DOCSLIB.ORG

Asset Allocation Diversification – 20 Years of the Best and Worst Everyone Wants to Be in the Best-Performing Asset Class Every Year

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asset Allocation Diversification – 20 Years of the Best and Worst Everyone Wants to Be in the Best-Performing Asset Class Every Year Asset Allocation Diversification – 20 Years of the Best and Worst Everyone wants to be in the best-performing asset class every year. The thing is, few people are savvy enough to consistently choose the best. That’s why diversification is key. This chart shows annual returns for eight broad-based asset classes, cash and a diversified portfolio ranked from best to worst. Notice how the “leadership” changes from year to year, and how competitively the diversified portfolio performed over 20 years (see the “average” column). 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 AVERAGE Small/ Large Cap Small/ Large Cap Small/ Large Cap Large Cap Large Cap REITs Commodities REITs Commodities REITs Commodities Bonds REITs Bonds REITs REITs Cash REITs Mid Cap Growth Mid Cap Growth Mid Cap Growth Growth Growth 15.50% 25.91% 30.41% 21.36% 34.35% 16.23% 5.24% 27.58% 7.84% 20.14% 27.15% 1.86% 9.71% 45.51% 37.21% 36.80% 5.67% 17.59% 30.21% 36.39% 38.49% Global Large Cap Global Small/ Small/ Small/ Large Cap Large Cap Large Small/ Small/ Bonds International International International International REITs REITs International Bonds REITs Bonds Growth Bonds Mid Cap Mid Cap Mid Cap Growth Value Cap Value Mid Cap Mid Cap BEST 8.44% 38.59% 20.25% 13.54% 26.34% 7.28% 2.29% 25.03% 0.01% 28.07% 16.53% 11.81% 4.79% 34.39% 26.71% 17.88% 33.48% 13.45% 17.34% 19.99% 9.44% Small/ Large Cap Global Large Cap Large Cap Large Cap Small/ Global Small/ Diversified Large Cap Cash Bonds REITs REITs International Cash International Commodities Bonds Commodities Mid Cap Value Bonds Value Value Growth Mid Cap Bonds Mid Cap Portfolio Growth 4.09% 10.25% 38.47% 8.29% 11.17% 1.80% 31.78% 16.83% 0.55% 11.77% 18.29% 22.25% 5.64% 17.51% 32.53% 13.05% 16.81% -1.20% 27.77% 10.58% 8.27% Global Large Cap Large Cap Small/ Small/ Global Diversified Large Cap Large Cap Small/ Large Large Cap Large Cap Global Large Cap REITs REITs International International Cash REITs Bonds Value Value Mid Cap Mid Cap Bonds Portfolio Growth Growth Mid Cap Cap Value Growth Value Bonds Value 5.22% 27.45% 17.32% 22.78% 0.03% 9.28% 1.57% 30.03% 16.49% 8.11% 16.17% 9.48% -27.54% 16.71% 2.64% 7.07% 13.66% –1.51% 26.54% 9.20% 6.82% Small/ Large Cap Diversified Diversified Diversified Diversified Diversified Large Cap Large Cap Diversified Diversified Diversified Diversified Cash Bonds Commodities Bonds International REITs International International Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Value Growth Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio 1.70% 6.97% –35.65% 5.97% -0.81% –4.10% 22.01% 7.82% 1.22% 29.75% 14.48% 7.92% 15.02% 23.72% 15.73% 0.39% 15.26% 13.41% 8.72% 13.21% 6.65% Diversified Diversified Diversified Global Large Cap Large Cap Small/ Large Cap Large Cap Diversified Diversified Small/ Large Cap Diversified Diversified Cash Cash REITs REITs Bonds Bonds Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Bonds Value Growth Mid Cap Value Value Portfolio Portfolio Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Portfolio RETURN ANNUAL 4.74% 0.08% 3.21% 9.27% 7.51% 4.83% –4.75% –2.91% 27.75% 9.27% 7.05% 9.07% –36.79% 19.69% 15.51% 12.02% 5.32% –2.90% 7.08% -5.98% 20.33% Large Cap Large Cap Large Cap Global Diversified Large Cap Diversified Global Global Global Global Large Large Global Commodities Commodities Commodities International Cash Bonds Bonds Value Value Growth Bonds Portfolio Value Portfolio Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Cap Value Cap Value Bonds 23.93% 9.15% 18.91% 7.75% 0.05% 2.65% 8.72% –5.59% –15.52% 5.26% 6.64% 4.69% –36.85% -0.16% 4.32% 0.59% –3.15% 7.39% –8.27% 2.80% 4.76% Global Large Cap Small/ Global Small/ Diversified Global Small/ Commodities International Cash Cash REITs Bonds Bonds Bonds Cash Bonds Commodities Cash International Bonds Growth Mid Cap Bonds Mid Cap Portfolio Bonds Mid Cap –19.51% –15.94% 3.00% 4.76% –37.34% 6.54% 4.21% –2.02% 0.03% 3.54% 7.69% 0.58% 4.50% 12.51% 6.30% 1.38% 6.93% –2.51% -3.33% 2.09% –10.00% Large Cap Small/ Large Cap Large Cap Global Global Large Global Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds International Cash International International Commodities Commodities Commodities Cash Growth Mid Cap Value Growth Bonds Bonds Cap Value Bonds 4.10% 4.34% 2.43% 4.33% 