DOCSLIB.ORG

Transport of Fatty Acid Molecules by Lipoprotein Micelles in the Human

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transport of Fatty Acid Molecules by Lipoprotein Micelles in the Human Transport of Fatty Acid Molecules by Lipoprotein Micelles in the Human Body By: Minxue Jia A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Baltimore, Maryland May, 2018 Abstract Though the death rate from coronary heart disease (CHD) has declined over the last several decades, CHD still remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Multiple lines of evidence have confirmed that Apo B-containing lipoproteins are involved in the development of atherosclerosis. The function of Apo B-containing lipoproteins is to transfer fatty acids and other lipids to peripheral organs. Two computational and mathematical methods, a deterministic ODE model and the stochastic Gillespie algorithm, are applied to model the complex lipoprotein transport and lipid metabolism of the human body for a better understanding of human’s lipid transfer system and its relationship to atherosclerosis. The ODE model is a set of differential equations which tracks the lipoproteins with an assumption of one-step transition between lipoprotein groups. While the Gillespie algorithm simulates the possible states for each lipoprotein at each step, which enables subtle track of lipoprotein transition. The two modeling methods provide a way to look at fatty acid transport qualitatively and quantitatively. The goal of this research is to obtain insight into fatty acid transport in the human body and develop strategies to prevent and treat atherosclerosis. Thesis Committee: Marc D. Donohue, Professor of Chemical Engineering Michael J. Betenbaugh, Professor of Chemical Engineering ii Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. iv List of Figure ........................................................................................................................ v List of Table ........................................................................................................................ vi Chapter 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Atherosclerosis ...................................................................................................................2 1.2 Apo B Lipoproteins ............................................................................................................3 1.3 HDL & Reverse Cholesterol Transfer ................................................................................9 1.4 Lipase .............................................................................................................................. 10 1.5 CETP & PLTP ................................................................................................................. 11 1.6 Small dense LDL .............................................................................................................. 12 Modeling and Results ......................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2. Ordinary Differential Equation Model ............................................................. 14 2.1 The lipoprotein species and transition ................................................................................... 14 2.2 Organ lipids and formation of lipoprotein ............................................................................. 15 2.3 Cholesterol ester transfer protein and sdLDL ....................................................................... 15 2.4 LDL receptor & LDL receptor related protein ...................................................................... 16 2.5 Results ................................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 3. Modified Gillespie algorithm: ........................................................................... 28 3.1 Grouped Gillespie algorithm ................................................................................................. 28 3.2 The three tracks .................................................................................................................... 29 3.3 Organ lipids and formation of lipoprotein ............................................................................. 29 3.4 Circulation: ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.5 Lipoprotein lipase .................................................................................................................. 30 3.6 Hepatic lipase ........................................................................................................................ 31 3.7 Cholesteryl ester transfer protein .......................................................................................... 31 3.8 LDL receptor ......................................................................................................................... 32 3.9 Result .................................................................................................................................... 32 3.10 Limitation ............................................................................................................................ 34 Chapter 4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 36 Reference ........................................................................................................................... 37 Appendix ............................................................................................................................ 44 Appendix I Parameter for ODE .................................................................................................. 