DOCSLIB.ORG

7. References Cited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7. References Cited Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment 7. References Cited Abbe, T. B., and D. R. Montgomery. 1996. Large Woody Debris Jams, Channel Hydraulics and Habitat Formation in Large Rivers. Research and Management 12:201-221 Abbe, T. B., Montgomery, D. R., and C. Petroff. 1997. Design of Stable In-channel Wood Debris Structures for Bank Protection and Habitat Restoration: An Example from the Cowlitz River, WA. Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Agee, J.K. 1993. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Washington D.C.: Island Press. Arno, S.F. 2000. Chapter 5: Fire in Western Forest Ecosystems. In, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR- 42, Vol. 2, pgs. 97-120. USDA Forest Service. Arrington, L. 1979. The Mormons in Nevada. Las Vegas Sun. Las Vegas, Nevada. Benda, L. 1990. The Influence of Debris Flows on Channels and Valley Floors in the Oregon Coast Range, USA. Earth Surface Process and Landforms 15(5): 457-466. Bennyhoff, J. A., V. Bente, M. Hilderman-Smith, and T. Jones. 1982. Emigrant Summit Trail: Archaeological Investigation and Historic Research of the Trail from Caples Lake to Maiden’s Grave. Eldorado National Forest, Placerville. Bentrup, G., and J. C. Hoag. 1998. The Practical Stream bank Bioengineering Guide: User’s Guide for Natural Stream bank Stabilization Techniques in the Arid and Semi-arid Great Basin and Intermountain West. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho. Beschta, R. L., W. S. Platts, J. B. Kaufmann, and M. T. Hill. 1994. Artificial Stream Restoration—Money Well-spent or an Expensive Failure? Universities Council on Water Resources Annual (UCWR) Conference, Big Sky, Montana, 2-5 August 1994. UCWR, University of Illinois, Carbondale. Blackburn, T., and K. Anderson 1993. Before the Wilderness: Environmental Management by Native Californians. Ballena Press, Menlo Park, California. Bowling, L. and D. Lettenmaier. 2001. The Effects of Forest Roads and Harvest on Catchment Hydrology in a Mountainous Maritime Environment. In M. Wigmosta and S. Burges (eds) : Land Use and Watersheds: Human Influence on Hydrology and Geomorphology in Urban and Forest Areas. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), 1998. Riparian Area Management TR-1737-15: A User Guide to Assessing Proper Functioning Condition and the Supporting Science for Lotic Areas. U. S. Department of the Interior, BLM, National Applied Resources Center, Denver, Colorado.. California Department of Water Resources, 1991. Carson River Atlas. The Resource Agency, California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California. California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB). 2001. Water Body Fact Sheet for 2002 Section 303(d) List Update, Lahontan Region: West Fork and East Fork Carson River Hydrologic Units. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region, South Lake Tahoe, California. June 2004 Page 190 Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment Centennial Book Committee. 1987. One Hundred Years of History, Recreation, and Lore in Alpine County, California. Alpine County Museum, Markleeville, California. Chang, C. 1996. Ecosystem Responses to Fire and Variations in Fire Regimes. In: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Vol II. Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California. 1071-1099. Church, M., D. McLean, and J. Wolcott. 1987. River Bed Gravels: Sampling and Analysis. In: Gravel-bed Rivers. C. Thorne, J. Bathurt, and R. Hey. John Wiley, New York. Clark, W. 1977. Mines and Mineral Resources of Alpine County, California. California Division of Mines and Geology County Report 8. Sacramento, California. Creel, E. 1964. A History of Agriculture in Nevada. College of Agriculture, University of Nevada. Reno, Nevada. Dangberg, G. 1972. Carson Valley: Historical Sketches of Nevada’s First Settlement. Carson Valley Historical Society, Minden, Nevada. Dangberg, G. 1975. Conflict on the Carson: A Study of Water Litigation in Western Nevada. Carson Valley Historical Society, Minden, Nevada. D’Azevedo, W. 1986. Washoe. In, Great Basin, edited by W. d'Azevedo, pp. 466-498. Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 11. W. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Dietrich, W. E., C. J. Wilson, D. R. Montogomery, and J. McKean. 1993. Analysis of Erosion Thresholds, Channel Networks and Landscape Morphology Using a Digital Terrain Model. Journal of Geology 101:259-278. Downs, J. 1966. The Significance of Environmental Manipulation in Great Basin Cultural Development. In, The Current Status of Anthropological Research in the Great Basin, edited by W. d’Azevedo, W. Davis, D. Fowler, and W. Suttles, pp 39-56. Social Sciences and Humanities Publication No. 1, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada. Duchesne, L.C. and B.C. Hawkes. 