5.93% –12.14% 0.07% –4.90% 1.00% 1.70% –11.25% –3.12% 1.43% –20.42% –17.80% –0.17% –38.44% 5.54% –2.60% –3.83% 6.84% WORST Large Cap Global International Cash Cash Commodities REITs International Cash Cash Commodities Commodities Commodities Commodities Commodities Cash Cash International Cash REITs Commodities Growth Bonds –21.44% 1.07% 1.24% 2.07% –17.83% –43.38% 0.16% 0.13% –13.32% –1.06% –9.52% –17.01% –24.66% 0.27% 0.84% –13.79% 2.25% –5.86% –0.52% –27.88% –4.49% Source: SPAR, FactSet Research Systems Inc. MARKET SEGMENT REPRESENTED BY *20 YEARS ENDED 12/31/20 STANDARD DEVIATION* IMPORTANT RISK CONSIDERATIONS 1 Cash FTSE 3-month T-bill Index 0.45 International: Investing in foreign and/or emerging market securities involves interest rate, currency exchange rate, economic, Bonds Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index2 3.41 and political risks. These risks are magnified in emerging or developing markets as compared with domestic markets.Small/Mid Cap Global bonds Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index (Unhedged)3 5.48 stocks: Investing in small and/or mid-sized companies involves more risk than that customarily associated with investing in more- Diversified portfolio Equal allocations of all segments disclosed herein, excluding cash 11.20 established companies. Bonds: Bonds, if held to maturity, provide a fixed rate of return and a fixed principal value. Bond funds will Large Cap Value stocks Russell 1000® Value Index4 15.34 fluctuate and, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Commodities Bloomberg Commodity Index5 15.90 The historical performance of each index cited is provided to illustrate market trends; it does not represent the performance Large Cap Growth stocks Russell 1000® Growth Index6 16.55 of a particular MFS® investment product. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Index performance does not take into International stocks MSCI EAFE Index7 16.94 account fees and expenses. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investments you choose should correspond Small/Mid Cap stocks Russell 2500TM Index8 18.75 to your financial needs, goals, and risk tolerance. For assistance in determining your financial situation, consult an investment REITs FTSE NAREIT All REITs Total Return Index9 20.06 professional. For more information on any MFS product, including performance, please visit mfs.com. NOT FDIC INSURED • MAY LOSE VALUE • NO BANK GUARANTEE See next page for important information. Note that the diversified portfolio’s assets were rebalanced at the end of every quarter to maintain the equal allocations throughout the period. Standard deviation reflects a portfolio’s total return volatility, which is based on a minimum of 36 monthly returns. The larger the portfolio’s standard deviation, the greater the portfolio’s volatility. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss. A Case for Asset Allocation Diversification Looking to balance risk with potential returns? ASSET ALLOCATION STRATEGIES AND UNDERLYING FUNDS Diversifying your assets can work if you and your financial advisor or investment MUTUAL FUND CLASS I CLASS R6 CLASS A MORNINGSTAR CATEGORY professional also examine how much risk you’re willing to take. Finding your ASSET ALLOCATION STRATEGIES MFS® Conservative Allocation Fund MACIX — MACFX Allocation – 30% to 50% Equity comfort zone in the asset allocation pies below will help determine how your MFS® Moderate Allocation Fund MMAIX — MAMAX Allocation – 50% to 70% Equity ® assets could be invested. See the table at right for MFS portfolios to consider. MFS® Growth Allocation Fund MGWIX — MAGWX Allocation – 70% to 85% Equity MFS® Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund MIAGX — MAAGX Allocation – 85%+ Equity MFS® Conservative MFS® Growth Allocation Fund Allocation Fund U.S. EQUITY MFS® Growth Fund MFEIX MFEKX MFEGX Large Growth RISK 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 RISK 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 MFS® Mid Cap Growth Fund OTCIX OTCKX OTCAX Mid-Cap Growth Specialty/Alternative 4% Specialty/Alternative 8% MFS® Mid Cap Value Fund MCVIX MVCKX MVCAX Mid-Cap Value ® US Equity 28% Fixed Income 20% MFS New Discovery Fund MNDIX MNDKX MNDAX Small Growth MFS® New Discovery Value Fund* NDVIX NDVVX NDVAX Small Value Global/ ® Global/ International Equity 20% MFS Research Fund MRFIX MFRKX MFRFX Large Blend International Equity 8% MFS® Value Fund MEIIX MEIKX MEIAX Large Value US Equity 52% Fixed Income 60% GLOBAL/INTERNATIONAL EQUITY MFS® Emerging Markets Equity Fund MEMIX MEMJX MEMAX Diversified