44 Appendix II Differential Equation & Matlab Code for ODE....................................................... 46 Appendix III Matlab Code for Modified Gillespie algorithms ..................................................... 76 Curriculum Vitae ............................................................................................................... 91 iii Acknowledgements I would like to greatly thank Professor Donohue for being my research advisor and for all of his guidance. I learned to model and apply computational & mathematical methods to solve complex problems from Professor Donohue’s teaching and mentoring. His support has always pushed me to strive in his lab. I would also like to thank Professor Betenbaugh for being on my thesis committee. Not only did his feedback help me understand my own research better, he kept me focused on the task at hand. In addition, I would like to thank the other students Denis Routkevitch, Gabriella Russo, Victoria Laney, Junyi Rao and Tiankai Zhang, who have helped me for my research work. Lastly, I would like to thank my friends and family, especially my parents, who have supported and helped me throughout this process and deserve all of the credit. iv List of Figure FIGURE 1. APOLIPOPROTEIN TRANSFER BETWEEN LIPOPROTEINS 6 FIGURE 2. LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM 8 FIGURE 3. CETP ACTIVITY AND LDLS & HDLS 16 FIGURE 4. CM AND CMR CONCENTRATION AT HOMEOSTASIS STATE 17 FIGURE 5. VLDL AND IDL CONCENTRATION AT HOMEOSTASIS STATE 18 FIGURE 6. LDL CONCENTRATION AT HOMEOSTASIS STATE 18 FIGURE 7. HDL CONCENTRATION AT HOMEOSTASIS STATE 19 FIGURE 8. LIPID CONCENTRATION AND CHOLESTEROL CONTENT IN VLDL AT HOMEOSTASIS STATE 19 FIGURE 9. CM AND CMR CONCENTRATION AFTER INCREASED DIETARY LIPID INTAKE 20 FIGURE 10. VLDL & IDL CONCENTRATION AFTER INCREASED DIETARY LIPID INTAKE 21 FIGURE 11. LDL CONCENTRATION AFTER INCREASED DIETARY LIPID INTAKE 22 FIGURE 12. HDL CONCENTRATION AFTER INCREASED DIETARY LIPID INTAKE 22 FIGURE 13. HEPATIC TRIGLYCERIDE & CHOLESTEROL AFTER INCREASED DIETARY LIPID INTAKE 23 FIGURE 14. LIPID CONCENTRATION AND CHOLESTEROL CONTENT IN VLDL AFTER INCREASED DIETARY LIPID INTAKE 24 FIGURE 15. VLDL & IDL CONCENTRATION WHEN VLDL GENERATION IS LIMITED 25 FIGURE 16.LDL CONCENTRATION WHEN VLDL GENERATION IS LIMITED 25 FIGURE 17. HDL CONCENTRATION WHEN VLDL GENERATION IS LIMITED 26 FIGURE 18. LIPIDS CONCENTRATION AND AVERAGE CHOLESTEROL CONTENT IN VLDL WHEN VLDL GENERATION IS LIMITED 27 FIGURE 19. COMPOSITION OF EACH TYPE OF LIPOPROTEIN 33 FIGURE 20. BODY CONCENTRATION THROUGH TIME 33 FIGURE 21. ORGAN COMPOSITION. 34 v List of Table TABLE 1. LIPOPROTEIN SIZE, DENSITY, CONCENTRATION, COMPOSITION AND APOLIPOPROTEI 4 TABLE 2. VOLUME AND BLOOD FLOW RATE OF ORGANS 44 TABLE 3. COMPOSITION OF LIPOPROTEINS IN MOLE 44 TABLE 4. TRIGLYCERIDE CONCENTRATION OF ORGANS 44 TABLE 5. CHOLESTEROL CONCENTRATION OF ORGANS 45 TABLE 6. FATTY ACID PROFILE AND TRIGLYCERIDE MOLAR MASS 45 vi Chapter 1. Introduction The death rate from coronary heart disease (CHD) has declined noticeably recently, but CHD remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States. 1 The CHD is a disease in which a waxy substance called plaque builds up inside the coronary arteries. Coronary arteries are the heart’s network of blood vessels, and they supply oxygen-rich blood to the body. The lack of oxygen-rich blood to portions of the heart muscle leads to ischemia of myocardial tissues and consequent alteration of heart function. 2 Atherosclerosis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Postprandial Lipid Metabolism: an Overview by RICHARD J
    Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (1997), 56, 659466 659 Guest Lecture Postprandial lipid metabolism: an overview BY RICHARD J. HAVEL Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA Since the original investigations of Gage & Fish (1924) on the dynamics of large chylo- micron particles during postprandial lipaemia, measurements of triacylglycerol-rich lipo- proteins (TRL) after ingestion of fat-rich meals have been utilized to provide information about the metabolism of these intestinal lipoprotein particles in vivo. There are many similarities, however, between the metabolism of chylomicrons and hepatogenous VLDL (Havel, 1989), so that observations in the postprandial state may provide generally ap- plicable information about the regulation of TRL metabolism. Recently, it has become possible to distinguish the dynamics of chylomicron and VLDL particles separately by analysing the fluctuations of the concentrations of the two forms of apolipoprotein (apo) B with which they are associated B-48 and B-100 respectively (Havel, 1994). The overall pathway of absorption of dietary lipids has long been known and the rapid clearance and metabolism of chylomicron triacylglycerols was appreciated early in this century. The modern era of research in this area, however, had to await the development of methods to separate and characterize plasma lipoproteins (Gofman et al. 1949; Havel et af. 1955) and was greatly stimulated by the discovery of lipoprotein lipase (EC 3.1.1.34; Korn, 1955) and the demonstration that genetic deficiency of this enzyme dramatically reduces the rate of clearance of dietary fat from the blood (Havel & Gordon, 1960). Related physiological studies showed that chylomicron triacylglycerols are rapidly hydrolysed and that their products, free fatty acids (FFA), are concomitantly released and transported in the blood bound to albumin (Havel & Fredrickson, 1956).
