Local Plan Suggested Sites Consultation January – March 2014: Schedule of Representations on Sites Within Swinton

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW001 / LGS45 / REC41 – Former Swinton Sewage Treatment Works and surrounding land

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0536 R00051 Agnes Rice Incorrect statements about Public Transport. Practically non-existent. An extra number of houses means a huge increase in cars, and your assessment of public transport is wildly inaccurate.

For example:.  No Buses to Manchester along length of Folly Lane. I used a taxi to get to work in the mornings! Single Deckers hourly for most of the day from the Worsley Road end. No bustops on East lancs without involving nearly ¾ mile walk. Journey from Manchester to Worsley Road in evenings for workers very poor as the bus is often full at Frederick Rd, impossible to reach this area of Swinton from Manchester within the times you state  Alternatives - Long Walk to Monton for an alternative bus is only for the fit and certainly not for elderly/young children  Most buses terminate early evening. Are you not aware that First Buses was fined heavily over a year ago for poor transport services in this area, but not fined heavily enough, because its actually worse.?  Car use essential in this area, Thorn Road/Campbell Rd are known to residents as rat runs along with frequent heavy lorries.

The site is wetter than you think, and prospective house purchasers would need a great deal of persuading that a big of digging would rectify it. The houses on ***street name*** have water sitting under them – ground water, that year by year as the weather gets wetter is an increasing problems(although few will admit it.) Perhaps some have never looked under their floorboards. Some of us pump out the water regularly when it gets to 6 inches in the cellars with our own pump systems. If digging the fields (aka the flood plains) to build new houses exacerbates this problem then there will be some liability on the Council/property developers to assume liability for further damage to the existing properties on ***street name***. I think some assurance needs to be made to residents that their properties are not going to be compromised as well as making aware to any prospective buyers of new built houses that sinking/flooding is on the cards.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Additional evidence

The council need to carefully review its facts. Maybe hire people to actually use public transport to get a correct assessment.

If the water problems on ***street name*** properties haven’t been resolved by the council and United Utilities over the years, then this needs clearly expressing in the document plan.

The dampness and proliferation of scrub has led to major nesting areas for wild birds which isn’t just in one part of these fields because wild life isn’t like that. The whole area needs looking at more carefully and certainly building near existing houses would devastate this environment which please note is used as informal leisure area for ADULTS. The proposal to formalise play areas for young children/older children is leaving a large number of the population who enjoy these field excluded.

Whilst house building may be inevitable, the number of houses should be guaranteed at under 70. Although traffic-wise this will still be unsustainable, if its inevitable then obviously as few as possible so as to keep some green quality of life in Salford. I don’t think buyers however will be too thrilled by the water problem which needs bringing into the open. I think residents will want assurance that water won’t be diverted into their houses by disturbing this site, adding to the already increasing ground water under foundations.

2 A0586 R00112 Alan Gorton I agree with the SOSCA proposal for the minimum amount of houses proposed (approx 100 dwellings) and no more to be built in the future on this site.

3 A0517 R00026 Barry Woodling I strongly object to the inclusion of this site in the plan. The whole site should be retained as and natural open space and green field and no housing development should be proposed. There is a R00047 serious shortage of green field in Salford and housing on this site would deplete the existing provision significantly.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) I am completely opposed to any housing development on site SW001. Therefore I would like the site to be retained as natural open space, and the proposal to build 250 houses withdrawn as a suggested site in the Salford Local Plan. Open space is at a premium in Salford and must be protected.

The site is greenfield and should be preserved for informal open space and recreation: 1) Any development would have a devastating impact on the environment. 2) There would be a loss of amenity and reduction in the quality of life. 3) Increase in air pollution would negatively impact on health. 4) Increase in traffic congestion would be unsustainable. 5) Visual impact on area would be catastrophic. 6) Additional burden on local services incl education and health.

4 A0652 R00201 Bettina Ellis I think it would be very good for recreation use. I Also agree with SOSCA about a smaller development of housing with access to housing development is off Folly Lane rather than through estate roads.

5 A0647 R00195 Carol Boyce Am happy to see you will take into account the fact this area is a wildlife corridor and that this should be retained. This is currently a vital green space in an area of high density housing.

The estimation of 250 additional houses seems excessive for this space – a maximum of 100 would seem more realistic.

Retaining as much of the green space as possible is paramount both for the new residents and existing residents in the area.

Recreational areas are needed for both young and older children but what this area offers is something that is now extremely rare and that’s open public space in its natural state with trees and hedges and etc I would be very much against making this area a ‘green space’ if by that is meant an expanse of mowed grass.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

We need space where nature can thrive and be enjoyed.

Yes keep the current pathways – locals use them on a regular basis.

Yes retain the current trees – we have few enough trees left – they are a crucial part of the ecosystem they do more than add beauty.

Access to the new development should be from existing access on Folly Lane and not from the Campbell Road/ Thorn Road end of the development – this is already heavily used and not built for increased traffic.

6 A0620 R00156 Colin Welsby Regarding your proposals for this site I wish to comment as follows

Access to the site cannot be via Eccles Rd. or Campbell Rd. due to future limitations imposed by the reduction to two lanes on the A580

Site of sewage works (what is surrounding land) What area does it cover)

Moorside road school moved over the road taking more OPEN SPACE and the old school now demolished. ( more building ? ) not open space for the local area

It is important that open spaces are retained for future generations on the Campbell Rd. playing field site which should be identified as separate to the Sewerage site for development purposes.

Can you please ensure these areas are seperate and the proposed build is limited to what you say and not encrouched on the playing or free open space area

Finally was this open space not presented to the people of Swinton by a local benefactor?.In the 50+ years we have lived here that has always been my understanding but I now wonder what

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) will happen when all " open space has been taken by succeeding councils

I do not object to the proposed 100 houses providing it stays within the parameters already indicated by you

7 A0547 R00062 David Matthews I am a resident of ***street name*** and use the recreational facilities on Campbell Rd regularly. I therefore oppose the proposal of 250 houses being built on the Former Sewage Site with access via Thorn Road or Campbell Road, as we already have enough traffic to deal with cutting through to join the East Lancs Road.

The Former Sewage Works has now become the natural habitat of many wild species that would be affected significantly unless some land was left untouched.

I fully understand the need for housing within our area and would not reject a smaller development with access being made via Folly Lane in the close vicinity to other new developments. This would allow part of the sewage works land to be opened up to encourage more wildlife and green space for the public.

8 A0589 R00115 David Selby I do not think that housing should be built on the site as it will have an adverse impact on the surrounding area.

The site would be better for the community if it were used for green space and recreational use.

9 A0598 R00129 Deborah Collins Whilst we agree with most of your assessment, we feel 250 houses would be highly detrimental to the area, not only aesthetically, but socially as well.

Additional evidence

To my knowledge this land has been vacant for well over 20 years consequently the wildlife (biodiversity) is in abundance e.g. hawks, owls, bats, ducks, foxes, and there must be small

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) animals such as voles, mice and such to feed the large population of wildlife. Your comments on play areas for older and younger children, whilst acceptable, can you not see the need for open space for the elderly to take peaceful walks in a countryside environment if they do not drive, dog walkers, ordinary walkers and joggers. I see many people on the site with binoculars taking in the beauty of the wildlife – Sunday 16.03.14 from 9.00am – 1.00pm 40+ people walking across not only with dogs. We are aware that this site is privately owned and should not be trespassed on, but the length of time it has been used it has become a natural communal open space.

Accessibility – Folly Lane / Rocky Lane 8.00am total backup to Worsley Road. So more buses needed which creates more pollution. The new ‘Bus Lanes’ on the East Lancs is already causing people to cut through and we feel we do not need another possible 250 cars around this area.

We don’t want onsite open space facilities, we want natural countryside in an urban area, not a housing estate with tarmac and swings.

As you can see from our address our house backs on to the site, we moved here nearly 7 years ago from a very large house in Prestwich, we bought this smaller house simply for the outlook, which we paid a premium for.

The peace and quiet is only disturbed in the summer by older children in the play area on Campbell Road sometimes until past midnight in the school holidays.

Please leave the site as it stands to enhance everyone in the areas access to some beautiful open space.

10 A0599 R00130 Daniel Collins Same representation as above.

11 A0609 R00142 Elizabeth James I am very pleased that the Council has recognised the importance of the natural features of the site, which has been reclaimed by nature.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

I strongly object to the assessment that the land could be used for up to 250 houses. Although I would prefer there to be no building at all I accept that a minimum of 100 houses may be necessary. It is important to maintain the open aspect of the land and therefore I think that any building should be at the west end only, with access to Folly Lane. As it is a long narrow site any linear development along the north or south boundaries would make it even narrower, losing the present wide open aspect. This is so important for both physical and mental health.

Access via Campbell Road would be detrimental to the safety and outlook of the play area. It would also produce an unacceptable increase in traffic through the estate.

Additional evidence

Further evidence of a growing healthy ecology on the site are recent sightings of buzzard and barn owl adding to the regular sightings of sparrow hawk and kestrel.

12 A0033 R00035 Ellesmere Park Ellesmere Park Residents Association would not object to an enabling development on part of Residents this site, but the suggested quantity of 250 seems excessive, after a quantity of 150 was Association previously included by the Authority in the amended Core Strategy. Resultant traffic from 250 houses could easily be 500 vehicles, requiring access to a restricted road.

Other concerns we have include access to the site, which should be from Folly Lane, with traffic controls. This road to be access only to the properties, not a through road.

Any development would need to be suitably screened from the rest of the open space, which is proposed for recreational use.

To enable interested parties, including residents groups, United Utilities, local authority, wildlife groups etc to fully consider the proposed use of various parts of the whole site we would like to see a comprehensive plan and map showing the allocation of each section of land.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

13 A0519 R00028 Graham Wilkins The assessment is reasonable, though generally re-iterates existing known information. A development of 250 houses, whilst this might be technically feasible, is hardly desirable. Development should be kept to the absolute minimum rather than the most profitable outcome for the landowner. 250 properties is not the absolute viable minimum.

The impacts of additional traffic on Folly Lane cannot be ignored as currently at peak times there can be extensive delays using this route.

The former sewage works site is one of the last remaining areas of open space locally and to sacrifice this for profit or Council budgetary pressures would be an irreversible mistake.

Can the existing infrastructure tolerate such a large development of an additional 250 houses? Are there sufficient local school places, doctors, dentists? I think not.

The existing sewage works site has a diverse range of bird and animal species and a large development would damage this habitat.

14 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Semi-Natural Sites outside strategic Green Infrastructure (SW01, SW13, SW016, LW015, Ecology Unit CW003)

These are a number of sites proposed that represent infilling of the existing urban envelope which fall outside strategic GI corridors but appear to have significant areas of semi-natural vegetation and are of potential local importance. Recommend that these sites be subject to extended phase 1 habitat surveys to determine how much of the sites are suitable for development.

15 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) If a site is located within the AQMA by the Strategic Road Network (SRN), then as part of the development of the site, a developer / landowner will be required to locate mitigation measures outside of the SRN boundary, and within the boundary of the site in question. As a consequence of this, this would lead to a reduced developable area for some sites, and this should be considered when considering the merits of the sites being promoted through this process.

In addition, all noise fences, screening and other structures must be erected on the developers land, and far enough within the developers land to enable maintenance to take place without encroachment onto highway land, and this should also be considered within the consideration of the sites being promoted.

16 A0660 R00211 Ian Furness Any development of the former sewage works site should be kept to a minimal level of around 100 dwellings with the remainder of the site becoming permanent public green space.

Any access to the site should be via Folly Lane and not through any existing estate roads or from the East Lancashire Road. This would have the effect of increasing available public green space and reducing the impact of the resulting increase in traffic on current properties and road users. It would also minimise impact on the green space of Campbell Road playing fields.

17 A0611 R00144 Janet Draper Don’t like the idea of 250 houses being built on the sewage works and surrounding land. I do however support the views of Swinton Open Space – that is to limit the number of houses to 100 then allow the remaining land (Campbell Road playing fields) to be a permanent public green space. I feel this is much needed in the area. I have lived here all my life and think a large development would ruin the area.

18 A0583 R00109 Jean Mangan I agree with SOSCAs proposal for a minimum amount of housing development on the sewage works site, which it believes is around 100 dwellings, provided that the rest of the site becomes permanent public green space and that access to the housing development is off Folly Lane rather than through estate roads.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

19 A0516 R00025 Jean Whalley I would like to oppose the planned housing development on the site of the former sewage works on the grounds that there is too much contamination of the site and suggest that the site should be left as a green open space for the use of Salford residents. So much of Salford has been developed that we are fast losing areas of uncultivated places to walk.

Many parts of the site are water logged and with the recent heavy rain there is a need for natural drainage to avoid the danger of flooding.

Currently the only access to the site is via Campbell Road which is hardly suitable for the number and size of vehicles that would be necessary to transport all the equipment and materials needed to prepare and build on the site.

The proposed 250 houses will have a dramatic effect on local traffic. Travel into and out of Manchester is already at a crawl from before 8.00am till after 10.00 and after 4.30pm till after 7.00pm so another 300 cars (a conservative estimate) will only make a bad situation worse.

The closest primary school only has 18 places so where will children go to school?

Where is the evidence that these proposed houses are needed?

Please consider carefully the impact on the local environment, infrastructure and facilities before agreeing to developing the site.

20 A0554 R00069 JL Armitage I would agree in principle to the addition of houses to the former sewage works site provided that the rest of the site be designated as public green space. Furthermore any access to housing should be from Folly Lane and not via Campbell Road or other existing estates.

21 A0535 R00050 Laura Bowers I feel that 250 dwellings is too much for the area concerned.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 100 dwellings would be much more amenable and would also mean that the green space could become permanent public areas for our enjoyment.

Access to the site would cause problems and would need to be carefully thought out so as not to cause more problems via the Thorn/Gorse Road area. It can get like a rat run - despite having speed humps. The safety of our children playing in the area is of paramount importance to us all on this estate!

22 A0539 R00054 Lee Parkinson Currently lack of open space in Swinton area, this open space is used regularly by local people, housing would create more traffic issues.

Temporary traffic lights were in place not long ago on Folly Lane, this caused traffic chaos all the way back through Monton, the housing development with traffic lights on Folly Lane would have the same effect. I’m strongly against any development in this area, more open space is required, additional sites could be found for housing developments.

Additional evidence

 Increase in traffic  Additional resources for the area, schools, doctors  Loss of open space  Pollution  Wildlife within the area

23 A0520 R00029 Letitia Wilkins I feel that building 250 houses on the site would be excessive and far fewer (or none at all) would be more desirable. Even 100 houses is likely to generate at least 200 more cars using the roads in the area each rush hour. Already at these times the roads are overcrowded and traffic jams are frequent.

Schools in this area are already overcrowded and have ‘closed their books’ to future intakes. 11

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) There would be similar problems for doctors and other essential services, as 250 new houses could potentially mean 1000 more people.

The sewage works site is a naturalised open space which is home to a great variety of wildlife – birds, animals and insects. Once built on this habitat would be gone forever.

24 A0027 R00190 Liezel Griffin I see that the area of the former Swinton sewage works is also designated. I believe that the council should be concentrating on development of sites like this and other brownfield sites (of which there are many in Salford).