Emerging Markets MFS® Moderate MFS® Aggressive Growth MFS® International Growth Fund MQGIX MGRDX MGRAX Foreign Large Growth Allocation Fund Allocation Fund MFS® International New Discovery Fund**** MWNIX MIDLX MIDAX Foreign Small/Mid Growth ® RISK 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 RISK 10, 11, 13, 14 MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund*** MINIX MINJX MGIAX Foreign Large Growth MFS® Research International Fund MRSIX MRSKX MRSAX Foreign Large Blend Specialty/Alternative 6% Specialty/Alternative 10% FIXED INCOME US Equity 41% US Equity 60% MFS® Emerging Markets Debt Fund MEDIX MEDHX MEDAX Emerging Markets Bond Fixed Income 40% Global/ MFS® Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund EMLIX EMLNX EMLAX Emerging-Markets Local-Currency Bond International Equity 30% MFS® Global Bond Fund MGBJX MGBOX MGBAX World Bond Global/ International Equity 13% MFS® Government Securities Fund MGSIX MFGKX MFGSX Intermediate Government ® Target allocations shown.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asset Securitization
    L-Sec Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Asset Securitization Comptroller’s Handbook November 1997 L Liquidity and Funds Management Asset Securitization Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background 1 Definition 2 A Brief History 2 Market Evolution 3 Benefits of Securitization 4 Securitization Process 6 Basic Structures of Asset-Backed Securities 6 Parties to the Transaction 7 Structuring the Transaction 12 Segregating the Assets 13 Creating Securitization Vehicles 15 Providing Credit Enhancement 19 Issuing Interests in the Asset Pool 23 The Mechanics of Cash Flow 25 Cash Flow Allocations 25 Risk Management 30 Impact of Securitization on Bank Issuers 30 Process Management 30 Risks and Controls 33 Reputation Risk 34 Strategic Risk 35 Credit Risk 37 Transaction Risk 43 Liquidity Risk 47 Compliance Risk 49 Other Issues 49 Risk-Based Capital 56 Comptroller’s Handbook i Asset Securitization Examination Objectives 61 Examination Procedures 62 Overview 62 Management Oversight 64 Risk Management 68 Management Information Systems 71 Accounting and Risk-Based Capital 73 Functions 77 Originations 77 Servicing 80 Other Roles 83 Overall Conclusions 86 References 89 ii Asset Securitization Introduction Background Asset securitization is helping to shape the future of traditional commercial banking. By using the securities markets to fund portions of the loan portfolio, banks can allocate capital more efficiently, access diverse and cost- effective funding sources, and better manage business risks. But securitization markets offer challenges as well as opportunity. Indeed, the successes of nonbank securitizers are forcing banks to adopt some of their practices. Competition from commercial paper underwriters and captive finance companies has taken a toll on banks’ market share and profitability in the prime credit and consumer loan businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification
    WORKING PAPER NO. 212 Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification Luigi Guiso and Tullio Jappelli January 2009 University of Naples Federico II University of Salerno Bocconi University, Milan CSEF - Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS – UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES 80126 NAPLES - ITALY Tel. and fax +39 081 675372 – e-mail: [email protected] WORKING PAPER NO. 212 Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification Luigi Guiso and Tullio Jappelli Abstract In this paper we focus on poor financial literacy as one potential factor explaining lack of portfolio diversification. We use the 2007 Unicredit Customers’ Survey, which has indicators of portfolio choice, financial literacy and many demographic characteristics of investors. We first propose test-based indicators of financial literacy and document the extent of portfolio under-diversification. We find that measures of financial literacy are strongly correlated with the degree of portfolio diversification. We also compare the test-based degree of financial literacy with investors’ self-assessment of their financial knowledge, and find only a weak relation between the two measures, an issue that has gained importance after the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID) has required financial institutions to rate investors’ financial sophistication through questionnaires. JEL classification: E2, D8, G1 Keywords: Financial literacy, Portfolio diversification. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to the Unicredit Group, and particularly to Daniele Fano and Laura Marzorati, for letting us contribute to the design and use of the UCS survey. European University Institute and CEPR. Università di Napoli Federico II, CSEF and CEPR. Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. The portfolio diversification puzzle 3. The data 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Portfolio Currency-Hedging Decision, by Objective and Block by Block