    [Show full text]
  • LRP2 Is Associated with Plasma Lipid Levels 311 Original Article
    310 Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis Vol.14, No.6 LRP2 is Associated with Plasma Lipid Levels 311 Original Article Genetic Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 2 (LRP2) with Plasma Lipid Levels Akiko Mii1, 2, Toshiaki Nakajima2, Yuko Fujita1, Yasuhiko Iino1, Kouhei Kamimura3, Hideaki Bujo4, Yasushi Saito5, Mitsuru Emi2, and Yasuo Katayama1 1Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Neurology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan. 2Department of Molecular Biology-Institute of Gerontology, Nippon Medical School, Kawasaki, Japan. 3Awa Medical Association Hospital, Chiba, Japan. 4Department of Genome Research and Clinical Application, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. 5Department of Clinical Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. Aim: Not all genetic factors predisposing phenotypic features of dyslipidemia have been identified. We studied the association between the low density lipoprotein-related protein 2 gene (LRP2) and levels of plasma total cholesterol (T-Cho) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) among 352 adults in Japan. Methods: Subjects were obtained from among participants in a cohort study that was carried out with health-check screening in an area of east-central Japan. We selected 352 individuals whose LDL-C levels were higher than 140 mg/dL from the initially screened 22,228 people. We assessed the relation between plasma cholesterol levels and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the LRP2 gene. Results:
    [Show full text]
  • Apoa5genetic Variants Are Markers for Classic Hyperlipoproteinemia
    CLINICAL RESEARCH CLINICAL RESEARCH www.nature.com/clinicalpractice/cardio APOA5 genetic variants are markers for classic hyperlipoproteinemia phenotypes and hypertriglyceridemia 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 Jian Wang , Matthew R Ban , Brooke A Kennedy , Sonia Anand , Salim Yusuf , Murray W Huff , Rebecca L Pollex and Robert A Hegele1* SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Hypertriglyceridemia is a common biochemical Background Several known candidate gene variants are useful markers for diagnosing hyperlipoproteinemia. In an attempt to identify phenotype that is observed in up to 5% of adults. other useful variants, we evaluated the association of two common A plasma triglyceride concentration above APOA5 single-nucleotide polymorphisms across the range of classic 1.7 mmol/l is a defining component of the meta­ 1 hyperlipoproteinemia phenotypes. bolic syndrome and is associated with several comorbidities, including increased risk of cardio­ Methods We assessed plasma lipoprotein profiles and APOA5 S19W and vascular disease2 and pancreatitis.3,4 Factors, –1131T>C genotypes in 678 adults from a single tertiary referral lipid such as an imbalance between caloric intake and clinic and in 373 normolipidemic controls matched for age and sex, all of expenditure, excessive alcohol intake, diabetes, European ancestry. and use of certain medications, are associated Results We observed significant stepwise relationships between APOA5 with hypertriglyceridemia; however, genetic minor allele carrier frequencies and plasma triglyceride quartiles. The factors are also important.5,6 odds ratios for hyperlipoproteinemia types 2B, 3, 4 and 5 in APOA5 S19W Complex traits, such as plasma triglyceride carriers were 3.11 (95% CI 1.63−5.95), 4.76 (2.25−10.1), 2.89 (1.17−7.18) levels, usually do not follow Mendelian patterns of and 6.16 (3.66−10.3), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Lrp1 Modulators
    Last updated on February 14, 2021 Cognitive Vitality Reports® are reports written by neuroscientists at the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF). These scientific reports include analysis of drugs, drugs-in- development, drug targets, supplements, nutraceuticals, food/drink, non-pharmacologic interventions, and risk factors. Neuroscientists evaluate the potential benefit (or harm) for brain health, as well as for age-related health concerns that can affect brain health (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes/metabolic syndrome). In addition, these reports include evaluation of safety data, from clinical trials if available, and from preclinical models. Lrp1 Modulators Evidence Summary Lrp1 has a variety of essential functions, mediated by a diverse array of ligands. Therapeutics will need to target specific interactions. Neuroprotective Benefit: Lrp1-mediated interactions promote Aβ clearance, Aβ generation, tau propagation, brain glucose utilization, and brain lipid homeostasis. The therapeutic effect will depend on the interaction targeted. Aging and related health concerns: Lrp1 plays mixed roles in cardiovascular diseases and cancer, dependent on context. Lrp1 is dysregulated in metabolic disease, which may contribute to insulin resistance. Safety: Broad-spectrum Lrp1 modulators are untenable therapeutics due to the high potential for extensive side effects. Therapies that target a specific Lrp1-ligand interaction are expected to have a better therapeutic profile. 