviors and to prepare for surprises in the event Our health behaviors, namely smok- that wildcards do come to pass. ing, poor dietary habits, lack of exer- cise, alcohol abuse, the use of illicit drugs, and violence, influence up to About the Institute for the Future 50 percent of our health status. Located in Menlo Park, California, IFTF Although we do not anticipate radical is an independent, nonprofit research improvements in these health behav- firm that specializes in long-term fore- iors in the coming decade, the empha- casting. Founded in 1968, IFTF has sis that managed care has placed on become a leader in applied research for prevention will help us begin to nonprofit organizations, corporations, decrease these harmful behaviors. In industries, and governments. IFTF has a addition, community-based programs cross-disciplinary professional staff that that change or restrict the environ- works internationally, analyzing health, ment will also be very important. technology, and broad public policy, fore- casting potential scenarios for the future, Expanded Perspective on Health and identifying markets for new products A definition of health must have equal and next-generation technologies. applicability to everyone: to the fully well, to people who are unwell because IFTF’s Health Team is in its 17th year of of disease or illness that is treatable or providing health care data tracking and curable, and to that growing segment forecasting based both on primary and of the population with genetic or secondary research data. Our research acquired impairment, such as people projects focus on emerging trends in the with chronic disease or disability. Over organization, financing, and delivery of the next decade, our view of health health care services, technologies, and will be expanded to encompass mental, products, with an emphasis on public social, and spiritual well being. policy changes as well as on the impact of private sector markets. The Health Team evaluates the forces that both drive and resist innovation and forecasts not only the direction but also the pace of change in the health and health care environments. xxii Introduction Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS H. Goldman, M.D. Ph.D.; Michael The idea for this study originated with Goze; Peter Grant, Jessie Gruman, Ruby Hearn, Ph.D., and Steven Ph.D.; David Gustafson, Ph.D.; Melinda Schroeder, M.D., of The Robert Wood Hamilton; David Hansen; Kathy Harty; Johnson Foundation. They believed that David Hayes-Bautista, Ph.D.; David there would be value in developing the Hemenway, Ph.D.; Rona Hu, M.D.; forecast as a long-range strategic plan- Patrick Jeffries; Don Kemper; Bill Kerr; ning tool for health organizations. Along Quita Kirk; Nandini Kuehn, Ph.D., with Dr. Hearn and Dr. Schroeder, Frank Paula Lack; Kim Lawrence; Julia Lear, Karel, Ann Searight, Maureen Cozine, Ph.D.; Bob Leitman; Jeff Lemieux; Connie Pechura, Ph.D., Beth Stevens, Katherine Levit; Karen Linkins, Ph.D.; Ph.D., Nancy Kaufman, Ph.D., and Marty Lynch; Ron Manderscheid, Ph.D.; Jeanne Weber provided consistent over- Alexandra Matveyeva; Molly Mettler; sight and cogent direction to the project, Arnie Milstein, M.D.; Al Mulley, M.D.; helping all of us to focus, refine, and Al Martin, M.D.; Gordon Moore, M.D.; improve the final product. Lois Shevlin H. Richard Nesson, M.D.; Robert New- and Phyllis Kane were invaluable in comer, Ph.D.; Mark Petrakis; David guiding us through the planning and Reuben, M.D.; Dorothy Rice, Ph.D.; development processes. We are indebted James Robinson, Ph.D.; Richard Rocke- to them and are extremely grateful for feller, M.D.; John Rother; Joan Rum- their support and guidance throughout melsburg; Pamela Russell; Bill Scanlon; this project. Andrew Scharlach, Ph.D.; Monica Seghers; Cary Sennet, M.D.; J. J. Singh; The IFTF staff could not have completed Mark Smith, M.D.; Elliott Sternberg, the research necessary to formulate this M.D.; Felicia Stewart, M.D.; Jon Stew- forecast without the help of many col- art; Humphrey Taylor; Sally Tom; Joan leagues, experts, and friends. Among Trauner, Ph.D.; and Leonard Zegans, those who were instrumental in identify- M.D.. ing and refining issues and trends with us, we would like to thank particularly Their thoughtfulness, insightful com- the following people: ments, and generous contributions of time and energy added significantly to Nancy Adler, Ph.D.; Adrianna Aranda; our own knowledge and to the robust- Morris Barer, Ph.D.; John Berthko; ness of the forecast. Katherine Binns; Bob Blendon, ScD; Robin Bogott; Janet Chambers; Rick Carlson; Toby Cole, M.D.; Rena Convis- sor; John Danaher, M.D.; Karen Davis, Ph.D.; Joe DeLuca; Paolo del Vecchio;Al Dembe; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Amy Einshorn; Carroll Estes, Ph.D.; Robert Evans, Ph.D..; Brian Finch, Ph.D.; Bar- bara Fuller; Brianna Gass; Suzanne Gel- ber Ph.D.; Michael Goldberg; Howard
Acknowledgments xxiii Special thanks go to Jean Hagan, Julie Koyano, Sue Reynolds and Susan Eastwood for their sensational editorial work and patience, and to Jon Peck for his guidance in pub- lishing this work.
Andy Pasternack, our publisher at Jossey-Bass, achieved early sainthood for his continu- ing patience and support during this process.
This forecast was submitted to the Foundation as a report to RWJF and is solely the responsibility of the Institute for the Future and its afffiliates.
With thanks, Wendy Everett Director
Roy Amara Ellen Morrison Mary Cain Ian Morrison Rick Carlson Geoffrey Nilsen Janet Chambers Marina Pascali Diana Cypress Andrew Robertson Hank Dempsey Denise Runde Rod Falcon Jane Sarasohn-Kahn Jaycee Garrett Greg Schmid Danielle Gasper Charlie Wilson Katherine Haynes Sanstad Kathy Yu Matthew Holt Institute for the Future Susannah Kirsch Menlo Park, California Nandini Kuehn Heather Kuiper Karen Bodenhorn Elaina Kyrouz Roberto Garces Robert Mittman California Center for Health Improvement
xxiv Acknowledgments HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE 2010 The Forecast, The Challenge
Second Edition Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Chapter 1 Health and Health Care Forecast Executive Summary
Fifteen years ago, the key issues in the making; determining responsibility for American health care system were clas- medical management; and improving sic: containing costs while improving the health behaviors of the American access to care for people and maintaining people. These will be the health battle- quality of services. Then the rapid cost grounds of the next decade. increases of the late 1980s, combined This chapter provides an overview of with the recession of the early 1990s, our 10-year forecast of health and health added a new issue to the list: ensuring care. We describe the path from now security of benefits. until 2005 in terms of the future legis- After the political dust of the lative and regulatory contexts; changes 1992–1994 debate about health reform in the demographics and attitudes of settled, several structural shifts in the patients, populations, and consumers; system became apparent. Managed the concerns of payers about health care care—designed to contain costs—went costs; the organization of health plans from being an aberration to being the and insurers; the structure of hospitals, mainstream method of providing health provider organizations, and the public insurance. Several new issues came to the health system; the role of medical infor- forefront of health policy: monitoring mation technologies; and the forthcom- the activities of managed care plans, ing shifts in care processes and medical organizing health care providers, and management. Beyond 2005, our forecast evaluating the quality of care delivered splits into three scenarios—one opti- to patients. Although the recent strong mistic about the impact of changes on economy and job market has increased the health of the population, one pes- the security of health benefits for some simistic about the ability of American people, the issue of how to pay for care society to provide coverage and access to for a growing number of uninsured care, and one in which incrementalism Americans remains with us. reigns supreme.