    The portfolio currency-hedging decision, by objective and block by block Vanguard Research August 2018 Daren R. Roberts; Paul M. Bosse, CFA; Scott J. Donaldson, CFA, CFP ®; Matthew C. Tufano ■ Investors typically make currency-hedging decisions at the asset class rather than the portfolio level. The result can be an incomplete and even misleading perspective on the relationship between hedging strategy and portfolio objectives. ■ We present a framework that puts the typical asset-class approach in a portfolio context. This approach makes clear that the hedging decision depends on the strategic asset allocation decision that aligns a portfolio’s performance with an investor’s objectives. ■ A number of local market and idiosyncratic variables can modify this general rule, but this approach is a valuable starting point. It recognizes that the strategic asset allocation decision is the most important step toward meeting a portfolio’s goals. And hedging decisions that preserve the risk-and-return characteristics of the underlying assets lead to a portfolio-level hedging strategy that is consistent with the portfolio’s objectives. Investors often look at currency hedging from an asset- • The hedging framework begins with the investor’s class perspective—asking, for example, “Should I hedge risk–return preference. This feeds into the asset-class my international equity position?”1 Combining individual choices, then down to the decisions on diversification portfolio component hedging decisions results in and currency hedging. a portfolio hedge position. This begs the question: Is • Those with a long investment horizon who are a building-block approach the right way to arrive at the comfortable with equity’s high potential return and currency-hedging view for the entire portfolio? Does volatility will allocate more to that asset class.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Steps to an Effective Asset Allocation Step 1
    SIX STEPS TO AN EFFECTIVE ASSET ALLOCATION STEP 1 Define Your Goals Just as important as what you’re saving for is when you’ll need the money. Whether your goal is short term (up to three years), intermediate term (three to 10 years) or long term (10 years or longer) you will need to balance the amount of risk you are willing to assume with an investment strategy designed to meet your goal. The longer your time horizon, the more you should lean towards equities to take advantage of the potential returns historically associated with stock investments. The shorter your time horizon, the more you will need to weight your allocation toward fixed and cash investments to avoid the short- term volatility associated with stocks. If your aim is building retirement security, it’s important to remember that your time horizon extends far beyond the day you retire. Depending on when you retire, it is possible that your retirement will span 30 years or longer, which means your investments will need to keep working to provide future income and keep pace with inflation. Consider leaving some of your money invested in stocks, which provide the potential of growth to support your future needs. STEP 2 Gauge Your Risk Tolerance With investing, your risk tolerance should be based on two factors: your time horizon (see Step 1) and your attitude toward investment volatility. For example, if you’re not comfortable with the stock market’s inevitable ups and downs, you may be inclined to weight your portfolio toward fixed-income investments such as bonds and money markets.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Asset Class Categorization Guide