1 Last updated on February 14, 2021 Availability: Research use Dose: N/A Chemical formula: N/A S16 is in clinical trials MW: N/A Half life: N/A BBB: Angiopep is a peptide that facilitates BBB penetrance by interacting with Lrp1 Clinical trials: S16, an Lrp1 Observational studies: sLrp1 levels are agonist was tested in healthy altered in Alzheimer’s disease, volunteers (n=10) in a Phase 1 cardiovascular disease, and metabolic study.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusterin and LRP2 Are Critical Components of the Hypothalamic Feeding Regulatory Pathway
    ARTICLE Received 21 Sep 2012 | Accepted 16 Apr 2013 | Published 14 May 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2896 Clusterin and LRP2 are critical components of the hypothalamic feeding regulatory pathway So Young Gil1, Byung-Soo Youn2, Kyunghee Byun3,4, Hu Huang5, Churl Namkoong1, Pil-Geum Jang1, Joo-Yong Lee1, Young-Hwan Jo6, Gil Myoung Kang1, Hyun-Kyong Kim1, Mi-Seon Shin7, Claus U. Pietrzik8, Bonghee Lee3,4, Young-Bum Kim3,5 & Min-Seon Kim1,7 Hypothalamic feeding circuits are essential for the maintenance of energy balance. There have been intensive efforts to discover new biological molecules involved in these pathways. Here we report that central administration of clusterin, also called apolipoprotein J, causes anorexia, weight loss and activation of hypothalamic signal transduction-activated transcript-3 in mice. In contrast, inhibition of hypothalamic clusterin action results in increased food intake and body weight, leading to adiposity. These effects are likely mediated through the mutual actions of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-2, a potential receptor for clusterin, and the long-form leptin receptor. In response to clusterin, the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-2 binding to long-form leptin receptor is greatly enhanced in cultured neuronal cells. Furthermore, long-form leptin receptor deficiency or hypothalamic low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-2 suppression in mice leads to impaired hypothalamic clusterin signalling and actions. Our study identifies the hypotha- lamic clusterin–low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-2 axis as a novel anorexigenic signalling pathway that is tightly coupled with long-form leptin receptor-mediated signalling. 1 Asan Institute for Life Science, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout 11 Lipoprotein Metabolism
    Handout 11 Lipoprotein Metabolism ANSC/NUTR 618 LIPIDS & LIPID METABOLISM Lipoprotein Metabolism I. Chylomicrons (exogenous pathway) A. 83% triacylglycerol, 2% protein, 8% cholesterol plus cholesterol esters, 7% phospholipid (esp. phosphatidylcholine) B. Secreted as nascent chylomicrons from mucosal cells with ApoB48 and ApoA1 C. Acquire ApoC1, C2, and C3 in blood (from high-density lipoproteins) 1. ApoC1 activates lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT; in blood) and ApoC2 activates lipoprotein lipase. ApoC3 prevents uptake by the liver. 2. Required for conversion of chylomicrons to remnant particles. D. Triacylgycerols are removed from chylomicrons at extrahepatic tissues by lipoprotein lipase (LPL). E. Chylomicron remnants are taken up by the LDL-receptor-related protein (LRP). Exceptions: In birds, the lymphatic system is poorly developed. Instead, pro-microns are formed, which enter the hepatic portal system (like bile salts) and are transported directly to the liver. 1 Handout 11 Lipoprotein Metabolism Ruminants do not synthesis chylomicrons primarily due to low fat intake. Rather, their dietary fats are transported from the small intestine as very low-density lipoproteins. F. Lipoprotein lipase 1. Lipoprotein lipase is synthesized by various cells (e.g., adipose tissue, cardiac and skeletal muscle) and secreted to the capillary endothelial cells. a. LPL is bound to the endothelial cells by a heparin sulfate bond. b. LPL requires lipoproteins (i.e., apoC2) for activity, hence the name. 2. TAG within the chylomicrons and VLDL are hydrolyzed to NEFA, glycerol, and 2-MAG. a. NEFA and 2-MAG are taken up the tissues and reesterified to TAG b. Glycerol is taken up by the liver for metabolism and converted to G-3-P by glycerol kinase (not present in adipose tissue).