This would easily help you meet this housing target of supposed need for thousands of new homes (I'm very sceptical about this - surely this is just driven by the greed of politicians and developers). Where is the need for all these houses? Are you aware the Boatyard development stil has many houses for sale; this hardly indicates a desperate need.

25 A0662 R00217 Lucia Williams This is a vital green space in an area of high density housing.

Retaining as much of the green space as possible is paramount both for the new residents and existing residents in the area.

The estimation of 250 additional houses is a lot for this space – a maximum of 100 seems more appropriate.

Getting rid of green spaces in favour of more and more housing is a short term solution, green areas and outdoor activities are proven to improve mental health. We are talking about an impending obesity epidemic but removing all the places our children can use to move and play.

We all need nature to survive! For our health and for the ecosystem. We need space where nature can thrive and be enjoyed.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 26 A0568 R00091 Martin Garratt On the whole I would back proposals put forward by SOSCA for the development of this site for limited housing development (up to 100 homes) alongside further development for recreation and green space. Careful planning would be needed to minimise flood risk, but development could be made to make this an excellent wildlife habitat and space for local residents.

Any residential development would need to be supported with a development plan to improve and maintain the recreation and wildlife facilities available. The local area lacks a community building, so perhaps this could be included in any plan. This could also provide space for a polling station that currently is a temporary building placed on Campbell Road.

The assessment noted “no known heritage assets on the site” - There are a number ruins that relate to the former LMS Railway Clifton Branch. The footpath next to the gold course follows the former route and offers important pedestrian and cycle access between Swinton and Eccles. This could also play an important part in plans to create a ring of cycle route around Manchester

Additional evidence

There are a number ruins that relate to the former LMS Railway Clifton Branch. These could be preserved and enhanced as part of any plan.

27 A0608 R00141 Mavis Roberts I have attended the SOSCA meetings for several years on this subject of the Sewage Treatment Works and surrounding land has yet to be resolved. However, at the latest SOSCA meeting held in February this year, what I consider to be a fair compromise was put to those attending. I therefore support SOSCA 100% in its advice for MINIMAL development of the sewage works site and the rest of the land to be PERMANENT public green space for leisure and enjoyment purposes for everyone. We certainly must not lose any more open space!

I also agree 100% (again) that access to any housing development on the site should be off Folly Lane. Anything else and the increased volume of traffic on the surrounding roads would be a nightmare!

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

28 A0610 R00143 Michael Weston The site is now a great area for walking and also the park on Campbell Road where I take my grandkids. We need to protect what little open space we have.

Open space like this needs protecting, I am opposed to any development.

29 A0584 R00110 Mildred Peterson The roads in this area are already extremely busy and any large housing development would make them really dangerous. There is a great deal of parking on Folly Lane and the estate roads. If there is to be any housing, it is imperative that it is kept to a minimum. It is also important that public space is kept and improved, making it suitable for all ages.

30 A0582 R00108 Mr & Mrs Balham This site should be designated as Local Green Space with allocated space for recreation and a minimal housing development of about 100 dwellings.

The development should have its own direct access to a main road (Folly Lane) rather than through existing estate roads.

31 A0592 R00122 Mr and Mrs Mull Access to the proposed houses main priority 250 say will mean around 500 extra cars. Can our local roads cope. Even a number of 30 houses originally mentioned would result in 60 extra cars. NB Thorn Road is already a rat-run, cut through from Folly Lane to the A580 (East Lancs Road).

The building of the proposed 250 houses will greatly eliminate the green space available in the area for recreation etc. Also more houses means more dog owners walking their dogs defacing the local streets creating more expense for council cleansing services (dog fouling is already a problem in the area).

32 A0622 R00158 Mrs Batten 100 houses is more than enough. Every time someone sees a bit of Greenspace it gets built on. We need a bit of greenery to see and get a bit of exercise and be able to walk without traffic.

You need to consider the drainage as well! Apart from that a 100 more houses means a lot more

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) families for doctors to treat and it’s hard enough to get appointments as it is. Not enough places at schools for the children just now, where are the rest to go!

33 A0563 R00079 Mrs S Higham 250 homes is far too many homes. This amount will cause chaos for local schools and traffic.

I would prefer the site not to be built on but feel we have no choice but to accept that at some time this land will be partly built upon. Would also not like access to be from Campbell Road.

34 A0623 R00159 Mrs Turner I think 100 homes on the site is more than adequate, considering the volume of traffic, schools, doctors, everything is getting over loaded. Openspace is needed for the wellbeing of the community. Greenspace is an important part of people’s lives to walk and enjoy freedom from built up areas. The lung which makes life enjoyable without having to travel. Once any land built on is lost forever to the detriment of the local area and wildlife. Ideally no further building at all.

35 A0639 R00178 Ms C Pasiero This site should not be used for housing development and if necessary only for a maximum number of 100. But preferably none.

It is not suitable for dwellings due to the problems that dwellings bring mainly the amount of foot traffic and vehicle traffic. The entrance and exit should not be onto campbell road at the swinton end as these roads are residential housing and as dwellings often have two cars per household, that would mean 200 plus vehicles leaving and arriving each day. The roads around there at the swinton end are not suitable for this traffic and exit should be the other side or rocky lane. However, vehicles such as recycling, rubbish etc will also be using it, along with post, courier, emergency services and as the swinton side is already not suitable for the cars it certainly is not suitable for any other or larger vehicles.

The green space is used by residents and visitors, therefore should not be reduced in size or kept to a minimum reduction. There are no alternative green spaces nearby and this should not be used.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) The houses that border the land from the swinton side would have their view and quietness disturbed by dwellings, especially if they were packed up to the existing houses.

That local residents in the swinton side have always been opposed to this development and people have already seen the disasters of similar plans and new estates adjoining already established housing.

The building of such an estate will devalue the house prices of the already established housing in the area.

There is no evidence of crime design reduction of the plots or the implication this will have on the existing houses on the swinton side.

36 A0607 R00140 Nicola Fogg Major concerns with the increase of traffic in an already extremely busy area. Traffic on Folly Lane to Worsley Road is already very busy most of the time and a further increase would make these roads unsafe and excessive. It would not be friendly to the environment. Also, the green space currently there is important for this already ‘built up’ area.

Additional evidence  Traffic  Highway concerns

37 A0627 R00163 Norma Gill I agree with the SOSCA proposal for the sewage works site.

38 A0561 R00076 Peter Banks There should be only a minimum amount of housing development and access should not be from Campbell Road.

39 A0517 R00098 Petition signed by Remove SW001 – Former Swinton Sewage Treatment Works and surrounding land from the 28 people Salford Local Plan as a suggested site for 250 houses and retain it as open space.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) (Petition organiser: Barry Woodling)

40 A0560 R00075 Rita Cunliffe Strong objection to any buildings, houses or otherwise on this site. It should be retained as it is for everyone’s enjoyment.

Goodness knows Salford has precious little greenery as it is, not to mention the devaluation of property already established, so please leave the site untouched.

41 A0669 R00269 Roy Zammit I would like to comment on the proposed plans for this area. We feel if this plan goes ahead it would bring too much traffic coming down Campbell Road and would be used even more so by traffic searching for a short cut to Folly Lane more so than they do now.

If the planned houses are approved then access must be from Folly Lane end only and no access egress must be available to and from Campbell Road.

42 A0587 R00113 Sarah Hardman I support the proposal for a minimum amount of housing development on the sewage works site, which I feel should be around 100 dwellings, provided that the rest of the site becomes permanent public green space and that access to the housing development is off Folly Lane rather than through estate roads.

43 A0403 R00187 Sport England The site includes playing field land. Development of this part of the site would require one of the special circumstances set out in Sport England’s playing field policy, or paragraph 74 of the National Planning Policy Framework, to be satisfied in which development of land used as playing field would not be opposed.

The text should make clear that the playing field land within the site is not to be developed, or make clear that potential mitigation is needed to comply with the requirements of Sport England’s playing field policy and paragraph 74 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 44 A0359 R00220 Swinton Open Swinton Open Space Community Association (SOSCA) supports the principle of the site being Space Community developed as a mix of housing and public green space. Association SOSCA notes that the City Council has previously identified that the minimum amount of housing development necessary in order for the rest of the site to be brought forward as public green space is approximately 100 dwellings, significantly less than the 250 dwellings the assessment states the site could accommodate.

SOSCA notes that the two major concerns of the local community about this proposal are:

1. That any housing development would either be too large for the site or poorly located within the site so as to degrade the quality of both the current public green space and of any additional public green space the proposal creates. 2. That inappropriate access to the housing development would adversely impact on the small estate roads around the site.

In order to avoid such adverse outcomes, SOSCA proposes that:

1. Any housing development should be restricted to the aforementioned 100 dwellings and be subject to the remainder of the site becoming public green space. 2. Any housing development should be sited at the South-West corner of the site and be screened from the surrounding green space by trees 3. Access to any housing development should only be via the bottom of Folly Lane, just before it becomes Rocky Lane. 4. The various stakeholders, namely the landowners (United Utilities and the City Council) and the local residents’ groups (SOSCA and Ellesmere Park Residents Association) work together to create a Master Plan to ensure the optimum development of the site.

45 A0617 R00152 United Utilities Site Assessment Property Services

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Limited (How The Suggested Site Consultation document identifies the former Swinton WwTW and Planning LLP) surrounding land (ref. SW001) as a potential site for housing and open space. The assessment summaries the key issues as follows (HOW emphasis in bold):

“The site is currently used for open space purposes and it would be appropriate to retain a large proportion of this in any future redevelopment. The site is accessible by bus and given its location is relatively accessible to the services and facilities of Swinton town centre. Therefore some housing development is likely to be appropriate on the site. However, any development of the site would need to address issues of priority habitats, potential flooding from Folly Brook, and contamination. Significant areas of open space would be expected together with the provision of additional play areas for older and younger children within any development.”

It should be noted that the former Swinton WwTW site is private land which is not currently accessible to the public and therefore should not be considered as “open space”. UUPSL request that the summary of key issues is amended to reflect the fact that only the eastern portion of the site which is under the ownership of the Council comprises open space which is accessible by the public.

Nevertheless, UUPSL broadly support the uses being considered by the Council on the site, in particular the suggested housing element which would enable the delivery of open space improvements and mitigation measures where required.

The Council’s Approach

UUPSL welcome the inclusion of the former Swinton WwTW as a suggested site in the emerging Salford Local Plan and strongly support the Council’s innovative approach to delivering both housing and significant community benefits, including an extensive area of publicly accessible open space on the site. UUPSL are committed to working with the Council to deliver a high quality scheme at the former Swinton WwTW and have already carried out comprehensive

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) assessments at the site covering ecology, highways, contamination and flood risk.

Flexibility

The Council has targeted a scale of development at the site of 250 houses at a density of 35 dwellings per hectare, however a flexible approach based on scheme viability must be taken. Such an approach would accord with the Government’s Growth Agenda and provisions set out with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which promotes housing development in sustainable locations such as the former Swinton WwTW. Given the abnormal site costs likely to be experienced on the site, viability may be a key issue in its delivery. In terms of viability considerations, paragraph 173 of the NPPF states: “Pursuing sustainable development requires careful attention to viability and costs in plan- making and decision-taking. Plans should be deliverable. Therefore, the sites and the scale of development identified in the plan should not be subject to such a scale of obligations and policy burdens that their ability to be developed viably is threatened. To ensure viability, the costs of any requirements likely to be applied to development, such as requirements for affordable housing, standards, infrastructure contributions or other requirements should, when taking account of the normal cost of development and mitigation, provide competitive returns to a willing land owner and willing developer to enable the development to be deliverable.”

This is reinforced at paragraph 174 of the Framework which states: “Local planning authorities should set out their policy on local standards in the Local Plan, including requirements for affordable housing. They should assess the likely cumulative impacts on development in their area of all existing and proposed local standards, supplementary planning documents and policies that support the development plan, when added to nationally required standards. In order to be appropriate, the cumulative impact of these standards and policies should not put implementation of the plan at serious risk, and should facilitate development throughout the economic cycle. Evidence supporting the assessment should be proportionate, using only appropriate available evidence.”

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Furthermore, the recently launched National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) provides additional clarification. Paragraph 006 (Reference ID: 10-006-20140306) states:

“Development of plan policies should be iterative – with draft policies tested against evidence of the likely ability of the market to deliver the plan’s policies, and revised as part of a dynamic process. Evidence should be proportionate to ensure plans are underpinned by a broad understanding of viability. Greater detail may be necessary in areas of known marginal viability or where the evidence suggests that viability might be an issue – for example in relation to policies for strategic sites which require high infrastructure investment.”

Guidance on how changes in values and costs should be treated in the plan-making process are set out at paragraph 025 (Reference ID: 10-025-20140306):

“Plan makers should not plan to the margin of viability but should allow for a buffer to respond to changing markets and to avoid the need for frequent plan updating. Current costs and values should be considered when assessing the viability of plan policy. Policies should be deliverable and should not be based on an expectation of future rises in values at least for the first five years of the plan period. This will help to ensure realism and avoid complicating the assessment with uncertain judgements about the future. Where any relevant future change to regulation or policy (either national or local) is known, any likely impact on current costs should be considered.”

In light of the above UUPSL request that a flexible approach is adopted to the scale of housing development identified by the Council which acknowledges the viability of the scheme taking into account any potential open space improvements and mitigation measures required. It is requested that the proposed target is based on a detailed assessment of development costs to be prepared in due course. UUPSL will be happy to work with the Council to identify the optimum figure which is required to achieve the desired outcomes.

Key Benefits

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) The development of the former Swinton WwTW has the potential to deliver significant benefits for the local community and also the wider Borough. These benefits include: . Provision of extensive, high quality, and publicly accessible open space; . Development of high quality family homes (including affordable housing); . Enhancement of ecological interests; . Remediation of potential ground contamination; and . Amelioration of existing flood risk.

Summary

UUPSL appreciates the work undertaken to date by the Council in including the site within the Salford Local Plan Suggested Sites. UUPSL broadly supports the uses under consideration, in particular the development of part of the site for housing, and notes the potential issues that have been identified. UUPSL does however request that the scale of housing development suggested be based on a robust assessment of viability which takes into account the potential need for open space improvements, remediation of contaminated land, ecological enhancements and any other abnormal site costs likely to be experienced on the site.

UUPSL are committed to working jointly with the Council to deliver a high quality scheme at the former Swinton WwTW and would be happy to work with the Council to identify the optimum housing figure which is required to achieve the desired outcomes at the site. UUPSL has an aspiration to bring back into positive use this brownfield site which has remained derelict and vacant since the decommissioning of the former Swinton WwTW. The site represents a deliverable and logical infill site for residential development, within the settlement boundary.

This representation seeks to help guide the development of the emerging Salford Local Plan and as such UUPSL respectfully requests that it is taken into consideration during the preparation of the next stage of the emerging Local Plan.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW002 – Former St Ambrose Barlow High School

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

If a site is located within the AQMA by the Strategic Road Network (SRN), then as part of the development of the site, a developer / landowner will be required to locate mitigation measures outside of the SRN boundary, and within the boundary of the site in question. As a consequence of this, this would lead to a reduced developable area for some sites, and this should be considered when considering the merits of the sites being promoted through this process.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW004 – Former Homebase, Wardley

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW005 – Land west of new St Ambrose Barlow High School

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0603 R00134 Carole Edwards- I wish to object to any potential development for housing on this green belt land. Viller The green belt land in Wardley is the last of the green belt land in the local area.

