DOCSLIB.ORG

Interocular Correlation, Luminance Contrast and Cyclopean Processing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vision Res. Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 2195-2207, 1991 0042-6989/91$3.00 + 0.00 Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved Copyright 0 1991Pergalnon FVessplc INTEROCULAR CORRELATION, LUMINANCE CONTRAST AND CYCLOPEAN PROCESSING LAWRENCE K. CORMACK, Sco3-r B. STEVENSONand CLIFTON M. SCHOR School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. (Received 27 August 1990; in revised form 17 January 1991) Abstract-We have investigated the nature and viability of interocular correlation as a measure of signal strength in the cyclopean domain. Thresholds for the detection of interocular correlation in dynamic random element stereograms were measured as a function of luminance contrast, a more traditional measure of stimulus strength. At high contrasts, correlation thresholds were independent of contrast. At low contrasts, correlation thresholds were inversely proportional to the square of contrast. Stereothresholds were also measured as a function of both contrast and interocular correlation. At low contrasts, stereoacuity was inversely proportional to both interocular correlation and the square of contrast. These results are consistent with an inherently multiplicative mechanism of binocular combi- nation, such as a cross-correlation of the two eye’s inputs. Interocular correlation Contrast Stereopsis INTRODUCTION images, with their generous variety of colors, luminances, etc. interocular correlation is some- In general, interocular correlation can be what difficult to intuit, regardless of the defi- thought of as the degree to which the images in nition employed. It would be unclear, for the two eyes match one another. Intuitively, example, how to change one member of an image interocular correlation, if reasonably defined, pair in order to reduce the interocular corre- should provide a measure of signal strength in lation by some desired amount. In the labora- the cyclopean domain. That is, if the two eye’s tory however, where one can restrict the visual views are almost identical, as is the case with environment to one-bit random dot stereograms binocular fixation of a flat surface, interocular of 50% density, the notion of interocular corre- correlation is very close to the maximum poss- lation is quite intuitive. Under these conditions, ible. On the contrary, if the two eye’s views of the interocular correlation for a given disparity the world are predominantly non-overlapping is simply a linear function of the proportion of then nothing can be predicted about the right dots which match at that disparity, i.e. eye’s image given only the left eye’s image and vice versa. In this case there would be zero IOC(d) = 2P, - 1 (2) interocular correlation and, hence, no cyclopean information available. where Pd is the proportion of matching dots at Formally, interocular correlation can be disparity d. defined as the cross-correlation of the image Examples of different interocular correlations pair comprising the right and left eye’s views of are shown in Fig. 1. The top stereo pair the world. For the simple one-dimensional case illustrates an interocular correlation of + 1 (all the interocular correlation at some disparity d is dots match at 0 disparity) and, when fused, given by: the percept is that of a flat plane. In the middle and bottom panels, the interocular correlation IOC(d) = f(x)h(x + d) dx (1) has been reduced to +OS and 0 respectively, s accompanied by a degradation of the perceived where f(x) and h(x) represent the intensity quality of the plane. It should be noted that the profiles (or some derivative of them) along the phenomenology of these static examples differs horizontal meridian of the right and left eye’s somewhat from that of dynamic displays such as retinae. were employed in our experiments. Specifically, This definition is simple, quantitative, and the dynamic displays of interocular correlations works for any given image pair. For “natural” less than unity give rise to a percept much like 2195 2196 LAWRENCE K. C‘ORMACK el (11. b. C. Fig. 1, Examples of random noise with various amounts of interocular correlation. These examples can either be free-fused or viewed through a stereoscope. In (a). the interocular correlation is 100% at 0 dn, parity, and the percept is one of a Aat plane. In (b) the interocular correlation has been reduced to SO” ,I while a flat plane is still perceived, it appears less robust and accompanied by dots both in front of :III~! behind the plane of fixation. In (c), the interocular correlation is 0, and no percept of a coherent plani. : extant. In dynamic versions of these stimuli, such as were employed in the experiments, the phenomtr; ology is somewhat different. Lower interocular correlations in particular appear as semi-transparct!t volumes when dynamic, whereas. when static, they appear as opaque surfaces with chaotic topograph? a dirty window embedded in fog; as correlation was the appearance of’s pstchwork 01 cc)-plan;lr increases, the window grows dirtier and the fop dots imbedded in a