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Expression of Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein Is Controlled by Receptor-Associated Protein in Vivo THOMAS E
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 92, pp. 4537-4541, May 1995 Cell Biology Functional expression of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein is controlled by receptor-associated protein in vivo THOMAS E. WILLNOW*, SCOTr A. ARMSTRONG*, ROBERT E. HAMMERt, AND JOACHIM HERZ* Departments of *Molecular Genetics and tBiochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235 Communicated by Joseph L. Goldstein, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, February 15, 1995 ABSTRACT The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein terminal HNEL tetraamino acid motif has prompted Strick- (RAP) associates with the multifunctional low density li- land et al (32) to propose a possible role of the KDEL receptor poprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein (LRP) and thereby in the process. When RAP is overexpressed the retention prevents the binding of all known ligands, including a2- system becomes saturated and RAP is secreted from the cell, macroglobulin and chylomicron remnants. RAP is predomi- resulting in autocrine/paracrine inhibition of LRP function in nantly localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, raising the vitro and in vivo. We have used this effect in a previous study possibility that it functions as a chaperone or escort protein (33) to provide evidence that LRP participates in the clearance in the biosynthesis or intracellular transport of LRP. Here we of remnant lipoproteins by the liver. have used gene targeting to show that RAP promotes the Based on its biochemical properties RAP has been proposed expression of functional LRP in vivo. The amount of mature, to function as a chaperone during biosynthesis, as an escort processed LRP is reduced in liver and brain of RAP-deficient protein within the secretory pathway, and as a short-acting mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Postprandial Lipoprotein Metabolism: VLDL Vs Chylomicrons
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Postprandial lipoprotein metabolism: VLDL vs chylomicrons. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wx8p0x5 Journal Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 412(15-16) ISSN 0009-8981 Authors Nakajima, Katsuyuki Nakano, Takamitsu Tokita, Yoshiharu et al. Publication Date 2011-07-01 DOI 10.1016/j.cca.2011.04.018 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Clinica Chimica Acta 412 (2011) 1306–1318 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Clinica Chimica Acta journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/clinchim Invited critical review Postprandial lipoprotein metabolism: VLDL vs chylomicrons Katsuyuki Nakajima a,b,d,e,i,⁎, Takamitsu Nakano a,b, Yoshiharu Tokita a, Takeaki Nagamine a, Akihiro Inazu c, Junji Kobayashi d, Hiroshi Mabuchi d, Kimber L. Stanhope e, Peter J. Havel e, Mitsuyo Okazaki f,g, Masumi Ai h,i, Akira Tanaka g,i a School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan b Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Tokushima, Japan c Department of Laboratory Sciences, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan d Department of Lipidology and Division of Cardiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan e Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA f Skylight Biotech Inc., Akita, Japan g Department of Vascular Medicine and
    [Show full text]
  • LRP1 Integrates Murine Macrophage Cholesterol Homeostasis And
    RESEARCH ARTICLE LRP1 integrates murine macrophage cholesterol homeostasis and inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis Xunde Xian1†*, Yinyuan Ding1,2†, Marco Dieckmann1†, Li Zhou1, Florian Plattner3,4, Mingxia Liu5, John S Parks5, Robert E Hammer6, Philippe Boucher7, Shirling Tsai8,9, Joachim Herz1,4,10,11* 1Departments of Molecular Genetics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States; 2Key Laboratory of Medical Electrophysiology, Ministry of Education of China, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China; 3Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States; 4Center for Translational Neurodegeneration Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States; 5Section on Molecular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; 6Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States; 7CNRS, UMR 7213, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, France; 8Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States; 9Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, United States; 10Department of Neuroscience, UT Southwestern, Dallas, United States; 11Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, UT Southwestern, Dallas, United States *For correspondence: [email protected] (XX); [email protected] Abstract Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) is a multifunctional cell (JH) surface
    [Show full text]
  • Apoa1 and Apoa1-Specific Self-Antibodies in Cardiovascular Disease Dimitry a Chistiakov1, Alexander N Orekhov2,3 and Yuri V Bobryshev2,4,5