Green belt land in the area has already been eroded in the area by the building of Ambrose Barlow school.

This green belt area is home to a variety of wildlife.

The Wardley area is a small residential area and local roads are already heavily congested, further development in the area would have a detrimental impact on the quality of life of residents.

2 A0606 R00139 Colin Ainscough I read with horror your document titled ‘Neighbourhood Area Document – Swinton’ which detailed suggested Green belt sites being considered for housing development.

I object in the strongest terms to any development of the green belt for housing, and I am particularly concerned about the sites North of the A6 in the Swinton and Wardley areas (Sites SW005, SW006, SW007 & SW008).

These areas are well used by locals for recreation, and have been for many years.

The paths and trails are excellent for walking, off road running and cycling, and are also popular with dog walkers and horse riders.

The amount of wildlife that can be seen here is outstanding, the most spectacular being the roe deer which roam throughout this area of green belt.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) In addition to the health benefits from exercise whilst using the green belt, there are significant benefits provided by the trees and hedgerows in filtering the pollution from the M60 motorway which cuts through Wardley and Swinton moss.

The number of houses proposed for sites SW005/6/7 & 8 is over 1100, and will completely overwhelm the local roads infrastructure, and cause a need for additional schooling (both primary and secondary) and doctors and dental surgeries.

For these reasons I urge the planning committee to reject applications SW005/6/7 & 8 for housing development in these green belt areas.

3 A0631 R00169 Councillors Iain We believe that green field, recreational and green belt sites across the city should be protected Lindley and Les and retained, and therefore we would oppose development at this site. Turner 4 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Evidence Base, Scale of Development & Cumulative Impacts Ecology Unit The Suggested Sites Consultation plan includes a number of greenfield sites outside the existing development envelope, which if they all came forward for development would result in the development of greenfield land on a scale not seen for many decades. GMEU currently does not have adequate baseline ecological information to make a strategic assessment about which of these sites or parts of these sites could be developed without leading to substantive losses in nature conservation features of local (Salford) interest.

These sites also appear to cover very large areas and whilst it may be that detailed surveys find that the qualitative ecological constraints on individual sites are low, the cumulative quantitative impact could still be large, particularly for non-protected species, leading to a potential erosion of local wildlife interests. In combination the overall impact could be significant in terms of scale, loss of habitat connectivity and reduced access to semi-natural greenspace.

It is important that ‘no net loss of biodiversity’ can be shown for all potential development sites

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) (which could be achieved by including an element of bio-diversity off-setting).

For the following site clusters we would recommend:

a) That extended phase 1 habitat surveys are carried out of allocated sites (or preferably prior to allocation)

b) that for any of these sites that are determined as suitable for development that these areas are required to develop ‘master plans’ that include proposals for retaining / enhancing biodiversity interests.

c) that biodiversity offsetting be considered for development proposals where applicable.

Wardley Moss (SW05-SW08 & WB05)

A group of sites to the south of the M60 that provide Ecological linkage between the river Irwell and Worsley Woods.

5 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

In addition, all noise fences, screening and other structures must be erected on the developers land, and far enough within the developers land to enable maintenance to take place without

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) encroachment onto highway land, and this should also be considered within the consideration of the sites being promoted.

6 A0663 R00219 Jane Thurston I have very strong view against the current suggestion/proposal that the green belt land in the Wardley should be used for the development for the purpose of housing, the reason are as follows:

Pollution – Air/Noise

I feel if this proposal went ahead there would be a significant disruption to the local area. The actual building of the development would have a significant impact of the air pollution in the local area and there would also be a long term impact because the proposal is suggesting a potential 1000 more houses over 3 different sites which are in a short distance of each other. This would clearly have an impact on the quality of the air, this will happen with the daily running of households; in additional to this the number of vehicles will significantly increase. In the modern day most households have 2 vehicles which means there could be potential another 2000 cars in the local area!

As well as air pollution, the suggestions for these sites will have an impact on noise pollution, the local area already is impacted by noise of the local motorways, and as a resident who has lived in Wardley all my childhood and adulthood, I have noticed the difference in the level of noise over the years which is produced throughout the day and night by the motorway traffic.

Land Subsidence

Historically there has always been a problem with the land around this area being known to subside, this is evident in the proposed area, I know from personal experience being an owner of the property. Again building should a large development will put more pressure on the land.

Need for Open Spaces in the Local area

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

I feel it is important for Salford to try and protect and save some greenland, the proposed areas are supposed to be protected by the ‘green belt’ policy. In April 2012, there was a document published that stated that the Core Strategy for Salford was to protects the city's existing greenbelt.

Being a Salford resident who also works in the city, I have seem a significant reduction in ‘green areas’ over the years and I feel to maintain the health and well being of the citizens of Salford it is essential to have areas and spaces that can be used for outdoor leisure so the public can step out of ‘city life’ into some green area without having to travel miles before reaching any open/green space.

The ethos of SALFORD City Council is promoting the health and well being of individuals to ensure the citizens of Salford have every opportunity to remain fit, well and as independent as possible. Having the open space to go for walks aids relaxation and promotes healthy living and general well being. People are more likely to walk in a green area than walk around streets! This may not be seen as an important factor for the Councilor or business men but as a Salford resident, parent and an adult who wishes to remain in Wardley community, it is important to me and my family!

Land is used for leisure

Another concern I have is that the proposed sites are used by the local community in respect of leisure activities. It is used by a range of age groups for a range of activities such as dog walkers; horse riding, fishing, bike riding and general exercise. All of which I feel are important for our community, again promoting individuals health and well being giving them the opportunity to experience the outdoors. There are many families within Salford that for a number of reasons are not able to leave the area and the green land is form of escapism and a sense of openness, it also allows children to experience the different seasons in the countryside without having to travel.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

Already number of properties on the market that are unable to sell.

I understand that Central Government are putting a great emphasis on Local Government for more housing but there are significant properties in the local area that are on the market and are unable to sell so increasing the number of houses available will have a further impact and also the housing market.

Pressure on school and Local resources.

As a Governor of a Local Primary School, I would have grave concerns with the number of houses that would be built in the local area. There is already a significant pressure on local schools and there is a lack of available places for the local children. I appreciate that there is suggestion that a school will be built as part of the complex but I do not feel that this will be sufficient due to the high volumes of houses that are planned.

Building a development of this size would also put additional pressure on the local high schools, given the number of dwellings that are being planned and the likely hood being that the main section of the population moving into the homes will have young children including primary and high school age.

Traffic – increased volume

Building a dwelling of this size will naturally have an impact on the volume of traffic in the local area. Swinton already has a high volume of traffic and with the development of Asda in the centre of Swinton this will also have an impact on traffic. As a result I feel that there is potential for Swinton to become grid locked and the area will not be able to cope with the increased volume of traffic which cross references back to the concerns regarding pollution of air and noise.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Road – poor conditions

In addition to the above, the increase traffic will also have an impact on the roads and the quality of the roads surface.

Boundaries of area.

I understand the green belt is about separation of areas, if this development went ahead there would not be any boundaries between a number of areas including Walkden, Swinton, Wardley, Clifton. Between all these areas there will be NO green areas.

Get in Car to get the Local Park

At the moment, the children that live in the Wardley area have to get in a car to get a park so they tend to use the moss for leisure, taking this space away is just unfair. Look after your local resident!

Public footpaths – access to other community resources ie, Clifton Marina

The greenbelt areas has many public footpaths on which are used on a daily basis, one of which enable the local residents including young families to get to other local resources such as Clifton Marina.

Potential impact on a local business

If this development went ahead, it could potentially close a local business down and we will lose another local resource for the young people of the area.

Wildlife

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Any development on this area will have a significant impact on the local wildlife and that is simply unfair, like many of the other reasons given, there is a significant lack of green space in Salford and you continue to take it away!

At the moment, Salford is running a campaign about the ‘Spirit of Salford’. I love living in Salford, moresso living in a close community of Wardley, this development will ruin the Spirit!!

My last point for now is that in the assessments, Salford City Council refers to development on Green belt will need exceptional circumstances to be built on and I personally and strongly believe there isn’t any to justify the approval for the development.

7 A0664 R00221 Mark Hallen I am very interested in any proposal to build on green belt land in my locality. In particular my moss. I have been a regular visitor to Wardley Moss since the late sixties and oppose any plan to change our lovely green wilderness.

8 A0665 R00263 Maxine Hepburn I am a resident in the Wardley community.

I am writing with my objection to The planning proposal of new houses on The Moss.

Wildlife: As a resident I am proud of the greenbelt area and wildlife population that we house, Endangered Barn Owls, Rabbits and unusual birds have been sighted in that area. Also the tree population is currently vast and contributes to healthy living. Is there a guarantee that our wildlife and tree population will not be destroyed. Flooding - The area is prone to flooding and land subsidence. How will this be repaired? Need for open space - The open space is very popular with walkers, dog walkers, nature trails, children and families to enjoy. Lack of privacy - Residents will lose their lack of privacy that currently enjoy the Greenbelt countryside. Some of which purposely bought the properties for this reason. Wardley traffic - We have recently had a new school built in our area which has put a huge stress on our already busy road network. Buses, school children and increased car activity is

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) already a problem. Could there be a guarantee we will not suffer even more ? Pollution - We already have a close motorway network surrounding our houses. We really could not withstand more pollution - noise, fumes etc. Our health will be at risk.

The above is a general and brief outline of our concerns. Please take the above into account when a decision is being made on the planned proposal.

9 A0654 R00203 Mr and Mrs James Mr and Mrs James are not happy with the consultation plans to build on the moss at the side of our houses there’s a lot of wildlife on the moss. The wildlife would go we walk on the moss to help keep fit there is so much wild life that it would be criminal to kill it we bought our house because it backed on to the moss with such a good outlook. When my house was built 52 years ago the builder had to stop building where we live the land was not suitable to build on or put any more houses on so they gave us more land between the four houses so that we had nice big gardens where the other house should have gone the noise from the motorway the pollution from cars this should come a factor in the plans there not enough schools around here my daughter had to go to school in Swinton because the school was full and we only lived at the end of the road to school so could you please log my concerns thank you.

10 A0640 R00182 Mr and Mrs Mellor Strongly believe that all the current green belt land should be retained as such given the density of housing in the Swinton North ward and the need for wildlife to be retained in the vicinity.

11 A0218 R00179 Nigel and Karen This site is Green Belt land and unsuitable for development. Protection should be afforded under Hyams UDP EN1.

12 A0666 R00264 P Dunn We are a local business and residents in the Wardley community.

We are writing to voice our concerns and back up our objection to The planning proposal of houses on The Moss.

Wildlife: As a business and resident we are proud of the greenbelt area and wildlife population

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) that we house, Endangered Barn Owls, Rabbits and unusual birds have been sighted in that area. Also the tree population is currently vast and contributes to healthy living. Is there a guarantee that our wildlife and tree population will not be destroyed. Flooding - The area is prone to flooding and land subsidence. Need for open space - The open space is very popular with walkers, dog walkers, nature trails, children and families to enjoy. Lack of privacy - Residents will lose their lack of privacy that currently enjoy the Greenbelt countryside. Some of which purposely bought the properties for this reason. Wardley traffic - We have recently had a new school built in our area which has put a huge stress on our already busy road network. Buses, school children and increased car activity is already a problem. Could there be a guarantee we will not suffer even more ? Pollution - We already have a close motorway network surrounding our houses. We really could not withstand more pollution - noise, fumes etc. Our health will be at risk.

The above is a general and brief outline of our concerns. Please take the above into account when a decision is being made on the planned proposal.

13 A0638 R00177 Paul Donovan The site in question is part of the green belt – the only stretch of green belt in this part of Salford.

There is no indication of brownfield sites or sites available for regeneration or redevelopment as suitable alternatives.

Development at this location would adversely impact upon the viability of the green belt in providing a buffer between the M60 and Wardley.

Air quality is poor in this area and local infrastructure could not support housing at this location. In addition, it is vitally important that this land is protected to maintain both a viable community and the vitality of the local community.

The loss of green land, habitats, landscape and wildlife and irreparable damage not deemed to

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) be for “exceptional circumstances” required for release of Green Belt land and lastly the increase in traffic congestion and pollution especially noise, air and overall pollution

Fundamental reassessment of this site given the comments above

14 A0394 R00248 Peel Holdings (Land Site proposed for development – site reference SW005 and Property) Limited (Turley on General comments behalf of) Peel acknowledge the existence of brick and clay underneath the site. Such does not however preclude the development of the site within the plan period

Scale of development/number of units

The development capacity of the site will be informed by a future masterplanning exercise, having regard to the site’s constraints, including the impact of the M60/M61 motorway to the north. It would not be appropriate to make assumptions regarding the impact of this constraint on the developable area at this stage therefore.

Potential mitigation requirements

Peel does not agree with the assessment’s conclusion regarding the public open space requirements of any future residential development of the site. These requirements will be established based on the scheme which is progressed, having regard to the number and mix of units, and informed by a full understanding of the extent to which the local area is deficient in different typologies of public open space. The Council does not currently have an up to date open space assessment. It is therefore not appropriate to specify the development’s public open space requirements at this stage.

The remaining identified mitigation requirements can be achieved in the context of the site’s

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) development for housing. Any constraints which the site presents are therefore not considered to be insurmountable. However, as with all of the sites proposed for development, a full suite of survey work would be undertaken at the pre-planning application stage to identify all constraints to the proposed development and to inform detailed mitigation requirements.

Green Belt assessment

The site’s allocation for development in the Local Plan would require its removal from the Green Belt. A separate statement is attached to this proforma which assesses the site’s Green Belt function and contribution and the impact on the Green Belt arising from its release. This assessment considers this site and site references SW006 and SW007 which form part of the same area of Green Belt land proposed for release by Peel.

See ‘Schedule of representations on Green Belt assessment sites’ in relation to site GBEX15 – New St Ambrose Barlow High School and Green Belt immediately to the north and west.

15 A0658 R00209 Residents Against This is green belt land that plays a key role in providing a green buffer between Swinton, Inappropriate Kearsley and Walkden. It is not suitable for development. Development (RAID) 16 A0637 R00176 Wardley Residents The site in question is part of the green belt – the only stretch of green belt in this part of Salford. Group Development at this location would adversely impact upon the viability of the green belt in providing a buffer between the M60 and Wardley.

Air quality is poor in this area and local infrastructure could not support housing at this location.

Given the fact that this is designated green belt land and since St Ambrose Barlow Roman Catholic High School was built on green belt land due to ‘exceptional circumstances’ this is all

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) the more reason to protect this land from development.

In addition, it is vitally important that this land is protected to maintain both a viable community and the vitality of the local community. The loss of green land, habitats, landscape and wildlife and irreparable damage not deemed to be for “exceptional circumstances” required for release of Green Belt land and lastly the increase in traffic congestion and pollution especially noise, air and overall pollution are our concerns

Insufficient notice was provided to the local community about the suggested sites and publicity was non-existent.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW006 – Land north of new St Ambrose Barlow High School

Green belt land in the area has already been eroded in the area by the building of Ambrose Barlow school.