None of these issues will be completely Legislation resolved in the next few years. Instead, a new group of issues will join them. They Legislative activity will be set against a include organizing insurers and interme- background of incremental legislative diaries, along with providers; incorporat- reform. The failure of the health reform ing consumers into health care decision effort from 1992 to 1994 dulled the
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 1 appetite of most politicians for signifi- Second, Medicare may look very differ- cant health regulation. In addition, there ent than it did in the early 1990s, when is almost no support for large-scale social its financial future became uncertain. programs targeting the poor or the un- Many Medicare recipients will not be in insured. Major government reform is the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) pro- therefore unlikely. Strong support for gram but instead will be in health main- the current Medicare and Social Security tenance organizations (HMOs), preferred systems means that change in the bene- provider organizations (PPOs), or some fits of these systems will be slow. There other organized health plan arrange- will be few initiatives to design new ment. Cost controls enacted in the 1997 government programs beyond the lim- Balanced Budget Act will have changed ited programs enacted in the past few the way providers deal with Medicare years—insurance portability and chil- patients, in particular placing the reim- dren’s coverage. Neither of these two bursement for outpatient, home health, initiatives will have a significant impact and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) on a on the overall number of uninsured or prospective payment system. It’s plausi- the general health insurance market. ble that the baseline will be sufficiently different that “incremental” legislation Government legislation in two signifi- in the future could make a big change in cant areas will have some impact on the the nature of the program. But Medicare mainstream health care system. remains the second most popular pro- gram among the most powerful demo- First, there will be legislative outcomes graphic group in America—the as a result of a backlash against managed elderly—and politicians have learned to care. While there are few clearly articu- tamper with it at their peril. lated alternatives to market-based health care in the United States, there is consid- Consequently, our forecast for legislation erable support for legislation to curb is one of continued incremental program what are seen as health plan abuses. change directed primarily at providers Given that these regulations will require and with little direct effect on beneficia- little money from public coffers, we can ries. The real challenge—changing expect more regulation of health plan Medicare so that it can afford to cover activity, including disclosure rules, the vast number of baby boomers retir- mandates for clinical protocols such as ing after 2010—will not be dealt with the 48-hour hospital stay for maternity until later in the decade. patients, and medical records privacy laws. Although the effect of such regu- Demographics: lations on the overall market may be Patients, Populations, slight, there will be significant effects and New Consumers on plan and provider operations. In the next decade, Americans will be getting older and living longer. By 2010 the average life expectancy will be up to
2 Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
86 years of age for a woman and 76 years Figure 1-1. Increasing diversity of the United States population for a man. In addition, there will be more than 100,000 people over the age Percent of 100 in the year 2010. However, the 40 Native American first baby boomers will not turn 65 until Asian Hispanic 2010, so although the population is 30 African American aging, it’s aging quite slowly.
20 America will soon be a more ethnically diverse nation (see Figures 1-1 and 1-2). 10 Currently 74 percent of the population is white, but that will decrease to about 64 percent by the year 2010. Asians will 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 make up 5 percent, and African Ameri-
Source: IFTF; U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract, 2000. cans 13 percent. In the more densely populated western states, approximately 15 percent of the population will be Figure 1-2. The real story of diversity in 2010 is regional. Hispanic.
African American Northeast Hispanic The population will also be better edu- Asian cated in 2005: 55 percent of the popula- Native American tion age 25 years and older will have Midwest the equivalent of one year of college (see Figure 1-3). Income disparity— South a critical factor in determining health— will increase slightly. In the year 2005, West 50 percent of the population will have a family income of $53,000 or more in 0 1020304050 Percent constant 1998 dollars, and the distribu- tion will be slightly more equal. Source: IFTF; U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract, 2000. Access to care will remain “tiered” and that tiering will become much more extreme. The top tier, the “empowered consumers,” have considerable discre- Tiers of Coverage tionary income, are well educated, and use technology (including the Internet) Empowered Consumers: 38 percent to get information about their health. Worried Consumers: 34 percent These new consumers increasingly will Excluded Consumers: 28 percent engage in shared decision making with their physicians.
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 3 Payers and Health Figure 1-3. A growing number of adults in the United States have Care Costs attended college. (Percentage of people age 25 years and older who The health care system has been domi- have attended college) nated by cost concerns for the better part Percent of 30 years, but that domination will 60 wane during the next decade. From 1965 to 1991—from the inception of Medicare 50 and Medicaid through the recession that precipitated the health care reform debate 40 of 1992–1994—health care grew from 30 5 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) to more than 13 percent. It is 20 now at about 14 percent of GDP, with virtually all the reduction in cost growth 10 coming from savings in the private
0 sector. 1965 1975 1985 1995 1999 2005 We forecast a moderate but consistent
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract, 2000. increase in the cost of health care between now and 2005. Health care will grow as a share of the economy,1 albeit more slowly than in the 1960s, 1970s, The second tier is made up of the and 1980s. By 2005, the health care sec- “worried consumers.” These are con- tor will account for about 15 percent of sumers who have access to some health GDP. Employers in the private sector insurance but have little or no choice of will see the short-lived cost decreases of health plans. This tier includes those the mid-1990s fade away.2 They’ll see whose employers only offer one type nominal cost increases of 3 to 6 percent of coverage and those who may be tem- per year. Despite the best efforts of Con- porarily employed and face an even less gress to reduce spending in the Medicare secure health insurance outlook. This system, public programs will continue to “worried” group also includes early grow between 6 and 9 percent per year. retirees and others who do not have the Between now and 2005, business and same access to discretionary income as government will put several strategies the empowered consumers. in place to repress large cost increases. The third tier is composed of the These strategies tend to assuage the “excluded consumers.” In this group are symptoms rather than to attack the cause the uninsured, people on Medicaid, and of the increases. The strategies include others who don’t have access to market- reducing insurance coverage, passing on based health insurance. Throughout our the costs of health care premiums to ben- forecast, these three groups are affected eficiaries, and increasing the restrictions in varying ways by different aspects of on access to care via financial disincen- the health care system. tives for utilization.