2000. Chapter 3: Fire in Northern Ecosystems. In, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42 Vol. 2, pgs. 35-52. USDA Forest Service Dunne, T. 1997. Evaluation of Erosion Conditions and Trends. Pp. 53-83 in: S.H. Kunkle and J.L. Thames (editors), Guidelines for watershed management. FAO Conservation Guide 1, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Dunne, T., and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California. Dvorsky, J. 2000. The Influence of Valley Morphology and Coarse Sediment Distribution on Rainbow Trout Populations in Sespe Creek, California at the Landscape Scale. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara. December 2000. Elmore, W. 1992. Riparian Responses to Grazing Practices. Pages 442-447 in R. J. Naiman, editor. Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change. Springer-Verlga, New York. June 2004 Page 191 Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment Elmore W., and R. L. Beschta. 1987. Riparian areas: Perceptions in Management. Rangelands 9(6):260- 265. Elston, R. 1982. Good Times, Hard Times: Prehistoric Culture Change in the Western Great Basin. In, Man and Environment in the Great Basin, edited by J. O'Connell and D. Madsen. Society for American Archaeology Paper 2. Farquhar, F. 1965. History of the Sierra Nevada. University of California Press, Berkeley. Fleischner, T. L. 1994. Ecological Costs of Livestock Grazing in North America. Conservation Biology 8:629-645. Fletcher, T. 1982. The Mono Basin in the Nineteenth Century: Discovery, Settlement, Land Use. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of California, Berkeley. Flosi, G., S. Downie, J. Hoplein, M. Bird, R. Coey, and B. Collins. 1998. California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual, 3rd edition. State of California Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Sacramento, California. Fox, S. 2003. Report on Wildlife Habitat, Upper Truckee River. Prepared by Susan Fox. Submitted to Swanson Hydrology and Geomorphology. Franzwa, G. M. 1999. Maps of the California Trail. The Patrice Press. Fremont, J. 1845. Report of the Expedition to the Rocky Mountains in the Year 1842, and to Oregon and North California in the Years 1843-44. Twenty-eighth Congress, House Executive Document 174. Washington, D.C. Garbecht, J. and P. Starks. 1995. Note on the Use of USGS level 7.5-minute DEM Coverages for Landscape Drainage Analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61: 519-522. Gianella, V. 1959. Where Fremont Crossed the Sierra Nevada in 1844. Sierra Club Bulletin 44(7):54-63. Glancy, P., and T. Katzer. 1975. Water Resources Appraisal of the Carson River Basin, Western Nevada. Water Resources Reconnaissance Series Report 59. Division of Water Resources, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Carson City, Nevada. Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon, B.C. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England. Graber, D. M. 1996. Status of Terrestrial Vertebrates. In, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Vol. II, pages 709-734. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37, University of California, Davis, CA. Grant, G. and Swanson, F. 1995. Morphology and Processes of Valley Floors in Mountain Streams, Western Cascades, Oregon. In John E. Costa (ed) Natural and Anthropogenic Influences in Fluvial Geomorphology: The Wolman Volume. Washington D.C., American Geophysical Union. Geophysical Monograph 89: 83-102. Gudde, E. 1969. California Place Names. University of California Press, Berkeley. June 2004 Page 192 Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment Hack, J. T. and J. C. Goodlett. 1960. Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the Central Appalachians. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 347. Harris, R. 1988. Associations Between Stream Valley Geomorphology and Riparian Vegetation as a Basis for Landscape Analysis in the Eastern Sierra Nevada, California. Environmental Management 12: 219- 228. Hattori, E. and T. King. 1985. A Selected Historical and Archaeological Survey of Carson Valley. Social Science Center Technical Report 43, Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada, Reno. Hawkins, C., J. Dobrowski, L. Decker, J. Hogue, J. Feminella, T. Hougaard, and D. Glatter. 1994. Cumulative Watershed Effects: An Extensive Analysis of Responses by Stream Biota to Watershed Management. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experimental Station. Heady, H. F., and R. D. Child. 1994. Rangeland Ecology and Management. Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado. Herbst,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geochemical Modeling of Iron and Aluminum Precipitation During Mixing and Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage
    minerals Article Geochemical Modeling of Iron and Aluminum Precipitation during Mixing and Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage Darrell Kirk Nordstrom U.S. Geological Survey, Boulder, CO 80303, USA; [email protected] Received: 21 May 2020; Accepted: 14 June 2020; Published: 17 June 2020 Abstract: Geochemical modeling of precipitation reactions in the complex matrix of acid mine drainage is fundamental to understanding natural attenuation, lime treatment, and treatment procedures that separate constituents for potential reuse or recycling. The three main dissolved constituents in acid mine drainage are iron, aluminum, and sulfate. During the neutralization of acid mine drainage (AMD) by mixing with clean tributaries or by titration with a base such as sodium hydroxide or slaked lime, Ca(OH)2, iron precipitates at pH values of 2–3 if oxidized and aluminum precipitates at pH values of 4–5 and both processes buffer the pH during precipitation. Mixing processes were simulated using the ion-association model in the PHREEQC code. The results are sensitive to the solubility product constant (Ksp) used for the precipitating phases. A field example with data on discharge and water composition of AMD before and after mixing along with massive precipitation of an aluminum phase is simulated and shows that there is an optimal Ksp to give the best fit to the measured data. Best fit is defined when the predicted water composition after mixing and precipitation matches most closely the measured water chemistry. Slight adjustment to the proportion of stream discharges does not give a better fit. Keywords: geochemical modeling; acid mine drainage; iron and aluminum precipitation; schwertmannite; basaluminite 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Conditions Introduction
    Chapter 4 Highway Conditions Introduction The Ebbetts Pass National Scenic Byway (NBS) began as a trail that American Indians most likely used for trade and a hunting access route, and was later utilized by fur trappers. By the early to mid 1800’s pioneers and miners crossed over the pass. With the discovery of silver and the demand for more supplies to be delivered to the region, so came improvements to the road. Today, the highway itself is managed and maintained by the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans). The road twists you further into the mountains narrowing with no centerline near Lake Alpine as it separates both the Carson-Iceberg and Mokelumne Wildernesses, luring the traveler farther away from society. The journey takes one both physically and psychologically closer to wildness. Beyond the crest of Ebbetts Pass, the descent winds through a rugged volcanic landscape overlooking the canyons below. This asphalt ribbon transitions back to a distinct, 2-lane highway with a centerline when you reach the floor of Silver Creek, just east of Silver Creek Campground. This portion of the byway is steep, narrow, and windy, and is not suitable for semi trucks, buses, and most Recreational Vehicles (RV’s). It is best left for smaller vehicle travel. Average Daily Traffic CalTrans collects data annually that reflects the number of vehicles that travel along Highway 4 in a given month. This data is compiled into average annual daily traffic counts (AADT). AADT numbers are calculated using electronic highway counters, determining the yearly figure and dividing by 365 days/year.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 101/Friday, May 24, 2002/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 101 / Friday, May 24, 2002 / Notices 36645 along Monument Creek from any future Service, the California Department of and sulfur underground mining development. Fish and Game, and the Nevada operations, in Alpine County, Only one federally listed species, the Division of Environmental Protection, California. Anaconda developed the threatened Preble’s meadow jumping announces the release for public review former underground mine into an open mouse, occurs onsite and has the of the Leviathan Mine Natural Resource pit sulfur mine and operated the Mine potential to be adversely affected by the Damage Assessment Plan—Public through 1962. Anaconda sold the Mine project. To mitigate impacts that may Release Draft (Assessment Plan). The in early 1963, but no further mining result from incidental take, the HCP Plan was developed by the Leviathan operations took place thereafter. provides mitigation for the residential Mine Council Natural Resource Releases of hazardous substances site by protection of the Monument Trustees, consisting of representatives of from the Mine began in the 1950s and Creek corridor onsite and its associated the Tribe and agencies listed above, to continue today. Infiltration of riparian areas from all future assess injuries to natural resources precipitation into and through the adits development through the enhancement resulting from releases of hazardous (tunnels from the former underground of 0.5 acre through native grass planting, substances from the Leviathan Mine in mine), open pit, and overburden piles, shrub planting, weed control, Alpine County, California. The along with direct contact of mine wastes preservation in a native and unmowed Assessment Plan describes the proposed with surface waters, has created acid condition, and the placement of the approach for determining and mine drainage (AMD), which has been proposed building site closer to the road quantifying natural resource injuries released, and continues to be released and farther away from mouse habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining's Toxic Legacy
