DOCSLIB.ORG

Wayland Baptist University Annual Daapp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ANNUAL DAAPP TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT 2 SANCTIONS 3 LEGAL SANCTIONS 5 Federal Law 6 Alaska 8 Arizona 20 Hawaii 29 New Mexico 32 Oklahoma 53 Texas 81 HEALTH RISKS 108 Drugs 108 Alcohol 124 DRUG AND ALCOHOL COUNSELING OPTIONS 124 Alaska 125 Arizona 127 Hawaii 128 New Mexico 129 Oklahoma 130 Texas 130 ANNUAL NOTIFICATION OF DAAPP 135 BIENNIEL REVIEW OF DAAPP 135 1 WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ANNUAL DAAPP INTRODUCTION Wayland Baptist University joins with Universities and Colleges across the United States in an effort to provide education about and to prevent drug and alcohol use and abuse. The United States Congress passed and the President signed into law the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Amendments of 1989-Public Law 101-226 on December 12, 1989. This Act requires an institution of higher education to certify that it has adopted and instituted a program to prevent the unlawful possession, use or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students, faculty, and staff. The conditions for meeting these certification requirements include the following provisions: 1. All institutions of higher education must provide annually, in writing, to faculty, staff, and students a statement declaring: a. Standards of conduct that prohibit unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol on University property or in connection with University activities; b. An institutional commitment to impose sanctions against students, faculty, and staff who violate such standards of conduct; c. Appropriate legal sanctions under local, state and federal law for the unlawful possession or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol; d. Health risks associated with the use of illicit drugs and alcohol abuse; e. The availability of drug and alcohol counseling, treatment, rehabilitation, and re- entry programs. 2. The University must certify that sanctions will be consistently enforced; 3. The University must review the effectiveness of its drug and alcohol program no less than biennially (every 2 years) and implement changes appropriately. This brochure is designed to inform all members of the Wayland Baptist University community of the information listed above. Additional information may be obtained from the resource agencies and offices listed in the text of this brochure. I. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT A. Employees Wayland Baptist University adheres to a high standard of moral conduct which includes prohibition of the use, possession, or distribution of alcohol or illegal drugs by students or university personnel on university owned or controlled property or in conjunction with any university activity. Employees should also be aware that Wayland Baptist University complies with Federal Law regarding the use and possession of marijuana; therefore, marijuana use and possession on campus, including university housing, is prohibited even if the employees use and/or 2 WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ANNUAL DAAPP possession meets the qualifications of state laws governing the medicinal use of marijuana. Documentation of medically prescribed marijuana will not exempt an employee from complying with University policy. The unlawful sale of alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs is also prohibited. B. Students Currently enrolled students are required to abide by the university’s Substance Abuse Policy which is found in the Wayland Baptist University Student Handbook. Wayland proudly adheres to high standards of intellectual, moral, ethical, and spiritual values. Convinced that self-discipline is more desirable than outside force and that the truly educated person must pursue what is right under all circumstances, Wayland entrusts each student with the solemn obligation of preserving these standards. However, in the light of revelation, reason, and the custom of the Christian community from which Wayland has sprung, certain practices are evaluated. The use or possession of alcoholic beverages and/or illegal drugs is forbidden. Students should be aware that laws regarding underage drinking will be strictly enforced by university officials including Wayland police. Students should also be aware that Wayland Baptist University complies with Federal Law regarding the use and possession of marijuana; therefore, marijuana use and possession on campus, including university housing, is prohibited even if a students or an employee’s use and/or possession meets the qualifications of the Texas Compassionate Use Act. Documentation of medically prescribed marijuana will not exempt a student or an employee from complying with University policy. The unlawful sale of alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs is also prohibited. II. SANCTIONS A. Employees University Policy 1.5.3 describes the sanctions regarding the use, possession or distribution of illegal drugs and/or alcohol in the following way: No employee will report for work or will work impaired by any substance, drug or alcohol, lawful or unlawful, except with the administration’s approval. Such approval will be limited to lawful medications and based strictly on an assessment of the employee’s ability to perform his/her regular or other assigned duties safely and efficiently. “Impaired” means under the influence of a substance such that the employee’s motor senses (i.e., sight, hearing, balance, reaction, reflex) or judgment either are or may be reasonably presumed to be affected. Employees found to possess or distribute illegal drugs will be terminated. 3 WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ANNUAL DAAPP No employee at any work site owned or controlled by the university will possess any quantity of any substance, drug or alcohol, lawful or unlawful, except for authorized substances. Employees should also be aware that Wayland Baptist University complies with Federal Law regarding the use and possession of marijuana; therefore, marijuana use and possession on campus, including university housing, is prohibited even if a student's or an employee’s use and/or possession meets the qualifications of the Texas Compassionate Use Act. Documentation of medically prescribed marijuana will not exempt a student or an employee from complying with University policy. B. Students Wayland Baptist University adheres to a high standard of moral conduct which includes prohibition of the use, possession, or distribution of alcohol or illegal drugs by students on university owned or controlled property or in conjunction with any university activity. The university may take action against students for off-campus use, possession or distribution of alcohol or controlled substances if deemed appropriate by university officials. The following sanctions will be applied to all violations of Wayland Baptist University’s policies on Substance Abuse: 1. Students found to possess alcohol on university owned or controlled property or in conjunction with any university activity will be (at minimum) placed on disciplinary probation for a period of two long semesters. The university reserves the right to use discretion in determining duration of sanction. 2. Students found to distribute alcohol on university owned or controlled property or in conjunction with any university activity will be (at minimum) suspended for a period of one long semester. The university reserves the right to use discretion in determining duration of sanction. 3. Students found to possess controlled substances, other than alcohol, on university owned or controlled property or in conjunction with any university activity will be (at minimum) suspended from the university for a period of two long semesters. 4. Students found to manufacture or distribute controlled substances, other than alcohol, on university owned or controlled property or in conjunction with any university activity will be expelled from the university. 5. Students found to use any type of inhalant as an intoxicant will be (at minimum) placed on disciplinary probation for a period of two long semesters. 6. Students found to be intoxicated by alcohol or controlled substances are considered to be in possession of that substance for disciplinary purposes. These sanctions and their duration are to be imposed at the discretion of university officials upon recommendation of the Judicial Council. Recurrence of offenses will incur more stringent sanctions. Completion of a rehabilitation program may be required as a part of a sanction at any level. University officials in the context of the university’s disciplinary system will make imposition of sanctions. The university may report any violations as outlined above to the proper law enforcement authorities for prosecution. 4 WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ANNUAL DAAPP Possible sanctions for violations involving alcohol and/or controlled substances may include: Loss of Privileges Entails any or all of the following sanctions: 1. Removal from preferred university housing. 2. Restriction from attending designated university events. 3. Restriction from the lobbies of residence halls and/or other public gathering places on campus such as Pete’s Place or the Laney Center. 4. Loss of dorm visitation privileges. 5. Restriction from eating meals in the cafeteria. Eviction Immediate removal from university housing. Removal from housing due to disciplinary sanction will not remove in any way the student’s responsibility to pay housing charges for the semester in which this sanction is administered. Community Service Community Service would entail participation in for the designated number
Recommended publications
  • Calculating Lives Saved Due to Minimum Drinking Age Laws John Kindelberger*

