House of Lords Official Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MEDICINES ACT 2003 Chapter 4
© Copyright Treasury of the Isle of Man Crown Copyright reserved See introductory page for restrictions on copying and reproduction MEDICINES ACT 2003 Chapter 4 Arrangement of sections PART 1 DEALINGS WITH MEDICINAL PRODUCTS 1. Introductory. 2. Restrictions on dealing with medicinal products. 3. Exemptions. 4. General sale of medicinal products. 5. Medicinal products on prescription only. 6. Regulations: general provisions. PART 2 CONSUMER PROTECTION 7. Adulteration of medicinal products. 8. Protection of purchasers of medicinal products. 9. Compliance with published standards. 10. Misleading descriptions etc. 11. Display of information on automatic machines. 12. Offences. PART 3 PROMOTION OF SALES OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS 13. False or misleading advertisements and representations. 14. Advertisements requiring consent. 15. Regulation of advertisements and representations. 16. Advertisements and representations directed to practitioners. 17. Interpretation. PART 4 ENFORCEMENT 18. Enforcement etc. 19. Rights of entry. 20. Power to inspect, take samples and seize goods and records. 1 Medicines Act 2003 21. Application of sampling procedure to substance or article seized under s. 20. 22. Obstruction etc. 23. Analysis of samples in other cases. 24. Liability to forfeiture. 25. Restrictions on disclosure of information. 26. Contravention due to default of other person. 27. Warranty as defence. 28. Offences in relation to warranties and certificates of analysis. 29. Offences: general. 30. Presumptions. PART 5 VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS AND ANIMAL FEEDING STUFFS 31. Veterinary medicinal products. 32. Application of Parts 1 to 4 to veterinary medicinal products. 33. Medicated animal feeding stuffs. 34. Animal feeding stuffs: enforcement. PART 6 PHARMACIES Conduct of retail pharmacy business 35. Retail pharmacy business. 36. -
The Medicines Act 1968 Amended
1 Medicines Act 1968 (c.67) Warning: This content may not be up-to-date. Please check the Update Status Warning message at the top of the Results within Legislation page Medicines Act 1968 1968 c.67 An Act to make new provision with respect to medicinal products and related matters, and for purposes connected therewith. The Medicines Act 1968 does not apply in relation to veterinary medicinal products. The Medicines (Prohibition of Importation and Possession of Veterinary Drugs Order (Northern Ireland) 1977 continues in force notwithstanding, and the Medicines Act 1968 shall continue to apply in so far as is necessary for the operation of that Order 25th October 1968 Medicines Act 1968 ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Administration .................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Ministers responsible for administration of Act ...................................................................... 6 2. …. ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2A. Establishment of the Commission on Human Medicines ..................................................... 6 3. Functions of the Commission -
Democracy in the Age of Pandemic – Fair Vote UK Report June 2020
Democracy in the Age of Pandemic How to Safeguard Elections & Ensure Government Continuity APPENDICES fairvote.uk Published June 2020 Appendix 1 - 86 1 Written Evidence, Responses to Online Questionnaire During the preparation of this report, Fair Vote UK conducted a call for written evidence through an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was open to all members of the public. This document contains the unedited responses from that survey. The names and organisations for each entry have been included in the interest of transparency. The text of the questionnaire is found below. It indicates which question each response corresponds to. Name Organisation (if applicable) Question 1: What weaknesses in democratic processes has Covid-19 highlighted? Question 2: Are you aware of any good articles/publications/studies on this subject? Or of any countries/regions that have put in place mediating practices that insulate it from the social distancing effects of Covid-19? Question 3: Do you have any ideas on how to address democratic shortcomings exposed by the impact of Covid-19? Appendix 1 - 86 2 Appendix 1 Name S. Holledge Organisation Question 1 Techno-phobia? Question 2 Estonia's e-society Question 3 Use technology and don't be frightened by it 2 Appendix 1 - 86 3 Appendix 2 Name S. Page Organisation Yes for EU (Scotland) Question 1 The Westminster Parliament is not fit for purpose Question 2 Scottish Parliament Question 3 Use the internet and electronic voting 3 Appendix 1 - 86 4 Appendix 3 Name J. Sanders Organisation emergency legislation without scrutiny removing civil liberties railroading powers through for example changes to mental health act that impact on individual rights (A) Question 1 I live in Wales, and commend Mark Drakeford for his quick response to the crisis by enabling the Assembly to continue to meet and debate online Question 2 no, not until you asked. -