    Mining’s Toxic Legacy An Initiative to Address Mining Toxins in the Sierra Nevada Acknowledgements _____________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Sierra Fund would like to thank Dr. Carrie Monohan, contributing author of this report, and Kyle Leach, lead technical advisor. Thanks as well to Dr. William M. Murphy, Dr. Dave Brown, and Professor Becky Damazo, RN, of California State University, Chico for their research into the human and environmental impacts of mining toxins, and to the graduate students who assisted them: Lowren C. McAmis and Melinda Montano, Gina Grayson, James Guichard, and Yvette Irons. Thanks to Malaika Bishop and Roberto Garcia for their hard work to engage community partners in this effort, and Terry Lowe and Anna Reynolds Trabucco for their editorial expertise. For production of this report we recognize Elizabeth “Izzy” Martin of The Sierra Fund for conceiving of and coordinating the overall Initiative and writing substantial portions of the document, Kerry Morse for editing, and Emily Rivenes for design and formatting. Many others were vital to the development of the report, especially the members of our Gold Ribbon Panel and our Government Science and Policy Advisors. We also thank the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment and The Abandoned Mine Alliance who provided funding to pay for a portion of the expenses in printing this report. Special thanks to Rebecca Solnit, whose article “Winged Mercury and
    [Show full text]
  • Davies Unr 0139M 11920.Pdf
    University of Nevada, Reno Applications of multi-season hyperspectral remote sensing for acid mine water characterization and mapping of secondary iron minerals associated with acid mine drainage A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Hydrogeology by Gwendolyn E. Davies Dr. Wendy M. Calvin/Thesis Advisor December, 2015 © by Gwendolyn E. Davies 2015 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by GWENDOLYN E. DAVIES entitled Applications of Multi-Season Hyperspectral Remote Sensing for Acid Mine Water Characterization and Mapping of Secondary Iron Minerals Associated with Acid Mine Drainage be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Wendy M. Calvin, Ph.D., Advisor Simon R. Poulson, Ph.D., Committee Member Glenn C. Miller, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School December, 2015 i Abstract: Acid mine drainage (AMD) resulting from the oxidation of sulfides in mine waste is a major environmental issue facing the mining industry today. Open pit mines, tailings ponds, ore stockpiles, and waste rock dumps can all be significant sources of pollution, primarily heavy metals. These large mining-induced footprints are often located across vast geographic expanses and are difficult to access. With the continuing advancement of imaging satellites, remote sensing may provide a useful monitoring tool for pit lake water quality and the rapid assessment of abandoned mine sites. This study explored the applications of laboratory spectroscopy and multi-season hyperspectral remote sensing for environmental monitoring of mine waste environments.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.1 Historic Period Human Interaction with the Watershed
    Upper Carson River Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment 5. Human Interaction With the Watershed 5.1 Historic Period Human Interaction With the Watershed The purpose of this section is to summarize human activities that have had some effect on the Carson River watershed in Alpine County, California. Regional prehistory and ethnography are summarized by Nevers (1976), Elston (1982), d’Azevedo (1986), and Lindstrom et al. (2000). Details of regional history can be found in Maule (1938), Jackson (1964), Dangberg (1972), Clark (1977), Murphy (1982), Marvin (1997), and other sources. A book published by the Centennial Book Committee (1987) contains an excellent selection of historic photographs. Particularly useful is a study on the historical geography of Alpine County by Howatt (1968). 5.1.1 Prehistoric Land Use Human habitation of the Upper Carson River Watershed extends thousands of years back into antiquity. Archaeological evidence suggests use of the area over at least the last 8,000 to 9,000 years. For most of that time, the land was home to small bands of Native Americans. Their number varied over time, depending on regional environmental conditions. For at least the last 2,000 years, the Washoe occupied the Upper Carson River Watershed. Ethnographic data provides clues as to past land use and land management practices (see extended discussions in Downs 1966; Blackburn and Anderson 1993; Lindstrom et al. 2000; Rucks 2002). A broad range of aboriginal harvesting and hunting practices, fishing, and camp tending would have affected the landscape and ecology of the study area. Shrubs such as service berry and willow were pruned to enhance growth.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE GUIDE to Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water