    Calculating Lives Saved Due to Minimum Drinking Age Laws John Kindelberger*

    Traffic Safety Facts Research Note March 2005 DOT HS 809 860 Calculating Lives Saved Due to Minimum Drinking Age Laws John Kindelberger* Currently (2004), every State in the United States prohibits study can be found in Arnold.2 The cumulative estimated purchase or public possession of alcoholic beverages for number of lives saved through 2002, based on Arnold’s those under the age of 21. Each year, the National Center methodology, is displayed in this note’s appendix. for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) publishes an estimate1 of lives saved due to such bans, referred to more generically Calculation as “minimum legal drinking age” (MLDA) laws. This note NCSA calculates its estimate of lives saved due to MLDA describes the methodology used, and introduces a slight laws as follows: change in that methodology. The described change will be implemented for the first time in the calculation of the estimate Let F = the actual number of fatalities in target crashes of number of lives saved during the year 2003. recorded in NHTSA’s Fatality Analysis Recording System (FARS); Let P = potential fatalities: the number of fatalities that would Background have been expected in target crashes absent the MLDA 13 Between 1970 and 1975, 29 States lowered their drinking ages percent effect to 18, 19, or 20. By 1983, safety concerns had led many of P is computed from F by finding the number which, when these States to reverse course. In 1984, the Uniform Drinking reduced by 13 percent, gives F. Thus F must be (1-.13)*P, or Age Act reduced Federal transportation funding to States 87 percent of P, so not prohibiting alcohol “purchase and public possession” for those under age 21.
  • Title 21 - Liquor