ri~Hlrousllustr_c,a- b:~l\ grows thinner. Absent in the dynamic displays t‘cv-ound, such as is seen in thcw stalk ;-tarl~pie~ lnterocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing 2197 Yet Fig. 1 does illustrate a basic point, which is that as one decreases the interocular corre- lation of the stimulus, the salience of the flat plane also decreases. In this sense, interocular correlation could represent a metric of signal amplitude in the cyclopean domain analogous to the manner in which luminance contrast provides a metric of signal amplitude in the spatial domain. * The generation of a cyclopean signal does not occur in parallel with the gener- ation of a spatial (contrast) signal however; the presence of a contrast signal is a necessary precursor to the generation of a cyclopean signal. Given this ordinal relationship, and the fact that contrast is already known to influence Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of the experimental apparatus. such hypercyclopean functions as stereoacuity Random bit streams were hardware generated and sent to a pair of video monitors, which were viewed through a (Halpern & Blake, 1988; Legge & Gu, 1989; mirror haploscope. Disparities were created by delaying the Heckman & Schor, 1989), it might be possible sync to one monitor. Interocular correlation was manipu- to control the amplitude of a cyclopean signal lated by driving the monitors with a single dot generator, by manipulating luminance contrast. For independent dot generators, or a combination thereof (see example, if the luminance contrast of a cy- text for details). The psychophysics (stimulus presentation, data aquisition, etc.) were all under computer control. clopean stimulus is reduced, it might be possible to compensate for the resulting decrease in signal strength by increasing the interocular 7 MHz and was displayed on a pair of matched correlation, thereby maintaining a constant (e.g. TSD monitors (p4 phosphor, 60 Hz non- threshold) level of performance on some task. interlaced) viewed through a mirror haploscope. Thus, given a threshold level of performance on The viewing distance was 53.7 cm and the said task, a trading relation would be expected haploscope mirrors were adjusted for each between contrast and interocular correlation. subject to the corresponding convergence Moreover, the form of this trading relation angle, thus obviating any mismatch between would reflect the manner in which cyclopean convergence and accommodation or “higher signals are derived from monocular contrast level” distance cues. Mean luminance was signals. Accordingly, we measured the effect 80cd/m2. The displays were viewed through of contrast on the detection of interocular 7 deg circular apertures in an otherwise black correlation in the first experiment. Based on surround. the results of this experiment, a model was Horizontal disparities were produced by de- developed to generate predictions concerning laying the horizontal video sync to one monitor. hypercyclopean functions such as stereoacuity. This was accomplished via a programmable Predictions of this model were then tested delay chip (Digital Delay Devices model PDU- in Experiment 2 by measuring stereoacuity as 13256-0.5), which allowed us to delay the noise a function of both contrast and interocular stimulus to one eye in 0.5 nsec (corresponding to correlation. 2 arc set) increments. Interocular correlation was simply the pro- GENERAL METHODS portion of the dots which were “forced” to match in the two images; the remainder of the The experiments were performed using dy- dots then had a 50% chance of matching. Thus, namic random-element stereograms of 50% el- in a display which had an interocular corre- ement density. A diagram of the basic apparatus lation of 0, half of the dots in the right image is shown in Fig. 2. A random noise signal was were matched by dots in the left image. In a hardware generated via shift registers running at display which had an interocular correlation of - 1 (“anticorrelation”), the right image was simply the opposite contrast version of the left *In this paper, we will use the term “cyclopean” to refer to the site and/or processes of binocular combination itself image and no matches existed. For an inter- and the term “hypercyclopean” to refer to processes ocular correlation of + 1, of course, the two occurring after or beyond the cyclopean stage. images were identical. 2198 LAWRENCEK. CORMACKet al Thus, rearranging equation (2), the pro- be placed under software (Experiment 1) or portion of matching dots is, on average, simply hardware (Experiment 2) control.* (IOC + 1)/2; the two are linearly related, as is Thus, to create an interocular correlation of somewhat demanded by intuition. 0.75, the duty cycle of the rectangular wave Interocular correlation was varied through switching pulse was such that the subject was the use of two independent noise generators. To viewing a fully correlated display 75% of the produce an interocular correlation of + 1, the space/time, and viewing an uncorrelated display output of a single noise generator was sent for the remainder.
Recommended publications
  • Randomized Algorithms