Resolving the Inconsistency Between National and EU Motor Insurance Law
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repository@Nottingham Resolving the Inconsistency between National and EU Motor Insurance Law. Was Factortame the Solution nobody Sought? Abstract In this article we argue that the continued uncertainty of UK national motor vehicle insurance law when viewed in respect of its EU parent, the Motor Vehicle Insurance Directive (MVID), has not been satisfactorily addressed using the remedy available through the non-contractual liability of the State. The existing enforcement mechanisms have equally been haphazard in their effectiveness and success in affording rights to third-party victims. Given the link between the MVID and the free movement of persons and goods on which the harmonization of insurance protection was based, we present the first article establishing an argument for the offending aspects of UK national law to be disapplied. Whilst the UK has concluded its agreement to withdraw its membership from the EU and thus to be bound by EU law and the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, until the transitional period is completed the UK remains aligned to EU law. It is committed to follow superior EU law and the judgments of the Court of Justice. Hence the remedy issued from the Factortame line of case authorities may prove to be the most effective way to grant access to rights which continue to be denied to victims in the UK. KEYWORDS: Breach of EU law; Factortame; Francovich v Italy; HS2; motor vehicles; MVID. A. Introduction As is well understood, the European Union, in its present and previous incarnations, was designed to facilitate a common market between its Member States (similar to a domestic market). -
Medicines Act 1968 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 19 July 2021
Status: Point in time view as at 19/01/2010. Changes to legislation: Medicines Act 1968 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 19 July 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Medicines Act 1968 1968 CHAPTER 67 An Act to make new provision with respect to medicinal products and related matters, and for purposes connected therewith. [25th October 1968] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 References to Ministers of Northern Ireland to be construed as references to heads of Northern Ireland departments: Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973 (c. 36), Sch. 5 para. 7 C2 Functions of Ministry of Home Affairs for Northern Ireland transferred to Department of Health and Social Services for Northern Ireland by S.R. & O. (N.I.) 1973 No. 504, art. 5, Sch. 2 Pt. I C3 Functions exercisable by Ministers jointly under this Act (except s. 108(4)(7) now exercisable by those Ministers and Secretary of State for Wales jointly: S.I. 1978/272, art. 2(3), Sch. 1; references to Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food amended (W.): ibid., art. 11(6) C4 Act restricted by S.I. 1985/273, reg. 3(3) C5 Act amended (N.I.) (1.4.1992) by S.I. 1991/194 (N.I. 1), art. 7(2), Sch. 2 para. 5(1); S.R. 1991/131, art. 2(e), Sch. Pt. III C6 Certain provisions of the Act extended and modified (14.2.1994) by S.I. -
Medicines Act 1968
Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Medicines Act 1968. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) ELIZABETH II c. 67 Medicines Act 1968 1968 CHAPTER 67 AnAct to make new provision with respect to medicinal products and related matters, and for purposes connected therewith. [25th October 1968] Annotations: Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 References to Ministers of Northern Ireland to be construed as references to heads of Northern Ireland departments: Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973 (c. 36), Sch. 5 para. 7 C2 Functions of Ministry of Home Affairs for Northern Ireland transferred to Department of Health and Social Services for Northern Ireland by S.R. & O. (N.I.) 1973 No. 504, art. 5, Sch. 2 Pt. I C3 Functions exercisable by Ministers jointly under this Act (except s. 108(4)(7) now exercisable by those Ministers and Secretary of State for Wales jointly: S.I. 1978/272, art. 2(3), Sch. 1; references to Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food amended (W.): ibid., art. 11(6) C4 Act restricted by S.I. 1985/273, reg. 3(3) C5 Act amended (N.I.) (1.4.1992) by S.I. 1991/194 (N.I. 1), art. 7(2), Sch. 2 para. 5(1); S.R. 1991/131, art. 2(e), Sch. Pt. III C6 Certain provisions of the Act extended and modified (14.2.1994) by S.I. 1994/105, reg. -
VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment
JIPEL NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 Statement of Purpose Consistent with its unique development, The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law (JIPEL) is a nonpartisan periodical specializing in the analysis of timely and cutting-edge topics in the world of intellectual property and entertainment law. As NYU’s first online-only journal, JIPEL also provides an opportunity for discourse through comments from all of its readers. There are no subscriptions, or subscription fees; in keeping with the open-access and free discourse goals of the students responsible for JIPEL’s existence, the content is available for free to anyone interested in intellectual property and entertainment law. i Cite as N.Y.U. J. INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law is published two times per year at the New York University School of Law, 139 MacDougal Street, New York, New York, 10012. In keeping with the Journal’s open access and free discourse goals subscriptions are free of charge and can be accessed via www.jipel.law.nyu.edu. Inquiries may be made via telephone (212-998-6101) or electronic mail ([email protected]). The Journal invites authors to submit pieces for publication consideration. Footnotes and citations should follow the rules set forth in the latest edition of The Bluebook A Uniform System of Citation. All pieces submitted become the property of the Journal. We review submissions through ExpressO Bepress (http://law.bepress.com/ expresso/) and through electronic mail ([email protected]). -
The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM
The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 21) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 11) THE WTERPRETATION OF STATUTE§ Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor, the Secretary of State for Scotland and the Lord Advocate pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9th June 1969 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE Reprinted 1 9 7 4 256 4Op net The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law other than the law of Scotland or of any law of Northern Ireland which the Parliament of Northern Ireland has power to amend. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr. Justice Scarman, O.B.E., Chairman. Mr. L. C. B. Gower. Mr. Neil Lawson, Q.C. Mr. Norman S. Marsh, Q.C. Mr. Andrew Martin, Q.C. Mr. Arthur Stapleton Cotton is a special consultant to the Commission. The Secretary of the Commission is Mr. J. M. Cartwright Sharp, and its offices are at Lacon House, Theobald’s Road, London, W.C.l. The Scottish Law Commission was set up by section 2 of the Law Com- missions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the Law of Scotland. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Kilbrandon, Chairman. Professor A. E. Anton. Professor J. M. Halliday. Mr. A. M. Johnston, Q.C. Professor T. B. Smith, Q.C. I The Secretary of the Commission is Mr. A. G. -
Copyright-Law-Cannot-Copyright
Mitchell Hamline Law Review Volume 47 Issue 3 Article 4 2021 Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law—Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc., 140 S.CT. 1498 (2020) Andy Taylor Follow this and additional works at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Andy (2021) "Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law—Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc., 140 S.CT. 1498 (2020)," Mitchell Hamline Law Review: Vol. 47 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr/vol47/iss3/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mitchell Hamline Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Taylor: Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law—Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org COPYRIGHT LAW CANNOT COPYRIGHT LAWGEORGIA V. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., 140 S. CT. 1498 (2020) Andy Taylor ǂ I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 977 II. THE PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG DECISION ...................................... 978 A. Facts and Procedural History ................................................ 978 B. U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision ............................................ 982 C. Understanding the Stakeholders’ Interests ........................... 985 1. What is Public.Resource.Org? ............................................ -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2011 No. 34 House of Representatives The House met at 2 p.m. and was In fact, in 1990, the Government Ac- business with Medicare, and the burden called to order by the Speaker pro tem- countability Office, GAO, listed both is on the government to remove a com- pore (Mr. YODER). Medicare and Medicaid as high risk be- pany from the Medicare program. This f cause these programs are vulnerable to needs to change to allow the govern- waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanage- ment to remove bad actors from the DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO ment. Now, how badly mismanaged are program quickly and efficiently. TEMPORE we talking about? Well, the GAO re- Secondly, Medicare needs to signifi- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- cently issued a report that there was cantly improve their provider and sup- fore the House the following commu- $48 billion just in improper payments. plier screening process. While individ- nication from the Speaker: This isn’t fraud. This is just improper uals have a right to Medicare, compa- WASHINGTON, DC, payments. So when it comes to fraud, nies do not have a right to become or March 8, 2011. it is estimated anywhere from $60 bil- stay a Medicare provider. I hereby appoint the Honorable KEVIN lion to $90 billion is lost to Medicare Third, Medicare needs to shift away YODER to act as Speaker pro tempore on this fraud every year. -
VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 NYU Journal of Intellectual Property
JIPEL NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & ENTERTAINMENT LAW VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................................................. v ESSAY EEEEEEEYOOOOOO!: Reflections on Protecting Pitbull’s Famous Grito ..................................... 179 Justin F. McNaughton, Esq., Ryan Kairalla, Esq., Leslie José Zigel, Esq., and Armando Christian Perez ARTICLE CopyrigHt in tHe Texts of tHe Law: Historical Perspectives ...................... 191 Charles Duan NOTES Towards a Trademark Rule of Reason ....................................................... 222 Daniel M. Lifton Of Mouse and Men: Will Mickey Mouse Live Forever? ........................... 249 Sarah Sue Landau Patent Term Extension and the Active Ingredient Problem ....................... 279 Nicholas G. Vincent, Ph.D. i Statement of Purpose Consistent with its unique development, The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law (JIPEL) is a nonpartisan periodical specializing in the analysis of timely and cutting-edge topics in the world of intellectual property and entertainment law. As NYU’s first online-only journal, JIPEL also provides an opportunity for discourse through comments from all of its readers. There are no subscriptions, or subscription fees; in keeping with the open-access and free discourse goals of the students responsible for JIPEL’s existence, the content is available for free to anyone interested in intellectual property and entertainment law. ii Cite as N.Y.U. J. INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law is published two times per year at the New York University School of Law, 139 MacDougal Street, New York, New York, 10012. In keeping with the Journal’s open access and free discourse goals subscriptions are free of charge and can be accessed via www.jipel.law.nyu.edu. -
The Human Medicines Regulations 2012
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2012 No. 1916 MEDICINES The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 Made - - - - 19th July 2012 Laid before Parliament 24th July 2012 Coming into force - - 14th August 2012 £38.00 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2012 No. 1916 MEDICINES The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 Made - - - - 19th July 2012 Laid before Parliament 24th July 2012 Coming into force - - 14th August 2012 CONTENTS PART 1 General 1. Citation and commencement 14 2. Medicinal products 14 3. Scope of these Regulations: special provisions 15 4. Special provisions for pharmacies etc 16 5. Classification of medicinal products 17 6. The licensing authority and the Ministers 18 7. Advertisements relating to medicinal products 18 8. General interpretation 19 PART 2 Administration 9. Commission on Human Medicines 30 10. Functions of the Commission 30 11. British Pharmacopoeia Commission 30 12. Reporting to Ministers 31 13. Co-option of additional members of advisory bodies 31 14. Appointment of expert advisory groups 31 15. Delegation of functions to expert advisory groups 31 16. Further provision about advisory bodies and expert advisory groups etc 32 PART 3 Manufacturing and wholesale dealing Grant etc of licences 17. Manufacturing of medicinal products 32 18. Wholesale dealing in medicinal products 32 19. Exemptions from requirement for wholesale dealer’s licence 33 20. Mixing of medicines 34 21. Application for manufacturer’s or wholesale dealer’s licence 34 22. Factors relevant to determination of application for manufacturer’s or wholesale dealer’s licence 34 23. Grant or refusal of licence 35 24. Standard provisions of licences 35 25. Duration of licence 35 26. General power to suspend, revoke or vary licences 36 27.