    Laboratory Investigation (2016) 96, 708–718 © 2016 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0023-6837/16 $32.00 PATHOBIOLOGY IN FOCUS ApoA1 and ApoA1-specific self-antibodies in cardiovascular disease Dimitry A Chistiakov1, Alexander N Orekhov2,3 and Yuri V Bobryshev2,4,5 Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) is a main protein moiety in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles. Generally, ApoA1 and HDL are considered as atheroprotective. In prooxidant and inflammatory microenvironment in the vicinity to the atherosclerotic lesion, ApoA1/HDL are subjected to modification. The chemical modifications such as oxidation, nitration, etc result in altering native architecture of ApoA1 toward dysfunctionality and abnormality. Neutrophil myeloperoxidase has a prominent role in this mechanism. Neo-epitopes could be formed and then exposed that makes them immunogenic. Indeed, these epitopes may be recognized by immune cells and induce production of proatherogenic ApoA1-specific IgG antibodies. These antibodies are biologically relevant because they are able to react with Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 and TLR4 in target cells and induce a variety of pro-inflammatory responses. Epidemiological and functional studies underline a prognostic value of ApoA1 self-antibodies for several cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, and severe carotid stenosis. Laboratory Investigation (2016) 96, 708–718; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2016.56; published online 16 May 2016 Atherosclerosis-Associated Inflammation inflammation. These mediators also promote hyperplasia of At present, chronic inflammation is considered as a key VSMCs that begin to migrate and proliferate, and contribute pathophysiological mechanism in atherosclerosis.1 Inflamma- to the neointimal formation. Inflammatory mediators also tory reactions influence all studies of atherosclerotic progres- facilitate intraplaque neovascularization.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Fate of Chylomicron Phospholipids and Apoproteins in the Rat
    Metabolic Fate of Chylomicron Phospholipids and Apoproteins in the Rat Alan R. Tall, … , Robert M. Glickman, John W. Riley J Clin Invest. 1979;64(4):977-989. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109564. Research Article To study the metabolic fate of chylomicron phospholipid and apoproteins, 15 mg of doubly labeled (3[H]leu, [32P]phospholipid) rat mesenteric lymph chylomicrons were injected as an intravenous bolus into conscious rats. The specific radioactivity, composition, pool size, and morphology of the plasma lipoproteins were determined after 2-60 min. After injection of chylomicrons, there was a rapid transfer of radioactivity into high density lipoproteins (HDL). At peak specific activity in HDL (2-5 min), 35% of injected apoprotein and 25% of phospholipid radioactivity were recovered in HDL (d 1.063-1.21 g/ml), with smaller recoveries in other lipoproteins and liver. There was an initial rapid rise of3 2P specific activity in HDL and d 1.02-1.063 lipoproteins (low density lipoproteins [LDL]), but whereas LDL specific activity subsequently converged with that of d < 1.02 lipoproteins, HDL specific activity decayed more rapidly than LDL ord < 1.02 lipoproteins. Lipolysis of chylomicrons was associated with a transfer of phospholipid mass into LDL and HDL. At 5 min, 80% of injected triglyceride had been lipolyzed and there was a significant increase in phospholipid mass in LDL and a smaller increase in HDL. At 10 min, the mass of phospholipid in LDL had returned towards control values, and there was a further increase in phospholipid mass in HDL, which suggested phospholipid transfer from LDL to HDL.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 in Lipid Metabolism, Glucose Homeostasis and Inflammation
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Role of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 in Lipid Metabolism, Glucose Homeostasis and Inflammation Virginia Actis Dato 1,2 and Gustavo Alberto Chiabrando 1,2,* 1 Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000HUA, Argentina; [email protected] 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología (CIBICI), Córdoba X5000HUA, Argentina * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +54-351-4334264 (ext. 3431) Received: 6 May 2018; Accepted: 13 June 2018; Published: 15 June 2018 Abstract: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a highly prevalent disorder which can be used to identify individuals with a higher risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. This metabolic syndrome is characterized by a combination of physiological, metabolic, and molecular alterations such as insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and central obesity. The low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1—A member of the LDL receptor family) is an endocytic and signaling receptor that is expressed in several tissues. It is involved in the clearance of chylomicron remnants from circulation, and has been demonstrated to play a key role in the lipid metabolism at the hepatic level. Recent studies have shown that LRP1 is involved in insulin receptor (IR) trafficking and intracellular signaling activity, which have an impact on the regulation of glucose homeostasis in adipocytes, muscle cells, and brain. In addition, LRP1 has the potential to inhibit or sustain inflammation in macrophages, depending on its cellular expression, as well as the presence of particular types of ligands in the extracellular microenvironment.
    [Show full text]