    REFERENCE GUIDE to Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water March 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation EPA 542-R-14-001 Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 Notice and Disclaimer..................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 9 Passive Technologies Technology: Anoxic Limestone Drains ........................................................................................ 11 Technology: Successive Alkalinity Producing Systems (SAPS).................................................. 16 Technology: Aluminator© ............................................................................................................ 19 Technology: Constructed Wetlands .............................................................................................. 23 Technology: Biochemical Reactors .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Water Trust Network
    RESTORING CARSON MEADOWS: ASSESSMENT AND PRIORITIZATION A report supported by the National Fish and Wildlife February 2018 Foundation Results of a broadly-collaborative effort to prioritize meadows in the Carson River Watershed for restoration. Restoring Carson Meadows Restoring Carson Meadows: Assessment and Prioritization Julie Fair, Luke Hunt, Meg Hanley and Jacob Dyste 2018. Restoring Carson Meadows: Assessment and Prioritization. A report by American Rivers submitted to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Page 1 Restoring Carson Meadows CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 THE CARSON WATERSHED .................................................................................................. 4 METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION OF CONDITION DATA ............................................................ 7 PRIORITIES ........................................................................................................................... 9 PRIORITIZATION FOR LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT ................................................. 14 INFLUENCE OF BEAVER ..................................................................................................... 14 CONCLUSION
    [Show full text]
  • Carson River Geographic Response Plan
    Carson River Geographic Response Plan Final Alpine County, California and Douglas, Carson City, Lyon, Churchill Counties, Nevada April 2006 Prepared by: Carson & Walker Rivers Area Committee (CWRAC) Carson River Geographic Response Plan April 2006 Acknowledgements The Carson River Geographic Response Plan (CRGRP) was developed through a collaborative effort between the local, state, and federal government agencies listed below. Local Government • Carson City Fire • Douglas County Emergency Management • East Fork Fire and Paramedic District • Lyon County Sheriff’s Office • Mason Valley Fire • Mono County Conservation District State Government • California Department of Fish and Game, Office of Spill Prevention and Response • California Office of Emergency Services • Nevada Division of Emergency Management • Nevada Division of Environmental Protection • Nevada Highway Patrol Tribal Government • Washo Tribe Federal Government • U.S. Bureau of Land Management • U.S. Department of Agriculture Carson Valley Conservation District • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IX o U.S. EPA Region IX Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START), Ecology & Environment, Inc. • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service i Carson River Geographic Response Plan April 2006 If this is an Emergency… …Involving a release or threatened release of hazardous materials, petroleum products, or other contaminants impacting public health and/or the environment Most important – Protect yourself and others! Then: 1) Turn to the Immediate Action Guide (Yellow Tab) for initial steps taken in a hazardous material, petroleum product, or other contaminant emergency. 2) Make the initial notification to Dispatch by dialing 911. Dispatch will make the Mandatory Notifications. A list of county dispatch centers is on page R-2 of this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA-Management and Treatment of Water from Hard Rock Mines