    Title 21 - Liquor

    TITLE 21 - LIQUOR CHAPTER 2 - ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES REGULATIONS Legislative History: Resolution No. 04-514, "Exempting the Tohono O'odham Gaming Enterprise (Formerly known as the Tohono 0 'odham Gaming Authority) from Additional Provisions ofArticle III of Ordinance 05-82, and Adopting Amended Regulations Pursuant to Article IV, Section 2(K) of Ordinance 05-82, "was approved on October 25, 2004. Related History: The regulations adopted by Resolution No. 04-514 superceded those previously adopted by Resolution No. 01-119, "Exempting the Tohono 0 'odham Gaming Authority from the provisions ofArticle Ill Sections (2) and (4) of Ordinance 05-82, and adopting regulations pursuant to Article IV, Section 2(K) of Ordinance 05-82, " which was passed by the Tohono 0 'odham Legislative Council on March 9, 2001, presented to the Nation's Chairman on March 9, 2001, and returned unsigned on March 15, 2001. ,. To,hono 0' odham Nation Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Control Regulations October , 2004 (1st ed. 2006) 1082 Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Control Regulations Table of Contents Definitions ................................................................... l Section 1.1. Purpose ...... ., ....................................... l Section t .2. Definitions ........................................... 1 1.2.1. "Act of violence" ............................... -1 1.2.2. "Beer" ......................................... l 1.2.3. "Broken package" ............................... l 1.2.4. "Control" ...................................... 1 1.2.5.
  • Alcohol and Drug Abuse in Medical Education. INSTITUTION State Univ

    Alcohol and Drug Abuse in Medical Education. INSTITUTION State Univ

    Doman RESUME ED 192 216 CG 014 672 AUTHOR Galanter, Marc. Ed. TITLE Alcohol and Drug Abuse in Medical Education. INSTITUTION State univ. of New York, Brooklyn., Downstate Medical Center.: Yeshiva univ.. Bronx, N.Y. Albert Einstein Coll. of Medicine. PONS AGENCY National Inst. on Drug Abuse (DBZW/PHS), Rockville, Md. REPORT NO ADM-79 -891 PUP EATS SO GRANT TO1-DA-00083: T01-CA-00197 NOTE 128p. AVAILABLE Pint superintendent of Documents, O.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 EDES PRICE mF01/FC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Alcohol Education: *Drug Abuse: *Drug Education: Higher Education: *Medical Education: medical School Faculty; Medical Services; *Physician Patient Relationship: Physicians: *social Responsibility: State cf the Art Reviews ABSTRACT This book presents the state of the art of American medical education in alcohol and drug abuse,and is the culmination of a four-year collaborative effort among the medicalschool faculty, of the Career Teacher Program in Alcohol and DrugAbuse. The first part contains reports, curricula, andsurvey data prepared for the medical education community, focusingon drug abuse and alcoholism teaching in medical/osteopathic schools, icourse on alcoholism for physicians, the Career Teacher Program andResource Handbook, and the role of substance abuse attitudes in_treatment.The second part is-- the proceedings of the NationalConference on Medical Education and Drug Abuse, November 1977. The conference sessionsaddress issues such as: (1) the physician's role in substance abuse treatment;(2) physicians' use of drugs and alcohol:(3) drug abuse questions on the National Board Examinations: and (4)an overview of the Career Teacher Program activities. (Author/HLM) * *s * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ***************** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *0 Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best thatcan be made from the original document.
  • Dwi Drug Court Intervention and Treatment Program