4 Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
The health insurance market will evolve Figure 1-4. Americans move into HMOs. into a mix of different health plan mod- els, many of which will spend the next Millions several years in a constant flurry of reor- 140 ganization and mergers. Four dominant 120 “intermediary” models will emerge by 100 2005: the case manager, the provider 80 partner, the high-end FFS broker, and
60 the safety-net funder. As a result, in 2007 close to 50 percent of the popula- 40 tion will be in health plans for which 20 cost containment is a key issue. 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Despite all the pressures toward increas- ing costs in the system, these new strate-
Source: Group Health Administration of America, Interstudy, American Association of Health Plans. gies will be successful enough to keep costs from exploding again as they did from 1960 to 1990.
Health Plans and Hospitals and Insurers Physicians
The biggest change in the health insur- As the demand side evolves, changes in ance market over the past 10 years has the ways providers are organized will been the fast growth of HMO enroll- occur in the context of significant ment. In 1998, more than 76 million provider oversupply (see Figure 1-5). Americans were enrolled in HMOs, and There are approximately 630,000 physi- a majority were in some kind of a man- cians in the United States and another aged care plan. By 2005, HMOs will 170,000 in the medical school pipeline. capture the majority of the commercial There are nearly three new physicians for market and more than 25 percent of the every one doctor who retires. Moreover, Medicare market. Sixty percent of Med- the numbers of nurse practitioners icaid recipients will be in some form of (NPs), physician’s assistants (PAs), and 3 HMO by the year 2010. other non-MD clinicians will increase rapidly over the next decade. Physicians Among this plethora of new products, it are moving into group practices, yet it will be increasingly difficult to distinguish will be 2005 before most office-based one health plan from another. They’ll physicians are in groups, and most of all offer similar—and often the same— those will be in groups of six or fewer. providers and pay those providers through a mixture of discounted FFS and capita- On the hospital side, occupancy percent- tion (a flat fee per patient). By 2005, more age rates have fallen from the low 80s to than 100 million people will be in these the low 60s in the past decade, but nei- “HMO descendants.” (See Figure 1-4.) ther beds nor hospitals have closed at a
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 5 interventions of health plans that have Figure 1-5. In excess: Physician supply and estimated requirement driven much activity out of the inpatient (including residents and interns) setting will continue, but at a relatively Total supply of nonfederal slower pace. patient-care physicians Medical and 726,067 690,399 Information 631,431 Technologies 564,074 431,527 Technological change is accelerating in two areas that will affect health care dra- 1985 1995 2000 2010 2020 matically: medical and information tech- nologies. Medical technology has been one of the major drivers of the health Nonfederal patient-care physicians per 100,000 civilian population care system since the introduction of 250 effective pharmacological agents in the Projected supply early part of this century. Its impact will 200 continue in the next decade. However, Projected 150 requirement health care has not made significant use of the advances in information technol- 100 ogy that have transformed most other 50 industries. That situation will not con-
0 tinue for much longer as the boundaries 1990 1994 2000 2010 2020 between information and medical tech- nologies begin to blur. Source: IFTF; Bureau of Health Professions, American Medical Association, Council on Graduate Medical Education. Medical Technologies
The health care system has quickly rate that’s close to the drop in demand. adopted new medical technologies, both Set against this background of institu- devices and pharmaceuticals. Despite tional inertia, no dominant model will increased interest in cost-benefit assess- emerge to replace the large teaching hos- ment techniques, the pace of introducing pital and smaller community hospital new technologies is unlikely to slow, and models that provided medical care from there will be a significant increase in the the 1930s to the early 1990s. number of new technologies available in the coming decade. Some of the most There will be some hospital closings and interesting new technologies include: bed reductions, but hospitals will con- Rational drug design. The use of com- tinue to be difficult to shut down. From puters to design drugs that target a a total of just over 850,000 beds in particular receptor. 1997, we anticipate a further reduction of 130,000 beds by 2005.4 The advances Advances in imaging. The use of new in medical technology and the aggressive imaging technologies—such as
6 Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
electron-beam computed tomography together they’ll be the drivers behind new (CT), harmonic ultrasound, high- clinical care processes. They are: resolution positron emission tomogra- phy (PET), and functional magnetic Automation of basic business processes. resonance imaging (MRI)—to look at The transaction standards mandated the form and function of organs that in the 1996 Health Insurance Porta- were once examined only in surgery. bility and Accountability Act (HIPAA) legislation are beginning Minimally invasive surgery. The use of to move plans and providers toward miniaturized devices, digitized imag- automation of the submission and ing, and vascular catheters in neuro- adjudication of claims, determination surgery, cardiology, and interventional of patient eligibility, coordination radiology. of benefits, and authorizations of referrals. Genetic mapping and testing. The identi- fication and testing of genes and Clinical information interfaces. genetic interactions that cause disease. The creation of an electronic medical record (EMR) has stumbled because of Gene therapy. The use of site-specific resistance from providers, even while genes to treat a variety of inherited or many of the basic building blocks are acquired diseases. being put into place. Over the next Vaccines. The use of vaccines to bolster decade, the availability of computers, immune systems, target tumors, or sophisticated decision support sys- immunize against viruses, and of tems, and voice recognition will create delivery methods including oral and interfaces that are clinician-friendly. nasal sprays to simplify the vaccina- A combination of low equipment tion processes. prices, younger, computer-savvy clini- cians, and the move of physicians into Artificial blood. The use of recombi- groups will cause a slow but certain nant hemoglobin, using E. coli, to cre- adoption of computerized medical ate a blood substitute. records in the years after 2005. Xenotransplantation. The transplanta- Data analysis. In the next few years, tion of tissues and organs from ani- administrative and claims data sets mals into humans, primarily bone will be extensively “mined” to gain a marrow and solid organs. better understanding of a population’s future illnesses and an improved abil- Information Technologies ity to risk-adjust payments to health plans and providers. After 2005, there The information and communications will be more data available directly revolution will move into the health care from clinical records. There will be system in the next 5 to 10 years. We fore- close to real-time online analytical cast that four main areas will be affected processing of information about by new information technologies and that patient and provider outcomes, and