    Randomized Algorithms

    Chapter 9 Randomized Algorithms randomized The theme of this chapter is madendrizo algorithms. These are algorithms that make use of randomness in their computation. You might know of quicksort, which is efficient on average when it uses a random pivot, but can be bad for any pivot that is selected without randomness. Analyzing randomized algorithms can be difficult, so you might wonder why randomiza- tion in algorithms is so important and worth the extra effort. Well it turns out that for certain problems randomized algorithms are simpler or faster than algorithms that do not use random- ness. The problem of primality testing (PT), which is to determine if an integer is prime, is a good example. In the late 70s Miller and Rabin developed a famous and simple random- ized algorithm for the problem that only requires polynomial work. For over 20 years it was not known whether the problem could be solved in polynomial work without randomization. Eventually a polynomial time algorithm was developed, but it is much more complicated and computationally more costly than the randomized version. Hence in practice everyone still uses the randomized version. There are many other problems in which a randomized solution is simpler or cheaper than the best non-randomized solution. In this chapter, after covering the prerequisite background, we will consider some such problems. The first we will consider is the following simple prob- lem: Question: How many comparisons do we need to find the top two largest numbers in a sequence of n distinct numbers? Without the help of randomization, there is a trivial algorithm for finding the top two largest numbers in a sequence that requires about 2n − 3 comparisons.
  • MA3K0 - High-Dimensional Probability

    MA3K0 - High-Dimensional Probability

    MA3K0 - High-Dimensional Probability Lecture Notes Stefan Adams i 2020, update 06.05.2020 Notes are in final version - proofreading not completed yet! Typos and errors will be updated on a regular basis Contents 1 Prelimaries on Probability Theory 1 1.1 Random variables . .1 1.2 Classical Inequalities . .4 1.3 Limit Theorems . .6 2 Concentration inequalities for independent random variables 8 2.1 Why concentration inequalities . .8 2.2 Hoeffding’s Inequality . 10 2.3 Chernoff’s Inequality . 13 2.4 Sub-Gaussian random variables . 15 2.5 Sub-Exponential random variables . 22 3 Random vectors in High Dimensions 27 3.1 Concentration of the Euclidean norm . 27 3.2 Covariance matrices and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) . 30 3.3 Examples of High-Dimensional distributions . 32 3.4 Sub-Gaussian random variables in higher dimensions . 34 3.5 Application: Grothendieck’s inequality . 36 4 Random Matrices 36 4.1 Geometrics concepts . 36 4.2 Concentration of the operator norm of random matrices . 38 4.3 Application: Community Detection in Networks . 41 4.4 Application: Covariance Estimation and Clustering . 41 5 Concentration of measure - general case 43 5.1 Concentration by entropic techniques . 43 5.2 Concentration via Isoperimetric Inequalities . 50 5.3 Some matrix calculus and covariance estimation . 54 6 Basic tools in high-dimensional probability 57 6.1 Decoupling . 57 6.2 Concentration for Anisotropic random vectors . 62 6.3 Symmetrisation . 63 7 Random Processes 64 ii Preface Introduction We discuss an elegant argument that showcases the
  • HIGHER MOMENTS of BANACH SPACE VALUED RANDOM VARIABLES 1. Introduction Let X Be a Random Variable with Values in a Banach Space

    HIGHER MOMENTS of BANACH SPACE VALUED RANDOM VARIABLES 1. Introduction Let X Be a Random Variable with Values in a Banach Space

    HIGHER MOMENTS OF BANACH SPACE VALUED RANDOM VARIABLES SVANTE JANSON AND STEN KAIJSER Abstract. We define the k:th moment of a Banach space valued ran- dom variable as the expectation of its k:th tensor power; thus the mo- ment (if it exists) is an element of a tensor power of the original Banach space. We study both the projective and injective tensor products, and their relation. Moreover, in order to be general and flexible, we study three different types of expectations: Bochner integrals, Pettis integrals and Dunford integrals. One of the problems studied is whether two random variables with the same injective moments (of a given order) necessarily have the same projective moments; this is of interest in applications. We show that this holds if the Banach space has the approximation property, but not in general. Several sections are devoted to results in special Banach spaces, in- cluding Hilbert spaces, CpKq and Dr0; 1s. The latter space is non- separable, which complicates the arguments, and we prove various pre- liminary results on e.g. measurability in Dr0; 1s that we need. One of the main motivations of this paper is the application to Zolotarev metrics and their use in the contraction method. This is sketched in an appendix. 1. Introduction Let X be a random variable with values in a Banach space B. To avoid measurability problems, we assume for most of this section for simplicity that B is separable and X Borel measurable; see Section 3 for measurability in the general case. Moreover, for definiteness, we consider real Banach spaces only; the complex case is similar.
  • Control Policy with Autocorrelated Noise in Reinforcement Learning for Robotics