    Dwi Drug Court Intervention and Treatment Program

    DWI DRUG COURT INTERVENTION AND TREATMENT PROGRAM OPERATIONS MANUAL EL PASO, TEXAS TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview Page 1-3 Eligibility/disqualification criteria Page 4 Pre-qualification screenings/clinical assessment Page 4-5 Confidentiality/Consent for Release of Confidential Information Page 5-9 Program Phase Requirements Page 10-15 Incentives/Sanctions (Grid Tables) Page 16-23 Treatment Services Page 24-25 Supervision Protocol Page 26 Alcohol/Drug testing Protocol Page 27 Termination Criteria Page 27 Program Fees Page 27-28 Team Staffing Meetings Page 28 Data Collection and Program Evaluation Page 28-29 Team member roles Page 29-31 Team Member Departures and Replacement Page 32 Team Member Coverage Page 32 Use of DWI Drug Court Program Equipment Page 33 Equipment/Electronics Usage (Statement of Understanding) Page 34-35 SOP for Surveillance officers Page 36-41 Surveillance Report Form Page 42 Confidentiality Agreement Page 43-44 Participant’s Program Contract Page 45-55 Participant Program Handbook Page 56-74 1 FORWARD The policies and procedures, outlined in this manual, represent the minimum requirements of the DWI Drug Court Intervention and Treatment Program. Additionally, specific practices were developed to provide team guidance and encourage DWI Drug Court participant conformity. The structure of these policies and procedures will: • Creating public awareness through forums and informational meetings; • Minimize duplication of efforts and ensure greater coordination among all affected departments and agencies; • Maximize coordination and sharing of treatment resources; • Strengthen efforts to obtain funding; by periodically reviewing, monitoring, and • Managing data; furthermore to analyze program effectiveness, modified operations and refine goals. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the DWI Drug Court Program is designed to reduce recidivism of alcohol and drug offenders and to enhance public safety through a cost effective integrated continuum of care and a judicially supervised regime of treatment and innovative case management.
  • Breaking the Link Between Legal Access to Alcohol and Motor Vehicle Accidents: Evidence from New South Wales∗

    Breaking the Link Between Legal Access to Alcohol and Motor Vehicle Accidents: Evidence from New South Wales∗

    Forthcoming in Health Economics Breaking the Link Between Legal Access to Alcohol and Motor Vehicle Accidents: Evidence from New South Wales∗ Jason M. Lindo Peter Siminski Oleg Yerokhin Abstract A large literature has documented significant public health benefits associated with the minimum legal drinking age in the United States, particularly because of the resulting effects on motor vehicle accidents. These benefits form the primary basis for continued efforts to restrict youth access to alcohol. It is important to keep in mind, though, that policymakers have a wide variety of alcohol-control options available to them, and understanding how these policies may complement or substitute for one another can improve policy making moving forward. Towards this end, we propose that investigating the causal effects of the minimum legal drinking age in New South Wales, Australia provides a particularly informative case study, because Australian states are among the world leaders in their efforts against drunk driving. Using an age-based regression-discontinuity design applied to restricted-use data from several sources, we find no evidence that legal access to alcohol has effects on motor vehicle accidents of any type in New South Wales, despite having large effects on drinking and on hospitalizations due to alcohol abuse. JEL Classification: I18, K32 Keywords: health, alcohol, minimum legal drinking age, drunk driving ∗Lindo is an Associate Professor of Economics at Texas A&M University, a Visiting Principal Fellow at University of Wollongong, a Faculty Research Fellow at NBER, and a Research Fellow at IZA. Siminski is an Associate Professor of Economics at University of Wollongong and a Research Fellow at IZA.
  • Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction

    Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction

    Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction A Treatment Improvement Protocol TIP 40 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES BP Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Buprenorphine Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Clinical Guide www.samhsa.gov BP Buprenorphine Clinical Guide Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction in the Treatment Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine TIP 40 Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction Laura McNicholas, M.D., Ph.D. Consensus Panel Chair A Treatment Improvement Protocol TIP 40 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 1 Choke Cherry Road Rockville, MD 20857 Acknowledgments described in this document are intended or should be inferred. The guidelines in this Numerous people contributed to the document should not be considered development of this TIP (see pp. ix, xi, and substitutes for individualized client care and appendix J). This publication was produced treatment decisions. by the American Institutes for Research® (AIR) under the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) contract, task order Public Domain Notice number 277-00-6401 under the Substance All materials appearing in this volume except Abuse and Mental Health Services those taken directly from copyrighted sources Administration (SAMHSA) contract, Number are in the public domain and may be 277-99-6400, U.S. Department of Health and reproduced or copied without permission from Human Services (DHHS). CAPT Susanne SAMHSA/CSAT or the authors.
  • DWI COURTS Judge John “Kevin” Holbrook