    2020 Asset Class Categorization Guide The purpose of this document is to further clarify the asset classes for the investment fees and commissions reporting requirements established by §802.103(a)(3) of the Texas Government Code and 40 TAC Chapter 609. The examples listed are not exhaustive. For investment products containing investments in more than one asset class, fees must be reported according to the corresponding asset class (e.g., a balanced fund comprised of 60% public equities and 40% fixed income). 1. Cash Cash and cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and near their maturity date. Examples include Treasury bills, commercial paper, and money market funds. 2. Fixed Income Fixed income generally comprises debt securities such as municipal or corporate bonds that provide returns in the form of fixed, periodic payments (e.g. interest or coupon payments) and the return of principal at maturity. Other examples include private debt, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), US Treasury securities, fixed income mutual funds and mortgage-backed securities. 3. Public Equity Equity securities are shares representing an ownership interest in a corporation. Examples of equities include domestic, international, and emerging market stocks, as well as equity mutual funds. 4. Real Assets Real assets are physical assets. They can include natural resources, commodities, and real estate investments such as real estate investment trusts (REITs), private real estate funds and direct investment in property. 5. Alternative/Other Investments that do not fit into any of the categories above may be classified as an alternative or other investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of BIS Derivatives Statistics1
    Eighth IFC Conference on “Statistical implications of the new financial landscape” Basel, 8–9 September 2016 Comparison of BIS derivatives statistics1 Philip Wooldridge, BIS 1 This paper was prepared for the meeting. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the BIS, the IFC or the central banks and other institutions represented at the meeting. September 2016 Comparison of BIS derivatives statistics Philip D Wooldridge1 A lot of information about derivatives is collected in various international datasets, mainly by the BIS, but demands from users for better derivatives statistics raise questions about what should be collected. The first phase of the G20 Data Gaps Initiative (DGI), which was launched in 2009 to close data gaps revealed by the crisis, recommended improvements to credit derivative statistics, and the second phase, launched in 2015, recommended investigating other improvements to derivatives statistics (IMF-FSB (2015)). Each set of derivatives statistics collected by the BIS was designed for a particular analytical use. Consequently, the statistics are neither closely integrated nor easily combined. Also, changes in derivatives markets pose challenges to the uses that the statistics were originally designed to meet (Tissot (2015)). There may be scope to increase the benefits of existing derivatives statistics, and reduce the overall costs, by merging some datasets and streamlining others. This note is intended to motivate discussions about possible changes to BIS derivatives statistics. It follows up on recommendation 6 from the second phase of the DGI, which asks the BIS to review the derivatives data collected for the international banking statistics and the semiannual survey of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
    [Show full text]
  • FX Effects: Currency Considerations for Multi-Asset Portfolios
    Investment Research FX Effects: Currency Considerations for Multi-Asset Portfolios Juan Mier, CFA, Vice President, Portfolio Analyst The impact of currency hedging for global portfolios has been debated extensively. Interest on this topic would appear to loosely coincide with extended periods of strength in a given currency that can tempt investors to evaluate hedging with hindsight. The data studied show performance enhancement through hedging is not consistent. From the viewpoint of developed markets currencies—equity, fixed income, and simple multi-asset combinations— performance leadership from being hedged or unhedged alternates and can persist for long periods. In this paper we take an approach from a risk viewpoint (i.e., can hedging lead to lower volatility or be some kind of risk control?) as this is central for outcome-oriented asset allocators. 2 “The cognitive bias of hindsight is The Debate on FX Hedging in Global followed by the emotion of regret. Portfolios Is Not New A study from the 1990s2 summarizes theoretical and empirical Some portfolio managers hedge papers up to that point. The solutions reviewed spanned those 50% of the currency exposure of advocating hedging all FX exposures—due to the belief of zero expected returns from currencies—to those advocating no their portfolio to ward off the pain of hedging—due to mean reversion in the medium-to-long term— regret, since a 50% hedge is sure to and lastly those that proposed something in between—a range of values for a “universal” hedge ratio. Later on, in the mid-2000s make them 50% right.” the aptly titled Hedging Currencies with Hindsight and Regret 3 —Hedging Currencies with Hindsight and Regret, took a behavioral approach to describe the difficulty and behav- Statman (2005) ioral biases many investors face when incorporating currency hedges into their asset allocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory
    Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Arbitrage Pricing Theory Gur Huberman Zhenyu Wang Staff Report no. 216 August 2005 This paper presents preliminary findings and is being distributed to economists and other interested readers solely to stimulate discussion and elicit comments. The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily reflective of views at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Arbitrage Pricing Theory Gur Huberman and Zhenyu Wang Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 216 August 2005 JEL classification: G12 Abstract Focusing on capital asset returns governed by a factor structure, the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) is a one-period model, in which preclusion of arbitrage over static portfolios of these assets leads to a linear relation between the expected return and its covariance with the factors. The APT, however, does not preclude arbitrage over dynamic portfolios. Consequently, applying the model to evaluate managed portfolios is contradictory to the no-arbitrage spirit of the model. An empirical test of the APT entails a procedure to identify features of the underlying factor structure rather than merely a collection of mean-variance efficient factor portfolios that satisfies the linear relation. Key words: arbitrage, asset pricing model, factor model Huberman: Columbia University Graduate School of Business (e-mail: [email protected]). Wang: Federal Reserve Bank of New York and University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business (e-mail: [email protected]). This review of the arbitrage pricing theory was written for the forthcoming second edition of The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Lawrence Blume and Steven Durlauf (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
    [Show full text]
  • Building Efficient Hedge Fund Portfolios August 2017
    Building Efficient Hedge Fund Portfolios August 2017 Investors typically allocate assets to hedge funds to access return, risk and diversification characteristics they can’t get from other investments. The hedge fund universe includes a wide variety of strategies and styles that can help investors achieve this objective. Why then, do so many investors make significant allocations to hedge fund strategies that provide the least portfolio benefit? In this paper, we look to hedge fund data for evidence that investors appear to be missing out on the core benefits of hedge fund investing and we attempt to understand why. The. Basics Let’s start with the assumption that an investor’s asset allocation is fairly similar to the general investing population. That is, the portfolio is dominated by equities and equity‐like risk. Let’s also assume that an investor’s reason for allocating to hedge funds is to achieve a more efficient portfolio, i.e., higher return per unit of risk taken. In order to make a portfolio more efficient, any allocation to hedge funds must include some combination of the following (relative to the overall portfolio): Higher return Lower volatility Lower correlation The Goal Identify return streams that deliver any or all of the three characteristics listed above. In a perfect world, the best allocators would find return streams that accomplish all three of these goals ‐ higher return, lower volatility, and lower correlation. In the real world, that is quite difficult to do. There are always trade‐ offs. In some cases, allocators accept tradeoffs to increase the probability of achieving specific objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Portfolio Financing on Alpha Generation by H…