This green belt area is home to a variety of wildlife.

The Wardley area is a small residential area and local roads are already heavily congested, further development in the area would have a detrimental impact on the quality of life of residents.

These areas are well used by locals for recreation, and have been for many years.

The paths and trails are excellent for walking, off road running and cycling, and are also popular with dog walkers and horse riders.

The amount of wildlife that can be seen here is outstanding, the most spectacular being the roe deer which roam throughout this area of green belt.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

For these reasons I urge the planning committee to reject applications SW005/6/7 & 8 for housing development in these green belt areas.

3 A0631 R00169 Councillors Iain We believe that green field, recreational and green belt sites across the city should be protected Lindley and Les and retained and therefore we would oppose development at this site. Turner 4 A0641 R00185 Dianne Butters This is a green belt area with lots of wildlife and nature. The development would be disastrous for the wildlife in the area, destroying animals and their habitat. There are no other green spaces left in this area and a new development would be highly detrimental and inappropriate to the area.

The housing density in the area would be far too high. Green spaces are essential to a cleaner and healthier environment. Houses versus open spaces would be overbalanced.

There are not enough amenities and services within Wardley to sustain the development ie doctors surgeries, dentists, shops, sports/recreational halls, pubs, churches and most importantly the volume of traffic the development would generate cannot be sustained on the A6/A666 which are already highly congested at peak times.

The air pollution in the area is already at high levels due to the M60 at the back of Wardley. The amount of houses planned means more vehicles in the area means more air pollution. When there is an easterly wind the carcinogenic vehicle fumes can be smelt in certain areas of

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Wardley. These are no doubt coming from the nearby M60. Some residents living nearer the M60 in Wardley have to close their windows at these times, so to build even nearer the M60 would be madness.

The effect of the development on the character of Wardley will be devastating due to the density of houses versus green space. Wardley has a village feel with a close community and this will be lost forever. Wardley will be another concrete jungle.

The visual impact of this development will adversely affect everyone in the neighbourhood. The loss of existing views will adversely affect the residential amenity of the neighbourhood. Instead of looking over at an open space, the area will feel claustrophobic and overdeveloped.

The scale of the development is vast, spoiling the landscape and destroying quality agricultural land.

5 A0651 R00200 Eunice Morris This site is far too near the motorway. Air quality is poor now and will only get worse as traffic will increase in future years. Salford needs all the green belt land we have to compensate for the high level of COPD in adults and children. On visits to friends in Sindsley Road the fumes coming off the motorway are very high. Do not put any more people at risk, you have a duty to protect future generations from living in a concrete jungle and save what little green belt we have.

Additional evidence

Wildlife must also be considered and must be left for future generations to enjoy. I suggest a test of air quality of the area and an inspection of what wildlife will be destroyed if these plans were passed.

6 A0646 R00193 Geoffrey Collins 1/ Land north of St Ambrose Barlow High School

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 2/ Land south of M60,with wardley moss to the west, Clifton moss to the north, and Mossfield road to the south

I would like to put forward that both of these sites 1&2 above are ideal to be made into a country park, similar to clifton country park. It would give people a real taste of the country on there own doorstep. The cost to the council would be minimum, and the benefits to everyone in and out of the area would be huge. Wild life would be saved for posterity, and I am sure a job or too could be found for people. These open spaces are a gift from past generations please do not let us be the ones that take this away from us and children to come

7 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Evidence Base, Scale of Development & Cumulative Impacts Ecology Unit The Suggested Sites Consultation plan includes a number of greenfield sites outside the existing development envelope, which if they all came forward for development would result in the development of greenfield land on a scale not seen for many decades. GMEU currently does not have adequate baseline ecological information to make a strategic assessment about which of these sites or parts of these sites could be developed without leading to substantive losses in nature conservation features of local (Salford) interest.

It is important that ‘no net loss of biodiversity’ can be shown for all potential development sites (which could be achieved by including an element of bio-diversity off-setting).

For the following site clusters we would recommend:

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) a) That extended phase 1 habitat surveys are carried out of allocated sites (or preferably prior to allocation)

c) that biodiversity offsetting be considered for development proposals where applicable.

Wardley Moss (SW05-SW08 & WB05)

A group of sites to the south of the M60 that provide Ecological linkage between the river Irwell and Worsley Woods.

8 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

Based of the development scenarios identified this site has also been identified as potentially

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) generating more than 30 two-way trips on the Strategic Road Network during either peak period (using the GraHAM tool (used for gravity modelling and trip distribution purposes)). Given its location within the AQMA and trip-generating potential, the site is considered of ‘interest’ to the Highways Agency at this point in the process. However it is worth noting that just because sites have been identified as being ‘of interest’ at this stage this is not an indication that the Agency will prevent this site coming forward.

9 A0663 R00219 Jane Thurston I have very strong view against the current suggestion/proposal that the green belt land in the Wardley should be used for the development for the purpose of housing, the reason are as follows:

Pollution – Air/Noise

Flooding

The Site Assessment Form refers to the sites suffering from slight flooding that may be

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) seasonal, I do not feel that this is a true reflection of the actual situation, my garden is often water logged and has ‘significant flooding’ which also flows into my garage, at times it can be ankle deep and this is from the field which is always water logged throughout the winter and had large ponds as a result. Building houses on this land will put additional pressure on the land.

Privacy

If housing was built at the back of my property – I feel my privacy would be invaded due to the development would be built very close to my property. There would be a feeling of ‘sardine in a tin!’

Land Subsidence

Need for Open Spaces in the Local area

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) The ethos of SALFORD City Council is promoting the health and well being of individuals to ensure the citizens of Salford have every opportunity to remain fit, well and as independent as possible. Having the open space to go for walks aids relaxation and promotes healthy living and general well being. People are more likely to walk in a green area than walk around streets! This may not be seen as an important factor for the Councilor or business men but as a Salford resident, parent and an adult who wishes to remain in Wardley community, it is important to me and my family!

Land is used for leisure

Already number of properties on the market that are unable to sell.

Pressure on school and Local resources.

As a Governor of a Local Primary School, I would have grave concerns with the number of houses that would be built in the local area. There is already a significant pressure on local

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) schools and there is a lack of available places for the local children. I appreciate that there is suggestion that a school will be built as part of the complex but I do not feel that this will be sufficient due to the high volumes of houses that are planned.

Traffic – increased volume

Road – poor conditions

In addition to the above, the increase traffic will also have an impact on the roads and the quality of the roads surface.

Boundaries of area.

Get in Car to get the Local Park

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

Public footpaths – access to other community resources ie, Clifton Marina

Potential impact on a local business

If this development went ahead, it could potentially close a local business down and we will lose another local resource for the young people of the area.

Wildlife

Any development on this area will have a significant impact on the local wildlife and that is simply unfair, like many of the other reasons given, there is a significant lack of green space in Salford and you continue to take it away!

At the moment, Salford is running a campaign about the ‘Spirit of Salford’. I love living in Salford, moresso living in a close community of Wardley, this development will ruin the Spirit!!

10 A0664 R00221 Mark Hallen I am very interested in any proposal to build on green belt land in my locality. In particular my

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) moss. I have been a regular visitor to Wardley Moss since the late sixties and oppose any plan to change our lovely green wilderness.

11 A0665 R00263 Maxine Hepburn I am a resident in the Wardley community.

I am writing with my objection to The planning proposal of new houses on The Moss.

The above is a general and brief outline of our concerns. Please take the above into account when a decision is being made on the planned proposal.

12 A0654 R00203 Mr and Mrs James Mr and Mrs James are not happy with the consultation plans to build on the moss at the side of our houses there’s a lot of wildlife on the moss. The wildlife would go we walk on the moss to help keep fit there is so much wild life that it would be criminal to kill it we bought our house because it backed on to the moss with such a good outlook. When my house was built 52 years ago the builder had to stop building where we live the land was not suitable to build on or put

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) any more houses on so they gave us more land between the four houses so that we had nice big gardens where the other house should have gone the noise from the motorway the pollution from cars this should come a factor in the plans there not enough schools around here my daughter had to go to school in Swinton because the school was full and we only lived at the end of the road to school so could you please log my concerns thank you.

13 A0640 R00182 Mr and Mrs Mellor Strongly believe that all the current green belt land should be retained as such given the density of housing in the Swinton North ward and the need for wildlife to be retained in the vicinity.

14 A0218 R00180 Nigel and Karen This site is Green Belt land and unsuitable for development. Protection should be afforded under Hyams UDP EN1.

15 A0666 R00264 P Dunn We are a local business and residents in the Wardley community.

We are writing to voice our concerns and back up our objection to The planning proposal of houses on The Moss.

Wildlife: As a business and resident we are proud of the greenbelt area and wildlife population that we house, Endangered Barn Owls, Rabbits and unusual birds have been sighted in that area. Also the tree population is currently vast and contributes to healthy living. Is there a guarantee that our wildlife and tree population will not be destroyed. Flooding - The area is prone to flooding and land subsidence. Need for open space - The open space is very popular with walkers, dog walkers, nature trails, children and families to enjoy. Lack of privacy - Residents will lose their lack of privacy that currently enjoy the Greenbelt countryside. Some of which purposely bought the properties for this reason. Wardley traffic - We have recently had a new school built in our area which has put a huge stress on our already busy road network. Buses, school children and increased car activity is already a problem. Could there be a guarantee we will not suffer even more ? Pollution - We already have a close motorway network surrounding our houses. We really could

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) not withstand more pollution - noise, fumes etc. Our health will be at risk.

The above is a general and brief outline of our concerns. Please take the above into account when a decision is being made on the planned proposal.

16 A0638 R00177 Paul Donovan The site in question is part of the green belt – the only stretch of green belt in this part of Salford.

There is no indication of brownfield sites or sites available for regeneration or redevelopment as suitable alternatives.

Development at this location would adversely impact upon the viability of the green belt in providing a buffer between the M60 and Wardley.

Air quality is poor in this area and local infrastructure could not support housing at this location.

In addition, it is vitally important that this land is protected to maintain both a viable community and the vitality of the local community.

The loss of green land, habitats, landscape and wildlife and irreparable damage not deemed to be for “exceptional circumstances” required for release of Green Belt land and lastly the increase in traffic congestion and pollution especially noise, air and overall pollution

Fundamental reassessment of this site given the comments above

17 A0394 R00249 Peel Holdings (Land Site proposed for development – site reference SW006 and Property) Limited (Turley on General comments behalf of) Peel acknowledge the existence of brick and clay underneath the site. Such does not however preclude the development of the site within the plan period.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

Scale of development/number of units

Potential mitigation requirements

The remaining identified mitigation requirements can be achieved in the context of the site’s development for housing. Any constraints which the site presents are therefore not considered to be insurmountable. However, as with all of the sites proposed for development, a full suite of survey work would be undertaken at the pre-planning application stage to identify all constraints to the proposed development and to inform detailed mitigation requirements.

Green Belt assessment

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) same area of Green Belt land proposed for release by Peel.

See ‘Schedule of representations on Green Belt assessment sites’ in relation to site GBEX15 – New St Ambrose Barlow High School and Green Belt immediately to the north and west.

18 A0658 R00209 Residents Against This is green belt land that plays a key role in providing a green buffer between Swinton, Inappropriate Kearsley and Walkden. It is not suitable for development. Development (RAID) 19 A0637 R00176 Wardley Residents The site in question is part of the green belt – the only stretch of green belt in this part of Salford. Group Development at this location would adversely impact upon the viability of the green belt in providing a buffer between the M60 and Wardley.

Air quality is poor in this area and local infrastructure could not support housing at this location.

Given the fact that this is designated green belt land and since St Ambrose Barlow Roman Catholic High School was built on green belt land due to ‘exceptional circumstances’ this is all the more reason to protect this land from development.

Insufficient notice was provided to the local community about the suggested sites and publicity was non-existent.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW007 – Land north of Wardley

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0593 R00123 Anne Hepburn I would be interested to know as per your assessment what the exceptional circumstances would be to justify this development. I would also be interested to know when did Peel Holdings buy this land and from whom. It has been noticed in recent months the Moss has not been tended to and is now overgrown and footpaths hard to access – many local people walk this area enjoying the wildlife and fish in the pond – why should this be destroyed by a housing estate.

Building on the greenbelt land would cause serious traffic problems along Mossfield Road – with a school on Mossfield Road and Wardley Primary at the other end along with Cemetery Road being blocked Mossfield is the only exit road on the estate – building new houses would cause chaos and would be dangerous to the children and residents who have to back out of their drives. The schools are already full building new homes would add to this problem. The majority of residents on the Wardley estate would also see their homes devalued especially the bungalows that back onto the moss they are at present not overlooked. The new homes would be too close to the motorway causing noise and pollution problems. It is already a nightmare driving round Swinton building 750 houses would add to this.

2 A0625 R00161 Barbara Browne I am writing to you to object in the strongest terms about the proposal to possibly remove the land north of Wardley, ref SW007, from greenbelt status for the possible development of up to 750 houses.

This area has been used extensively by local residents including myself and family for many years, for various types of recreation i.e. walking, horse riding, fishing. I walk my dog there regularly and over the years I have taught my children and now my grandchildren about nature and the value of preserving it.

‘The moss’ as it is known locally holds a great diversity of flora and fauna. Many birds including kestrels call it home. Through the country many once common birds are declining. Sparrow and starlings among them. This is not happening here and a major factor in that is ‘the moss’. Frogs

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) are also declining but not here. We have foxes, weasels, lizards and lots of other inhabitants. We have newts as well as frogs in the ponds –possibly ‘great crested’ a protected species. Also bats, another protected species feed on the moss and possibly roost.

The moss also provides a buffer between the M60 and local housing estates.

Over 20 years ago we fought a long, hard battle about the traffic on Mossfield and Cemetery Roads. This resulted in Cemetery Road being blocked off, resulting in a much better quality of life and a much safer environment for our children. A direct result of the development would be a massive increase in noise and return of the fear for our children’s safety, as inevitably Cemetery Road would have to be opened up to provide the access needed and we would have the return of the ‘rat run’ between the A666 and the A6. There would also be a serious decline in air quality which as an asthma sufferer myself concerns me deeply. Another impact would be on the local infrastructure. Local schools are already full, waiting time for doctors and dentist appointments are high. All this having a detrimental impact on our lives.

This is the only piece of greenbelt we have between the M60, A666, A6 and Swinton town centre and needs to be preserved.

I am not surprised that the source of the site suggestion was Peel Holdings. They have already bulldozed and ripped out all the trees on the piece of land they want to build houses on, even though they have not yet applied for planning permission. This was with complete disregard for the fact that it is illegal to disturb nesting birds. I have checked with the R.S.P.B. and this applies from when the first stitch of a nest is laid. The law obviously is of no concern to Peel Holdings.

3 A0603 R00134 Carole Edwards- I wish to object to any potential development for housing on this green belt land. Viller The green belt land in Wardley is the last of the green belt land in the local area.

Green belt land in the area has already been eroded in the area by the building of Ambrose

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Barlow school.

This green belt area is home to a variety of wildlife.

The Wardley area is a small residential area and local roads are already heavily congested, further development in the area would have a detrimental impact on the quality of life of residents.

4 A0590 R00116 Cath McNicoll I am writing to raise my objections to the proposed building of 750 houses on the land known as the moss.