    DWI COURTS Judge John “Kevin” Holbrook

    DWI COURTS Impaired Driving Case Essentials Honorable Michael Barrasse Honorable Peggy Fulton Hora Rhinestone Cowboy at .20 “Down and Out in Beverly Hills” “Rock Bottom” at .17 Brave(?) Mouth at .12 with prior “Baby Love” at .20 Objectives Overview of NCDC/DWI Drug Court Model Federally funded DWI Courts Discuss Unique Attributes of DWI cases Discuss “Ideal Participants” for DWI Courts Consider DWI Court workings Don’t drink and make signs Problem Solving Courts Problem Solving Courts a.k.a Collaborative Justice, Solution-Focused Courts Problem Solving Focus Team Approach to Decision Making Integration of ancillary services Judicial Supervision of Treatment Process and Proactive Role of Judge In and Out of Court Direct Interaction between Participants and Judge Community Outreach ~2,500 Drug Tx Courts in U.S. Adult Federal Juvenile District Drug Tx Campus Family Courts Tribal DWI Reentry 500 1,157 Problem-Solving Courts Re- entry Gambling Gun Child Community Supp Mental Truancy P-S Health Courts Integrated DV Tx Veteran Prosti- tution Home Parole less Vio. International Perspective on Problem-Solving Courts Australia Bermuda England Jamaica Canada Mauritius Scotland Wales Ireland Northern Ireland New Zealand Guam Cayman Islands N. Marianas Belgium Guam Netherlands Mexico Georgia Surinam Macedonia Israel Brazil Norway Problem Solving Considerations Changing Traditional Attitudes of Judges and other team members Changing Role Orientations of Judges and other team members Resource Constraints Time Constraints
  • Alcohol Effects on People; 00 Social Responsibility for the Control of the Use of Beverage; and (5) the Social Responsibility for the Treatment of Individuals

    Alcohol Effects on People; 00 Social Responsibility for the Control of the Use of Beverage; and (5) the Social Responsibility for the Treatment of Individuals

    DOC- NT RESUME ED 140 180 CG 011 461 TITLE Alcohol Education: Curriculum Guide for Grades 7-12. INSTITUTION New York State Education Dept., Albany. Bureau of Drug Education. PUB DATE 76 NOTE 144p.; For relat d document, see CG 011 462 EERS PRICE MF-$0.83 BC-$7.35 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Alcohol Education; *Alcoholic Beverages; Class Activities; Curriculum Guides; *Drinking; Drug Education; Health Education; *Learning Activities; Recreational Activities; *Secondary Education; Socially Deviant Behavior; Teaching Guides AB TRACT This curriculum guide is designed as an interdisciplinary resource on alcohol education for teachers of Grades 7-12. tevelopmental traits are discussed, and objectives and learning experiences are presented. The following topics are covered: ro the nature of alcohci;(2) factors influencing the use of alcoholic beverages; (3) alcohol effects on people; 00 social responsibility for the control of the use of beverage; and (5) the social responsibility for the treatment of individuals. A division is made between Grades 7-9 and 10-12, with each set of three grades considered separately. (Author/OLL)' Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for
  • Drug Court Review

    Drug Court Review

    DRUG COURT REVIEW Volume IX, Issue 1 NATIONAL DRUG COURT INSTITUTE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA DRUG COURT REVIEW VOLUME IX, ISSUE 1 EDITOR IN CHIEF Douglas B. Marlowe, JD, PhD ASSOCIATE EDITOR Carolyn D. Hardin, MPA MANAGING EDITOR Vanessa Cunningham West, MA PRODUCTION EDITOR Jennifer L. Carson EDITORIAL BOARD Steven Belenko, PhD Shannon M. Carey, PhD Fred L. Cheesman, PhD David S. Festinger, PhD Michael W. Finigan, PhD Cary E. Heck, PhD Scott Henggeler, PhD Matthew L. Hiller, PhD Judge Peggy F. Hora (Ret.) Robert Kirchner, PhD Judge William G. Meyer (Ret.) Randy Monchick, JD, PhD Roger H. Peters, PhD Michael Rempel, MA John Roman, PhD Lisa M. Shannon, PhD, MSW NATIONAL DRUG COURT INSTITUTE C. West Huddleston, III, Chief Executive Officer Carolyn D. Hardin, MPA., Senior Director 1029 N. Royal Street, Suite 201 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Tel. (703) 575-9400, Fax (703) 575-9402 www.ndci.org | iii Copyright 2014, National Drug Court Institute The National Drug Court Institute (NDCI) is the Professional Ser- vices Branch of the National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP). NDCI is grateful to the Bureau of Justice Assistance with- in the Office of Justice Programs at the U.S. Department of Justice for the support that made this publication possible. This project was supported by Grant No. 2012-DC-BX-K007 award- ed by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assis- tance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Jus- tice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the SMART Office, and the Office for Victims of Crime.
  • Western Literature Wee~ Gracesbo~1 Perspective on the History Of