    Management and Treatment of Water from Hard Rock Mines 1.0 PURPOSE Index The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Engineering Issues 1.0 PURPOSE are a new series of technology transfer documents that summarize the 2.0 SUMMARY latest available information on selected treatment and site remediation technologies and related issues. They are designed to help remedial 3.0 INTRODUCTION project managers (RPMs), on-scene coordinators (OSCs), contractors, 3.1 Background: Environmental Problems and other site managers understand the type of data and site charac­ at Hard-Rock Mines teristics needed to evaluate a technology for potential applicability to 3.2 Conceptual Models at Hard-Rock their specific sites. Each Engineering Issue document is developed in Mines conjunction with a small group of scientists inside the EPA and with 3.3 The Process of Selecting Remedial outside consultants, and relies on peer-reviewed literature, EPA re­ Technologies ports, Internet sources, current research, and other pertinent informa­ 3.4 Resources for Additional Information tion. The purpose of this document is to present the “state of the sci­ ence” regarding management and treatment of hard-rock mines. 4.0 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTIONS 4.1 Source Control Internet links are provided for readers interested in additional infor­ 4.1.1 Capping and Revegetation for mation; these Internet links, verifi ed as accurate at the time of publi­ Source Control cation, are subject to change. 4.1.2 Plugging Drainage Sources and Interception of Drainage by Diversion Wells 2.0 SUMMARY 4.1.3 Prevention of Acid Drainage via Contaminated water draining from hard rock mine sites continues Protective Neutralization to be a water quality problem in many parts of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Carson River Aquatic Trail Plan August 4, 2006
    DRAFT Carson River Aquatic Trail Plan August 4, 2006 DRAFT Prepared for: CARSON CITY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3303 Butti Way, Building #9 Carson City, Nevada 89701 Prepared by: RESOURCE CONCEPTS, INC. 340 N. Minnesota Street Carson City, NV 89703-4152 Carson River Aquatic Trail Plan August 4, 2006 DRAFT Prepared for: CARSON CITY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3303 Butti Way, Building #9 Carson City, Nevada 89701 Prepared by: RESOURCE CONCEPTS, INC. 340 N. Minnesota Street Carson City, NV 89703-4152 DRAFT Table of Contents Page 10.0 CARSON RIVER AQUATIC TRAIL...........................................................................1 10.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CARSON RIVER..................................................................... 1 10.1.1 River Hydrology ............................................................................................................... 1 10.1.2 General River Terminology.............................................................................................. 3 10.1.3 River Anatomy and Common River Hazards.................................................................... 4 10.1.4 Hazardous Dams on the Carson River............................................................................. 5 10.2 JURISDICTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 10.2.1 The State of Nevada.......................................................................................................... 5 10.2.2 Property
    [Show full text]
  • Carson River Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan, Part 1
    CARSON RIVER WATERSHED “Our Lifeline in the Desert” Adaptive Stewardship Plan Prepared by: CarsonCarson WaterWater SSubconservancyubconservancy DDistrictistrict Alpine County, California Carson City, Nevada Churchill County, Nevada Douglas County, Nevada Lyon County, Nevada CarsonCarson RiverRiver CoalitionCoalition CarsonCarson ValleyValley ConservationConservation DistrictDistrict DaytonDayton ValleyValley ConservationConservation DistrictDistrict WesternWestern NevadaNevada ResourceResource ConservationConservation andand DevelopmentDevelopment NaturalNatural ResourcesResources ConservationConservation ServiceService LyonLyon CountyCounty GISGIS DepartmentDepartment C.G.C.G. CelioCelio andand SonsSons Co.Co. Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - Water Quality Planning June 2006 DRAFT CARSON RIVER WATERSHED “Our Lifeline in the Desert” Adaptive Stewardship Plan Prepared by: Carson Water Subconservancy District Alpine County, California Carson City, Nevada Churchill County, Nevada Douglas County, Nevada Lyon County, Nevada Lyon County GIS Department Carson Valley Conservation District Dayton Valley Conservation District Western Nevada Resource Conservation and Development Natural Resource Conservation Service C.G. Celio and Sons Co. In Cooperation with: Carson River Coalition Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - Water Quality Planning May 2007 Carson River Watershed Stewardship Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following were
    [Show full text]