DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Lords Official Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Lords Official Report Vol. 806 Monday No. 129 19 October 2020 PARLIAMENTARYDEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDEROFBUSINESS Introduction: Lord Dodds of Duncairn...........................................................................1269 Questions Historic Statues ............................................................................................................1269 Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens v Home Office.................1272 Gender Recognition Act 2004 ......................................................................................1275 Trains: East Midlands...................................................................................................1279 High Speed Rail (West Midlands–Crewe) Bill Order of Commitment ...................................................................................................1281 United Kingdom Internal Market Bill Second Reading.............................................................................................................1282 Grand Committee Medicines and Medical Devices Bill Committee (1st Day) ..............................................................................................GC 315 Lords wishing to be supplied with these Daily Reports should give notice to this effect to the Printed Paper Office. No proofs of Daily Reports are provided. Corrections for the bound volume which Lords wish to suggest to the report of their speeches should be clearly indicated in a copy of the Daily Report, which, with the column numbers concerned shown on the front cover, should be sent to the Editor of Debates, House of Lords, within 14 days of the date of the Daily Report. This issue of the Official Report is also available on the Internet at https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2020-10-19 In Hybrid sittings, [V] after a Member’s name indicates that they contributed by video call. The following abbreviations are used to show a Member’s party affiliation: Abbreviation Party/Group CB Cross Bench Con Conservative DUP Democratic Unionist Party GP Green Party Ind Lab Independent Labour Ind LD Independent Liberal Democrat Ind SD Independent Social Democrat Ind UU Independent Ulster Unionist Lab Labour Lab Co-op Labour and Co-operative Party LD Liberal Democrat LD Ind Liberal Democrat Independent Non-afl Non-affiliated PC Plaid Cymru UKIP UK Independence Party UUP Ulster Unionist Party No party affiliation is given for Members serving the House in a formal capacity, the Lords spiritual, Members on leave of absence or Members who are otherwise disqualified from sitting in the House. © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2020, this publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1269 Introduction: Lord Dodds of Duncairn [19 OCTOBER 2020] Historic Statues 1270 House of Lords with Cecil Rhodes in my home city, I maintain that he did more good than bad and should not be sacrificed Monday 19 October 2020 to current concerns, but should be joined by a statue of Mandela. Will the Minister do all she can to stop The House met in a hybrid proceeding. the destruction of important historical statues? 1 pm Baroness Barran (Con): The noble Baroness gives Prayers—read by the Lord Bishop of London. some very helpful examples. The Government share her concern, particularly at some of the scenes we have seen recently, which have been deeply troubling. Introduction: Lord Dodds of Duncairn It is very unfortunate when figures such as Churchill 1.07 pm have to be boarded up to avoid desecration. The Government continue to prioritise this. The right honourable Nigel Alexander Dodds, OBE, having been created Baron Dodds of Duncairn, of Duncairn Lord Browne of Ladyton (Lab) [V]: Webster’s in the City of Belfast, was introduced and took the oath, Dictionary’sdefinition of putting someone on a pedestal is supported by Lord Morrow and Lord Browne of Belmont, “to think of someone as a perfect person with no faults: to admire and signed an undertaking to abide by the Code of someone greatly”. Conduct. The erection of a statue is not an objective act, but a subjective judgment of an individual’s historical Arrangement of Business contribution. Does the Minister agree that just as the Announcement civic leadership of communities most often decided who should have a statue placed on a pedestal in 1.12 pm public places, their modern equivalents, not Ministers, The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler): My Lords, the should be trusted to decide whose statues are representative Hybrid Sitting of the House will now begin. Some of a community’s current values? Members are here in the Chamber, respecting social distancing, others are participating remotely, but all Baroness Barran (Con): Obviously local authorities Members will be treated equally. Oral Questions will are primarily responsible in this area and will take the now commence. Please can those asking supplementary view of their community into consideration, but my questions keep them short and confined to two points? understanding is that for the most contested examples I ask that Ministers’ answers are also brief. there has been not a uniform community view, but a divided one. Historic Statues Lord Oates (LD): My Lords, I declare my interest Question as an ambassador of the charitable education and arts 1.13 pm project, The World Reimagined. Does the Minister agree that people would be more likely to accept Asked by Baroness Deech existing statues if we showed greater recognition of Toask Her Majesty’sGovernment what assessment the full history of our country? In 1682, William they have made of the future of historic statues in Godwyn proposed a statue in London to prominently England. acknowledge the injustice suffered by enslaved Africans. Does the Minister not agree that, 350 years on, it is TheParliamentaryUnder-Secretaryof State,Department well past time that a national memorial should be for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Baroness Barran) constructed in London to commemorate the millions (Con): My Lords,there are approximately 12,000 outdoor of Africans enslaved under British rule? statues in England. In the region of 3,500 are protected as, or as part of, listed buildings; of those, 473 are of Baroness Barran (Con): The noble Lord is right historical figures. The future of the vast majority of when he talks about a full history of our country, and these historic statues is the responsibility of the owners, we hope our approach of retain and explain goes some usually local authorities. The government policy on way to addressing that, but he is also right that there is historic public statues is quite clear: they should not be a place for new statues expressing many different removed but retained, with a fuller contextualisation issues, both permanent and temporary installations, on the background and history of those commemorated such as the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square. provided; this is summarised as “retain and explain”. Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Con) [V]: Baroness Deech (CB) [V]: My Lords, the wish on My Lords, while I in no way condone criminal damage, the part of some to eradicate our past, in the belief I note that our historical statues signally fail to recognise that it is evil, does not justify vandalism. I am dismayed the contribution of women to the scientific and medical to see re-evaluation, often uninformed, of the contribution advances we enjoy today. In fact, research by the of historical figures, most of whom have both good campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez suggests that there and less good elements. For example, there are strong are only 158 statues of women. Of those, 110 feature reasons to take away the prominent position enjoyed mythical or allegorical women, 46 depict royals and by Richard the Lionheart outside our own front door 14 show the Virgin Mary. Does the Minister agree but I am content to walk by him every day, knowing that, rather than myths, princesses or virgins, we should that the study of history places him in context. Likewise, invest in a few statues that commemorate some of our 1271 Historic Statues[LORDS] ChildrenasBritishCitizensVHomeOffice 1272 [BARONESS BLACKWOOD OF NORTH OXFORD] Baroness Barran (Con): It is perhaps worth separating great female innovators and role models, such as Dorothy out the different issues here. The noble Lord is right Hodgkin, Ada Lovelace and Jocelyn Bell Burnell? that many issues, as he has described, relate to and fall There are many to choose from and they would be a within the responsibility of local government. Where great addition to our landscape. central government has been clear in setting out its position is in relation to publicly funded institutions, Baroness Barran (Con): My noble friend is absolutely where we have stressed their need for impartiality. right. There is plenty of room for more women of extraordinary talent and contribution to be represented Baroness Uddin (Non-Afl): My Lords, on 17 December in that way. Indeed, more broadly, we welcome the 2015, I drew to the attention of this House the brutal recent decision by English Heritage to unveil the portrait legacy of slavery which led to the establishment of of Sara Forbes Bonetta during this Black History Buxton memorial fountain just across from the Chamber. Month. Colonisation across the globe was a trade of human misery, of men and women, families, communities and Lord Woolley of Woodford (CB) [V]: My Lords, nations, shredded, bound and pillaged, against
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MEDICINES ACT 2003 Chapter 4