    Control Policy with Autocorrelated Noise in Reinforcement Learning for Robotics

    International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, Vol. 5, No. 2, April 2015 Control Policy with Autocorrelated Noise in Reinforcement Learning for Robotics Paweł Wawrzyński primitives by means of RL algorithms based on MDP Abstract—Direct application of reinforcement learning in framework, but it does not alleviate the problem of robot robotics rises the issue of discontinuity of control signal. jerking. The current paper is intended to fill this gap. Consecutive actions are selected independently on random, In this paper, control policy is introduced that may undergo which often makes them excessively far from one another. Such reinforcement learning and have the following properties: control is hardly ever appropriate in robots, it may even lead to their destruction. This paper considers a control policy in which It is applicable to robot control optimization. consecutive actions are modified by autocorrelated noise. That It does not lead to robot jerking. policy generally solves the aforementioned problems and it is readily applicable in robots. In the experimental study it is It can be optimized by any RL algorithm that is designed applied to three robotic learning control tasks: Cart-Pole to optimize a classical stochastic control policy. SwingUp, Half-Cheetah, and a walking humanoid. The policy introduced here is based on a deterministic transformation of state combined with a random element in Index Terms—Machine learning, reinforcement learning, actorcritics, robotics. the form of a specific stochastic process, namely the moving average. The paper is organized as follows. In Section II the I. INTRODUCTION problem of our interest is defined. Section III presents the main contribution of this paper i.e., a stochastic control policy Reinforcement learning (RL) addresses the problem of an that prevents robot jerking while learning.
  • CONVERGENCE RATES of MARKOV CHAINS 1. Orientation 1

    CONVERGENCE RATES of MARKOV CHAINS 1. Orientation 1

    CONVERGENCE RATES OF MARKOV CHAINS STEVEN P. LALLEY CONTENTS 1. Orientation 1 1.1. Example 1: Random-to-Top Card Shuffling 1 1.2. Example 2: The Ehrenfest Urn Model of Diffusion 2 1.3. Example 3: Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm 4 1.4. Reversible Markov Chains 5 1.5. Exercises: Reversiblity, Symmetries and Stationary Distributions 8 2. Coupling 9 2.1. Coupling and Total Variation Distance 9 2.2. Coupling Constructions and Convergence of Markov Chains 10 2.3. Couplings for the Ehrenfest Urn and Random-to-Top Shuffling 12 2.4. The Coupon Collector’s Problem 13 2.5. Exercises 15 2.6. Convergence Rates for the Ehrenfest Urn and Random-to-Top 16 2.7. Exercises 17 3. Spectral Analysis 18 3.1. Transition Kernel of a Reversible Markov Chain 18 3.2. Spectrum of the Ehrenfest random walk 21 3.3. Rate of convergence of the Ehrenfest random walk 23 1. ORIENTATION Finite-state Markov chains have stationary distributions, and irreducible, aperiodic, finite- state Markov chains have unique stationary distributions. Furthermore, for any such chain the n−step transition probabilities converge to the stationary distribution. In various ap- plications – especially in Markov chain Monte Carlo, where one runs a Markov chain on a computer to simulate a random draw from the stationary distribution – it is desirable to know how many steps it takes for the n−step transition probabilities to become close to the stationary probabilities. These notes will introduce several of the most basic and important techniques for studying this problem, coupling and spectral analysis. We will focus on two Markov chains for which the convergence rate is of particular interest: (1) the random-to-top shuffling model and (2) the Ehrenfest urn model.
  • Multivariate Scale-Mixed Stable Distributions and Related Limit