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 7 that information will be used in all use them. The second is the need to aspects of health care. reduce variations in practice, thereby reducing costs and improving clinical Telehealth. A combination of com- outcomes. Since an individual clinician is puter-supported case management, less able to judge adherence to protocols remote telemetry via sensors, and bet- than is a manager reviewing records of an ter-informed patients will create new entire organization, decisions about med- ways of delivering health care. Chron- ical management will continue to shift ically ill patients will be monitored away from the prerogative of the inde- remotely by using a variety of sensor pendent physician. Instead, internal man- devices, such as video cameras, blood agers in provider organizations and pressure monitors, blood glucose read- external managers working for interme- ers, and smart pill boxes. Sensors will diaries and plans will assume increasing be linked to computer systems that authority in managing physicians’ behav- enable the provider to catch adverse ior and patients’ compliance. Because events almost before they happen. The medical management will depend on vast increase in information about information systems to monitor and track health that the Internet, interactive both processes and outcomes, we forecast TV, and other communications media that putting these medical management bring into the home will also affect processes in place will take closer to 15 the health care system. Patients will years than 5 years. use these media for disease-specific research, psychosocial support groups, In the interim, disease and demand self-care, and shared decision making. management programs for the well population—advice nurses working We forecast that the impact of medical with patients using the telephone and technologies on the health care system will the Internet—will be commonplace. The continue to be significant, although the advent of disease management programs true gains from using information tech- and the adoption of clinical guidelines nology and computerizing clinical care will have a significant impact on medical processes will not be seen until after 2005. practice and patient management by 2005 and a sporadic but discernible Care Processes and effect on practice variation a few years Medical Management later. However, the struggle between intermediaries and providers and among Medical management—the active man- different provider organizations over who agement of the care of patients and popu- controls patients’ and physicians’ behav- lations—is currently applied sporadically, ior will not be resolved by 2010. if at all. There are two main issues in the future of medical management. The first Public Health is the debate over which care processes are used. Many groups are developing Over the past 30 years the public health guidelines and practice protocols, but system has operated under pressures of none has agreed how, where, or when to resource scarcity, limits in leadership, and
8 Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
organizational fragmentation. As the pub- totally collapse because support for pub- lic health system assumed the role of lic health will increase enough to main- safety-net medical provider, the economic tain at least a minimal system. The rise of burden upon it became almost unbear- the new consumer will also increase sup- able. Public health also suffered an iden- port for public health measures. tity crisis as the public confused public health with indigent medical care, further Over the next decade, national public diminishing support for a population- health policy will be generally piece- based health infrastructure. At the same meal, but dynamic state-level actions time, new health challenges emerged, will generate enough momentum to such as HIV/AIDS and environmental reignite federal comprehensive health contamination, that required strong lead- care reform debate. Community coali- ership and an integration of population- tions that assure access to basic personal based approaches into public health. and public health services will become more common. Managed care will con- Overarching global forces will determine tinue to dominate, but will be aug- the context in which public health func- mented by the integration of population tions in the future. By the end of this and personal health, public and private decade the currently inchoate social vision patient bases, and a variety of reimburse- reshaping government will have fully ment strategies. The full potency, limita- emerged and will determine the players tions, and consequences of public health and resources in future public health litigation, à la tobacco, also will be evi- leadership and action. Furthermore, dent in the next decade. global economies and populations will drive increases in health risks, and by The future of public health service deliv- the next decade, national public health ery will be shared among the local public concerns will be embedded in a global health agencies, the community’s private context of threats and opportunities. health care providers and organizations, Cost-effective technological advances, and community-based organizations and while mitigated by ethical debate, will leaders. The science of epidemiology will enhance screening, surveillance, and envi- continue to be one of public health’s ronmental health. Finally, public health most useful guides and will extend will increasingly employ “ecological” beyond biomedical applications to evalu- strategies that simultaneously address ate innovative and comprehensive public multiple human and structural determi- health prevention strategies. nants of health and health behavior. Tobacco use will continue its steady During most of the next decade, public decline, but at a very slow pace. In some health will continue to be underfunded geographic regions, use may remain at the and marginalized, and efforts to address current plateau. Community-based these underlying problems will be largely actions and local legislation will remain incremental. Breaches in public health effective tactics in curbing tobacco use in prevention systems will become increas- public places. A persistent influx of youth ingly evident, but the system will not smokers will require constant vigilance,
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 9 tious and chronic disease will keep Forecast Through 2005 infectious diseases on the public health Health Care 2 percent per year above nominal attention list. Finally, the by-products of Spending Growth: GDP growth our modern society will gain markedly Health Care Spending: 15 percent of GDP, $6,424 per capita increased attention in the next decade as food safety and air and water quality reach Uninsurance Rate: 44 million uninsured, 15 percent of critical points. The crucible for environ- population mental health action will be child health and safety actions and standards.