    © Copyright Treasury of the Isle of Man Crown Copyright reserved See introductory page for restrictions on copying and reproduction MEDICINES ACT 2003 Chapter 4 Arrangement of sections PART 1 DEALINGS WITH MEDICINAL PRODUCTS 1. Introductory. 2. Restrictions on dealing with medicinal products. 3. Exemptions. 4. General sale of medicinal products. 5. Medicinal products on prescription only. 6. Regulations: general provisions. PART 2 CONSUMER PROTECTION 7. Adulteration of medicinal products. 8. Protection of purchasers of medicinal products. 9. Compliance with published standards. 10. Misleading descriptions etc. 11. Display of information on automatic machines. 12. Offences. PART 3 PROMOTION OF SALES OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS 13. False or misleading advertisements and representations. 14. Advertisements requiring consent. 15. Regulation of advertisements and representations. 16. Advertisements and representations directed to practitioners. 17. Interpretation. PART 4 ENFORCEMENT 18. Enforcement etc. 19. Rights of entry. 20. Power to inspect, take samples and seize goods and records. 1 Medicines Act 2003 21. Application of sampling procedure to substance or article seized under s. 20. 22. Obstruction etc. 23. Analysis of samples in other cases. 24. Liability to forfeiture. 25. Restrictions on disclosure of information. 26. Contravention due to default of other person. 27. Warranty as defence. 28. Offences in relation to warranties and certificates of analysis. 29. Offences: general. 30. Presumptions. PART 5 VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS AND ANIMAL FEEDING STUFFS 31. Veterinary medicinal products. 32. Application of Parts 1 to 4 to veterinary medicinal products. 33. Medicated animal feeding stuffs. 34. Animal feeding stuffs: enforcement. PART 6 PHARMACIES Conduct of retail pharmacy business 35. Retail pharmacy business. 36.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medicines Act 1968 Amended
    1 Medicines Act 1968 (c.67) Warning: This content may not be up-to-date. Please check the Update Status Warning message at the top of the Results within Legislation page Medicines Act 1968 1968 c.67 An Act to make new provision with respect to medicinal products and related matters, and for purposes connected therewith. The Medicines Act 1968 does not apply in relation to veterinary medicinal products. The Medicines (Prohibition of Importation and Possession of Veterinary Drugs Order (Northern Ireland) 1977 continues in force notwithstanding, and the Medicines Act 1968 shall continue to apply in so far as is necessary for the operation of that Order 25th October 1968 Medicines Act 1968 ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Administration .................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Ministers responsible for administration of Act ...................................................................... 6 2. …. ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2A. Establishment of the Commission on Human Medicines ..................................................... 6 3. Functions of the Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in the Age of Pandemic – Fair Vote UK Report June 2020
    Democracy in the Age of Pandemic How to Safeguard Elections & Ensure Government Continuity APPENDICES fairvote.uk Published June 2020 Appendix 1 - 86 1 Written Evidence, Responses to Online Questionnaire During the preparation of this report, Fair Vote UK conducted a call for written evidence through an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was open to all members of the public. This document contains the unedited responses from that survey. The names and organisations for each entry have been included in the interest of transparency. The text of the questionnaire is found below. It indicates which question each response corresponds to. Name Organisation (if applicable) Question 1: What weaknesses in democratic processes has Covid-19 highlighted? Question 2: Are you aware of any good articles/publications/studies on this subject? Or of any countries/regions that have put in place mediating practices that insulate it from the social distancing effects of Covid-19? Question 3: Do you have any ideas on how to address democratic shortcomings exposed by the impact of Covid-19? Appendix 1 - 86 2 Appendix 1 Name S. Holledge Organisation Question 1 Techno-phobia? Question 2 Estonia's e-society Question 3 Use technology and don't be frightened by it 2 Appendix 1 - 86 3 Appendix 2 Name S. Page Organisation Yes for EU (Scotland) Question 1 The Westminster Parliament is not fit for purpose Question 2 Scottish Parliament Question 3 Use the internet and electronic voting 3 Appendix 1 - 86 4 Appendix 3 Name J. Sanders Organisation emergency legislation without scrutiny removing civil liberties railroading powers through for example changes to mental health act that impact on individual rights (A) Question 1 I live in Wales, and commend Mark Drakeford for his quick response to the crisis by enabling the Assembly to continue to meet and debate online Question 2 no, not until you asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving the Inconsistency Between National and EU Motor Insurance Law