This green belt area is the only open land in the vicinity and is enjoyed by young and old alike. Children playing, dog walkers, horse riders, fishermen, to name just a few. To destroy this area of natural beauty would be a sin.

The area is already densely populated with houses and to create more will only make our already congested roads worse. Ours schools are already full to capacity with some children unable to get into their local school. How many more schools would be needed, which creates even more traffic. On another note what about the wild life that's lives on the moss, the birds that nest in the trees, the foxes, rabbits, squirrels, mice, frogs, snakes etc. where will they go in this built up area.

I note the proposal indicates that the ponds may stay in the area, how will that work a new estate probably filled with young children with deep ponds in the middle. Certainly would create a safety issue.

5 A0606 R00139 Colin Ainscough I read with horror your document titled ‘Neighbourhood Area Document – Swinton’ which detailed suggested Green belt sites being considered for housing development.

I object in the strongest terms to any development of the green belt for housing, and I am

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) particularly concerned about the sites North of the A6 in the Swinton and Wardley areas (Sites SW005, SW006, SW007 & SW008).

These areas are well used by locals for recreation, and have been for many years.

The paths and trails are excellent for walking, off road running and cycling, and are also popular with dog walkers and horse riders.

The amount of wildlife that can be seen here is outstanding, the most spectacular being the roe deer which roam throughout this area of green belt.

In addition to the health benefits from exercise whilst using the green belt, there are significant benefits provided by the trees and hedgerows in filtering the pollution from the M60 motorway which cuts through Wardley and Swinton moss.

For these reasons I urge the planning committee to reject applications SW005/6/7 & 8 for housing development in these green belt areas.

6 A0631 R00169 Councillors Iain We believe that green field, recreational and green belt sites across the city should be protected Lindley and Les and retained and therefore we would oppose development at this site. Turner 7 A0646 R00193 Geoffrey Collins 1/ Land north of St Ambrose Barlow High School

2/ Land south of M60,with wardley moss to the west, Clifton moss to the north, and Mossfield road to the south

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) I would like to put forward that both of these sites 1&2 above are ideal to be made into a country park, similar to clifton country park. It would give people a real taste of the country on there own doorstep. The cost to the council would be minimum, and the benefits to everyone in and out of the area would be huge. Wild life would be saved for posterity, and I am sure a job or too could be found for people. These open spaces are a gift from past generations please do not let us be the ones that take this away from us and children to come

8 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Evidence Base, Scale of Development & Cumulative Impacts Ecology Unit The Suggested Sites Consultation plan includes a number of greenfield sites outside the existing development envelope, which if they all came forward for development would result in the development of greenfield land on a scale not seen for many decades. GMEU currently does not have adequate baseline ecological information to make a strategic assessment about which of these sites or parts of these sites could be developed without leading to substantive losses in nature conservation features of local (Salford) interest.

It is important that ‘no net loss of biodiversity’ can be shown for all potential development sites (which could be achieved by including an element of bio-diversity off-setting).

For the following site clusters we would recommend:

a) That extended phase 1 habitat surveys are carried out of allocated sites (or preferably prior to allocation)

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) b) that for any of these sites that are determined as suitable for development that these areas are required to develop ‘master plans’ that include proposals for retaining / enhancing biodiversity interests.

c) that biodiversity offsetting be considered for development proposals where applicable.

Wardley Moss (SW05-SW08 & WB05)

A group of sites to the south of the M60 that provide Ecological linkage between the river Irwell and Worsley Woods.

9 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

10 A0663 R00219 Jane Thurston I have very strong view against the current suggestion/proposal that the green belt land in the Wardley should be used for the development for the purpose of housing, the reason are as follows:

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Pollution – Air/Noise

Land Subsidence

Need for Open Spaces in the Local area

Being a Salford resident who also works in the city, I have seem a significant reduction in ‘green

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) areas’ over the years and I feel to maintain the health and well being of the citizens of Salford it is essential to have areas and spaces that can be used for outdoor leisure so the public can step out of ‘city life’ into some green area without having to travel miles before reaching any open/green space.

Land is used for leisure

Already number of properties on the market that are unable to sell.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

Pressure on school and Local resources.

Traffic – increased volume

Road – poor conditions

In addition to the above, the increase traffic will also have an impact on the roads and the quality of the roads surface.

Boundaries of area.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) I understand the green belt is about separation of areas, if this development went ahead there would not be any boundaries between a number of areas including Walkden, Swinton, Wardley, Clifton. Between all these areas there will be NO green areas.

Get in Car to get the Local Park

Public footpaths – access to other community resources ie, Clifton Marina

Potential impact on a local business

If this development went ahead, it could potentially close a local business down and we will lose another local resource for the young people of the area.

Wildlife

At the moment, Salford is running a campaign about the ‘Spirit of Salford’. I love living in Salford, moresso living in a close community of Wardley, this development will ruin the Spirit!!

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) My last point for now is that in the assessments, Salford City Council refers to development on Green belt will need exceptional circumstances to be built on and I personally and strongly believe there isn’t any to justify the approval for the development.

11 A0614 R00147 Janet Hesford I wish to advise you of my concerns towards the proposed plans for development in Swinton ‐ SW007.

I have lived in this area for almost 30 years and remember the fight the local residents had prior to this to get the area recognised as greenbelt land. They were assured at the time that there would never be any development on this land as it was now designated greenbelt.

I believe there to be Great Crested Newts which are a protected species in the fishing ponds on this land. This is information from people who fish there and not from personal sightings.

There is an abundance of wildlife on the Moss and it would be sad to see it disturbed due to more building in what is an already built‐up area. I have seen many types of birds, and nests within the trees on the Moss, hedgehogs and also bats, which we see from time to time at the rear of our garden.

I am retired on ill‐health and use the Moss for walking. The council supposedly prides itself on striving for a “fit city” and yet if this land is built on, the only place to walk without cars locally to me would be the local cemetery on Cemetery Road.

I walk here often with my 4 young grandchildren teaching them about different aspects of wildlife as I did my own children when they were younger. Again it would be most upsetting if we were unable to walk there when they visited. We also sometimes use the Moss as a cut through when we are going to and from school (they attend Clifton Primary). It encourages the children to walk and encourages them to take an active interest in their surroundings.

The local primary schools are already at capacity. I am concerned as to future generations 63

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) schooling should 750 houses be built on this land. At what detriment would it be to the education of next generations of local children?

The roads (certainly Mossfield Road) are not of an infrastructure to be able to withstand a further increase in volume of traffic, even if the bollards were removed on Cemetery Road. I lived here when the bollards were installed, and they were put there to create a safer environment for children and the local schools, in order to reduce volume of traffic on this residential estate. Twenty odd years down the line you would get even more cars and huge wagons using the area as a cut through to get to the motorway and so put children’s lives at risk.

Mossfield School have a horrendous problem already with parking in the area and to drive through there at start and end of the school day is dreadful at times. An increase in traffic would pose further problems there and again cause a risk to the safety of the children.

The land is mainly peat and would cause many issues should property developers try and build on there. There have been problems with many of the properties built around here.

Several years ago we were offered money due to the air quality and noise pollution being diminished because of the motorway which is to the rear of our property. An increase in the region of 1500 cars in the area (assuming 2 to a home which is average these days) would only create further problems with air quality and noise pollution.

Currently 20+ houses are supposedly being built by Peel Holdings at the end of Mossfield Road. Recently one lorry was there to flatten out the land near Wardley Primary school. The mess left on our road was appalling. I dread to think what a “development” of 750 houses would bring with it.

The area is used by many local people for walking and fishing. If this is taken then there is no “green” space left in this part of Swinton within walking distance for me. I do not always have access to transport to get me to Clifton Marina (our next local area of green space) and so it

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) would mean less access to green space areas and impose a direct impact on my personal health.

We are constantly being told that people need more green spaces, and whilst I appreciate that there could be a need for housing developments ‐ I am sure that Salford has many brownfield plots that could be utilised and improved upon to fill that need.

In conclusion, I ask you therefore to consider all of my comments when determining where new property developments should be developed.

12 A0648 R00197 Katherine Hesford - I was brought up on Mossfield Road and spent much of my childhood playing on the Moss at the Preston back of our home. My mum and dad still live there, we live close to the Marina. Often myself and my 3 children walk across the Moss to visit my mum and dad.

It is a place where I fished on the pond, learnt about local wildlife, climbed the trees and played with my friends. I spent many a happy hour out there.

As a staff nurse I must add that taking away land such as this encourages children to sit indoors playing on ipads, consoles, etc thus putting costs on the NHS due to obesity.

I hope therefore that you will keep the land as greenbelt for the people around the Moss area.

13 A0650 R00199 Lauren Preston I am writing to you about the moss. Don’t build houses on the moss here are a few reasons why. 1. The builders will ruin the trees where the birds live and destroy their nests. 2. We need plants and trees to survive. Killing plants and trees kills everything. 3. It would ruin animal habitats. 4. If you take the moss away it will affect the animals. I have seen birds, hedgehogs, cats, squirrels and bats out there. 5. People will give up exercise and start to play more on consoles, iPads, iPhones etc.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 6. Don’t ruin the place I and other people like my sister and brother play there in the summer and walk home from school that way with my nana and granddad. Remember nowhere to play - no joy, no happiness.

14 A0601 R00132 Linda Mitchell I agree 100% with the key issues identified in the SW007 document.

Additional evidence

This is a very important green belt area which separates Swinton from Walkden and used as a recreation and nature walks for all especially the young children of Wardley and the surrounding areas.

The report shows what would be accessible from this proposed site if developed but does not say how the site would be accessed once completed. There are no obvious routes (from what I can see) without demolishing already occupied houses.

As previous surveys have established, there is a certain amount of noise levels and pollution from the nearby motorway, way would we even consider building houses so close and put people’s health at risk

15 A0664 R00221 Mark Hallen I am very interested in any proposal to build on green belt land in my locality. In particular my moss. I have been a regular visitor to Wardley Moss since the late sixties and oppose any plan to change our lovely green wilderness.

16 A0665 R00263 Maxine Hepburn I am a resident in the Wardley community.

I am writing with my objection to The planning proposal of new houses on The Moss.

Wildlife: As a resident I am proud of the greenbelt area and wildlife population that we house, Endangered Barn Owls, Rabbits and unusual birds have been sighted in that area. Also the tree

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) population is currently vast and contributes to healthy living. Is there a guarantee that our wildlife and tree population will not be destroyed. Flooding - The area is prone to flooding and land subsidence. How will this be repaired? Need for open space - The open space is very popular with walkers, dog walkers, nature trails, children and families to enjoy. Lack of privacy - Residents will lose their lack of privacy that currently enjoy the Greenbelt countryside. Some of which purposely bought the properties for this reason. Wardley traffic - We have recently had a new school built in our area which has put a huge stress on our already busy road network. Buses, school children and increased car activity is already a problem. Could there be a guarantee we will not suffer even more ? Pollution - We already have a close motorway network surrounding our houses. We really could not withstand more pollution - noise, fumes etc. Our health will be at risk.

The above is a general and brief outline of our concerns. Please take the above into account when a decision is being made on the planned proposal.

17 A0846 R00446 Minerals and Waste Policy 7 of the Minerals Plan aims to restrict the removal of peat except where it is required to Planning Unit allow restoration and then only peat physically required to enable this. The BGS geological data identifies that this site may be underlain by peat deposits. If peat deposits do exist then Policy 7 will need to be taken into account during the site assessment.

18 A0600 R00131 Mr and Mrs We are extremely concerned over the council’s review of the greenbelt land at Wardley moss. Bradford This is an area of protected wildlife species and plants that removal of could only have a detrimental effect on the locality and environment as a whole. In particular known to be habitants of the area are bats, newts, butterflies, hedgehogs, various wild birds and nesting areas, crickets, dragonflies, ducks, to name but a few. This is a wildlife corridor that would be ruined. This area also has large water/pond areas that are not suitable for development for many reasons.

As well as this if this area was to be developed it would mean one urban sprawl and no

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) distinction between the townships of Clifton/ Swinton/ Wardley. Plus as residents of ***street name*** which backs onto this area, we object to the change in visual appearance and the impact of the visual appearance on the area as a whole, along with the pollution that goes with this.

The area includes trees, potential removal of these would lead to increased noise levels including motorway traffic noise. Plus the addition of extra people and subsequent vehicles in the area that a development would bring is not only more pollution, but will cramp the already congested roads around this hotspot area of the Swinton interchange-regularly peaking on the traffic news.

Additional evidence

Although the draft national planning policy to look at developing land is being considered, by the same token the England Biodiversity strategy to stop the loss of nature’s species and habitats is to create nature improvement areas, so why not let an existing nature spot be retained?

19 A0654 R00203 Mr and Mrs James Mr and Mrs James are not happy with the consultation plans to build on the moss at the side of our houses there’s a lot of wildlife on the moss. The wildlife would go we walk on the moss to help keep fit there is so much wild life that it would be criminal to kill it we bought our house because it backed on to the moss with such a good outlook. When my house was built 52 years ago the builder had to stop building where we live the land was not suitable to build on or put any more houses on so they gave us more land between the four houses so that we had nice big gardens where the other house should have gone the noise from the motorway the pollution from cars this should come a factor in the plans there not enough schools around here my daughter had to go to school in Swinton because the school was full and we only lived at the end of the road to school so could you please log my concerns thank you.

20 A0640 R00182 Mr and Mrs Mellor Strongly believe that all the current green belt land should be retained as such given the density of housing in the Swinton North ward and the need for wildlife to be retained in the vicinity.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

21 A0626 R00162 Mrs Parkinson The area of land bordering Mossfield extending to the motorway M60 was subject to a public inquiry some 20 years ago. The inquiry ruled in favour of the issues raised at that time by the general public. These constraints/issues must surely have increased during that period.

Noise-traffic pollution and hazards remitted from the M60 etc would be a major concern for local residents unfortunate enough to be housed along this perimeter area.

Mossfield playing fields are a designated public open space on the town map. As such it should be retained as such for future generations. Is there not a legal covenant on this area?

Salford City Council lost their last public inquiry at a considerable expense to their budget -20 years hence, are you prepared to generate further public anger which would inevitably result in this proceeding resurfacing again. To what avail?

Let this last remaining ‘green lung’ between Swinton and Walkden be retained. Let common sense prevail!

22 A0404 R00207 Natural England SW007 Land north of Wardley Housing Green belt SW008 Land north west of Little Moss Lane / SW009 Land at Moss Colliery Road Housing Recreation / SW010 Land west of Collegiate Way These proposed site allocations contain includes Deep Peat (please see advice below relating to this designation).

Blanket Bog/Peat represents the largest terrestrial carbon store in the UK. Peatlands also perform an important role in water catchment management- both water quality and water storage. As such there is widespread concern that development in these areas may have adverse impacts on the biodiversity , carbon value and water management functions of these areas.

The habitat is internationally important not only in a Europe context but also the world. The UK

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) has a special responsibility for protection of this habitat type ( both inside and outside of SSSIs) and is required to report to Europe on the extent, condition and threats to this feature – favourable conservation status.

Mosslands (upland blanket bog and lowland raised bog) are a fantastic wildlife habitat - hotspots for a wide range of unique and rare species. They once covered large areas of this region but today, 99% of the resource has been destroyed with only 300 hectares of intact habitat remaining.