especially as smoking interacts with alco- Three Scenarios hol and illicit drug use. Abuse of these substances, in the absence of significant Our forecast is relatively certain and augmentation of treatment and preven- stable through the year 2005. Beyond tion programs, will continue to fluctuate 2005, we have created three scenarios to at high but not record-breaking levels. describe how the health care landscape Barring a massive economic recession, might evolve. firearm injuries related to violence will continue their decline, which began in the Scenario One: mid-1990s, with slower declines in nonvi- Stormy Weather olent firearm injury gaining momentum In the Stormy Weather scenario, as an array of interventions take effect. pressures from rising costs, dissatisfied Although levels of infectious disease in providers and patients, marked inequal- the early 21st century will not approxi- ity of access to care, greedy profit takers, mate those of the early 20th century, and repeated health care scandals accu- (re)emerging infections, drug resistance, mulate through the year 2005. None of resurgence in risky behaviors, threats of the fundamental problems of cost, qual- bioterrorism, and the interaction of infec- ity, or access are addressed in a meaning- ful way. Between 2005 and 2010, the barometer drops, winds converge, and What Level of Health Care Spending Growth stormy weather erupts. The primary dri- Is Sustainable in the Long Run? ving forces in this scenario include: A sea change in health care spending took place in the early 1990s. The Managed care programs that fail to annual growth rate dropped from 11 percent—a rate that had been sustained deliver on their promises to contain since the 1960s—to 6.75 percent. A combination of forces converged to costs or to improve quality. Instead, lower spending growth: strong price pressure from employer coalitions and they default to more hassling of other large purchasers; a low point in the health insurance underwriting cycle; and providers’ and suppliers’ keeping their prices in check during the providers and gaming of utilization health reform debate and its aftermath. A key question for the next 10 years management systems. is this: Do we sustain the 1990s pattern of low growth rates in spending or do we return to the historical, 30-year pattern of higher growth? Scenario One Consumers and providers who react to reflects the 30-year pattern of spending growth. Scenarios Two and Three the adversarial climate with a strong, reflect the more recent pattern of spending growth. unified backlash to managed care. They succeed in getting legislation
10 Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
breaks from health plans. Many small Scenario One Indicators employers, meanwhile, drop insurance Health Care 2.5 percent per year above nominal benefits altogether, substantially Spending Growth: GDP growth increasing the number of uninsured. Health Care Spending: 19 percent of GDP, $10,200 per capita The march of new medical technolo- Uninsurance Rate: 65 million uninsured, 22 percent of population gies, which continues unabated. Con- sumers, prompted both by pharmaceutical companies’ direct-to- consumer advertising and by “gee- passed that further erodes the effec- whiz” articles in the popular press, tiveness of managed care by inter- demand access to the latest, greatest, vening in a variety of clinical and and most expensive drugs and medical structural decisions, such as regulation technologies. Beleaguered health of lengths of stay for various proce- plans concede the point and lose con- dures, staffing ratios, and any-willing- trol over cost and quality. provider laws. Costly medical technologies for Health plans that engage in substan- extending life that are not restricted, tial adverse selection and cream- as no social consensus develops to skimming of beneficiaries as Medicare limit spending on health care near the moves toward managed care and a end of life. wider range of choices for its benefi- Information technologies, once ciaries. Medicare risk plans manage thought to be the way to efficiency, to get the bulk of low-cost, healthy consistency, and higher-quality care, beneficiaries, leaving the sick, costly that prove to be costly and ineffective. people to the conventional indemnity Plans and providers find that their plan. Each attempt at risk adjustment investments in the late 1990s and is met with strategies that boost over- early 2000s don’t pay off, but seeing all Medicare spending. no better way, they continue to invest Provider oligopolies, including large after 2005. group practices, physician practice The public health system, which will management firms, national single- be in tatters, with local public health specialty groups, and large hospital departments retreating from service chains, that are able to sustain high provision and only minimally fulfill- prices in an environment that ing mandated functions, and no com- demands open provider networks. pensatory response from the private They threaten to leave the networks sector. of plans that don’t pay well and the plans blink first. Scenario One plays out with a range of Large employers that continue to offer difficult consequences. Health care insurance as a benefit of employment spending, by 2010, constitutes almost in the face of a tight labor market and one-fifth of gross domestic spending. are unable to demand substantial price Even with expenditures at that level,
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 11 more than one in five Americans remains benefit structures. They keep substan- uninsured. A majority worry about los- tial price pressure on health plans, ing their health benefits. Insecurity of limiting increases on the commercial benefits is widespread as many people are side to 3 to 4 percent per year. They just one job change away from being also shift cost and risk to employees without health insurance. Even those by moving increasingly from a defined who retain insurance are a lot less happy benefit plan to a defined contribution as their out-of-pocket costs rise. program. As beneficiaries’ out-of- pocket costs increase, utilization of The health system exhibits radical tier- health care services drops off in ing, with much poorer access to care for response. the uninsured and people on Medicaid. Health plans that, in turn, increase Medicaid itself puts enormous strain on pressure on providers. They convince states, as the state programs are faced employers that they can only control with medical costs that overwhelm reces- utilization in a more closed network, sion-depleted state budgets. A number so the expansive networks of the late of major public hospitals are forced to 1990s disappear. In their place are close their doors. Although their closing more tightly controlled networks that helps bring the supply of hospital beds exert both clinical control and strong into closer relation to the demand, it also price pressure on providers. strands many people who have nowhere else to go. The Medicare program finds Providers who—stung by the high itself unprepared to absorb the baby cost and organizational difficulty of boomers, who begin to become eligible forming large units and integrating in 2010. By the end of the forecast care—adopt few of the innovations of period, health reform is again on the the leading-edge provider groups. public policy agenda. Instead, they engage in sustained, and largely unsuccessful, resistance to being “hassled” by insurers. Scenario Two: The Long and Winding Road The cost-containment provisions of the 1998 federal budget, which rein In Scenario Two, The Long and Winding in both Medicare and Medicaid spend- Road, incrementalism reigns. The suc- ing. The provisions stick. That bill cessive attempts at revising a portion of sets the standard for budget bills for the health care system work sufficiently the first 10 years of this century. well that tinkering continues well past 2005. As costs get pushed down in one The public health system, which will place, they pop up in another, but the engage in the dynamic competition system is able to respond rapidly and with the private sector in service keep costs in balance. The primary dri- delivery. ving forces for this scenario include: The period of 2005 through 2010 is one Employers who continue to pay close of turbulent, disorganized change. The attention to health care costs and their health care landscape changes as much in
12 Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
but most of those are in three- to six- Scenario Two Indicators doctor groups. These groups are not large Health Care 1 to 2 percent per year above enough to accept global capitation safely, Spending Growth: nominal GDP growth align with a hospital, or influence their Health Care Spending: 16 percent of GDP, $8,600 per capita physicians’ practice patterns radically. Uninsurance Rate: 47 million uninsured, 16 percent of population Comprehensive health reform does not enter the public policy debate, as incre- mental changes each year reassure elected officials that they are “doing something those 5 years as it did in the period from about health care.” 1993 to 1998.