    Western Literature Wee~ Gracesbo~1 Perspective on the History Of

    Boise State University ScholarWorks Student Newspapers (UP 4.15) University Documents 10-26-2006 Arbiter, October 26 Students of Boise State University Although this file was scanned from the highest-quality microfilm held by Boise State University, it reveals the limitations of the source microfilm. It is possible to perform a text search of much of this material; however, there are sections where the source microfilm was too faint or unreadable to allow for text scanning. For assistance with this collection of student newspapers, please contact Special Collections and Archives at [email protected]. THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT VOICE OF BOISE STATE SINCE 1933 ISSUE 21, VOLUME 19. FIRST ISSUE FREE. THURSDAY. OCTOBER 26.2006 ar iteror11irle, "iil OPINION J PAGE 3 Read the confessions of an angry banker and Hadley Rush's Western Literature Wee~ gracesBo~1 perspective on the history of . ;/i BY DUSTIN, Mana "Whore-Ioween." .. ' Terry Tempest IIjams will read tonight at the Egyptian Theater CULTURE College is about a lot of things, but at the core of the endeavor resides a yearning at".,7:3.0 tICke~,."-.are F schedulep.rn., of . W events,$12. for educational challenges. This week the City of Boise and Boise State University play PAGE 4 ch out arbltero - lne.corn host to a vibrant series of lectures, readings and presentations by western writers and scholars. The Arbiter or" ow up to the' ve Hotel embarks today through Satu" ay and he Western Literature Week conference is in its 40th dreds of speakers and scholars reading this week. on all register.
  • The Drinking Age

    The Drinking Age

    Vermont Legislative Research Shop Lowering the Drinking Age The minimum legal drinking age fluctuated throughout the second half of the 20th century, yielding mixed results. After prohibition was repealed in 1933, almost every state set the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) at 21 years.1 In 1970 Congress lowered the voting age to 18, which began a movement to lower the drinking age, as well. During the Vietnam era, many people were outraged that 18 year‐olds were fighting overseas yet could not have a drink. In the period between 1970 and 1975, 29 states lowered their MLDA to 18, 19 or 20. A study by Alexander Wagenaar revealed that in states that had lowered their minimum age there was a 15 to 20% increase in teen automobile accidents.2 This information influenced 16 states to raise their MLDA to 21 between 1976 and 1983. Pressure from groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) led to the signing of the Uniform Drinking Age Act by President Ronald Reagan on July 17, 1984.3 This act mandated a significant decrease in federal transportation funding for states that did not raise their MLDA to 21. Worldwide, the United States has the highest MLDA, with others ranging from birth to age 20.4 The majority of countries have a MLDA of 18. In most of these countries, however, the family teaches responsible drinking from a very young age. Since 1960, over one hundred studies have been conducted to analyze the effects of raising the MLDA. This research was examined by Alexander Wagenaar to determine the trends that appeared in the conclusions.5 Some of these studies provided evidence supporting a MLDA of 21, while most others found no conclusive results.
  • Research.Pdf (665.6Kb)

    Research.Pdf (665.6Kb)

    SOCIAL NORMING THROUGH ALCOHOL ADVERTISING AND BINGE DRINKING ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by TAYLOR SOLDNER Dr. Shelly Rodgers, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2015 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled SOCIAL NORMING THROUGH ALCOHOL ADVERTISING AND BINGE DRINKING ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES presented by Taylor Soldner, a candidate for the degree of Master of Arts, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Shelly Rodgers Professor Amanda Hinnant Professor Jon Stemmle Professor Bryan Maggard DEDICATION Thank you to everyone who supported me and gave me strength to finish this mammoth of a project! For that, I dedicate this to my family, friends, and loved ones who continued to support and challenge me throughout this process (you know who you are). I could not have done it without you and for that, I am truly grateful! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my fearless thesis committee, you guided me in areas where I was lost and led me towards finding the true connection between social norming and alcohol advertising. You challenged me and encouraged me to dig deeper. This project would truly not have been possible without the contribution of my dedicated thesis supervisor, Dr. Shelly Rodgers. I could not have successfully finished my thesis without all of your help and guidance to my constant stream of questions. To all my family, friends and colleagues, I appreciate the countless hours proofreading, brainstorming and recruiting participants.