Peat is a precious resource that can take thousands of years to form and peat bogs are important habitats for a whole range of species from bog bush-crickets to hen harriers. However, our peat bogs have been overexploited by the commercial extraction of peat, particularly for horticulture, and have been irreparably damaged by drainage, afforestation and inappropriate management.

Peat is still growing on some active bogs, but the rate of formation is greatly exceeded by the rate of loss. Poorly managed grazing, intensive burning and acid rain all cause erosion, while peat-cutting exposes the underlying bedrock. The subsequent loss of sponge-like blanket bog causes flash flooding and erosion downstream.

23 A0218 R00180 Nigel and Karen This site is Green Belt land and unsuitable for development. Protection should be afforded under Hyams UDP EN1.

24 A0666 R00264 P Dunn We are a local business and residents in the Wardley community.

We are writing to voice our concerns and back up our objection to The planning proposal of houses on The Moss.

Wildlife: As a business and resident we are proud of the greenbelt area and wildlife population that we house, Endangered Barn Owls, Rabbits and unusual birds have been sighted in that

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) area. Also the tree population is currently vast and contributes to healthy living. Is there a guarantee that our wildlife and tree population will not be destroyed. Flooding - The area is prone to flooding and land subsidence. Need for open space - The open space is very popular with walkers, dog walkers, nature trails, children and families to enjoy. Lack of privacy - Residents will lose their lack of privacy that currently enjoy the Greenbelt countryside. Some of which purposely bought the properties for this reason. Wardley traffic - We have recently had a new school built in our area which has put a huge stress on our already busy road network. Buses, school children and increased car activity is already a problem. Could there be a guarantee we will not suffer even more ? Pollution - We already have a close motorway network surrounding our houses. We really could not withstand more pollution - noise, fumes etc. Our health will be at risk.

The above is a general and brief outline of our concerns. Please take the above into account when a decision is being made on the planned proposal.

25 A0638 R00177 Paul Donovan The site in question is part of the green belt – the only stretch of green belt in this part of Salford.

There is no indication of brownfield sites or sites available for regeneration or redevelopment as suitable alternatives.

Development at this location would adversely impact upon the viability of the green belt in providing a buffer between the M60 and Wardley.

Air quality is poor in this area and local infrastructure could not support housing at this location.

In addition, it is vitally important that this land is protected to maintain both a viable community and the vitality of the local community.

The loss of green land, habitats, landscape and wildlife and irreparable damage not deemed to

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

Fundamental reassessment of this site given the comments above

26 A0394 R00250 Peel Holdings (Land Site proposed for development – site reference SW007 and Property) Limited (Turley on General comments behalf of) Peel do not support the Council’s assessment that the whole of this site lies within the Green Belt; a small area of the site directly the north west of Mossfield Drive is unallocated in the UDP and does not form part of the Green Belt. As such, the Council’s assessment of the site should be updated to note that exceptional circumstances would not need to be demonstrated in order to justify its development.

Biodiversity

The statement that there are records of important species on this site is unqualified. It should be given no weight in assessing the development potential of this site at this stage.

Potential mitigation measures

Peel does not agree with the identified mitigation requirement for the provision of a new primary school. The requirement for a primary school can only be established in the context of a full understanding of the local school capacity position and how this is likely to chance over time and alongside the phased delivery of the development. At this stage, insufficient information on this has been presented to enable the conclusion to be drawn that a primary school will be needed. The same point would apply to the proposed open space requirements, which cannot be established without the benefit of an up to date open space audit.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Notwithstanding the above, it should be noted that two existing primary schools adjoin the site. There could be opportunities to extend these schools, or other schools in the local area.

Peel acknowledge the existence of brick and clay underneath the site. Such does not however preclude the development of the site within the plan period.

Green Belt assessment

The site’s allocation for development in the Local Plan would require its removal from the Green Belt. A separate statement is attached to this proforma which assesses the site’s Green Belt function and contribution and the impact on the Green Belt arising from its release. This assessment considers this site and site references SW005 and SW006 which form part of the same area of Green Belt land proposed for release by Peel.

See ‘Schedule of representations on Green Belt assessment sites’ in relation to site GBEX16 – Green Belt north of Wardley.

27 A0588 R00114 Rebecca Pugh My house backs on to the moss. I object to the proposal of building on the moss for the following reasons:-  Destruction of habitat for wide life  People take their children/dogs for walks on the moss  The amount of traffic will increase, with the traffic already being horrendous in the morning and evenings anyway  The schools are already full, bringing more children into the catchment area 73

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)  The doctors are already hard enough to get an appointment, more people in the area it's going to get harder

There is already nowhere for the children on our estate to play, with parents taking children for walks on the moss, maybe a play area would be a good idea with a field for them to play football.

I feel very strongly about opposing this.

28 A0658 R00209 Residents Against This is green belt land that plays a key role in providing a green buffer between Swinton, Inappropriate Kearsley and Walkden. It is not suitable for development. Development (RAID) 29 A0649 R00198 Rob Hesford I have lived in this area for the best part of 50 years and remember the fight my parents & the local residents had to this to get the area recognised as greenbelt land. They were assured at the time that there would never be any development on this land as it was now designated greenbelt.

 Mossfield Road has a restricted access to it, this is for 2 reasons - o To stop the constant flow of heavy traffic cutting through travelling to & from the motorway. o To improve the safety of local children walking to & from school etc.

 In addition to the above point(s) the construction of the roadway on Mossfield Road is insufficient to withstand a further increase in volume of traffic. Prior to the bollards being installed on Cemetery Road the road surface at the junction of Mossfield Road & Cemetery Road constantly shifted due to the volume of traffic requiring repairs to the surface being carried out on a regular basis.

 My wife is retired on ill-health and uses the Moss for walking. The council allegedly prides itself on striving for a “fit city” and yet if this land is built on the only place to walk without the 74

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) need for a car & to be away from traffic pollution would be the local cemetery on Cemetery Road.

 As I previously stated I have lived on Mossfield Road for almost 50 years & the view from the rear of our property has changed dramatically. When it was originally built the M62 (now M60) was just noise pollution. However, nowadays, due to the changes in the contours of the land between it & our home it is now possible to read the signs over the motorway - indicating to me that the land ‘has dropped’ at least 6 feet over time. What impact would that movement have on any properties built?

 The moss is the natural habitat to many birds & animals. Foxes, hedgehogs, bats (protected?) & a multitude of species of birds to name a few.

30 A0595 R00125 Robert and Susan The primary function of “Green Belt Land” is to act as a clear zone/space between urban Pritchard developments. This area of the Moss, together with adjoining land, clearly separates Swinton/Wardley from Kearsley (Bolton), and must retain its “Green Belt Land” designation for this purpose.

A second function is as a “priority habitat”. This land is a priority habitat for Salford due to the presence of endangered species; for Manchester due to the areas of standing water for wild fowl etc.; at National Level for the hedgerows which provide habitat for small mammals and small birds.

Thirdly as a recreation area for walkers with links through to Walkden, Little Hulton, Clifton and Clifton Marina etc.; for local anglers in the ponds etc.; and an educational facility for children regarding flora and fauna.

Finally the area serves an ecological function by absorbing pollution from the nearby Motorways, especially as numerous trees have been recently planted as part of the Red Rose Forest project, and as a wetland protecting against local flooding. These functions would be lost if

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) hardstandings, numerous cars and general emissions from a large swathe of houses would replace it. Extra emissions could lead to health problems for residents of Swinton North, Clifton and Wardley, especially elderly people and children.

The GREEN BELT DESIGNATION MUST REMAIN.

Once developed the land is lost forever. Priority must be given to develop Brownfield Sites before Green Belt Land is even considered.

The impact of up to 750 Houses, with approximately 1100 plus vehicles, would have a major effect on traffic problems in the area. The only access to the site would be from Bolton Road and/or Mossfield Road, with traffic using these roads to get onto Station Road to get to Swinton Town Centre.

All these Roads have major traffic problems in rush hours and during school run times, especially Mossfield Road which is the only access to Bolton Road and Station Road and onto Walkden for residents of Mossfield Road, Cemetery Road North, Burford Drive, Woodford Drive, Chelford Drive, Dewberry Close, Clematis Walk, Ackworth Road etc.

Traffic on Bolton Road and Station Road would be brought to a stand still at various times and rush hours particularly.

The increase traffic around the areas and the two schools shown on the Layout Plans would constitute a danger to children attending these schools from increase numbers of vehicles and increase pollution generally to children attending them. Especially the Children attending Mossfield School and Sure Start Centre as, previously noted, this is the only route to Bolton Road and Station Road for the addresses listed above.

These dangers cannot be overstated.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 31 A0578 R00104 Robert Stubbs I am writing to formally (and strongly) oppose & reject the proposal to develop the land north of Wardley (your reference: SW007) for the following reasons:

Green Belt/Wildlife - As you know the land in question is a green belt site, with many types/species of wildlife/birds using the green belt as their habitat, the development would see this natural habitat destroyed. - 99% of moss land has already been destroyed in the north west so far in recent years (according to statistics taken from Wildlife Trusts Website: www.wildlifetrusts.org/) - "Not only are mosslands a key habitat for endangered and rare species, but they also have the ability to store carbon dioxide. In an age where Climate Change issues are rife, mosslands hold the key to many concerns." - People of the Wardley/Swinton area have moved to this area and chose to buy/invest in houses here as it's next to a green belt.

Traffic implications - If the build were to be permitted, at development stage alone there would be very significant potential traffic impact. In previous developments of a similar scale, it was estimated 3,780 HGV trips per day we're needed to remove hardcore/waste material, more than one per minute during peak times! This would have an obvious impact to local residents, visitors and our schools in close vicinity (both Wardley C of E and St Ambrows Barlow to name a few.)

- Once the proposed development were finished, there would also be a significant increase in traffic passing through our area to access the new houses. Having worked for Salford CC highways in the past, I know the roads would not be structurally able to take the increase in such traffic. This would then see a rapid deterioration of local roads and the obvious increase of traffic and pollution in general.

To sum up, I feel this development would potentially threaten local residents' property investments, disrupt their lifestyle, and to some degree their health.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 32 A0594 R00124 Ryan Pugh I am writing regarding the proposed building on the Moss area in Swinton. I understand from reading the plans that the plan is to build 750 houses, I know this is only a proposition at the moment, but I am against any idea of building in that area for the following reasons.

 It would destroy the habitat of the many different species that live on there, some of which are protected. (Eg. Bats)  People take their children/dogs for walks on the moss.  The amount of traffic will increase heavily, and the traffic already being horrendous in the morning and evenings anyway.  The schools are already full, bringing more children into the catchment area.  This is Greenbelt land and needs preserving.

There is already nowhere for the children in our area to play, with parents taking children for walks on the moss, maybe a play area would be a good idea with a field for them to play football, instead of them playing on the road. I also understand the need to develop in certain areas, especially when the population is increasing, but this is greenbelt land and there aren’t many areas like this in Salford.

I do feel very strongly about opposing this, as my house backs directly onto the moss.

33 A0403 R00187 Sport England The site appears to include more than one playing field although the supporting text only refers to a single playing field (Clifton Primary school playing field). Aerial photographs appear to show a playing field off Mossfield Rd (west of Chelford Drive) as well. Development of either of these areas would require one of the special circumstances set out in Sport England’s playing field policy, or paragraph 74 of the National Planning Policy Framework, to be satisfied in which development of land used as playing field would not be opposed.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) is stands, the text only refers to potential mitigation for the school playing field.

For the sake of clarity, Sport England would not usually consider replacement playing field for a school to be of equivalent quality if it was to be detached from the school.

34 A0624 R00160 Stewart Browne I wish to register my objection to the proposal by Peel Holdings to take the land north of Wardley Ref SW007 out of the ‘green belt’, for the purpose of development of up to 750 houses.

This area of land south of the M60 is used extensively by local residents for recreation, riding, walking etc. and should remain as ‘green belt’, not least for the wildlife resident within. Stoats, weasels, foxes, newts, toads and bats are all present and a greater variety of birdlife, since Little Moss Wood was planted. We also look forward each spring to the return of the swifts for summer residence.

The area, roughly triangular has as its longest side the M60 which in effect would restrict access to and from the area to a few streets and roads to the south east and south west perimeters. This would put a greater strain of traffic passed at least two schools if not three.

A number of years ago Cemetery Road was thankfully blocked to through traffic, a survey at the time found over 400 cars an hour using it as a rat run. The figures today would be well in excess of 400 and there is great concern that a new housing estate would seek to reopen this road.

For those of us who live within the area bound by the M60, A6, A666 and Swinton town centre, this is realistically the only truly open space. Please have the good sense to leave it that way.

35 A0637 R00176 Wardley Residents The site in question is part of the green belt – the only stretch of green belt in this part of Salford. Group Development at this location would adversely impact upon the viability of the green belt in providing a buffer between the M60 and Wardley.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Air quality is poor in this area and local infrastructure could not support housing at this location.

Insufficient notice was provided to the local community about the suggested sites and publicity was non-existent.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW008 – Land north west of Little Moss Lane

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0606 R00139 Colin Ainscough I read with horror your document titled ‘Neighbourhood Area Document – Swinton’ which detailed suggested Green belt sites being considered for housing development.

These areas are well used by locals for recreation, and have been for many years.

The paths and trails are excellent for walking, off road running and cycling, and are also popular with dog walkers and horse riders.

The amount of wildlife that can be seen here is outstanding, the most spectacular being the roe deer which roam throughout this area of green belt.

For these reasons I urge the planning committee to reject applications SW005/6/7 & 8 for housing development in these green belt areas.

2 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Evidence Base, Scale of Development & Cumulative Impacts Ecology Unit

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) The Suggested Sites Consultation plan includes a number of greenfield sites outside the existing development envelope, which if they all came forward for development would result in the development of greenfield land on a scale not seen for many decades. GMEU currently does not have adequate baseline ecological information to make a strategic assessment about which of these sites or parts of these sites could be developed without leading to substantive losses in nature conservation features of local (Salford) interest.

It is important that ‘no net loss of biodiversity’ can be shown for all potential development sites (which could be achieved by including an element of bio-diversity off-setting).

For the following site clusters we would recommend:

a) That extended phase 1 habitat surveys are carried out of allocated sites (or preferably prior to allocation)

c) that biodiversity offsetting be considered for development proposals where applicable.

Wardley Moss (SW05-SW08 & WB05)

A group of sites to the south of the M60 that provide Ecological linkage between the river Irwell

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) and Worsley Woods.

3 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

4 A0846 R00446 Minerals and Waste From review of the BGS geological data we note that mineral reserves may exist in this area Planning Unit (site underlain by coal resource area) and consideration should be given for mineral extraction prior to development.

Sand and gravel extraction may be considered suitable within the urban area, however depending on the site location coal extraction may not be considered appropriate. We would recommend that you consult the Coal Authority regarding the proposed sites and the potential for coal extraction.

5 A0404 R00207 Natural England SW007 Land north of Wardley Housing Green belt SW008 Land north west of Little Moss Lane / SW009 Land at Moss Colliery Road Housing Recreation / SW010 Land west of Collegiate Way

These proposed site allocations contain includes Deep Peat (please see advice below relating to

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) this designation).