In Scenario Two, costs grow only a little Scenario Three: The Sunny faster than nominal GDP growth, reach- Side of the Street ing 16 percent of GDP by 2010. Federal In the Sunny Side of the Street scenario, and commercial cost containment work all the hard work and investment from well enough to make insurance coverage now until 2005 pays off after 2005 in the affordable for most employers. About form of a sustainable, efficient health care one in six Americans (47 million) is system. Competition helps drive excess uninsured. capacity out of the system. We learn what does and does not work in medi- The health care system remains tiered, cine, and especially how to get providers with about 20 percent of Americans in and patients to work effectively together. the bottom tier of public coverage and Health plans and providers put in place uninsurance, 60 percent in managed care information and management systems plans that substantially restrict their that can take the health care system choice of providers and limit providers’ through the next 2 decades. The driving autonomy, and 20 percent in high-end, forces for this scenario include: indemnity-type programs. Competition at all levels of the health The bottom tier safety-net providers care system, but especially among face tighter conditions, with cuts in dis- providers, which helps drive costs proportionate share hospital (DSH) fund- down. Young physicians enter the ing, an end to cost-based reimbursement market with lower income expecta- for outpatient clinics, and tight state and tions and more of an employee men- local budgets. But they manage to mud- tality than their predecessors. dle through as usual by patching together a range of disparate funding sources. The wave of consolidation of the late 1990s, which continues through the Care delivery is still fragmented, as early 2000s. Efficient health care orga- national players remain relatively rare nizations, which can assimilate the and small. The majority of physicians best practices from their constituent now practice in groups of three or more, parts, emerge. Consolidation also
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 13 demonstrate their cost-effectiveness Scenario Three Indicators as well as their safety and efficacy Health Care 1 percent per year above nominal with more rapid approvals. Health Spending Growth: GDP growth plans and providers, through their Health Care Spending: 15 percent of GDP, $8,100 per capita improved information systems, develop the capacity to make trade- Uninsurance Rate: 30 million uninsured, 10 percent of population offs among therapies according to their cost-effectiveness. The public health sector, which will embrace public-private community serves to drive some excess capacity, partnerships, where service delivery especially of hospital beds although occurs in the private sector and gov- not necessarily hospitals themselves, ernment focuses on assessment, devel- out of the system. opment, and assurance. The provider service networks (PSNs) that form to contract with Medicare. In Scenario Three, cost growth is also PSNs find that they have efficient just 1 percent above the nominal growth administrative structures. They begin of GDP. By 2010, it reaches 15 percent to contract directly with employers in of GDP. These moderate cost increases certain parts of the country. Medicare make health insurance more affordable. encourages further growth in its risk People experience more security of contracting as it develops effective benefits, leaving an uninsurance rate risk-adjustment methods that make of 10 percent (30 million people). risk contracting cost-neutral for the program. The good news is that the basics are in place—health systems are equipped to Innovative payment approaches that minimize unnecessary variation in prac- are developed throughout the health tices, they operate efficiently, they can care system. Prospective payment for track what they’re doing. The time spent outpatient services is put in place first cultivating a well-organized health sys- by Medicare, then by commercial tem pays off in the long run. The bad health plans. news is that we still have 30 million Health care information systems, people who are uninsured. which make significant progress Medicare and private plans begin think- beyond their current administrative ing about the long term. They put in functions. Clinical information sys- place incentives to reward population tems are put in place that successfully management in addition to individual improve care processes and outcomes. patient care. They also provide incen- The EMR sees the light of day. tives for a longer-term focus on today’s Developments in medical technology health care decisions. The system appears that focus both on improving out- well equipped to take on the wave of comes and on reducing costs. Regula- baby boomers who will begin to be eligi- tors favor technologies that can ble for Medicare starting in 2010.
14 Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Endnotes decreases from health plans in a string of “famous victories” between 1993 and 1997. 1 We forecast that, until 2010, real economic growth will remain at 2.5 percent, with gen- 3 These 60 percent will account for only 30 eral inflation in the economy averaging 3 percent of the costs of the program, as the percent. Health care cost growth at 5.5 per- blind, disabled, and dual-eligible elderly will cent will mean no change in the share of still consume most of the resources. GDP going to health care. Faster growth of health care costs will mean that health care 4 This doesn’t tell the whole story as beds are will grow as a share of GDP. often allocated to SNFs, 23-hour beds, or long-term care without moving from the 2 Overall private sector cost increases averaged same facility, but this projection is based on 4.8 percent from 1991 to 1995, but many the official American Hospital Association large employers extracted actual premium (AHA) data for inpatient beds.
Chapter 1: Health and Health Care Forecast 15 Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Chapter 2 Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease Increasing Diversity
Demographic shifts will shape the fastest-growing segment of the popula- future. An increasing number of debates tion. Their numbers will increase from and discussions are surfacing around the 35 million in 1999 to 40 million in 2010 social, economic, and health implications (see Figure 2-2). This “age wave” will of demographic and social change. All of have a transformational impact across these concerns present new challenges for many institutions, levels of government, public policy, government, business, and and segments of society. The health care the health care industry. Several critical industry should begin planning now— issues and trends deserve attention—the well before 2010—to respond adequately aging baby boomers, the increasing eth- to the needs of an older American popula- nic and racial diversity, the growing dis- tion. The average life expectancy has parity between the richest and the increased by more than 30 years in the poorest households, and the future bur- last century and will be 81 for women den of disease. and 76 for men who are 65 in the year 2010 (see Figure 2-3). This chapter examines each of these issues and sets the broad demographic The health care industry will certainly context for examining the future of feel the effects of this demographic health and health care in America. change in the next decade. Baby boomers have transformed many institutions and The United States aspects of society along their life cycle— Population Is including the workplace, financial insti- Growing Older and tutions, and government. As baby Living Longer boomers interact with the health care sys- tem, their expectations and preferences The United States population is growing will also transform these institutions as older, a demographic trend that will have the health care industry adapts to accom- far-reaching effects as the baby boom gen- modate baby boomers’ demands and eration—those Americans born between numbers. They will access the system not 1946 and 1964—ages (see Figure 2-1). only for themselves but also for their par- People 65 years of age and older are the ents and children. Boomers’ involvement
Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease 17 Figure 2-1. The changing age structure of the population (number of Figure 2-2. The coming surge in the people per age group, in millions) population of age 65 years and older
2000 Number (in millions) 50 80 65Ð74 70 40 75Ð84 60 85 and older 30 50
20 40
30 10 20 0 1Ð9 10Ð19 20Ð29 30Ð39 40Ð49 50Ð59 60Ð69 70Ð79 80Ð89 90+ 10 Age group 0 1995 2000 2010 2020 2030 2010 50 Source: IFTF; U.S. Census Bureau.
40
30
20 in their own care will be distinctly differ- ent from that of past generations of older 10 Americans. They will accelerate the movement and awareness of self-care and 0 1Ð9 10Ð19 20Ð29 30Ð39 40Ð49 50Ð59 60Ð69 70Ð79 80Ð89 90+ wellness and will irreversibly alter the Age group traditional doctor–patient relationship.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau. However, the full impact of the aging population will not be felt until well after 2010, when baby boomers reach retirement age. Many baby boomers will enjoy better health and longer lives due in part to advances in health and medical technologies. With increasing longevity, boomers will lead more active and pro- ductive lives rather than simply retiring in old age, illustrating just one of the many social changes associated with this demographic shift. Not until 2030, when the youngest baby boomer has
18 Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
reached the age of 65 and the entire Figure 2-3. Life expectancy at age 65 increased throughout the 20th baby boom’s health care is subsidized by century in the United States and this increase is projected to continue. Medicare, will the nation’s health and
Years of life remaining welfare system feel the true social and 25 economic impact of this large age cohort. This trend signals the urgent need to Women 20 resolve the problems of financing and delivering health care, social services,
15 Men and long-term care for the population, as well as managing the health and 10 health behaviors of this group.
5 The Face of America Continues to 0 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 Change—Diversity Is Increasing Source: Economic Report of the President, February 1999. The United States is growing increas- ingly diverse. Although the population Figure 2-4. Increasing diversity of the United States population remains largely white non-Hispanic (69 percent), the Hispanic, African Percent American, Asian, and Native American 40 Native American populations are all growing faster than Asian Hispanic the population as a whole—a trend dri- 30 African American ven by both higher immigration and higher birthrates among these groups. 20 By 2010, minority ethnic and racial groups will account for 34 percent of the
10 population, up from 22 percent in 1980. Yet the absolute number of ethnic and racial minorities will remain small and 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 will continue to account for less than 50 percent of the population until well Source: IFTF; U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract, 2000. after 2050 (see Figure 2-4).
