DOCSLIB.ORG

Wilson Peak Land Exchange

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Wilson Peak Land Exchange Forest Service Norwood and Gunnison Ranger Districts Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests April 2015 and Dolores Ranger District San Juan National Forest San Miguel, Dolores, Gunnison and Saguache Counties Wilson Peak Summit (summitpost.org) For Information Contact: Dee A. Closson, Lands/Minerals Staff Officer Norwood Ranger District PO Box 388 Norwood, CO 81423 (970) 327-4261 [email protected] 1 (Intentionally left blank) 2 Summary The following Environmental Assessment (EA) examines the environmental consequences of the proposed Wilson Peak Land Exchange. Non-Federal Parties propose to convey five separate parcels of non-federal land containing a total of approximately 681 acres to the United States in exchange for four federal properties containing a total of approximately 301 acres of equal value. Land from two additional non-federal equalization parcels may be included if necessary. This EA was prepared by the United States Forest Service and includes recommendations from third-party consultants as well as extensive public input. 3 (Intentionally left blank) 4 Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Document Organization ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Project Location .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................................................ 11 1.5 Proposed Action ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.6 Consistency with Approved Plans and Key Laws ............................................................................ 12 Forest Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Land Ownership Adjustment Strategy ................................................................................................ 14 Uncompahgre National Forest Travel Plan ......................................................................................... 14 Key Federal Laws and Executive Orders ............................................................................................ 14 1.7 Decision Framework ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.8 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................................... 15 1.9 Issues ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Key Issues Identified Through the Scoping Process ........................................................................... 16 Additional Effects to Consider ............................................................................................................ 17 2.0 Alternatives Including the Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 19 2.1 Alternatives Considered in Detail ..................................................................................................... 19 Activities Common to all Alternatives (Mineral Withdrawal) ........................................................... 19 Alternative 1 – No Action ................................................................................................................... 19 Activities Common to Alternatives 2 and 3 (Appraisal) ..................................................................... 19 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action ......................................................................................................... 19 Alternative 3 – Proposed Action with Mountain Bike Trails ............................................................. 21 2.2 Alternatives Not Considered in Detail .............................................................................................. 21 Purchase Option .................................................................................................................................. 21 Deed Restrictions on the Federal Parcels ............................................................................................ 21 2.3 Comparison of Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 22 3.0 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................................... 25 3.1 Hazardous Materials ......................................................................................................................... 25 Exis ting Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 25 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 26 5 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................. 26 3.2 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................................. 26 Existing Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 26 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 27 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................. 28 3.3 Forest Service Sensitive Species ....................................................................................................... 28 Existing Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 28 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 30 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................. 32 3.4 Management Indicator Species (MIS) ............................................................................................... 32 Existing Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 32 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 33 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................. 33 3.5 Wetlands and Floodplains ................................................................................................................. 34 Existing Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 34 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 34 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................. 34 3.6 Water Rights and Water Resources .................................................................................................. 34 Existing Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 34 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 36 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................. 37 3.7 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................ 37 Existing Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 37 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 38 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................. 38 3.8 Minerals ............................................................................................................................................ 38 Existing Condition (No Action Alternative) ....................................................................................... 38 Environmental Consequences (Proposed Action and Alternative 3) .................................................. 39 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Statement of Dan Gibbs Executive Director Colorado Department Of

    Statement of Dan Gibbs Executive Director Colorado Department Of

    Statement of Dan Gibbs Executive Director Colorado Department of Natural Resources Before The Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands of The House Natural Resources Committee April 2, 2019 Chairwoman Haaland, Ranking Member Young, and Members of the Subcommittee: On behalf of Governor Polis and the State of Colorado, we appreciate the opportunity to provide testimony on the Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act (H.R. 823). We strongly support the CORE Act and hope Congress will move swiftly to enact it. Governor Polis would have liked to be here today with his former colleagues to express his strong support for this legislation. As you know, as a member of Congress, Governor Polis had sponsored the Continental Divide Recreation, Wilderness and Camp Hale Legacy Act, which has now been incorporated into the broader CORE Act. Introduction This legislation—the product of years of collaboration among elected officials, businesses, community members, and a myriad of other interested and affected stakeholders across Colorado—would protect some of the most beloved public lands in Colorado for their unsurpassed recreation, scenery, wildlife, watersheds, historic, and other unique values. As the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, I support this bill because it will benefit our wildlife by protecting critical habitat and migration corridors; it will protect the outstanding recreational experiences that bring people from across Colorado—and the world—to these special places; it will help safeguard Colorado’s water resources by protecting key watersheds and all water rights; it strikes the right balance by protecting key public lands from development, while protecting all existing mineral rights and leaving other appropriate lands available for mining, oil, and gas development; and because it complements the values and opportunities associated with our state lands.
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist

    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist

    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
  • Multiple Intrusions in the San Miguel Mountains, Colorado Calvin S

    Multiple Intrusions in the San Miguel Mountains, Colorado Calvin S

    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/19 Multiple intrusions in the San Miguel Mountains, Colorado Calvin S. Bromfield and Alfred L. Bush, 1968, pp. 94-99 in: San Juan, San Miguel, La Plata Region (New Mexico and Colorado), Shomaker, J. W.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 19th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 212 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1968 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
  • Awesome Infographic

    Awesome Infographic

    [ ALIVE [ Article MOST LIKELY TO HAVE A HIGHWArticleAY TO THEALIVE TOP TALLEST Pikes Peak (near Colorado Springs) and Mt. Evans A FEW INTERESTING (near Idaho Springs) both have incredibly scenic Mt. Elbert at 14,440 and winding roads that go to the tippy top. WHAT IS A OURTEENER? southwest of Leadville MOST POSTCARDED A peak that rises 14,000 feet or more above sea level. Colorado is PEAKS AMONG THE home to more of these than any other state. (Alaska has 22; California Thousands k eep them clean sum e one on pr that Bef VE NO TRACEafter has 12; Washington has 1) xtr CROWD staying epa WHO DO the subject, r eme or SHORTEST Sunshine Peak at 14,001 LEA wildlife. mit y c ou ra limbinge you go skip you gr ar and Mt.Mar Snef tion. near Lake City aphed epeaks likely in bef ha climb weather, oon P ve on by or Pick See e the these Mt. Bierstadt near Idaho packing EASIEST TO HIKE designated eak near our the most photo a esear and fternoon lev up YOU THINK Springs is often recognized as the perfect lnt.org fels near head ping up a mountainside, el peaks fourteener ch yourone starter fourteener, followed by Grays Peak in tact for of out the state. Aspen up fitness to tackle,of and Torreys Peak near lightning c for Our an tr anything earl the Keystone. r ails - oute and mak ay be -HAVE ITEMS more s y plentiful MUST those NUMBER OF FOURTEENERS Several vie for each and — danger HARDEST Layers of clothing storms this title — Capitol and YOU inf you r who Peak, Little Bear, ormation.especting year guide ous pr Hiking shoes be re pack epa e sur Mt.
  • Description of the Telluride Quadrangle

    Description of the Telluride Quadrangle

    DESCRIPTION OF THE TELLURIDE QUADRANGLE. INTRODUCTION. along the southern base, and agricultural lands water Jura of other parts of Colorado, and follow­ vents from which the lavas came are unknown, A general statement of the geography, topography, have been found in valley bottoms or on lower ing them comes the Cretaceous section, from the and the lavas themselves have been examined slopes adjacent to the snow-fed streams Economic Dakota to the uppermost coal-bearing member, the only in sufficient degree to show the predominant and geology of the San Juan region of from the mountains. With the devel- imp°rtance- Colorado. Laramie. Below Durango the post-Laramie forma­ presence of andesites, with other types ranging opment of these resources several towns of tion, made up of eruptive rock debris and known in composition from rhyolite to basalt. Pene­ The term San Juan region, or simply " the San importance have been established in sheltered as the "Animas beds," rests upon the Laramie, trating the bedded series are several massive Juan," used with variable meaning by early valleys on all sides. Railroads encircle the group and is in turn overlain by the Puerco and higher bodies of often coarsely granular rocks, such as explorers, and naturally with indefinite and penetrate to some of the mining centers of Eocene deposits. gabbro and diorite, and it now seems probable limitation during the period of settle- sa^juan the the interior. Creede, Silverton, Telluride, Ouray, Structurally, the most striking feature in the that the intrusive bodies of diorite-porphyry and ment, is. now quite.
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)

    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)

    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
  • Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P

    Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P

    # # # # # # # # # ######## # # ## # # # ## # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") (!KÂ ) )¬ (! LARAMIE" KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lodg Centennial 4 ep National Federal ole (! 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ Kimball 9 CHEYENNE 11 C 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY reek Bushnell (! 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside (! LARAMIE ! ") Ik ( ") (! ) " Colorado 1 8 (! 1 27 Y S.P. ") Pine !a 2 Ij Cree Medicine Bow 2 KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge R ") " National 34 .P. (! Burns Bluffs k U ") 10 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment (! 7 KEITH 40 Forest (! Red Buttes (! 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 (! DEUEL ") ) " ") 2 ! 6 ") 3 ( Albany ") 9 2 A (! 6 9 ) River 27 6 Ik !a " 1 2 3 6 3 CHEYENNE ") Brule K ") on ") G 4 10 Big Springs Jct. 9 lli ") ) Ik " ") 3 Chappell 2 14 (! (! 17 4 ") Vermi S Woods Landing ") !a N (! Ik ) ! 8 15 8 " ") ) ( " !a # ALBANY 3 3 ^! 5 7 2 3 ") ( Big Springs ") ") (! 4 3 (! 11 6 2 ek ") 6 WYOMING MI Dixon Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") (! (! 6 RA I« 10 ) Baggs Tie Siding " Cre Savery (! ! (! National ") ( 6 O 7 9 B (! 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge (! 4 NEBRASKA (! (! Powder K Res. ^ Home tonwo 2 ^ NE t o o ! C d ! ell h Little En (! WYOMING 3 W p ! 7 as S Tala Sh (! W Slater cam ^ ") Ovid 4 ! ! mant Snake River pm ^ ^ 3 ! es Cr (! ! ! ^ Li ! Gr Mi en ^ ^ ^ ttle eek 8 ! ^JULESBURG een Creek k Powder Wash ddle t ! Hereford (! ! 8 e NORTHGATE 4 ( Peetz ! ! Willo ork K R Virginia Jumbo Lake Sedgwick ! ! # T( ") Cre F ing (! 1 ek Y 7 RA ^ Cre CANYON ek Lara (! Dale B I§ w Big Creek o k F e 2 9 8 Cre 9 Cr x DAGGETT o Fo m Lakes e 7 C T(R B r NATURE TRAIL ") A ee u So k i e e lde d 7 r lomon e k a I« 1 0 Cr mil h k k r 17 t r r 293 PERKINS River Creek u e 9 River Pawnee v 1 e o e ") Carr ree r Rockport Stuc Poud 49 7 r® Dry S Ri C National 22 SENTINAL La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ (! (! k 6 NE e A Gr e Halligan Res.
  • MONTANA N7 4Qea

    MONTANA N7 4Qea

    E 12, p( /F- o77 (r 2) Sf(jji PGJ/F-077(82) National Uranium Resource Evaluation 6 BOZEMAN QUADRANGLE 41 MONTANA n7 4QeA/ University of Montana Missoula, Montana and Montana State University Bozeman, Montana E2T oFi Issue Date August 1982 SATESO9 PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Grand Junction Area Office, Colorado rmetadc957781 Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report is a result of work performed by the University of Montana and Montana State University, through a Bendix Field Engineering Corporation subcontract, as part of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation. NURE was a program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Grand Junction, Colorado, Office to acquire and compile geologic and other information with which to assess the magnitude and distribution of uranium resources and to determine areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium in the United States. Available from: Technical Library Bendix Field Engineering Corporation P.O.
  • High Country Climbs Peaks

    High Country Climbs Peaks

    HighHig Countryh Country Cl iClimbsmbs The San Juan Mountains surrounding Telluride are among Colorado’s most beautiful and historic peaks. This chapter records some of the Telluride region’s most classic alpine rock routes. Warning: These mountain routes are serious undertakings that should only be attempted by skilled, experienced climbs. Numerous hazards—loose rock, severe lightning storms, hard snow and ice and high altitudes—will most likely be encountered. Come Prepared: An ice axe and crampons are almost always necessary for the approach, climb or descent from these mountains. Afternoon storms are very common in the summertime, dress accordingly. Loose rock is everpre- sent, wearing a helmet should be considered. Rating Mountain Routes: Most routes in this section are rated based on the traditional Sierra Club system. Class 1 Hiking on a trail or easy cross-country Class 2 Easy scrambling using handholds Class 3 More difficult and exposed scrambling, a fall could be serious Class 4 Very exposed scrambling, a rope may be used for belaying or short-roping, a fall would be serious Class 5 Difficult rockclimbing where a rope and protection are used Route Descriptions: The routes recorded here are mostly long scrambles with countless variations possible. Detailed route descriptions are not pro- vided; good routefinding skills are therefore required. Routes described are for early to mid-summer conditions. The Climbing Season: Climbers visit these mountains all year, but the main climbing season runs from June through September. Late spring through early summer is the best time, but mid-summer is the most popular. Less snow and more loose rock can be expected in late summer.
  • EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED the COLORADO FOURTEENERS (In Order of Date of Submittal) ` First Name M.I

    EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED the COLORADO FOURTEENERS (In Order of Date of Submittal) ` First Name M.I

    EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED THE COLORADO FOURTEENERS (In Order of Date of Submittal) ` First Name M.I. Last Name First Peak Month Year Last Peak Month Year 1. Carl Blaurock (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 2. William F. Ervin (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 3. Albert Ellingwood 4. Mary Cronin Longs Peak 1921 Sep 1934 5. Carl Melzer 1937 6. Robert B. Melzer 1937 7. Elwyn Arps Eolus, Mt. 1920 Jul 1938 8. Joe Merhar Pyramid Peak Aug 1938 9. O. P. Settles Longs Peak 1927 Jul 1939 10. Harry Standley Elbert, Mt. 1923 Sep 1939 11. Whitney M. Borland Pikes Peak Jun 1941 12. Vera DeVries Longs Peak 1936 Kit Carson Peak Aug 1941 13. Robert M. Ormes Pikes Peak Capitol Peak Aug 1941 14. Jack Graham Sep 1941 15. John Ambler Sep 1943 16. Paul Gorham Pikes Peak 1926 Aug 1944 17. Ruth Gorham Grays Peak 1933 Aug 1944 18. Henry Buchtel Longs Peak 1946 19. Herb Hollister Longs Peak 1927 Jul 1947 20. Roy Murchison Longs Peak 1908 Aug 1947 21. Evelyn Runnette Longs Peak 1931 Uncompahgre Peak Sep 1947 22. Marian Rymer Longs Peak 1926 Crestones Sep 1948 23. Charles Rymer Longs Peak 1927 Crestones Sep 1948 24. Nancy E. Nones (Perkins) Quandary 1937 Eolus, Mt. Sep 1948 25. John Spradley Longs Peak 1943 Jul 1949 26. Eliot Moses Longs Peak 1921 Jul 1949 27. Elizabeth S. Cowles Lincoln, Mt. Sep 1932 Wetterhorn Peak Sep 1949 28. Dorothy Swartz Crestones Aug 1950 29. Robert Swartz Bross, Mt. 1941 Crestones Aug 1950 30.
  • Board Resolution Adopting the Official Street Name List

    Board Resolution Adopting the Official Street Name List

    DocuSign Envelope ID: 14D0EADE-B4CE-49C9-A8E7-F7AA6AB2A2EA RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, COLORADO, RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2011-22 AND IMPLEMENTING THE UPDATED VERSION OF THE SAN MIGUEL COUNTY OFFICIAL STREET NAME LIST 030 Resolution #2020 - _________ WHEREAS, on July 28, 2005 the Board of County Commissioners of San Miguel County, Colorado, (“BOCC”), enacted Resolution 2005-23 providing for the “Adoption of an Amendment to the San Miguel County Land Use Code Changing Language in Section 5-502 HH. Street Names and Sign Locations and Adding a New Appendix B: Street Naming and Addressing Standards;” and WHEREAS, pursuant to BOCC Resolution 2005-23, and in accordance with the County Land Use Code Appendix B: Street Naming and Addressing Standards, the San Miguel County Addressing Official has developed the “San Miguel County Official Street Name List,” a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A;” and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public meeting held on November 4, 2020, at Telluride, Colorado, the BOCC considered the adoption of the “San Miguel County Official Street Name List,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and does hereby find and determine from the testimony and evidence received at that public meeting that Exhibit “A” appears to be in compliance with the County Land Use Code Appendix B: Street Naming and Addressing Standards, and that the public health, safety, and welfare will be served by the adoption of Exhibit “A” as the “San Miguel County Official Street Name List.” NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners of San Miguel County, Colorado, as follows: 1.
  • Eagle's View of San Juan Mountains

    Eagle's View of San Juan Mountains

    Eagle’s View of San Juan Mountains Aerial Photographs with Mountain Descriptions of the most attractive places of Colorado’s San Juan Mountains Wojtek Rychlik Ⓒ 2014 Wojtek Rychlik, Pikes Peak Photo Published by Mother's House Publishing 6180 Lehman, Suite 104 Colorado Springs CO 80918 719-266-0437 / 800-266-0999 [email protected] www.mothershousepublishing.com ISBN 978-1-61888-085-7 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Printed by Mother’s House Publishing, Colorado Springs, CO, U.S.A. Wojtek Rychlik www.PikesPeakPhoto.com Title page photo: Lizard Head and Sunshine Mountain southwest of Telluride. Front cover photo: Mount Sneffels and Yankee Boy Basin viewed from west. Acknowledgement 1. Aerial photography was made possible thanks to the courtesy of Jack Wojdyla, owner and pilot of Cessna 182S airplane. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Section NE: The Northeast, La Garita Mountains and Mountains East of Hwy 149 5 San Luis Peak 13 3. Section N: North San Juan Mountains; Northeast of Silverton & West of Lake City 21 Uncompahgre & Wetterhorn Peaks 24 Redcloud & Sunshine Peaks 35 Handies Peak 41 4. Section NW: The Northwest, Mount Sneffels and Lizard Head Wildernesses 59 Mount Sneffels 69 Wilson & El Diente Peaks, Mount Wilson 75 5. Section SW: The Southwest, Mountains West of Animas River and South of Ophir 93 6. Section S: South San Juan Mountains, between Animas and Piedra Rivers 108 Mount Eolus & North Eolus 126 Windom, Sunlight Peaks & Sunlight Spire 137 7. Section SE: The Southeast, Mountains East of Trout Creek and South of Rio Grande 165 9.