    The Impact of Portfolio Financing on Alpha Generation by Hedge Funds An S3 Asset Management Commentary by Robert Sloan, Managing Partner and Krishna Prasad, Partner S3 Asset Management 590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: 212-759-5222 www.S3asset.com September 2004 Building a successful hedge fund requires more than just the traditional three Ps of Pedigree, Performance and Philosophy. As hedge funds’ popularity increases, it is increasingly clear that Process needs to be considered the 4th P in alpha generation. Clearly, balance sheet management, also known as securities or portfolio financing, is a key element of “process” as it adds to alpha (the hedge fund manager’s excess rate of return as compared to a benchmark). Typically, hedge funds surrender their balance sheet to their prime broker and do not fully understand the financing alpha that they often leave on the table. The prime brokerage business is an oligopoly and the top three providers virtually control the pricing of securities financing. Hedge funds and their investors therefore need to pay close heed to the value provided by their prime broker as it has a direct impact on alpha and the on-going health of a fund. Abstract As investors seek absolute returns, hedge funds have grown exponentially over the past decade. In the quest for better performance, substantial premium is being placed on alpha generation skills. Now, more than ever before, there is a great degree of interest in deconstructing and better understanding the drivers of hedge fund alpha. Investors and hedge fund managers have focused on the relevance of asset allocation, stock selection, portfolio construction and trading costs on alpha.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Gold in Today's Global Multi-Asset Portfolio
    Gold October 2019 The Role of Gold in Today’s Global Multi-Asset Portfolio SPDR® Gold Strategy Team Investors have often used gold tactically in their portfolios, with an aim to help preserve wealth during market corrections, times of geopolitical stress or persistent dollar weakness. But given gold’s historically low or negative correlation with most other asset classes (See Figures 2 and 3), we believe that in addition to gold’s tactical benefits, its function as a core diversifying asset may demonstrate that gold can potentially play a more long-term strategic role in an investor’s portfolio. In fact, research has shown that the modern multi-asset portfolio may be more efficient with a strategic allocation to gold playing a crucial role as a potential core diversifier.1 In this paper, we examine how including gold in a hypothetical multi-asset portfolio that also includes global stocks, various classes of fixed income, real estate, private equity, and commodities may improve its risk-return characteristics. We found that holding between 2% and 10% of SPDR® Gold Shares (GLD®) between January 1, 20052 and September 30, 2019 may have improved the hypothetical portfolio’s cumulative returns and Sharpe ratio and lowered its maximum drawdown, as compared to a portfolio without any gold-backed investments. See Figure 7 for asset weightings of hypothetical portfolios. Gold as an Investable Since 1971, when President Nixon removed the US dollar from the gold standard, the price of gold Asset: From IPO to ETF has increased from $43.28/oz. to $1,485.30/oz at the end of September 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Commodities in Asset Allocation
    COMMODITY INVESTMENTS: THE MISSING PIECE OF THE PORTFOLIO PUZZLE? The Role of Commodities in Asset Allocation Investors often look to commodities as a way to potentially gain enhanced Contributor: portfolio diversification, protection against inflation, and equity-like returns. As such, commodities have gained traction among institutional and retail Xiaowei Kang, CFA investors in recent years, either as a separate asset class or as part of a real Director assets allocation. Index Research & Design [email protected] Generally, commodities have low or negative correlation with traditional asset classes over the long-term, and can act as a portfolio diversifier. For ® example, from December 1972 to June 2012, the S&P GSCI had a correlation of -0.02 and -0.08 with global equities and fixed income, Want more? Sign up to receive respectively. However, during periods of global economic downturn such as complimentary updates on a broad in the early 1980s, early 1990s and late 2000s, commodities’ correlation with range of index-related topics and other asset classes–especially equities–tended to sharply increase before events brought to you by S&P Dow reverting to relatively low levels (see Exhibit 1). Jones Indices. Exhibit 1: Rolling 36-Month Correlation with Equities and Fixed Income www.spindices.com/registration 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 Jul-91 Jul-08 Apr-87 Apr-04 Oct-78 Oct-95 Jan-83 Jan-00 Feb-90 Feb-07 Jun-84 Jun-01 Nov-85 Nov-02 Dec-75 Dec-92 Dec-09 Aug-81 Aug-98 Mar-80 Mar-97 Sep-88 Sep-05 May-77 May-94 May-11 Correlation with Equities Correlation with Fixed Income Source: S&P DOW JONES INDICES, MSCI, Barclays.
    [Show full text]