However, national data do not tell the full story—the real story of diversity is regional.
Hispanic, African American, Asian, and Native American populations are not evenly distributed across the United States, making the issue of diversity
Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease 19 more pronounced in certain regions than California, the Hispanic, Asian, African in others. Although the degree of diver- American, and Native American popula- sity is increasing throughout the United tions already account for 53.3 percent States, the highest concentration of eth- of the population and no one ethnic or nic and racial minorities is found in the racial group (including whites) is in the West, followed by the South, the North- majority (see Figure 2-6). In cities such east, and the Midwest—a pattern that as Los Angeles, where 45 percent of the will continue (see Figure 2-5). In 2010, population is Hispanic, clinical providers the concentration of African Americans are already facing the challenges of deliv- will be highest in the South. The West ering care to a diverse population. will continue to be the most diverse multiethnic and multiracial region of The increasing diversity of the popula- the United States with the largest con- tion will place new demands on the centration of Hispanic, Asian, and health care industry. As the patient Native American populations. profile shows increasing proportions of Hispanic, African American, Asian, and In addition to examining this issue at Native American patients, the demand the regional level, it is important to look will become more pronounced for ser- at specific states and metropolitan vices that are culturally appropriate, areas—a level where demographic pro- beyond simple language competency. files have more strategic meaning to The concept of culturally appropriate health care providers. California, Illinois, services includes awareness of the com- New York, Florida, and Texas are all plex issues related to the underdiagnosis states where the issues of diversity are of certain conditions and diseases among being confronted now. For example, in minority groups, the effects of lifestyle and cultural differences on health status, the implications of the diverse genetic endowment of the population, and the Figure 2-5. The real story of diversity in 2010 is regional. impact of patterns of assimilation on health status. African American Northeast Hispanic Asian Native American Household Income Is Midwest Increasing, but the Gap Between the South Extremes Is Widening
Another key demographic shift is the West growing number of households with 0 1020304050 high incomes. This trend is particularly Percent important to consider in examining the Source: IFTF; U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract, 2000. future of both health and health care because income is related to both health
20 Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
By 2010, the number of households with Figure 2-6. California is ahead of the nation. an income of $50,000 or more will reach 48 million, or 52 percent of all house- Percent holds—a number that is driven by the 100 White large number of baby boomers who will Native American 80 Asian be well into their peak earning years. Hispanic 60 African American However, the pattern of income distribu- 40 tion reveals a second, more disturbing trend: a widening of the gap between 20 the richest 25 percent and the poorest 0 25 percent of the population (see Figure California United States 1998 2050 2-7). The prosperity of the 1980s and 1990s has moved many middle-class Source: IFTF; State of California, Department of Finance; U.S. Census Bureau. households into higher income tiers. By 2010, this pattern will be even more pronounced. Research has also shown that when income disparity among the status and access to health care services. population widens, the overall health Although various demographic charac- status of the population worsens.2 This teristics are correlated with differences in projected income disparity will have health status, none is more highly corre- negative consequences on the nation’s lated than income. overall health status and will remain a significant social and health issue well The boom in the United States economy into the future. in the late 1990s resulted in extraordi- narily low unemployment rates, low infla- The Shifting Burden tion, high productivity, and a generally of Disease: Chronic favorable economic outlook. This eco- Diseases, Mental nomic growth (2.5 percent in real terms) Illness, and Lifestyle moved many people into higher house- Behaviors hold income brackets. Households with higher incomes have higher levels of dis- In reviewing disease prevalence and causes cretionary income and have better health of death over the past century, it is impos- status and access to care. sible to ignore the significant decrease in, and even eradication of, many infectious An examination of income distribution diseases. Vaccines, antibiotics, and bio- in the United States from 1970 to 2010 technological advances have curbed the shows two significant trends emerging. communicable diseases of the 20th cen- First, the average per capita income in tury. Simultaneously, there has been an in- America will increase in real dollars. crease in the incidence of chronic diseases, The good news is that higher income is such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. associated with improved health status.1 One reason for this increase is the greater
Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease 21 Figure 2-7. The middle shrinks, the high end grows. (Households in the two most dynamic income categories, in 1999 dollars)
$15KÐ$49K $75K+ Percent Percent 60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Source: IFTF; U.S. Census Bureau, Money Income in the United States, 1999.
life expectancy enjoyed by many Ameri- comprehensively current mortality and cans. Many chronic illnesses, such as car- disability rates from diseases, injuries, diovascular disease, generally strike people and risk factors and to project them out in their later years. Increases in life ex- to 2020. To assess the relative impact of pectancy and in the proportion of elderly different diseases, the study uses “1 year people are accompanied by an increased of healthy life lost” as a unit of measure- prevalence of chronic diseases. Although ment with which to compare disability new medical innovations promise to make and death from each disease. This a dent in the prevalence of some noncom- approach reveals that the burden of a municable, chronic diseases in the 21st condition such as depression, alcohol century, between 1990 and 2020 the ab- dependence, or schizophrenia has been solute number of deaths in the United seriously underestimated by traditional States from noncommunicable disease will approaches that take into account only increase by 77 percent, from 28.1 million deaths and not disabilities. to 49.7 million.3 The overall effect of heart disease in An important shift in the burden of dis- terms of both death and disability rates ease in the future is related to the huge will continue to be greater than that of impact of chronic disease around the any other illness. When looking only at world. The World Health Organization mortality rates, cancer will continue to (WHO) defines “burden of disease” as a rank second. What is surprising in the combination of untimely death and current forecast is that—taking into disability.4 The WHO Global Burden account the extent to which an illness of Disease Study attempts to assess causes both death and disability—
22 Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
mental illness, especially unipolar major Figure 2-8. Determinants of health depression, will have a larger impact than cancer by the year 2010. Access to care (10%) The burden of disease is also shifting Genetics (20%) from diseases caused by infectious organ- isms to disorders with behavioral causes,
Environment such as illnesses related to smoking and (20%) to alcohol abuse. It is estimated that lifestyle behaviors alone contribute to 50 percent of an individual’s health sta- Health behaviors (50%) tus (see Figure 2-8). The biomedical model of health care, which focuses on a single causative agent for an illness and is concerned primarily with curing, is necessary but not sufficient. Much more needs to be done to create and imple- Source: IFTF; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ment effective health management and disease prevention programs. Our cul- ture’s current focus on wellness is encouraging but is primarily a phenom- enon in the wealthier, more educated cohorts of society—which tend to have a better health status anyway.
Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease 23 Endnotes 3 Unless otherwise noted, the information presented here is from 2000 United States 1 Adler, N. Black Report. Report of the Census data. Working Group on Inequalities in Health. London: DHSS, 1980. 4 The Global Burden of Disease. Murray, C.J.L, 2 Wilkinson, R. G. Income distribution and and Lopez, A. D. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: life expectancy. British Medical Journal 1992; Harvard University Press, 1996. 304:165–168.
24 Chapter 2: Demographic Trends and the Burden of Disease Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
Chapter 3 Health Care’s Demand Side Changing Trends in Growth Rates 1960–2010
From 1960 to 1990, American health care To understand the components of health saw steady cost increases in excess of the care cost growth, we need to know where growth of the rest of the economy: health the money comes from. The United care’s share of GDP went from 5 percent States has had a balanced public-private in 1960 to 12 percent in 1990, as shown health care financing system since the in Figure 3-1. But after annual growth introduction of Medicaid and Medicare averaging more than 11 percent per year in 1965. Spending is fairly evenly split between 1960 and 1990 (3 percent above between government and the private sec- the nominal growth of the economy), tor, including out-of-pocket costs and annual growth in health care costs fell to insurance premiums paid by individuals. 5.8 percent between 1992 and 1995 and Any growth in overall health care costs fell each year after that until 1999. For will be a function of the growth in pri- the first time in decades, health care costs vate costs, paid by both employers and were stable as a share of GDP.1 individuals, and public costs.
Figure 3-1. Total health care expenditures as a percentage of GDP, Historical Trends 1960Ð1999 The Private Sector Percent of GDP So far it’s the private sector that has 15 experienced the greatest reversal in cost growth. From 1960 to 1990, private 12 sector costs grew an average of 10.6 per- cent a year. From 1991 to 1995—in a period viewed by some as the triumph 9 of market-based managed care and by others as the ultimate nadir of cost shift- 6 ing from employers to consumers and government—private-sector health care costs fell below the growth rates of the 3 rest of the economy, averaging under 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 1999 5 percent per year2 (see Figure 3-2). Source: Health Care Financing Administration. Many employers saw an actual decrease in their health care expenditures. How was
Chapter 3: Health Care’s Demand Side 25 Figure 3-2. Average annual growth rate of health care costs by sector
Percent
15 1960Ð1990 1991Ð1999 public sector. In the 1990s, the private 12 sector saw cost growth slow to below 5 percent, whereas the public sector had 9 average cost growths of over 9 percent from 1990 to 1995. The difference
6 between the two widened to nearly 5 percent at that time, indicating that a greater share of health care spending 3 was going to the public sector, and that public sector cost growth was a greater 0 concern for the future. Public sector Private sector
Source: Health Care Financing Administration. While there are several reasons for this fast growth in public sector costs, a casual observer would notice that neither this achieved? First, employers passed of the major public programs—Medicare more costs on to employees by demand- and Medicaid—was as quick to follow ing greater contributions in premiums the private sector’s lead in adopting and forcing higher copays and HMOs or PPOs. Medicare’s basic deductibles. Second, employers reduced infrastructure supports an FFS cost- the number of people for whom they pro- reimbursement system for virtually all vided insurance. But most of these cost types of services apart from hospital decreases resulted from lower payments inpatient care, which was changed to a to health plans. In particular, HMOs and per-episode prospective payment system PPOs have actively intervened with care in 1983. This may partially explain why providers to lower costs and have become public program cost increases did not the staple form of insurance plan used by tail off as they did in the private sector. most employers, rather than the more Even if these were not the causative traditional indemnity products. factors, they encapsulated two underly- ing legacies of Medicare and Medicaid— The Public Sector a typical FFS payment system and the peripherality of managed care—each of From 1960 to 1990, public spending on which will see dramatic changes during health care grew at an annual average the next decade. rate of 13.3 percent, about 3 percent more than in the private sector. But The Issues: most of that difference related to the What Drives Cost 1960s and 1970s when Medicare and Increases? Medicaid were expanding fast. In fact, the experience of the 1990s is in contrast Several factors are responsible for the to that of the early 1980s, when costs in slowing growth in health care costs the private sector grew faster than in the in the early 1990s. They includ the
26 Chapter 3: Health Care’s Demand Side Health and Health Care 2010 Institute for the Future
movement toward HMOs and PPOs, health care spending from 1960 to a reluctance to raise prices during the 1990, even though health care costs health care reform debate, and a techno- increased as a share of household logical shift away from hospitalization. spending. But with a combination The question is whether these trends of fewer employers offering insurance will continue through 2010. and, of those who do, more demand- ing premium contributions and In general we believe they will continue increased deductibles and copays, because the experiences and drives of consumers are picking up more of the consumers purchasing health care have financial slack. They are likely to be changed since the mid-1990s. Some of more cost conscious in the future. these purchase factors include: Providers are more “sophisticated.” A more conservative Congress passed a While higher health care costs ulti- budget bill aimed in part at cutting mately translate into higher provider back Medicare expenditures and incomes, in recent years payers have delegating Medicaid decisions to the clearly communicated their demands states. Managed care options will for cost containment. In this equation, expand, quickly and involuntarily for specific providers may be rewarded people in Medicaid and more slowly for reducing costs—despite the (because of market factors) for those in myriad pressures to increase health Medicare. Other entitlements such as care spending—and all providers are Social Security are coming under con- aware of that pressure. sideration for future cuts in a political era when a balanced-budget mentality Although these factors indicate that a appears dominant, even if subdued by slowing of the underlying growth in pressures from industry lobbies. health care costs has taken place, several traditional factors ensure that cost infla- Private (and some public sector) employers tion will not die easily. For instance: have successfully maneuvered a major- ity of their workforce into managed care The vast majority of providers are paid products. They’ve also either prodded on some type of FFS basis. FFS medi- health plans (intermediaries) into more cine stimulates increased use of ser- aggressive cost-containment efforts vices in contrast to capitation, the with providers or have increasingly pur- most extreme form of managed care chased coverage from plans that have payment. Although pure FFS medicine taken that stance. Now that employers is in decline, most forms of provider know they can influence costs, they are payment still encourage more utiliza- not likely to loosen that control. tion of services rather than less.