    Multivariate Scale-Mixed Stable Distributions and Related Limit

    Multivariate scale-mixed stable distributions and related limit theorems∗ Victor Korolev,† Alexander Zeifman‡ Abstract In the paper, multivariate probability distributions are considered that are representable as scale mixtures of multivariate elliptically contoured stable distributions. It is demonstrated that these distributions form a special subclass of scale mixtures of multivariate elliptically contoured normal distributions. Some properties of these distributions are discussed. Main attention is paid to the representations of the corresponding random vectors as products of independent random variables. In these products, relations are traced of the distributions of the involved terms with popular probability distributions. As examples of distributions of the class of scale mixtures of multivariate elliptically contoured stable distributions, multivariate generalized Linnik distributions are considered in detail. Their relations with multivariate ‘ordinary’ Linnik distributions, multivariate normal, stable and Laplace laws as well as with univariate Mittag-Leffler and generalized Mittag-Leffler distributions are discussed. Limit theorems are proved presenting necessary and sufficient conditions for the convergence of the distributions of random sequences with independent random indices (including sums of a random number of random vectors and multivariate statistics constructed from samples with random sizes) to scale mixtures of multivariate elliptically contoured stable distributions. The property of scale- mixed multivariate stable
  • Random Fields, Fall 2014 1

    Random Fields, Fall 2014 1

    Random fields, Fall 2014 1 fMRI brain scan Ocean waves Nobel prize 2996 to The oceans cover 72% of John C. Mather the earth’s surface. George F. Smoot Essential for life on earth, “for discovery of the and huge economic blackbody form and importance through anisotropy of the cosmic fishing, transportation, microwave background oil and gas extraction radiation" PET brain scan TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A The course • Kolmogorov existence theorem, separable processes, measurable processes • Stationarity and isotropy • Orthogonal and spectral representations • Geometry • Exceedance sets • Rice formula • Slepian models Literature An unfinished manuscript “Applications of RANDOM FIELDS AND GEOMETRY: Foundations and Case Studies” by Robert Adler, Jonathan Taylor, and Keith Worsley. Complementary literature: “Level sets and extrema of random processes and fields” by Jean- Marc Azais and Mario Wschebor, Wiley, 2009 “Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Gaussian Processes” by Vladimir Piterbarg, American Mathematical Society, ser. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 148, 1995 “Random fields and Geometry” by Robert Adler and Jonathan Taylor, Springer 2007 Slides for ATW ch 2, p 24-39 Exercises: 2.8.1, 2.8.2, 2.8.3, 2.8.4, 2.8.5, 2.8.6 + excercises in slides Stochastic convergence (assumed known) 푎.푠. Almost sure convergence: 푋푛 X 퐿2 Mean square convergence: 푋푛 X 푃 Convergence in probability: 푋푛 X 푑 푑 푑 Convergence in distribution: 푋푛 X, 퐹푛 F, 푃푛 P, … 푎.푠. 푃 • 푋푛 X ⇒ 푋푛 푋 퐿2 푃 • 푋푛 X ⇒ 푋푛 푋 푃 퐿2 • 푋푛 푋 plus uniform integrability ⇒ 푋푛 X 푃 푎.푠.
  • Random Polynomials Over Finite Fields

    Random Polynomials Over Finite Fields

    RANDOM POLYNOMIALS OVER FINITE FIELDS by Andrew Sharkey A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Science at the University of Glasgow for the degree of . Doctor of Philosophy June 22, 1999 ©Andrew Sharkey 1999 ProQuest Number: 13834241 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13834241 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346 m Questa tesi e dedicata ad Alessandro Paluello (1975-1997). Preface This thesis is submitted in accordance with the regulations for the degree of Doctor of Philoso­ phy in the University of Glasgow. It is the record of research carried out at Glasgow University between October 1995 and September 1998. No part of it has previously been submitted by me for a degree at any university. I should like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. R.W.K.Odoni, for his ad­ vice and encouragement throughout the period of research. I would also like to thank Dr. S.D.Gohen for helping out with my supervision, and the E.P.S.R.G.
  • University of Groningen Panel Data Models Extended to Spatial Error