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repository@Nottingham Resolving the Inconsistency between National and EU Motor Insurance Law. Was Factortame the Solution nobody Sought? Abstract In this article we argue that the continued uncertainty of UK national motor vehicle insurance law when viewed in respect of its EU parent, the Motor Vehicle Insurance Directive (MVID), has not been satisfactorily addressed using the remedy available through the non-contractual liability of the State. The existing enforcement mechanisms have equally been haphazard in their effectiveness and success in affording rights to third-party victims. Given the link between the MVID and the free movement of persons and goods on which the harmonization of insurance protection was based, we present the first article establishing an argument for the offending aspects of UK national law to be disapplied. Whilst the UK has concluded its agreement to withdraw its membership from the EU and thus to be bound by EU law and the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, until the transitional period is completed the UK remains aligned to EU law. It is committed to follow superior EU law and the judgments of the Court of Justice. Hence the remedy issued from the Factortame line of case authorities may prove to be the most effective way to grant access to rights which continue to be denied to victims in the UK. KEYWORDS: Breach of EU law; Factortame; Francovich v Italy; HS2; motor vehicles; MVID. A. Introduction As is well understood, the European Union, in its present and previous incarnations, was designed to facilitate a common market between its Member States (similar to a domestic market).
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Act 1968 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 19 July 2021
    Status: Point in time view as at 19/01/2010. Changes to legislation: Medicines Act 1968 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 19 July 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Medicines Act 1968 1968 CHAPTER 67 An Act to make new provision with respect to medicinal products and related matters, and for purposes connected therewith. [25th October 1968] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 References to Ministers of Northern Ireland to be construed as references to heads of Northern Ireland departments: Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973 (c. 36), Sch. 5 para. 7 C2 Functions of Ministry of Home Affairs for Northern Ireland transferred to Department of Health and Social Services for Northern Ireland by S.R. & O. (N.I.) 1973 No. 504, art. 5, Sch. 2 Pt. I C3 Functions exercisable by Ministers jointly under this Act (except s. 108(4)(7) now exercisable by those Ministers and Secretary of State for Wales jointly: S.I. 1978/272, art. 2(3), Sch. 1; references to Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food amended (W.): ibid., art. 11(6) C4 Act restricted by S.I. 1985/273, reg. 3(3) C5 Act amended (N.I.) (1.4.1992) by S.I. 1991/194 (N.I. 1), art. 7(2), Sch. 2 para. 5(1); S.R. 1991/131, art. 2(e), Sch. Pt. III C6 Certain provisions of the Act extended and modified (14.2.1994) by S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Act 1968
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Medicines Act 1968. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) ELIZABETH II c. 67 Medicines Act 1968 1968 CHAPTER 67 AnAct to make new provision with respect to medicinal products and related matters, and for purposes connected therewith. [25th October 1968] Annotations: Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 References to Ministers of Northern Ireland to be construed as references to heads of Northern Ireland departments: Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973 (c. 36), Sch. 5 para. 7 C2 Functions of Ministry of Home Affairs for Northern Ireland transferred to Department of Health and Social Services for Northern Ireland by S.R. & O. (N.I.) 1973 No. 504, art. 5, Sch. 2 Pt. I C3 Functions exercisable by Ministers jointly under this Act (except s. 108(4)(7) now exercisable by those Ministers and Secretary of State for Wales jointly: S.I. 1978/272, art. 2(3), Sch. 1; references to Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food amended (W.): ibid., art. 11(6) C4 Act restricted by S.I. 1985/273, reg. 3(3) C5 Act amended (N.I.) (1.4.1992) by S.I. 1991/194 (N.I. 1), art. 7(2), Sch. 2 para. 5(1); S.R. 1991/131, art. 2(e), Sch. Pt. III C6 Certain provisions of the Act extended and modified (14.2.1994) by S.I. 1994/105, reg.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment
    JIPEL NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 Statement of Purpose Consistent with its unique development, The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law (JIPEL) is a nonpartisan periodical specializing in the analysis of timely and cutting-edge topics in the world of intellectual property and entertainment law. As NYU’s first online-only journal, JIPEL also provides an opportunity for discourse through comments from all of its readers. There are no subscriptions, or subscription fees; in keeping with the open-access and free discourse goals of the students responsible for JIPEL’s existence, the content is available for free to anyone interested in intellectual property and entertainment law. i Cite as N.Y.U. J. INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law is published two times per year at the New York University School of Law, 139 MacDougal Street, New York, New York, 10012. In keeping with the Journal’s open access and free discourse goals subscriptions are free of charge and can be accessed via www.jipel.law.nyu.edu. Inquiries may be made via telephone (212-998-6101) or electronic mail ([email protected]). The Journal invites authors to submit pieces for publication consideration. Footnotes and citations should follow the rules set forth in the latest edition of The Bluebook A Uniform System of Citation. All pieces submitted become the property of the Journal. We review submissions through ExpressO Bepress (http://law.bepress.com/ expresso/) and through electronic mail ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 21) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 11) THE WTERPRETATION OF STATUTE§ Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor, the Secretary of State for Scotland and the Lord Advocate pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9th June 1969 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE Reprinted 1 9 7 4 256 4Op net The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law other than the law of Scotland or of any law of Northern Ireland which the Parliament of Northern Ireland has power to amend. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr. Justice Scarman, O.B.E., Chairman. Mr. L. C. B. Gower. Mr. Neil Lawson, Q.C. Mr. Norman S. Marsh, Q.C. Mr. Andrew Martin, Q.C. Mr. Arthur Stapleton Cotton is a special consultant to the Commission. The Secretary of the Commission is Mr. J. M. Cartwright Sharp, and its offices are at Lacon House, Theobald’s Road, London, W.C.l. The Scottish Law Commission was set up by section 2 of the Law Com- missions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the Law of Scotland. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Kilbrandon, Chairman. Professor A. E. Anton. Professor J. M. Halliday. Mr. A. M. Johnston, Q.C. Professor T. B. Smith, Q.C. I The Secretary of the Commission is Mr. A. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright-Law-Cannot-Copyright
    Mitchell Hamline Law Review Volume 47 Issue 3 Article 4 2021 Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law—Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc., 140 S.CT. 1498 (2020) Andy Taylor Follow this and additional works at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Andy (2021) "Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law—Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc., 140 S.CT. 1498 (2020)," Mitchell Hamline Law Review: Vol. 47 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr/vol47/iss3/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mitchell Hamline Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Taylor: Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law—Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org COPYRIGHT LAW CANNOT COPYRIGHT LAWGEORGIA V. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., 140 S. CT. 1498 (2020) Andy Taylor ǂ I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 977 II. THE PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG DECISION ...................................... 978 A. Facts and Procedural History ................................................ 978 B. U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision ............................................ 982 C. Understanding the Stakeholders’ Interests ........................... 985 1. What is Public.Resource.Org? ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2011 No. 34 House of Representatives The House met at 2 p.m. and was In fact, in 1990, the Government Ac- business with Medicare, and the burden called to order by the Speaker pro tem- countability Office, GAO, listed both is on the government to remove a com- pore (Mr. YODER). Medicare and Medicaid as high risk be- pany from the Medicare program. This f cause these programs are vulnerable to needs to change to allow the govern- waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanage- ment to remove bad actors from the DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO ment. Now, how badly mismanaged are program quickly and efficiently. TEMPORE we talking about? Well, the GAO re- Secondly, Medicare needs to signifi- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- cently issued a report that there was cantly improve their provider and sup- fore the House the following commu- $48 billion just in improper payments. plier screening process. While individ- nication from the Speaker: This isn’t fraud. This is just improper uals have a right to Medicare, compa- WASHINGTON, DC, payments. So when it comes to fraud, nies do not have a right to become or March 8, 2011. it is estimated anywhere from $60 bil- stay a Medicare provider. I hereby appoint the Honorable KEVIN lion to $90 billion is lost to Medicare Third, Medicare needs to shift away YODER to act as Speaker pro tempore on this fraud every year.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 NYU Journal of Intellectual Property
    JIPEL NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & ENTERTAINMENT LAW VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................................................. v ESSAY EEEEEEEYOOOOOO!: Reflections on Protecting Pitbull’s Famous Grito ..................................... 179 Justin F. McNaughton, Esq., Ryan Kairalla, Esq., Leslie José Zigel, Esq., and Armando Christian Perez ARTICLE CopyrigHt in tHe Texts of tHe Law: Historical Perspectives ...................... 191 Charles Duan NOTES Towards a Trademark Rule of Reason ....................................................... 222 Daniel M. Lifton Of Mouse and Men: Will Mickey Mouse Live Forever? ........................... 249 Sarah Sue Landau Patent Term Extension and the Active Ingredient Problem ....................... 279 Nicholas G. Vincent, Ph.D. i Statement of Purpose Consistent with its unique development, The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law (JIPEL) is a nonpartisan periodical specializing in the analysis of timely and cutting-edge topics in the world of intellectual property and entertainment law. As NYU’s first online-only journal, JIPEL also provides an opportunity for discourse through comments from all of its readers. There are no subscriptions, or subscription fees; in keeping with the open-access and free discourse goals of the students responsible for JIPEL’s existence, the content is available for free to anyone interested in intellectual property and entertainment law. ii Cite as N.Y.U. J. INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law is published two times per year at the New York University School of Law, 139 MacDougal Street, New York, New York, 10012. In keeping with the Journal’s open access and free discourse goals subscriptions are free of charge and can be accessed via www.jipel.law.nyu.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Medicines Regulations 2012
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2012 No. 1916 MEDICINES The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 Made - - - - 19th July 2012 Laid before Parliament 24th July 2012 Coming into force - - 14th August 2012 £38.00 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2012 No. 1916 MEDICINES The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 Made - - - - 19th July 2012 Laid before Parliament 24th July 2012 Coming into force - - 14th August 2012 CONTENTS PART 1 General 1. Citation and commencement 14 2. Medicinal products 14 3. Scope of these Regulations: special provisions 15 4. Special provisions for pharmacies etc 16 5. Classification of medicinal products 17 6. The licensing authority and the Ministers 18 7. Advertisements relating to medicinal products 18 8. General interpretation 19 PART 2 Administration 9. Commission on Human Medicines 30 10. Functions of the Commission 30 11. British Pharmacopoeia Commission 30 12. Reporting to Ministers 31 13. Co-option of additional members of advisory bodies 31 14. Appointment of expert advisory groups 31 15. Delegation of functions to expert advisory groups 31 16. Further provision about advisory bodies and expert advisory groups etc 32 PART 3 Manufacturing and wholesale dealing Grant etc of licences 17. Manufacturing of medicinal products 32 18. Wholesale dealing in medicinal products 32 19. Exemptions from requirement for wholesale dealer’s licence 33 20. Mixing of medicines 34 21. Application for manufacturer’s or wholesale dealer’s licence 34 22. Factors relevant to determination of application for manufacturer’s or wholesale dealer’s licence 34 23. Grant or refusal of licence 35 24. Standard provisions of licences 35 25. Duration of licence 35 26. General power to suspend, revoke or vary licences 36 27.
    [Show full text]