The habitat is internationally important not only in a Europe context but also the world. The UK has a special responsibility for protection of this habitat type ( both inside and outside of SSSIs) and is required to report to Europe on the extent, condition and threats to this feature – favourable conservation status.

6 A0407 R00194 United Utilities The town centres and infrastructure section of your Site Assessment Forms says there is no

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Water PLC known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site.

This statement may lead to confusion or a misunderstanding and we therefore request the following amendments:

From: “…There is no known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site…”

To: “...It is anticipated that there will be limited impact on the development site from known on-site utilities infrastructure subject to prior negotiations regarding the layout, scale and type of development for this site…”

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW009 – Land at Moss Colliery Road

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0631 R00169 Councillors Iain We believe that green field, recreational and green belt sites across the city should be protected Lindley and Les and retained and therefore we would oppose development at this site. Turner 2 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Evidence Base, Scale of Development & Cumulative Impacts Ecology Unit The Suggested Sites Consultation plan includes a number of greenfield sites outside the existing development envelope, which if they all came forward for development would result in the development of greenfield land on a scale not seen for many decades. GMEU currently does not have adequate baseline ecological information to make a strategic assessment about which of these sites or parts of these sites could be developed without leading to substantive losses in nature conservation features of local (Salford) interest.

It is important that ‘no net loss of biodiversity’ can be shown for all potential development sites (which could be achieved by including an element of bio-diversity off-setting).

For the following site clusters we would recommend:

a) That extended phase 1 habitat surveys are carried out of allocated sites (or preferably prior to allocation)

b) that for any of these sites that are determined as suitable for development that these areas are required to develop ‘master plans’ that include proposals for retaining /

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) enhancing biodiversity interests.

c) that biodiversity offsetting be considered for development proposals where applicable.

Clifton Moss (SW09-10)

Any development proposal should maintain ecological linkage between the Irwell valley and Clifton Moss SBI.

3 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

4 A0846 R00446 Minerals and Waste Policy 7 of the Minerals Plan aims to restrict the removal of peat except where it is required to Planning Unit allow restoration and then only peat physically required to enable this. The BGS geological data identifies that this site may be underlain by peat deposits. If peat deposits do exist then Policy 7 will need to be taken into account during the site assessment.

5 A0404 R00207 Natural England SW007 Land north of Wardley Housing Green belt SW008 Land north west of Little Moss Lane /

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) SW009 Land at Moss Colliery Road Housing Recreation / SW010 Land west of Collegiate Way These proposed site allocations contain includes Deep Peat (please see advice below relating to this designation).

Blanket Bog/Peat represents the largest terrestrial carbon store in the UK. Peatlands also perform an important role in water catchment management- both water quality and water storage. As such there is widespread concern that development in these areas may have adverse impacts on the biodiversity, carbon value and water management functions of these areas.

The habitat is internationally important not only in a Europe context but also the world. The UK has a special responsibility for protection of this habitat type (both inside and outside of SSSIs) and is required to report to Europe on the extent, condition and threats to this feature – favourable conservation status.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

6 A0394 R00251 Peel Holdings (Land Site proposed for development – site reference SW009 and for release from the Green and Property) Belt – site reference GBX017 Limited (Turley on behalf of) Peel considers that the site is previously developed land in the Green Belt that could be allocated for housing. The appraisal of the site undertaken by the Council, that, subject to exceptional circumstances being demonstrated to remove the site from the Green Belt, the site may be a suitable location for residential development, therefore misses the key point. Nonetheless, if Green Belt boundaries were to be reviewed in this area as a result of exceptional circumstances, the site could be considered as part of that process.

The site is currently used for storage and divided into a number of plots. The site is occupied by a number of structures, buildings, stables and areas of hard standing. It is therefore not an open area of land, as the majority of the site is built.

The identified mitigation requirements can be achieved in the context of the site’s development. As with all of the sites proposed for development, a full suite of survey work would be undertaken at the pre-planning application stage to identify all constraints to the proposed development and to inform detailed mitigation requirements.

7 A0658 R00209 Residents Against This is green belt land that plays a key role in providing a green buffer between Clifton and Inappropriate Kearsley. It is not suitable for development. Development (RAID)

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW010 – Land west of Collegiate Way

It is important that ‘no net loss of biodiversity’ can be shown for all potential development sites (which could be achieved by including an element of bio-diversity off-setting).

For the following site clusters we would recommend:

a) That extended phase 1 habitat surveys are carried out of allocated sites (or preferably prior to allocation)

b) that for any of these sites that are determined as suitable for development that these areas are required to develop ‘master plans’ that include proposals for retaining /

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) enhancing biodiversity interests.

c) that biodiversity offsetting be considered for development proposals where applicable.

Clifton Moss (SW09-10)

Any development proposal should maintain ecological linkage between the Irwell valley and Clifton Moss SBI.

3 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

5 A0640 R00182 Mr and Mrs Mellor Strongly believe that all the current green belt land should be retained as such given the density

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) of housing in the Swinton North ward and the need for wildlife to be retained in the vicinity.

6 A0404 R00207 Natural England SW007 Land north of Wardley Housing Green belt SW008 Land north west of Little Moss Lane / SW009 Land at Moss Colliery Road Housing Recreation / SW010 Land west of Collegiate Way These proposed site allocations contain includes Deep Peat (please see advice below relating to this designation).

Peat is still growing on some active bogs, but the rate of formation is greatly exceeded by the

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) rate of loss. Poorly managed grazing, intensive burning and acid rain all cause erosion, while peat-cutting exposes the underlying bedrock. The subsequent loss of sponge-like blanket bog causes flash flooding and erosion downstream.

7 A0046 R00166 Redcliff Estates Ltd Redcliff Estates Ltd are the owners of the above site which has been assessed in the Local Plan (Steven Abbott Suggested Sites Consultation document. Associates LLP on behalf of) Before addressing the Council’s assessment of the site and the technical surveys and reports which are included with this submission, it is considered prudent to give some context and history to the site.

I first wrote to the Council about this site on 19 April 2010 shortly after being contacted by Redcliff Estates Ltd and being asked for my professional opinion on the future of the site. My opinion was the same as it is now, that the site no longer serves any of the purposes that Green Belt land should and there are exceptional circumstances surrounding the site and its condition which warrant the amendment of the Green Belt boundaries in this locality.

The site is unusual as large parts of it are unable to sustain healthy vegetation growth due to its occupation by a Government highway contractor in the early 1990s whilst work was being carried out on the adjacent M60 motorway. Unfortunately, the contractors did not treat the site with respect and it has been severely damaged as a result. Stephen Locke BSc (Hons) MRICS FAAV of Berrys has been instructed and his findings are summarised further on in this report.

My 2010 letter to the Council addressed Green Belt policy contained in PPG2 but since then the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) has been published which supersedes PPG2.

Notwithstanding this, the purpose of the Green Belt remains the same:

(Para 80) “Green Belt serves five purposes:

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)  To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas;  To prevent neighbouring towns from merging into one another;  To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;  To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and  To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.”

My client’s site does not satisfy any of the above criteria because:  Its development would not lead to urban sprawl;  The development of the site would not result in material encroachment into the countryside;  Its development would not result in towns or established urban areas merging into one another; and  The land does not preserve the setting and special character of a historic town.

The fifth criterion of paragraph 80 in the NPPF is highly pertinent because my client’s site, although located in the Green Belt, is derelict and unable to be recycled for the majority of uses considered appropriate for Green Belt land. In essence, its Green Belt allocation is hampering its future development; development which could take place with relatively little material impact on the existing surrounding uses and the existing highway network.

WYG Transport have been instructed by my client to assess the possibilities for access into the site and their Highways Statement is included with this submission and their findings summarised further on in this report.

The physical boundaries of the site, which are without question urban in character, ensure that if the site was to be released for development, it would simply result in a logical extension to the urban form and would not prejudice the reasons for including the site in the Green Belt in the first instance.

The site is sustainable - the motorway junction to the north of the site provides excellent 94

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) connectivity and there are regular and frequent bus services along Manchester Road which transport people to Bolton, other areas of Salford, Manchester and beyond. There are schools, health services, recreational facilities, shops, Post Offices and other essential services all in relatively close proximity. Swinton train station is approximately one mile to the south of the site. Details of this are included in the attached Highways Statement from WYG Transport.

Swinton Precinct is currently undergoing a major overhaul with the erection of a 35,000 sq ft Asda which will help regenerate the local area and reinforces the view that the area has the capacity for an influx of new residents.

All prospective occupiers of dwellings would be able to use public transport if they so wished and car users would be able to travel to their place of work via the existing road and motorway network. Furthermore, they would be within walking distance of football pitches and golf facilities to the north-west at Kearsley Moss, Clifton Cricket Club within metres of the site and Clifton Country Park just to the north of the site on the opposite side of Manchester Road. The Country Park is one of Salford’s ‘hidden gems’ and is an excellent place for families to take their children. Future occupants of the site could reasonably expect to have a high quality of life with such facilities nearby.

When assessing the site in terms of its proximity to employment opportunities, it is highly relevant that Wardley, just to the south of the site, contains one of Salford’s best performing employment sites.

It is also highly relevant that the site was subject to a Town and Village Green (TVG) application in recent years which failed. Therefore, the site is privately owned and is not available for the everyday use by local people. The site is secured because my client is very concerned about the possibility of someone getting injured on site due to the ground condition. Again it has to be stressed that the ground is in such a condition because of the Highways Agency and has nothing to do with my client. There is also evidence of trespass but my client is doing his utmost to prevent this.

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)

In addition to its Green Belt designation, I am aware that the UDP identifies the site as a Key Recreation Area. This policy (R4/3) states that, “planning permission will only be granted for development within, adjoining or directly affecting a key recreation area where it would be consistent with the following objectives:

i. The protection and enhancement of the existing and potential recreational use of the area;

ii. The protection and improvement of the amenity of the area;

iii. The protection of existing trees, woodlands and other landscape features;

iv. Where appropriate, the provision, improvement and maintenance of new areas of woodland planting;

v. The provision, improvement and maintenance of public access where appropriate, for walking, cycling, horse riding and water-based recreational activities;

vi. The provision, improvement and maintenance of accessible, open land recreation uses; and

vii. The protection, provision, improvement and maintenance of the quality and diversity of wildlife habitats.”

I will avoid labouring the point by addressing each of the above in-turn, but it is fair to say that the condition of the site, and the fact that it is secured private land, means that its potential for recreational use is extremely limited (I refer you back to the TVG Court decision). This is also backed up by the findings of Stephen Locke below.

Land Use Statement (Stephen Locke BSc (Hons) MRICS - Berrys)

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) My client instructed Stephen Locke of Berrys to carry out an assessment of the ground condition as it has long been considered obvious that portions of the site are not fit for purpose as Green Belt land (agriculture and forestry etc) but it is appreciated the Council require some firm evidence of this before releasing the land from the Green Belt.

The Council is urged to read Mr Locke’s report in full but his findings can be summarised as follows:  The historical land use was agricultural but the land was irrevocably damaged by the removal of topsoil and laying of hardcore and tarmac to create a working compound and storage area for the M60 motorway contractors in the 1990s;  Parts of the site to the west exhibit old signs of former farming use but disturbance due to the old road works, tipping of soil and reversion to marshy grassland and scrub have produced a site which would be extremely costly to restore to agricultural or recreational use;  The ground conditions are poor and will only degenerate;  The habitats on site have some limited ecological value but this will be restricted by the site’s location next to the motorway;  The land is not at risk of flooding from rivers, seas or watercourses;  The land certainly presents opportunities for residential and commercial development.

All the above suggests that our assumption, given what can be seen on the site, that the land is of little to no use for appropriate Green Belt uses was correct.

Highways Statement (WYG Transport)

Having established that the site is not serving, and cannot serve, the purposes that a Green belt site should, the next step is to prove its suitability as a development site and this is why my client instructed WYG Transport to assess the site’s accessibility and related issues. Their findings are summarised as follows:

 It is envisaged that the site could potentially accommodate approximately 350 dwellings with 97

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) access being taken from Moss Colliery Road to the west of the site;  Two potential access junctions have been designed – a priority T-Junction and the realignment of Moss Colliery Road to form a through route;  The junction of the A666 Manchester Road and Moss Colliery Road is, in geometry terms, capable of serving the site;  The site is accessible on foot;  The site is very accessible by cycle;  The site is accessible by public transport.

The work of WYG Transport provides clear evidence that the site can be accessed from Moss Colliery Road to the west and is accessible enough to allow development on the site – preferably residential given the strong residential frontage to the north - it is not an employment site in our professional opinion.

It is also worth noting that vehicular and pedestrian access could also be possible from Manchester Road and Collegiate Way.

Noise Assessment (Simon Faircloth MIO - Miller Goodall Environmental Services Ltd)

Given the close proximity of the motorway and the fact potential noise issues were rightly flagged up in the Council’s assessment of the site, it was considered essential that a noise assessment was carried out and the resulting noise assessment from Miller Goodall Environmental Services Ltd is included with this submission.

The conclusion of the assessment is as follows: “With due consideration of noise impact during the evolution of the proposed housing layout and with appropriate mitigation measures in place it is considered that noise need not necessarily preclude the development of the site for residential use”

The mitigation measures suggested by the report can be considered by my client further down 98

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) the Local Plan process but it is clear that the site can be developed for residential purposes and the developable area will not be significantly reduced.

Air Quality Assessment (Lesley Goodall – Miller Goodall Environmental Services Ltd)

Another issue flagged up by the Council’s site assessment was the impact of the air quality on a residential scheme so this was another essential piece of work that my client wanted carrying out at this stage.

The conclusion of the assessment is as follows: “The information available indicates that air quality is not a barrier to residential development except within areas between 25m and 40m from the motorway. However, the assessment tool used is a screening tool only and should this site come forward for development this ‘buffer’ area may change.”

As with the noise assessment results, this proves that not only can the site be developed for residential purposes, the buffer required will not impact significantly on the developable area of the site which means a high quality residential scheme could be developed in this location despite the presence of the motorway nearby.

Conclusions

The Council’s assessment of the site was considered to be relatively positive in terms of its suitability for residential development despite the land currently being in the Green Belt. However, the Council did flag up some issues regarding noise and air quality because of the close proximity of the M60 and the Miller Goodall reports included with this submission clearly prove that the site can contain a high quality residential scheme if mitigation measures are put in place.

It is appreciated that exceptional circumstances are required to remove the site from the Green

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Belt but these exist in this context because of the ground condition of the site, confirmed in Stephen Locke’s report, which means that appropriate Green Belt uses such as forestry and agriculture are simply not possible on the site and furthermore, the site is not serving the five purposes of Green Belt set out in paragraph 80 of the NPPF because:  Its development would not lead to urban sprawl;  The development of the site would not result in material encroachment into the countryside;  Its development would not result in towns or established urban areas merging into one another; and  The land does not preserve the setting and special character of a historic town.

Of course, the site would not be of any use for residential development if it could not be accessed and it was not sustainable but the WYG Transport Highways Statement shows that access is possible from Moss Colliery Road to the west and that the site is highly sustainable.