    University of Groningen Panel Data Models Extended to Spatial Error

    University of Groningen Panel data models extended to spatial error autocorrelation or a spatially lagged dependent variable Elhorst, J. Paul IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2001 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Elhorst, J. P. (2001). Panel data models extended to spatial error autocorrelation or a spatially lagged dependent variable. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 01-10-2021 3$1(/'$7$02'(/6(;7(1'('7263$7,$/ (5525$872&255(/$7,2125$63$7,$//< /$**(''(3(1'(179$5,$%/( J.
  • Random Variable

    Random Variable

    Random Variable Definition A random variable X on a sample spaceΩ is a real-valued function onΩ; that is, X :Ω !R.A discrete random variable is a random variable that takes on only a finite or countably infinite number of values. Discrete random variable X and real value a: the event \X = a" represents the set fs 2 Ω: X (s) = ag. X Pr(X = a) = Pr(s) s2Ω:X (s)=a Independence Definition Two random variables X and Y are independent if and only if Pr((X = x) \ (Y = y)) = Pr(X = x) · Pr(Y = y) for all values x and y. Similarly, random variables X1; X2;::: Xk are mutually independent if and only if for any subset I ⊆ [1; k] and any values xi ,i 2 I , ! \ Y Pr Xi = xi = Pr(Xi = xi ): i2I i2I Expectation Definition The expectation of a discrete random variable X , denoted by E[X ], is given by X E[X ] = i Pr(X = i); i where the summation is over all values in the range of X . The P expectation is finite if i jij Pr(X = i) converges; otherwise, the expectation is unbounded. The expectation (or mean or average) is a weighted sum over all possible values of the random variable. Median Definition The median of a random variable X is a value m such Pr(X < m) ≤ 1=2 and Pr(X > m) < 1=2: Linearity of Expectation Theorem For any two random variablesX andY E[X + Y ] = E[X ] + E[Y ]: Lemma For any constantc and discrete random variableX, E[cX ] = cE[X ]: Bernoulli Random Variable A Bernoulli or an indicator random variable: 1 if the experiment succeeds, Y = 0 otherwise.
  • Iterated Random Functions∗

    Iterated Random Functions∗

    SIAM REVIEW c 1999 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 45–76 Iterated Random Functions∗ Persi Diaconisy David Freedmanz Abstract. Iterated random functions are used to draw pictures or simulate large Ising models, among other applications. They offer a method for studying the steady state distribution of a Markov chain, and give useful bounds on rates of convergence in a variety of examples. The present paper surveys the field and presents some new examples. There is a simple unifying idea: the iterates of random Lipschitz functions converge if the functions are contracting on the average. Key words. Markov chains, products of random matrices, iterated function systems, coupling from the past AMS subject classifications. 60J05, 60F05 PII. S0036144598338446 1. Introduction. The applied probability literature is nowadays quite daunting. Even relatively simple topics, like Markov chains, have generated enormous complex- ity. This paper describes a simple idea that helps to unify many arguments in Markov chains, simulation algorithms, control theory, queuing, and other branches of applied probability. The idea is that Markov chains can be constructed by iterating random functions on the state space S. More specifically, there is a family fθ : θ Θ of functions that map S into itself, and a probability distribution µ onf Θ. If the2 chaing is at x S, it moves by choosing θ at random from µ, and going to fθ(x). For now, µ does2 not depend on x. The process can be written as X0 = x0;X1 = fθ1 (x0);X2 =(fθ2 fθ1 )(x0); :::, with for composition of functions.
  • Automorphisms of Random Trees

    Automorphisms of Random Trees

    Automorphisms of Random Trees A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Le Yu in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics December 2012 c Copyright 2012 Le Yu. All Rights Reserved. ii Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................... iv Abstract................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 1 2. LOG jAUT(T )j. ................................................................... 4 2.1 Product Representation ..................................................... 4 2.2 Excluding Large Branches .................................................. 10 2.3 Expected value of log jAut(T )j ............................................. 14 2.3.1 Expected value of N(T; d; B) ....................................... 16 2.3.2 Expected Value of log jAut(T )j .................................... 18 2.3.3 The unrooted case: En(log jAut(Un)j)............................. 23 2.4 Concentration around the mean ............................................ 26 2.4.1 Joyal's bijection...................................................... 27 2.4.2 Probability Spaces ................................................... 29 2.4.3 Application of the Azuma-McDiarmid theorem ................... 31 2.5 Evaluation of µ .............................................................