As I am sure the Council can understand, my client is frustrated by the fact that his land has been blighted by Government contractors who had a statutory right to occupy it without his family’s approval, leaving it in the sorry condition it is today. However, it is considered that the new Local Plan provides Salford Council with the opportunity to amend the Green Belt boundary in this locality and allocate a site for housing to assist with the increasing need for residential development in the City.

Copies of the following reports were submitted alongside this representation and are available separately:  Land Use Statement (Stephen Locke, Berrys – March 2014)  Highways Statement (WYG – March 2014)  Noise Assessment (Miller Goodall – March 2014)  Air Quality Assessment (Miller Goodall – March 2014)

8 A0658 R00209 Residents Against This is green belt land that plays a key role in providing a green buffer between Clifton and Inappropriate Kearsley. It is not suitable for development. 100

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Development (RAID) 9 A0407 R00194 United Utilities The town centres and infrastructure section of your Site Assessment Forms says there is no Water PLC known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site.

This statement may lead to confusion or a misunderstanding and we therefore request the following amendments:

From: “…There is no known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site…”

101

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW012 – Clifton Junction industrial estate

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0414 R00170 English Heritage The site includes two grade II listed buildings – Clifton Railway Viaduct and Clifton Aqueduct and a locally listed asset (Clifton Railway Bridge).

The NPPF considers that any substantial harm to or loss to a Grade II listed building should be exceptional.

Any development proposals for the site will need to demonstrate that they conserve those elements that contribute to their significance and setting.

We welcome recognition of the archaeological significance of this site and the need to consult GMAAS should the site come forward for development.

2 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester 2.0 River Irwell Ecology Unit The River Irwell is one of the most important elements of Green Infrastructure in Greater Manchester, providing ecological and recreational connectivity through to Rossendale, as well as connectivity to Bolton via the Croal and Rochdale via the Roch. It is also a critical element in terms of flood defence for both Salford and Manchester with the much of the land below Singleton Brook at risk of flooding.

The River begins to weaken in terms of ecological connectivity to the south of Agecroft Rd, with open land to the west of Irwell restricted to an access strip that is heavily maintained and embanked. Redevelopment of this land through to Castle Irwell presents both a threat and an opportunity in terms of the Irwell as a functioning wildlife corridor.

The following development sites are proposed along the river Irwell at locations where connectivity is poor.

102

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent)  Chloride, MEL, Pilkington Tile Works SW012

It is concluded that this large area of historic heavy industry is unsuitable for housing, and it is recommended as retention for employment. Whilst not disagreeing with this assessment, we would like to recommend that should any of these sites come forward for redevelopment whether as housing or employment the opportunity to pull development back from the river should be taken in order to improve the linkage between the key green infrastructure assets at Clifton Country Park, Prestwich Forest Park in Bury and the recreational land around Forest Bank.

Manchester-Bolton-Bury Canal

Any suitable redevelopment adjacent to or over the course of the M-B-B Canal should contribute towards restoration and enhancement of the canal. This applies to: ES018, SW014, SW012

Railway Corridors (SW012-014 & ES10,11 & 23)

The main line to Bolton and main line to Wigan function as wildlife corridors. In particular the Bolton line provides linkage parallel to the Irwell and the Croal, through to Bolton in locations where the corridor along the Irwell is weak.

Any development adjacent to these sites should look to maintain and enhance the functionality of these corridors.

3 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

103

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) should be considered when considering the merits of the sites being promoted through this process.

Based of the development scenarios identified this site has also been identified as potentially generating more than 30 two-way trips on the Strategic Road Network during either peak period (using the GraHAM tool (used for gravity modelling and trip distribution purposes)). Given its location within the AQMA and trip-generating potential, the site is considered of ‘interest’ to the Highways Agency at this point in the process. However it is worth noting that just because sites have been identified as being ‘of interest’ at this stage this is not an indication that the Agency will prevent this site coming forward.

4 A0653 R00202 Irwell Valley What ever the final decision is, regarding the use of the site, it is of the utmost importance that Heritage every effort is made to protect the historical heritage of the archaeology. Not just the Manchester Bolton Bury canal, but of greater importance to Pendlebury and Clifton is the Fletcher canal and its association with Wet Earth colliery, at Clifton Country Park. Also to be taken into consideration is the old railway station, whose brick built platforms are still intact and we would ask that the Clifton Hall Farm, which stands on the fringe of the estate is protected. As a housing site it would be more appealing to our project, which is to restore the historical industrial heritage of the valley to a place of interest and pleasant surroundings, making full use of the thirteen arches, the aqueduct and the restored canal as a heritage trail, turning the valley into a tourist area, using the dismantled railway as a heritage trail. The benefits to the community are obvious, it ticks all the boxes, walking, cycling, horse riding, education and would encourage employment.

But for the reasons documented in the site assessment form, housing may be out of the

104

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) question. But we can insist that any industrial development that is suggested must be sympathetic and respectful to the needs of the community and not simply an excuse to create further environmental vandalism in the cause of making profit. As is the case currently (plastic re-cycling on site, with mountains of bales of plastic spilling over in to the B.B.M. canal.). We would also hope that, within the planning conditions it is made clear that the site owners should work with the local communities to present a respectable and clean image from the site. Particularly as the G.M.C. appear to have pencilled in the site as suitable for waste re-cycling. A further problem attached to this site is the infrastructure, by the nature of re-cycling waste, it will require that there will be lots of traffic bringing waste to the site and then taking away the by- products, this will involve large numbers of very large vehicles using very unsuitable roads. All the roads to and from the site are narrow, with steep gradients and sharp bends.

The site backs up to a steep rising back ground, on the top of which are the housing estates of Clifton Green and Silverdale, and pollutants from the activities on the site will need to clear that high ground otherwise it will cause pollution and health problems for those communities.

5 A0632 R00171 Magnesium Elektron The Luxfer Group of companies which includes within Magnesium Elektron is a world class global materials technology company, specialising in the design, manufacturing and supply of high performance material components.

Magnesium Elektron specialises in the development manufacture and supply of magnesium products and services on a worldwide basis, its products are used in a number of industries including inter alia, Automotive, Aerospace, Power Generation and Defence. The Clifton Junction Industrial Estate is home to the UK manufacturing facility of Magnesium Elektron. The company have invested in the location in the creation of jobs and the development of high technology manufacturing. The company wishes to remain on site in this location to capitalise upon the investments it has made and to allow it to retain and build upon its local skilled workforce.

The company therefore opposes the suggestion made by the Manchester Bolton & Bury Canal

105

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) Society that the site be redeveloped for housing, and supports the council’s assessment that the existing employment function should be retained and expanded.

The Salford Local Plan should provide a positive framework which ensures that local business have the confidence to invest in existing infrastructure and support the economy. The Local Plan should allocate the site for flexible range of employment uses.

Additional Evidence

The number employed by Magnesium Elektron and MEL Chemicals is approximately 250, which are all highly skilled and consequently highly paid jobs.

We have also spent millions of pounds in new investments supporting new technologies and export growth projects.

It is also the home of the Group’s Magnesium Technology Centre where core R&D activities are undertaken.

6 A0633 R00172 MEL Chemicals The Luxfer Group of companies which includes within it is MEL Chemicals a world class global materials technology company, specialising in the design, manufacturing and supply of high performance material components.

MEL Chemicals specialises in the development manufacture and supply of Zirconium products and services on a worldwide basis, its products are used in a number of industries including inter alia, Automotive, Aerospace, Health care. The Clifton Junction Industrial Estate is home to the UK manufacturing facility of MEL Chemicals. The company have invested in the location in the creation of jobs and the development of high technology manufacturing. The company wishes to remain on site in this location to capitalise upon the investments it has made, and to allow it to retain and build upon its local skilled workforce.

106

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) The company therefore opposes the suggestion made by the Manchester Bolton & Bury Canal Society that the site be redeveloped for housing, and supports the council’s assessment that the existing employment function should be retained and expanded.

Additional Evidence

The number employed by Magnesium Elektron and MEL Chemicals is approximately 250, which are all highly skilled and consequently highly paid jobs.

We have also spent millions of pounds in new investments supporting new technologies and export growth projects.

It is also the home of the Group’s Magnesium Technology Centre where core R&D activities are undertaken.

7 A0846 R00446 Minerals and Waste This site is identified in Policy 5: Area Allocations of the Greater Manchester Waste Plan as an Planning Unit area suitable for waste management facilities. Waste Plan Policy 11: Safeguarding of sites allocated for waste management in the Waste Plan sets out the policy regarding safeguarding of sites identified in the Greater Manchester Waste Plan. However, as set out in paragraph 4.34 of the Waste Plan, “areas allocated in the Waste Plan as suitable for waste management are not included in the safeguarding policy because they are likely to be suitable for a range of industrial or employment uses, not just waste uses. Areas have not been safeguarded for waste uses because this might restrict the development of the area for other employment or industrial uses”.

This site is being considered for housing redevelopment. Notwithstanding the fact that areas are not safeguarded in the Waste Plan, it should be noted that a change of allocation to housing

107

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) may impact on the potential for this area’s future waste use.

8 A0402 R00032 Network Rail This site lies adjacent to the operational railway and this may impact on the nature of development. Any development of this site should be subject to pre-application consultation with Network Rail.

Part of the site is subject to a demarcation agreement (DA32176/RT) where the proposal will need Network Rail approval in addition to any planning consent.

S106 or CIL developer contribution should be included in any planning application for enhancements to Clifton Railway station.

9 A0571 R00094 Stephen Parker Replace all of this historical industry with housing - highway improvements required though as this is a big site.

108

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW013 – Land at Agecroft Commerce Park

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Railway Corridors (SW012-014 & ES10,11 & 23) Ecology Unit The main line to Bolton and main line to Wigan function as wildlife corridors. In particular the Bolton line provides linkage parallel to the Irwell and the Croal, through to Bolton in locations where the corridor along the Irwell is weak.

Any development adjacent to these sites should look to maintain and enhance the functionality of these corridors.

Semi-Natural Sites outside strategic Green Infrastructure (SW01, SW13, SW016, LW015, CW003)

2 A0846 R00446 Minerals and Waste From review of the BGS geological data we note that mineral reserves may exist in this area Planning Unit (whole site underlain by sand and gravel, and part of site underlain by coal resource area) and consideration should be given for mineral extraction prior to development.

3 A0402 R00032 Network Rail This site lies adjacent to the operational railway and this may impact on the nature of

109

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) development. Any development of this site should be subject to pre-application consultation with Network Rail.

4 A0407 R00194 United Utilities The town centres and infrastructure section of your Site Assessment Forms says there is no Water PLC known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site.

This statement may lead to confusion or a misunderstanding and we therefore request the following amendments:

From: “…There is no known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site…”

110

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW014 – Land south of Agecroft Road

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0591 R00118 Greater Manchester Manchester-Bolton-Bury Canal Ecology Unit Any suitable redevelopment adjacent to or over the course of the M-B-B Canal should contribute towards restoration and enhancement of the canal. This applies to: ES018, SW014, SW012

The section of canal adjacent to SW014 is also an Site of Biological Importance.

Railway Corridors (SW012-014 & ES10,11 & 23)

Any development adjacent to these sites should look to maintain and enhance the functionality of these corridors.

2 A0643 R00188 Highways Agency This site has been identified as falling, either partially or wholly, within the Air Quality Management Area.

In addition, all noise fences, screening and other structures must be erected on the developers land, and far enough within the developers land to enable maintenance to take place without

111

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) encroachment onto highway land, and this should also be considered within the consideration of the sites being promoted.

3 A0846 R00446 Minerals and Waste From review of the BGS geological data we note that mineral reserves may exist in this area Planning Unit (site underlain by sand and gravel) and consideration should be given for mineral extraction prior to development.

Sand and gravel extraction may be considered suitable within the urban area.

4 A0402 R00032 Network Rail This site lies adjacent to the operational railway and this may impact on the nature of development. Any development of this site should be subject to pre-application consultation with Network Rail.

5 A0407 R00194 United Utilities The town centres and infrastructure section of your Site Assessment Forms says there is no Water PLC known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site.

This statement may lead to confusion or a misunderstanding and we therefore request the following amendments:

From: “…There is no known on-site utilities infrastructure which would significantly constrain the development of the site…”

112

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW015 – Land east of Pendlebury Road and south of rail line

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0402 R00032 Network Rail This site lies adjacent to the operational railway and this may impact on the nature of development. Any development of this site should be subject to pre-application consultation with Network Rail.

113

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

SW016 – Land south of St Augustine's Church

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0414 R00170 English Heritage English Heritage opposes the allocation of this site for development (at this stage of the Plan)

The site is adjacent to St Augustine’s Church (Grade 1) and St Augustine’s Conservation Area. The church is also known locally as the “Miners Church” and has been painted by LS Lowry.

The NPPF designates Grade I listed to be of the highest significance. Therefore, any substantial harm to or loss of these designated assets (including setting) should be wholly exceptional. The development potential of this site should not be considered and this option should be removed from the Plan.

In view of the duty on the Council to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of its conservation areas including their setting, there will need to be some assessment of what contribution this area makes to the character, appearance and setting of the conservation area. If this area does make an important contribution, then the plan would need to explain why its loss and subsequent development is considered acceptable.

Should the Council wish to pursue this site as an allocated site for redevelopment, then a heritage impact assessment will need to be undertaken prior to this site being including in the next stage of the site allocations plan to justify this intention and submitted to English Heritage for comment.

This will need to consider the loss of this land and the contribution it makes to the significance of the assets. Failure to do this will result in a lack of a positive strategy for the historic environment, a requirement of the NPPF.

2 A0591 R01188 Greater Manchester Semi-Natural Sites outside strategic Green Infrastructure (SW01, SW13, SW016, LW015, Ecology Unit CW003)

114

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) These are a number of sites proposed that represent infilling of the existing urban envelope which fall outside strategic GI corridors but appear to have significant areas of semi-natural vegetation and are of potential local importance. Recommend that these sites be subject to extended phase 1 habitat surveys to determine how much of the sites are suitable for development.

3 A0403 R00187 Sport England The site includes a playing field which is in active use, a disused bowling green and possibly a disused football pitch. Development of these areas would require one of the special circumstances set out in Sport England’s playing field policy, or paragraph 74 of the National Planning Policy Framework, to be satisfied in which development of land used as playing field (or other sports facilities) would not be opposed.

The supporting text should make this clear.

115

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

LGS46 / REC43 – Green Belt around Wardley Hall

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0393 R00514 Worsley and We agree and support this land remaining amenity land and should be allocated to recreational Boothstown use. Community Committee

REC42 – Land north of Overdale

No representations submitted.

116

Local Plan suggested sites consultation January – March 2014: schedule of representations on sites within Swinton

REC44 – Wardley Green Belt south of the M60

No A Ref R Ref Respondent name Comments / or organisation (and agent) 1 A0394 R00248 Peel Holdings (Land The Council’s assessment states that for recreation designation to be appropriate, a firm and Property) proposal supported by the landowner would be required. As landowner, Peel does not support Limited (Turley on the allocation of this land for recreation purposes. As such, the proposed allocation would be behalf of) inappropriate.

2 A0393 R00515 Worsley and We agree and support this land remaining amenity land and should be allocated to recreational Boothstown use. Community Committee

REC46 – Slack Brook Country Park (adjacent to the River Irwell)

No representations submitted.

117